Next Article in Journal
Blockage Effects in Wind Tunnel Tests for Tall Buildings with Surrounding Buildings
Previous Article in Journal
Real Coded Mixed Integer Genetic Algorithm for Geometry Optimization of Flight Simulator Mechanism Based on Rotary Stewart Platform
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cryptococcus: History, Epidemiology and Immune Evasion

by
Israel Diniz-Lima
1,
Leonardo Marques da Fonseca
1,
Elias Barbosa da Silva-Junior
1,
Joyce Cristina Guimarães-de-Oliveira
1,
Leonardo Freire-de-Lima
1,
Danielle Oliveira Nascimento
2,
Alexandre Morrot
3,4,
Jose Osvaldo Previato
1,
Lucia Mendonça-Previato
1,
Debora Decote-Ricardo
2,* and
Celio Geraldo Freire-de-Lima
1,*
1
Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21944-970, Brazil
2
Instituto de Veterinária, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica 23890-000, Brazil
3
Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-900, Brazil
4
Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro 21045-900, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(14), 7086; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147086
Submission received: 11 May 2022 / Revised: 11 July 2022 / Accepted: 12 July 2022 / Published: 13 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Cryptococcosis is a disease caused by the pathogenic fungi Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, both environmental fungi that cause severe pneumonia and may even lead to cryptococcal meningoencephalitis. Although C. neoformans affects more fragile individuals, such as immunocompromised hosts through opportunistic infections, C. gattii causes a serious indiscriminate primary infection in immunocompetent individuals. Typically seen in tropical and subtropical environments, C. gattii has increased its endemic area over recent years, largely due to climatic factors that favor contagion in warmer climates. It is important to point out that not only C. gattii, but the Cryptococcus species complex produces a polysaccharidic capsule with immunomodulatory properties, enabling the pathogenic species of Cryptococccus to subvert the host immune response during the establishment of cryptococcosis, facilitating its dissemination in the infected organism. C. gattii causes a more severe and difficult-to-treat infection, with few antifungals eliciting an effective response during chronic treatment. Much of the immunopathology of this cryptococcosis is still poorly understood, with most studies focusing on cryptococcosis caused by the species C. neoformans. C. gattii became more important in the epidemiological scenario with the outbreaks in the Pacific Northwest of the United States, which resulted in phylogenetic studies of the virulent variant responsible for the severe infection in the region. Since then, the study of cryptococcosis caused by C. gattii has helped researchers understand the immunopathological aspects of different variants of this pathogen.

1. Introduction

In this review, we approach general aspects of the pathogenic species of the genus Cryptococcus, Cyptococcus gattii, seeking to explore its history, as well as other aspects related to its physiology and structural morphology. Revisiting the epidemiology of Cryptococcus spp., we aim to describe the geographic distribution of the reemerging fungus C. gattii and its epidemiological importance as well. Furthermore, we showcase the functional characteristics of the virulence factors of this genus, a topic being constantly re-evaluated in recent years and a fundamental aspect for understanding the physiopathology of the fungus. Although a lot remains unknown when distinguishing the pathological characteristics of the two species C. neoformans and C. gattii, the most relevant virulence component in these fungi is the polysaccharide capsule, which despite being vastly researched, is still not completely understood regarding the correlation between its chemical structure and immunomodulatory properties. Therefore, we aim to shed some light on this complex subject while describing the general features of C. gattii immunopathology.

2. Classification and Habitat of the Cryptococcus spp.

Cryptococcus (Filobasidiella) is a genus of fungus in the Phylum Basidiomycota of the Subphylum, Basidimycotina, of the Order Sporidiales and Family Sporidiobolaceae. It has more than 100 species ubiquitously distributed in the environment, with two species commonly known to cause cryptococcosis in humans, Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii [1]. C. neoformans is a fungus that is distributed globally, being found in bird feces, trees and soil [2]. For the most part, it affects immunocompromised patients, causing a symptomatic and disseminated infection [3]; however, there are reports of C. neoformans var grubii infecting immunocompetent patients [4]. C. gattii is seen as a tropical and subtropical fungus, being found in reforestation trees, such as pine and eucalyptus, and in the soil close to these trees [5], and differently from C. neoformans, C. gattii infection occurs in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients [6]. Another species of the same genus, C. laurentii, is distributed in a dispersed way in the environment, in soil and plants, even maintaining a role for symbiosis with mycorrhizas, helping in plant metabolism [7]. It is known not to cause infection in humans and immunocompetent animals [8,9]; however, there are reports of infected immunocompromised patients in tropical regions [10,11,12].

3. First Historical Aspects of Cryptococcus spp.

The discovery of the C. gattii fungus was carried out after several attempts to classify other species of the same genus throughout the years. It started in 1894 in Germany, when the pathologist Otto Busse and the surgeon Abraham Buschke isolated a yeast similar to Saccharomyces from a bone infection in a patient, calling it “Saccharomycosis hominis”. Later in the same year in Italy, Francesco Sanfelice isolated a similar yeast from peach juice ferment and named it Saccharomyces neoformans because of its peculiar colony formation [3,13]. In 1901, in France, Jean-Paul Vuillemin would give new nomenclatures to these yeasts, as they did not form ascospores, which are clusters of spores within a single mother cell called an ascus [14], and did not ferment carbohydrates, both hallmarks of Saccharomyces. Thus, the yeast discovered by Busse was named Cryptococcus hominis and that of Sanfelice was renamed Cryptococcus neoformans. It was only in 1950 that Benham in the United States would recommend the definitive nomenclature for the species (C. neoformans), which would be adopted in later works [15]. In the same year, Evans and authors, for the first time, described an antigenic feature of the fungus in three specific serotypes: A, B and C [16]; only in 1968, Wilson described a fourth serotype, D [3]. Decades later, based on agglutination reactions of the capsular constituents of the fungus, the complex of species of Cryptococcus neoformans could be divided into serotypes A, D and hybrid AD, with serotype A corresponding to the grubii variant, whereas C. gattii has distinguishing serotypes B and C [17,18]. In addition to this classification, the division can also be made from DNA polymorphisms found in these species. In this way, the species C. neoformans of serotype A, known as C. neoformans variant grubii, can be divided into molecular types VNI, VNII and VNB, the latter referring to a specific variant [19], and serotype D, known as C. neoformans variant neoformans with molecular type VNIV and the hybrid of the two serotypes AD with molecular type VNIII [17]. C. gattii has a B serotype with the most common variants VGI and VGII and C serotype with VGIII and VGIV [20]. Although the characterization studies were carried out at the beginning of the century and since then, this pathogen has been known to cause disease in humans [13], C. neoformans became more important at the end of the 20th century with the AIDS crisis, where it was responsible for a large part of the morbidity in these patients. Recent data show that about 181,000 deaths from cryptococcal meningitis are recorded annually [21]. C. gattii infections are more frequent in tropical and subtropical regions and even though their incidence has increased globally over the last few decades, they do not comprise the highest incidence globally, with about 80% of cases being caused by C. neoformans. However, C. gattii is responsible for more severe cases of the disease [3], with studies suggesting these cases may be underdiagnosed, either because the tests used rely on cryptococcal serum antigen, which is very hard to detect in cases of localized pulmonary cryptococcosis, or are unable to discriminate between different species of Cryptococcus [22,23].

4. Cryptococcus gattii

The first clinical sample finding of C. gattii came from the cerebrospinal fluid of a Congolese individual, initially reported as C. neoformans in 1894. Only in later years, the yeast with an atypical elliptical shape would be confirmed as C. gattii [2]. Initially, C. gattii was not classified as a species on it own, but considered a Cryptococcus neoformans variant [24]. Differentiation between the yeasts was made using CBD medium, still used to differentiate the species and consisting of an agar solution containing canavanine-glycine-bromothymol blue. C. neoformans only uses glycine as a carbon source and does not show favorable growth in the presence of canavanine [25]; however, C. gattii grows well on this medium and uses glycine not only as a carbon source, but also as a source of nitrogen, thus, alkalinizing the medium, granting it a bluish tinge due to the pH indicator bromothymol blue [26]. Unlike C. neoformans, which is ubiquitously distributed in soil and plant species, C. gattii is found specifically in plant material, mainly in urban landscape trees and in tree species associated with tropical and subtropical climates, such as in forests of Eucalyptus spp. in Australia [27]. The most common variants of C. gattii are the globally distributed VGI and VGII, both responsible for causing most cases of C. gattii cryptococcosis in immunocompetent individuals [28,29]. The variants of C. gattii are more frequent in warmer morphoclimatic domains, such as the predominant VGII in the Brazilian territory, with findings in the Amazon biome [30,31,32], clinical isolates from the Brazilian Northeast [33], Central-West [34] and the Brazilian Southeast [35,36,37], as well as in northern Australia and the islands of Papua New Guinea [8]. However, there is a trend of VGII findings causing outbreaks of C. gattii in temperate regions around the world, as has been observed with large numbers of domestic animals infected with C. gattii reported in western Australia [38], in outbreaks of C. gattii in North America from Vancouver Island in Canada, which resulted in cases of infections both in wildlife and domestic animals [39,40], along with an outbreak of cases in immunocompetent and immunocompromised humans in 1999 [41]. This outbreak also contributed to the expansion of new cases in the Northwest Pacific Coast of the United States of America, in Washington and Oregon, and more recently in the Southeast of the USA [42,43]. These cases obtained their clinical findings with evidence of a genetic profile from the tropical forests of South America [44,45]. However, more recent analyses indicate a high genetic diversity of the population in the Brazilian variant C. gattii VGII, changing the origin of this variant from the Amazon rainforest to the Brazilian semi-arid northeast [46]. Thus, the data suggest a change in the dynamics of the global dissemination of C. gattii, associating it to the current scenario of climate change and global warming that favors the increase in new cases of C. gattii infections by facilitating its spread [47].

5. Structure and Virulence Factors

Although estimates indicate the genetic separation of ancestors of the genus Cryptococcus at about 30 to 40 million years ago [48], evidence suggests that about 80 to 100 million years ago, ancestors belonging to the species complex of the genus Cryptococcus were physically separated by the drift of the supercontinent Pangea into two continental masses in the region that today corresponds to South America and Africa. This event would have made possible the accumulation of genetic determinants in the genus Cryptococcus in different environments that, in the future, would lead to differentiation in the contemporary species C. neoformans and C. gattii [49,50,51]. The role that birds currently play in the aerial dispersal of Cryptococcus spp. between different regions is closely linked with the emergence of bird species in the early Cretaceous and the dispersal of the Cryptococcus genus between continents in the same geological period [49,52]. However, despite the evolutionary distance between the current species of the genus Cryptococcus, the structural determinants that are shared between these species are still well preserved, especially between the pathogenic C. neoformans and C. gattii [27]. Among these components, the cell wall of Cryptococcus spp. itself. has molecules that help the fungus defend against host defenses and environmental stress, in addition to intrinsic characteristics of the yeast, such as resistance to temperatures of 37 °C [53]. A protein that is required for this thermal resistance is a serine/threonine phosphatase called calmodulin, responsible for modulating the yeast response to environmental stresses. Given that calmodulin mutations adversely affect Cryptococcus spp. resistance to the physiological temperature of mammals, it is fundamental in enabling its successful growth in the host [54,55]. Other proteins involved in C. gattii thermotolerance are superoxide dismutase (SOD2p) [56] and trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (TPS1p and TPS2p) [57]. Another important virulence factor in the fungus is the production of melanin [3], present in the cell wall of the fungus and associated with: resistance to oxidative stress [58,59,60], resistance to antimicrobial peptides and antifungal components [60,61,62] and tolerance to environmental radiation, with the example of some Cryptococcus variants found surviving in environments with high levels of ionizing radiation, such as on the walls of the reactor of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster-UA [63,64]. Regarding melanin synthesis, laccase (Lac1), a phenol oxidase present in Cryptococcus spp., is responsible for this role, depositing this molecule in the yeast cell wall [65,66]. It has already been described that the deposition of melanin in the cell wall of Cryptococcus spp. depends on the composition and flexibility of the cell wall; as the C. gattii variant R265 has a higher chitosan composition than the C. neoformans variant H99, this ends up contributing to a more homogeneous distribution of melanin in the cell wall of C. gattii [67]. Chitosan is a deacetylated form of chitin and its presence in the cell wall of Cryptococcus spp. provides structure and stability to the other molecules in the cell wall [68]. In addition, differences in the amount of chitosan between different species of Cryptococcus have already been seen, with possible implications concerning the the virulence gap between C. gattii variant R265 and C. neoformans, since C. gattii has two- to three-times more chitosan in its cell wall [69]. Other virulence factors have already been described, such as the production of hexitol D-mannitol that helps in the survival of Cryptococcus spp. in the host and confers the resistance to oxidative stress [70,71], as well as the production of phospholipases, contributing to yeast homeostasis and virulence [72,73], provoking the rupture of cell membranes in the host [74] and, thus, contributing to the passage of the fungus to critical sites, such as the central nervous system of mammals [75]. In addition to all these components that are considered important virulence factors for both pathogenic species, C. neoformans and C. gattii, and other species of the same genus, they also produce a capsule containing mostly polysaccharide components that are determinants in the pathogenesis of the fungus [76]. However, due to its complexity, this subject will be addressed in more detail in another topic.

6. Cell Wall

The cell wall of Cryptococcus spp., as in other species of fungus, provides protection against environmental stressors, such as ultraviolet radiation, dehydration and variations in pH, temperature and osmolarity [77,78], in addition to mediating adhesion to host cells and protecting against free radicals and oxidant species produced by the cells of defense in the immune system [79,80]. Contrary to what one might think, the cell wall of Cryptococcus spp. is not a static barrier, but a dynamic structure that adapts to environmental conditions [81]. Its integrity is regulated by intracellular adapters that orchestrate its remodeling [82,83] and its importance for the survival of the fungus in the host is made clear when the pathogenicity of mutant variants that lack cell wall integrity regulators is compromised [84]. Linked polysaccharides, plasma membrane-associated glycoproteins and pigments, such as melanin, comprise cell wall components, extending physically into the extracellular medium [77]. These polysaccharides that make up the cell wall of Cryptococcus spp. are glycans, more specifically glucose polymers connected by β-(1-3), β-(1-6) and α-(1-6) bonds [85], chitins, which are polymers of N-acetylglucosamines, and chitosans [86]. Unlike the glycans and glycoconjugates present in the polysaccharide capsule of Cryptococcus spp., which are synthesized by glycosyltransferases in cytoplasmic organelles, cell wall polymers are produced by synthases present in the plasma membrane [87]. Synthases and deacetylases present at sites in the plasma membrane, producing chitin and chitosan, respectively, as the extracellular medium and other synthases form channels with activity of glycosyltransferases, allowing the passage of sugar nucleotides from the cytosol to the unreduced ends of glycans present in the cell wall [88]. Once in the extracellular medium, the glycans are arranged in layers of macrostructures, with the innermost part rich in electron density and composed of chitin, chitosan and β-glycans, the middle part rich in melanin and glycoproteins and the outermost part with lower electronic density being composed of α- and β-glycans [89]. Glycans correspond to about 50 to 60% of the dry weight of the cell wall [76,89]; β-(1-3)-glycans form long polysaccharide chains and are the most abundant component in fungal species acting as a skeleton of the cell wall. The β-(1-6)-glycans are the most abundant component in the cell wall of C. neoformans, forming smaller chains that link to glycosylphosphatidylinositol molecule anchors through glycosidic bonds, chitin molecules, chitosan, β-(1-3)-glycans and constituents of the polysaccharide capsule [90,91]. However, the mechanism through which this arrangement occurs is still unknown, especially with regard to the percentage of the glycan composition in the cell wall of C. gattii. Furthermore, glycan degradation as a regulatory mechanism is not yet well characterized in C. neoformans and C. gattii, despite the fact that α-(1-3) and β-(1-3)-glycanase activity has already been identified in cell wall of C. neoformanss [92]. Although glycans play an important role in the structure of the cell wall of Cryptococcus spp., chitin polymers, β-(1-4)-N-acetylglucosamines, are responsible for the rigidity of the fungal cell wall, mainly due to its secondary structure, which is composed of antiparallel pleated beta-sheets stabilized by hydrogen bonds [90]. Interestingly, the percentage of chitin in the cell wall of fungi varies greatly according to their morphology, ranging from 1 to 2% in yeasts, reaching about 15% in filamentous fungi [93]. Other species of fungi have about 60% of their chitin converted into chitosan, β-(1-4)-N-glucosamine [94]. However, C. neoformans has about three- to five-times more chitosan than chitin in its cell wall and, since chitosan has multiple positive charges, C. neoformans yeast acquires greater solubility and flexibility in the environment [68]. In addition to the action of deacetylases, chitin can undergo catalysis by chitinases, three of which, Chi2, Chi4 and Chi22, are associated with the formation of spores during sexual reproduction of C. neoformans [95]. In this context, the exact repertoire of enzymes associated with chitin and chitinase skeleton remodeling in C. gattii is not yet known. However, a systematic analysis of the proteins associated with the cell wall of C. neoformans identified and divided about 29 proteins into three distinct groups: proteases, glycan remodeling enzymes and free radical regulatory enzymes [96]. Some of those proteins bind to β-(1-3)-glycans, being soluble in cell wall components and coming from secretion processes or catalysis by protein lipases associated with glycophosphatidylinositol groups, while another part is integrally associated with the cell wall, covalently linked to β-(1-6)-glycans and anchored to the cytoplasmic membrane by glycophosphatidylinositol groups [96,97,98] (Figure 1).

7. Polysaccharide Capsule

The most important and best-studied virulence factor of Cryptococcus spp. is its polysaccharide capsule, the outermost structure of yeast, which is chemically associated with the fungal cell wall and also permeates the yeast microenvironment [99,100]. Although there are other capsulated fungal species, none are considered pathogenic, only C. neoformans and C. gattii present such morphology associated with their pathogenicity [76,101]. Its components are constantly exuded into the extracellular medium, which facilitates their collection for purification assays by chromatography and structural characterization by magnetic resonance [102]. Its composition comprises mainly the polysaccharides glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) and glucuronoxylomannogalactan (GXMGal) [103,104]. GXM corresponds to about 90 to 95% of the polysaccharide capsule, having a molecular weight of 1700 to 7000 kDa, depending on the variant of Cryptococcus spp. [105]. The basic unit of GXM is a mannose trisaccharide joined by α-(1-3)-mannose bonds and with β-(1-2)- and β-(1-4)-glucuronosidic and β-(1-2)-xylosidic substitutions, having 6-O-acetylations in mannose residues, mainly in those where there are no bonds with the radical groups of glucuronic acid and xylose [106,107]. About two out of three mannoses are 6-O-acetylated, with the possibility for glucuronic acid-linked mannoses to also be linked [107,108]. Differences in the proportions of xylose, mannose and glucuronic acid of GXM separate the different serotypes found in Cryptococcus spp. [104,108], suggesting: 1:3:1 and 2:3:1 for serotypes D and A and 3:3:1 and 4:3:1 for serotypes B and C, respectively [108,109]. However, these proportions are still not well established and further research is needed for this purpose. Something that differs from the polysaccharide capsule of Cryptococcus spp. of bacterial capsular species is the existence of Structure Reported Groups (SRG), which are seven structures, all different from each other, in the configuration of substitutions in the mannose polymer in the case of GXM, ranging from M1 to M6 [102], with the last called Hexosaccharide 1, described by Nimrichter and authors [110] (Figure 1). GXMGal is a polysaccharide of lower molecular weight, about 100 kDa, and corresponds to about 5 to 10% of the total capsule [108]. The structural characterization of GXMGal is usually conducted from the purification of acapsular variants of C. neoformans, such as CAP67, but has only one layer of GXMGal, with the absence of GXM, which facilitates the separation of GXMGal [111,112]. GXMGal is a more complex polysaccharide than GXM, having a backbone composed of galactose polymer with α-(1-6)-galactan bonds, linked by β-(1-3)-galacto-α-(1-4)-manno-α-(1-3)-mannan galactomannan chains, with galactomannan side chain substitutions with β-(1-2)- and β-(1-3)-xylosyl and β-(1-3)-glucuronyl groups [111,113], and rare double galactofuranose residues, associated with the galactan backbone by β-(1-2)- and β-(1-3)- bounds at the same galactose residue [114,115] (Figure 1). GXMGal is the most abundant polysaccharide in the capsule of C. neoformans due to its lower molecular weight compared to GXM. Nonetheless, attempts to visualize GXMGal by microscopy fail since this polysaccharide covers a thin layer on the surface of non-encapsulated variants [105]. There are indications that GXMGal recovers the innermost parts of the capsule of C. neoformans, since the removal of the outermost layers by radiation indicates the absence of galactose in these samples [116]. In addition to the major polysaccharide components GXM and GXMGal, there is a small percentage of mannoproteins, less than 1% [117,118], which are located in the innermost part of the polysaccharide capsule of Cryptococcus spp. close to the cell wall [119]. These mannoproteins were recently evaluated in proteomic analysis in the species C. neoformans and C. gattii, with about 46 and 36 predicted, respectively, for each species [120]. There are few data regarding the composition of mannoproteins of Cryptococcus spp., especially regarding C. gattii. However, some mannoproteins have already been associated with high immunogenic capacity [113], being partially linked to the dynamics of capsular components [118,121] and to the virulence of the yeast, as is the case of Cig1 in C. neoformans, responsible for capturing iron, with the deletion of its CIG1 gene, associated with impaired cell and capsular growth [122,123]. It is also the case for MP98, a chitin deacetylase present in the capsule and associated with the integrity of the cell wall [68], and in C. gattii, the recently described Krp1, associated with the construction of the polysaccharide capsule [120]. C. gattii has also been described as capable of altering its capsular structure, increasing its virulence and host evasion; there is a description of modifications in two O-acetylations of GXM from C. gattii that confer this characteristic on the virulent strain JP02 [124]. Interestingly, morphological characteristics in the capsular dimension of C. gattii are associated with the greater virulence of this species in relation to others of the genus Cryptococcus, since it has the ability to change its size during infection, facilitating its intracellular life stage and passage through the blood–brain barrier [125]. Clearly, virulence factors of glycoconjugate composition are proposed to be crucial for adaptation of pathogenic fungal species, such as in the Cryptococcus genus [126].

7.1. Glucuronoxylomannan (GXM)

The glucuronoxylomannan polysaccharide is the major component in the Cryptococcus spp. capsule and its effects on the immune system are diverse, converging mainly on an immunoregulatory response [100]. GXM is diffused in body tissues during a cryptococcal infection, with the highest concentrations being found in the lungs, largely due to the persistence of the fungus during pulmonary infection, while the lowest levels are in the spleen, blood and cerebrospinal fluid [127]. Studies investigating the immunomodulatory effects in the presence of GXM use non-encapsulated strains as a control, since they do not have GXM [128,129]. This polysaccharide still has an antiphagocytic character, since it generates electrostatic repulsion due to its negative charge, reducing the interaction between effector cell and pathogen [130]. This is exemplified by the reduction in cell adhesion of non-capsulated yeasts; when they are experimentally coated with GXM, the phagocytosis is drastically reduced [131]. A characteristic that GXM brings to the table is the affinity for specific anti-GXM antibodies generated in the course of an infection and the influence that these antibodies have in increasing phagocytosis in yeasts by macrophages [132,133]. GXM increases affinity not only depending on specific antibodies, but also on the action of complement proteins, such as C3, which reinforces the importance that complement receptors have in fighting infection [134]. These receptors are not only found in macrophages but also in B cells [135], and their presence is associated with the maintenance of the B-1 lymphocyte population [136]. In addition, the complement receptors CR3 (CD11b/CD18) and CR4 (CD11c/CD18) have already been described as contributing to the phagocytosis of C. neoformans, independently of the action of antibodies [137]. In addition to binding soluble molecules, GXM has already shown interaction with receptors of innate immunity cells, mainly in the incorporation of the polysaccharide into the cell interior, mediated by: CD18 receptor on neutrophils [138], FcγRII and CD206, important in the antigenic presentation of dendritic cells during cryptococcosis [139]. Although these receptors are not associated with GXM clearance during infection [140], their accumulation within phagocytes leads to the modulation of intracellular cytokine production, such as the regulation of TNF-α by the interaction with CD14 and TLR4 via GXM binding [141], and GXM-CD14 interaction that induces IL-8 production in alveolar macrophages [142]. The negative modulation of GXM in the production of cytokines associated with the inflammatory response has already been observed, as was the reduction in secreted TNF-α, IL-1β and IFN-γ [143,144] and the increase in IL-10 associated with an anti-inflammatory profile [145]. Furthermore, high levels of IL-10 are associated with the presence of GXM in cerebrospinal fluid, and this has already been described as a predictor of death from cryptococcal meningoencephalitis [146]. Another mechanism generated by the interaction with GXM is the induction of cellular apoptosis [145,147]. This mechanism has already been described as being triggered on the production of nitric oxide induced by GXM [148], and the action of caspase-8 via the induction of Fas and FasL receptor expression [109,149]. Furthermore, GXM is able to suppress the expression of MHCII, reducing antigen presentation by dendritic cells and, consequently, the proliferation of T lymphocytes. However, GXM also non-specifically prevents T cell proliferation [150,151,152]. Another mechanism observed is the inhibition in the production of neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) by the presence of GXM in an in vitro model, which further reinforces the immunoregulatory potential of this polysaccharide [128]. Interestingly, that is evidence that fractions of different molecular weights of GXM from C. neoformans elicit different immunomodulatory activities in vitro. Nevertheless, the direct relationship between molecular weight and immunomodulatory effect has not yet been established, especially with regard to GXM fractions from C. gattii, which have very little data available [153]. However, other aspects have been studied, such as the induction of apoptosis, which is already a well-described mechanism for C. neoformans [154]. Similarly, Chiapello and colleagues still describe this mechanism in C. gattii as dependent on the production of nitric oxide by phagocytes [148]. Interestingly, Villena and colleagues proposed that macrophages that internalize apoptotic bodies are sufficient to contribute to immunoregulation, as they trigger the release of anti-inflammatory mediators, which facilitate infection [109].

7.2. Glucuronoxylomannogalactan (GXMGal)

The polysaccharide glucuronoxylomannogalactan was several times described as galactoxylomannan due to its first structural characterizations showing the presence of galactose, xylose and mannose [111]. However, in later studies, it was found that it had a galactose main chain as opposed to mannose and the residue associated with the galactose side chain, previously described as β-(1-3)-xylosyl, was actually a β-(1-3)-glucuronyl bond, thus, adding glucuronic acid to the structure of this polysaccharide. Therefore, a new nomenclature was proposed, identifying it as a glucuronoxylomannogalactan [155]. Furthermore, a high rate of O-acetylations was recently revealed in the structure of GXMGal from C. neoformans in a capsular growth-inducing medium, demonstrating the higher presence of important binding sites in this polysaccharide that may confer potential immunobiological activity [115]. One of the characteristics that differentiates the species of C. neoformans and C. gattii with regard to the immunoregulatory potential of GXM is the differences in the O-acetylations of this polysaccharide, suggesting a relationship with the greater virulence of C. gattii [124], on the GXMGal of C. gattii; the real implications of its potential are still unknown. Another important structural adjustment proposed is the presence of two galactofuranosides, linked by β-(1-2)- and β-(1-3)- bonds to the galactose residues of the main chain of GXMGal from C. neoformans, which suggests greater complexity in the structure of this polysaccharide than previously observed [156]. Some immunomodulatory effects of GXMGal have already been observed, such as the activation of cellular apoptosis induced by Fas and FasL, as already observed in GXM [109] and unlike GXM, GXMGal induces NET release by neutrophils instead of inhibiting [128], which shows a clear indication of immunoactivating activity in GXMGal. Regarding GXMGal apoptosis-inducing properties, T lymphocyte glucoreceptors responsible for the interaction with this polysaccharide, such as CD7, CD43 and CD45, have already been described within this mechanism, inducing indirectly and directly by the activation of Bid and Caspase-9 [157]. An interesting finding in this context is the relationship discovered by GXMGal in the activation of immunological paralysis, through the depletion of B lymphocyte populations, due to its pro-apoptotic properties during the course of infection by C. neoformans [158,159]. GXMGal has already been described as a potent inducer of dendritic cell activation in the context of a Th17 profile in vitro and, in addition, treatment with GXMGal before infection by C. neoformans promotes protection against the fungus by a mechanism dependent on the production of IL-6 and IL -17 [160]. The production of IL-6 induced by GXMGal has also been observed in monocytes and appears to be independent of the action of TNF-α [161]. In addition, it has already been described that GXMGal binds to CD18 receptors on neutrophils [138], inducing iNOS expression in the RAW macrophage line as well as nitric oxide (NO) production [109,162]. However, some immunoregulatory properties of GXMGal have already been reported, such as the induction of a Treg profile in function and in number of cells [163], the inhibition of IL-17A production in T lymphocytes from patients with rheumatoid arthritis [164] and reduced production of IL-1β and IL-12 [165]. Data on the immunomodulatory effects of GXMGal are diverse and demonstrate the little knowledge elucidated about the real functions and mechanisms that this polysaccharide can elicit; in addition, there are no data on the structure of this polysaccharide in C. gattii, demonstrating the importance of further research in order to unravel it, as it must result in possible differences in immunobiological effects between different species of Cryptococcus spp.

8. Cryptococcosis

Cryptococcosis is an infectious disease caused by fungal species of the genera Cryptococcus, C. neoformans and C. gattii. They are globally distributed, although C. gattii is generally seen as a tropical or subtropical fungus [1,48,166]. Cryptococcosis affects immunocompromised individuals, causing severe lung disease and meningoencephalitis, with C. gattii particularly capable of infecting immunocompetent hosts [6,27]. As well as C. neoformans, C. gattii, despite indiscriminately affecting immunocompetent individuals, has risk factors associated with infection, such as diabetes [167,168], history of cancer [169], use of corticosteroids, chronic lung disease, age over 50 years and smoking habits [170,171], in addition to the ease of dissemination of the fungus in immunocompromised patients, as already described for C. neoformans [3,172]. There is a tendency for cases of cryptococcosis to be associated as a secondary infection in already debilitated patients, as in the case of HIV-positive patients, with about 11 to 17% of these patients having already been diagnosed with cryptococcosis in different studies around the world [173,174]. The prevalence of death from cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in these patients reaches 15% and the global incidence of cryptococcosis in 2014 was around 223,000 cases [21]. Data on cryptococcosis are alarming since more and more immunocompetent human individuals are affected by the disease. Immunocompetent patients already account for about 60% of cases of cryptococcosis, with about 67% having associated cryptococcal meningoencephalitis [172,175]. In both studies, about 24 to 25% of the patients were asymptomatic, which indicates the possibility of misdiagnosis in cases of C. gattii cryptococcosis. In addition to affecting immunocompetent individuals, this fungus has increased its area of influence, with several cases reported in regions not previously associated with its clinical diagnosis [176,177]. In northern Brazil, about 23% of clinical isolates from patients affected by cryptococcosis are C. gattii [30], and the VGII variant C. deuterorogattii was described as the most prevalent in immunocompetent individuals in a study in the southeastern region of Brazil [36]. C. gattii infection is associated with permanence in areas where the fungus is present with the persistence of contact with the host [178]. Normally, this fungus is associated with plant and forest material in rural and wild environments; thus, environmental isolates are increasingly found more in urban areas, suggesting the establishment of the fungus in cities and a possible correlation with the persistence of the fungus and the emergence of new clinical findings, especially the higher risk variant, VGII [8,31,179].

9. Disease Development

During its life cycle outside the host, the fungus found in the environment produces spores of about 1 to 5 µm in diameter, which are easily aspirated by mammalian hosts [180]. These infectious propagules lodge inside the pulmonary alveoli and proceed to the life cycle, promoting cell division and proliferating inside the lungs, triggering severe pneumonia [181]. The incubation time of C. neoformans has already been described as around 110 months, being characterized by a period of dormancy before the establishment of the infection and the appearance of clinical symptoms in debilitated patients, whereas C. gattii has reported much shorter periods, with an average of 6 to 7 months, indicating that this fungus is more consistent with a primary infection [182,183]. During the course of cryptococcosis, hosts may be completely asymptomatic before the clinical picture deteriorates and progresses into acute pneumonia [180]. The symptoms during infection are very wide ranging and are associated with pneumonia, such as chest pain, malaise, dyspnea, fever, cough, weight loss, night sweats and hemoptysis [184].

10. Cryptococcus Dissemination

After its establishment in the lung tissue, the capsular and cell body growth of the fungus occurs, a mechanism that is closely associated with the impediment of phagocytosis and formation of titanized yeasts. Titan cells have been found in both C. neoformans and C. gattii [185,186]. These yeasts have a size greater than 20 µm in cell body diameter and have a greater-than-normal capsular thickening, which gives the yeast greater external coverage with its structural virulence factors [187,188]. A characteristic that the fungus has during infection is the tropism for the central nervous system [189], and associated with this, the titanization of the yeast is a morphological modification that is linked to favoring the spread to this region of the organism; however, C. gattii is less likely to disseminate to the CNS as compared to C. neoformans, and C. gattii is more likely to present as pneumonia [171,190]. After the establishment of the yeast in the lungs, the fungus can spread to other organs in the organism, resulting in the progression to systemic cryptococcosis [191] (Figure 2). This extrapulmonary spread favors the passage of the fungus to the central nervous system and can be mediated by the action of phagocytes present in the pulmonary alveoli, residing in the site of infection in the lungs [189]. There are several mechanisms proposed for this dissemination, the “Trojan Horse” being one of the most observed [192]. In this dissemination, the yeast is internalized by resident phagocytes and migrates through transcytosis through the epithelial barrier; thus, the intact yeast inside the cell can migrate to the various tissues that the phagocyte finds in the body, including the central nervous system, going through the phagocyte by lytic or non-lytic extrusion, also called vomocytosis. Both C. neoformans and C. gattii have already presented this type of transport [193]. Yeast can be either phagocytosed or actively enter the cell body, by mechanisms not yet well elucidated [194] and, in addition, the cell can migrate through the pulmonary endothelium and blood–brain barrier by paracellular passage (between cells) and transcellular passage (through the cell) [195,196] (Figure 2). Interestingly, even rare, transplacental migration can occur, with cases already well documented on this topic [197]. Although the transfer of yeast by the organism mediated by phagocytes is well described, there are other mechanisms by which Cryptococcus spp. can cross physiological barriers, such as transcytosis by epithelial cells, already described as mediated by the binding of GXM with the CD14 receptor and palmitic acid from the yeast by binding to the pulmonary surfactant protein D, both mechanisms starting with the facilitation of cell adhesion [198,199]. A similar mechanism has been associated with the binding of hyaluronic acid on CD44, also facilitating cell adhesion and the metalloproteinase Mpr1 engaging Annexin A2 in the transfer of yeast transcellularly across the blood–brain barrier [200,201]. In addition to these mechanisms, Cryptococcus yeast produces urease and induces the release of IL-33, which leads to the dissociation of tight junctions in the epithelium, facilitating paracellular passage [202,203]. Urease, as well as other proteolytic enzymes and Plb1, are capable of destroying the epithelial cells in the blood–brain barrier, favoring the passage of yeast [204,205] (Figure 2). Despite the mechanisms of dissemination of yeasts, dependent on their intrinsic factors, the dissemination of Cryptococcus through immune cells is particularly important, mainly due to the subversion of cellular activity that the capsular constituents of yeast promote [189]. In this way, phagocytes have already been demonstrated important in the dissemination of the fungus to the central nervous system [206]. In general, the exopolysaccharides exuded by the internalized yeast accumulate inside the cell and, in a way that has not yet been elucidated, suppress the intracellular defense mechanisms [207].

11. Cryptococcosis Resistance

Before any subversion occurs, it is necessary that the yeast survives inside the cell without harm to its functional integrity. Therefore, an intrinsic characteristic of Cryptococcus spp. is the ability to survive in more acidic pH, including inside the phagolysosomes of the phagocyte–host [208]. This survival ends up being advantageous for the yeast also regarding the access to iron for its metabolism, since transferrins capture this micronutrient in neutral pH; thus, a more acidic pH increases the availability of iron intracellularly for the yeast [209], with iron being a determining factor for the virulence and dissemination of the fungus by the host [210]. In this context, in addition to surviving in more acidic pH, the yeast of Cryptococcus spp. can prevent phagolysosomal maturation to some degree [211] and, specifically, internalized yeasts of C. deurogattii R265 are able to prevent phagolysosomal fusion into dendritic cells by subverting phagosomal actin cytoskeleton rearrangement in the early stages of phagolysosomal maturation, preventing acidification and enzyme entry in the digestive vacuole by forming a kind of actin cage that protects the yeast intracellularly, a phenomenon that has not yet been observed in other species of Cryptococcus and that culminates in the immunological paralysis of the cell [212]. The subversion of macrophages by the infection caused by Cryptococcus spp. has already been described in terms of activation profile, since molecular factors of yeast are already described for inducing a differentiation to the M2 profile of macrophages [213]. This profile is associated with less control in fungal dissemination and less oxidative capacity to eliminate yeast intracellularly [214]. In addition, the result of a Th2-induced lymphocyte profile is also associated with reduced infection control [187,215]. In this sense, an immunological alteration caused by the opportunistic infection of Cryptococcus spp. is the state of Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS) [216], it occurs in individuals diagnosed with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) or immunosuppression that paradoxically generates exacerbated inflammation in response to an opportunistic infection, such as cryptococcosis. This phenomenon is still not completely understood and is associated with the worsening of an individual’s health status, having been observed in infections caused by C. gattii [27]. An efficient treatment for patients affected by IRIS and cryptococcal meningitis is the use of corticosteroids to alleviate the inflammatory response, being effective in the treatment of infections by C. gattii [217]. In general, the treatment for cryptococcosis lasts about 6 months, varying from case to case. In asymptomatic and mild cases, treatment with fluconazole is indicated and in more cases, pneumonia and meningitis indicate liposomal amphotericin B and flucytosine, in addition to continuous treatment with fluconazole [218]. In the case of C. gattii, initial in vitro experiments identified a lower susceptibility of C. gattii to fluconazole in relation to C. neoformans, with treatment with amphotericin B and flucytocin being more effective for C. gattii infection [219]. Specifically, C. gattii appears to show an adaptive heteroresistance to fluconazole, which leads to recurrence of disease severity during infection [220].

12. Immune Response against Cryptococcosis

12.1. The First Contact

When initially established in the lungs, the yeasts of Cryptococcus spp. come into contact with the first immunological barrier, the surfactants of the pulmonary [221]. Collectins, specifically SP-A and SP-D, have already demonstrated binding activity by Cryptococcus spp., presenting affinity for yeast sugar residues, which increases yeast affinity for phagocytes present by opsonization [222,223]. However, it has already been shown that C. neoformans appears to be resistant to the action of SP-A [224]. Further, this fungus subverts the action of the SP-D receptor as previously described by using it for its transcellular traffic [198] and, curiously, the action of SP-D is associated with worsening cryptococcosis, leading to mortality in an animal model by increasing IL-5 levels and promoting pulmonary eosinophilia during infection [225] (Figure 3). In addition, when contacting soluble surfactants in the pulmonary alveoli, the yeast encounters several cells responsible for innate immunity, such as alveolar macrophages and resident dendritic cells, which are responsible for the initial anti-cryptococcal cellular response, mainly through the recognition of yeast molecular patterns, phagocytosis and release of cytokines in the lung microenvironment [226,227].

12.2. Immunomodulation

Recognition of the molecular patterns associated with the fungus by immune cells is crucial for an efficient anti-cryptococcal response [227]. Da Silva-Junior and colleagues described this aspect using TLR9-deficient mice. When its deficiency in a model of cryptococcosis was caused by C. gattii, it was associated with a lower Th1 and Th17 profile and a higher presence of titanized cells, characterizing a lack of disease control [185]. Mannose and β-glycan receptors also mediate the incorporation of C. neoformans yeast by phagocytosis and production of cytokines with a pro-inflammatory profile, as in the production of TNF-α [228]. Furthermore, complement receptors CR3 and CR4 are involved in the recognition of C. neoformans, mediating phagocytosis independently of antibody action, as previously seen when binding to GXM [137]. Receptors, such as dectin-1 and CD11b, are associated with a rapid interaction with C. neoformans spores β-glycans, facilitating alveolar macrophage phagocytosis [229]. However, dectin-1 does not appear to be necessary for host defense against C. neoformans. This is most likely due to the blockade of β-glycan binding sites by GXM, since the spores that are non-encapsulated rapidly bind to the receptor exerting cellular activation, unlike encapsulated yeasts [230]. Receptors that alter the cytokine profile and mediate C. neoformans yeast–cell adhesion are the SCARF1 and CD36 scavenger receptors, which increase IL-1β and CXCL2 production [231], TLR2 and MyD88 adapter, which increase the production of TNF-α, IL-12 and IFN-γ [232] and mannose receptors that induce the proliferation of CD4+ T lymphocytes [233]. In addition, non-encapsulated strains of C. neoformans activate the inflammasome by NLRP3 and fungal capsular constituents appear to inhibit this process [234]. Likewise, inhibition in the production of IL-8 and CXCL1 has also been observed in endothelial cells in contact with C. neoformans due to the presence of the polysaccharide capsule in the fungus [235]. The cytokine microenvironment is also compromised not only by the Cryptococcus spp. intrinsic factors, as already observed, but by extrinsic ones. For instance, during infection caused by C. gattii, the microbiota seem to be important for limiting the progression of the disease, with germ-free animals being more susceptible to this infection and with lower production of IFN-γ, IL -1β and IL-17, which leads to a lower infection control [236]. Interestingly, the production of IFN-γ appears to be more potent during macrophage phagocytosis induction of C. neoformans and less responsive for the phagocytosis of C. gattii yeasts, with C. gattii also showing a reduced capacity for inducing IL-12 in vitro when compared to C. neoformans [237]. Within the C. gattii species complex itself, there are differences in the in vitro cytokine induction potential, with the hypervirulent R265 variant C. deuterorogattii showing the lowest inductions of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-a, IL-1b and IL-6, which, in theory, suggests a greater escape from the pro-antifungal conditions of the inflammatory microenvironment during an infection [238].

12.3. Cell Response against the Infection

The internalized fungus survives well at the acidic pH of the phagolysosome and subverts its maturation machinery, as already described [211]. In this sense, some analyses were carried out with regard to autophagy markers during an infection caused by C. neoformans and it was noted that unlike in other pathogenic yeast species, cryptococcosis caused by the selective intracellular pathogen C. neoformans is less severe in the absence of autophagy [239]. Furthermore, NLRC4 inflammasome-mediated activation of caspase-1 during C. gattii cryptococcosis increases pyroptosis in phagocytes and affects their phagocytic capacity by inhibiting the yeast intracellular parasitism [240]. Ueno and colleagues even describe that C. gattii has a greater resistance to oxidative stress generated by the antifungal activity of neutrophils than C. neoformans [241]. In addition to the control of cryptococcosis by the innate immune response, the adaptive response also plays a key role. During cryptococcosis, where the cytotoxic role of CD8+ T lymphocytes in infection control has already been reported, interestingly, this mechanism is dependent on activation by CD4+ T lymphocytes and the production of IL-15, a cytokine responsible for the increase in the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T lymphocytes in the immune microenvironment [242]. Furthermore, it is well described, not only for C. gattii but also for other pathogenic fungal species, that targeting the Th1/Th17 activation axis is important for fighting infection and for the better clearance of the fungal load in the host, with the production of cytokines, such as IFN-γ and IL-17, associated with this phenotype [221] (Figure 3). Therefore, T lymphocyte populations mediate infection control by acting directly on the yeast and directing the antifungal immunity by controlling the cytokine profile in the immune microenvironment; however, the mechanisms orchestrated during the immunopathogenesis of cryptococcosis are still discreetly elucidated, especially in the context of infection caused by C. gattii. Along these same lines, the role that the B lymphocyte population plays during this infection is still poorly understood. However, there are some data that show the importance of this population of cells in the production of antibodies. For instance, it has been observed that B lymphocytes produce IgM antibodies that have the ability to induce the Th1 profile and assist in the recruitment of macrophages and phagocytosis during pulmonary C. neoformans cryptococcosis [243]. Specifically, natural IgM produced by B-1 lymphocytes appears to mediate antifungal immunity in the early stages of infection caused by C. neoformans [244,245]. However, not only the production of natural IgM seems to be related to the reduction in the predisposition to the formation of titan yeasts, but the population of B-1 lymphocytes seems to limit this phenotype that is associated with the worsening of the C. gattii and C. neoformans infection [187,190,246]. This demonstrates the importance that the B lymphocyte population as a whole seems to have in anticryptococcal immunity, especially when it is associated with the clinical description of a higher incidence of C. neoformans cryptococcosis in human individuals who have compromised B lymphocyte populations [247,248]. The populations of B lymphocytes are responsible for maintaining the humoral response in the body, helping to control infections caused by a countless range of pathogens [249]. Among them, the subpopulation of B-1 lymphocytes has a decisive role in the control of fungal infections, being recently studied, during the progression of C. gattii and C. neoformans infection [245,246]. B-1a and B-1b populations have been reported to produce natural antibodies against the capsular components of Streptococcus pneumoniae, attenuating the infection [250]. In addition to humoral activity, B-1 lymphocytes are capable of acting innately, differentiating themselves in a population of mononuclear phagocytes and fighting the infection caused by C. neoformans in a nitric-oxide-dependent manner; this population is called B-1-Cell-Derived Phagocytes (B-1CDP) [251] (Figure 3). However, it was demonstrated in the infection of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis that B-1 cells also secrete IL-10 and induce activation of regulatory T cells, facilitating disease progression [252,253]. This contribution of IL-10 production by B-1 cells was also observed in Leishmania and Francisella infections [254,255,256]. Therefore, B-1 cells seem to perform their effector function differently in different infections. Furthermore, XID mice have already been described as having increased susceptibility to C. neoformans cryptococcosis [257], and recent data using the same animal model suggest that in the aspect of natural antibody production, the role of IgM produced by B-1 cells seems to be related to the control of infection of C. neoformans and C. gattii, preventing its spread from the lungs to the brain and restricting the size of yeasts [187,246]. However, despite having observed the important role that B lymphocytes play in the onset of cryptococcosis, using B lymphocyte depletion and transfer strategies in the infection model caused by C. neoformans [244,245], B-1 cell population transfer strategies have not yet been used to demonstrate the effect of its reconstitution and depletion during the experimental model of C. gattii infection. Only a few trials have been conducted with unsatisfactory results using the same strategy in an experimental model of C. neoformans infection [246]. Therefore, B lymphocyte immunity is potentially decisive for the control of cryptococcosis and there are still multiple facets to be explored in this field of study during infection caused by C. gattii. Nevertheless, both C. gattii and C. neoformans present distinct features when comparing together their molecular components, epidemiological aspects and immune response; therefore, we summarize some differences between the pathogenic species of Cryptococcus in Table 1.

13. Concluding Remarks

In summary, cryptococosis is a disease of great clinical importance, with both pathogenic species C. gattii and C. neoformans responsible for causing a severe disease. Specifically, C. gattii causes the most severe cases in immunocompetent individuals. Generally, both species of fungus are found in plant material in different geographic regions, having increased the number of cases over the last few years, mainly of C. gattii, where, despite being less frequent than C. neoformans, a considerable increase in the number of C. gattii clinical samples has been found, quite possibly due to changes in global climate dynamics in new geographic regions of incidence, since this fungus is more frequent in warmer climates. One of the factors that establishes these fungal species as extremely harmful to the human host is the evolution to cryptococcal meningitis after the initial stages of pneumonia, which is characterized by its difficult treatment and associated with a considerable worsening of the prospects for recovery. During the infection, C. gattii interacts with immune cells, which are activated by its various virulence factors, engaging antifungal immunity; however, the most studied virulence factors, capsular polysaccharides, intrinsically have the potential to subvert the immune system. This happens due to the blockade of cell activation receptors, modification of the cytokine microenvironment profile and activation of cell death pathways. Nevertheless, these polysaccharides facilitate the spread of the disease due to their immunomodulatory properties and confer increases in yeast size, also leading to reduced cryptococcal clearance in the host. However, despite the structural characterization of these constituents being elucidated, the mechanisms that involve their synthesis during the infection are still vaguely clarified. Nevertheless, progressively, many studies aim to describe these aspects and some have successfully uncovered important features between Cryptococcus species that contribute to the understanding of the disease. Thus, the awareness of cryptococcosis immunopathology not only open doors for disease prevention and control strategies, but also provides the necessary knowledge to better understand the evolutionary and adaptive aspects that condition the major virulence of one of the most significant pathogens.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.D.-L., D.D.-R., L.M.d.F. and C.G.F.-d.-L.; Writing, I.D.-L., D.D.-R. and C.G.F.-d.-L.; Supervision, C.G.F.-d.-L., L.M.-P. and D.D.-R.; Project Administration, C.G.F.-d.-L., A.M., D.O.N., L.F.-d.-L., J.O.P., J.C.G.-d.-O. and E.B.d.S.-J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq), Rio de Janeiro State Science Foundation (FAPERJ), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), and Programa Institutos Nacionais de Ciência e Tecnologia (INCT), CNPq, Brazil. We thank Lindomar Miranda for helpful technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maziarz, E.K.; Perfect, J.R. Cryptococcosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2016, 30, 179–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Springer, D.J.; Chaturvedi, V. Projecting global occurrence of Cryptococcus gattii. Emerg. Infect. Dis 2010, 16, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Fraser, J.A.; Doering, T.L.; Wang, Z.; Janbon, G.; Idnurm, A.; Bahn, Y.S. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 4, a019760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chau, T.T.; Mai, N.H.; Phu, N.H.; Nghia, H.D.; Chuong, L.V.; Sinh, D.X.; Duong, V.A.; Diep, P.T.; Campbell, J.I.; Baker, S.; et al. A prospective descriptive study of cryptococcal meningitis in HIV uninfected patients in Vietnam—High prevalence of Cryptococcus neoformans var grubii in the absence of underlying disease. BMC Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kielstein, P.; Hotzel, H.; Schmalreck, A.; Khaschabi, D.; Glawischnig, W. Occurrence of Cryptococcus spp. in excreta of pigeons and pet birds. Mycoses 2000, 43, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Springer, D.J.; Billmyre, R.B.; Filler, E.E.; Voelz, K.; Pursall, R.; Mieczkowski, P.A.; Larsen, R.A.; Dietrich, F.S.; May, R.C.; Filler, S.G.; et al. Cryptococcus gattii VGIII isolates causing infections in HIV/AIDS patients in Southern California: Identification of the local environmental source as arboreal. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Moller, L.; Kessler, K.D.; Steyn, A.; Valentine, A.J.; Botha, A. The role of Cryptococcus laurentii and mycorrhizal fungi in the nutritional physiology of Lupinus angustifolius L. hosting N2-fixing nodules. Plant. Soil 2016, 409, 345–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Diaz, J.H. The Disease Ecology, Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Management of Emerging Cryptococcus gattii Complex Infections. Wilderness Environ. Med. 2020, 31, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ferreira-Paim, K.; Ferreira, T.B.; Andrade-Silva, L.; Mora, D.J.; Springer, D.J.; Heitman, J.; Fonseca, F.M.; Matos, D.; Melhem, M.S.; Silva-Vergara, M.L. Phylogenetic analysis of phenotypically characterized Cryptococcus laurentii isolates reveals high frequency of cryptic species. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Castro-Lainez, M.T.; Deliz-Aguirre, R.; Antunez, D.; Cruz-Codina, M.; Cahuayme-Zuniga, L.; Vitale, K.; Sierra-Hoffman, M.; Midturi, J.K. Cryptococcus laurentii meningitis in a non-HIV patient. IDCases 2019, 18, e00612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salazar-Leal, J.I.; Ramirez-Montelongo, S.M.; Lopez Luis, B.A. Clinical significance of nosocomial Cryptococcus laurentii in urine: A case series. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2019, 40, 1442–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Gupta, M.; Mishra, A.K.; Singh, S.K. Cryptococcus laurentii fungemia in a low birth weight preterm neonate: India. J. Infect. Public Health 2018, 11, 896–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mitchell, T.G.; Perfect, J.R. Cryptococcosis in the era of AIDS--100 years after the discovery of Cryptococcus neoformans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1995, 8, 515–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Neiman, A.M. Ascospore formation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2005, 69, 565–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Barnett, J.A. A history of research on yeasts 14: Medical yeasts part 2, Cryptococcus neoformans. Yeast 2010, 27, 875–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Evans, E.E.; Sorensen, L.J.; Walls, K.W. The antigenic composition of Cryptococcus neoformans. V. A survey of cross-reactions among strains of Cryptococcus and other antigens. J. Bacteriol. 1953, 66, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lin, X.; Heitman, J. The biology of the Cryptococcus neoformans species complex. Annu Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 60, 69–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Franzot, S.P.; Salkin, I.F.; Casadevall, A. Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii: Separate varietal status for Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 838–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Litvintseva, A.P.; Thakur, R.; Vilgalys, R.; Mitchell, T.G. Multilocus sequence typing reveals three genetic subpopulations of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii (serotype A), including a unique population in Botswana. Genetics 2006, 172, 2223–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Meyer, W.; Marszewska, K.; Amirmostofian, M.; Igreja, R.P.; Hardtke, C.; Methling, K.; Viviani, M.A.; Chindamporn, A.; Sukroongreung, S.; John, M.A.; et al. Molecular typing of global isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans by polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA-a pilot study to standardize techniques on which to base a detailed epidemiological survey. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 1790–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rajasingham, R.; Smith, R.M.; Park, B.J.; Jarvis, J.N.; Govender, N.P.; Chiller, T.M.; Denning, D.W.; Loyse, A.; Boulware, D.R. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: An updated analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Tintelnot, K.; Hagen, F.; Han, C.O.; Seibold, M.; Rickerts, V.; Boekhout, T. Pitfalls in Serological Diagnosis of Cryptococcus gattii Infections. Med. Mycol. 2015, 53, 874–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Iverson, S.A.; Chiller, T.; Beekmann, S.; Polgreen, P.M.; Harris, J. Recognition and diagnosis of Cryptococcus gattii infections in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 1012–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Polacheck, I.; Bennett, J.E. Improved diagnostic medium for separation of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans (serotypes A and D) and Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii (serotypes B and C). J. Clin. Microbiol. 1982, 15, 535–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Polacheck, I.; Kwon-Chung, K.J. Canavanine resistance in Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1986, 29, 468–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Klein, K.R.; Hall, L.; Deml, S.M.; Rysavy, J.M.; Wohlfiel, S.L.; Wengenack, N.L. Identification of Cryptococcus gattii by use of L-canavanine glycine bromothymol blue medium and DNA sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 3669–3672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chen, S.C.; Meyer, W.; Sorrell, T.C. Cryptococcus gattii infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 980–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. D’Souza, C.A.; Kronstad, J.W.; Taylor, G.; Warren, R.; Yuen, M.; Hu, G.; Jung, W.H.; Sham, A.; Kidd, S.E.; Tangen, K.; et al. Genome variation in Cryptococcus gattii, an emerging pathogen of immunocompetent hosts. mBio 2011, 2, e00342-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Springer, D.J.; Phadke, S.; Billmyre, B.; Heitman, J. Cryptococcus gattii, no longer an accidental pathogen? Curr. Fungal. Infect. Rep. 2012, 6, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Da Silva, B.K.; Freire, A.K.; Bentes Ados, S.; Sampaio Ide, L.; Santos, L.O.; Dos Santos, M.S.; De Souza, J.V. Characterization of clinical isolates of the Cryptococcus neoformans-Cryptococcus gattii species complex from the Amazonas State in Brazil. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2012, 29, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dos Santos Bentes, A.; Wanke, B.; Dos Santos Lazéra, M.; Freire, A.K.L.; da Silva Júnior, R.M.; Rocha, D.F.S.; Pinheiro, S.B.; Zelski, S.E.; Matsuura, A.B.J.; da Rocha, L.C.; et al. Cryptococcus gattii VGII isolated from native forest and river in Northern Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2019, 50, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Nishikawa, M.M.; Almeida-Paes, R.; Brito-Santos, F.; Nascimento, C.R.; Fialho, M.M.; Trilles, L.; Morales, B.P.; da Silva, S.A.; Santos, W.; Santos, L.O.; et al. Comparative antifungal susceptibility analyses of Cryptococcus neoformans VNI and Cryptococcus gattii VGII from the Brazilian Amazon Region by the Etest, Vitek 2, and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 864–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Martins, L.M.; Wanke, B.; Lazéra Mdos, S.; Trilles, L.; Barbosa, G.G.; Macedo, R.C.; Cavalcanti Mdo, A.; Eulálio, K.D.; Castro, J.A.; Silva, A.S.; et al. Genotypes of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii as agents of endemic cryptococcosis in Teresina, Piauí (northeastern Brazil). Mem Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2011, 106, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Maruyama, F.H.; de Paula, D.A.J.; Menezes, I.G.; Favalessa, O.C.; Hahn, R.C.; de Almeida, A.; Sousa, V.R.F.; Nakazato, L.; Dutra, V. Genetic Diversity of the Cryptococcus gattii Species Complex in Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Mycopathologia 2019, 184, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Bennett, J.E. High prevalence of Cryptococcus neoformans var gattii in tropical and subtropical regions. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Mikrobiol. Hyg. A 1984, 257, 213–218. [Google Scholar]
  36. Grizante Barião, P.H.; Tonani, L.; Cocio, T.A.; Martinez, R.; Nascimento, E.; von Zeska Kress, M.R. Molecular typing, in vitro susceptibility and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans/Cryptococcus gattii species complex clinical isolates from south-eastern Brazil. Mycoses 2020, 63, 1341–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nascimento, E.; Barião, P.H.G.; Kress, M.; Vilar, F.C.; Santana, R.C.; Gaspar, G.G.; Martinez, R. Cryptococcosis by Cryptococcus neoformans/Cryptococcus gattii Species Complexes in non-HIV-Infected Patients in Southeastern Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2021, 54, e01692021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McGill, S.; Malik, R.; Saul, N.; Beetson, S.; Secombe, C.; Robertson, I.; Irwin, P. Cryptococcosis in domestic animals in Western Australia: A retrospective study from 1995-2006. Med. Mycol. 2009, 47, 625–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Duncan, C.; Schwantje, H.; Stephen, C.; Campbell, J.; Bartlett, K. Cryptococcus gattii in wildlife of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. J. Wildl. Dis. 2006, 42, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Stephen, C.; Lester, S.; Black, W.; Fyfe, M.; Raverty, S. Multispecies outbreak of cryptococcosis on southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Can. Vet. J. 2002, 43, 792–794. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kidd, S.E.; Hagen, F.; Tscharke, R.L.; Huynh, M.; Bartlett, K.H.; Fyfe, M.; Macdougall, L.; Boekhout, T.; Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Meyer, W. A rare genotype of Cryptococcus gattii caused the cryptococcosis outbreak on Vancouver Island (British Columbia, Canada). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 17258–17263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Byrnes, E.J., 3rd; Li, W.; Lewit, Y.; Perfect, J.R.; Carter, D.A.; Cox, G.M.; Heitman, J. First reported case of Cryptococcus gattii in the Southeastern USA: Implications for travel-associated acquisition of an emerging pathogen. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bruner, K.T.; Franco-Paredes, C.; Henao-Martinez, A.F.; Steele, G.M.; Chastain, D.B. Cryptococcus gattii Complex Infections in HIV-Infected Patients, Southeastern United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 1998–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Harris, J.R.; Lockhart, S.R.; Debess, E.; Marsden-Haug, N.; Goldoft, M.; Wohrle, R.; Lee, S.; Smelser, C.; Park, B.; Chiller, T. Cryptococcus gattii in the United States: Clinical aspects of infection with an emerging pathogen. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 53, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Datta, K.; Bartlett, K.H.; Baer, R.; Byrnes, E.; Galanis, E.; Heitman, J.; Hoang, L.; Leslie, M.J.; MacDougall, L.; Magill, S.S.; et al. Spread of Cryptococcus gattii into Pacific Northwest region of the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 1185–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Souto, A.C.; Bonfietti, L.X.; Ferreira-Paim, K.; Trilles, L.; Martins, M.; Ribeiro-Alves, M.; Pham, C.D.; Martins, L.; Dos Santos, W.; Chang, M.; et al. Population Genetic Analysis Reveals a High Genetic Diversity in the Brazilian Cryptococcus gattii VGII Population and Shifts the Global Origin from the Amazon Rainforest to the Semi-arid Desert in the Northeast of Brazil. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Akins, P.T.; Jian, B. The Frozen Brain State of Cryptococcus gattii: A Globe-Trotting, Tropical, Neurotropic Fungus. Neurocrit. Care 2019, 30, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. May, R.C.; Stone, N.R.; Wiesner, D.L.; Bicanic, T.; Nielsen, K. Cryptococcus: From environmental saprophyte to global pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Casadevall, A.; Freij, J.B.; Hann-Soden, C.; Taylor, J. Continental Drift and Speciation of the Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii Species Complexes. mSphere 2017, 2, e00103-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Farrer, R.A.; Desjardins, C.A.; Sakthikumar, S.; Gujja, S.; Saif, S.; Zeng, Q.; Chen, Y.; Voelz, K.; Heitman, J.; May, R.C.; et al. Genome Evolution and Innovation across the Four Major Lineages of Cryptococcus gattii. mBio 2015, 6, e00868-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Meyer, W. Cryptococcus gattii in the Age of Whole-Genome Sequencing. mBio 2015, 6, e01761-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Litvintseva, A.P.; Mitchell, T.G. Population genetic analyses reveal the African origin and strain variation of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Buchanan, K.L.; Murphy, J.W. What makes Cryptococcus neoformans a pathogen? Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1998, 4, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Srikanta, D.; Santiago-Tirado, F.H.; Doering, T.L. Cryptococcus neoformans: Historical curiosity to modern pathogen. Yeast 2014, 31, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Odom, A.; Muir, S.; Lim, E.; Toffaletti, D.L.; Perfect, J.; Heitman, J. Calcineurin is required for virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 2576–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Narasipura, S.D.; Chaturvedi, V.; Chaturvedi, S. Characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans variety gattii SOD2 reveals distinct roles of the two superoxide dismutases in fungal biology and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1782–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ngamskulrungroj, P.; Himmelreich, U.; Breger, J.A.; Wilson, C.; Chayakulkeeree, M.; Krockenberger, M.B.; Malik, R.; Daniel, H.M.; Toffaletti, D.; Djordjevic, J.T.; et al. The trehalose synthesis pathway is an integral part of the virulence composite for Cryptococcus gattii. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 4584–4596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Wang, Y.; Casadevall, A. Susceptibility of melanized and nonmelanized Cryptococcus neoformans to nitrogen- and oxygen-derived oxidants. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 3004–3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Blasi, E.; Barluzzi, R.; Mazzolla, R.; Tancini, B.; Saleppico, S.; Puliti, M.; Pitzurra, L.; Bistoni, F. Role of nitric oxide and melanogenesis in the accomplishment of anticryptococcal activity by the BV-2 microglial cell line. J. Neuroimmunol. 1995, 58, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Doering, T.L.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Roberts, W.K.; Casadevall, A. Melanin as a potential cryptococcal defence against microbicidal proteins. Med. Mycol. 1999, 37, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ikeda, R.; Sugita, T.; Jacobson, E.S.; Shinoda, T. Effects of melanin upon susceptibility of Cryptococcus to antifungals. Microbiol. Immunol. 2003, 47, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. van Duin, D.; Casadevall, A.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Melanization of Cryptococcus neoformans and Histoplasma capsulatum reduces their susceptibilities to amphotericin B and caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 3394–3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Khajo, A.; Bryan, R.A.; Friedman, M.; Burger, R.M.; Levitsky, Y.; Casadevall, A.; Magliozzo, R.S.; Dadachova, E. Protection of melanized Cryptococcus neoformans from lethal dose gamma irradiation involves changes in melanin’s chemical structure and paramagnetism. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Dadachova, E.; Bryan, R.A.; Howell, R.C.; Schweitzer, A.D.; Aisen, P.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Casadevall, A. The radioprotective properties of fungal melanin are a function of its chemical composition, stable radical presence and spatial arrangement. Pigment. Cell Melanoma Res. 2008, 21, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhu, X.; Williamson, P.R. Role of laccase in the biology and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. FEMS Yeast Res. 2004, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Waterman, S.R.; Hacham, M.; Panepinto, J.; Hu, G.; Shin, S.; Williamson, P.R. Cell wall targeting of laccase of Cryptococcus neoformans during infection of mice. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Chrissian, C.; Camacho, E.; Fu, M.S.; Prados-Rosales, R.; Chatterjee, S.; Cordero, R.J.B.; Lodge, J.K.; Casadevall, A.; Stark, R.E. Melanin deposition in two Cryptococcus species depends on cell-wall composition and flexibility. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 1815–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Baker, L.G.; Specht, C.A.; Donlin, M.J.; Lodge, J.K. Chitosan, the deacetylated form of chitin, is necessary for cell wall integrity in Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 855–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lam, W.C.; Upadhya, R.; Specht, C.A.; Ragsdale, A.E.; Hole, C.R.; Levitz, S.M.; Lodge, J.K. Chitosan Biosynthesis and Virulence in the Human Fungal Pathogen Cryptococcus gattii. mSphere 2019, 4, e00644-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Chaturvedi, V.; Wong, B.; Newman, S.L. Oxidative killing of Cryptococcus neoformans by human neutrophils. Evidence that fungal mannitol protects by scavenging reactive oxygen intermediates. J. Immunol. 1996, 156, 3836–3840. [Google Scholar]
  71. Wong, B.; Perfect, J.R.; Beggs, S.; Wright, K.A. Production of the hexitol D-mannitol by Cryptococcus neoformans in vitro and in rabbits with experimental meningitis. Infect. Immun. 1990, 58, 1664–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Cox, G.M.; McDade, H.C.; Chen, S.C.; Tucker, S.C.; Gottfredsson, M.; Wright, L.C.; Sorrell, T.C.; Leidich, S.D.; Casadevall, A.; Ghannoum, M.A.; et al. Extracellular phospholipase activity is a virulence factor for Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lev, S.; Desmarini, D.; Li, C.; Chayakulkeeree, M.; Traven, A.; Sorrell, T.C.; Djordjevic, J.T. Phospholipase C of Cryptococcus neoformans regulates homeostasis and virulence by providing inositol trisphosphate as a substrate for Arg1 kinase. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Chen, S.C.; Muller, M.; Zhou, J.Z.; Wright, L.C.; Sorrell, T.C. Phospholipase activity in Cryptococcus neoformans: A new virulence factor? J. Infect. Dis. 1997, 175, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Maruvada, R.; Zhu, L.; Pearce, D.; Zheng, Y.; Perfect, J.; Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Kim, K.S. Cryptococcus neoformans phospholipase B1 activates host cell Rac1 for traversal across the blood-brain barrier. Cell Microbiol. 2012, 14, 1544–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Bose, I.; Reese, A.J.; Ory, J.J.; Janbon, G.; Doering, T.L. A yeast under cover: The capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot. Cell 2003, 2, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Doering, T.L. How sweet it is! Cell wall biogenesis and polysaccharide capsule formation in Cryptococcus neoformans. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 63, 223–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Chrissian, C.; Lin, C.P.; Camacho, E.; Casadevall, A.; Neiman, A.M.; Stark, R.E. Unconventional Constituents and Shared Molecular Architecture of the Melanized Cell Wall of C. neoformans and Spore Wall of S. cerevisiae. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hernandez-Chavez, M.J.; Perez-Garcia, L.A.; Nino-Vega, G.A.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Fungal Strategies to Evade the Host Immune Recognition. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Hopke, A.; Brown, A.J.P.; Hall, R.A.; Wheeler, R.T. Dynamic Fungal Cell Wall Architecture in Stress Adaptation and Immune Evasion. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 284–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kumar, P.; Heiss, C.; Santiago-Tirado, F.H.; Black, I.; Azadi, P.; Doering, T.L. Pbx proteins in Cryptococcus neoformans cell wall remodeling and capsule assembly. Eukaryot. Cell 2014, 13, 560–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Walker, L.; Sood, P.; Lenardon, M.D.; Milne, G.; Olson, J.; Jensen, G.; Wolf, J.; Casadevall, A.; Adler-Moore, J.; Gow, N.A.R. The Viscoelastic Properties of the Fungal Cell Wall Allow Traffic of AmBisome as Intact Liposome Vesicles. mBio 2018, 9, e02383-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. O’Meara, T.R.; Holmer, S.M.; Selvig, K.; Dietrich, F.; Alspaugh, J.A. Cryptococcus neoformans Rim101 is associated with cell wall remodeling and evasion of the host immune responses. mBio 2013, 4, e00522-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Esher, S.K.; Ost, K.S.; Kohlbrenner, M.A.; Pianalto, K.M.; Telzrow, C.L.; Campuzano, A.; Nichols, C.B.; Munro, C.; Wormley, F.L., Jr.; Alspaugh, J.A. Defects in intracellular trafficking of fungal cell wall synthases lead to aberrant host immune recognition. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1007126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. James, P.G.; Cherniak, R.; Jones, R.G.; Stortz, C.A.; Reiss, E. Cell-wall glucans of Cryptococcus neoformans Cap 67. Carbohydr. Res. 1990, 198, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Banks, I.R.; Specht, C.A.; Donlin, M.J.; Gerik, K.J.; Levitz, S.M.; Lodge, J.K. A chitin synthase and its regulator protein are critical for chitosan production and growth of the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot. Cell 2005, 4, 1902–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Reese, A.J.; Yoneda, A.; Breger, J.A.; Beauvais, A.; Liu, H.; Griffith, C.L.; Bose, I.; Kim, M.J.; Skau, C.; Yang, S.; et al. Loss of cell wall alpha(1-3) glucan affects Cryptococcus neoformans from ultrastructure to virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 1385–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Wang, Z.A.; Li, L.X.; Doering, T.L. Unraveling synthesis of the cryptococcal cell wall and capsule. Glycobiology 2018, 28, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Garcia-Rubio, R.; de Oliveira, H.C.; Rivera, J.; Trevijano-Contador, N. The Fungal Cell Wall: Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus Species. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cabib, E.; Blanco, N.; Grau, C.; Rodriguez-Pena, J.M.; Arroyo, J. Crh1p and Crh2p are required for the cross-linking of chitin to beta(1-6)glucan in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 63, 921–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lu, C.F.; Montijn, R.C.; Brown, J.L.; Klis, F.; Kurjan, J.; Bussey, H.; Lipke, P.N. Glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-dependent cross-linking of alpha-agglutinin and beta 1,6-glucan in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 128, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Macekova, D.; Farkas, V.; Kishida, E.; Takeo, K. Ecto-glycanases and metabolic stability of the capsule in Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Basic Microbiol. 2006, 46, 470–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Brown, H.E.; Esher, S.K.; Alspaugh, J.A. Chitin: A “Hidden Figure” in the Fungal Cell Wall. Curr Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 425, 83–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Aiba, S. Studies on chitosan: 4. Lysozymic hydrolysis of partially N-acetylated chitosans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1992, 14, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Baker, L.G.; Specht, C.A.; Lodge, J.K. Chitinases are essential for sexual development but not vegetative growth in Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot. Cell 2009, 8, 1692–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Eigenheer, R.A.; Jin Lee, Y.; Blumwald, E.; Phinney, B.S.; Gelli, A. Extracellular glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored mannoproteins and proteases of Cryptococcus neoformans. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007, 7, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Yin, Q.Y.; de Groot, P.W.; Dekker, H.L.; de Jong, L.; Klis, F.M.; de Koster, C.G. Comprehensive proteomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell walls: Identification of proteins covalently attached via glycosylphosphatidylinositol remnants or mild alkali-sensitive linkages. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 20894–20901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Yang, N.; Yu, Z.; Jia, D.; Xie, Z.; Zhang, K.; Xia, Z.; Lei, L.; Qiao, M. The contribution of Pir protein family to yeast cell surface display. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 2897–2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. McClelland, E.E.; Bernhardt, P.; Casadevall, A. Estimating the relative contributions of virulence factors for pathogenic microbes. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 1500–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Decote-Ricardo, D.; LaRocque-de-Freitas, I.F.; Rocha, J.D.B.; Nascimento, D.O.; Nunes, M.P.; Morrot, A.; Freire-de-Lima, L.; Previato, J.O.; Mendonca-Previato, L.; Freire-de-Lima, C.G. Immunomodulatory Role of Capsular Polysaccharides Constituents of Cryptococcus neoformans. Front. Med. 2019, 6, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Araujo Gde, S.; Fonseca, F.L.; Pontes, B.; Torres, A.; Cordero, R.J.; Zancope-Oliveira, R.M.; Casadevall, A.; Viana, N.B.; Nimrichter, L.; Rodrigues, M.L.; et al. Capsules from pathogenic and non-pathogenic Cryptococcus spp. manifest significant differences in structure and ability to protect against phagocytic cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e29561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Cherniak, R.; Valafar, H.; Morris, L.C.; Valafar, F. Cryptococcus neoformans chemotyping by quantitative analysis of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of glucuronoxylomannans with a computer-simulated artificial neural network. Clin. Diagn Lab. Immunol. 1998, 5, 146–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Vartivarian, S.E.; Reyes, G.H.; Jacobson, E.S.; James, P.G.; Cherniak, R.; Mumaw, V.R.; Tingler, M.J. Localization of mannoprotein in Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Bacteriol. 1989, 171, 6850–6852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. McFadden, D.C.; Fries, B.C.; Wang, F.; Casadevall, A. Capsule structural heterogeneity and antigenic variation in Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 1464–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. McFadden, D.C.; De Jesus, M.; Casadevall, A. The physical properties of the capsular polysaccharides from Cryptococcus neoformans suggest features for capsule construction. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 1868–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Cherniak, R.; Jones, R.G.; Reiss, E. Structure determination of Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A-variant glucuronoxylomannan by 13C-n.m.r. spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Res. 1988, 172, 113–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Janbon, G.; Himmelreich, U.; Moyrand, F.; Improvisi, L.; Dromer, F. Cas1p is a membrane protein necessary for the O-acetylation of the Cryptococcus neoformans capsular polysaccharide. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 42, 453–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Cherniak, R.; Sundstrom, J.B. Polysaccharide antigens of the capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 1994, 62, 1507–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Villena, S.N.; Pinheiro, R.O.; Pinheiro, C.S.; Nunes, M.P.; Takiya, C.M.; DosReis, G.A.; Previato, J.O.; Mendonca-Previato, L.; Freire-de-Lima, C.G. Capsular polysaccharides galactoxylomannan and glucuronoxylomannan from Cryptococcus neoformans induce macrophage apoptosis mediated by Fas ligand. Cell Microbiol. 2008, 10, 1274–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Nimrichter, L.; Frases, S.; Cinelli, L.P.; Viana, N.B.; Nakouzi, A.; Travassos, L.R.; Casadevall, A.; Rodrigues, M.L. Self-aggregation of Cryptococcus neoformans capsular glucuronoxylomannan is dependent on divalent cations. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 1400–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Vaishnav, V.V.; Bacon, B.E.; O’Neill, M.; Cherniak, R. Structural characterization of the galactoxylomannan of Cryptococcus neoformans Cap67. Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 306, 315–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wozniak, K.L.; Levitz, S.M. Isolation and purification of antigenic components of Cryptococcus. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009, 470, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Fonseca, F.L.; Reis, F.C.G.; Sena, B.A.G.; Jozefowicz, L.J.; Kmetzsch, L.; Rodrigues, M.L. The Overlooked Glycan Components of the Cryptococcus Capsule. Curr Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2019, 422, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Heiss, C.; Skowyra, M.L.; Liu, H.; Klutts, J.S.; Wang, Z.; Williams, M.; Srikanta, D.; Beverley, S.M.; Azadi, P.; Doering, T.L. Unusual galactofuranose modification of a capsule polysaccharide in the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 10994–11003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Previato, J.O.; Vinogradov, E.; Maes, E.; Fonseca, L.M.; Guerardel, Y.; Oliveira, P.A.V.; Mendonca-Previato, L. Distribution of the O-acetyl groups and beta-galactofuranose units in galactoxylomannans of the opportunistic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Glycobiology 2017, 27, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Bryan, R.A.; Zaragoza, O.; Zhang, T.; Ortiz, G.; Casadevall, A.; Dadachova, E. Radiological studies reveal radial differences in the architecture of the polysaccharide capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot. Cell 2005, 4, 465–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Levitz, S.M.; Nong, S.; Mansour, M.K.; Huang, C.; Specht, C.A. Molecular characterization of a mannoprotein with homology to chitin deacetylases that stimulates T cell responses to Cryptococcus neoformans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 10422–10427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Rodrigues, M.L.; Alvarez, M.; Fonseca, F.L.; Casadevall, A. Binding of the wheat germ lectin to Cryptococcus neoformans suggests an association of chitinlike structures with yeast budding and capsular glucuronoxylomannan. Eukaryot. Cell 2008, 7, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Jesus, M.D.; Nicola, A.M.; Chow, S.K.; Lee, I.R.; Nong, S.; Specht, C.A.; Levitz, S.M.; Casadevall, A. Glucuronoxylomannan, galactoxylomannan, and mannoprotein occupy spatially separate and discrete regions in the capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans. Virulence 2010, 1, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Reuwsaat, J.C.V.; Motta, H.; Garcia, A.W.A.; Vasconcelos, C.B.; Marques, B.M.; Oliveira, N.K.; Rodrigues, J.; Ferrareze, P.A.G.; Frases, S.; Lopes, W.; et al. A Predicted Mannoprotein Participates in Cryptococcus gattii Capsular Structure. mSphere 2018, 3, e00023-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Cordero, R.J.; Pontes, B.; Guimaraes, A.J.; Martinez, L.R.; Rivera, J.; Fries, B.C.; Nimrichter, L.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Viana, N.B.; Casadevall, A. Chronological aging is associated with biophysical and chemical changes in the capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 4990–5000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Lian, T.; Simmer, M.I.; D’Souza, C.A.; Steen, B.R.; Zuyderduyn, S.D.; Jones, S.J.; Marra, M.A.; Kronstad, J.W. Iron-regulated transcription and capsule formation in the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1452–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Cadieux, B.; Lian, T.; Hu, G.; Wang, J.; Biondo, C.; Teti, G.; Liu, V.; Murphy, M.E.; Creagh, A.L.; Kronstad, J.W. The Mannoprotein Cig1 supports iron acquisition from heme and virulence in the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 207, 1339–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Urai, M.; Kaneko, Y.; Ueno, K.; Okubo, Y.; Aizawa, T.; Fukazawa, H.; Sugita, T.; Ohno, H.; Shibuya, K.; Kinjo, Y.; et al. Evasion of Innate Immune Responses by the Highly Virulent Cr.ryptococcus gattii by Altering Capsule Glucuronoxylomannan Structure. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2015, 5, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Jain, N.; Li, L.; McFadden, D.C.; Banarjee, U.; Wang, X.; Cook, E.; Fries, B.C. Phenotypic switching in a Cryptococcus neoformans variety gattii strain is associated with changes in virulence and promotes dissemination to the central nervous system. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 896–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Diniz-Lima, I.; da Fonseca, L.M.; Dos Reis, J.S.; Rodrigues da Costa Santos, M.A.; da Costa, K.M.; do Nascimento Santos, C.A.; Barcelos, P.M.; Guimaraes-Pinto, K.; Filardy, A.A.; Freire-de-Lima, M.E.; et al. The Sweet Side of Fungal Infections: Structural Glycan Diversity and Its Importance for Pathogenic Adaptation. Medicines 2022, 9, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Goldman, D.L.; Lee, S.C.; Casadevall, A. Tissue localization of Cryptococcus neoformans glucuronoxylomannan in the presence and absence of specific antibody. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63, 3448–3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Rocha, J.D.; Nascimento, M.T.; Decote-Ricardo, D.; Corte-Real, S.; Morrot, A.; Heise, N.; Nunes, M.P.; Previato, J.O.; Mendonca-Previato, L.; DosReis, G.A.; et al. Capsular polysaccharides from Cryptococcus neoformans modulate production of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) by human neutrophils. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Cleare, W.; Casadevall, A. Scanning electron microscopy of encapsulated and non-encapsulated Cryptococcus neoformans and the effect of glucose on capsular polysaccharide release. Med. Mycol. 1999, 37, 235–243. [Google Scholar]
  130. Nosanchuk, J.D.; Casadevall, A. Cellular charge of Cryptococcus neoformans: Contributions from the capsular polysaccharide, melanin, and monoclonal antibody binding. Infect. Immun. 1997, 65, 1836–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Ibrahim, A.S.; Filler, S.G.; Alcouloumre, M.S.; Kozel, T.R.; Edwards, J.E., Jr.; Ghannoum, M.A. Adherence to and damage of endothelial cells by Cryptococcus neoformans in vitro: Role of the capsule. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63, 4368–4374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Zhong, Z.; Pirofski, L.A. Opsonization of Cryptococcus neoformans by human anticryptococcal glucuronoxylomannan antibodies. Infect. Immun. 1996, 64, 3446–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Mukherjee, S.; Lee, S.C.; Casadevall, A. Antibodies to Cryptococcus neoformans glucuronoxylomannan enhance antifungal activity of murine macrophages. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Zaragoza, O.; Taborda, C.P.; Casadevall, A. The efficacy of complement-mediated phagocytosis of Cryptococcus neoformans is dependent on the location of C3 in the polysaccharide capsule and involves both direct and indirect C3-mediated interactions. Eur. J. Immunol. 2003, 33, 1957–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Rossbacher, J.; Shlomchik, M.J. The B cell receptor itself can activate complement to provide the complement receptor 1/2 ligand required to enhance B cell immune responses in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2003, 198, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Ahearn, J.M.; Fischer, M.B.; Croix, D.; Goerg, S.; Ma, M.; Xia, J.; Zhou, X.; Howard, R.G.; Rothstein, T.L.; Carroll, M.C. Disruption of the Cr2 locus results in a reduction in B-1a cells and in an impaired B cell response to T-dependent antigen. Immunity 1996, 4, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Taborda, C.P.; Casadevall, A. CR3 (CD11b/CD18) and CR4 (CD11c/CD18) are involved in complement-independent antibody-mediated phagocytosis of Cryptococcus neoformans. Immunity 2002, 16, 791–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Dong, Z.M.; Murphy, J.W. Cryptococcal polysaccharides bind to CD18 on human neutrophils. Infect. Immun. 1997, 65, 557–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Syme, R.M.; Spurrell, J.C.; Amankwah, E.K.; Green, F.H.; Mody, C.H. Primary dendritic cells phagocytose Cryptococcus neoformans via mannose receptors and Fcgamma receptor II for presentation to T lymphocytes. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 5972–5981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Yauch, L.E.; Mansour, M.K.; Levitz, S.M. Receptor-mediated clearance of Cryptococcus neoformans capsular polysaccharide in vivo. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 8429–8432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Shoham, S.; Huang, C.; Chen, J.M.; Golenbock, D.T.; Levitz, S.M. Toll-like receptor 4 mediates intracellular signaling without TNF-alpha release in response to Cryptococcus neoformans polysaccharide capsule. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 4620–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Barbosa, F.M.; Fonseca, F.L.; Figueiredo, R.T.; Bozza, M.T.; Casadevall, A.; Nimrichter, L.; Rodrigues, M.L. Binding of glucuronoxylomannan to the CD14 receptor in human A549 alveolar cells induces interleukin-8 production. Clin. Vaccine Immunol 2007, 14, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Vecchiarelli, A.; Retini, C.; Pietrella, D.; Monari, C.; Tascini, C.; Beccari, T.; Kozel, T.R. Downregulation by cryptococcal polysaccharide of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1 beta secretion from human monocytes. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63, 2919–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Walenkamp, A.M.; Chaka, W.S.; Verheul, A.F.; Vaishnav, V.V.; Cherniak, R.; Coenjaerts, F.E.; Hoepelman, I.M. Cryptococcus neoformans and its cell wall components induce similar cytokine profiles in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells despite differences in structure. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 1999, 26, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Chiapello, L.S.; Baronetti, J.L.; Aoki, M.P.; Gea, S.; Rubinstein, H.; Masih, D.T. Immunosuppression, interleukin-10 synthesis and apoptosis are induced in rats inoculated with Cryptococcus neoformans glucuronoxylomannan. Immunology 2004, 113, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Scriven, J.E.; Graham, L.M.; Schutz, C.; Scriba, T.J.; Wilkinson, K.A.; Wilkinson, R.J.; Boulware, D.R.; Urban, B.C.; Lalloo, D.G.; Meintjes, G. A Glucuronoxylomannan-Associated Immune Signature, Characterized by Monocyte Deactivation and an Increased Interleukin 10 Level, Is a Predictor of Death in Cryptococcal Meningitis. J. Infect. Dis 2016, 213, 1725–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Chiapello, L.S.; Aoki, M.P.; Rubinstein, H.R.; Masih, D.T. Apoptosis induction by glucuronoxylomannan of Cryptococcus neoformans. Med. Mycol. 2003, 41, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Chiapello, L.S.; Baronetti, J.L.; Garro, A.P.; Spesso, M.F.; Masih, D.T. Cryptococcus neoformans glucuronoxylomannan induces macrophage apoptosis mediated by nitric oxide in a caspase-independent pathway. Int. Immunol. 2008, 20, 1527–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Monari, C.; Paganelli, F.; Bistoni, F.; Kozel, T.R.; Vecchiarelli, A. Capsular polysaccharide induction of apoptosis by intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms. Cell Microbiol. 2008, 10, 2129–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Retini, C.; Vecchiarelli, A.; Monari, C.; Bistoni, F.; Kozel, T.R. Encapsulation of Cryptococcus neoformans with glucuronoxylomannan inhibits the antigen-presenting capacity of monocytes. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 664–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Mariano Andrade, R.; Monteiro Almeida, G.; Alexandre DosReis, G.; Alves Melo Bento, C. Glucuronoxylomannan of Cryptococcus neoformans exacerbates in vitro yeast cell growth by interleukin 10-dependent inhibition of CD4+ T lymphocyte responses. Cell Immunol. 2003, 222, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Yauch, L.E.; Lam, J.S.; Levitz, S.M. Direct inhibition of T-cell responses by the Cryptococcus capsular polysaccharide glucuronoxylomannan. PLoS Pathog. 2006, 2, e120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Albuquerque, P.C.; Fonseca, F.L.; Dutra, F.F.; Bozza, M.T.; Frases, S.; Casadevall, A.; Rodrigues, M.L. Cryptococcus neoformans glucuronoxylomannan fractions of different molecular masses are functionally distinct. Future Microbiol. 2014, 9, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Monari, C.; Pericolini, E.; Bistoni, G.; Casadevall, A.; Kozel, T.R.; Vecchiarelli, A. Cryptococcus neoformans capsular glucuronoxylomannan induces expression of fas ligand in macrophages. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 3461–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Heiss, C.; Klutts, J.S.; Wang, Z.; Doering, T.L.; Azadi, P. The structure of Cryptococcus neoformans galactoxylomannan contains beta-D-glucuronic acid. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Dorokhova, V.S.; Gerbst, A.G.; Komarova, B.S.; Previato, J.O.; Previato, L.M.; Dmitrenok, A.S.; Shashkov, A.S.; Krylov, V.B.; Nifantiev, N.E. Synthesis and conformational analysis of vicinally branched trisaccharide beta-d-Galf-(1 ≥ 2)-[beta-d-Galf-(1 ≥ 3)-]-alpha-Galp from Cryptococcus neoformans galactoxylomannan. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 2923–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Pericolini, E.; Gabrielli, E.; Cenci, E.; De Jesus, M.; Bistoni, F.; Casadevall, A.; Vecchiarelli, A. Involvement of glycoreceptors in galactoxylomannan-induced T cell death. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 6003–6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. De Jesus, M.; Nicola, A.M.; Frases, S.; Lee, I.R.; Mieses, S.; Casadevall, A. Galactoxylomannan-mediated immunological paralysis results from specific B cell depletion in the context of widespread immune system damage. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 3885–3894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Pericolini, E.; Gabrielli, E.; Bistoni, G.; Cenci, E.; Perito, S.; Chow, S.K.; Riuzzi, F.; Donato, R.; Casadevall, A.; Vecchiarelli, A. Role of CD45 signaling pathway in galactoxylomannan-induced T cell damage. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. LaRocque-de-Freitas, I.F.; Rocha, J.D.B.; Nunes, M.P.; Oliveira, P.A.V.; Nascimento, D.O.; Freire-de-Lima, L.; Takiya, C.M.; Morrot, A.; Decote-Ricardo, D.; Previato, J.O.; et al. Involvement of the capsular GalXM-induced IL-17 cytokine in the control of Cryptococcus neoformans infection. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Delfino, D.; Cianci, L.; Lupis, E.; Celeste, A.; Petrelli, M.L.; Curro, F.; Cusumano, V.; Teti, G. Interleukin-6 production by human monocytes stimulated with Cryptococcus neoformans components. Infect. Immun. 1997, 65, 2454–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  162. Snarr, B.D.; Qureshi, S.T.; Sheppard, D.C. Immune Recognition of Fungal Polysaccharides. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Pericolini, E.; Gabrielli, E.; Alunno, A.; Bartoloni Bocci, E.; Perito, S.; Chow, S.K.; Cenci, E.; Casadevall, A.; Gerli, R.; Vecchiarelli, A. Functional improvement of regulatory T cells from rheumatoid arthritis subjects induced by capsular polysaccharide glucuronoxylomannogalactan. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Pericolini, E.; Alunno, A.; Gabrielli, E.; Bartoloni, E.; Cenci, E.; Chow, S.K.; Bistoni, G.; Casadevall, A.; Gerli, R.; Vecchiarelli, A. The microbial capsular polysaccharide galactoxylomannan inhibits IL-17A production in circulating T cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Vecchiarelli, A.; Pericolini, E.; Gabrielli, E.; Chow, S.K.; Bistoni, F.; Cenci, E.; Casadevall, A. Cryptococcus neoformans galactoxylomannan is a potent negative immunomodulator, inspiring new approaches in anti-inflammatory immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2011, 3, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Garelnabi, M.; May, R.C. Variability in innate host immune responses to cryptococcosis. Mem Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2018, 113, e180060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Jha, M.K.; Mohanty, A.; Gupta, P. Cryptococcus gattii meningitis in a diabetic adult in South India. J. Family Med. Prim. Care 2019, 8, 1253–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Prasad, K.T.; Sehgal, I.S.; Shivaprakash, M.R.; Dhooria, S. Uncommon mycosis in a patient with diabetes. BMJ Case Rep. 2016, 2016, bcr2016214453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Paccoud, O.; Bougnoux, M.E.; Desnos-Ollivier, M.; Varet, B.; Lortholary, O.; Lanternier, F. Cryptococcus gattii in Patients with Lymphoid Neoplasms: An Illustration of Evolutive Host-Fungus Interactions. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Bartlett, K.H.; Cheng, P.Y.; Duncan, C.; Galanis, E.; Hoang, L.; Kidd, S.; Lee, M.K.; Lester, S.; MacDougall, L.; Mak, S.; et al. A decade of experience: Cryptococcus gattii in British Columbia. Mycopathologia 2012, 173, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. MacDougall, L.; Fyfe, M.; Romney, M.; Starr, M.; Galanis, E. Risk factors for Cryptococcus gattii infection, British Columbia, Canada. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Ye, F.; Xie, J.X.; Zeng, Q.S.; Chen, G.Q.; Zhong, S.Q.; Zhong, N.S. Retrospective analysis of 76 immunocompetent patients with primary pulmonary cryptococcosis. Lung 2012, 190, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Deok-jong Yoo, S.; Worodria, W.; Davis, J.L.; Cattamanchi, A.; den Boon, S.; Kyeyune, R.; Kisembo, H.; Huang, L. The prevalence and clinical course of HIV-associated pulmonary cryptococcosis in Uganda. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2010, 54, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Harris, J.R.; Lindsley, M.D.; Henchaichon, S.; Poonwan, N.; Naorat, S.; Prapasiri, P.; Chantra, S.; Ruamcharoen, F.; Chang, L.S.; Chittaganpitch, M.; et al. High prevalence of cryptococcal infection among HIV-infected patients hospitalized with pneumonia in Thailand. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, e43–e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Suwatanapongched, T.; Sangsatra, W.; Boonsarngsuk, V.; Watcharananan, S.P.; Incharoen, P. Clinical and radiologic manifestations of pulmonary cryptococcosis in immunocompetent patients and their outcomes after treatment. Diagn Interv. Radiol. 2013, 19, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Herkert, P.F.; Hagen, F.; Pinheiro, R.L.; Muro, M.D.; Meis, J.F.; Queiroz-Telles, F. Ecoepidemiology of Cryptococcus gattii in Developing Countries. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. Damasceno-Escoura, A.H.; de Souza, M.L.; de Oliveira Nunes, F.; Pardi, T.C.; Gazotto, F.C.; Florentino, D.H.; Mora, D.J.; Silva-Vergara, M.L. Epidemiological, Clinical and Outcome Aspects of Patients with Cryptococcosis Caused by Cryptococcus gattii from a Non-endemic Area of Brazil. Mycopathologia 2019, 184, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Mitchell, D.H.; Sorrell, T.C.; Allworth, A.M.; Heath, C.H.; McGregor, A.R.; Papanaoum, K.; Richards, M.J.; Gottlieb, T. Cryptococcal disease of the CNS in immunocompetent hosts: Influence of cryptococcal variety on clinical manifestations and outcome. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1995, 20, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Anzai, M.C.; Lazéra Mdos, S.; Wanke, B.; Trilles, L.; Dutra, V.; de Paula, D.A.; Nakazato, L.; Takahara, D.T.; Simi, W.B.; Hahn, R.C. Cryptococcus gattii VGII in a Plathymenia reticulata hollow in Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Mycoses 2014, 57, 414–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Shirley, R.M.; Baddley, J.W. Cryptococcal lung disease. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2009, 15, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Velagapudi, R.; Hsueh, Y.P.; Geunes-Boyer, S.; Wright, J.R.; Heitman, J. Spores as infectious propagules of Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 4345–4355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Garcia-Hermoso, D.; Janbon, G.; Dromer, F. Epidemiological evidence for dormant Cryptococcus neoformans infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 3204–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. MacDougall, L.; Fyfe, M. Emergence of Cryptococcus gattii in a novel environment provides clues to its incubation period. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 1851–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Kerkering, T.M.; Duma, R.J.; Shadomy, S. The evolution of pulmonary cryptococcosis: Clinical implications from a study of 41 patients with and without compromising host factors. Ann. Intern. Med. 1981, 94, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. da Silva-Junior, E.B.; Firmino-Cruz, L.; Guimaraes-de-Oliveira, J.C.; De-Medeiros, J.V.R.; de Oliveira Nascimento, D.; Freire-de-Lima, M.; de Brito-Gitirana, L.; Morrot, A.; Previato, J.O.; Mendonca-Previato, L.; et al. The role of Toll-like receptor 9 in a murine model of Cryptococcus gattii infection. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Hommel, B.; Mukaremera, L.; Cordero, R.J.B.; Coelho, C.; Desjardins, C.A.; Sturny-Leclere, A.; Janbon, G.; Perfect, J.R.; Fraser, J.A.; Casadevall, A.; et al. Titan cells formation in Cryptococcus neoformans is finely tuned by environmental conditions and modulated by positive and negative genetic regulators. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1006982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Diniz-Lima, I.; da Rosa, P.R.; da Silva-Junior, E.B.; Guimarães-de-Oliveira, J.C.; de Freitas, E.O.; de Oliveira Nascimento, D.; Morrot, A.; Nimrichter, L.; Previato, J.O.; Mendonça-Previato, L.; et al. X-linked immunodeficient (XID) mice exhibit high susceptibility to Cryptococcus gattii infection. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Dos Santos, M.H.; Machado, M.P.; Kumaresan, P.R.; da Silva, T.A. Titan Cells and Yeast Forms of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii Are Recognized by GXMR-CAR. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Denham, S.T.; Brown, J.C.S. Mechanisms of Pulmonary Escape and Dissemination by Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Trevijano-Contador, N.; Pianalto, K.M.; Nichols, C.B.; Zaragoza, O.; Alspaugh, J.A.; Pirofski, L.A. Human IgM Inhibits the Formation of Titan-Like Cells in Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun 2020, 88, e00046-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Voelz, K.; May, R.C. Cryptococcal interactions with the host immune system. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 9, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  192. Strickland, A.B.; Shi, M. Mechanisms of fungal dissemination. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 3219–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Sorrell, T.C.; Juillard, P.G.; Djordjevic, J.T.; Kaufman-Francis, K.; Dietmann, A.; Milonig, A.; Combes, V.; Grau, G.E. Cryptococcal transmigration across a model brain blood-barrier: Evidence of the Trojan horse mechanism and differences between Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii strain H99 and Cryptococcus gattii strain R265. Microbes Infect. 2016, 18, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Sheppard, D.C.; Filler, S.G. Host cell invasion by medically important fungi. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2014, 5, a019687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Tseng, H.K.; Huang, T.Y.; Wu, A.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Liu, C.P.; Jong, A. How Cryptococcus interacts with the blood-brain barrier. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 1669–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Chang, Y.C.; Stins, M.F.; McCaffery, M.J.; Miller, G.F.; Pare, D.R.; Dam, T.; Paul-Satyaseela, M.; Kim, K.S.; Kwon-Chung, K.J. Cryptococcal yeast cells invade the central nervous system via transcellular penetration of the blood-brain barrier. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 4985–4995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Patel, M.; Beckerman, K.P.; Reznik, S.; Madan, R.P.; Goldman, D.L. Transplacental transmission of Cryptococcus neoformans to an HIV-exposed premature neonate. J. Perinatol. 2012, 32, 235–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Taylor-Smith, L.M. Cryptococcus-Epithelial Interactions. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Ganendren, R.; Carter, E.; Sorrell, T.; Widmer, F.; Wright, L. Phospholipase B activity enhances adhesion of Cryptococcus neoformans to a human lung epithelial cell line. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8, 1006–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Na Pombejra, S.; Salemi, M.; Phinney, B.S.; Gelli, A. The Metalloprotease, Mpr1, Engages AnnexinA2 to Promote the Transcytosis of Fungal Cells across the Blood-Brain Barrier. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Jong, A.; Wu, C.H.; Chen, H.M.; Luo, F.; Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Chang, Y.C.; Lamunyon, C.W.; Plaas, A.; Huang, S.H. Identification and characterization of CPS1 as a hyaluronic acid synthase contributing to the pathogenesis of Cryptococcus neoformans infection. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 1486–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  202. Heyen, L.; Muller, U.; Siegemund, S.; Schulze, B.; Protschka, M.; Alber, G.; Piehler, D. Lung epithelium is the major source of IL-33 and is regulated by IL-33-dependent and IL-33-independent mechanisms in pulmonary cryptococcosis. Pathog. Dis. 2016, 74, ftw086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  203. Rutherford, J.C. The emerging role of urease as a general microbial virulence factor. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  204. Olszewski, M.A.; Noverr, M.C.; Chen, G.H.; Toews, G.B.; Cox, G.M.; Perfect, J.R.; Huffnagle, G.B. Urease expression by Cryptococcus neoformans promotes microvascular sequestration, thereby enhancing central nervous system invasion. Am. J. Pathol. 2004, 164, 1761–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  205. Siafakas, A.R.; Sorrell, T.C.; Wright, L.C.; Wilson, C.; Larsen, M.; Boadle, R.; Williamson, P.R.; Djordjevic, J.T. Cell wall-linked cryptococcal phospholipase B1 is a source of secreted enzyme and a determinant of cell wall integrity. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 37508–37514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  206. Charlier, C.; Nielsen, K.; Daou, S.; Brigitte, M.; Chretien, F.; Dromer, F. Evidence of a role for monocytes in dissemination and brain invasion by Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  207. Chang, Z.L.; Netski, D.; Thorkildson, P.; Kozel, T.R. Binding and internalization of glucuronoxylomannan, the major capsular polysaccharide of Cryptococcus neoformans, by murine peritoneal macrophages. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Levitz, S.M.; Nong, S.H.; Seetoo, K.F.; Harrison, T.S.; Speizer, R.A.; Simons, E.R. Cryptococcus neoformans resides in an acidic phagolysosome of human macrophages. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 885–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  209. Kronstad, J.W.; Hu, G.; Jung, W.H. An encapsulation of iron homeostasis and virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans. Trends Microbiol. 2013, 21, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Davis, M.J.; Moyer, S.; Hoke, E.S.; Sionov, E.; Mayer-Barber, K.D.; Barber, D.L.; Cai, H.; Jenkins, L.; Walter, P.J.; Chang, Y.C.; et al. Pulmonary Iron Limitation Induced by Exogenous Type I IFN Protects Mice from Cryptococcus gattii Independently of T Cells. mBio 2019, 10, e00799-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  211. Smith, L.M.; Dixon, E.F.; May, R.C. The fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans manipulates macrophage phagosome maturation. Cell Microbiol 2015, 17, 702–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  212. Jamil, K.; Polyak, M.J.; Feehan, D.D.; Surmanowicz, P.; Stack, D.; Li, S.S.; Ogbomo, H.; Olszewski, M.; Ganguly, A.; Mody, C.H. Phagosomal F-Actin Retention by Cryptococcus gattii Induces Dendritic Cell Immunoparalysis. mBio 2020, 11, e01821-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Eastman, A.J.; He, X.; Qiu, Y.; Davis, M.J.; Vedula, P.; Lyons, D.M.; Park, Y.D.; Hardison, S.E.; Malachowski, A.N.; Osterholzer, J.J.; et al. Cryptococcal heat shock protein 70 homolog Ssa1 contributes to pulmonary expansion of Cryptococcus neoformans during the afferent phase of the immune response by promoting macrophage M2 polarization. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 5999–6010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  214. Arora, S.; Olszewski, M.A.; Tsang, T.M.; McDonald, R.A.; Toews, G.B.; Huffnagle, G.B. Effect of cytokine interplay on macrophage polarization during chronic pulmonary infection with Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 1915–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  215. Huffnagle, G.B. Role of cytokines in T cell immunity to a pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection. Biol. Signals 1996, 5, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Haddow, L.J.; Colebunders, R.; Meintjes, G.; Lawn, S.D.; Elliott, J.H.; Manabe, Y.C.; Bohjanen, P.R.; Sungkanuparph, S.; Easterbrook, P.J.; French, M.A.; et al. Cryptococcal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV-1-infected individuals: Proposed clinical case definitions. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 791–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Seaton, R.A.; Verma, N.; Naraqi, S.; Wembri, J.P.; Warrell, D.A. The effect of corticosteroids on visual loss in Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii meningitis. Trans. R Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1997, 91, 50–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Perfect, J.R.; Dismukes, W.E.; Dromer, F.; Goldman, D.L.; Graybill, J.R.; Hamill, R.J.; Harrison, T.S.; Larsen, R.A.; Lortholary, O.; Nguyen, M.H.; et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 50, 291–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Trilles, L.; Fernández-Torres, B.; Lazéra Mdos, S.; Wanke, B.; Guarro, J. In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Cryptococcus gattii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 4815–4817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  220. Ferreira, G.F.; Santos, J.R.; Costa, M.C.; Holanda, R.A.; Denadai, Â.M.; Freitas, G.J.; Santos, Á.R.; Tavares, P.B.; Paixão, T.A.; Santos, D.A. Heteroresistance to Itraconazole Alters the Morphology and Increases the Virulence of Cryptococcus gattii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 4600–4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  221. Gibson, J.F.; Johnston, S.A. Immunity to Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii during cryptococcosis. Fungal. Genet. Biol. 2015, 78, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  222. Kishore, U.; Bernal, A.L.; Kamran, M.F.; Saxena, S.; Singh, M.; Sarma, P.U.; Madan, T.; Chakraborty, T. Surfactant proteins SP-A and SP-D in human health and disease. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2005, 53, 399–417. [Google Scholar]
  223. Wright, J.R. Host defense functions of pulmonary surfactant. Biol. Neonate 2004, 85, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Giles, S.S.; Zaas, A.K.; Reidy, M.F.; Perfect, J.R.; Wright, J.R. Cryptococcus neoformans is resistant to surfactant protein A mediated host defense mechanisms. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Holmer, S.M.; Evans, K.S.; Asfaw, Y.G.; Saini, D.; Schell, W.A.; Ledford, J.G.; Frothingham, R.; Wright, J.R.; Sempowski, G.D.; Perfect, J.R. Impact of surfactant protein D, interleukin-5, and eosinophilia on Cryptococcosis. Infect. Immun. 2014, 82, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Santangelo, R.; Zoellner, H.; Sorrell, T.; Wilson, C.; Donald, C.; Djordjevic, J.; Shounan, Y.; Wright, L. Role of extracellular phospholipases and mononuclear phagocytes in dissemination of cryptococcosis in a murine model. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 2229–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  227. Coelho, C.; Bocca, A.L.; Casadevall, A. The intracellular life of Cryptococcus neoformans. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2014, 9, 219–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  228. Cross, C.E.; Bancroft, G.J. Ingestion of acapsular Cryptococcus neoformans occurs via mannose and beta-glucan receptors, resulting in cytokine production and increased phagocytosis of the encapsulated form. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63, 2604–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  229. Giles, S.S.; Dagenais, T.R.; Botts, M.R.; Keller, N.P.; Hull, C.M. Elucidating the pathogenesis of spores from the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 3491–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Nakamura, K.; Kinjo, T.; Saijo, S.; Miyazato, A.; Adachi, Y.; Ohno, N.; Fujita, J.; Kaku, M.; Iwakura, Y.; Kawakami, K. Dectin-1 is not required for the host defense to Cryptococcus neoformans. Microbiol. Immunol. 2007, 51, 1115–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Means, T.K.; Mylonakis, E.; Tampakakis, E.; Colvin, R.A.; Seung, E.; Puckett, L.; Tai, M.F.; Stewart, C.R.; Pukkila-Worley, R.; Hickman, S.E.; et al. Evolutionarily conserved recognition and innate immunity to fungal pathogens by the scavenger receptors SCARF1 and CD36. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 637–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Biondo, C.; Midiri, A.; Messina, L.; Tomasello, F.; Garufi, G.; Catania, M.R.; Bombaci, M.; Beninati, C.; Teti, G.; Mancuso, G. MyD88 and TLR2, but not TLR4, are required for host defense against Cryptococcus neoformans. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005, 35, 870–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Dan, J.M.; Kelly, R.M.; Lee, C.K.; Levitz, S.M. Role of the mannose receptor in a murine model of Cryptococcus neoformans infection. Infect. Immun. 2008, 76, 2362–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  234. Guo, C.; Chen, M.; Fa, Z.; Lu, A.; Fang, W.; Sun, B.; Chen, C.; Liao, W.; Meng, G. Acapsular Cryptococcus neoformans activates the NLRP3 inflammasome. Microbes Infect. 2014, 16, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Guillot, L.; Carroll, S.F.; Badawy, M.; Qureshi, S.T. Cryptococcus neoformans induces IL-8 secretion and CXCL1 expression by human bronchial epithelial cells. Respir. Res. 2008, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  236. Costa, M.C.; Santos, J.R.; Ribeiro, M.J.; Freitas, G.J.; Bastos, R.W.; Ferreira, G.F.; Miranda, A.S.; Arifa, R.D.; Santos, P.C.; Martins Fdos, S.; et al. The absence of microbiota delays the inflammatory response to Cryptococcus gattii. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 306, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Ikeda-Dantsuji, Y.; Ohno, H.; Tanabe, K.; Umeyama, T.; Ueno, K.; Nagi, M.; Yamagoe, S.; Kinjo, Y.; Miyazaki, Y. Interferon-γ promotes phagocytosis of Cryptococcus neoformans but not Cryptococcus gattii by murine macrophages. J. Infect. Chemother. 2015, 21, 831–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Herkert, P.F.; Dos Santos, J.C.; Hagen, F.; Ribeiro-Dias, F.; Queiroz-Telles, F.; Netea, M.G.; Meis, J.F.; Joosten, L.A.B. Differential In Vitro Cytokine Induction by the Species of Cryptococcus gattii Complex. Infect. Immun. 2018, 86, e00958-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  239. Nicola, A.M.; Albuquerque, P.; Martinez, L.R.; Dal-Rosso, R.A.; Saylor, C.; De Jesus, M.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Casadevall, A. Macrophage autophagy in immunity to Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 3065–3076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Wang, Y.; Feng, F.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y. The Inflammasome NLRC4 Protects against Cryptococcus gattii by Inducing the Classic Caspase-1 to Activate the Pyroptosis Signal. J. Healthc. Eng. 2022, 2022, 7355485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Ueno, K.; Yanagihara, N.; Otani, Y.; Shimizu, K.; Kinjo, Y.; Miyazaki, Y. Neutrophil-mediated antifungal activity against highly virulent Cryptococcus gattii strain R265. Med. Mycol. 2019, 57, 1046–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Ma, L.L.; Spurrell, J.C.; Wang, J.F.; Neely, G.G.; Epelman, S.; Krensky, A.M.; Mody, C.H. CD8 T cell-mediated killing of Cryptococcus neoformans requires granulysin and is dependent on CD4 T cells and IL-15. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 5787–5795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  243. Subramaniam, K.S.; Datta, K.; Quintero, E.; Manix, C.; Marks, M.S.; Pirofski, L.A. The absence of serum IgM enhances the susceptibility of mice to pulmonary challenge with Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 5755–5767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  244. Dufaud, C.; Rivera, J.; Rohatgi, S.; Pirofski, L.A. Naive B cells reduce fungal dissemination in Cryptococcus neoformans infected Rag1(-/-) mice. Virulence 2018, 9, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  245. Rohatgi, S.; Pirofski, L.A. Molecular characterization of the early B cell response to pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 5820–5830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  246. Szymczak, W.A.; Davis, M.J.; Lundy, S.K.; Dufaud, C.; Olszewski, M.; Pirofski, L.A. X-linked immunodeficient mice exhibit enhanced susceptibility to Cryptococcus neoformans Infection. mBio 2013, 4, e00265-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  247. Subramaniam, K.; Metzger, B.; Hanau, L.H.; Guh, A.; Rucker, L.; Badri, S.; Pirofski, L.A. IgM(+) memory B cell expression predicts HIV-associated cryptococcosis status. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 200, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  248. Rohatgi, S.; Nakouzi, A.; Carreno, L.J.; Slosar-Cheah, M.; Kuniholm, M.H.; Wang, T.; Pappas, P.G.; Pirofski, L.A. Antibody and B Cell Subset Perturbations in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Uninfected Patients With Cryptococcosis. Open Forum. Infect. Dis. 2018, 5, ofx255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Pieper, K.; Grimbacher, B.; Eibel, H. B-cell biology and development. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 131, 959–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Haas, K.M.; Poe, J.C.; Steeber, D.A.; Tedder, T.F. B-1a and B-1b cells exhibit distinct developmental requirements and have unique functional roles in innate and adaptive immunity to S. pneumoniae. Immunity 2005, 23, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  251. Ghosn, E.E.; Russo, M.; Almeida, S.R. Nitric oxide-dependent killing of Cryptococcus neoformans by B-1-derived mononuclear phagocyte. J. Leukoc Biol. 2006, 80, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Noal, V.; Santos, S.; Ferreira, K.S.; Almeida, S.R. Infection with Paracoccidioides brasiliensis induces B-1 cell migration and activation of regulatory T cells. Microbes Infect. 2016, 18, 798–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Popi, A.F.; Godoy, L.C.; Xander, P.; Lopes, J.D.; Mariano, M. B-1 cells facilitate Paracoccidioides brasiliensis infection in mice via IL-10 secretion. Microbes Infect. 2008, 10, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Arcanjo, A.F.; Nunes, M.P.; Silva-Junior, E.B.; Leandro, M.; da Rocha, J.D.B.; Morrot, A.; Decote-Ricardo, D.; Freire-de-Lima, C.G. B-1 cells modulate the murine macrophage response to Leishmania major infection. World J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 8, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Crane, D.D.; Griffin, A.J.; Wehrly, T.D.; Bosio, C.M. B1a cells enhance susceptibility to infection with virulent Francisella tularensis via modulation of NK/NKT cell responses. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 2756–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  256. Firmino-Cruz, L.; Decote-Ricardo, D.; Gomes, D.C.O.; Morrot, A.; Freire-de-Lima, C.G.; de Matos Guedes, H.L. How to B(e)-1 Important Cell During Leishmania Infection. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  257. Marquis, G.; Montplaisir, S.; Pelletier, M.; Mousseau, S.; Auger, P. Genetic resistance to murine cryptococcosis: Increased susceptibility in the CBA/N XID mutant strain of mice. Infect. Immun. 1985, 47, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Cell wall and the polysaccharide capsule structure of Cryptococcus spp. with description of the molecular structure of the capsule polysaccharides glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) and glucuronoxylomannogalactan (GXMGal).
Figure 1. Cell wall and the polysaccharide capsule structure of Cryptococcus spp. with description of the molecular structure of the capsule polysaccharides glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) and glucuronoxylomannogalactan (GXMGal).
Applsci 12 07086 g001
Figure 2. First morphological changes in Cryptococcus spp. inside the host and its dissemination mechanisms through the respiratory and blood–brain epithelial barriers.
Figure 2. First morphological changes in Cryptococcus spp. inside the host and its dissemination mechanisms through the respiratory and blood–brain epithelial barriers.
Applsci 12 07086 g002
Figure 3. Immune response against Cryptococcus spp. and its capsular polysaccharides immunomodulatory effects.
Figure 3. Immune response against Cryptococcus spp. and its capsular polysaccharides immunomodulatory effects.
Applsci 12 07086 g003
Table 1. Some differences between Cryptococcus pathogenic species.
Table 1. Some differences between Cryptococcus pathogenic species.
CharacteristicCryptococcus neoformansCryptococcus gattiiReferences
Geographic distributionFound globally in bird feces, trees and soil.Found in tropical and subtropical areas closely to pine and eucalyptus trees *.[2,5]
InfectionMostly immunocompromised hosts; secondary infection; incubation period around 110 months.Mostly immunocompetent hosts; primary infection; incubation period from 6 to 7 months.[3,6,182,183]
SerotypesA, D and ADB and C.[17,18]
Genotypes(A) VNI and VNII; (D) VNIV; (AD) VNIII; VNB.(B) VGI and VGII; (C) VGIII and VGIV.[17,19,20]
Cryptococcosis globallyCorresponds around 80% of infections.Corresponds < 20% of infections.[3]
Culture medium growthOnly uses urea as a nitrogen source, does not grow well in the presence of canavanine.Can use glycine as a nitrogen source, grows well in the presence of canavanine.[25,26]
Cell wallH99 strain presents lower chitosan composition; less homogenous melanin distribution.R265 strain presents higher chitosan composition; more homogenous melanin distribution.[67]
Capsule composition, mannoprotein components, and structural differenceProportion of (xylose:mannose:glucuronic acid) by serotypes: (D) 1:3:1 and (A) 2:3:1; mannoproteins: 46 predicted; Cig1; MP98; H99 strain GXM presents more O-acetylations.Proportion of (xylose:mannose:glucuronic acid) by serotypes: (B) 3:3:1 and (C) 4:3:1; mannoproteins: 36 predicted; Krp1; JP02 strain GXM presents less O-acetylations.[68,108,109,120,123,124]
Cryptococcus disseminationMore likely to disseminate to the CNS **; less severe disease than C. gattii.More likely to present as pneumonia; a more severe disease.[171]
Immune and pharmacological resistanceCannot fully prevent phagolysosomal maturation; susceptibility to fluconazole.R265 strain can highly prevent phagolysosomal maturation in dendritic cells leading to immune paralysis; adaptive heteroresistance to fluconazole and best treatment combining also amphotericin B and flucytocin.[212,219]
Immune responseDuring phagocytosis macrophage IFN-γ production is more potent when compared to C. gattii; less severe cryptococcosis in the absence of autophagyReduced capacity for inducing IL-12 in vitro when compared to C. neoformans; R265 strain presents a lower production of TNF-a, IL-1b and IL-6; greater resistance to neutrophil oxidative stress than C. neoformans[237,238,239,241]
* C. gattii infections are more frequent in tropical and subtropical regions, even though their incidence has increased globally over the last few decades. ** Although C. neoformans can cause a severe meningoencephalitis in immunocompromised individuals, it also establishes a severe form of pneumonia.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Diniz-Lima, I.; Fonseca, L.M.d.; Silva-Junior, E.B.d.; Guimarães-de-Oliveira, J.C.; Freire-de-Lima, L.; Nascimento, D.O.; Morrot, A.; Previato, J.O.; Mendonça-Previato, L.; Decote-Ricardo, D.; et al. Cryptococcus: History, Epidemiology and Immune Evasion. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7086. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147086

AMA Style

Diniz-Lima I, Fonseca LMd, Silva-Junior EBd, Guimarães-de-Oliveira JC, Freire-de-Lima L, Nascimento DO, Morrot A, Previato JO, Mendonça-Previato L, Decote-Ricardo D, et al. Cryptococcus: History, Epidemiology and Immune Evasion. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(14):7086. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147086

Chicago/Turabian Style

Diniz-Lima, Israel, Leonardo Marques da Fonseca, Elias Barbosa da Silva-Junior, Joyce Cristina Guimarães-de-Oliveira, Leonardo Freire-de-Lima, Danielle Oliveira Nascimento, Alexandre Morrot, Jose Osvaldo Previato, Lucia Mendonça-Previato, Debora Decote-Ricardo, and et al. 2022. "Cryptococcus: History, Epidemiology and Immune Evasion" Applied Sciences 12, no. 14: 7086. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147086

APA Style

Diniz-Lima, I., Fonseca, L. M. d., Silva-Junior, E. B. d., Guimarães-de-Oliveira, J. C., Freire-de-Lima, L., Nascimento, D. O., Morrot, A., Previato, J. O., Mendonça-Previato, L., Decote-Ricardo, D., & Freire-de-Lima, C. G. (2022). Cryptococcus: History, Epidemiology and Immune Evasion. Applied Sciences, 12(14), 7086. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147086

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop