Deformation and Control of Super-Large-Diameter Shield in the Upper-Soft and Lower-Hard Ground Crossing the Embankment
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Project Overview
2.1. Tunnel Engineering Background
2.2. Upper-Soft and Lower-Hard Strata Characteristics
3. Numerical Simulation Analysis
3.1. Model Construction
3.2. Simulation Conditions and Steps
3.3. Numerical Results Analysis
3.4. Comparison of Field Measurement Results with Numerical Results
4. Conclusions
- The numerical simulation results show that the settlement of the embankment caused by the shield tunneling before the reinforcement is large, and there are potential construction risks. However, the use of grouting reinforcement can effectively minimize the maximum surface settlement value and deformation range.
- A method for controlling the deformation of the embankment during the construction of the super-large-diameter shield tunnel crossing the embankment is proposed, which can provide a reference for other large-diameter shield tunneling projects in the future.
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liang, Y.; Chen, X.; Yang, J.; Huang, L.C. Risk analysis and control measures for slurry shield tunneling diagonally under an urban river embankment. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, 8875800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.Z.; Wen, Z.Y.; You, G.M.; Liu, N. Difficulties and countermeasures in design and construction of shield tunnels in upper-soft and lower-hard stratum. Tunn. Constr. 2019, 39, 152–159. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Yao, W.J.; Cai, Y.Q.; Xu, B.; Wei, G. Analysis of ground surface settlement induced by the construction of a large-diameter shallow-buried twin-tunnel in soft ground. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2019, 83, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Liu, Q.S.; Shi, K.; Pan, Y.; Liu, J.P. Application and prospect of hard rock TBM for deep roadway construction in coal mines. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018, 73, 105–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, J.T.; Jiang, X.P.; Wang, X.H.; Huo, H.Y.; Liu, B. Study on ultimate supporting force of tunnel excavation face and deformation law in upper-soft lower-hard stratum. Yangtze River 2018, 49, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
- Li, W.M.; Ren, H.; Sun, Y.T.; Sha, M.Y.; Zhang, Y.W.; Shi, X.D. Multi-source Settlements Evolution Mechanisms Induced by Tunnel Shielding in Upper-soft and Lower-hard Strata. J. Railw. Eng. Soc. 2020, 37, 78–84. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, S.Q.; Miao, C.; Gang, F.; Wang, Y.C.; Meng, B.; Li, Y.H.; Jing, H.W. Physical experiment and numerical modelling of tunnel excavation in slanted upper-soft and lower-hard strata. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018, 82, 248–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.S.; Zhu, Z.D.; Song, S.G.; Zhang, J.; Peng, Y.Y. Ground settlement caused by large-diameter slurry shield during tunnel construction in soft soils. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2019, 41, 169–172. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Di, H.G.; Zhou, S.X.; Huo, P.; Huang, Q. Effective method for adjusting the uplifting of shield machine tunneling in upper-soft lower-hard strata. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2021, 115, 104040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, F.; Zhang, K.Y. Analysis on embankment settlement caused by undercrossing of shield tunneling. Highway 2017, 62, 293–298. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, W.G.; Li, H.R.; Wu, C.Z.; Li, Y.Q.; Liu, Z.Q.; Liu, H.L. Soft computing approach for prediction of surface settlement induced by earth pressure balance shield tunneling. Undergr. Space 2021, 6, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Chen, Z.Q.; Wang, L.; Zeng, Z.; Gu, D.M. Numerical simulation and analysis of the pile underpinning technology used in shield tunnel crossings on bridge pile foundations. Undergr. Space 2021, 6, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lü, X.; Su, Z.; Huang, M.; Zhou, Y. Strength reduction finite element analysis of a stability of large cross-river shield tunnel face with seepage. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 2020, 24, 336–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.G.; Huang, M.S.; Nadim, F.; Liu, Z.Q. Embankment responses to shield tunnelling considering soil-structure interaction: Case studies in Hangzhou soft ground. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2020, 96, 103230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Y.; Wei, G.; Xie, Y. Effect of Grouting Reinforcement on Settlement of Existing Tunnels: Case Study of a New Crossing Underpass. Symmetry 2021, 13, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, X.K.; Cao, J.X.; Duan, D.M.; Zhao, J.C.; Wu, J.W. Application of Midas/GTS in soft rock tunnel construction design. Highway 2019, 64, 321–325. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Y.; Liu, X. Stability analysis and design optimization of cutting slope in coal measure. Yangtze River 2020, 51, 104–107. [Google Scholar]
Stratum Number | Stratum | Thickness/m | Density/g⋅cm−3 | Moisture Content/% | Deformation Modulus/MPa | Poisson Ratio | Cohesion/ kPa | Friction Angle/° |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
① | Plain fill | 1.0~5.0 | 1.71 | 23.8 | - | 0.18 | 14.0 | 26.9 |
②-1 | Silt | 5.2~16.7 | 1.60 | 63.9 | 1.8 | 0.40 | 15.0 | 13.0 |
②-2 | Silty clay | 2.0~18.0 | 1.92 | 28.4 | 4.8 | 0.30 | 35 | 17.4 |
②-3 | Coarse sand | 0.9~13.0 | 2.64 | - | - | 0.26 | - | 30 |
②-4 | Silty soil | 1.1~19.2 | 1.74 | 46 | 2.3 | 0.39 | 18 | 16.2 |
②-5 | Gravel | 0.8~19.2 | 19.0 | - | 40.0 | 0.25 | - | 35.0 |
③ | Sandy clay | 1.4~16.5 | 1.88 | 24.5 | 4.9 | 0.25 | 29 | 23.2 |
④-1 | Fully weathered granite | 1.1~25.0 | 1.91 | 20.9 | 89 | 0.30 | 26 | 23.0 |
④-2 | Strongly weathered granite | 0.2~7.5 | 2.00 | - | 160 | 0.23 | 35 | 25 |
④-3 | Moderately weathered granite | 6.0~7.4 | 2.81 | - | 2000 | 0.20 | 400 | 33 |
Materials | Density/(kg·m−3) | Elastic Modulus/GPa | Poisson’s Ratio |
---|---|---|---|
Segment | 2500 | 34.5/36.5 | 0.167 |
Grouting layer | 2000 | 2 × 10−3 | 0.25 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
You, S.; Sun, J. Deformation and Control of Super-Large-Diameter Shield in the Upper-Soft and Lower-Hard Ground Crossing the Embankment. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4324. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094324
You S, Sun J. Deformation and Control of Super-Large-Diameter Shield in the Upper-Soft and Lower-Hard Ground Crossing the Embankment. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(9):4324. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094324
Chicago/Turabian StyleYou, Shuang, and Jianan Sun. 2022. "Deformation and Control of Super-Large-Diameter Shield in the Upper-Soft and Lower-Hard Ground Crossing the Embankment" Applied Sciences 12, no. 9: 4324. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094324
APA StyleYou, S., & Sun, J. (2022). Deformation and Control of Super-Large-Diameter Shield in the Upper-Soft and Lower-Hard Ground Crossing the Embankment. Applied Sciences, 12(9), 4324. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094324