Next Article in Journal
Obesity Hinders the Protective Effect of Selenite Supplementation on Insulin Signaling
Next Article in Special Issue
Roles of Heme Oxygenase-1 in Neuroinflammation and Brain Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of the Biological Activity of the Ethanolic Extract from the Roots of Cannabis sativa L. Grown in Aeroponics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Therapeutic Potential of Inducible Endogenous Cytoprotective Heme Oxygenase-1 in Mitigating SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Associated Inflammation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Crosstalk between Heme Oxygenase-1 and Iron Metabolism in Macrophages: Implications for the Modulation of Inflammation and Immunity

by
Joseana de Oliveira
1,2,†,
Marina B. Denadai
1,2,† and
Diego L. Costa
1,2,*
1
Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto 14049-900, Brazil
2
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Imunologia Básica e Aplicada, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto 14049-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(5), 861; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11050861
Submission received: 1 April 2022 / Revised: 21 April 2022 / Accepted: 22 April 2022 / Published: 27 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heme Oxygenase in Physiology and Pathology)

Abstract

:
Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) is an enzyme that catalyzes the degradation of heme, releasing equimolar amounts of carbon monoxide (CO), biliverdin (BV), and iron. The anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of HO-1 activity are conferred in part by the release of CO and BV and are extensively characterized. However, iron constitutes an important product of HO-1 activity involved in the regulation of several cellular biological processes. The macrophage-mediated recycling of heme molecules, in particular those contained in hemoglobin, constitutes the major mechanism through which living organisms acquire iron. This process is finely regulated by the activities of HO-1 and of the iron exporter protein ferroportin. The expression of both proteins can be induced or suppressed in response to pro- and anti-inflammatory stimuli in macrophages from different tissues, which alters the intracellular iron concentrations of these cells. As we discuss in this review article, changes in intracellular iron levels play important roles in the regulation of cellular oxidation reactions as well as in the transcriptional and translational regulation of the expression of proteins related to inflammation and immune responses, and therefore, iron metabolism represents a potential target for the development of novel therapeutic strategies focused on the modulation of immunity and inflammation.

1. Introduction

Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) is an enzyme encoded by the Hmox1 gene and its main function is to degrade heme molecules into three sub products: carbon monoxide gas (CO), iron (Fe2+), and biliverdin; the latter is converted into bilirubin by the action of biliverdin reductase [1,2]. Due to its activity in heme metabolism, HO-1 is constitutively expressed in macrophages from tissues involved in the recycling of erythrocytes and hemoglobin, such as bone marrow (BM), spleen, and liver [3]. In addition, HO-1 expression can be induced in response to a variety of stress signals in different cell populations, but specially in macrophages from different tissues of the organism [4].
Heme, the substrate of HO-1, is a tetrapyrrolic cofactor of extreme importance for living organisms due to its role as a major oxygen (O2) transporter. Composed of a protoporphyrin IX ring complexed to an iron ion, heme participates in several functions in the body, such as cellular respiration, electron transport, modulation of reactive oxygen species, as well as regulation of transcription and gene translation [5,6]. Heme is synthesized in the mitochondria and cytosol of developing erythroid progenitor cells and is further conjugated to hemoglobin molecules, which are abundantly present in mature erythrocytes [7]. However, this molecule is also commonly found in macrophages that perform the physiological process of recycling senescent red blood cells [8].
The intracellular accumulation of heme is harmful to the organism and triggers cellular and tissue damage due to its highly pro-oxidant nature. Genotoxicity, induction of paraptosis in endothelial cells, and consequent dysfunction in the angiogenesis process are examples of detrimental effects caused by heme accumulation in different cells and tissues [9,10]. HO-1 is widely known for its antioxidant properties and, in this sense, the catalysis of heme degradation by the enzyme activity alone can be considered as an important antioxidant function of HO-1 [11,12,13,14]. In humans, HO-1 deficiency induces high sensitivity to oxidative stress, intravascular hemolysis, perturbations of iron homeostasis, kidney, liver, and endothelial inflammation [15,16,17].
Particularly in macrophages, HO-1 and its products play important roles in the regulation of inflammatory and immune responses. In fact, HO-1 along with the products CO and biliverdin/bilirubin are classically associated with the promotion of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and immunosuppressive activities in macrophages [4]. A classic example was demonstrated by Lee and Chau, who found that the inhibition of the enzyme activity blocks the anti-inflammatory activities of IL-10 in murine macrophages stimulated with LPS, resulting in increased production of TNF [18]. Because of that, HO-1 induction has been proposed as a therapeutic strategy to treat several inflammatory conditions, such as autoimmune diseases, while its inhibition has been suggested as an approach to promote improved immunity and resistance to many infectious diseases caused by intracellular pathogens [4,19]. The exception to this rule applies to viral infections, in which HO-1 has been shown to play majorly host-protective roles. These effects are associated to reduction of inflammation and oxidative stress-driven cellular and tissue damage as well as to roles of heme degradation products in blocking the assembly of viral particles in infected cells [20]. However, the iron ions released following HO-1-mediated heme degradation display opposing pro-oxidant effects and can also play important immunomodulatory effects [21,22].
In the following sections, we will review general aspects of heme metabolization by HO-1 in macrophages with special focus on the crosstalk of HO-1 activity and iron metabolism as well as the effects on the regulation of inflammation and immune responses.

2. Heme Acquisition by Macrophages

2.1. Erythrophagocytosis

Erythrocytes (red blood cells—RBCs) promote the transport of O2 for cellular respiration. The average life span of these cells is approximately 120 days, after which they undergo structural changes and enter senescence [23]. Senescent RBCs express molecules in their membranes known as “eat me” signals, which will be recognized by receptors expressed by macrophages, in particular those from the splenic red pulp and liver (Kupffer cells—KCs) [24,25]. Some of these signals include: (a) The formation of Band 3 (RBC surface protein) clusters in senescent RBC membrane, which are bound by naturally occurring antibodies (Nabs) and activate complement, being further recognized by Fc or C3 receptors in macrophages [25,26,27]; (b) exposure of phosphatidylserine (PS) in the extracellular portion of the membrane, which can be directly bound by PS receptors in macrophages, such as Tim-1, Tim,4, CD300, and Stabilin-2, or can bind to GAS-6 or PROS1 that will be further recognized by TAM receptors in macrophages [25,28,29,30,31,32,33]; (c) expression of CD47 on the RBC surface and its interaction with thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), which bind to the signal-regulatory receptor protein alpha (SIRPα) present in macrophages [34,35]. All of those signals trigger the phagocytic machinery of macrophages that result in phagocytosis of senescent RBC (Figure 1A).
The human organism acquires the vast majority of its iron through the process of erythrophagocytosis and recycling of senescent RBCs. Approximately 1 billion iron atoms are extracted from almost 280 million of hemoglobin molecules per erythrocyte [36]. Adult humans have about 25 trillion RBCs, and each second, we recycle about 5 million of them by erythrophagocytosis in macrophages of the reticuloendothelial system [37,38].

2.2. Haptoglobin and Hemopexin

Hemolytic processes result in the release of hemoglobin and heme into the bloodstream. Free hemoglobin and heme can promote the development of several pathological processes through their pro-oxidant nature as well as their pro-inflammatory and prothrombotic activity [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. However, it was shown that hemopexin overexpression in the liver of model mice for sickle cell anemia was able to inhibit the inflammatory activity and vascular stasis caused by heme [51].
Haptoglobin (Hp) and hemopexin (Hx) are plasma glycoproteins produced mainly by hepatic cells, which retain high binding affinity with free hemoglobin and heme, respectively [52,53,54]. Hp (alpha—2 glycoprotein) is composed of an alpha and a beta chain with approximately 328–388 amino acids each [55,56], while Hx has 439 amino acid residues divided into two homologous domains, N-domain and C-domain, in which both have four-bladed β-propeller fold helix [53,54].
Free hemoglobin in plasma can undergo structural changes caused by H2O2 that interfere with its internalization by cells, which causes its accumulation in the blood. The formation of the hemoglobin–Hp complex prevents H2O2 from modifying amino acids in the beta-globulin chain, thus limiting cross-link reactions that would occur with the alpha-globulin chain [57]. The Hb–Hp complex is recognized by the CD163 transporter in the surface of monocytes and macrophages and is further endocytosed by these cells. Following CD163-mediated internalization, hemoglobin–Hp complexes will be degraded in the lysosome, resulting in the release of heme molecules [55,58] (Figure 1Bb). Although Hp has been identified as a critical mediator in the clearance of free hemoglobin from the plasma, CD163 has also been shown to be able to directly internalize free hemoglobin not bound to Hp [59]. At the end of this process, CD163 is recycled and returns to the cell surface [55,58].
Hx stably binds free heme at a pH greater than 5.0 and undergoes a conformational change that prevents additional binding of peptides to its structure, consequently protecting the complex from proteolysis [53,54]. The Hx–heme complexes are recognized by the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP)/CD91, which are present on the surface of macrophages but also in several other cell types, such as fibroblasts, hepatocytes, neurons, adipocytes, syncytiotrophoblasts, and columnar epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract [60]. Following LRP/CD91-mediated internalization of Hx–heme complexes by endocytosis, Hx is degraded by lysosomal enzymes releasing the heme molecules (Figure 1Bb) and the LRP/CD91 receptor is recycled to the cell surface [61].

2.3. Autophagy of Hemoproteins and Mitophagy

Hemoproteins/heme proteins comprise a group of more than 2300 proteins that have one or more heme groups in their structure [62,63]. They can be classified into different types and contain heme complexed to the amino acids in different forms as well, such as heme a, heme b, heme c, heme or heme o. Hemoproteins perform different functions within the cells, which range from transport, storage, and activation of O2 molecules; electron transfer; and substrate for oxidation reactions [64,65]. Therefore, hemoproteins are normally found in cell cytoplasm and mitochondria. Among the more than two thousand hemoproteins present in the databases, we can mention myoglobin, cytochrome P450, cytochrome c, catalase, and iNOS, which were extensively characterized [65,66,67].
In addition to the various forms of heme acquisition presented in the previous sections, the cell is also able to obtain heme via its synthesis in the inner membrane of the mitochondrial matrix. Once its production occurs, heme is routed to be incorporated among the hemoproteins present in the mitochondria and cellular cytoplasm [68]. Thus, it is implied that the process of autophagy or mitophagy caused by cellular or mitochondrial damage, inflammatory stimuli, or regular processes of organelle recycling by the cells [69], can also cause the release of free heme within the cell (Figure 1Ba).

3. Heme Degradation by HO-1 and Iron Release

After heme is released from hemoglobin, Hx–heme complexes or from other hemoproteins in phagolysosomes or autophagolysosomes, and is transferred to the cytosol by the heme transporters heme-carrier protein 1 (HCP1) and heme responsive gene 1 protein (HRG1). Following their transport to the cytoplasm, heme molecules are then metabolized by HO-1, which is anchored to the membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum [8,24,37,70,71]. As mentioned previously, HO-1 is constitutively expressed in macrophages involved in the recycling of RBCs in the liver and the spleen [8]. However, the enzyme expression can also be induced in different cells in the organism in response to several cellular stressors, such as ultraviolet radiation, endotoxins, heavy metals, physical stress, heme-containing enzymes, and ROS [72]. The major signaling pathway responsible for the induction of HO-1 expression involves the action of the nuclear transcription factor erythroid 2p45-related factor 2 (Nrf2) [4]. Nrf2 is normally found in the cytosol in its inactive form, bound to the protein Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1), which promotes the ubiquitination of Nrf2 and consequent proteasomal degradation of the transcription factor. However, under oxidative stress, Keap1 undergoes oxidation of its cysteine residues and releases Nrf2, which migrates to the nucleus and binds, in conjunction with small Maf proteins, to stress-responsive DNA sequence elements (StREs) containing Maf recognition element sequences (MARE). StREs/MARE are present upstream of the HO-1 gene, and therefore, binding of Nrf2 to these regions, results in induction of enzyme expression [72,73,74,75,76]. In homeostatic conditions, the MARE sequences in HO-1 gene promoter are found complexed to the transcription repressor Bach1, which prevents the induction of HO-1 expression. However, concurrently to Nrf2 activation, the accumulation of free heme favors the binding of these molecules to Bach1, which results in the release of this repressor from the MARE regions, therefore promoting expression of HO-1 [77,78,79].
As previously introduced, heme cleavage by HO-1 results in the release of equimolar amounts of CO, biliverdin, and iron as end products of the enzymatic reaction [8]. CO and biliverdin, which is further converted into bilirubin by the enzyme biliverdin reductase, display important antioxidant and anti-inflammatory functions within the cell and account for much of the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of HO-1 activity itself. However, those will not be discussed in depth in the present review article, but have been extensively reviewed elsewhere [4,80,81,82,83,84].
Iron, the third product of heme degradation by HO-1, is an essential ion for the organism. Free Fe2+ in the cytoplasm, also known as labile iron, is involved in several vital processes in the cell, such as cellular respiration, oxygen sensing and metabolism, cell signaling, energy metabolism, as well as DNA synthesis and repair. However, free Fe2+ is highly reactive and can promote the production of ROS by the Fenton reaction, which can consequently cause oxidative damage to cellular components [8,85]. Because of that, the cell prevents the cytotoxic effects of iron by promoting the conversion of Fe2+ ions to the ferric Fe3+ form, which is further stored intracellularly, or by exporting the Fe2+ to the extracellular environment. Iron storage occurs through a multimeric protein complex called ferritin (FT), which is composed of heavy (H—ferritin heavy/heart chain—FTH) and light (L—ferritin light/liver chain—FTL) chains [86,87]. FTH is responsible for catalyzing Fe2+ into Fe3+ by ferroxidase, forming ferrihydrite aggregates, which are inert and incapable of generating free radicals. FTH chains provide stability to the ferritin structure but also assist in the formation of inorganic ferrihydrite aggregates. It is estimated that one ferritin molecule can store as much as 4500 iron atoms [87]. Alternatively, if Fe2+ is not used by the cell or stored in ferritin molecules, this ion is directed to be exported out of the cell through the transmembrane transporter ferroportin (FPN1), encoded by the gene SLC40A1 (Solute Carrier Family 40 Member 1) (Figure 1C) [88,89].
Macrophages can also acquire iron through other ways besides heme metabolization by HO-1. In the serum, iron is oxidized by ceruplasmin and majorly converted to the Fe3+ form, which will then be complexed to transferrin (each transferrin molecule can accommodate two iron ions) [90]. Iron-loaded transferrin is recognized by the transferrin receptor (TFR) on the surface of macrophages and endocytosed. Inside the endosomal compartment, Fe3+ is reduced to ferrous iron (Fe2+) by the six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of prostate (STEAP3) enzyme and further transported into the cytosol through the divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1), which is a transmembrane glycoprotein that can only transport iron in its ferrous (Fe2+) form (Figure 1Bb). Following this, TFR is subsequently recycled back to the cell surface [91,92,93]. DMT1 is also commonly found in the plasma membrane, where it promotes the internalization of extracellular free iron ions [94]. In the cell surface, ferric iron is reduced to its ferrous form by cytochrome B DCYTB and subsequently internalized though DMT1 (Figure 1Bc) [86]. Macrophages can further mobilize iron by nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4)-induced autophagy of iron loaded ferritin molecules (ferritinophagy). Ferritin is then degraded and iron ions are transported to the cytosol through the same mechanisms described earlier [92].
HO-1 and FPN1 expression in macrophages play a pivotal role in the systemic iron homeostasis. The genetic deletion of HO-1 profoundly affects iron levels in the body, causing anemia and iron accumulation inside cells in several tissues [95]. The deficiency of ferroportin gene in macrophages was also shown to result in the development of anemia and iron accumulation in the spleen, liver, and BM [96]. Ferroportin expression can be regulated transcriptionally or through a post-translational mechanism by the action of hepcidin, a peptide hormone secreted by liver cells in response to increases in serum iron concentration or inflammation [97]. Hepcidin binds to ferroportin in the surface of cells and induces its internalization and further degradation. As a consequence, the export of iron ions to the extracellular environment ceases and the metal accumulates inside the cells. Accordingly, overproduction of hepcidin leads to tissue iron overload and hypoferremia [98].

4. Cross Regulation of Iron Homeostasis, Inflammation, and Immunity

As mentioned previously, serum iron levels can regulate the production of hepcidin and consequently, the expression of ferroportin in cell membranes. High serum iron levels induce the production of hepcidin, which promotes the degradation of ferroportin and ceases further export of iron to serum, while in situations of low iron levels, hepcidin expression is suppressed, favoring ferroportin expression and promoting iron export to the circulation [97]. However, hepcidin production can also be induced in macrophages in response to inflammatory stimuli, the most studied of which is IL-6 biding to its receptor and subsequent activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling pathway [24].
Hepcidin itself has antibacterial properties, however, its main role in the immune response to infectious diseases has been associated to the induction of nutritional immunity or “hypoferremia of inflammation” [99,100]. The production of hepcidin by macrophages and other cells in response to infection-derived stimuli is intended to decrease ferroportin expression and consequently limit iron bioavailability to pathogens [24]. Armitage et al. demonstrated that pathogen-derived Toll-like receptor 5 agonists stimulate hepcidin production by leukocytes and hepatoma cells in an IL-6-dependent manner, while IL-22, an important cytokine produced in response to extracellular infections, also induces phosphorylation of STAT3 and upregulation of hepcidin production. The authors additionally found that following in vivo infection with C. albicans or Influenza A/PR/8/34 virus (H1N1), hepcidin expression is upregulated causing a decrease in serum iron levels in mice [101]. Intraperitoneal challenge with Pseudomonas aeruginosa was also shown to induce TLR4-dependent hepcidin expression and consequent iron deposition in splenic macrophages [102]. More recently, Abreu et al. demonstrated that activation of TLRs 1/2 or TLR 2/6 induces a decrease in ferroportin expression by direct inhibition of gene transcription, independently of hepcidin, while activation of TLRs 4, 7, and 8 induces hepcidin expression and further ferroportin downregulation [103].
The studies cited above illustrate how the hepcidin/ferroportin axis can be modulated in response to infectious stimuli as well as cytokines produced in response to those triggers, consequently affecting systemic and local iron levels. However, some of the pro-inflammatory signals that trigger hepcidin production and/or ferroportin downregulation, also induce the expression of HO-1. Such scenario promotes increased iron release by HO-1-mediated degradation of heme molecules along with reduced iron export by ferroportin, favoring intracellular iron accumulation. Although these mechanisms can restrict nutrient iron for extracellular pathogens, they may have the opposite effect in infections with intracellular microorganisms [4]. In addition, the pro-inflammatory signals that modulate the expression of HO-1, hepcidin, and ferroportin are also produced in several sterile inflammatory conditions, such as autoimmune diseases, ischemia-reperfusion injuries and tumors, and, therefore, in all of those conditions, intracellular iron accumulation can also occur.
As discussed in the following sections, the fluctuations in intracellular iron levels in response to the mechanisms discussed above can regulate several intracellular signaling pathways that play important roles in the modulation of inflammatory and immune responses. Therefore, the crosstalk between iron homeostasis and inflammatory/immune responses holds promise as an important target for new immunomodulatory therapies.

4.1. Iron Regulation of HIF1α Expression

Hypoxia inducible factors (HIFs) are alpha/beta heterodimeric transcription factors that play critical roles in the adaptive transcriptional responses to O2 deprivation (hypoxia). Under normoxia, the prolyl hydroxylase (PHDs) and asparaginyl hydroxylase (factor inhibiting HIF—FIH) enzymes use O2 as a cofactor in order to catalyze a hydroxylation reaction in the HIF-α chains that will culminate in their ubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome [104,105]. These enzymes can also use Fe2+ ions as cofactors, and therefore, under hypoxia or iron depletion, the hydroxylation of HIF-α subunits is inhibited and the expression of the transcription factors as a whole is stabilized, culminating in the increased expression of genes induced by them [104,106].
HIF-1α and HIF-2α are the two most studied and characterized members of the HIF family of transcription factors and share high identity in their functional domains [107]. Their susceptibility to degradation under normoxia, however, is different, since HIF-2α is stabilized at higher O2 concentrations and for longer durations compared to HIF-1α [108]. Moreover, the modulation of HIF-1α expression in particular, is highly susceptible to changes in iron concentration, since the chelation of iron by bacterial siderophores was demonstrated to be able to induce HIF-1α stabilization and expression independently of hypoxia, while increases in iron levels induce its degradation by PHDs [109]. In fact, the use of iron chelating agents is a common positive control used in the induction of HIF1α expression (Figure 2A) [110]. HIF-1α has been demonstrated to play a role in glycolytic metabolism, apoptosis, angiogenesis, cellular stress, and inflammation, among other major biological processes [104].
Macrophages are known to adapt to hypoxic conditions, which involve the expression of genes induced by HIF-1α. Many of the alterations observed during monocyte to macrophage maturation that are induced in response to hypoxia, were shown to be driven by changes in gene expression pattern and phenotype that are dependent on the expression of HIF-1α [111,112]. In addition, aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect) is observed in activated macrophages, in which HIF-1α expression occurs in the absence of hypoxia and plays an important role in the induction of pro-inflammatory responses [113,114,115]. In the latter situation, in particular, it is possible that fluctuations in the labile iron pool of macrophages might be involved in the regulation of HIF-1α expression through modulation of PHD activity. In fact, iron depletion of macrophages was found to mimic the effects of hypoxia, by driving HIF-1α stabilization and promoting the transcription and synthesis of IL-1β [116]. Studies have also demonstrated that treatment with the iron chelator deferoxamine induces DNA binding activity to the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) consensus sequence of the iNOS gene promoter and activated the gene’s hypoxia responsive element (HRE) in murine macrophages [117]. Along with HIF-1α, iron chelators were also demonstrated to promote the activation of nuclear factor (NF)-IL6, which further induces the expression of iNOS and production of NO by macrophages [117,118].
Multiple studies have demonstrated a role for HIF-1α in the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokine production by macrophages as well as in the activation of its cellular microbicidal functions responses [111]. For instance, in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb)-infected mice, the blockade of HIF-1α during the early stage of infection, in which pro-inflammatory responses are critical to contain bacterial replication, results in higher susceptibility to infection. On the other hand, HIF-1α inhibition during the late stage of Mtb infection resulted in decreased bacillary loads [119], likely due to the restraining of detrimental pro-inflammatory responses, which may promote susceptibility during chronic phase of Mtb infection by inducing tissue damage. IFN-γ restricts the ability of Mtb to grow in macrophages and defects in the IFN-γ signaling pathway result in increased susceptibility to infection both in humans and mice [120]. RNA sequencing analysis demonstrated that almost half of all the genes upregulated by IFN-γ are HIF-1α-dependent genes [121].
Several studies have shown the importance of HIF-1α in metabolism, differentiation, migration, and cell survival in both hypoxia and inflammation for other immune cells as well [111]. DCs of mice with a conditional deletion of HIF-1α display a reduction in IL-22 production and CCR7 expression in response to hypoxia, which impacts the migratory capacity of these cells [122]. In neutrophils, HIF-1α promotes cell survival and phagocytosis, which might favor the control of infections with different pathogens by these cells [123]. HIF-1α has also been shown to play a role in the differentiation and function of different T-cell subsets [111]. Studies demonstrated that Th17 cells display the highest rates of HIF-1α-dependent glycolysis, while Tregs comprise the CD4+ T-cell subset that undergoes the lowest glycolysis levels [124]. CD8+ T cells lacking HIF-1α were also shown to express reduced levels of glycolytic enzymes along with decreased production of IFN-γ and TNF following TCR stimulation [125].
Therefore, HIF-1α stabilization and enhanced expression triggered by the reduction in cytosolic iron levels can play an important role in the activation of macrophage pro-inflammatory functions, and may additionally be involved in the HIF-1α-dependent activation of other immune cell subsets, such as DCs, neutrophils, and T cells.

4.2. Iron Regulation of IRPs/IRE Interactions

The iron-regulatory proteins (IRPs) 1 and 2 (IRP1 and IRP2) are mRNA-binding proteins that recognize and interact with non-coding sequences, known as iron responsive elements (IREs) present at the 3′ or 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of mRNA transcripts of particular genes, forming conserved RNA stem loop structures. The binding of IRPs to IREs located at 3′ regions protects the mRNA molecule from degradation and promotes its translation, while binding of IRPs to IREs at the 5′ regions blocks the translation of mRNA molecules into proteins [126,127]. Much of the cellular iron uptake, transport, storage, utilization, and release processes are controlled by the IRP/IRE system [24]. When intracellular iron is abundant, it binds to IRP1 and alters its conformation, making it incapable of binding to IREs, while high iron concentrations promote the degradation of IRP2. In situations of low iron tension, IRP1 is not bound to iron and assumes a conformation with high affinity for the IREs, while expression of IRP2 is stabilized (Figure 2Ba). Therefore, in cases of intracellular iron accumulation, mRNAs from genes that have IREs at 3′ of UTRs will be degraded, while those that have IREs at 5′ of UTRs will be translated, due to the absence of IRP binding to the IREs. When iron tension is low, IRPs are able to bind to IREs, and the opposite effect is observed [128]. The mRNAs of the iron importer proteins transferrin receptor 1 (TFR1) and DMT1 (SLC11A2) have IREs at 3′ of UTR, and therefore, their translation is increased when intracellular iron concentration is low and repressed when iron levels in the cytosol are high. On the other hand, the mRNAs for ferroportin (SLC40A1), as well as the heavy (FTH) and light (FTL) chains of ferritin have IREs at 5′ of the UTR, which results in induction of translation when intracellular iron concentration is high and repression at low iron levels (Figure 2Bb) [129,130]. The mRNA of other genes that are not involved or at least not exclusively involved in iron homeostasis also have IREs, and therefore, their translation can be regulated by the IRP/IRE system.
Aconitase is an enzyme primarily located in the mitochondria, which participates in the second step of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, catalyzing the conversion of citrate into cis-aconitate and then isocitrate in a reversible way, while isocitrate is further decarboxylated by isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) into α-ketoglutarate, giving sequence to the TCA cycle in mitochondria [131]. The mRNA for the mitochondrial aconitase (Aco2) has an IRE motif at 5′ of the UTR, and therefore, its translation is induced when iron levels are high and repressed in low intracellular iron concentrations [132,133]. Cis-aconitate, the intermediate product in the conversion of citrate into isocitrate by Aco2, can be also metabolized into itaconate by the action of the enzyme cis-aconitate decarboxylase, also known as immune-responsive gene 1 (IRG1) [131,134].
Recently, it was demonstrated that iron deprivation in activated macrophages results in reduced Aco2 activity, which promotes a break in TCA cycle inducing citrate accumulation and lipid droplet formation (Figure 2C). Importantly, these iron-deprived macrophages also displayed enhanced itaconate accumulation, which resulted in decreased pro-inflammatory cytokine production [135]. Itaconate has been shown to induce important anti-inflammatory effects, such as the downregulation of Nos2, Il6, and Il12b gene expression as well as reduction of mature IL-1β and IL-18 production. Itaconate has also been shown to block IL-1β production through the inhibition of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity [136]. In addition, it was found that itaconate mediates Nrf2 activation in LPS-treated mouse and human macrophages. Itaconate directly modifies proteins via alkylation of cysteine residues in Keap1, which releases Nrf2 and allows it to promote an increase in the expression of downstream genes with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [137]. Therefore, the regulation of Aco2 translation by the IRP/IRE system and the resulting consequences in the modulation of itaconate levels in the cell, may be an important mechanism through which the intracellular iron levels can regulate inflammatory responses.
As mentioned previously, HIF-2α is a member of the HIF family of transcription factors. However, differently from HIF-1α, the mRNA of HIF-2α has an IRE at 5′ of the UTR and therefore, its translation is induced under high cytosolic iron concentrations [130]. HIF-2α plays an important role in iron homeostasis in living organisms by regulating the transcription of DMT1 and erythropoietin genes; the latter is critical for erythropoiesis [138]. However, such as HIF-1α, HIF-2α also plays important roles in the regulation of inflammatory responses [111].
Imtiyaz et al. have demonstrated that HIF-2α activity promotes pro-inflammatory cytokine production and mortality in a LPS-induced shock model [139]. More recently, it was observed that HIF-2α modulation of macrophage mitochondrial metabolism favors the development of pro-inflammatory responses during myocardial infarction [140]. On the opposite direction, studies have demonstrated an anti-inflammatory role for HIF-2α in infections and inflammatory diseases. During the infection with M. marinum in fish, the negative regulation of HIF-2α results in improved control of bacterial replication through an iNOS-dependent mechanism [141]. In fact, while HIF-1α expression is associated with M1 macrophages, which express high levels of iNOS, HIF-2α have been identified as an inducer of Arg1 expression, which is characteristic of M2 alternatively activated macrophages [142]. Additionally, Kerber et al. have demonstrated that HIF-1α and HIF-2α play opposite roles in myeloid cells during colitis. While HIF-1α was found to induce colon inflammation, HIF-2α activity was associated with the suppression of inflammatory responses. More specifically, animals with conditional deletion of HIF-2α in myeloid cells displayed increased susceptibility to colitis development, characterized by enhanced levels of neutrophils, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as higher expression of IL-6 and IFN-γ compared to controls [143]. More recently, a study by Hsu et al. demonstrated that HIF-2α deletion in regulatory T cells results in a loss of their suppressive functions, which display enhanced reprogramming toward Th17 phenotype. Additionally, the authors demonstrated that mice carrying HIF-2α deletion in Tregs are more resistant to tumors [144].
The studies cited above clearly demonstrate that the role played by HIF-2α in the modulation of immunity and inflammation varies according to the cells and tissues in which the reaction takes place. Therefore, the effects of iron-induced regulation of HIF-2α expression might likely play different roles in the modulation of inflammation and immunity depending on the target organ.

4.3. Iron Induction of ROS Generation by Fenton Reaction

Macrophages produce inflammation-related proteins, such as myeloperoxidase, NADPH oxidase, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, nitric oxide synthases, or lipoxygenases, all of which contain iron [145]. Moreover, iron induces the generation of ROS by the Fenton reaction and is also involved in the production of such radicals by the phagocyte oxidase. NOX2, a NOX family member that is part of the phagocyte oxidase system, is a transmembrane hemoprotein that uses heme iron to transport electrons across membranes to catalyze the generation of superoxide (O2), via the following reaction: O2 + O2. When NOX2 accumulates in macrophages, O2 can give rise to other ROS, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which reacts with iron to generate hydroxide ions (OH) and hydroxyl radicals (OH), leading to the production of hydrogen peroxide radicals (HOO). This latter step occurs via two iron-catalyzed reactions, first Fe2+ + H2O2 → Fe3+ + HO + OH and second (Fe3+ + H2O2 → Fe2+ + HOO + H+). These ROS play a critical role in the destruction of pathogens in phagolysosomes but also support other macrophage functions, such as disassembling of dying cells internalized by phagocytosis [8,146]. Accordingly, it was demonstrated that Fe chelation dramatically exacerbates murine infection with S. typhimurium via inhibition of the host phagocyte oxidase-dependent respiratory burst and the production of nitrogen radical catalyzed by the inducible nitric oxide synthase [147].
HO-1 has been demonstrated to play an important role in cancer. The antioxidant properties of HO-1 are involved in the protection of cancer cells against oxidative stress, which favors tumor survival and progression [148,149]. The enzyme also promotes angiogenesis, which favors tumor invasiveness and metastasis, while expression of HO-1 in tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) was found to impair immune responses and favor tumor progression as well [150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157]. However, HO-1 expression may also have an opposite effect in cancer, in particular considering its role in the release of iron following heme degradation. Intracellular accumulation of Fe2+ and subsequent Fenton reaction-induced ROS generation, along with decreased expression of the enzyme glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), result in membrane lipid peroxidation and necrotic cell death by ferroptosis [158,159]. Excessive expression of HO-1 has been shown to promote intracellular iron accumulation and oxidative stress [160]. Chang et al. have demonstrated that the toxicity of the compound BAY11-7085 against tumor cells occurs through the induction of ferroptotic cell death and that HO-1 plays a major role in this effect, by promoting intracellular iron accumulation [161].
The ferrous iron and Fenton reaction-induced hydroxyl radical formation, as mentioned above also drives oxidative damage and contributes to cellular injuries. To maintain homeostasis in healthy cells, the Nrf2 transcription factor plays a critical role in the regulation of iron-mediated oxidative damage through the induction of several antioxidant cytoprotective mechanisms, and among them, the expression of ferroportin and ferritin, which are directly related to the control of iron accumulation-induced detrimental effects [162,163].

4.4. Iron and Polarization of M1 and M2 Macrophages

M1 macrophage polarization is induced in response to Th1 cytokines, such as TNF and IFN-γ, or by bacterial LPS recognition. These macrophages produce majorly pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-23 and low levels of IL-10. M1 macrophages display potent anti-microbial activity mainly through the generation of NADPH-oxidase-dependent ROS and iNOS-induced NO production [164].
M2 macrophages display an anti-inflammatory profile and are polarized in response to Th2 and suppressor cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-13, and IL-10. IL-33 is another cytokine involved in M2 polarization, through the amplification of IL-13-induced effects. M2 macrophages are characterized by the high expression of arginase-1 (Arg-1) and production of both IL-10 and TGF-β, while the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines is very low or absent. M2 macrophages play an important role in the scavenging of cellular debris and apoptotic cells, as well in the promotion of tissue repair and wound healing, besides displaying pro-angiogenic and pro-fibrotic properties [164].
M1 and M2 macrophages have been characterized regarding their iron status and IRP/IRE binding activity. RNA binding activity of IRPs was found to be low in M1 macrophages, which present intracellular iron accumulation, while M2 macrophages were found to display high IRP/IRE binding activity, which was associated with lower intracellular iron levels [165]. The molecular signature of M1 macrophages, in which ferroportin expression is reduced and ferritin H is upregulated, favors iron sequestration and this effect is observed in the reticuloendothelial system in several inflammatory disorders. On the other hand, M2 macrophages have an expression profile characterized by upregulation of ferroportin and HO-1 expression along with the downregulation of ferritin H, which correlates with enhanced release of iron, and therefore, reduced retention of the metal in the intracellular compartment [166]. Iron overload, induced by treatment with ferric citrate, has been shown to induce M1 polarization in RAW 264.7 macrophages, which was associated with the induction of ROS production in iron-treated cells [167]. In an experimental model of chronic venous ulcers, the induction of iron overload in macrophages was shown to potently induce M1 polarization, which was characterized by elevated TNF production and to promote poor wound healing properties in these cells. In addition, the pro-inflammatory activity of these macrophages promoted DNA damage and senescence of skin-resident fibroblasts [168]. These results are in agreement with the characterization of M1 macrophages as cells that accumulate intracellular iron [166], and in addition, indicate that the cytosolic iron levels may play a role in driving such M1 polarization program.
However, a study by Agoro et al. demonstrated that, contrarily to the studies cited above, the expression of Arg1 and IL-10 along with a series of genes associated with M2 polarized macrophages, such as Ym1, IL-10, and Stat6, were all upregulated in mice fed with a diet containing high levels of iron. On the other hand, mice that were fed a diet poor in iron displayed increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and expression of M1 macrophage markers [169]. Along these same lines, studies employing experimental in vitro and in vivo models of Salmonella infection have demonstrated that a major mechanism used by macrophages to restrict infection is to enhance the expression of ferroportin, therefore decreasing the intracellular iron pool, which also enhances the levels of iNOS expression and NO production in response to the reduction of intracellular iron concentration [170,171,172].
The studies discussed above demonstrate that although some pattern is observed in M1 and M2 macrophages regarding the expression of molecules linked to the modulation of iron homeostasis, it is hard to draw a definite conclusion on whether different iron levels can be is associated with M1 or M2 macrophage phenotypes. Regardless, these studies clearly demonstrate that the levels of cytosolic iron can play important roles in the regulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory programs of macrophages.

5. Conclusions

HO-1 plays a key role in maintaining cellular homeostasis, particularly through its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, which were proven to display several cytoprotective functions throughout the organism [1,149]. However, HO-1 activity also results in the release of pro-oxidant ferrous iron (Fe2+). In fact, the recycling of iron from heme molecules in macrophages by the action of HO-1 is the major mechanism used by the organism to acquire the metal. The coordinated action of HO-1 and the hepcidin/ferroportin axis controls the release of iron to the serum and/or its retention inside cells to efficiently maintain optimal systemic iron levels [97].
As discussed in this review, alterations in iron homeostasis can have profound impacts on the regulation of inflammation and immune responses. In particular, the changes in macrophage intracellular iron levels resulting from modulation of HO-1 expression and activity as well as from the transcriptionally or hepcidin production-induced regulation of ferroportin expression, can impact the activation of microbicidal effector functions as well as cytokine production by these cells. Given the important role played by macrophages in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune and auto-inflammatory disorders, as well as in the host response to infectious diseases with different pathogens [145,173], the iron metabolism of macrophages represents a potential target for novel immunomodulatory therapeutic strategies in these areas. In recent years, several advances have been achieved in the identification of novel inhibitors and inducers of HO-1 activity as well as in modulators of the hepcidin/ferroportin axis [174,175,176]. Besides their use in therapies to treat disorders in systemic iron homeostasis, in particular different forms of anemia, this review highlights additional potential applications for those drugs, such as in host-directed therapies to treat infections and immunomodulatory interventions in autoimmune and auto-inflammatory diseases as well as in cancer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.d.O., M.B.D. and D.L.C.; writing: original draft: J.d.O., M.B.D. and D.L.C.; editing: D.L.C.; figure preparation: J.d.O. and M.B.D.; supervision: D.L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

J.d.O. is funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), fellowship number: 2020/10321-2; M.B.D. is funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), fellowship number: 2021/04028-3; D.L.C. is funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), grant number: 2019/0845-8 and fellowship number 2019/25770-0.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Otterbein, L.E.; Soares, M.P.; Yamashita, K.; Bach, F.H. Heme oxygenase-1: Unleashing the protective properties of heme. Trends Immunol. 2003, 24, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Soares, M.P.; Bach, F.H. Heme oxygenase-1: From biology to therapeutic potential. Trends Mol. Med. 2009, 15, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kikuchi, G.; Yoshida, T. Heme degradation by the microsomal heme oxygenase system. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1980, 5, 323–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Costa, D.L.; Amaral, E.P.; Andrade, B.B.; Sher, A. Modulation of Inflammation and Immune Responses by Heme Oxygenase-1: Implications for Infection with Intracellular Pathogens. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Choby, J.E.; Skaar, E.P. Heme Synthesis and Acquisition in Bacterial Pathogens. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 3408–3428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Piel, R.B., III; Dailey, H.A., Jr.; Medlock, A.E. The mitochondrial heme metabolon: Insights into the complex(ity) of heme synthesis and distribution. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2019, 128, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chiabrando, D.; Mercurio, S.; Tolosano, E. Heme and erythropoieis: More than a structural role. Haematologica 2014, 99, 973–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Soares, M.P.; Hamza, I. Macrophages and Iron Metabolism. Immunity 2016, 44, 492–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hedblom, A.; Hejazi, S.M.; Canesin, G.; Choudhury, R.; Hanafy, K.A.; Csizmadia, E.; Persson, J.L.; Wegiel, B. Heme detoxification by heme oxygenase-1 reinstates proliferative and immune balances upon genotoxic tissue injury. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Petrillo, S.; Chiabrando, D.; Genova, T.; Fiorito, V.; Ingoglia, G.; Vinchi, F.; Mussano, F.; Carossa, S.; Silengo, L.; Altruda, F.; et al. Heme accumulation in endothelial cells impairs angiogenesis by triggering paraptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2018, 25, 573–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seiwert, N.; Wecklein, S.; Demuth, P.; Hasselwander, S.; Kemper, T.A.; Schwerdtle, T.; Brunner, T.; Fahrer, J. Heme oxygenase 1 protects human colonocytes against ROS formation, oxidative DNA damage and cytotoxicity induced by heme iron, but not inorganic iron. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Han, D.; Gao, J.; Gu, X.; Hengstler, J.G.; Zhang, L.; Shahid, M.; Ali, T.; Han, B. P21(Waf1/Cip1) depletion promotes dexamethasone-induced apoptosis in osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells by inhibiting the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Arch. Toxicol. 2018, 92, 679–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ji, Y.; Yin, W.; Liang, Y.; Sun, L.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, W. Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Oxidative Activity of Indole-3-Acetic Acid Involves Induction of HO-1 and Neutralization of Free Radicals in RAW264.7 Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Duckers, H.J.; Boehm, M.; True, A.L.; Yet, S.F.; San, H.; Park, J.L.; Webb, R.C.; Lee, M.E.; Nabel, G.J.; Nabel, E.G. Heme oxygenase-1 protects against vascular constriction and proliferation. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 693–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kartikasari, A.E.; Wagener, F.A.; Yachie, A.; Wiegerinck, E.T.; Kemna, E.H.; Swinkels, D.W. Hepcidin suppression and defective iron recycling account for dysregulation of iron homeostasis in heme oxygenase-1 deficiency. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2009, 13, 3091–3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Radhakrishnan, N.; Yadav, S.P.; Sachdeva, A.; Pruthi, P.K.; Sawhney, S.; Piplani, T.; Wada, T.; Yachie, A. Human heme oxygenase-1 deficiency presenting with hemolysis, nephritis, and asplenia. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2011, 33, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yachie, A.; Niida, Y.; Wada, T.; Igarashi, N.; Kaneda, H.; Toma, T.; Ohta, K.; Kasahara, Y.; Koizumi, S. Oxidative stress causes enhanced endothelial cell injury in human heme oxygenase-1 deficiency. J. Clin. Investig. 1999, 103, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lee, T.S.; Chau, L.Y. Heme oxygenase-1 mediates the anti-inflammatory effect of interleukin-10 in mice. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vijayan, V.; Wagener, F.; Immenschuh, S. The macrophage heme-heme oxygenase-1 system and its role in inflammation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 153, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Espinoza, J.A.; Gonzalez, P.A.; Kalergis, A.M. Modulation of Antiviral Immunity by Heme Oxygenase-1. Am. J. Pathol. 2017, 187, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lamb, N.J.; Quinlan, G.J.; Mumby, S.; Evans, T.W.; Gutteridge, J.M. Haem oxygenase shows pro-oxidant activity in microsomal and cellular systems: Implications for the release of low-molecular-mass iron. Biochem. J. 1999, 344, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Suttner, D.M.; Dennery, P.A. Reversal of HO-1 related cytoprotection with increased expression is due to reactive iron. FASEB J. 1999, 13, 1800–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mebius, R.E.; Kraal, G. Structure and function of the spleen. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 5, 606–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sukhbaatar, N.; Weichhart, T. Iron Regulation: Macrophages in Control. Pharmaceuticals 2018, 11, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Klei, T.R.L.; Meinderts, S.M.; Berg, T.K.v.d.; Bruggen, R.v. From the Cradle to the Grave: The Role of Macrophages in Erythropoiesis and Erythrophagocytosis. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Arese, P.; Turrini, F.; Schwarzer, E. Band 3/complement-mediated recognition and removal of normally senescent and pathological human erythrocytes. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2005, 16, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lutz, H.U.; Bussolino, F.; Flepp, S.F.R.; Stammler, P.; Kazatchkine, M.D.; Arese, P. Naturally occurring anti-band-3 antibodies and complement together mediate phagocytosis of oxidatively stressed human erythrocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 7368–7372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lang, F.; Jilani, K.; Lang, E. Therapeutic potential of manipulating suicidal erythrocyte death. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2015, 19, 1219–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fernandez-Boyanapalli, R.F.; Frasch, S.C.; McPhillips, K.; Vandivier, R.W.; Harry, B.L.; Riches, D.W.H.; Henson, P.M.; Bratton, D.L. Impaired apoptotic cell clearance in CGD due to altered macrophage programming is reversed by phosphatidylserine-dependent production of IL-4. Blood 2009, 113, 2047–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Raymond, A.; Ensslin, M.A.; Shur, B.D. SED1/MFG-E8: A bi-motif protein that orchestrates diverse cellular interactions. J. Cell. Biochem. 2009, 106, 957–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kobayashi, N.; Karisola, P.; Peña-Cruz, V.; Dorfman, D.M.; Jinushi, M.; Umetsu, S.E.; Butte, M.J.; Nagumo, H.; Chernova, I.; Zhu, B.; et al. TIM-1 and TIM-4 glycoproteins bind phosphatidylserine and mediate uptake of apoptotic cells. Immunity 2007, 27, 927–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Park, S.-Y.; Jung, M.-Y.; Kim, H.-J.; Lee, S.-J.; Kim, S.-Y.; Lee, B.-H.; Kwon, T.-H.; Park, R.-W.; Kim, I.-S. Rapid cell corpse clearance by stabilin-2, a membrane phosphatidylserine receptor. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Murakami, Y.; Tian, L.; Voss, O.H.; Margulies, D.H.; Krzewski, K.; Coligan, J.E. CD300b regulates the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells via phosphatidylserine recognition. Cell Death Differ. 2014, 21, 1746–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Oldenborg, P.A.; Zheleznyak, A.; Fang, Y.F.; Lagenaur, C.F.; Gresham, H.D.; Lindberg, F.P. Role of CD47 as a marker of self on red blood cells. Science 2000, 288, 2051–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Burger, P.; Hilarius-Stokman, P.; Korte, D.d.; Berg, T.K.v.d.; Bruggen, R.v. CD47 functions as a molecular switch for erythrocyte phagocytosis. Blood 2012, 119, 5512–5521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Vogt, A.S.; Arsiwala, T.; Mohsen, M.; Vogel, M.; Manolova, V.; Bachmann, M.F. On Iron Metabolism and Its Regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. White, C.; Yuan, X.; Schmidt, P.J.; Bresciani, E.; Samuel, T.K.; Campagna, D.; Hall, C.; Bishop, K.; Calicchio, M.L.; Lapierre, A.; et al. HRG1 is essential for heme transport from the phagolysosome of macrophages during erythrophagocytosis. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Knutson, M.D.; Oukka, M.; Koss, L.M.; Aydemir, F.; Wessling-Resnick, M. Iron release from macrophages after erythrophagocytosis is up-regulated by ferroportin 1 overexpression and down-regulated by hepcidin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 1324–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Belcher, J.D.; Nath, K.A.; Vercellotti, G.M. Vasculotoxic and Proinflammatory Effects of Plasma Heme: Cell Signaling and Cytoprotective Responses. ISRN Oxidative Med. 2013, 2013, 831596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Figueiredo, R.T.; Fernandez, P.L.; Mourao-Sa, D.S.; Porto, B.N.; Dutra, F.F.; Alves, L.S.; Oliveira, M.F.; Oliveira, P.L.; Graca-Souza, A.V.; Bozza, M.T. Characterization of heme as activator of Toll-like receptor 4. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 20221–20229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hsu, L.L.; Champion, H.C.; Campbell-Lee, S.A.; Bivalacqua, T.J.; Manci, E.A.; Diwan, B.A.; Schimel, D.M.; Cochard, A.E.; Wang, X.; Schechter, A.N.; et al. Hemolysis in sickle cell mice causes pulmonary hypertension due to global impairment in nitric oxide bioavailability. Blood 2007, 109, 3088–3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Windsant, I.C.V.; Wit, N.C.J.d.; Sertorio, J.T.C.; Bijnen, A.A.v.; Ganushchak, Y.M.; Heijmans, J.H.; Tanus-Santos, J.E.; Jacobs, M.J.; Maessen, J.G.; Buurman, W.A. Hemolysis during cardiac surgery is associated with increased intravascular nitric oxide consumption and perioperative kidney and intestinal tissue damage. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Reiter, C.D.; Wang, X.; Tanus-Santos, J.E.; Hogg, N.; Cannon, R.O., 3rd; Schechter, A.N.; Gladwin, M.T. Cell-free hemoglobin limits nitric oxide bioavailability in sickle-cell disease. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 1383–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Meyer, C.; Heiss, C.; Drexhage, C.; Kehmeier, E.S.; Balzer, J.; Mühlfeld, A.; Merx, M.W.; Lauer, T.; Kühl, H.; Floege, J.; et al. Hemodialysis-induced release of hemoglobin limits nitric oxide bioavailability and impairs vascular function. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Meegan, J.E.; Bastarache, J.A.; Ware, L.B. Toxic effects of cell-free hemoglobin on the microvascular endothelium: Implications for pulmonary and nonpulmonary organ dysfunction. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2021, 321, L429–L439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Barber, B.E.; Grigg, M.J.; Piera, K.A.; William, T.; Cooper, D.J.; Plewes, K.; Dondorp, A.M.; Yeo, T.W.; Anstey, N.M. Intravascular haemolysis in severe Plasmodium knowlesi malaria: Association with endothelial activation, microvascular dysfunction, and acute kidney injury. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Atichartakarn, V.; Chuncharunee, S.; Archararit, N.; Udomsubpayakul, U.; Aryurachai, K. Intravascular hemolysis, vascular endothelial cell activation and thrombophilia in splenectomized patients with hemoglobin E/β-thalassemia disease. Acta Haematol. 2014, 132, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Posta, N.; Csősz, É.; Oros, M.; Pethő, D.; Potor, L.; Kalló, G.; Hendrik, Z.; Sikura, K.É.; Méhes, G.; Tóth, C.; et al. Hemoglobin oxidation generates globin-derived peptides in atherosclerotic lesions and intraventricular hemorrhage of the brain, provoking endothelial dysfunction. Lab. Investig. 2020, 100, 986–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shaver, C.M.; Wickersham, N.; McNeil, J.B.; Nagata, H.; Miller, A.; Landstreet, S.R.; Kuck, J.L.; Diamond, J.M.; Lederer, D.J.; Kawut, S.M.; et al. Cell-free hemoglobin promotes primary graft dysfunction through oxidative lung endothelial injury. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e98546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Loomis, Z.; Eigenberger, P.; Redinius, K.; Lisk, C.; Karoor, V.; Nozik-Grayck, E.; Ferguson, S.K.; Hassell, K.; Nuss, R.; Stenmark, K.; et al. Hemoglobin induced cell trauma indirectly influences endothelial TLR9 activity resulting in pulmonary vascular smooth muscle cell activation. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vercellotti, G.M.; Zhang, P.; Nguyen, J.; Abdulla, F.; Chen, C.; Nguyen, P.; Nowotny, C.; Steer, C.J.; Smith, A.; Belcher, J.D. Hepatic Overexpression of Hemopexin Inhibits Inflammation and Vascular Stasis in Murine Models of Sickle Cell Disease. Mol. Med. 2016, 22, 437–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Buehler, P.W.; Humar, R.; Schaer, D.J. Haptoglobin Therapeutics and Compartmentalization of Cell-Free Hemoglobin Toxicity. Trends Mol. Med. 2020, 26, 683–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Paoli, M.; Anderson, B.F.; Baker, H.M.; Morgan, W.T.; Smith, A.; Baker, E.N. Crystal structure of hemopexin reveals a novel high-affinity heme site formed between two beta-propeller domains. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6, 926–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nielsen, M.J.; Møller, H.J.; Moestrup, S.K. Hemoglobin and heme scavenger receptors. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010, 12, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nielsen, M.J.; Moestrup, S.K. Receptor targeting of hemoglobin mediated by the haptoglobins: Roles beyond heme scavenging. Blood 2009, 114, 764–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Masi, A.d.; Simone, G.D.; Ciaccio, C.; D’Orso, S.; Coletta, M.; Ascenzi, P. Haptoglobin: From hemoglobin scavenging to human health. Mol. Aspects Med. 2020, 73, 100851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Buehler, P.W.; Abraham, B.; Vallelian, F.; Linnemayr, C.; Pereira, C.P.; Cipollo, J.F.; Jia, Y.; Mikolajczyk, M.; Boretti, F.S.; Schoedon, G.; et al. Haptoglobin preserves the CD163 hemoglobin scavenger pathway by shielding hemoglobin from peroxidative modification. Blood 2009, 113, 2578–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kristiansen, M.; Graversen, J.H.; Jacobsen, C.; Sonne, O.; Hoffman, H.J.; Law, S.K.; Moestrup, S.K. Identification of the haemoglobin scavenger receptor. Nature 2001, 409, 198–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Schaer, D.J.; Schaer, C.A.; Buehler, P.W.; Boykins, R.A.; Schoedon, G.; Alayash, A.I.; Schaffner, A. CD163 is the macrophage scavenger receptor for native and chemically modified hemoglobins in the absence of haptoglobin. Blood 2006, 107, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Moestrup, S.K.; Gliemann, J.; Pallesen, G. Distribution of the alpha 2-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein in human tissues. Cell Tissue Res. 1992, 269, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hvidberg, V.; Maniecki, M.B.; Jacobsen, C.; Hojrup, P.; Moller, H.J.; Moestrup, S.K. Identification of the receptor scavenging hemopexin-heme complexes. Blood 2005, 106, 2572–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Smith, L.J.; Kahraman, A.; Thornton, J.M. Heme proteins--diversity in structural characteristics, function, and folding. Proteins 2010, 78, 2349–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, T.; Bonkovsky, H.L.; Guo, J.-t. Structural analysis of heme proteins: Implications for design and prediction. BMC Struct. Biol. 2011, 11, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Reedy, C.J.; Gibney, B.R. Heme protein assemblies. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 617–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shimizu, T.; Lengalova, A.; Martínek, V.; Martínková, M. Heme: Emergent roles of heme in signal transduction, functional regulation and as catalytic centres. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 5624–5657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gebicka, L. Redox reactions of heme proteins with flavonoids. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2020, 208, 111095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Henry, Y.; Guissani, A. Interactions of nitric oxide with hemoproteins: Roles of nitric oxide in mitochondria. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1999, 55, 1003–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Donegan, R.K.; Moore, C.M.; Hanna, D.A.; Reddi, A.R. Handling heme: The mechanisms underlying the movement of heme within and between cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 133, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Boya, P.; Reggiori, F.; Codogno, P. Emerging regulation and functions of autophagy. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Korolnek, T.; Hamza, I. Macrophages and iron trafficking at the birth and death of red cells. Blood 2015, 125, 2893–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Delaby, C.; Rondeau, C.; Pouzet, C.; Willemetz, A.; Pilard, N.; Desjardins, M.; Canonne-Hergaux, F. Subcellular localization of iron and heme metabolism related proteins at early stages of erythrophagocytosis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Srisook, K.; Kim, C.; Cha, Y.-N. Molecular mechanisms involved in enhancing HO-1 expression: De-repression by heme and activation by Nrf2, the “one-two” punch. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2005, 7, 1674–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Itoh, K.; Wakabayashi, N.; Katoh, Y.; Ishii, T.; O’Connor, T.; Yamamoto, M. Keap1 regulates both cytoplasmic-nuclear shuttling and degradation of Nrf2 in response to electrophiles. Genes Cells 2003, 8, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. McMahon, M.; Itoh, K.; Yamamoto, M.; Hayes, J.D. Keap1-dependent proteasomal degradation of transcription factor Nrf2 contributes to the negative regulation of antioxidant response element-driven gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 21592–21600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Alam, J.; Killeen, E.; Gong, P.; Naquin, R.; Hu, B.; Stewart, D.; Ingelfinger, J.R.; Nath, K.A. Heme activates the heme oxygenase-1 gene in renal epithelial cells by stabilizing Nrf2. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2003, 284, F743–F752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Ishii, T.; Itoh, K.; Takahashi, S.; Sato, H.; Yanagawa, T.; Katoh, Y.; Bannai, S.; Yamamoto, M. Transcription factor Nrf2 coordinately regulates a group of oxidative stress-inducible genes in macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 16023–16029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Sun, J.; Hoshino, H.; Takaku, K.; Nakajima, O.; Muto, A.; Suzuki, H.; Tashiro, S.; Takahashi, S.; Shibahara, S.; Alam, J.; et al. Hemoprotein Bach1 regulates enhancer availability of heme oxygenase-1 gene. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 5216–5224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sun, J.; Brand, M.; Zenke, Y.; Tashiro, S.; Groudine, M.; Igarashi, K. Heme regulates the dynamic exchange of Bach1 and NF-E2-related factors in the Maf transcription factor network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 1461–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Oyake, T.; Itoh, K.; Motohashi, H.; Hayashi, N.; Hoshino, H.; Nishizawa, M.; Yamamoto, M.; Igarashi, K. Bach proteins belong to a novel family of BTB-basic leucine zipper transcription factors that interact with MafK and regulate transcription through the NF-E2 site. Mol. Cell Biol. 1996, 16, 6083–6095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ryter, S.W. Heme oxygenase-1/carbon monoxide as modulators of autophagy and inflammation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2019, 678, 108186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gozzelino, R.; Jeney, V.; Soares, M.P. Mechanisms of cell protection by heme oxygenase-1. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2010, 50, 323–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Canesin, G.; Hejazi, S.M.; Swanson, K.D.; Wegiel, B. Heme-Derived Metabolic Signals Dictate Immune Responses. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Jansen, T.; Daiber, A. Direct Antioxidant Properties of Bilirubin and Biliverdin. Is there a Role for Biliverdin Reductase? Front. Pharmacol. 2012, 3, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Motterlini, R.; Otterbein, L.E. The therapeutic potential of carbon monoxide. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 728–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kuang, Y.; Wang, Q. Iron and lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 2019, 464, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Andrews, N.C. Forging a field: The golden age of iron biology. Blood 2008, 112, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Gozzelino, R.; Soares, M.P. Coupling heme and iron metabolism via ferritin H chain. Antiox. Redox Signal. 2014, 20, 1754–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Donovan, A.; Brownlie, A.; Zhou, Y.; Shepard, J.; Pratt, S.J.; Moynihan, J.; Paw, B.H.; Drejer, A.; Barut, B.; Zapata, A.; et al. Positional cloning of zebrafish ferroportin1 identifies a conserved vertebrate iron exporter. Nature 2000, 403, 776–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. McKie, A.T.; Marciani, P.; Rolfs, A.; Brennan, K.; Wehr, K.; Barrow, D.; Miret, S.; Bomford, A.; Peters, T.J.; Farzaneh, F.; et al. A novel duodenal iron-regulated transporter, IREG1, implicated in the basolateral transfer of iron to the circulation. Mol. Cell 2000, 5, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Eid, C.; Hemadi, M.; Ha-Duong, N.T.; El Hage Chahine, J.M. Iron uptake and transfer from ceruloplasmin to transferrin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1840, 1771–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gomme, P.T.; McCann, K.B.; Bertolini, J. Transferrin: Structure, function and potential therapeutic actions. Drug Discov. Today 2005, 10, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Winn, N.C.; Volk, K.M.; Hasty, A.H. Regulation of tissue iron homeostasis: The macrophage “ferrostat”. JCI Insight 2020, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Philpott, C.C.; Jadhav, S. The ins and outs of iron: Escorting iron through the mammalian cytosol. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 133, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Yanatori, I.; Tabuchi, M.; Kawai, Y.; Yasui, Y.; Akagi, R.; Kishi, F. Heme and non-heme iron transporters in non-polarized and polarized cells. BMC Cell. Biol. 2010, 11, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Poss, K.D.; Tonegawa, S. Heme oxygenase 1 is required for mammalian iron reutilization. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 10919–10924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, F.; An, P.; Guo, X.; Shen, Y.; Tao, Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Ning, B.; et al. Ferroportin1 deficiency in mouse macrophages impairs iron homeostasis and inflammatory responses. Blood 2011, 118, 1912–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Michels, K.; Nemeth, E.; Ganz, T.; Mehrad, B. Hepcidin and Host Defense against Infectious Diseases. PLoS Path. 2015, 11, e1004998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Nemeth, E.; Tuttle, M.S.; Powelson, J.; Vaughn, M.B.; Donovan, A.; Ward, D.M.; Ganz, T.; Kaplan, J. Hepcidin Regulates Cellular Iron Efflux by Binding to Ferroportin and Inducing Its Internalization. Science 2004, 306, 2090–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Ganz, T. Iron and infection. Int. J. Hematol. 2018, 107, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Gaël, N.; Caroline, C.; Lydie, V.; Jean Louis, D.; Xavier, B.; Isabelle, D.; Carole, B.; Axel, K.; Vaulont, S. The gene encoding the iron regulatory peptide hepcidin is regulated by anemia, hypoxia, and inflammation. J. Clin. Investig. 2002, 110, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Armitage, A.E.; Eddowes, L.A.; Gileadi, U.; Cole, S.; Spottiswoode, N.; Selvakumar, T.A.; Ho, L.-P.; Townsend, A.R.M.; Drakesmith, H. Hepcidin regulation by innate immune and infectious stimuli. Blood 2011, 118, 4129–4139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Peyssonnaux, C.; Annelies, S.; Zinkernagel; Datta, V.; Xavier Lauth, R.S.J.; Nizet, V. TLR4–dependent hepcidin expression by myeloid cells in response to bacterial pathogens. Blood 2006, 107, 3727–3732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Abreu, R.; Quinn, F.; Giri, P.K. Role of the hepcidin-ferroportin axis in pathogen-mediated intracellular iron sequestration in human phagocytic cells. Blood Adv. 2018, 2, 1089–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Renassiaa, C.; Peyssonnaux, C. New insights into the links between hypoxia and iron homeostasis. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2019, 26, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Lando, D.; Peet, D.J.; Gorman, J.J.; Whelan, D.A.; Whitelaw, M.L.; Bruick, R.K. FIH-1 is an asparaginyl hydroxylase enzyme that regulates the transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible factor. Res. Com. 2002, 16, 1466–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Schofield, C.J.; Ratcliffe, P.J. Oxygen sensing by HIF hydroxylases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hashimoto, T.; Shibasaki, F. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor as an Angiogenic Master Switch. Front. Pediatr. 2015, 3, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Wiesener, M.S.; Turley, H.; Allen, W.E.; Willam, C.; Eckardt, K.U.; Talks, K.L.; Wood, S.M.; Gatter, K.C.; Harris, A.L.; Pugh, C.W.; et al. Induction of Endothelial PAS Domain Protein-1 by Hypoxia: Characterization and Comparison With Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1a. Blood 1998, 92, 2260–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hartmann, H.; Eltzschig, H.K.; Wurz, H.; Hantke, K.; Rakin, A.; Yazdi, A.S.; Matteoli, G.; Bohn, E.; Autenrieth, I.B.; Karhausen, J.; et al. Hypoxia-independent activation of HIF-1 by enterobacteriaceae and their siderophores. Gastroenterology 2008, 134, 756–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Woo, K.J.; Lee, T.-J.; Park, J.-W.; Kwon, T.K. Desferrioxamine, an iron chelator, enhances HIF-1a accumulation via cyclooxygenase-2 signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 343, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. McGettrick, A.F.; O’Neill, L.A.J. The Role of HIF in Immunity and Inflammation. Cell Metab. 2020, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Staples, K.J.; Sotoodehnejadnematalahi, F.; Pearson, H.; Frankenbergerb, M.; Francescut, L.; Ziegler-Heitbrock, L.; Burke, B. Monocyte-derived macrophages matured under prolonged hypoxia transcriptionally up-regulate HIF-1 mRNA. Immunobiology 2011, 216, 832–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Vaupel, P.; Multhof, G. Revisiting the Warburg effect: Historical dogma versus current understanding. J. Physiol. 2021, 599, 1745–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Lua, J.; Tanb, M.; Caia, Q. The Warburg effect in tumor progression: Mitochondrial oxidative metabolism as an anti-metastasis mechanism. Cancer Lett. 2015, 356, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Semenza, G.L. HIF-1 mediates the Warburg effect in clear cell renal carcinoma. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2007, 39, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Peyssonnaux, C.; Cejudo-Martin, P.; Doedens, A.; Zinkernagel, A.S.; Johnson, R.S.; Nizet, V. Cutting Edge: Essential Role of Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1 a in Development of Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Sepsis. J. Immunol. 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Melillo, G.; Taylor, L.S.; Brooks, A.; Musso, T.; Cox, G.W.; Varesio, L. Functional Requirement of the Hypoxia-responsive Element in the Activation of the Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Promoter by the Iron Chelator Desferrioxamine. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 12236–12243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Nairz, M.; Weiss, G. Iron in infection and immunity. Mol. Aspects Med. 2020, 75, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Baay-Guzman, G.J.; Duran-Padilla, M.A.; Rangel-Santiago, J.; Tirado-Rodriguez, B.; Antonio-Andres, G.; Barrios-Payan, J.; Mata-Espinosa, D.; Klunder-Klunder, M.; Vega, M.I.; Hernandez-Pando, R.; et al. Dual role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 α in experimental pulmonary tuberculosis: Its implication as a new therapeutic target. Future Microbiol. 2018, 13, 785–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Flynn, J.L.; Chan, J.; Triebold, K.J.; Dalton, D.K.; Stewart, T.A.; Bloom, B.R. An essential role for interferon gamma in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J. Exp. Med. 1993, 178, 2249–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Braverman, J.; Sogi, K.M.; Benjamin, D.; Nomura, D.K.; Stanley, S.A. HIF-1alpha Is an Essential Mediator of IFN-gamma-Dependent Immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 1287–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Köhler, T.; Reizis, B.; Johnson, R.S.; Weighardt, H.; Förster, I. Influence of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α on dendritic cell differentiation and migration. Eur. J. Immunol. 2012, 42, 1226–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Walmsley, S.R.; Print, C.; Farahi, N.; Peyssonnaux, C.; Johnson, R.S.; Cramer, T.; Sobolewski, A.; Condliffe, A.M.; Cowburn, A.S.; Johnson, N.; et al. Hypoxia-induced neutrophil survival is mediated by HIF-1a–dependent NF-kB activity. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 201, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Shi, L.Z.; Wang, R.; Huang, G.; Vogel, P.; Neale, G.; Green, D.R.; Chi, H. HIF1α–dependent glycolytic pathway orchestrates a metabolic checkpoint for the differentiation of TH17 and Treg cells. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 1367–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Palazon, A.; Tyrakis, P.A.; Macias, D.; Goldrath, A.W.; Bergh, J.; Johnson, R.S. An HIF-1a/VEGF-A Axis in Cytotoxic T Cells Regulates Tumor Progression. Cancer Cell 2017, 32, 669–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Casey, J.L.; Koeller, D.M.; Ramin, V.C.; Klausner, R.D.; Harford, J.B. Iron regulation of transferrin receptor mRNA levels requires iron-responsive elements and a rapid turnover determinant in the 3' untranslated region of the mRNA. EMBO J. 1989, 8, 3693–3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Theil, E.C. Iron regulatory elements (IREs): A family of mRNA non-coding sequences. Biochem. J. 1994, 304, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Zhou, Z.D.; Tan, E.-K. Iron regulatory protein (IRP)-iron responsive element (IRE) signaling pathway in human neurodegenerative diseases. Mol. Neurodegener. 2017, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Neves, J.; Haider, T.; Gassmann, M.; Muckenthaler, M.U. Iron Homeostasis in the Lungs—A Balance between Health and Disease. Pharmaceuticals 2019, 12, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Dandekar, T.; Hentze, M.W. Finding the hairpin in the haystack: Searching for RNA motifs. Treds Genet. 1995, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Williams, N.C.; O’Neill, L.A.J. A Role for the Krebs Cycle Intermediate Citrate in Metabolic Reprogramming in Innate Immunity and Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Kim, H.Y.; LaVaute, T.; Iwai, K.; Klausner, R.D.; Rouault, T.A. Identification of a conserved and functional iron-responsive element in the 5'-untranslated region of mammalian mitochondrial aconitase. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 24226–24230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Schalinske, K.L.; Chen, O.S.; Eisenstein, R.S. Iron differentially stimulates translation of mitochondrial aconitase and ferritin mRNAs in mammalian cells. Implications for iron regulatory proteins as regulators of mitochondrial citrate utilization. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 3740–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Micheluccia, A.; Cordesa, T.; Ghelfia, J.; Pailota, A.; Reilingb, N.; Goldmannc, O.; Binza, T.; Wegnera, A.; Tallama, A.; Rausella, A.; et al. Immune-responsive gene 1 protein links metabolism to immunity by catalyzing itaconic acid production. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 7820–7825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Pereira, M.; Chen, T.D.; Buang, N.; Olona, A.; Ko, J.H.; Prendecki, M.; Costa, A.S.H.; Nikitopoulou, E.; Tronci, L.; Pusey, C.D.; et al. Acute Iron Deprivation Reprograms Human Macrophage Metabolism and Reduces Inflammation In Vivo. Cell Rep. 2019, 28, 498–511, e495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Pålsson-McDermott, E.M.; O’Neill, L.A.J. Targeting immunometabolism as an anti-inflammatory strategy. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 300–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Mills, E.L.; Ryan, D.G.; Prag, H.A.; Dikovskaya, D.; Menon, D.; Zaslona, Z.; Jedrychowski, M.P.; Costa, A.S.H.; Higgins, M.; Hams, E.; et al. Itaconate is an anti-inflammatory metabolite that activates Nrf2 via alkylation of KEAP1. Nature 2018, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Mastrogiannaki, M.; Matak, P.; Keith, B.; Simon, M.C.; Vaulont, S.; Peyssonnaux, C. HIF-2α, but not HIF-1α, promotes iron absorption in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2009, 119, 1159–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Imtiyaz, H.Z.; Williams, E.P.; Hickey, M.M.; Patel, S.A.; Durham, A.C.; Yuan, L.J.; Hammond, R.; Gimotty, P.A.; Keith, B.; Simon, M.C. Hypoxia-inducible factor 2alpha regulates macrophage function in mouse models of acute and tumor inflammation. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 2699–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. DeBerge, M.; Lantz, C.; Dehn, S.; Sullivan, D.P.; Van der Laan, A.M.; Niessen, H.W.M.; Flanagan, M.E.; Brat, D.J.; Feinstein, M.J.; Kaushal, S.; et al. Hypoxia-inducible factors individually facilitate inflammatory myeloid metabolism and inefficient cardiac repair. J. Exp. Med. 2021, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Elks, P.M.; Brizee, S.; van der Vaart, M.; Walmsley, S.R.; Van Eeden, F.J.; Renshaw, S.A.; Meijer, A.H. Hypoxia inducible factor signaling modulates susceptibility to mycobacterial infection via a nitric oxide dependent mechanism. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Harris, A.J.; Thompson, A.R.; Whyte, M.K.; Walmsley, S.R. HIF-mediated innate immune responses: Cell signaling and therapeutic implications. Hypoxia 2014, 2, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Evelyn, L.K.; Padberg, C.; Nora Koll, V.S.; Fandrey, J.; Winning, S. The Importance of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIF-1 and HIF-2) for the Pathophysiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  144. Hsu, T.S.; Lin, Y.L.; Wang, Y.A.; Mo, S.T.; Chi, P.Y.; Lai, A.C.; Pan, H.Y.; Chang, Y.J.; Lai, M.Z. HIF-2alpha is indispensable for regulatory T cell function. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Wessling-Resnick, M. Iron homeostasis and the inflammatory response. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2010, 30, 105–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Bedard, K.; Krause, K.-H. The NOX Family of ROS-Generating NADPH Oxidases: Physiology and Pathophysiology. Physiol. Rev. 2007, 87, 245–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Collins, H.L.; Kaufmann, S.H.E.; Schaible, U.E. Iron Chelation Via Deferoxamine Exacerbates Experimental Salmonellosis Via Inhibition of the Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate Oxidase-Dependent Respiratory Burst. J. Immunol. 2002, 3458–3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Han, Z.; Varadharaj, S.; Giedt, R.J.; Zweier, J.L.; Szeto, H.H.; Alevriadou, B.R. Mitochondria-Derived Reactive Oxygen Species Mediate Heme Oxygenase-1 Expression in Sheared Endothelial Cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 329, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Loboda, A.; Damulewicz, M.; Pyza, E.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J. Role of Nrf2/HO-1 system in development, oxidative stress response and diseases: An evolutionarily conserved mechanism. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 3221–3247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Deshane, J.; Chen, S.; Caballero, S.; Grochot-Przeczek, A.; Was, H.; Calzi, S.L.; Lach, R.; Hock, T.D.; Chen, B.; Hill-Kapturczak, N.; et al. Stromal cell–derived factor 1 promotes angiogenesis via a heme oxygenase 1–dependent mechanism. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 605–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Bussolati, B.; Ahmed, A.; Pemberton, H.; Landis, R.C.; Carlo, F.D.; Haskard, D.O.; Mason, J.C. Bifunctional role for VEGF-induced heme oxygenase-1 in vivo: Induction of angiogenesis and inhibition of leukocytic infiltration. Blood 2004, 103, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Nitti, M.; Piras, S.; Marinari, U.M.; Moretta, L.; Pronzato, M.A.; Furfaro, A.L. HO-1 Induction in Cancer Progression: A Matter of Cell Adaptation. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Cheng, C.-C.; Guan, S.-S.; Yang, H.-J.; Chang, C.-C.; Luo, T.-Y.; Chang, J.; Ho, A.-S. Blocking heme oxygenase-1 by zinc protoporphyrin reduces tumor hypoxiamediated VEGF release and inhibits tumor angiogenesis as a potential therapeutic agent against colorectal cancer. J. Biomed. Sci. 2016, 23, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Sunamura, M.; Duda, D.G.; Ghattas, M.H.; Lozonschi, L.; Fuyuhiko, M.; Yamauchi, J.-I.; Matsuno, S.; Shibahara, S.; Abraham, N.G. Heme oxygenase-1 accelerates tumor angiogenesis of human pancreatic cancer. Angiogenesis 2003, 6, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Shang, F.-t.; Hui, L.-l.; An, X.-s.; Zhang, X.-c.; Guo, S.-g.; Kui, Z. ZnPPIX inhibits peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer via its antiangiogenic activity. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2015, 71, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Nemeth, Z.; Li, M.; Csizmadia, E.; Döme, B.; Johansson, M.; Persson, J.L.; Seth, P.; Otterbein, L.; Wegiel, B. Heme oxygenase-1 in macrophages controls prostate cancer progression. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 33675–33688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Hoang, K.N.L.; Anstee, J.E.; Arnold, J.N. The Diverse Roles of Heme Oxygenase-1 in Tumor Progression. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Dixon, S.J.; Lemberg, K.M.; Lamprecht, M.R.; Skouta, R.; Zaitsev, E.M.; Gleason, C.E.; Patel, D.N.; Bauer, A.J.; Cantley, A.M.; Yang, W.S.; et al. Ferroptosis: An Iron-Dependent Form of Non-Apoptotic Cell Death. Cell 2012, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Chiang, S.-K.; Chen, S.-E.; Chang, L.-C. A Dual Role of Heme Oxygenase-1 in Cancer Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Chang, L.-C.; Chiang, S.-K.; Chen, S.-E.; Yu, Y.-L.; Chou, R.-H.; Chang, W.-C. Heme oxygenase-1 mediates BAY 11e7085 induced ferroptosis. Cancer Lett. 2018, 416, 124–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Harada, N.; Kanayama, M.; Maruyama, A.; Yoshida, A.; Tazumi, K.; Hosoya, T.; Mimura, J.; Toki, T.; Maher, J.M.; Yamamoto, M.; et al. Nrf2 regulates ferroportin 1-mediated iron efflux and counteracts lipopolysaccharide-induced ferroportin 1 mRNA suppression in macrophages. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2011, 508, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Marro, S.; Chiabrando, D.; Messana, E.; Stolte, J.; Turco, E.; Tolosano, E.; Muckenthaler, M.U. Heme controls ferroportin1 (FPN1) transcription involving Bach1, Nrf2 and a MARE/ARE sequence motif at position -7007 of the FPN1 promoter. Haematologica 2010, 95, 1261–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Moghaddam, A.S.; Mohammadian, S.; Vazini, H.; Taghadosi, M.; Esmaeili, S.; Mardani, F.; Seifi, B.; Mohammadi, A.; Afshari, J.T.; Sahebkar, A. Macrophage plasticity, polarization and function in health and disease. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 223, 6425–6440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Corna, G.; Campana, L.; Pignatti, E.; Castiglioni, A.; Tagliafico, E.; Bosurgi, L.; Campanella, A.; Brunelli, S.; Manfredi, A.A.; Apostoli, P.; et al. Polarization dictates iron handling by inflammatory and alternatively activated macrophages. Haematologica 2010, 95, 1814–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Recalcati, S.; Locati, M.; Marini, A.; Santambrogio, P.; Zaninotto, F.; Pizzol, M.D.; Zammataro, L.; Girelli, D.; Cairo, G. Differential regulation of iron homeostasis during human macrophage polarized activation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010, 40, 824–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Zhou, Y.; Que, K.-T.; Zhang, Z.; Yi, Z.J.; Zhao, P.X.; You, Y.; Gong, J.-P.; Liu, Z.-J. Iron overloaded polarizes macrophage to proinflammation phenotype through ROS/acetyl-p53 pathway. Cancer Med. 2018, 7, 4012–4022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Sindrilaru, A.; Peters, T.; Wieschalka, S.; Baican, C.; Baican, A.; Peter, H.; Hainzl, A.; Schatz, S.; Qi, Y.; Schlecht, A.; et al. An unrestrained proinflammatory M1 macrophage population induced by iron impairs wound healing in humans and mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 985–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Agoro, R.; Taleb, M.; Quesniaux, V.F.J.; Mura, C. Cell iron status influences macrophage polarization. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0196921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Nairz, M.; Fritsche, G.; Brunner, P.; Talasz, H.; Hantke, K.; Weiss, G. Interferon-gamma limits the availability of iron for intramacrophage Salmonella typhimurium. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008, 38, 1923–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Nairz, M.; Theurl, I.; Ludwiczek, S.; Theurl, M.; Mair, S.M.; Fritsche, G.; Weiss, G. The co-ordinated regulation of iron homeostasis in murine macrophages limits the availability of iron for intracellular Salmonella typhimurium. Cell. Microbiol. 2007, 9, 2126–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Weiss, G.; Werner-Felmayer, G.; Werner, E.R.; Grunewald, K.; Wachter, H.; Hentze, M.W. Iron regulates nitric oxide synthase activity by controlling nuclear transcription. J. Exp. Med. 1994, 180, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  173. Ganz, T.; Nemeth, E. Iron homeostasis in host defence and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 500–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Salerno, L.; Floresta, G.; Ciaffaglione, V.; Gentile, D.; Margani, F.; Turnaturi, R.; Rescifina, A.; Pittala, V. Progress in the development of selective heme oxygenase-1 inhibitors and their potential therapeutic application. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 167, 439–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Katsarou, A.; Pantopoulos, K. Hepcidin Therapeutics. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2018, 11, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  176. Sebastiani, G.; Wilkinson, N.; Pantopoulos, K. Pharmacological Targeting of the Hepcidin/Ferroportin Axis. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Major mechanisms of iron acquisition by macrophages. (A) Phagocytosis and recycling of senescent erythrocytes by macrophages occur through the recognition of Nabs (natural antibodies) bound to Band3 antigens and complement by Fc and C3 receptors, recognition of phosphatidylserine (PS) by PS receptors and TAM receptors bridged by GAS6 and PROS1 ligands or recognition of CD47 bound by TSP-1 by SIRPα receptors. (Ba) Autophagy of hemoproteins (H-prot) found free in the cytoplasm or present in mitochondria (mitophagy). (Bb) Endocytosis of circulating extracellular hemoglobin (Hb)-haptoglobin (Hp) and heme-hemopexin complexes through CD163 and LPR/CD91 receptors respectively. These mechanisms result in the release of heme molecules in the cytosol, which are metabolized by HO-1 and release Fe2+ iron. Extracellular circulating transferrin (TF)-Fe3+ complexes are recognized by transferrin receptors (TFR) and endocytosed, releasing ferric iron that is converted to ferrous (Fe2+) iron and transported to the cytosol through the DMT1 receptor. (Bc) DMT1 receptor can also internalize extracellular free Fe2+ ions. (C) Intracellular free iron can be stored in ferritin molecules in the ferric (Fe3+) form or transported to the extracellular compartment through ferroportin. Free intracellular ferrous iron promotes the generation of reactive oxygen species through the Fenton reaction. Some elements in this figure use pictures from Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com, last accessed on 30 March 2022) licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, last accessed on 30 March 2022).
Figure 1. Major mechanisms of iron acquisition by macrophages. (A) Phagocytosis and recycling of senescent erythrocytes by macrophages occur through the recognition of Nabs (natural antibodies) bound to Band3 antigens and complement by Fc and C3 receptors, recognition of phosphatidylserine (PS) by PS receptors and TAM receptors bridged by GAS6 and PROS1 ligands or recognition of CD47 bound by TSP-1 by SIRPα receptors. (Ba) Autophagy of hemoproteins (H-prot) found free in the cytoplasm or present in mitochondria (mitophagy). (Bb) Endocytosis of circulating extracellular hemoglobin (Hb)-haptoglobin (Hp) and heme-hemopexin complexes through CD163 and LPR/CD91 receptors respectively. These mechanisms result in the release of heme molecules in the cytosol, which are metabolized by HO-1 and release Fe2+ iron. Extracellular circulating transferrin (TF)-Fe3+ complexes are recognized by transferrin receptors (TFR) and endocytosed, releasing ferric iron that is converted to ferrous (Fe2+) iron and transported to the cytosol through the DMT1 receptor. (Bc) DMT1 receptor can also internalize extracellular free Fe2+ ions. (C) Intracellular free iron can be stored in ferritin molecules in the ferric (Fe3+) form or transported to the extracellular compartment through ferroportin. Free intracellular ferrous iron promotes the generation of reactive oxygen species through the Fenton reaction. Some elements in this figure use pictures from Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com, last accessed on 30 March 2022) licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, last accessed on 30 March 2022).
Antioxidants 11 00861 g001
Figure 2. Major iron-regulated pathways involved in the modulation of inflammation and immune responses. (A) Prolyl hydroxylase (PHD) enzymes use iron as a cofactor to mediate the reaction that results in the ubiquitination and further degradation of HIF-1α by the proteasome in high iron concentration environment. In the presence of low iron levels, PHDs are inactivated, which results in the stabilization of HIF-1α molecules that migrate to the nucleus and promote the transcription of pro-inflammatory genes. (Ba) Iron regulatory proteins 1 and 2 (IRP1 and 2) are active (IRP1) or stabilized (IRP2) in low iron concentration or are inactivated (IRP1) or degraded (IRP2) in high iron concentrations. (Bb) Active and stable IRPs (low iron levels) bind to iron responsive element (IRE) motifs present in the untranslated region (UTR) of mRNA molecules of some proteins, which can stabilize mRNA and promote protein translation if the IRE is located at 3′ of the mRNA UTR (transferrin receptor and DMT1), or induce translation repression if the IRE is located at 5′ of the mRNA UTR (ferritin, ferroportin, HIF-2α, and mitochondrial aconitase)—high iron levels inactivate or degrade IRPs and the opposite effect is observed regarding the translation of these proteins’ mRNA molecules. (C) Low iron levels result in reduced translation of mitochondrial aconitase, which breaks the TCA (tricarboxylic acid) and promotes the accumulation of citrate and itaconate (highlighted with a red circle), which mediate lipid synthesis and anti-inflammatory effects, respectively. Some elements in this figure use pictures from Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com, last accessed on 30 March 2022) licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, last accessed on 30 March 2022).
Figure 2. Major iron-regulated pathways involved in the modulation of inflammation and immune responses. (A) Prolyl hydroxylase (PHD) enzymes use iron as a cofactor to mediate the reaction that results in the ubiquitination and further degradation of HIF-1α by the proteasome in high iron concentration environment. In the presence of low iron levels, PHDs are inactivated, which results in the stabilization of HIF-1α molecules that migrate to the nucleus and promote the transcription of pro-inflammatory genes. (Ba) Iron regulatory proteins 1 and 2 (IRP1 and 2) are active (IRP1) or stabilized (IRP2) in low iron concentration or are inactivated (IRP1) or degraded (IRP2) in high iron concentrations. (Bb) Active and stable IRPs (low iron levels) bind to iron responsive element (IRE) motifs present in the untranslated region (UTR) of mRNA molecules of some proteins, which can stabilize mRNA and promote protein translation if the IRE is located at 3′ of the mRNA UTR (transferrin receptor and DMT1), or induce translation repression if the IRE is located at 5′ of the mRNA UTR (ferritin, ferroportin, HIF-2α, and mitochondrial aconitase)—high iron levels inactivate or degrade IRPs and the opposite effect is observed regarding the translation of these proteins’ mRNA molecules. (C) Low iron levels result in reduced translation of mitochondrial aconitase, which breaks the TCA (tricarboxylic acid) and promotes the accumulation of citrate and itaconate (highlighted with a red circle), which mediate lipid synthesis and anti-inflammatory effects, respectively. Some elements in this figure use pictures from Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com, last accessed on 30 March 2022) licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, last accessed on 30 March 2022).
Antioxidants 11 00861 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Oliveira, J.; Denadai, M.B.; Costa, D.L. Crosstalk between Heme Oxygenase-1 and Iron Metabolism in Macrophages: Implications for the Modulation of Inflammation and Immunity. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 861. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11050861

AMA Style

de Oliveira J, Denadai MB, Costa DL. Crosstalk between Heme Oxygenase-1 and Iron Metabolism in Macrophages: Implications for the Modulation of Inflammation and Immunity. Antioxidants. 2022; 11(5):861. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11050861

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Oliveira, Joseana, Marina B. Denadai, and Diego L. Costa. 2022. "Crosstalk between Heme Oxygenase-1 and Iron Metabolism in Macrophages: Implications for the Modulation of Inflammation and Immunity" Antioxidants 11, no. 5: 861. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11050861

APA Style

de Oliveira, J., Denadai, M. B., & Costa, D. L. (2022). Crosstalk between Heme Oxygenase-1 and Iron Metabolism in Macrophages: Implications for the Modulation of Inflammation and Immunity. Antioxidants, 11(5), 861. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11050861

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop