Next Article in Journal
Using High-Pressure Technology to Develop Antioxidant-Rich Extracts from Bravo de Esmolfe Apple Residues
Previous Article in Journal
L-Methionine Protects against Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in an In Vitro Model of Parkinson’s Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Serine or Threonine in the Active Site of Typical 2-Cys Prx on Hyperoxidation Susceptibility and on Chaperone Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Signaling Overlap between the Golgi Stress Response and Cysteine Metabolism in Huntington’s Disease

1
Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
2
The Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
3
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
Antioxidants 2021, 10(9), 1468; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091468
Submission received: 18 August 2021 / Revised: 1 September 2021 / Accepted: 10 September 2021 / Published: 15 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thiol-Based Redox Regulation of Cellular and Organismal Function)

Abstract

:
Huntington’s disease (HD) is caused by expansion of polyglutamine repeats in the protein huntingtin, which affects the corpus striatum of the brain. The polyglutamine repeats in mutant huntingtin cause its aggregation and elicit toxicity by affecting several cellular processes, which include dysregulated organellar stress responses. The Golgi apparatus not only plays key roles in the transport, processing, and targeting of proteins, but also functions as a sensor of stress, signaling through the Golgi stress response. Unlike the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response, the Golgi stress response is relatively unexplored. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms underlying the Golgi stress response and its intersection with cysteine metabolism in HD.

1. Introduction

Huntington’s disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease which profoundly affects the corpus striatum of the brain; it results from expansion of polyglutamine repeats in the protein huntingtin [1]. Mutant huntingtin (mHtt) aggregates and affects cellular processes in multiple ways [2]. mHtt affects basic neuronal processes such as transcription, translation, nuclear-cytoplasmic transport, redox homeostasis, mitochondrial function and amino acid metabolism in addition to a myriad of physiological processes [3,4,5,6,7].
HD has also been linked to impaired stress responses involving redox homeostasis and endoplasmic stress response [5,7]. In addition to essential functions in cellular function, organelles serve important roles as sensors of stress and as hubs for signaling pathways. For instance, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) plays central roles in protein folding, post-translational modifications, quality control of proteins and Ca2+ handling, among many other functions [8,9,10,11]. During ER stress—a state of functional imbalance—adaptive and restorative programs such as the unfolded protein response (UPR) and ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD), or autophagy, come into play [12,13]. One stimulus that triggers the ER stress response is the accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER lumen. Three arms exist in the ER stress response: the protein kinase R (PKR)-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), and inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1) pathways, where each of the sensor proteins is a membrane protein (Figure 1). In the PERK arm, during stress, PERK dissociates from the chaperone protein, binding immunoglobulin protein/glucose-regulated protein 78 (BiP/GRP78), and undergoes dimerization and phosphorylation. PERK, (a component of the integrated stress response) then phosphorylates the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit −α (eIF2α), which results in global translational arrest. Under these conditions only certain mRNAs such as those encoding activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) are translated, in order to maintain functions important for cell survival. ATF4 regulates amino acid homeostasis, purine metabolism, response to oxidative stress, autophagy and apoptosis.
In the inositol-requiring enzyme (IRE) branch, the ER-resident IRE1 senses unfolded proteins or lipid disequilibrium and undergoes dimerization and autophosphorylation, activating IRE1′s cytosolic endonuclease domain, which then splices a specific intron from the mRNA of X-box binding protein 1u, XBP1u to create XBP1s. The XBP1s protein translocates to the nucleus and transactivates genes involved in protein degradation, protein folding, and lipid metabolism [14,15]. The third arm of the UPR consists of ATF6, an ER transmembrane protein that translocates to the Golgi when activated. During ER stress, when unfolded proteins accumulate, BiP/GRP78 dissociates from ATF6 to cause translocation of ATF6 into the Golgi. In the Golgi, site 1 protease (S1P) and site 2 protease (S2P) cleave ATF6 [16]. The N-terminal region of ATF6 functions as a transcription factor and stimulates expression of target genes, such as protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), XBP1, and C/EBP Homologous Protein (CHOP) [16,17]. When proteins cannot be repaired or folded back into their functional configurations, they are targeted for degradation by ERAD [18]. When the repair capacity of ERAD is crossed, portions of the ER can be specifically targeted for degradation through autophagy (ER-phagy) [19]. Recently, we elucidated the involvement of signaling pathways modulated by the Golgi apparatus in HD [20,21]. This review focuses on the involvement of the Golgi and stress signaling coordinated by this organelle in neurodegenerative states.

2. The Golgi Apparatus

2.1. Organization of the Golgi Apparatus

The Italian anatomist Camillo Golgi was the first to describe the Golgi apparatus in 1898 [22]. He developed the staining protocol for the Golgi, termed the ‘Black Reaction’ (La reazione nera) or Golgi’s staining, which accelerated the study of the brain by facilitating the microscopic visualization of the complexity of the human nervous system [23,24,25]. The Golgi apparatus both processes and sorts lipids and proteins through the secretory pathway. The Golgi complex is organized as a stack of cisternae, with the cis-face receiving cargo from the ER and the trans-face or trans Golgi network (TGN) sorting cargo for export to their respective destinations [26]. The stacks are interconnected by tubular membranes into a continuous structure named the Golgi ribbon, which is a feature of the organelle in mammals. Within cells the Golgi is positioned close to the centrosomes, the primary microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) in dividing cells; vital for the maintenance of cell polarity, this center in turn modulates cell migration and neurite outgrowth [27]. The Golgi undergoes changes in morphology during various cellular processes such as cell cycle progression and stress responses [28]. The Golgi is highly dynamic, and undergoes disassembly during mitosis in early prophase and reassembly in telophase [29,30]. During mitosis in mammals, the Golgi ribbon is disassembled and partitioned into daughter cells. This disassembly also regulates mitotic progression [31].

2.2. The Golgi Stress Response

The Golgi plays central roles in glycosylation of proteins and harbors glycosyltransferases, glycosidases, and nucleotide sugar transporters, which orchestrate addition of various sugars that result in a mature glycan [32]. The cargo may also undergo several post-translational modifications including acetylation and phosphorylation, sulfation, methylation or proteolytic cleavage [33]. When the capacity of the Golgi is exceeded, it causes Golgi stress in a manner analogous to ER stress. In order to counter Golgi stress, cells mount signaling cascades which constitute the Golgi stress response [34]. Although the Golgi stress response is not as extensively characterized as ER stress, mounting evidence suggests the involvement of signaling cascades. Several signaling cascades have been reported with sensor proteins and effector proteins, which together elicit the Golgi stress response (Figure 2). These include the TFE3, proteoglycan, CREB3, PERK and HSP47 pathways [21,35,36].

2.2.1. The TFE3 Pathway

The TFE3 pathway involves the activation of proteins responsible for the maintenance of Golgi functions. TFE3 targets include the Golgi structural proteins (GCP60, Giantin, and GM130) which maintain the structural integrity of the Golgi. GM130 (Golgin95) and Golgin-160 are cis-Golgi-localized harboring coiled-coils, and mediate stacking of Golgi cisternae and vesicular transport by serving as a vesicle tethering factor [37]. GM130 anchors adjacent stacks by interacting with Golgi reassembly and stacking protein of 65 kD (GRASP65) and the p115 protein through its C-terminal and N-domains, respectively [37]. GCP60 (also called acyl-CoA binding domain containing 3, or ACBD3) is a Golgi structural protein associated with Golgi integral membrane protein (Giantin). Overexpressing a dominant negative mutant of GCP60 triggers disassembly of the Golgi and blockage of protein transport from the ER to the Golgi [38]. Other targets of TFE3 include: N-glycosylation enzymes, such as ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 1 (SIAT4A/ST3GAL1), SIAT10, fucosyltransferase 1 (FUT1), Galactosylgalactosylxylosylprotein 3-beta-glucuronosyltransferase 2 (B3GAT2) and UDP-N-acetylhexosamine pyrophosphorylase-like protein 1 (UAP1L1); proteins involved in vesicular transport, such as Syntaxin 3A (STX3A), WD-repeat protein Interacting with phosphoinositide (WIPI)-1alpha (WIPI49/WIP1α) and RAB20 (Ras-related protein Rab-20); and Golgi proteases. Analysis of the promoters of ACBD3 and SIAT4A has revealed the presence of an enhancer element, termed the Golgi apparatus stress response element (GASE) [39]. Two transcription factors, TFE3 and MLX, were reported to bind GASE, which has a consensus sequence of ACGTGGC. Increasing the expression of TFE3 while increasing expression of MLX decreased transcription of genes with the GASE sequence. It has also been reported that Golgi stressors cause dephosphorylation of TFE3 at Ser108 and its nuclear translocation [40]. Similarly, MLX also translocates to the nucleus in response to Golgi stress [41]. Similar to ER stress, Golgi stress may trigger proteosomal degradation, which acts to restore Golgi homeostasis and organelle autoregulation. When Golgi stress persists, Golgi-apparatus related degradation (GARD) may ensue, analogous to ERAD associated with the ER. Golgi stress induces proteasomal degradation of GM130, which causes Golgi dispersal [42]. Other mechanisms proposed for regulation of Golgi tethering factors and morphology include caspase 3 mediated cleavage of GRASP-65 [43].

2.2.2. The Proteoglycan Pathway

The proteoglycan (PG) pathway involves upregulation of glycosylation enzymes when PG glycosylation capacity in the Golgi is suboptimal. Genes encoding these glycosylation enzymes harbor the enhancer elements PGSE-A and PGSE-B (with consensus sequences CCGGGGCGGGGCG and TTTTACAATTGGTC, respectively) in their promoters.

2.2.3. The CREB3 Pathway

In the CREB3 (ATF3) pathway, the ER-resident membrane protein CREB3 senses Golgi stress and translocates from the ER to the Golgi to be cleaved by S1P and S2P proteases. The truncated CREB3 derived from the cytosolic region moves to the nucleus and activates transcription of ARF4 to induce apoptosis [36].

2.2.4. The HSP47 Pathway

The HSP47 pathway, on the other hand, acts to prevent apoptosis induced by Golgi stress by stimulating the expression of the ER-resident chaperone HSP47 to suppress Golgi stress-induced apoptosis [44].

2.2.5. The Mucin Arm

The mucin arm, first proposed in 2019, is activated in response to inadequate mucin-type glycosylation in the Golgi. Mucins are high molecular weight, heavily glycosylated proteins produced by epithelial cells, which often form gel-like structures and are components of mucous. Expression of glycosylation enzymes for mucins such as GALNT5, GALNT8, and GALNT18 has been observed in this case. The mucin-type Golgi stress intersects with the TFE3 pathway as well, by inducing the expression and activation of TFE3. An enhancer element regulating transcriptional induction of TFE3 upon mucin-type Golgi stress was identified and designated as the mucin-type Golgi stress response element, with a consensus sequence ACTTCC (N9) TCCCCA [45].

2.2.6. The PERK Pathway

The PERK pathway, which is also activated during ER stress, has additionally been identified as a pathway activated by the Golgi stressor monensin [21]. However, unlike ER stress, the ER-resident chaperone BiP/GRP78 is not induced during Golgi stress, suggesting that Golgi stress response is a distinct type of stress despite the phosphorylation of PERK in both types of stress response.

3. Golgi Stress Response and Redox Imbalance in Neurodegeneration: Focus on Huntington’s Disease

Accumulating evidence reveals that abnormalities in the structure and function of Golgi apparatus occur in neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease (HD) and Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease [20,46,47,48,49,50,51]. The Golgi has also been reported to be fragmented during viral infection [52]. Depletion of the golgin GM130 has been reported to cause Golgi disruption, Purkinje neuron loss, and ataxia in mice [53]. Golgi fragmentation in dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra has been observed in Parkinson’s disease patients [54]. Early studies revealed that the Golgi apparatus may be fragmented in a population of neurons without neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) [55]. In JNPL3 transgenic mice—which express the P301L mutant of tau, a component of NFTs and paired helical filaments (PHFs)—the Golgi complex was fragmented; however, mitochondria or other membranous organelles appeared normal, indicating that Golgi fragmentation is one of the earliest events that occur during pathogenesis, a finding which has been suggested by other laboratories as well [56,57,58]. Structural deformities in the Golgi complex were also linked to accumulation of phospho-tau in the P301S mouse model of AD [59]. Aging is a major risk factor for neurodegeneration; not surprisingly, increased Golgi fragmentation in neurons was observed with aging. GRASP65 and Golgin-84 were also diminished in the aging mouse brain [60].
In HD, we showed that elevated levels of ACBD3 occurred in cell culture and mouse models as well as human HD [20]. ACBD3 bound to the striatal protein ras homolog enriched in striatum (Rhes), which binds to mutant huntingtin (mHtt) and mediates cell death in HD [61]. More recently, we identified another arm of the Golgi stress signaling pathway in a striatal progenitor cell line model of HD. HD is a neurodegenerative disorder triggered by expansion of CAG repeats (encoding polyglutamine repeats) in the gene encoding huntingtin and which primarily affects the corpus striatum of the brain, manifesting as abnormal involuntary movements along with motor and cognitive deficits [1,2]. mHtt affects multiple cellular processes such as DNA replication and repair, transcription, translation, nucleocytoplasmic trafficking, mitochondrial function and proteostasis, to name a few [4,5,6,62,63,64,65,66].

3.1. Redox Imbalance and Cysteine Metabolism in HD

A hallmark of HD is increased oxidative stress. Oxidative stress occurs when the balance between prooxidant and antioxidant pathways tilts in favor of the former. However, oxidative stress has more recently been defined as a disruption of redox signaling pathways [67]. Elevated oxidative stress is at the heart of several neurodegenerative diseases, as well as other conditions [68,69]. Decreased levels and/or dysregulated metabolism of the antioxidants such as ascorbate (vitamin C), glutathione (GSH) and cysteine, and coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) have been observed in HD and contribute to disease pathology [70,71,72]. Both biosynthesis and the uptake of cysteine or its oxidized form cystine are compromised in HD, causing elevated oxidative stress [5,73,74]. The activity of the neuronal cysteine transporter EAAT3/EAAC1 is reduced in HD due to decreased trafficking to the cell membrane [75]. Decreased expression of cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE) (the biosynthetic enzyme for cysteine) also occurs in HD as mHtt sequesters specificity protein 1 (SP1), the transcription factor for CSE during basal conditions [71,76,77]. CSE is also regulated by activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) in response to stress. In HD-affected cells the induction of ATF4 is suboptimal, leading to decreased CSE expression and cysteine biosynthesis [5]. Cysteine is utilized in the biosynthesis of sulfur-containing molecules such as coenzyme A, taurine, lanthionine, homolanthionine, and cystamine [78]. It is also the substrate for production of the gaseous signaling molecule hydrogen sulfide (H2S) [79,80]. H2S signals by sulfhydration or persulfidation, a posttranslational modification which occurs on the –SH group of reactive cysteine residues, leading to formation of –SSH or persulfide groups [81]. Sulfhydration modulates the function of several proteins and signaling cascades, including response to inflammation, mitochondrial bioenergetics and stress responses [82,83]. Both cysteine metabolism and sulfhydration are altered in HD, which contributes to increased protein oxidation [5,71,84].

3.2. Golgi Stress Response and Links to Redox Homeostasis

ATF4, a master regulator of amino acid homeostasis and stress responses, is a central player in the integrated stress response [85,86,87]. It also regulates purine biosynthesis and regulates mTOR function [88]. Furthermore, ATF4 modulates the switch from synthesis of fetal hemoglobin to adult hemoglobin by stimulating transcription of BCL11A, a repressor of γ-globin synthesis [89]. ATF4 harbors a basic leucine-zipper (bZIP) domain and can either form homodimers or heterodimerize with other members of the bZIP family (FOS/JUN, ATF and CCAAT enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) bZIP transcription factors) to control transcription [90,91]. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), the master regulator of redox regulation, also forms heterodimers with ATF4 and stimulates the transcription of cytoprotective genes during oxidative stress [92]. ATF4 may have dual functions, modulating either cell survival or cell death, and excessive stimulation of ATF4 signaling may cause cell death [93]. The pro-survival or apoptotic function of ATF4 has been attributed in part to the identity of its heterodimerization partner and the physiologic context; the mechanisms are still being elucidated [94].
Expression of ATF4 is regulated at the transcriptional as well as the translational level, and is a vital part of the integrated stress response [95,96]. The integrated stress response (Figure 3) is engaged in response to stress stimuli, including but not limited to amino acid and nutrient deprivation, ER stress, mitochondrial stress, iron dysregulation and viral infection. Four kinases, namely general control non-derepressible 2 (GCN2), PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) 19, double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR), and heme-regulated eIF2α kinase (HRI) sense the stress and phosphorylate the eukaryotic initiation 2 α (eIF2α), which abrogates its catalytic activity resulting in global translational arrest [85,97,98,99,100,101]. Under these conditions, only mRNAs responsible for maintenance of cell survival and essential signaling (such as ATF4) are translated. Recently, we showed that the Golgi stressors, monensin and nigericin, activated the integrated stress response by eliciting phosphorylation of PERK, resulting in translation of ATF4 and expression of its targets [21] (Figure 4). Among these targets were enzymes involved in cysteine biosynthesis and uptake, cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE) and SLC7A11, a subunit of the XcT transporter, which imports cystine, the oxidized form of cysteine (Figure 4a).
In the striatal progenitor cell culture models STHdhQ7/Q7 (Q7) and STHdh1117/Q111 (Q111), treatment with monensin rescued cell death associated with cysteine deprivation. Monensin increased the expression of ATF4 in the Q111 cells, which have compromised stress responses. We had shown previously that Q111 cells had decreased expression of CSE and thus could not grow in the absence of cysteine [5,71]. These cells were also compromised in their ability to upregulate ATF4, the transcription factor responsible for induction of CSE during cysteine deprivation. Treatment with monensin rescued growth in cysteine-free media and decreased oxidative stress in a manner dependent on PERK (Figure 4b). Monensin failed to upregulate ATF4 and CSE expression in cells deleted for PERK. Thus, Golgi stress engages the PERK pathway in HD cells. We further showed that mild Golgi stress can be harnessed to elicit cytoprotective effects [21].

4. Conclusions

Cells are outfitted with an array of defense mechanisms to counter stress. When exposed to stress stimuli, adaptive and cytoprotective pathways are engaged to restore balance. When the damage induced by stress cannot be resolved, apoptosis ensues. It is becoming increasingly clear that exposure to low-grade stress may precondition cells in a hermetic manner. Thus, mild stress such as low-grade Golgi stress, which does not cause toxicity, can up-regulate defense mechanisms to precondition cells to withstand future insults. Novel therapeutics which target the points of intersection between stress and adaptive responses may be beneficial in a wide variety of diseases.

Funding

This work was funded by the American Heart Association (AHA)/Paul Allen Frontiers Group; grant number 19PABH134580006 and National Institutes of Health, NIA grant 1R21AG073684—01 to B.D.P.

Acknowledgments

Biorender is acknowledged for the use of their software for preparation of figures.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

ACBD3Acyl CoA-Binding Domain Containing 3
ATF4Activating Transcription Factor 4
BGAT2Galactosyl Galactosyl Xylosyl Protein 3-β
Glucuronosyltransferase 2
BiPBinding Immunoglobulin Protein
CHOPC/EBP Homologous Protein
CoQ10Coenzyme Q10
CREBcAMP Response Element Binding Protein 3
CSECystathionine γ-lyase
GCN2General Control non-Derepressible 2
eIF2αEukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 2
Subunit-α
EAAT3/EAAC1Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 3
EREndoplasmic Reticulum
ERADER-Associated Degradation
FUT1Fucosyltransferase 1
GARDGolgi-Apparatus Related Degradation
GASEGolgi Apparatus Stress Response Element
GRASP65Golgi Reassembly and Stacking Protein of 65 kD
HDHuntington’s Disease
HRIHeme-Regulated eIF2α Kinase
IRE1Inositol-Requiring Enzyme 1
MTOCMicrotubule Organizing Center
NFTsNeurofibrillary Tangles
Nrf2Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2
PDIProtein Disulfide Isomerase
PERKProtein Kinase R Protein Kinase R (PKR)-Like ER Kinase
PGProteoglycan
PHFPaired Helical Filament
Rab20Ras-Related Protein Rab-20
RhesRas Homolog Enriched in Striatum
RIDDRegulated IRE1-Dependent Decay
S1PSite 1 Protease
S2PSite 2 Protease
SIAT4A/ST3GAL1ST3β-Galactoside Alpha-2,3-Sialyltransferase 1
SP1Specificity Protein 1
STX3Syntaxin 3A
TFE3Transcription Factor E3
TGNTrans Golgi Network
UAP1L1UDP-N-Acetylhexosamine
Pyrophosphorylase-Like Protein 1
UPRUnfolded Protein Response
WIPI49/WIP1αWD-Repeat Protein Interacting with
PhosphoInosides 1α
XBP1X-box Binding Protein 1

References

  1. O’Donovan, M.C. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell 1993, 72, 971–983. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, G.P.; Dorsey, R.; Gusella, J.F.; Hayden, M.R.; Kay, C.; Leavitt, B.R.; Nance, M.; Ross, C.A.; Scahill, R.I.; Wetzel, R.; et al. Huntington disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2015, 1, 15005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ahmed, I.; Sbodio, J.I.; Harraz, M.M.; Tyagi, R.; Grima, J.C.; Albacarys, L.K.; Hubbi, M.; Xu, R.; Kim, S.; Paul, B.D.; et al. Huntington’s disease: Neural dysfunction linked to inositol polyphosphate multikinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 9751–9756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Grima, J.C.; Daigle, J.G.; Arbez, N.; Cunningham, K.; Zhang, K.; Ochaba, J.; Geater, C.; Morozko, E.; Stocksdale, J.; Glatzer, J.C.; et al. Mutant Huntingtin Disrupts the Nuclear Pore Complex. Neuron 2017, 94, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Sbodio, J.I.; Snyder, S.H.; Paul, B.D. Transcriptional control of amino acid homeostasis is disrupted in Huntington’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 8843–8848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Eshraghi, M.; Karunadharma, P.P.; Blin, J.; Shahani, N.; Ricci, E.P.; Michel, A.; Urban, N.T.; Galli, N.; Sharma, M.; Ramírez-Jarquín, U.N.; et al. Mutant Huntingtin stalls ribosomes and represses protein synthesis in a cellular model of Huntington disease. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Paul, B.D.; Snyder, S.H. Impaired Redox Signaling in Huntington’s Disease: Therapeutic Implications. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 12, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Cao, S.S.; Kaufman, R.J. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress in cell fate decision and human disease. Antioxid. Redox. Signal 2014, 21, 396–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Reid, D.W.; Nicchitta, C.V. Diversity and selectivity in mRNA translation on the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 16, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schwarz, D.S.; Blower, M.D. The endoplasmic reticulum: Structure, function and response to cellular signaling. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Roscoe, J.M.; Sevier, C.S. Pathways for Sensing and Responding to Hydrogen Peroxide at the Endoplasmic Reticulum. Cells 2020, 9, 2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lemmer, I.L.; Willemsen, N.; Hilal, N.; Bartelt, A. A guide to understanding endoplasmic reticulum stress in metabolic disorders. Mol. Metab. 2021, 47, 101169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hetz, C.; Zhang, K.; Kaufman, R.J. Mechanisms, regulation and functions of the unfolded protein response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 421–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Walter, P.; Ron, D. The unfolded protein response: From stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science 2011, 334, 1081–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Frakes, A.E.; Dillin, A. The UPR(ER): Sensor and Coordinator of Organismal Homeostasis. Mol. Cell 2017, 66, 761–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ye, J.; Rawson, R.B.; Komuro, R.; Chen, X.; Davé, U.P.; Prywes, R.; Brown, M.S.; Goldstein, J.L. ER Stress Induces Cleavage of Membrane-Bound ATF6 by the Same Proteases that Process SREBPs. Mol. Cell 2000, 6, 1355–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Haze, K.; Yoshida, H.; Yanagi, H.; Yura, T.; Mori, K. Mammalian Transcription Factor ATF6 Is Synthesized as a Transmembrane Protein and Activated by Proteolysis in Response to Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Mol. Biol. Cell 1999, 10, 3787–3799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lemberg, M.K.; Strisovsky, K. Maintenance of organellar protein homeostasis by ER-associated degradation and related mechanisms. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 2507–2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wilkinson, S. Emerging Principles of Selective ER Autophagy. J. Mol. Biol. 2020, 432, 185–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sbodio, J.I.; Paul, B.D.; Machamer, C.E.; Snyder, S.H. Golgi Protein ACBD3 Mediates Neurotoxicity Associated with Huntington’s Disease. Cell Rep. 2013, 4, 890–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Sbodio, J.I.; Snyder, S.H.; Paul, B.D. Golgi stress response reprograms cysteine metabolism to confer cytoprotection in Huntington’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 780–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Golgi, C.; Lipsky, N.G. On the structure of nerve cells. J. Microsc. 1989, 155, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Friend, D.S.; Murray, M.J. Osmium Impregnation of the Golgi Apparatus. Am. J. Anat. 1965, 117, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ghosh, S.K. Camillo Golgi (1843–1926): Scientist extraordinaire and pioneer figure of modern neurology. Anat. Cell Biol. 2020, 53, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fodstad, H. The neuron theory. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 2001, 77, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lowe, M. Structural organization of the Golgi apparatus. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 23, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wei, J.H.; Seemann, J. Unraveling the Golgi ribbon. Traffic 2010, 11, 1391–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Altan-Bonnet, N.; Sougrat, R.; Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Molecular basis for Golgi maintenance and biogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2004, 16, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Robbins, E.; Gonatas, N.K. The Ultrastructure of a Mammalian Cell during the Mitotic Cycle. J. Cell Biol. 1964, 21, 429–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ayala, I.; Colanzi, A. Mitotic inheritance of the Golgi complex and its role in cell division. Biol. Cell 2017, 109, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guizzunti, G.; Seemann, J. Mitotic Golgi disassembly is required for bipolar spindle formation and mitotic progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E6590–E6599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Stanley, P. Golgi glycosylation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a005199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Potelle, S.; Klein, A.; Foulquier, F. Golgi post-translational modifications and associated diseases. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2015, 38, 741–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sasaki, K.; Yoshida, H. Organelle autoregulation-stress responses in the ER, Golgi, mitochondria and lysosome. J. Biochem. 2015, 157, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sasaki, K.; Yoshida, H. Golgi stress response and organelle zones. FEBS Lett. 2019, 593, 2330–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Reiling, J.H.; Olive, A.; Sanyal, S.; Carette, J.; Brummelkamp, T.R.; Ploegh, H.L.; Starnbach, M.N.; Sabatini, D.M. A CREB3–ARF4 signalling pathway mediates the response to Golgi stress and susceptibility to pathogens. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 1473–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Nakamura, N. Emerging New Roles of GM130, a cis-Golgi Matrix Protein, in Higher Order Cell Functions. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2010, 112, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sohda, M.; Misumi, Y.; Yamamoto, A.; Yano, A.; Nakamura, N.; Ikehara, Y. Identification and Characterization of a Novel Golgi Protein, GCP60, That Interacts with the Integral Membrane Protein Giantin. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 45298–45306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Oku, M.; Tanakura, S.; Uemura, A.; Sohda, M.; Misumi, Y.; Taniguchi, M.; Wakabayashi, S.; Yoshida, H. Novel Cis-acting Element GASE Regulates Transcriptional Induction by the Golgi Stress Response. Cell Struct. Funct. 2011, 36, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Taniguchi, M.; Nadanaka, S.; Tanakura, S.; Sawaguchi, S.; Midori, S.; Kawai, Y.; Yamaguchi, S.; Shimada, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Matsumura, Y.; et al. TFE3 is a bHLH-ZIP-type transcription factor that regulates the mammalian Golgi stress response. Cell Struct. Funct. 2015, 40, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Taniguchi, M.; Sasaki-Osugi, K.; Oku, M.; Sawaguchi, S.; Tanakura, S.; Kawai, Y.; Wakabayashi, S.; Yoshida, H. MLX Is a Transcriptional Repressor of the Mammalian Golgi Stress Response. Cell Struct. Funct. 2016, 41, 93–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Eisenberg-Lerner, A.; Benyair, R.; Hizkiahou, N.; Nudel, N.; Maor, R.; Kramer, M.P.; Shmueli, M.D.; Zigdon, I.; Lev, M.C.; Ulman, A.; et al. Golgi organization is regulated by proteasomal degradation. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lane, J.; Lucocq, J.; Pryde, J.; Barr, F.; Woodman, P.G.; Allan, V.; Lowe, M. Caspase-mediated cleavage of the stacking protein GRASP65 is required for Golgi fragmentation during apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 156, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Miyata, S.; Mizuno, T.; Koyama, Y.; Katayama, T.; Tohyama, M. The Endoplasmic Reticulum-Resident Chaperone Heat Shock Protein 47 Protects the Golgi Apparatus from the Effects of O-Glycosylation Inhibition. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jamaludin, M.I.; Wakabayashi, S.; Taniguchi, M.; Sasaki, K.; Komori, R.; Kawamura, H.; Takase, H.; Sakamoto, M.; Yoshida, H. MGSE Regulates Crosstalk from the Mucin Pathway to the TFE3 Pathway of the Golgi Stress Response. Cell Struct. Funct. 2019, 44, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Gonatas, N.K.; Stieber, A.; Gonatas, J.O. Fragmentation of the Golgi apparatus in neurodegenerative diseases and cell death. J. Neurol. Sci. 2006, 246, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mourelatos, Z.; Gonatas, N.K.; Stieber, A.; Gurney, M.E.; Canto, M.C.D. The Golgi apparatus of spinal cord motor neurons in transgenic mice expressing mutant Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase becomes fragmented in early, preclinical stages of the disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 5472–5477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Joshi, G.; Bekier, M.E., 2nd; Wang, Y. Golgi fragmentation in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Rendón, W.O.; Martínez-Alonso, E.; Tomás, M.; Martínez-Martínez, N.; Martínez-Menárguez, J.A. Golgi fragmentation is Rab and SNARE dependent in cellular models of Parkinson’s disease. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 139, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Strehlow, A.N.; Li, J.; Myers, R.M. Wild-type huntingtin participates in protein trafficking between the Golgi and the extracellular space. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006, 16, 391–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Sakurai, A.; Okamoto, K.; Fujita, Y.; Nakazato, Y.; Wakabayashi, K.; Takahashi, H.; Gonatas, N.K. Fragmentation of the Golgi apparatus of the ballooned neurons in patients with corticobasal degeneration and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2000, 100, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Campadelli, G.; Brandimarti, R.; Di Lazzaro, C.; Ward, P.L.; Roizman, B.; Torrisi, M.R. Fragmentation and dispersal of Golgi proteins and redistribution of glycoproteins and glycolipids processed through the Golgi apparatus after infection with herpes simplex virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 2798–2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Liu, C.; Mei, M.; Li, Q.; Roboti, P.; Pang, Q.; Ying, Z.; Gao, F.; Lowe, M.; Bao, S. Loss of the golgin GM130 causes Golgi disruption, Purkinje neuron loss, and ataxia in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Tomas, M.; Martinez-Alonso, E.; Martinez-Martinez, N.; Cara-Esteban, M.; Martinez-Menarguez, J.A. Fragmentation of the Golgi complex of dopaminergic neurons in human substantia nigra: New cytopathological findings in Parkinson’s disease. Histol. Histopathol. 2021, 36, 47–60. [Google Scholar]
  55. Stieber, A.; Mourelatos, Z.; Gonatas, N.K. In Alzheimer’s disease the Golgi apparatus of a population of neurons without neurofibrillary tangles is fragmented and atrophic. Am. J. Pathol. 1996, 148, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Liazoghli, D.; Perreault, S.; Micheva, K.D.; Desjardins, M.; Leclerc, N. Fragmentation of the Golgi Apparatus Induced by the Overexpression of Wild-Type and Mutant Human Tau Forms in Neurons. Am. J. Pathol. 2005, 166, 1499–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lewis, J.; McGowan, E.; Rockwood, J.; Melrose, H.; Nacharaju, P.; Van Slegtenhorst, M.; Gwinn, K.; Murphy, M.P.; Baker, M.; Yu, X.; et al. Neurofibrillary tangles, amyotrophy and progressive motor disturbance in mice expressing mutant (P301L) tau protein. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 402–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nakagomi, S.; Barsoum, M.J.; Bossy-Wetzel, E.; Sütterlin, C.; Malhotra, V.; Lipton, S.A. A Golgi fragmentation pathway in neurodegeneration. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008, 29, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Antón-Fernández, A.; Merchán-Rubira, J.; Avila, J.; Hernández, F.; DeFelipe, J.; Muñoz, A. Phospho-Tau Accumulation and Structural Alterations of the Golgi Apparatus of Cortical Pyramidal Neurons in the P301S Tauopathy Mouse Model. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017, 60, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Jiang, Q.; Wang, L.; Guan, Y.; Xu, H.; Niu, Y.; Han, L.; Wei, Y.-P.; Lin, L.; Chu, J.; Wang, Q.; et al. Golgin-84-associated Golgi fragmentation triggers tau hyperphosphorylation by activation of cyclin-dependent kinase-5 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 1352–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Subramaniam, S.; Sixt, K.M.; Barrow, R.; Snyder, S.H. Rhes, a Striatal Specific Protein, Mediates Mutant-Huntingtin Cytotoxicity. Science 2009, 324, 1327–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Lu, X.H.; Mattis, V.B.; Wang, N.; Al-Ramahi, I.; van den Berg, N.; Fratantoni, S.A.; Waldvogel, H.; Greiner, E.; Osmand, A.; Elzein, K.; et al. Targeting ATM ameliorates mutant Huntingtin toxicity in cell and animal models of Huntington’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 268ra178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Iyer, R.R.; Pluciennik, A. DNA Mismatch Repair and its Role in Huntington’s Disease. J. Huntingtons Dis. 2021, 10, 75–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Luthi-Carter, R.; Hanson, S.A.; Strand, A.D.; Bergstrom, D.A.; Chun, W.; Peters, N.L.; Woods, A.M.; Chan, E.Y.; Kooperberg, C.; Krainc, D.; et al. Dysregulation of gene expression in the R6/2 model of polyglutamine disease: Parallel changes in muscle and brain. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2002, 11, 1911–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Bañez-Coronel, M.; Ayhan, F.; Tarabochia, A.D.; Zu, T.; Perez, B.A.; Tusi, S.K.; Pletnikova, O.; Borchelt, D.R.; Ross, C.A.; Margolis, R.L.; et al. RAN Translation in Huntington Disease. Neuron 2015, 88, 667–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Soares, T.R.; Reis, S.D.; Pinho, B.R.; Duchen, M.R.; Oliveira, J.M.A. Targeting the proteostasis network in Huntington’s disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 2019, 49, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jones, D.P. Redefining Oxidative Stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2006, 8, 1865–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sbodio, J.I.; Snyder, S.H.; Paul, B.D. Redox Mechanisms in Neurodegeneration: From Disease Outcomes to Therapeutic Op-portunities. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2019, 30, 1450–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Paul, B.D.; Lemle, M.D.; Komaroff, A.L.; Snyder, S.H. Redox imbalance links COVID-19 and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2024358118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Andrich, J.; Saft, C.; Gerlach, M.; Schneider, B.; Arz, A.; Kühn, W.; Müller, T. Coenzyme Q10 serum levels in Huntington’s disease. In Focus on Extrapyramidal Dysfunction; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2004; Volume 68, pp. 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Paul, B.D.; Sbodio, J.I.; Xu, R.; Vandiver, M.S.; Cha, J.Y.; Snowman, A.M.; Snyder, S.H. Cystathionine gamma-lyase deficiency mediates neurodegeneration in Huntington’s disease. Nature 2014, 509, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Acuña, A.I.; Esparza, M.; Kramm, C.; Beltrán, F.A.; Parra, A.V.; Cepeda, C.; Toro, C.A.; Vidal, R.L.; Hetz, C.; Concha, I.I.; et al. A failure in energy metabolism and antioxidant uptake precede symptoms of Hun-tington’s disease in mice. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Zhang, C.; Rodriguez, C.; Spaulding, J.; Aw, T.Y.; Feng, J. Age-dependent and tissue-related glutathione redox status in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2012, 28, 655–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Frederick, N.M.; Bertho, J.; Patel, K.K.; Petr, G.T.; Bakradze, E.; Smith, S.B.; Rosenberg, P.A. Dysregulation of system xc(-) expression induced by mutant huntingtin in a striatal neuronal cell line and in R6/2 mice. Neurochem. Int. 2014, 76, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Li, X.; Valencia, A.; Sapp, E.; Masso, N.; Alexander, J.; Reeves, P.; Kegel, K.B.; Aronin, N.; DiFiglia, M. Aberrant Rab11-dependent trafficking of the neuronal glutamate transporter EAAC1 causes oxidative stress and cell death in Huntington’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 4552–4561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Dunah, A.W.; Jeong, H.; Griffin, A.; Kim, Y.M.; Standaert, D.G.; Hersch, S.M.; Mouradian, M.M.; Young, A.B.; Tanese, N.; Krainc, D. Sp1 and TAFII130 transcriptional activity disrupted in early Huntington’s disease. Science 2002, 296, 2238–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Paul, B.D.; Snyder, S.H. Neurodegeneration in Huntington’s disease involves loss of cystathionine gamma-lyase. Cell Cycle 2014, 13, 2491–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Paul, B.D.; Sbodio, J.I.; Snyder, S.H. Cysteine Metabolism in Neuronal Redox Homeostasis. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 39, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Paul, B.D.; Snyder, S.H. H2S: A Novel Gasotransmitter that Signals by Sulfhydration. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2015, 40, 687–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Sen, N.; Paul, B.D.; Gadalla, M.M.; Mustafa, A.K.; Sen, T.; Xu, R.; Kim, S.; Snyder, S.H. Hydrogen sulfide-linked sulfhydration of NF-kappaB mediates its antiapoptotic actions. Mol. Cell 2012, 45, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Mustafa, A.K.; Gadalla, M.M.; Sen, N.; Kim, S.; Mu, W.; Gazi, S.K.; Barrow, R.K.; Yang, G.; Wang, R.; Snyder, S.H. H2S Signals Through Protein S-Sulfhydration. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, ra72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Paul, B.D.; Snyder, S.H. Gasotransmitter hydrogen sulfide signaling in neuronal health and disease. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 149, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Paul, B.D.; Snyder, S.H.; Kashfi, K. Effects of hydrogen sulfide on mitochondrial function and cellular bioenergetics. Redox Biol. 2021, 38, 101772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zivanovic, J.; Kouroussis, E.; Kohl, J.B.; Adhikari, B.; Bursac, B.; Schott-Roux, S.; Petrovic, D.; Miljkovic, J.L.; Thomas-Lopez, D.; Jung, Y.; et al. Selective Persulfide Detection Reveals Evolutionarily Conserved Antiaging Effects of S-Sulfhydration. Cell Metab. 2019, 30, 1152–1170.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Harding, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, H.; Novoa, I.; Lu, P.D.; Calfon, M.; Sadri, N.; Yun, C.; Popko, B.; Paules, R.S.; et al. An Integrated Stress Response Regulates Amino Acid Metabolism and Resistance to Oxidative Stress. Mol. Cell 2003, 11, 619–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kilberg, M.S.; Shan, J.; Su, N. ATF4-dependent transcription mediates signaling of amino acid limitation. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 20, 436–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Rzymski, T.; Milani, M.; Pike, L.; Buffa, F.; Mellor, H.R.; Winchester, L.; Pires, I.; Hammond, E.; Ragoussis, I.; Harris, A.L. Regulation of autophagy by ATF4 in response to severe hypoxia. Oncogene 2010, 29, 4424–4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Ben-Sahra, I.; Hoxhaj, G.; Ricoult, S.J.H.; Asara, J.M.; Manning, B.D. mTORC1 induces purine synthesis through control of the mitochondrial tetrahydrofolate cycle. Science 2016, 351, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Huang, P.; Peslak, S.A.; Lan, X.; Khandros, E.; Yano, J.A.; Sharma, M.; Keller, C.A.; Giardine, B.M.; Qin, K.; Abdulmalik, O.; et al. HRI-regulated transcription factor ATF4 activates BCL11A transcription to silence fetal hemoglobin expression. Blood 2020, 135, 2121–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Huggins, C.J.; Mayekar, M.K.; Martin, N.; Saylor, K.L.; Gonit, M.; Jailwala, P.; Kasoji, M.; Haines, D.C.; Quiñones, O.A.; Johnson, P.F. C/EBPgamma Is a Critical Regulator of Cellular Stress Response Networks through Heterodimerization with ATF. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 36, 693–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Hai, T.; Curran, T. Cross-family dimerization of transcription factors Fos/Jun and ATF/CREB alters DNA binding specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 3720–3724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. He, C.H.; Gong, P.; Hu, B.; Stewart, D.; Choi, M.E.; Choi, A.M.K.; Alam, J. Identification of Activating Transcription Factor 4 (ATF4) as an Nrf2-interacting Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 20858–20865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Lange, P.S.; Chavez, J.C.; Pinto, J.T.; Coppola, G.; Sun, C.W.; Townes, T.M.; Geschwind, D.H.; Ratan, R.R. ATF4 is an oxidative stress-inducible, prodeath transcription factor in neurons in vitro and in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2008, 205, 1227–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Wortel, I.M.N.; van der Meer, L.T.; Kilberg, M.S.; van Leeuwen, F.N. Surviving Stress: Modulation of ATF4-Mediated Stress Re-sponses in Normal and Malignant Cells. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 28, 794–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Dey, S.; Baird, T.; Zhou, D.; Palam, L.R.; Spandau, D.F.; Wek, R.C. Both Transcriptional Regulation and Translational Control of ATF4 Are Central to the Integrated Stress Response. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 33165–33174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Pakos-Zebrucka, K.; Koryga, I.; Mnich, K.; Ljujic, M.; Samali, A.; Gorman, A.M. The integrated stress response. EMBO Rep. 2016, 17, 1374–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Berlanga, J.J.; Herrero, S.; de Haro, C. Characterization of the hemin-sensitive eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha kinase from mouse nonerythroid cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 32340–32346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Chen, J.J.; Throop, M.S.; Gehrke, L.; Kuo, I.; Pal, J.; Brodsky, M.; London, I.M. Cloning of the cDNA of the heme-regulated eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF-2 alpha) kinase of rabbit reticulocytes: Homology to yeast GCN2 protein kinase and human double-stranded-RNA-dependent eIF-2 alpha kinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 7729–7733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Shi, Y.; Vattem, K.M.; Sood, R.; An, J.; Liang, J.; Stramm, L.; Wek, R.C. Identification and Characterization of Pancreatic Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2 α-Subunit Kinase, PEK, Involved in Translational Control. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 7499–7509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Meurs, E.; Chong, K.; Galabru, J.; Thomas, N.B.; Kerr, I.M.; Williams, B.; Hovanessian, A.G. Molecular cloning and characterization of the human double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase induced by interferon. Cell 1990, 62, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Donnelly, N.; Gorman, A.; Gupta, S.; Samali, A. The eIF2α kinases: Their structures and functions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013, 70, 3493–3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response. The mammalian ER stress response consists of three arms: the inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), protein kinase R (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) pathways. IRE1 senses ER stress, which leads to its dimerization and to the activation of its endonuclease role, that is, to splice a specific intron from the mRNA of X-box binding protein 1, XBP1 to create XBP1s. T XBP1s protein translocates to the nucleus and transactivates its target genes. In the ATF6 arm, binding immunoglobulin protein/glucose-regulated protein 78 (BiP/GRP78) dissociates from ATF6 when unfolded proteins accumulate in the ER. ATF6 translocates to the Golgi complex, where it undergoes proteolytic cleavage by site 1 and site 2 proteases (S1P and S2P). The N-terminal cytosolic fragment of ATF6 migrates to the nucleus and induces expression of target genes. In the PERK arm, dissociation of BiP causes its dimerization and autophosphorylation. PERK then phosphorylates eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α), which results in global translational arrest. Under these conditions, only certain mRNAs such as ATF4 are translated, in order to maintain cellular functions during stress.
Figure 1. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response. The mammalian ER stress response consists of three arms: the inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), protein kinase R (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) pathways. IRE1 senses ER stress, which leads to its dimerization and to the activation of its endonuclease role, that is, to splice a specific intron from the mRNA of X-box binding protein 1, XBP1 to create XBP1s. T XBP1s protein translocates to the nucleus and transactivates its target genes. In the ATF6 arm, binding immunoglobulin protein/glucose-regulated protein 78 (BiP/GRP78) dissociates from ATF6 when unfolded proteins accumulate in the ER. ATF6 translocates to the Golgi complex, where it undergoes proteolytic cleavage by site 1 and site 2 proteases (S1P and S2P). The N-terminal cytosolic fragment of ATF6 migrates to the nucleus and induces expression of target genes. In the PERK arm, dissociation of BiP causes its dimerization and autophosphorylation. PERK then phosphorylates eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α), which results in global translational arrest. Under these conditions, only certain mRNAs such as ATF4 are translated, in order to maintain cellular functions during stress.
Antioxidants 10 01468 g001
Figure 2. The Golgi stress response. Pathways involving the transcription factor E3 (TFE3), mucin, proteoglycan, heat shock protein 47 (HSP47), cAMP responsive element binding protein 3 (CREB3) and the protein kinase R (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK) have been identified. The sensors for TFE3, mucin, proteoglycan and HSP47 have not yet been identified. The transcription factors for the mucin, proteoglycan and HSP47 pathways are also not well characterized. In the TFE3 pathway, dephosphorylation of TFE3 causes its nuclear translocation, where it activates transcription of its target genes by interacting with the Golgi apparatus stress response element (GASE) enhancer element. The mucin pathway, which is activated in response to insufficiency of mucin glycosylation, displays crosstalk with the TFE3 pathway. The mucin-type Golgi stress response element (MGSE) is present on the promoter of the TFE3 gene as well. The proteoglycan pathway involves the ER-localized CREB3 (which functions as a sensor for Golgi stress) translocating from the ER to the Golgi to be cleaved by S1P and S2P proteases. The cytosolic region of the truncated CREB3 migrates to the nucleus and activates transcription of ARF4, leading to apoptosis. In the HSP47 pathway, expression of HSP47 (an ER chaperone involved in collagen folding and maturation) inhibits Golgi stress-induced apoptosis. The PERK pathway acts via the eIF2α/ATF4 axis, however, BiP/GRP78 is not induced when this pathway is activated by Golgi stress.
Figure 2. The Golgi stress response. Pathways involving the transcription factor E3 (TFE3), mucin, proteoglycan, heat shock protein 47 (HSP47), cAMP responsive element binding protein 3 (CREB3) and the protein kinase R (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK) have been identified. The sensors for TFE3, mucin, proteoglycan and HSP47 have not yet been identified. The transcription factors for the mucin, proteoglycan and HSP47 pathways are also not well characterized. In the TFE3 pathway, dephosphorylation of TFE3 causes its nuclear translocation, where it activates transcription of its target genes by interacting with the Golgi apparatus stress response element (GASE) enhancer element. The mucin pathway, which is activated in response to insufficiency of mucin glycosylation, displays crosstalk with the TFE3 pathway. The mucin-type Golgi stress response element (MGSE) is present on the promoter of the TFE3 gene as well. The proteoglycan pathway involves the ER-localized CREB3 (which functions as a sensor for Golgi stress) translocating from the ER to the Golgi to be cleaved by S1P and S2P proteases. The cytosolic region of the truncated CREB3 migrates to the nucleus and activates transcription of ARF4, leading to apoptosis. In the HSP47 pathway, expression of HSP47 (an ER chaperone involved in collagen folding and maturation) inhibits Golgi stress-induced apoptosis. The PERK pathway acts via the eIF2α/ATF4 axis, however, BiP/GRP78 is not induced when this pathway is activated by Golgi stress.
Antioxidants 10 01468 g002
Figure 3. The integrated stress response (ISR). ISR is activated by several stress stimuli. In mammals, these are sensed by four kinases: general control non-depressible 2 (GCN2), protein kinase R protein kinase R (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK), Heme-regulated eIF2α kinase (HRI) and double stranded RNA dependent protein kinase (PKR), each of which respond to a set of stimuli. These kinases undergo autophosphorylation and phosphorylate the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α), which inhibits its catalytic activity and its function of delivering the initiator tRNA to the ribosome, thereby arresting global translation. Under these conditions, only certain mRNAs (such as that encoding ATF4) are translated. ATF4 functions either as a homodimer or heterodimer to transactivate its target genes. The pathway is referred to as ISR because signaling mediated by diverse stress stimuli converge upon a common pathway (eIF2α/ATF4 axis).
Figure 3. The integrated stress response (ISR). ISR is activated by several stress stimuli. In mammals, these are sensed by four kinases: general control non-depressible 2 (GCN2), protein kinase R protein kinase R (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK), Heme-regulated eIF2α kinase (HRI) and double stranded RNA dependent protein kinase (PKR), each of which respond to a set of stimuli. These kinases undergo autophosphorylation and phosphorylate the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α), which inhibits its catalytic activity and its function of delivering the initiator tRNA to the ribosome, thereby arresting global translation. Under these conditions, only certain mRNAs (such as that encoding ATF4) are translated. ATF4 functions either as a homodimer or heterodimer to transactivate its target genes. The pathway is referred to as ISR because signaling mediated by diverse stress stimuli converge upon a common pathway (eIF2α/ATF4 axis).
Antioxidants 10 01468 g003
Figure 4. The Golgi stress response and its intersection with redox homeostasis in Huntington’s disease (HD). (a) Golgi stress response in normal cells. Golgi stress activates PERK, which phosphorylates eIF2α to inhibit general protein synthesis. Only mRNAs such as ATF4 are translated. ATF4 regulates amino acid homeostasis and one of the genes induced by ATF4 is CTH (which encodes the biosynthetic enzyme for cysteine, also called CSE). CSE utilizes cysteine to produce the gaseous signaling molecule hydrogen sulfide (H2S). H2S signals by a post-translational modification termed sulfhydration/persulfidation and modulates the activity of target proteins. H2S stimulates cystine uptake by the cystine transporter, leading to increased cysteine levels in cells. ATF4 also regulates expression of SLC7A11 (xCT), a subunit of the cystine transporter, by activating its transcription through heterodimerization with Nrf2, a master regulator of redox homeostasis. (b) Harnessing the Golgi stress response to elicit cytoprotection in HD. Normal cells express CSE and ATF4 during basal conditions and during stress to produce cysteine. Cysteine is also imported into cells via the cystine transporter, Xc-. In HD, both basal expression of CSE (regulated by specificity protein1, SP1) as well as stress-induced expression of CSE and the xCT subunit of the cystine transporter by ATF4 are compromised, causing a cysteine deficit which leads to decreased H2S levels and sulfhydration. When cells are treated with monensin, a Golgi stressor, CSE is induced via the PERK/ATF4 pathway to increase cysteine and H2S levels and mediate cytoprotection.
Figure 4. The Golgi stress response and its intersection with redox homeostasis in Huntington’s disease (HD). (a) Golgi stress response in normal cells. Golgi stress activates PERK, which phosphorylates eIF2α to inhibit general protein synthesis. Only mRNAs such as ATF4 are translated. ATF4 regulates amino acid homeostasis and one of the genes induced by ATF4 is CTH (which encodes the biosynthetic enzyme for cysteine, also called CSE). CSE utilizes cysteine to produce the gaseous signaling molecule hydrogen sulfide (H2S). H2S signals by a post-translational modification termed sulfhydration/persulfidation and modulates the activity of target proteins. H2S stimulates cystine uptake by the cystine transporter, leading to increased cysteine levels in cells. ATF4 also regulates expression of SLC7A11 (xCT), a subunit of the cystine transporter, by activating its transcription through heterodimerization with Nrf2, a master regulator of redox homeostasis. (b) Harnessing the Golgi stress response to elicit cytoprotection in HD. Normal cells express CSE and ATF4 during basal conditions and during stress to produce cysteine. Cysteine is also imported into cells via the cystine transporter, Xc-. In HD, both basal expression of CSE (regulated by specificity protein1, SP1) as well as stress-induced expression of CSE and the xCT subunit of the cystine transporter by ATF4 are compromised, causing a cysteine deficit which leads to decreased H2S levels and sulfhydration. When cells are treated with monensin, a Golgi stressor, CSE is induced via the PERK/ATF4 pathway to increase cysteine and H2S levels and mediate cytoprotection.
Antioxidants 10 01468 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paul, B.D. Signaling Overlap between the Golgi Stress Response and Cysteine Metabolism in Huntington’s Disease. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1468. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091468

AMA Style

Paul BD. Signaling Overlap between the Golgi Stress Response and Cysteine Metabolism in Huntington’s Disease. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(9):1468. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091468

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paul, Bindu D. 2021. "Signaling Overlap between the Golgi Stress Response and Cysteine Metabolism in Huntington’s Disease" Antioxidants 10, no. 9: 1468. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091468

APA Style

Paul, B. D. (2021). Signaling Overlap between the Golgi Stress Response and Cysteine Metabolism in Huntington’s Disease. Antioxidants, 10(9), 1468. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10091468

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop