Next Article in Journal
A Deep Learning-Based Framework for Strengthening Cybersecurity in Internet of Health Things (IoHT) Environments
Previous Article in Journal
Design of a Dispersive 1064 nm Fiber Probe Raman Imaging Spectrometer and Its Application to Human Bladder Resectates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Comprehensive Review of Developments in Electric Vehicles Fast Charging Technology

Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town 7535, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(11), 4728; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114728
Submission received: 18 April 2024 / Revised: 20 May 2024 / Accepted: 22 May 2024 / Published: 30 May 2024

Abstract

:
Electric vehicle (EV) fast charging systems are rapidly evolving to meet the demands of a growing electric mobility landscape. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of various fast charging techniques, advanced infrastructure, control strategies, and emerging challenges and future trends in EV fast charging. It discusses various fast charging techniques, including inductive charging, ultra-fast charging (UFC), DC fast charging (DCFC), Tesla Superchargers, bidirectional charging integration, and battery swapping, analysing their advantages and limitations. Advanced infrastructure for DC fast charging is explored, covering charging standards, connector types, communication protocols, power levels, and charging modes control strategies. Electric vehicle battery chargers are categorized into on-board and off-board systems, with detailed functionalities provided. The status of DC fast charging station DC-DC converters classification is presented, emphasizing their role in optimizing charging efficiency. Control strategies for EV systems are analysed, focusing on effective charging management while ensuring safety and performance. Challenges and future trends in EV fast charging are thoroughly explored, highlighting infrastructure limitations, standardization efforts, battery technology advancements, and energy optimization through smart grid solutions and bidirectional chargers. The paper advocates for global collaboration to establish universal standards and interoperability among charging systems to facilitate widespread EV adoption. Future research areas include faster charging, infrastructure improvements, standardization, and energy optimization. Encouragement is given for advancements in battery technology, wireless charging, battery swapping, and user experience enhancement to further advance the EV fast charging ecosystem. In summary, this paper offers valuable insights into the current state, challenges, and future directions of EV fast charging, providing a comprehensive examination of technological advancements and emerging trends in the field.

1. Introduction

The emergence of electric vehicles (EVs) has heralded a new era of environmentally friendly transportation, promising lower emissions and a cleaner environment. As EV use grows, the need for efficient and fast charging options becomes ever more critical. Fast chargers that are meant to provide speedy charging periods for electric car batteries have emerged as a possible answer to the problems encountered by EV drivers on longer excursions. These chargers provide a lifeline for travellers, allowing them to quickly recharge their automobiles while on the road, making long-distance electric mobility possible [1]. The requirement for fast battery charging has become a critical component in driving worldwide electric transportation growth. To encourage the widespread adoption of electric vehicles, charging choices that are dependable, convenient, and fast must compete with the refuelling experience of traditional internal combustion engines [2,3]. As a result, researchers and industry participants have made major efforts to develop cutting-edge charging technologies capable of dramatically reducing charging periods, hence increasing the attraction and practicality of electric vehicles for consumers [4,5]. This study aims to shed light on the numerous fast charging technologies that have emerged in the electric vehicle ecosystem and power electronics converters and benefit drivers. The goal is to review the latest advancements in fast charging infrastructure, detailing widely used strategies, advantages, and disadvantages and also to discuss electronic power topologies and advanced control techniques aimed at reducing charging times and enhancing the efficiency of fast charging systems and explore the potential impact of fast charging on the EV industry. This study effectively establishes the importance of fast charging for EV adoption and justifies the need for this research in exploring and understanding current technologies and future trends. Electric vehicle (EV) fast charging falls into two categories: alternative current (AC) charging and direct current (DC) charging [6,7]. AC charging, which involves an on-board battery charger within the EV, tends to be slower due to limited power ratings [8,9]. Conversely, DC charging utilizes off-board battery chargers outside the vehicle, enabling faster charging speeds and greater power transfer capabilities [10,11]. As battery electric vehicles (BEVs) have become more widespread, the charging station design has rapidly evolved to accommodate these BEVs [12,13,14,15,16]. The speed at which EV battery packs charge is directly tied to the power transfer rate from the station, leading to the creation of fast and ultrafast charging stations capable of quick, high-power charging [17,18]. EV charging systems can allow power to flow in one direction or both directions [19]. Most on-board chargers facilitate one-way power flow, favouring grid-to-vehicle (G2V) charging [20]. This approach is preferred for its simplicity, reliability, affordability, and being easy to control [19]. Bidirectional chargers can feed power back into the grid through the grid-to-vehicle, V2G, mode [10]. Bidirectional charging is increasingly recognized for its potential to balance loads and integrate renewable energy, and reduce power losses in the grid [21,22,23,24]. This has sparked an increased interest in bidirectional chargers among researchers as a growing option for future EV applications. Charging units in AC bus-based architectures use separate rectifiers, enabling efficient and independent charging of multiple vehicles [25]. In contrast, systems with a common DC bus provide versatility and high-power operation [26,27]. Hybrid charging architectures, integrating AC and DC technologies alongside micro-grid systems, aim to optimize renewable energy use and enhance micro-grid performance beyond electric vehicle applications [28,29,30]. Researchers are dedicated to advancing charging stations through improved converters and smart control techniques to effectively manage the challenges of public charging. EV charging systems utilize multiple AC-DC and DC-DC converters and control strategies for safe and efficient battery charging, with the converter topology choice affecting the cost, size, performance, and efficiency of the system [31,32,33,34]. High-power converters can reduce charging time and provide additional grid services [25,35]. The increasing number of EVs and the incorporating renewable energy sources into the grid pose challenges to power quality, grid operation, safety, and reliability [36,37,38]. Researchers are developing various power converters, charging methods, and integration techniques to harness the benefits of EVs while addressing the challenges in this critical area for electric vehicle adoption. EV charging standards vary globally, with different regions adopting standards like SAE J1772, IEC 61851, and GB/T [26,38]. DC fast charging follows standards such as IEC-62196, CHAdeMO, CCS Type 1 and 2, and Tesla’s proprietary standard. Standardization efforts are underway, including the ChaoJi standard [38]. While AC-connected systems maintain reliability, DC microgrids offer efficiency but face standardization challenges [39]. High-power DC fast charging may require grid upgrades, especially in rural areas and on highways [40,41]. Intelligent charging algorithms in modern chargers improve energy efficiency and grid stability, with energy storage systems aiding grid integration and cost reduction. Isolation from the AC grid is crucial in DC fast charging station design, and is achievable through low-frequency transformers or isolated DC-DC converters with careful consideration of soft-switching conditions [42].
The research emphasizes the importance of considering societal and economic factors when analysing fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles (EVs). By exploring economic feasibility, job creation, equity, and regulatory frameworks, the study provides a holistic understanding of the impact of fast charging systems, bridging technological advancements with broader societal objectives. Additionally, the paper offers valuable insights into current EV fast charging technology, covering techniques, infrastructure advancements, and challenges. Our research lays out pathways for the advancement of EV fast charging technology in the future, advocating for global collaboration, standardization, and advancements in battery technology to promote widespread EV adoption. This comprehensive approach underscores the significance of addressing societal, economic, and technological aspects to advance sustainable transportation through fast charging infrastructure.
The final section of the manuscript provides a comprehensive overview and analysis of EV fast charging infrastructure. It begins by examining various fast charging techniques and delving into advanced technical specifications, including charging standards and mode control. The paper also categorizes battery chargers for on-board and off-board charging, exploring converters and control strategies for EV systems. Challenges and future trends in EV fast charging and strategies to enhance efficiency and performance are discussed. The paper aims to contribute to the understanding and advancement of EV technology and fast charging infrastructure, offering insights to optimize solutions and improve energy utilization. It serves as a valuable resource for researchers and industry professionals, covering a wide range of topics from current state analysis to future trends and potential solutions.

2. Fast Charging Techniques for Electric Vehicles

Research and development efforts in fast charging techniques for electric vehicles are increasingly vital, aiming to reduce charging times and enhance the convenience of EV ownership [43]. According to the International Energy Agency’s 2022 report, global electric car sales have surged, reaching 14% of all new car purchases, up from being 9% in 2021 and less than 5% in 2020. The first quarter of 2023 saw over 2.3 million electric cars sold, a 25% increase from the previous year. Projections suggest that 14 million electric vehicles will be sold by the end of 2023, with expectations that they may constitute 18% of total car sales for the year. Forecasts under the IEA Stated Policies Scenario indicate that electric car sales could reach 35% globally by 2030. This increasing popularity underscores the importance of efficient fast charging methods to support widespread adoption. Addressing the time needed to recharge EV batteries is a key challenge as EV adoption grows. A survey by McKinsey & Company found that 80% of EV owners consider fast charging availability to be crucial to their purchase decisions. Fast charging infrastructure is crucial for commercial sectors like taxi fleets and delivery services to minimize vehicle downtime and enhance operational efficiency. Significant advancements have been made in fast charging systems for electric vehicles (EVs) to meet the growing demand for high-power charging. These innovations enable shorter charging times compared to traditional methods. Key charging techniques include inductive charging, ultra-fast charging, DC fast charging, Tesla Superchargers, bidirectional charging V2G (vehicle-to-grid) integration, and battery swapping, as illustrated in Figure 1.

2.1. Inductive Charging

Inductive charging, known as wireless charging, eliminates the need for physical cables by transmitting energy through an electromagnetic field between a charging pad on the ground and a receiver on the electric vehicle [44]. While not as fast as some wired fast charging methods, wireless charging offers convenience, allowing drivers to park over a charging pad for automatic charging without connecting any cables [44]. Nikola Tesla’s experiment in 1910 at the Wardenclyffe Tower laid the groundwork for wireless power transfer (WPT) [45,46]; smart cities with e-mobility mainly utilize WPT [47], employing methods like inductive power transfer (IPT) and capacitive power transfer (CPT). Improving IPT efficiency involves optimizing coil design, ensuring coil alignment, selecting appropriate batteries and charging standards, and using electromagnetic field shielding [45,47,48,49]. Advanced optimization techniques and control strategies, such as adjusting charging frequency and monitoring alignment, enhance power transfer efficiency and safety. Inductive charging offers a convenient alternative to traditional plug-in charging methods, simplifying the connection process significantly. However, it is essential to consider potential safety risks, such as the possibility of foreign object hazards. While moderately weatherproof, inductive charging systems necessitate embedded charging pads for effective operation, influencing their integration with existing infrastructure. Moreover, compatibility is restricted to vehicles equipped with compatible receivers, posing a limitation on widespread adoption. Additionally, inductive charging may contribute to slightly accelerated battery degradation due to the heat generated during the charging process. Nonetheless, its scalability and upgradability are notable advantages, allowing for the incorporation of additional charging pads over time. It is worth noting, however, that inductive charging tends to exhibit a lower efficiency than traditional methods, which can be attributed to energy loss in the magnetic field.
Static charging systems, similar to IPT, are commonly found in stationary locations like parking lots, traffic lights, and toll booths, as depicted in Figure 2a. These systems are more efficient and compatible with electric vehicles. However, in wireless EV charging, misalignment between the transmitter and receiver coils can lead to fluctuations in the coupling coefficient, reducing the system’s efficiency and power output [50]. Researchers are working to address misalignment issues in static WPT systems [50,51,52,53]. These systems typically have two stages: a high-frequency inverter converts input power to AC, which is then transferred to the primary coil to create an electromagnetic field. This induces AC power in the nearby receiver coil, which is then converted to DC power and stored in the vehicle’s battery [45]. The system can achieve an efficiency of 85% or higher, with the individual stages reaching up to 97% efficiency.
Dynamic inductive charging is a method that wirelessly charges a vehicle’s battery while it is in motion, also known as on-the-go or road-based charging. This addresses the challenge of electric vehicles having a limited range for long-distance trips [54,55]. It is an emerging technology that is currently being explored in various pilot projects and studies. In dynamic inductive charging, as depicted in Figure 2b, a primary coil buried along the road track and a secondary coil mounted on the vehicle chassis facilitate power transfer as the vehicle moves [47,56]. The primary infrastructure components include the Power Supply Unit and the Inductive Transmitter Units embedded in the road [47]. This charging method has several advantages; the major disadvantages are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Ultra-Fast Charging (UFC)

Ultra-fast charging (UFC) is a charging technology that significantly reduces EV charging times compared to traditional methods [57,58]. With power levels typically exceeding 350 kW, UFC delivers a lot of energy to the vehicle’s battery quickly [57]. This approach addresses concerns about long charging times, making EV charging more comparable to refuelling a conventional vehicle and alleviating range anxiety [59,60]. UFC systems employ control strategies for efficient power delivery and battery management, including Constant Current (CC) and Constant Voltage (CV) modes and temperature monitoring. Although UFC stations are still in the early deployment stages and are less widespread than conventional infrastructure, their numbers are increasing, especially along major highways [61]. Both the charging infrastructure and EVs must be compatible with higher power levels, requiring station design and in-station and battery technology advancements. Automakers and charging providers are developing UFC technologies, introducing new standards like CCS and CHAdeMO 3.0 to support higher power levels [62,63]. Ongoing research aims to further improve charging speeds, infrastructure, and battery technologies in the dynamic field of UFC [61]. Ultra-fast charging offers unparalleled convenience with rapid charging times and minimal user interactions being required. However, it is important to acknowledge potential safety concerns, notably the risk of overheating. While generally safe, precautions should be taken to prevent overheating incidents. In terms of durability, ultra-fast charging stations are moderately weatherproof, ensuring reliable operation in various conditions. High-power charging stations facilitate integration with existing infrastructure, although their availability is not yet widespread. Compatibility primarily extends to newer electric vehicle (EV) models, though it is not guaranteed for all makes and models. Additionally, the high charging currents associated with ultra-fast charging may contribute to slightly accelerated battery degradation over time. Nonetheless, the scalability and upgradability of these stations are notable advantages, as they can be modified to accommodate even faster charging speeds. Although ultra-fast charging systems boast high efficiency, some energy loss still occurs during charging.

2.3. DC Fast Charging (DCFC)

DC fast charging, also known as level 3 charging, is a prominent fast charging method that relies on high-power charging stations to deliver DC electricity directly to the vehicle battery, bypassing the onboard charger [18,64]. Unlike slower AC charging methods, which involve electricity passing through the vehicle’s charger to convert AC power to DC, DCFC systems employ control strategies such as CC and CV modes and temperature monitoring for safe and efficient charging. These systems often incorporate intelligent power electronics and communication capabilities to optimize the charging process and grid integration. With the charging power typically ranging from 50 kW to 350 kW, DC fast charging drastically reduces charging times to as little as 30 min or less for a full charge, depending on factors like vehicle battery capacity and charging power level [65,66,67]. The global expansion of DC fast charging infrastructure, strategically placed along highways and urban areas [68,69], addresses range anxiety and promotes the feasibility of EV adoption. It is important to note that EV charging capabilities vary, with factors like vehicle model and battery technology influencing charging rates and maximum power support [70,71]. DC Fast Charging offers enhanced convenience with its faster charging times compared to standard AC charging methods, although it does require some user interaction. While generally safe, it is imperative to prioritize thermal management to mitigate potential risks. These charging systems are moderately weatherproof, ensuring a reliable performance under various conditions. Integration with existing infrastructure is widely available at dedicated charging stations but mandated DC fast charging equipment is required. The compatibility of this system spans most electric vehicle (EV) models, though it is not guaranteed to work for all makes and models. However, the faster charging speeds associated with DC Fast Charging may lead to slightly accelerated battery degradation compared to slower charging methods. Yet, the scalability and upgradability of these stations are notable, allowing for future upgrades to deliver even higher power outputs. Despite their higher efficiency, there is still some energy loss during the conversion process that is inherent to DC fast charging.

2.4. Tesla Superchargers

Tesla Superchargers are exclusively designed for Tesla vehicles and offer fast DC charging capabilities. These chargers are unique to Tesla and cannot be used with other electric vehicle brands [25]. Superchargers possess the ability to generate power outputs reaching a maximum of 250 kW, possibly adding up to 200 miles of range in just 15 min [72]. However, the charging rate experienced in practice can fluctuate due to various factors, including the battery’s current charge level, battery temperature, and the capacity of the charging infrastructure [73]. Control strategies implemented in Tesla Superchargers include constant current and constant voltage modes, temperature monitoring, and battery management techniques. Tesla Superchargers also use advanced communication and vehicle-specific protocols to optimize the charging process and ensure compatibility with and safety for Tesla vehicles. The charging power levels of Superchargers have undergone advancements, resulting in newer versions that offer higher power outputs compared to their earlier counterparts. The charging time for Tesla vehicles utilizing Superchargers can also differ based on factors such as the specific model and battery size [74]. Superchargers can charge a Tesla vehicle to approximately 80% of its battery capacity in optimal conditions in about 20 min. However, it is essential to note that the charging rate may slow as the battery approaches total capacity to protect its health and longevity [75]. Tesla has been continuously expanding its Supercharger network, adding new charging stations and increasing the number of charging stalls at existing locations [76]. This expansion aims to provide Tesla owners with convenient access to charging infrastructure, reduce range anxiety, and promote long-distance travel with electric vehicles. Tesla Superchargers epitomize convenience, offering an exceedingly user-friendly experience seamlessly integrated into the Tesla ecosystem. Safety is paramount, and there are rigorous safety protocols in place to ensure the well-being of users. Built to withstand diverse weather conditions, these chargers boast exceptional durability. However, access to the Tesla supercharger network is not universally available, necessitating reliance on Tesla’s infrastructure. Compatibility is exclusively reserved for Tesla vehicles, thus limiting accessibility to owners of such vehicles. While the rapid charging provided by Tesla Superchargers may contribute to slightly faster battery degradation compared to slower charging methods, their extensive network, ongoing expansion, and potential for future upgrades underscore their scalability and upgradability. Despite their high efficiency, some energy loss occurs during the conversion process that is inherent to these chargers.

2.5. Bidirectional Charging Integration

Bidirectional charging, also known as vehicle-to-grid integration, is a promising concept in the electric vehicle ecosystem. It allows electric vehicles not only to draw energy from the grid for charging but also to discharge stored energy back into the grid [77], as shown in Figure 3. This bidirectional energy flow turns EVs into mobile energy storage resources, offering flexibility and support to the power grid [78]. Advanced bidirectional charging systems use communication protocols and control strategies to manage power flow, ensuring grid stability and optimizing energy usage. By participating in grid services, EVs with V2G capabilities can stabilize the grid, manage loads, and integrate renewable energy sources. This integration enhances grid stability, enables load management, and supports renewable energy integration, optimizing the use of renewable resources and improving grid efficiency [25,74,78,79]. However, successful V2G integration depends on a compatible infrastructure, communication systems, and regulatory support, which may vary by region and market dynamics [22,80].
Bidirectional charging offers convenience and demands additional setup and planning compared to standard charging methods. Although generally safe, its added complexity requires meticulous management. These chargers exhibit moderate weatherproofing, ensuring functionality in various conditions. However, integration with infrastructure relies on the availability of compatible charging stations and home setups, which are not yet widely accessible. Compatibility extends to some electric vehicles (EVs) with additional hardware, but it is not universally compatible across all models. The discharger cycles inherent to bidirectional charging may lead to slightly accelerated battery degradation over time. Nonetheless, there is potential for a broader adoption and future upgrades to enhance system capabilities, emphasizing its scalability and upgradability. Despite its advantages, bidirectional charging tends to have lower efficiency compared to other faster charging methods, primarily due to additional conversion steps being involved in the process.

2.6. Battery Swapping

Battery swapping addresses the issue of long charging times associated with traditional methods by allowing drivers to exchange depleted batteries for fully charged ones quickly. Typically taking just a few minutes, this process benefits businesses managing fleets and individuals on long trips, reducing downtime [80], as shown in Figure 4. At dedicated swapping stations, the EV’s discharged battery is replaced with a fully charged one, supported by advanced automation and communication technologies ensuring safe and efficient operations [81]. The swapped-out battery is then recharged for future use. Stations accommodate various EV models and employ automated systems for alignment and connections [82]. Advantages include reduced charging times, convenience, and potentially lower battery degradation [83]. While battery swapping offers a faster alternative, challenges like standardization and infrastructure costs must be addressed for widespread implementation, especially as charging technologies evolve. Battery swapping charging provides a faster alternative to standard AC charging, although it necessitates locating a swapping station. While generally safe, standardized procedures and automated mechanisms further ensure safety during swapping. These stations are designed for repeated swaps and offer moderate weatherproofing to withstand various conditions. However, their integration with existing infrastructure relies on the availability of a network of swapping stations with spare batteries, which is currently limited. Compatibility is contingent upon EVs being equipped with compatible battery packs, limiting universal applicability. Battery degradation may occur slightly faster due to handling and thermal stress during swaps. Despite the advantages, expanding a swapping network can be slower than upgrading charging stations, highlighting the differences in the scalability and upgradability of these techniques. Nonetheless, battery swapping boasts a high efficiency, although some energy loss occurs during handling and charging/discharging cycles.
Modular design in car manufacturing, especially with battery packs, presents a transformative opportunity for the industry. The concept of easily swappable battery packs alongside dedicated swapping stations could redefine the efficiency of networks and promote manufacturing adaptability. Recent advancements in assembly planning and Industry 4.0 technologies are making this modular approach feasible, potentially reshaping global production and factory flexibility in the automotive sector.
Table 1 provides a comprehensive overview of the specifications of these advanced fast-charging techniques for EVs, including their advantages and comparative analyses. The table covers several criteria essential to the effectiveness and viability of fast-charging systems, including convenience, safety, durability, integration with infrastructure, compatibility, battery degradation, scalability/upgradability, and efficiency. These criteria evaluate user-friendliness, safety measures, long-term reliability, compatibility with existing infrastructure, impact on battery health, ability to handle increased demand, and energy conversion efficiency.
Table 1. Electrical vehicles fast charging techniques vs. EV specs.
Table 1. Electrical vehicles fast charging techniques vs. EV specs.
EV SpecificationsRefInductive Charging Rating (1–10)Ultra-Fast Charging Rating (1–10) DC Fast Charging Rating (1–10) Tesla Superchargers Rating (1–10) Bidirectional Charging Rating (1–10) Battery Swapping Rating (1–10)
Convenience[82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90](7)(9)(8)(10)(4)(7)
Safety[91,92,93,94,95,96](5)(8)(7)(9)(7)(8)
Durability[97,98](6)(6)(6)(8)(6)(7)
Integration with Infrastructure[25,61,96,99,100,101,102,103,104,105](4)(5)(8)(7)(5)(4)
Compatibility[89,92,102,106,107,108,109,110](3)(7)(7)(3)(5)(7)
Battery Degradation[61,107,109,111,112,113,114,115,116,117](5)(6)(5)(5)(5)(5)
Scalability and Upgradability[3,24,98,118,119,120],(6)(7)(6)(9)(7)(5)
Efficiency[43,65,72,89,118,120,121,122,123](4)(8)(8)(8)(6)(8)

3. Advanced Infrastructure for DC Fast Charging for Electric Vehicles

A crucial aspect of the evolving electric vehicle landscape involves the development of advanced infrastructure for fast DC charging. This consists of implementing state-of-the-art systems and technologies that enable efficient and fast charging of electric vehicles [120].. Table 2 provides the power level charging ratings and classification standards of the different charging stations. The levels are categorized based on the supply system, maximum power rating (in kW), and maximum current rating (in A). DC fast charging, commonly referred to as Level 3 charging, offers much faster charging times [62]. It makes use of a higher-voltage power supply, often in the 400 to 800 volt range, which makes it possible for EVs to charge significantly more quickly, frequently providing up to 80% charge in as little as 20 to 30 min [62].
The trend involves integrating renewable energy sources and energy storage systems into fast-charging networks to reduce their environmental impact and bolster sustainability. Planning approaches, simulation models, and optimization techniques are scrutinized to refine charging station locations and grid integration. Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology is gaining attention for its potential to ease the strain on the power grid and enhance reliability. However, detailed assessments of its operational mode in planned stations are limited. Integrating V2G into fast charging infrastructure planning is emerging as a strategy to optimize power system analyses, although current research often sidelines this aspect in favour of prioritizing losses and voltage stability [2].
Many important elements and factors contribute to the sophisticated infrastructure needed for DC fast charging. Below are several crucial aspects of the charging standards and charging modes control.

3.1. Charging Standards

The creation and observance of charging standards are essential elements in the field of advanced infrastructure for DC fast charging [62,109]. For owners of EVs, charging standards enable compatibility, interoperability, and seamless charging experiences across multiple charging networks and hardware providers [92]. The significant standards for EV charging systems shown in Table 3, along with some crucial points about the charging specifications for cutting-edge DC fast charging infrastructure.

3.1.1. Organizations for Standardization

International bodies like the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) are frequently responsible for developing and maintaining charging standards [97]. These groups work with industry participants to establish technical requirements and charging protocol standards for EVs.

3.1.2. Charging Connector Types

Various connector types and setups have been examined to ensure a dependable and safe link between the charging station and the electric vehicle. Commonly utilized connectors for DC fast charging include CHAdeMO and CCS [62] connectors [124]. These connectors guarantee compatibility between EVs made by various manufacturers and the charging infrastructure.

3.1.3. Communication Protocols

Communication protocols that enable data transmission between the charging station and the EV are also included in charging standards. These protocols allow for essential features to be controlled, including identification, control over power distribution, and real-time monitoring of charging conditions [125]. The Open Charge Point Protocol (OCPP) and ISO 15118 are two instances of communication protocols [126].

3.1.4. Power Level and Charging Speeds

The power levels and charging speeds enabled by the infrastructure are defined by charging standards. DC fast charging power levels can vary from 50 kW to several hundred kW, facilitating rapid charging durations [127]. Guidelines have established the upper limits for power and voltage to ensure safe and efficient charging procedures.
Table 4 provides a comprehensive overview of the specifications for commercial Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs), Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs), and Extended-Range Electric Vehicles (E-REVs). Key details encompass a variety of vehicle models, classification by powertrain type, battery capacity measured in kilowatts (KW), driving range expressed in kilometres (KM), and connector types required for charging.

3.2. Charging Modes Control

Charging modes are crucial in the field of modern fast charging infrastructure for maximising charging effectiveness and catering to the various needs of EV owners [126]. “Charging modes” refers to the many power distribution and charging methods used with DC fast charging infrastructure. Here, we present some essential information about charging modes.

3.2.1. Constant Current Charging

In this mode of control, the charging station feeds the EV battery a steady current while it is being charged. During the initial phases of charging, when the battery’s state of charge (SoC) remains relatively low, this mode control method is frequently employed [127]. Constant current charging facilitates faster charge rates, ensuring prompt replenishment of the battery’s capacity.

3.2.2. Constant Voltage Charging

As the battery’s SoC reaches a predefined level, the charging station transitions to constant voltage charging. In this control mode, the charging station gradually reduces the charging current while sustaining a consistent voltage. Constant voltage charging is employed during the final stage to prevent overcharging the battery and ensure its longevity. Throughout this stage, the charging system continuously monitors the battery voltage and adjusts the current to prevent it from surpassing the designated level.

3.2.3. Constant Power Charging

The constant power charging mode adjusts the current and voltage to uphold a consistent power level throughout the charging procedure. This mode optimizes the charging speed and ensures an efficient utilization of available resources by dynamically adapting the charging conditions based on the battery’s status and temperature [128]. When the battery’s SoC is low, it enables quicker charging rates and automatically lowers the charging power when the battery gets close to capacity. Dynamic power control also enables load management and helps balance the power demand and supply within the charging infrastructure.

3.2.4. Demand–Response Charging

Demand–response charging capabilities may be included in advanced DC fast charging infrastructure. With this mode of control, the charging station can dynamically modify the charging power depending on the capacity of the grid and the electricity demand [129]. Reducing the charging power during heightened demand or when the electrical grid is strained allows for grid resources to be utilized efficiently.

3.2.5. Bidirectional Flow Charging

Bidirectional power flow is supported by cutting-edge fast charging infrastructure, allowing energy to be transmitted to and from the EV’s battery. By employing this capability, EVs receive grid-based charging and discharge energy back into the grid or supply power to other consuming devices [130]. Vehicle-to-grid applications, where EVs can help to stabilise the grid and offer grid services, may be supported via bidirectional charging [131]. Different charging modes are implemented in sophisticated DC fast charging infrastructures, giving EV owners and grid operators flexibility and optimisation options based on battery state, grid limitations, and user choices; it also enables efficient charging [92]. EVs may be charged quickly while preserving battery health, grid stability, and economical power usage by utilising the correct charging mode. Furthermore, intelligent charging algorithms and communication protocols that enable real-time monitoring, control, and coordination of the charging process are frequently used in conjunction with charging modes [132]. These characteristics facilitate grid integration, optimise power distribution, and guarantee secure and dependable charging operations. Implementing charging modes within advanced DC fast charging infrastructure enhances the user experience for electric vehicle owners during charging sessions. Additionally, it promotes optimal energy utilization and contributes to the broader adoption of EVs as a sustainable transportation option [133].

3.2.6. Temperature Monitoring and Control

DC fast charging produces heat because of the substantial charging currents it employs. Temperature monitoring and control techniques have been implemented to safeguard the battery against overheating. Temperature sensors are positioned inside the battery pack to monitor its temperature throughout the charging process [134]. The charging system utilizes these data to modify charging parameters like current or voltage, ensuring the battery remains within safe temperature thresholds. This practice is crucial for preserving optimal battery performance and extending its longevity [135]. The good news is that advancements in lithium-ion batteries continue to be made, opening doors for next-generation options like solid-state batteries. Material research is key to overcoming challenges and making electric vehicles more sustainable. By focusing on improving the heat resistance of materials, using venting mechanisms, and employing eco-friendly bio-based flame retardants, researchers are working to prevent thermal runaway, a critical safety concern.

3.2.7. State of Charge (SoC) Estimation

Accurate estimation of the battery’s SoC is crucial for efficient charging. Control strategies utilize algorithms and models to estimate the SoC based on various parameters such as voltage, current, and temperature measurements [136,137,138]. These methods consider the battery’s discharge and charge characteristics to provide a reliable estimate of its state of charge [136]. SoC estimation helps regulate the charging process, ensuring the battery is neither undercharged nor overcharged [139].

4. Electric Vehicle Battery Chargers Categories

Electric vehicle battery chargers can be classified according to their charging capabilities, physical configurations, and intended applications as on-board or off-board chargers. On-board chargers are incorporated within the vehicle, and their capacity determines their charging rate. They are commonly found in electric vehicles and are compatible with various charging infrastructures. On the other hand, off-board chargers are external units, and their specifications determine the charging rate. They are used in public charging stations and private charging points where on-board charging is not possible or convenient. On-board charging, while convenient for many EV owners, may not always suffice in certain situations, leading to the need for off-board chargers. Challenges such as long-distance travel, lack of personal charging facilities, and the demand for faster charging options highlight the limitations of on-board charging. Off-board chargers, including fast-charging stations along highways, public locations, and commercial premises, address these challenges by offering quick and accessible charging solutions for EV users.

4.1. On-Board Charging

On-board charging (OBC) in electric vehicles involves converting external AC power into DC power to charge the vehicle’s battery pack. It is a critical process requiring various components like rectifiers and transformers to ensure safe and efficient charging [62]. The OBC, typically integrated into the vehicle’s powertrain or near the battery pack, can be built within the vehicle or be part of the charging cable [140], as shown in Figure 5. Common methods include Level 1, standard outlets, and Level 2, with dedicated charging stations offering higher voltage. On-board charging provides convenience, as EVs can be charged at home, work, or other accessible locations. Level 1 charging (120 volts) is cost-effective, while Level 2 (240 volts) provides flexibility without requiring specialized infrastructure [3]. Owners can charge their vehicles wherever suitable outlets or stations are available [141]. For on-board chargers, popular models and manufacturers commonly found in electric vehicles include the Tesla Supercharger, which offers fast-charging capabilities for Tesla owners, the Nissan CHAdeMO which is compatible with the Nissan Leaf for fast charging at CHAdeMO-equipped public charging stations, the BMW i3 equipped with an on-board charger supporting both AC and DC charging for flexibility at various public charging stations, and the Chevrolet Bolt EV with an on-board charger capable of accepting both AC and DC charging for fast-charging at compatible public charging stations. Table 5 details the advantages and disadvantages of on-board and off-board chargers.

4.2. OFF-Board Charging

Off-board charging involves replenishing EV batteries outside the vehicle itself, typically at external charging stations or infrastructure [143], as shown in Figure 5. Researchers are exploring off-board and DC-based charging methods for EVs due to their potential impact on power quality and efficiency [137]. Common off-board charging methods include public charging stations, DC fast charging (Level 3), and wireless charging (inductive charging) [117]. These methods have fewer conversion stages, making charging more efficient, especially with a DC power supply, which eliminates the need for AC-DC conversion and power factor correction stages. While DC chargers are not widely adopted in EVs yet, they offer the potential for the integration of solar PV power. Some studies propose dual-input EV chargers that can utilize both AC grid power and standalone PV systems, operating in grid-connected mode during low solar irradiation and in V2G mode during idle hours [138]. Off-board chargers can be divided into isolated and non-isolated converters, with isolated converters being preferred at higher voltage levels and non-isolated topologies being feasible for low power levels [65,144,145]. Off-board chargers include examples such as the Tesla supercharger network, strategically located along highways and major routes to offer high-speed charging for Tesla vehicles during long-distance travel, charging points providing both Level 2 AC chargers and DC fast chargers, which are commonly found in public parking lots and commercial premises for convenient charging options, various industries currently provide fast-charging stations supporting multiple charging standards like CCS and CHAdeMO, which are primarily located along major highways and urban areas, and home charging stations, installed by many EV owners at their homes for convenient overnight charging or charging during low electricity demand periods, typically including Level 2 AC chargers and being installed in residential garages or driveways.

5. Status of DC Fast Charging Stations and DC-DC Converters Classification

Efficiently and quickly charging electric vehicles demands high-power DC-DC converters to adjust the charging infrastructure’s high-voltage DC power to the battery’s required voltage. Various converter topologies are used, with recent studies proposing designs with fewer active and passive components [146]. To minimize switching losses, soft-switching power electronic switches are being introduced [147,148]. These converters, used in both on-board and off-board chargers, include buck, boost, buck–boost, SEPIC, Cuk, Zeta, and Super-lift Luo converters [24,25,26].
Higher power chargers typically employ isolated DC-DC converters with options like fly-back, forward, push–pull, half-bridge, full-bridge, and multilevel converters [144,149]. The bidirectional operation of the transformer is achievable in multiple switch topologies through the alternate operation of the switches [65]. However, this approach has limitations, including transformer core saturation and the strain on primary-side switches caused by operating in discontinuous mode [145]. Newer topologies, like bridgeless and interleaved configurations, aim to enhance efficiency, reduce voltage/current ripples, and streamline the number of components. Soft-switching techniques with resonant converter topologies may further boost charging efficiency [150]. For high-gain applications, multilevel converters are another multi-switch alternative. Additionally, their use guarantees less electromagnetic interference (EMI) because there are fewer voltage jumps [146]. Prioritizing EV charger design effectiveness and charging time is crucial, considering most EVs require 3–4 h to charge fully, a critical factor for their potential use in public transportation [147]. Figure 6 outlines a general classification of DC-DC converter topologies for EV powertrains.
Figure 7 illustrates the key components of a typical DC fast charger power system, featuring two conversion stages for converting three-phase AC power to DC, along with a DC-DC stage incorporating galvanic isolation [121]. The AC-DC rectification stage includes a Power Factor Correction circuit to meet grid codes’ power quality requirements. The DC-DC stage facilitates parallel connectivity at the charger’s output stage, ensuring isolation between the EV and the grid [121]. Two main approaches for achieving galvanic isolation are presented: One method involves utilizing a low-frequency transformer (LFT) positioned between the grid and the AC-DC stage, as depicted in Figure 7a. These techniques have been extensively discussed in various sources [66,149,150]. Alternatively, a high-frequency transformer (HFT) can be incorporated within the DC-DC stage, as shown in Figure 7b. These methods have also been explored in multiple references. Figure 7 visually represents the two isolation options, focusing on a single module charger for simplicity. However, as the power requirements of DC fast chargers increase, the system’s output power can be enhanced by connecting multiple identical modules in parallel. This approach enables the system to meet the growing demand effectively. For those seeking more detailed information and comprehensive insights into LF and HF transformer configurations, we advise you to refer to the aforementioned references [66,144,148,149,150,151]. The article proposes integrating a filter at the input stage to address the harmonic distortion originating from the rectifier. This filter aims to mitigate the inherent harmonic distortion in the current drawn by the rectifier. LC or LCL filters are typically favoured over L filters due to their superior performance characteristics. Additional information on the advantages and specifications of LC or LCL filters can be found in references [152,153,154,155].

6. Control Strategies for EV Systems

This section focuses on the control technology employed in DC-DC converters for EV fast charging. It covers control objectives, methods, and challenges associated with different converters. Various control techniques such as voltage mode, current mode, peak current, and average current control are examined, applicable to isolated and non-isolated converter systems. Table 6 offers a comparison of control strategies for these converter types.
Control objectives in DC-DC converter control technology refer to the desired performance criteria that need to be achieved. These objectives typically include regulating the output voltage or current, achieving a fast response to load changes, maintaining stability, minimising ripple and noise, and maximising efficiency. Ongoing research and development efforts continue to refine these control technologies and explore new approaches to optimize charging performance, integrate them with smart grids, and enhance user experience. As the EV market expands, advancements in control technologies will play a vital role in shaping the future of fast and reliable charging infrastructure. Control methods in DC-DC converter control technology encompass the techniques and algorithms to achieve the desired control objectives. Some commonly employed methods include voltage mode control, current mode control, peak current control, and average current control. Each method has advantages and trade-offs regarding response speed, stability, and complexity. However, despite the availability of various control methods, DC-DC converters can encounter common problems that need to be addressed. These issues include output voltage or current overshoot or undershoot, instability leading to oscillations or ringing, poor transient response, excessive ripple or noise, and cross-regulation problems in multiple-output converters. Effective control strategies should consider these challenges and aim to mitigate them.
In voltage mode control for non-isolated and isolated DC/DC converters, charging techniques include pulse width modulation, peak and average current mode control, feedforward control, proportional–integral–derivative control, and predictive control. Techniques for non-isolated DC/DC converters under current mode control involve current sensing, cycle-by-cycle current limiting, and slope compensation. The peak current control technique in non-isolated converters employs peak current sensing and limiting, while average current control utilizes the average current sensing and limiting control techniques. Isolated DC/DC converters under voltage mode control use the same methods as non-isolated converters. In contrast, the current mode control technique utilizes current sensing, cycle-by-cycle current limiting, and slope compensation. Peak current control in isolated converters employs peak current sensing and limiting, while average current control uses average current sensing and limiting. These strategies and techniques are tailored to ensure effective voltage and current regulation in various DC/DC converter configurations.
When choosing a control method, considering the impact of charging methods on battery durability, it is crucial to prioritize factors like battery health, longevity, and service life. To achieve this, it is necessary to assess how each method affects battery degradation and lifespan [156]. This evaluation should consider aspects such as charging rate (high currents degrade batteries faster), temperature management (cooler temperatures promote battery health), and general stress on the battery cells during charging [157]. Prioritizing these factors in the charging process can extend the lifespan of electric vehicle batteries and maximize their long-term performance. For optimal charging profiles, always consult the battery manufacturer’s specifications. Remember that cooler temperatures and multi-stage charging can enhance battery life. Ultimately, the best control method for battery life requires balancing efficiency, speed, and the battery’s characteristics.
Table 6. Control strategies for EV systems techniques for isolated and non-isolated DC-DC converters [10,158,159,160,161].
Table 6. Control strategies for EV systems techniques for isolated and non-isolated DC-DC converters [10,158,159,160,161].
Control Methods (Non-Isolated)Benefits
Voltage Mode ControlImproves charging efficiency, fast response, regulation protects the battery.
Current Mode ControlEnhancing charging efficiency, ensuring the charging current remains within a predetermined threshold, reducing charging times, minimizes energy losses, and improves efficiency.
Peak Current ControlIt prevents overloading the converter and charging infrastructure, regulates and limits the peak current to optimize the charging process, prevents the current from exceeding the peak limit, ensures efficient energy transfer, and provides overcurrent protection.
Average Current ControlOptimizes energy transfer and improves charging, ensures optimal charging performance and power quality, and reliable, safe, fast charging operations.
Control Methods (Isolated)
Voltage Mode ControlMaintaining a stable output voltage provides efficient energy transfer, stability from the grid to the EV battery, and compatibility with charging infrastructure.
Current Mode ControlProvide efficient energy transfer, stability from the grid to the EV battery, fast dynamic response to load variations, and excellent adaptability to load variation conditions.
Peak Current ControlRegulates and maintains a stable average output current, demand for rapid and reliable EV charging increases, compatibility with grid constraints, maintaining safety, optimizing energy transfer, and increasing charging efficiency demand for EV fast charging.
Average Current ControlRegulates and maintains a stable average output current; it ensures compatibility with charging infrastructure and provides flexibility in adapting to changing load conditions, allowing the system to accommodate different charging scenarios, optimizing energy transfer, reducing charging times, and creating reliable and high-performance charging infrastructure.

7. Challenges and Future Trends in EV Fast Charging

EV fast charging systems are continuously evolving to meet the demands of the growing electric mobility landscape. Challenges and future trends in EV fast charging revolve around addressing infrastructure limitations, including expanding the charging network and managing grid capacity intelligently through technologies like load balancing and demand response. Universal standards and interoperability among charging systems are crucial for widespread EV adoption, requiring global collaboration to establish compatibility across networks and countries. Despite advancements, battery technology poses challenges, necessitating improvements in chemical compositions and thermal management for faster charging without sacrificing battery longevity. Future research areas recommend prioritizing faster charging, improving infrastructure components, standardizing charging processes, and optimizing energy utilization through smart grid solutions and bidirectional chargers. Exploration of battery advancements, wireless charging, battery swapping, and enhancing user experience is encouraged. Enriching the current trends involves detailing advancements in ultra-fast charging for quicker charging times, exploring battery technology advancements, emphasizing standardization efforts for compatibility across different EVs and charging stations, and highlighting the integration of renewable energy sources with charging stations for a more sustainable ecosystem.
This research paper on EV fast charging technology highlights key areas for recommended future research, emphasising the need to prioritise faster charging, improve infrastructure components, standardize charging processes, and optimise energy utilization through smart grid solutions and bidirectional chargers. It encourages exploration of battery advancements, wireless charging, battery swapping, and enhancing user experience. Future research should comprehensively analyse the impact of EV fast charging on the power grid, delve into DC fast charging, ultra-fast charging, and V2G systems, advance infrastructure, and control techniques, integrate renewable energy sources, address standardisation challenges, implement intelligent charging algorithms, and strategies for efficiency enhancement. Achieving faster charging times and exploring various charging techniques, control strategies, and using EV batteries for grid services are crucial areas for ongoing exploration.

8. Research Contribution

This research paper makes insightful contributions to the field of EV fast charging, standing out for its comprehensive analysis of crucial aspects. It offers a multifaceted contribution that propels us towards a more electrifying future. The paper’s impact on the field can be summarised in three key ways:
  • Comprehensive Landscape Analysis: It paints a complete picture, delving into diverse charging categories, methods, infrastructure specifics, and crucial elements like charging modes control, standards, converters, and control strategies. This holistic view informs future research and development efforts.
  • Detailed Comparative Evaluation: By meticulously analysing various charging techniques, including their advantages and limitations, the paper empowers informed decision-making for future infrastructure advancements and technology choices.
  • Challenges and Future Outlook: The article does not shy away from addressing current limitations and boldly proposes future research directions. This forward-thinking approach paves the way for overcoming obstacles and achieving faster, more efficient, and sustainable EV charging solutions.

9. Conclusions

This paper has thoroughly examined the latest advancements in fast charging infrastructure, elucidating widely adopted strategies alongside their advantages and disadvantages. It has delved into power electronic topologies and advanced control techniques to reduce charging durations and enhance efficiency within fast charging systems. Additionally, exploring the potential impact of fast charging on the electric vehicle (EV) industry has underscored its significance for EV adoption. This research highlights the critical need to understand current technologies and anticipate future trends to effectively navigate the evolving landscape of fast charging and its implications for the broader EV ecosystem. It aims to bring clarity to the pursuit of faster charging times, emphasising high-power fast charging as a significant focal point of EV charging technology. The review explores methods to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of fast charging systems, providing insights into current developments in EV fast charging techniques and power electronic converters utilized in fast-charging systems. Control strategies for electric vehicles are analysed, alongside the impacts of high-power fast charging on battery systems and future developmental trends. Various fast charging methods for electric vehicles are extensively examined, including inductive charging, UFC, DCFC, Tesla superchargers, V2G integration, and battery swapping, with a summary of the associated advantages and drawbacks for each technique provided. Moreover, the essential components and considerations involved in the intricate infrastructure for DC fast charging are outlined. An analysis of high-power rear DC-DC converters, both isolated and non-isolated, utilized in on-board and off-board chargers has been conducted. These two-stage or single-stage converters efficiently convert high-voltage DC power for the fast-charging infrastructure of electric vehicle batteries. Control strategies employed for these converters are also investigated, with the primary objective being to maintain consistent performance across the entire load spectrum, minimize current fluctuations, and enhance system efficiency. The efficiency, affordability, safety, reliability, and control mechanisms of converter configurations have significantly influenced the advancement of fast charging technology for electric vehicles. Fast charging systems integrated with V2G capabilities can lower charging expenses and enable EVs to engage in grid services, extending their interaction with the electrical grid beyond conventional charging. When connected to the grid, EV batteries can serve various purposes, including grid stabilization, load management, and integrating renewable energy sources.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Szumska, E.M. Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure along Highways in the EU. Energies 2023, 16, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohammed, A.; Saif, O.; Abo-Adma, M.; Fahmy, A.; Elazab, R. Strategies and sustainability in fast charging station deployment for electric vehicles. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mastoi, M.S.; Zhuang, S.; Munir, H.M.; Haris, M.; Hassan, M.; Usman, M.; Bukhari, S.S.H.; Ro, J.S. An in-depth analysis of electric vehicle charging station infrastructure, policy implications, and future trends. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 11504–11529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Etukudoh, E.A.; Hamdan, A.; Ilojianya, V.I.; Daudu, C.D.; Fabuyide, A. Adefunke Fabuyide Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure: A Comparative Review in Canada, Usa, and Africa. Eng. Sci. Technol. J. 2024, 5, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ntombela, M.; Musasa, K.; Moloi, K. A Comprehensive Review of the Incorporation of Electric Vehicles and Renewable Energy Distributed Generation Regarding Smart Grids. World Electr. Veh. J. 2023, 14, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ali, A.; Mousa, H.H.H.; Shaaban, M.F.; Member, S.; Azzouz, M.A.; Member, S.; Awad, A.S.A.; Member, S. A Comprehensive Review on Charging Topologies and Power Electronic Converter Solutions for Electric Vehicles. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2023, 12, 675–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Arya, H.; Das, M. Fast Charging Station for Electric Vehicles Based on DC Microgrid. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Ind. Electron. 2023, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yahaya, A.A.; Member, S.; Edpuganti, A. A Novel Simultaneous AC and DC Charging Scheme for Electric Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2024, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, M.; Panda, K.P.; Naayagi, R.T.; Thakur, R.; Panda, G. Comprehensive Review of Electric Vehicle Technology and Its Impacts: Detailed Investigation of Charging Infrastructure, Power Management, and Control Techniques. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 8919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Khalid, M.; Ahmad, F.; Panigrahi, B.K.; Al-Fagih, L. A comprehensive review on advanced charging topologies and methodologies for electric vehicle battery. J. Energy Storage 2022, 53, 105084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dimitriadou, K.; Rigogiannis, N.; Fountoukidis, S.; Kotarela, F.; Kyritsis, A.; Papanikolaou, N. Current Trends in Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Opportunities and Challenges in Wireless Charging Integration. Energies 2023, 16, 2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mehndiratta, T.; Kumar, R. Wireless Charging for Electric Vehicles: A Survey and Comprehensive Guide. World Electr. Veh. J. 2024, 1065, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Barman, P.; Dutta, L. Charging infrastructure planning for transportation electrification in India: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 192, 114265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, X.; Lin, Y.; Lim, M.K.; Zhou, F.; Liu, F. Electric vehicle charging station diffusion: An agent-based evolutionary game model in complex networks. Energy 2022, 257, 124700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Costantino, G.; De Vincenzi, M.; Martinelli, F.; Matteucci, I. Electric Vehicle Security and Privacy: A Comparative Analysis of Charging Methods. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 97th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2023-Spring), Florence, Italy, 20–23 June 2023; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sandhya, P.; Nisha, G.K. Review of Battery Charging Methods for Electric Vehicle. In In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Informatics, Communication and Energy Systems (SPICES), Thiruvananthapuram, India, 10–12 March 2022; pp. 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Savari, G.F.; Sathik, M.J.; Raman, L.A.; El-Shahat, A.; Hasanien, H.M.; Almakhles, D.; Abdel Aleem, S.H.E.; Omar, A.I. Assessment of charging technologies, infrastructure and charging station recommendation schemes of electric vehicles: A review. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2023, 14, 101938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, H.; Niu, S.; Shang, Y.; Shao, Z.; Jia, Y.; Jian, L. Electric vehicles integration and vehicle-to-grid operation in active distribution grids: A comprehensive review on power architectures, grid connection standards and typical applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 168, 112812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Berrehil El Kattel, M.; Mayer, R.; Ely, F.; de Jesus Cardoso Filho, B. Comprehensive review of battery charger structures of EVs and HEVs for levels 1–3. Int. J. Circuit Theory Appl. 2023, 51, 3514–3542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adegbohun, F.; von Jouanne, A.; Agamloh, E.; Yokochi, A. A Review of Bidirectional Charging Grid Support Applications and Battery Degradation Considerations. Energies 2024, 17, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mastoi, M.S.; Zhuang, S.; Munir, H.M.; Haris, M.; Hassan, M.; Alqarni, M.; Alamri, B. A study of charging-dispatch strategies and vehicle-to-grid technologies for electric vehicles in distribution networks. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 1777–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Benedetto, G.; Bompard, E.; Mazza, A.; Pons, E.; Jaboeuf, R.; Tosco, P.; Zampolli, M. Impact of bidirectional EV charging stations on a distribution network: A Power Hardware-In-the-Loop implementation. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2023, 35, 101106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. İnci, M.; Savrun, M.M.; Çelik, Ö. Integrating electric vehicles as virtual power plants: A comprehensive review on vehicle-to-grid (V2G) concepts, interface topologies, marketing and future prospects. J. Energy Storage 2022, 55, 105579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mateen, S.; Amir, M.; Haque, A.; Bakhsh, F.I. Ultra-fast charging of electric vehicles: A review of power electronics converter, grid stability and optimal battery consideration in multi-energy systems. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2023, 35, 101112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rafi, M.A.H.; Bauman, J. A Comprehensive Review of DC Fast-Charging Stations with Energy Storage: Architectures, Power Converters, and Analysis. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2021, 7, 345–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sharma, G.; Sood, V.K.; Alam, M.S.; Shariff, S.M. Comparison of common DC and AC bus architectures for EV fast charging stations and impact on power quality. eTransportation 2020, 5, 100066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Elmouatamid, A.; Ouladsine, R.; Bakhouya, M.; El Kamoun, N.; Khaidar, M.; Zine-Dine, K. Review of control and energy management approaches in micro-grid systems. Energies 2021, 14, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eriksson, E.L.V.; Gray, E.M.A. Optimization and integration of hybrid renewable energy hydrogen fuel cell energy systems—A critical review. Appl. Energy 2017, 202, 348–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dragičević, T.; Lu, X.; Vasquez, J.C.; Guerrero, J.M. DC Microgrids—Part II: A Review of Power Architectures, Applications, and Standardization Issues. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2016, 31, 3528–3549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Waheed, A.; Rehman, S.U.; Alsaif, F.; Rauf, S.; Hossain, I.; Pushkarna, M.; Gebru, F.M. Hybrid multimodule DC–DC converters accelerated by wide bandgap devices for electric vehicle systems. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 4746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singh, B.; Gupta, J. A Bidirectional Charging System for Electric Two-Wheelers and Three Wheelers. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Global Conference on Computing, Power and Communication Technologies (GlobConPT), New Delhi, India, 23–25 September 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gupta, J.; Singh, B. A Bidirectional On-Board Charging System for LEVs. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Smart Technologies for Power, Energy and Control (STPEC), Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India, 19–22 December 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Suresh, P.; Kalirajan, K.K.; Soundarapandian, K.A.; Nadar, E.R.S. Performance evaluation of improved Y source power factor correction converter with enhanced power quality in EV rapid charger application. Electr. Eng. 2024, 2, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Afshar, S.; Macedo, P.; Mohamed, F.; Disfani, V. Mobile charging stations for electric vehicles—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 152, 111654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shariff, S.M.; Alam, M.S.; Hameed, S.; Khalid, M.R.; Ahmad, A.; Al-Ammar, E.A.; Alsaidan, I.; Alrajhi, H. A state-of-the-art review on the impact of fast EV charging on the utility sector. Energy Storage 2022, 4, e300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gonzalez Venegas, F.; Petit, M.; Perez, Y. Active integration of electric vehicles into distribution grids: Barriers and frameworks for flexibility services. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 145, 111060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tavakoli, A.; Saha, S.; Arif, M.T.; Haque, M.E.; Mendis, N.; Oo, A.M.T. Impacts of grid integration of solar PV and electric vehicle on grid stability, power quality and energy economics: A review. IET Energy Syst. Integr. 2020, 2, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Arena, G.; Emiliani, P.; Chub, A.; Vinnikov, D.; Carne, G. De DC Fast Charging of Electric Vehicles: A Review on Architecture and Power Conversion Technology. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG), Tallinn, Estonia, 14–16 June 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Feng, J.; Khan, A.M. Accelerating Urban Road Transportation Electrification: Planning, Technology, Economic and Implementation Factors in Converting Gas Stations into Fast Charging Stations; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; Volume 4, pp. 1–32. ISBN 0123456789. [Google Scholar]
  40. Gamage, T.; Tal, G.; Jenn, A.T. The costs and challenges of installing corridor DC Fast Chargers in California. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 2022, 11, 100969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Igbinovia, F.O.; Fandi, G.; Mahmoud, R.; Tlustý, J. A Review of Electric Vehicles Emissions and its Smart Charging Techniques Influence on Power Distribution Grid. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2016, 9, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ullah, I.; Liu, K.; Layeb, S.B.; Severino, A.; Jamal, A. Optimal Deployment of Electric Vehicles’ Fast-Charging Stations. J. Adv. Transp. 2023, 2023, 6103796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mohamed, A.A.S.; Shaier, A.A.; Metwally, H.; Selem, S.I. A comprehensive overview of inductive pad in electric vehicles stationary charging. Appl. Energy 2019, 262, 114584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rayan, B.A.; Subramaniam, U.; Balamurugan, S. Wireless Power Transfer in Electric Vehicles: A Review on Compensation Topologies, Coil Structures, and Safety Aspects. Energies 2023, 16, 3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tesla, N.; Nikola Tesla U.S. Patent Apparatus for Transmitting Electrical Energy|Tesla Universe 1914. Available online: https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-1119732-apparatus-transmitting-electrical-energy (accessed on 5 April 2024).
  46. Macharia, V.M.; Garg, V.K.; Kumar, D. A review of electric vehicle technology: Architectures, battery technology and its management system, relevant standards, application of artificial intelligence, cyber security, and interoperability challenges. IET Electr. Syst. Transp. 2023, 13, e12083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Williamson, S.S.; Madawala, U.; Kumar, D. Guest Editorial Advances in Wireless Power Transfer Technologies. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Ind. Electron. 2022, 3, 391–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Esmaeili Jamakani, B.; Mosallanejad, A.; Afjei, E.; Lahooti Eshkevari, A. Investigation of triple quadrature pad for wireless power transfer system of electric vehicles. IET Electr. Syst. Transp. 2021, 11, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Huang, Z.; Wang, H.; Liu, C.; Mao, X. Achieving misalignment tolerance with hybrid topologies in electric vehicle wireless charging systems. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wen, H.; Wang, P.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, K.; Yang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Tong, X. Improving the Misalignment Tolerance of Wireless Power Transfer System for AUV with Solenoid-Dual Combined Planar Magnetic Coupler. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Amjad, M.; Farooq-i-Azam, M.; Ni, Q.; Dong, M.; Ansari, E.A. Wireless charging systems for electric vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 167, 112730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ahmad, A.; Alam, M.S.; Rafat, Y.; Shariff, S. Designing and demonstration of misalignment reduction for wireless charging of autonomous electric vehicle. eTransportation 2020, 4, 100052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Palani, G.; Sengamalai, U.; Vishnuram, P.; Nastasi, B. Challenges and Barriers of Wireless Charging Technologies for Electric Vehicles. Energies 2023, 16, 2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Panchal, C.; Stegen, S.; Lu, J. Review of static and dynamic wireless electric vehicle charging system. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2018, 21, 922–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bosshard, R.; Kolar, J.W. Inductive Power Transfer for Electric Vehicle Charging: Technical challenges and tradeoffs. IEEE Power Electron. Mag. 2016, 3, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhou, K.; Wu, Y.; Wu, X.; Sun, Y.; Teng, D.; Liu, Y. Research and Development Review of Power Converter Topologies and Control Technology for Electric Vehicle Fast-Charging Systems. Electronics 2023, 12, 1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Meyer, D.; Wang, J. Integrating ultra-fast charging stations within the power grids of smart cities: A review. IET Smart Grid 2018, 1, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Leone, C.; Longo, M.; Fernández-Ramírez, L.M. Optimal size of a smart ultra-fast charging station. Electronics 2021, 10, 2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Franzese, P.; Patel, D.D.; Mohamed, A.A.S.; Iannuzzi, D.; Fahimi, B.; Risso, M.; Miller, J.M. Fast DC Charging Infrastructures for Electric Vehicles: Overview of Technologies, Standards, and Challenges. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2023, 9, 3780–3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rajendran, G.; Vaithilingam, C.A.; Misron, N.; Naidu, K.; Ahmed, M.R. A comprehensive review on system architecture and international standards for electric vehicle charging stations. J. Energy Storage 2021, 42, 103099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ashique, R.H.; Salam, Z.; Bin Abdul Aziz, M.J.; Bhatti, A.R. Integrated photovoltaic-grid dc fast charging system for electric vehicle: A review of the architecture and control. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 1243–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shakeel, F.M.; Malik, O.P. Vehicle-To-Grid Technology in a Micro-grid Using DC Fast Charging Architecture. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Canadian Conference of Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), Edmonton, AB, Canada, 5–8 May 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Saadaoui, A.; Ouassaid, M.; Maaroufi, M. Overview of Integration of Power Electronic Topologies and Advanced Control Techniques of Ultra-Fast EV Charging Stations in Standalone Microgrids. Energies 2023, 16, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lim, K.L.; Speidel, S.; Bräunl, T. A comparative study of AC and DC public electric vehicle charging station usage in Western Australia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Transit. 2022, 2, 100021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Safayatullah, M.; Elrais, M.T.; Ghosh, S.; Rezaii, R.; Batarseh, I. A Comprehensive Review of Power Converter Topologies and Control Methods for Electric Vehicle Fast Charging Applications. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 40753–40793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ahmad, A.; Qin, Z.; Wijekoon, T.; Bauer, P. An Overview on Medium Voltage Grid Integration of Ultra-Fast Charging Stations: Current Status and Future Trends. IEEE Open J. Ind. Electron. Soc. 2022, 3, 420–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sachan, S.; Deb, S.; Singh, P.P.; Alam, M.S.; Shariff, S.M. A comprehensive review of standards and best practices for utility grid integration with electric vehicle charging stations. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 2022, 11, e424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Meintz, A.; Zhang, J.; Vijayagopal, R.; Kreutzer, C.; Ahmed, S.; Bloom, I.; Burnham, A.; Carlson, R.B.; Dias, F.; Dufek, E.J.; et al. Enabling fast charging—Vehicle considerations. J. Power Sources 2017, 367, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Burnham, A.; Dufek, E.J.; Stephens, T.; Francfort, J.; Michelbacher, C.; Carlson, R.B.; Zhang, J.; Vijayagopal, R.; Dias, F.; Mohanpurkar, M.; et al. Enabling fast charging—Infrastructure and economic considerations. J. Power Sources 2017, 367, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mahdy, A.; Hasanien, H.M.; Turky, R.A.; Abdel Aleem, S.H.E. Modeling and optimal operation of hybrid wave energy and PV system feeding supercharging stations based on golden jackal optimal control strategy. Energy 2023, 263, 125932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sanguesa, J.A.; Torres-Sanz, V.; Garrido, P.; Martinez, F.J.; Marquez-Barja, J.M. A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 372–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hemavathi, S.; Shinisha, A. A study on trends and developments in electric vehicle charging technologies. J. Energy Storage 2022, 52, 105013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kim, S.; Tanim, T.R.; Dufek, E.J.; Scoffield, D.; Pennington, T.D.; Gering, K.L.; Colclasure, A.M.; Mai, W.; Meintz, A.; Bennett, J. Projecting Recent Advancements in Battery Technology to Next-Generation Electric Vehicles. Energy Technol. 2022, 10, 2200303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yong, J.Y.; Tan, W.S.; Khorasany, M.; Razzaghi, R. Electric vehicles destination charging: An overview of charging tariffs, business models and coordination strategies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 184, 113534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. O’Neill, D.; Yildiz, B.; Bilbao, J.I. An assessment of electric vehicles and vehicle to grid operations for residential microgrids. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 4104–4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Seo-yeon, P.; Sung-hoon, C. Integrating Vehicle-to-Grid Technologies in Autonomous Electric Vehicle Systems. Appl. Res. Artif. Intell. Cloud Comput. 2022, 5, 105–120. [Google Scholar]
  77. Taghizad-Tavana, K.; Alizadeh, A.; Ghanbari-Ghalehjoughi, M.; Nojavan, S. A Comprehensive Review of Electric Vehicles in Energy Systems: Integration with Renewable Energy Sources, Charging Levels, Different Types, and Standards. Energies 2023, 16, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Huang, Z.; Guo, Z.; Ma, P.; Wang, M.; Long, Y.; Zhang, M. Economic-environmental scheduling of microgrid considering V2G-enabled electric vehicles integration. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2022, 32, 100872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tarar, M.O.; Hassan, N.U.; Naqvi, I.H.; Pecht, M. Techno-Economic Framework for Electric Vehicle Battery Swapping Stations. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2023, 9, 4458–4473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sayarshad, H.R.; Mahmoodian, V.; Gao, H.O. Non-myopic dynamic routing of electric taxis with battery swapping stations. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 57, 102113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Schmidt, S. Use of battery swapping for improving environmental balance and price-performance ratio of electric vehicles. eTransportation 2021, 9, 100128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Patil, P. Innovations in Electric Vehicle Technology: A Review of Emerging Trends and Their Potential Impacts on Transportation and Society. Rev. Contemp. Bus. Anal. 2021, 2, 20–32. [Google Scholar]
  83. Sun, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, C. Technology development of electric vehicles: A review. Energies 2023, 13, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Alanazi, F. Electric Vehicles: Benefits, Challenges, and Potential Solutions for Widespread Adaptation. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 6016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Visaria, A.A.; Jensen, A.F.; Thorhauge, M.; Mabit, S.E. User preferences for EV charging, pricing schemes, and charging infrastructure. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2022, 165, 120–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cedillo, M.H.; Sun, H.; Jiang, J.; Cao, Y. Dynamic pricing and control for EV charging stations with solar generation. Appl. Energy 2022, 326, 119920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Solanke, T.U.; Ramachandaramurthy, V.K.; Yong, J.Y.; Pasupuleti, J.; Kasinathan, P.; Rajagopalan, A. A review of strategic charging–discharging control of grid-connected electric vehicles. J. Energy Storage 2020, 28, 101193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ahmad, F.; Alam, M.S.; Alsaidan, I.S.; Shariff, S.M. Battery swapping station for electric vehicles: Opportunities and challenges. IET Smart Grid 2020, 3, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liang, Y.; Cai, H.; Zou, G. Configuration and system operation for battery swapping stations in Beijing. Energy 2020, 214, 118883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Naor, M.; Coman, A.; Wiznizer, A. Vertically integrated supply chain of batteries, electric vehicles, and charging infrastructure: A review of three milestone projects from theory of constraints perspective. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Levy, J.; Riu, I.; Zoi, C. The Costs of EV Fast Charging Infrastructure and Economic Benefits to Rapid Scale-Up; EVgo Fast Charging Storyblok; EVgo: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  92. Das, H.S.; Rahman, M.M.; Li, S.; Tan, C.W. Electric vehicles standards, charging infrastructure, and impact on grid integration: A technological review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 120, 109618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Arfeen, Z.A.; Khairuddin, A.B.; Azam, M.K.; Humayun, U.; Khidrani, A. V2G Facts and Facets With Modeling of Electric Vehicle Fast-Charging Station-Status and Technological Review. Pak. J. Sci. Res. 2021, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gjelaj, M.; Hashemi, S.; Traeholt, C.; Andersen, P.B. Grid integration of DC fast-charging stations for EVs by using modular li-ion batteries. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2018, 12, 4368–4376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Rubino, L.; Capasso, C.; Veneri, O. Review on plug-in electric vehicle charging architectures integrated with distributed energy sources for sustainable mobility. Appl. Energy 2017, 207, 438–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Deb, N.; Singh, R.; Brooks, R.R.; Bai, K. A review of extremely fast charging stations for electric vehicles. Energies 2021, 14, 7566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Xie, F.; Liu, C.; Li, S.; Lin, Z.; Huang, Y. Long-term strategic planning of inter-city fast charging infrastructure for battery electric vehicles. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2017, 109, 261–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Roni, M.S.; Yi, Z.; Smart, J.G. Optimal charging management and infrastructure planning for free-floating shared electric vehicles. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2019, 76, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ahmadi, M.; Kaleybar, H.J.; Brenna, M.; Castelli-dezza, F.; Carmeli, M.S. Integration of distributed energy resources and EV fast-charging infrastructure in high-speed railway systems. Electronics 2021, 10, 2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ram, S.K.; Devassy, S.; Verma, B.K.; Mishra, S.; Akbar, S.A. Review on Renewable Energy Based EV Charging System with Grid Support Functionality. In Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), Coimbatore, India, 19–20 March 2021; pp. 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vosooghi, R.; Puchinger, J.; Bischoff, J.; Jankovic, M.; Vouillon, A. Shared autonomous electric vehicle service performance: Assessing the impact of charging infrastructure. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2020, 81, 102283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tao, Y.; Qiu, J.; Lai, S.; Sun, X.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, B.; Cheng, L. Data-driven on-demand energy supplement planning for electric vehicles considering multi-charging/swapping services. Appl. Energy 2022, 311, 118632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kumar, K.J.; Kumar, S.; VS, N. Standards for electric vehicle charging stations in India: A review. Energy Storage 2022, 4, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Leone, C.; Longo, M. Modular Approach to Ultra-fast Charging Stations. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2021, 16, 1971–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, L.; Qin, Z.; Slangen, T.; Bauer, P.; Van Wijk, T. Grid Impact of Electric Vehicle Fast Charging Stations: Trends, Standards, Issues and Mitigation Measures—An Overview. IEEE Open J. Power Electron. 2020, 2, 56–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhang, C.; Jiang, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Q.; Hu, X. Charging optimization in lithium-ion batteries based on temperature rise and charge time. Appl. Energy 2017, 194, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Leone, C.; Longo, M.; Fernandez-Ramirez, L.M.; Garcia-Trivino, P. Multi-Objective Optimization of PV and Energy Storage Systems for Ultra-Fast Charging Stations. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 14208–14224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Motoaki, Y.; Yi, W.; Salisbury, S. Empirical analysis of electric vehicle fast charging under cold temperatures. Energy Policy 2018, 122, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Xie, W.; Liu, X.; He, R.; Li, Y.; Gao, X.; Li, X.; Peng, Z.; Feng, S.; Feng, X.; Yang, S. Challenges and opportunities toward fast-charging of lithium-ion batteries. J. Energy Storage 2020, 32, 101837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chen, C.; Wei, Z.; Knoll, A.C. Charging Optimization for Li-Ion Battery in Electric Vehicles: A Review. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2022, 8, 3068–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Tan, K.M.; Ramachandaramurthy, V.K.; Yong, J.Y. Integration of electric vehicles in smart grid: A review on vehicle to grid technologies and optimization techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 53, 720–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tan, X.; Qu, G.; Sun, B.; Li, N.; Tsang, D.H.K. Optimal scheduling of battery charging station serving electric vehicles based on battery swapping. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2019, 10, 1372–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yuan, N.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chang, H.; Kang, H. Review of Electric Vehicle Ultra-Fast DC Charging Station. In Proceedings of the 2022 7th Asia Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering (ACPEE), Hangzhou, China, 15–17 April 2022; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mahfouz, M.M.; Iravani, M.R. Grid-Integration of Battery-Enabled DC Fast Charging Station for Electric Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2020, 35, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Atanalian, S.; Sebaaly, F.; Zgheib, R.; Al-Haddad, K. Modular Multilevel Converters for Fast Charging Stations of Electric Vehicles: An Overview. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Orlando, FL, USA, 4–6 April 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mohamed, A.A.S.; Meintz, A.; Zhu, L. System Design and Optimization of In-Route Wireless Charging Infrastructure for Shared Automated Electric Vehicles. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 79968–79979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Mohammed, S.A.Q.; Jung, J.W. A Comprehensive State-of-the-Art Review of Wired/Wireless Charging Technologies for Battery Electric Vehicles: Classification/Common Topologies/Future Research Issues. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 19572–19585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Cui, D.; Wang, Z.; Liu, P.; Wang, S.; Dorrell, D.G.; Li, X.; Zhan, W. Operation optimization approaches of electric vehicle battery swapping and charging station: A literature review. Energy 2023, 263, 126095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Ding, R.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Hou, Y.; Sun, W.; Zhai, H.; Wei, X. Joint charging scheduling of electric vehicles with battery to grid technology in battery swapping station. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 872–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. He, H.; Sun, F.; Wang, Z.; Lin, C.; Zhang, C.; Xiong, R.; Deng, J.; Zhu, X.; Xie, P.; Zhang, S.; et al. China’s battery electric vehicles lead the world: Achievements in technology system architecture and technological breakthroughs. Green Energy Intell. Transp. 2022, 1, 100020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ronanki, D.; Kelkar, A.; Williamson, S.S. Extreme fast charging technology—Prospects to enhance sustainable electric transportation. Energies 2019, 12, 3721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Genovese, M.; Cigolotti, V.; Jannelli, E.; Fragiacomo, P. Current standards and configurations for the permitting and operation of hydrogen refueling stations. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 19357–19371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Draz, A.; Othman, A.M.; El-fergany, A.A. State-of-the-Art with numerical analysis on electric fast charging stations: Infrastructures, standards, techniques, and challenges Electric vehicle Supply Equipment Point of Common Coupling. Renew. Energy Focus J. 2023, 47, 100499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Jaman, S.; Verbrugge, B.; Garcia, O.H.; Abdel-Monem, M.; Oliver, B.; Geury, T.; Hegazy, O. Development and Validation of V2G Technology for Electric Vehicle Chargers Using Combo CCS Type 2 Connector Standards. Energies 2022, 15, 7364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Neaimeh, M.; Andersen, P.B. Mind the gap- open communication protocols for vehicle grid integration. Energy Inform. 2020, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Aretxabaleta, I.; De Alegria, I.M.; Andreu, J.; Kortabarria, I.; Robles, E. High-Voltage Stations for Electric Vehicle Fast-Charging: Trends, Standards, Charging Modes and Comparison of Unity Power-Factor Rectifiers. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 102177–102194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Jiang, L.; Li, Y.; Ma, J.; Cao, Y.; Huang, C.; Xu, Y.; Chen, H.; Huang, Y. Hybrid charging strategy with adaptive current control of lithium-ion battery for electric vehicles. Renew. Energy 2020, 160, 1385–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Camacho, O.M.F.; Mihet-Popa, L. Fast Charging and Smart Charging Tests for Electric Vehicles Batteries Using Renewable Energy. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. Rev. IFP Energies Nouv. 2014, 71, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Elma, O. A dynamic charging strategy with hybrid fast charging station for electric vehicles. Energy 2020, 202, 117680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ben Sassi, H.; Alaoui, C.; Errahimi, F.; Es-Sbai, N. Vehicle-to-grid technology and its suitability for the Moroccan national grid. J. Energy Storage 2021, 33, 102023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sharma, A.; Sharma, S. Review of power electronics in vehicle-to-grid systems. J. Energy Storage 2019, 21, 337–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Subashini, M.; Vijayan, S. Smart Charging for Zero Emission Vehicles—A Comprehensive Review. Renew. Energy Focus 2023, 46, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Dharavat, N.; Golla, N.K.; Sudabattula, S.K.; Velamuri, S.; Kantipudi, M.V.V.P.; Kotb, H.; AboRas, K.M. Impact of plug-in electric vehicles on grid integration with distributed energy resources: A review. Front. Energy Res. 2023, 10, 1099890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Wassiliadis, N.; Schneider, J.; Frank, A.; Wildfeuer, L.; Lin, X.; Jossen, A.; Lienkamp, M. Review of fast charging strategies for lithium-ion battery systems and their applicability for battery electric vehicles. J. Energy Storage 2021, 44, 103306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Hossain Lipu, M.S.; Hannan, M.A.; Karim, T.F.; Hussain, A.; Saad, M.H.M.; Ayob, A.; Miah, M.S.; Indra Mahlia, T.M. Intelligent algorithms and control strategies for battery management system in electric vehicles: Progress, challenges and future outlook. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 292, 126044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wu, M.; Qin, L.; Wu, G. State of charge estimation of Power lithium-ion battery based on an Affine Iterative Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter. J. Energy Storage 2022, 51, 104472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ucer, E.; Member, S.; Kisacikoglu, M.C.; Yavuz, M.; Meintz, A.; Rames, C. Modeling and Analysis of a Fast Charging Station and Evaluation of Service Quality for Electric Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2019, 5, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Esfahani, F.N.; Darwish, A.; Williams, B.W. Power Converter Topologies for Grid-Tied Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Powered Electric Vehicles (EVs)—A Comprehensive Review. Energies 2022, 15, 4648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Zhang, Z.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, L.; Huang, C. State-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion battery pack by using an adaptive extended Kalman filter for electric vehicles. J. Energy Storage 2021, 37, 102457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Metwly, M.Y.; Abdel-Majeed, M.S.; Abdel-Khalik, A.S.; Hamdy, R.A.; Hamad, M.S.; Ahmed, S. A Review of Integrated On-Board EV Battery Chargers: Advanced Topologies, Recent Developments and Optimal Selection of FSCW Slot/Pole Combination. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 85216–85242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Khaligh, A.; Dantonio, M. Global Trends in High-Power On-Board Chargers for Electric Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 3306–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Bommana, B.; Kumar, J.S.V.S.; Nuvvula, R.S.S.; Kumar, P.P.; Khan, B.; Muthusamy, S.; Inapakurthi, R. A Comprehensive Examination of the Protocols, Technologies, and Safety Requirements for Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure. J. Adv. Transp. 2023, 2023, 7500151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Brenna, M.; Foiadelli, F.; Leone, C.; Longo, M. Electric Vehicles Charging Technology Review and Optimal Size Estimation. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2020, 15, 2539–2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Mishra, D.K.; Ghadi, M.J.; Li, L.; Hossain, M.J.; Zhang, J.; Ray, P.K.; Mohanty, A. A review on solid-state transformer: A breakthrough technology for future smart distribution grids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 133, 107255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Moghaddam, A.F.; Van den Bossche, A. Forward converter current fed equalizer for lithium based batteries in ultralight electrical vehicles. Electronics 2019, 8, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Jou, H.L.; Huang, J.J.; Wu, J.C.; Wu, K. Der Novel isolated multilevel DC-DC power converter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2016, 31, 2690–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Mouli, G.R.C.; Van Duijsen, P.; Grazian, F.; Jamodkar, A.; Bauer, P.; Isabella, O. Sustainable e-bike charging station that enables ac, dc andwireless charging from solar energy. Energies 2020, 13, 3549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hannan, M.A.; Ker, P.J.; Lipu, M.S.H.; Choi, Z.H.; Rahman, M.S.A.; Muttaqi, K.M.; Blaabjerg, F. State of the art of solid-state transformers: Advanced topologies, implementation issues, recent progress and improvements. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 19113–19132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Atkar, D.D.; Chaturvedi, P.; Suryawanshi, H.M.; Nachankar, P.P.; Yadeo, D. Optimal Design of Solid State Transformer-Based Interlink Converter for Hybrid AC/DC Micro-Grid Applications. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2022, 10, 3685–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Lee, H.S.; Kang, B.; Kim, W.S.; Yoon, S.J. Reduction of input voltage/current ripples of boost half-bridge DC-DC converter for photovoltaic micro-inverter. Sol. Energy 2019, 188, 1084–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Da Silva, R.L.; Borges, V.L.F.; Possamai, C.E.; Barbi, I. Solid-State Transformer for Power Distribution Grid Based on a Hybrid Switched-Capacitor LLC-SRC Converter: Analysis, Design, and Experimentation. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 141182–141207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Guo, W.; Chen, T.; Huang, A.Q. A Control Bandwidth Optimized Active Damping Scheme for LC and LCL Filter-Based Converters. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 34286–34296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Xiang, Z.; Pang, Y.; Wang, L.; Wong, C.K.; Lam, C.S.; Wong, M.C. Design, control and comparative analysis of an LCLC coupling hybrid active power filter. IET Power Electron. 2020, 13, 1207–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Al-Barashi, M.; Meng, X.; Liu, Z.; Saeed, M.S.R.; Tasiu, I.A.; Wu, S. Enhancing power quality of high-speed railway traction converters by fully integrated T-LCL filter. IET Power Electron. 2023, 16, 699–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Jiang, S.; Liu, Y.; Liang, W.; Peng, J.; Jiang, H. Active EMI Filter Design with a Modified LCL-LC Filter for Single-Phase Grid-Connected Inverter in Vehicle-to-Grid Application. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 10639–10650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Dai, H.; Jiang, B.; Hu, X.; Lin, X.; Wei, X.; Pecht, M. Advanced battery management strategies for a sustainable energy future: Multilayer design concepts and research trends. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 138, 110480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Senol, M.; Safak Bayram, I.; Naderi, Y.; Galloway, S. Electric Vehicles under Low Temperatures: A Review on Battery Performance, Charging Needs, and Power Grid Impacts. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 39879–39912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Venugopal, R.; Chandrasekar, B.; Savio, A.D.; Narayanamoorthi, R.; Aboras, K.M.; Kotb, H.; Ghadi, Y.Y.; Shouran, M.; Elgamli, E. Review on Unidirectional Non-Isolated High Gain DC-DC Converters for EV Sustainable DC Fast Charging Applications. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 78299–78338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Dileep, G.; Singh, S.N. Selection of non-isolated DC-DC converters for solar photovoltaic system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 1230–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Taghvaee, M.H.; Radzi, M.A.M.; Moosavain, S.M.; Hizam, H.; Hamiruce Marhaban, M. A current and future study on non-isolated DC-DC converters for photovoltaic applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 17, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Fernão Pires, V.; Cordeiro, A.; Foito, D.; Fernando Silva, J. Control transition mode from voltage control to MPPT for PV generators in isolated DC microgrids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 137, 107876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. EV charging techniques.
Figure 1. EV charging techniques.
Applsci 14 04728 g001
Figure 2. Inductive charging: (a) static charging. (b) dynamic charging.
Figure 2. Inductive charging: (a) static charging. (b) dynamic charging.
Applsci 14 04728 g002
Figure 3. Bidirectional EV charging V2G.
Figure 3. Bidirectional EV charging V2G.
Applsci 14 04728 g003
Figure 4. Battery swapping system.
Figure 4. Battery swapping system.
Applsci 14 04728 g004
Figure 5. Illustrated on-board/off-board EVs fast charging.
Figure 5. Illustrated on-board/off-board EVs fast charging.
Applsci 14 04728 g005
Figure 6. Classification of DC-DC converters utilized for EV charging systems.
Figure 6. Classification of DC-DC converters utilized for EV charging systems.
Applsci 14 04728 g006
Figure 7. Block diagram of DC Fast Charging Power Conversion Stage with: (a) LFTS Configuration. (b) SST-Based HFT Configuration.
Figure 7. Block diagram of DC Fast Charging Power Conversion Stage with: (a) LFTS Configuration. (b) SST-Based HFT Configuration.
Applsci 14 04728 g007
Table 2. Power level charging rating [121,122].
Table 2. Power level charging rating [121,122].
Level of Charging Rating (A)Supply SystemMaximum Power Rating (kW)Maximum Current Rating (A)
Level 1 (AC) (IEC)240 V4.716
Level 2 (AC) (IEC)240 V11.532
Level 3 (AC) (IEC)415 V90250
Fast DC Charging (DC) (IEC)600 V150400
Level 1 (AC) (SAE)120 V216
Level 2 (AC) (SAE)208–240 V2080
Level 3 (AC)(SAE)300–920 V120-350500
Fast DC Charging (DC) (SAE)−400 V
Table 3. Major standards of EV charging systems [11,21,26,38,60,77,92,95,121,123,124,125].
Table 3. Major standards of EV charging systems [11,21,26,38,60,77,92,95,121,123,124,125].
StandardDescription
IEC 60038Specifies the standard voltage levels used for electrical power systems and charging applications.
IEC 62196Standards conductive charging components for connectors, cables, outlets, plugs, inlets, and communication protocols used in AC charging of electric vehicles.
IEC 60664-1Insulation coordination for equipment within low-voltage systems.
IEC 62752Provides guidelines for connecting electric vehicles to information and communication technology, ICT, networks.
IEC 61851Covering various charging modes, communication protocols, and safety features.
SAE J1772Requirements for the electrical connectors and communication protocols for Level 1 and Level 2 charging used for AC charging of electric vehicles in North America.
SAE J2344Provides guidelines and test procedures for evaluating the crashworthiness and safety of electric vehicle battery systems.
SAE J2894/2Requirements for the power quality and conductive charge coupler used in DC fast charging electric vehicles.
SAE J2953Standards for interoperability to provide guidelines for conductive automated charging systems for electric vehicles.
SAE J2847/1Communication between vehicles as a distributed energy source and the grid.
SAE J3068Wireless power transfer for light-duty plug-in/electric vehicles and alignment methodology.
SAE J2931/7Evaluating the electrical performance of components used in hybrid and electric vehicles.
ISO 15118Standards for V2G communication protocols and interfaces between vehicle and charging infrastructure.
ISO 17409Specifications and reliable measurement of energy consumption allow for accurate comparisons and evaluations of different EV models.
Table 4. Specifications of commercial electric vehicles [26,126,128,129,130,131,132].
Table 4. Specifications of commercial electric vehicles [26,126,128,129,130,131,132].
CategoryModelTypeBattery (KWh)Range (Km)Connector
Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV)Chevrolet VoltPHEV18.485 (battery)Type 1 J1772
Mitsubishi OutlanderPHEV2084 (battery)CCS, Type 2
Volvo XC40PHEV10.743 (battery)CCS, Type
Toyota Prius PrimePHEV8.840 (battery)SAE J1772
Nissan LeafPHEV64480CHAdeMO, Type 2
Electric Vehicle (BEV)Tesla Model SBEV100620Supercharger
Tesla Model XBEV100500Supercharger
Tesla Model 3BEV82580Supercharger
Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle (FCEV)Toyota MiraiFCEV1.6 (hydrogen capacity)647N/A
Hyundai NexoFCEV40 (hydrogen capacity) 570N/A
Honda ClarityFCEV25.5 (hydrogen capacity)550N/A
Extended Range Electric Vehicle (E-REV)BYD Atto3E-REV60.4420 (battery)CCS, Type 2
Table 5. Comparison between on-board and off-board chargers [142].
Table 5. Comparison between on-board and off-board chargers [142].
Charging MethodsAdvantageDisadvantage
On-board charger
-
A lower rate of energy transfer (KW).
-
Convenience (charge anywhere with an outlet).
-
Weight is added to the EV.
-
An on-board rectifier controls battery management system (BMS).
-
Slow charging times.
-
Added weight and size to the vehicle.
-
Limited charging infrastructure compatibility.
-
May require specific outlets.
-
Potential battery heating issues.
Off-board charger
-
High energy transfer (KW).
-
The problem of battery heating must be solved.
-
Potential enhanced BMS systems.
-
Fast charging speed.
-
Charger at higher power levels.
-
Reduces weight in the vehicle.
-
Limited flexibility (requires compatible charging stations.
-
Potential challenges with the battery management system.
-
Higher cost and complexity.
-
Charging station accountability.
-
Limited ability to identify defective battery cells.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zentani, A.; Almaktoof, A.; Kahn, M.T. A Comprehensive Review of Developments in Electric Vehicles Fast Charging Technology. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4728. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114728

AMA Style

Zentani A, Almaktoof A, Kahn MT. A Comprehensive Review of Developments in Electric Vehicles Fast Charging Technology. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(11):4728. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114728

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zentani, Ahmed, Ali Almaktoof, and Mohamed T. Kahn. 2024. "A Comprehensive Review of Developments in Electric Vehicles Fast Charging Technology" Applied Sciences 14, no. 11: 4728. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114728

APA Style

Zentani, A., Almaktoof, A., & Kahn, M. T. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of Developments in Electric Vehicles Fast Charging Technology. Applied Sciences, 14(11), 4728. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114728

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop