Next Article in Journal
Immunogenicity, Safety, and Immune Persistence of One Dose of SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Adenovirus Type-5 Vectored Vaccine in Children and Adolescents Aged 6–17 Years: An Immunobridging Trial
Next Article in Special Issue
Risk Factors for Impaired Cellular or Humoral Immunity after Three Doses of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Healthy and Immunocompromised Individuals
Previous Article in Journal
Water-Soluble and Freezable Aluminum Salt Vaccine Adjuvant
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Overview of the Strategies to Boost SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immunity in People with Inborn Errors of Immunity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/vaccines12060682
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hybrid Immunity and the Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections during the Omicron Era in Frontline Healthcare Workers

by
Carmen-Daniela Chivu
1,2,
Maria-Dorina Crăciun
1,2,*,
Daniela Pițigoi
1,3,†,
Victoria Aramă
3,4,
Monica Luminița Luminos
3,5,
Gheorghiță Jugulete
3,5,
Viorela Gabriela Nițescu
2,6,
Andreea Lescaie
2,6,
Cătălin Gabriel Apostolescu
3,4 and
Adrian Streinu Cercel
3,4,†
1
Department of Epidemiology 1, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
2
Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children “Grigore Alexandrescu”, 011743 Bucharest, Romania
3
National Institute for Infectious Diseases “Prof. Dr. Matei Balș”, 021105 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department of Infectious Diseases 1, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
5
Department of Infectious Diseases 3, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
6
Department of Pediatrics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Vaccines 2024, 12(6), 682; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12060682
Submission received: 24 May 2024 / Revised: 14 June 2024 / Accepted: 17 June 2024 / Published: 19 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Influence of Natural and/or Vaccine Immunity on the Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic healthcare workers (HCWs) acquired immunity by vaccination or exposure to multiple variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Our study is a comparative analysis between subgroups of HCWs constructed based on the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections, vaccination, and the dominant variant of SARS-CoV-2 in the population. We collected and analyzed data using the χ2 test and density incidence of reinfections in Microsoft Excel for Mac, Version 16.84, and MedCalc®, 22.026. Of the 829 HCWs, 70.1% (581) had only one SARS-CoV-2 infection and 29.9% (248) had two infections. Of the subjects with two infections, 77.4% (192) worked in high-risk departments and 93.2% (231) of the second infections were registered during Omicron dominance. The density incidence of reinfections was higher in HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule than those vaccinated with the first booster, and the incidence ratio was 2.8 (95% CI: 1.2; 6.7). The probability of reinfection was five times lower (95% CI: 2.9; 9.2) in HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule if the first infection was acquired during Omicron dominance. The subjects vaccinated with the first booster had a density incidence of reinfection three times lower (95% CI: 1.9; 5.8) if the first infection was during Omicron. The incidence ratio in subgroups constructed based on characteristics such as gender, age group, job category, and department also registered significant differences in density incidence. The history of SARS-CoV-2 infection by variant is important when interpreting and understanding public health data and the results of studies related to vaccine efficacy for hybrid immunity subgroup populations.

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic was declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) on 30 January 2020, based on International Health Regulations (IHR) [1,2]. The meeting of the IHR Emergency Committee on the COVID-19 pandemic on 4 May 2023 acknowledged that this public health emergency was an established and ongoing health issue [3,4]. During the time interval when COVID-19 was PHEIC, almost 7 million deaths and over 750 million confirmed cases were reported [5].
Due to the potential evolution of SARS-CoV-2, the WHO has recommended a long-term strategic attitude consisting of calibrated measures regarding research, public health interventions, and continuous collaborative surveillance [6,7]. Studies and public health indicators have shown a waning immunity against evolving variants of SARS-CoV-2, thus the WHO recommended vaccination and revaccination for priority groups [8]. The effectiveness of prevention and control strategies has also been proposed for monitoring [8].
Genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 showed an important genetic diversity, with an impact on transmission, case severity, and immunity escape of the virus. The variants of SARS-CoV-2 were named variants of concern (VOC) if important genetic mutations with an impact on transmission, severity, or immunity escape were acquired, or variants of interest and variants under monitoring in cases of minor mutations.
The laboratory testing of suspected cases and genome sequencing were guided through methodologies, also reporting the data [9,10,11,12]. The Romanian National Institute of Public Health (NIPH) released methodological criteria for the genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 [11]. Changes in the epidemiological, laboratory, and representativeness of the selection criteria are summarized in Supplemental Data S1. Reports regarding genomic surveillance were published weekly by the Romanian NIPH, starting from February 2021 [13]. Summarized data regarding the positive cases of SARS-CoV-2 VOC are presented in Supplemental Data S2.
In Romania, SARS-CoV-2 evolved from the ancestral variant (hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019) to Alpha (B1.1.7 lineage), Delta (B1.1617.2), and Omicron variants [13,14]. The Alpha variant (B1.1.7 lineage) was characterized by an increase in the severity of the cases and the transmission, with no impact on immunity escape. The Delta variant (B1.1617.2) exhibited an impact on immunity escape and a rise in the transmission and severity of cases. All Omicron variants for which evidence-based data existed were characterized by an increase in transmission, a decrease in the severity of the cases, and an impact on immunity protection after vaccination [15,16]. The mutation registered in the Omicron variants involved the spike protein and receptor binding domain. These mutations have affected the transmission dynamics and the targets of the neutralizing antibodies, resulting in a lower efficiency of the previous vaccination. Updated vaccines have been developed to address the decreasing immunity against new Omicron variants. Although the originally authorized vaccines continue to be efficient in preventing hospitalization, severe illness, and death, protection against mild and moderate clinical outcomes is low.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, HCWs acquired immunity induced by vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infection, or both. Recommendations for the use of updated vaccines for primary vaccination and re-vaccination have been made for risk groups [8,17]. In populations with hybrid immunity, the SARS-CoV-2 VOC, which determined the prior infection, may play an important role in individual protection and in the incidence of reinfections.
The current study continues and complements previous research on the risk of COVID-19 in HCWs in a designated hospital for treating COVID-19 patients in Bucharest, Romania. The previously published research evaluated the clinical outcome in relation to nonpharmacological protective measures, vaccination, and individual risk [18,19]. Data showed that risk factors associated with the severity of the first SARS-CoV-2 infection were exposure to COVID-19 confirmed cases, age, obesity and anemia [18]. The risk of COVID-19 across all clinical events was lower in HCWs with the first booster administered compared with the risk in HCWs with the primary schedule or who were nonvaccinated [19].
The current study aims to compare the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule and the first booster by estimating the density incidence of reinfections during the Omicron variant circulation in Romania. The study also considers the circulating variant of SARS-CoV-2 during the first infection of HCWs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Hospital Setting, Participants, and Definitions

During the COVID-19 pandemic in Romania, the National Institute for Infectious Diseases (INBI) “Professor Dr. Matei Balș” in Bucharest admitted multiple COVID-19 cases covering all pandemic waves. HCWs were actively surveyed, and epidemiological investigations were performed on a case-by-case basis, to establish risk factors related to work or individuals.
This retrospective cohort study included HCWs with previously confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The cases were identified and tested according to the national methodology and testing protocol [11]. Cases were suspected if the clinical criteria from the case definition were met, or if there was an identified high risk of exposure in the community or hospital. Laboratory criteria consisted of positive reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) or rapid antigen test (RAT).
Protection of HCWs during medical activities was provided through personal protective equipment (PPE) and vaccination campaigns when vaccines became available. HCWs were trained in the proper use of PPE as a specific regulation of the hospital. The vaccination campaign for the primary schedule started on 27 December 2020, and from September 2021 booster shots were administered. A vaccination center was established at the hospital level and HCWs were prioritized for vaccination.
The HCWs were included in the study based on their professional activity at INBI “Prof. Dr. Matei Balș”, as confirmed by their employment contract, and the history of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection detected according to national methodology [11]. The exclusion criteria were undetermined professional role, unknown infection status before vaccination, and uninfected HCWs. Reinfections were defined as confirmed cases by methodological laboratory testing at least 90 days apart from a previous infection. HCWs with more than two infections were registered; however, they did not meet all the study protocol criteria and were excluded from the analysis.
The HCWs were considered vaccinated with the primary schedule after 14 days from the last dose administered had elapsed. HCWs vaccinated with the first booster were represented by persons who received an additional dose of the vaccine at least six months after receiving the primary schedule. High-risk departments were defined as wards where there were identified possibilities for direct and indirect transmission by contact with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases or their contaminated environments. The healthcare auxiliary role was defined as employees who participated in activities related to the environment of the patients, but without performing any procedures (e.g., cleaning staff).
Hybrid immunity was defined as the immune protection of vaccinated individuals who had experienced at least one SARS-CoV-2 infection before or after the initiation of vaccination [20]. The history of SARS-CoV-2 infection by variant was assumed based on the circulant variant reported by the NIPH in Romania, with Omicron being dominant from January 2022 (Supplemental Datas S1 and S2) [13]. The study workflow and timeline of the surveyed events are shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Study Period

We analyzed the reinfection in HCWs from January 2022 to the end of May 2023, when SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants were dominant in Romania.

2.3. Data Sources and Collection

The primary data source was the register of HCWs constructed by the Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) team prospectively with data regarding age, gender, professional role, department of activity, laboratory tests, vaccination, and recommendations. Vaccination status was verified retrospectively from the National Electronic Registry of Vaccinations, along with information regarding the date of vaccination [21].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The comparison groups were independently constructed based on the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections, primary vaccination schedule, first booster shot, and history of the first SARS-CoV-2 infections during the Omicron era. A descriptive analysis of the study group and the infections and reinfections during SARS-CoV-2 VOC in HCWs was performed.
The comparative analysis used groups of HCWs without SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and HCWs with reinfections and characteristics such as age, gender, professional role, department, and vaccination status. We also compared groups of HCWs with the first SARS-CoV-2 infection acquired before or after the dominance of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants in Romania. We evaluated and compared the density incidence of reinfections in HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule and those vaccinated with the first booster.
Continuous and categorical variables were presented in mean, median, interquartile ranges (IQR), numbers, and percentages. Differences between the proportions of categorical variables were assessed using χ2 tests in MedCalc® 22.026 Software by Ostend, Belgium (https://www.medcalc.org; accessed on 1 March 2024). Density incidence was calculated based on the number of events in different groups of HCWs reported as the number of person-days of HCWs at risk [22]. The results are expressed in values per 10,000 person-days with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The comparison of the density incidence was made using the incidence ratio, with a threshold for significance of p-value < 0.05. Visualization of data was performed using Microsoft® Excel for Mac, Version 16.84.

2.5. Ethics Approval

The Institutional Bioethics Committee approved the study protocol with the registration numbers C02648/16.03.2022 and C08784/27.07.2023. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, only standard informed consent was required from the participants. Access to data was limited to the IPC team and study investigators, ensuring confidentiality.

3. Results

We included 829 participants with documented SARS-CoV-2 first infection, of which 70.1% (581) had no reinfection and 29.9% (248) had SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. The study group was composed of 84.3% (699) females with a median age of 44 years, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 36 to 51. Of the female participants, 41.5% (344) were nurses and 71.4% (592) worked in high-risk departments. Comparing the group of HCWs without SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and the group of HCWs with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, we found statistically significant differences regarding the frequency of the cases by department. In high-risk departments, we identified 77.4% (192) reinfections (p = 0.012). Detailed data regarding the descriptive demographics of HCWs from the study and comparison between groups are presented in Table 1.
Regarding vaccination status, the study group had 737 (88.9%) HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule, 301 (36.7%) vaccinated with the first booster, and 92 (11.1%) HCWs were unvaccinated. Among HCWs vaccinated with the first booster, only one person had an updated vaccine formula. The second booster was identified in 21 (6.9%) persons, of whom 9 (42.9%) were vaccinated with originally authorized vaccines and 12 (57%) had boosters with bivalent vaccines.
Descriptive data regarding the first SARS-CoV-2 infection and the reinfections in different periods of the COVID-19 pandemic defined by the dominance of SARS-CoV-2 variants in Romania, also correlated with data regarding vaccination, are presented in Table 2.
The data indicated that 45.6% (378) of the first SARS-CoV-2 infections were registered during the dominance of the ancestral variant of SARS-CoV-2 and 37.2% (308) during the Omicron variants. There were 248 (29.9%) reinfections, of which 93.2% (231) were detected during the Omicron dominance period. Of the SARS-CoV-2 reinfections during the Omicron period, 56.3% (130) were registered in HCWs vaccinated with the primary series and 31.2% (72) in HCWs who received the first booster. The reinfected HCWs had a median number of days since the last vaccine shot of 365 days (IQR: 238–519) if they were vaccinated with the primary schedule and 169 days (IQR: 99–361) if they acquired the first booster shot.
The vaccination campaign for HCWs commenced on 27 December 2020. The HCWs’ option regarding vaccination with the primary schedule continued until April 2022. The administration of booster shots started in September 2021, and the HCWs’ option regarding the first booster continued until September 2022.
Cumulative data regarding the first and second SARS-CoV-2 infections, vaccination status, and booster are represented graphically in Figure 2. The temporal representation of both the first and second SARS-CoV-2 infections pointed out a dramatic rise in the number of cases starting at the end of 2021, corresponding with the detection of Omicron variant BA.1 of SARS-CoV-2 in the community; in January 2022, the variant becoming dominant.

3.1. Reinfections during Omicron in Vaccinated HCWs

Comparing the density of incidence of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections of HCWs vaccinated with the primary series and those vaccinated with the first booster showed that the male HCWs vaccinated with the primary series had a density of incidence of 2.8 (95% CI: 1.2; 6.7) times higher than that of HCWs vaccinated with the first booster. Other groups also registered differences, but with no statistical significance indicated by a p-value > 0.05 or 95% confidence interval including a value of 1. Detailed data are presented in Table 3.

3.2. Reinfections in HCWs Vaccinated with the Primary Series by the History of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Overall, there were fewer COVID-19 cases in the group with a history of infection after January 2022. The incidence density of reinfections in HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule registered significant differences between groups constructed based on the history of infection before and after January 2022. HCWs with a history of COVID-19 before Omicron variant dominance had an incidence density 5.0 (95% CI 2.9; 9.2) times higher than HCWs with a history of COVID-19 after Omicron became dominant in Romania. Subgroups that had significant differences were females, with an incidence density in the group with a history of first COVID-19 before January 2022 that was 6.1 (95% CI 3.2; 13.1) times higher than in the group with a history of first infection after January 2022.
The incidence density by age groups indicated significant differences between age groups above 30 years, with a lower incidence density in the group with a history of infection after January 2022. The job category presented significant differences only for density incidence in the healthcare auxiliary and other categories. In both high-risk and low-risk departments, there were registered differences with lower values in the group of HCWs with a history of infection after January 2022. The data are presented in Table 4.

3.3. Reinfections in HCWs Vaccinated with the First Booster and the History of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Overall, there were fewer COVID-19 cases in the group with a history of infection after January 2022. The incidence density of reinfections in HCWs was significantly different between subgroups of females, age groups over 30 years, nurses, physicians, healthcare auxiliary personnel, and high-risk departments. All mentioned subgroups had a lower incidence density if the participants had a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection after January 2022. Detailed data are presented in Table 5.

4. Discussion

The present study identified aspects related to the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in HCWs, considering specific characteristics of the participants such as gender, age, occupational category, department of activity, vaccination status, and history of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection before or during Omicron dominance in Romania.
The first objective of this study was to compare groups to identify differences between HCWs without reinfection versus HCWs with reinfection during the study period. The current study showed that the characteristics represented by gender, age, and occupational category did not indicate statistically significant differences in the comparison of HCWs groups. Reinfections were more common in HCWs from high-risk departments. Our study detected a higher rate of reinfections in HCWs than other studies as the current study comprised a much longer time period and implied multiple variants of Omicron [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Also, in the studies performed during Omicron circulation the populations received multiple vaccine doses after the primary schedule [25,26,30,31].
We considered the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 in the community by establishing periods of dominance of VOC strains according to weekly reports from the Romanian NIPH. Thus, we had four periods: the initial variant of SARS-CoV-2 dominance (hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019), and the dominance of VOC Alpha, Delta, and Omicron [13,14].
The dominance periods of SARS-CoV-2 VOC strains varied in length, with a shorter period of dominance circulation of the Alpha and Delta VOC, accounting for almost four months and six months, respectively, during 2021 [13,14]. In Romania, the initial variant of SARS-CoV-2 (hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019) circulated for approximately one year, and Omicron variants became dominant at the beginning of 2022. During the Omicron dominance, there was an increase in the number of COVID-19 cases, primary infections, and reinfections in HCWs, although most of the HCWs were vaccinated with the primary schedule, and some also had the first booster administered. The assumption that the high number of infections could be explained by the increased transmissibility of Omicron variants has been demonstrated in multiple studies worldwide [15,16,32].
The time elapsed from vaccination to infection or reinfection is an important indicator for tailoring public health measures regarding the administration of booster shots [33,34,35]. In our study, the average time elapsed from the primary vaccination to reinfection was almost one year. Although a significant proportion of the participants received boosters, there were several reinfections in this category as well. Notably, the boosters used were not adapted to the circulating variants.
Natural and artificial immunity has been assessed by evaluating the dynamics of protective antibodies over time or by using epidemiological indicators from surveillance data. Both types of study have shown that natural and artificial immunity both wane over time and have led to the adaptation of recommendations regarding vaccination schedules [8,17,19,27,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Common epidemiological indicators of frequency in other studies showed increases in the number of reinfections and primo-infections in the Omicron era, similar to our study [25,26,43,44]. The previously published study on the first SARS-CoV-2 infection, on the same population of HCWs, showed a higher severity of the cases registered in HCWs from the high-risk departments [18].
The demographic characteristics of HCWs, such as age, gender, profession, and department, are important in identifying differences between subgroups. These characteristics have been studied and reported in surveillance data throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, providing information on potential protective measures or additional monitoring of these categories [25,26].
The incidence density of reinfections during Omicron in the male gender and in HCWs from high-risk departments was higher in HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule than in HCWs vaccinated with the first booster.
A study from the United States of America (USA) conducted in 2020–2021 on a cohort of 62,310 people in the general population also reported a higher frequency of COVID-19 cases in the male gender [45]. Other studies have reported more frequent reinfections in males [46,47].
The higher frequency of infections and reinfections during Omicron circulation reported in other studies has been explained by changes in the transmissibility of Omicron variants and vaccine effectiveness [16,43,44,48]. Although during the study period the HCWs wore PPE in healthcare activities, in the community they were exposed to asymptomatic or suspected COVID-19 cases, as restrictions were fewer during Omicron compared to other waves. The proper use of PPE was assessed for the first COVID-19 confirmed cases in a previously published study using a WHO standardized questionnaire, and a high risk of exposure was identified in 6.8% of HCWs [18].
In terms of disease history, published studies have supported the importance of hybrid immunity [19,39,49]. The study ORCHESTRA compared subjects re-vaccinated with the first booster and a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection with subjects with no prior infection, and the relative risk ratio was 0.11 (95% CI: 0.05–0.25). A cohort retrospective study of HCWs showed a rate of reinfection of 16.2% (95% CI: 13.5–19.3%) in the hybrid immunity group compared with HCWs with no prior infection, which registered a rate of reinfection of 41.7% (95% CI: 40.3–43.0%). In our cohort, surveillance data demonstrated an advantage in terms of protection in individuals with hybrid immunity compared with HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule and no prior infection, with a hazard ratio (HR) across all COVID-19 events of 0.6 (95% CI: 0.47–0.77) [19]. The HCWs with hybrid immunity and first booster compared to HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule and no prior infection had a HR of 0.42 (95% CI: 0.30–0.58) [19].
The incidence density of reinfection in different subgroups of HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule had higher values if there was a history of the first SARS-CoV-2 infection before Omicron compared to HCWs with a history of disease after Omicron dominant circulation. The low likelihood of developing reinfections in this subgroup of HCWs with the first SARS-CoV-2 infection during Omicron emphasizes the importance of the circulating variants when interpreting the hybrid immunity.
Comparing the incidence density of HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule and the first booster, it was found that those with a history of primoinfection during Omicron were three times less likely to develop a reinfection compared to those who had a history of reinfection before Omicron, but the incidence of reinfections in HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule versus HCWs vaccinated with the first booster showed no significant differences. This suggests the need for adapted boosters and the importance of recent infections in interpreting vaccine efficacy in populations with hybrid immunity [15,16,50,51,52,53].
Studies demonstrating complex mechanisms or correlating antibody levels and their dynamics postvaccination or post-SARS-CoV-2 infection are extremely useful for understanding the pathological phenomenon. In a hybrid immunity population, the infection-induced and the vaccine-induced antibodies cannot be differentiated, but the duration of persistence of the antibodies is very useful for establishing vaccination programs and the optimal timing for boosters [15,16,20,53,54,55]. As the current study shows, indicators like density incidence are useful for evaluating the effectiveness of control measures in specific subgroups of the population in specific SARS-CoV-2 VOC circulation periods.
The strengths of this study are represented by the quality of data obtained through active surveillance of HCWs by a specialized team in field epidemiology. In addition, the data (comprised of multiple sources) were both manually and automatically validated.
However, our study had some limitations. In particular, we did not consider transition periods where two SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern were co-circulating, and we only took into account the moment when a VOC of SARS-CoV-2 became dominant, a situation imposed given the reduced circulation as a time period of Alpha and Delta variants. However, the objective was to assess the incidence of pre-Omicron disease and post-Omicron disease in HCWs, but not for each strain. In addition, we did not have data to compare non-adapted boosters with adapted boosters, as our cohort had administered only a few adapted boosters.

5. Conclusions

The presence of a history of illness during the Omicron circulation period influenced the incidence density of reinfections in HCWs, including in subgroups based on demographic characteristics. Thus, our study highlights the importance of considering the history of SARS-CoV-2 infection when interpreting and understanding the public health data and the results of studies related to the evaluation of vaccine efficacy in hybrid immunity subgroup populations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vaccines12060682/s1. Supplemental Data S1 (Table S1: Changes in National Methodology for COVID-19 surveillance, regarding Genomic Surveillance; Table S2: Criteria for selecting cases for testing in the surveillance system, from April 2021 to July 2021; Table S3: Criteria for selecting cases for testing in the surveillance system, from August 2021 to January 2022; Table S4: Criteria for selecting cases for testing in the surveillance system, from July 2022 to May 2023). Supplemental Data S2 (Table S5: Summarised surveillance data regarding sequencing, from reports of the Romanian National Institute of Public Health; Figure S1: Weekly positive sequenced samples according to reports of the Romanian National Institute of Public Health).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-D.C., A.S.C., V.A., M.L.L., G.J. and D.P.; methodology, C.-D.C., C.G.A., V.G.N., A.L., M.-D.C., D.P. and A.S.C.; software, C.-D.C. and A.L.; validation, C.-D.C. and V.G.N.; formal analysis, C.-D.C., V.G.N., M.-D.C. and A.L.; data curation, C.-D.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-D.C.; writing—review and editing, C.-D.C., M.-D.C., D.P., V.A., M.L.L., G.J., V.G.N., A.L., C.G.A. and A.S.C.; visualization, C.-D.C.; supervision, M.-D.C., D.P., V.A., M.L.L., G.J. and A.S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki, and the Institutional Bioethics Committee of the National Institute for Infectious Diseases “Professor Dr. Matei Balș”, Bucharest, Romania, approved this study (protocol C08784/27 July 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Infection Control Department and the participants. Publication of this paper was supported by the University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” through the institutional program Publish not Perish.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. WHO. COVID-19 Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) Global Research and Innovation Forum. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-public-health-emergency-of-international-concern-(pheic)-global-research-and-innovation-forum (accessed on 7 May 2024).
  2. WHO. International Health Regulations. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/international-health-regulations (accessed on 7 May 2024).
  3. WHO. Statement on the Fifteenth Meeting of the IHR (2005) Emergency Committee on the COVID-19 Pandemic. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-pandemic (accessed on 9 December 2023).
  4. European Medicines Agency. COVID-19 Public Health Emergency of International Concern (2020–23). Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory-overview/public-health-threats/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/covid-19-public-health-emergency-international-concern-2020-23#external-links-19865 (accessed on 7 May 2024).
  5. WHO. COVID-19 Cases|WHO COVID-19 Dashboard. Available online: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/cases (accessed on 7 May 2024).
  6. WHO. From Emergency Response to Long-Term COVID-19 Disease Management: Sustaining Gains Made during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-WHE-SPP-2023.1 (accessed on 7 May 2024).
  7. WHO. Standing Recommendations for COVID-19 Issued by the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) in Accordance with the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR). Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/standing-recommendations-for-covid-19-issued-by-the-director-general-of-the-world-health-organization-(who)-in-accordance-with-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-(ihr) (accessed on 7 May 2024).
  8. WHO. WHO SAGE Roadmap for Prioritizing Uses of COVID-19 Vaccines: An Approach to Optimize the Global Impact of COVID-19 Vaccines, Based on Public Health Goals, Global and National Equity, and Vaccine Access and Coverage Scenarios. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-2019-nCoV-Vaccines-SAGE-Prioritization-2023.1 (accessed on 7 May 2024).
  9. WHO. Laboratory Testing for 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Suspected Human Cases. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/10665-331501 (accessed on 20 May 2024).
  10. ECDC. Guidance for Representative and Targeted Genomic SARS-CoV-2 Monitoring. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Guidance-for-representative-and-targeted-genomic-SARS-CoV-2-monitoring-updated-with%20erratum-20-May-2021.pdf (accessed on 20 May 2024).
  11. INSP. Metodologii—Institutul Național de Sănătate Publică. Available online: https://insp.gov.ro/centrul-national-de-supraveghere-si-control-al-bolilor-transmisibile-cnscbt/metodologii/ (accessed on 20 May 2024).
  12. Enciu, B.G.; Tănase, A.A.; Drăgănescu, A.C.; Aramă, V.; Pițigoi, D.; Crăciun, M.-D. The COVID-19 Pandemic in Romania: A Comparative Description with Its Border Countries. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. INSP. Centrul Național de Supraveghere şi Control al Bolilor Transmisibile—Analiză Cazuri Confirmate COVID19. Available online: https://www.cnscbt.ro/index.php/analiza-cazuri-confirmate-covid19 (accessed on 9 December 2023).
  14. GISAID. GISAID-hCov19 Variants. Available online: https://gisaid.org/hcov19-variants/ (accessed on 7 May 2024).
  15. Manathunga, S.S.; Abeyagunawardena, I.A.; Dharmaratne, S.D. A comparison of transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern. Virol. J. 2023, 20, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. ECDC. SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern as of 26 April 2024. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/variants-concern (accessed on 7 May 2024).
  17. EMA. EMA and ECDC Statement on Updating COVID-19 Vaccines to Target New SARS-CoV-2 Virus Variants|European Medicines Agency. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-and-ecdc-statement-updating-covid-19-vaccines-target-new-sars-cov-2-virus-variants (accessed on 20 May 2024).
  18. Chivu, C.-D.; Crăciun, M.-D.; Pițigoi, D.; Aramă, V.; Luminos, M.L.; Jugulete, G.; Apostolescu, C.G.; Streinu Cercel, A. Vaccination and Factors Related to the Clinical Outcome of COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers—A Romanian Front-Line Hospital’s Experience. Vaccines 2023, 11, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chivu, C.-D.; Crăciun, M.-D.; Pițigoi, D.; Aramă, V.; Luminos, M.L.; Jugulete, G.; Constantin, C.; Apostolescu, C.G.; Streinu Cercel, A. The Dynamic Risk of COVID-19-Related Events in Vaccinated Healthcare Workers (HCWs) from a Tertiary Hospital in Bucharest, Romania: A Study Based on Active Surveillance Data. Vaccines 2024, 12, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. WHO. Interim Statement on Hybrid Immunity and Increasing Population Seroprevalence Rates. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/01-06-2022-interim-statement-on-hybrid-immunity-and-increasing-population-seroprevalence-rates (accessed on 12 June 2024).
  21. Enciu, B.G.; Pițigoi, D.; Zaharia, A.; Popescu, R.; Niculcea, A.; Crăciun, M.-D.; Pistol, A. COVID-19 Vaccination in Romania and the Benefits of the National Electronic Registry of Vaccinations. Vaccines 2023, 11, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Celentano, D. Gordis Epidemiology, 6th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. Deng, L.; Li, P.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, Q.; Turner, D.; Zhou, C.; Gao, Y.; Qian, F.; Zhang, C.; Lu, H.; et al. Risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 20763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rivelli, A.; Fitzpatrick, V.; Blair, C.; Copeland, K.; Richards, J. Incidence of COVID-19 reinfection among Midwestern healthcare employees. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cegolon, L.; Negro, C.; Mastrangelo, G.; Filon, F.L. Primary SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Re-infections and Vaccine Effectiveness during the Omicron Transmission Period in Healthcare Workers of Trieste and Gorizia (Northeast Italy), 1 December 2021–31 May 2022. Viruses 2022, 14, 2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cegolon, L.; Magnano, G.; Negro, C.; Filon, F.L.; ORCHESTRA Working Group. SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections in Health-Care Workers, 1 March 2020–31 January 2023. Viruses 2023, 15, 1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guedes, A.R.; Oliveira, M.S.; Tavares, B.M.; Luna-Muschi, A.; Lazari, C.D.S.; Montal, A.C.; de Faria, E.; Maia, F.L.; Barboza, A.D.S.; Leme, M.D.; et al. Reinfection rate in a cohort of healthcare workers over 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nieto, M.A.; Caballero, N.; Remolina, C.I.; Moreno, S.; Vega, D.; Quintero, J. Incidence and risk factors related to SARS-CoV-2 infection, reinfection, and seroconversion: Analysis of a healthcare workers cohort from a university hospital in Colombia. IJID Reg. 2023, 9, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Karimi, Y.; Abdollahi, A.; Ahmadi, S.A.Y.; Riahi, T.; Kalantari, S.; Nafissi, N.; Shokri, S.; Baradaran, H.R.; Goodarzi, A. COVID-19 Reinfection in Healthcare Workers: An Original Comprehensive Longitudinal Study. 14 November 2023, PREPRINT (Version 1) Available at Research Square. Available online: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3596390/v1 (accessed on 7 May 2024).
  30. Zhang, C.; Guo, T.; Zhang, L.; Gu, A.; Ye, J.; Lin, M.; Chu, M.; Zhu, F.; Zhu, L. The Infection of Healthcare Workers and the Reinfection of Patients by Omicron Variant—Jiangsu Province, China, December 2022 to January 2023. China CDC Wkly. 2023, 5, 402–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ma, X.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z. The symptoms and interval of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 reinfection among healthcare workers in a hospital of Southern China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Niu, Y.; Luo, L.; Yang, S.; Abudurusuli, G.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Rui, J.; Li, Z.; Deng, B.; Liu, W.; et al. Comparison of epidemiological characteristics and transmissibility of different strains of COVID-19 based on the incidence data of all local outbreaks in China as of March 1, 2022. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 949594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Malhotra, S.; Mani, K.; Lodha, R.; Bakhshi, S.; Mathur, V.P.; Gupta, P.; Kedia, S.; Sankar, M.J.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, A.; et al. COVID-19 infection, and reinfection, and vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection among health care workers in the setting of omicron variant transmission in New Delhi, India. Lancet Reg. Health Southeast Asia 2022, 3, 100023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lanièce Delaunay, C.; Martínez-Baz, I.; Sève, N.; Domegan, L.; Mazagatos, C.; Buda, S.; Meijer, A.; Kislaya, I.; Pascu, C.; Carnahan, A.; et al. COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 BA.1/BA.2 lineages among adults and adolescents in a multicentre primary care study, Europe, December 2021 to June 2022. Eurosurveillance 2024, 29, 2300403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hönning, A.; Tomczyk, S.; Hermes, J.; Grossegesse, M.; Hofmann, N.; Michel, J.; Neumann, M.; Nitsche, A.; Hoppe, B.; Eckmanns, T.; et al. Follow-up SARS-CoV-2 serological study of a health care worker cohort following COVID-19 booster vaccination. BMC Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Long, Q.Y.; Zheng, Y.L.; Gao, Z.C. Analysis of the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 reinfection cases. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi Zhonghua Jiehe He Huxi Zazhi Chin. J. Tuberc. Respir. Dis. 2021, 44, 793–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pilz, S.; Theiler-Schwetz, V.; Trummer, C.; Krause, R.; Ioannidis, J.P.A. SARS-CoV-2 reinfections: Overview of efficacy and duration of natural and hybrid immunity. Environ. Res. 2022, 209, 112911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Goldberg, Y.; Mandel, M.; Bar-On, Y.M.; Bodenheimer, O.; Freedman, L.S.; Ash, N.; Alroy-Preis, S.; Huppert, A.; Milo, R. Protection and Waning of Natural and Hybrid Immunity to SARS-CoV-2. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 2201–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Porru, S.; Monaco, M.G.L.; Spiteri, G.; Carta, A.; Caliskan, G.; Violán, C.; Torán-Monserrat, P.; Vimercati, L.; Tafuri, S.; Boffetta, P.; et al. Incidence and Determinants of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Breakthrough Infections After Booster Dose in a Large European Multicentric Cohort of Health Workers-ORCHESTRA Project. J. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2023, 13, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Spiteri, G.; D’Agostini, M.; Abedini, M.; Ditano, G.; Collatuzzo, G.; Boffetta, P.; Vimercati, L.; Sansone, E.; De Palma, G.; Modenese, A.; et al. Protective role of SARS-CoV-2 anti-S IgG against breakthrough infections among European healthcare workers during pre and post-Omicron surge-ORCHESTRA project. Infection 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Martín Pérez, C.; Aguilar, R.; Jiménez, A.; Salmerón, G.; Canyelles, M.; Rubio, R.; Vidal, M.; Cuamba, I.; Barrios, D.; Díaz, N.; et al. Correlates of protection and determinants of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections 1 year after third dose vaccination. BMC Med. 2024, 22, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kurra, N.C.; Sriram, K.; Gandrakota, N.; Nagarajan, J.S.; Khasnavis, S.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Dalal, S.; Irfan, S.A.; Khan, S.; Jk, H.; et al. Frontliners on the Move: A Quantitative Analysis of the Prevalence of COVID-19 Reinfection Among Healthcare Workers. Cureus 2022, 14, e24652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ibanes-Gutierrez, C.; Martínez-Rivera, N.; Martin-Onraet, A.; Rivera-Buendia, F.; Piñeirua-Menendez, A.; Villaseñor-Echavarri, R.; Serrano-Ortega, J.; Vilar-Compte, D. SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers during the first 2-years of the pandemic at a cancer hospital in Mexico. Am. J. Infect. Control 2024, 52, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yu, W.; Guo, Y.; Hu, T.; Liu, Y.; Fan, Q.; Guo, L.; Zheng, B.; Kong, Y.; Zhu, H.; Yu, J.; et al. Incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, a multicenter cohort study in Shanghai, China. J. Med. Virol. 2023, 95, e28997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kharroubi, S.A.; Diab-El-Harake, M. Sex-differences in COVID-19 diagnosis, risk factors and disease comorbidities: A large US-based cohort study. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1029190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nisha, B.; Dakshinamoorthy, K.; Padmanaban, P.; Jain, T.; Neelavarnan, M. Infection, reinfection, and postvaccination incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and associated risks in healthcare workers in Tamil Nadu: A retrospective cohort study. J. Fam. Community Med. 2022, 29, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tavakoli, A.; Lotfi, F.; Lotfi, M.; Bayati, M.; Seif, M.; Salesi, M.; Emadi, M.; Keshavarz, K.; Delavari, S. COVID-19 Reinfection Rate and Related Risk Factors in Fars Province, Iran: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Iran. J. Med. Sci. 2023, 48, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Medić, S.; Anastassopoulou, C.; Lozanov-Crvenković, Z.; Vuković, V.; Dragnić, N.; Petrović, V.; Ristić, M.; Pustahija, T.; Gojković, Z.; Tsakris, A.; et al. Risk and severity of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections during 2020–2022 in Vojvodina, Serbia: A population-level observational study. Lancet Reg. Health Eur. 2022, 20, 100453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jacobson, M.A.; Blanc, P.D.; Tulsky, J.; Tilly, M.; Meister, R.; Huen, W.; McNicholas, J.E., Jr. Risk of subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection among vaccinated employees with or without hybrid immunity acquired early in the Omicron-predominant era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2024, 67, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jacot, D.; von Rotz, U.; Pellaton, C.; Blondet, F.; Aebischer, O.; Perreau, M.; De Rham, M.; Pantaleo, G.; Marchetti, O.; Greub, G. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody response in vaccinated and non-vaccinated hospital healthcare workers with or without history of infection. Microbes Infect. 2023, 25, 105077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chin, E.T.; Leidner, D.; Lamson, L.; Lucas, K.; Studdert, D.M.; Goldhaber-Fiebert, J.D.; Andrews, J.R.; Salomon, J.A. Protection against Omicron from Vaccination and Previous Infection in a Prison System. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 1770–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kahn, F.; Bonander, C.; Moghaddassi, M.; Christiansen, C.B.; Bennet, L.; Malmqvist, U.; Inghammar, M.; Björk, J. Previous SARS-CoV-2 infections and their impact on the protection from reinfection during the Omicron BA.5 wave—A nested case-control study among vaccinated adults in Sweden. IJID Reg. 2024, 10, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tan, C.Y.; Chiew, C.J.; Pang, D.; Lee, V.J.; Ong, B.; Lye, D.C.; Tan, K.B. Protective immunity of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccines against medically attended symptomatic omicron BA.4, BA.5, and XBB reinfections in Singapore: A national cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, 799–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Beaudoin-Bussières, G.; Tauzin, A.; Dionne, K.; Gendron-Lepage, G.; Medjahed, H.; Perreault, J.; Levade, I.; Alfadhli, L.; Bo, Y.; Bazin, R.; et al. A Recent SARS-CoV-2 Infection Enhances Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity against Several Omicron Subvariants following a Fourth mRNA Vaccine Dose. Viruses 2023, 15, 1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vargas-De-León, C.; Cureño-Díaz, M.A.; Salazar, M.I.; Cruz-Cruz, C.; Loyola-Cruz, M.Á.; Durán-Manuel, E.M.; Zamora-Pacheco, E.R.; Bravata-Alcántara, J.C.; Lugo-Zamudio, G.E.; Fernández-Sánchez, V.; et al. Neutralizing Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2: Importance of Comorbidities in Health Personnel against Reinfections. Viruses 2023, 15, 2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Vaccines 12 00682 g001
Figure 1. The workflow diagram of the HCWs study in the National Institute for Infectious Diseases “Professor Dr. Matei Balș”, Bucharest, Romania, January 2022–May 2023.
Figure 1. The workflow diagram of the HCWs study in the National Institute for Infectious Diseases “Professor Dr. Matei Balș”, Bucharest, Romania, January 2022–May 2023.
Vaccines 12 00682 g001
Vaccines 12 00682 g002
Figure 2. Graphical representation of cumulative data regarding vaccination status, first and second SARS-CoV-2 infections in HCWs included in the study.
Figure 2. Graphical representation of cumulative data regarding vaccination status, first and second SARS-CoV-2 infections in HCWs included in the study.
Vaccines 12 00682 g002
Table 1. Descriptive characteristics of the study group and comparative analysis between HCWs without reinfections and HCWs with reinfection during the study period.
Table 1. Descriptive characteristics of the study group and comparative analysis between HCWs without reinfections and HCWs with reinfection during the study period.
CharacteristicsStudy ParticipantsWithout
SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection		With SARS-CoV-2
Reinfection		p-Value
829 (%)581 (70.1)248 (29.9)
Gender
Female699 (84.3)491 (84.5)208 (83.9)0.828
Male130 (15.7)90 (15.5)40 (16.1)
Age
Mean (SD)43 (9.9)43 (10.2)43 (9.14)
Median age (years), IQR44 (36–51)44 (35–44)44 (36–50)
≤2978 (9.4)61 (10.5)17 (6.9)0.105
30–39196 (23.6)136 (23.4)60 (24.2)0.804
40–49293 (35.3)200 (34.4)93 (37.5)0.393
≥50262 (31.6)184 (31.7)78 (31.5)0.955
Job category
Nurses344 (41.5)236 (40.6)108 (43.5)0.438
Physicians156 (18.8)111 (19.1)45 (18.1)0.736
Healthcare auxiliary activities203 (24.5)143 (24.6)60 (24.2)0.903
Other categories126 (15.2)91 (15.7)35 (14.1)0.557
Department
High Risk 1592 (71.4)400 (68.8)192 (77.4)0.012
Low risk 2237 (28.6)181 (31.2)56 (22.6)
1 ICU, emergency, COVID-19 wards; 2 nonCOVID-19 wards, laboratory; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range.
Table 2. Descriptive analysis of the first and second SARS-CoV-2 infection of the HCWs from INBI” Prof. Dr. Matei Balș” by pandemic wave corresponding to the predominant transmission period of main SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Table 2. Descriptive analysis of the first and second SARS-CoV-2 infection of the HCWs from INBI” Prof. Dr. Matei Balș” by pandemic wave corresponding to the predominant transmission period of main SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Characteristics of COVID-19 Cases in the Study GroupFirst SARS-CoV-2 InfectionSecond SARS-CoV-2 Infection
829%24829.9 * (%)
hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 (February 2020–February 2021)
Total37845.652.0
Nonvaccinated HCWs37845.65100.0
HCWs vaccinated with the primary series00.000.0
HCWs vaccinated with the first booster dose00.000.0
Alpha (March 2021–June 2021)
Total202.400.0
Nonvaccinated HCWs1470.000.0
HCWs vaccinated with the primary series630.000.0
Median number of days since immunization (IQR)44.5 (36–52)---
HCWs vaccinated with the first booster dose00.000.0
Delta (June 2021–December 2021)
Total12314.8124.8
Nonvaccinated HCWs3830.9650.0
HCWs vaccinated with the primary series8569.1650.0
Median number of days since immunization (IQR)240 (218–257)-203 (169–301)-
HCWs vaccinated with the first booster dose00.000.0
Omicron (January 2022–May 2023)
Total30837.223193.2
Nonvaccinated HCWs309.72912.5
HCWs vaccinated with the primary series13945.113056.3
Median number of days since immunization (IQR)352 (241–384)-365 (238–519)-
HCWs vaccinated with the first booster dose13945.17231.2
Median number of days since revaccination (IQR)127 (98–257)-169 (99–361)-
SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; * percent of reinfections.
Table 3. The incidence density of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, in those vaccinated with the primary schedule and vaccinated with the first booster HCWs by demographic characteristics.
Table 3. The incidence density of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, in those vaccinated with the primary schedule and vaccinated with the first booster HCWs by demographic characteristics.
CharacteristicsReinfections during Omicron
in HCWs Vaccinated with the Primary Schedule 		Reinfections during Omicron in HCWs Vaccinated with the First Booster Incidence Rate Ratio
(95% CI)		p-Value
NP-dRate × 10,000
(95% CI)		NP-dRate × 10,000
(95% CI)
Total130179,2087.3 (6.1; 8.6)72130,3715.5 (4.3; 6.9)0.8 (0.6; 1.0)0.062
Gender
Female105154,8646.8 (5.5; 8.2)63106,2425.9 (4.6; 7.6)1.1 (0.8; 1.6)0.402
Male2524,34410.3 (6.7; 15.2)924,1293.7 (1.7; 7.1)2.8 (1.2; 6.7)0.006
Age
≤29616,1793.7 (1.4; 8.1)815,3985.2 (2.2; 10.2)0.7 (0.2; 2.3)0.545
30–393641,5028.7 (6.1; 12.0)1731,3295.4 (3.2; 8.7)1.6 (0.9; 3.0)0.108
40–494968,7507.1 (5.3; 9.4)2341,5925.5 (5.5; 8.3)1.3 (0.7; 2.4)0.405
≥503952,7777.4 (5.3; 10.1)2442,0525.7 (3.7; 8.5)1.3 (0.8; 2.2)0.322
Job category
Nurses6079,9507.5 (5.7; 9.7)2445,9655.2 (3.3; 7.8)1.4 (0.9; 2.4)0.129
Physicians1516,1799.3 (5.2; 15.3)2845,9846.1 (4.0; 8.8)1.5 (0.8; 2.9)0.197
Healthcare auxiliary activities3651,8226.9 (4.9; 9.6)1424,1815.8 (3.2; 9.7)1.2 (0.6; 2.4)0.576
Other categories1931,2576.1 (3.7; 9.5)614,2414.2 (1.5; 9.2)1.4 (0.6; 4.4)0.448
Department
High Risk 1102119,9188.5 (6.9; 10.3)63103,5586.1 (4.7; 7.8)1.4 (1.0; 1.9)0.035
Low risk 22859,2904.7 (3.1; 6.8)926,8133.4 (1.5; 6.4)1.4 (0.6; 3.4)0.381
1 ICU, emergency, COVID-19 wards; 2 nonCOVID-19 wards, laboratory, other departments.
Table 4. The incidence density of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule by history of infection before and after the Omicron era.
Table 4. The incidence density of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in HCWs vaccinated with the primary schedule by history of infection before and after the Omicron era.
CharacteristicsHistory of Infection before
January 2022		History of Infection after
January 2022		Incidence Rate Ratio (95% CI)p-Value
NP-dRate × 10,000
(95% CI)		NP-dRate × 10,000
(95% CI)
HCWs Vaccinated with the
Primary Schedule		115108,57010.6 (8.7; 12.7)1570,6382.1 (1.2; 3.5)5.0 (2.9; 9.2)<0.001
Gender
Female9594,35910.1 (8.2; 12.3)1060,5051.7 (0.8; 3.0)6.1 (3.2; 13.1)<0.001
Male2014,21114.1 (8.6; 21.7)510,1334.9 (1.6; 11.5)2.9 (1.0; 9.7)0.026
Age
≤29571807.0 (2.3; 16.3)189991.1 (0.0; 6.2)6.3 (0.7; 296.4)0.073
30–393223,36613.7 (9.4; 19.3)418,1362.2 (0.6; 5.6)6.2 (2.2; 24.2)<0.001
40–494343,8759.8 (7.1; 13.2)624,8752.4 (0.9; 5.3)6.1 (2.2; 23.4)<0.001
≥503534,14910.3 (7.1; 14.3)418,6282.1 (0.6; 5.5)7.2 (2.7; 27.5)<0.001
Job category
Nurses5349,52010.7 (8.0; 14.0)730,4302.3 (0.9; 4.7)6.3 (0.7; 296.4)0.073
Physicians12886313.5 (7.0; 23.7)373164.1 (0.8; 12.0)3.3 (0.9; 18.2)0.051
Healthcare auxiliary activities3333,05310.0 (6.9; 14.0)318,7691.6 (0.3; 4.7)6.2 (2.0; 31.8)<0.001
Other categories1717,1349.9 (5.8; 15.9)214,1231.4 (0.2; 5.1)7.0(1.7; 62.5)0.002
Department
High Risk 19171,81612.7 (10.2; 15.6)1148,1022.3 (1.1; 4.1)5.5 (3.0; 11.5)<0.0001
Low risk 22436,7546.5 (4.2; 9.7)422,5361.8 (0.5; 4.5)3.7 (1.3; 14.6)0.0072
1 ICU, emergency, COVID-19 wards; 2 nonCOVID-19 wards, laboratory, other departments.
Table 5. The incidence density of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in HCWs vaccinated with the first booster by history of infection before and after the Omicron era.
Table 5. The incidence density of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in HCWs vaccinated with the first booster by history of infection before and after the Omicron era.
CharacteristicsHistory of Infection before
January 2022		History of Infection after
January 2022		Incidence Rate Ratio
(95% CI)		p-Value
NP-dRate × 10,000
(95% CI)		NP-dRate × 10,000
(95% CI)
HCWs Vaccinated with the First Booster5360,4388.8 (6.6; 11.5)1969,9332.7 (1.6; 4.2)3.2 (1.9; 5.8)<0.001
Gender
Female4551,5788.7 (6.4; 11.7)1854,6643.3 (2.0; 5.2)2.6 (1.5; 4.9)<0.001
Male888609.0 (3.9; 17.8)115,2690.7 (0.0; 3.6)13.8 (1.8; 611.8)0.002
Age
≤29561558.1 (2.6; 19.0)392433.2 (0.7; 9.5)2.5 (0.5; 16.1)0.223
30–391311,64611.2 (5.9; 19.1)419,6832.0 (0.6; 5.2)5.5 (1.7; 23.1)0.002
40–491516,9738.8 (4.9; 14.6)824,6193.3 (1.4; 6.4)2.7 (1.1; 7.4)0.021
≥502025,6647.8 (4.8; 12.0)416,3882.4 (0.7; 6.2)3.2 (1.1; 12.8)0.022
Job category
Nurses1923,4648.1 (4.9; 12.6)522,5012.2 (0.7; 5.2)3.6 (1.3; 12.5)0.006
Physicians1718,2139.3 (5.4; 14.9)1127,7714.0 (2.0; 7.1)2.4 (1.0; 5.6)0.027
Healthcare auxiliary activities1112,7608.6 (4.3; 15.4)311,4212.6 (0.5; 7.7)3.3 (0.9; 18.3)0.056
Other categories6600110.0 (3.7; 21.8)082400 (0;0)0 (0;0)-
Department
High Risk 14645,77310.1 (7.4; 13.4)1757,7852.9 (1.7; 4.7)3.4 (1.9; 6.4)<0.001
Low risk 2714,6654.8 (1.9; 9.8)212,1481.6 (0.2; 5.9)2.9 (0.6; 28.6)0.182
1 ICU, emergency, COVID-19 wards; 2 nonCOVID-19 wards, laboratory, other departments.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chivu, C.-D.; Crăciun, M.-D.; Pițigoi, D.; Aramă, V.; Luminos, M.L.; Jugulete, G.; Nițescu, V.G.; Lescaie, A.; Apostolescu, C.G.; Streinu Cercel, A. Hybrid Immunity and the Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections during the Omicron Era in Frontline Healthcare Workers. Vaccines 2024, 12, 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12060682

AMA Style

Chivu C-D, Crăciun M-D, Pițigoi D, Aramă V, Luminos ML, Jugulete G, Nițescu VG, Lescaie A, Apostolescu CG, Streinu Cercel A. Hybrid Immunity and the Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections during the Omicron Era in Frontline Healthcare Workers. Vaccines. 2024; 12(6):682. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12060682

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chivu, Carmen-Daniela, Maria-Dorina Crăciun, Daniela Pițigoi, Victoria Aramă, Monica Luminița Luminos, Gheorghiță Jugulete, Viorela Gabriela Nițescu, Andreea Lescaie, Cătălin Gabriel Apostolescu, and Adrian Streinu Cercel. 2024. "Hybrid Immunity and the Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections during the Omicron Era in Frontline Healthcare Workers" Vaccines 12, no. 6: 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12060682

APA Style

Chivu, C. -D., Crăciun, M. -D., Pițigoi, D., Aramă, V., Luminos, M. L., Jugulete, G., Nițescu, V. G., Lescaie, A., Apostolescu, C. G., & Streinu Cercel, A. (2024). Hybrid Immunity and the Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections during the Omicron Era in Frontline Healthcare Workers. Vaccines, 12(6), 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12060682

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop