Next Article in Journal
An Algorithm for Rescheduling of Trains under Planned Track Closures
Next Article in Special Issue
Neuroimaging of Pediatric Cerebellum in Inherited Neurodegenerative Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
3D Texture Feature Extraction and Classification Using GLCM and LBP-Based Descriptors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phenotypic Definition and Genotype-Phenotype Correlates in PMPCA-Related Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Clinical-Based Diagnostic Approach to Cerebellar Atrophy in Children

1
Developmental Neurology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milano, Italy
2
Unit of Medical Genetics and Neurogenetics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milano, Italy
3
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milano, Italy
4
Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
5
Neurogenetics Research Centre, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy
6
Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, 80078 Napoli, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(5), 2333; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052333
Submission received: 6 December 2020 / Revised: 20 February 2021 / Accepted: 23 February 2021 / Published: 5 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cerebellar Genetic Diseases: Diagnostic and Monitoring)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

The study proposes a possible approach to pediatric ataxias with cerebellar atrophy, in order to optimize the diagnostic process and reach molecular confirmation.

Abstract

Background: Cerebellar atrophy is a neuroradiological definition that categorizes conditions heterogeneous for clinical findings, disease course, and genetic defect. Most of the papers proposing a diagnostic workup for pediatric ataxias are based on neuroradiology or on the literature and experimental knowledge, with a poor participation of clinics in the process of disease definition. Our study aims to offer a different perspective on the way we approach cerebellar atrophy in developmental age, building a clinical-based diagnostic workup to guide molecular diagnosis. Methods: we recruited 52 patients with pediatric-onset cerebellar atrophy and definite disease categorization. Children underwent brain MRI, neurophysiological exams, metabolic investigations, and muscle biopsy with respiratory chain complex study. Single-gene sequencing, next-generation sequencing NGS panels, whole-exome sequencing (WES), and disease-specific techniques have been used to reach genetic confirmation. Results: Brain MRI is the main method of diagnosis, followed by tests on muscle biopsy and peripheral nervous system study. Other exams (e.g., metabolic investigations or evoked potentials) may be useful to narrow the list of diagnostic possibilities. Conclusions: We propose a diagnostic approach to cerebellar atrophy in children based on clinical findings, and support the evidence that a precise phenotypic definition may lead to the formulation of a definite diagnosis or otherwise guide the back phenotyping process derived from large molecular data.

1. Introduction

Cerebellar Atrophy (CA) is a neuroradiological definition for an arborized cerebellum with progressive and irreversible volume reduction, where neurons have been lost following a neurodegenerative process [1,2,3]. Numerous diseases, which especially in children may have a genetic cause, share such a brain-imaging pattern.
When addressing cerebellar genetic diseases in childhood, it is relatively easy to formulate a diagnosis in the case of cerebellar malformations, for which an extensive categorization conceived by Barkovich in 2009 serves as an accurate guide [4]. The diagnostic process is more challenging for cerebellar atrophy, as the radiological patterns are often overlapping, tend to evolve over time, and it is often not possible reach an etiopathological definition based solely on brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings. The most complete and recent classification of cerebellar degenerative patterns was published by Poretti and colleagues and it is essentially based on neuroimaging [3].
CA can affect the vermis, the hemispheres, or both, but most of the time the vermis is more severely affected [2]. A peculiar hypo-atrophic pattern, where atrophy is superimposed on hypoplasia, characterizes diseases caused by genes responsible for cerebellar integrity and trophism; these genes are not primarily implicated in embryonic brain development, but the detrimental insult is early and severe, causing in utero damage mimicking malformative disease. This is mainly typical of Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation (CDG) and Pontocerebellar Hypoplasias (PCH), where the severity of the atrophy may or may not evolve [2,4].
Despite the miscellaneous MRI patterns and the variety of the genetic pathways involved, the clinical presentation can be very similar among patients. Initially, developmental stages may be normally achieved, but unbalance and incoordination with gait, stance, and sitting problems emerge in most children as a major sign of cerebellar involvement. Many pediatric patients also show a reduced muscular tone, even in the absence of pyramidal or peripheral nervous system involvement, confirming the role of the cerebellum in tone maintenance. Nystagmus, saccadic intrusion, and impaired pursuit are frequently found, as well as dysarthria and orobuccal dyspraxia. Finally, a global developmental delay is often present, confirming the cerebellum’s role in cognition (reviewed by Bodranghien et al. [5]).
Beyond cerebellar involvement, children with CA may present signs of the impairment of other neurological or extra-neurological systems. Brain MRI can reveal the concomitant atrophy of supratentorial regions, more typically in ravaging disorders with severe and progressive disability, as in the case of Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis (NCL); white matter (WM) abnormalities may be found, and that is the case of the Hypomyelinating Leukodystrophies (HLD) with cerebellar involvement, but also in some DNA repair defect disorders [2,6]. This latter group of diseases typically show extrapyramidal system deterioration and Peripheral Nervous System (PNS) involvement (axonal neuropathy). The concurrent presence of cerebellar and pyramidal signs is instead more common in some Spinocerebellar Ataxias (SCA) or metabolic/mitochondrial disorders [6,7]. Retinopathy can be present, but it is not immediately attributable to a specific disorder, although it may hint at SCA or mitochondrial diseases [8,9].
Given the unspecific clinical presentation, overlapping radiological patterns, and shared comorbidities, the diagnosis of children with CA is often challenging. In more recent years, the progress of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based techniques has significantly increased the diagnostic yield of pediatric ataxias. However, the broader the analysis is, the more variants are detected and need interpretation, and only a definite knowledge of the clinical presentation may help in reaching a molecular diagnosis. Precise phenotype definition is indeed essential, also because ataxias may follow non-Mendelian patterns of inheritance (e.g., nucleotide expansions, mitochondrial) and because null alleles can derive from a partial or complete loss of the gene: such assets can be lost with NGS-based diagnostic strategies and require a precise suspicion to be tested for.
In the medical literature, a number of diagnostic algorithms for cerebellar degenerative disorders in childhood [2,3,6,8,9] have been proposed based on neuroradiology or diseases’ description in the medical literature, with a limited participation of clinics in the process of disease definition.
Here, we report our experience with CA: 80 pediatric patients with radiological evidence of CA were recruited; in 52 a precise disease categorization was possible and in 79% of this subgroup a genetic confirmation was also obtained. We describe the tailored process leading to diagnosis in such patients, proposing a newly conceived diagnostic approach to cerebellar atrophy in children, with a focus on clinical diagnostic handles.

2. Materials and Methods

Eighty pediatric patients with radiological evidence of CA were collected from 2010 to 2020 in a single referral center in Milan, Italy.
Patients underwent a diagnostic workup, including general and neurological assessment, brain MRI, EEG, metabolic investigations, and muscle biopsy with respiratory chain complex study. Metabolic tests included serum amino acids (AA), urinary organic acids (OA), serum lactate and pyruvate, cholesterol, albumin, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and transferrin isoelectric focusing (T-IEF). Further exams were performed in most patients, following clinical indications: electromyography (EMG) and/or nerve conduction studies (NCS); electroretinography (ERG) and visual, auditory, sensory evoked potentials (VEP, BAEP, SSEP); additional metabolic studies (e.g., vitamin E, TSH). Genetic studies were performed in all patients and included single-gene Sanger sequencing, next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques for custom gene panels or whole exome sequencing (WES), specific testing to search for nucleotides expansions, and Array-CGH analyses. All the genetic tests were conducted with parental consent and according to laboratory and ethical standards. Array-CGH analyses were performed using Cytosure oligo ISCA180K platform with a medium resolution of 40 Kb. The variants detected by molecular analyses were classified according to ACMG guidelines [10]; all the variants identified by NGS techniques were validated by Sanger sequencing.
Of the original 80-patient cohort, we discuss data of the 52 patients who had a definite diagnosis based on genetic confirmation or, in cases still lacking a definite molecular diagnosis, histopathological and/or biochemical confirmation of a genetic determined condition.

3. Results

The diagnostic rate in the original 80-patient cohort was 65%. The distribution of diagnosis is shown in Figure 1. Of the 52 patients, a genetic confirmation was obtained in 79% (41/52). The patients lacking a molecular diagnosis include three CDG patients who have a confirmed Pattern I at the T-IEF (in two of them, brothers, a single mutation in ALG9 was found), two with Cockayne, who only have confirmation on fibroblasts, and six patients with urinary OA alterations and/or mitochondrial studies alterations in which the molecular cause is missing despite extensive genetic analyses.
In the 52-patient cohort, the male to female ratio was 0.68 (M 21/F 31). Age at first diagnosis ranged from 3 months (3 m) to 13 years and 3 months (13 y5 m), with a mean of 5 y4 m and a median of 4 y6 m.
Table A1 summarizes the prevalence of the main clinical findings, while Table A2 lists the neurophysiological and laboratory exam results; complete data about personal information, clinical features, and exam results are reported in Supplementary Material, Table S1.
Growth parameters are shown in Figure 2; most patients have poor growth, with approximately a third being under -2 Standard Deviations (SDs) for Height (H), Weight (W), and Head Circumference (HC); only 25% of the patients show parameters with positive SD values (≥0 SD). Microcephaly is present in 35% (18/52); in six patients, the head size reduction is proportional to their short stature, with a H/HC discrepancy lower than 1SD, while in 12 a more prominent slowdown of the HC is found. Absolute macrocephaly is never observed, but 21% (11/52) have relative macrocephaly. Height is below the normal age range in 35% (18/52) of the children, and in 61% (11/18) of the cases it is associated with poor weight; two children gained weight after a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) was performed (the QARS1 patient and one of the seven SCA subjects).
Facial dysmorphisms are present in 58% of children from almost all categories of disorders, except for Autosomal Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS), Friedreich Ataxia (FRDA), mitochondrial disorders, and NCL. Almost a third of children (16/52) present somatic malformations, which are in most cases skeletal deformities (75%), while heart and genito-urinary abnormalities are rare; eye malformations are limited to Gillespie syndrome, with 2/2 patients showing pathognomonic aniridia (see Supplementary Material, Table S1 for details)
Consistently with the cerebellar dysfunction, a gait and/or appendicular ataxia is present in 80% of patients able to fulfill the examination tasks (35/44); in eight patients, the presence of ataxia is not assessable, given the severely compromised motor or developmental skills. A total of 27% of patients never acquired the first motor developmental stages (no head/trunk control). Tremor is present in 36% (16 of the 44 patients in which it is possible to explore the sign). Oculomotor abnormalities (apraxia or jerky smooth pursuit) are seen in 63% of the children (31/51, one patient has cortical blindness); this number may not reflect the real incidence, given the poor collaboration of the children. A total of 36% have strabismus (19/52) that is in 79% of cases convergent and in 21% divergent. Of the 36 children able to speak, more than a half have dysarthria (58%, 21/36). Impairment of the orobuccal motility (orobuccal dyspraxia) is present in 23% of patients, while two patients have dysphagia. All such signs do not appear to be specific to a particular disorder, but can be variably present—or not—in all the ataxic syndromes included in the cohort.
Hypotonia is seen in 56% (29/52) and in some cases, particularly in children with DNA repair disorders, a truncal hypotonia is associated with distal limbs spasticity. Extra-cerebellar neurological degeneration is common. 65% have signs of pyramidal system involvement (spasticity, hyper-reflexia, clonus, Babinski sign). Extra-pyramidal movement disorders are found in 21% and may be dys/hyperkinetic movements (four patients), choreoatetoid movements (three, all affected by DNA repair defect disorders: 2 AOA1, 1 A-T), dystonia (7 patients: 1 Cockayne, 1 Mitochondrial, 2 NBIA, 1 PCH, the QARS1 patient, 1 SCA); bradykinesia is observed in one patient with mitochondrial disorder. Finally, a hypo-reflexia is present in 15%; five out of eight of these children have a definite neuropathy recorded at NCS (one did not have the investigation, the Wolfram child and one Cockayne had normal NCS study).
Epilepsy affects 25% (14/52) children and in particular all children with NCL and PCH and 41% of those with DNA repair defect disorders.
Brain MRI was performed more than once in all but eight patients (85%); a progression of the atrophy is present in 70% (31/54). Children with the absence of radiological progression had ARSACS (2/2 children affected by such disease), CMT2Z (1), FRDA (1), Gillespie syndrome (1/2), KIF1A mutation (1/2), mitochondrial disease (two of the six with available follow-up), PCH (1/2 with available follow-up), SCA (2/5 with available follow-up, one SCA6, one SCA5), and Wolfram Syndrome (1/1). CA affects cerebellar vermis in all patients, while hemispheres are spared in seven cases. In 38% (20/52), a cerebellar hyperintensity is present, affecting dentate nuclei (7/20), the cerebellar cortex (7/20), or both (6/20). Cerebellar hypoplasia is present in six children (12%): 3/5 CDG and 3/3 PCH; in these latter three children, hypoplasia spreads to the pons, showing the pathognomonic PCH pattern. A brainstem involvement is globally present in 29%. Atrophy was present also in the supratentorial areas in nine cases; in two NCL and in two out of five Cockayne, it is associated with WM abnormalities, with these latter globally present in 33%. One child with Cockayne syndrome and one with NCL also have basal ganglia alterations.
In the majority of cases, neurophysiological studied have been conducted. All the children underwent at least one sleep-EEG, which demonstrated epileptic abnormalities not only in those patients suffering from epilepsy, but in an additional seven cases, so that the global prevalence of EEG abnormalities was 40% (21/52). BAEP and VEP were, respectively, pathological in 32% (15/47) and 20% (9/44) patients in which the exams were performed; both studies does not seem to correlate with any disorder; also, ERG alterations, present in 8 out of 47 patients (17%), are not typical of specific diseases, except for the fact that both CLN patients showed an abnormal retinal function. SEP study has been performed in a small number of patients (n = 19) addressing specific clinical suspicions (mostly, a possible SCA diagnosis); in such children, 58% showed abnormalities. EMG and NCS were, respectively, performed in 27 and 35 patients. EMG was pathological in 37% of the tested patients and NCS abnormalities were just as common (37%). Children presenting EMG + NCS alterations are seven (26%, 7/27), more than a half with DNA repair defect diseases.
Almost half of the patients underwent muscle biopsy. The exam showed non-specific alterations in 28%: minimal neurogenic alterations were present in three patients with DNA repair defects, while the exam revealed minor alterations in the structure of muscular fibers in four SCA patients. A definite single or multiple respiratory chain complex deficiency was found in 16%: all the four patients still lack molecular confirmation. A Coenzyme Q10 deficiency was present in two children, and in one of them the defect was confirmed by genetic analysis.
In the two patients with genetically defined NCL, lipopigments were present at the histological examination of skin biopsy.
Metabolic investigations has been changed and expanded over the years, so that not all children underwent the same tests. T-IEF was studied in 81% of children and was normal in all but the 4 patients with CDG, all presenting a type I pattern of glycosylation. investigations for DNA repair defect disorder (cholesterol, albumin and AFP dosage) has been also performed in 81% and revealed abnormalities in 14% (6/42) of patients; in all of them, the metabolic anomaly was consistent with the disease. TSH and Vitamin E were normal in all the patients tested. A total of 10% (4/42) patients had elevated levels of serum lactate and pyruvate. Serum AA and urinary OA profiles were studied in 85%, revealing AA alterations in one case and OA alterations in three cases: one child with Ataxia with Oculomotor Apraxia (AOA, who has AA + OA alterations), one metabolic disorder, and one mitochondrial disease (who both have excretion anomaly of multiple OA).

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to create a possible diagnostic workup for pediatric ataxias with cerebellar atrophy, which can guide both the formulation of a clinical suspicion and the interpretation of big genetic data; the proposed algorithm is shown in Figure 3.
We do not include brain MRI as part of the diagnostic process as it should be the first exam to be performed in a child with a congenital or early onset ataxia [2] in order to discriminate in the first place primary from acquired ataxias (e.g., cerebral tumors, toxins, teratogens, prenatal viral infections…), and, in the case of a primary ataxia, malformative to degenerative diseases. Studies have focused so far on delineating different neuroradiological patterns with CA, while little has been written on the global clinical presentation of the patients.
Neuroradiological evaluation is the prerogative and should precede any other investigation. In most patients, it was performed more than once and frequently revealed atrophy progression. Consistent with the literature data [2], cerebellar vermis is always atrophic, but the degeneration is global (vermis plus hemispheres) in most kids, without any disease-specific pattern. Children who have a CA superimposed to cerebellar hypoplasia had those disorders in which cerebellar degeneration is known to start at a very early stage of development: PCH and CDG [3,11]. The hypo-atrophic pattern cannot be missed, as its presence consistently narrows the possible diagnosis to a small group of disorders. A hyperintensity of the cerebellar structure is otherwise less specific; it is generally thought of as a sign of PLA2G6 mutations, mitochondrial diseases or, once again, CDG [2,8]. This is partially confirmed by our study, where more than a half of children with mitochondrial diseases or Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation (NBIA) present dentate nuclei and/or cerebellar cortex hyperintensity, but the same sign is also shared by other kind of diseases (e.g., DNA repair disorders, SCA) as found in a previous work [8]. This observation points out that the presence of dentate or cerebellar cortex hyperintensity alone is not sufficient to suggest a specific disease or disease group but, along with other features, it may strengthen the hypothesis of a metabolic disorder. Of note, the only PCH child with cortex and dentate T2-hyperintensity was affected by PCH6, caused by the mutation of a gene implicated in mitochondrial functions (RARS2) [12]. The involvement of brainstem structures is common and it is important to recognize the patterns that are disease-specific: beyond PCH, these include the characteristic pontine tigroid hypointensities of ARSACS [6]. Brainstem atrophy is considered rare also in advanced stages2; in our cohort, it is present in 9 out of 52 children.
Supratentorial alterations are mostly non-specific, as also found in previous studies [8,9], although, when associated with other features and consistent with the clinical phenotype, they may aid in the diagnosis (HLD in the case of diffuse hypomyelination, Cockayne syndrome with hypomyelination and calcifications, WM abnormalities and severe atrophy in NCL). Interestingly, of the three patients with mutation in NBIA genes, only one presents a definite basal ganglia anomaly until now.
Clinical presentation is often similar in all children with CA. Patients who are sooner brought to the physician attention are mostly affected by diseases with intrinsic malformative aspects (e.g., aniridia in Gillespie) or characterized by an early cerebellar dysfunction (e.g., CDG or PCH). Ataxia or other signs of cerebellar dysfunction may not be present at onset and emerge over time; most children who reach sufficient motor skills develop truncal or appendicular ataxia, as well as oculomotor functions are impaired in the majority of cases. Oculomotor abnormalities and orobuccal dyspraxia are common but not disease-specific, although strabismus is almost uniformly found in CDG. Muscular hypotonia affects more than a half of children at any age and may be the sign of a cerebellar and early pyramidal involvement; in younger children, the sign may disappear with age and evolve into ataxia or, in some cases, turn into spasticity. Our clinical data confirm that a combined pyramidal and extrapyramidal dysfunction is a clue of DNA repair disorders [7]. This latter disease group is also the one most frequently complicated by epilepsy, suggesting that DNA repair disorders must always be considered in children with ataxia, epilepsy, and microcephaly (also a recurrent finding).
Unless we have a definite suspicion based on brain MRI and clinical evaluation, we need the help of neurophysiology and laboratory tests to narrow the field of differential diagnosis.
Abnormalities in EEG are often found in children with mitochondrial/metabolic disorders, even in the absence of seizures, as an effect of global metabolic dysfunction on brain activity. Alterations in ERG are generally considered a sign of mitochondrial diseases or some specific SCA, mainly SCA7 [9,10,11,12,13], but they do not seem to recur in particular groups of diseases in our cohort, and the same happens for visual and auditory evoked potentials. VEP may give a strong clue to diagnosis, for example revealing signs of optic nerve involvement in Wolfram Syndrome. In such studies though, the poor collaboration of younger and severely disabled children must be considered. SEP appears helpful, showing a dysfunction in the somatosensory system functioning, at different levels, in those disorders known to possibly have such features (ARSACS, DNA repair defects, FRDA, NBIA, Wolfram syndrome); unexpectedly, neither of the two SCA children who underwent the exam had SEP abnormalities.
PNS involvement sometimes complicates the clinical presentation and course of children. In our cohort, EMG and NCS data were helpful to guide genetic analyses, in some cases focusing on a very specific disorder. Patients with NCS abnormalities were affected by ARSACS, Charcot–Marie–Tooth 2Z (CMT2Z), DNA repair disorders, FRDA, and mitochondrial diseases; EMG was altered in the same disorders, plus NBIA and PCH. The highest recurrence of PNS involvement was found in children with DNA repair defects: this demonstrates that, even if EMG is quite an invasive exam to perform in a child, it must be considered as it may lead to diagnosis. Notably, the PNKP gene was recently described to cause a large spectrum of phenotypes, ranging from congenital macrocephaly to adult-onset ataxia [14]; we suggest that in children where ataxia is associated with at least two of the following three features—microcephaly, seizures, and neuropathy—PNKP sequencing should be considered, especially in the presence of supportive elements such as AFP/cholesterol/albumin alterations or signs of extrapyramidal system involvement.
The role of muscle biopsy in the diagnostic process of pediatric ataxias is already recognized and biochemical studies on muscle samples were found to be helpful in a range from 5.5% up to 23% of children [8,15,16,17]. In our cohort, a definite alteration was found in 24% of children, thus confirming the role of the exam in the diagnostic process of pediatric-onset CA.
Lastly, the study proves the effectiveness of a laboratory investigations for conditions that may present with CA in the phenotype (and therefore genotype) definition (results summarized in Table A3). Abnormalities of serum AA, urinary AO, T-IEF, cholesterol, albumin, and AFP were found in a proportion of patients and in such cases unambiguously defined the disease group. It is important to remark that such exams may be repeated in children who lack diagnosis, as they can turn positive over time: in one of the two CDG brothers of the study, T-IEF was negative at onset (10 months), but became positive at the age of 6 years; this result allowed us to give a diagnosis in two children in which WES failed to find the molecular defect (as only one mutation in the CDG1L gene could be detected). Of note, negative results in muscle biopsy or normal serum lactate and pyruvate values should not be considered exclusion criteria of mitochondrial-based pathology, as demonstrated by the PCH6 patient, who both had values in the normal range, despite PCH6 being the only PCH with mitochondrial involvement. Mitochondrial diseases are among the most common cause of degenerative ataxia in children [16]. This is confirmed by our study, where the leading cause was DNA repair defect disorders, followed by mitochondrial diseases and SCA. It is therefore important to exclude all such conditions, also considering that pediatric SCA often does not show a nucleotide expansion pathogenic mechanism. Of importance, the Array-CGH was normal, confirming the poor role of cytogenetic in pediatric ataxias [18].
In conclusion, this study proposes a battery of investigations that it is useful to perform when approaching a child with cerebellar degeneration, based on a retrospective evaluation of a cohort. Beyond brain MRI, and especially in those patients who already underwent molecular analyses without a successful diagnosis, we support the use of neurophysiology and muscular biopsy, as they can at least allow a biochemical confirmation and narrow the field of genetic diagnosis. Additionally, we encourage performing metabolic investigations, as they are rapid and cost-effective and, when positive, they can be conclusive in resolving the diagnosis.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/5/2333/s1: Table S1: complete list of patients with genetic and clinical data, and results of all the performed exams.

Author Contributions

C.C. and S.D. conceptualized and wrote the paper draft; along with C.P., they are responsible for the data elaboration and clinical assessment of the patients. F.T., D.D.B., S.M., E.M.V., and V.N. performed the genetic analyses. E.L. and D.G. were in charge of the mitochondrial studies. All the authors critically revised the manuscript and agreed on its final version.

Funding

This research was funded by FONDAZIONE PIERFRANCO E LUISA MARIANI, grant number CM22 and CM23.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the patients and their families for collaboration during the diagnostic process.

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Table A1. Clinical examination.
Table A1. Clinical examination.
FEATURESMAIN DISEASES
GENERAL EXAMINATION
HCMicrocephaly (HC > +2 SD)35% (16/52)2/5 CDG, 1/1 CMT, 9/12 DNA repair (3/4 AOA, 5/5 Cockayne, 1/1 SCAR23), 1/2 Gillespie, 1/7 SCA, 3/3 PCH, 1/1 QARS1
Macrocephaly (HC < −2 SD)21% (11/52)1/1 FRDA, 2/2 HLD, 2/2 KIF1A, 1/1 Metabolic, 2/7 Mitochondrial, 1/3 NBIA, 2/7 SCA
Short stature
(H < −2 SD)
35% (18/52)1/5 CDG, 1/1 CMT, 7/12 DNA repair (2/4 AOA, 5/5 Cockayne), 2/2 HLD, 1/2 KIF1A, 2/7 Mitochondrial, 1/1 QARS1, 3/7 SCA
Underweight
(W < −2 SD)
33% (17/52)1/1 CMT, 7/12 DNA repair (1/4 AOA, 5/5 Cockayne, 1/1 SCAR23), 1/2 Gillespie, 1/2 HLD, 1/1 Metabolic, 1/7 Mitochondrial, 1/2 NCL, 1/3 PCH, 3/7 SCA
Facial dysmorphisms58% (30/52)
Physical malformations30% (16/52)Skeletal malformations25% (13/52)1/2 ARSACS, 2/5 CDG, 1/1 CMT, 4/12 DNA repair (1/4 AOA, 1/2 AT, 2/5 Cockayne), 2 Mitochondrial, 1/1 QARS1, 1/7 SCA, 1/1 Wolfram
Heart malformations4% (2/52)1/5 Cockayne, 1/2 NCL
Genitourinary malformations4% (2/52)1/5 CDG, 1/7 SCA
Eye malformations4% (2/52)2/2 Gillespie: Aniridia
NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION
Strabismus36% (19/52)Esotropia29% (15/52)4/5 CDG, 2/12 DNA repair (1/4 AOA, 1/5 Cockayne), 1/2 Gillespie, 2/2 HLD, 1/3 NBIA, 1/3 PCH, 4/7 SCA
Exotropia8% (4/52)3/12 DNA repair (2/5 Cockayne, 1/1 SCAR23), 1/3 NBIA
Oculomotor anomalies63% (32/51)
Orobuccal dyspraxia23% (12/52)
Dysphagia4% (2/52)
Hypotonia56% (29/52)
Ataxia80% (35/44)
Not assessable for severe deterioration15% (8/52)3/5 Cockayne, 1/2 NCL, 3/3 PCH, QARS1
Intention tremor34% (15/44)
Pyramidal system involvement65% (34/52)2/2 ARSACS, 11/12 DNA repair (4/4 AOA, 1/2 AT, 5/5 Cockayne, 1/1 SCAR23), 1/1 FRDA, 1/2 HLD, 1/1 Metabolic, 5/7 Mitochondrial, 2/3 NBIA, 2/2 NCL, 3/3 PCH, 1/1 QARS1, 3/7 SCA, 1/1 Wolfram
Extrapyramidal system involvement21% (11/52)Dyskinetic hyperkinetic movements4% (2/52)1/5 PCH, 1/7 SCA
Choreoatetoid movements2% (3/52)DNA repair (2/4 AOA, 1/2 AT)
Dystonia13% (7/52)1/5 Cockayne, 1/7 Mitochondrial, 2/3 NBIA, 1/3 PCH, 1/1 QARS1, 1/7 SCA
Hyporeflexia15% (8/52)1/1 CMT, 6/12 DNA repair (3/4 AOA, 3/5 Cockayne), 1/1 Wolfram
Neuropathy5/52 (10%)
Epilepsy25% (14/52)1/5 CDG, 5/12 DNA repair (2/4 AOA, 3/5 Cockayne, 1/1 SCAR23), 1/7 Mitochondrial, 1/3 NBIA, 2/2 NCL, 3/3 PCH, 1/7 SCA
Table A2. Brain MRI and neurophysiological exams.
Table A2. Brain MRI and neurophysiological exams.
FEATURES/EXAMMAIN DISEASES
BRAIN MRI
Cerebellar atrophy100%Global atrophy87% (45/52)
Isolated vermis atrophy13% (7/52)2/2 ARSACS, 1/5 CGD, 1/4 AOA, 1/1 FRDA, 2/7 SCA
Progression+70% (31/44)
-30% (13/44)2/2 ARSACS, 1/1 CMT, 1/1 FRDA, 1/2 Gillespie syndrome, 1/1 HLD, 1/2 KIF1A, 2/6 Mitochondrial, 1/2 PCH, 2/5 SCA, 1/1 Wolfram
Cerebellar T2 hyperintensities38% (20/52)Dentate nuclei13% (7/52)1/2 ARSACS, 1/5 CDG, 1/4 AOA, 1/1 Metabolic, 2/7 Mitochondrial, 1/3 NBIA
Cortex13% (7/52)2/12 DNA repair (1/2 AT, 1/1 SCAR23), 1/2 Gillespie, 2/7 Mitochondrial, 1/3 NBIA, 1/7 SCA
Dentate nuclei + Cortex12% (6/52)1/1 CMT, 1/4 AOA, 1/2 KIF1A, 1/7 Mitochondrial, 1/3 PCH, 1/7 SCA
Cerebellar hypoplasia12% (6/52)3/5 CDG, 3/3 PCH
Brainstem anomalies29% (15/52)Atrophy15% (8/52)1/2 ARSACS, 1/5 CDG, 2/5 Cockayne, 2/7 Mitochondrial, 1/3 NBIA, 2/7
Hypoplasia10% (5/52)1/5 CDG, 3/3 PCH, 1/7 SCA
Signal alterations8% (4/52)2/2 ARSACS, 1/7 Mitochondrial, 1/3 NBIA
Supratentorial anomalies38% (20/52)Atrophy29% (15/52)5/12 DNA repair (4/5 Cockayne, 1/1 SCAR23), 1/3 NBIA, 2/2 NCL, 1/1 QARS1
WM anomalies33% (17/52)1/2 ARSACS, 1/5 CDG, 4/5 Cockayne, 2/2 HLD, 1/1 Metabolic, 3/7 Mitochondrial, 1/3 NBIA, 2/2 NCL, 1/3 PCH, 1/7 SCA
NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL ALTERATIONS
EEG40% (21/52)
ERG8/47
VEP15/47
BAEP9/44
SSEP11/19
EMG10/27Neurogenic alteration9/101/2 ARSACS, 1/2 CMT, 4/12 DNA repair (2/4 AOA, 2/2 AT), 1/1 FRDA, 1/3 NBIA, 1/3 PCH
Myopathic alteration1/101/7 Mitochondrial
NCS13/352/2 ARSACS, 1/2 CMT, 8/12 DNA repair (4/4 AOA, 2/2 AT, 2/5 Cockayne), 1/1 FRDA, 1/7 Mitochondrial
Table A3. Laboratory tests.
Table A3. Laboratory tests.
Muscle BiopsyT-IEFCholesterol, Albumin, AFPSerum Lactate/PyruvateSAA, UOAArray-CGH
Performed
v48% (25/52)
Performed
81% (42/52)
Performed
81% (42/52)
Performed
81% (42/52)
Performed
85% (44/52)
Performed
50%(26/52)
Normal
48% (12/25)
Normal
90% (38/42)
Normal
86% (36/42)
Normal
90% (38/42)
Normal
93% (41/44)
Normal
81% (21/26)
Non specific 28% (7/25):
  • 3/7 minimal neurogenic alterations (1/4AOA, 1 SCAR23, 1 Metabolic)
  • 4/7 mild histological alterations (4/7 SCA)
Pattern I
10% (4/42)
→100% (4/4) of CDG
↑ AFP
12% (5/42)
→42% (5/12) of DNA repair defects
10% ↑Lactate (4/42):
  • 1 AOA
  • 1 Metabolic disorder
  • 1 Mitochondrial disease
  • 1 NBIA
2% AA alterations (1/44)
5% AO alterations (2/44):
  • 1 AOA: AA+AO
  • 1 Metabolic disorder: AO
  • 1 Mitochondrial disease: AO
VOUS
19% (5/26)
↓ respiratory chain complex activity
16% (4/25):
  • 2/4 ↓ complex I
  • 2/4 ↓ multicomplex
↓ Albumin
5% (2/42)
→17% (2/12) of DNA repair defects
Pathogenic
0
CoQ deficiency
8% (2/25)
↑ Cholesterol
3% (1/42)
→8% (1/12) of DNA repair defects
More specific informations can be found in Supplementary Materials—Table S1. Abbreviations legend: AFP: Alpha-FetoProtein; AOA: Ataxia with Oculomotor Apraxia; ARSACS: Autosomal Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay; BAEP: Brainstem Evoked Potentials; CDG: Congenital Disorders of Glycosilation; CMT: Charcot-Marie-Tooth; EEG; Electro Encephalogram, EMG: ElectroMyography; ERG: Electroretinogram; FRDA: Friedreich Ataxia; H: Height; HC: Head Circumference; HLD: Hypomyelinating Leukodystrophies; NBIA: Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation; NCL: Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis; NCS: Nerve Conduction Studies; PCH: Ponto-Crebellar Hypoplasia; SAA: Serum AminoAcids; SCA: SpinoCerebellar Ataxias; SCAR23: SpinoCerebellar Ataxia Recessive 23; SD: Standard Deviations; SSEP: SomatoSensorial Evoked Potentials; T-IEF: Transferrin Isoelectric Focusing; UOA: Urinary Organic Acids; VEP: Visual Evoked Potentials; W: Weight.

References

  1. Boltshauser, E. Cerebellum—Small brain but large confusion: A review of selected cerebellar malformations and disruptions. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2004, 126, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Poretti, A.; Wolf, N.I.; Boltshauser, E. Differential diagnosis of cerebellar atrophy in childhood. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2008, 12, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Poretti, A.; Wolf, N.I.; Boltshauser, E. Differential Diagnosis of Cerebellar Atrophy in Childhood: An Update. Neuropediatrics 2015, 46, 359–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Barkovich, A.J.; Millen, K.J.; Dobyns, W.B. A developmental and genetic classification for midbrain-hindbrain malformations. Brain 2009, 132 Pt 12, 3199–3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bodranghien, F.; Bastian, A.; Casali, C.; Hallett, M.; Louis, E.D.; Manto, M.; Mariën, P.; Nowak, D.A.; Schmahmann, J.D.; Serrao, M.; et al. Consensus Paper: Revisiting the Symptoms and Signs of Cerebellar Syndrome. Cerebellum 2016, 15, 369–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Blaser, S.I.; Steinlin, M.; Al-Maawali, A.; Yoon, G. The Pediatric Cerebellum in Inherited Neurodegenerative Disorders: A Pattern-recognition Approach. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 2016, 26, 373–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Beaudin, M.; Matilla-Dueñas, A.; Soong, B.W.; Pedroso, J.L.; Barsottini, O.G.; Mitoma, H.; Tsuji, S.; Schmahmann, J.D.; Manto, M.; Rouleau, G.A.; et al. The Classification of Autosomal Recessive Cerebellar Ataxias: A Consensus Statement from the Society for Research on the Cerebellum and Ataxias Task Force. Cerebellum 2019, 18, 1098–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Al-Maawali, A.; Blaser, S.; Yoon, G. Diagnostic approach to childhood-onset cerebellar atrophy: A 10-year retrospective study of 300 patients. J. Child Neurol. 2012, 27, 1121–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Brandsma, R.; Verschuuren-Bemelmans, C.C.; Amrom, D.; Barisic, N.; Baxter, P.; Bertini, E.; Blumkin, L.; Brankovic-Sreckovic, V.; Brouwer, O.F.; Bürk, K.; et al. A clinical diagnostic algorithm for early onset cerebellar ataxia. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2019, 23, 692–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Leto, K.; Arancillo, M.; Becker, E.B.; Buffo, A.; Chiang, C.; Ding, B.; Dobyns, W.B.; Dusart, I.; Haldipur, P.; Hatten, M.E.; et al. Consensus Paper: Cerebellar Development. Cerebellum 2016, 15, 789–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Glamuzina, E.; Brown, R.; Hogarth, K.; Saunders, D.; Russell-Eggitt, I.; Pitt, M.; de Sousa, C.; Rahman, S.; Brown, G.; Grunewald, S. Further delineation of pontocerebellar hypoplasia type 6 due to mutations in the gene encoding mitochondrial arginyl-tRNA synthetase, RARS2. J. Inherit Metab. Dis. 2012, 35, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bird, T.D. Hereditary Ataxia Overview. 1998 Oct 28 [updated 2019 July 25]. In GeneReviews® [Internet]; Adam, M.P., Ardinger, H.H., Pagon, R.A., Wallace, S.E., Bean, L.J.H., Stephens, K., Amemiya, A., Eds.; University of Washington: Seattle, WA, USA, 1993–2020. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1138/ (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  14. Gatti, M.; Magri, S.; Nanetti, L.; Sarto, E.; Di Bella, D.; Salsano, E.; Pantaleoni, C.; Mariotti, C.; Taroni, F. From congenital microcephaly to adult onset cerebellar ataxia: Distinct and overlapping phenotypes in patients with PNKP gene mutations. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2019, 179, 2277–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alves, C.A.P.F.; Fragoso, D.C.; Gonçalves, F.G.; Marussi, V.H.; Amaral, L.L.F.D. Cerebellar Ataxia in Children: A Clinical and MRI Approach to the Differential Diagnosis. Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018, 27, 275–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bargiela, D.; Shanmugarajah, P.; Lo, C.; Blakely, E.L.; Taylor, R.W.; Horvath, R.; Wharton, S.; Chinnery, P.F.; Hadjivassiliou, M. Mitochondrial pathology in progressive cerebellar ataxia. Cerebellum Ataxias 2015, 2, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Terracciano, A.; Renaldo, F.; Zanni, G.; D’Amico, A.; Pastore, A.; Barresi, S.; Valente, E.M.; Piemonte, F.; Tozzi, G.; Carrozzo, R.; et al. The use of muscle biopsy in the diagnosis of undefined ataxia with cerebellar atrophy in children. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2012, 16, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Ciaccio, C.; Pantaleoni, C.; Bulgheroni, S.; Sciacca, F.; D’Arrigo, S. Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Has a Poor Diagnostic Yield in Children with Developmental Delay/Intellectual Disability When Concurrent Cerebellar Anomalies Are Present. Cerebellum 2020, 19, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Distribution of diagnosis in the 52-patient cohort. Abbreviations legend: ARSACS: Autosomal Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay; CDG: Congenital Disorders of Glycosilation; CMT: Charcot-Marie-Tooth; HLD: Hypomyelinating Leukodystrophies; NBIA: Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation; NCL: Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis; PCH: Ponto-Crebellar Hypoplasia; SCA: SpinoCerebellar Ataxias.
Figure 1. Distribution of diagnosis in the 52-patient cohort. Abbreviations legend: ARSACS: Autosomal Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay; CDG: Congenital Disorders of Glycosilation; CMT: Charcot-Marie-Tooth; HLD: Hypomyelinating Leukodystrophies; NBIA: Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation; NCL: Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis; PCH: Ponto-Crebellar Hypoplasia; SCA: SpinoCerebellar Ataxias.
Applsci 11 02333 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of Height (H), Weight (W), and Head Circumference (HC) within the cohort. Note that more than 70% of children have global parameters in the lower half of Standard Deviations (SD) and more than 30% are below the normality range for all parameters, especially for H.
Figure 2. Distribution of Height (H), Weight (W), and Head Circumference (HC) within the cohort. Note that more than 70% of children have global parameters in the lower half of Standard Deviations (SD) and more than 30% are below the normality range for all parameters, especially for H.
Applsci 11 02333 g002
Figure 3. Proposed diagnostic flowchart for children with cerebellar atrophy. Abbreviations legend: ARSACS: Autosomal Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay; CDG: Congenital Disorders of Glycosilation; DM I: Diabetes Mellitus type I; NBIA: Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation; NCL: Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis; PCH: Ponto-Crebellar Hypoplasia; SCA: SpinoCerebellar Ataxias.
Figure 3. Proposed diagnostic flowchart for children with cerebellar atrophy. Abbreviations legend: ARSACS: Autosomal Recessive Spastic Ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay; CDG: Congenital Disorders of Glycosilation; DM I: Diabetes Mellitus type I; NBIA: Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation; NCL: Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis; PCH: Ponto-Crebellar Hypoplasia; SCA: SpinoCerebellar Ataxias.
Applsci 11 02333 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ciaccio, C.; Pantaleoni, C.; Taroni, F.; Di Bella, D.; Magri, S.; Lamantea, E.; Ghezzi, D.; Valente, E.M.; Nigro, V.; D’Arrigo, S. A Clinical-Based Diagnostic Approach to Cerebellar Atrophy in Children. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2333. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052333

AMA Style

Ciaccio C, Pantaleoni C, Taroni F, Di Bella D, Magri S, Lamantea E, Ghezzi D, Valente EM, Nigro V, D’Arrigo S. A Clinical-Based Diagnostic Approach to Cerebellar Atrophy in Children. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(5):2333. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052333

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ciaccio, Claudia, Chiara Pantaleoni, Franco Taroni, Daniela Di Bella, Stefania Magri, Eleonora Lamantea, Daniele Ghezzi, Enza Maria Valente, Vincenzo Nigro, and Stefano D’Arrigo. 2021. "A Clinical-Based Diagnostic Approach to Cerebellar Atrophy in Children" Applied Sciences 11, no. 5: 2333. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052333

APA Style

Ciaccio, C., Pantaleoni, C., Taroni, F., Di Bella, D., Magri, S., Lamantea, E., Ghezzi, D., Valente, E. M., Nigro, V., & D’Arrigo, S. (2021). A Clinical-Based Diagnostic Approach to Cerebellar Atrophy in Children. Applied Sciences, 11(5), 2333. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052333

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop