Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Redox Regulation of Monodehydroascorbate Reductase by Thioredoxin y in Plastids Revealed in the Context of Water Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Small Peptides that Inhibit NADPH Oxidase (Nox2) Activation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crystal Structure of Chloroplastic Thioredoxin f2 from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Reveals Distinct Surface Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 7
Issue 12
10.3390/antiox7120182
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Involvement of Glutaredoxin and Thioredoxin Systems in the Nitrogen-Fixing Symbiosis between Legumes and Rhizobia

by
Geneviève Alloing
1,
Karine Mandon
1,
Eric Boncompagni
1,
Françoise Montrichard
2 and
Pierre Frendo
1,*
1
Université Côte d’Azur, INRA, CNRS, ISA, France
2
IRHS, INRA, AGROCAMPUS-Ouest, Université d’Angers, SFR 4207 QUASAV, 42 rue Georges Morel, 49071 Beaucouzé CEDEX, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2018, 7(12), 182; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox7120182
Submission received: 29 October 2018 / Revised: 30 November 2018 / Accepted: 1 December 2018 / Published: 5 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thioredoxin and Glutaredoxin Systems)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Leguminous plants can form a symbiotic relationship with Rhizobium bacteria, during which plants provide bacteria with carbohydrates and an environment appropriate to their metabolism, in return for fixed atmospheric nitrogen. The symbiotic interaction leads to the formation of a new organ, the root nodule, where a coordinated differentiation of plant cells and bacteria occurs. The establishment and functioning of nitrogen-fixing symbiosis involves a redox control important for both the plant-bacteria crosstalk and the regulation of nodule metabolism. In this review, we discuss the involvement of thioredoxin and glutaredoxin systems in the two symbiotic partners during symbiosis. The crucial role of glutathione in redox balance and S-metabolism is presented. We also highlight the specific role of some thioredoxin and glutaredoxin systems in bacterial differentiation. Transcriptomics data concerning genes encoding components and targets of thioredoxin and glutaredoxin systems in connection with the developmental step of the nodule are also considered in the model system Medicago truncatula–Sinorhizobium meliloti.

1. Introduction

Most terrestrial plants establish symbiotic relationships with fungi or bacteria that provide nutrients for their growth [1,2]. Nitrogen and phosphorous are critical determinants of plant growth and productivity. Amongst the plant families, leguminous plants can achieve a nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with soil bacteria of the family Rhizobiaceae to reduce atmospheric nitrogen (N2) to ammonia [3]. The ability to reduce N2 is restricted to bacteria and archaea which produce the enzyme nitrogenase. Legumes are an economically important plant family, for their contribution to animal and human nutrition on one hand, and for their ecosystemic services in cropping systems on the other hand, by participating to nitrogen enrichment of soils and thereby to a reduced use of nitrogen fertilizers. The study of these symbioses is therefore a major challenge to promote a more environmentally-friendly agriculture.
The nitrogen-fixing symbiosis (NFS) between rhizobia bacteria and legumes leads to the formation of new root organs, called nodules [4,5]. The development of the nodule requires many crucial steps to achieve the fixation of atmospheric nitrogen. The first step is the cross recognition between bacteria and the plant partner. This recognition involves the nodulation (Nod) factors produced by the bacteria that play a major role in the symbiotic specificity between the two partners. In parallel to bacterial recognition, Nod factors promote the development of a new meristem in the plant root that leads to the establishment of the root nodule. Subsequently, the formation of infection threads allows the transport of bacteria from the surface of the root to the plant cells that will host bacteria, in an endosymbiotic way. The accommodation of numerous bacteria inside plant cells and nitrogen fixation requirements involve modifications of the cellular structure and physiology of both partners for maintaining the symbiotic interaction. These modifications are achieved through differentiation of the plant cells which includes cell enlargement, DNA endoreduplication, and significant reprogramming of cellular structure and metabolism [6]. Cellular and biochemical changes are also observed during the differentiation of bacteria into N2-fixing bacteroids. Amongst them, a high aerobic metabolism provides ATP and reductants necessary to sustain nitrogenase activity, whereas the nitrogen-fixing enzyme is irreversibly inactivated by oxygen. Thus nitrogen-fixation efficiency depends on oxygen protective mechanisms involving the formation of an oxygen barrier cell layer around the infected cells and the production of a symbiotic hemoglobin, called leghemoglobin. This later is involved in the protection of nitrogenase from denaturation, and in the supply of ample amount of oxygen to bacteria for respiration. The supply of energy from the plant to nitrogen-fixing bacteroids, and the export of ammonia from the bacteroids to the roots also require major metabolic adaptations in the nodules. In conclusion, the nodule functioning depends on a strict regulation of the development and the metabolism of plant and bacteria cells.
The nodules are considered as “indeterminate” or “determinate” according to their mode of development [7]. In the determinate nodules, such as those of soybean (Glycine max), the nodular meristems are transiently active. This results in spherical nodules, containing cells with a similar developmental state to each other. In the indeterminate nodules, such as those formed by pea (Pisum sativum), alfalfa (Medicago sativa) or barrel medic (M. truncatula), the meristems persist throughout the plant’s life, giving an elongated nodule. Consequently, the functional nodule presents three zones: (I) the meristematic zone, (II) the infection zone, and (III) the N2-fixing zone (Figure 1A,B). At later stage, there is a rupture in the symbiotic interaction, which occurs in the senescence zone (zone IV).
As mentioned above, the meristematic cells of the nodule destined to house the rhizobia undergo several DNA endoreduplication cycles. The endoreduplication (up to 64 C) is accompanied by an expansion (up to 80 times) of the infected cells (Figure 1C) [9,10]. These transformations are associated with metabolic changes allowing the bacteria reception and the assimilation of reduced nitrogen. Bacteroid differentiation depends on the host plant [11]. In some legumes such as soybean, the bacteroid morphology is little affected in comparison to the free-living bacteria. In contrast, in other legumes, such as faba bean (Vicia faba), pea or the Medicago genus, bacteroids present an extreme morphological change with an elongated phenotype (5 to 10 times longer than the free-living cells) (Figure 1D). This change is coupled with endoreduplication of the bacterial genome, and irreversible terminal differentiation, preventing subsequent bacterial multiplication. Transcriptomic analyses of the host plants, inducing (M. truncatula) or not (Lotus japonicum) the terminal bacterial differentiation, have allowed the identification of plant factors involved in this process. These factors, called Nodule Specific Cysteine Rich (NCR) peptides, are defensin-like peptides specifically expressed in the nodule [12]. This family of peptides has been extensively described in M. truncatula, and several homologs have been found in M. sativa and P. sativum [6]. The NCR peptides produced by the host plant are targeted to the bacteroids through the secretory pathway. In vitro treatment of S. meliloti culture with certain NCR peptides induces some aspects of terminal differentiation such as bacterial membrane permeabilization, cell division inhibition, genome endoreduplication, and bacterial elongation. In addition, mutants of M. truncatula deficient in two NCR peptides, NCR169 and NCR211, develop non-functional nodules [13,14].
Regulation of the cellular redox state represents a major regulatory component of the nitrogen-fixing symbiosis. During the last twenty years, analysis of numerous redox components of the nodules has shown their specific involvement in the functioning of the root nodule. Amongst them, some NADPH oxidases, which are involved in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), have been shown to regulate the symbiotic interaction throughout the lifetime of the nodule from its installation to its senescence [15]. Similarly, enzymes implicated in the steady state of nitric oxide (NO), a growth and metabolic regulator in plants, control nodule development and functioning [16]. Antioxidant components of the cells involved in the regulation of the cellular redox state also participate in the nodule development [17,18]. In this review, we will present an overview of the work performed on the glutaredoxin and thioredoxin systems, which regulate the redox state of the proteins, in the nitrogen-fixing symbiosis in both symbiotic partners.

2. The Glutaredoxin and Thioredoxin Systems of Plant Partner

2.1. The Glutaredoxin System

Glutaredoxins (Grxs) are small redox enzymes of approximately one hundred amino-acid residues that use glutathione (GSH) as a reducer, that is maintained in a reduced state by glutathione reductase (GR) and NADPH. The GSH synthesis has been extensively studied in leguminous plants [17]. In legumes, the structural homolog, homoglutathione (hGSH; γGlu-Cys-βAla), may partially or completely replace GSH [19,20,21]. Both compounds can be found at concentrations of 0.5–1.5 mM in nodules [22], similar to the estimated levels of 1–3 mM GSH and 0.4–0.8 mM hGSH in the chloroplast stroma [23] or in the cytosol [24]. However, the (h)GSH content is much higher in nodules than in roots due to the structural modifications of nodule cells with an increased cytosol volume compared to root cells (see Figure 1). (h)GSH synthesis derives from sulfur (S) metabolism which has been studied in N2 fixing nodules of L. japonicus [25]. The high adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate reductase activity, the strong S-flux into cysteine and derivatives, and the up-regulation of the expression of several rhizobial and plant genes involved in S-assimilation showed the important function of nodules in S-assimilation [25]. Moreover, the higher thiol content observed in roots and leaves of N2-fixing plants in comparison to uninoculated plants could not be attributed to local biosynthesis, showing that nodules are an important site for production of reduced S for the plants [25]. The S-metabolism of nodules is reduced in plants nodulated by mutant rhizobia unable to reduce N2 indicating a strong interdependency between N2-fixation and S-assimilation [25,26]. Sulfate transport is also modified in the nodule. Nodule-specific sulfate transporters have been identified [27]. Some of them are located on the peribacteroid membrane and allow the transport of inorganic sulfur to the bacteroid [28,29]. In soybean, this transport has been shown to be crucial for nitrogen-fixing efficiency. We have analyzed the transcriptome of M. truncatula using sulfate transporter as a key word in the symbimics website (https://iant.toulouse.inra.fr/symbimics/), which allows to compare the expression of genes in roots and nodules and to define the level of gene expression in the different nodule zones (Table 1). In M. truncatula, 22 putative sulfate transporter genes were identified. The expression of some of them (Medtr3g087730, Medtr5g061860, Medtr6g086170, Mt0062_10115) were significantly upregulated in nodules compared to roots. Transcriptomic analyses in the M. truncatula Gene Expression Atlas (https://mtgea.noble.org/v3/) showed that Medtr5g061860 and Medtr6g086170 expression were correlated with the nitrogen fixation efficiency as treatment of plants with nitrate, which reduces the nodule nitrogen fixation, led to a reduction of less than 20% of the expression of these genes as compared to control nodules.
The synthesis of GSH in plants and other organisms is accomplished in two sequential reactions catalyzed by γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γECS) and glutathione synthetase (GSHS), both showing a strict requirement for ATP and Mg2+ [23]. In legumes, the synthesis of hGSH is also carried out in two steps, involving the same γECS enzyme and a specific homoglutathione synthetase (hGSHS), which exhibits a much higher affinity for β-alanine than for glycine [19,20,30,31]. Site-directed mutagenesis of soybean and M. truncatula hGSHS has conclusively shown that two contiguous amino acid residues in the active site (Leu-487 and Pro-488, positions that are Ala in GSHS) mainly determine the substrate preference for β-alanine over glycine [20,32]. The GSHS and hGSHS genes share high homology (~70% amino acid identity) and are located in tandem on the same chromosome in the model plant legumes M. truncatula [20] and L. japonicus [21]. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the hGSHS gene derives from the GSHS gene by a duplication event occurring after the divergence between the Fabales, Solanales, and Brassicales [20]. Despite this close relationship, the two genes are differentially regulated in plant organs. This can be exemplified with studies performed on the two model legumes. Thus, M. truncatula produces exclusively GSH in the leaves and both GSH and hGSH in the roots and nodules, whereas L. japonicus produces almost exclusively hGSH in the roots and leaves, but more GSH than hGSH in the nodules. In legumes, the thiol contents are positively correlated with the GSHS and hGSHS activities and in general with their mRNA levels [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33].
The concentration of (h)GSH and the N2-fixing activity in nodules are positively correlated during nodule development [34]. The two parameters decline with aging [35,36] as well as during stress-induced senescence [37,38,39,40,41]. These findings suggest that (h)GSH is important for nodule activity, a hypothesis that was tested by modulating the nodule content of (h)GSH using pharmacological and genetic approaches. The application of buthionine sulfoximine (a specific inhibitor of γECS) or the expression of (h)GSHS in antisense orientation caused depletion of (h)GSH in M. truncatula roots [42]. The (h)GSH synthesis deficiency in roots decreased substantially the number of nascent nodules and the expression of some early nodulin genes [42]. These results, along with the proposed role of GSH in meristem formation in Arabidopsis thaliana [43,44,45], suggest that (h)GSH is required for the initiation and maintenance of the nodule meristem. The transcriptomic analysis of (h)GSH-depleted plants during early nodulation revealed downregulation of genes implicated in meristem formation and upregulation of salicylic acid-related genes after infection with S. meliloti [46]. The enhanced expression of defense-related genes provides a partial explanation for the negative effects of (h)GSH depletion on the symbiosis. The role of (h)GSH was also analyzed in the nitrogen-fixing zone. Downregulation of the γECS gene by RNA interference using the nodule nitrogen-fixing zone-specific NCR001 promoter resulted in significantly lower biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) associated with a significant reduction in the expression of nodule specific genes. This lower (h)GSH content was correlated with a reduction in the nodule size. Conversely, γECS overexpression using the same promoter resulted in an elevated GSH content associated with increased BNF and significantly higher expression of the sucrose synthase-1 and leghemoglobin genes. Taken together, these data show that the plant (h)GSH content of the nodule nitrogen-fixing zone modulates the efficiency of the BNF process, demonstrating their important role in the regulation of this process [47]. All these data show the importance of sulfur metabolism and more particularly of (h)GSH in the development and functioning of nodules.
Amongst the multiple roles of (h)GSH, these thiols serve as reducing power for Grxs. Numerous Grxs are present in plants. To date, no physiological analysis was performed to investigate the importance of Grxs in the nitrogen-fixing symbiosis. M. truncatula genome analysis using BLAST and publication data mining [48,49] allowed us to find thirty-six genes encoding putative Grxs of class I, II, and III (Table 2). Gene expression analysis in roots and nodules did not allow us to find class I and class II Grxs significantly upregulated in nodules compared to roots. In contrast, two Class III Grxs (Medtr2g014760, Medtr1g088910) are upregulated in nodules compared to roots suggesting that they play a significant role in nodule development or functioning. Nevertheless, three class III Grxs are also significantly downregulated in nodules compared to roots and multiple Class III Grxs are not expressed in roots and nodules. Taken together, these results showing the significant modification of the expression of multiple Grx genes suggest that redox regulation of nodule metabolism is extensively modified compared to roots.

2.2. The Thioredoxin System

The other biochemical system involved in the thiol-dependent redox regulation of enzyme activity is the thioredoxin system. Thioredoxins (Trxs) are small proteins similar to Grxs that reduce disulfide bounds. Oxidized Trxs are in turn re-reduced by NADP-dependent Trx reductases (TR) and NADPH or ferredoxin in plastids. Nonetheless, a few members of the Trx family use, as Grxs, glutathione as a reducer [51,52]. Trxs are able to reduce directly some of basic metabolic enzymes such as ribonucleotide reductase, and enzymes involved in the antioxidant systems such as peroxiredoxins (Prx), glutathione peroxidase (Gpx), and methionine sulfoxide reductase (MSR). In plant tissues, several groups of Trxs have been identified. The Trxs f, m, x, y, and z are localized in the plastids, Trxs o are addressed to the mitochondria and the Trxs h mainly accumulate in the cytoplasm [53]. Cytosolic Trxs h can also be transferred in nucleus in cells suffering oxidative stress [54]. Nucleoredoxins were also described as other redoxins located in the nucleus [55]. In legumes, the Trx family has been analyzed in detail in M. truncatula [52,56] and L. japonicus [57]. The analysis of Trx expression in L. japonicus showed that there is a differential expression pattern of the different isoforms in leaves, root, and nodules. However, no isoform seems to be significantly more expressed in nodules than in roots and leaves. In soybean, a Trx h expressed in infected cells of mature nodules is able to protect a yeast Trx mutant against hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [58]. This Trx is crucial for nodule development and functioning as RNAi-mediated repression of the Trx gene severely impaired nodule development [58]. Nodulin-35, a subunit of uricase, was found to be a target of this thioredoxin suggesting a novel role of Trx in the regulation of enzyme activities involved in nodule nitrogen fixation [59]. In addition to all the classical types of Trxs found in plants, M. truncatula contains a novel type of Trxs, called Trxs s, comprising four isoforms which are associated with symbiosis [56,60]. No orthologs were found in A. thaliana, L. japonicus or soybean suggesting that the Trxs s isoforms could be unique to certain legume species. Trx s1 and s3, are induced in the nodule infection zone where bacterial differentiation occurs. Trx s1 is targeted to the symbiosomes, the N2-fixing organelles. Trx s1 interacted with NCR247 and NCR335 and increased the cytotoxic effect of NCR335 in S. meliloti. Trx s1 silencing impairs bacteroid endoreduplication and enlargement, two features of terminal bacteroid differentiation, and the ectopic expression of Trx s1 in S. meliloti partially complements the silencing phenotype. Thus, Trx s1 is targeted to the bacterial endosymbiont where it controls bacteroid terminal differentiation [60].
Gpxs and Prxs are also present in root nodules. In plants, most Gpxs reduce hydroperoxides using Trxs and TR, instead of GSH and GR, as a reducing system [61]. This is also true for Gpx1 in M. truncatula [62]. Based on genome analysis, six Gpxs were reported in L. japonicus [63]. Except the LjGpx4, the other isoforms were expressed in nodules with a higher level for LjGpx1 and LjGpx3 [63,64]. The two Gpx were Trx-dependent phospholipid hydroperoxidases and were upregulated in response to NO for LjGpx1 and in response to cytokinine and the ethylene precursor ACC for LjGpx3 [64]. Both genes were highly expressed in the nodule zone containing the bacteria, and the LjGpx3 mRNA was also detected in the cortex and vascular bundles. Immunogold localization of Gpx allowed to localize LjGpx1 in plastids and nuclei and LjGpx3 in the cytosol and the endoplasmic reticulum [64]. Based on yeast complementation experiments, both enzymes protect against oxidative stress, salt stress, and membrane damage suggesting that both LjGpxs perform major antioxidative functions in nodules, preventing lipid peroxidation and other oxidative processes at different subcellular sites of vascular and infected cells [64].
There are four types of Prxs in plants (1-CysPrx, 2-CysPrx, PrxII, and PrxQ). Based on genome analysis, seven Prxs were reported in L. japonicus [63]. Eight transcripts were detected: Lj1CPrx, LjPrxQ1a, and LjPrxQ1b which derive from the gene LjPrxQ1a with an alternative splicing, and Lj2CPrxA, Lj2CPrxB, LjPrxIIB, LjPrxIIE, and Lj1CPrxIIF [63]. The expression profiles in the different plant tissues did not allow the detection of a Prx isoform which would be more expressed in the nodules. Nevertheless, reduction of PrxIIB and PrxIIF expression levels were associated to the nodule senescence process in bean nodules [65]. In contrast, whereas the level of PrxIIF protein remains constant in senescent nodules, the level of PrxIIB decreases in senescent nodules [65]. Similarly, the decrease of the putative PrxIIA content and a constant level of the mitochondrial PrxIIF protein were observed in senescent nodules compared to mature nodules [66]. Trx also serve as electron donors for MSRs that repair oxidized proteins. To our knowledge, no experiment was performed to analyze the roles of MSRs in root nodules. We have analyzed the transcriptome of M. truncatula searching for methionine sulfoxide in the symbimics website and BLAST sequence alignment program to validate the putative identity of the sequences. The comparison of gene expression in roots and nodules, and in the different nodule zones allowed the detection of a significant upregulation of Medtr3g051460 in the infection zone and the nitrogen-fixing zone compared to the uninfected nodule zone I. Apart from this isoform, no clear difference in transcript level was observed for the seven other genes. Functional analysis of this enzymatic family awaits to be performed in root nodules.

3. The Glutaredoxin and Thioredoxin Systems of Bacterial Partner

Rhizobial genomes contain the genes of Grx and Trx systems (http://genome.annotation.jp/rhizobase). We summarize recent data on these systems emphasizing how they contribute to the efficiency of nitrogen-fixing symbiotic interaction.

3.1. The Gutaredoxin System

In most bacteria, the glutaredoxin system consists of GR, which catalyzes the NADPH-driven reduction of glutathione disulfide (GSSG) to GSH, which in turn reduces Grx. The two steps of GSH biosynthesis are catalyzed by γECS and GSHS, encoded by the gshA and gshB genes, respectively. The GSH recycling from GSSG is performed by a GR encoded by the gor gene. Studies of rhizobial mutants affected in GSH metabolism demonstrate the central role of GSH pool in free-living cells and in planta. In all cases, gshB inactivation alters the fitness of free-living bacteria, and gshB mutants develop poorly effective symbiosis with their plant partners. For example, the growth of a S. meliloti gshB mutant is altered in minimal medium whereas a gshA mutant does not grow under the same conditions, showing that GSH is essential and can be partially replaced by γ-glytamyl-cysteine [67]. The two mutants experience oxidative stress as both exhibit higher catalase activity, a biochemical marker of oxidative stress, when compared with the wild-type strain. M. sativa plants inoculated with the gshA mutant did not produce nodules, while gshB inactivation triggered a delayed nodulation phenotype and the development of abnormal, early senescing nodules associated with 75% reduction in the nitrogen-fixation capacity of bacteroids. A gshB mutant of Rhizobium tropici has a reduced ability to compete against the wild-type strain for nodule occupancy on common bean, while a Rhizobium etli gshB mutant has a delayed nodulation phenotype when inoculated onto bean [68,69]. Plants infected by either one of the other gshB mutant develop ineffective nitrogen-fixing nodules with obvious signs of early senescence. Nodule phenotype is associated with enhanced levels of superoxide anion in the case of R. tropici infection, showing that GSH-deficient bacteroids face an environmental oxidative stress [68]. In the same way, a gshA mutant of Bradyrhizobium japonicum gives rise to nodules with a strong nitrogen-fixation deficiency during interaction with soybean [70]. There are, however, variations in GSH requirement among rhizobial species since another Bradyrhizobium-legume interaction develops effective nodules independently of the bacterial GSH pool. The gshA mutant of Bradyrhizobium sp. SEMIA 6144 indeed induced functional nodules with peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), even though GSH depletion affects nodule occupancy capacity and growth of the free-living bacterium in normal and stressful conditions [70]. Overall, the homeostasis (both level and redox status) of GSH in bacterial cells is important for nodule development, and this is also exemplified by the symbiotic deficiency of S. meliloti gor mutant [71]. The lack of GR in gor mutants causes a decrease in the GSH/GSSG ratio, triggering oxidative stress with an increased expression of catalase genes, and an enhanced sensitivity to oxidants. In planta, the gor mutant is affected in its ability to compete for nodule occupancy and displays a reduced nitrogen-fixing phenotype [71]. Altogether, these different studies highlight the major role of rhizobial GSH in regulating the intracellular redox environment and protecting cells against ROS.
Besides its role in redox balance, the GSH pool in nodules might also be crucial in regulating metabolic pathways. The R. etli gshB and gor mutants were shown to be affected in Gln uptake in free-living bacteria [69]. Similarly, a gshB mutant of Rhizobium leguminosarum is impaired in symbiosis with P. sativum and presents a defect in the uptake of several carbon source compounds in free-living bacteria [72].
Glutathione is involved in the maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis in particular as a reductant for Grxs. The function of bacterial Grxs during rhizobium–legume symbiosis has been investigated in S. meliloti. The genome of this bacterium encodes three Grxs, the dithiol SmGrx1 (CGYC redox active site), the monothiol SmGrx2 (CGFS redox active site), and the atypical SmGrx3 which carries two domains, an N-terminal Grx domain with a CPYG active site and a C-terminal domain with a methylamine utilization protein (MauE) motif. Both SmGrx1 and SmGrx2 orthologs are ubiquitously present in bacteria while SmGrx3 orthologs are found only in cyanobacteria and some proteobacteria [73]. Biochemical and genetic analyses established that the three proteins have distinct properties [73]. SmGrx1 was shown to play a key role in protein deglutathionylation: on one hand SmGrx1 recombinant protein displayed an efficient degluthationylation activity, on the other Smgrx1 inactivation in free-living bacteria led to a higher level of glutathionylated proteins. The Smgrx1 deficient mutant undergoes a severe growth defect under non-stress conditions and an increased sensitivity to H2O2 treatment. During the interaction with M. truncatula the Smgrx1 mutant induces abortive nodules, containing bacteria unable to differentiate into bacteroids following release inside plant cells. This original symbiotic phenotype suggests that the control of protein and redox homeostasis by Grx1-mediated protein deglutathionylation is crucial for bacteroid differentiation.
Data obtained with SmGrx2 provide the first demonstration of Grx involvement in bacterial iron metabolism [73]. Smgrx2 inactivation in free-living bacteria results in the decreased activity of Fe–S cluster containing enzymes, suggesting that SmGrx2 participates to Fe–S cluster assembly machinery. A deregulation of RirA (Rhizobial iron regulator)-dependent genes, and an increase of the total intracellular iron content, was also observed in the Smgrx2 mutant. During the interaction between S. meliloti and M. truncatula, Smgrx2 inactivation affects nodulation efficiency and the nitrogen-fixation capacity of bacteroids; Smgrx2 bacteroids are fully differentiated, in contrast to those of Smgrx1. The nitrogen-fixation deficiency of mutant bacteroids could result from a direct effect on nitrogenase which contains many Fe–S clusters. Indeed, the nitrogen-fixing enzyme consists of two Fe–S cluster-containing proteins, the dimeric Fe protein that serves as the electron donor for N2 reduction and as the site of ATP hydrolysis, and the heterotetrameric MoFe protein where substrates are reduced. The Fe protein contains a Fe–S cluster while the MoFe protein contains two unique metal clusters, the [8Fe:7S] P-cluster and the FeMo cofactor described as a [Mo:7Fe:9S]:C-homocitrate entity [74]. Consistently, a mutant in sufT, involved in Fe–S cluster metabolism, also has a lowered nitrogen fixation capacity [75].
Concerning SmGrx3, the same approaches used to analyze SmGrx1 and SmGrx2 function were performed. Whereas a SmGrx3 recombinant protein presents a low degluthationylation activity, a Smgrx3 mutant did not display defective phenotype in the free-living and symbiotic states. The biological function of SmGrx3 still remains to be elucidated.
In conclusion, SmGrx1 and smGrx2 play distinct, critical roles in the control of S. meliloti physiology. The growth and symbiotic defects of grx mutants also indicate that Grx and Trx systems are not functionally redundant in S. meliloti, in contrary to the thiol-redox systems of E. coli [76]. The question arises as to whether these properties can be generalized to other rhizobial Grxs and deserves more studies.

3.2. The Thioredoxin System

The thioredoxin system consists of NADPH, the flavoprotein Trx reductase (TR), and Trxs. A very limited number of studies have investigated the role of thioredoxin system in rhizobia. Trx-like proteins were initially described as playing an important role in symbiosis. In S. meliloti CE52G, inactivation of a trx-like gene involved in melanine production increased the sensitivity of free-living bacteria to paraquat-induced stress and affected the nitrogen fixation capacity of bacteroids [77]. In R. leguminosarum, a mutant deficient in the Trx-like TlpA, involved in cytochrome c biogenesis, was unable to form nitrogen-fixing nodule [78]. TlpA was recently shown to act as a reductant for the copper metallochaperone ScoI and cytochrome oxidase subunit II CoxB [79].
In S. meliloti as in E. coli, the canonical Trx system contains two Trxs, TrxA and the product of SMc03801 (TrxC in E. coli), and one TR (TrxB). Recent results showed that TrxB recombinant protein efficiently reduces Trx s1, a host-plant thioredoxin specifically addressed to the microsymbiont, which is able to reduce NCR and is involved in bacteroid differentiation [60]. These data suggest that TrxB is implicated in the redox regulation of differentiation by reactivating Trx s1 but further studies are required to characterize the physiological role of TrxB during symbiosis.

3.3. Transcriptional Regulation of Trx and Grx Systems in S. meliloti

Various gene expression studies underline the importance of rhizobial Trx and Grx systems during symbiosis; we will focus on S. meliloti for which most of the results were obtained.
A high expression level of Trx/Grx component genes was observed in bacteroids from different zones of the M. truncatula nodules ([50]; Table 3). Some of these genes belong to stress response regulons, markedly required for S. meliloti survival in host cells.
Regulation of the S. meliloti GSH metabolic pathway involves the activity of LsrB, a transcriptional regulator required for efficient alfalfa nodulation [80]. LsrB belongs to the LysR family of bacterial transcriptional regulators including the oxidative stress regulator OxyR [81]. An lsrB deletion mutant has a reduced pool of GSH, and LsrB inactivation accordingly results in the decreased expression of genes involved in GSH metabolism (gshA, gshB, gor) both in free-living and in planta [82,83]. The regulator was shown to directly activate the expression of gshA, and to respond to cellular redox changes via the three reactive cysteines in the substrate-binding domain [83]. LsrB also positively regulates the expression of genes involved in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis [84]. Nodules induced by mutants defective in LsrB undergo premature senescence coupled to impaired bacteroid differentiation and ROS accumulation, which could be partly due to GSH deficiency [83]. Several genes of the Trx/Grx systems belong to the RpoH1 regulon. RpoH1 is one of the 14 alternative sigma factors encoded in the S. meliloti genome. The presence of multiple RpoHs in S. meliloti and other alpha proteobacteria is correlated with a diverse lifestyle. RpoH1 regulates gene expression in response to acidic pH stress [85,86], heat shock, and stationary phase [87], and was also involved in maintaining the redox status of the cell challenged with H2O2 [88]. A rpoH1 mutant is capable of eliciting the formation of nodules on alfalfa plants, but shows poor survival after its release in plant cells and barely fixes N2 [89]. In addition to environmental stresses encountered both in free-living state and in planta, the S. meliloti microsymbiont is challenged with hundreds of peptides secreted by the host-plant, and largely involved in controlling bacterial populations during nodule development and functioning [90]. Transcriptome analyses of cultures challenged with two cationic NCR peptides exhibiting antimicrobial activities, NCR247 and NCR335, showed upregulation of genes involved in stress adaptation such as Smgrx1 and trxA [91], see Table 3. This effect might be mediated via RpoH1, as the rpoH1 gene itself was induced by NCR treatment [91].
Other, still unknown transcription factors and signals are likely also to be involved in the regulation of Grx/Trx systems, and other regulatory mechanisms as well. For example, the expression of gshB and Smgrx2 is very low in zone III whereas the activity of GSHS and SmGrx2 is required in this zone, indicating that post-transcriptional regulation mechanism(s) could play a significant role.
Some well-known target proteins of Trx or Grx have a high expression level inside the nodules and might contribute to their optimal development (Table 3). Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) plays a central role in DNA replication and repair by catalyzing production of deoxyribonucleotides from the corresponding ribonucleotides. Both Trx and Grx were identified as being dithiol electron donors for the E. coli RNR [92]. There are three major classes of RNRs based on the metallocofactors necessary for nucleotide reduction. S. meliloti requires a cobalamin-dependent class II RNR for symbiosis with M. sativa [93]. This RNR is most likely involved in DNA synthesis during bacteroid differentiation, when cells undergo endoreduplication, and later in DNA repair within differentiated bacteroids. The nrdJ gene encoding RNR has a maximal expression in zone III, suggesting that the level of RNR synthesis and DNA repair mechanisms are tightly linked in bacteroids. Trxs are also involved in protein repair by providing the electrons to peptide methionine sulfoxide reductases (MsrA/MsrB), which catalyze the reduction of methionine sulfoxides (S- and R-MetSO diastereosisomers respectively) back to methionine [94]. Three msrA and three msrB genes are present in the genome of S. meliloti. The highest level of msrA/msrB expression in nodules is observed in the differentiation and nitrogen fixation zones, a feature probably correlated to an increased methionine oxidation once bacteroid differentiation has begun. Most msrA/msrB genes are controlled by RpoH1, which underlines the coordinated expression of genes encoding components of Trx system and their targets.
S. meliloti encodes thiol-base peroxidases of distinct families, one typical 1-Cys peroxiredoxin (product of SMb20964), and two organic hydroperoxide resistance thiol peroxidase paralogs from the OsmC/Ohr family [95]. Whereas Ohr proteins used a lipoylated protein as reductant, the bacterial 1-Cys or 2-Cys peroxiredoxins can use Trx or GSH as reductants to support small alkyl peroxide or H2O2 reductase activity [96,97]. The S. meliloti 1-Cys peroxiredoxin is upregulated in cultures challenged with H2O2 via an OxyR-dependent mechanism [88]. The corresponding protein has been identified in nodules [98] and transcripts were detected in bacteroids mostly in zone III [50], suggesting a role in nodule functioning. In R. etli, the typical 2-Cys peroxiredoxin PrxS uses the thioredoxin system for H2O2 reductase activity. The R. etli double mutant prxS-katG, deficient for both peroxidoxin and catalase-dependent H2O2 reduction, induced nodules with reduced nitrogen-fixation capability [99].
In conclusion, these data suggest the existence of a complex oxidative stress response network involving Grx and Trx to control protein redox state, and which allow bacteria to adapt to the host cell environment.

4. Conclusions

During the last years, many advances have been made in the characterization of redox regulatory systems and their roles in the two partners of nitrogen-fixing symbiosis (Figure 2). The development of genomic and transcriptomic analyses allowed to better characterize the gene families involved in redox metabolism and to define their expression regulation. A new research track was also opened with the redox regulation of the cross-talk between plant and bacteria, exemplified by Trx s1. However, these advances are revealing the complexity of the regulatory mechanisms and an increased number of key regulatory actors, as illustrated by the amazing high number of Grxs and Trxs in the plant partner. Characterizing the most promising candidates represents an important task both at the scientific level and in terms of work amount. Moreover, many lines of research remain to be opened. One of them is to assemble the different pieces of the “redox puzzle”, taking into account the redox post-transcriptional regulation signals including oxidation, nitrosylation, and glutathionylation. In this perspective, the development of redox proteomics and laser microdissection will allow the large-scale identification of proteins that are modified in response to specific stimuli in specific cell types. Another crucial task would be the use of this huge amount of knowledge to improve the resistance of nitrogen fixation efficiency to abiotic stresses. Intensive farming leads to a significant increase in surfaces affected by drought or salinity, which particularly impairs nitrogen fixation. In the context of sustainable agriculture, the use of redox components as markers for symbiotic efficiency or as genetic material to improve plant breeding or bacterial inoculum is of crucial importance.

Funding

This work was supported by the "Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique”, the “Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique”, the University of Nice—Sophia Antipolis and the French Government (National Research Agency, ANR) through the “Investments for the Future” LABEX SIGNALIFE: program reference #ANR-11-LABX-0028-01.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Li Yang for providing the document for Figure 1. We thank the Microscopy and the Analytical Biochemistry Platforms—Sophia Agrobiotech Institut—INRA 1355—UNS—CNRS 7254—INRA PACA-Sophia Antipolis for access to instruments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, W.; Shi, J.; Xie, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Yu, N.; Wang, E. Nutrient exchange and regulation in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 1147–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Martin, F.M.; Uroz, S.; Barker, D.G. Ancestral alliances: Plant mutualistic symbioses with fungi and bacteria. Science 2017, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhu, H. Genetic and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Symbiotic Specificity in Legume-Rhizobium Interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Oldroyd, G.E. Speak, friend, and enter: Signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 252–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Oldroyd, G.E.; Murray, J.D.; Poole, P.S.; Downie, J.A. The rules of engagement in the legume-rhizobial symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011, 45, 119–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Maroti, G.; Kondorosi, E. Nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium-legume symbiosis: Are polyploidy and host peptide-governed symbiont differentiation general principles of endosymbiosis? Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 326. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Hirsch, A.M. Developmental biology of legume nodulation. New Phytol. 1992, 122, 211–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Pierre, O.; Hopkins, J.; Combier, M.; Baldacci, F.; Engler, G.; Brouquisse, R.; Herouart, D.; Boncompagni, E. Involvement of papain and legumain proteinase in the senescence process of Medicago truncatula nodules. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 849–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kondorosi, E.; Kondorosi, A. Endoreduplication and activation of the anaphase-promoting complex during symbiotic cell development. FEBS Lett. 2004, 567, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Vinardell, J.M.; Fedorova, E.; Cebolla, A.; Kevei, Z.; Horvath, G.; Kelemen, Z.; Tarayre, S.; Roudier, F.; Mergaert, P.; Kondorosi, A. Endoreduplication mediated by the anaphase-promoting complex activator CCS52A is required for symbiotic cell differentiation in Medicago truncatula nodules. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2093–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kondorosi, E.; Mergaert, P.; Kereszt, A. A paradigm for endosymbiotic life: Cell differentiation of Rhizobium bacteria provoked by host plant factors. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 67, 611–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mergaert, P.; Nikovics, K.; Kelemen, Z.; Maunoury, N.; Vaubert, D.; Kondorosi, A.; Kondorosi, E. A novel family in Medicago truncatula consisting of more than 300 nodule-specific genes coding for small, secreted polypeptides with conserved cysteine motifs. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Horvath, B.; Domonkos, A.; Kereszt, A.; Szucs, A.; Abraham, E.; Ayaydin, F.; Boka, K.; Chen, Y.; Chen, R.; Murray, J.D.; et al. Loss of the nodule-specific cysteine rich peptide, NCR169, abolishes symbiotic nitrogen fixation in the Medicago truncatula dnf7 mutant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 15232–15237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Kim, M.; Chen, Y.; Xi, J.; Waters, C.; Chen, R.; Wang, D. An antimicrobial peptide essential for bacterial survival in the nitrogen-fixing symbiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 15238–15243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Puppo, A.; Pauly, N.; Boscari, A.; Mandon, K.; Brouquisse, R. Hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide: Key regulators of the Legume-Rhizobium and mycorrhizal symbioses. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 2202–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hichri, I.; Boscari, A.; Castella, C.; Rovere, M.; Puppo, A.; Brouquisse, R. Nitric oxide: A multifaceted regulator of the nitrogen-fixing symbiosis. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2877–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Frendo, P.; Matamoros, M.A.; Alloing, G.; Becana, M. Thiol-based redox signaling in the nitrogen-fixing symbiosis. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Ribeiro, C.W.; Alloing, G.; Mandon, K.; Frendo, P. Redox regulation of differentiation in symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1850, 1469–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Klapheck, S. Homoglutathione: Isolation, quantification and occurrence in legumes. Physiol. Plant. 1988, 74, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Frendo, P.; Jimenez, M.J.; Mathieu, C.; Duret, L.; Gallesi, D.; Van de Sype, G.; Herouart, D.; Puppo, A. A Medicago truncatula homoglutathione synthetase is derived from glutathione synthetase by gene duplication. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 1706–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Matamoros, M.A.; Clemente, M.R.; Sato, S.; Asamizu, E.; Tabata, S.; Ramos, J.; Moran, J.F.; Stiller, J.; Gresshoff, P.M.; Becana, M. Molecular analysis of the pathway for the synthesis of thiol tripeptides in the model legume Lotus japonicus. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2003, 16, 1039–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Matamoros, M.A.; Moran, J.F.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Rubio, M.C.; Becana, M. Glutathione and homoglutathione synthesis in legume root nodules. Plant Physiol. 1999, 121, 879–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bergmann, L.R.H. Glutathione metabolism in plants. In Sulphur Nutrition and Assimilation in Higher Plants; DeKok, S.I., Rennenberg, H., Brunold, C., Rauser, W., Eds.; SPB Academic Publishing: The Hague, The Netherlands, 1993; pp. 109–124. [Google Scholar]
  24. Meyer, A.J.; May, M.J.; Fricker, M. Quantitative in vivo measurement of glutathione in Arabidopsis cells. Plant J. 2001, 27, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kalloniati, C.; Krompas, P.; Karalias, G.; Udvardi, M.K.; Rennenberg, H.; Herschbach, C.; Flemetakis, E. Nitrogen-fixing nodules are an important source of reduced sulfur, which triggers global changes in sulfur metabolism in Lotus japonicus. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 2384–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Thal, B.; Braun, H.P.; Eubel, H. Proteomic analysis dissects the impact of nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation on Vicia faba root nodule physiology. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 97, 233–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Krusell, L.; Krause, K.; Ott, T.; Desbrosses, G.; Kramer, U.; Sato, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Tabata, S.; James, E.K.; Sandal, N.; et al. The sulfate transporter SST1 is crucial for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Lotus japonicus root nodules. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1625–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wienkoop, S.; Saalbach, G. Proteome analysis. Novel proteins identified at the peribacteroid membrane from Lotus japonicus root nodules. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 1080–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Clarke, V.C.; Loughlin, P.C.; Gavrin, A.; Chen, C.; Brear, E.M.; Day, D.A.; Smith, P.M. Proteomic analysis of the soybean symbiosome identifies new symbiotic proteins. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2015, 14, 1301–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Macnicol, P.K.; Randall, P.J. Changes in the levels of major sulfur metabolites and free amino acids in pea cotyledons recovering from sulfur deficiency. Plant Physiol. 1987, 83, 354–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Heras, B.; Matamoros, M.A.; Ramos, J.; Moran, J.F.; Becana, M. Cloning and functional characterization of a homoglutathione synthetase from pea nodules. Physiol. Plant 2002, 115, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Galant, A.; Preuss, M.; Cameron, J.; Jez, J. Plant Glutathione Biosynthesis: Diversity in Biochemical Regulation and Reaction Products. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Frendo, P.; Mathieu, C.; Van de Sype, G.; Herouart, D.; Puppo, A. Characterisation of a cDNA encoding gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase in Medicago truncatula. Free Radic. Res. 1999, 31, S213–S218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dalton, D.A.; Baird, L.M.; Langeberg, L.; Taugher, C.Y.; Anyan, W.R.; Vance, C.P.; Sarath, G. Subcellular localization of oxygen defense enzymes in Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) root nodules. Plant Physiol. 1993, 102, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Evans, P.J.; Gallesi, D.; Mathieu, C.; Hernandez, M.J.; de Felipe, M.; Halliwell, B.; Puppo, A. Oxidative stress occurs during soybean nodule senescence. Planta 1999, 208, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Groten, K.; Vanacker, H.; Dutilleul, C.; Bastian, F.; Bernard, S.; Carzaniga, R.; Foyer, C.H. The roles of redox processes in pea nodule development and senescence. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 1293–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Escuredo, P.R.; Minchin, F.R.; Gogorcena, Y.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Klucas, R.V.; Becana, M. Involvement of activated oxygen in nitrate-Induced senescence of pea root nodules. Plant Physiol. 1996, 110, 1187–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gogorcena, Y.; Gordon, A.J.; Escuredo, P.R.; Minchin, F.R.; Witty, J.F.; Moran, J.F.; Becana, M. N2 fixation, carbon metabolism and oxidative damage in nodules of dark stressed common bean plants. Plant Physiol. 1997, 113, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Matamoros, M.A.; Baird, L.M.; Escuredo, P.R.; Dalton, D.A.; Minchin, F.R.; Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I.; Rubio, M.C.; Moran, J.F.; Gordon, A.J.; Becana, M. Stress induced legume root nodule senescence. Physiological, biochemical and structural alterations. Plant Physiol. 1999, 121, 97–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Marino, D.; Frendo, P.; Ladrera, R.; Zabalza, A.; Puppo, A.; Arrese-Igor, C.; Gonzalez, E.M. Nitrogen fixation control under drought stress. Localized or systemic? Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1968–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Naya, L.; Ladrera, R.; Ramos, J.; Gonzalez, E.M.; Arrese-Igor, C.; Minchin, F.R.; Becana, M. The response of carbon metabolism and antioxidant defenses of alfalfa nodules to drought stress and to the subsequent recovery of plants. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1104–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Frendo, P.; Harrison, J.; Norman, C.; Hernandez Jimenez, M.J.; Van de Sype, G.; Gilabert, A.; Puppo, A. Glutathione and homoglutathione play a critical role in the nodulation process of Medicago truncatula. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2005, 18, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vernoux, T.; Wilson, R.C.; Seeley, K.A.; Reichheld, J.P.; Muroy, S.; Brown, S.; Maughan, S.C.; Cobbett, C.S.; Van Montagu, M.; Inze, D.; et al. The ROOT MERISTEMLESS1/CADMIUM SENSITIVE2 gene defines a glutathione-dependent pathway involved in initiation and maintenance of cell division during postembryonic root development. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Reichheld, J.P.; Khafif, M.; Riondet, C.; Droux, M.; Bonnard, G.; Meyer, Y. Inactivation of thioredoxin reductases reveals a complex interplay between thioredoxin and glutathione pathways in Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 1851–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schippers, J.H.; Foyer, C.H.; van Dongen, J.T. Redox regulation in shoot growth, SAM maintenance and flowering. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 29, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pucciariello, C.; Innocenti, G.; Van de Velde, W.; Lambert, A.; Hopkins, J.; Clement, M.; Ponchet, M.; Pauly, N.; Goormachtig, S.; Holsters, M.; et al. (Homo)glutathione depletion modulates host gene expression during the symbiotic interaction between Medicago truncatula and Sinorhizobium meliloti. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 1186–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. El Msehli, S.; Lambert, A.; Baldacci-Cresp, F.; Hopkins, J.; Boncompagni, E.; Smiti, S.A.; Herouart, D.; Frendo, P. Crucial role of (homo)glutathione in nitrogen fixation in Medicago truncatula nodules. New Phytol. 2011, 192, 496–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rouhier, N.; Couturier, J.; Johnson, M.K.; Jacquot, J.P. Glutaredoxins: Roles in iron homeostasis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Meyer, Y.; Belin, C.; Delorme-Hinoux, V.; Reichheld, J.P.; Riondet, C. Thioredoxin and glutaredoxin systems in plants: Molecular mechanisms, crosstalks, and functional significance. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 17, 1124–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Roux, B.; Rodde, N.; Jardinaud, M.F.; Timmers, T.; Sauviac, L.; Cottret, L.; Carrère, S.; Sallet, E.; Courcelle, E.; Moreau, S.; et al. An integrated analysis of plant and bacterial gene expression in symbiotic root nodules using laser-capture microdissection coupled to RNA sequencing. Plant J. 2014, 77, 817–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Gelhaye, E.; Rouhier, N.; Gerard, J.; Jolivet, Y.; Gualberto, J.; Navrot, N.; Ohlsson, P.I.; Wingsle, G.; Hirasawa, M.; Knaff, D.B.; et al. A specific form of thioredoxin h occurs in plant mitochondria and regulates the alternative oxidase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 14545–14550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Renard, M.; Alkhalfioui, F.; Schmitt-Keichinger, C.; Ritzenthaler, C.; Montrichard, F. Identification and characterization of thioredoxin h isoforms differentially expressed in germinating seeds of the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 1113–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Meyer, Y.; Buchanan, B.B.; Vignols, F.; Reichheld, J.P. Thioredoxins and glutaredoxins: Unifying elements in redox biology. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2009, 43, 335–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pulido, P.; Cazalis, R.; Cejudo, F.J. An antioxidant redox system in the nucleus of wheat seed cells suffering oxidative stress. Plant J. 2009, 57, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Marchal, C.; Delorme-Hinoux, V.; Bariat, L.; Siala, W.; Belin, C.; Saez-Vasquez, J.; Riondet, C.; Reichheld, J.P. NTR/NRX define a new thioredoxin system in the nucleus of Arabidopsis thaliana cells. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 30–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alkhalfioui, F.; Renard, M.; Frendo, P.; Keichinger, C.; Meyer, Y.; Gelhaye, E.; Hirasawa, M.; Knaff, D.B.; Ritzenthaler, C.; Montrichard, F. A novel type of thioredoxin dedicated to symbiosis in legumes. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 424–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tovar-Mendez, A.; Matamoros, M.A.; Bustos-Sanmamed, P.; Dietz, K.J.; Cejudo, F.J.; Rouhier, N.; Sato, S.; Tabata, S.; Becana, M. Peroxiredoxins and NADPH-dependent thioredoxin systems in the model legume Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1535–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lee, M.Y.; Shin, K.H.; Kim, Y.K.; Suh, J.Y.; Gu, Y.Y.; Kim, M.R.; Hur, Y.S.; Son, O.; Kim, J.S.; Song, E.; et al. Induction of thioredoxin is required for nodule development to reduce reactive oxygen species levels in soybean roots. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1881–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Du, H.; Kim, S.; Nam, K.H.; Lee, M.S.; Son, O.; Lee, S.H.; Cheon, C.I. Identification of uricase as a potential target of plant thioredoxin: Implication in the regulation of nodule development. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 397, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ribeiro, C.W.; Baldacci-Cresp, F.; Pierre, O.; Larousse, M.; Benyamina, S.; Lambert, A.; Hopkins, J.; Castella, C.; Cazareth, J.; Alloing, G.; et al. Regulation of differentiation of nitrogen-fixing bacteria by microsymbiont targeting of plant thioredoxin s1. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rouhier, N.; Jacquot, J.P. The plant multigenic family of thiol peroxidases. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2005, 38, 1413–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Castella, C.; Mirtziou, I.; Seassau, A.; Boscari, A.; Montrichard, F.; Papadopoulou, K.; Rouhier, N.; Puppo, A.; Brouquisse, R. Post-translational modifications of Medicago truncatula glutathione peroxidase 1 induced by nitric oxide. Nitric Oxide 2017, 68, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ramos, J.; Matamoros, M.A.; Naya, L.; James, E.K.; Rouhier, N.; Sato, S.; Tabata, S.; Becana, M. The glutathione peroxidase gene family of Lotus japonicus: Characterization of genomic clones, expression analyses and immunolocalization in legumes. New Phytol. 2009, 181, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Matamoros, M.A.; Saiz, A.; Penuelas, M.; Bustos-Sanmamed, P.; Mulet, J.M.; Barja, M.V.; Rouhier, N.; Moore, M.; James, E.K.; Dietz, K.J.; et al. Function of glutathione peroxidases in legume root nodules. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 2979–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Matamoros, M.A.; Fernandez-Garcia, N.; Wienkoop, S.; Loscos, J.; Saiz, A.; Becana, M. Mitochondria are an early target of oxidative modifications in senescing legume nodules. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 873–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Groten, K.; Dutilleul, C.; van Heerden, P.D.; Vanacker, H.; Bernard, S.; Finkemeier, I.; Dietz, K.J.; Foyer, C.H. Redox regulation of peroxiredoxin and proteinases by ascorbate and thiols during pea root nodule senescence. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 1269–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Harrison, J.; Jamet, A.; Muglia, C.I.; Van de Sype, G.; Aguilar, O.M.; Puppo, A.; Frendo, P. Glutathione plays a fundamental role in growth and symbiotic capacity of Sinorhizobium meliloti. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Muglia, C.; Comai, G.; Spegazzini, E.; Riccillo, P.M.; Aguilar, O.M. Glutathione produced by Rhizobium tropici is important to prevent early senescence in common bean nodules. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 23, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tate, R.; Cermola, M.; Riccio, A.; Diez-Roux, G.; Patriarca, E.J. Glutathione is required by Rhizobium etli for glutamine utilization and symbiotic effectiveness. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sobrevals, L.; Muller, P.; Fabra, A.; Castro, S. Role of glutathione in the growth of Bradyrhizobium sp. (peanut microsymbiont) under different environmental stresses and in symbiosis with the host plant. Can. J. Microbiol. 2006, 52, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tang, G.; Li, N.; Liu, Y.; Yu, L.; Yan, J.; Luo, L. Sinorhizobium meliloti Glutathione Reductase Is Required for both Redox Homeostasis and Symbiosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cheng, G.; Karunakaran, R.; East, A.K.; Munoz-Azcarate, O.; Poole, P.S. Glutathione affects the transport activity of Rhizobium leguminosarum 3841 and is essential for efficient nodulation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Benyamina, S.M.; Baldacci-Cresp, F.; Couturier, J.; Chibani, K.; Hopkins, J.; Bekki, A.; de Lajudie, P.; Rouhier, N.; Jacquot, J.P.; Alloing, G.; et al. Two Sinorhizobium meliloti glutaredoxins regulate iron metabolism and symbiotic bacteroid differentiation. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 795–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Spatzal, T.; Aksoyoglu, M.; Zhang, L.; Andrade, S.L.; Schleicher, E.; Weber, S.; Rees, D.C.; Einsle, O. Evidence for interstitial carbon in nitrogenase FeMo cofactor. Science 2011, 334, 940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sasaki, S.; Minamisawa, K.; Mitsui, H. A Sinorhizobium meliloti RpoH-regulated gene is involved in iron-sulfur protein metabolism and effective plant symbiosis under intrinsic iron limitation. J. Bacteriol. 2016, 198, 2297–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Prinz, W.A.; Aslund, F.; Holmgren, A.; Beckwith, J. The role of the thioredoxin and glutaredoxin pathways in reducing protein disulfide bonds in the Escherichia coli cytoplasm. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 15661–15667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Castro-Sowinski, S.; Matan, O.; Bonafede, P.; Okon, Y. A thioredoxin of Sinorhizobium meliloti CE52G is required for melanin production and symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2007, 20, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Vargas, C.; Wu, G.; Davies, A.E.; Downie, J.A. Identification of a gene encoding a thioredoxin-like product necessary for cytochrome c biosynthesis and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 4117–4123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abicht, H.K.; Scharer, M.A.; Quade, N.; Ledermann, R.; Mohorko, E.; Capitani, G.; Hennecke, H.; Glockshuber, R. How periplasmic thioredoxin TlpA reduces bacterial copper chaperone ScoI and cytochrome oxidase subunit II (CoxB) prior to metallation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 32431–32444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Luo, L.; Yao, S.Y.; Becker, A.; Ruberg, S.; Yu, G.Q.; Zhu, J.B.; Cheng, H.P. Two new Sinorhizobium meliloti LysR-type transcriptional regulators required for nodulation. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 4562–4572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Imlay, J.A. Transcription factors that defend bacteria against reactive oxygen species. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 69, 93–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lu, D.; Tang, G.; Wang, D.; Luo, L. The Sinorhizobium meliloti LysR family transcriptional factor LsrB is involved in regulation of glutathione biosynthesis. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai) 2013, 45, 882–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tang, G.; Xing, S.; Wang, S.; Yu, L.; Li, X.; Staehelin, C.; Yang, M.; Luo, L. Regulation of cysteine residues in LsrB proteins from Sinorhizobium meliloti under free-living and symbiotic oxidative stress. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 5130–5145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tang, G.; Wang, Y.; Luo, L. Transcriptional regulator LsrB of Sinorhizobium meliloti positively regulates the expression of genes involved in lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 5265–5273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ono, Y.; Mitsui, H.; Sato, T.; Minamisawa, K. Two RpoH homologs responsible for the expression of heat shock protein genes in Sinorhizobium meliloti. Mol. Gen. Genet. 2001, 264, 902–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. De Lucena, D.K.; Puhler, A.; Weidner, S. The role of sigma factor RpoH1 in the pH stress response of Sinorhizobium meliloti. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Barnett, M.J.; Bittner, A.N.; Toman, C.J.; Oke, V.; Long, S.R. Dual RpoH sigma factors and transcriptional plasticity in a symbiotic bacterium. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 4983–4994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lehman, A.P.; Long, S.R. OxyR-dependent transcription response of Sinorhizobium meliloti to oxidative stress. J. Bacteriol. 2018, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mitsui, H.; Sato, T.; Sato, Y.; Ito, N.; Minamisawa, K. Sinorhizobium meliloti RpoH1 is required for effective nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with alfalfa. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2004, 271, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kereszt, A.; Mergaert, P.; Montiel, J.; Endre, G.; Kondorosi, E. Impact of plant peptides on symbiotic nodule development and functioning. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tiricz, H.; Szucs, A.; Farkas, A.; Pap, B.; Lima, R.M.; Maroti, G.; Kondorosi, E.; Kereszt, A. Antimicrobial nodule-specific cysteine-rich peptides induce membrane depolarization-associated changes in the transcriptome of Sinorhizobium meliloti. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 6737–6746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gon, S.; Faulkner, M.J.; Beckwith, J. In vivo requirement for glutaredoxins and thioredoxins in the reduction of the ribonucleotide reductases of Escherichia coli. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2006, 8, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Taga, M.E.; Walker, G.C. Sinorhizobium meliloti requires a cobalamin-dependent ribonucleotide reductase for symbiosis with its plant host. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 1643–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Ezraty, B.; Aussel, L.; Barras, F. Methionine sulfoxide reductases in prokaryotes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1703, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Fontenelle, C.; Blanco, C.; Arrieta, M.; Dufour, V.; Trautwetter, A. Resistance to organic hydroperoxides requires ohr and ohrR genes in Sinorhizobium meliloti. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Barranco-Medina, S.; Lazaro, J.J.; Dietz, K.J. The oligomeric conformation of peroxiredoxins links redox state to function. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 1809–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Cussiol, J.R.; Alegria, T.G.; Szweda, L.I.; Netto, L.E. Ohr (organic hydroperoxide resistance protein) possesses a previously undescribed activity, lipoyl-dependent peroxidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 21943–21950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Djordjevic, M.A.; Chen, H.C.; Natera, S.; Van Noorden, G.; Menzel, C.; Taylor, S.; Renard, C.; Geiger, O.; the Sinorhizobium DNA Sequencing Consortium; Weiller, G.F. A global analysis of protein expression profiles in Sinorhizobium meliloti: Discovery of new genes for nodule occupancy and stress adaptation. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2003, 16, 508–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dombrecht, B.; Heusdens, C.; Beullens, S.; Verreth, C.; Mulkers, E.; Proost, P.; Vanderleyden, J.; Michiels, J. Defence of Rhizobium etli bacteroids against oxidative stress involves a complexly regulated atypical 2-Cys peroxiredoxin. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1207–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antioxidants 07 00182 g001 550
Figure 1. The indeterminate root nodule structure in Medicago truncatula. (A) Longitudinal section of indeterminate nodule 3 weeks post infection (wpi) with the apical meristem (I), the infection zone (II), and the nitrogen-fixing zone (III). (B–D) Longitudinal section of wild-type nodules 3 wpi analyzed by confocal microscopy with S. meliloti DNA stained with SYTO9 (green) and plant nuclei stained with propidium iodide (red) [8]. (C) The size of plant cells and of plant cell nuclei increases during cellular differentiation and intracellular bacterial infection occurs in zone II. (D) The nitrogen-fixing cells in zone III are fully packed with numerous elongated endosymbiotic bacteria called symbiosomes. Bars: (A) 200 µm; (B) 100 µm; (C) 10 µm; (D) 50 µm.
Figure 1. The indeterminate root nodule structure in Medicago truncatula. (A) Longitudinal section of indeterminate nodule 3 weeks post infection (wpi) with the apical meristem (I), the infection zone (II), and the nitrogen-fixing zone (III). (B–D) Longitudinal section of wild-type nodules 3 wpi analyzed by confocal microscopy with S. meliloti DNA stained with SYTO9 (green) and plant nuclei stained with propidium iodide (red) [8]. (C) The size of plant cells and of plant cell nuclei increases during cellular differentiation and intracellular bacterial infection occurs in zone II. (D) The nitrogen-fixing cells in zone III are fully packed with numerous elongated endosymbiotic bacteria called symbiosomes. Bars: (A) 200 µm; (B) 100 µm; (C) 10 µm; (D) 50 µm.
Antioxidants 07 00182 g001
Antioxidants 07 00182 g002 550
Figure 2. An overview of the physiological importance of Trx and Grx networks in rhizobium–legume symbiosis. Redox networks of glutaredoxin and thioredoxin systems in the two symbiotic partners is shown. The roles of (h)GSH, Grxs, and Trxs (grey squares) are indicated for bacteria (brown arrow) and for plants (green arrow). See text for details.
Figure 2. An overview of the physiological importance of Trx and Grx networks in rhizobium–legume symbiosis. Redox networks of glutaredoxin and thioredoxin systems in the two symbiotic partners is shown. The roles of (h)GSH, Grxs, and Trxs (grey squares) are indicated for bacteria (brown arrow) and for plants (green arrow). See text for details.
Antioxidants 07 00182 g002
Table
Table 1. Expression of plant sulfate transporters in M. truncatula nodules. Gene accession numbers are indicated in the table. Gene annotation is based on candidate orthologues and interprodomain signature. The different columns correspond to root and nodule whole organ analysis (Root and Nodule) and to the nodule zones : meristematic zone (I), distal infection zone (IId), proximal infection zone (IIp), infection/fixation interzone (IZ II-III) and nitrogen-fixation zone (III). The numbers in the different columns correspond to Total Reads ribominus. All RNA-seq read values were normalized [50]. The total reads are reported from the symbimics bioinformatics website. The full organs are nitrogen starved Roots and 10 days old nodules. The red and blue colours correspond respectively to higher and lower significant differences between the organs (roots and nodules) and between the different nodule zones. The statistical differences are reported from the symbimics bioinformatics website.
Table 1. Expression of plant sulfate transporters in M. truncatula nodules. Gene accession numbers are indicated in the table. Gene annotation is based on candidate orthologues and interprodomain signature. The different columns correspond to root and nodule whole organ analysis (Root and Nodule) and to the nodule zones : meristematic zone (I), distal infection zone (IId), proximal infection zone (IIp), infection/fixation interzone (IZ II-III) and nitrogen-fixation zone (III). The numbers in the different columns correspond to Total Reads ribominus. All RNA-seq read values were normalized [50]. The total reads are reported from the symbimics bioinformatics website. The full organs are nitrogen starved Roots and 10 days old nodules. The red and blue colours correspond respectively to higher and lower significant differences between the organs (roots and nodules) and between the different nodule zones. The statistical differences are reported from the symbimics bioinformatics website.
Gene NameRootNoduleIIIdIIpIZ II-IIIIII
Sulfate transporter
Medtr7g09543013071297724199
Medtr4g084620298176139434429
Mt0062_101155454830154289235361
Medtr4g01197063310523071721306410941406
Medtr3g0877304876118530108832392
Medtr5g0618608714494142213131742
Medtr6g0861704548,52714291566689812,537
Medtr3g0737302202024110
Medtr5g061880200431514233
Medtr2g1022433221931918110
Medtr2g008470140625311178
Medtr3g0877402150854191716413
Mt0050_000720000000
Medtr4g0846400000000
Mt0008_011490000000
Mt0008_110830000000
Medtr4g0638250610000
Mt0006_100021023000
Medtr2g0826103512000
Medtr3g0737809100001
Medtr1g07153034518422011
Medtr7g0228704644494852172039
Table
Table 2. Expression of glutaredoxins in M. truncatula nodules. Gene accession numbers are indicated in the table. Gene annotation is based on candidate orthologues and interprodomain signature. The different columns correspond to root and nodule whole organ analysis (Root and Nodule) and to the nodule zones: meristematic zone (I), distal infection zone (IId), proximal infection zone (IIp), infection/fixation interzone (IZ II-III) and nitrogen-fixation zone (III). The numbers in the different columns correspond to Total Reads ribominus. All RNA-seq read values were normalized [50]. The total reads are reported from the symbimics bioinformatics website. The full organs are nitrogen starved Roots and 10 days old nodules. The red and blue colours correspond respectively to higher and lower significant differences between the organs (roots and nodules) and between the different nodule zones. The statistical differences are reported from the symbimics bioinformatics website.
Table 2. Expression of glutaredoxins in M. truncatula nodules. Gene accession numbers are indicated in the table. Gene annotation is based on candidate orthologues and interprodomain signature. The different columns correspond to root and nodule whole organ analysis (Root and Nodule) and to the nodule zones: meristematic zone (I), distal infection zone (IId), proximal infection zone (IIp), infection/fixation interzone (IZ II-III) and nitrogen-fixation zone (III). The numbers in the different columns correspond to Total Reads ribominus. All RNA-seq read values were normalized [50]. The total reads are reported from the symbimics bioinformatics website. The full organs are nitrogen starved Roots and 10 days old nodules. The red and blue colours correspond respectively to higher and lower significant differences between the organs (roots and nodules) and between the different nodule zones. The statistical differences are reported from the symbimics bioinformatics website.
Gene namePutative redox siteRootNoduleIIIdIIpIZ II-IIIIII
Glutaredoxins
Class I
Medtr7g035245YCPFC26122354665163156238167
Medtr1g069255WCSYC121153544113510992
Medtr3g077560YCGYC131436621120
Medtr3g077570YCGYC20114827163315
Medtr2g038560YCPYC15731200425682837509297
Medtr5g021090YCPYC128414447697637250
Class II
Medtr2g103130QCGFS13321390380266323546302
Medtr4g079110GCCMS96818346236100
Medtr7g079520QCGFS77164017014310310762
Medtr4g088905KCGFS1444194027725219497105
Medtr4g016930LCGSF1242185766706571
Class III
Medtr7g026770TCCMC1313215000
Medtr3g104510SCCMC163213245396
Medtr1g088910SCYMC6226020000
Medtr1g015890SCCMC1443401001437562164258
Medtr2g090755GCCMS78387104123
Medtr2g014760GCCLC7146733198410
Medtr1g088925SCCLC474111000
Medtr1g088920LCCLC460310000
Medtr7g108200SCCLC165030821000
Medtr4g119030SCCMS0000000
Medtr2g048970SCCMS0000000
Medtr2g019950SCGMS0000000
Medtr4g119050SCCMS0000000
Medtr7g108250TCCLS0000000
Medtr7g108220SCYMC0000000
Medtr7g108250TCCLS0000000
Medtr7g022690SCCMC0000000
Medtr5g077550DCCFS0000000
Medtr1g088905TCCLS0010000
Mt0001_10735SCCMS0100000
Medtr7g022710SCCMC0010000
Medtr7g022550SCCMC0010000
Medtr7g108260TCPMS2400000
Medtr2g019900SCCMC168400000
Medtr7g108210SCYMC303010000
Table
Table 3. Expression of S. meliloti genes from the Grx and Trx systems in M. truncatula nodules and regulation in free-living bacteria. Gene accession numbers are indicated in the table. Gene annotation is based on candidate orthologs and interprodomain signature. The values corresponding to gene expression in root nodules are, from left to right, total reads from laser-capture microdissection (LCM) and their distribution in each zone (%), as reported by Roux and colleagues [50]. All RNA-seq read values were normalized. The full organs were 10-day old nodules. IZ, interzone; ZIII, zone III; FI, fraction I; FIId, distal fraction II; FIIp, proximal fraction II.
Table 3. Expression of S. meliloti genes from the Grx and Trx systems in M. truncatula nodules and regulation in free-living bacteria. Gene accession numbers are indicated in the table. Gene annotation is based on candidate orthologs and interprodomain signature. The values corresponding to gene expression in root nodules are, from left to right, total reads from laser-capture microdissection (LCM) and their distribution in each zone (%), as reported by Roux and colleagues [50]. All RNA-seq read values were normalized. The full organs were 10-day old nodules. IZ, interzone; ZIII, zone III; FI, fraction I; FIId, distal fraction II; FIIp, proximal fraction II.
S. meliloti GenesBacterial Gene Expression in M. truncatula NodulesTranscription FactorsInducing ConditionsReferences
Total reads LCM% FI% FIIp% FIId% IZ% FIII
Grx system
SMc00825 (gshA)38191622301616LsrBGSSG[82,83]
SMc00419 (gshB)64338924536LsrB, RpoH1 [82,87]
SMc00154 (gor)44771912282417LsrB, RpoH1 [82,87]
SMc02443 (Smgrx1)912376201651RpoH1low pH[86]
NCR247, NCR335[91]
SMc00538 (Smgrx2)10138242421229
SMa0280 (Smgrx3)15711718222221 HS[87]
Trx system
SMc02761 (trxA)55191310192137RpoH1HS[87]
NCR247, NCR335[91]
SMc0380127802018311417RpoH1
SMc01224 (trxB)53941817281324RpoH1low pH, HS[86,87]
Grx/Trx targets
SMc02885 (msrA1)2016118173233RpoH1low pH, HS[86,87]
NCR247, NCR335[91]
SMc02467 (msrA2)1690514224316
SMa1896 (msrA3)5512012262021RpoH1HS[87]
NCR247, NCR335[91]
H2O2[88]
SMc00117 (msrB1)7292413192320RpoH1HS[87]
SMa1894 (msrB2)107014172445RpoH1HS[87]
NCR247, NCR335[91]
H2O2[88]
SMc01724 (msrB3)795019231840
SMc01237 (nrdJ)33647974476
SMb2096413082999745OxyRH2O2[88]
GSSG, glutathione disulfide; HS, heat shock.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alloing, G.; Mandon, K.; Boncompagni, E.; Montrichard, F.; Frendo, P. Involvement of Glutaredoxin and Thioredoxin Systems in the Nitrogen-Fixing Symbiosis between Legumes and Rhizobia. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox7120182

AMA Style

Alloing G, Mandon K, Boncompagni E, Montrichard F, Frendo P. Involvement of Glutaredoxin and Thioredoxin Systems in the Nitrogen-Fixing Symbiosis between Legumes and Rhizobia. Antioxidants. 2018; 7(12):182. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox7120182

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alloing, Geneviève, Karine Mandon, Eric Boncompagni, Françoise Montrichard, and Pierre Frendo. 2018. "Involvement of Glutaredoxin and Thioredoxin Systems in the Nitrogen-Fixing Symbiosis between Legumes and Rhizobia" Antioxidants 7, no. 12: 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox7120182

APA Style

Alloing, G., Mandon, K., Boncompagni, E., Montrichard, F., & Frendo, P. (2018). Involvement of Glutaredoxin and Thioredoxin Systems in the Nitrogen-Fixing Symbiosis between Legumes and Rhizobia. Antioxidants, 7(12), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox7120182

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop