Next Article in Journal
Expression of Mutant Glycine Receptors in Xenopus Oocytes Using Canonical and Non-Canonical Amino Acids Reveals Distinct Roles of Conserved Proline Residues
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Treatment of Tiny Pollution Water with PAC-HUM System in Kuitun River
Previous Article in Special Issue
Performance Analysis of a Solar Heating Ammonia Decomposition Membrane Reactor under Co-Current Sweep
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Flux Nanofiltration Membranes with Double-Walled Carbon Nanotube (DWCNT) as the Interlayer

1
Frontiers Science Center for Deep Ocean Multispheres and Earth System, Key Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
2
SEPCOIII Electric Power Construction Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266100, China
3
Quanzhou Lanshen Environmental Protection Research Institute Co., Ltd., Quanzhou 362000, China
4
The Institute of Seawater Desalination and Multipurpose Utilization, SOA, Tianjin 300192, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2022, 12(10), 1011; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12101011
Submission received: 15 September 2022 / Revised: 6 October 2022 / Accepted: 13 October 2022 / Published: 19 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmentally Conscious Development of Membrane Separations)

Abstract

:
Nanofiltration (NF) membranes with a high permeability and rejection are of great interest in desalination, separation and purification. However, how to improve the permeation and separation performance still poses a great challenge in the preparation of NF membranes. Herein, the novel composite NF membrane was prepared through the interfacial polymerization of M-phenylenediamine (MPD) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) on a double-walled carbon nanotube (DWCNT) interlayer supported by PES substrate. The DWCNT interlayer had a great impact on the polyamide layer formation. With the increase of the DWCNT dosage, the XPS results revealed an increase in the number of carboxyl groups, which decreased the crosslinking degree of the polyamide layer. Additionally, the AFM results showed that the surface roughness and specific surface area increased gradually. The water flux of the prepared membrane increased from 25.4 L/(m2·h) and 26.6 L/(m2·h) to 109 L/(m2·h) and 104.3 L/(m2·h) with 2000 ppm Na2SO4 and NaCl solution, respectively, under 0.5 MPa. Meanwhile, the rejection of Na2SO4 and NaCl decreased from 99.88% and 99.38% to 96.48% and 60.47%. The proposed method provides a novel insight into the rational design of the multifunctional interlayer, which shows great potential in the preparation of high-performance membranes.

1. Introduction

With population growth and economic development, fresh water scarcity has become extremely serious [1,2,3,4,5], and 25% of the population currently do not have enough fresh water. Due to low energy requirements, good stability and environment compatibility, membrane separation technology has been widely applied to alleviate the shortage of water resources. As a kind of pressure-driven membrane separation technology [6], nanofiltration (NF) with high permeability and selectivity for specific components has developed rapidly in recent years. Until now, NF has been widely applied in water treatment [7,8,9,10,11,12], biomedicine [9,13], food [14,15,16,17] and environmental protection [18,19,20,21]. The preparation methods of NF membranes mainly include phase-transformation [22], surface coating [23], layer-by-layer self-assembly [24], surface grafting [25], co-extrusion [26] and interfacial polymerization [27]. Among the above methods, interfacial polymerization has the advantages of a simple operation and low cost; therefore, it is the most commonly used method in the preparation of commercial NF membranes.
Currently, there are many studies on the preparation of NF membranes by the interfacial polymerization method, most of which focus on the preparation of substrate and the selection of reaction monomers and additives. The studies related to substrate indicate that the pore structure and properties (pore diameter, porosity, hydrophilicity, etc.) of substrate can directly affect the diffusion rate of monomer in the interfacial polymerization reaction and then change the morphology and properties of polyamide layers [28,29,30,31]. Misdan et al. [29] used PS, PES and PEI membrane as the substrate and indicated that the enhanced hydrophilicity of substrates could reduce the crosslinking degree of polyamide layers and then improve the permeability of NF membranes. Other related literatures have studied interfacial polymerization monomers. Hydrophilic monomers can improve the surface hydrophilicity of NF membranes and thus increase the water flux [32,33,34,35]. For example, Ma et al. [34] synthesized zwitterionic monomers using PEI and SBMA, and then prepared NF membranes through the interfacial polymerization method. The results showed that the water flux of NF membranes was over two times that of the membranes without zwitterion. In addition to hydrophilic monomers, monomers with special functional groups can also improve the performance of NF membranes [36,37,38].
With the development of nanomaterials, researchers have turned their attention to the modification of NF membranes using nanostructured materials. Some studies reported that the addition of nanomaterials (carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide, metal organic frameworks, covalent organic frameworks, etc.) into aqueous solution or oil phase solution could change the structures and properties of polyamide layers [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Zhao et al. [40] utilized a hydrophilic carbon nanotube (CNT) to increase the water flux of NF membranes without much decrease in salt rejection, and thus broke through the “trade-off” effect. Similarly, Zhu et al. [44] added a metal organic framework (MOF) into the polyamide layer to improve the surface roughness of NF membranes. The results showed that the permeability of NF membranes was greatly enhanced under the premise of maintaining salt rejection. Furthermore, some studies used nanomaterials as an interlayer to improve the properties of membranes [48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. Wang et al. [50] coated cellulose nanocrystals on the substrate surface as an interlayer, which decreased the cross-linking degree of the polyamide layer by regulating the interfacial polymerization process, and thus improved the water permeation. Wu et al. [53] modified NF membranes with PDA-COFs and reduced the thickness of the polyamide layer from 79 nm to 11 nm. The study indicated that the NF membranes simultaneously had a high water flux and salt rejection.
The double-walled carbon nanotube (DWCNT) possesses a good hydrophilicity and interconnected structure, which has the potential to endow NF membranes with a perfect performance. In this study, DWCNT was modified with dopamine hydrochloride and then used as an interlayer to improve the performance of NF membranes. The results showed that the prepared membrane had a high water flux and rejection of Na2SO4. It is expected that the study will be able to facilitate the preparation of NF membranes with an enhanced permeability, and thus it shows great potential in the industrial preparation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Commercial PES membranes (Haining Zhengda Filtration Equipment Co., Ltd., Haining, China) with a pore size of 100 nm were used as substrate for the preparation of NF membranes. The COOH-functionalized DWCNT (60%, Nanjing XFNANO Materials Tech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) with an inner diameter of 1–3 nm, outer diameter of 2–4 nm and length of 0.5–2 μm, dopamine hydrochloride (98%, Aladdin, Vienna, VA, USA), sodium dodecyl benzenesulfonate (SDBS, 98%, Aladdin) and Tris-HCl (1 M, Ph = 7.5, Aladdin) were used to modify the substrate. M-phenylenediamine (MPD, 99.5%, Aladdin), trimesoyl chloride (TMC, 99.5%, Aladdin), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, 99%, Aladdin), camphor sulfonic acid (CSA, 99%, Aladdin), triethylamine (TEA, 99.5%, Aladdin), N-hexane (99%, Aladdin) and deionized water (18 MΩ) were used to fabricate NF membranes by the interfacial polymerization method. NaCl (99.5%, Tianjin Fengchuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China) and Na2SO4 (99.5%, Tianjin Fengchuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China) were used to test the performance of the NF membrane.

2.2. Modification of the Substrate with DWCNT

Dopamine hydrochloride was used to modify DWCNT, in order to make DWCNT stably adhere to the substrate surface [49]. A total of 10 mg DWCNT and 100 mg SDBS were dispersed in 100 mL deionized water, and the mixed solution was subjected to sonication for 10 h. Then, the obtained dispersion was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 1 h to remove the undispersed DWCNT. The concentration of DWCNT in dispersion was about 0.06 mg/mL. After that, we added 10 mg dopamine hydrochloride into 100 mL DWCNT dispersion and stirred for 1 h at 40 °C. Then, we added 10 mL Tris-HCl into the mixture and reacted it for at least 36 h. Finally, the solution was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 30 min to obtain the polydopamine/DWCNT dispersion. In this study, different dosages of polydopamine/DWCNT dispersion (0 mL, 1 mL, 3 mL, 5 mL, 7 mL and 9 mL) were diluted to 100 ml and then adhered to the PES membrane after suction filtration, which were named UF-0, UF-1, UF-3, UF-5, UF-7 and UF-9, respectively. The modified PES membranes were dried for 5 min at 80 °C and then stored in deionized water for later use.

2.3. Preparation of NF Membranes

The interfacial polymerization process is depicted in Figure 1. First of all, the PES membranes were fixed on a clean glass plate with the dense layer facing up, then 2.0 wt% MPD aqueous solution containing 2.6 wt% CSA, 1.1 wt% TEA and 0.1 wt% SDS was poured onto the top surface of PES membranes for 1 min, followed by removing excess MPD solution by a rubber roller. After that, 0.15 wt% TMC/n-hexane solution was poured onto the MPD-impregnated side of the PES substrate for 40 s, and the polyamide formed through interfacial polymerization reaction. Then, the membranes were rinsed thoroughly with pure n-hexane to remove unreacted TMC. Finally, the membranes were put into the oven (80 °C) for 5 min and soaked in deionized water for later use. The NF membranes were named NF-0, NF-1, NF-3, NF-5, NF-7 and NF-9 according to the substrate membranes, respectively.

2.4. Membranes Characterization

Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR, Nicolet IS50, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) can analyze the information of functional groups according to characteristic peaks of the infrared spectrum, and thus confirm the formation of the polyamide layer [55]. X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-Alpha, Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to characterize the chemical components and functional groups of the membranes surface. The surface morphology and properties (including roughness, surface area and projected area) of membranes were characterized by an atomic force microscope (AFM, AIST, Tokyo, Japan). Additionally, the specific surface area could be calculated by the Equation (1). The contact angle was measured by the static contact angle measuring instrument (DSA100, Berlin, Germany), which indicated the membranes’ surface hydrophilicity. The zeta potential instrument (SurPASS 3, Anton Paar, Berlin, Germany) was used to analyze the electric charge of membranes [50].
Specific   surface   area = Surface   Area Projected   Area

2.5. Membrane Filtration Performance

The filtration performance of NF membranes was tested in a lab-scale cross-flow filtration system with an effective area of 28.26 cm2 at 25 ± 0.5 °C and 0.5 MPa. In this study, the membranes were pre-compacted for 1 h under 0.5 MPa with deionized water, and then the performance of membranes was tested by replacing deionized water with 2000 ppm NaCl solution and 2000 ppm Na2SO4 solution, respectively. The water flux and salt rejection were calculated by the following equation [4,56]:
F = V A × Δ t
where F is the water flux of membranes, L/(m2·h); V is the volume of permeation during the experiment, L; A is the effective area of the membrane, m2; and Δ t is the operation time, h.
R = ( 1 C p C f ) × 100 %
where R is the salt rejection of membranes, %; Cf is the salt concentration of the feed solution, ppm; and Cp is the salt concentration of the permeate solution, ppm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface Properties of Membranes

The chemical groups of the NF membranes’ surface were characterized by ATR-FTIR. The PES substrate has three characteristic spectra at 1410 cm−1, 1485 cm−1 and 1580 cm−1 (Figure 2) due to aromatic ring (benzene) vibration [28,57]. However, for the composite NF membranes, three new peaks at 1541 cm−1, 1611 cm−1 and 1667 cm−1 related to C=O stretching of the amide I bond, aromatic amide ring breathing and N–H bending of amide II in the –CO–NH– group [58,59], respectively, were identified in Figure 2. The three characteristic peaks indicated that the polyamide functional layer had been successfully prepared on the surface of the PES substrate by the interfacial polymerization method. In addition, Figure 2 shows that the addition of DWCNT has little effect on the infrared peak of NF membranes, which indicated that new functional groups were not generated on the surface of NF membranes after the addition of DWCNT.
An XPS analysis was carried out to characterize the elemental composition of the polyamide layer (5~10 nm in the surface layer) [60]. The XPS analysis confirmed that there was no characteristic element S on the surface of the NF membrane, indicating that the PES substrate surface was completely covered by a polyamide layer with a thickness of more than 10 nm. The crosslinking degree can be calculated in terms of the atomic concentration of the membrane surface. The calculation formula is as follows [60]:
Crosslinking   Degree ( % ) = X X + Y × 100 %
where X and Y represent cross-linked and linear parts, respectively (Figure 1). The crosslinking degree can be calculated according to the atomic ratio of N and O [61]:
O N = 3 X + 4 Y 3 X + 2 Y
Crosslinking   Degree ( % ) = 4 N 2 O N + O × 100 %
In theory, the range of the crosslinking degree is 0~100%. When the crosslinking degree is 100%, the polyamide completely forms a cross-linked structure, and thus O/N is equal to 1; when the crosslinking degree is 0, the whole structure is linear, and the O/N is equal to 2. The atomic concentration, O/N ratio and crosslinking degree of the polyamide layer are shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that with the increase of the DWCNT dosage, the O/N ratio increased gradually, which indicated that the linear structure increased and that the crosslinking degree of the polyamide layer decreased. Figure 3 illustrates that the addition of DWCNT led to the reduction of amide groups and the increase of carboxyl groups [62]. This phenomenon can be explained by the diffusion and migration of MPD in the reaction region. When the substrate was immersed in the aqueous solution, the MPD monomer entered the substrate pores and adhered to the surface of the substrate. Additionally, when the substrate was immersed in TMC solution, the MPD diffused to the reaction zone and reacted with TMC, after which polyamide was formed in the substrate pores and on the surface of the substrate [63]. At the same time, some water molecules adhered to the substrate surface with the addition of DWCNT because of its strong hydrophilicity. During the interfacial polymerization reaction, water molecules diffused to the reaction zone, leading to the hydrolysis reaction of TMC and formation of more carboxyl groups, and the crosslinking degree of NF membranes decreased.
The XPS can also test the ratio of oxygen in different functional groups. The O1s has two peaks at binding energies of 531.5 eV and 533 eV, representing carbonyl oxygen bonding (O=C-O/N-C=O) and carboxyl oxygen bonding (O=C-O) [64], respectively. As seen in Figure 4, the ratio of carboxyl oxygen (At%) rose with the DWCNT dosage increase, which indicated that the crosslinking degree decreased and that the number of carboxyl groups on the NF membrane surface increased.
Zeta potential is used to characterize the electric charge on the membrane surface [21]. The variation trend of membranes’ zeta potential for different DWCNT dosages is shown in Figure 5. The isoelectric point (IEP) decreased with the increase of the DWCNT dosage, from 4.2 without DWCNT modification to 2.7 for NF membranes modified with 9 ml DWCNT dispersion, which indicated that the addition of DWCNT increased the negative electric charge on the membrane surface [49]. In this experiment, it showed that the number of carboxyl groups on the membrane surface increased, which was consistent with the XPS test results.
The surface morphology of DWCNT-modified membranes characterized by AFM is shown in Figure 6 exhibiting a lotus-leaf-like structure. Additionally, with the increase of the DWCNT dosage, peak-valley structures appeared more obviously, and the mean roughness (Ra) and root mean square (Rms) of the polyamide layer gradually increased (Table 1). Because most DWCNTs cannot enter into the pore channels but adhere to the substrate surface, which enlarges the height difference of the substrate surface, and because the roughness of membranes is positively correlated with the height difference of the substrate surface, the roughness of NF membranes increased with the addition of DWCNT. Meanwhile, the specific surface area of NF membranes gradually increased as well, which was beneficial to improving the water flux of NF membranes.
The water contact angle is an important parameter to evaluate the wettability. In general, the increase of roughness can decrease the contact angle of hydrophilic materials but increase the contact angle of hydrophobic materials [4,65]. As shown in Figure 7, the contact angle of NF membranes decreased significantly with the increase of the DWCNT dosage, which was related to the changes of functional groups and the roughness of the membrane surface. According to the analysis of the XPS and zeta potential results, the addition of DWCNT could increase the number of carboxyl groups on the membrane surface, which improved the hydrophilicity of the membrane. Moreover, the roughness also increased with the addition of DWCNT. Under the influence of functional groups and the surface morphology, the contact angle of membranes decreased with the addition of DWCNT.

3.2. Membrane Performance Tests

The water permeability and salt rejection of NF membranes were evaluated and are shown in Figure 8. Generally, the growing DWCNT dosage increased the water flux of membranes but decreased the salt rejection. For NaCl and Na2SO4 solutions, the water flux increased from 26.6 L/(m2·h) and 25.4 L/(m2·h) to 104.3 L/(m2·h) and 109 L/(m2·h), while the salt rejection decreased from 99.38% and 99.88% to 60.47% and 96.48%, respectively. The phenomenon of water flux increasing with the DWCNT dosage could be attributed to the following three factors. Firstly, according to the results of the XPS, zeta potential and contact angle, the addition of DWCNT increased the quantity of carboxyl groups of the NF membranes, which improved the hydrophilicity of the membrane surface [4], and then in turn reduced the resistance of water molecules passing through the boundary layer to the membrane surface, thus decreasing the overall resistance of NF membranes. Secondly, the addition of DWCNT increased the specific surface area, which provided more penetration sites for water molecules passing through the polyamide layer and improved the transmission efficiency [66,67]. Thirdly, the water molecules with a diameter of approximately 0.4 nm can, at 25 °C [68], pass through the inner channels of DWCNT. Like the “water channel” between the polyamide layer and the substrate, internal channels of DWCNT facilitated the water molecules entering into substrate pores, which reduced the penetration resistance of water molecules. At the same time, the channels formed between the polyamide and DWCNT also provided another path for water molecules.
There are two reasons for the difference in the rejection rate of NaCl and Na2SO4. With the increase of the DWCNT dosage, the quantity of carboxyl groups on the membrane surface had a sharp increase. Due to the Donnan exclusion effect, the repulsive forces between divalent sulfate ions were much larger than those of chloride ions [49]. Moreover, the increase of the DWCNT dosage gradually decreased the crosslinking degree of the polyamide layer [51], and the hydrated ionic radius of sulfate ions was greater than that of chloride ions. Therefore, under the joint influence of size sieving and the Donnan exclusion effect [4,69,70], sulfate ions were more difficult to pass through the membranes. Hence, the rejection rate of Na2SO4 was much higher than that of NaCl.

4. Conclusions

In this study, NF membranes were prepared by the interfacial polymerization method on a PES substrate modified with DWCNT. By adjusting the dosage of DWCNT, NF membranes with different crosslinking degrees and roughness values were prepared. Additionally, due to the changes of the membrane surface properties and the internal structure of the polyamide layer, the water flux increased by about three times. For 2000 ppm NaCl and Na2SO4 solutions, the water flux increased from 26.6 L/(m2·h) and 25.4 L/(m2·h) to 104.3 L/(m2·h) and 109 L/(m2·h), respectively, while the salt rejection decreased from 99.38% and 99.88% to 60.47% and 96.48%. The modified membranes exhibit a high rejection rate of Na2SO4 due to size sieving and the Donnan exclusion effect. These findings propose an avenue to fabricate high-flux NF membranes.

Author Contributions

Investigation, methodology, data curation, writing—original draft, Z.W.; methodology, investigation, writing—original draft and writing—review and editing, X.W.; conceptualization, writing—review and editing, T.Z.; conceptualization, writing—review and editing, B.M.; visualization and methodology, H.X.; visualization and methodology, Y.H.; conceptualization, methodology and supervision, J.W.; supervision, conceptualization and methodology, C.G.; Funding acquisition, supervision, conceptualization, data curation, writing—review and editing, X.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Projects, grant number 2019YFD0900502, Key Research Project of Shandong Province, grant number 2019JZZY010806 and the Young Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Laboratory of Seawater Comprehensive Utilization, Ocean University of China, for the Analytical Testing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fang, X.; Wei, S.; Liu, S.; Li, R.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lou, M.; Chen, G.; Li, F. Metal-Coordinated Nanofiltration Membranes Constructed on Metal Ions Blended Support toward Enhanced Dye/Salt Separation and Antifouling Performances. Membranes 2022, 12, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Amadou-Yacouba, Z.; Mendret, J.; Lesage, G.; Zaviska, F.; Brosillon, S. Impact of Pre-Ozonation during Nanofiltration of MBR Effluent. Membranes 2022, 12, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jee, H.; Jang, J.; Kang, Y.; Eisa, T.; Chae, K.-J.; Kim, I.S.; Yang, E. Enhancing the Dye-Rejection Efficiencies and Stability of Graphene Oxide-Based Nanofiltration Membranes via Divalent Cation Intercalation and Mild Reduction. Membranes 2022, 12, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Masibi, E.G.; Makhetha, T.A.; Moutloali, R.M. Effect of the Incorporation of ZIF-8@ GO into the Thin-Film Membrane on Salt Rejection and BSA Fouling. Membranes 2022, 12, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ma, Z.-Y.; Xue, Y.-R.; Xu, Z.-K. Alginate hydrogel assisted controllable interfacial polymerization for high-performance nanofiltration membranes. Membranes 2021, 11, 435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, M.; Liu, C.; Fan, M.; Liu, M.; Shen, S. Optimization of Nanofiltration Hollow Fiber Membrane Fabrication Process Based on Response Surface Method. Membranes 2022, 12, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Al-Rashdi, B.; Somerfield, C.; Hilal, N. Heavy metals removal using adsorption and nanofiltration techniques. Sep. Purif. Rev. 2011, 40, 209–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chang, F.; Liu, W.; Wang, X. Comparison of polyamide nanofiltration and low-pressure reverse osmosis membranes on as (III) rejection under various operational conditions. Desalination 2014, 334, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tapia-Quirós, P.; Montenegro-Landívar, M.F.; Reig, M.; Vecino, X.; Saurina, J.; Granados, M.; Cortina, J.L. Integration of Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis Technologies in Polyphenols Recovery Schemes from Winery and Olive Mill Wastes by Aqueous-Based Processing. Membranes 2022, 12, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Javier, L.; Pulido-Beltran, L.; Vrouwenvelder, J.S.; Farhat, N.M. Permeation Increases Biofilm Development in Nanofiltration Membranes Operated with Varying Feed Water Phosphorous Concentrations. Membranes 2022, 12, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vives, M.B.; Thuvander, J.; Arkell, A.; Lipnizki, F. Low-Molecular-Weight Lignin Recovery with Nanofiltration in the Kraft Pulping Process. Membranes 2022, 12, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Szekely, G.; Bandarra, J.; Heggie, W.; Sellergren, B.; Ferreira, F.C. Organic solvent nanofiltration: A platform for removal of genotoxins from active pharmaceutical ingredients. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 381, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Siew, W.E.; Livingston, A.G.; Ates, C.; Merschaert, A. Molecular separation with an organic solvent nanofiltration cascade–augmenting membrane selectivity with process engineering. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 90, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tres, M.V.; Ferraz, H.C.; Dallago, R.M.; Di Luccio, M.; Oliveira, J.V. Characterization of polymeric membranes used in vegetable oil/organic solvents separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 362, 495–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. García-Martín, N.; Pérez-Magariño, S.; Ortega-Heras, M.; González-Huerta, C.; Mihnea, M.; González-SanJosé, M.L.; Palacio, L.; Prádanos, P.; Hernandez, A. Sugar reduction in musts with nanofiltration membranes to obtain low alcohol-content wines. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 76, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Salgado, C.; Palacio, L.; Carmona, F.; Hernández, A.; Prádanos, P. Influence of low and high molecular weight compounds on the permeate flux decline in nanofiltration of red grape must. Desalination 2013, 315, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Catarino, M.; Mendes, A. Dealcoholizing wine by membrane separation processes. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2011, 12, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kharaka, Y.K.; Ambats, G.; Presser, T.S.; Davis, R.A. Removal of selenium from contaminated agricultural drainage water by nanofiltration membranes. Appl. Geochem. 1996, 11, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Akbari, A.; Desclaux, S.; Rouch, J.-C.; Remigy, J.-C. Application of nanofiltration hollow fibre membranes, developed by photografting, to treatment of anionic dye solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 297, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Liu, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z. Application Progress of Nanofiltration Combination Technology in the Treatment of Landfill Leachate. Meteorol. Environ. Res. 2020, 11, 85–89. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ang, M.B.M.Y.; Wu, Y.-L.; Chu, M.-Y.; Wu, P.-H.; Chiao, Y.-H.; Millare, J.C.; Huang, S.-H.; Tsai, H.-A.; Lee, K.-R. Nanofiltration Membranes Formed through Interfacial Polymerization Involving Cycloalkane Amine Monomer and Trimesoyl Chloride Showing Some Tolerance to Chlorine during Dye Desalination. Membranes 2022, 12, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Darvishmanesh, S.; Tasselli, F.; Jansen, J.; Tocci, E.; Bazzarelli, F.; Bernardo, P.; Luis, P.; Degrève, J.; Drioli, E.; Van der Bruggen, B. Preparation of solvent stable polyphenylsulfone hollow fiber nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 384, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, S.; Chen, Z.; Cheng, Q.; Lü, Z.; Liu, M.; Gao, C. Application of thin-film composite hollow fiber membrane to submerged nanofiltration of anionic dye aqueous solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 88, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, L.; Qu, S.; Yang, Z.; Chen, Y. Fractionation of dye/NaCl mixture using a loose nanofiltration membrane based on the incorporation of WS2 in self-assembled layer-by-layer polymeric electrolytes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 18160–18169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Deng, L.; Li, S.; Qin, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H.; Chang, Z.; Hu, Y. Fabrication of antifouling thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane via surface grafting of polyethyleneimine followed by zwitterionic modification. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 619, 118564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhu, W.-P.; Sun, S.-P.; Gao, J.; Fu, F.-J.; Chung, T.-S. Dual-layer polybenzimidazole/polyethersulfone (PBI/PES) nanofiltration (NF) hollow fiber membranes for heavy metals removal from wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 456, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Q.; Liao, Z.; Xie, J.; Ni, L.; Wang, C.; Qi, J.; Sun, X.; Wang, L.; Li, J. Enhancing nanofiltration performance by incorporating tannic acid modified metal-organic frameworks into thin-film nanocomposite membrane. Environ. Res. 2020, 191, 110215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ramon, G.; Wong, M.C.; Hoek, E.M. Transport through composite membrane, Part 1: Is there an optimal support membrane? J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415–416, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Misdan, N.; Lau, W.; Ismail, A.; Matsuura, T.; Rana, D. Study on the thin film composite poly(piperazine-amide) nanofiltration membrane: Impacts of physicochemical properties of substrate on interfacial polymerization formation. Desalination 2014, 344, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhu, S.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Z.; Tian, X.; Shi, M.; Wang, J.; Wang, S. Improved performance of polyamide thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane by using polyetersulfone/polyaniline membrane as the substrate. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 493, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, J.; Xu, R.; Yang, F.; Kang, J.; Cao, Y.; Xiang, M. Probing influences of support layer on the morphology of polyamide selective layer of thin film composite membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 556, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jin, J.-B.; Liu, D.-Q.; Zhang, D.-D.; Yin, Y.-H.; Zhao, X.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-F. Preparation of thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes with improved antifouling property and flux using 2,2′-oxybis-ethylamine. Desalination 2015, 355, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Weng, X.-D.; Ji, Y.-L.; Ma, R.; Zhao, F.-Y.; An, Q.-F.; Gao, C.-J. Superhydrophilic and antibacterial zwitterionic polyamide nanofiltration membranes for antibiotics separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 510, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ma, T.; Su, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; He, M.; Li, Y.; Dong, N.; Wu, H.; Jiang, Z. Fabrication of electro-neutral nanofiltration membranes at neutral pH with antifouling surface via interfacial polymerization from a novel zwitterionic amine monomer. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 503, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cheng, X.Q.; Liu, Y.; Guo, Z.; Shao, L. Nanofiltration membrane achieving dual resistance to fouling and chlorine for “green” separation of antibiotics. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 493, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hu, J.; Lv, Z.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L. Fabrication of a High-flux Sulfonated Polyamide Nanofiltration Membrane: Experimental and Dissipative Particle Dynamics Studies. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 505, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zeng, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Q.J. An acid resistant nanofiltration membrane prepared from a precursor of poly(s-triazine-amine) by interfacial polymerization. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 546, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tang, Y.-J.; Xu, Z.-L.; Xue, S.-M.; Wei, Y.-M.; Yang, H. A chlorine-tolerant nanofiltration membrane prepared by the mixed diamine monomers of PIP and BHTTM. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 498, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wen, P.; Chen, Y.; Hu, X.; Cheng, B.; Liu, D.; Zhang, Y.; Nair, S. Polyamide thin film composite nanofiltration membrane modified with acyl chlorided graphene oxide. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 535, 208–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, F.-Y.; Ji, Y.-L.; Weng, X.-D.; Mi, Y.-F.; Ye, C.-C.; An, Q.-F.; Gao, C.-J. High-flux positively charged nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes filled with poly (dopamine) modified multiwall carbon nanotubes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 6693–6700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xue, S.; Xu, Z.-L.; Tang, Y.-J.; Ji, C.-H. Polypiperazine-amide nanofiltration membrane modified by different functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 19135–19144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bano, S.; Mahmood, A.; Kim, S.-J.; Lee, K.-H. Graphene oxide modified polyamide nanofiltration membrane with improved flux and antifouling properties. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 2065–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sorribas, S.; Gorgojo, P.; Téllez, C.; Coronas, J.; Livingston, A.G. High flux thin film nanocomposite membranes based on metal–organic frameworks for organic solvent nanofiltration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 15201–15208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhu, J.; Hou, J.; Yuan, S.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, R.; Tian, M.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Van der Bruggen, B. MOF-positioned polyamide membranes with a fishnet-like structure for elevated nanofiltration performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 16313–16322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, C.; Li, Z.; Chen, J.; Li, Z.; Yin, Y.; Cao, L.; Zhong, Y.; Wu, H. Covalent organic framework modified polyamide nanofiltration membrane with enhanced performance for desalination. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 523, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Batool, M.; Shafeeq, A.; Haider, B.; Ahmad, N. TiO2 nanoparticle filler-based mixed-matrix PES/CA nanofiltration membranes for enhanced desalination. Membranes 2021, 11, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wu, H.; Tang, B.; Wu, P. Optimization, characterization and nanofiltration properties test of MWNTs/polyester thin film nanocomposite membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 428, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wu, M.; Lv, Y.; Yang, H.-C.; Liu, L.-F.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Z.-K. Thin film composite membranes combining carbon nanotube intermediate layer and microfiltration support for high nanofiltration performances. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 515, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhu, Y.; Xie, W.; Gao, S.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Z.; Jin, J. Single-walled carbon nanotube film supported nanofiltration membrane with a nearly 10 nm thick polyamide selective layer for high-flux and high-rejection desalination. Small 2016, 12, 5034–5041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cheng, S.; Oatley, D.L.; Williams, P.M.; Wright, C.J. Positively charged nanofiltration membranes: Review of current fabrication methods and introduction of a novel approach. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 164, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, J.-J.; Yang, H.-C.; Wu, M.-B.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Z.-K. Nanofiltration membranes with cellulose nanocrystals as an interlayer for unprecedented performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 16289–16295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Soyekwo, F.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, R.; Qu, Y.; Lin, C.; Huang, X.; Zhu, A.; Liu, Q. Cellulose nanofiber intermediary to fabricate highly-permeable ultrathin nanofiltration membranes for fast water purification. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 524, 174–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wu, M.; Yuan, J.; Wu, H.; Su, Y.; Yang, H.; You, X.; Zhang, R.; He, X.; Khan, N.A.; Kasher, R.; et al. Ultrathin nanofiltration membrane with polydopamine-covalent organic framework interlayer for enhanced permeability and structural stability. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 576, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Park, M.J.; Wang, C.; Seo, D.H.; Gonzales, R.R.; Matsuyama, H.; Shon, H.K. Inkjet printed single walled carbon nanotube as an interlayer for high performance thin film composite nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 620, 118901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Belfer, S.; Fainchtain, R.; Purinson, Y.; Kedem, O. Surface characterization by FTIR-ATR spectroscopy of polyethersulfone membranes-unmodified, modified and protein fouled. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 172, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chen, B.-Z.; Lu, T.-D.; Wu, H.-L.; Fan, Y.-Q.; Xing, W.; Sun, S.-P. Designing high-performance nanofiltration membranes for high-salinity separation of sulfate and chloride in the chlor-alkali process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 12280–12290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Oldani, M.; Schock, G. Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by infrared spectroscopy, ESCA, and contact angle measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 1989, 43, 243–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tang, C.; Kwon, Y.-N.; Leckie, J. Probing the nano-and micro-scales of reverse osmosis membranes—A comprehensive characterization of physiochemical properties of uncoated and coated membranes by XPS, TEM, ATR-FTIR, and streaming potential measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 287, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Song, Y.; Liu, F.; Sun, B. Preparation, characterization, and application of thin film composite nanofiltration membranes. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 95, 1251–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Khorshidi, B.; Thundat, T.; Fleck, B.A.; Sadrzadeh, M. A novel approach toward fabrication of high performance thin film composite polyamide membranes. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Khorshidi, B.; Thundat, T.; Fleck, B.A.; Sadrzadeh, M. Thin film composite polyamide membranes: Parametric study on the influence of synthesis conditions. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 54985–54997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tian, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Cao, Z.; Zhao, M.; Guan, Y.; Zhang, Y. Establishment of transport channels with carriers for water in reverse osmosis membrane by incorporating hydrotalcite into the polyamide layer. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 12439–12448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Singh, P.S.; Joshi, S.; Trivedi, J.; Devmurari, C.; Rao, A.P.; Ghosh, P. Probing the structural variations of thin film composite RO membranes obtained by coating polyamide over polysulfone membranes of different pore dimensions. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ng, Z.; Lau, W.; Kartohardjono, S.; Ismail, A.F. Comprehensive studies of membrane rinsing on the physicochemical properties and separation performance of TFC RO membranes. Desalination 2020, 491, 114345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cassie, A.B.D. Contact angles. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 1948, 3, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Al Mayyahi, A. Important approaches to enhance reverse osmosis (RO) thin film composite (TFC) membranes performance. Membranes 2018, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Kwak, S.-Y.; Jung, S.G.; Kim, S.H. Structure-motion-performance relationship of flux-enhanced reverse osmosis (RO) membranes composed of aromatic polyamide thin films. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 4334–4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Schatzberg, P. Molecular diameter of water from solubility and diffusion measurements. J. Phys. Chem. 1967, 71, 4569–4570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jamil, T.S.; Mansor, E.S.; Abdallah, H.; Shaban, A. Innovative high flux/low pressure blend thin film composite membranes for water softening. React. Funct. Polym. 2018, 131, 384–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Misdan, N.; Lau, W.J.; Ong, C.S.; Ismail, A.F.; Matsuura, T. Study on the thin film composite poly (piperazine-amide) nanofiltration membranes made of different polymeric substrates: Effect of operating conditions. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2015, 32, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the interfacial polymerization reaction between MPD and TMC at the surface of PES substrate.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the interfacial polymerization reaction between MPD and TMC at the surface of PES substrate.
Membranes 12 01011 g001
Figure 2. Infrared spectrum of membrane with different DWCNT dosages.
Figure 2. Infrared spectrum of membrane with different DWCNT dosages.
Membranes 12 01011 g002
Figure 3. O/N ratio and crosslinking degree of NF membranes with different DWCNT dosages.
Figure 3. O/N ratio and crosslinking degree of NF membranes with different DWCNT dosages.
Membranes 12 01011 g003
Figure 4. Oxygen 1s XPS spectra of NF membranes with different DWCNT dosages.
Figure 4. Oxygen 1s XPS spectra of NF membranes with different DWCNT dosages.
Membranes 12 01011 g004
Figure 5. Zeta potential of NF membranes with different DWCNT dosages.
Figure 5. Zeta potential of NF membranes with different DWCNT dosages.
Membranes 12 01011 g005
Figure 6. AFM of NF membranes prepared with different DWCNT dosages.
Figure 6. AFM of NF membranes prepared with different DWCNT dosages.
Membranes 12 01011 g006
Figure 7. Contact angle of NF membranes with different DWCNT dosages.
Figure 7. Contact angle of NF membranes with different DWCNT dosages.
Membranes 12 01011 g007
Figure 8. Water flux and rejection of (a) NaCl/(b) Na2SO4 with different DWCNT dosages.
Figure 8. Water flux and rejection of (a) NaCl/(b) Na2SO4 with different DWCNT dosages.
Membranes 12 01011 g008
Table 1. Surface parameters of NF membranes with different DWCNT dosages.
Table 1. Surface parameters of NF membranes with different DWCNT dosages.
Specific Surface Area (S/P)Roughness
Ra/nmRms/nm
NF-01.6876.397.2
NF-11.7479.6101.1
NF-31.8285.9109.9
NF-51.9594.1120.1
NF-72.06103.5132.6
NF-92.11105.4135.1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zheng, T.; Mo, B.; Xu, H.; Huang, Y.; Wang, J.; Gao, C.; Gao, X. High Flux Nanofiltration Membranes with Double-Walled Carbon Nanotube (DWCNT) as the Interlayer. Membranes 2022, 12, 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12101011

AMA Style

Wang Z, Wang X, Zheng T, Mo B, Xu H, Huang Y, Wang J, Gao C, Gao X. High Flux Nanofiltration Membranes with Double-Walled Carbon Nanotube (DWCNT) as the Interlayer. Membranes. 2022; 12(10):1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12101011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zhen, Xiaojuan Wang, Tao Zheng, Bing Mo, Huacheng Xu, Yijun Huang, Jian Wang, Congjie Gao, and Xueli Gao. 2022. "High Flux Nanofiltration Membranes with Double-Walled Carbon Nanotube (DWCNT) as the Interlayer" Membranes 12, no. 10: 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12101011

APA Style

Wang, Z., Wang, X., Zheng, T., Mo, B., Xu, H., Huang, Y., Wang, J., Gao, C., & Gao, X. (2022). High Flux Nanofiltration Membranes with Double-Walled Carbon Nanotube (DWCNT) as the Interlayer. Membranes, 12(10), 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12101011

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop