Next Article in Journal
Study on Low-Speed Steering Resistance Torque of Vehicles Considering Friction between Tire and Pavement
Next Article in Special Issue
Morphology and Properties of Electrospun PCL and Its Composites for Medical Applications: A Mini Review
Previous Article in Journal
Nano-Structured Demineralized Human Dentin Matrix to Enhance Bone and Dental Repair and Regeneration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis, Characterization and Photocatalytic Activity of Nanocrystalline First Transition-Metal (Ti, Mn, Co, Ni and Zn) Oxisde Nanofibers by Electrospinning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancement of the Oil Absorption Capacity of Poly(Lactic Acid) Nano Porous Fibrous Membranes Derived via a Facile Electrospinning Method

Guangdong Provincial Research Center on Smart Materials and Energy Conversion Devices, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of the Functional Soft Condensed Matter, School of Materials and Energy, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(5), 1014; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9051014
Submission received: 25 January 2019 / Revised: 25 February 2019 / Accepted: 5 March 2019 / Published: 12 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electrospinning Technology: Control of Morphology for Nanostructure)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

The porous fibrous membranes could be used for environmental protections, e.g., spilled oil absorption.

Abstract

Oil spilling has been a serious problem in the world for a long time, which can bring toxic substances to marine life. A large number of researchers around the world have introduced many measures to address this problem. One of the effective methods to remove oil from the oil/water mixture is to absorb oil from the mixture. Here, we prepared porous poly(lactic acid) (PLA) membranes using the electrospinning approach with different sized syringe needles, and used these membranes to absorb oil from the top of the water. It was found that the diameter of the needle has a big impact on the size and structure of the pores on the PLA fibers. The oil absorption capacity of membranes increases with a decreasing needle diameter due to the increased pore volume and specific surface area. The highest absorption capacity reached was 42.38 g/g for vacuum pump oil, 28.17 g/g for peanut oil, and 6.74 g/g for diesel oil.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Much attention has been paid to oil spilling over many decades due to the reason that it might bring toxic matters to marine life. As a result, this harmful matter will be transferred into human bodies through the food chain [1,2]. With an increase in people’s awareness of environmental protection, researchers around the world have become devoted to decontaminating the ocean pollution caused by oil spills. Currently, adsorbent materials, such as fabric-based materials [3,4], sponge and foam-based materials [5,6], and some inorganic materials like carbon-based aerogels [7], have been widely used as potential solutions to ocean pollution. These materials have high oil sorption capacity, low reaction with the water/oil and low cost. In addition, hydrophobic organic materials play an important role in separating the oil and water. However, most of the hydrophobic materials, e.g., polystyrene (PS) [8,9,10,11] and polydimethylsiloxane [12,13], are difficult to degrade naturally (contrary to some degradable polymers used in medical applications, polyesters, polyesteramides, poly(ortho ester)s, polyurethanes, polyanhydrides, cyanoacrylates, and hydrogels, e.g., based on poly(ethylene glycol)) [14]) and form secondary pollution, despite their high oil-sorption capacity.
Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is a biodegradable organic material which has been widely used. Due to their high specific surface area, PLA fibers have been used as the scaffold for drug delivery and tissue engineering [15]. Electrospinning is a high-efficiency, simple, and low-cost process for the preparation of various nanofibers. Electrospinning-derived PLA fiber membranes demonstrate high hydrophobicity [16] because their superficial area increases. Water cannot penetrate the PLA membranes and only stays on the surface of membranes. In addition, blending the PLA membrane with another material can change the morphology of the fibers. Xu et al. managed to blend the PLA and chitosan to make electrospun fibers. They found that with an increase in chitosan content, the diameter of the mixed fibers decreased [17]. Lu et al. tried to blend the PLA with poly(ecaprolactone) to make electrospun fibers. They observed that with the increase of poly (ecaprolactone) content, the diameter of fibers decreased [18]. These investigations focused on blending other materials with PLA to change the morphology of the PLA fibers, which can affect the specific surface areas and surface roughness, while they were less focused on the effect on the pores’ formation via varying the needle sizes and water permeability of electrospun membranes and related hydrophobic separation of oil/water suspension. Moreover, the degradability of mixed materials might not be as efficient as pure PLA.
In this work, the pure PLA fiber sorbents were fabricated using an electrospinning process with different needle sizes. The effect of needle size on the porous morphologies of fibers and the oil absorption capacities for pump oil, peanut oil, and diesel oil were investigated and discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

PLA 6052D (ρ = 1.24 g/cm3, the glass transition temperature is at about 58 °C, NatureWorks, Nebraska, USA), dichloromethane (DCM), and dimethyl formamide (DMF) (Tianjin Da Mao Chemical Reagent, Tianjin, China) were used as the fiber material and two solvents, respectively. All reagents are utilized without further purification. A plastic syringe (Foshan Lepton Precision Measurement & Control Technology, Foshan, Guangdong, China) with a stainless steel needle of different inner diameters (0.50, 0.67, 0.86, 1.26, and 1.60 mm respectively) was employed as the electrospinning equipment. The samples were named F1, F2, F3, F4, and F5, respectively.
An amount of PLA (10 wt.%) was dissolved in a mixture of DCM and DMF (9:1 weight ratio) at room temperature with stirring for 2 h to form the precursor solution. The solution was then put into a 20 mL plastic syringe. In order to form the PLA fibers with different diameters, metallic needles with inner diameters of 0.50, 0.67, 0.86, 1.26, and 1.60 mm were used. The high voltage applied between the needle tip and the collector was set to 18 kV, and the distance between them was 15 cm. The flow rate was fixed at 0.5 mL/h. A temperature of 25 ± 2 °C and Relative humidity of 65 ± 5% were used during the electrospinning process. Afterwards, the porous fibers were annealed at 70 °C for over 12 h.
To analyze the maximum oil absorption capacity using the procured fiber membranes, 10 g vacuum pump oil (dyed a green color) was poured into a beaker which contained 80 mL of water. A quantity of 0.5 g of the fiber was placed on the surface of the oil which was on the top of water. After 10 min, the wet absorbent was drained for 2 min until no residual oil droplets were left on the surface. Oil absorption capacities of all absorbents were determined by the following equation:
δ = [ m f ( m 0 + m w ) ] m 0
where δ is the absorption capacity (g/g), mf is the weight of the wet absorbent after 10 min of immersion, m0 is the initial weight of the absorbent, and mw is the weight of adsorbed water (although the absorbent is placed in the up oil layer, practically, the water is usually absorbed at the same time. To exactly measure the absorbed oil and water weight, the porous fiber was imposed in pure water and pure oil respectively, and the absorbed weights were recorded). In pure oil medium without any water, mw is equal to zero. To explore the selectivity of different oils, the same fibrous membranes were put into different types of oil (vacuum pump oil, peanut oil, and diesel oil) for absorption and to test their individual absorption capacity.
The SEM images were taken using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, SU8220, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and the diameters of fibers were measured using Image J software. Functional groups of the fibers were measured in absorbance mode by an Attenuated Total Reflection Flourier Transformed Infrared Spectrometer (ATR-FTIR, Nicolet IS50, Thermofisher, Massachusetts, USA). The wavenumber ranged from 400 to 4000 cm−1. The contact angle was measured using a contact-angle system (JC2000D2, Shanghai Zhongchen Digital Technology Co. Ltd. Shanghai, China) at 25 °C, and the specific surface areas of five samples were measured using a Surface Area and Porosimetry Analyzer (BET, V-Sorb 2008B, Gold APP Instrument Corporation, Beijing, China).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology

Figure 1a–e show the images of the five samples. Fibers were randomly deposited on the aluminum foil, and the diameters of fibers were 1.50 ± 0.21, 1.47 ± 0.23, 1.42 ± 0.32, 1.30 ± 0.38, and 1.27 ± 0.34 μm, respectively. All morphologies were measured using Image J software. The differences in fiber diameter were due to charge repulsion and the synergistic effect between the surface tension and the electric interaction. When a high voltage is applied, the charged droplets at the needle tip are not only subjected to surface tension, but also to charge repulsion caused by the electric field. When the charge repulsion on the droplet is larger than its surface tension, the droplet will form a jet. Then, a fiber is formed and eventually deposited on the collection plate (aluminum foil). Both the charge repulsion and the surface tension are related to the droplet’s radius. Their relationship can be illustrated as follows. In addition, the pore volume was also observed to increase with the decreasing needle diameter, as shown in Figure 2.
The electrostatic pressure on the droplet (PE) is [19]
P E = σ 2 2 ε ,
where σ is the surface charge density of droplet and ε is the dielectric constant in vacuum. The pressure of the droplet at the needle tip related to the droplet radius (PC) can be expressed as [19]
P C = 2 γ R ,  
where γ is the surface tension of the droplet and R is the radius of the droplet.
Above two pressures, the non-equilibrium is formed and can be written as [19]
Δ P = P C P E = 2 γ R e 2 32 π 2 ε R 4 .
Based on Equation (4), smaller droplets are easily subjected to electrostatic pressure. In other words, small droplets more easily form small diameter fibers after stretching in an electric field. It was found that the size of the droplet at the tip is associated with the inner diameter of needle, i.e., a smaller droplet radius is usually formed at the tip of the smaller diameter of the needle. A schematic diagram to illustrate the mechanism is shown in Figure 3. Wu et al. used PS to make fibers with different diameters of needles via the electrospinning technique, they also obtained fibers with different diameters [20,21].
The pore size was also affected by the diameter of the needle. In fact, the formation of pores in the fiber is attributed to the solvent evaporation of small molecule solvent and the polymerization of the polymer PLA. When evaporation is stronger during polymerization in the course of the electrospinning process, pores are formed. When evaporation is weaker during polymerization, there will be no pores formed. For droplets with a larger size coming out from the larger sized needle, it is harder for the solvent to evaporate from the fiber; thus, the pores are smaller in size, while for droplets with smaller size coming out from the smaller sized needle, there is a larger specific surface area for the solvent to evaporate from the fiber; thus, the pores are larger in size. A schematic diagram is shown in Figure 4 to illustrate the mechanism of the formation of pores in fibers.

3.2. Wettability

Wettability is an important parameter for adsorption materials, which is generally characterized by the water contact angle (WCA). A water droplet of about 2 μL was dropped on the surface of the sample to be measured. If the WCA is larger than 90°, as shown in Figure 5a, it means the sample is hydrophobic. In contrast, an oil droplet of about 2 μL also dropped on the surface of the sample, as shown in Figure 5b, shows that the oil is absorbed and the oil contact angle (OCA) is about 12°. In this study, as shown in Figure 5c, the WCAs of F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5 were127.0 ± 1.2°, 130.7 ± 2.1°, 132.1 ± 2.6°, 133.9 ± 3.1°, and 138.9 ± 3.4°, respectively. With a decreasing fiber diameter, the WCA increased slightly. The OCAs of the samples were 16.2 ± 0.4°, 16.0 ± 0.3°, 15.4 ± 0.3°, 15.2 ± 0.3°, and 12.7 ± 0.2°, respectively. Figure 5a shows the image of the WCA of the fiber membrane prepared by a 21 G needle, and Figure 5b presents the OCA of the same sample. A similar measurement was done for the absorption time of an oil drop on the porous fiber. The results are shown in Figure 6. One can see that the tendency of absorption time was similar to that of the oil contact angle. The wettability of a solid surface is determined by the chemical nature and roughness of the solid surface. When a large number of hydrophobic groups, such as ester groups, are present on the solid surface, the surface of the material is hydrophobic. If the surface of the substance is hydrophobic, it can be easily changed from hydrophobic to super hydrophobic by increasing the roughness of the substance; thus, the contact angle becomes larger. In this work, since PLA is a hydrophobic polymer, when we decreased the inner diameter of the needle, the water contact angle increased. In addition, it was found that the pore volume also increased significantly. Since the pore volume increased with a decreasing needle diameter, the oil contact angle decreased due to the increasing absorption capacity.

3.3. ATR-FTIR (Attenuated Total Reflection Flourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy)

It is known that adsorption includes physical adsorption and chemical adsorption. The former is due to the Van der Waals forces between oil/water and the PLA fiber on the fiber surface. The latter depends on the chemical bonds formed between oil/water and the PLA fiber. In order to investigate whether chemical adsorption existed, the PLA membranes were tested by the ATR-FTIR, which is an approach to test the chemical bonds via molecular vibration after the infrared light interacted with the molecules. As shown in Figure 7, the peak at 1757 cm−1 is a stretching vibration mode of carbon-oxygen double bond (C=O), and the peak at 1183–1088 cm−1 is the stretching vibration mode of carbon-oxygen-carbon ester group (C–O–C) [22,23,24]. An ester group is a kind of hydrophobic group, which can be combined with the oil molecule and hinders water molecules. This is the reason why PLA is hydrophobic.

3.4. Oil Absorption

We investigated the oil absorption capacity of porous membranes with different diameters for different kinds of oil. These fiber membranes were soaked in vacuum pump oil, peanut oil, and diesel oil, respectively, and compared with the changes in the weight of fiber membrane before and after the absorption. Then, the largest amount of absorption was calculated. As shown in Figure 8, the capacities of absorbed vacuum pump oil for the samples of F1 to F5 were 23.44, 25.44, 32.67, 36.82, and 42.38 g/g, and those of peanut oil are 21.43, 21.47, 21.63, 25.14, and 28.17 g/g, respectively. Finally, we also put the same samples in diesel oil for absorption. As a result, these samples presented low absorption capacities, i.e., 5.30, 5.73, 5.68, 6.28, and 6.74 g/g, respectively. This is because the diameters of the fibers decreased with the decreasing needle size, leading to increased evaporation the of solvent, leaving an increasing specific surface area and also an increasing pore volume; thus, the oil absorption capability on the surface of the fibers increased.
In Table 1, it is also shown that there were different viscosities for different kinds of oil. Based on the results shown in Figure 8, it seems that the absorption capability is inversely proportional to the viscosity. This is probably because the oil is more likely to adhere to the surface and voids of the fibers to inhibit the oil entering into the interior of the fibers; thus, the oil with lower viscosity has a higher absorption capability [25,26,27,28].
As one can see, the oil absorption capacity of the fiber membrane increased with the declining diameter of the needle. Therefore, we finally explored whether the fiber membrane could effectively achieve oil absorption from the oil–water suspension. As shown in Figure 9a, in order to absorb the oil, the oil-soluble dye was used to make the oil have a green color. Then, 0.5 g of the fiber membranes obtained from a 21 G needle were placed in the oil–water suspension, and the absorption capacity was tested and calculated using Equation (1). Figure 9b shows an image of the fiber membrane after absorption for 30 s. In addition, the fiber membrane was also able to absorb the vacuum pump oil. As shown in Figure 9c, after 1 min, it was found that there was no significant amount of residual oil [29]. The absorption experiment was further pursued in the pure oil system, showing that the fiber membrane absorbed 10 g of oil and 0.92 g of water, respectively, which means that the oil was successfully absorbed from the oil–water suspension.
Finally, the approach illustrated above can be scaled up in terms of using rows of syringes to continuously produce large quantities of porous fibers to be applied to clean oil polluted ocean.

4. Conclusions

A series of porous PLA fiber membranes with decreasing diameters and pore volumes were successfully prepared by reducing the needle diameter of the syringe. It was observed that the highest absorbed oil capacity was 42.38 g/g for vacuum pump oil, 28.17 g/g for peanut oil, and 6.74 g/g for diesel oil for the oil-water suspensions, respectively, for porous fiber procured using a 21 G needle.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.L. and J.W.L.; methodology, J.W.L.; formal analysis, G.P.; investigation, J.W.L., S.C.W. and J.L.W.; writing—original draft preparation, J.W.L. and G.P.; writing—review and editing, S.G.L.; funding acquisition, S.G.L.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51372042, 51872053; NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund, grant number U1501246; and the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, grant number 2015A030308004.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Short, J.W.; Rice, S.D.; Heintz, R.A.; Carls, M.G.; Moles, A. Long-term effects of crude oil on developing fish: Lessons from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Energy Sources 2003, 25, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dubansky, B.; Whitehead, A.; Miller, J.T.; Rice, C.D.; Galvez, F. Multitissue molecular, genomic, and developmental effects of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on resident Gulf killifish (Fundulus grandis). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 5074–5082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cortese, B.; Caschera, D.; Federici, F.; Ingo, G.M.; Gigli, G. Superhydrophobic fabrics for oil–water separation through a diamond like carbon (DLC) coating. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 6781–6789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cortese, B.; Caschera, D.; Padeletti, G.; Ingo, G.M.; Gigli, G. A brief review of surface-functionalized cotton fabrics. Surf. Innov. 2013, 1, 140–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nguyen, D.D.; Tai, N.-H.; Lee, S.-B.; Kuo, W.-S. Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic properties of graphene-based sponges fabricated using a facile dip coating method. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7908–7912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, H.X.; Sun, D.Z.; Tan, W.J.; Fan, S.H.; Wen, X.J.; Qing, G.X.; Li, S.Y.; Deng, W.-Q. Superhydrophobic conjugated microporous polymers for separation and adsorption. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 2062–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ceylan, D.; Dogu, S.; Karacik, B.; Yakan, D.S.; Okay, S.O. Evaluation of butyl rubber as sorbent material for the removal of oil and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from seawater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 3846–3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Acatay, K.; Simsek, E.; Ow-Yang, C.; Menceloglu, Y.Z. Tunable, superhydrophobically stable polymeric surfaces by electrospinning. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5210–5213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Miyauchi, Y.; Ding, B.; Shiratori, S. Fabrication of a silver-ragwort-leaf-like super-hydrophobic micro/nanoporous fibrous mat surface by electrospinning. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 5151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gu, Z.-Z.; Wei, H.-M.; Zhang, R.-Q.; Han, G.-Z.; Pan, C.; Zhang, H.; Tian, X.-J.; Chen, Z.-M. Artificial silver ragwort surface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 201915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rojas, J.; Montero, G.A.; Habibi, Y. Electrospun nanocomposites from polystyrene loaded with cellulose nanowhiskers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 927–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ma, M.; Hill, R.M.; Lowery, J.L.; Fridrikh, S.V.; Rutledge, G.C. Electrospun Poly(Styrene-block-dimethylsiloxane) Block Copolymer Fibers Exhibiting Superhydrophobicity. Langmuir 2005, 21, 5549–5554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Fei, X.; Sun, M.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y.; Yang, Q.; Hong, X. Preparation of a durable superhydrophobic membrane by electrospinning poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) mixed with epoxy–siloxane modified SiO2 nanoparticles: A possible route to superhydrophobic surfaces with low water sliding angle and high water contact angle. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 359, 380–388. [Google Scholar]
  14. Schroeter, M.; Wildemann, B.; Lendlein, A. Ch. 20, Biodegradable Materials. In Regenerative Medicine: From Protocol to Patient; Steinhoff, G., Ed.; Springer Science+Business Media B.V.: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 469–492. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sawalha, H.; Schroen, K.; Boom, R. Biodegradable polymeric microcapsules: Preparation and properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 169, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yue, M.; Zhou, B.; Jiao, K.; Qian, X.; Xu, Z.; Teng, K.; Zhao, L.; Wang, J.; Jiao, Y. Switchable hydrophobic/hydrophilic surface of electrospun poly(L-lactide) membranes obtained by CF4microwave plasma treatment. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 327, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Gao, W.; Liang, H.; Wang, H.; Li, J. Preparation of chitosan/PLA blend micro/nanofibers by electrospinning. Mater. Lett. 2009, 63, 658–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lu, L.; Wu, D.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, W. Fabrication of polylactide/poly (ecaprolactone) blend fibers by electrospinning: Morphology and orientation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 3682–3691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Salem, D. Electrospinning of nanofibers and the charge injection method. In Nanofibers and Nanotechnology in Textiles; Brown, P.J., Stevens, K., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu, J.; Wang, N.; Wang, L.; Dong, H.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, L. Electrospun porous structure fibrous film with high oil adsorption capacity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 3207–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zahid, M.A.; Halligan, J.E.; Johnson, R.F. Oil Slick Removal Using Matrices of Polypropylene Filaments. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1972, 11, 550–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Popelka, S.; Machova, L.; Rypacek, F. Adsorption of poly (ethylene oxide)–block–polylactide copolymers on polylactide as studied by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 308, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Agarwal, M.; Koelling, K.W.; Chalmers, J.J. Characterization of the Degradation of Polylactic Acid Polymer in a solid substrate environment. Biotechnol. Prog. 1998, 14, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, S.-L.; Wu, Z.-H.; Yang, W.; Yang, M.-B. Thermal and mechanical properties of chemical crosslinked polylactide (PLA). Polym. Test. 2008, 27, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qiao, Y.; Zhao, L.L.; Li, P.; Sun, H.X.; Li, S. Electrospun polystyrene/polyacrylonitrile fiber with high oil sorption capacity. J. Reinf. Plast. Compd. 2014, 33, 1849–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Johnson, R.F.; Manjrekar, T.G.; Halligan, J.E. Removal of oil from water surfaces by sorption on unstructured fibers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1973, 7, 439–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, H.T.; Qiu, S.S.; Jiang, W.; Wu, D.X.; Zhang, C.Y. Evaluation of electrospun polyvinyl chloride/polystyrene fibers as sorbent materials for oil spill cleanup. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 4527–4531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tadmor, R.; Das, R.; Gulec, S.; Liu, J.; N’guessan, H.E.; Shah, M.; Wasnik, P.S.; Yadav, S.B. Solid-Liquid Work of Adhesion. Langmuir 2017, 33, 3594–3600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tadmor, R.; Pepper, K.G. Interfacial tension and spreading coefficient for thin films. Langmuir 2008, 24, 3185–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM (scanning electron microscope) images of different PLA porous fibers prepared using different needle diameters: (a) 14 G, (b) 16 G, (c) 18 G, (d) 19 G and (e) 21 G. (All images are ×10.0 k).
Figure 1. SEM (scanning electron microscope) images of different PLA porous fibers prepared using different needle diameters: (a) 14 G, (b) 16 G, (c) 18 G, (d) 19 G and (e) 21 G. (All images are ×10.0 k).
Applsci 09 01014 g001
Figure 2. Average fiber diameters (black line) and relative pore volumes (red line) of porous fibers obtained using different needle diameters.
Figure 2. Average fiber diameters (black line) and relative pore volumes (red line) of porous fibers obtained using different needle diameters.
Applsci 09 01014 g002
Figure 3. A schematic diagram of droplet stretching from the needle tip to the collection board in a high electric field.
Figure 3. A schematic diagram of droplet stretching from the needle tip to the collection board in a high electric field.
Applsci 09 01014 g003
Figure 4. A schematic diagram of pores formed in fibers.
Figure 4. A schematic diagram of pores formed in fibers.
Applsci 09 01014 g004
Figure 5. The wettability of fibers is presented: (a) the WCA of fibers prepared by the 21 G needle, (b) the OCA of fibers prepared by 21 G the needle, (c) the WCAs and OCAs of the fiber membranes for samples obtained using different needle diameters.
Figure 5. The wettability of fibers is presented: (a) the WCA of fibers prepared by the 21 G needle, (b) the OCA of fibers prepared by 21 G the needle, (c) the WCAs and OCAs of the fiber membranes for samples obtained using different needle diameters.
Applsci 09 01014 g005
Figure 6. The absorption time of an oil drop on the different porous fibers.
Figure 6. The absorption time of an oil drop on the different porous fibers.
Applsci 09 01014 g006
Figure 7. The ATR-FTIR spectra of samples prepared by 14 G, 16 G, 18 G, 19 G, 21 G needles and the raw PLA.
Figure 7. The ATR-FTIR spectra of samples prepared by 14 G, 16 G, 18 G, 19 G, 21 G needles and the raw PLA.
Applsci 09 01014 g007
Figure 8. Maximum oil absorption capacity of porous membranes with different diameters for different kinds of oil.
Figure 8. Maximum oil absorption capacity of porous membranes with different diameters for different kinds of oil.
Applsci 09 01014 g008
Figure 9. The absorption test was carried out in 60 s. (a) Ten grams of pump oil dyed in green were suspended on the top of 80 mL water. (b) Fiber membranes of 0.5 g in weight were fixed to adsorb the oils in the suspension. The images were taken after 30 s. (c) After 60 s, the oil absorption was almost complete, and the adsorbed fiber films were moved to another beaker.
Figure 9. The absorption test was carried out in 60 s. (a) Ten grams of pump oil dyed in green were suspended on the top of 80 mL water. (b) Fiber membranes of 0.5 g in weight were fixed to adsorb the oils in the suspension. The images were taken after 30 s. (c) After 60 s, the oil absorption was almost complete, and the adsorbed fiber films were moved to another beaker.
Applsci 09 01014 g009
Table 1. Viscosity of different types of oil.
Table 1. Viscosity of different types of oil.
TypeViscosity/(mPa·s)
Vacuum pump oil27.20
Peanut oil32.40
Diesel oil79.10

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, J.-W.; Prasad, G.; Wang, S.-C.; Wu, J.-L.; Lu, S.-G. Enhancement of the Oil Absorption Capacity of Poly(Lactic Acid) Nano Porous Fibrous Membranes Derived via a Facile Electrospinning Method. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9051014

AMA Style

Liang J-W, Prasad G, Wang S-C, Wu J-L, Lu S-G. Enhancement of the Oil Absorption Capacity of Poly(Lactic Acid) Nano Porous Fibrous Membranes Derived via a Facile Electrospinning Method. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(5):1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9051014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Jun-Wei, Gajula Prasad, Shi-Cai Wang, Jia-Lin Wu, and Sheng-Guo Lu. 2019. "Enhancement of the Oil Absorption Capacity of Poly(Lactic Acid) Nano Porous Fibrous Membranes Derived via a Facile Electrospinning Method" Applied Sciences 9, no. 5: 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9051014

APA Style

Liang, J. -W., Prasad, G., Wang, S. -C., Wu, J. -L., & Lu, S. -G. (2019). Enhancement of the Oil Absorption Capacity of Poly(Lactic Acid) Nano Porous Fibrous Membranes Derived via a Facile Electrospinning Method. Applied Sciences, 9(5), 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9051014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop