Next Article in Journal
Towards Intelligent, Programmable, and Open Railway Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Amodal Segmentation Just Like Doing a Jigsaw
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/app12084056
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reducing Capsular Contracture Formation in Breast Augmentation with Silicone Implants: Experimental Study on Rats

by
Nadia Aladari
1,2,*,†,
Madalina M. Palaghia
1,3,†,
Ana-Maria Trofin
1,3,†,
Elena Cojocaru
4,†,
Carmen Ungureanu
4,†,
Victor Ianole
4,
Eugenia Morosan
4,†,
Cristian C. Budacu
5,†,
Theodor C. Motruc
6,
Mihaela Pertea
1,2,*,† and
Teodor Stamate
1,2
1
Saint Spiridon County Hospital, 700111 Iasi, Romania
2
Department of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Faculty of Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
3
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
4
Department of Morphofunctional Sciences I—Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
5
Department of Dentoalveolar and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
6
Ominiclinic, 70044 Iasi, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(8), 4056; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12084056
Submission received: 2 March 2022 / Revised: 1 April 2022 / Accepted: 15 April 2022 / Published: 17 April 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Silicone implants are frequently used for breast augmentation and reconstruction. However, late complication, such as capsular contracture, remain the most important side effect. In this study we compare different methods for reducing the inflammatory reaction around the silicone implant by introducing one microtextured breast implant in wistar rats. The rats were dividing in 4 groups: the first one was the control group that received untreated implant; in the second we used silicone implants impregnated with rifampin solution, the third one had implant combined with intramuscular dexamethasone injection and the last one had silicone implant associated with autologous centrifuged fat introduced in the implant pocket. The implants and the capsular tissue surrounding were removed after eight weeks. Capsule samples were submitted to histological evaluations. The present study demonstrated that fat grafting may have a role in reducing and preventing capsular contractures after breast augmentation with silicone implants by decreasing the inflammatory process.

1. Introduction

The capsular contracture is the most common long-term complication of breast augmentation and reconstruction with silicone implants, as it is the result of an exaggerated healing response to the foreign body (the silicone implant) forming a fibrous capsule which wraps the implant. The incidence of capsular contracture is approximately 10.6%. Clinically, the capsular contracture is manifested by: pain, discomfort of varying degrees casused by distortion and displacement of the implant, determining the change in consistency, volume and appearance of the operated breast [1,2]. There are two main theories that can cause capsular contracture [2,3]: Infectious process theory describing a chronic subclinical infection located immediately adjacent to the implant sheath in a microscopic biofilm that is relatively inaccessible to cells and immune humoral function; this apparent process is determined by contamination. The theory of hypertrophic scarring in which the mechanism involved is to stimulate the activity of myofibroblasts that are present in the capsular tissue, which determines in the future formation of a contractile periprosthetic hypertrophic scar due to a series of phenomena similar to those of the inflammatory reaction towards a foreign body. The stimulus that can trigger the inflammatory reaction can be even the silicone particles on the implant coating but also the hematomas and seroma or the presence of foreign bodies. The diagnosis in case of suspected capsular contracture is establish by clinical and imaging examinations: ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Capsular contracture was clinically classified by Baker (1975) into four degrees: Baker I-non-palpable capsule (normal augmented breast consistency), Baker II—minimum firmness (firm consistency, the implant is not visible, but palpable), Baker III—moderate firmness (breast is harder, implant visible, easy to feel), Baker IV—severe contracture (breast is hard, tender, painful and sometimes distorted) [1,2,3]. Depending on the degree of Baker’s capsular contracture, it is indicated surgery.
Histologically the capsular membrane has three layers: the inner layer—consisting of fascicular collagen fibers, fibrocytes, and histocytes; the middle layer—consisting of dense collagen bundles with fibers arranged parallel to each other; the outer layer—consisting of loose connective tissue. In 50% of cases, synovial metaplasia may appear with a starting point in the middle layer of the capsule [3,4].
The following methods were used to prevent and reduce the risk of capsular contracture formation: placing the implant in the retro muscular plane, dissection of a larger pocket, performing rigorous hemostasis, using implants with a textured surface, minimizing the exposure, contact, and handling time of the implant, irrigation of the pocket with antiseptic solutions or with a broad-spectrum antibiotic solution to prevent the infectious process, use of talc-free gloves, use of corticosteroids, immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory drugs. An additional method of prevention is wrapping the implant in a layer of acellular dermal matrix, Thus, the proliferation rate of myofibroblasts and the inflammatory process are reduced, which decreases the risk of developing long-term capsular contracture formation [5,6,7].
Autologous fat transfer is generally used by plastic surgeon for both reconstructive and aesthetic purposes [8]. It’s like a natural filler that commonly used in face, breast and buttocks volumetry and rejuvenation [9,10,11,12,13]. Some of these procedures require minimum anesthesia [14,15]. Fat grafting can also improve cicatrization process in patients who have undergone radiation therapy for breast cancer. The effects of radiation cause damage to fibroblasts, scars and reduce microcirculation in the targeted areas [16], causing poor aesthetic results and increased risk of capsular contracture. The pluripotent stem cells from grafted fat are supposed to improve angiogenesis by paracrine signaling and endothelial cell recruitment [17].

2. Materials and Methods

In this study, we used forty-eight Wister rats, adults, with a similar weight, between 300–440 g, which were kept in the same conditions of light and humidity. Water and standard laboratory food for rats were freely provided to the animals, room temperature and alternating 12 h cycles of light and dark. At the end of our study the rats used were euthanized. The study received the Ethics opinion of “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi. The tissue fragments taken were processed by the usual paraffin-embedded histopathological technique and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. We implanted with one microtextured breast implant, according to an approved institutional animal care protocol. The implants were each 2 ccs (2 cm diameter).
Before surgical procedures, the rats were anesthetized with intramuscular administration of Ketamine 50 mg/mL, 0.3 mL/kg and Xylazine 2% 0.2 mL/kg. After the animals had been shaved and prepared prior to surgery, the skin of each rat was washed with 4 % Chlorhexidine surgical scrub and their skin was disinfected with Betadine solution that contained 10% povidone-iodine, according to the instructions for performing rodens surgery new drape and a new sterile gloves was used for each animal The animal was positioned in supine position that does not influence the surgical technique and the results either. The surgical procedure was performed in an animal operating theater following aseptic rules. Talc-free gloves were used at all times during the procedure. Implant pockets were developed throw an abdominal paramedian incision next to the mammary gland, in a retroglandular pocket with atraumatic dissection. Under direct vision, particular attention was paid to hemostasis, avoiding blunt instrumentation; there was no obvious bleeding. A new pair of talc-free gloves were worn when inserting the implants. 8 rats received an untreated implant (control), 17 rats an implant impregnated with rifampicin solution, 12 rats had implant combined with intramuscular dexamethasone injection for ten days and 11 rats had silicone implant associated with autologous centrifuged fat introduced in the implant pocket. The skin incisions were closed using 4-0 nylon sutures.
Rats were sacrificed at eight weeks. Prior to sacrifice, each animal was anesthetized, and a 5-mm incision was made directly over the previous incision, through the skin, we identify the capsular tissue surrounding the silicone implant and we removed it after dissection through the skin incision. Capsule samples were immersed in 10% formalin and were submitted to histological evaluations.
Histological Assessment: Capsule specimens were fixed with 10% buffered formalin and after 24 h were embedded in paraffin. The transversal sections were made in order to evaluate the capsular architecture. Afterwards were performed the hematoxylin and eosin staining and histological assessment for tissue inflammation and capsular thickness. Lympocytes, granulocytes, macrophages, eosinophils, and mastocytes were the types of inflammatory cells evaluated in the capsule. The giant cellular reaction and the signs of acute and chronic inflammation were quantificated. Inflammatory infiltrate was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe, according to the intensity.
Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical software package IBM SPSS Statistics Version 20.0 (International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). The confidence interval (CI) was invariably calculated using the confidence interval analysis (CIA) software (3).
Prior to the statistical analysis, the presumption of normality was performed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Descriptive data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median with interquartile range (IQR), or relative frequency with 95% CI.
The study applied specific tests to various types of data analysed, including tests for comparing the mean values of a parameter corresponding to several data sets, including the ANOVA test and the Student’s t-test, specific correlation for quantitative variables and variables. qualitative of which we can mention Pearson Chi-square (χ2). We considered that there is an association between the tested variables only when the calculated significance level p is lower than the accepted level, p < 0.05 (the accepted error is for less than 5% of cases).

3. Results

In the control, none of the 8 implants was ulcerated; 2 of the subjects had developed clinical Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture (Figure 1).
The rifampicin group had 1 ulcerated implant, and 2 implants had developed Baker grade II/III capsular contracture (Figure 2).
In the dexamethasone group, 2 of the 12 implants were ulcerated, and no cases of capsular contracture were observed (Figure 3).
The autologous centrifuged fat group had no ulcerated implants and no clinical capsular contracture has been found. The capsules with contracture were adherent to the adjacent tissue, dense and stiff (Figure 4).
Histology assessment: in the control group was observed an active chronic inflammation associated with giant foreign body cell reaction. More specifically lymphocytes and plasma (Ly-PL) cells were associated with neutrophil Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) in 10% and giant foreign cell reaction in the proportion of 30% (Figure 5 and Figure 6).
In the rifampicin group, microtextured breast implant induced an inflammatory chronic reaction with low inflammatory infiltrate consisting mostly of Ly-PL cells (90%), associated with a giant foreign body cell reaction in the proportion of 10% and chronic inflammation with moderate inflammatory infiltrates consisting mostly of lymphocytes and plasma cells (80%), associated with a giant foreign cell reaction in the proportion of 20%.
In dexamethasone group has been identified acute inflammation with abundant inflammatory infiltrate with PMN (70%), the giant cellular reaction of foreign body in the proportion of (15%), macrophages (10%) and Ly-PL cells about (5%) and chronic active inflammation with abundant inflammatory infiltrate in which Ly-PL cells (30%) were associated with neutrophilic PMN in (10%), macrophages (2%) and giant foreign body reaction in the proportion of (58%).
Fat cell group had chronic inflammation to the implants with low inflammatory infiltrate consisting mostly of Ly-PL cells (95%), associated with a giant foreign body reaction in a proportion of 5% and in one case chronic active inflammation with reduced Ly-PL inflammatory infiltrate (90%), associated with PMN (10%) (Figure 7 and Figure 8) (Table 1).
Statistical analyses revealed low levels of acute and chronic inflammation in the group study treated with autologous centrifugated fat compared to the other three groups. The rifampicin group had a higher rate of acute and chronic inflammation. In the control group, acute inflammation was encountered in half of the study subjects and the rate of chronic inflammation was slightly increased. Dexamethasone intramuscular administration reduced the chronic inflammatory process (Figure 9).
Correlations between types of inflammatory cells in the contracture capsule of the silicone implants in the studied groups showed a significant statistical association of macrophage, mastocytes and gigantocellular reaction and the type of treatment applied in each group (Table 2). Also chronic inflammation was statistical significant associated in our study in group 1 and 2, highlighting the protective role of silicone coating with autologous centrifugated fat (Table 3).

4. Discussion

The body reacts to the silicone implant by forming a capsule around it, but is yet unknown why some of them contract [18,19,20].
Ji Ung Park et al. demonstrated in vivo study that the implant triggered a foreign body reaction, which led to a cascade of inflammatory cell recruitment, fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis which eventually led to capsule formation. At the same time, they showed that a stronger reaction of the foreign body leads to the formation of a denser capsule with a higher density of collagen, reason why they considered that the collagen is a decisive factor in capsular formation. They also correlated the impact of the capsular thickness in the appearance of the capsular contracture as being directly proportional [21,22].
Capsular contractures typically form in the early postoperative period, but they also may appear many years later with an increasing incidence over time [23,24]. Two commonly accepted hypotheses exist: an infectious process theory describing a chronic subclinical infection located immediately adjacent to the implant sheath in a microscopic biofilm that is relatively inaccessible to cells and immune humoral function; this apparent process is determined by contamination and a hypertrophic scar theory in which the mechanism involved is to stimulate the activity of myofibroblasts that are present in the capsule, which determines the subsequent formation of hypertrophic scars that contracts due to a series of phenomena similar to those of an inflammatory reaction [25,26,27,28,29].
The type of cells that predominate in the capsule are macrophages, lymphocytes and fibroblasts. More recent studies have shown the role of mast cells present in significant numbers in the capsule. Apparently mast cells play an important role in the formation of capsular contracture through their contribution in the formation of fibrotic tissue; mast cells have profibrotic mediators renin-angiotensin II, histamine and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) on their cell surface that activate angiotensin receptors (ATıR) and TGF-β receptors on the surface of the fibroblasts also present in the capsular tissue. It appears that these cells are responsible for the initial production and storage of collagen, which subsequently causes the formation of fibrotic tissue [4].
The occurrence of capsular contraction is known to be a result of the inflammation caused by the surface of the implanted silicone material [4,5]. As a result, it’s critical to comprehend the mechanism of capsular contraction development and identify appropriate preventive techniques.
Fibroblasts and macrophages are principal elements detected in microscopic analyses of the fibrotic capsule adjacent to the breast implant [30]. They are detected in large number in ‘the contact zone’ of the implant, reason why they are associate with the capsular contracture severity.
Litong Ji et al. claim that the macrophages are the cells that produce initiation of repair and remodelling process entering the first in action before fibroblasts being possible that macrophages have an influence on the functions of fibroblasts. However, the exact relationship between macrophages and fibroblasts in the process of capsular formation it has not been sufficiently explored [31].
Numerous methods have been described in the literature to prevent and reduce the risk of capsular contraction such as: placing the implant in the submuscular plane, dissecting a larger pocket, performing a rigorous haemostasis to prevent hematoma, using implants with a textured surface, minimizing exposure, contact and handling of the implant, irrigation of the pocket with antiseptic solutions or bactericidal solution to prevent infectious processes, use of steroid therapy, immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory drugs [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
The autologous fat graft offers potential applications in breast reconstruction. While smaller volumes of fat injection are used to correct contour asymmetries, larger amounts of injection offer alternatives for augmenting the entire breast [17]. The use of autologous fat transfer for the purpose of breast reconstruction extends beyond the remodeling of breast volume or asymmetry. Other therapeutic applications considered include the treatment of postmastectomy pain syndrome, pain due to capsular contracture, and irradiated tissue fibrosis [16,41,42,43].
Recent studies in the literature suggest that adipose tissue contains a cell fraction (adipose-derived stromal cells and/or stem cells) that contributes to improving wound cicatrisation process, tissue repair, and extracellular matrix remodelling [44].
Papadopoulos et al. found that autologous fat transfer can relieve pain caused by capsular contracture and reduce the degree of contracture from Baker 4 to 3. Treatment is in several stages of fat injection around the implant requiring a longer period of time. The authors attributed the pain relief to the differentiation and softening of the tissues that decreased the compression of nerves [43].
Studies performed on burn scars using autologous adipose tissue grafting have shown a reduction in tissue thickness, with improved elasticity and decreased stiffness both subjectively quantified by patient perception and objectively by histopathological examination [44].
We investigated the efficacy of different strategies that can reduce inflammation and decrease peri-implant fibrosis. Comparing the results from our four study groups we revealed that fat grafting has the capacity to determine the favourable impact on dermal elasticity and thickening by reducing tissue inflammation.
The study’s main limitation was that it was ended after the eighth week. However, long-term experimental and clinical studies are needed to evaluate the evolution of the capsule around the silicone implant over time and the impact of autologous fat transfer in reducing the degree of capsular contracture.

5. Conclusions

The study proved that fat grafting may play a role in minimizing and avoiding capsular contractures after silicon implants by reducing inflammation and histological structure in an animal model, suggesting that it could be a viable therapy option for high-risk patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.A. and M.P.; Data curation, M.M.P., C.U. and T.C.M.; Formal analysis, A.-M.T., E.C., V.I., C.C.B. and T.C.M.; Investigation, N.A., M.M.P., E.C., V.I. and E.M.; Methodology, N.A., M.M.P., A.-M.T., C.U., V.I., E.M., C.C.B. and T.C.M.; Project administration, E.C., C.U., E.M. and T.S.; Resources, A.-M.T. and E.M.; Software, M.M.P., A.-M.T., C.U., C.C.B. and T.C.M.; Supervision, T.S.; Validation, E.C., C.C.B. and M.P.; Visualization, V.I. and T.S.; Writing–original draft, N.A., A.-M.T. and M.P.; Writing–review & editing, M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

No external Funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maxwell, G.P.; Gabriel, A. Breast Augmentation. Plastic Surgery, 3rd ed.; Neligan, P.C., Ed.; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 5, pp. 37–38. [Google Scholar]
  2. Maxwekk, G.P.; Hartley, R.W., Jr. Breast Augmentation. Plastic Surgery, 2nd ed.; Mathes, S.J., Ed.; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Volume 6, pp. 26–29. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hunt, J.; Salomon, J. Augmentation Mammaplasty. Selected Readings in Plastic Surgery. Bangladesh J. Plast. Surg. 2002, 9, 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brazin, J.; Malliaris, S.; Groh, B.; Mehrara, B.; Hidalgo, D.; Otterburn, D.; Silver, R.B.; Spector, J.A. Mast Cells in the Periprosthetic Breast Capsule. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 2014, 38, 592–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Schmitz, M.; Bertram, M.; Kneser, U.; Keller, A.K.; Horch, R.E. Experimental total wrapping of breast implants with acellular dermal matrix: A preventive tool against capsular contracture in breast surgery. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesth. Surg. 2013, 66, 1382–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hester, T.R., Jr.; Bahair, H.G.; Hunter, R.M. Use of Dermal Matrix to Prevent Capsular Contracture in Aesthetic Breast Surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012, 130, 126S–136S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Spear, S.L.; Sinkin, J.C.; Al-Attar, A. Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix (Steattice) in Primary and Revision Cosmetic Breast Surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2013, 131, 1140–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Coleman, S.R. Structural fat grafting: More than a permanent filler. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006, 118 (Suppl. S3), 108S–120S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Coleman, S.R. Facial recontouring with lipostructure. Clin. Plast. Surg. 1997, 24, 347–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ciuci, P.M.; Obagi, S. Rejuvenation of the periorbital complex with autologous fat transfer: Current therapy. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 2008, 66, 1686–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bircoll, M. Autologous fat transplantation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1987, 79, 492–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Coleman, S.R. Hand rejuvenation with structural fat grafting. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2002, 110, 1731–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Missana, M.C.; Laurent, I.; Barreau, L.; Balleyguier, C. Autologous fat transfer in reconstructive breast surgery: Indications, technique and results. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2007, 33, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pertea, M.; Grosu, O.M.; Veliceasa, B.; Velenciuc, N.; Ciobanu, P.; Tudor, R.; Poroch, V.; Lunca, S. Effectiveness and Safety of Wide Awake Local Anesthesia no Tourniquet (WALANT) Technique in Hand Surgery. Rev. Chim. 2019, 70, 3587–3591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pertea, M.; Poroch, V.; Grosu, O.M.; Lunca, S. Study on Epinephrine Used in Local Anesthesia Controversy and certainty. Rev. Chim. 2018, 69, 169–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Komorowska-Timek, E.; Turfe, Z.; Davis, A.T. Outcomes of prosthetic reconstruction of irradiated and nonirradiated breasts with fat grafting. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2017, 139, 1e–9e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Khouri, R.K., Jr. Current clinical applications of fat grafting. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2017, 140, 466e–486e. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moyer, H.R.; Ghazi, B.H.; Losken, A. The effect of silicone gel bleed on capsular contracture: A generational study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012, 130, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ratner, B.D. Reducing capsular thickness and enhancing angiogenesis around implant drug release systems. J. Control Release 2002, 78, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kyomoto, M.; Moro, T.; Saiga, K.; Hashimoto, M.; Ito, H.; Kawaguchi, H.; Takatori, Y.; Ishihara, K. Biomimetic hydration lubrication with various polyelectrolyte layers on cross-linked polyethylene orthopedic bearing materials. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 4451–4459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ji Ung, P.; Jiyeon, H.; Sukwha, K.; Ji-Hun, S.; Sang-Hyon, K.; Seonju, L.; Hye Jeong, M.; Sunghyun, C.; Ra Mi, C.; Heejin, K.; et al. Alleviation of capsular formations on silicone implants in rats using biomembrane-mimicking coatings. Acta Biomaterialia 2014, 10, 4217–4225. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vieira, V.J.; d’Acampora, A.J.; Marcos, A.B.W.; Giunta, G.D.; de Vasconcellos, Z.A.A.; Bins Ely, J.; d’Eça Neves, R.; Figueiredo, C. Vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression positively modulates the characteristics of periprosthetic tissue of polyurethane-coated silicone breast implant in rats. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2010, 126, 1899–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lavine, D.M. Saline inflatable prosthesis: 14 years’ experience. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 1993, 17, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wyatt, L.E.; Sinow, J.D.; Wollman, J.S.; Sami, D.A.; Miller, T.A. The influence of time on human breast capsule histology: Smooth and textured silicone-surfaced implants. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1998, 102, 1922–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Burkhardt, B.R.; Dempsey, P.D.; Schnur, P.L.; Tofield, J.J. Capsular contracture: A prospective study of the effect of local antibacterial agents. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1986, 77, 919–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dobke, M.K.; Svahn, J.K.; Vastine, V.L.; Landon, B.N.; Stein, P.C.; Parsons, C.L. Characterization of microbial presence at the surface of silicone mammary implants. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1995, 34, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Virden, C.P.; Dobke, M.K.; Stein, P.; Parsons, C.L.; Frank, D.H. Subclinical infection of silicone breast implant surface as a possible cause of capsular contracture. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 1992, 16, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Smahel, J. Histology of capsule causing constrictive fibrosis around breast implants. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1977, 30, 324–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wilflingsedar, P.; Propst, A.; Mikuz, G. Constrictive fibrosis following silicon implants in mammary augmentation. Clin. Plast. Surg. 1974, 2, 215–222. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuriyama, E.; Ochiai, H.; Inoue, Y.; Sakamoto, Y.; Yamamoto, N.; Utsumi, T.; Kishi, K.; Okumoto, T.; Matsuura, A. Characterization of the capsule surrounding smooth and textured tissue expanders and correlation with contracture. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob Open. 2017, 5, e1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Litong, J.I.; Tie, W.; Lining, T.; Hongjang, S.; Meizhuo, G. Roxatidine inhibits fibrosis by inhibiting NF-κB and MAPK signaling in macrophages sensing breast implant surface materials. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 21, 161–172. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hakelius, L.; Ohlsen, L. Tendency to capsular contracture around smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants: A 5-year follow-up. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1997, 100, 1566–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Handel, N.; Jensen, J.A.; Black, Q.; Waisman, J.R.; Silver-stein, M.J. The fate of breast implants: A critical analysis of complications and outcomes. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1995, 96, 1521–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cachay-Velasquez, H.; Ale, A.A. Lateral approach to mammary implants. Ann. Plast. Surg. 1990, 25, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Asplund, O.; Gylbert, L.; Jurell, G.; Ward, C. Textured or smooth implants for submuscular breast augmentation: A controlled study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1996, 97, 1200–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hester, T.R., Jr.; Nahai, F.; Bostwick, J.; Cukic, J. A 5-year experience with polyurethane-covered mammary prostheses for treatment of capsular contracture, primary augmentation mammaplasty, and breast reconstruction. Clin. Plast. Surg. 1988, 15, 569–585. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Thuesen, B.; Siim, E.; Christensen, L.; Schroder, M. Capsular contracture after breast reconstruction with the tissue expansion technique: A comparison of smooth and textured silicone breast prostheses. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg. 1995, 29, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lemperle, G.; Exner, K. Effects of cortisone in double-lumen breast implants: 10-year experience. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 1993, 17, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ajmal, N.; Riordan, C.L.; Cardwell, N.; Nanney, L.B.; Shack, R.B. The effectiveness of sodium 2-mercaptoethane sulfonate (mesna) in reducing capsular formation around implants in a rabbit model. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2003, 112, 1455–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Caffee, H. Intracapsular injection of triamcinolone for intractable capsule contracture. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1994, 94, 824–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Caviggioli, F.; Maione, L.; Forcellini, D.; Klinger, F.; Klinger, M. Autologous fat graft in postmastectomy pain syndrome. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011, 128, 349–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huang, S.H.; Wu, S.H.; Chang, K.P.; Lin, C.H.; Chang, C.H.; Wu, Y.C.; Lee, S.-S.; Lin, S.-S.; Lai, C.-S. Alleviation of neuropathic scar pain using autologous fat grafting. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2015, 74, S99–S104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Papadopoulos, S.; Vidovic, G.; Neid, M.; Abdallah, A. Using fat grafting to treat breast implant capsular contracture. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob Open. 2018, 6, e1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Brown, J.C.; Shang, H.; Yang, N.; Pierson, J.; Ratliff, C.R.; Prince, N.; Roney, N.; Chan, R.; Hatem, V.; Gittleman, H.; et al. Autologous fat transfer for scar prevention and remodeling: A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob Open. 2020, 27, e2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Applsci 12 04056 g001 550
Figure 1. Silicon implant non treated–moment of extraction of the implant with the view of the remaining thick capsule.
Figure 1. Silicon implant non treated–moment of extraction of the implant with the view of the remaining thick capsule.
Applsci 12 04056 g001
Applsci 12 04056 g002 550
Figure 2. Silicon implant treated with rifampicin–moment of extraction of the implant and a remaining capsule thinner.
Figure 2. Silicon implant treated with rifampicin–moment of extraction of the implant and a remaining capsule thinner.
Applsci 12 04056 g002
Applsci 12 04056 g003 550
Figure 3. Silicon implant treated with dexamethasone–moment of extraction of the implant with no capsular contracture.
Figure 3. Silicon implant treated with dexamethasone–moment of extraction of the implant with no capsular contracture.
Applsci 12 04056 g003
Applsci 12 04056 g004 550
Figure 4. Silicon implant treated with autologous centrifugated fat (a) moment of insertion and fat harvesting; (b) fat injection in the implant pocket; (c) moment of extraction of the implant with no capsular contracture.
Figure 4. Silicon implant treated with autologous centrifugated fat (a) moment of insertion and fat harvesting; (b) fat injection in the implant pocket; (c) moment of extraction of the implant with no capsular contracture.
Applsci 12 04056 g004
Applsci 12 04056 g005 550
Figure 5. High level of inflammatory infiltrate at six weeks after surgery.
Figure 5. High level of inflammatory infiltrate at six weeks after surgery.
Applsci 12 04056 g005
Applsci 12 04056 g006 550
Figure 6. Giant foreign cell reaction at six weeks after surgery.
Figure 6. Giant foreign cell reaction at six weeks after surgery.
Applsci 12 04056 g006
Applsci 12 04056 g007 550
Figure 7. Low inflammatory infiltrate at six weeks after surgery.
Figure 7. Low inflammatory infiltrate at six weeks after surgery.
Applsci 12 04056 g007
Applsci 12 04056 g008 550
Figure 8. Reduced PMN level at six weeks after surgery.
Figure 8. Reduced PMN level at six weeks after surgery.
Applsci 12 04056 g008
Applsci 12 04056 g009 550
Figure 9. Correlations between acute or chronic inflammation and treatment of silicone implant. Count: number of rats in group VI: groups of rats in study; 0: number of rats without acute/chronic inflammation; 1: number of rats with acute/chronic inflammation.
Figure 9. Correlations between acute or chronic inflammation and treatment of silicone implant. Count: number of rats in group VI: groups of rats in study; 0: number of rats without acute/chronic inflammation; 1: number of rats with acute/chronic inflammation.
Applsci 12 04056 g009
Table
Table 1. Complications and histological results of the studied groups.
Table 1. Complications and histological results of the studied groups.
GroupParticularities GroupNumber of Animals in GroupUlcerationCapsular ContractureHistological Aspects
IUntreated implant802active chronic inflammation associated with giant foreign body cell reaction (30%)
IIImplant impregnate with rifampicin1712inflammatory chronic reaction with low inflammatory infiltrate and giant foreign body cell reaction (20%)
IIIImplant associate with dexamethasone injection1220acute inflammation with abundant inflammatory infiltrate and giant foreign body cell reaction (58%)
IVImplant associate with autologous fat1100chronic inflammation to the implants with low inflammatory infiltrate and giant foreign body cell reaction (5%)
Table
Table 2. Correlations of inflammatory type cells.
Table 2. Correlations of inflammatory type cells.
V1PMNLy-PLEOZMacrophageGigantocellular ReactionMastocyte
V1Pearson Correlation1102−35−77357 *−354 *417 **
Sig. (2-tailed) 49281660113143
Sum of Squares and Cross-products49,91787,917−42,042−542133,917−243,79281,500
Covariance10621871−895−122849−51871734
N48484848484848
V1: capsular contracture; PMN: Polymorphonuclear leukocytes; Ly-PL: lymphocytes and plasma cells; EOZ: Eosinophils. * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table
Table 3. Correlations of inflammation.
Table 3. Correlations of inflammation.
V1Acute InflammationChronic InflammationChronic Active Inflammation
V1Pearson Correlation1−186−364 *−94
Sig. (2-tailed) 20611526
Sum of Squares and Cross-products49,917−4542−8708−2042
Covariance1062−97−185−43
N48484848
V1: capsular contracture. * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aladari, N.; Palaghia, M.M.; Trofin, A.-M.; Cojocaru, E.; Ungureanu, C.; Ianole, V.; Morosan, E.; Budacu, C.C.; Motruc, T.C.; Pertea, M.; et al. Reducing Capsular Contracture Formation in Breast Augmentation with Silicone Implants: Experimental Study on Rats. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4056. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12084056

AMA Style

Aladari N, Palaghia MM, Trofin A-M, Cojocaru E, Ungureanu C, Ianole V, Morosan E, Budacu CC, Motruc TC, Pertea M, et al. Reducing Capsular Contracture Formation in Breast Augmentation with Silicone Implants: Experimental Study on Rats. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(8):4056. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12084056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aladari, Nadia, Madalina M. Palaghia, Ana-Maria Trofin, Elena Cojocaru, Carmen Ungureanu, Victor Ianole, Eugenia Morosan, Cristian C. Budacu, Theodor C. Motruc, Mihaela Pertea, and et al. 2022. "Reducing Capsular Contracture Formation in Breast Augmentation with Silicone Implants: Experimental Study on Rats" Applied Sciences 12, no. 8: 4056. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12084056

APA Style

Aladari, N., Palaghia, M. M., Trofin, A. -M., Cojocaru, E., Ungureanu, C., Ianole, V., Morosan, E., Budacu, C. C., Motruc, T. C., Pertea, M., & Stamate, T. (2022). Reducing Capsular Contracture Formation in Breast Augmentation with Silicone Implants: Experimental Study on Rats. Applied Sciences, 12(8), 4056. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12084056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop