One of the most common issues encountered during the operational use of buried PVC-U pipes is pipe leakage, particularly at the interfaces between pipe sections. Consequently, conducting research and optimization on the end-forming process of pipes using a digital twin system becomes crucial to enhance the quality of pipe interfaces.
3.1. Pre-Production Test
PVC-U pipes are commonly connected using various methods, with the socket-and-spigot connection being widely preferred due to its convenience and ease of construction. Among the stages of the end-forming process for PVC-U pipes, thermoforming plays a critical role. This process involves deforming one end of the pipe to facilitate piping connection. Numerous researchers have conducted investigations on different techniques for the end-forming process of pipes, as referenced in studies [
10,
11,
12]. These techniques can be categorized, based on the employed method, such as incremental forming [
13] and punch press forming [
14,
15]. They can also be distinguished by the conditions applied, such as cold flaring [
16] and hot flaring [
17,
18]. Furthermore, the number of forming cycles can differentiate between single-cycle flaring and multi-cycle flaring. Considering the material properties of PVC, the socket formation for PVC-U axial hollow-wall pipes typically involves single-cycle punch press forming under heated conditions. The end-forming equipment used in the experimental setup is illustrated in
Figure 3, and the step of the end-forming process is depicted in
Figure 4.
The quality of the pipe’s end-forming process is influenced by several factors, as illustrated in
Figure 4. These factors include the forward rate of the equipment’s punching head, the design of the punching equipment, the friction coefficient between the pipe and the equipment, the end-forming conditions (presence of sealing ring), the heating temperature of the pipe, the heating time, the preheating temperature of the punching head, the ambient temperature, and the cooling temperature of the pipe after end-forming. Among these factors, the change in the pipe’s cross-sectional structure has minimal impact on the first four factors. To minimize the design and construction costs of the axial hollow pipe production line, it is advisable to keep these four factors unchanged, compared to the existing design of the company’s solid-wall pipe end-forming production line. Specifically, the equipment forward rate is set at 100 mm/s, the punching head has a rounded corner design of 3° to reduce stress concentration, lubricating oil is applied to the outer surface of the equipment and rubber ring to reduce the friction coefficient, and a sealing ring is used during the end-forming process to simplify subsequent construction steps and to facilitate the insertion of a steel ring inside the sealing ring to improve its stiffness. However, the change in the pipe’s cross-sectional structure has a significant impact on the last five factors, which require further research to determine the optimal design.
The experimental site for this research is located in Shandong Province, China. The experiments were conducted in November, when the ambient temperature in the factory was approximately 15 °C. Under the conditions of an ambient temperature of 15 °C, with heating temperatures of 225 °C on both the inner and outer sides, the heating time required for a solid-wall PVC-U pipe with an outer diameter of 200 mm and a wall thickness of 8 mm was determined to be 180 s. Considering that the axial hollow-wall pipe has a lower cross-sectional rigidity, compared to the solid-wall pipe, it requires a lower end-forming process temperature. Furthermore, considering that the axial hollow pipe has the same material composition as the solid-wall pipe, but with a thinner wall thickness (the hollow pipe has a wall thickness of 7.5 mm, with 1.5 mm for the outer wall and 2 mm for the inner wall, for an outer diameter of 200 mm, as illustrated in
Figure 5), it can be inferred from Equation (1) that the optimal heating time for the hollow pipe, under the same heating temperature conditions, should fall within the range of 50 to 70 s. Therefore, in the pre-production test, six different heating times were set: 40 s, 50 s, 60 s, 70 s, 80 s, and 90 s. To mitigate performance variations among different pipe materials and to reduce the influence of random factors on the experimental results, each test involved one length of axial hollow pipe (6 m) divided into six 1 m segments, which were randomly assigned to six groups. The experiments were repeated five times, and the results were averaged.
Q: Quantity of heat, C: Specific heat capacity, M: Mass, V: Volume, ρ: Density, T: Final temperature, T_0: Initial temperature. To prevent rapid cooling and its impact on the forming quality of the heated pipes upon contact with the stamping equipment, preheating is required for the stamping equipment. In the case of solid-wall pipes, the preheating temperature for the stamping equipment is generally around 90 °C. However, for hollow pipes, the preheating temperature for the stamping equipment can be appropriately reduced. On the other hand, excessive residual temperature stress can be induced in the pipes, due to a high residual temperature after the flaring process. Therefore, it is necessary to control the temperature at the moment of cooling and detachment of the pipes after the flaring process.
After the heating process, temperature measurements were conducted at intervals of 50 mm within a 400 mm range from the pipe opening, as depicted in
Figure 6. The horizontal axis, X, represents the distance from the measurement point to the pipe opening. The results depicted in
Figure 6 demonstrate that, in the heating section (0–200 mm), the average temperature of the pipe gradually increased as the heating duration progressed. This temperature variation pattern aligned with Equation (1) mentioned earlier. Additionally, due to the non-enclosed structure of the oven, the temperature decreased as the position in the pipe segment moved closer to the oven outlet. However, the overall temperature remained within an appropriate range. In the non-heating section (200–400 mm), the cooling effect of the surrounding air led to a rapid temperature drop from 73–144 °C to 20–40 °C within the pipe segment. Beyond the 400 mm point, the pipe temperature approached room temperature, and the influence of temperature became negligible.
The pipe end heating process is illustrated in
Figure 7, wherein the pipe is fed into the oven using a fixture and heated using internal and external radiation heating tubes. In the heating process, the fixture rotates the pipe to ensure uniform heating of the pipe walls at all locations.
The expanded mouth forming process is carried out on the heated pipe. The schematic diagram of the end-forming process is illustrated in
Figure 7. After heating, the pipe is swiftly moved to the end-forming process area. Firstly, the sealing ring is placed inside the groove of the punching head. Then, the pipe is pushed forward, and the punching head is utilized to expand the pipe diameter. During the end-forming process, the pneumatic pressure loading device on the outer slide rail of the punching head applies air pressure to ensure tight contact between the pipe wall and the punching head; thus, preventing any gaps between the pipe wall and punching head.
Figure 8 visually presents different types of defects that were observed during this process. The experimental observations are summarized below:
In the 40 s heating group, the pipe material exhibited whitening on the inner wall diameter changed area of the socket end and small cracks appeared at the expanded section. This was due to insufficient heating of the pipe material, resulting in low elongation at fracture. Consequently, excessive plastic deformation (whitening), and even cracking, occurred during the flaring process, as illustrated in
Figure 8(1,2).
In the 50 s heating group, the pipe material’s temperature increased by prolonging the heating time, which reduced the material’s elastic modulus and increased the elongation at fracture; thereby, avoiding inner wall cracking. However, whitening the diameter changed area of the inner wall at the end of the socket still occurred, as depicted in
Figure 8(2).
In the 60 s heating group, the pipe material’s elastic modulus further decreased, enhancing its plastic deformation capability. The pipe body exhibited no whitening, cracks, or flanging, indicating that the material was adequately heated and reached the required temperature. The results were ideal, as illustrated in
Figure 8(9).
In the 70 s heating group, the pipe material’s inner wall showed no whitening or cracks, but slight flanging occurred. This suggests that excessive heating of the pipe material resulted in a low elastic modulus and decreased stiffness. The sudden change in the sealing ring placement during the flaring process caused outward deformation of the pipe opening, as depicted in
Figure 8(7).
In the 80 s heating group, extensive flanging and cracks appeared on the outer wall, with widespread cracking on the inner wall (
Figure 8(4,5)). The material lost its ability to recover elasticity after deformation, and its strength was insufficient to support the flaring process. Additionally, the weak point of the sealing ring deformed due to excessive temperature, as depicted in
Figure 8(8).
In the 90 s heating group, significant sagging and slight burn marks were observed on the pipe wall. Insufficient stiffness caused the pipe to sag, and partial overheating and carbonization occurred. The subsequent flaring process could not be sustained (
Figure 8(3,6)).
The experimental results indicated that, within the range of 15–122 °C, as the temperature increased, the tensile strength and stiffness of PVC pipes decreased, while elongation at fracture increased. Beyond 122 °C, the tensile strength and stiffness of the PVC pipes continued to decrease with increasing temperature, but the elongation at fracture decreased. This was because the thermal vibration of the PVC polymer chains increased with temperature, reducing the intermolecular forces between the chains and resulting in a decline in the overall mechanical properties of the material, but an increase in its ductility. However, when the temperature exceeded 122 °C, the low intermolecular forces were insufficient to resist deformation caused by external forces, leading to a decrease in the material’s ductility (elongation at fracture). The peak value of 122 °C was not fixed and varied depending on the type and proportion of materials used in the pipe production [
19,
20,
21]. Nevertheless, the tendency of the elongation at fracture of this PVC material to initially increase and then decrease with temperature has been confirmed [
22,
23,
24].
The duration of end-forming heating plays a critical role in determining the tensile properties of rigid polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes. Based on the experimental results, it was found that a heating time of 60 s was most suitable for achieving the desired outcomes at the ambient temperature (15 °C). Additionally, the preheating temperature of the stamping equipment could be set within a range of 70–80 °C, which met the requirements. However, considering the importance of reducing energy consumption, a preheating temperature of 70 °C was deemed more appropriate. It is crucial to control the temperature for cooling detachment within the range of 35–45 °C to prevent significant cooling shrinkage; thereby, ensuring improved forming quality. Effective temperature control played a vital role in achieving optimal forming quality at the flaring end of the pipe and the diameter changed area at the end of the socket. Furthermore, the subsequent leak tightness test under internal pressure and angular deviation of the axial hollow pipe demonstrated that the quality of these two areas had a direct impact on the pipeline’s overall operational risk resistance.
3.2. Establish a Digital Twin Model
The data gathered from the pre-production experiments was imported into the digital twin system platform, which encompassed interfaces for various modeling and simulation software. This platform empowers researchers to deploy software tailored to their specific requirements. Utilizing the collected data and AutoCAD software, a 1:1 digital twin model of the pipe was generated.
Figure 5 illustrates the schematic cross-section of the pipe, showcasing an outer diameter of 200 mm and a wall thickness of 7.5 mm. The outer wall thickness measured 1.5 mm, the inner wall thickness measured 2 mm, the hollow cavity layer thickness measured 4 mm, and the interlayer support thickness measured 2 mm. The pipe included a total of 60 evenly distributed hollow holes along its circumference.
The end-forming process of the pipe was simulated using ABAQUS software, as illustrated in
Figure 7, involving two steps. Firstly, the simulation focused on the heating and softening of the pipe material. The length of the pipe segment considered for the simulation was 400 mm, and solid elements were utilized. The material properties are depicted in
Table 1.
The variation in the tensile properties of the pipe material with temperature was determined based on the standards GB/T 8804-2003 and GB/T 1040.1-2018. The corresponding curve is depicted in
Figure 9.
The analysis included a heat transfer step, where the time was determined based on the requirements of each group. To meet the experimental conditions, the initial temperature of the pipe segment was set at 15 °C. The temperature propagated from the pipe mouth towards the far end, with a transfer temperature of 225 °C. Within the last 200 mm section of the pipe segment, surface heat exchange occurred, establishing contact with an ambient temperature of 15 °C. After the heating process was complete, the entire pipe segment underwent a 10 s heat exchange in an environment with a temperature of 15 °C (there was approximately a 10 s gap between the oven heating and the punching press process). The mesh was divided into hexahedral elements, utilizing standard heat transfer elements for the grid attributes. The total number of elements was 1.008 million. The simulation results are illustrated in
Figure 10.
As illustrated in
Figure 11, a comparison between the experimental and simulated temperature variations of the pipe demonstrated certain differences. In the simulated results, the temperature of the pipe in the 0–100 mm section was approximately 0–3 °C higher than the experimental results. This divergence could be attributed to the simulation’s assumption of an ideal sealed heating condition for this section of the pipe. However, in reality, the non-sealed structure of the oven led to some heat dissipation, resulting in a slightly lower actual heating effect compared to the ideal temperature.
Conversely, in the simulated results, the temperature of the pipe in the 100–200 mm section was approximately 0–6 °C lower than the experimental results. This discrepancy arose from the simulation’s assumption that this section of the pipe experiences heating at 225 °C and heat dissipation at an ambient temperature of 15 °C. However, during the actual experiment, the high-temperature operation of the oven caused the surrounding air temperature to exceed 15 °C, resulting in a slightly higher pipe temperature than predicted by the simulation. The slight deviation in the simulated temperature of the 200–300 mm section, compared to the experimental results, can also be attributed to the aforementioned variations in heat dissipation conditions. However, in the case of the 300–400 mm section, the simulated and experimental results demonstrated good agreement. Overall, the simulation error was negligible, with a value of less than 5%. This indicated that the model satisfactorily met the required criteria.
In the second step, the simulation of the flaring process for the softened pipe segment was performed, as illustrated in
Figure 12. The stamping equipment of the actual expansion device was modeled at a 1:1 scale.
Figure 7 illustrates the structure of the expansion equipment used for the pipe. In this simulation, the sealing ring was represented by solid elements, while the punch head was considered to be an analytically rigid body. To analyze this process dynamically, a temperature–displacement coupling approach was employed. The contact between the stamping equipment surface and the inner wall of the pipe, as well as between the inner wall of the pipe and the sealing ring, was modeled as frictional contact. The coefficient of friction was determined according to the specifications outlined in GB/T 10006-2021, as depicted in
Table 2.
The punch was programmed to move at a constant speed, covering a forward distance of 220 mm within a time duration of 2.2 s. In the pipe’s 0–220 mm section, a uniform pressure of 0.1 MPa was uniformly applied to the outer side of the pipe. This pressure served as a substitute for the pneumatic load used in the experimental setup. The mesh configuration utilized temperature–displacement elements, maintaining the same number of elements as in the previous step. The simulation results are presented in
Figure 13.
Based on the combination of
Figure 9 and
Figure 13, it can be observed that after 40 s of heating, the temperature in the expanded section of the pipe ranged from 73 °C to 90 °C. At this temperature, the yield strength of the pipe material was 35.348 MPa. The presence of small cracks on both the inner and outer walls at the sealing ring placement indicated the maximum strain at this location, with some elements exceeding the fracture elongation rate of the material at this temperature (70–87%). This conclusion aligned with the experimental results.
Following 50 s of heating, the temperature in the expanded section of the pipe increased to 92–110 °C. The yield strength decreased to 26.386 MPa, while the fracture elongation rate increased to 94–181%. No cracks were observed in the pipe section at this point, and the quality of the end-forming met the requirements.
After 60 s of heating, the temperature in the expanded section of the pipe reached 108–128 °C. The yield strength further decreased to 22.554 MPa, while the fracture elongation rate rapidly increased to 165–250%. The higher fracture elongation rate indicated excellent ductility of the pipe material. Within the temperature range of 73–122 °C, the fracture elongation rate of the pipe material increased with the temperature. Considering the temperature drop caused by air cooling during the actual expansion process, selecting a 60 s heating time could effectively prevent the cracking issues observed in the 40 s heating model.
After 70 s of heating, the temperature in the expanded section of the pipe rose to 130–142 °C. The yield strength decreased to 18.956 MPa, and the fracture elongation rate decreased to 124–192%. At this stage, the pipe end exhibited outward bending and deformation of the hollow structure at the pipe opening, but no cracks were observed. This phenomenon indicated that, although the fracture elongation rate decreased, it still met the requirements. However, the increase in temperature led to a rapid decrease in the elastic modulus, causing the cross-sectional stiffness of the pipe material to no longer meet the requirements for expansion deformation, resulting in deformation and damage to the pipe opening structure.
After 80 s of heating, the temperature in the expanded section of the pipe increased to 143–162 °C. At this stage, the yield strength further decreased to 11.342 MPa, and the fracture elongation rate decreased rapidly to 65–106%. Large deformation cracks appeared when the pipeline expanded to the position of the sealing ring placement, and the structure of the pipe opening was damaged with significant folding. The low elastic modulus and fracture elongation rate prevented the pipe material from withstanding the deformation caused by the expansion, which aligned with the occurrence of cracks penetrating the inner and outer walls and the extensive flaring of the pipe opening observed in the experiments.
After 90 s of heating, the temperature in the expanded section of the pipe rose to 155–170 °C. The yield strength decreased to 8.257 MPa, and the fracture elongation rate decreased to 41–75%. In the 90 s group, cracking occurred at the early stage of expansion due to an excessively low fracture elongation rate, resulting in the termination of the calculation.
The experimental and simulation studies revealed that the temperature–fracture elongation rate performance of the pipe material had a significant impact on the expansion-forming quality of the PVC-U hollow pipes. The numerical simulation results aligned with the experimental findings, and, based on this model, a preliminary digital twin was established. Subsequently, the digital twin was fed back to the production end of the factory for industrial production through the digital twin platform. Real-time monitoring and adjustments were performed, based on various production data through integration with the automation monitoring system, resulting in a yield rate of the pipe of up to 95% for the qualified products.