Next Article in Journal
Mapping Co–Cr–Cu and Fe Occurrence in a Legacy Mining Waste Using Geochemistry and Satellite Imagery Analyses
Next Article in Special Issue
Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Fatty Acids from Cultured and Commercial Phytoplankton Species
Previous Article in Journal
Verification and Comparison of Direct Calculation Method for the Analysis of Support–Ground Interaction of a Circular Tunnel Excavation
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Two-Step Process for Improved Biomass Production and Non-Destructive Astaxanthin and Carotenoids Accumulation in Haematococcus pluvialis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biomolecules from Microalgae and Cyanobacteria: Applications and Market Survey

1
Laboratoroire de Biotechnologies Végétales Appliquées à l’Amélioration des Cultures, Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Université de Sfax, Sfax 3038, Tunisia
2
SIGMA Clermont, Institut Pascal, CNRS, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
3
Laboratoire de Génie Enzymatique et Microbiologie, Equipe de Biotechnologie des Algues, Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Sfax, Université de Sfax, Sfax 3038, Tunisia
4
Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), 1 Rue Descartes, 75005 Paris, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(4), 1924; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041924
Submission received: 18 December 2021 / Revised: 2 February 2022 / Accepted: 6 February 2022 / Published: 12 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Microalgal Biomass Productions)

Abstract

:
Nowadays, microalgae and cyanobacteria have become a promising and sustainable source of useful products, thanks to their richness in bioactive metabolites of high value (antibiotics, toxins, pharmaceutically active compounds, plant growth regulators, and others). These photoautotroph microorganisms generate biomass using photosynthesis. This review, which distinguishes microalgae and Cyanobacteria, often called blue-green microalgae, aims to present their classification and taxonomic diversity as the ecological niches occupied by them. In addition, the usages of open ponds and photobioreactors to produce various microalgae and Cyanobacteria strains and the high-value bioactive compounds from these microorganisms are summarized. Finally, the numerous commercial applications of these phytoplanktons in different fields, such as food, dietary supplements, feed, cosmetic, and biofuel applications, are reviewed.

1. Introduction

Worldwide population is rising and resulting in an increased demand for food, biofuel, therapeutic molecules, enzymes, pigments, cosmetic products, and others. Given their broad spectrum of applications, the world encourages the production and cultivation of these organisms. At the academic and industrial levels, many researchers are exploring the engineering tools applied to microalgae processes, including techno-economic analysis and integration and intensification processes [1].
Usually, the term algae does not refer to a proper taxonomic group but to an assembly of aquatic organisms that reduce CO2 and produce O2 using photosynthesis, in which chlorophyll a is responsible for 50% of the photosynthic activity on earth. Organisms from this group vary in size, from micrometers to several tens of meters for some algae [2]. The larger ones, macroalgae, are generally visible to the naked eye and are often known as “seaweeds”. The smallest ones, microalgae, are unicellular, microscopic algae that can occur separately or in colonies. Within this group, photosynthetic microorganisms can be divided into eukaryotic cells, including the phyla Chlorophyta, Rhodophyta, Glaucophyta, Cryptophyta, Euglenozoa, Cercozoa, Heterokontophyta, Haptophyta, and Miozoa; the prokaryotic ones are also called blue-green microalgae or Cyanobacteria [3,4].
The classification of this diversity is complex, and the taxonomy is subject to frequent upheavals due to the use of molecular phylogeny techniques. Subsequently, some taxonomists contradict classifying Cyanobacteria as microalgae or bacteria [5,6]. Moreover, their evolution was based on the theory of endosymbiosis, according to the characteristics of their mitochondria and plastids [7]. In addition, microalgae and Cyanobacteria are chlorophyll organisms that thrive in water or in very humid environments. Although most abundant in the waters of seas, lakes, and running waters, it is also found on wet rocks and on land. They can live free or fixed to a support structure [8].
Thanks to their different morphological, physiological, and genetic traits, microalgae and Cyanobacteria have the ability to produce various biomolecules and, notably, biologically active metabolites with great potential in a large range of industrial applications [9].
The present work provides a first part that focuses on the richness of microalgal biomass as a basis for the many biotechnological and industrial applications developed in the second part. It also aims to give readers past, present, and future market data.

2. Microalgae

2.1. What Are Microalgae and Cyanobacteria?

According to phycologists, any organisms containing chlorophyll a (Chl a), devoid of stem, roots, leaves, and flowers, can be considered an alga [10]. These organisms are divided into macro- and microalgae, which are essentially differentiated by their sizes and organelle contents. Macroalgae are benthic, multicellular, and able to reach several meters in length, while microalgae are unicellular microscopic eukaryotic phytoplankton. There is a disagreement among taxonomists in classifying this polyphyletic group of organisms of prokaryotic microalgae, known as Cyanobacteria, as microalgae or bacteria [5,6].
There are obvious distinctions between Cyanobacteria and microalgae—primarily, the presence of membrane-bound structures in eukaryotic cells acquired during evolution through endosymbiosis [7,11]. In fact, Cyanobacteria are primitive microorganisms that bear an intermediate structure between bacteria, characterized by the absence of a distinct membrane-bound nucleus, mitochondria, and chloroplasts, and plants by oxygenic photosynthesis. Secondly, eukaryotes are larger, more complex, more diverse, and can be either unicellular or multicellular [12], while prokaryotes are simple and microscopic single-celled organisms that have neither a distinct nucleus with a membrane nor other specialized organelles. Furthermore, Cyanobacteria contain chlorophyll a as a major photosynthetic pigment, which may be accompanied by carotenoids, xanthophylls, and phycobilisomes (mostly phycoerythrin and phycocyanin) as light collectors. It was estimated that around 1025 cells of these blue-green microorganisms exist in the oceans, where they are responsible for the achievement of the fixation of photosynthetic carbon and nitrogen [13].
Microalgae are able to grow rapidly and live in a wide range of environmental conditions [14]. They are closely guided by abiotic factors (light, salinity, pH, temperature, and trophic limitation or excess) and biotic ones (trophic relationships) [15]. Microalgae generate themselves using photosynthesis by capturing sunlight, H2O, CO2, and inorganic nutrients and converting them into biomass, chemical energy, and O2, effectuating a full life cycle every few days [16]. They are more efficient at utilizing sunlight than terrestrial plants (10 times greater), with numerous additional technological advantages such as consuming damaging pollutants, having minimal resource requirements, and not competing with agriculture for precious resources [8].
The presence of microalgae is essential since they represent the basis of several food chains. It is estimated that microalgae and Cyanobacteria are around 200,000 to 800,000. Among them, the sole diatoms are estimated to be over 200,000 [17,18,19]. Currently, more than 164,800 species and infraspecific names exist in the database Algaebase (https://www.algaebase.org/, accessed on 24 november 2020). This appreciable diversity is associated with richness in lipids, proteins, vitamins, pigments, carbohydrates, and other compounds.

2.2. Properties, Taxonomy, and Habitats

Microscopic in size and giant in their properties, eukaryotic microalgae and Cyanobacteria have a huge assortment of colors and different types of cell organization, e.g., unicellular, colonial, and filamentous. They possess different shapes: spherical (Porphyridium), droplet (Chlamydomonas), filament (Oscillatoria), spiral (Arthrospira/Spirulina), and even star shape (Staurastrum). With a diameter or length of approximately 3 to 10 μm and a size ranging from 0.2 to 2 μm, they could be classified into picophytoplankton (0.2–2 μm), nanoplankton (2–20 μm), microplankton (20–200 μm), and mesoplankton (200 µm–5 mm) [20].
A microalgal cell contains within its cytoplasm many organelles necessary for sound functioning and metabolism. A single cell may contain one or more chloroplasts. They store their “food” as starch and fats (Table 1). Due to their simple reproduction, their cell growth systems, and their genetic adaptation amenability, they can quickly proliferate by forming phytoplankton “blooms” and survive long term in various harsh environmental conditions (e.g., higher temperature, light intensity, ultraviolet radiations, CO2 levels, and salinity). They can survive short-term environmental stress by physiological acclimatization triggered by modifying their gene expression. Nevertheless, when environmental stress exceeds their physiological limits, adaptation will be acquired through the selection of several mutations with minor effects [21,22,23].
Diverse groups of microalgae have generated the remarkable wealth production of primary and secondary metabolites. These compounds, sometimes with high added value, are synthesized by several metabolic pathways such as photosynthesis, carotenogenesis, lipogenesis, and glycerol synthesis. Efficient coordination and regulation of the different metabolic pathways have been demonstrated, depending on the conditions and depth of culture in marine and freshwater environments. These autotrophic organisms are responsible for 40% of photosynthesis on earth [24]. They transform inorganic matter and light energy into chemical energy and different forms of reserve molecules: α-(1-4)-d-glucans (such as starches)/β-(1-3)-d-glucan, fructans, carbohydrates (such as floridoside) and triacyglycerols [20]. They have three modes of reproduction: sexual by the union of gametes, vegetative by the division of a single cell or by fragmentation of a colony, and, finally, asexual by the production of mobile spores.
Cyanobacteria show enormous biodiversity, and a minority of the described species have been sequenced [25]. They can be either unicellular (Chroococcus) or multicellular (Arthrospira), with coccoid (Chroococcus) or branched filaments (Anabaena), singly or grouped into colonies, nearly colorless or intensely pigmented, autotrophic or heterotrophic, psychrophilic or thermophilic, acidophilic or alkalophilic, planktonic or barophilic, dwelling in fresh water or marine environments, including hypersaline environments (salt pans). They are found both free-living and as endosymbionts [26,27,28]. They constitute a phylogenetically coherent group of evolutionarily ancient phototrophic Gram-negative bacteria [13] that show a great deal of variety in size, ranging from small forms called picoplankton (less than 2–3 μm) to larger forms. Cyanobacteria do not contain chloroplast in the cells and keep their energy in reserve in the form of starch or lipids (Table 1). Cyanobacteria are also called blue-green algae due to the presence of Chl a and phycocyanin located in membrane vesicles called thylakoids, which give the cells a bluish color when present in sufficiently high concentrations. Phycoerythrin, a red accessory pigment, can be found as well in these organisms [27].
Cyanobacterial biomass can be estimated at around a thousand million tons (1015 g) of wet biomass; therefore, they are considered among the most important organisms on Earth. Discovered as putative microfossils 2000–3500 million years ago, they are also considered among the oldest organisms in evolution and are believed to be ultimately responsible for the oxygenation of Earth’s atmosphere during the episode of the “Great Oxidation Event” at the end of the Archean Aeon [13,28]. Thought to be amongst the first organisms to colonize the earth, these bacteria are predicted to be the photosynthetic ancestors of chloroplasts in eukaryotes such as plants and algae. In addition, Cyanobacteria have the ability to perform photosynthesis, aerobic respiration, and CO2 and (sometimes) nitrogen fixation. They perform oxygenic photosynthesis like plants and algae, utilizing solar energy and water to generate chemical energy (ATP) and reducing power (NADPH) to fix atmospheric CO2 and synthesize carbohydrates [13,29]. Vermaas (2001) noted that photosynthesis and respiration in Cyanobacteria can take place simultaneously in the same compartment, represented by the thylakoid membrane, thus making this combination a bit unique for them [28]. During photosynthesis, Cyanobacteria use water as an electron donor and produce oxygen as a coproduct. Some filamentous Cyanophycae are characterized by the presence of specialized cells called heterocysts, which allow the fixation of atmospheric N2 in anaeroby and, therefore, give Cyanobacteria the possibility of growth in inorganic nitrogen-depleted environments [30]. In the dark or under anoxic conditions, Cyanobacteria can perform fermentations for energy generation [31]. It may be due to this flexibility of metabolic pathways that these organisms are able to grow under a wide range of conditions.
Unlike eukaryotic organisms, the Cyanobacteria reproduce by vegetative, asexual processes, and sexual reproduction is completely absent. The commonest mode of reproduction among them is undergoing a binary split. Moreover, there have certain specialized structures such as akinetes, hormogonia, hormocysts, and spores, which are partly involved in the process of reproduction [25].
Microalgae and Cyanobacteria are extremely heterogeneous groups gathered around a common characteristic: oxygenic photosynthesis [32]. Among these groups, which exhibit significant taxonomic diversity, the evolution of microalgae was based on the theory of endosymbiosis, according to the characteristics of their mitochondria and plastids [7]. It was proposed that mitochondria originated from the endosymbiosis of α-proteobacteria by a protoeukaryote, which thereby developed the complex eukaryote cell. The chloroplast, in turn, takes its origin through the primary endosymbiosis of a Cyanobacterium by this heterotrophic eukaryote, also called “protist”. Endosymbiosis may be the origin of the Plantae kingdom, with primary plastids (formed with only two membranes) comprising phyla of Chlorophyta, Glaucophyta, and Rhodophyta. Therefore, photosynthetic membranes of plastids of red algae strongly evoke the thylakoids of photosynthetic bacteria. In addition, the pigment equipment of Rhodophyta (Chl a) and phycobiliproteins resemble that of Cyanobacteria. Other endosymbioses have arisen during the evolution of microalgae, giving rise to organisms with secondary and even tertiary plastids. However, uncertainties relating to the order of appearances and the independence of events still persist. The secondary endosymbiosis took place between a red algae and a non-photosynthetic host cell and gave rise to the ancestor of all Chromalveolata supergroup: Cryptophyta, Haptophyta, Ochrophyta (or Heterokontophyta), and Miozoa. This is the most controversial hypothesis in the literature postulated in 1999 by Cavalier-Smith under the name of “The Chromalveolate Hypothesis” [33]. By a similar process, Euglenophyta, Cercozoa, and green Miozoa acquired their plastids from ancestral Chlorophyta [34,35,36]. Nevertheless, the work described by Baurain et al. [37] has shown that the differences observed within these groups cannot be fully explained by this hypothesis. For this reason, another theory called “The Independent Acquisition Hypothesis” explains the origin of Chromalveolates by a series of endosymbioses.
Therefore, the classification of microalgae is very complex and ambiguous. As mentioned above, it could be based on various different criteria, such as the organization of photosynthetic membranes, but also other criteria such as the chemical nature of storage products and, most commonly, their pigmentation [38,39]. In addition to the morphological basis, Reviers Bruno de [40] and Groendahl et al. [41] have proposed a classification of microalgae and Cyanobacteria by means of molecular biology techniques based on the sequence alignments of genes encoding the 16S and 23SrRNAs for Cyanobacteria and 18S and 28SrRNAs for microalgae in order to establish family ties between these microorganisms. Other methods, such as the flow cytometer, ensuring semi-automated or fully automated classification, have been recently employed to identify and classify algal species [42]. Currently, there is no specific classification used by the taxonomists since the taxonomic organization may change over the years [43,44].
As early as their discovery, different kinds of classification of algae were proposed. For example, [5,45,46] classified microalgae and Cyanobacteria into 11 and 10 classes, respectively. Contrary to the classification of Fritsh, where the 11th class consists of Cyanobacteria, Chapman employed the Procaryota-Eucaryota concept in the classification of microalgae. Table 2 summarizes this classification by implementing the main characteristics of the different classes. Table 3 presents the classification of microalgae and Cyanobacteria, detailing their branches. Those tables show that microalgae and Cyanobacteria are a mixture of different kingdoms: Eubacteria, Protozoa, Chromists, and Plants. This classification is based on data from Ruggiero et al., published in 2015 [47], who detailed the distribution of all living organisms.
Microalgae and Cyanobacteria are ubiquitous, and they occupy various types of ecological niches. Most of them thrive in fresh, saline, or brackish waters. Some of them are also capable of forming a sticky coating in the form of “biofouling” biofilms on various terrestrial habitats such as soil and rocks, tree trunks, or even architectural buildings [8,48] (Table 2). There are many parameters that influence the habitat of the microalgae and Cyanobacteria, mainly the salinity and the availability of substrates. The temperature and the quantity and quality of light are also among the principal factors influencing their habitat. At sea level, these two factors depend on the movement of the tides and the seacoast depth. Indeed, algae spread according to the sea depth, influencing the availability of the wavelengths that can be absorbed by their pigments. Some authors define this mechanism by the chromatic adaptation in algae [49]. The latter can be considered as a change in the absorption spectrum of an organism, activated by different spectral compositions and intensities of incident solar energy [50]. Green microalgae are present on the surface, adapted to red wavelengths. Brown microalgae are found between green and red microalgae, which are found in the deeper strata. In this depth, they exploit the green and blue wavelengths. However, this parameter does not prevent us from sometimes finding green microalgae living in deeper depths and red microalgae on the surface. This diversity of color allows microalgae to easily absorb the dominant rays in the solar radiation at various depths [51].

2.3. Compositions and Technologies for Photoautotrophic Production of Microalgae and Cyanobacteria

Different morphological, physiological, and genetic traits confer on microalgae the ability to produce different biologically active metabolites. This implies biochemical diversity, which becomes the basis for many biotechnological and industrial applications. In fact, microalgae biomass contains important primary metabolites such as lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates, with food and nutraceutical applications. Nevertheless, bioactive compounds also can be synthesized from secondary metabolism with cosmetics and pharmaceutical aims [24,52]. Similarly, Cyanobacteria from marine and freshwater sources are known to produce a variety of bioactive compounds (secondary metabolites) that are derived from mixed biosynthetic pathways endowed with diverse biological activities, including antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, antimalarial, antitumoral, and antiinflammatory properties [53,54,55].

2.3.1. Amino acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Microalgae and Cyanobacteria are considered to be rich and natural sources of vegetable proteins, mainly used as functional ingredients [56]. Indeed, they can produce proteins from 6% to 80% of their dry mass, depending on the species [57], e.g., Chlorella vulgaris (Chlorophyta) (51–58% DW), Arthrospira maxima (Cyanobacteria) (60–71% DW), Isochrysis galbana (Haptophyta) (50–56% DW), or Porphyridium purpureum (Rhodophyta) (28–39% DW). Moreover, bioactive peptides are convenient high added-value compounds for humans due to their therapeutic potential in the treatment of various diseases, in addition to providing nutritional benefits [56].
Besides their high protein content, microalgae and Cyanobacteria are also known for their high amino acid (Aas) content, in which the more abundant are aspartate and glutamate [39]. According to Sousa et al. [58], microalgae contain essential amino acids compared to egg and soybean. Microalgae and Cyanobacteria, such as those belonging to the species Nostoc sphaeroides, Arthrospira platensis (Cyanobacteria), and Chlorella vulgaris (Chlorophyta), show a large variability in protein digestibility, with values of 82%, 81%, and 76%, respectively [59]. Aminograms of Arthrospira extracts with high protein digestibility (83–90%) have highlighted all essential amino acids, particularly, leucine, valine, and isoleucine [60]. The increased digestibility of Cyanobacteria is explained by their thinner cell wall. Kose et al. [61] reported that other species, such as Nannochloropsis oceanica (Eustigmatophyceae) and Chlorella sorokiniana (Chlorophyta), may exhibit low digestibility rates of 50% and 55%, respectively, due to the rigidity and thickness of their cell walls, which are considered digestibility barriers.
Cyanobacteria represent an inexhaustible source of proteins and various compounds with promising antiviral activities. Cyanovirin-N is an 11 KDa protein produced by Nostoc ellipsosporum that displays viricidal activity against several viruses and, notably, the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Other microbial metabolites were equally reported to exhibit antiviral activities, such as Scytovirin, a single 95-amino acids protein, which was isolated from the Cyanobacteria Scytonema varium, with potent antiviral activity against HIV.

2.3.2. Photosynthetic Pigments

Photosynthetic pigments of microalgae and Cyanobacteria are composed of chlorophylls, carotenoids, and phycobiliproteins (phycoerythrin, phycocyanin, and allophycocyanin). These three groups confer on microalgae their green, yellow/orange, and red/blue colors, respectively [62]. Natural pigments derived from microalgae and Cyanobacteria are of great importance for the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries. They are not only responsible for capturing solar energy for photosynthesis but also play a role in photoprotective processes and display antioxidant, anticarcinogen, anti-inflammatory, antiobesity, antiangiogenic, and neuroprotective activities [24,63]. Chlorophylls, which represent 0.5% to 1.5% of dry matter of microalgae and Cyanobacteria, are green, lipid-soluble pigments that play a major role in photosynthesis. They are tetra-pyrrolic macrocycles that are metalized by the presence of a complexed magnesium atom in their center and substituted by a phytyl chain, and they may be found in algae, higher plants, and Cyanobacteria.
Chlorophyll a (Chl a) is present in all algae and has a major peak of light absorption at 683 ± 20 nm due to the activity of photosystem II (PSII) and a second one at 700 to 750 nm due to both PSII and PSI [64]. This photosynthetic pigment is accompanied by accessory ones, including chlorophylls b, cl, c2 and d, phycobiliproteins, and carotenoids, which absorb at different wavelengths, thus expanding the spectrum of light-harvesting [20]. Chlorophyll b, c, and d are variants of the Chl a found in green algae, brown algae, and Rhodophyta, respectively [65].
Present as orange, red, or yellow colors, carotenoids (0.1% to 0.2% of dry matter) are responsible not only for the primary coloration of some algal groups but also for the mechanism of photosynthesis [66]. Carotenoids are chemically subdivided into deoxygenated carotenes, principally β-carotene, which is the most widely known of the carotenoids because of its antioxidant property as well as its dyeing power. Known as provitamin A (precursor of vitamin A), β-carotene is mainly produced by the hypersaline species Dunaliella salina (Chlorophyta), which can accumulate up to 98.5% of this compound in relation to its total carotenoids and about 13% of its dry biomass [39]. The second major group is the red oxygenated pigment. The freshwater chlorophyceae Haematococcus lacustris (Chlorophyta) is considered the primary source of astaxanthin as it was found to have the highest production on the industrial scale and can accumulate up to 81% of astaxanthin of its total carotenoids and about 7% of its dry weight [67,68,69]. This pigment is commercially produced from Chlorella zofingiensis, Chlorococcum sp., and Scenedesmus sp. Astaxanthinis is described in the literature as having a higher antioxidant activity, health benefits, and dyeing power compared with those of α- and β-carotenes, lutein and lycopene, canthaxanthin, and tocopherols [24,39,70]. Phycobiliproteins are colored (blue or red pigments) and water-soluble pigments organized in supramolecular complexes, called phycobilisomes, mainly present in Cyanophyta, Rhodophyta, Glaucophyta, and Cryptophyta. These complexes consist of 85% phycobiliproteins, of which 4 classes can be distinguished: allophycocyanin at the center of the complex, phycocyanin, followed by phycoerythrin or phycoerythrocyanin at the level of the radiary projections. The characteristics of these pigments have been detailed by Thomas (1989) [71]. They absorb light in the visible region of 450–650 nm. They are used as natural colorants in the food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries as substitutes for synthetic dyes. The species most commonly used for the production of phycobiliproteins are Porphyridium sp. (Rhodophyta), Arthrospira/Spirulina sp., and Aphanizomenon flosaquae (Cyanobacteria) [39,70].

2.3.3. Lipids and Fatty Acids

Lipids from microalgae and Cyanobacteria are classified into two categories, which are: (i) storage lipids, mainly triglycerides that are non-polar lipids produced by photosynthesis and stored in cells and (ii) structural lipids, such as phospholipids and sterols, which are plastid and cell membrane polar lipids [72]. Microalgae are able to accumulate up to 20–50% of their dry weight in lipids, and this content can reach 80% in response to changes in nutritional and environmental conditions (nitrogen concentration, salinity, or temperature). Furthermore, microalgae contain very rich and diverse fatty acid profiles. The latter are the primary metabolites with 14–20 carbons, belonging to the class of storage lipids mainly used for applications focusing on the production of biodiesel. Saturated and polyunsaturated (PUFAs) fatty acids with more than 20 carbon atoms are used in food as health food supplements and in the pharmaceutical industry for docosahexaenoic (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic (EPA) acids. In addition, the lipid composition of microalgae is very rich in essential PUFAs such as ω3, in particular eicosapentaenoic (ω3, EPA, C20: 5) and docosahexaenoic (ω3, DHA, C22: 6) and ω-6 fatty acids. The fatty acid composition of microalgae and Cyanobacteria depends essentially on the species. The Chlorella species are known for their high content of DHA and EPA (3.24% and 8.9% of total fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), respectively, in addition to saturated fatty acids). The fatty acids extracted from Chlorella vulgaris are mainly composed of oleic, palmitic, and linolenic acids. The green algae Haematococcus are characterized by its short-chain fatty acids profile with antimicrobial activity, while the Cyanobacterium Arthrospira/Spirulina represents a good source of γ-linolenic acid, sterols, and fatty acids such as palmitic, lauric, oleic acids, and DHA. Diatoms are considered to be a promising source of EPA (15% to 30% of total fatty acids) but not DHA, contrary to dinoflagellates, which have a high potential for use in the commercial production of this compound, which ranges from 12% to 51% of total fatty acids [39,72,73,74]. Different antimicrobial, antiviral, anticancer, and antiprotozoal compounds have been reported from Cyanobacteria. Singh et al. [75,76] mentioned that lipopeptides from Cyanobacteria have cytotoxic (41%), antitumor (13%), antiviral (4%), antibiotic (12%) activities, and the remaining 18% include antimalarial and antimycoticsone activities. Some Cyanobacteria also have the potential to produce intracellular and extracellular bioactive compounds with potent antibacterial and antifungal activities against many fungi and Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. However, some of the antimicrobial compounds isolated from Cyanobacteria exhibit cytotoxicity and may be ineffective for use in pharmaceuticals [77].
Cyanobacteria are a source of value-added products such as isoprene, which is an unsaturated, energy-rich hydrocarbon widely used as a biofuel by the chemical industry. Polyhydroxyalkanoates are biodegradable and biocompatible polyesters produced in nature by numerous Cyanobacteria, including Aphanothece sp., Oscillatoria limosa, Arthrospira/Spirulina, and the thermophilic strain Synechococcus sp. MA19. This polymer has gained immense attention for industrial applications, such as replacements for conventional non-biodegradable plastics, as well as in the biomedical or pharmaceutical field [78]. Additionally, Cyanobacteria produce a broad spectrum of compounds with anticancer activity. These compounds show potential benefits against cancer, including cell cycle arrest by inhibition of cell growth using apoptotic processes and mitochondrial dysfunctions. For example, some compound extracts from the genus Arthrospira/Spirulina resulted in the inhibition of homogenous leukoplakia. Others repressed chemically induced carcinogenesis in model hamster buccal pouches [76].

2.3.4. Carbohydrates

Microalgae have been suggested as a promising source of carbohydrates, which are located not only inside the chloroplast but also in the cytosol and extracellular compartments. These mono-, oligo-, and polysaccharides are produced during photosynthesis, and their contents can reach 50% of the dry weight of some microalgae, depending on the species and the cultivation and environmental conditions [39,78]. Cyanobacteria and red microalgae store, respectively, glycogen (α-(1,4-1,6)-d-glucan) and floridean starch (hybrid between starch and glycogen), while green microalgae accumulate amylopectin-like polysaccharides [39,78] (Table 3).
Carbohydrates are classified as simple or complex compounds. The former contains just one or two sugars and are called monosaccharides, while the latter has two or more sugars, called di-, oligo-, and polysaccharides. The latter are polymers of carbohydrates (glycans), and they are extracted from many species and genera of microalgae, mainly from Chlorella sp., Tetraselmis sp. (Chlorophyta), Isochrysis sp. (Haptophyta), Porphyridium purpureum, and Dixoniella grisea (Rhodophyta) [65,78,79]. Some microalgae also produce, depending on species, structural polysaccharides qualified as fibrillary, which participate in the formation of the cell wall and could be used in pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food industries. They also have the potential of applications such as thickening or gelling agents as well as bioactive compounds, citing antiviral, anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant and antithrombotic, antitumor, and immunomodulatory activities [80]. The second class is known as energy reserve polysaccharides and exocellular polysaccharides (EPSs), mainly used for biofuel production. Finally, polysaccharides can also be involved in cell communication [40]. Carbohydrates such as Nostoflan, cyclic depsipeptides, microvirin, ichthyopeptins A and B, and many others compound extracts from Cyanobacteria also show strong antiviral properties [13,76,77].

2.3.5. Other Compounds

Microalgae have also been recognized as an excellent source of vitamins and minerals, some of them having antioxidant properties such as the hydrosoluble vitamins (C, B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B9, and B12) and fat-soluble ones (provitamin A and vitamins E, D, and K). They also contain nicotinate, biotin, folic acid, and pantothenic acid as well as macrominerals (Na, K, Ca, and Mg) and microminerals (Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu) [81,82,83,84]. Parts of prokaryotic microalgae are known for their large-scale production of vitamins of commercial interest, such as vitamins B and E, and Spirulina is part of this. In fact, this Cyanobacterium is known to be a rich source of vitamin B12, β-carotene, thiamin, and riboflavin [77].
Microalgal biomass also contains an abundance of a wide variety of secondary bioactive substances. Within this bioactive diversity, phenolic compounds constitute one of the most numerous and abundant groups of phytochemicals, which exhibit a wide range of biological properties, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antiallergic, antidiabetes, antiaging, and antimicrobial properties [39]. Moreover, microalgae and Cyanobacteria have great potential for synthesizing enzymes such as cellulases, galactosidases, amylases, proteases, lipases, phytases, laccases, phosphatases, and antioxidant enzymes, with high potential for several applications [77,84]. Microalgae also produce phytohormones such as auxin, abscisic acid, cytokinin, ethylene, gibberellins, polyamines, and jasmonides, mainly known to regulate the main physiological processes of plants, terrestrial or aquatic organisms [79,85,86], phytosterols [39], and others.

2.3.6. Technologies for Photoautotrophic Production of Microalgae and Cyanobacterial Biomass

Given the great interests of algae and their broad spectrum of applications, the world is invited to push and encourage the production and cultivation of these organisms. Furthermore, until 2011, global algal exploitation remained marginal, with 15 million tons/year of macroalgae and 4 billion tons/year of terrestrial plants against 10,000 tons/year of microalgae [38]. New estimates show that between 2016 and 2018, the production of microalgae, including Cyanobacteria, bounded by 19,000 and 20,000 tons per year. By 2024, their expected commercial production will be 27,500 tons per year, with a market value of USD 1.1 billion [87]. The challenge nowadays will be to improve current cultivation methods to scale up this production. Macroalgae are cultivated in a natural marine environment, while microalgae and Cyanobacteria are cultivated in reactors, either in photoautotrophy (raceways or photobioreactors) or in heterotrophy [38]. These two production systems remain, in fact, the most practical, as mentioned next.
Open ponds are the most exploited processes for the industrial culture of microalgae and Cyanobacteria due to their ease of use and low cost. These systems generally use natural light and vary according to their shape, the type of materials used, as well as the mixing system. They are mainly classified into two types: circular and “raceway” ponds [88]. The first open ponds, qualified as natural basins, were without agitation and generally had low cell productivity. In order to overcome this problem, mixing systems with a circular shape and centrally pivoted rotating agitator were then put in place for the production of biomass, animal feed (aquaculture), and dietary supplements based on Arthrospira/Spirulina (Cyanobacteria) or Chlorella (Chlorophyta) [89]. Open raceway tanks later appeared, characterized by an elongated shape, and they are currently the most widely used artificial systems for microalgal cultivation. This design consists of a closed-loop flow channel with a typical culture depth of approximately 12 to 50 cm, in which the mixing and circulation of the microalgae culture are promoted by paddle wheels [90]. Light intensity is considered among the parameters that strongly influence the growth rates of microalgae in outdoor cultures. Moreover, with such a mixing system, microalgae have better access to sunlight, which can come only from the top. Besides light, dissolved CO2 concentration is another important parameter for productivity in these systems. Indeed, atmospheric CO2 uptake by microalgae and Cyanobacteria is not sufficient for optimal growth. In open reactors, supplementary to light and CO2 availabilities, factors such as temperature and the mixing and availability of nutrients are involved in reaching optimal growth and are strongly affected by the culture depth [90].
Photobioreactors (PBRs) are closed systems that consist either of horizontally or vertically arranged tubes or vertically arranged panels, wherein microalgae or Cyanobacteria are grown. This technology offers better control of all culture parameters such as pH, temperature, oxygen, and agitation. They are well suited for microalgae sensitive to contamination, such as extremophilic microalgae. Depending on location and metabolite production, they may or may not be artificially illuminated. During the last decades, the marketing of industrial PBRs with different designs and efficiencies has increased the yields of biomass production. Several shapes are currently available, such as sleeves, tubular reactors, annular reactors, flat reactors, rigid panel type reactors, and “airlift” type reactors (bubble column) [88,91].
Microalgae and Cyanobacteria can be harvested by mechanical, chemical, biological, and electrical methods. They are based on the principles of separation by the density difference or cells sizes. For the first strategy, we cite sedimentation, flocculation-settling, flotation, and centrifugation techniques, while the second one is based on membrane processes such as micro- or ultrafiltration [38]. The choice of the used technique depends on the chosen microalgae morphology, specifications of the final product, the ability to reuse the culture medium, as well as the density and size of the microalgal cell [92]. Likewise, to improve harvesting efficiencies, the process should not only be effective for the majority of microalgae and allow for a higher biomass concentration but should also require moderate costs of operation energy and maintenance. Therefore, the harvesting process cost is also very important as it usually accounts for about 20–30% of the total microalgal production cost. Thus, it is better to apply a combination of reliable and low-cost processes such as coagulation/flocculation by mechanical, chemical, and biological methods, which are the most used to reduce operation and maintenance charges. Filtration-, centrifugation-, and electrical-based processes remain the least used due to their high energy and equipment costs.

3. Current Uses of Microalgae and Cyanobacteria in Industry

Thanks to their important and diverse high-added-value contents, industrial microalgae and Cyanobacteria production has increased in these last years. By 2050, the world population will exceed 9 billion, which will compel humanity to find and use new sources for food. In fact, 70% more food will be needed, according to Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) organization (www.fao.org, accessed on 10 November 2020). In addition to this increase, demand for food and fuel production will be affected by climate change and the decline of ordinary resources. Microalgae and Cyanobacteria could represent a natural alternative for the resolution of these problems. The National Center for Biotechnology Information expects that, by 2050, algae could provide 18% of protein sources (www.fortunebusinessinsights.com, accessed on 7 December 2020). Currently, algae production is rising as their compound annual growth rate (CAGR) will increase by 4.3% in the period 2020–2027, according to www.strategyr.com, accessed on 11 November 2020). It was estimated that in 2020, dyeing agents are at the head of the list of microalgae products on the market, with USD 800 million, followed by pharmaceuticals/chemicals (USD 500 million), nutraceuticals (USD 300 million), and, finally, cosmetics (USD 30 million) [39].

3.1. Microalgae and Cyanobacteria as Food, Dietary Supplements, and Feed

Microalgae and Cyanobacteria provide to the consumer an unrepeatable source of high-value compounds. Therefore, they are mostly commercialized as health products, diet supplements, functional food, and nutraceuticals in capsules, tablets, powders, pills, and syrups forms [93]. Table 4 presents different industries producing food supplements and nutraceuticals from microalgae and Cyanobacteria. Chlorella (Chlorophyta) and Arthrospira/Spirulina (Cyanobacteria) are the most popular genus used as diet supplements. They constitute 80% of the global microalgae food market, thanks to their composition (www.fortunebusinessinsights.com, accessed on 14 February 2021).
Spirulina is known as an interesting source of proteins, phycobiliproteins, vitamin B12, minerals, γ-linolenic acid, and others. Its production and consumption are in continuous growth. In a previous assessment, the global production of dried Spirulina was 12,000 tons.year−1. In 2014, FAO estimated a Spirulina global production of 86,000 tons [94]. According to persistence market research, over 128,000 tons of Spirulina were globally consumed in 2016 (www.persistencemarketresearch.com/, accessed on 14 February 2021). Its global market size was USD 348 million in 2018 and is projected to reach USD 779 million by 2026, growing at a CAGR of 10.5% from 2019 to 2026 (www.alliedmarketresearch.com, accessed on 14 February 2021). In their report, Persistence Market Research affirmed that the powder form of Spirulina was the highest form used as, in 2016, this segment represented 73.5%, and it is expected that its consumption will record a CAGR of 10.2% in the period 2019–2026. In second place, the demand for tablets and capsules will increase to a CAGR of 8.8% in the same period. By 2026, more than 250,000 tons of Spirulina will be consumed globally in the production of nutraceuticals (www.persistencemarketresearch.com/, accessed on 14 February 2021). The aqueous extract of this blue-green microalgae, rich in natural phycocyanin colorant, was authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) at a maximum level of 2 mg·kg−1 to be safely used in coloring confections and in dietary supplement tablets and capsules (www.accessdata.fda.gov, accessed on 10 December 2020). Different companies are currently producing phycobiliprotein around the world, such as Parry Nutraceuticals (Pudukkottai District, Unaiyur, Tamil Nadu, India), Kyanos nutrition (Toulouse, France), and Greensea (Mèze, France), which produce C-PC, R-PC, APC, R-PE, and B-PE. Algosource Technology (Saint Nazaire, France) is developing different extracts from Arthrospira platensis (Cyanobacteria), which are Spirulysat, an aqueous extract rich in phycocyanin and Spirugrass, a fraction from the biorefining of Spirulina, rich in amino acids, iron, vitamin K, and beta-carotenes. Spirulina diet supplements are advantageous for athletes, women during pregnancy and lactation, malnourished children, and even for cosmonauts in long space travels.
Chlorella is also considered an exceptional source of proteins, especially in its hot water extract, known as Chlorella growth factor (CGF), rich in amino acids, vitamins, peptides, minerals, and nucleic acids (DNA and RNA). It was demonstrated to promote growth and healing, stimulate the immune system, and control body weight and serum lipid content [95]. Chlorella production has doubled, as it was 2000 tons.year−1 in 2003 [96], to be over 5000 tons.year−1 [39]. The largest Chlorella producers are situated in Taiwan. Its commercial market value is around one billion US dollars [94].
The global algae protein market will exceed USD 1 billion by 2026; algae protein capsules demand, mainly by sports athletes, will increase by over 6% by the same year. In 2018, dietary supplements represented about 42% of the global algae protein market, simultaneously with the expansion of the nutraceuticals industry in China, Japan, and India. Other microalgae or their extracts, such as Dunaliella, Haematococcus, Scenedesmus (Chlorophyta), Aphanizomenon (Cyanobacteria), Odontella (Bacillariophyta), Porphyridium (Rhodophyta), Schizochytrium, and Ulkenia (Marine Fungi), have been accepted in food and health-food markets [93]. Between 2017 and 2019, three microalgae/microfungi (Euglena gracilis—Euglenozoa, Tetraselmis chui—Chlorophyta, and Aurantiochytrium limacinum—Fungi) were recommended for full Qualified Presumption of Safety status, according by the European Food Safety Authority [97]. Table 5 presents examples of the authorized microalgae and Cyanobacteria and their respective allowed levels for specified foods given by the union list of novel foods in accordance with Regulation European Union (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council on novel foods (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/, accessed on 27 November 2020) and also by the FDA [98]. Schizochytrium sp. oil, extracted in specified conditions, was authorized as a novel food by the EFSA [99]. Many companies are producing this oil, rich in DHA, such as DSM (Heerlen, The Netherlands), Progress Biotech (Capelle aan den Ijssel, Netherlands), Bioplus Life Sciences PvT (Bengaluru, Karataka, India), Mara Renewables Corporation (Dartmouth, NH, Canada), and BASF (Ludwigshafen, Germany) (Table 4). It was proposed as an alternative to fish DHA.
Carotenoid production is also in perpetual growth, with a CAGR estimated at 4.2%. Its annual market size is projected to grow from USD 1.5 billion in 2019 to USD 2 billion in 2026 (www.marketsandmarkets.com/, accessed on 26 January 2021). This rise goes together with scientific acceptance and authorization. Betatene, produced by BASF, is an extract of β-carotene from Dunaliella salina used as dietary supplements as well as functional foods and beverages. Dunaliella production also increased from 1200 tons.year−1 to 3000 tons.year−1. The D. salina global market is estimated to reach a CAGR of 5.1% and will evolve from USD 472.3 million in the year 2020 to US D 671 million by 2027 (www.researchandmarkets.com, accessed on 26 January 2021). The EFSA has accepted the use of an AST-rich oleoresin from Haematococcus lacustris (Chlorophyta) algae as a food supplement up to 40–80 mg·day−1 (Table 5) [100]. AST was shown to be a powerful dietary antioxidant. There are also many companies producing AST, such as Fuji Chemical Industries Co., Ltd. (Toyama, Japan), Cyanotech (Kailua-Kona, Hawai, HI, USA), Algalif (Reykjanesbaer, Iceland), and Microphyt (Baillargues, France). Its global market is expected to reach USD 770 million by 2024, where the global nutraceuticals industry will be assessed to have consumed 54.8% of H. lacustris microalgae natural AST in 2017 to reach 190 metric tons by 2024 (www.businesswire.com, accessed on 14 February 2021). The H. lacustris market is estimated to grow at a CAGR of 13.2% from 2020 to 2027 to reach USD 148.1 million by 2027 (www.globenewswire.com, accessed on 14 February 2021).
The introduction of microalgae as food ingredients and the demand for high-added-value products are increasing despite some concerns of the algae powder consistence, color, fishy smell, and production cost [101]. Some companies have incorporated Chlorella in noodles (Sun Chlorella (Torrance, CA, USA), Paldo (Seoul, Korea)), bars and cookies (Allma (Lisboa, Portugal)), and in mayonnaise to replace eggs (Fooding Company (Sucy-en-Brie, France)) (Table 6).
Microalgae constitute equally an important feed for animals, especially with the expansion of aquaculture, the reduction of land fertility, and scientific evidence on their positive effect on animal health. For example, carotenoids have been incorporated as a pigment in egg yolks, broiler skin, fishes, and crustaceans. Microalgae feeds are largely used in aquaculture and poultry as a source of DHA and proteins. Nannostar, based on the microalgae Microchloropsis gaditana (Eustigmatophyceae), is produced by AlgaSpring (Almere, The Netherlands) for aquaculture purposes. It is rich in EPA (20:5 omega-3) and other fatty acids such as C14:0, C16:0, C16:1, C18:1, and C18:2. It contains β-carotene, violaxanthin, tocopherols, various sterols, and valuable minerals. Some industries use a combination of microalgae, as in the case of Easybooster (Fitoplancton marino, Cádiz, Spain), commercialized as a liquid phytoplankton extract combining 33% of Isochrysis (T-ISO), 31% of Nannochloropsis, 18% of Tetraselmis, and 18% Phaeodactylum (Table 6).
Microalgae are an important food for some marine bivalve mollusks, the larval stages of abalone and conch gastropods, the larvae of several marine fish species, penaeid shrimp, and zooplankton [102]. For adult fish, the use of microalgae is limited as fishmeal is still cheaper [101]. Oostlander estimated the cost of live microalgae production for feed in aquaculture hatcheries as 300–600 EUR·kg−1 biomass. This cost could be reduced using larger-scale production [103].

3.2. Use of Microalgae and Cyanobacteria for Cosmetic Applications

Microalgae and Cyanobacteria have been incorporated into face, skin, and hair care products, in addition to sun protection compounds such as antioxidants, thickening, and water-binding agents [104]. Some industries in this field develop their own microalgae culture, but others tend to develop collaborations with industries producing microalgae, such as Rejuvasea® (NV, USA), which commercializes products containing active compounds from marine microalgae provided by Fitoplancton Marino (Cadiz, Spain). Some brands incorporate in their products extracts from more than one microalga in combination with other plant extracts, as Estee Lauder (New York, NY, USA) and Algenist, which is Solazyme’s skincare line. The latter produces a whole range of cosmetic products based on microalgae (Table 7). In the literature, several works have been carried out to evaluate the effect of these extracts by in vitro and in vivo studies. Rumin et al. [105] reported that in 2015 and 2017, the number of publications was about 25 per year, where France, Spain, and Germany were the top publishers. They focus mainly on the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of microalgae extracts and the potential of bioactive compounds in the treatment of skin problems such as aging, tanning, and pigment disorders [106]. For instance, the effect of Dermochlorella D, produced by CODIF, an aqueous extract of Chlorella vulgaris rich in amino acids, was COSMOS approved. This label is managed by a not-for-profit, international, and independent association, and it represents a consumer guarantee for organic and natural cosmetics. The effect of this extract was studied by in vitro test on fibroblasts and keratinocytes. It was shown that the mentioned extract ameliorated the skin structure by an increase in collagen-1, -3, and -4 and also laminin-6 and elastin expressions by human fibroblasts, as well as collagen-7, laminin-5, and elafin expressions by keratinocytes. It also improved skin protection against free radicals by increasing the expression of thioredoxin-1 and thioredoxin-2, which could reduce skin process aging. Furthermore, it protects Langerhans cells against ultraviolet exposure [106]. Phormiskin from CODIF Company took the second prize at the “BSB Innovation Awards 2010” for the most innovative ingredient focused on natural products.

3.3. Use of Microalgae and Cyanobacteria for Biofuel Applications

The use of microalgae in recent years for the production of “third-generation” biofuel is increasing as this renewable biosource is not in conflict with critical food production. Indeed, it does not compete with agriculture or at the expense of food, as is the case with first- and second-generation biofuels. In addition, biofuel production from microalgae does not cause deforestation or habitat destruction. These microorganisms are suitable for biofuel production thanks to their high content of lipids, which can reach over 84% of dry cell weight among some species. Lipids produced by microalgae are converted into biofuels, biogas, dihydrogen (H2), and bioelectricity. The term biofuels encompass biodiesel, bioethanol, and biomethane. From microalgae containing 30% oil by weight of dry biomass, 587,000 L of oil per hectare can be obtained [12]. Additionally, their richness of carbohydrates is convertible to fermentable sugars, making them convenient for bioethanol production [107]. Moreover, the production of biofuel by microalgae has the advantage of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and preserving the environment. It has been reported that, during their growth, a production of 100 kg of algae consumes 182 kg of CO2, which has a positive effect on the climate; in addition, some species could use SOx and NOx as a nutrient source [38,105].
The global biofuel algae market is expected to have a CAGR of 8.8% and to reach USD 10.73 billion by 2025, with a dominance of their use in transportation to account for over 70% of the total demand (www.grandviewresearch.com/, accessed on 19 January 2021).
However, until now, there have been many challenges and difficulties of this production, such as the enormous water demand and the necessity of maintaining algae cultivation across all climates. If wastewater is used to produce oil, the barrel of algae oil could cost USD 332, according to the estimation of Lundquist et al. [108]. This price is too high compared to crude oil, which was USD 80 in 2010 as the average closing price and USD 56 in 2021. The proposed solutions are to capitalize the production and develop technologies for larger-scale productions. Some industries use genetically modified microalgae or Cyanobacteria to produce biofuel, as in the case of Algenol, which uses modified Cyanobacteria for ethanol production [109]. European Aeronautic Defence and Space (EADS), the parent company of Airbus, used, in 2010, 100% derived biofuel microalgae to fly a Diamond DA42NG for 4 days. With the aim of testing and certification, Solazyme (San Francisco, CA, USA) produced over 36,000 L of 100% algae-derived biofuel destined for the U.S. Navy in 2010. In the next few years, it is awaited that North America will be the largest market, accounting for over 30% (www.grandviewresearch.com/, www.grandviewresearch.com/, accessed on 19 January 2021). In addition to Solazyme, there are many industries producing energy based on algae in the United States, such as Algenol, Blue Marble Production, Sapphire Energy, Culture Biosystems, Genifuels, Seambiotic, Solix Biofuels, and Algae Production Systems, and in other countries, such as Proviron in Belgium (Hemiksem, Belgium).

4. Conclusions

Microalgae is a group of eukaryotic photosynthetic microorganisms that thrive in many habitats and present significant taxonomic diversity. They present obvious properties distinguishing them from Cyanobacteria (sometimes called prokaryotic microalgae or blue-green microalgae). Typically, microalgae are photoautotrophic microorganisms producing biomass with great efficiency using water, solar energy, and CO2, implying biochemical diversity, which becomes the basis for many biotechnological, commercial, and industrial sectors to harness the growing demands of such an unexplored natural resource.
Despite the huge use of microalgal and Cyanobacterial biomass in many industrial applications, as presented in this review, some bioactive compounds from these biomasses still depict an entirely passive role because of the photoproduction, extraction, and purification costs. Moreover, the selection of algal strains after screening from collections or isolation from different environments as well as their cultivation in appropriate culture media always require numerous developments. Thus, the development of novel and adapted extraction and purification methodologies applied to algal biomass might initiate the turning event toward wider industrial utilization. Moreover, the improvement of biomass production in photobioreactors after process intensification could, probably in the future, significantly increase biomass yields by capturing CO2. Indeed, photoproduction in dilute aqueous media using natural or artificial light remain currently inappropriate for large-scale biomass production and low-value applications. Additionally, more work needs to be done to fully utilize the potential of microalgae and Cyanobacteria biomass for their application in large-scale production. Since the key challenges appear to be the high cost of operation, infrastructure, maintenance, mass production, bioproduct accumulation, and extraction, a proposed solution is the cultivation of microalgae in wastewaters, thanks to their ability to assimilate organic and inorganic carbon as well as inorganic nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P), in order to reduce the cost of cultures.

Author Contributions

I.F. and P.M. conceived and designed the research; R.H. (Rihab Hachicha), F.E., H.B.H., P.D., H.d.B., C.D., G.P., R.H. (Ridha Hachicha) and S.A. analyzed and interpreted the data; writing—review and editing, R.H. (Rihab Hachicha), F.E. and H.B.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been funded by the Franco-Tunisian program (PHC UTIQUE-46201NH).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jacob-Lopes, E.; Maroneze, M.M.; Queiroz, M.I.; Zepka, L.Q. Handbook of Microalgae-Based Processes and Products: Fundamentals and Advances in Energy, Food, Feed, Fertilizer, and Bioactive Compounds; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gonçalves, A.L.; Rodrigues, C.M.; Pires, J.C.M.; Simões, M. The Effect of Increasing CO2 Concentrations on Its Capture, Biomass Production and Wastewater Bioremediation by Microalgae and Cyanobacteria. Algal Res. 2016, 14, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alvarez, A.L.; Weyers, S.L.; Goemann, H.M.; Peyton, B.M.; Gardner, R.D. Microalgae, Soil and Plants: A Critical Review of Microalgae as Renewable Resources for Agriculture. Algal Res. 2021, 54, 102200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abu-Ghosh, S.; Dubinsky, Z.; Verdelho, V.; Iluz, D. Unconventional High-Value Products from Microalgae: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 329, 124895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chapman, V.J.; Chapman, D.J. Classification. In The Algae; Chapman, V.J., Chapman, D.J., Eds.; Macmillan Education: London, UK, 1973; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  6. Palinska, K.A.; Surosz, W. Taxonomy of Cyanobacteria: A Contribution to Consensus Approach. Hydrobiologia 2014, 740, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Rockwell, N.C.; Lagarias, J.C.; Bhattacharya, D. Primary Endosymbiosis and the Evolution of Light and Oxygen Sensing in Photosynthetic Eukaryotes. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2014, 2, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mostafa, S.S.M. Microalgal Biotechnology: Prospects and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lauersen, K.J. Eukaryotic Microalgae as Hosts for Light-Driven Heterologous Isoprenoid Production. Planta 2019, 249, 155–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, R.E. Phycology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pulz, O.; Gross, W. Valuable Products from Biotechnology of Microalgae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 65, 635–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Suresh, K.S.; Suresh, P.V.; Kudre, T.G. 4—Prospective Ecofuel Feedstocks for Sustainable Production. In Advances in Eco-Fuels for a Sustainable Environment; Azad, K., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 89–117. [Google Scholar]
  13. Garcia-Pichel, F. Cyanobacteria. In Encyclopedia of Microbiology, 3rd ed.; Schaechter, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 107–124. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mata, T.M.; Martins, A.A.; Caetano, N.S. Microalgae for Biodiesel Production and Other Applications: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. De Vargas, C.; Audic, S.; Henry, N.; Decelle, J.; Mahé, F.; Logares, R.; Lara, E.; Berney, C.; Le Bescot, N.; Probert, I.; et al. Ocean Plankton. Eukaryotic Plankton Diversity in the Sunlit Ocean. Science 2015, 348, 1261605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sheehan, J.; Dunahay, T.; Benemann, J.; Roessler, P. Look Back at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Aquatic Species Program: Biodiesel from Algae; Close-Out Report; National Renewable Energy Lab.: Golden, CO, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  17. Norton, T.A.; Melkonian, M.; Andersen, R.A. Algal Biodiversity. Phycologia 1996, 35, 308–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Richmond, A. Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Biotechnology and Applied Phycology; Blackwell Publishing: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guiry, M.D. How Many Species of Algae Are There? J. Phycol. 2012, 48, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Metting, F.B. Biodiversity and Application of Microalgae. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1996, 17, 477–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. García-Balboa, C.; Baselga-Cervera, B.; García-Sanchez, A.; Igual, J.M.; Lopez-Rodas, V.; Costas, E. Rapid Adaptation of Microalgae to Bodies of Water with Extreme Pollution from Uranium Mining: An Explanation of How Mesophilic Organisms Can Rapidly Colonise Extremely Toxic Environments. Aquat. Toxicol. Amst. Neth. 2013, 144–145, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yong, W.K.; Tan, Y.H.; Sze-Wan, P.; Lim, P.E. Response of Microalgae in a Changing Climate and Environment. Malays. J. Sci. 2016, 35, 167–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Suparmaniam, U.; Lam, M.K.; Uemura, Y.; Lim, J.W.; Lee, K.T.; Shuit, S.H. Insights into the Microalgae Cultivation Technology and Harvesting Process for Biofuel Production: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 115, 109361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De Morais, M.G.; da Vaz, B.S.; de Morais, E.G.; Costa, J.A.V. Biologically Active Metabolites Synthesized by Microalgae. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 835761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Dvořák, P.; Casamatta, D.A.; Hašler, P.; Jahodářová, E.; Norwich, A.R.; Poulíčková, A. Diversity of the Cyanobacteria. In Modern Topics in the Phototrophic Prokaryotes: Environmental and Applied Aspects; Hallenbeck, P.C., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 3–46. [Google Scholar]
  26. Thajuddin, N.; Subramanian, G. Cyanobacterial Biodiversity and Potential Applications in Biotechnology. Curr. Sci. 2005, 89, 47–57. [Google Scholar]
  27. Whitton, B.; Potts, M. The Ecology of Cyanobacteria: Their Diversity in Time and Space; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  28. Vermaas, W.F. Photosynthesis and Respiration in Cyanobacteria. In eLS; American Cancer Society: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  29. Whitton, B. Diversity, Ecology, and Taxonomy of the Cyanobacteria. Photosynth. Prokaryotes 1992, 1–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vachard, D. Cyanobacteria. In Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. Stal, L.J.; Moezelaar, R. Fermentation in Cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1997, 21, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Andersen, R.A. Diversity of Eukaryotic Algae. Biodivers. Conserv. 1992, 1, 267–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cavalier-Smith, T. Principles of Protein and Lipid Targeting in Secondary Symbiogenesis: Euglenoid, Dinoflagellate, and Sporozoan Plastid Origins and the Eukaryote Family Tree1,2. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 1999, 46, 347–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Raven, J.A.; Allen, J.F. Genomics and Chloroplast Evolution: What Did Cyanobacteria Do for Plants? Genome Biol. 2003, 4, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Jeffrey, S.W.; Wright, S.W.; Zapata, M. Microalgal Classes and Their Signature Pigments. Phytoplankton Pigment. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Archibald, J.M. Endosymbiosis and Eukaryotic Cell Evolution. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25, R911–R921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Baurain, D.; Brinkmann, H.; Petersen, J.; Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, N.; Stechmann, A.; Demoulin, V.; Roger, A.J.; Burger, G.; Lang, B.F.; Philippe, H. Phylogenomic Evidence for Separate Acquisition of Plastids in Cryptophytes, Haptophytes, and Stramenopiles. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 1698–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Person, J. Livre Turquoise—Algues, Filière Du Future; Actes Colloq; Adebiotech: Romainville, France, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  39. Levasseur, W.; Perré, P.; Pozzobon, V. A Review of High Value-Added Molecules Production by Microalgae in Light of the Classification. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 41, 107545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. De Reviers, B. Biologie et Phylogénie des Algues; Belin Editeur: Paris, France, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  41. Groendahl, S.; Kahlert, M.; Fink, P. The Best of Both Worlds: A Combined Approach for Analyzing Microalgal Diversity via Metabarcoding and Morphology-Based Methods. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Correa, I.; Drews, P.; Botelho, S.; de Souza, M.S.; Tavano, V.M. Deep Learning for Microalgae Classification. In Proceedings of the 2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Cancun, Mexico, 18–21 December 2017; pp. 20–25. [Google Scholar]
  43. Heimann, K.; Huerlimann, R. Microalgal Classification: Major Classes and Genera of Commercial Microalgal Species. In Handbook of Marine Microalgae; Kim, S.-K., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; Chapter 3; pp. 25–41. [Google Scholar]
  44. Malcata, F.X.; Pinto, I.S.; Guedes, A.C. (Eds.) Marine Macro-and Microalgae: An Overview; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  45. Fritsch, F.E. The Structure and Reproduction of The Algae, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1922; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  46. Fritsch, F.E. The Structure and Reproduction of The Algae, 1st ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1922; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ruggiero, M.A.; Gordon, D.P.; Orrell, T.M.; Bailly, N.; Bourgoin, T.; Brusca, R.C.; Cavalier-Smith, T.; Guiry, M.D.; Kirk, P.M. A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sialve, B.; Steyer, J.-P. Les microalgues, promesses et défis. Innov. Agron. 2013, 26, 25–39. [Google Scholar]
  49. Rochet, M.; Legendre, L.; Demers, S. Photosynthetic and Pigment Responses of Sea-Ice Microalgae to Changes in Light Intensity and Quality. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1986, 101, 211–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pazderník, B.M. Light Harvesting Complexes and Chromatic Adaptation of Eustigmatophyte Alga Trachydiscus Minutus. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  51. Dutton, H.J.; Juday, C. Chromatic Adaptation in Relation to Color and Depth Distribution of Freshwater Phytoplankton and Large Aquatic Plants. Ecology 1944, 25, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hentati, F.; Tounsi, L.; Djomdi, D.; Pierre, G.; Delattre, C.; Ursu, A.V.; Fendri, I.; Abdelkafi, S.; Michaud, P. Bioactive Polysaccharides from Seaweeds. Molecules 2020, 25, 3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ben Hlima, H.; Bohli, T.; Kraiem, M.; Ouederni, A.; Mellouli, L.; Michaud, P.; Abdelkafi, S.; Smaoui, S. Combined Effect of Spirulina Platensis and Punica Granatum Peel Extacts: Phytochemical Content and Antiphytophatogenic Activity. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Elleuch, F.; Hlima, H.B.; Barkallah, M.; Baril, P.; Abdelkafi, S.; Pichon, C.; Fendri, I. Carotenoids Overproduction in Dunaliella Sp.: Transcriptional Changes and New Insights through Lycopene β Cyclase Regulation. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Elleuch, F.; Baril, P.; Barkallah, M.; Perche, F.; Abdelkafi, S.; Fendri, I.; Pichon, C. Deciphering the Biological Activities of Dunaliella Sp. Aqueous Extract from Stressed Conditions on Breast Cancer: From in Vitro to in Vivo Investigations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Ibañez, E.; Cifuentes, A. Benefits of Using Algae as Natural Sources of Functional Ingredients. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Becker, E.W. Micro-Algae as a Source of Protein. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sousa, I.; Gouveia, L.; Batista, A.P.; Raymundo, A.; Bandarra, N.M. Microalgae in Novel Food Products; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 75–112. [Google Scholar]
  59. Niccolai, A.; Chini Zittelli, G.; Rodolfi, L.; Biondi, N.; Tredici, M.R. Microalgae of Interest as Food Source: Biochemical Composition and Digestibility. Algal Res. 2019, 42, 101617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Da Vaz, B.S.; Moreira, J.B.; de Morais, M.G.; Costa, J.A.V. Microalgae as a New Source of Bioactive Compounds in Food Supplements. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2016, 7, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kose, A.; Ozen, M.O.; Elibol, M.; Oncel, S.S. Investigation of in vitro Digestibility of Dietary Microalga Chlorella Vulgaris and Cyanobacterium Spirulina Platensis as a Nutritional Supplement. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Siqueira, S.F.; Queiroz, M.I.; Jacob-Lopes, L.Q.Z.E. Introductory Chapter: Microalgae Biotechnology—A Brief Introduction. Microalgal Biotechnol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Borowitzka, M.A. Microalgae as Sources of Pharmaceuticals and Other Biologically Active Compounds. J. Appl. Phycol. 1995, 7, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pedrós, R.; Moya, I.; Goulas, Y.; Jacquemoud, S. Chlorophyll Fluorescence Emission Spectrum inside a Leaf. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2008, 7, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Gaignard, C.; Gargouch, N.; Dubessay, P.; Delattre, C.; Pierre, G.; Laroche, C.; Fendri, I.; Abdelkafi, S.; Michaud, P. New Horizons in Culture and Valorization of Red Microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 193–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vílchez, C.; Forján, E.; Cuaresma, M.; Bédmar, F.; Garbayo, I.; Vega, J.M. Marine Carotenoids: Biological Functions and Commercial Applications. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Molino, A.; Rimauro, J.; Casella, P.; Cerbone, A.; Larocca, V.; Chianese, S.; Karatza, D.; Mehariya, S.; Ferraro, A.; Hristoforou, E.; et al. Extraction of Astaxanthin from Microalga Haematococcus Pluvialis in Red Phase by Using Generally Recognized as Safe Solvents and Accelerated Extraction. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 283, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Rammuni, M.N.; Ariyadasa, T.U.; Nimarshana, P.H.V.; Attalage, R.A. Comparative Assessment on the Extraction of Carotenoids from Microalgal Sources: Astaxanthin from H. Pluvialis and β-Carotene from D. Salina. Food Chem. 2019, 277, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. De Raposo, M.F.J.; de Morais, A.M.M.B.; de Morais, R.M.S.C. Carotenoids from Marine Microalgae: A Valuable Natural Source for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 5128–5155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cuellar-Bermudez, S.P.; Aguilar-Hernandez, I.; Cardenas-Chavez, D.L.; Ornelas-Soto, N.; Romero-Ogawa, M.A.; Parra-Saldivar, R. Extraction and Purification of High-Value Metabolites from Microalgae: Essential Lipids, Astaxanthin and Phycobiliproteins. Microb. Biotechnol. 2015, 8, 190–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Thomas, J.-C. L’antenne Collectrice d’énergie Lumineuse à Phycobiliprotéines Chez Les Cyanobactéries. Bull. Société Bot. Fr. Actual. Bot. 1989, 136, 31–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Hamed, I. The Evolution and Versatility of Microalgal Biotechnology: A Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2016, 15, 1104–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Dammak, M.; Haase, S.M.; Miladi, R.; Ben Amor, F.; Barkallah, M.; Gosset, D.; Pichon, C.; Huchzermeyer, B.; Fendri, I.; Denis, M.; et al. Enhanced Lipid and Biomass Production by a Newly Isolated and Identified Marine Microalga. Lipids Health Dis. 2016, 15, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Dammak, M.; Hadrich, B.; Barkallah, M.; Hentati, F.; Ben Hlima, H.; Pichon, C.; Denis, M.; Fendri, I.; Michaud, P.; Abdelkafi, S. Modelling Tetraselmis Sp. Growth-Kinetics and Optimizing Bioactive-Compound Production through Environmental Conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 249, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Singh, S.; Kate, B.N.; Banerjee, U.C. Bioactive Compounds from Cyanobacteria and Microalgae: An Overview. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2005, 25, 73–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kumar, J.; Singh, D.; Tyagi, M.B.; Kumar, A. Cyanobacteria: Applications in Biotechnology. In Cyanobacteria; Mishra, A.K., Tiwari, D.N., Rai, A.N., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; Chapter 16; pp. 327–346. [Google Scholar]
  77. Lau, N.-S.; Matsui, M.; Abdullah, A.A.-A. Cyanobacteria: Photoautotrophic Microbial Factories for the Sustainable Synthesis of Industrial Products. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 754934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Markou, G.; Angelidaki, I.; Georgakakis, D. Microalgal Carbohydrates: An Overview of the Factors Influencing Carbohydrates Production, and of Main Bioconversion Technologies for Production of Biofuels. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 96, 631–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mourelle, M.L.; Gómez, C.P.; Legido, J.L. The Potential Use of Marine Microalgae and Cyanobacteria in Cosmetics and Thalassotherapy. Cosmetics 2017, 4, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. De Raposo, M.F.J.; de Morais, R.M.S.C.; de Morais, A.M.M.B. Bioactivity and Applications of Sulphated Polysaccharides from Marine Microalgae. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 233–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Christaki, E.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Bonos, E. Microalgae: A Novel Ingredient in Nutrition. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 62, 794–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Galasso, C.; Gentile, A.; Orefice, I.; Ianora, A.; Bruno, A.; Noonan, D.M.; Sansone, C.; Albini, A.; Brunet, C. Microalgal Derivatives as Potential Nutraceutical and Food Supplements for Human Health: A Focus on Cancer Prevention and Interception. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Škrovánková, S. Seaweed Vitamins as Nutraceuticals. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2011, 64, 357–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Brasil, B.; Siqueira, F.; Salum, T.; Zanette, C.; Spier, M. Microalgae and Cyanobacteria as Enzyme Biofactories. Algal Res. 2017, 25, 76–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lu, Y.; Xu, J. Phytohormones in Microalgae: A New Opportunity for Microalgal Biotechnology? Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Bajguz, A. Brassinosteroids in Microalgae: Application for Growth Improvement and Protection Against Abiotic Stresses. In Brassinosteroids: Plant Growth and Development; Hayat, S., Yusuf, M., Bhardwaj, R., Bajguz, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 45–58. [Google Scholar]
  87. Amorim, M.L.; Soares, J.; dos Coimbra, J.S.R.; de Leite, M.O.; Albino, L.F.T.; Martins, M.A. Microalgae Proteins: Production, Separation, Isolation, Quantification, and Application in Food and Feed. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 61, 1976–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pruvost, J.; Cornet, J.-F.; Pilon, L. Large-Scale Production of Algal Biomass: Photobioreactors. In Algae Biotechnology: Products and Processes; Bux, F., Chisti, Y., Eds.; Green Energy and Technology Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 41–66. [Google Scholar]
  89. Costa, J.A.V.; de Morais, M.G. An Open Pond System for Microalgal Cultivation. In Biofuels from Algae; Pandey, A., Lee, D.-J., Chisti, Y., Soccol, C.R., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Chapter 1; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  90. Costa, J.A.V.; Freitas, B.C.B.; Santos, T.D.; Mitchell, B.G.; Morais, M.G. Open Pond Systems for Microalgal Culture. In Biofuels from Algae, 2nd ed.; Pandey, A., Chang, J.-S., Soccol, C.R., Lee, D.-J., Chisti, Y., Eds.; Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Chapter 9; pp. 199–223. [Google Scholar]
  91. Jerney, J.; Spilling, K. Large Scale Cultivation of Microalgae: Open and Closed Systems. In Biofuels from Algae: Methods and Protocols; Spilling, K., Ed.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  92. Singh, G.; Patidar, S.K. Microalgae Harvesting Techniques: A Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 217, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chacón-Lee, T.L.; González-Mariño, G.E. Microalgae for “Healthy” Foods—Possibilities and Challenges. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010, 9, 655–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mobin, S.; Alam, F. Some Promising Microalgal Species for Commercial Applications: A Review. Energy Procedia 2017, 110, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. An, B.-K.; Kim, K.-E.; Jeon, J.-Y.; Lee, K.W. Effect of Dried Chlorella Vulgaris and Chlorella Growth Factor on Growth Performance, Meat Qualities and Humoral Immune Responses in Broiler Chickens. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Milledge, J.J. Microalgae—Commercial Potential for Fuel, Food and Feed. Food Sci. Amp Technol. 2012, 26, 28–30. [Google Scholar]
  97. Koutsoumanis, K.; Allende, A.; Alvarez-Ordóñez, A.; Bolton, D.; Bover-Cid, S.; Chemaly, M.; Davies, R.; Cesare, A.D.; Hilbert, F.; Lindqvist, R.; et al. Scientific Opinion on the Update of the List of QPS-Recommended Biological Agents Intentionally Added to Food or Feed as Notified to EFSA (2017–2019). EFSA J. 2020, 18, e05966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. U.S.A. Food & Drug Administration. Summary of Color Additives for Use in the United States in Foods, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Med-ical Devices. FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  99. Turck, D.; Castenmiller, J.; Henauw, S.D.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.I.; Kearney, J.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.J.; Naska, A.; Pelaez, C.; et al. Safety of Schizochytrium Sp. Oil as a Novel Food Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2020, 118, e06242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Turck, D.; Castenmiller, J.; de Henauw, S.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.I.; Kearney, J.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.J.; Naska, A.; Pelaez, C.; et al. Safety of Astaxanthin for Its Use as a Novel Food in Food Supplements. EFSA J. 2020, 18, e05993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Van der Voort, M.P.J.; Vulsteke, E.; de Visser, C.L.M. Macro-Economics of Algae Products: Output WP2A7.02; EnAlgae Swansea University: Swansea, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  102. Baert, P.; Bosteels, T.; Sorgeloos, P. Manual on the Production and Use of Live Food for Aquaculture; Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): Rome, Italy, 1996; pp. 196–251. [Google Scholar]
  103. Oostlander, P.C.; van Houcke, J.; Wijffels, R.H.; Barbosa, M.J. Microalgae Production Cost in Aquaculture Hatcheries. Aquaculture 2020, 525, 735310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Rizwan, M.; Mujtaba, G.; Memon, S.A.; Lee, K.; Rashid, N. Exploring the Potential of Microalgae for New Biotechnology Applications and beyond: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 92, 394–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Rumin, J.; Nicolau, E.; de Junior, R.G.O.; Fuentes-Grünewald, C.; Picot, L. Analysis of Scientific Research Driving Microalgae Market Opportunities in Europe. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Morvan, P.-Y.; Vallee, R. Effects of Chlorella Extract on Skin. Pers. Care 2007, 7, 57–64. [Google Scholar]
  107. Khan, M.I.; Shin, J.H.; Kim, J.D. The Promising Future of Microalgae: Current Status, Challenges, and Optimization of a Sustainable and Renewable Industry for Biofuels, Feed, and Other Products. Microb. Cell Factories 2018, 17, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lundquist, T.; Woertz, I.; Quinn, N.; Benemann, J. A Realistic Technology and Engineering Assessment of Algae Biofuel Production. Energy 2010, 1, 1–178. [Google Scholar]
  109. Legere, E.; Roessler, P.; Miller, H.; Belicka, L.; Yuan, Y.; Chance, R.; Dalrymple, K.; Porubsky, W.; Coleman, J.; Sweeney, K.; et al. Recovery Act—Integrated Pilot-Scale Biorefinery for Producing Ethanol from Hybrid Algae; Algenol Biotech LLC: Fort Myers, FL, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Reserve molecules from photosynthesis products [20].
Table 1. Reserve molecules from photosynthesis products [20].
Reserve FormMicroalgae
Floridian starch (amylopectin subunits)Red microalgae
Myxophyceal starch
(amylopectin or glycogen-like subunits)
Blue-green microalgae
Cross-linked amylose-amylopectin starch
Fructans (inulin-like fructose oligosaccharides)
Green microalgae
α-(1-4)-glucanCryptophyceae and Dinoflagellate
Oil or chrysolaminarin
Chrysolaminarin
Chrysophyceae
Bacillariophyceae
Paramylon: β-(l-3)-d-glucanEuglenophyta and Prymnesiophyceae
Table 2. Classification of microalgae and Cyanobacteria [20,45,46].
Table 2. Classification of microalgae and Cyanobacteria [20,45,46].
PhylumClassPigmentsReserveFlagellationReproductionCell EnvelopeHabitat
CyanobacteriaCyanophyceaeChl a, β-carotene, flavacene, Echinenone
isozea-, zea-, myxo-, oscillaxanthin
APC, C-PC, C-PE
Starch (granule)
and glycogen
UnflagellatedSimple division,
non-motile endospore, vegetative fragmentation
No sexual reproduction
Lack of celluloseMarine
Freshwater
Terrestrial
ChlorophytaChlorophyceaeChl a, b, α and β-carotene, lutein,
zea-, viola-, loro- and neoxanthin
Starch
Oil
From two to four flagella (mobile), isokontIsogamy, anisogamy, oogamy
Motile zoospore,
non-motile spore
Cellulose+ mannans+ xylans
Sitosterol
Sometimes calcified
Marine
Freshwater
Trebouxiophyceae
Ulvophyceae
EuglenophytaEuglenophyceaeSome colorless
Chl a, b, diadinoxanthin
Paramylon
Ergosterol
One or two flagella, one of which contains cilia and the second being reducedLongitudinal divisionNo cell membrane
Flexible periplast or pellicle
Marine
Freshwater
Terrestrial
Heterokontophyta/
Ochrophyta
Xanthophyceae
Eustigmatophyceae
Chl a and c, β-carotene, heteroxanthin, diadinoxanthin (++)Oil
Leucosin
Ergosterol
Two heterokont flagella and sometimes a single flagellumZoospore, aplanospores, statospores
Isogamy, oogamy (Vaucheria)
Rich in pectic compounds
Silicification during the rest period
Marine
Freshwater
Terrestrial
MiozoaDinophyceaeChl a, c, β-carotene, diadinoxanthin, dinoxanthin, peridininsStarch
Lipids
Lateral biflagellaZoospore
Longitudinal oblique division
Aniso or isogamy
With or without celluloseMarine
Freshwater
Heterokontophyta/
Ochrophyta
ChrysophyceaChl a, c, β-carot,
Fuco-, Diato-, diadinoxanthin
Chrysolaminarin
Fucosterol
Porifasterol
Two heterokont flagellaZoospore, statosporeLess cellulose with silicification or calcification of the membraneMarine
Freshwater
HaptophytaCoccolithophyceae
Pavlovophyceae
Rappephyceae
Chl a, c, β-carot,
Fuco-, Diato-, diadinoxanthin
Chrysolaminarin
Fucosterol
Porifasterol
Two isokont flagella + haptonemaZoospore, statosporeLess cellulose with silicification or calcification of the membraneMarine
Freshwater
Bacillariophyta (Diatoms)BacillariophyceaeChl a, c, β-carot,
Fuco-, Diato-, diadinoxanthin
Chrysolaminarin
Oil
Without flagellum except for male gametesCell division
Oogamie (centered diatoms)
Amoeboid isogamy (pinnate diatoms)
Silica + pectic compoundsMarine
Freshwater
Terrestrial
CryptophytaCryptophyceaeChl a, c, Biliproteins, α-carot, Allo-, Croco-, Monado-xanthinStarch (granule)
Oil
Carbohydrates
Two unequal flagella except for Bjornbergiella and TetragonidiumZoosporesProteinaceous periplastMarine
Freshwater
Heterokontophyta/
Ochrophyta
PhaeophyceaeChl a, c, β-carot, violaxanthin
Fucoxanthin (++)
Mannitol
Laminarin
Lipids
Two heterokont flagellaMonospores, tetraspores, non-motile aplanospores
From isogamy to oogamy
Cellulose + alginic acid + fucoidinMarine
Freshwater
Terrestrial
RhodophytaPorphyridiophyceae
Bangiophyceae Florideophyceae
APC, C-PC, R-PC, B-PE, R-PE, phytochrome,α and βcarot, Chl a and d, zeaxanthin, luteinStarch, floridoside, mannoglycerate, sulfated polysaccharidesNo flagellaOogamy complexCarbohydrates (xylose, cellulose, galactane)Marine
Freshwater
Terrestrial
Table 3. Classification of microalgae and Cyanobacteria according to their phyla (based on data from Ruggiero et al. [47] and https://www.algaebase.org/, accessed on 24 November 2020).
Table 3. Classification of microalgae and Cyanobacteria according to their phyla (based on data from Ruggiero et al. [47] and https://www.algaebase.org/, accessed on 24 November 2020).
KingdomPhylumClass
Kingdom EUBACTERIASubkingdom NegibacteriaPhylum Cyanobacteria [=Cyanophyta]Class Cyanophyceae
[=Phycobacteria]
Class Gloeobacterophyceae
Kingdom PROTOZOASUBKINGDOM EOZOAINFRAKINGDOM EUGLENOZOAPhylum EuglenozoaSubphylum GlycomonadaClass Diplonemea
Class Kinetoplastea
Subphylum
Euglenoida
Infraphylum
Entosiphona
Class Entosiphonea
Class Euglenophyceae
Subphylum SymbiontidaClass Postgaardea
Infraphylum DipilidaSuperclass SpirocutaClass Peranemea
Superclass RigimonadaClass Ploeotarea
Class Stavomonadea
INFRAKINGDOM EXCAVATAPhylum LoukozoaSubphylum EoloukaClass Jakobea
Subphylum NeoloukaClass Malawimonadea
Phylum MetamonadaSubphylum TrichozoaSuperclass
Eopharyngia
Class Trepomonadea
Phylum ChoanozoaSubphylum ChoanofilaClass Choanoflagellatea
Subphylum CristidiscoideaClass Cristidiscoidia
Phylum PicozoaClass Picomonadea
Phylum PercolozoaSubphylum TetramitiaClass Heterolobosea
Kingdom CHROMISTASubkingdom HacrobiaPhylum CryptophytaClass Cryptophyceae
Phylum HaptophytaClass Coccolithophyceae
[=Prymnesiophyceae]
Class Pavlovophyceae
SUBKINGDOM HAROSAINFRAKINGDOM HALVARIASuperphylum AlveolataPhylum CiliophoraSubphylum
Intramacronucleata
Class Ciliatea
Class Litostomatea
Class Spirotrichea
Phylum MiozoaSubphylum MyzozoaInfraphylum
Apicomplexa
Superclass
Apicomonada
Class Apicomonadea
Superclass Sporozoa
Infraphylum
Dinozoa
Superclass DinoflagellataClass Dinophyceae
Class Ellobiopsea
Class Noctilucea
Class Oxyrrhea
Class Syndinea
Superclass PerkinsozoaClass Perkinsea
Subphylum ProtalveolataClass Colponemea
Phylum Ochrophyta
[= Heterokontophyta p.p.]
Class Bolidophyceae
Class Chrysomerophyceae
Class Chrysophyceae
Class Eustigmatophyceae
Class Pelagophyceae
Class Dictyochophyceae
Class Phaeophyceae
Class Phaeothamniophyceae
[=Aurophyceae]
Class Picophagophyceae
Class Pinguiophyceae
Class Raphidophyceae
(=Chloromonadophyta)
Class Schizocladiophyceae
Class Synchromophyceae
Class Synurophyceae
Class Xanthophyceae
Phylum BigyraClass Bikosea
Class Blastocystea
Class Nanomonadea
Class Opalinea
Class Labyrinthulea
Class Placididea [=Placidiophyceae]
INFRAKINGDOM RHIZARIAPhylum CercozoaClass Chlorarachniophyceae
[Chlorarachnea]
Class Thecofilosea
Class Filosa
Class Imbricatea
Phylum BacillariophytaSubphylum BacillariophytinaClass Bacillariophyceae
[=Diatomeae]
Kingdom
PLANTAE
SUBKINGDOM BILIPHYTAPhylum GlaucophytaClass Glaucophyceae
Phylum RhodophytaSubphylum CyanidiophytinaClass Cyanidiophyceae
Subphylum EurhodophytinaClass Bangiophyceae
Class Florideophyceae
Subphylum ProteorhodophytinaClass Compsopogonophyceae
Class Porphyridiophyceae
Class Rhodellophyceae
Class Stylonematophyceae
SUBKINGDOM VIRIDIPLANTAEINFRAKINGDOM CHLOROPHYTAPhylum ChlorophytaSubphylum ChlorophytinaClass Chlorodendrophyceae
Class Chlorophyceae
Class Pedinophyceae
Class Trebouxiophyceae
Class Ulvophyceae
Subphylum PrasinophytinaClass Nephrophyceae
Class Mamiellophyceae
Class Pyramimonadophyceae
INFRAKINGDOM STREPTOPHYTASuperphylum Charophyta:
Phylum Charophyta
Class Charophyceae
Class Chlorokybophyceae
Class Coleochaetophyceae
Class Conjugatophyceae
Class Klebsormidiophyceae
Class Mesostigmatophyceae
Table 4. Uses of microalgae and Cyanobacteria for food supplement and nutraceutical production by some industries.
Table 4. Uses of microalgae and Cyanobacteria for food supplement and nutraceutical production by some industries.
IndustryProduct NameMicroalgae/Microfungi Strain Specificity/Description
Food supplementNutriphys (Enghien, Belgium) https://nutriphys.com/, accessed on 17 March 2021CHLORELLA Green Gem®Auxenochlorella pyrenoidosa
(Chlorophyta)
Food nutritional supplement
FLORILFood supplement: stimulates the intestinal flora while eliminating toxins and heavy metals
DIETIMAGFood supplement: reduces exhaustion and regain energy
VITENEDietary supplement: helps to fight against the signs of aging and premature aging
CHLORELLA PLUS®Food supplement with antioxidant properties: revitalizing action, detoxifying the body, toning, acid-base regulator, stimulating natural defenses, helps regulate intestinal transit
NUbiocell ® TONIC PLUSFood supplement: improves sportive performance; treats herpes, reduces fatigue; stimulates the immune system, tones the body
Algavia (Oran, Algeria)
https://algavia.com/, accessed on 26 January 2021
AlgaVia® Protein-Rich Whole AlgaeAuxenochlorella pyrenoidosa
(Chlorophyta)
Protein-rich product
AlgaSpring (Almer, Netherlands) https://www.algaspring.nl/, accessed on 3 February 2021NutriSpringMicrochloropsis gaditana
(Eustigmatophyceae)
Food supplement
Fitoplancton Marino (Cadiz, Spain) https://www.tetrasod.com/, accessed on 10 March 2021TetraSODTetraselmis chuii
(Chlorophyta)
Powerful antioxidant and nutritious marine phytoplankton ingredient
Flora (Burnaby, British Columbia, USA) https://www.florahealth.com/, accessed on 17 March 2021Omega Brain+Schizochytrium spp.
(Fungi)
Vegan rich in EPA and DHA: maintains good health and brain function, supports cardiovascular health, healthy blood triglycerides levels, and cognitive health in an aging population
DSM (Heerlen, Netherlands) https://www.dsm.com/23 March 2021DHASCO-B®Schizochytrium sp.
(Fungi)
Nutritional oil from microalgae containing min. 38% DHA
Sun Chlorella (Torrance, USA) https://www.sunchlorellausa.com/, accessed on 17 March 2021Sun Wakasa Gold PlusChlorella
(Chlorophyta)
Food supplement: extract from the nucleus containing CGF
Microphyt (Baillargues, France) http://www.microphyt.eu/, accessed on 17 March 2021BrainPhytPhaeodactylum tricornutum
(Bacillariophyta)
Functional food: Phycoprostans, Xanthophylls, omega-3 fatty acids, sterols… Prevent the effects of cognitive decline
Kyanos nutrition (Toulouse, France) https://kyanos-nutrition.com/, accessed on 28 March 2021KyanosBrainAphanizomenon flos-aquae and Arthrospira platensis
(Cyanobacteria)
Food supplement: phenylethylamineandphycocyanin
BlueBioTech/Dr. Peter Hartig (Holstein/Germany)
https://dr-peterhartig.de/, accessed on 28 March 2021
Spirulina 720Arthrospira platensis
(Cyanobacteria)
Food supplement with plant and microalgae powder
Spirulina 5-FlowersFood supplement with Bach flowers, microalgae and vitamin B5
AstaxanthinHaematococcus lacustris (Chlorophyta)Dietary supplement with astaxanthin
Chlorella coriander 900Auxenochlorella pyrenoidosa
(Chlorophyta)
Food supplement: microalgae powder
Sunny 200Dunaliella salina (Chlorophyta)Food supplement: beta-carotene-rich microalgae powder
Power 22® double packArthrospira platensis (Cyanobacteria),
Auxenochlorella pyrenoidosa (Chlorophyta)
Dietary supplement: microalgae powder
NutraceuticalsAlgaTechnologies Ltd. (Hevel Eliot, Israel) https://www.algatech.com/, accessed on 29 March 2021FucoVital™Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Bacillariophyta)Fucoxanthin
AstaPureHaematococcus lacustris(Chlorophyta)Astaxanthin
Fuji Chemical Industries (Toyama, Japan) http://www.fujichemical.co.jp/, accessed on 29 March 2021AstaRealHaematococcus lacustris (Chlorophyta)Astaxanthin
Cyanotech (Kailua-Kona, Hawai) https://www.cyanotech.com/, accessed on 17 March 2021BioAstinHaematococcus lacustris (Chlorophyta)Astaxanthin
Progress Biotech (Capelle aan den IJssel, Netherlands) https://www.progressbiotech.com/, accessed on 6 March 2021DHA algal oilSchizochytrium
(Fungi)
DHA (omega-3)
Parry nutraceuticals (Onnaiyur, India) https://www.parrynutraceuticals.com/, accessed on 6 January 2021OrganicphycocyaninArthrospira/Spirulina (Cyanobacteria)Phycocyanin
Kyanos nutrition (Toulouse, France) https://kyanos-nutrition.com/, accessed on 12 March 2021Kyanos BlueArthrospira/Spirulina (Cyanobacteria)Phycocyanin
BASF (Ludwigshafen, Germany) https://nutrition.basf.com/, accessed on 2 February 2021BetateneDunaliella salina (Chlorophyta)β-carotene
Algosource (Saint Nazaire, France) https://algosource.com/, accessed on 12 March 2021SpirulysatArthrospira/Spirulina (Cyanobacteria)Extract of phycocyanin with polysaccharides, amino acids
Table 5. Microalgae and Cyanobacteria authorized for incorporation into food products according to the European Union (“EUR-Lex-02017R2470-20200827-EN-EUR-Lex,” n.d.) and the Food and Drug Administration (Nutrition, 2020).
Table 5. Microalgae and Cyanobacteria authorized for incorporation into food products according to the European Union (“EUR-Lex-02017R2470-20200827-EN-EUR-Lex,” n.d.) and the Food and Drug Administration (Nutrition, 2020).
Microalgae/
Microfungi
FractionSpecified Food CategoryMaximum DoseAuthorized by
Ulkenia sp.
(Marine Fungi)
Extracted oilBakery products
(breads, rolls, and sweet cookies)
200 mg·100 g−1EU
Cereal bars500 mg·100 g−1
Non-alcoholic drinks
(including milk drinks)
60 mg·100 mL−1
Haematococcus lacustris (Chlorophyta)extracted Oleoresin rich in astaxanthinFood supplements40–80 mg oleoresin per day, equivalent to ≤8 mg astaxanthin per day
Odontella aurita (Bacillariophyta) Flavored pasta1.5%
Fish soups1%
Marine terrines0.5%
Court bouillon preparations1%
Crackers1.5%
Frozen breaded fish1.5%
Schizochytrium sp.
(Marine Fungi)
Extracted oil with high DHA and EPA contentFood supplements, intended for the adult population, excluding pregnant or breastfeeding women3000 mg·day−1
Food supplements, intended for pregnant or breastfeeding women450 mg·day−1
Substitutes for the total daily ration for weight control250 mg
Milk-based beverages and similar products intended for young children200 mg·100 g−1
Cereal-based preparations and baby food intended for infants and young children
Foods suitable for intense muscular expenditure (for athletes)
Dairy product substitutes, except beverages600 mg·100 g−1 for cheeses; 200 mg·100 g−1 for soy milk and imitation milk products (except beverages)
Tetraselmis chuii
(Chlorophyta)
Dried microalgaeSauces20% or 250 mg·day−1
Special salts1%
Condiments250 mg·day−1
Food supplements250 mg·day−1
Arthrospira/Spirulina
(Cyanobacteria)
Extract (color additive)Coloring confections, frostings, ice cream and frozen desserts, dessert coatings and toppings, beverage mixes and powders, yogurts, … FDA
Haematococcus sp. (Chlorophyta)MealSalmonid fish feed onlyTotal astaxanthin from all astaxanthin color additive sources ≤80 mg per kg of finished feedFDA
Table 6. Microalgae exploitation in food and feed domains.
Table 6. Microalgae exploitation in food and feed domains.
IndustryProduct NameMicroalgae StrainDescription
FoodAllma (Pataias, Portugal) https://www.allmicroalgae.com/en/, accessed on 26 January 2021Bars with microalgae—ChlorellaChlorella
(Chlorophyta)
Bars
Chlorella CookiesCookies
Seeds Crunchy Bar. Bar with microalgaeSeeds Crunchy Bar
Sun Chlorella (Torrance, USA) https://www.sunchlorellausa.com/, accessed on 17 March 2021Chlorella Udon NoodlesChlorella (Chlorophyta)Noodles
Paldo (Seoul, South Korea) http://www.paldofood.com/, accessed on 18 March 2021Green Tea Chlorella NoodlesChlorella (Chlorophyta)Noodles
Fooding Company (Sucy-en-Brie, France) http://foodingcompany.com/, accessed on 18 March 2021The good spoonChlorella (Chlorophyta)Mayonnaise
eChlorial (L’isle-d’Abeau, France) https://www.echlorial.fr/, accessed on 19 March 2021TetraselmischuiieChlorialTetraselmis chuii (Chloroophyta)Sea spice, condiment
The Algae Factory (Wageningen, The Netherlands) http://thealgaefactory.com/the-milk-chocolate/, accessed on 17 March 2021The dark chocolateArthrospira/Spirulina (Cynaophya)Chocolate
FeedAlgaSpring (E. Heimansweg Almere, The Netherlands) https://www.algaspring.nl/nannochloropsis-gaditana-micro-algae/, accessed on 17 March 2021NannoStarMicrochloropsis gaditana (Chlorophyta)Aquaculture feed
TomAlgae (Belgium) https://www.tomalgae.com/, accessed on 19 March 2021TomAlgae (ThalaPure)freeze-dried algaeAquaculture feed
Solazyme (San Francisco, USA) https://algaprime.com/, accessed on 17 March 2021AlgaPrime™ DHAMicroalgaeCompanion animals and in aquaculture feed
Table 7. Microalgae and Cyanobacteria exploitation in the cosmetic field.
Table 7. Microalgae and Cyanobacteria exploitation in the cosmetic field.
IndustryProductMicroalgaeFraction UsedEffect
DSM
(Heerlen, The Netherlands) https://www.dsm.com/, accessed on 26 January 2021
PEPHA®-CTIVEDunaliella salina (Chloroophyta) aqueous extract rich in amino acids, minerals, and carbohydratesSkin care: reloads skin with new energy and improves its radiance.
PEPHA®-TIGHTMicrochloropsis gaditana (Chlorophyta)aqueous extract rich in vitamin C, vitamin B12, and polysaccharidesSkin care: Tightening effect and long-term skin firming effect
PEPHA-AGEHalochlorella rubescens
(Chlorophyta)
aqueous extract rich in amino acids, vitamins (B3), algal saccharides, and minerals (Zn)Skin protection from blue light and UV
Evonik (Frankfurt, Germany) https://corporate.evonik.com/en, accessed on 26 January 2021TEGO® StemlastinCyanidium caldarium
(Rhodophyta)
n.d.Skin care: retains a youthful skin appearance and reduces the signs of chronological skin aging
CODIF technologie naturelle (SaintMalo, France)
http://www.codif-tn.com/, accessed on 12 January 2021
Phormiskinbioprotech gPseudanabaena persicina
(Cyanobacteria)
Concentrate microalgaeSkin care: against photo-aging of the skin, makes skin pigmentation uniform and adds luster to the skin tone
DetoxondriaRhodella
(Rhodophyta)
Concentrate microalgaeSkin care: improves tissue oxygenation and luminosity of the skin, reduces the susceptibility of the skin to fatigue and signs of fatigue
RosaceaRhodella violacea
(Rhodophyta)
The complete extractSkin care: hydrates the skin
Dermochlorella DChlorella vulgaris
(Chlorophyta)
aqueous extract rich in amino acid concentrateSkin care: reactivates collagen synthesis
GoldellaChlorella vulgaris
(Chlorophyta)
Extracted oil rich in luteinSkin care: Anti-Aging
Sun Chlorella (Torrance, USA) https://www.sunchlorellausa.com/, accessed on 26 January 2021Astarella Primetime Skin CreamChlorella (Chlorophyta)Astaxanthin and CGFSkin care: ensures healthy-looking skin
Sun Chlorella CreamChlorella (Chlorophyta)20% CGFSkin care: Nourishes and hydrates the skin
Kalia Naturel (Bondy, France) https://kalianature.com/fr/, accessed on 2 March 2021Protect My HairArthrospira/Spirulina (Cyanobacteria)Microalgae powderHair care: strengthens the hair and accelerates their growth
Algenist (Torrance, CA, USA) https://www.algenist.com/, accessed on 2 March 2021BLUE ALGAE VITAMIN C™ Dark Spot Correcting PeelArthrospira/Spirulina (Cyanobacteria)Extracted vitamin CSkin care: reduces the appearance of dark spots & discolorations
ELEVATE Advanced Lift Contouring CreamDunaliella salina (Chlorophyta)n.d.Skin care: anti-aging
GENIUS Liquid Collagen®Parachlorella beijerinckii and Auxenochlorella protothecoides (Chlorophyta)Parachlorella beijerinckii Exopolysaccharides and Chlorella protothecoides OilSkin care: enhances skin’s bounce and resilience
Estee lauder (New York, USA) https://www.esteelauder.fr, accessed on 17 March 2021Nutritious Micro-Algae, Pore Purifying Cleansing JellyChlorella vulgaris (Chlorophyta) and Arthrospira platensis (Cyanobacteria)Chlorella vulgaris extract and Spirulina platensis powderSkin care: gel to remove makeup and impurities.
Givaudan (Vernier, Switzerland) https://www.givaudan.com/, accessed on 17 March 2021DepollutinePhaeodactylum tricornutum (Bacillariophyta)Peptidic extractSkin care: Anti-pollution, anti-ageing
Sensityl™Water extractSkin care: calm the skin
CostalaneSkeletonema costatum
(Bacillariophyta)
Poly-unsaturated fatty acid rich in omega-3Skin care: restore skin homeostasis and promotes epidermal differentiation
Grevilline™ PFPeptidic extractAnti-inflammatory, Anti-redness
HydrintensePorphyridium purpureum (Rhodophyta)ExopolysaccharideSkin care: hydrates the skin
MarilianceRhodosorus marinus (Rhodophyta) n.d.Neurosoother
blue algae life waterArthrospira/Spirulina (Cyanobacteria)Extract rich in vitamins, minerals, trace elements, and essential amino-acidSkin care: stimulates and revitalizes the skin
Microphyt (Baillargues, France) http://www.microphyt.eu/, accessed on 20 March 2021ReinaPhytChlamydomonas reinhardtii (Chlorophyta)extract rich in carotenoidsSkin care: protects the skin
MonaPhytcarotenes rich extractSkin care: rejuvenates the skin
LuteanaTisochrysis lutea (Haptophyta, Coccolithophyceae)lipidic fractions rich in xanthophyllsSkin care: soothing effect and anti-aging
RenouvellancePorphyridium purpureum (Rhodophyta)Phycoerythrin and EPSSkin care: Anti-aging, anti-pollution, exposomial protection, radiance enhancer and sun care
Expanscience (Epernon, France) with microphyt (Baillargues, France) https://www.expanscience.com/fr/, accessed on 25 March 2021ALGAENIAChlamydomonas acidophila
(Chlorophyta)
peptide concentrateSkin care: protects sensitive skin
GREENSEA (Mèze, France) http://greensea.fr/, accessed on 27 March 2021Silidine®Porphyridium purpureum (Rhodophyta)mixture of oligosaccharides and trace elementsSkin care: corrects skin dysfunctions
Symrise (Holzminden, Germany) https://www.symrise.com/, accessed on 29 March 2021SymControlTetraselmis suecica (Chlorophyta)n.d.Skin care: reduce sebum overproduction, soothing the skin and strengthening the skin barrier.
SymBronze®1659Isochrysis Galbana (Haptophyta, Coccolithophyceae)n.d.Skin care: increases skin pigmentation and accelerates the natural tanning process
SymHair® Force 1631n.d.Hair care: prevents hair loss, improves volume, and makes hair stronger, healthier, and more vital
algoVita (Tunis, Tunisia) https://www.algovita.tn/, accessed on 19 January 2021CONFORTING SOOTHING CREAM Porphyridium purpureum (Rhodophyta)n.d.Skin care: provides intense and long-lasting hydration, soothes, and promotes skin repair.
LIPOFILLER SERUMNannochloropsis (Eustigmatophyceae)n.d.Skin care: treat older stains
DEPICLEAR SERUMHaematococcus lacustris (Chlorophyta)astaxanthinSkin care: unifies skin complexion while reducing spots and imperfections.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hachicha, R.; Elleuch, F.; Ben Hlima, H.; Dubessay, P.; de Baynast, H.; Delattre, C.; Pierre, G.; Hachicha, R.; Abdelkafi, S.; Michaud, P.; et al. Biomolecules from Microalgae and Cyanobacteria: Applications and Market Survey. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041924

AMA Style

Hachicha R, Elleuch F, Ben Hlima H, Dubessay P, de Baynast H, Delattre C, Pierre G, Hachicha R, Abdelkafi S, Michaud P, et al. Biomolecules from Microalgae and Cyanobacteria: Applications and Market Survey. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(4):1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041924

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hachicha, Rihab, Fatma Elleuch, Hajer Ben Hlima, Pascal Dubessay, Helene de Baynast, Cedric Delattre, Guillaume Pierre, Ridha Hachicha, Slim Abdelkafi, Philippe Michaud, and et al. 2022. "Biomolecules from Microalgae and Cyanobacteria: Applications and Market Survey" Applied Sciences 12, no. 4: 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041924

APA Style

Hachicha, R., Elleuch, F., Ben Hlima, H., Dubessay, P., de Baynast, H., Delattre, C., Pierre, G., Hachicha, R., Abdelkafi, S., Michaud, P., & Fendri, I. (2022). Biomolecules from Microalgae and Cyanobacteria: Applications and Market Survey. Applied Sciences, 12(4), 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041924

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop