A Critical Review of Supersonic Flow Control for High-Speed Applications
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. High-Speed Flow Development in Nozzle
3. Passive Control Methods
3.1. Flow Control
3.2. Jet Control
3.3. Noise Control
4. Active Control Methods
4.1. Experimental Investigation
4.2. Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach
4.3. Soft Computing Methods
4.3.1. Design of Experiments
4.3.2. Fuzzy Logic
4.3.3. Machine Learning
5. Critical Analysis of Literature
Challenges in the Flow Control Method
- Experimental test: One of the major issues during the test is how to reduce the flow disturbances in the connecting pipe from the main settling chamber.
- Instrumentation: With its sensing hole facing the flow, the pitot probe mounted on a rigid 3D traverse with a resolution of 0.1 mm was used for pressure measurement. Deficient Reynolds numbers based on the probe diameter significantly influenced the pressures measured by pitot probes. However, this effect is seldom a problem in supersonic streams because a probe of reasonable size will usually have a Reynolds number above 500, which is above the range of troublesome Reynolds numbers.
- Data accuracy: Pressure distribution along the jet centerline with a normal to the tab is difficult to measure and needs a proper location and observation.
- The nozzle calibration: The measured pitot pressure can determine the Mach number by treating the flow through the nozzle to be isentropic, thus leading to the total pressure at the nozzle exit being the same as the settling chamber pressure.
- Simulation: The 2D model was developed in several studies but this can only be suitable when it is uncontrolled or passive controlled. Indeed, a microjet controller needs a 3D model for more accurate results and it is difficult to design, also requiring a supercomputer to simulate/analyze.
- Base pressure: Based on the previous result, the base pressure either increases or decreases when it is controlled and also it varies by varying the nozzle parameter. However, it is critical to increasing the supersonic or hypersonic ranges due to high-speed formation in the setup that has a chance to incur breaks/damages; hence, it needs a very high configured/quality setup for testing.
- Microjet location: It was found that the microjets were located in the PCD of 13 mm but there is no other location that is reported in the literature; this can be explored well in future studies.
- Soft computing: As compared to DOE, only a few studies are reported with machine learning algorithms and the Fuzzy logic approach. These methods can be explored well in future investigations.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Khan, S.A.; Rathakrishnan, E. Control of Suddenly Expanded Flows with Micro-Jets. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 2003, 20, 63–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AAabid, A.; Khan, S.A. Investigation of High-Speed Flow Control from CD Nozzle Using Design of Experiments and CFD Methods. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 2201–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramanjaneyulu, S. Design and flow analysis of Convergent Divergent nozzle using CFD. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2019, 7, 4020–4029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, J.; Zerpa, L.E.; Partington, B.; Gamboa, J. Effect of nozzle geometry on critical-subcritical flow transitions. Heliyon 2019, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rathakrishnan, E. Applied Gas Dynamics; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Greyvenstein, G.P. An implicit method for the analysis of transient flows in pipe networks. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 2001, 53, 1127–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keir, A.S.; Ives, R.; Hamad, F. CFD analysis of C-D nozzle compared with theoretical & experimental data. INCAS Bull. 2018, 10, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrás, L.L.; Afonso, A.M.; Alves, M.A.; Nóbrega, J.M.; Pinho, F.T. Newtonian and viscoelastic fluid flows through an abrupt 1:4 expansion with slip boundary conditions. Phys. Fluids 2020, 32, 043103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poole, R.; Pinho, F.; Alves, M.; Oliveira, P. The effect of expansion ratio for creeping expansion flows of UCM fluids. J. Non Newton. Fluid Mech. 2009, 163, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Poole, R.; Alves, M.; Oliveira, P.J.; Pinho, F. Plane sudden expansion flows of viscoelastic liquids. J. Non Newton. Fluid Mech. 2007, 146, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dhinakaran, S.; Oliveira, M.; Pinho, F.; Alves, M. Steady flow of power-law fluids in a 1:3 planar sudden expansion. J. Non Newton. Fluid Mech. 2013, 198, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Francisco, A.R.L. Nozzles. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 1689–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.R.; Devarajan, Y. CFD simulation analysis of two-dimensional convergent-divergent nozzle. Int. J. Ambient. Energy 2018, 41, 1505–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A. CFD Analysis of Convergent-Divergent Nozzle Flow and Base Pressure Control Using Micro-JETS. 2018. Available online: www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/IJET (accessed on 26 July 2021).
- Khan, S.A.; Rathakrishnan, E. Active Control of Suddenly Expanded Flows from Overexpanded Nozzles. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 2002, 19, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raman, R.K.; Dewang, Y.; Raghuwanshi, J. A review on applications of computational fluid dynamics. Int. J. LNCT 2018, 6, 8. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, G.; Luxbacher, K.D.; Ragab, S.; Xu, J.; Ding, X. Computational fluid dynamics applied to mining engineering: A review. Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 2016, 31, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alobaid, F. Computational Fluid Dynamics. Mater. Intern. Struct. 2018, 57, 87–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tapasvi, V.; Gupta, M.S.; Kumaraswamy, T. Designing and Simulating Compressible Flow in a Nozzle. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 2015, 6, 46–54. [Google Scholar]
- Lai, Y.G.; Wu, K. A three-dimensional flow and sediment transport model for free-surface open channel flows on unstructured flexible meshes. Fluids 2019, 4, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chong, M.S.; Perry, A.E.; Cantwell, B.J. A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields. Phys. Fluids A Fluid Dyn. 1990, 2, 765–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakaki, K.; Shimizu, Y. Effect of the Increase in the Entrance Convergent Section Length of the Gun Nozzle on the High-Velocity Oxygen Fuel and Cold Spray Process. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2001, 10, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viswanath, P.R. Aircraft viscous drag reduction using riblets. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2002, 38, 571–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ishide, T.; Itazawa, M. Aerodynamic improvement of a delta wing in combination with leading edge flaps. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 2017, 7, 357–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khurana, S.; Suzuki, K.; Rathakrishnan, E. Flow Field around a Blunt-nosed Body with Spike. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 2012, 29, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khurana, S.; Suzuki, K. Towards Heat Transfer Control by Aerospikes for Lifting-Body Configuration in Hypersonic Flow at Mach 7. In Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 24–27 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Khurana, S.; Suzuki, K. Assessment of Aerodynamic Effectiveness for Aerospike Application on Hypothesized Lifting-Body in Hypersonic Flow. In Proceedings of the Fluid Dynamics and Co-Located Conferences, San Diego, CA, USA, 24–27 June 2013; pp. 24–27. [Google Scholar]
- Khurana, S.; Suzuki, K.; Rathakrishnan, E. Flow field behavior with Reynolds number variance around a spiked body. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2016, 30, 1650362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinclair, J.; Cui, X. A theoretical approximation of the shock standoff distance for supersonic flows around a circular cylinder. Phys. Fluids 2017, 29, 026102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viswanath, P.R. Passive devices for axisymmetric base drag reduction at transonic speeds. J. Aircr. 1988, 25, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viswanath, P. Flow management techniques for base and afterbody drag reduction. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 1996, 32, 79–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, N.K.; Rathakrishnan, E. Sonic Jet Control with Tabs. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 2002, 19, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vijayaraja, K.; Senthilkumar, C.; Elangovan, S.; Rathakrishnan, E. Base Pressure Control with Annular Ribs. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 2014, 31, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vikramaditya, N.S.; Viji, M.; Verma, S.B.; Ali, N.; Thakur, D.N. Base Pressure Fluctuations on Typical Missile Configuration in Presence of Base Cavity. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 2018, 55, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kreth, P.A.; Alvi, F.S. Using High-Frequency Pulsed Supersonic Microjets to Control Resonant High-Speed Cavity Flows. AIAA J. 2020, 58, 3378–3392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, P. Flow control in supersonic flow field based on micro jets. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathakrishnan, E.; Ramanaraju, O.; Padmanaban, K. Influence of cavities on suddenly expanded flow field. Mech. Res. Commun. 1989, 16, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sethuraman, V.; Khan, S.A. Effect of sudden expansion for varied area ratios at subsonic and sonic flow regimes. Int. J. Energy Environ. Econ. 2016, 24, 99–112. [Google Scholar]
- Asadullah, M.; Khan, S.A.; Asrar, W.; Sulaeman, E. Active control of base pressure with counter clockwise rotating cylinder at Mach 2. In Proceedings of the 2017 4th IEEE International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences, Salmabad, Bahrain, 29 November–1 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, S.A.; Asadullah, M.; Sadhiq, J. Passive Control of Base Drag Employing Dimple in Subsonic Suddenly Expanded Flow. Int. J. Mech. Mechatron. Eng. 2018, 8, 69–74. [Google Scholar]
- Gutmark, E.J.; Grinstein, F.F. Flow control with noncircular jets. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1999, 31, 239–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samimy, M.; Webb, N.; Crawley, M. Excitation of Free Shear-Layer Instabilities for High-Speed Flow Control. AIAA J. 2018, 56, 1770–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathakrishnan, E.; Ethirajan, R. AR 4 elliptic jet control with limiting tab. Fluid Dyn. Res. 2017, 50, 025505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; Kumar, R. Experimental Study and Passive Control of Overexpanded Plug Nozzle Jet. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 2018, 55, 778–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacksi, K.; Ibrahim, F.; Ali, S. Scholars Journal of Engineering and Technology (SJET). Sch. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 9523, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akram, S.; Rathakrishnan, E. Control of Supersonic Elliptic Jet with Ventilated Tabs. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 2017, 37, 267–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.A.; Aileni, M.; Rathakrishnan, E. Impact of tab location relative to the nozzle exit on the shock structure of a supersonic jet. Phys. Fluids 2019, 31, 076104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; Panthi, R.; Kumar, R.; Ibrahim, S.M. Experimental investigation of the effect of extended cowl on the flow field of planar plug nozzles. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2019, 88, 208–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manigandan, S.; Vijayaraja, K. Flow field and acoustic characteristics of elliptical throat CD nozzle. Int. J. Ambient. Energy 2017, 40, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.; Akram, S.; Kumar, R. Experimental study on enhancement of supersonic twin-jet mixing by vortex generators. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2020, 96, 105521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panthi, R.; Krishna, T.V.; Nanda, S.R.; Khan, A.; Kumar, R.; Sugarno, M.I. Experimental Study of Impinging Plug Nozzle Jet Using a Vortex Generator. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 2020, 57, 1414–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.A.; Rathakrishnan, E. Elliptic jet control with triangular tab. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerosp. Eng. 2017, 231, 1460–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tam, C.; Tanna, H. Shock associated noise of supersonic jets from convergent-divergent nozzles. J. Sound Vib. 1982, 81, 337–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Ramamurti, R. Numerical Study of Supersonic Jet Noise Emanating from an F404 Nozzle at Model Scale. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum 2019, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akatsuka, J.; Hromisin, S.; Falcone, J.; McLaughlin, D.K.; Morris, P.J. Mean Flow Measurements in Supersonic Jets with Noise Reduction Devices. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum 2019, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, C.; Morris, P.J. Unsteady Simulations of Fluid Inserts for Supersonic Jet Noise Reduction. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum 2019, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Xu, X.; Li, X. Numerical simulation of supersonic twin-jet noise with high-order finite difference scheme. AIAA J. 2018, 56, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Wang, Y. Active aerodynamic noise control research for supersonic aircraft cavity by nonlinear numerical simulation. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, W.; Xiao, Z.; Fu, S. Numerical modeling screen for flow and noise control around tandem cylinders. AIAA J. 2020, 58, 2504–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, T.K. Analysis of Supersonic Jet Noise in the Sideline and Upstream Directions Using the Navier-Stokes Equations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Coombs, J.; Schembri, T.; Zander, A. The effect of hemispherical surface on noise suppression of a supersonic jet. In Proceedings of the Acoustics 2019—Sound Decisions: Moving forward with Acoustics, Mornington Peninsula, Australia, 13–14 May 2019; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Mondal, K.; Das, S.; Hamada, N.; Abu, A.; Das, S.; Faris, W.; Thiam, H.; Toh, T.; Ahmas, A. An improved narrowband active noise control system without secondary path modelling based on the time domain. Int. J. Veh. Noise Vib. 2019, 15, 110–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berton, J.J.; Huff, D.L.; Geiselhart, K.; Seidel, J. Supersonic Technology Concept Aeroplanes for Environmental Studies. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prasad, C.; Morris, P.J. A study of noise reduction mechanisms of jets with fluid inserts. J. Sound Vib. 2020, 476, 115331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salehian, S.; Mankbadi, R.R. A review of aeroacoustics of supersonic jets interacting with solid surfaces. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum 2020, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmani, S.K.; Alhawwary, M.A.; Wang, Z.J.; Phommachanh, J.; Hill, C.; Hartwell, B.; Collicott, B.; Swim, J.; Farokhi, S.; Taghavi, R.; et al. Noise Mitigation of a Supersonic Jet Using Shear Layer Swirl. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum 2020, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horner, C.; Sescu, A.; Afsar, M.; Collins, E.; Azarpeyvand, M. Passive Noise Control Strategies for Jets Exhausting over Flat Surfaces: An LES Study. AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum 2020, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, C.; Morris, P.J. Steady active control of noise radiation from highly heated supersonic jets. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2021, 149, 1306–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pourhashem, H.; Kumar, S.; Kalkhoran, I.M. Flow field characteristics of a supersonic jet influenced by downstream microjet fluidic injection. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2019, 93, 105281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, B.; Ye, C.-C.; Wan, Z.-H.; Liu, N.-S.; Sun, D.-J.; Lu, X.-Y. Noise control of subsonic flow past open cavities based on porous floors. Phys. Fluids 2020, 32, 125101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin, R.; Soria, M.; Rodriguez, I.; Lehmkuhl, O. On the Flow and Passive Noise Control of an Open Cavity at Re = 5000. Flow Turbul. Combust. 2021, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, C.C.; Zhang, P.J.Y.; Wan, Z.H.; Sun, D.J.; Lu, X.Y. Numerical investigation of the bevelled effects on shock structure and screech noise in planar supersonic jets. Phys. Fluids 2020, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Z.; Liu, E.; Xu, Y.; Xie, P.; Shang, C.; Zhu, Q. Flow field and noise characteristics of manifold in natural gas transportation station. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. Rev. l’IFP 2019, 74, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, X.; Mariani, R.; Chua, L.; Lim, H.D.; Lu, Z.; Cui, Y.; New, T.H. Mitigation of under-expanded supersonic jet noise through stepped nozzles. J. Sound Vib. 2019, 459, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coombs, J.; Zander, A.; Schembri, T. Influence of a Hemispherical Noise Reduction Reflector on Transonic Jet Flows. In Proceedings of the 22nd Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference AFMC2020, Brisbane, Australia, 7–10 December 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Cuppoletti, D.; Gutmark, E.J.; Hafsteinsson, H.E.; Eriksson, L.-E. Elimination of Shock Associated Noise in Supersonic Jets by Destructive Wave Interference. AIAA J. 2018, 57, 720–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.A.; Kumar, S.M.A.; Mitra, A.S.; Rathakrishnan, E. Empirical scaling analysis of supersonic jet control using steady fluidic injection. Phys. Fluids 2019, 31, 056107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mancini, S.; Kolb, A.; Gonzalez-Martino, I.; Casalino, D. Effects of wall modifications on pressure oscillations in high-subsonic and supersonic flows over rectangular cavities. In Proceedings of the 25th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Delft, The Netherlands, 20–23 May 2019; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiansheng, W.; Dangguo, Y.; Jun, L.; Fangqi, Z. Control of Pressure Oscillations Induced by Supersonic Cavity Flow. AIAA J. 2020, 58, 2070–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robertson, G.; Kumar, R. Effects of a Generic Store on Cavity Resonance at Supersonic Speeds. AIAA J. 2020, 58, 4426–4437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, C.; Morris, P. Effect of fluid injection on turbulence and noise reduction of a supersonic jet. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2019, 377, 20190082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Anureka, R.; Srinivasan, K. Passive control of pipe-jet noise using trailing-edge castellations. Appl. Acoust. 2020, 170, 107516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Rathakrishnan, E. Active Control of Suddenly Expanded Flows from Underexpanded Nozzles. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 2004, 21, 233–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Rathakrishnan, E. Control of Suddenly Expanded Flows from Correctly Expanded Nozzles. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 2004, 21, 255–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Rathakrishnan, E. Active Control of Suddenly Expanded Flows from Underexpanded Nozzles—Part II. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 2005, 22, 163–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.; Rathakrishnan, E. Control of suddenly expanded flow. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 2006, 78, 293–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Rathakrishnan, E. Nozzle Expansion Level Effect on Suddenly Expanded Flow. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 2006, 23, 233–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman, S.; Khan, S.A. Control of base pressure with micro-jets: Part I. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 2008, 80, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baig, M.A.A.; Al-Mufadi, F.; Khan, S.A.; Rathakrishnan, E. Control of Base Flows with Micro Jets Control of Base Flows with Micro Jets. Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines 2011, 28, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biag, M.A.A.; Khan, S.A.; Rathakrishnan, E. Active control of base pressure in suddenly expanded flow for area ratio 4.84. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2012, 4, 1892–1902. [Google Scholar]
- Kostic, O.; Stefanović, Z.; Kostič, I.; Olivera, K.; Zoran, S.; Ivan, K. CFD modeling of supersonic airflow generated by 2D nozzle with and without an obstacle at the exit section. FME Trans. 2015, 43, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fharukh, M.; Asadullah, M.; Khan, S.A. Experimental Study of Suddenly Expanded Flow from Correctly Expanded Nozzles. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2016, 11, 10041–10047. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, S.A.; Aabid, A.; Chaudhary, Z.I. Influence of control mechanism on the flow field of duct at mach 1.2 for area ratio 2.56. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2019, 8, 1135–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhary, Z.I.; Shinde, V.B.; Khan, S.A. Investigation of base flow for an axisymmetric suddenly expanded nozzle with micro JET. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, F.; Khan, S.A. Investigation of efficacy of low length-to-diameter ratio and nozzle pressure ratio on base pressure in an abruptly expanded flow. In Proceedings of the MATEC Web of Conferences, Chennai, India, 31 July 2018; Volume 01004, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Asadullah, M.; Jalaluddeen, A.; Baig, M.A. Flow Control with Aerospike behind Bluff Body. Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 2018, 8, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, S.A.; Al Robaian, A.A.; Asadullah, M.; Khan, A.M. Grooved Cavity as a Passive Controller behind Backward Facing Step. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2019, 53, 185–193. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, S.A.; Alrobaian, A.A.; Asadullah, M. Threaded Spikes for Bluff Body Base Flow Control. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2019, 2, 194–203. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, S.A.; Rathakrishnan, E. Active Control of Base Pressure in Supersonic Regime. J. Inst. Eng. Aerosp. Eng. J. 2006, 87, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- AAabid Fharukh, A.; Sher Afghan, K. Experimental Investigation of Wall Pressure Distribution in a Suddenly Expanded Duct from a Convergent-Divergent Nozzle. In Proceedings of the 2019 6th IEEE International Conference on Engineering Technologies and Applied Sciences (ICETAS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 20–21 December 2019; p. 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Aabid, A.; Mokashi, I.; Ahmed, Z. Effect of Micro Jet Control on the Flow Filed of the Duct at Mach 1.5. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 2019, 8, 1758–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Mokashi, I.; Aabid, A.; Faheem, M. Experimental Research on Wall Pressure Distribution in C-D Nozzle at Mach number 1.1 for Area Ratio 3.24. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 2019, 8, 971–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faheem, M.; Kareemullah, M.; Aabid, A.; Mokashi, I.; Khan, S.A. Experiment on of nozzle flow with sudden expansion at mach 1.1. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 2019, 8, 1769–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, M.N.; Bakar, E.A.; Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A. Effects of micro jets on the flow field of the duct with sudden expansion. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2019, 8, 636–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azami, M.H.; Faheem, M.; Aabid, A.; Mokashi, I.; Khan, S.A. Experimental Research of Wall Pressure Distribution and Effect of Micro Jet at Mach 1.5. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 2019, 8, 1000–1003. [Google Scholar]
- Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A. Determination of wall pressure flows at supersonic Mach numbers. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 38, 2347–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleel, A.; Baig, M.A.A.; Khan, S.A. Experimental Investigation of the Base Flow and Base Pressure of Sudden Expansion Nozzle. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 370, 012052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Ahmed, Z.; Aabid, A.; Mokashi, I. Experimental research on flow development and control effectiveness in the duct at high speed. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 2019, 8, 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azami, M.H.; Faheem, M.; Aabid, A.; Mokashi, I.; Khan, S.A. Inspection of Supersonic Flows in a CD Nozzle using Experimental Method. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 2019, 8, 996–999. [Google Scholar]
- Akhtar, M.N.; Bakar, E.A.; Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A. Control of CD nozzle flow using microjets at mach 2.1. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2019, 8, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A. Studies on Flows Development in a Suddenly Expanded Circular Duct at Supersonic Mach Numbers. Int. J. Heat Technol. 2021, 38, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A.; Baig, M.A.A.; Reddy, A.R. Investigation of Flow Growth in aDuct Flowsfor Higher Area Ratio. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1057, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A.; Baig, M.A.A.; Rao, K.S. Effect of Control on the Duct Flow at High Mach Numbers. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1057, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.A.; Manoj, N.; Onkar, A.K.; Manjuprasad, M. Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of a Cropped Delta Wing. Procedia Eng. 2016, 144, 1205–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ali, A.; Neely, A.; Young, J.; Blake, B.; Lim, J.Y. Numerical Simulation of Fluidic Modulation of Nozzle Thrust. In Proceedings of the 17th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Auckland, New Zeeland, 5–9 December 2010; pp. 5–8. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, G.M.; Fernando, D.X.; Kumar, R.M. Design and Optimization of De Lavel Nozzle to Prevent Shock Induced Flow Separation. Adv. Aerosp. Sci. Appl. 2013, 3, 119–124. [Google Scholar]
- Shariatzadeh, O.J.; Abrishamkar, A.; Jafari, A.J. Computational Modeling of a Typical Supersonic Converging-Diverging Nozzle and Validation by Real Measured Data. J. Clean Energy Technol. 2015, 3, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Su, L. CFD Simulation and Shape Optimization of Supersonic Ejectors for Refrigeration and Desalination Applications. Master’s Thesis, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- SA Khan MMohiuddin AS, C.; Fharukh, G.M. Investigation of the Effects of Nozzle Exit Mach number and Nozzle Pressure Ratio on Axisymmetric Flow through Suddenly Expanded Nozzles. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 2019, 8, 570–578. [Google Scholar]
- Cai, Y.; Liu, Z.; Shi, Z.; Song, Q.; Wan, Y. Residual surface topology modeling and simulation analysis for micro-machined nozzle. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2015, 16, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belega, B.-A.; Nguyen, T.D. Analysis of Flow in Convergent-Divergent Rocket Engine Nozzle Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Science Paper AFASES, Brasov, Romania, 28–30 May 2015; p. 6. [Google Scholar]
- Patel, M.S.; Mane, S.D.; Raman, M. Concepts and CFD Analysis of De-Laval Nozzle. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol. 2016, 7, 221–240. [Google Scholar]
- Mouli, C.S.; Vardhan, C.N.; Chowdary, G.V.; Jeevan, P. Aerodynamic Design and Performance of Nozzle with Different Mach Numbers Using CFD Analysis. IRJET 2017, 9, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
- Pathan, K.A.; Khan, S.A.; Dabeer, P.S. CFD Analysis of Effect of Flow and Geometry Parameters on Thrust Force Created by Flow from Nozzle. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT) CFD, Mumbai, India, 7–9 April 2017; pp. 1121–1125. [Google Scholar]
- Pathan, K.A.; Khan, S.A.; Dabeer, P.S. CFD analysis of effect of area ratio on suddenly expanded flows. In Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT), Mumbai, India, 7–9 April 2017; pp. 1192–1198. [Google Scholar]
- Pathan, K.A.; Khan, S.A.; Dabeer, P.S. CFD analysis of effect of Mach number, area ratio and nozzle pressure ratio on velocity for suddenly expanded flows. In Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT) CFD, Mumbai, India, 7–9 April 2017; pp. 1104–1110. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, K.; Dabeer, P.S.; Afghan, S. Optimization of area ratio and thrust in suddenly expanded fl ow at supersonic Mach numbers. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2018, 12, 696–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moorthy, C.; Srinisas, V.; Prasad, V.; Vanaja, T. Computational Analysis of a Cd Nozzle with ‘Sed’ for a Rocket Air Ejector in Space Applications. Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 2017, 7, 53–60. Available online: http://tjprc.org/view-archives.php (accessed on 26 July 2021).
- Arun, K.; Tiwari, S.; Mani, A. Three-dimensional numerical investigations on rectangular cross-section ejector. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2017, 122, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Kim, H.D. Theoretical and numerical analysis on choked multiphase flows of gas and solid particle through a convergent–divergent nozzle. J. Comput. Multiph. Flows 2017, 10, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilon, A.R.; McLaughlin, D.K.; Morris, P.J.; Powers, R.W. Design and Analysis of a Supersonic Jet Noise Reduction Concept. J. Aircr. 2014, 54, 1705–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Aabid, A.; Ghasi, F.A.M.; Al-Robaian, A.A.; Alsagri, A.S. Analysis of Area Ratio in a CD Nozzle with Suddenly Expanded Duct using CFD Method. CFD Lett. 2019, 11, 61–71. [Google Scholar]
- Fharukh, A.G.M.; Alrobaian, A.A.; Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A. Numerical Analysis of Convergent-Divergent Nozzle Using Finite Element Method. Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Dev. 2018, 8, 373–382. Available online: www.tjprc.org (accessed on 26 July 2021).
- Khan, S.A.; Aabid, A.; Baig, M.A.A. CFD analysis of cd nozzle and effect of nozzle pressure ratio on pressure and velocity for suddenly expanded flows. Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 2018, 8, 1147–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Aabid, A.; Saleel, C.A. Influence of Micro Jets on the Flow Development in the Enlarged Duct at Supersonic Mach number. Int. J. Mech. Mechatron. Eng. 2019, 19, 70–82. [Google Scholar]
- Aabid, A.; Khan, A.; Mazlan, N.M.; Ismail, M.A.; Akhtar, M.N.; Khan, S.A. Numerical Simulation of Suddenly Expanded Flow at Mach 2.2. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 2019, 8, 452–457. [Google Scholar]
- Sajali, M.F.M.; Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A.; Fharukh, A.; Sulaeman, E. Numerical Investigation of Flow Field of a Non-Circular Cylinder. CFD Lett. 2019, 11, 37–49. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, S.A.; Aabid, A.; Ahmed, S. CFD Simulation with Analytical and Theoretical Validation of Different Flow Parameters for the Wedge at Supersonic Mach Number. Int. J. Mech. Mechatron. Eng. 2019, 19, 170–177. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, S.A.; Aabid, A.; Mokashi, I.; Al-Robaian, A.A.; Alsagri, A.S. Optimization of Two-dimensional Wedge Flow Field at Supersonic Mach Number. CFD Lett. 2019, 11, 80–97. [Google Scholar]
- Sajali, M.F.M.; Ashfaq, S.; Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A. Simulation of Effect of Various Distances between Front and Rear Body on Drag of a Non-Circular Cylinder. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2019, 62, 53–65. [Google Scholar]
- Aabid, A.; Afifi, A.; Ali, F.A.G.M.; Akhtar, M.N.; Khan, S.A. CFD Analysis of Splitter Plate on Bluff Body. CFD Lett. 2019, 11, 5–38. [Google Scholar]
- Afifi, A.; Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A. Numerical investigation of splitter plate effect on bluff body using finite volume method. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 38, 2181–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Tan, J.; Yao, X. Numerical investigation on splitter plate jet assisted mixing in supersonic flow. Acta Astronaut. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kharulaman, L.; Aabid, A.; Ahmed, F.; Mehaboobali, G.; Khan, S.A. Research on Flows for NACA 2412 Airfoil using Computational Fluid Dynamics Method. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 2019, 9, 5450–5456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aabid, A.; Nabilah, L.; Khairulaman, B.; Khan, S.A. Analysis of Flows and Prediction of CH10 Airfoil for Unmanned Arial Vehicle Wing Design. Adv. Aircr. Spacecr. Sci. 2021, 2, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Fatepurwala, M.A.; Pathan, K.N.; Dabeer, P.S.; Baig, M.A.A. CFD Analysis of Human Powered Submarine to Minimize Drag. Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 2018, 8, 1057–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, M.N.; Bakar, E.A.; Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A. Numerical Simulations of a CD Nozzle and the Influence of the Duct Length. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2019, 8, 622–630. [Google Scholar]
- Aabid, A.; Chaudhary, Z.I.; Khan, S.A. Modelling and Analysis of Convergent Divergent Nozzle with Sudden Expansion Duct using Finite Element Method. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. J. 2019, 63, 34–51. [Google Scholar]
- Fischer, R.A.; Yates, F. Statistical Methods for Research Workers; Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh, UK, 1935; pp. 241–271. [Google Scholar]
- Montgomery, D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 8th ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Quadros, J.D.; Khan, S.A.; Antony, A.J. Investigation of effect of process parameters on suddenly Expanded flows through an axi-symmetric nozzle for different Mach Numbers using Design of Experiments. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 184, 012005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Quadros, J.D.; Khan, S.A.; Antony, A.J. Base Pressure Behaviour in a Suddenly Expanded Duct at Supersonic Mach Number Regimes using Taguchi Design of Experiments. Mech. Mech. Eng. 2018, 22, 1077–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quadros, J.; Khan, S.A.; Antony, A.J. Study of Effect of Flow Parameters on Base Pressure in a Suddenly Expanded Duct at Supersonic Mach Number Regimes using CFD and Design of Experiments. J. Appl. Fluid Mech. 2018, 11, 483–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quadros, J.D.; Khan, S.A.; Anthony, J.A. Modelling of Suddenly Expanded Flow Process in Supersonic Mach Regime using Design of Experiments and Response Surface Methodology. J. Comput. Appl. Mech. 2018, 49, 149–160. [Google Scholar]
- Quadros, J.D.; Khan, S.; Antony, A. Study of base pressure behavior in a suddenly expanded duct at supersonic mach number regimes using statistical analysis. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Mech. 2018, 17, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al-khalifah, T.; Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A.; Azami, M.H.B.; Baig, M. Response surface analysis of the nozzle flow parameters at supersonic flow through microjets. Aust. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 13, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majil, D.D.; Poojitha, A.; Devi, G. Computational Study on Optimization of Rocket Nozzle. Master’s Thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, 2016; pp. 8–13. [Google Scholar]
- Quadros, J.; Khan, S.; Anthony, J.A. Predictive modeling of suddenly expanded flow process in the Supersonic Mach number regime using response surface methodology. Int. J. Recent Res. Asp. 2018, 49, 149–160. [Google Scholar]
- Al-khalifah, T.; Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A. Regression Analysis of Flow Parameters at High Mach Numbers. Solid State Technol. 2020, 63, 5473–5488. [Google Scholar]
- Jagannath, R.; Naresh, N.G.; Pandey, K.M. Studies on Pressure Loss in Sudden Expansion in Flow through Nozzles: A Fuzzy Logic Approach. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2007, 2, 50–61. [Google Scholar]
- Pandey, K.M.; Kumar, A. Studies on Base Pressure in Suddenly Expanded Circular Ducts: A Fuzzy Logic Approach. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2010, 2, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, K.M.; Kumar, S.; Kalita, J.P. Wall static pressure variation in sudden expansion in cylindrical ducts with supersonic flow: A fuzzy logic approach. Int. J. Soft Comput. Eng. 2012, 2, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quadros, J.D.; Khan, S.A.; Sapkota, S.; Vikram, J.; Prashanth, T. On Recirculation Region Length of Suddenly Expanded Supersonic Flows, Using CFD and Fuzzy Logic. Int. J. Comut. Fluid Dyn. 2020, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Efe, M.Ö.; Debiasi, M.; Yan, P.; Özbay, H.; Samimy, M. Neural network-based modelling of subsonic cavity flows. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 2008, 39, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Mattos Secco, B.S.; Ney, R. Artificial neural networks to predict aerodynamic coefficients of transport airplanes. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 2017, 89, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afzal, A.; Aabid, A.; Khan, A.; Khan, S.A.; Rajak, U.; Verma, T.N.; Kumar, R. Response surface analysis, clustering, and random forest regression of pressure in suddenly expanded high-speed aerodynamic flows. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2020, 107, 106318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afzal, A.; Khan, S.A.; Islam, M.T.; Jilte, R.D.; Khan, A.; Soudagar, M.E.M. Investigation and back-propagation modeling of base pressure at sonic and supersonic Mach numbers. Phys. Fluids 2020, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uzun, A.; Solomon, J.T.; Foster, C.H.; Oates, W.S.; Hussaini, M.Y.; Alvi, F.S. Flow Physics of a Pulsed Microjet Actuator for High-Speed Flow Control. AIAA J. 2013, 51, 2894–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Da, X.; Fan, Z.; Fan, J.; Zeng, L.; Rui, W.; Zhou, R. Microjet flow control in an ultra-compact serpentine inlet. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2015, 28, 1381–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kreth, P.; Alvi, F. Microjet based active flow control on a fixed wing UAV. J. Flow Control. Meas. Vis. 2010, 2, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvi, F.S.; Elavarasan, R.; Shih, C.; Garg, G.; Krothapalli, A. Control of supersonic impinging jet flows using microjets. Fluids 2000 Conf. Exhib. 2000, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.Y.; Arora, N.; Topolski, M.; Alvi, F.S.; Solomon, J.T. Properties of Resonance Enhanced Microjets in Supersonic Crossflow. AIAA J. 2017, 55, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tebbiche, H.; Boutoudj, M.S. Active flow control by micro-blowing and effects on aerodynamic performances. Ahmed body and NACA 0015 airfoil. Int. J. Fluid Mech. Res. 2021, 48, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.S.; Cooperman, A.; van Dam, C.P.; Pandya, S.A. Microjet Configuration Sensitivities for Active Flow Control on Multi-Element High-Lift Systems. J. Aircr. 2021, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.S.; van Dam, C.P.; Pandya, S.A. Surface-Normal Active Flow Control for Lift Enhancement and Separation Mitigation for High-Lift Common Research Model. In Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum, Vitual Event, 11–15, 19–21 January 2021; Available online: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/book/10.2514/MSCITECH21 (accessed on 26 July 2021).
- Verma, S.B.; Manisankar, C. Control of Compression-Ramp-Induced Interaction with Steady Microjets. AIAA J. 2019, 57, 2892–2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burrows, T.J.; Vukasinovic, B.; Glezer, A. Flow Dynamics Effected by Active Flow Control in an Offset Diffuser. In Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation Forum, Atlanta, GA, USA, 25–29 June 2018; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kreth, P.A. The Effects of High-Frequency, Supersonic Microjet Injection on a High-Speed Cavity Flow. In Proceedings of the 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, TX, USA, 9–13 January 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uzun, A.; Foster, C.H.; Solomon, J.T.; Oates, W.S.; Hussaini, M.Y.; Alvi, F.S. Simulations of pulsed actuators for high-speed flow control. In Proceedings of the 17th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (32nd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), Portland, OR, USA, 5–8 June 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afghan, S.; Mohamed, O.; Aabid, A. CFD analysis of compressible flows in a convergent-divergent nozzle. Mater. Today Proc. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
S. No. | Control | Experimental | CFD | Optimization | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Active | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Very recently, CFD and optimization studies were found, and still a lot of scope in optimization |
2 | Passive | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Several studies have been reported in all approaches |
3 | Without Control | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Several studies have been reported in all approaches |
Type of Object | Technique Adopted | Focused Parameter | Limitations | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Compression corner calculation model | ANSYS Fluent with k–ɛ turbulence model | Numerical investigations in the supersonic flow field with different injection pressure ratios, actuation positions, and nozzle types | The only simulation was used for investigation | [36] |
CD nozzle with sudden expansion duct | Experimental, CFD and DOE | Effect of microjet control in a sudden expansion duct with the parametric investigation | Numerical investigation done by 2D model and microjet location is fixed to a single point | [2] |
CD nozzle with sudden expansion duct | RSM, clustering, and random forest regression | Pressure in suddenly expanded high-speed aerodynamic flow | Predicting the pressure values using the optimization method with and without microjet controller | [166] |
Resonant high-speed cavity | Wind tunnel test with a blowdown-type facility | High-frequency pulsed supersonic microjets to control resonant high-speed cavity flows | The fact that the REM/ SmartREM actuator performance can be enhanced | [35] |
Cylindrical cavity structure takes | A computational method based on high-order numerical techniques | Flow physics of a pulsed microjet actuator for high-speed flow control | Efficient and geometrically complicated pulsed actuators were developed for various high-speed flow and noise control | [168] |
Ultra-compact serpentine inlet | Experimental work with high-pressure air supply and CFD | Microjet flow control in an ultra-compact serpentine inlet | Mach number of inlet throat between 0.2 to 0.5, and it is varied to a higher number | [169] |
Crewless Arial Vehicle | Experimental wind tunnel test | Microjet-based active flow control on a fixed-wing UAV | Experimental results possible to simulate with the CFD model | [170] |
Impinging Jet | Experimental work with supersonic jet facility | Control of impinging supersonic jet flows using microjets | A fluent model will be helpful in such an example | [171] |
Supersonic Crossflow model | Experimental work in a supersonic wind tunnel | Properties of resonance-enhanced microjets in supersonic crossflow | Limited to experimental work and also the Mach number can be varied | [172] |
Ahmed body and NACA 0015 airfoil | An experimental study was conducted in a subsonic wind tunnel | Active flow control by micro-blowing and effects on aerodynamic performances | Experimental work only | [173] |
Flap’s pressure-side | Experimental approach | Microjet configuration sensitivities for active flow control on multi-element high-lift systems | CFD and data optimization are helpful techniques to predict the multi-element high-lift system | [174] |
Flap’s pressure-side | Experimental approach | Surface-normal active flow control for lift enhancement and separation mitigation for high-lift standard research model | Other aerodynamic forces | [175] |
Spaced jet configurations | Experimental investigation | Control of compression-ramp-induced interaction with steady microjets. | It is advantageous to utilize a control design (MJ6) that functions well | [176] |
Double-offset diffuser | Experimental technique | Flow dynamics affected by active flow control in an offset diffuser | Parametric study to predict more accurate results from the experimental data | [177] |
Series of cavity flow | Experimental technique | The effects of high-frequency, supersonic microjet injection on a high-speed cavity flow | Specific Mach 1.5 | [178] |
cylindrical cavity | Simulation and Experimental investigation | Simulations of pulsed actuators for high-speed flow control | The parametric investigation will be effective in changing flow control results | [179] |
CD Nozzle with sudden expansion duct | CFD approach with 2D model | Base pressure control using microjets | Limited to two-dimensional model | [133,137,147,180] |
Wedge | CFD approach with 2D model | Aerodynamics flow control | Limited to two-dimensional model | [137,138] |
Bluff body | CFD approach with 2D model | Splitter plate to control flow and non-circular cylinder | Limited to a two-dimensional model | [137,140,141,142] |
Airfoil | CFD approach with 2D model | Analysis of flows and prediction of CH10 airfoil for unmanned aerial vehicle wing design | Only simulation | [150] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Aabid, A.; Khan, S.A.; Baig, M. A Critical Review of Supersonic Flow Control for High-Speed Applications. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6899. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156899
Aabid A, Khan SA, Baig M. A Critical Review of Supersonic Flow Control for High-Speed Applications. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(15):6899. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156899
Chicago/Turabian StyleAabid, Abdul, Sher Afghan Khan, and Muneer Baig. 2021. "A Critical Review of Supersonic Flow Control for High-Speed Applications" Applied Sciences 11, no. 15: 6899. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156899
APA StyleAabid, A., Khan, S. A., & Baig, M. (2021). A Critical Review of Supersonic Flow Control for High-Speed Applications. Applied Sciences, 11(15), 6899. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156899