Next Article in Journal
Cerebellar Differences after Rehabilitation in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder
Next Article in Special Issue
Research on Top Archer’s EEG Microstates and Source Analysis in Different States
Previous Article in Journal
A Short Functional Neuroimaging Assay Using Attachment Scenes to Recruit Neural Correlates of Social Cognition—A Replication Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acute Sleep Deprivation Impairs Motor Inhibition in Table Tennis Athletes: An ERP Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Brain Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/brainsci12070852
Review Report
brainsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Shedding Light on the Effects of Orienteering Exercise on Spatial Memory Performance in College Students of Different Genders: An fNIRS Study

Brain Sci. 2022, 12(7), 852; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070852
by Shengbin Bao 1, Jingru Liu 2,* and Yang Liu 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Riwanti Estiasari
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(7), 852; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12070852
Submission received: 17 May 2022 / Revised: 16 June 2022 / Accepted: 23 June 2022 / Published: 29 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical Exercise-Driven Brain Plasticity)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The Shedding Light on the Effects of Orienteering Exercise on Spatial Memory Performance in College Students of Different  Genders: An fNIRS Study, is a very interesting study. It showed the role of orienteering exercises in improving spatial memory. It is written clearly and quite easy to follow.

Several questions regarding the methods:

1. Did the author consider the depression level of the subjects before starting the exercise? Depression might interfere the cognitive ability

2. The study intervention is 12 weeks. Did all subjects fulfill all the schedules? Is there any violation of protocol during the study? Such as lateness of exercise from the schedule

3. From the graph that the author develops, seems that it's not coming from SPSS. Did the author also use Graphpad or other software? Please stated it

There were also some minors in English written that need correction. 

Better use male and female instead of male and women

The abbreviation of fNIRS was not written at the beginning of the paper

Section 4 on page 22, should be discussion not result

Line 128. Seems that it is the information on how to write the methods section

Line 216 reflects brain function. and other indicators. (There are 2 full stops, please revised the punctuation)

Line 437 experimental group --> group

Page 23, line 680, there are 3 exercise words, please revised it

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1) lines 128-135 are template text. Please delete.

2) Table on page 5 should have horizontal dividers between items.

3) Line 182, please explain why that frequency was chosen.

4) Section 2.4.3 (beginning on line 200); it is unclear to whom "you", "he" and "she" are referring. Please change it to 3rd person if used to explain what the subject did and was told.

5)Please make figure 5, 6, 7 have higher resolution. 

6) please present all statistics calculations (F, eta squared, p) in a table rather than in large paragraphs. It is difficult for the reader to see and compare. 

Author Response

1.Please see the attachment

2.The language description of the article is being embellished.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop