Next Article in Journal
A Method for Correcting the Interference of Overlapping Absorption Lines Using Second Harmonic Spectral Reconstruction
Previous Article in Journal
INSPECTORMAP: A Spatial Data Infrastructure Applied to the Maintenance of Solar Plants Using Free Satellite Imagery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Numerical Infeasibilities of Nanofibrous Mats Process Design
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antibacterial and Biodegradable Electrospun Filtering Membranes for Facemasks: An Attempt to Reduce Disposable Masks Use

1
Centre for Textile Science and Technology (2C2T), University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
2
Centro de Investigação da Academia Militar (CINAMIL), Unidade Militar Laboratorial de Defesa Biológica e Química (UMLDBQ, Instituto Universitário Militar), Av. Dr. Alfredo Bensaúde, 1849-012 Lisboa, Portugal
3
CEB—Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(1), 67; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010067
Submission received: 3 December 2021 / Revised: 14 December 2021 / Accepted: 17 December 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021

Abstract

:
Due to the prevalence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the demand for disposable facemasks has become a global issue. Unfortunately, the use of these products has negative effects on the environment, and therefore, the use of biodegradable materials is a powerful strategy to overcome this challenge. Aligned with this concept, in this work, biodegradable facemasks were developed using poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) polymer and cotton natural fibers. The filter layer was produced using an electrospinning technique, since electrospun membranes present remarkable characteristics for air filtration. The electrospun membranes were functionalized with different nanoparticles (NPs), including silver (Ag), titanium dioxide (TiO2) and magnesium oxide (MgO), in order to include new properties, namely antibacterial effect. The developed membranes were characterized by FESEM, EDS, ATR-FTIR, GSDR and TGA, which confirmed the successful impregnation of NPs onto PCL membranes. The antibacterial effect and filtration efficiency were assessed, with the PCL/MgO NPs membrane presenting better results, showing inhibition zone diameters of 25.3 and 13.5 mm against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively, and filtration efficiency of 99.4%. Three facemask prototypes were developed, and their filtration efficiency, air permeability and thermal comfort were evaluated. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of PCL/NPs electrospun membranes to act as an active and biodegradable filter layer in facemasks.

1. Introduction

The sudden outburst of the COVID-19 pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has contributed to the extensive production and consumption of facemasks worldwide, creating a new and serious environmental challenge. Facemasks are generally composed of nonbiodegradable polymers, such as polypropylene, polyethylene, polyurethane, polystyrene, polycarbonate and polyacrylonitrile, and the disposal of these facemasks generates a large amount of waste, causing severe ecological problems and becoming a new source of microplastics [1,2].
Therefore, researchers have been looking for innovative strategies to develop facemasks with a similar or better performance to the existing nonbiodegradable ones, to minimize the negative environmental impact. One sustainable option is the exploitation of green chemistry as well as the replacement of conventional materials with eco-friendly ones, such as natural fibers and biodegradable polymers [2,3,4].
Recently, the electrospinning technique has acquired tremendous focus for the development of high-performance filters. This technique enables the production of fibers with diameters ranging from micrometers to nanometers, which show significant morphological advantages over current conventional filters. Moreover, the cost effectiveness, simplicity of use, versatility of using different biodegradable natural or synthetic materials and possibility of scalability make electrospinning more competitive and attractive compared to conventional nonwoven manufacturing methods [5,6]. In fact, electrospun fibers exhibit outstanding properties, such as a high specific surface area, which results in the higher adsorption capacity of contaminants, controllable small diameters, highly porous structure with small pore sizes and internal interconnectivity, flexibility and possibility of functionalization with active agents. Due to their low weight and high permeability, these fibrous membranes provide high filtration efficiency, without adding extra weight and maintaining the wearer’s comfort and breathability [7,8,9,10].
To date, several polymers have been used to produce membranes by electrospinning for air filtration applications. As already mentioned, to face the accumulation of plastics in the environment, the use of biodegradable polymers is preferable [4]. Among them, synthetic PCL polymer has been demonstrated as a promising candidate for filtration applications, due to its low cost, biocompatibility, biodegradability, availability, excellent mechanical properties and ease of operation [11,12,13].
Besides acting as a physical barrier to prevent the penetration of small particles and microorganisms, electrospun membranes can be functionalized with several materials in order to achieve new functions, such as antimicrobial activity. Microorganisms can reach the surface of the mask, fail to be destroyed and then penetrate the filter layer, which compromises the protection of the wearer. Therefore, the development of facemasks able not only to act as a barrier for the particles and microorganisms but also to actively degrade them is crucial [14].
One possible approach to develop active filter layers is by the addition of antimicrobial agents, such as NPs. Their nanoscale size and large surface area-to-volume ratio give NPs unique characteristics, improving their catalytic, magnetic, mechanical and optical properties [15,16]. Several metal and metal oxide NPs, such as Ag, TiO2 and MgO, have been explored as effective antimicrobial agents against several microorganisms, such as bacteria, viruses and fungi [17,18]. With the increasing concern about bacterial resistance, other alternatives to the use of antibiotics are required. In this way, NPs arise as suitable options since their mechanisms of action are different from traditional antibiotics [19,20]. Furthermore, Ag [21], TiO2 [22] and MgO [23] NPs are already shown to increase the filtration efficiency of electrospun membranes. Therefore, the combination of antimicrobial NPs with electrospun membranes is a very promising strategy to improve the overall performance of the facemasks, namely the filtration efficiency as well as elimination of microorganisms [5,18,22].
The incorporation of the materials into electrospun fibers can be carried out using different techniques, namely the surface functionalization. In this method, the electrospun membranes are firstly produced, and then functionalized with the desirable materials in order to obtain improved properties. Using the surface functionalization method, the NPs stay available at the surface of the fibers instead of within them [24]. This also reduces the costs compared to the conventional inclusion approaches, due to the use of fewer nanomaterials for an equivalent efficacy and fine-tuning of surface properties [25].
Thus, the aim of this work involves the development of an active, fully biodegradable facemask which is able not only to exhibit high filtration efficiency but also to degrade the microorganisms, taking advantage of the biodegradability and excellent properties of natural fibers and biopolymers. The first part of the work was focused on the development of PCL electrospun membranes functionalized with different types of NPs (Ag, TiO2 and MgO) to act as the filter layer. Ag NPs were synthetized using a green methodology, whereas commercial TiO2 and MgO NPs were used. All the developed membranes were characterized by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS), Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), Ground State Diffuse Reflectance (GSDR) and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA). The functional properties were also evaluated, including the antibacterial activity and the filtration efficiency. Finally, the PCL/NPs electrospun membranes with the most promising results were selected for the production of a facemask prototype, using cotton natural fiber for the inner and outer mask layers. Three different configurations of facemasks were evaluated regarding their filtration efficiency, air permeability and thermal comfort.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

PCL pellets (molecular weight of 80,000 g/mol) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Chloroform (CHF) and N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) were provided by Honeywell and Sigma Aldrich, respectively. Commercial NPs (TiO2 and MgO) were acquired from Sigma Aldrich. For the synthesis of Ag NPs, silver nitrate (AgNO3) and poly(ethyleneglycol) (PEG) Mr ~200 were provided by Scharlau.

2.2. Preparation of PCL Polymer Solution

PCL polymer solutions were prepared according to the procedure described by Francavilla et al. [13], using 15% (w/v) of PCL in CHF/DMF (4:1). Firstly, PCL pellets were dissolved in CHF and stirred at 35 °C for at least 2 h, until their complete dissolution. Afterwards, DMF was added to the polymer solution and left under stirring overnight.

2.3. Electrospinning Process

PCL solution was electrospun in electrospinning NF-103 equipment from MECC Co., Ltd. (Fukuoka, Japan). The polymer solution was transferred into a 24 mL syringe accoupled to a needle with diameter of 0.61 mm. A static metallic collector was used to collect the electrospun membranes. The final processing conditions used to produce defect-free fibers are shown in Table 1.

2.4. Functionalization of PCL Electrospun Membranes with NPs

After the production of PCL membranes by electrospinning, the developed membranes were impregnated in a solution containing the NPs. Three different types of NPs were used: Ag, TiO2 and MgO. Ag NPs were synthesized using a green methodology described by Ferreira et al. [26], whereas commercial TiO2 and MgO NPs were utilized. A schematic flow chart of the whole process is represented in Figure 1.

2.4.1. Synthesis of Ag NPs and Their Impregnation into PCL Membranes

Ag NPs were synthetized according to a sustainable methodology described by Ferreira et al. [26], where AgNO3 was used as the precursor agent and PEG as nontoxic reducing agent, stabilizer and dispersant. Firstly, 0.04 M AgNO3 was dissolved in PEG under constant stirring for 2 h at room temperature (RT). The color change of the solution to yellow indicates the reduction of Ag ions to Ag metal (Ag0), thus demonstrating the formation of NPs. Afterwards, the solution was placed in an ultrasound bath for 1 h. After this, PCL electrospun membranes were immersed in this solution under orbital agitation for 1 h at RT. The membranes were removed from the impregnation solution and dried at RT. Subsequently, PCL/Ag NPs membranes were washed with distilled water at 50 rpm for 5 min, to remove the superficial excess of NPs.

2.4.2. Impregnation of TiO2 and MgO NPs into PCL Membranes

The impregnation solutions were prepared by adding 3% (w/v) of each type of NPs, TiO2 and MgO, in ethanol. Next, the solutions were placed in an ultrasound bath for 1 h. Subsequently, the PCL electrospun membranes were immersed into the impregnation solution containing the NPs and stirred in an orbital shaker at 80 rpm for 1 h. The PCL membranes were allowed to dry at RT overnight, followed by washing with distilled water at 50 rpm for 5 min.

2.5. Characterization of Electrospun Membranes

2.5.1. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS)

The morphology of the developed electrospun fibers as well as the presence and distribution of NPs onto them were evaluated by FESEM, using NOVA 200 Nano SEM, FEI Company (Hillsboro, OR, USA). The electrospun membranes were removed from the aluminum foil and coated with a very thin film (20 nm) of Au-Pd (80–20 weight%), using a high-resolution sputter coater, 208 HR Cressington Company (Watford, UK), coupled to a MTM-20 Cressington High Resolution Thickness Controller. Secondary electron images, i.e., topographic images, were performed at acceleration voltage of 10 kV. The FESEM images were analyzed and the diameters of fibers were determined using Image J 1.53a software (Wayne Rasband—National Institutes of Health, USA), through the measurement in 100 different locations. The EDS technique (Hillsboro, OR, USA) coupled to FESEM was also performed to evaluate the elemental composition of the samples, using an EDAX Si (Li) detector with 15 kV of acceleration voltage.

2.5.2. Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR)

Chemical composition of electrospun membranes was evaluated by ATR-FTIR analysis using an IRAffinity-S1, SHIMADZU equipment (Kyoto, Japan). Each spectrum was obtained in transmittance mode, by accumulation of 45 scanning cycles and with a resolution of 8 cm−1, in a range between 400 and 4000 cm−1.

2.5.3. Ground State Diffuse Reflectance (GSDR)

To verify the formation and the presence of Ag, TiO2 and MgO NPs onto the PCL membranes, GSDR analysis was performed using a Spectrophotometer UV-2600 Shimadzu. The samples were analyzed in different places to ensure homogeneity. The reflectance spectra were acquired in the range of 200–800 nm, and the remission function (F(R)) was calculated accordingly with the Kubelka–Munk equation:
F R = ( 1 R ) 2 2 R = K S  
where R is the reflectance, K is the absorption coefficient and S is the dispersion coefficient [27].

2.5.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

TGA analysis was performed using a STA 700 SCANSCI (Tokyo, Japan), in order to estimate the quantity of NPs presented in each sample. The electrospun membranes were subjected to a heating process from 25 to 600 °C, under nitrogen atmosphere, with a constant heating rate of 10 °C/min. The percentage of NPs was calculated according to the system of equations [28]:
N P s   % + P C L   m e m b r a n e   %   ( P C L   m e m b r a n e   r e s i d u e s   % 100 ) = s a m p l e   t o t a l   r e s i d u e s   % N P s   % + P C L   m e m b r a n e   % = 100 %
Considering that the NPs have residues of 100% and the sample with NPs after thermal treatment is composed of NPs and PCL membrane residue.

2.5.5. Thickness

The samples’ thickness was measured using a digital caliper. Three different positions of each electrospun membranes were recorded and the average thickness was determined.

2.6. Functional Properties Evaluation

2.6.1. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity of electrospun membranes was assessed through the halo inhibition method. The inoculum was prepared by adding in a sterile medium a portion of the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 (as representative of Gram-positive bacteria) or Escherichia coli CECT 434 (as representative of Gram-negative bacteria) to 40 mL of TSB (Tryptic soy broth). The bacteria grew in an orbital incubator at 37 °C, with orbital shaking at 120 rpm, overnight (18 h). Then, the cell suspension was adjusted to a final concentration of approximately 1 × 108 CFU/mL, determined from the optical density at 620 nm.
In the antimicrobial susceptibility test, on a Petri dish containing 15 mL of Plate Count Agar (PCA), 0.1 mL of the bacterial solution (1 × 108 CFU/mL) was spread over the dry agar. After drying, samples of 1 × 1 cm2 were placed in the center of each Petri dish on the agar surface and incubated at 37 °C. Measurements of the bacterial growth inhibition zone were taken after 24 h of incubation time. This test was repeated three times in triplicate.

2.6.2. Filtration Capacity

The filtration tests were performed in a cylindrical acrylic chamber (Ø = 194 mm × length= 400 mm) developed for the controlled release of particles and mounted inside a 1 m3 negative pressure flexible isolator (SolocontainmentTM,Cheshire, UK), to avoid the hazardous exposition of technicians to aerosolized particles during tests. Polystyrene beads (Ø = 1 µm, COUNT-CAL™ Count Precision Size Standards Thermo Fisher) were aerosolized using a medical nebulizer (OMRON C28P) with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min to obtain a final amount of particles between 1 × 106 and 4 × 106 inside the aerosolization compartment of the acrylic chamber. The number of particles were measured in real time using a laser particle counter (APEX R4 airborne particle counter, LighthouseTM, Fremont, CA, USA) installed above the aerosolization compartment of the chamber. The testing membranes were mounted in a leak tight sample port positioned above the aerosolization compartment and inside the counting compartment of the acrylic chamber, where the inlet of the laser particle counter was installed. Polystyrene particles released inside the aerosolization compartment were aspirated through the sample port at a rate of 28.2 L/min and measured three times during 20 s for a total of 60 s. The acrylic chamber was cleaned between tests using a HEPA vacuum cleaner (KARCHERTM A2204, Winnenden, Germany) and the cutoff value to consider the chamber clean for tests was below 4000 particles. A blank measurement between cleaning procedures and sample loading was performed, to count the residual amount of particles inside the acrylic chamber. The acrylic chamber used to perform these tests is shown in Figure 2.

2.6.3. Air Permeability

The air permeability of electrospun membranes was performed by quantification of the rate of airflow through a 20 cm2 area passage at a pressure of 40 Pa for 1 min, using FX3300 Air Permeabillity Tester III, TexTest instrument (WanJiang, Dongguan, China).

2.6.4. Thermal Management

The experiment was performed using a Thermal Imaging Camera Testo 885. The participants were tested using different facemask’s prototypes: (i) Cotton + Cotton; (ii) Cotton + PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton and (iii) Cotton + 2 × PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton. Two conditions were evaluated, including during inhalation and exhalation. After an initial stabilization time, thermal images were taken and the changes in facial temperature were recorded in three different locations: nose, mouth and cheek. During the test, the participants were seated and in silence. The temperature range of the camera was defined in 24–36.5 °C.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the Developed Electrospun Membranes

3.1.1. FESEM Analysis

In order to evaluate the surface morphology and diameters of the developed electrospun fibers as well as the presence of NPs, FESEM analysis was performed (Figure 3).
As shown in Figure 3a, defect-free PCL fibers were successfully developed with average diameters of 1.81 μm. Figure 3b represents the PCL membranes impregnated with Ag NPs, where the presence of these NPs with some agglomerates onto the fibers is clearly visible. In this case, the Ag NPs were synthetized through the reduction of AgNO3 by PEG, which also acted as a stabilizer and dispersing agent [26,28], this being the solution used to impregnate the PCL membranes. Thus, by these images it is possible to confirm the successful synthesis of Ag NPs as well as their attachment to the PCL electrospun membranes. A decrease in fibers’ diameters was observed with the incorporation of Ag NPs (1.78 μm). From Figure 3c,d, it is also possible to detect the presence of NPs covering the fibers’ surface, which correspond to TiO2 and MgO NPs, respectively. Additionally, a more dense and uniform deposition was observed using TiO2 NPs. The impregnation with TiO2 and MgO NPs led to a slight increase in fibers’ diameters to 2.09 and 2.02 μm, respectively.

3.1.2. EDS, ATR-FTIR, GSDR and TGA Analyses

To further confirm the synthesis of Ag NPs as well as the impregnation of Ag, TiO2 and MgO NPs onto PCL electrospun membranes, other techniques, such as EDS, ATR-FTIR and GSDR were performed. Moreover, TGA was also used to quantify the amount of NPs present in each sample. The results are shown in Figure 4.
The successful impregnation of the NPs onto the surface of PCL membranes was further confirmed by EDS analysis. Figure 4e shows the presence of peaks related to carbon and oxygen, which are the constituent elements of PCL polymer. An additional strong peak appeared at 2.98 keV, which corresponds to silver, confirming the successfully synthesis and impregnation of Ag NPs on PCL fibers’ surface [26,28]. The EDS spectrum from Figure 4b demonstrates the characteristic peaks of titanium element at 4.51 and 4.94 keV, which together with the presence of oxygen element confirms the presence of TiO2 NPs [29,30]. Finally, the presence of oxygen and magnesium was detected in EDS profile of PCL/MgO NPs membranes at 0.52 and 1.27 keV, respectively, indicating the presence of MgO NPs [31,32].
Regarding the ATR-FTIR analysis, PCL spectrum shows the typical bands of this polymer, with the main ones described as follows. The bands at 2941 and 2866 cm−1 correspond to the asymmetric and symmetric CH2 stretching, respectively. A strong band at 1724 cm−1 is related with carbonyl (C = O) stretching. Finally, the bands at 1470, 1240 and 1169 cm−1 are attributed to C-C bending, asymmetric C–O–C stretching and symmetric C–O–C stretching, respectively. The band at 1294 cm−1 is from C-O and C-C stretching in the crystalline phase, while the one at 1105 cm−1 corresponds to C-O and C-C stretching in the amorphous phase [33,34]. Considering the spectrum of PCL membranes functionalized with PEG-coated Ag NPs, besides the characteristic bands of PCL, the appearance of a new one at 887 cm−1 is observed, which is attributed to PEG polymer [26,28]. Other typical bands of PEG coincide with the region of characteristic bands of PCL, and only detect an increase in bands’ intensity (1240 and 961 cm−1). Moreover, in the spectrum of PCL membranes with Ag-PEG NPs, a broad peak appeared at 3435 cm−1, which is attributed to stretching vibrations of O-H. This could be due to hydroxyl groups of PEG [35], or could indicate intermolecular hydrogen bonding formed between the groups from PCL and the hydroxyl groups from PEG [26].
The spectrum of TiO2 powder shows a characteristic band in the region of 900–400 cm−1, which is attributed to Ti–O stretching vibration. Besides presenting the typical bands of PCL, the PCL/TiO2 NPs spectrum also demonstrates the presence of a new band in this region, confirming successful incorporation of TiO2 NPs onto PCL membranes [36,37]. The spectrum of commercial MgO NPs shows a band around 800–400 cm−1, which corresponds to Mg-O stretching vibrations [31,38,39,40]. The appearance of the band in the region of 800–400 cm−1 in the spectrum of PCL/MgO NPs fibers is observed, confirming the presence of these NPs into the PCL membranes’ surface.
Figure 4e shows the GSDR spectra of PCL/NPs electrospun membranes. Compared to the PCL spectrum, the spectrum of PCL/Ag NPs reveals the appearance of the absorption band characteristic of Ag NPs formation, resulting from the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of Ag NPs, peaking at 413 nm [26,28]. This result indicates the successful synthesis and attachment of Ag NPs onto PCL membranes. On the other hand, a new absorption band at approximately 380 nm, characteristic of TiO2 NPs [41,42], is observed in the spectrum of PCL/TiO2 NPs membranes, once again confirming the presence of these NPs onto the PCL surface. Finally, a very small absorption band seems to appear around 277 nm in the spectrum of PCL/MgO NPs when compared to the PCL spectrum, which is probably related to the presence of the MgO NPs on the membranes’ surfaces [43,44].
Finally, TGA analysis was performed in order to estimate the amount of NPs impregnated in PCL electrospun membranes (Figure 4f). The samples were heated to 600 °C and the residues obtained at the end of the heating process were considered, being the amount of each type of NPs calculated using equation 2 [27,28]. PCL membranes presented 2.48 wt% of residues while PCL/Ag NPs, PCL/TiO2 NPs and PCL/MgO NPs revealed 2.98, 5.49 and 6.18 wt%, respectively. Assuming that the final sample is composed of PCL and NPs, the percentage of NPs presented onto the membranes’ surface is approximately 0.512, 3.09 and 3.79%, respectively. The estimated amount of commercial NPs (TiO2 and MgO) NPs detected in PCL membranes was higher than the amount of synthetized Ag NPs. This finding could be related with the in situ synthesis of Ag NPs. Contrary to the impregnation solutions containing the commercial NPs, where the added amount of NPs is known, the impregnation solution of Ag NPs was the synthesis solution, where the amount of synthetized NPs is unknown. Since during the synthesis process some losses can occur, including the possibility of not all the precursors being reduced to produce the NPs, it is expected that the PCL/Ag NPs electrospun membranes present the lowest amount of NPs when compared to membranes containing the commercial NPs.
All of these techniques were able to confirm the successful functionalization of PCL electrospun membranes with three different types of NPs.

3.2. Functional Properties Evaluation

3.2.1. Antibacterial Effect

The antibacterial effect is a very important parameter, since the survivability of microorganisms on the facemask surface can compromise the protection of the wearer and become a source of fomite transmission. Therefore, the development of active facemasks with antibacterial properties is crucial to kill or deactivate microorganisms in addition to particle filtration [45]. The antibacterial effect was assessed by the formation of a halo around the samples, which indicates the absence of bacteria growth, the size of the halo being proportional to antibacterial effect level [28]. The antibacterial tests were performed against Gram-positive (S. aureus) and Gram-negative (E. coli) bacteria, and the results are described in Table 2.
As expected, PCL membranes did not present any antibacterial effect [46]. On the contrary, inhibition zones were formed using PCL/NPs membranes, except when using PCL/TiO2 NPs sample for E. coli. In fact, several NPs, including metal and metal oxide NPs, exhibit antibacterial effect against a broad spectrum of bacteria, the main antimicrobial mechanisms proposed being: (i) disruption of the bacterial cell membrane; (ii) generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS); (iii) penetration of the bacterial cell membrane and (iv) interactions with DNA, RNA, proteins and lipids, resulting in bacteria death [18,20].
PCL/Ag NPs electrospun membranes exhibited an inhibition zone diameter of 18.3 and 16.5 mm for S. aureus and E. coli, respectively. Ag NPs are well recognized as an effective antibacterial agent [28,47]. In fact, Ag NPs can adhere to the bacterial cell membrane, altering its permeability, causing structural changes and functional damage. Moreover, Ag+ ions released from NPs can interact with intracellular components of bacteria, leading to their destruction. Ag NPs are also able to produce ROS [48]. Thomas et al. also demonstrated that PCL electrospun membranes functionalized with synthetized Ag NPs exhibited antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus [46].
On the other hand, PCL/TiO2 NPs samples only demonstrated antibacterial effect against Gram-positive bacteria, with the size of the halo at 18.7 mm. This is in accordance with other works, which also found that Gram-positive bacteria were more susceptible to TiO2 NPs than Gram-negative, which could be due to the distinct structure of the bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria have a thin peptidoglycan layer, which is surrounded by an outer membrane layer composed by proteins, lipids and lipopolysaccharides, whereas Gram-positive bacteria present one thick peptidoglycan layer which contains a mixture of lipoteichoic acid and glucose with amino acids [30,49]. The higher amount of negatively charged peptidoglycans in Gram-positive bacteria can make them more susceptible to positively charged antimicrobials [27].
Finally, PCL/MgO NPs membranes exhibited an antibacterial effect against both S. aureus and E. coli bacteria, showing the highest inhibition zone for Gram-positive bacteria (25.3 mm) when compared to the other samples. Once again, the antibacterial effect was more pronounced on Gram-positive compared to Gram-negative bacteria. The main proposed mechanism of MgO NPs for bacterial lysis is the generation of ROS, which results in excessive oxidative stress, causing cell damage. The release of Mg2+ ions from NPs can also contribute to the ROS production [50]. Liu et al. showed that PCL/gelatin/MgO NPs electrospun membranes presented antibacterial effect against E. coli, S. aureus and S. epidermidis, being this effect proportional to the amount of MgO NPs incorporated [51]. Dehghan et al. also demonstrated that MgO NPs addition to polyacrylonitrile (PAN) electrospun membranes enhanced their antibacterial effect [23].

3.2.2. Filtration Efficiency

Filtration efficiency is one of the main concerns regarding the performance of a facemask. After the evaluation of antibacterial effect, the filtration performance of electrospun membranes was also assessed. The filtration tests were conducted in a filtration chamber using polystyrene particles of 1 µm for 60 s. The obtained results are presented in Table 3 as well as the samples’ thickness and basis weight.
PCL membranes showed a filtration efficiency of 84.9%. The addition of NPs onto electrospun membranes is expected to improve their adsorption capacity, enhancing the overall filtration performance of the membranes [22,52].
Nevertheless, the introduction of Ag NPs onto PCL membranes led to a decrease in filtration efficiency to 70.8%. Comparing all samples, the membranes functionalized with Ag NPs presented the lowest filtration efficiency. On contrary to TiO2 and MgO NPs, Ag NPs were synthetized, and the synthesis solution was used to impregnate PCL membranes. In fact, this result can be related with the synthesis process of these NPs, namely the amount of NPs produced and present at the membrane surface. Although the concentration of AgNO3 used was estimated to mimic the final concentration of TiO2 and MgO NPs used, the exact amount of synthetized Ag NPs is unknown. Since the addition of NPs onto the surface of electrospun membranes can increase the adsorption capacity of the system, contributing to the filtration performance, this could be one of the parameters that influence the filtration efficiency [22]. By TGA analysis, it is possible to have an estimation of the amount of NPs present in electrospun membranes, with the PCL/Ag NPs membrane being the one that presented the lowest amount of NPs, which corroborates these findings. Moreover, the impregnation of PCL membranes into the synthesis solution could interfere with the membrane’s structure, including its integrity and pore sizes.
On the other hand, the incorporation of TiO2 and MgO NPs promoted an increase in filtration efficiency, presenting values of 86 and 99.4%, respectively. Several parameters regulate the filtration effectiveness, such as fiber diameter, porosity and filter thickness [53]. One possible explanation is due to the changes in diameters of PCL fibers when these NPs are added. In fact, the introduction of TiO2 NPs led to a slight increase in average diameters of PCL fibers from 1.81 to 2.09 µm, whereas the addition of MgO NPs increased the diameters to 2.02 µm. Consequently, a decrease in pore sizes is expected, promoting a higher filtration efficiency of the particles. Therefore, the functionalization of PCL membranes with TiO2 and MgO NPs was demonstrated to be a promising strategy to efficiently filtrate small particles.
Wang et al. reported that the addition of TiO2 NPs into poly(lactic acid) (PLA) electrospun membranes promoted an increase in the filtration efficiency. This result could be due to the increase in nanometer-scale protrusions induced by the introduction of NPs, which can also enhance the surface roughness and specific surface area. This may dramatically increase the friction coefficient and the effective contact area between the target particles and fibers [22]. Therefore, the increase in filtration efficiency of PCL membranes functionalized with TiO2 and MgO NPs could be due to the increase in surface roughness and specific surface area enhancing the trapping capacity of the fibers on the particles.
Although membranes with higher thickness and basis weight are associated with higher filtration efficiency, they are also associated with higher breathing resistance [6,21]. Thus, a balance should be achieved to obtain the greatest filtration performance and breathability at the same time. In this case, the PCL/MgO NPs membranes were the ones that presented the highest filtration efficiency and the lowest thickness and basis weight, showing the advantages in using these membranes to obtain a high filtration performance without adding extra weight while maintaining the comfort. Dehghan et al. developed PAN/MgO NPs electrospun membranes, which demonstrated high filtration efficiency and low air resistance [54].
Combining the results of antibacterial and filtration tests, the PCL/MgO NPs were demonstrated to be the most promising membrane, and the one selected for further tests.

3.3. Facemask Prototype: Assembling of the Different Layers and Their Evaluation

After selecting the best electrospun membrane to act as a filter and antibacterial layer, the assembling of the different facemask’s layers was performed. Since this work aims for the development of an eco-friendly facemask, the chosen material for the inner and outer layers of the mask was a natural fabric (cotton). Three different configurations were evaluated, as exemplified in Figure 5: (i) inner and outer layers composed by cotton fabrics; (ii) inner and outer layers composed by cotton fabrics and a middle layer of PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane; (iii) inner and outer layers composed by cotton fabrics and two middle layers of PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane.
Natural cellulosic fibers, such as cotton, present remarkable characteristics. Besides their natural origin, these fibers have good mechanical strength, high abundance, low cost, hydrophilicity, biocompatibility, nontoxicity, washability, reusability and provide breathability, being a suitable and sustainable option for facemasks. Moreover, cotton fabrics could be functionalized in order to achieve the required properties [3,28]. For these reasons, the facemask prototype was developed using cotton fabric for the inner and outer layers.
After the assembly of the different layers, filtration efficiency and air permeability tests were performed. The results are demonstrated in Table 4.
As demonstrated by Table 4, the filtration efficiency of the cotton fabrics is low (15.6%), the main aim of these layers being to act as a support for PCL/NPs electrospun membranes and to not have a significant influence on the filtration performance. The addition of electrospun membranes in the middle of the two cotton layers significantly improved the filtration efficiency, confirming that these membranes are responsible for the filtration capacity, whereas they promoted a reduction in air permeability.
The incorporation of two PCL/MgO NPs membranes as filter layers improved the filtration efficiency from 96.2 to 99.1%. Nevertheless, it decreased the air permeability of the facemask. These results were expected, since the incorporation of another filter layer composed of fibers with the same diameters and the same type and amount of NPs will promote an increase in thickness and basis weight, and consequently, a reduction in the air permeability. In fact, increasing the membranes’ thickness provides more opportunities for the particles to meet with the fibers when they are traveling through the membrane [55]. Pardo-Figuerez et al. also showed that the percentage of porosity of the electrospun membranes is reduced when a higher basis weight is deposited, which can also contribute to a decrease in breathability [6].

Thermal Management Using Different Facemask Prototypes

Wearing a facemask could result in higher face temperature, leading to overall discomfort while wearing them [56]. In order to evaluate this parameter, the facial temperature changes were recorded in three different locations (nose, mouth and cheek) using the three facemask configurations. The thermal images were taken during inhalation and exhalation, as demonstrated in Figure 6.
As can be seen by Figure 6, the facial temperature changed according to the type of facemask used, as well as to each condition (inhalation and exhalation). During inhalation, lower temperatures were observed using Cotton + 2× PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton, since more green and yellow areas were visible. During exhalation, higher temperatures were detected (indicated by red zones), these being the temperature values recorded in the nose, mouth and cheek (Table 5).
During exhalation, facemasks composed of only cotton showed homogeneous red zones over the whole face, exhibiting temperatures between 34.4–35.6 °C, which may induce slight sensations of thermal discomfort [57]. On the other hand, the incorporation of one electrospun membrane promoted a decrease in temperature in the nose and cheek, showing more yellow areas. Interestingly, the introduction of two electrospun membranes resulted in a reduction in temperature in the three locations (nose, mouth and check). These results demonstrated that the incorporation of electrospun membranes can improve the thermal comfort when compared to cotton-based facemasks.

4. Conclusions

In this work, biodegradable antibacterial PCL/NPs electrospun membranes were produced to act as a filter layer of a facemask. Defect-free PCL membranes were developed by electrospinning, showing average diameters of 1.81 μm. Subsequently, PCL electrospun membranes were functionalized with Ag, TiO2 and MgO NPs, being the Ag NPs firstly synthetized using a green methodology, where PEG was used as a reducing, dispersant and stabilizing agent. The average diameters of the fibers changed to 1.78, 2.09 and 2.02 μm, with the impregnation of Ag, TiO2 and MgO NPs, respectively. FESEM, EDS, ATR-FTIR and GSDR confirmed the impregnation of NPs onto PCL membranes. Moreover, TGA analysis revealed that PCL electrospun membranes contained an estimated percentage of Ag, TiO2 and MgO NPs of 0.512, 3.09 and 3.79%, respectively.
PCL/Ag NPs membranes exhibited an inhibition zone with diameters of 18.3 ± 0.6 against S. aureus and 16.5 ± 0.7 against E. coli, whereas PCL/TiO2 NPs membranes only demonstrated antibacterial effect against Gram-positive bacteria, with an inhibition zone of 18.7 ± 1.2 mm. Finally, PCL functionalized with MgO NPs showed halos with a size of 25.3 ± 0.6 and 13.5 ± 0.7 for S. aureus and E. coli bacteria, respectively, demonstrating the highest antibacterial effect against Gram-positive bacteria. The filtration performance of PCL membrane was 84.9%, which reduced to 70.8% with the addition of Ag NPs. This could be due to the synthesis process of these NPs. This decrease was not observed when using commercial NPs. The impregnation of TiO2 and MgO NPs led to a filtration efficiency of 86.0 and 99.4%, respectively. The highest filtration efficiency was detected for the membrane with the lowest thickness and basis weight (PCL/MgO NPs).
PCL/MgO NPs membranes were selected to act as the filter layer of the facemask prototypes. The addition of the filter layer in the middle of the cotton outer and inner layers significantly enhanced the filtration efficiency from 15.6 to 96.2%, which increased even more with the incorporation of two electrospun membranes (99.1%). These results were accompanied with a decrease in air permeability. Thermal management analysis revealed that the incorporation of PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane in the middle of the cotton layers promoted an increase in thermal comfort.
This research work reports the development of an eco-friendly active facemask. Joining the properties of electrospun membranes with the NPs, it was possible to achieve filter layers with high filtration performance and excellent antibacterial effect against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, investigation, writing—original draft preparation, S.M.C.; investigation, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, L.P.; conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision, D.P.F.; supervision, R.F.; investigation, methodology, review and editing, P.T.; methodology, review and editing, W.A., R.V. and N.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are thankful to project UID/CTM/00264/2021 of 2C2T—Centro de Ciência e Tecnologia Têxtil, funded by National Founds through FCT/MCTES- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia. Diana P. Ferreira is thankful to CEECIND/02803/2017 and Sofia M. Costa for the FCT PhD Scholarship (SFRH/BD/147517/2019), founded by National Founds through FCT/MCTES. Pilar Teixeira is thankful to the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the scope of the strategic funding of UIDB/04469/2020 unit.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fadare, O.O.; Okoffo, E.D. COVID-19 face masks: A potential source of microplastic fibers in the environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 737, 140279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Das, O.; Neisiany, R.E.; Capezza, A.J.; Hedenqvist, M.S.; Försth, M.; Xu, Q.; Jiang, L.; Ji, D.; Ramakrishna, S. The need for fully bio-based facemasks to counter coronavirus outbreaks: A perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 736, 139611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pandit, P.; Maity, S.; Singha, K.; Annu; Uzun, M.; Shekh, M.; Ahmed, S. Potential biodegradable face mask to counter environmental impact of COVID-19. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2021, 4, 100218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lv, D.; Wang, R.; Tang, G.; Mou, Z.; Lei, J.; Han, J.; De Smedt, S.; Xiong, R.; Huang, C. Ecofriendly Electrospun Membranes Loaded with Visible-Light-Responding Nanoparticles for Multifunctional Usages: Highly Efficient Air Filtration, Dye Scavenging, and Bactericidal Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019, 11, 12880–12889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mamun, A.; Blachowicz, T.; Sabantina, L. Electrospun Nanofiber Mats for Filtering Applications-Technology, Structure and Materials. Polymers 2021, 13, 1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pardo-Figuerez, M.; Chiva-Flor, A.; Figueroa-Lopez, K.; Prieto, C.; Lagaron, J.M. Antimicrobial Nanofiber Based Filters for High Filtration Efficiency Respirators. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qin, X.; Subianto, S. 17—Electrospun nanofibers for filtration applications. In Electrospun Nanofibers; Afshari, M., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2017; pp. 449–466. [Google Scholar]
  8. Graham, K.; Gogins, M.; Schreuder-Gibson, H. Incorporation of Electrospun Nanofibers into Functional Structures. Int. Nonwovens J. 2004, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yin, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, H.; Venkateswaran, S.; Hsiao, B.S. Ultra-fine electrospun nanofibrous membranes for multicomponent wastewater treatment: Filtration and adsorption. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 242, 116794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ribeiro, A.S.; Costa, S.M.; Ferreira, D.P.; Calhelha, R.C.; Barros, L.; Stojković, D.; Soković, M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Fangueiro, R. Chitosan/nanocellulose electrospun fibers with enhanced antibacterial and antifungal activity for wound dressing applications. React. Funct. Polym. 2021, 159, 104808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khandaker, M.; Progri, H.; Arasu, D.T.; Nikfarjam, S.; Shamim, N. Use of Polycaprolactone Electrospun Nanofiber Mesh in a Face Mask. Materials 2021, 14, 4272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Woodruff, M.A.; Hutmacher, D.W. The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 1217–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Francavilla, P.; Ferreira, D.P.; Araújo, J.C.; Fangueiro, R. Smart Fibrous Structures Produced by Electrospinning Using the Combined Effect of PCL/Graphene Nanoplatelets. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ji, S.-M.; Tiwari, A.P.; Oh, H.J.; Kim, H.-Y. ZnO/Ag nanoparticles incorporated multifunctional parallel side by side nanofibers for air filtration with enhanced removing organic contaminants and antibacterial properties. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 621, 126564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nikzamir, M.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Panahi, Y. An overview on nanoparticles used in biomedicine and their cytotoxicity. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 61, 102316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Araújo, J.C.; Fangueiro, R.; Ferreira, D.P. Protective Multifunctional Fibrous Systems Based on Natural Fibers and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Polymer 2021, 13, 2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Beyth, N.; Houri-Haddad, Y.; Domb, A.; Khan, W.; Hazan, R. Alternative Antimicrobial Approach: Nano-Antimicrobial Materials. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 246012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ansari, M.A.; Albetran, H.M.; Alheshibri, M.H.; Timoumi, A.; Algarou, N.A.; Akhtar, S.; Slimani, Y.; Almessiere, M.A.; Alahmari, F.S.; Baykal, A.; et al. Synthesis of Electrospun TiO2 Nanofibers and Characterization of Their Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Potential against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sánchez-López, E.; Gomes, D.; Esteruelas, G.; Bonilla, L.; Lopez-Machado, A.L.; Galindo, R.; Cano, A.; Espina, M.; Ettcheto, M.; Camins, A.; et al. Metal-Based Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agents: An Overview. Nanomater 2020, 10, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, L.; Hu, C.; Shao, L. The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: Present situation and prospects for the future. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 1227–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bortolassi, A.C.C.; Nagarajan, S.; Araújo Lima, B.; Guerra, V.G.; Aguiar, M.L.; Huon, V.; Soussan, L.; Cornu, D.; Miele, P.; Bechelany, M. Efficient nanoparticles removal and bactericidal action of electrospun nanofibers membranes for air filtration. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2019, 102, 718–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, Z.; Pan, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhao, R. A Novel Hierarchical Structured Poly(lactic acid)/Titania Fibrous Membrane with Excellent Antibacterial Activity and Air Filtration Performance. J. Nanomater. 2016, 2016, 6272983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dehghan, S.F.; Golbabaei, F.; Mousavi, T.; Mohammadi, H.; Kohneshahri, M.H.; Bakhtiari, R. Production of Nanofibers Containing Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles for the Purpose of Bioaerosol Removal. Pollution 2020, 6, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sagitha, P.; Reshmi, C.R.; Sundaran, S.P.; Sujith, A. Recent advances in post-modification strategies of polymeric electrospun membranes. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 105, 227–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kharaghani, D.; Kee Jo, Y.; Khan, M.Q.; Jeong, Y.; Cha, H.J.; Kim, I.S. Electrospun antibacterial polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membranes functionalized with silver nanoparticles by a facile wetting method. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 108, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferreira, D.; Ferreira, A.; Fangueiro, R. Searching for Natural Conductive Fibrous Structures via a Green Sustainable Approach Based on Jute Fibers and Silver Nanoparticles. Polymers 2018, 10, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Araújo, J.C.; Ferreira, D.P.; Teixeira, P.; Fangueiro, R. In-situ synthesis of CaO and SiO2 nanoparticles onto jute fabrics: Exploring the multifunctionality. Cellulose 2021, 28, 1123–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Costa, S.M.; Ferreira, D.P.; Ferreira, A.; Vaz, F.; Fangueiro, R. Multifunctional Flax Fibres Based on the Combined Effect of Silver and Zinc Oxide (Ag/ZnO) Nanostructures. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Patri, A.; Umbreit, T.; Zheng, J.; Nagashima, K.; Goering, P.; Francke-Carroll, S.; Gordon, E.; Weaver, J.; Miller, T.; Sadrieh, N.; et al. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis of titanium dioxide nanoparticle distribution after intravenous and subcutaneous injection in mice. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2009, 29, 662–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sundrarajan, M.; Bama, K.; Bhavani, M.; Jegatheeswaran, S.; Ambika, S.; Sangili, A.; Nithya, P.; Sumathi, R. Obtaining titanium dioxide nanoparticles with spherical shape and antimicrobial properties using M. citrifolia leaves extract by hydrothermal method. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2017, 171, 117–124. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dobrucka, R. Synthesis of MgO Nanoparticles Using Artemisia abrotanum Herba Extract and Their Antioxidant and Photocatalytic Properties. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 2018, 42, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Saied, E.; Eid, A.M.; Hassan, S.E.-D.; Salem, S.S.; Radwan, A.A.; Halawa, M.; Saleh, F.M.; Saad, H.A.; Saied, E.M.; Fouda, A. The Catalytic Activity of Biosynthesized Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles (MgO-NPs) for Inhibiting the Growth of Pathogenic Microbes, Tanning Effluent Treatment, and Chromium Ion Removal. Catalysts 2021, 11, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Palacios Hinestroza, H.; Urena-Saborio, H.; Zurita, F.; Guerrero de León, A.A.; Sundaram, G.; Sulbarán-Rangel, B. Nanocellulose and Polycaprolactone Nanospun Composite Membranes and Their Potential for the Removal of Pollutants from Water. Mol. 2020, 25, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Nandagopal, S.; Augustine, R.; George, S.C.; Jayachandran, V.P.; Kalarikkal, N.; Thomas, S. Gentamicin Loaded Electrospun Poly(ε-Caprolactone)/TiO2 Nanocomposite Membranes with Antibacterial Property against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2016, 55, 1785–1796. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shameli, K.; Bin Ahmad, M.; Jazayeri, S.D.; Sedaghat, S.; Shabanzadeh, P.; Jahangirian, H.; Mahdavi, M.; Abdollahi, Y. Synthesis and Characterization of Polyethylene Glycol Mediated Silver Nanoparticles by the Green Method. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 6639–6650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pais, V.; Navarro, M.; Guise, C.; Martins, R.; Fangueiro, R. Hydrophobic performance of electrospun fibers functionalized with TiO2 nanoparticles. Text. Res. J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Al-Amin, M.; Dey, S.C.; Rashid, T.U.; Ashaduzzaman, M.; Shamsuddin, S.M. Solar Assisted Photocatalytic Degradation of Reactive Azo Dyes in Presence of Anatase Titanium Dioxide. Int. J. Latest Res. Eng. Technol. 2016, 2, 14–21. [Google Scholar]
  38. Raveesha, H.R.; Nayana, S.; Vasudha, D.R.; Begum, J.P.S.; Pratibha, S.; Ravikumara, C.R.; Dhananjaya, N. The electrochemical behavior, antifungal and cytotoxic activities of phytofabricated MgO nanoparticles using Withania somnifera leaf extract. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2019, 4, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fouda, A.; Hassan, S.E.-D.; Saied, E.; Hamza, M.F. Photocatalytic degradation of real textile and tannery effluent using biosynthesized magnesium oxide nanoparticles (MgO-NPs), heavy metal adsorption, phytotoxicity, and antimicrobial activity. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shafiee, M.R.M.; Kargar, M.; Ghashang, M. Characterization and low-cost, green synthesis of Zn2+ doped MgO nanoparticles. Green Process. Synth. 2018, 7, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kuriechen, S.K.; Murugesan, S.; Paul Raj, S. Mineralization of Azo Dye Using Combined Photo-Fenton and Photocatalytic Processes under Visible Light. J. Catal. 2013, 2013, 104019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Huang, K.; Chen, L.; Liao, M.; Xiong, J. The Photocatalytic Inactivation Effect of Fe-Doped TiO2 Nanocomposites on Leukemic HL60 Cells-Based Photodynamic Therapy. Int. J. Photoenergy 2012, 2012, 367072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Das, B.; Moumita, S.; Ghosh, S.; Khan, M.I.; Indira, D.; Jayabalan, R.; Tripathy, S.K.; Mishra, A.; Balasubramanian, P. Biosynthesis of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoflakes by using leaf extract of Bauhinia purpurea and evaluation of its antibacterial property against Staphylococcus aureus. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. 2018, 91, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Almontasser, A.; Parveen, A.; Azam, A. Synthesis, Characterization and antibacterial activity of Magnesium Oxide ({MgO}) nanoparticles. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 577, 12051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pullangott, G.; Kannan, U.; S., G.; Kiran, D.V.; Maliyekkal, S.M. A comprehensive review on antimicrobial face masks: An emerging weapon in fighting pandemics. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 6544–6576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Thomas, R.; Soumya, K.R.; Mathew, J.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. Electrospun Polycaprolactone Membrane Incorporated with Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles as Effective Wound Dressing Material. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 176, 2213–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ferreira, D.P.; Costa, S.M.; Felgueiras, H.P.; Fangueiro, R. Smart and Sustainable Materials for Military Applications Based on Natural Fibres and Silver Nanoparticles. Key Eng. Mater. 2019, 812, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, H.; Chen, G. Potent Antibacterial Activities of Ag/TiO2 Nanocomposite Powders Synthesized by a One-Pot Sol−Gel Method. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 2905–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Abu-Dalo, M.; Jaradat, A.; Albiss, B.A.; Al-Rawashdeh, N.A.F. Green synthesis of TiO2 NPs/pristine pomegranate peel extract nanocomposite and its antimicrobial activity for water disinfection. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bhattacharya, P.; Dey, A.; Neogi, S. An insight into the mechanism of antibacterial activity by magnesium oxide nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2021, 9, 5329–5339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Liu, M.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Xia, C.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Yin, A.; Lou, X.; Wang, H.; Mo, X.; et al. Magnesium oxide-incorporated electrospun membranes inhibit bacterial infections and promote the healing process of infected wounds. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2021, 9, 3727–3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Juuti, P.; Nikka, M.; Gunell, M.; Eerola, E.; Saarinen, J.J.; Omori, Y.; Seto, T.; Mäkelä, J.M. Fabrication of Fiber Filters with Antibacterial Properties for VOC and Particle Removal. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2019, 19, 1892–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Essa, W.K.; Yasin, S.A.; Saeed, I.A.; Ali, G.A.M. Nanofiber-Based Face Masks and Respirators as COVID-19 Protection: A Review. Membranes 2021, 11, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dehghan, S.F.; Golbabaei, F.; Maddah, B.; Latifi, M.; Pezeshk, H.; Hasanzadeh, M.; Akbar-Khanzadeh, F. Optimization of electrospinning parameters for polyacrylonitrile-MgO nanofibers applied in air filtration. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2016, 66, 912–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Li, Q.; Xu, Y.; Wei, H.; Wang, X. An electrospun polycarbonate nanofibrous membrane for high efficiency particulate matter filtration. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 65275–65281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Luximon, Y.; Anne Sheen, K.; Luximon, A. Time dependent infrared thermographic evaluation of facemasks. Work 2016, 54, 825–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Scarano, A.; Inchingolo, F.; Lorusso, F. Facial Skin Temperature and Discomfort When Wearing Protective Face Masks: Thermal Infrared Imaging Evaluation and Hands Moving the Mask. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic flow chart showing the functionalization of PCL electrospun membranes with (left) synthetized Ag NPs and (right) commercial NPs (TiO2 and MgO).
Figure 1. Schematic flow chart showing the functionalization of PCL electrospun membranes with (left) synthetized Ag NPs and (right) commercial NPs (TiO2 and MgO).
Applsci 12 00067 g001
Figure 2. The different components of the acrylic chamber used for the filtration tests.
Figure 2. The different components of the acrylic chamber used for the filtration tests.
Applsci 12 00067 g002
Figure 3. FESEM images of (a) PCL; (b) PCL/Ag NPs; (c) PCL/TiO2 NPs and (d) PCL/MgO NPs electrospun fibers and their respective diameter distribution histograms. FESEM images were obtained using different magnifications: 100, 20, 10 and 2 μm.
Figure 3. FESEM images of (a) PCL; (b) PCL/Ag NPs; (c) PCL/TiO2 NPs and (d) PCL/MgO NPs electrospun fibers and their respective diameter distribution histograms. FESEM images were obtained using different magnifications: 100, 20, 10 and 2 μm.
Applsci 12 00067 g003
Figure 4. EDS analysis of (a) PCL/Ag NPs; (b) PCL/TiO2 NPs; (c) PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membranes; (d) ATR-FTIR; (e) GSDR of PCL and PCL/NPs electrospun membranes; (f) estimated amount of NPs presented in PCL membranes.
Figure 4. EDS analysis of (a) PCL/Ag NPs; (b) PCL/TiO2 NPs; (c) PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membranes; (d) ATR-FTIR; (e) GSDR of PCL and PCL/NPs electrospun membranes; (f) estimated amount of NPs presented in PCL membranes.
Applsci 12 00067 g004
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the three configurations evaluated: (a) Cotton + Cotton; (b) Cotton + PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton and (c) Cotton + 2 × PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton.
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the three configurations evaluated: (a) Cotton + Cotton; (b) Cotton + PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton and (c) Cotton + 2 × PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton.
Applsci 12 00067 g005
Figure 6. An example of facial temperature distribution for each condition.
Figure 6. An example of facial temperature distribution for each condition.
Applsci 12 00067 g006
Table 1. Processing parameters used to produce electrospun membranes.
Table 1. Processing parameters used to produce electrospun membranes.
Processing ParametersOptimized Values
Applied voltage25 kV
Feed rate1 mL/h
Needle-to-collector distance260 mm
Needle diameter0.61 mm
Deposition time4 h
Head transverse speed50 mm/s
Head transverse distance150 mm
Type of collectorStatic
Humidity59–65%
Temperature19–20 °C
Table 2. Inhibition zone diameter of electrospun membranes (PCL, PCL/Ag NPs, PCL/TiO2 NPs and PCL/MgO NPs) against S. aureus and E. coli bacteria. Values are represented by mean ± standard deviation of triplicates.
Table 2. Inhibition zone diameter of electrospun membranes (PCL, PCL/Ag NPs, PCL/TiO2 NPs and PCL/MgO NPs) against S. aureus and E. coli bacteria. Values are represented by mean ± standard deviation of triplicates.
SamplesMean Diameter of the Halos (mm)
S. aureusE. coli
PCL0.0 ± 00.0 ± 0
PCL/Ag NPs18.3 ± 0.616.5 ± 0.7
PCL/TiO2 NPs18.7 ± 1.20.0 ± 0
PCL/MgO NPs25.3 ± 0.613.5 ± 0.7
Table 3. Thickness, basis weight and filtration efficiency (%) of the different electrospun membranes (PCL, PCL/Ag NPs, PCL/TiO2 NPs and PCL/MgO NPs).
Table 3. Thickness, basis weight and filtration efficiency (%) of the different electrospun membranes (PCL, PCL/Ag NPs, PCL/TiO2 NPs and PCL/MgO NPs).
SamplesThickness
(mm)
Basis Weight
(g/cm2)
Filtration Efficiency (%)
PCL0.3760.00584.9
PCL/Ag NPs0.600 0.01070.8
PCL/TiO2 NPs0.5060.00886.0
PCL/MgO NPs0.147 0.00399.4
Table 4. Filtration efficiency (%) and air permeability (L/min) of the different facemask configurations evaluated (Cotton + Cotton, Cotton + PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton and Cotton + 2× PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton.).
Table 4. Filtration efficiency (%) and air permeability (L/min) of the different facemask configurations evaluated (Cotton + Cotton, Cotton + PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton and Cotton + 2× PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton.).
SamplesFiltration Efficiency
(%)
Air Permeability (L/min)
Cotton + Cotton15.628.5
Cotton + PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton96.23.2
Cotton + 2× PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton99.12.4
Table 5. Facial temperatures recorded in three different locations (nose, mouth and cheek) during exhalation using different facemask prototypes.
Table 5. Facial temperatures recorded in three different locations (nose, mouth and cheek) during exhalation using different facemask prototypes.
SamplesFacial Temperature (°C)
NoseMouthCheek
Cotton + Cotton35.035.634.4
Cotton + PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton34.536.032.7
Cotton + 2× PCL/MgO NPs electrospun membrane + Cotton34.133.530.6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Costa, S.M.; Pacheco, L.; Antunes, W.; Vieira, R.; Bem, N.; Teixeira, P.; Fangueiro, R.; Ferreira, D.P. Antibacterial and Biodegradable Electrospun Filtering Membranes for Facemasks: An Attempt to Reduce Disposable Masks Use. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010067

AMA Style

Costa SM, Pacheco L, Antunes W, Vieira R, Bem N, Teixeira P, Fangueiro R, Ferreira DP. Antibacterial and Biodegradable Electrospun Filtering Membranes for Facemasks: An Attempt to Reduce Disposable Masks Use. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(1):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Costa, Sofia M., Luísa Pacheco, Wilson Antunes, Ricardo Vieira, Nuno Bem, Pilar Teixeira, Raul Fangueiro, and Diana P. Ferreira. 2022. "Antibacterial and Biodegradable Electrospun Filtering Membranes for Facemasks: An Attempt to Reduce Disposable Masks Use" Applied Sciences 12, no. 1: 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010067

APA Style

Costa, S. M., Pacheco, L., Antunes, W., Vieira, R., Bem, N., Teixeira, P., Fangueiro, R., & Ferreira, D. P. (2022). Antibacterial and Biodegradable Electrospun Filtering Membranes for Facemasks: An Attempt to Reduce Disposable Masks Use. Applied Sciences, 12(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12010067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop