1. Introduction
Two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), such as MoS
2, have attracted considerable attention owing to the unique optical and electronic properties related to its 2D ultrathin atomic layer structure [
1]. MoS
2 is becoming prevalent in post-silicon digital electronics and in highly efficient optoelectronics due to its extremely low thickness and its tunable band gap (E
g = 1–2 eV) [
2,
3]. Sparsely-layered MoS
2 displays light absorbing and luminescence capabilities, enabling photodetector operation [
1,
3]. Several efforts have been made to further develop 2D TMDC photodetectors with ultrafast response and high responsivity [
4], owing to the longer lifetime of their photo-generated carriers and higher photosensitivity than traditional semiconductors [
5,
6,
7]. However, 2D TMDC photodetectors fabricated with transferred van der Waals heterostructures or chemical vapor deposition-grown hybrids are typically characterized with low responsivity. This is due to the lack of a photo-gain mechanism or by resilient photoconductivity in the heterojunction structure [
8]. In order to realize MoS
2-based complementary electronic circuits and optoelectronic devices, it is necessary for there to be a development of up-scalable techniques to achieve controlled doping of MoS
2.
Recently, field-effect transistors (FETs) fabricated with MoS
2 thin films have exhibited an excellent on/off current ratio (10
6–10
8) with a high carrier mobility of around 200 cm
2 V
−1 s
−1, making them suitable for next-generation transistors [
9]. For low-power, high-performance complementary logic applications, both
p- and
n-type MoS
2 FETs (NFETs and PFETs) must be developed. NFETs with an electron accumulation channel can be obtained using unintentionally doped
n-type MoS
2. However, the fabrication of MoS
2 FETs with complementary
p-type characteristics is challenging due to the significant difficulty of injecting holes into its inversion channel [
10]. One approach is to use unconventional contacts resulting in a low Schottky barrier height for hole injection in MoS
2 PFETs. For example, MoO
x (2 < x < 3) contacts have been shown to be effective for hole injection into pristine MoS
2 [
11]. A proper interface between MoO
x and MoS
2 layers is necessary for efficient hole injection. Alternatively, several
p-type doping approaches for MoS
2 have been established. Examples initiated doping by incorporating substitutional niobium, Nb, atoms during chemical vapor deposition (CVD) growth and chemical doping with AuCl
3 [
12,
13,
14]. However, substitutional doping during CVD growth is lacking in area selectivity and the adoption of AuCl
3 would be hampered by the risk of Au contamination. Plasma treatments with different species (including CF
4, SF
6, O
2, and CHF
3) have also been found to achieve the desired property modifications of MoS
2 [
15,
16,
17]. In the case of multilayer MoS
2, which is exposed to energetic F-plasma treatment,
p-type doping of the exposed area has been shown. However, plasma treatment may cause significant etching of the MoS
2, which can directly affect the feasibility of the development of MoS
2 FETs with a thin channel region. Therefore, mild plasma treatments are essential to achieve the proper modification of MoS
2.
In this work, we demonstrated a
p-type multilayer MoS
2 enabled by selective-area doping using CHF
3 plasma treatment. Compared with single layer MoS
2, multilayer MoS
2 can carry a higher drive current due to its lower bandgap and multiple conduction channels. Moreover, it has three times the density of states at its minimum conduction band [
18]. Back-gated MoS
2 PFETs were presented with an on/off current ratio in the order of 10
3 and a field-effect mobility of 65.2 cm
2V
−1s
−1. The MoS
2 PFETs photodetector exhibited ultraviolet (UV) photodetection capability with a rapid response time of 37 ms and exhibited modulation of the generated photocurrent by back-gate voltage. Microscopic and spectroscopic characterization techniques, including atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), were used to investigate the morphological and electrical modification of the MoS
2 surface after CHF
3 plasma treatment. This work suggests the potential application of the mild plasma-doped
p-type multilayer MoS
2 in UV photodetectors for environmental monitoring, human health monitoring, and biological analysis.
3. Results and Discussion
The MoS
2 films fabricated from the thermal decomposition process were uniform and continuous based on optical microscopy (3D laser microscope, VK-X250, Keyence, Osaka, Japan), as shown in
Figure 1a. This demonstrates the feasibility of the large-scale growth of homogeneous MoS
2 films by thermal decomposition for practical electronic applications. The grown MoS
2 films were subjected to out-of-plane doping by CHF
3 plasma treatment using a dry-etching system (ULVAC original NLD-570). The radiofrequency power of this dry-etching system was set to 100 W and the pressure was set to 7.5 mTorr. The final thickness of the treated samples was obtained by etching for 30 s.
Figure 1b shows the optical micrograph (OM) image of the selective-area MoS
2 films with and without CHF
3 plasma treatment. On the right, the untreated region exhibits a light blue color, while on the left, the plasma-treated region displays a dark blue color. Raman spectroscopy is being used widely to study 2D materials and to identify their thicknesses.
Figure 1c shows the Raman spectra of the MoS
2 films in the untreated region and in the CHF
3 plasma-treated region, respectively.
Figure 1c clearly shows two main Raman features which correspond to E
12g (approximately 381 cm
−1) and A
1g (approximately 406 cm
−1) modes [
20]. The intensity of the two peaks increases with an increase in MoS
2 film thickness. The strong, sharp peaks displayed in the Raman spectrograph of the untreated region indicate a thick layer of high crystalline MoS
2 film. On the other hand, the E
12g and A
1g peaks of the CHF
3-treated region are weaker due to a reduction in thickness during the plasma treatment. The energy difference between the two Raman peaks can be used to identify the number of MoS
2 layers. This energy difference value was obtained in the untreated region and equated to about 25.9 cm
−1, indicating a bulk-like multilayer MoS
2. However, in the CHF
3-treated region, the energy difference equated to a smaller value of 23.2 cm
−1, indicating a lower thickness of MoS
2 film than in the untreated region. The difference in thickness between the untreated and the CHF
3 treated region was further indicated by the difference in the E
12g and A
1g peak intensity between these two regions.
AFM (Dimension Icon, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was used to examine the surface morphology and the thickness of the MoS
2 films.
Figure 2a,b show the AFM image and the height profile of the as-grown MoS
2 films on the substrate, respectively. The difference in contrasts in the AFM image indicates the different heights in the image. From the height profile, the thickness of the as-grown MoS
2 was found to be about 10 nm, suggesting that there are 15 layers of MoS
2. The different contrasts in the AFM image shown in
Figure 2c further indicated the thinning effect after plasma treatment. From the height profile in
Figure 2d, the difference in height between the untreated and CHF
3-treated MoS
2 film was found to be approximately 4 nm. Further doping could be applied by increasing the plasma etching time; however, that would result in poor and uncontained MoS
2 films due to MoS
2 chemical modification and the formation of defects introduced by energetic ions.
XPS analysis was carried out to investigate the binding energies of Mo, S, and F in the CHF
3-treated and untreated MoS
2 samples.
Figure 3a,b show the detailed binding energy profiles of Mo and S for the CHF
3-treated and untreated MoS
2 samples, respectively. Two peaks at 229.8 and 232.9 eV are shown in
Figure 3a. They were attributed to the doublet Mo 3d
5/2 and Mo 3d
3/2 of the untreated MoS
2, respectively, while the peaks of the S 2p
3/2 and S 2p
1/2 orbitals of the divalent sulfide ions were observed at 162.7 and 163.8 eV, respectively. These results are consistent with the reported values for untreated MoS
2 crystals [
21,
22]. In comparison, all relevant peaks of the CHF
3-treated sample were broader, and red-shifted by 0.57 eV. This was because of the shift in Fermi levels of the CHF
3-treated samples towards the valence band edge [
23]. This red-shift of peaks indicates the proper
p-type doping of MoS
2 films. The specific types of dopants introduced by the plasma processes were confirmed by the XPS spectra in
Figure 3c. A prominent binding energy peak associated with F was observed in CHF
3-treated samples, while the F peak was absent for untreated samples. The excess electrons were preferentially transferred from the MoS
2 layers onto F atoms with strong electronegativity when incorporating F dopants into MoS
2 layers. This surface charge transfer process suggests that F atoms are the critical dopants responsible for the
p-type doping in MoS
2 film [
24].
In order to measure the electrical characteristics of the CHF
3-treated multilayer MoS
2, a back-gated FET device was fabricated as shown in the schematic illustrated in
Figure 4a. Photolithography was carried out to define the exposed area of MoS
2 films for plasma treatment. After plasma treatment, 80 nm of Au was deposited as the source and as drain contacts for the FET by sputtering and was followed by lift-off. Due to the screening of the electric field in MoS
2, only the top few layers of the MoS
2 encountered a surface charge transfer process. Therefore, a thinner
n-type MoS
2 channel at the untreated bottom layers could result in effective gate modulation and higher on/off ratios for FET applications.
Figure 4b shows the output characteristics, drain current (I
ds)–drain voltage (V
ds), of the MoS
2 FET under varying gate voltages (V
g, from 0 to −10 V). I
ds decreased with the increasing V
g values, indicating typical
p-type behavior. The I
ds–V
ds characteristic of the device exhibited a low onset voltage and a linear increase of I
ds versus V
ds up to a value of V
ds approximately equal to 0.6 V, where a kink in the I
ds–V
ds curves was observed. This was followed by saturation of the I
ds–V
ds curve for V
ds greater than 0.6 V.
Figure 4c represents the transfer characteristic of the back-gated MoS
2 FET at V
ds of 4 V. The back-gated MoS
2 FET showed excellent gating control capability. The field-effect mobility,
μh, of this MoS
2 device can be estimated based on the following equation:
where the channel length,
L, is 1 mm, the channel width,
W, is 1.2 mm, and the gate capacitance,
Cg, is 115 aF/μm
2 for a 300 nm thick SiO
2 layer [
9]. The mobility of the device was calculated to be 65.2 cm
2 V
−1s
−1, which is comparable with previous results of similar back-gated FET devices [
18]. However, the mobility was lower than that obtained from the top-gated FET. This difference in the mobility was due to the existence of trap states within the SiO
2 dielectric layer at the bottom gate. Moreover, the device exhibited an on/off current ratio in the order of 10
3, and a threshold gate bias of about −5 V, whereas the MoS
2 PFET was positively biased under 4 V. This indicates that a large negative V
g (less than or equal to −5 V) is needed to tune the electron-rich layers of the bottom untreated MoS
2 layers into hole-rich layers. The energy band structures of the device under a negative gate with applied bias are shown in
Figure 4d–f, where the conduction band (CB) and Fermi level (E
F) of multilayer MoS
2 were assumed to be 4.2 eV and 4.7 eV, respectively. From
Figure 4d, the work function of Au was found to be about 5.1 eV. Although the E
F of the MoS
2 was shifted toward the valence band (VB) due to
p-type doping, the E
F of Au still lay on the top half of the MoS
2 band. This led to a large Schottky barrier for holes along the Au/MoS
2 interface. As shown in
Figure 4e, for V
g(th) < V
g < 0, holes could only pass through the barrier at a high V
ds due to the bending of the MoS
2 channel. As shown in
Figure 4f, as the negative V
g increased, for V
g < V
g(th) < 0, the hole barrier became thinner and allowed holes to penetrate through. This was consistent with the threshold gate bias (−5 V) obtained in
Figure 4c. The drain current was greatly enhanced under a negative gate bias less than −5 V.
MoS
2 is sensitive to light illumination and is able to generate photoexcited electron–hole pairs from incident light.
Figure 5a displays the photoinduced I
ds–V
ds output curves of the MoS
2 PFET excited by ultraviolet (λ = 365 nm) light (UV lamp SLUV-8, intensity 1407 μW/cm
2). The photocurrent generated at V
g from −10 to 0 V suggests that the MoS
2 PFET can be used as a phototransistor for UV light detection. Based on the photocurrent generated under different values of V
g, the photoresponsivity as a function of V
g is plotted in
Figure 5b. The photoresponsivity increased from 0.45 A/W under zero gate voltage to 9.3 A/W under the gate voltage of 10 V, with an incident light power of 16 μW and V
ds set at 4 V. The gate voltage-dependent photoresponsivity in the MoS
2 FET was due to the
p-type doping of MoS
2. Under the negative V
g, E
F moved from the CB to the VB of the
p-MoS
2, forming a smaller Schottky barrier between the CB of MoS
2 and the E
F of the Au electrode. This led to photogenerated charges which efficiently transferred to the external circuit and produced a large photocurrent. This photocurrent was enhanced by further increasing the negative V
g due to a thin hole Schottky barrier at the Au/MoS
2 interface. The photocurrent was also enhanced by the application of a higher positive bias V
ds due to the bending of the MoS
2 channel.
Figure 5c shows the transfer curves of the MoS
2 device with V
ds equal to 4 V under UV illumination and dark conditions, respectively. Compared with dark conditions, the V
g(th) obtained from the UV illumination had a greater absolute value. This indicates that the photoexcited holes are transferred to the electrodes due to the
p-type behavior of the MoS
2, while the photoexcited electrons are trapped within the MoS
2. This is consistent with the results shown in previous literature, indicating that MoS
2 is an effective charge trapping layer [
25]. The time-resolved characteristics revealed a reliable photoresponse with a stabilized photocurrent, as shown in
Figure 5d. Under 365 nm illumination, the photocurrent of the MoS
2 PFET increased rapidly after exposure to UV radiation, with a rise time of 37 ms, significantly faster than those of other reported MoS
2 photodetectors [
3,
4,
15,
26], as shown in
Figure 5e. This photocurrent remained nearly constant during the UV exposure (10 s) and decayed quickly during dark conditions with a decay time of approximately 39 ms. The current fully recovered after repeated cycles, which shows excellent repeatability and optical response for this MoS
2 PFET photodetector.