Next Article in Journal
Detection of Prostate Cancer via IR Spectroscopic Analysis of Urinary Extracellular Vesicles: A Pilot Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Progress in Research and Application of Nanofiltration (NF) Technology for Brackish Water Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
A New Activated Sludge Model with Membrane Separation–Implications for Sewage and Textile Effluent
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biochar/Kevlar Nanofiber Mixed Matrix Nanofiltration Membranes with Enhanced Dye/Salt Separation Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of High Salinity on Alginate Fouling during Ultrafiltration of High-Salinity Organic Synthetic Wastewater

1
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 102488, China
2
School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2021, 11(8), 590; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080590
Submission received: 17 July 2021 / Revised: 28 July 2021 / Accepted: 28 July 2021 / Published: 31 July 2021

Abstract

:
Ultrafiltration is widely employed in treating high-salinity organic wastewater for the purpose of retaining particulates, microbes and macromolecules etc. In general, high-salinity wastewater contains diverse types of saline ions at fairly high concentration, which may significantly change foulant properties and subsequent fouling propensity during ultrafiltration. This study filled a knowledge gap by investigating polysaccharide fouling formation affected by various high saline environments, where 2 mol/L Na+ and 0.5–1.0 mol/L Ca2+/Al3+ were employed and the synergistic influences of Na+-Ca2+ and Na+-Al3+ were further unveiled. The results demonstrated that the synergistic influence of Na+-Ca2+ strikingly enlarged the alginate size due to the bridging effects of Ca2+ via binding with carboxyl groups in alginate chains. As compared with pure alginate, the involvement of Na+ aggravated alginate fouling formation, while the subsequent addition of Ca2+ or Al3+ on the basis of Na+ mitigated fouling development. The coexistence of Na+-Ca2+ led to alginate fouling formed mostly in a loose and reversible pattern, accompanied by significant cracks appearing on the cake layer. In contrast, the fouling layer formed by alginate-Na+-Al3+ seemed to be much denser, leading to severer irreversible fouling formation. Notably, the membrane rejection under various high salinity conditions was seriously weakened. Consequently, the current study offered in-depth insights into the development of polysaccharide-associated fouling during ultrafiltration of high-salinity organic wastewater.

1. Introduction

High-salinity organic wastewater, which refers to organic wastewater with salt content higher than 1%, is increasingly produced in recent years, especially from seafood processing, electroplating, petroleum industries, etc. [1,2,3]. The discharge of such high-salinity wastewater may pose seriously negative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems [4]. However, the current effective techniques to treat high-salinity organic wastewater are still limited, as the highly saline environment hinders the biodegradation process and causes the invalidation of adsorption due to the presence of numerous ions [5]. Recently, membrane-based technologies have gained broad applications in large-scale water and wastewater treatment processes, attributed to their unique features of superb permeate quality, energy efficiency, small footprint, etc. [6]. Despite not being appropriate for removing ions, ultrafiltration (UF) and microfiltration (MF) have received increasing attention in current years for decontamination of high-salinity organic wastewater for the purposes of removing microbes, particles and various organics [7,8,9]. Membrane fouling is a great concern which hampers the sustainable operation of a membrane system and increases the cost of treatment [10,11,12,13,14], although diverse fouling control methods have been proposed and developed to tackle fouling issues [15,16,17,18,19].
The composition of salts in high-salinity wastewater commonly consists of Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Al3+, etc., at very high concentrations, of which the main component should be regarded as NaCl. Polysaccharides are considered the typical contaminant present in waste and wastewater. In common aquatic systems such as surface water or general wastewater, many studies have been conducted to explore the influence of ions on organic fouling development, and have found that the presence of ions, especially multivalent ions, strikingly influenced membrane fouling caused by polysaccharides as well as membrane rejection [20,21,22,23]. It was reported that the presence of Ca2+ could promote binding between alginate chains, leading to accelerated membrane fouling [23,24].
Unfortunately, most of the existing studies in the literature were conducted under relatively low-saline conditions (e.g., salinity within 1 g/L NaCl), and extremely low multivalent ion concentrations, commonly in the level of mmol/L. There is still a lack of understanding of the effects of high salinity on membrane fouling formation, which is of great significance for ultrafiltration of ionic-based wastewaters such as pharmaceutical wastewater. Our recent work showed that high-concentration Na+ significantly increased fouling formed by humic acid, while decreasing fouling by bovine serum albumin [25]. However, the impacts of a high salinity environment including Na+, Ca2+ and Al3+ on polysaccharide fouling were still elusive. It can be expected that such high-concentration ions might exert considerable impacts on the properties and fouling propensities of polysaccharide. In addition, the coexistence of various ions (e.g., Na+-Ca2+ or Na+-Al3+) might result in a more complex fouling structure developing. The examination of these hypotheses was the goal of the current work.
Therefore, the current study aims to (i) understand the effects of high salinity on polysaccharide fouling formation, where 2 mol/L Na+ was employed to simulate a high saline environment; (ii) reveal the influences of the coexistence of Na+-Ca2+ or Na+-Al3+ on polysaccharide fouling, based on the practical composition of high-salinity wastewater; (iii) evaluate the effects of high salinity on membrane retention during ultrafiltration of polysaccharide-associated wastewater.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials

A high-salinity environment was simulated by using NaCl, CaCl2 and AlCl3, which were all purchased from Macklin Biochemical Company of China. Sodium alginate, which was selected as a surrogate of polysaccharide in wastewater, was purchased from Beijing Solibal Technology Company of China. A raw solution with a concentration of 2500 mg/L was prepared by disintegrating 2.5 g alginate in 1000 mL of deionized water while stirring for 24 h, followed by adjusting the solution pH to 7.0 by using 0.01 mol/L of either NaOH or HCl. The raw alginate solution was stored in a black box at 4 °C and diluted to 50 mg/L with various saline solutions before usage.

2.2. Membrane Filtration Experiments

A standard cross-flow membrane filtration setup was used for UF filtration tests in order to evaluate the fouling propensities of alginate under the effects of high salinity conditions. The feed solution was pumped by a digital gear pump (ColeParmer, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) to a commercial crossflow cell (CF042 membrane cell, Sterlitech, Auburn, WA, USA) at a constant flowrate of 0.3 L/min and superficial liquid velocity of 0.1 m/s. The experiments were carried out in a constant pressure mode with the transmembrane pressure remaining at 2 bar. The high-salinity environment was first simulated by Na+ alone at a concentration of 2 mol/L (i.e., 11.7% NaCl), after which the effects of coexistence of Na+-Ca2+ or Na+-Al3+ were determined by adding 0.5–1.0 mol/L Ca2+ or Al3+ (i.e., 5.6–11.1% CaCl2 or 6.7–13.4% AlCl3) to the 2 mol/L Na+ solution. A commercial polyethersulfone (PES) UF membrane (Beijing Saipuruite Company, Beijing, China) with a nominal molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) of 50 kDa and effective surface area of 0.0042 m2 was used for filtration evaluations. Prior to usage, the PES membrane was immersed in deionized water for around 24 h for wetting purposes and subject to pre-compaction by filtrating deionized water at a pressure of 2 bar before each filtration. The permeate flux was determined according to the rate of change of the permeate mass by an electronic balance (Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland) and the data were automatically recorded by LabVIEW software at 5 min intervals. To avoid a change in feed concentration, the permeate was poured back to feed at a fixed interval of 5 min. The filtration experiment finished after operation for 180 min, which allowed all of the flux curves to level off.

2.3. Modelling of Membrane Filtration

After each experiment, the total membrane filtration resistance (Rt) was measured according to the following equation:
J = Δ P   μ R t
where J is the permeate flux in units of m3/(m2·s); Δ P is the applied transmembrane pressure (TMP) in units of Pa; μ is water viscosity (Pa·s).
The contribution of the fouling resistances, i.e., the intrinsic membrane resistance (Rm), reversible (Rr) and irreversible (Rir) membrane fouling resistances, was determined according to the resistance-in-series model:
Rt = Rm + Rr + Rir
where Rm was determined by filtering deionized water through the pure membrane. Rir and Rr were evaluated by the following protocol:
(i)
The fouled membrane was rinsed using deionized water for around 2 min to remove the reversible fouling layer;
(ii)
The value of Rm + Rir was then determined from Equation (1) by filtering deionized water through the rinsed membrane;
(iii)
The values of Rr and Rir were then obtained respectively from Equation (2), based on the determined Rt, Rm, and Rm + Rir values.
The achieved flux decline curves were further analyzed using the pore blocking models for crossflow filtration, which were expressed as follows:
Complete blocking model:
d J d t = k A ( J J * )
Standard blocking model:
d J d t = k B J 0.5 ( J J * )
Intermediate blocking model:
d J d t = k C J ( J J * )
Cake filtration model:
d J d t = k D J 2 ( J J * )
where kA is the kinetic rate for the complete blocking model in units of min−1, kB (m−0.5 min−0.5) is the kinetic rate for the standard blocking model, kC (m−1) is the kinetic rate for the intermediate blocking model, and kD (min m−2) is the kinetic rate for the cake filtration model. J* is the flux associated with back-transport due to the liquid shear of the crossflow operation. The best fit model was checked by the relative goodness (f) method [26] as shown in Equation (7):
f = ( σ 2 ) m i n σ
where σ2 is the prediction error square, and (σ2)min is the minimum σ2 value among the four models shown in Equations (3)–(6). The value of σ2 could be predicted using the following equation:
σ 2 = ( Y k Y ^ k ) 2 n p
where Yk and Y ^ k   represent the experimental and modeled data, respectively. n-p is the residual degrees of freedom [27].

2.4. Other Measurements

In this study, the properties of alginate in terms of zeta potential and particle size were measured using Zetasizer NanoZs (Malvern, Worcestershire, UK). Each measurement was repeated at least six times with the mean value presented as the results. Alginate concentrations in the feed water and permeate were measured with a total organic carbon analyzer (Shimadzu, Japan), and membrane rejection rate was thereby calculated based on the concentration changes between initial feed water and permeate at 180 min. After membrane filtration, the fouled membranes were collected and freeze-dried in a freeze-dryer (Beijing Boyikang Experimental Instrument Company, China) for approximately 12 h. The surface morphology was observed via field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The functional groups of the fouled membranes were characterized via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Effects of High Salinity on the Properties of Alginates

Figure 1 depicts the evolutions of surface zeta potential and particle size of sodium alginate affected by various high-salinity conditions. Compared to previous works [11,22,28], all of the ion additions were investigated at relatively high concentrations (i.e., 2 mol/L Na+, 0.5–1.0 mol/L Ca2+ and Al3+) in order to simulate the real composition of high-salinity wastewater. Obviously, 2 mol/L Na+ induced the dramatic increase in zeta potential from −46.13 mV to +12.80 mV, and subsequent addition of Ca2+ on the basis of Na+ decreased the zeta potential. It is generally acknowledged that the presence of counter ions may increase the zeta potential of organics due to the effects of charge neutralization, and extremely high amounts of ions can exert opposite charges on molecular surfaces [29,30], which explained the sharp rise in zeta potential observed with Na+. However, the decrease in positive charges induced by Ca2+ probably resulted from the coordination of Ca2+ with carboxyl groups in the alginate chains, thus strikingly reducing surface potential to around +2.00 mV. Moreover, it was expected that the changes in surface charge would pronouncedly influence the stability of alginate dispersion, reflected by variations in particle size. Unsurprisingly, Figure 1b displays increased alginate size caused by the presence of Na+, probably because of the reduced absolute charge value (Figure 1a) leading to enhanced attraction between alginate molecules. The synergistic influences of Na+-Ca2+ further enlarged the particle size strikingly, due to the enhanced coordination effects by Ca2+ to bridge alginate chains together. Comparatively negligible variations in surface charge and particle size of alginates were found to result from the presence of Na+-Al3+, which was consistent with a previous study reporting that the binding affinity with alginates was stronger for Ca2+ than for Al3+ [31].

3.2. Effects of High Salinity on Membrane Fouling Propensity

The evolution in permeate flux versus time affected by various high-saline conditions is presented in Figure 2. After 180 min filtration, all of the flux profiles nearly reached equilibrium. It was found that the involvement of Na+ aggravated alginate fouling formation, witnessed by the lower J/J0 value observed compared with the pure alginate solution. However, the subsequent addition of Ca2+ or Al3+ mitigated such fouling to some extent. Table 1 displays the membrane fouling resistance values in terms of reversible resistance (Rr), irreversible resistance (Rir), and intrinsic membrane resistance (Rm). Reversible fouling was derived from the loose attachment of foulants to the membrane surface, which could be removed by physical cleaning methods, while irreversible fouling generally resulted from the formation of a strong matrix of fouling layer or pore narrowing/blocking that could not be removed by physical cleaning [32]. Apparently, the dominant filtration resistance was caused by reversible fouling for all cases studied. Under the condition of simultaneous presence of Na+-Ca2+, more than 80% of filtration resistance was caused by reversible fouling formation and only 0.18%–0.85% of total resistance was attributed to irreversible fouling. In comparison, the coexistence of Na+-Al3+ induced more than 20% irreversible fouling formation. This indicated that Ca2+ addition led to fouling formation mostly in a loose and reversible pattern, whereas Al3+ was beneficial for irreversible fouling development, which inevitably made the membrane difficult to clean. In general, the changes in total resistance were in agreement with the flux profiles in Figure 2, where Na+ enhanced membrane fouling formation, while the synergistic effects of Na+-Ca2+ or Na+-Al3+ mitigated fouling development.
To better understand the fouling properties influenced by high salinity, the flux profiles were fitted with the four theoretical fouling models described in Equations (3)–(6). Briefly, the complete blocking model assumed that one foulant clogged and sealed one membrane pore; the standard blocking assumed that the foulant entered into the membrane pores and was adsorbed on the internal walls of membrane pores, causing a decrease in effective pore radius; the cake filtration model assumed that a cake layer was formed on the membrane surface during membrane filtration; the intermediate blocking model assumed the simultaneous occurrence of cake layer formation and complete blocking [33]. Figure 3 exhibits the relative goodness (f) results of the modeling, in which the model with f value of 1.00 was the best fitting model for the experimental data. Table 2 further depicts the parameters from the best fitting models. The results showed the filtration outcomes of pure alginates and Na+-Al3+ were best described by the cake filtration model. Despite a relatively higher kD value of 5.1 × 10−6 min m−2 for pure alginates, a larger back-transport flux of 72.93 L/(m2 h) was found during filtrating alginates, compared with 66.12 L/(m2 h) obtained in the scenario of Na+-Al3+. Combined with Rt values in Table 1, it could be speculated that the cake fouling formation was mainly governed by the back-transportation of foulants by liquid shear during crossflow filtration, thus resulting in enhanced fouling when Na+ and Al3+ simultaneously existed. In contrast, intermediate blocking was found to be the primary fouling mechanism in the presence of Na+ alone as well as the coexistence of Na+-Ca2+, while the fouling formation appeared to be intensified with lower back-transport flux and higher kinetic rate in the presence of Na+ alone, which was consistent with the results obtained in Figure 2 and Table 1.

3.3. Effects of High Salinity on Membrane Fouling Morphology

After 180 min filtration, the FTIR spectra of the fouled membranes by alginates under various high-salinity environments are depicted in Figure 4. As displayed in Figure 4, the simultaneous presence of Na+ and Ca2+ showed the smallest FTIR peaks, which indicated that the functional groups were mostly occupied by Ca2+. By contrast, further addition of Al3+ on the basis of Na+ seemed to increase the peak intensities of several functional groups located at the wavenumbers of 3010 cm−1, 830 cm−1, 600 cm−1, etc. As observed in Figure 1b, Ca2+ addition induced significant increments in alginate size, probably via bridging effects of Ca2+ with carboxyl groups in the alginate chains, and thus negligible FTIR peaks were found in the presence of Ca2+. In comparison, the presence of Al3+ did not exhibit significant binding with alginates because of the invariable particle size and prominent alginate FTIR characteristic peaks of the fouled membrane upon Al3+ addition. However, the increased peak intensities observed implied that the configuration of the alginate cake layer formed might be significantly changed by the involvement of Al3+. SEM images of the fouled membranes are displayed in Figure 5. As compared with pure alginates, more serious fouling formation was induced in the presence of Na+. When Ca2+ was further added, the fouling layer tended to be much smoother with significant defects and cracks appearing on the top, probably explaining the reduced fouling development and resistances shown in Figure 2 and Table 1. In contrast, the fouling layer formed by alginate-Na+-Al3+ in Figure 5d seemed to be much denser, which might cause the higher degree of irreversible fouling identified under the influence of Al3+.

3.4. Effects of High Salinity on Membrane Rejection

Figure 6 exhibits the rejection performance during filtration of alginates affected by various high-salinity conditions. By comparing with initial UF rejection without addition of salts, it was obvious that the membrane rejection rate was strikingly weakened by the high-salinity environments studied. Since our previous study demonstrated that the effects of addition of high-concentration Na+ on water flux through a UF membrane could be negligible [25], the principal reason for the reduced membrane rejection may be the changed interactions between foulant–membrane and foulant–foulant instead of salts–membrane. This could be further explained through the fact that the remarkable increase in positive surface charges induced by high salinity (Figure 1a) enhanced the attraction between alginates and the negatively charged UF membrane, thus driving more alginate molecules to pass through the membrane. Notably, a much lower rejection rate of 33% occurred in the presence of Na+-Ca2+, presumably due to the significant defects and cracks observed in Figure 5c. The higher membrane rejection of 45% found with Na+-Al3+ might be attributed to the denser cake layer (Figure 5d) and aggravated irreversible fouling formation (Table 1).

4. Discussion

The current study systemically investigated the effects of high salinity on fouling behaviors of alginates, during which 2 mol/L Na+ as well as 0.5–1.0 mol/L Ca2+ or Al3+ were employed. It was noteworthy that membrane fouling was enhanced by the presence of Na+ compared to pure alginate, probably due to the sharp increase in positive surface charges in the alginate, thus improving the attractions between alginates and the membrane. However, decreased total filtration resistances were observed when Ca2+ or Al3+ were further added on the basis of Na+, and entirely differentiated fouling morphology and foulant properties were found for the cases of Na+-Ca2+ and Na+-Al3+. Specifically, Ca2+ addition triggered a significant increase in foulant size (Figure 1b) by strongly coordinating with carboxyl groups to bridge alginate chains together, leading to less binding affinity in the formation of the cake layer as well as remarkable defects appearing in the fouling layer (Figure 5c). As was reported in a previous work, alginate can form longer and larger polymeric networks [11]. Larger flocs caught on the membrane surface could generate more porous area than smaller size flocs and decrease the fouling resistance by allowing the water to pass through the floc defects. Thereby, fouling development with the coexistence of Na+-Ca2+ was mitigated and accompanied by negligible irreversible fouling as compared with Na+ alone (Table 1). In contrast, limited binding and ionic bridging effects were found with the coexistence of Na+-Al3+ (Figure 1b), and increased concentration of organic functional groups was observed (Figure 4), probably due to the changed configuration of the alginate cake layer induced by the involvement of Al3+. Eventually, a more compact fouling layer with a higher amount of irreversible fouling was observed with Na+-Al3+ than the case of Na+-Ca2+, which presumably led to the higher membrane rejection rate during ultrafiltration of alginates (Figure 6). These results implied that high-saline environments could substantially affect fouling propensities and water treatment effectiveness.

5. Conclusions

The current work investigated the impacts of high salinity on membrane fouling by polysaccharides during ultrafiltration of high-salinity organic wastewater. The change in alginate characteristics affected by high-salinity environments, i.e., high-concentration Na+ alone, as well as the coexistences of Na+-Ca2+ and Na+-Al3+, were examined in depth, with their fouling propensities and retention rates evaluated in a standard crossflow ultrafiltration system. The key findings can be summarized as follows:
(i)
Compared with pure alginate, membrane fouling was enhanced by the presence of Na+, while decreased fouling development was observed when Ca2+ and Al3+ were further added on the basis of Na+, but entirely differentiated fouling morphology and foulant properties were found with the cases of Na+-Ca2+ and Na+-Al3+.
(ii)
The membrane rejection rate for organics was generally weakened by high salinity environments; however, the synergistic effects of Na+ and Ca2+ further worsened permeate quality because of significant defects and cracks appearing on the fouling layer.
(iii)
Ca2+ enlarged the molecule size of the alginate due to the strong coordination effects of Ca2+ with carboxyl groups to bridge alginate chains together, while negligible binding affinity with the alginate was found for Al3+ addition.
(iv)
Na+-Al3+ triggered more irreversible fouling formation, probably making the membranes difficult to clean and thus increasing operational cost.
(v)
This study gained more insights into the current treatment of high-salinity wastewater using membrane-based techniques.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.C. and J.W.; methodology, W.C.; validation, Q.C. and J.Z.; formal analysis, W.C.; investigation, Q.C., J.Z., Y.L. and W.X.; data curation, Q.C., J.Z., Y.L. and W.X.; writing—original draft preparation, W.C.; writing—review and editing, W.C. and J.W.; visualization, W.C.; supervision, W.C.; funding acquisition, W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China, grant number 2021YFC2102203; National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 22008009; and Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Safavi, M.; Mohammadi, T. High-salinity water desalination using VMD. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 149, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mannina, G.; Cosenza, A.; di Trapani, D.; Capodici, M.; Viviani, G. Membrane bioreactors for treatment of saline wastewater contaminated by hydrocarbons (diesel fuel): An experimental pilot plant case study. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 291, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Tan, X.; Acquah, I.; Liu, H.; Li, W.; Tan, S. A critical review on saline wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactor (MBR) from a microbial perspective. Chemosphere 2019, 220, 1150–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Bañuelos, G.; Yan, B.; Zhou, Q.; Yu, X.; Cheng, X. Constructed wetlands for saline wastewater treatment: A review. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 98, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. He, H.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, C.; Zeng, G. Influence of salinity on microorganisms in activated sludge processes: A review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 119, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, J.; Cahyadi, A.; Wu, B.; Pee, W.; Fane, A.G.; Chew, J.W. The roles of particles in enhancing membrane filtration: A review. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 595, 117570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Song, W.; Li, Z.; Ding, Y.; Liu, F.; You, H.; Qi, P.; Wang, F.; Li, Y.; Jin, C. Performance of a novel hybrid membrane bioreactor for treating saline wastewater from mariculture: Assessment of pollutants removal and membrane filtration performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 331, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Foglia, A.; Akyol, Ç.; Frison, N.; Katsou, E.; Eusebi, A.L.; Fatone, F. Long-term operation of a pilot-scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating high salinity low loaded municipal wastewater in real environment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 236, 116279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mei, X.; Ding, Y.; Li, P.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Z.; Shen, W.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; et al. A novel system for zero-discharge treatment of high-salinity acetonitrile-containing wastewater: Combination of pervaporation with a membrane-aerated bioreactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 384, 123338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. You, X.; Zhang, J.; Shen, L.; Li, R.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Hong, H.; Yang, L.; Ma, Y.; Lin, H. Thermodynamic mechanisms of membrane fouling during filtration of alginate solution in coagulation-ultrafiltration (UF) process in presence of different ionic strength and iron(III) ion concentration. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 635, 119532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Long, Y.; Yu, G.; Dong, L.; Xu, Y.; Lin, H.; Deng, Y.; You, X.; Yang, L.; Liao, B.Q. Synergistic fouling behaviors and mechanisms of calcium ions and polyaluminum chloride associated with alginate solution in coagulation-ultrafiltration (UF) process. Water Res. 2021, 189, 116665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, R.; Rao, L.; Zhang, J.; Shen, L.; Xu, Y.; You, X.; Liao, B.-Q.; Lin, H. Novel in-situ electroflotation driven by hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) with polypyrrole (PPy)-Ni-modified fabric membrane for efficient oil/water separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 635, 119502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, M.; Chen, Y.; Lin, H.; Zhao, L.; Shen, L.; Li, R.; Xu, Y.; Hong, H.; He, Y. Membrane fouling caused by biological foams in a submerged membrane bioreactor: Mechanism insights. Water Res. 2020, 181, 115932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cai, W.; Han, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y. Formation mechanisms of emerging organic contaminants during on-line membrane cleaning with NaOCl in MBR. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 386, 121966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Weinberger, M.E.; Kulozik, U. Pulsatile crossflow improves microfiltration fractionation of cells and proteins. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 629, 119295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.; Tang, G.; Zhang, D.; Wu, L.; Lu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, X.; Cheng, W.; Feng, J.; Yan, W.; et al. Fouling control in ultrafiltration of secondary effluent using polyaniline/TiO2 adsorption and subsequent treatment of desorption eluate using electrochemical oxidation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, E.J.; Kim, Y.H.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, H.S. Effect of different physical conditions on fouling control in in-situ chemical cleaning in place (CIP) for flat sheet membranes fouled by secondary effluents. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 302, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cheng, X.; Liang, H.; Qu, F.; Ding, A.; Chang, H.; Liu, B.; Tang, X.; Wu, D.; Li, G. Fabrication of Mn oxide incorporated ceramic membranes for membrane fouling control and enhanced catalytic ozonation of p-chloronitrobenzene. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 308, 1010–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, J.; Wu, B.; Chew, J.W. Membrane fouling mitigation by fluidized granular activated carbon: Effect of fiber looseness and impact on irreversible fouling. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 242, 116764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. You, X.; Teng, J.; Chen, Y.; Long, Y.; Yu, G.; Shen, L.; Lin, H. New insights into membrane fouling by alginate: Impacts of ionic strength in presence of calcium ions. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hao, Y.; Moriya, A.; Maruyama, T.; Ohmukai, Y.; Matsuyama, H. Effect of metal ions on humic acid fouling of hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 376, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hao, Y.; Moriya, A.; Ohmukai, Y.; Matsuyama, H.; Maruyama, T. Effect of metal ions on the protein fouling of hollow-fiber ultrafiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 111, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. van de Ven, W.J.C.; Sant, K.v.t.; Pünt, I.G.M.; Zwijnenburg, A.; Kemperman, A.J.B.; van der Meer, W.G.J.; Wessling, M. Hollow fiber dead-end ultrafiltration: Influence of ionic environment on filtration of alginates. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 308, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Meng, S.; Winters, H.; Liu, Y. Ultrafiltration behaviors of alginate blocks at various calcium concentrations. Water Res. 2015, 83, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cai, W.; Gao, Z.; Yu, S.; Lv, M.; Shi, Y.; Wang, J. New insights into membrane fouling formation during ultrafiltration of organic wastewater with high salinity. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 635, 119446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.W. Uncertainty of preset-order kinetic equations in description of biosorption data. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 3309–3312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Montgomery, D.C.; Runger, G.C. Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang, Y.; Ma, F.; Li, G.-B. Fouling of ultrafiltration membrane by algal-rich water: Effect of kalium, calcium, and aluminum. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 405, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ostolska, I.; Wiśniewska, M. Application of the zeta potential measurements to explanation of colloidal Cr2O3 stability mechanism in the presence of the ionic polyamino acids. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2014, 292, 2453–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Carneiro-da-Cunha, M.G.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Souza, B.W.S.; Teixeira, J.A.; Vicente, A.A. Influence of concentration, ionic strength and pH on zeta potential and mean hydrodynamic diameter of edible polysaccharide solutions envisaged for multinanolayered films production. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 85, 522–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Idota, Y.; Kogure, Y.; Kato, T.; Yano, K.; Arakawa, H.; Miyajima, C.; Kasahara, F.; Ogihara, T. Relationship between physical parameters of various metal ions and binding affinity for alginate. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2016, 39, 1893–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, Z.; Ma, J.; Tang, C.Y.; Kimura, K.; Wang, Q.; Han, X. Membrane cleaning in membrane bioreactors: A review. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 468, 276–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jarusutthirak, C.; Mattaraj, S.; Jiraratananon, R. Influence of inorganic scalants and natural organic matter on nanofiltration membrane fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 287, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The changes in (a) zeta potential and (b) particle size of alginates affected by the presence of Na+ and different concentrations of Ca2+ and Al3+. Note: control represents pure alginate solution, whereas 0 mol/L means alginate solution with 2 mol/L Na+.
Figure 1. The changes in (a) zeta potential and (b) particle size of alginates affected by the presence of Na+ and different concentrations of Ca2+ and Al3+. Note: control represents pure alginate solution, whereas 0 mol/L means alginate solution with 2 mol/L Na+.
Membranes 11 00590 g001
Figure 2. The change in flux profiles against filtration time for alginate solutions affected by the presences of Na+, Na+-Ca2+ (a) and Na+-Al3+ (b). Note: control represents pure alginate solution.
Figure 2. The change in flux profiles against filtration time for alginate solutions affected by the presences of Na+, Na+-Ca2+ (a) and Na+-Al3+ (b). Note: control represents pure alginate solution.
Membranes 11 00590 g002
Figure 3. Fitting results of the filtration data with four theoretical models.
Figure 3. Fitting results of the filtration data with four theoretical models.
Membranes 11 00590 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of the fouled membranes after filtration of alginates under various high-salinity conditions.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of the fouled membranes after filtration of alginates under various high-salinity conditions.
Membranes 11 00590 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of fouled membranes after filtration of alginates under various high-salinity conditions. (a) Pure alginate; (b) Alginate-Na+; (c) Alginate-Na+-Ca2+; (d) Alginate-Na+-Al3+; (e) Virgin membrane.
Figure 5. SEM images of fouled membranes after filtration of alginates under various high-salinity conditions. (a) Pure alginate; (b) Alginate-Na+; (c) Alginate-Na+-Ca2+; (d) Alginate-Na+-Al3+; (e) Virgin membrane.
Membranes 11 00590 g005
Figure 6. The changes in membrane rejection rates during filtration of alginates affected by various high-salinity environments. Note: control represents pure alginate solution.
Figure 6. The changes in membrane rejection rates during filtration of alginates affected by various high-salinity environments. Note: control represents pure alginate solution.
Membranes 11 00590 g006
Table 1. Respective resistance of fouled membranes after 180 min filtration. Note: control represents pure alginate solution.
Table 1. Respective resistance of fouled membranes after 180 min filtration. Note: control represents pure alginate solution.
ResistanceControlNa+Na+-Ca2+Na+-Al3+
0.5 M Ca2+1.0 M Ca2+0.5 M Al3+1.0 M Al3+
Rm (×1012 m−1)1.612.001.201.711.471.83
Rr (×1012 m−1)7.5840.739.339.536.099.24
Rir (×1012 m−1)0.182.470.090.022.942.86
Rt (×1012 m−1)9.3745.2010.6211.2610.5013.90
Table 2. Parameters of the best fitting models during membrane filtration of alginate affected by various high-salinity environments.
Table 2. Parameters of the best fitting models during membrane filtration of alginate affected by various high-salinity environments.
SaltsBest Fitting ModelKinetic RateBack-Transport Flux (J*, L/(m2 h))
ControlCake filtrationkD = 5.1 × 10−6 min m−272.93
Na+-Al3+Cake filtrationkD = 4.1 × 10−6 min m−266.12
Na+Intermediate blockingkC = 0.0011 m−130.63
Na+-Ca2+Intermediate blockingkC = 0.0002 m−159.63
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cai, W.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Xie, W.; Wang, J. Effects of High Salinity on Alginate Fouling during Ultrafiltration of High-Salinity Organic Synthetic Wastewater. Membranes 2021, 11, 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080590

AMA Style

Cai W, Chen Q, Zhang J, Li Y, Xie W, Wang J. Effects of High Salinity on Alginate Fouling during Ultrafiltration of High-Salinity Organic Synthetic Wastewater. Membranes. 2021; 11(8):590. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cai, Weiwei, Qiuying Chen, Jingyu Zhang, Yan Li, Wenwen Xie, and Jingwei Wang. 2021. "Effects of High Salinity on Alginate Fouling during Ultrafiltration of High-Salinity Organic Synthetic Wastewater" Membranes 11, no. 8: 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080590

APA Style

Cai, W., Chen, Q., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Xie, W., & Wang, J. (2021). Effects of High Salinity on Alginate Fouling during Ultrafiltration of High-Salinity Organic Synthetic Wastewater. Membranes, 11(8), 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080590

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop