Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Partial Discharges in the Air by Application of Corona Camera
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Contact Parameters in a Dovetail Type of Blade Root Joints
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Moldavian Dragonhead Bagasse in Shaping the Thermophysical and Physicochemical Properties of Ice Cream
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modal Verification and Strength Analysis of Bladed Rotors of Turbine in Rated Working Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Coupled Vibration Characteristics of a Two-Stage Bladed Disk Rotor System

1
Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
2
Laboratory Management Center, Shenyang Sport University, Shenyang 110102, China
3
School of Science, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(18), 8600; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188600
Submission received: 25 August 2021 / Revised: 10 September 2021 / Accepted: 13 September 2021 / Published: 16 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bladed Disks Structural Dynamics)

Abstract

:
This paper conducts a coupled vibration analysis of a two-stage bladed disk rotor system. According to the finite element method, the bladed disk rotor system is established. The substructure modal synthesis super-element method (SMSM) with a fixed interface and free interface is presented to obtain the vibration behaviors of the rotor system. Then, the free vibration results are compared with the ones calculated by the cyclic symmetry analysis method to validate the analysis in this paper. The results show that the modes of the two-stage bladed disk not only include the modes of the first- and second-stage bladed disk, but also the coupled modes of the two-stage bladed disk.

1. Introduction

An aero-engine is a kind of high-speed rotating machinery with a complex structure. The rotating blades and the fixed bladed disk are the important key parts of the aero-engine. In an aero-engine, multi-stage bladed disks are assembled together, and the study of the coupling interaction between the multi-stage bladed disks is particularly important for understanding the dynamics characteristics of the whole engine. In the vibration analysis of the bladed disk, the vibration coupling form between the blade and disk is usually analyzed. However, the interstage coupled effect is usually ignored. For the multi-stage bladed disk system, the coupling between stages is an important factor affecting the energy propagation between the disks. The multi-stage rotor has a specific type of mode and response mode that extends a multi-stage bladed disk structure. Therefore, it is very important to analyze the interstage coupled vibration of the multi-stage bladed disk, which is also the basis for further study of the interstage coupled vibration caused by the mistuned single-stage bladed disk.
In recent years, scholars have carried out theoretical, numerical simulation, and experimental studies on the dynamic characteristics of the bladed disk. In view of the actual structure in engineering, the finite element method is usually used to model and analyze the complex bladed disk. For the multi-stage and multi-component integral bladed disk assemblies, potential topics have been proposed in [1]; for instance, building a more effective and applicative model with higher precision. Based on the Timoshenko beam theory and Kirchhoff plate theory, Laxalde et al. [2] propose a new method that combines the cyclic modelling of each stage with a realistic inter-stage coupling. Study cases are presented to evaluate the efficiency of the method. Joannin et al. [3] introduces a novel reduced-order modelling technique well-suited to the study of nonlinear vibrations in large finite element models. The performance of the method is appraised on a nonlinear finite element model of the bladed disk in the presence of structural mistuning. HS et al. [4] proposed an improved shaft–disk–blade coupling model to study the influence of disk position and flexibility on critical speed and natural frequency in the coupling-disk-blade unit. Zhao et al. [5] established the finite element model of the fully flexible shaft-disk-sleeve system with tip rub fault by using the Lagrange multiplier method, and proposed an improved disk-blade interface coupling method. Ma et al. [6] established a rotor-blade system dynamics model. With the increase in the number of blades, complex coupling modes, such as the vane-blade coupling mode, rotor lateral vibration and blade bending coupling mode, and rotor torsional vibration and blade bending coupling mode, have also appeared. Zhao et al. [7] established the coupled model of spinning shaft-disk assemblies under sliding bearing supports. For the multi-stage assembly of cyclic structures, Wang et al. [8] simulated and analyzed the vibration characteristics of ceramic matrix composite monolayers and found that the blade had a great influence on the vibration mode of the entire blade disc. On the basis of previous studies, Tang et al. [9] further established a vane-disk-shaft coupling model and explained the influence of tuning/detuning on the coupling modal characteristics. Al Bedoor B.O. [10] established a mathematical model of reduced order and studied the natural frequencies of shaft-torsion and blade-bending coupling. Huang et al. [11] studied axial-torsional, disk-lateral, and blade-bending coupled vibrations in a shaft–disk–blade unit. Chiu et al. [12] investigated the influence on the coupling vibrations among shaft-torsion and blade-bending coupling vibrations of a multi-disk rotor system. Chiu et al. [13] studied the influence of shaft torsion, blade bending, and wire-drawing coupling vibration on the coupled vibration of a multi-disk rotor system with group blades. Ma et al. [14] analyzed the effects of blade stagger angles on the blade rubbing-induced responses of a rotational shaft–disk–blade system. Wang et al. [15] analyzed the nonlinear dynamic behavior of a rotor-bearing system with interaction between the blades and rotor. Luo et al. [16] investigated the natural frequency of the free transverse vibration of blades in rotating disks to examine the relationship of the natural frequencies, blade stiffness, and nodal diameters, to study how neighboring blades react upon each other and affect the blade’s natural frequency. Rzadkowski et al. [17] adopted the forced vibration analysis method and considered the influence of multistage coupling on the dynamic characteristics of an octave-disc rotor on a solid shaft. The results show that multi-level coupling must be considered in the design of rotor blades and discs to avoid the resonance caused by low-frequency flow excitation. Bladh et al. [18] studied the influence of interstage coupling on the dynamic performance of harmonic and detuned multistage blade-disk structures and pointed out that the dynamic performance of a single-stage rotor depends on the selection of the interstage coupled boundary conditions. Based on sector mistuning, Vargiu et al. [19] established a reduced order model for the dynamic analysis of mistuned bladed disks. Sector frequency mistuning is preferable to capture blade-to-disk irregularities. Petrov et al. [20] proposed an efficient method for analysis of nonlinear vibrations of mistuned bladed disk assemblies. For a practical high-pressure bladed turbine disk, considering several types of nonlinear forced response, the analysis of nonlinear forced response for simplified and realistic models of mistuned bladed disks has been performed. Rzadkowski et al. [21] studied the forced vibration of eight detuned blade discs on a solid shaft and found that when the blade disc was on the shaft, detuning had little influence on the blade stress. Chaofeng Li et al. [22] studied the coupling vibration characteristics of a flexible shaft–disk–blade system with detuning characteristics. Due to the detuning characteristics, the natural frequency and coupling mode types will change accordingly. Huang et al. [23] used a disk comprising of periodically shrouded blades to simulate the weakly coupled periodic structure. The effects of Coriolis force and the magnitude of disorder on the localization phenomenon of a rotating blade-disk system were investigated numerically. Zhao et al. [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34] studied the vibration characteristics of a graphene nanoplatelet (GPL)-reinforced blade-disk rotor system by the experimental method and the finite element (FE) method, and studied the parallel intelligent algorithm based on a computed unified device architecture. The genetic particle swarm optimization algorithm is used for optimization arrangement on mistuned blades. The above works are mainly based on the finite element method to study the coupled modes and responses of the shaft–disk–blades system under the tuned and mistuned bladed disk. The coupled modes of the multi-stage blade-disc system have not been studied, and the coupled model is greatly simplified compared with the actual structure.
In this paper, respectively using the substructure modal synthesis super-element method and the cyclic symmetry analysis method, two kinds of accurate finite element model for two-stage bladed disk were established. The accuracy of the substructure modal synthesis super-element method was verified by the cyclic symmetry analysis method. The interstage coupled vibration of the two-stage bladed disk was analyzed. This research fills in the blanks regarding the interstage coupled vibration of a complex bladed disk and lays a foundation for further research on the effect of a mistuned bladed disk on interstage coupled vibration.

2. Materials and Methods

Using the fixed interface prestress-free interface substructure modal synthesis super-element method, based on the finite element analysis software ANSYS, the dynamic frequency analysis of the first-stage bladed disk system of the compressor was carried out. The finite element model of the basic sector is shown in Figure 1. The parameters of the blade tenon and tenon grooves are respectively as follows: elastic modulus E 0 = 1.135 × 10 11   Pa , Poisson’s ratio μ 0 = 0.3 , and density ρ 0 = 4380 kg / m 3 . The material parameters of the disk are as follows: elastic modulus E 1 = 1.15 × 10 11 Pa , Poisson’s ratio μ 1 = 0.3 , density ρ 1 = 4640 kg / m 3 , and the contact form of the blade tenon and tenon grooves adopts a standard contact.
The analysis process of the substructure modal synthesis super-element method is shown in Figure 2. For the modal synthesis super-element method, for the fixed interface prestressed and free interface substructures, the basic idea is that the finite element model of the basic sector of the bladed disk is established by using the substructure analysis method from bottom to top. The two side outlet degrees of freedom (master degrees of freedom) of the basic sectors of the bladed disk are fixed and the working speed is applied to perform the prestressed contact analysis (bladed binding, bladed contact) for each basic sector of the detuned bladed disk. One opens the prestress setting and releases the fixed constraints of the two side exit degrees of freedom (master degrees of freedom) of the basic sector of the bladed disk, and then conducts the modal synthesis generation part analysis of the substructure of the free interface. One then generates a supercell and use supercell nesting technology to generate a multilevel supercell to complete the generation part. Secondly, the superunits are connected to analyze the overall bladed disk system (modal, dynamic response), and the use part is completed. Finally, the condensed solution of the dynamic response of the supercell master degree of freedom is extended to all the degrees of freedom in the supercell, so as to obtain the complete solution of the dynamic response of all the degrees of freedom in the bladed disk system, completing the extension part.

2.1. Super-Element Power Reduction

The motion equation of the superunit with interfacial force is
[ m i i m i j m j i m j j ] { x ¨ i x ¨ j } + [ k i i k i j k j i k j j ] { x i x j } = { f i 0 }
where x i is the displacement of interface nodes, which is also the coordinate of main degrees of freedom; x j is the displacement of internal nodes, namely, the coordinate of deputy degrees of freedom; and f i is the interface strength.
Assuming that { x } = e j w t { x } and { f i } = e j w t { F i } and ω 2 = λ , then, it can be obtained by Equation (1).
[ k i i k i j k j i k j j ] { x i x j } λ [ m i i m i j m j i m j j ] { x i x j } = { F i 0 }
assuming that λ = ω 2 , it can be obtained from Equation (2).
{ x j } = [ β ] [ x i ]
where [ β ] = [ k j j ω 2 m i j ] 1 [ k i j ω 2 m j i ] , then
{ x } = { x i x j } = [ I β ] { x i } = [ β 1 ] [ x i ]
Substitute this equation into Equation (2).
[ k ¯ ] { x i } λ [ m ¯ ] { x i } = { F ¯ i }
where
{ [ k ¯ ] = [ β 1 ] T [ k i i k i j k j i k j j ] [ β 1 ] [ m ¯ ] = [ β 1 ] T [ m i i m i j m j i m j j ] [ β 1 ] F ¯ = [ β 1 ] T [ F i ]
To constrain the degree of freedom of the interface, namely { x j } = 0 , can be obtained from the second equation in Equation (2).
[ k j j ] { x j } λ [ m j j ] { x j } = 0
by this formula, the main mode [ Φ ] of the fixed interface is obtained and regularized, and then
{ [ Φ ] T [ m j j ] [ Φ ] = [ I ] [ Φ ] T [ k j j ] [ Φ ] = [ Λ j ]
where [ Λ j ] = d i a g [ p 1 2 , p k 2 , p m 2 ] and p k ( k = 1 , 2 , , m ) is the natural frequency under the condition that the super-element has a fixed interface. M is the degree of freedom inside the super-element. It can be obtained from Equation (7).
{ [ m j j ] = [ Φ ] T [ Φ ] 1 [ k j j ] 1 = [ Φ ] [ Λ j ] [ Φ ] T [ Λ j ] 1 = d i a g [ 1 p 1 2 , , 1 p r 2 , , 1 p m 2 ]
calculate the matrix in Equation (3) from the above equation [ k j j ω 2 m j j ] 1 .
[ k j j ω 2 m j j ] 1 = [ k j j ω 2 m j j k j j 1 k j j ] 1 = [ k j j ] 1 [ I ω 2 Φ T Φ 1 Φ Λ j Φ T ] 1 = [ k j j ] 1 [ I ω 2 Φ T Λ j Φ T ] 1 = [ k j j ] 1 [ Φ ] 1 [ T ] [ Φ ] T = [ k j j ] 1 [ I + T 1 ]
where
{ [ T ] = d i a g [ p 1 2 p 1 2 ω 2 , , p k 2 p k 2 ω 2 , , p m 2 p m 2 ω 2 ] [ T 1 ] = [ Φ ] 1 [ Λ ] [ Φ ] T [ Λ ] = d i a g [ W 2 p 1 2 ω 2 , , W 2 p k 2 ω 2 , , W 2 p m 2 ω 2 ]
in Equation (3), [ β ] can be written as
[ β ] = [ k j j ] 1 [ I + T 1 ] [ K j i ω 2 m j i ]
and substituting this equation into Equations (4) and (5) we obtain
{ [ m ¯ ] = [ m 0 ] + 2 [ A Λ A T ] + [ A Λ Λ A T ] [ k ¯ ] = [ k 0 ] + [ A Λ Λ j Λ A T ]
where
{ [ m 0 ] = [ m i i m i j k j j 1 k j i k i j k j j 1 m j i + k i j k j j 1 m j j k j j 1 k j i ] [ k 0 ] = [ k i i = k i j k j j 1 k j i ] [ A ] = [ m i i Φ k i j Φ Λ j 1 ]
[ K 0 ω 2 M ( ω ) ] { x i } = { F ¯ i }
where
{ [ K 0 ] = [ k 0 ] [ M ( ω ) ] = [ m 0 + A Λ A T ]
The above derivation uses precise power reduction. Compared with static shrinkage, dynamic shrinkage introduces the inertia correction term A Λ A T on the basis of the static shrinkage term [ k 0 ] and [ m 0 ] . The modified inertia term [ M ( ω ) ] is different from the static reduction value, while the elastic term is unchanged.
It should be noted that the above derivation does not introduce approximation. In practical applications, the higher order modes of the main modes of the fixed interface are generally omitted, and only some of the lower order modes are taken, thus greatly reducing the scale of analysis and calculation.

2.2. Substructure Modal Synthesis

The reduced super-element group is integrated into the motion equation of the whole system by using the conditions of interface displacement coordination and interface force balance.
[ K ¯ ] { x ¯ } ω 2 [ M ¯ ( ω ) ] { x ¯ } = { F ¯ }
The difference between this equation and the equations of motion of the whole system obtained by other substructure synthesis techniques is that the mass matrix is a function of frequency. Equation (13) corresponds to the nonlinear eigenvalue problem. This kind of eigenvalue problem can adopt the dichotomy method or other methods to solve the nonlinear eigenvalue problem.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Dynamic Frequency Calculation and Precision Check

Firstly, the analysis accuracy of the modal synthesis super-element method for prestressed and free interfacial substructures with fixed interfaces was verified. The dynamic frequency of the standard contact bladed disk system under the working speed was analyzed by using the cyclic symmetry analysis method and the modal synthesis super-element method of fixed interface prestressed and free interface substructures, respectively. In Table 1, the dimensionless dynamic frequency and relative error of the homophonic standard contact bladed disk system was calculated by two methods, and the working speeds are given. Figure 3 shows the dynamic frequency curve of the harmonized standard contact bladed disk system calculated by the two methods under the working speed. It can be seen that compared with the cyclic symmetry analysis method, the maximum relative error of the dimensionless dynamic frequency of the modal synthesis super-element method of the prestressed free interface substructure with a fixed interface is 5.68%. Since the number of modes intercepted by the substructures is the same, and the same finite element mesh model is used, the errors of the two methods at each frequency are relatively consistent.

3.2. Static Frequency Analysis of Blades

Since the natural vibration characteristics of the blades have a direct impact on the coupled vibration of the bladed disk system, the blades of the first and second stage of the bladed disk system were taken as the research objects, and the static frequency analysis of the two stages was carried out to obtain the inherent vibration characteristics. The three-dimensional solid model of the first- and second-stage bladed disk system and the finite element model of the two-stage blade after meshing are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5.
The first 10 order natural frequencies and mode shapes of the first- and second-stage blades were obtained by modal analysis after the tenon position of the first- and second-stage blades were all constrained.
The first 10 natural frequencies are shown in Table 2.
The first four natural frequencies and mode shapes are shown in Table 3:
Specific mode shapes are shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7.
Through the analysis of the modes and vibration shapes of the first- and second-stage blades, it can be seen that the low-order mode shapes of the blades are bending and torsional vibration, and the frequency of the corresponding mode shapes of the second stage blades is slightly higher than that of the first-stage blades.

3.3. Modal Analysis of a Single-Stage Bladed Disk System

3.3.1. Modal Analysis of the First-Stage Bladed Disk System

The first-stage bladed disk system model was taken as the object of analysis, and its modal analysis was carried out. Figure 8 shows the three-dimensional solid model of the first-stage bladed disk system, and Figure 9 shows the finite element model of the first-stage bladed disk system. Through modal analysis, the first 150 order natural frequencies and mode shapes of the first-stage blading disk system were calculated and solved. The specific values of natural frequencies of each order are shown in Table 4 and Table 5.
The first 150th order mode shapes of the bladed disk system of the first stage are shown in Table 5:
The mode diagram of the typical order of the first-stage bladed disk system is as follows (Figure 10):
Through analysis, it can be seen that the low order mode shape of the first-stage bladed disk system is the first order bending vibration of the blade according to the pitch diameter. With the increase in mode order, the vibration of the disk is excited, and the coupled vibration of the blade and the disk appears. As the modal order continues to increase, the blade begins to transform from a bending vibration to twisting vibration. In addition, it can be found that due to the coupled action of the blade and the wheel, the first-order bending frequency of the blade is increased.

3.3.2. Modal Analysis of the Second-Stage Bladed Disk System

The second-stage bladed disk system model is taken as the analysis object, and its modal analysis is carried out. Figure 11 shows the three-dimensional solid model of the second-stage bladed disk system, and Figure 12 shows the finite element model of the second-stage bladed disk system. Through modal analysis, the first 150 order natural frequencies and mode shapes of the second-stage blading disk system were calculated and solved. The specific values of natural frequencies of each order are shown in Table 6 and Table 7.
The first 150th order mode shapes of the second stage bladed disk system are shown in Table 7:
Figure 13 shows the mode diagram of the typical order of the second-stage bladed disk system.
According to the analysis, the vibration law of the second-stage bladed disk system is similar to that of the first-stage bladed disk system. With the increase in the modal order, the first-order bending vibration of the blade is presented, and then the vibration of the disk is excited, resulting in the coupled vibration of the blade and disk. As the modal order continues to increase, the blade begins to transform from a bending vibration to twisting vibration. At the same time, due to the coupling of the blade and the disk, the first-order bending frequency of the blade is increased.

3.4. Modal Analysis of the Two-Stage Bladed Disk Coupled System

For the interstage coupled vibration analysis of multi-stage bladed disk system, the two-stage bladed disk system composed of the first- and second-stage bladed disk systems is selected firstly, and the overall model of the two-stage bladed disk system is taken as the analysis object. Figure 14a shows the overall three-dimensional solid model of the two-stage bladed disk system. Figure 14b shows the overall finite element model of a two-stage bladed disk system with meshing and boundary conditions considered. Through modal analysis, the first 195th order natural frequencies and vibration shapes of the two-stage bladed disk system were calculated and solved, as shown in Table 8 and Table 9.
The first 160th order mode shapes of the two-stage bladed disk coupled system are shown in Table 9:
The mode diagram of the typical order of the two-stage bladed disk coupled system is as follows:
(1)
As shown in Figure 15, Figure 16, Figure 17, Figure 18 and Figure 19, coupled mode shape when the first-stage bladed disk vibration is dominant.
(2)
As shown in Figure 20, Figure 21, Figure 22, Figure 23 and Figure 24, coupled mode shapes of the second-stage bladed disk when the vibration is dominant.
(3)
As shown in Figure 25, Figure 26, Figure 27, Figure 28 and Figure 29, coupled mode of two stages of the bladed disk with the same vibration amplitude.
According to the modal and mode shape analysis of the two-stage bladed disk coupled system, in the low-order mode, the first-order bending vibration of the first-order blade and the second-order blade is firstly manifested. With the increase in the modal order, the coupled vibration of the blade and the wheel, the twisted vibration of the blade, and the coupled vibration between the two stages of the bladed disk appear. In addition, it can be found that the vibration of the two-stage bladed disk will appear at the same frequency with the same pitch diameter. However, in most two-stage coupled bladed disks, the mode pattern cannot be seen directly. This is because the vibration of the first-stage bladed disk is dominant, while the vibration of the other stage is relatively small.
For the order with obvious inter-stage coupled vibration of the two-stage bladed disk system, the maximum vibration displacements of the first-stage bladed disk system and the second-stage bladed disk system are shown in Table 10. Figure 30, Figure 31, Figure 32, Figure 33, Figure 34 and Figure 35 show the inter-stage coupled modes.

3.5. Comparison of the Results between the Two-Stage and Single-Stage Systems

Table 11 shows a comparison of the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the two-stage bladed disk system with the first- and second-stage bladed disk systems.
According to the comparison of the natural frequencies and modes of the two-stage bladed disk system and the single-stage bladed disk system in Table 11, it can be seen that the vibration of the bladed disk system has a certain order: the blade vibration is first, followed by the coupled vibration of the bladed disk. At the intersection of the two stages, the interstage coupled vibration of the bladed disk will occur. It can be seen that the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the two-stage bladed disk coupled system not only include the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the first- and second-stage bladed disk, respectively, but also have the coupled modes of the two-stage bladed disk. Therefore, the two-stage bladed disk system model should be chosen to calculate the coupled vibration modes of the two-stage bladed disk system. For the dominant vibration mode of a single-stage disk, a single-stage bladed disk calculation model should be selected.

4. Conclusions

The whole coupled vibration mode of a two-stage bladed disk system was analyzed. Firstly, the modal analysis of the first- and second-stage bladed disks was carried out, and then the modes and configurations of the first- and second-stage bladed disks were solved, respectively. Finally, the modal analysis of the two-stage bladed disk coupled system was carried out, and the coupled vibration forms of the two-stage bladed disk were analyzed. The following conclusions were drawn.
(1) For the single-stage bladed disk system, the low-order mode shape is the first-order bending vibration of the blade according to the pitch diameter. With an increase in the mode order, the vibration of the disk is excited, resulting in the coupled vibration of the blade and the disk. As the modal order continues to increase, the blade begins to transform from a bending vibration to twisting vibration. At the same time, due to the coupling of the blade and the disk, the first-order bending frequency of the blade is increased.
(2) For the two-stage bladed disk coupled system, the vibration of the bladed disk has a certain order: the blade vibration is first, followed by the coupled vibration of the bladed disk. For the intersecting position of the two-stage bladed disk frequencies, the interstage coupled vibration of the bladed disk will occur, and the number of pitch diameters or pitch circles of the vibration would be the same. The natural frequencies and mode shapes of the two-stage bladed disk coupled system not only include the natural frequencies and mode shapes of the first- and second-stage bladed disks, respectively, but also have the coupled modes of the two-stage bladed disk, so the multistage bladed disk model is more accurate to analyze.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Y. and T.Z.; methodology, Y.Y. and T.Z.; software, Y.F.; validation, Y.Y. and T.Z.; formal analysis, X.J.; investigation, X.J.; data curation, Y.F.; writing–original draft preparation, Y.Y.; writing–review and editing, Y.Y., X.J., T.Z. and Y.F.; visualization, Y.F.; supervision, T.Z.; project administration, T.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52165014, No. 51805076, No. U1708255 and No. 51775093), National Science and Technology Major Project of China (J2019-I-0008-0008), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (N2105013).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bai, B.; Bai, G.S.; Tong, X.C. Research on vibration problem of integral mistuned bladed disk assemblies at home and abroad. Chinese. J. Aerosp. Power 2014, 29, 91–103. [Google Scholar]
  2. Laxalde, D.; Thouverez, F.; Lombard, J.P. Dynamical analysis of multi-stage cyclic structures. Mech. Res. Commun. 2007, 34, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Joannin, C.; Thouverez, F.; Chouvion, B. Reduced-order modelling using nonlinear modes and triple nonlinear modal synthesis. Comput. Struct. 2018, 203, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Hs, A.; Cla, B.; Qt, A.; Bwa, B. Influence mechanism of disk position and flexibility on natural frequencies and critical speeds of a shaft-disk-blade unit—Sciencedirect. J. Sound Vib. 2020, 469, 115156. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zeng, J.; Zhao, C.; Hui, M.; Cui, X.; Luo, Z. Dynamic response characteristics of the shaft-blisk-casing system with blade-tip rubbing fault. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2021, 3, 105406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, H.; Lu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Tai, X.; Wen, B.C. A new dynamic model of rotor-blade systems. J. Sound Vib. 2015, 357, 168–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, T.Y.; Wang, Y.X.; Pan, H.G.; Yuan, H.Q.; Cai, Y. Nonlinear forced vibration analysis of spinning shaft-disk assemblies under sliding bearing supports. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.H.; Wu, J.W. Vibration simulation analysis of ceramic matrix composite turbine rotor integral blade-disk. J. Acoust. Vib. 2021, 9, 46–52. [Google Scholar]
  9. She, H.; Li, C.; Tang, Q.; Wen, B.C. Effects of blade’s interconnection on the modal characteristics of a shaft-disk-blade system. Mechanical. Syst. Signal Process. 2021, 146, 106955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al Bedoor, B.O. Natural frequncies of coupled blade-bending and shaft-torsional vibrations. Shock Vib. 2007, 14, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, C.H.; Huang, S.C. The influence of disk’s flexibility on coupling vibration of shaft-disk-blades systems. J. Sound Vib. 2007, 301, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chiu, Y.J.; Chen, D.Z. The coupled vibration in a rotating multi-disk rotor system. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2011, 53, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chiu, Y.J.; Yang, C.H. The coupled vibration in a rotating multi-disk rotor system with grouped blades. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2014, 28, 1653–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ma, H.; Lu, Y.; Wu, Z.Y.; Tai, X.Y.; Wen, B.C. Vibration response analysis of a rotational shaft-disk-blade system with blade-tip rubbing. Int. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2016, 107, 110–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, L.; Cao, D.Q.; Huang, W. Nonlinear coupled dynamics of flexible blade-rotor-bearing systems. Tribol. Int. 2010, 43, 759–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Luo, R. Free transverse vibration of rotating blades in a bladed disk assembly. Acta Mech. 2012, 223, 1385–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rzadkowski, R.; Drewczynski, M. Coupling of vibration of several bladed discs on a shaft part ii. forced vibration analysis. Adv. Vib. Eng. 2010, 9, 363–374. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bladh, R.; Castanier, M.P.; Pierre, C. Effects of multi-Stage coupling and disk flexibility on mistuned bladed disk dynamics. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2003, 125, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vargiu, P.; Firrone, C.M.; Zucca, S.; Gola, M.M. A reduced order model based on sector mistuning for the dynamic analysis of mistuned bladed disks. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2011, 53, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Petrov, E.P.; Ewins, D.J. Method for analysis of nonlinear multiharmonic vibrations of mistuned bladed disks with scatter of contact interface characteristics. J. Turbomach. 2005, 127, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rzadkowski, R.; Maurin, A. Multistage coupling of eight mistuned bladed disks on a solid shaft of the steam turbine, forced vibration analysis. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 2014, 2, 495–508. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, C.F.; She, H.X.; Tang, Q.S.; Wen, B.C. The coupling vibration characteristics of a flexible shaft-disk-blades system with mistuned features. Appl. Math. Model. 2019, 67, 557–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, B.W.; Kuang, J.H. Mode localization in a rotating mistuned turbo disk with coriolis effect. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2001, 43, 1643–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, T.Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, H.Y.; Pan, H.G.; Cai, Y. Free vibration analysis of a rotating graphene nanoplatelet reinforced pre-twist blade-disk assembly with a setting angle. Appl. Math. Model. 2021, 93, 578–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, T.Y.; Cui, Y.S.; Pan, H.G.; Yuan, H.Q.; Yang, J. Free vibration analysis of a functionally graded graphene nanoplatelet reinforced disk-shaft assembly with whirl motion. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2021, 197, 106335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, T.Y.; Jiang, L.P.; Pan, H.G.; Yang, J.; Kitipornchai, S. Coupled free vibration of a functionally graded pre-twisted blade-shaft system reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Compos. Struct. 2020, 262, 113362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, T.Y.; Liu, Z.F.; Pan, H.G.; Zhang, H.Y.; Yuan, H.Q. Vibration characteristics of functionally graded Porous nanocomposite blade-disk-shaft rotor system reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2021, 28, 717–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, T.Y.; Wang, Y.X.; Pan, H.G.; Gao, X.S.; Cai, Y. Analytical solution for vibration characteristics of rotating graphene nanoplatelet-reinforced plates under rub-impact and thermal shock. Adv. Compos. Lett. 2020, 29, 2633366X2093365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhao, T.Y.; Jiang, Z.Y.; Zhao, Z.; Xie, L.Y.; Yuan, H.Q. Modeling and free vibration analysis of rotating hub-blade assemblies reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 2021, 030932472098690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, T.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yang, J. Coupled free vibration of spinning functionally graded porous double-bladed disk systems reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Materials 2020, 13, 5610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhao, T.; Yang, Y.; Pan, H.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, H.Q. Free vibration analysis of a spinning porous nanocomposite blade reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 2021, 030932472098575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, T.; Li, G.; Pan, H.; Yuan, H.Q. Dynamic characteristics analysis for vehicle parts based on parallel optimization algorithm with CUDA. Eng. Comput. 2021. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, T.Y.; Li, H.; Sun, H. Parallel intelligent algorithm analysis of optimization arrangement on mistuned blades based on compute unified device architecture. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 2019, 233, 2207–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, T.Y.; Yuan, H.Q.; Yang, W.J.; Sun, H.G. Genetic particle swarm parallel algorithm analysis of optimization arrangement on mistuned blades. Eng. Optim. 2017, 49, 2095–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Finite element model of the basic sector.
Figure 1. Finite element model of the basic sector.
Applsci 11 08600 g001
Figure 2. Analysis process of SMSM.
Figure 2. Analysis process of SMSM.
Applsci 11 08600 g002
Figure 3. First-order dynamic frequency of the substructure method and cyclic commutation method.
Figure 3. First-order dynamic frequency of the substructure method and cyclic commutation method.
Applsci 11 08600 g003
Figure 4. Single-blade model of Stage 1.
Figure 4. Single-blade model of Stage 1.
Applsci 11 08600 g004
Figure 5. Single-blade model of Stage 2.
Figure 5. Single-blade model of Stage 2.
Applsci 11 08600 g005
Figure 6. The first four modes of the first stage blade.
Figure 6. The first four modes of the first stage blade.
Applsci 11 08600 g006
Figure 7. The first four modes of the second stage blade.
Figure 7. The first four modes of the second stage blade.
Applsci 11 08600 g007
Figure 8. Three-dimensional solid model of the first-stage leaf disk.
Figure 8. Three-dimensional solid model of the first-stage leaf disk.
Applsci 11 08600 g008
Figure 9. Finite element model of the first-stage bladed disk.
Figure 9. Finite element model of the first-stage bladed disk.
Applsci 11 08600 g009
Figure 10. Mode pattern of a typical order of the first-stage bladed disk system.
Figure 10. Mode pattern of a typical order of the first-stage bladed disk system.
Applsci 11 08600 g010
Figure 11. 3D solid model of the second-stage leaf disk.
Figure 11. 3D solid model of the second-stage leaf disk.
Applsci 11 08600 g011
Figure 12. Finite element model of the second-stage bladed disk.
Figure 12. Finite element model of the second-stage bladed disk.
Applsci 11 08600 g012
Figure 13. Mode pattern of a typical order of the second-stage bladed disk system.
Figure 13. Mode pattern of a typical order of the second-stage bladed disk system.
Applsci 11 08600 g013
Figure 14. Two-stage bladed disk system model.
Figure 14. Two-stage bladed disk system model.
Applsci 11 08600 g014
Figure 15. One-pitch coupled vibration of the blade and disk.
Figure 15. One-pitch coupled vibration of the blade and disk.
Applsci 11 08600 g015
Figure 16. One-pitch coupled vibration of the blade and disk.
Figure 16. One-pitch coupled vibration of the blade and disk.
Applsci 11 08600 g016
Figure 17. Two-pitch coupled vibration of the blade and disk.
Figure 17. Two-pitch coupled vibration of the blade and disk.
Applsci 11 08600 g017
Figure 18. Coupled vibration of the blade and disk in three segments.
Figure 18. Coupled vibration of the blade and disk in three segments.
Applsci 11 08600 g018
Figure 19. Four-pitch coupled vibration of the blade and disk.
Figure 19. Four-pitch coupled vibration of the blade and disk.
Applsci 11 08600 g019
Figure 20. Coupled vibration of the blade and disk with a 0 pitch diameter.
Figure 20. Coupled vibration of the blade and disk with a 0 pitch diameter.
Applsci 11 08600 g020
Figure 21. One-pitch coupled vibration of the blade and disk.
Figure 21. One-pitch coupled vibration of the blade and disk.
Applsci 11 08600 g021
Figure 22. Coupled vibration of the blade and disk with a two-pitch diameter.
Figure 22. Coupled vibration of the blade and disk with a two-pitch diameter.
Applsci 11 08600 g022
Figure 23. Coupled vibration of the blade and disk in three segments.
Figure 23. Coupled vibration of the blade and disk in three segments.
Applsci 11 08600 g023
Figure 24. Four-pitch coupled vibration of the blade and disk.
Figure 24. Four-pitch coupled vibration of the blade and disk.
Applsci 11 08600 g024
Figure 25. Coupled vibration at a natural frequency of 656.78 Hz.
Figure 25. Coupled vibration at a natural frequency of 656.78 Hz.
Applsci 11 08600 g025
Figure 26. Coupled vibration at a 674.13 Hz natural frequency.
Figure 26. Coupled vibration at a 674.13 Hz natural frequency.
Applsci 11 08600 g026
Figure 27. Coupled vibration at a natural frequency of 1548.55 Hz.
Figure 27. Coupled vibration at a natural frequency of 1548.55 Hz.
Applsci 11 08600 g027
Figure 28. Coupled vibration at a natural frequency of 1700.81 Hz.
Figure 28. Coupled vibration at a natural frequency of 1700.81 Hz.
Applsci 11 08600 g028
Figure 29. Coupled vibration at a natural frequency of 1730.44 Hz.
Figure 29. Coupled vibration at a natural frequency of 1730.44 Hz.
Applsci 11 08600 g029
Figure 30. Mode 99 × 10−5 × 10−4 × 10−3.
Figure 30. Mode 99 × 10−5 × 10−4 × 10−3.
Applsci 11 08600 g030
Figure 31. Mode 104.
Figure 31. Mode 104.
Applsci 11 08600 g031
Figure 32. Mode 105.
Figure 32. Mode 105.
Applsci 11 08600 g032
Figure 33. Mode 106.
Figure 33. Mode 106.
Applsci 11 08600 g033
Figure 34. Mode 115.
Figure 34. Mode 115.
Applsci 11 08600 g034
Figure 35. Mode 116.
Figure 35. Mode 116.
Applsci 11 08600 g035
Table 1. Accuracy verification of the modal synthesis super-element method for the prestressed and free interfacial substructures with fixed interfaces.
Table 1. Accuracy verification of the modal synthesis super-element method for the prestressed and free interfacial substructures with fixed interfaces.
Methods and ErrorsCyclic Symmetric Structure Analysis Is Used to Harmonize the Dimensionless Dynamic Frequency of Standard Contact Bladed Disk SystemModal Synthesis Super-element Method of Fixed Interface Prestressed Free Interface Substructure Harmonizes the Dimensionless Dynamic Frequency of Standard Contact Bladed Disk SystemMethod Error
Number of Knuckle Diameter
01.04780.98895.62%
11.04920.99035.61%
21.05220.99365.57%
31.05590.99755.54%
41.05961.00115.52%
51.06291.00425.52%
61.06591.00695.54%
71.06861.00915.56%
81.07071.01095.59%
91.07251.01225.61%
101.07381.01335.63%
111.07471.01415.64%
121.07551.01465.65%
131.07601.01515.66%
141.07641.01545.67%
151.07661.01565.67%
161.07681.01575.67%
171.07691.01585.68%
181.07701.01595.68%
191.07701.01595.68%
Table 2. Natural frequencies of the first 10 orders of the Stage 1 and Stage 2 blades.
Table 2. Natural frequencies of the first 10 orders of the Stage 1 and Stage 2 blades.
Stage 1 BladeStage 2 Blade
Order NumberNatural Frequency/HzOrder NumberNatural Frequency/Hz
1602.01632.0
21842.622273.2
32310.633043.1
44243.045590.8
54754.556616.9
65760.767898.7
76231.178803.8
86756.8810,457.0
99294.0912,714.0
109540.41013,367.0
Table 3. First four order natural frequencies and mode shapes of the Stage 1 and Stage 2 blades.
Table 3. First four order natural frequencies and mode shapes of the Stage 1 and Stage 2 blades.
Order NumberStage 1 BladeStage 2 Blade
Natural Frequency/HzVibration ModeNatural Frequency/HzVibration Mode
1602.0The first-order bending632.0The first-order bending
21842.6The first-order distortion2273.2The first-order distortion
32310.6The second-order bending3043.1The second-order bending
44243.0The second-order distortion5590.8The second-order distortion
Table 4. Natural frequencies of the first 150 orders of the first-stage blading disk system.
Table 4. Natural frequencies of the first 150 orders of the first-stage blading disk system.
Order NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural Frequency
1667.6831695.3611813.10911855.901212189.90
2668.2732695.33621813.50921870.101222196.70
3669.5333695.37631814.10931905.801232198.40
4671.5134695.40641814.40941914.301242216.40
5673.5735695.43651814.70951942.301252218.50
6677.2136695.45661815.00961948.301262255.50
7678.3637695.46671815.20971963.701272255.80
8682.4138695.48681815.40981968.801282277.60
9683.19391064.10691815.60991976.301292316.50
10686.42401208.30701815.701001980.801302317.80
11687.08411217.00711815.801011984.201312331.20
12689.28421317.70721815.901021988.001322334.40
13689.90431331.70731816.001031989.401332396.50
14691.25441455.40741816.101041992.501342398.80
15691.85451456.30751816.201051993.201352479.40
16692.55461460.20761816.301061995.301362481.80
17693.13471573.40771816.301071996.001372551.80
18693.41481584.50781816.301081997.201382553.80
19693.94491687.90791816.401091997.901392609.60
20694.00501693.00801823.501101998.601402611.20
21694.37511703.60811823.901111999.201412653.90
22694.50521767.90821824.201121999.701422655.40
23694.65531774.70831824.701132000.201432687.30
24694.82541784.70841825.601142000.701442688.90
25694.89551797.20851826.201152001.001452712.60
26695.01561806.20861828.301162001.201462713.90
27695.08571806.40871830.501172001.401472731.60
28695.15581810.20881831.201182143.701482732.40
29695.21591811.20891832.601192159.801492745.50
30695.25601812.30901842.601202186.901502746.00
Table 5. The first 150 order natural frequencies and mode shapes of the first-stage bladed disk system.
Table 5. The first 150 order natural frequencies and mode shapes of the first-stage bladed disk system.
Order NumberNatural Frequency/HzVibration Mode
1–38667.68–695.48Blade first-order bending vibration
39–541064.10–1784.70The blade and the wheel vibrate together
55–921797.20–1870.10First-order torsional vibration of blades
93–1171905.80–2001.40Blade bending-torsion coupled vibration
118–1502143.70–2746.00Second-order bending vibration of blade
Table 6. Natural frequencies of the first 150 orders of the second-stage blading disk system.
Table 6. Natural frequencies of the first 150 orders of the second-stage blading disk system.
Order NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural Frequency
1650.6331748.66611561.70912123.101212249.80
2706.2232748.73621564.70922123.801222254.00
3725.0633748.80631610.80932125.601232255.50
4725.5834748.85641618.40942126.301242264.80
5730.0335748.95651657.50952127.601252267.70
6733.4636748.98661714.00962128.301262290.40
7734.1837749.00671718.80972129.301272293.50
8737.9138749.07681833.40982129.901282324.40
9738.5339749.10691838.50992130.701292327.60
10740.9140749.12701850.401002131.201302361.80
11741.5341749.17711930.901012131.901312364.90
12742.9842749.19721934.901022132.201322396.30
13743.6343749.24731971.901032132.801332399.50
14744.4844749.26742001.701042133.101342425.20
15745.1445749.28752004.301052133.501352428.40
16745.5746749.29762013.301062133.701362448.10
17746.2147749.33772047.301072134.001372451.30
18746.3548749.37782048.401082134.301382466.00
19746.9249749.40792075.101092134.701392469.10
20746.9950749.42802075.301102135.001402480.10
21747.3951749.43812091.901112135.001412483.00
22747.5252749.46822092.401122135.401422491.20
23747.7553749.50832102.901132135.401432493.90
24747.9254797.09842103.501142135.501442500.10
25748.0255835.36852110.401152230.701452502.50
26748.2156999.34862111.201162232.801462507.30
27748.27571002.60872115.801172233.001472509.30
28748.42581305.60882116.601182235.901482513.10
29748.46591306.80892119.901192238.201492514.90
30748.55601500.20902120.701202247.201502517.80
Table 7. First 150 order natural frequencies and mode shapes of stage 2 blading disk systems.
Table 7. First 150 order natural frequencies and mode shapes of stage 2 blading disk systems.
Order NumberNatural Frequency/HzVibration Mode
1650.63The vibration of the blade and the wheel is coupled with 0 pitch diameter
2–53706.22–749.50Blade first-order bending vibration
54–78797.09–2048.40The blade and the wheel vibrate together
79–1312075.10–2364.90First-order torsional vibration of blades
132–1502396.30–2517.80Blade bending-torsion coupled vibration
Table 8. First 195 order natural frequencies of a two-stage bladed disk coupled system.
Table 8. First 195 order natural frequencies of a two-stage bladed disk coupled system.
Order NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural Frequency
1656.7840720.9979748.961181763.901571852.60
2664.5541722.3780748.981191766.501581866.90
3666.8642728.6181749.031201781.101591870.70
4666.9943729.3582749.051211795.601601874.00
5668.8144735.5583749.071221805.101611875.30
6674.1345736.2684749.091231805.601621894.80
7675.6646739.3185749.121241809.701631900.60
8676.7847739.9186749.171251810.601641909.50
9681.7348741.7487749.21261811.901651937.20
10682.549742.3388749.211271812.701661937.30
11686.0150743.4489749.231281813.201671943.40
12686.6751744.0690749.251291813.801681952.80
13688.9752744.6891749.301301814.101691955.20
14689.5853745.3192778.351311814.401701959.10
15690.9554745.60931025.801321814.701711962.10
16691.5555746.21941026.201331814.901721964.10
17692.2656746.29951037.401341815.201731967.90
18692.8457746.80961195.501351815.301741972.00
19693.1358746.89971199.001361815.401751976.40
20693.6659747.23981284.501371815.601761980.00
21693.7360747.38991292.501381815.701771983.90
22694.0961747.571001358.101391815.801781985.40
23694.2362747.751011359.401401815.901791988.50
24694.3963747.831021420.901411816.001801989.30
25694.5664748.021031426.501421816.001811991.50
26694.6365748.081041471.401431816.101821992.20
27694.7666748.221051484.901441816.101831993.50
28694.8267748.261061548.501451816.201841994.20
29694.9068748.351071555.201461819.501851994.90
30694.9569748.461081566.601471822.601861995.50
31695.0070748.521091585.501481823.101871996.20
32695.0471748.591101604.201491824.701881996.60
33695.0872748.651111615.901501825.201891997.20
34695.1373748.741121618.001511825.301901997.50
35695.1574748.781131679.801521826.201911997.70
36695.1975748.791141695.501531827.501921997.90
37695.2176748.861151700.801541830.101932011.00
38695.2277748.901161730.401551831.901942012.60
39695.2378748.921171763.201561841.201952049.70
Table 9. First 160th order natural frequencies and mode shapes of the two-stage bladed disk coupled system.
Table 9. First 160th order natural frequencies and mode shapes of the two-stage bladed disk coupled system.
Order NumberNatural Frequency/HzVIBRATION MODE
1656.78Coupled vibration of the two-stage blade and wheel
2–5664.55–668.810First-order bending vibration of the one-stage blade
6674.13Coupled vibration of the two-stage blade and wheel
7–39675.66–695.23First-order bending vibration of the one-stage blade
40–91720.99–749.30First-order bending vibration of the two-stage blades
92778.35Zero pitch diameter vibration of the stage two blades and disks
93–941025.80–1026.20One-pitch vibration of the stage two blades and disks
951037.40Zero pitch diameter vibration of the stage one blade and wheel
96–971195.50–1199.00One-pitch vibration of the stage one blades and disks
98–991284.50–1292.50Two-pitch vibration of the stage one blades and disks
100–1011358.10–1359.40Two-pitch diameter vibration of the two stage blades and disks
102–1031420.90–1426.50Three-pitch vibration of the stage one blades and disks
104–1061471.40–1548.50Coupled vibration of the two-stage blade and wheel
107–1081555.20–1566.60Four-pitch vibration of the stage one blades and disks
109–1101585.50–1604.20Two-pitch diameter vibration of the two-stage blades and disks
111–1121615.90–1618.00Three-section diameter vibration of the stage two blades and disks
113–1141679.80–1695.50Five section diameter vibration of the stage one blade and wheel
115–1161700.80–1730.40Coupled vibration of the two-stage blade and wheel
1171763.20Four-pitch vibration of the stage two blades and disks
1181763.90Bending-torsion coupled vibration of the stage one blade
1191766.50Four-pitch vibration of the stage two blades and disks
120–1581781.10–1866.90First order torsional vibration of the one-stage blade
159–1601870.70–1874.00Five section diameter vibration of the stage two blades and wheel
Table 10. Maximum displacement and ratio of the vibration of the Stage 1 and Stage 2 bladed disk systems.
Table 10. Maximum displacement and ratio of the vibration of the Stage 1 and Stage 2 bladed disk systems.
Order NumberNatural Frequency/HzLevel One Blade Disk/mmLevel Two Blade Disk/mmRatio
991292.51.00600.23194.34
1041471.40.32660.19071.71
1051484.90.45791.09432.39
1061548.50.52400.90441.73
1151700.80.54050.09695.58
1161730.40.49070.50071.00
Note: the ratio is the ratio of the larger value to the smaller value in the maximum displacements of Stage 1 and Stage 2 bladed disk systems.
Table 11. Comparison of natural frequencies between the two-stage and single-stage bladed disk coupled systems.
Table 11. Comparison of natural frequencies between the two-stage and single-stage bladed disk coupled systems.
Level OneLevel TwoTwo Levels of CouplingVibration Mode
Order NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural FrequencyOrder NumberNatural Frequency
------1650.631656.78Coupled vibration of the two-stage bladed disk
1–38667.68–695.48------2–5664.55–668.81Level one blade vibration
6674.13Coupled vibration of the two-stage bladed disk
7–39675.66–695.23Level one blade vibration
------2–53706.22–749.5040–91720.99–749.30Level two blade vibration
39–541064.10–1784.7054–78797.09–2048.4092–103778.35–1426.50Single stage coupled vibration of the bladed disk
104–1061471.40–1548.50Coupled vibration of the two-stage bladed disk
107–1141555.20–1695.50Single-stage coupled vibration of the bladed disk
115–1161700.80–1730.40Coupled vibration of the two-stage bladed disk
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, Y.; Jin, X.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, T. Study on the Coupled Vibration Characteristics of a Two-Stage Bladed Disk Rotor System. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8600. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188600

AMA Style

Yu Y, Jin X, Fu Y, Zhao T. Study on the Coupled Vibration Characteristics of a Two-Stage Bladed Disk Rotor System. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(18):8600. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188600

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Yinxin, Xiaolong Jin, Yanming Fu, and Tianyu Zhao. 2021. "Study on the Coupled Vibration Characteristics of a Two-Stage Bladed Disk Rotor System" Applied Sciences 11, no. 18: 8600. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188600

APA Style

Yu, Y., Jin, X., Fu, Y., & Zhao, T. (2021). Study on the Coupled Vibration Characteristics of a Two-Stage Bladed Disk Rotor System. Applied Sciences, 11(18), 8600. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188600

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop