Next Article in Journal
The Heat Transfer Analysis of an Acting-type Heat Retention Panel used in a Hot Rolling Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Aluminum-Doped Zinc Oxide as Front Electrode for Rear Emitter Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells with High Efficiency
Previous Article in Journal
Brillouin Optical Correlation-Domain Technologies Based on Synthesis of Optical Coherence Function as Fiber Optic Nerve Systems for Structural Health Monitoring
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Co-Solvents on the Performance of PEDOT:PSS Films and Hybrid Photovoltaic Devices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review: Thermal Stability of Methylammonium Lead Halide Based Perovskite Solar Cells

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Old Dominion University, Applied Research Center, 12050 Jefferson Ave, Newport News, VA 23606, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(1), 188; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010188
Submission received: 29 November 2018 / Revised: 26 December 2018 / Accepted: 29 December 2018 / Published: 7 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Next Generation Photovoltaic Solar Cells)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

solar cells, photodetectors

Abstract

Perovskite solar cells have achieved photo-conversion efficiencies greater than 20%, making them a promising candidate as an emerging solar cell technology. While perovskite solar cells are expected to eventually compete with existing silicon-based solar cells on the market, their long-term stability has become a major bottleneck. In particular, perovskite films are found to be very sensitive to external factors such as air, UV light, light soaking, thermal stress and others. Among these stressors, light, oxygen and moisture-induced degradation can be slowed by integrating barrier or interface layers within the device architecture. However, the most representative perovskite absorber material, CH3NH3PbI3 (MAPbI3), appears to be thermally unstable even in an inert environment. This poses a substantial challenge for solar cell applications because device temperatures can be over 45 °C higher than ambient temperatures when operating under direct sunlight. Herein, recent advances in resolving thermal stability problems are highlighted through literature review. Moreover, the most recent and promising strategies for overcoming thermal degradation are also summarized.

1. Introduction

Increasing global demand for energy and continued reductions in fossil fuel-based energy sources call for the greater use of alternative renewable energy sources. Among the possible renewable sources of energy, solar energy is the most promising, as it can be converted into electrical energy and reach almost every part of the world. Commercially available solar cells are based on silicon, GaAs (gallium arsenide), CdTe (cadmium telluride) and CIGS (copper indium gallium (di)selenide) and have sufficiently established efficiencies to meet global energy demand. However, efforts have been made to reduce the cost [1] of these existing technologies by replacing them with cheaper alternative photovoltaic devices such as perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Currently, the photo-conversion efficiency (PCE) of PSCs has soared beyond 20% in less than five years of laboratory research [2].
Miyasaka, et al. first introduced organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite absorber layer in dye sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) configuration with an efficiency of only 3.81% [3]. The poor stability and efficiency of liquid electrolyte-based structures were attributed to iodine-based redox processes. The efficiency increased to 10% when the liquid electrolyte was replaced with a solid-state hole transport layer of spiro-OMeTAD and led to stability improvements as well [4]. Currently, for PSCs, a planar heterojunction structure (introduced by Snaith, et al. [4]) is widely used, and consists of a solid perovskite layer with electron and hole selective contacts. The planar heterojunction structure can be fabricated at a low temperature (<150 °C), while the mesoporous TiO2 scaffold structure requires high temperature (<400 °C), making the former structure superior to the latter structure in terms of cost [5]. The projected theoretical maximum efficiency of solar cells made of this type of device structures is higher than 30%, which would surpass the practical efficiency of ~25% for silicon solar cells [6].
The promising performance of perovskite solar cells has been attributed to extraordinary material properties, including high absorption coefficient, long charge carrier diffusion length, low exciton binding energy, and tunable bandgap [7,8,9,10,11,12]. However, despite achieving lab-scale device efficiency comparable to that of commercially available solar cells, PSCs retain critical issues regarding stability. Standard PV modules available on the market are typically warrantied to retain their initial efficiency for 20–25 years [13]. Since perovskite solar cells are prone to degradation when exposed to air, UV light, thermal stress (heat), light soaking, electric fields, and many other factors [14,15,16], they cannot currently achieve such a market requirement. Hence, extensive research has recently focused on the study of degradation mechanisms to improve perovskite solar device stability. Stability improvements could be achieved by device encapsulation, adding UV filters, and suppressing trap states for degradation caused by air, UV light, and electric fields, respectively [17,18,19,20], but degradation due to thermal stress is considered inevitable since it is difficult to avoid the temperature rise of the solar cells during operation. The effective operational temperature can range from −40 °C to +85 °C [21], so the standard heat stability test is commonly run within this temperature window.
In this review paper, we aim to present a survey of the existing literature on the thermal stability of the most commonly used methyl ammonium halide perovskite solar cells. We will first focus on the evolution of the structural stability of perovskite materials, followed by the impact of thermal stress on perovskite solar devices. Perovskite solar cells consist of many layers and this study specifically highlights the intrinsic degradation mechanisms of the perovskite absorber layer, including chemical, morphological, and optical degradation. In addition, the effect of thermal stress on other layers in the device architecture has also been reviewed, particularly noting the degradation of charge transport layers and metal contacts, and presents solutions to slow down the degradation. Finally, the available strategies to improve the thermal stability of perovskite solar cells are depicted.

2. Structural Stability of Perovskite

The structural stability of the perovskites is critical when used in photovoltaic devices, since they are expected to remain stable for more than 25 years [22]. Structural stability is defined as the ability for a crystalline phase to be stable over a wide range of external factors such as heat, pressure, moisture, etc. Perovskite compounds have a general chemical formula of ABX3, where A and B are cations and X is an anion. Their crystal structure is similar to that of calcium titanium oxide. Usually, the A cations are larger than the B cations. Oxide perovskites have been studied extensively because of their multifunctional nature [23]. However, owing to their wide bandgap, oxide perovskites harvest only 8–20% of the solar spectrum, limiting their use in photovoltaic applications [23]. Instead, halide organic-inorganic perovskites were developed by replacing the oxygen anion of oxide perovskites with an inorganic halide (I, Cl, Br) [23]. An organic or inorganic monovalent A+ cation (e.g., Rb+, Cs+, CH3NH3+, HC(NH2)2+) and a divalent B2+ metal cation (e.g., Pb2+, Sn2+) were also implemented in the frame of the perovskite structures [23]. The halide perovskites obtain a desired crystal symmetry by maintaining an allowable tolerance factor. A tolerance factor developed by Goldschmidt [24] determines the radii sizes associated with cubic symmetry, described by
t = R A + R X 2 ( R A + R X )
where RA, RB, RX are the ionic radii of A, B, X, respectively. The tolerance factor provides a rough estimate of the stability and distortion of crystal structures of a compound. In addition, it gives an idea of whether the phase is cubic (t = 1) or deviates into the tetragonal or orthorhombic phase [25]. In general, an established tolerance factor value for halide perovskites lies in the range of 0.85 < t < 1.11 [26]. Non-perovskite structures are formed when the tolerance factor is higher or lower. In an inorganic-organic hybrid perovskite, it is difficult to calculate the absolute tolerance factor as the organic cation has a non-spherical geometry [27]. However, it is possible to qualitatively analyze the transition of structure in these materials. For example, formamidinium lead iodide, HC(NH2)2PbI3 (FAPbI3), has a larger A cation than methylammonium lead iodide, CH3NH3PbI3 (MAPbI3) and a larger cation would generally represent a higher tolerance factor [28]. Two phases can be obtained in solution-processed FAPbI3 materials. One is the photoactive α-phase (black phase) and the other is a non-photoactive phase (yellow phase or δ-phase) [29].
Figure 1a,b shows the ideal case of cubic symmetry for perovskites. The cubic symmetry corresponds to a Pm3m space group with 12-fold coordination for the A cation, 6-fold coordination for the B cations, and BX6 octahedra residing in the corners [23]. The deviation from cubic symmetry can be attributed to several factors including the atomic sizes of the constituents. The A cation does not directly affect the electronic properties [30,31,32]; however, the size of A cations can cause distortion of the B-X bonds, which undesirably affects the symmetry. The best electronic properties are obtained with cubic symmetry due to high ionic bonding. An octahedral tilting occurs when the tolerance factor exceeds the ideal range, and affects the electronic properties.
In recent years, methylammonium lead trihalide (MAPbX3) has received increasing attention as an absorber material for perovskite solar cells. However, the stability of MAPbX3 has been found to strongly vary depending on temperature, changing phase or crystal orientation. The structural data of various methylammonium lead trihalides (MAPbX3; X = I, Cl, Br) [33,34] are summarized in Table 1. As indicated in Table 1, both MAPbBr3 and MAPbCl3 crystallize in the cubic phase at room temperature, while MAPbI3 needs to be heated to a temperature higher than 323 K to allow the transition from a tetragonal to a cubic phase. Interestingly, many studies on MAPbI3 materials report that the tetragonal phase of MAPbI3 can still exist even after heating at temperature of 373 K [4,35,36,37]. This suggests that the tetragonal phase is surprisingly stable in the thin films, but also emphasizes an ambiguity about the exact phase transition temperature and the nature of the phase transition between tetragonal and cubic phases.

3. Impact of Thermal Stress on Perovskites

Typically, device temperatures can be over 45 °C higher than ambient temperatures when solar cells operate under direct sunlight. According to International Standards (IEC 61646 climatic chamber tests), long-term stability at 85 °C is required to compete with other solar cell technologies [38]. Therefore, the study of the thermal stability of perovskite solar devices has attracted world-wide research attention. Different degradation pathways have been proposed and the topic remains under discussion, but the material MAPbI3 (CH3NH3PbI3) clearly loses its excellent light harvesting properties over time because it evolves into PbI2 after a nominal loss of CH3NH3I. The degradation from CH3NH3PbI3 to PbI2 is most likely accompanied by a release of gases via simple sublimation or assisted chemical reaction. It is proposed that the first mass loss step during the thermal degradation of CH3NH3PbI3 and CH3NH3I under an inert atmosphere proceeds as [39]:
CH 3 NH 3 PbI 3 Δ NH 3 + CH 3 I + PbI 2
CH 3 NH 3 I Δ NH 3 + CH 3 I
Therefore, the determination of the composition of these released gases during the controlled thermal degradation of CH3NH3PbI3 is expected to pinpoint the degradation pathways. Different interpretations can be found in the literature regarding the chemical nature of these released gases during thermal degradation and several studies have analyzed the effect of intrinsic degradation and thermal stress on the perovskites. Herein, an overview of the impact of thermal stress on perovskites, based on different aspects such as chemical, crystallographic, morphological and optical degradation, is described.

3.1. Chemical and Structural Degradation

Fan, et al. [40] studied the thermal degradation of MAPbI3 by fabricating MAPbI3 microplates. Microplates are highly crystalline and thus provide an outstanding opportunity to study the structural degradation mechanisms of perovskites. The authors investigated the crystal structure under thermal stimulation using in-situ high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). They found that almost 75% of the original perovskite tetragonal phase returned to trigonal PbI2 after 100 s of heating at 85 °C. Degradation is initiated by breaking the weak Pb-I-Pb bond along the (001) direction [41], after which the PbI2 relaxes into its energetically favorable trigonal structure (Figure 2). During this process, CH3NH2 and HI sublime into the gas phase. Their studies conducted in dry and inert gaseous environments revealed that no MAPbI3 hydrates are generated during the degradation process [42,43,44]. The authors therefore concluded that the phase transition to PbI2 is not initiated by the intrinsic hygroscopicity of alkylammonium cations [38,44], but instead is completely due to the thermally induced degradation. They suggested that a sequential transition occurs from tetragonal MAPbI3 to trigonal PbI2 based on the time-dependent studies, which showed an overlap of the MAPbI3 and PbI2 crystal structures in the electron diffraction patterns under thermal stress. In particular, the diffraction intensity of the perovskite tetragonal phase was correlated with a direct increase in the PbI2 trigonal phase intensity. This correlation indicates that the structure is a stacked architecture, with PbI2 formed on top of the underlying MAPbI3 layers. In addition, the thickness of each layer varies with the annealing time, with the thermal transformation from MAPbI3 to PbI2 occurring through bulk or surface reactions. To understand the actual reaction process, they conducted density functional theory (DFT) calculations [44]. The corresponding reaction rate calculated for the minimum energy path from MAPbI3 to PbI2 through bulk degradation was found to be approximately 1000 times slower than surface-initiated decomposition [44]. Therefore, they concluded that surface degradation is kinetically preferred. The first layer is degraded, and the underlying layer gets exposed. The process is repeated until the entire material degrades, which supports the theory that it is a surface-dominated reaction [44].
The thermal stability of perovskite solar cells, with a structure of ITO/TiO2/MAPbI3, was studied by Conings and co-workers [38]. In order to separate the perovskite layer degradation from degradation at other interfaces, the hole transfer layer (HTL) and the top electrode were excluded. The samples were heated at 85 °C for 24 h, under four environmental conditions: pristine film (reference), O2 environment, N2 environment and ambient conditions. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns revealed the formation of PbI2 under ambient conditions, as shown in Figure 3a. Smecca, et al. [45] showed that the peak at 2θ = 14.00° (corresponding to a unique (001) plane of MAPbI3) decreased along with an increase of the peak at 2θ = 12.61° (corresponding to a (003) plane of PbI2) (Figure 3b,c).
All peaks related to the perovskite layer disappeared in the diffraction pattern during thermal annealing. On the basis of these findings, the authors concluded that the perovskite layer degraded into PbI2 in less than 10 h. Similarly, Phillippe and co-workers investigated the effect of higher temperatures on both MAPbI3 and MAPbI3−xClx films [46], but used hard X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HX-PES) instead of XRD in their study. HX-PES aids the understanding of the film decomposition procedure by determining the chemical composition of the sample regardless of crystallinity. To investigate the decomposition process, the samples were prepared in an oxygen- and water-free environment and were heated in an analysis chamber under ultra-high vacuum. The films were quantitatively analyzed using HX-PES by extracting the I/Pb and N/Pb atomic ratios. The reduction in these ratios represents the conversion of perovskite to PbI2. The atomic ratio of I/Pb (red circle) and N/Pb (black diamond) plotted at various temperatures are shown in Figure 3d. Heating at 100 °C for 20 min significantly reduced both ratios. Furthermore, upon heating at 200 °C, the two ratios decreased to 2 and 0, respectively. This indicates that the film decomposed completely into PbI2.

3.2. Morphological Degradation

Several reports have investigated the effect of temperature on the morphology of perovskites. As mentioned above, Conings and co-workers [38] studied the thermal stability of perovskite solar cells with an ITO/TiO2/MAPbI3 structure when subjected to heat treatment at 85 °C for 24 h under various environmental conditions. High-angle annular dark field (HAADF) TEM was used to understand the effect of temperature on devices in different environmental conditions. Cross-sectional views of the HAADF images are shown in Figure 4a,b. The pristine perovskite device exhibited well-defined layers stacked evenly on top of each other, while the degraded samples exhibited structural variations. Interestingly, a large PbI2 grain, highlighted in red, is formed in the O2 environment (see Figure 4c). The calculated ratio of Pb/I determined by EDX revealed the highlighted oblong structure to be PbI2. When exposed to ambient atmosphere, more severe device degradation occurred with spot-like structures in the perovskite and delamination from the TiO2 layer, as shown in Figure 4d. Additionally, topographical AFM images (Figure 4e–h) showed significant structural changes for samples measured under ambient conditions. Significant dark areas appearing in AFM images were associated with PbI2 regions, which indicates a photocurrent reduction in those regions upon degradation.
Han et al. [17] tested the stability of perovskite solar devices in an environmental chamber, where the temperature was controlled in the range of −20 °C to 100 °C. The actual cell temperature inside the chamber was found to be approximately 30 °C higher than the environmental temperature, so the temperatures were denoted as “environmental temperature (actual cell temperature)”, e.g., 55 °C (85 °C) [17]. The degradation mechanism of CH3NH3PbI3 solar cells was analyzed for 500 h at 55 °C (85 °C) using cross-sectional focused ion beam–scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM). The cross-sectional FIB-SEM images shown in Figure 5 reveal the degradation mechanism of an encapsulated device. The direct exposure equivalent to one sun illumination clearly damaged the entire device, with the most degradation observed in the silver layer. A number of degradation features were observed in the degraded cells; including degradation of the silver layer, formation of voids in spiro-OMeTAD and the perovskite layer, and delamination of the perovskite layer from the TiO2 layer, as shown in Figure 5a–c. Particularly, the formation of a PbI2 layer was found, as indicated by a bright contrast in the SEM image (see Figure 5d). It is anticipated that the degradation was initiated by the reaction of HI gas and Ag in an encapsulated device structure. Therefore, the authors suggested replacing the silver contact and using highly heat-resistant encapsulating materials.

3.3. Optical Degradation

Foley et al. [47] investigated the temperature dependence of the bandgap and energy levels of MAPbI3 by employing absorbance and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy (Figure 6a,b). They showed that both valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum (CBM) levels were reduced by 110 meV and 77 meV, respectively, when the temperature was increased from 25 °C to 85 °C. The bandgap of MAPbI3 also increased by 33 meV, with an increase in temperature. This provided deeper insights into the relationship between the observed shift in VBM level and thermal expansion of the lattice using density functional theory (DFT) calculations. These results are significant when designing MAPbI3 solar cells at different operating temperatures. Recently, the effects of heating and cooling on the performance of MAPbI3−xClx perovskite solar cells were investigated by varying the device temperatures from room temperature to 82 °C and then returning them to room temperature [48]. For this study, temperature-dependent steady-state PL and time-resolved lifetime decay measurements were investigated using a Linkam THM S600E system. Interestingly, an irreversible optical and electrical degradation of the perovskite films was observed at 70 °C. This irreversible degradation continued up to 82 °C and even when the device was cooled back to below 82 °C. PL measurements, shown in Figure 6c,d, demonstrate this irreversible degradation. An increase in the disordered phase of the perovskite films (observed by PL measurements) was found to result in a drastic increase in charge trapping and the development of a deeper trap depth. Temperature-dependent lifetime decay measurements were performed and the trapping and detrapping rates were calculated [48] to show a trap depth of 145 meV for temperatures in the range 40–70 °C. However, a deeper trap depth of 1.1 eV was observed at temperatures over 70 °C, indicating the formation of deep trap states due to the thermal decomposition of the perovskite layer (Figure 6e,f). Herz et al. also observed a gradual shift in the band-edge of MAPbI3 at elevated temperature (100 °C) based on PL and transmittance measurements [49]. These results suggest that the observed intrinsic thermal decomposition of perovskite solar cells at such low temperatures may limit their commercial applications.

4. Impact of Thermal Stress on Various Layers and Possible Solutions

We now move the stability discussion to the other important layers of perovskite solar cells. In particular, we will discuss how the temperature affects the electron transport layer (ETL), the hole transport layer (HTL), and the metal electrode.

4.1. Electron Transport Layers

The most commonly used ETL in perovskite solar devices is titanium dioxide (TiO2). However, non-stoichiometric defects, such as oxygen vacancies and titanium interstitials, can also form in this layer [50] and cause deep sub-band gap trap states. Perovskite devices with TiO2 ETL show rapid degradation under illumination. Recently, Ahn et al. reported the degradation of the photo conversion efficiency of perovskite solar cells due to the decomposition of the perovskite film at the interface with TiO2 [51]. As shown by the SEM images, degradation is initiated at the perovskite/TiO2 interface in a TiO2-based device. The authors postulated that the trapped charges at the interface were responsible for the irreversible degradation of perovskites along grain boundaries [51]. To enhance stability, compact TiO2 ETL can be replaced with C60, which shows much more stable performance when deployed in the device structure.
Wojciechowski et al. used C60 as interface modification layer for TiO2 and as an electron-accepting layer [52,53]. They performed steady-state PL measurements over time at the PL peak of 775 nm in the devices with TiO2 and C60 as ETLs (See Figure 7a,b) [53]. The C60 layer was shown to increase the photoluminescence decay and exhibited more stable device performance under full-spectrum illumination for 500 h, as shown in Figure 7c [53]. The control device with TiO2 as an n-type layer showed a notable reduction in the photovoltaic performance with time as shown in Figure 7d, while the C60 based device exhibited much more stable performance when annealed at 60 °C for 500 h. To overcome the non-stoichiometric defects of TiO2, Pathak et al. [50] used Al-doping for their TiO2, and developed a sol–gel deposition process with an Al-containing precursor. Photo-thermal deflection spectroscopy (PDS) measurements indicated that Al-doping in TiO2 reduced the number of trap states and they found that Al-doping not only passivated non-stoichiometric defects but also improved the stability of encapsulated devices.

4.2. Hole Transport Layers

The most commonly used hole transport layer in inverted perovskite device structure is poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS). However, the prime disadvantage of the PEDOT:PSS based hole transport layer (HTL) is that it leads to the chemical instability of perovskite solar devices due to its acidity and highly hygroscopic nature [54,55,56]. Vitoratos et al. [57] investigated the thermal stability of PEDOT:PSS and found a decrease in the electrical conductivity of perovskites with aging due to the shrinkage of PEDOT conductive grains. Moreover, the XPS and UPS measurements suggested a broken conformational PEDOT:PSS structure, which results in the thermal instability of this material [57]. Despite this, a recent study [58] showed the potential for improved efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells with enhanced PEDOT: PSS HTLs. This was done by fabricating PEDOT:PSS monolayers, using spin coating and ultrapure water rinse, and constructing ultra-thin layer of PEDOT:PSS. The water rinsed device sustained more than 50% of its stability, attributed to the less hygroscopic nature of the thin PEDOT:PSS layer [58]. Another improvement approach is to use an oxide-based hole transporting material such as NiO, which exhibits better air [59,60,61] and thermal stability [62].
Xu et al. [63] synthesized cross-linked films using an arylamine derivative (N4,N4′-Di(naphthalen-1-yl)-N4,N4′-bis(4-vinylphenyl)biphenyl-4,4′-diamine) (VNBP) [63]. A two-step process was employed to construct a thermally cross-linked hole extracting layer, as shown in Figure 8a. In the first step, a layer of VNBP is deposited and then thermally cross-linked; in the second step, an interface doping layer of MoO3 is simply deposited on top of the HTL. The device architecture consisted of a double layer of VNBP-MoO3, and showed a steady-state efficiency of 16.5% and improved thermal stability compared to the control device. The device performance shown in Figure 8b,c indicates that the devices with cross-linked VNBP-MoO3 HTL retained almost 90% of their initial performance with low hysteresis for 1 h of annealing at 110 °C. Figure 8d illustrates the optical microscopy images of the control and cross-linked device before and after annealing. No morphological deformation was found for the cross-linked device, while the control device with spiro-OMeTAD HTL exhibited the chain-like structures which lead to irreversible degradation. The thermally cross-linked devices were found to be thermally stable for 30 days during thermal annealing at 110 °C for 1 h and high humidity exposure at 70% relative humidity, as evidenced by the XRD patterns (Figure 8e). The authors suggested that the exceptional barrier properties of cross-linked organic hole transport material with metal oxide allowed the device to maintain high performance under thermal stress for a longer period than that found in previous studies.
Habisreutinger et al. investigated the effect of the HTL on the thermal degradation of perovskite solar cells [64]. A schematic illustration of the investigated device structure is shown in Figure 9a. The authors investigated thermal stability by employing the three most common and highly efficient HTLs, Spiro-OMeTAD, P3HT, and PTAA. A rapid degradation of the perovskite films was observed for all three HTLs, as evidenced by the photographs in Figure 9b. To achieve better thermal stability, organic HTLs were replaced with functionalized single-walled nanotubes (SWNT) embedded in an insulating polymer of polycarbonate (PC) and poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). The absorption and XRD measurements revealed that the devices with spiro-OMeTAD degraded when heated at 80 °C for 96 h in ambient environment. In contrast, devices with PMMA and PMMA-SWNT showed less degradation in absorption spectra and no significant change in the XRD patterns, as shown in Figure 9d,e. Devices fabricated with P3HT/SWNT-PMMA HTLs did not exhibit PCE reduction when annealed at 80 °C. Interestingly, the efficiency increased from 13.3% to 14.3% with an annealing time of 96 h, but a further increase in temperature led to a reduction in PCE (see Figure 9c), possibly due to the degradation of the perovskite layer at such high temperatures.

4.3. Metal Contacts

The most commonly used electrodes for high efficiency perovskite solar devices are gold (Au) or silver (Ag) [65,66,67]. Gold is expensive and can be typically replaced by Ag as an electrode in perovskite solar cells [18,68], but both Ag and Au layers show degradation when exposed to thermal stress [69,70]. Domanski et al. reported the migration of gold through HTL into the perovskite materials at 70 °C [70]. Li et al. showed, in an inverted perovskite solar cell, that ions migrating from MAPbI3 thin film diffused through the Phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) ETL and accumulated at the Ag surface in N2 at 85 °C [71]. The proposed mechanism of the Ag-electrode induced thermal degradation of the inverted PSCs is shown in Figure 10a. The loss of methylammonium iodide (MAI) occurred at the grain boundaries (GBs), and upon thermal annealing, the AgI, MA+, and I ions migrate to reconstruct the GBs, creating more defects in the bulk grains and at the MAPbI3/PCBM interface. Multiple reports have investigated an alternative to Au and Ag based electrodes by employing carbon as a back-contact material [16,72]. Li et al. [16] fabricated a hole-conductor-free PSC based on a triple layer architecture with printed carbon electrode. The triple layer consists of mesoporous TiO2 and ZrO2, as well as a 10 µm thick carbon layer. A schematic is shown in Figure 10b. The perovskite precursor solution was infiltrated by drop casting using a carbon counter electrode. The fabricated perovskite was (5-AVA)x(MA)1−xPbI3, where 5-AVA is 5-ammoniumvaleric acid iodide. The device structure displayed excellent stability and an encapsulated device showed stable performance during outdoor operation for seven consecutive days (Figure 10c) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia [16]. Moreover, the encapsulated device remained thermally stable when annealed at 80–85 °C for 90 days, in the dark. Hence, the use of carbon as a back-contact can be beneficial to make stable PSCs at a temperature of 100 °C, representing progress toward the commercialization of PSCs [73]. Baranwal et al. [73] also fabricated a three-layer printable HTL-free MAPbI3 PSC with a mesoporous carbon back contact and UV-curable sealant and performed thermal stability tests of over 1500 h at 100 °C. Interestingly, they found that the position of the UV-curing glue considerably affected device stability. The PCE of side-sealed devices (Figure 10e) remained almost constant during the thermal test over 1500 h (Figure 10f), while for the over-sealed device (Figure 10d), the PCE deteriorated to 20% of the initial value during the 100 °C thermal stress test after only 30 h.

5. Other Strategies to Improve Thermal Stability

Several techniques can be used to achieve thermally stable perovskite solar cells. Manipulating the electron and hole transport layers and metal contacts as discussed extensively in the previous section is one approach. Here, we describe complementary technologies that researchers have adopted to improve the thermal stability of perovskite solar cells.
Yun et al. [74] showed that the thermal stability of perovskite solar cells can be improved by constructing 2D/3D stacking structures. 2D perovskite materials exhibit better moisture stability than 3D perovskite materials [75,76,77,78,79], but the highest efficiency of 2D perovskite solar cells reported in literature is relatively low [80]. Yun et al. fabricated a thin layer of 2D perovskite on top of 3D perovskites in order to cover the surface and grain boundaries. Since the grain boundaries of the perovskite are defective and degradation occurs at the grain boundaries [81], covering the crystal boundaries of the 3D structure by the 2D stacking structure improves overall device stability and maintains high efficiency. They constructed 2D/3D stacking structures by reacting n-butylamine (BA) with the surface of 3D perovskites (see Figure 11a–c). Two types of solutions were used to investigate the thermal stability: BA dissolved in chlorobenzene and n-butylamine iodide (BAI) dissolved in isopropyl alcohol. The SEM images (Figure 11d–f) revealed that the BA solution spun-coated on top of the 3D perovskite layers enhanced the surface smoothness due to the gradual diffusion of BA molecules into the perovskite crystal structure, passivating surface and grain boundaries. The BAI treated film exhibited a relatively rougher surface morphology (Figure 11f), which was attributed to 3D to 2D phase transition [82]. The thermal stress studies using capacitance versus frequency measurements showed that when the device was annealed at 85 °C for 20 h, the device based on the 3D structure had a capacitance greater than that of the fresh perovskite in the low-frequency regime. This high capacitance in the low-frequency regime was attributed to ionic migration at moderately high temperature [8,83,84]. The modified perovskite film also showed better thermal stability under continuous annealing for 1000 h compared to the fresh perovskite, with the modified devices maintaining 96.5% and 88.2% of their initial efficiencies for devices with BA and BAI treatments, respectively, while the fresh device degraded to 69.8% of its initial efficiency under thermal stress [74].
Li et al. investigated the thermal stability of MAPbI3 by modifying its surface. In that study, an additive butylphosphonic acid 4-ammoniumchloride (4-ABPACl) was spun-coated onto the surface [16]. Structural, morphological, and elemental examinations then showed that the additive acted as a crosslink between perovskite grains. The phosphonic acid ammonium additive facilitated obtaining a smooth surface layer because perovskite was incorporated into the mesoporous TiO2 scaffold. The 4-ABPACl additive increased the absorption and almost doubled the efficiency of the devices, compared to the control device. The effect of thermal stress was investigated on an encapsulated device at 45 °C under 10 mW/cm2 illumination. The CH3NH3PbI3-ABPA modified devices maintained 90% of their initial efficiency after one week. A heat stress test was performed on CH3NH3PbI3-ABPA device at 85 °C in the dark for 350 h to confirm if the modified device could endure the exposure to high temperature and the modified device maintained 80% of its initial PCE after 350 h of continuous annealing.
Perovskite thin films are very sensitive to oxygen and moisture, even though different cations and mixed halides have been employed in perovskite structures. Moisture ingress is known to accelerate the thermal degradation of perovskite solar cells, so encapsulation is used to protect perovskites from moisture. Matteocci et al. [85] compared five different glass-glass sealing procedures and found an optimized procedure using Kapton and glue bonded glass. They also showed that an additional edge sealing increased moisture resistance, leading to improved thermal stability with the ability to maintain initial PCE for over 1300 h of shelf-life. Furthermore, they found that the optimized sealing procedure prevents the intrinsic degradation of CH3NH3PbI3, although a reduction in PCE of 0.1%/h at 60 °C and 0.21% at 85 °C was also observed. They suggested that this reduction was attributed to the degradation of Spiro-OMeTAD HTL. A different sealing procedure approach can include the use of polymers such as poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), polycarbonate (PC), or polystyrene to protect perovskite films from oxygen and moisture [64]. Along with protection from air, polymers act as an insulating tunneling contact and passivate defects in perovskite film by increasing the efficiency by more than 18% [86]. Habisreutinger et al. proposed a device architecture consisting of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) and a polymer matrix of PMMA or PC. The SWNTs in such architecture facilitate selective charge extraction, while the polymer matrix serves as an encapsulating layer to protect the device from moisture penetration [64]. The proposed devices showed enhanced thermal stability at high temperatures of 80 °C in ambient humidity conditions, compared to the control devices.
Another approach to improve thermal stability is substituting the methylammonium (MA) cation of the perovskite material, with mixed cation-based perovskites having been extensively studied by researchers. Enhanced crystallinity and structural stability with improved power conversion efficiency were obtained by replacing MA with formamidinium (FA) [87,88,89], cesium (Cs) cations, [90,91,92,93] or a mixture of the two [94,95,96,97,98]. Eperon et al. reported a relatively slower degradation for FAPbI3 compared to MAPbI3 when annealed at 150 °C [89]. Although FAPbI3 is more thermally stable than MAPbI3, the structural instability of FAPbI3 in the presence of moisture limits its use in perovskite solar devices [99]. Replacing FAI by MAI or MABr results in FA1−xMAxPbI3 or FA1−xMAxPbI3−yBry perovskites, with a stabilized black perovskite phase [87,88]. Binek et al. achieved 3D black FA-based perovskite by adding a smaller MA cation compared to FA, resulting in no phase transition in the 25–150 °C temperature range [98]. Such stability improvement was ascribed to the larger dipole moment of MA, which increases the Coulomb interactions within the structure [98].
However, since the unstable nature of the MA cation can hinder long-term stability, inorganic cations, such as cesium, have attracted on-going research attention due to their established sustainability at higher temperatures [90,91,92,93]. For example, CsPbI3 based perovskite forms in a cubic structure with a band gap of 1.73 eV [89,90]. but crystallizes into a photo-inactive yellow phase when exposed to air. In contrast, CsPbBr3 is less sensitive to moisture [92,100], but does not have a favorable bandgap for single-junction solar cell applications [101]. Since inorganic cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, I) have demonstrated advantageous thermal stability, efforts have been made to develop mixed cation perovskites with simultaneous high efficiency and good thermal stability [28,94,95,96,102]. Several groups have studied Cs/FA mixtures, showing enhanced stability results in light, moisture, and heat compared to the pure material (FAPbI3). Saliba et al. have also fabricated solar cells using quadruple-cation perovskites (MA/FA/Cs/Rb), revealing improved reproducibility and stability [103]. Saliba et al. tested devices annealed for 500 h at 85 °C under continuous illumination in a nitrogen atmosphere, and the current-voltage characteristics of the best performance solar cells and the external quantum efficiency (EQE) electroluminescence (EL) are shown in Figure 12a–c, where the compounded stress test exceeds industrial standards [104]. They showed that the device retained 95% of its initial performance when annealed at 85 °C for 500 h, as shown in Figure 12d.

6. Conclusions

Organic-inorganic halide perovskites have been extensively used in solar cells as a promising light harvesting material due to their excellent optoelectronic properties. Although perovskite solar cells have achieved photo-conversion efficiencies above 20%, the instability of their materials at elevated temperatures is a major issue that needs to be solved for commercial use. Particularly, perovskite films tend to exhibit intrinsic thermal degradation mechanisms under thermal stress. Typically, the commonly used MAPbI3 perovskite material is decomposed into MAI and PbI2 at elevated temperatures. The decomposition of perovskites has been discussed here from the chemical, morphological, and optical points of view, confirming the deterioration of perovskites during thermal stress. Furthermore, since perovskite solar devices are composed of many layers, notably an electron transport layer, a hole transport layer, and electrodes, other decomposition challenges exist. Thus, to facilitate better thermal stability, the selective incorporation of electron and hole transport layers and the replacement of silver or gold electrodes is discussed, and the enhancement of the stability of the perovskite layer by encapsulation or including additives is also reviewed. Currently, perovskite solar cells have been made thermally stable for annealing of up to 500 h at 85 °C by using quadruple-cation perovskites, but with available solar products on the market (c-Si, CdTe, CIGS, GaAs) guaranteed to remain stable for up to 25 years, perovskites continue to need research attention. Recent advances in perovskite solar cell thermal stability and in determining the causes of degradation indicate that it should be possible to achieve similar longevity, and support the scalable solutions that would allow this promising technology to reach its full potential and compete in the existing solar market.

Author Contributions

Authors equally contributed to the review paper.

Funding

This research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation under projects (1355678 and 1547771) and the Virginia Microelectronic Consortium Program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wright, M.; Uddin, A. Organic—Inorganic hybrid solar cells: A comparative review. Sol. Energy Mater Sol. Cells 2012, 107, 87–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. NREL Solar Cell Efficiency Chart. Available online: http://www.nrel.gov/ncpv/ (accessed on 9 September 2018).
  3. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lee, M.M.; Teuscher, J.; Miyasaka, T.; Murakami, T.N.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient hybrid solar cells based on meso-superstructured organometal halide perovskites. Science 2012, 1228604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wojciechowski, K.; Saliba, M.; Leijtens, T.; Abate, A.; Snaith, H.J. Sub-150 °C processed meso-superstructured perovskite solar cells with enhanced efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1142–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Berhe, T.A.; Su, W.N.; Chen, C.H.; Pan, C.J.; Cheng, J.H.; Chen, H.M.; Tsai, M.C.; Chen, L.Y.; Dubale, A.A.; Hwang, B.J. Organometal halide perovskite solar cells: Degradation and stability. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 323–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hao, F.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Cao, D.H.; Chang, R.P.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Lead-free solid-state organic–inorganic halide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, Q.; Armin, A.; Nagiri, R.C.R.; Burn, P.L.; Meredith, P. Electro-optics of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Miyata, A.; Mitioglu, A.; Plochocka, P.; Portugall, O.; Wang, J.T.W.; Stranks, S.D.; Snaith, H.J.; Nicholas, R.J. Direct measurement of the exciton binding energy and effective masses for charge carriers in organic-inorganic tri-halide perovskites. Nat. Phys. 2015, 11, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stranks, S.D.; Eperon, G.E.; Grancini, G.; Menelaou, C.; Alcocer, M.J.; Leijtens, T.; Herz, L.M.; Petrozza, A.; Snaith, H.J. Electron-hole diffusion lengths exceeding 1 micrometer in an organometal trihalide perovskite absorber. Science 2013, 342, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xing, G.; Mathews, N.; Sun, S.; Lim, S.S.; Lam, Y.M.; Grätzel, M.; Mhaisalkar, S.; Sum, T.C. Long-range balanced electron-and hole-transport lengths in organic-inorganic CH3NH3PbI3. Science 2013, 342, 344–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Noh, J.H.; Im, S.H.; Heo, J.H.; Mandal, T.N.; Seok, S.I. Chemical management for colorful, efficient, and stable inorganic–organic hybrid nanostructured solar cells. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1764–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, D.; Wright, M.; Elumalai, N.K.; Uddin, A. Stability of perovskite solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater Sol. Cells 2016, 147, 255–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Niu, G.; Guo, X.; Wang, L. Review of recent progress in chemical stability of perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8970–8980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Grätzel, M. The light and shade of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, X.; Tschumi, M.; Han, H.; Babkair, S.S.; Alzubaydi, R.A.; Ansari, A.A.; Habib, S.S.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. Outdoor performance and stability under elevated temperatures and long-term light soaking of triple-layer mesoporous perovskite photovoltaics. Energy Technol. 2015, 3, 551–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Han, Y.; Meyer, S.; Dkhissi, Y.; Weber, K.; Pringle, J.M.; Bach, U.; Spiccia, L.; Cheng, Y.B. Degradation observations of encapsulated planar CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells at high temperatures and humidity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8139–8147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Leijtens, T.; Eperon, G.E.; Pathak, S.; Abate, A.; Lee, M.M.; Snaith, H.J. Overcoming ultraviolet light instability of sensitized TiO2 with meso-superstructured organometal tri-halide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, W.; Wu, Y.; Yue, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, W.; Yang, X.; Chen, H.; Bi, E.; Ashraful, I.; Grätzel, M.; et al. Efficient and stable large-area perovskite solar cells with inorganic charge extraction layers. Science 2015, aad1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shao, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, J. Correlation of energy disorder and open-circuit voltage in hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 15001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cheacharoen, R.; Boyd, C.C.; Burkhard, G.F.; Leijtens, T.; Raiford, J.A.; Bush, K.A.; Bent, S.F.; McGehee, M.D. Encapsulating perovskite solar cells to withstand damp heat and thermal cycling. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2018, 2, 2398–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leijtens, T.; Eperon, G.E.; Noel, N.K.; Habisreutinger, S.N.; Petrozza, A.; Snaith, H.J. Stability of metal halide perovskite solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1500963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Q.; De Marco, N.; Yang, Y.M.; Song, T.B.; Chen, C.C.; Zhao, H.; Hong, Z.; Zhou, H.; Yang, Y. Under the spotlight: The organic–inorganic hybrid halide perovskite for optoelectronic applications. Nano Today 2015, 10, 355–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Goldschmidt, V.M. Krystallbau und chemische Zusammensetzung. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. 1927, 60, 1263–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Leijtens, T.; Bush, K.; Cheacharoen, R.; Beal, R.; Bowring, A.; McGehee, M.D. Towards enabling stable lead halide perovskite solar cells; interplay between structural, environmental, and thermal stability. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 11483–11500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, C.; Lu, X.; Ding, W.; Feng, L.; Gao, Y.; Guo, Z. Formability of ABX3(X=F, Cl, Br, I) Halide Perovskites. Acta Crystallogr. B 2008, 64, 702–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bakulin, A.A.; Selig, O.; Bakker, H.J.; Rezus, Y.L.; Muller, C.; Glaser, T.; Lovrincic, R.; Sun, Z.; Chen, Z.; Walsh, A.; et al. Real-Time Observation of Organic Cation Reorientation in Methylammonium Lead Iodide Perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 3663–3669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Li, Z.; Yang, M.; Park, J.S.; Wei, S.H.; Berry, J.J.; Zhu, K. Stabilizing perovskite structures by tuning tolerance factor: Formation of formamidinium and cesium lead iodide solid-state alloys. Chem. Mater. 2015, 28, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, J.; Seol, D.; Cho, A.; Park, N. High-Efficiency Perovskite Solar Cells Based on the Black Polymorph of HC(NH2)2PbI3. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4991–4998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chang, Y.H.; Park, C.H.; Matsuishi, K. First-Principles Study of the Structural and the Electronic Properties of the Lead-Halide-Based Inorganic-Organic Perovskites (CH3NH3)PbX3 and CsPbX3(X=Cl, Br, I). J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2004, 44, 889–893. [Google Scholar]
  31. Umari, P.; Mosconi, E.; De Angelis, F. Relativistic GW calculations on CH3NH3PbI3 and CH3NH3SnI3 perovskites for solar cell applications. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Umebayashi, T.; Asai, K.; Kondo, T.; Nakao, A. Electronic structures of lead iodide based low-dimensional crystals. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, 155405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wasylishen, R.E.; Knop, O.; Macdonald, J.B. Cation rotation in methylammonium lead halides. Solid State Commun. 1985, 56, 581–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Egger, D.A.; Kronik, L.; Rappe, A.M. Theory of hydrogen migration in organic–inorganic halide perovskites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 12437–12441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ball, J.M.; Lee, M.M.; Hey, A.; Snaith, H.J. Low-temperature processed meso-superstructured to thin-film perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 1739–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stoumpos, C.C.; Malliakas, C.D.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Semiconducting tin and lead iodide perovskites with organic cations: Phase transitions, high mobilities, and near-infrared photoluminescent properties. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 9019–9038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Im, J.H.; Lee, C.R.; Lee, J.W.; Park, S.W.; Park, N.G. 6.5% efficient perovskite quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 4088–4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Conings, B.; Drijkoningen, J.; Gauquelin, N.; Babayigit, A.; D’Haen, J.; D’Olieslaeger, L.; Ethirajan, A.; Verbeeck, J.; Manca, J.; Mosconi, E.; et al. Intrinsic thermal instability of methylammonium lead trihalide perovskite. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1500477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Juarez-Perez, E.J.; Hawash, Z.; Raga, S.R.; Ono, L.K.; Qi, Y. Thermal degradation of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite into NH3 and CH3I gases observed by coupled thermogravimetry–mass spectrometry analysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 3406–3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fan, Z.; Xiao, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Lin, Z.; Cheng, H.C.; Lee, S.J.; Wang, G.; Feng, Z.; Goddard, W.A., III; et al. Layer-by-layer degradation of methylammonium lead tri-iodide perovskite microplates. Joule 2017, 1, 548–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pauling, L. The dependence of bond energy on bond length. J. Phys. Chem. 1954, 58, 662–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Frost, J.M.; Butler, K.T.; Brivio, F.; Hendon, C.H.; Van Schilfgaarde, M.; Walsh, A. Atomistic origins of high-performance in hybrid halide perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2584–2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Christians, J.A.; Miranda Herrera, P.A.; Kamat, P.V. Transformation of the excited state and photovoltaic efficiency of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite upon controlled exposure to humidified air. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1530–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yang, J.; Siempelkamp, B.D.; Liu, D.; Kelly, T.L. Investigation of CH3NH3PbI3 degradation rates and mechanisms in controlled humidity environments using in situ techniques. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 1955–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Smecca, E.; Numata, Y.; Deretzis, I.; Pellegrino, G.; Boninelli, S.; Miyasaka, T.; La Magna, A.; Alberti, A. Stability of solution-processed MAPbI3 and FAPbI3 layers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 13413–13422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Philippe, B.; Park, B.W.; Lindblad, R.; Oscarsson, J.; Ahmadi, S.; Johansson, E.M.; Rensmo, H. Chemical and Electronic Structure Characterization of Lead Halide Perovskites and Stability Behavior under Different Exposures-A Photoelectron Spectroscopy Investigation. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 1720–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Foley, B.J.; Marlowe, D.L.; Sun, K.; Saidi, W.A.; Scudiero, L.; Gupta, M.C.; Choi, J.J. Temperature dependent energy levels of methylammonium lead iodide perovskite. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 243904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Al Mamun, A.; Ava, T.T.; Byun, H.R.; Jeong, H.J.; Jeong, M.S.; Nguyen, L.; Gausin, C.; Namkoong, G. Unveiling the irreversible performance degradation of organo-inorganic halide perovskite films and solar cells during heating and cooling processes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 19487–19495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Milot, R.L.; Eperon, G.E.; Snaith, H.J.; Johnston, M.B.; Herz, L.M. Temperature-dependent charge-carrier dynamics in CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite thin films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 6218–6227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pathak, S.K.; Abate, A.; Ruckdeschel, P.; Roose, B.; Gödel, K.C.; Vaynzof, Y.; Santhala, A.; Watanabe, S.-I.; Hollman, D.J.; Noel, N.; et al. Performance and stability enhancement of dye-sensitized and perovskite solar cells by Al doping of TiO2. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 6046–6055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ahn, N.; Kwak, K.; Jang, M.S.; Yoon, H.; Lee, B.Y.; Lee, J.K.; Pikhitsa, P.V.; Byun, J.; Choi, M. Trapped charge-driven degradation of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Wojciechowski, K.; Stranks, S.D.; Abate, A.; Sadoughi, G.; Sadhanala, A.; Kopidakis, N.; Rumbles, G.; Li, C.Z.; Friend, R.H.; Jen, A.K.Y.; et al. Heterojunction modification for highly efficient organic–inorganic perovskite solar cells. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 12701–12709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wojciechowski, K.; Leijtens, T.; Siprova, S.; Schlueter, C.; Hörantner, M.T.; Wang, J.T.W.; Li, C.Z.; Jen, A.K.Y.; Lee, T.L.; Snaith, H.J. C60 as an efficient n-type compact layer in perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 2399–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ye, S.; Sun, W.; Li, Y.; Yan, W.; Peng, H.; Bian, Z.; Liu, Z.; Huang, C. CuSCN-Based Inverted Planar Perovskite Solar Cell with an Average PCE of 15.6%. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3723–3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Labban, A.E.; Chen, H.; Kirkus, M.; Barbe, J.; Del Gobbo, S.; Neophytou, M.; McCulloch, I. Improved Efficiency in Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells Employing a Novel Diarylamino-Substituted Molecule as PEDOT:PSS Replacement. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 1502101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, W.; Song, M.; Park, S.; Nam, S.; Seo, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, Y. Acidity-Controlled Conducting Polymer Films for Organic Thermoelectric Devices with Horizontal and Vertical Architectures. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Vitoratos, E.; Sakkopoulos, S.; Dalas, E.; Paliatsas, N.; Karageorgopoulos, D.; Petraki, F.; Kennou, S.; Choulis, S.A. Thermal degradation mechanisms of PEDOT: PSS. Org. Electron. 2009, 10, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hu, L.; Li, M.; Yang, K.; Xiong, Z.; Yang, B.; Wang, M.; Tang, X.; Zang, Z.; Liu, X.; Li, B.; et al. PEDOT: PSS monolayers to enhance the hole extraction and stability of perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 16583–16589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. You, J.; Meng, L.; Song, T.-B.; Guo, T.-F.; Yang, Y.; Chang, W.-H.; Hong, Z.; Chen, H.; Zhou, H.; Chen, Q.; et al. Improved Air Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells via Solution- Processed Metal Oxide Transport Layers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 11, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, H.; Cheng, J.; Lin, F.; He, H.; Mao, J.; Wong, K.S.; Jen, A.K.-Y.; Choy, W.C.H. Pinhole-Free and Surface-Nanostructured NiOx Film by Room-Temperature Solution Process for High- Performance Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells with Good Stability and Reproducibility. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 1503–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kim, H.-S.; Seo, J.-Y.; Park, N.-G. Impact of Selective Contacts on Long-Term Stability of CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 27840–27848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhao, X.; Kim, H.S.; Seo, J.Y.; Park, N.G. Effect of selective contacts on the thermal stability of perovskite solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 7148–7153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Xu, J.; Voznyy, O.; Comin, R.; Gong, X.; Walters, G.; Liu, M.; Kanjanaboos, P.; Lan, X.; Sargent, E.H. Crosslinked Remote-Doped Hole-Extracting Contacts Enhance Stability under Accelerated Lifetime Testing in Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2807–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Habisreutinger, S.N.; Leijtens, T.; Eperon, G.E.; Stranks, S.D.; Nicholas, R.J.; Snaith, H.J. Carbon nanotube/polymer composites as a highly stable hole collection layer in perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 5561–5568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Xu, J.; Buin, A.; Ip, A.H.; Li, W.; Voznyy, O.; Comin, R.; Yuan, M.; Jeon, S.; Ning, Z.; McDowell, J.J.; et al. Perovskite–fullerene hybrid materials suppress hysteresis in planar diodes. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Sheikh, A.D.; Bera, A.; Haque, M.A.; Rakhi, R.B.; Del Gobbo, S.; Alshareef, H.N.; Wu, T. Atmospheric effects on the photovoltaic performance of hybrid perovskite solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater Sol. Cells 2015, 137, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sfyri, G.; Kumar, C.V.; Raptis, D.; Dracopoulos, V.; Lianos, P. Study of perovskite solar cells synthesized under ambient conditions and of the performance of small cell modules. Sol. Energy Mater Sol. Cells 2015, 134, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wehrenfennig, C.; Eperon, G.E.; Johnston, M.B.; Snaith, H.J.; Herz, L.M. High charge carrier mobilities and lifetimes in organolead trihalide perovskites. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1584–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Divitini, G.; Cacovich, S.; Matteocci, F.; Cina, L.; Di Carlo, A.; Ducati, C. In situ observation of heat-induced degradation of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy. 2016, 1, 15012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Domanski, K.; Correa-Baena, J.P.; Mine, N.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Abate, A.; Saliba, M.; Tress, W.; Hagfeldt, A.; Grätzel, M. Not all that glitters is gold: Metal-migration-induced degradation in perovskite solar cells. ACS nano 2016, 10, 6306–6314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, J.; Dong, Q.; Li, N.; Wang, L. Direct Evidence of Ion Diffusion for the Silver-Electrode-Induced Thermal Degradation of Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mei, A.; Li, X.; Liu, L.; Ku, Z.; Liu, T.; Rong, Y.; Xu, M.; Hu, M.; Chen, J.; Yang, Y.; et al. A hole-conductor–free, fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with high stability. Science 2014, 345, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Baranwal, A.K.; Kanaya, S.; Peiris, T.N.; Mizuta, G.; Nishina, T.; Kanda, H.; Miyasaka, T.; Segawa, H.; Ito, S. 100 °C thermal stability of printable perovskite solar cells using porous carbon counter electrodes. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 2604–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lin, Y.; Bai, Y.; Fang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yang, S.; Zheng, X.; Tang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Huang, J. Enhanced thermal stability in perovskite solar cells by assembling 2D/3D stacking structures. J Phys Chem Lett. 2018, 9, 654–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Smith, I.C.; Hoke, E.T.; Solis-Ibarra, D.; McGehee, M.D.; Karunadasa, H.I. A Layered Hybrid Perovskite Solar-Cell Absorber with Enhanced Moisture Stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11232–11235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Cao, D.H.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Farha, O.K.; Hupp, J.T.; Kanatzidis, M.G. 2D Homologous Perovskites as Light-Absorbing Materials for Solar Cell Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7843–7850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tsai, H.; Nie, W.; Blancon, J.C.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Asadpour, R.; Harutyunyan, B.; Neukirch, A.J.; Verduzco, R.; Crochet, J.J.; Tretiak, S.; et al. High-Efficiency Two-Dimensional Ruddlesden- Popper Perovskite Solar Cells. Nature 2016, 536, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Quan, L.N.; Yuan, M.; Comin, R.; Voznyy, O.; Beauregard, E.M.; Hoogland, S.; Buin, A.; Kirmani, A.R.; Zhao, K.; Amassian, A.; et al. Ligand-stabilized reduced-dimensionality perovskites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2649–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yao, K.; Wang, X.; Xu, Y.-X.; Li, F.; Zhou, L. Multilayered Perovskite Materials Based on Polymeric-Ammonium Cations for Stable Large-Area Solar Cell. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 3131–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhang, X.; Ren, X.; Liu, B.; Munir, R.; Zhu, X.; Yang, D.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Smilgies, D.M.; Li, R.; et al. Stable high efficiency two-dimensional perovskite solar cells via cesium doping. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 2095–2102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, Q.; Chen, B.; Liu, Y.; Deng, Y.; Bai, Y.; Dong, Q.; Huang, J. Scaling behavior of moisture-induced grain degradation in polycrystalline hybrid perovskite thin films. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yang, S.; Zheng, Y.C.; Hou, Y.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Yang, H.G. Formation Mechanism of Freestanding CH3NH3PbI3 Functional Crystals: In Situ Transformation vs. Dissolution−Crystallization. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 6705–6710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hoque, M.N.F.; Yang, M.; Li, Z.; Islam, N.; Pan, X.; Zhu, K.; Fan, Z. Polarization and Dielectric Study of Methylammonium Lead Iodide Thin Film to Reveal its Nonferroelectric Nature under Solar Cell Operating Conditions. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jonscher, A. Analysis of the Alternating Current Properties of Ionic Conductors. J. Mater. Sci. 1978, 13, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Matteocci, F.; Cinà, L.; Lamanna, E.; Cacovich, S.; Divitini, G.; Midgley, P.A.; Ducati, C.; Di Carlo, A. Encapsulation for long-term stability enhancement of perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy 2016, 30, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, F.; Shimazaki, A.; Yang, F.; Kanahashi, K.; Matsuki, K.; Miyauchi, Y.; Takenobu, T.; Wakamiya, A.; Murata, Y.; Matsuda, K. Highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells by interfacial engineering using solution-processed polymer layer. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 1562–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Jeon, N.J.; Noh, J.H.; Yang, W.S.; Kim, Y.C.; Ryu, S.; Seo, J.; Seok, S.I. Compositional engineering of perovskite materials for high-performance solar cells. Nature 2015, 517, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pellet, N.; Gao, P.; Gregori, G.; Yang, T.Y.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Maier, J.; Grätzel, M. Mixed-organic-cation Perovskite photovoltaics for enhanced solar-light harvesting. Angew. Chem. Int. 2014, 126, 3215–3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Eperon, G.E.; Stranks, S.D.; Menelaou, C.; Johnston, M.B.; Herz, L.M.; Snaith, H.J. Formamidinium lead trihalide: A broadly tunable perovskite for efficient planar heterojunction solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 982–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Eperon, G.E.; Paterno, G.M.; Sutton, R.J.; Zampetti, A.; Haghighirad, A.A.; Cacialli, F.; Snaith, H.J. Inorganic cesium lead iodide perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 19688–19695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sutton, R.J.; Eperon, G.E.; Miranda, L.; Parrott, E.S.; Kamino, B.A.; Patel, J.B.; Hörantner, M.T.; Johnston, M.B.; Haghighirad, A.A.; Moore, D.T.; et al. Bandgap-tunable cesium lead halide perovskites with high thermal stability for efficient solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kulbak, M.; Gupta, S.; Kedem, N.; Levine, I.; Bendikov, T.; Hodes, G.; Cahen, D. Cesium enhances long-term stability of lead bromide perovskite-based solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 7, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Beal, R.E.; Slotcavage, D.J.; Leijtens, T.; Bowring, A.R.; Belisle, R.A.; Nguyen, W.H.; Burkhard, G.F.; Hoke, E.T.; McGehee, M.D. Cesium lead halide perovskites with improved stability for tandem solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 746–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Saliba, M.; Matsui, T.; Seo, J.Y.; Domanski, K.; Correa-Baena, J.P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Tress, W.; Abate, A.; Hagfeldt, A.; et al. Cesium-containing triple cation perovskite solar cells: Improved stability, reproducibility and high efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1989–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. McMeekin, D.P.; Sadoughi, G.; Rehman, W.; Eperon, G.E.; Saliba, M.; Hörantner, M.T.; Haghighirad, A.; Sakai, N.; Korte, L.; Rech, B.; et al. A mixed-cation lead mixed-halide perovskite absorber for tandem solar cells. Science 2016, 351, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Lee, J.W.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, H.S.; Seo, S.W.; Cho, S.M.; Park, N.G. Formamidinium and cesium hybridization for photo-and moisture-stable perovskite solar cell. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1501310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yi, C.; Luo, J.; Meloni, S.; Boziki, A.; Ashari-Astani, N.; Grätzel, C.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Röthlisberger, U.; Grätzel, M. Entropic stabilization of mixed A-cation ABX3 metal halide perovskites for high performance perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Binek, A.; Hanusch, F.C.; Docampo, P.; Bein, T. Stabilization of the trigonal high-temperature phase of formamidinium lead iodide. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 1249–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Koh, T.M.; Fu, K.; Fang, Y.; Chen, S.; Sum, T.C.; Mathews, N.; Mhaisalkar, S.G.; Boix, P.P.; Baikie, T. Formamidinium-containing metal-halide: An alternative material for near-IR absorption perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 118, 16458–16462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kulbak, M.; Cahen, D.; Hodes, G. How important is the organic part of lead halide perovskite photovoltaic cells? Efficient CsPbBr3 cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 2452–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Stoumpos, C.C.; Malliakas, C.D.; Peters, J.A.; Liu, Z.; Sebastian, M.; Im, J.; Chasapis, T.C.; Wibowo, A.C.; Chung, D.Y.; Freeman, A.J.; et al. Crystal growth of the perovskite semiconductor CsPbBr3: A new material for high-energy radiation detection. Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 13, 2722–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Choi, H.; Jeong, J.; Kim, H.B.; Kim, S.; Walker, B.; Kim, G.H.; Kim, J.Y. Cesium-doped methylammonium lead iodide perovskite light absorber for hybrid solar cells. Nano Energy 2014, 7, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Saliba, M.; Matsui, T.; Domanski, K.; Seo, J.Y.; Ummadisingu, A.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Correa-Baena, J.P.; Tress, W.R.; Abate, A.; Hagfeldt, A.; et al. Incorporation of rubidium cations into perovskite solar cells improves photovoltaic performance. Science 2016, 354, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Rong, Y.; Liu, L.; Mei, A.; Li, X.; Han, H. Beyond efficiency: The challenge of stability in mesoscopic perovskite solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1501066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The unit cell of cubic perovskite, where the blue spheres at lattice corners are A cations, the green sphere at the center is a B cation, and the red spheres at the lattice faces are X anions. (b) Another illustration of BX6 octahedral network, where B cations are surrounded by X anions. (c) A tilted BX6 octahedral structure due to non-ideal size effects and additional factors. Reprinted from [23], with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 1. (a) The unit cell of cubic perovskite, where the blue spheres at lattice corners are A cations, the green sphere at the center is a B cation, and the red spheres at the lattice faces are X anions. (b) Another illustration of BX6 octahedral network, where B cations are surrounded by X anions. (c) A tilted BX6 octahedral structure due to non-ideal size effects and additional factors. Reprinted from [23], with permission from Elsevier.
Applsci 09 00188 g001
Figure 2. (ac) Degradation process of MAPbI3 grain with direct transition from tetragonal to trigonal crystalline structure. The purple dashed lines in (ac) showed the shrinking of perovskite and the insets represented Fast Fourier transform (FFT) phase diagrams of the corresponding HRTEM images (Scale bar = 2 nm). (d) Transition from MAPbI3 with a tetragonal configuration to PbI2 with a trigonal configuration. Reprinted from [40], with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 2. (ac) Degradation process of MAPbI3 grain with direct transition from tetragonal to trigonal crystalline structure. The purple dashed lines in (ac) showed the shrinking of perovskite and the insets represented Fast Fourier transform (FFT) phase diagrams of the corresponding HRTEM images (Scale bar = 2 nm). (d) Transition from MAPbI3 with a tetragonal configuration to PbI2 with a trigonal configuration. Reprinted from [40], with permission from Elsevier.
Applsci 09 00188 g002
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of ITO/TiO2/perovskite samples heated at 85 °C for 24 h in different atmospheres. Reprinted with permission from [38]. (b) XRD patterns of MAPbI3 film collected at 120 °C in air at different times and (c) the corresponding rocking curves at 2y = 14.11° and 2y = 12.71°. Reprinted with permission from [45]. (d) The atomic ratio of I/Pb (red circle) and N/Pb (black diamond) at elevated temperatures analyzed from photoelectron spectroscopy measurement. Reprinted with permission from [46]. Copyright (2015) American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of ITO/TiO2/perovskite samples heated at 85 °C for 24 h in different atmospheres. Reprinted with permission from [38]. (b) XRD patterns of MAPbI3 film collected at 120 °C in air at different times and (c) the corresponding rocking curves at 2y = 14.11° and 2y = 12.71°. Reprinted with permission from [45]. (d) The atomic ratio of I/Pb (red circle) and N/Pb (black diamond) at elevated temperatures analyzed from photoelectron spectroscopy measurement. Reprinted with permission from [46]. Copyright (2015) American Chemical Society.
Applsci 09 00188 g003
Figure 4. (ad) Cross-sectional views of perovskite solar cells heated at 85 °C for 24 h in different atmospheric conditions. The area highlighted in red in the degraded device in O2 environment indicates the presence of PbI2 grain. (eh) Topographical AFM images of perovskite films that were heated at 85 °C for 24 h in different atmospheric conditions. Reprinted from [38] with permission.
Figure 4. (ad) Cross-sectional views of perovskite solar cells heated at 85 °C for 24 h in different atmospheric conditions. The area highlighted in red in the degraded device in O2 environment indicates the presence of PbI2 grain. (eh) Topographical AFM images of perovskite films that were heated at 85 °C for 24 h in different atmospheric conditions. Reprinted from [38] with permission.
Applsci 09 00188 g004
Figure 5. Cross-sectional FIB-SEM images of a (A) (a) A fresh cell and (b-d) cells aged at high temperature (55 °C (85 °C)) and humidity (50%) for 500 h. Degradations in different layers are denoted as voids in the Spiro-OMeTAD layer (□); voids in the perovskite layer (∆); degraded silver layer (○) and formation of particles with higher atomic numbers, likely PbI2 (◊). Reprinted with permission from [17].
Figure 5. Cross-sectional FIB-SEM images of a (A) (a) A fresh cell and (b-d) cells aged at high temperature (55 °C (85 °C)) and humidity (50%) for 500 h. Degradations in different layers are denoted as voids in the Spiro-OMeTAD layer (□); voids in the perovskite layer (∆); degraded silver layer (○) and formation of particles with higher atomic numbers, likely PbI2 (◊). Reprinted with permission from [17].
Applsci 09 00188 g005
Figure 6. Temperature dependent (a) absorbance and (b) photoluminescence spectra of MAPbI3 when the temperature is increased from 28 °C to 85 °C. Reprinted with permission from [47]. (c) photoluminescence (PL) intensity plotted as a function of temperature showing three transitional PL peaks during the heating process. (d) PL measurements as a function of temperature during the heating and cooling processes (room temperature to 52 °C). (e) Best-fit of lifetime decay using trapping and detrapping model. (f) Evolution of the lifetime of MAPbI3−xClx during heating and cooling processes. The trap depths of 145 meV for temperatures in the range 40–70 °C and 1.1 eV above 70 °C were obtained from a quantitative analysis of the Arrhenius plots. Reprinted with permission from [48].
Figure 6. Temperature dependent (a) absorbance and (b) photoluminescence spectra of MAPbI3 when the temperature is increased from 28 °C to 85 °C. Reprinted with permission from [47]. (c) photoluminescence (PL) intensity plotted as a function of temperature showing three transitional PL peaks during the heating process. (d) PL measurements as a function of temperature during the heating and cooling processes (room temperature to 52 °C). (e) Best-fit of lifetime decay using trapping and detrapping model. (f) Evolution of the lifetime of MAPbI3−xClx during heating and cooling processes. The trap depths of 145 meV for temperatures in the range 40–70 °C and 1.1 eV above 70 °C were obtained from a quantitative analysis of the Arrhenius plots. Reprinted with permission from [48].
Applsci 09 00188 g006
Figure 7. Steady state PL measured over time with (a) compact TiO2 or (b) C60 acceptor electron transport layers (ETLs) at short circuit and different forward biases. (c) Time resolved PL decays for the devices before and after applying 1 V forward bias. The pre-biased devices are measured within 3 s after applying the forward bias. (d) Photovoltaic parameters extracted from J-V curves for both cells after heat treatment at 60 °C for 500 h. J-V curves were measured every 65 min. Reprinted with permission from [53]. Copyright (2015) American Chemical Society.
Figure 7. Steady state PL measured over time with (a) compact TiO2 or (b) C60 acceptor electron transport layers (ETLs) at short circuit and different forward biases. (c) Time resolved PL decays for the devices before and after applying 1 V forward bias. The pre-biased devices are measured within 3 s after applying the forward bias. (d) Photovoltaic parameters extracted from J-V curves for both cells after heat treatment at 60 °C for 500 h. J-V curves were measured every 65 min. Reprinted with permission from [53]. Copyright (2015) American Chemical Society.
Applsci 09 00188 g007
Figure 8. (a) Two-step process to form an insoluble and thermally stable hole extraction contact. (b) The performance of devices using Spiro-OMeTAD as the hole extraction contact tested at room temperature (light gray) and after annealing at 110 °C (dark gray). (c) The performance of devices using VNBP-MoO3 tested at room temperature (light gray) and after annealing at 110 °C (dark gray). (d) Optical microscopy images of doped Spiro-OMeTAD and VNBP-MoO3 films before and after annealing. (e) XRD patterns illustrating the evolution of perovskite content in the device active layer. Reprinted from [63], with permission.
Figure 8. (a) Two-step process to form an insoluble and thermally stable hole extraction contact. (b) The performance of devices using Spiro-OMeTAD as the hole extraction contact tested at room temperature (light gray) and after annealing at 110 °C (dark gray). (c) The performance of devices using VNBP-MoO3 tested at room temperature (light gray) and after annealing at 110 °C (dark gray). (d) Optical microscopy images of doped Spiro-OMeTAD and VNBP-MoO3 films before and after annealing. (e) XRD patterns illustrating the evolution of perovskite content in the device active layer. Reprinted from [63], with permission.
Applsci 09 00188 g008
Figure 9. (a) Schematic of a solar cell where carbon nanotube/polymer composite is used as a hole-transport layer. (b) Photographs illustrating the visible degradation of the perovskite layer for various HTLs. (c) Temperature dependent power conversion efficiency for perovskite solar cells as a function of temperature for different HTLs. (d) Absorption measurements and (e) XRD patterns of sample with different HTLs before and after annealing for 96 h. Reprinted with permission from [64]. Copyright (2014) American Chemical Society. PMMA: poly (methyl methacrylate); SWNT: single-walled nanotubes.
Figure 9. (a) Schematic of a solar cell where carbon nanotube/polymer composite is used as a hole-transport layer. (b) Photographs illustrating the visible degradation of the perovskite layer for various HTLs. (c) Temperature dependent power conversion efficiency for perovskite solar cells as a function of temperature for different HTLs. (d) Absorption measurements and (e) XRD patterns of sample with different HTLs before and after annealing for 96 h. Reprinted with permission from [64]. Copyright (2014) American Chemical Society. PMMA: poly (methyl methacrylate); SWNT: single-walled nanotubes.
Applsci 09 00188 g009
Figure 10. (a) A proposed mechanism for Ag-electrode-induced thermal degradation of the inverted perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Reprinted from [71], with permission. (b) A schematic of fabricated perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with carbon electrodes and (c) Photovoltaic parameters of the encapsulated perovskite solar cell plotted versus time during outdoor aging in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Reprinted from [16], with permission. Diagram of a three-layer perovskite device: (d) over-sealed and (e) side-sealed cell. (f) photo-conversion efficiency (PCE) of PSCs fabricated using the side-sealing configuration during thermal stability testing at different temperatures in the dark. Reprinted from [73], with permission.
Figure 10. (a) A proposed mechanism for Ag-electrode-induced thermal degradation of the inverted perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Reprinted from [71], with permission. (b) A schematic of fabricated perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with carbon electrodes and (c) Photovoltaic parameters of the encapsulated perovskite solar cell plotted versus time during outdoor aging in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Reprinted from [16], with permission. Diagram of a three-layer perovskite device: (d) over-sealed and (e) side-sealed cell. (f) photo-conversion efficiency (PCE) of PSCs fabricated using the side-sealing configuration during thermal stability testing at different temperatures in the dark. Reprinted from [73], with permission.
Applsci 09 00188 g010
Figure 11. (a) A schematic of 2D/3D stacking structure obtained from BA-treated perovskite film. (b,c) 2D/3D molecular junctions on the surface and at grain boundaries of 3D perovskite films with BA and BAI treatments, respectively. SEM images of (d) MAPbI3 films, (e) BA-treated MAPbI3 films, and (f) BAI-treated MAPbI3 films. Capacitance−frequency spectra (g) before and (h) after thermal stress at 85 °C for 20 h of the control, BA-treated, and BAI-treated devices; (i) Time evolution of normalized PCE under thermal stress. Reprinted with permission from [74]. Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society.
Figure 11. (a) A schematic of 2D/3D stacking structure obtained from BA-treated perovskite film. (b,c) 2D/3D molecular junctions on the surface and at grain boundaries of 3D perovskite films with BA and BAI treatments, respectively. SEM images of (d) MAPbI3 films, (e) BA-treated MAPbI3 films, and (f) BAI-treated MAPbI3 films. Capacitance−frequency spectra (g) before and (h) after thermal stress at 85 °C for 20 h of the control, BA-treated, and BAI-treated devices; (i) Time evolution of normalized PCE under thermal stress. Reprinted with permission from [74]. Copyright (2018) American Chemical Society.
Applsci 09 00188 g011
Figure 12. (a) Current density–voltage (J-V) curve of the highest performance RbCsMAFA solar cell. The inset shows the scan rate–independent maximum power point (MPP) tracking for 60 s. (b) J-V curve of the highest-VOC device. The inset illustrates the VOC for 120 s (c) EQE electroluminescence (EL) versus voltage. The left and right inset show the corresponding EL spectrum and two areas of a solar cell, respectively (d) Thermal stability as a function of time for the perovskite solar cell. Reprinted with permission from [103].
Figure 12. (a) Current density–voltage (J-V) curve of the highest performance RbCsMAFA solar cell. The inset shows the scan rate–independent maximum power point (MPP) tracking for 60 s. (b) J-V curve of the highest-VOC device. The inset illustrates the VOC for 120 s (c) EQE electroluminescence (EL) versus voltage. The left and right inset show the corresponding EL spectrum and two areas of a solar cell, respectively (d) Thermal stability as a function of time for the perovskite solar cell. Reprinted with permission from [103].
Applsci 09 00188 g012
Table 1. Structural data for various methylammonium lead trihalides [22].
Table 1. Structural data for various methylammonium lead trihalides [22].
Halides (X)Temperature (K)Crystal StructureSpace GroupLattice Parameter (Å)
abc
Cl>178.8CubicPm3m5.675
172.9–178.8TetragonalP4/mmm5.656 5.630
<172.9OrthorhombicP22215.6735.62811.182
Br>236.9CubicPm3m5.901
155.1–236.9TetragonalI4/mcm8.322 11.832
149.5–155.1TetragonalP4/mmm5.894 5.861
<144.5OrthorhombicPna217.9798.58011.849
I>327.4CubicPm3m6.329
162.2–327.4TetragonalI4/mcm8.855 12.659
<162.2OrthorhombicPna218.8618.58112.620

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ava, T.T.; Al Mamun, A.; Marsillac, S.; Namkoong, G. A Review: Thermal Stability of Methylammonium Lead Halide Based Perovskite Solar Cells. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010188

AMA Style

Ava TT, Al Mamun A, Marsillac S, Namkoong G. A Review: Thermal Stability of Methylammonium Lead Halide Based Perovskite Solar Cells. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(1):188. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010188

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ava, Tanzila Tasnim, Abdullah Al Mamun, Sylvain Marsillac, and Gon Namkoong. 2019. "A Review: Thermal Stability of Methylammonium Lead Halide Based Perovskite Solar Cells" Applied Sciences 9, no. 1: 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010188

APA Style

Ava, T. T., Al Mamun, A., Marsillac, S., & Namkoong, G. (2019). A Review: Thermal Stability of Methylammonium Lead Halide Based Perovskite Solar Cells. Applied Sciences, 9(1), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010188

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop