Wedge-Splitting Test on Carbon-Containing Refractories at High Temperatures

Abstract

The mode I fracture behavior of ordinary refractory materials is usually tested with the wedge-splitting test. At elevated temperatures, the optical displacement measurement is difficult because of the convection in the furnace and possible reactions of refractory components with the ambient atmosphere. The present paper introduces a newly developed testing device, which is able to perform such experiments up to 1500 °C. For the testing of carbon-containing refractories a gas purging, for example, with argon, is possible. Laser speckle extensometers are applied for the displacement measurement. A carbon-containing magnesia refractory (MgO–C) was selected for a case study. Based on the results obtained from tests, fracture mechanical parameters such as the specific fracture energy and the nominal notch tensile strength were calculated. An inverse simulation procedure applying the finite element method yields tensile strength, the total specific fracture energy, and the strain-softening behavior. Additionally, the creep behavior was also considered for the evaluation.

1. Introduction

The wedge-splitting test is performed on notched prismatic specimens that enable stable crack formation for relatively large specimens [1,2]. The reasons are the action of the wedge and the relatively high fracture surface to sample volume ratio. The specimen length is 100 mm, the height is also 100 mm, and the thickness 75 mm. A three-dimensional schematic representation of the sample including the load transmission parts is shown in Figure 1. The wedge-splitting test (WST) at room temperature is performed with a loading rate of 0.5 mm/min. During the test, a video extensometer detects the horizontal displacement at the measuring points. The displacement is measured at the height where the rollers contact the load transmission elements.

The sample rests on a linear support (3 × 3 × 90 mm³) to allow for the free vertical displacement of the sample except for the support. The linear support, as well as the wedge and the rollers, are made of corundum to withstand the testing temperatures.

From the results, the specific fracture energy G_f’ and the nominal notch tensile strength σ_NT, can be calculated directly from the load-displacement curve (Equations (2) and (3)). The horizontal force F_H, which is needed for Equations (2) and (3), is calculated from the geometry of the wedge and the measured vertical force F_V (Equation (1)):

$$F_H=\frac{F_V}{2tan\frac{\alpha }{2}}$$

(1)

In this equation, α is the wedge angle (10°).

$$G_{f^{\prime }}=\frac{1}{A}{{\displaystyle \int }}_0^{\delta }{F}_{H}d{\delta }_H$$

(2)

The specific fracture energy G_f’ is the area below the load-displacement curve divided by the ligament area A. The measured horizontal displacement is defined with δ_H, and the horizontal displacement at 15% of the maximum load is δ.

Here G_f’ (Equation (2)) is the specific fracture energy directly evaluated from the load-displacement curve. This parameter includes only the major part of the specific fracture energy because a premature termination of the test is necessary to avoid the contact of the wedge with the ligament. This means that the WST is stopped before the force reaches zero.

The nominal notch tensile strength σ_NT is calculated according to Equation (3):

$${\sigma }_{NT}=\frac{F_{H,max}}{bh}\left(1+\frac{6y}{h}\right)$$

(3)

Here, F_H,max is the maximum horizontal load, b and h are the width and the height of the ligament, and y is the vertical distance from the loading position to the center of the ligament.

The simplest possibility for the displacement measurement is to make use of the crosshead travel. Unfortunately, this is not accurate because deformations of the testing machine influence the results as well as the adjustment of the load transmission parts during load application. Out of these reasons, it is advantageous to measure the displacement directly on the sample.

At elevated temperatures, one possibility is to measure the displacement with an optical dilatometer. Here a halogen lamp illuminates the sample on one side and on the other side the shadow cast by the sample against the light source is recorded by a high-resolution complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) camera [3]. With this method, the displacement is measured on one side of the sample only. Although the performance of the wedge splitting test at room temperature with optical displacement measurement is state of the art [4], at elevated temperatures, the optical measurement is far more difficult due to the radiation and convection in the furnace chamber.

High-temperature testing above 600 °C of carbon-containing refractories shall be carried out in non-oxidizing atmospheres. Otherwise, the oxidation of carbon 2C_(g) + O2_(g) = 2CO_(g) takes place [5], and the microstructure and the properties will be changed significantly [6].

To counteract these problems, a new device was developed to perform the WST on carbon-containing materials up to 1500 °C in an argon atmosphere and to measure the displacement on the front and rear side of the sample. The horizontal displacements are measured with two laser speckle extensometers (LSE). In the present paper, the features of the new device and the fracture behavior of a resin-bonded magnesia carbon material at elevated temperatures are discussed.

2. Material and Sample Preparation

The tested resin bonded magnesia carbon brick is composed of fused magnesia, large crystal magnesia clinker, and graphite. A typical application is the refractory lining of a steel ladle in the secondary steel metallurgy. The residual carbon content after cooking under reducing conditions was 10%. The composition showed a CaO/SiO₂ (C/S) ratio of 3.8. Bricks were heat-treated at 1000 °C for 5 h in a coke bed prior to testing; this enhanced the carbon bond and reduced the emission of volatiles during testing. These emissions caused problems for the displacement measurement by laser speckle extensometers.

3. Device

The wedge splitting test device (universal testing device with displacement measurement) was developed in close cooperation with the company ZwickRoell Testing Systems GmbH (Furstenfeld, Austria). An existing universal testing device with a rigid frame and two rotating spindles were equipped with several components in order to perform the wedge-splitting test at high temperatures. A schematic drawing of the device is illustrated in Figure 2. The load cell is integrated in the lower piston and the maximum load capacity is 300 kN at room temperature. The vertical load rate is set to 0.5 mm/min for the wedge-splitting test.

In this device, a gas-tight furnace was installed (Figure 2, Figure 3). The furnace has two windows (front and rear) in order to measure the displacement during the test. The maximum testing temperature is 1500 °C. In order to protect the carbon in the samples from oxidation, the furnace chamber can be purged with an inert gas. The purging rate depends on the material and on the testing temperature and can be adjusted between 8 and 70 L/h. The adjustment of the purging rate was done with a valve at the digital flowmeter.

For the displacement measurement during the wedge-splitting test, the device was equipped with two laser-speckle extensometers. One is situated in the front and the other one in the rear of the furnace. The sample was illuminated with green laser light (wavelength: 532 nm), creating a speckled pattern on the sample surface. The movement of the speckled pattern was recorded with two full-screen digital cameras. In each evaluation area, a displacement measurement of the speckled pattern was performed. The increase in the distance between the measurement points is calculated. It is called horizontal displacement in this paper [7].

The setup of the furnace including the laser-speckle extensometers is shown in Figure 4 (all units in mm).

Each extensometer has two lasers and two cameras. The green lines in Figure 4 show the course of the laser beam. The distance of the measuring points was set to 40 mm. This initial measurement length can be adjusted according to the sample geometry. The distance between the position of the camera and the sample surface is 380 mm.

The advantage of a laser-speckle-extensometer compared to a mechanical extensometer is that the sample and the extensometer fingers are not in contact. Contacting extensometer fingers could be damaged during the cracking of the sample, furthermore, a possible deformation of the extensometers could influence the results. An advantage compared to a standard laser extensometer is that an application of measuring marks to increase the contrast is not necessary because of the characteristic speckled pattern. The resolution of the strain measurement is 0.11 µm according to the specifications from ZwickRoell. The scattering of the measurement signal during a high-temperature test was below 3 µm. This value was determined together with the company ZwickRoell in the course of preliminary investigations. The horizontal displacement was measured in the front and rear side, the average value was used for the evaluation. Figure 5 shows the configuration after a test.

The alignment of the rolls and the wedge is essential to achieve symmetrical displacement on the front and rear side of the sample.

4. Results and Discussion

This section is divided into three subsections. It provides a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretations, and the conclusions that can be drawn.

4.1. Experiments and Evaluation

Tests with the newly developed device were carried out successfully between room temperature and 1470 °C. During the high-temperature experiments, the furnace chamber was purged with argon and a purging rate up to 70 L/h. Figure 6 shows the load-displacement diagrams from room temperature to 1470 °C.

As the oxidation of carbon in the sample increases with increasing temperature, a purging rate was defined for each individual temperature. The purging rate at 1100 °C was set to 10 L/h, at 1370 °C 40 L/h and to 70 L/h for the test at 1470 °C.

The

Table 1. Fracture mechanical parameters determined from tests performed at room temperature (RT), 1100 °C, 1370 °C, and 1470 °C.

	20 °C (RT)	1100 °C	1370 °C	1470 °C
FVmax [N]	301	288	439	440
FHmax [N]	1720	1646	2508	2510
Specific fracture energy Gf’ [N/m]	240	125	362	513
Nominal notch tensile strength σNT [N/mm2]	2.71	3.13	4.02	4.35
Gf’/σNT [mm]	0.09	0.04	0.09	0.12

below shows the maximum horizontal force F_H,max, the specific fracture energy Gf’ and the nominal notch tensile strength σ_NT according to the Equations (1)–(3).

For the high-temperature tests the specific fracture energy G_f’ and the nominal notch tensile strength σ_NT show an increase with increasing temperature. The test at room temperature shows the smallest nominal notch tensile strength but the specific fracture energy G_f’ is higher than that at 1100 °C and lower than that at 1370 °C. The ratio between the specific fracture energy G_f’ and the notch tensile strength σ_NT are applied as an indicator for brittleness [8].

The following figure illustrates a sample after the experiment at 1470 °C. The oxidation of the carbon in the sample is relatively small, only slight traces of oxidation are visible on the surface. The ligament area of the sample (the area inside the red frame) is without any visible oxidation (Figure 7).

The weight loss after the test at 1470 °C is below 1% (18 g out of 2250 g of a sample in virgin state) for a purging rate of 70 L/h. The reaction of C(s) with O₂(g) decreases with an increase in the argon purging rate [9]. The weight loss after the test at 1370 °C is 0.8%. For the test at 1100 °C, the weight loss decreases to 0.5%.

4.2. Inverse Evaluation

In order to determine other parameters of interest, such as the tensile strength f_t and the total specific fracture energy G_f and to consider the influence of the creep behavior, an inverse evaluation method was applied on a two-dimensional finite element model of the wedge splitting test developed earlier [10]. The commercial software package ABAQUS (6.13, Dassault Sys Simulia Corp, Providence, RI, USA) was used for modeling. The mode I fracture was considered with an exponential strain-softening behavior applied in the ligament area (Figure 8) (Equation (4)).

$$\sigma =f_t\left\{1-\left(\frac{1-e^{-\phi \frac{x}{x_{ult}}}}{1-e^{-\phi }}\right)\right\}$$

(4)

In this equation f_t is the tensile strength of the material, the parameter x_ult is the ultimate crack opening and φ is a non-dimensional parameter that defines the rate of damage evolution [11]. Cohesive elements were applied to the interfaces of the two half specimens to simulate the mode I fracture [11]. Through an adaptive nonlinear least-squares algorithm, the fracture parameters are inversely calculated by fitting the results of finite element simulations to the results of laboratory wedge splitting tests.

The following Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 show the load-displacement diagrams and the determined strain-softening behavior for experiments between 1100 °C and 1470 °C. The green curves in the left diagrams (a) are the measured ones from the wedge splitting tests. The blue curves (a) are the curves simulated by finite element simulations. The red curves in the diagrams show the results with consideration of the creep behavior and are explained in the following chapter. The (b) figures show the strain-softening behavior determined via inverse evaluation from parameters f_t, x_ult, and φ. Results from (b) correspond to (a).

The inversely calculated curve (a) shows only a slight deviation from the tested one. The minimization procedure is automatically terminated when a minimum of residuals is reached [10]. The tensile strength and x_ult show a decrease with decreasing temperature when the creep is not considered.

Table 2. Fracture mechanical parameters and brittleness indicators at different temperatures calculated from ABAQUS simulations.

Parameter	1470 °C	1370 °C	1100 °C
Total specific fracture energy Gf [N/m]	563	453	162
Tensile strength ft [N/mm²]	2.40	2.26	1.42
σNT/ft	1.83	1.77	2.2
Gf/ft [mm]	0.23	0.20	0.11

shows the inversely evaluated parameters and brittleness indicators.

With increasing temperature, the specific fracture energy G_f increases. The tensile strength follows the same trend. At 1470 °C and 1370 °C, the maximum horizontal forces are similar but the specific fracture energy is lower at 1370 °C because of lower horizontal displacement.

Additionally, the ratio between σ_NT and f_t was calculated. The difference between σ_NT and f_t is expected. Reasons are the action of the notch on the one hand and on the other hand the dependence on the brittleness number [12]. As well as G_f’/σ_NT, the ratio between the real specific fracture energy G_f and the tensile strength f_t is an indicator of the brittleness. This ratio decreases with decreasing temperature.

4.3. Inverse Evaluation with the Consideration of Creep

In this chapter, the tensile creep behavior was considered in the inverse evaluation. The creep behavior of this material was already investigated by the authors [13]. It is clear that creep has an influence on the service behavior and furthermore on the results of the high-temperature wedge splitting test. The aim of these simulations is to calculate the specific fracture energy, which is caused by crack propagation only. The contribution of creep depends on the loading rate. For low loading rates, the influence of creep is comparatively high and vice versa for high loading rates. The Norton–Bailey creep equation was applied (Equation (5)).

$${\dot{\epsilon }}_{cr}=K\left(T\right){\sigma }^n {\epsilon }_{cr}^a$$

(5)

Here, σ is the applied load, ${\dot{\epsilon }}_{cr}$ is the creep strain rate, ɛ_cr is the creep strain, K(T) is a temperature-dependent function and the parameters n and a are the stress and strain exponents, respectively.

These parameters were implemented in the simulation of the wedge-splitting test and the creep behavior was considered in the whole specimen volume. The diagrams (Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11) in Section 4.2 shows the results in detail. The left diagrams (a) at each temperature show the experimental curve and the fits, both, with and without consideration of creep. The strain-softening behavior, which is plotted on the right side in Figure 9b, Figure 10b and Figure 11b, shows the change of the energy and the tensile strength of the material at each temperature.

Table 3. Fracture mechanical parameters at different temperatures calculated considering creep and influence on G_f.

Parameter	1470 °C	1370 °C	1100 °C
Specific fracture energy Gf, creep considered [N/m]	417	238	137
∆Gf [N/m]	146 (26%)	215 (47%)	25 (15%)
Tensile strength ft, creep considered [N/mm²]	2.47	2.99	1.71
Gf/ft, creep considered [mm]	0.17	0.08	0.08

shows the change of the parameter with respect to temperature when creep is considered. The inverse calculated parameter G_f shows an increase of the specific fracture energy with increasing temperature. The ratio between the specific fracture energy and the tensile strength that is related to the brittleness shows, for both cases (with and without consideration of creep), an increase with increasing temperature. The difference between G_f with consideration of creep and G_f without consideration of creep (Table 2), ∆G_f, shows a maximum temperature of 1370 °C and is between 15% and 47% for the high-temperature tests.

5. Conclusions

A new testing device to perform the WST was introduced in this paper. This new device allows fracture mechanical characterization of carbon-containing refractories up to 1500 °C under reducing conditions. Tests on resin bonded magnesia carbon material were successfully carried out. The oxidation of the carbon in the sample during the high-temperature test can be avoided by inert gas purging during the whole test. The displacement measurement directly on the sample shows a resolution below 3 µm and works stably over the whole temperature range. Based on the data obtained from laboratory experiments, fracture parameters can be determined and implemented in finite element simulations with an inverse estimation procedure. Besides, simulations including the tensile creep behavior were performed and the fracture parameters under pure mode I failure were determined. The influence of creep on the results obtained from the inverse evaluation for the specific fracture energy is between 15% (1100 °C) and 47% (1370 °C).