Next Article in Journal
Security and Privacy Issues in IoT-Based Big Data Cloud Systems in a Digital Twin Scenario
Next Article in Special Issue
An Improved Multiple-Target Tracking Scheme Based on IGGM–PMBM for Mobile Aquaculture Sensor Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Post-Quantum Biometric Authentication Based on Homomorphic Encryption and Classic McEliece
Previous Article in Special Issue
Training Autoencoders Using Relative Entropy Constraints
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Research on Image Mosaic Method Based on Fracture Edge Contour of Bone Tag

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(2), 756; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020756
by Ting Wang 1,2,*, Huiqin Wang 3, Ke Wang 3 and Zhe Yang 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(2), 756; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020756
Submission received: 21 October 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 28 December 2022 / Published: 5 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Control Using Machine Learning)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors should clearly describe the application, purpose , system flow and main contributions of their research.

The additional experiments and performance comparisons are also needed to verify the proposed method.

 

Paper Title: Research on Image Stitching Method of Broken Bone Tag Outline and Edge 

 Overall Recommendation : Reconsider after major revision (control missing in some experiments) 

 

 

The following are some suggestions and comments for authors:

1. Paper title should be more specific 

2. Abstract should include the purpose and main contribution of the research, 

3. It also should include some introduction and explanation about the importance of their research work and how it can be applicable in real-world.

4. At least one flow diagram should be included in the explanation of research work.

5. Title of section 2 should be “Proposed Method” or “Methodology”

6. The authors should modify the presentation style of the manuscript.

7. If the main contribution is the implementation of a new algorithm, the authors should describe their new algorithm in algorithm writing style, rather than writing the paragraph. 

8. In experimental results, it should include more sample input images.

9. Figure caption should be also more specific. For example , “Fig. 7 The algorithm of this paper ”,

10.Figure numbers such as (a), (b), (c) should be included in the figure, rather than written in the sentence. For example “According to the order from left to right in Fig. 7 and Fig. 8, the splicing results of the feature descriptor pairs are a, b, c, and d in turn. ”

 

11. Also in Table 1 and Table 2, what does a, b, c,d? Does it mean the experiment was performed only on these four parts?

12.  In most of the figures, the feature descriptors are too small and difficult to see the results.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors

The paper intiled Research on Image Stitching Method of Broken Bone Tag introduced a new feature descriptor registration algorithm is proposed to solve the splicing problem of fractured contours. The results are consistents. So, i acepted it.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have modified the papers according to the comments and suggestions of previous review.

Therefore, I agree and encourage to publish this paper.

Reviewer 3 Report

Authors revised their article w.r.t  all of my comments.

Back to TopTop