Next Article in Journal
In-Depth Analysis of the Extracorporeal Proteome Adsorbed to Dialysis Membranes during Hemodialysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Allylamines, Benzylamines, and Fungal Cell Permeability: A Review of Mechanistic Effects and Usefulness against Fungal Pathogens
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Dispersed TiO2 Nanoparticles via Steric Interaction on the Antifouling Performance of PVDF/TiO2 Composite Membranes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isoliquiritigenin Protects Neuronal Cells against Glutamate Excitotoxicity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Membranes
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/membranes12111119
membranes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Relevance of GIRK Channels in Heart Function

by
Ana Campos-Ríos
1,2,
Lola Rueda-Ruzafa
3,* and
José Antonio Lamas
1,2
1
CINBIO, Laboratory of Neuroscience, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain
2
Laboratory of Neuroscience, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IISGS), 15706 Vigo, Spain
3
Department of Nursing Science, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2022, 12(11), 1119; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12111119
Submission received: 30 September 2022 / Revised: 6 November 2022 / Accepted: 7 November 2022 / Published: 9 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane Permeability and Channels)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Among the large number of potassium-channel families implicated in the control of neuronal excitability, G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channels (GIRK/Kir3) have been found to be a main factor in heart control. These channels are activated following the modulation of G-protein-coupled receptors and, although they have been implicated in different neurological diseases in both human and animal studies of the central nervous system, the therapeutic potential of different subtypes of these channel families in cardiac conditions has remained untapped. As they have emerged as a promising potential tool to treat a variety of conditions that disrupt neuronal homeostasis, many studies have started to focus on these channels as mediators of cardiac dynamics, thus leading to research into their implication in cardiovascular conditions. Our aim is to review the latest advances in GIRK modulation in the heart and their role in the cardiovascular system.

1. Introduction

Among the variety of potassium channels involved in cardiac electrical activity [1,2,3], G-protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels, also known as Kir3 channels, appear as contributors to resting membrane potential [4,5]. They are members of a subfamily of inwardly rectifying channels (Kir1–Kir7), that preferentially conduct larger inward currents at negative voltages to the K+ equilibrium potential than outward currents at positive voltages, a phenomenon known as inward rectification [4,5].
GIRK channels are activated in response to neurotransmitters such as γ-aminobutyric acid, serotonin, dopamine, or opioids, interacting with G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [6]. GPCRs constitute a large family of seven-transmembrane (7TM) receptors encoded by over 800 genes [7]. Their signalization via heterotrimeric G proteins (composed by α and βγ subunits) regulates several physiological processes and serves as a target of many drugs. Once activated, intracellular Gα and Gβγ protein effectors are released and they trigger a cascade that generates several molecular activities, such as the activation of GIRK channels in both the heart and the brain [7,8]. The βγ-subunit of the heterotrimeric G-protein complex Gαβγ is believed to be responsible for activating these channels [9,10,11,12], which in turn hyperpolarize the cell membrane with a subsequent decrement in excitability [5].
Regarding heart regulation, sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) tightly control heart rate by stimulating different GPCRs, responsible for activating ion channels that modify the electrical properties of cardiac pacemaker cells [13]. Parasympathetic fibers travelling over the vagus nerve mainly target in the sinoatrial (SA) node, slowing its pacemaker cells by hyperpolarizing them, and atrioventricular (AV) node, diminishing its conduction, thus leading to a decrease in heart rate. By contrast, the sympathetic nervous system has a more ventricular distribution and predominantly increases the heart rate and the myocardial contractility [14].
In this way, GIRK channels are considered largely responsible for controlling heart neuronal excitability, so it is not hard to imagine that imbalances in the function of these channels can lead to disturbances in heart rhythm [15] and thus, to many cardiac disorders [16,17,18,19,20]. We therefore review the role of GIRK channels in the functioning of the heart and their involvement in its physiology and pathophysiology.

2. Structure and Signaling

As we have mentioned before, the heart is thoroughly controlled by the ANS. The diminished heart rate mediated by vagus nerve stimulation and chemical synaptic transmission was first shown by Otto Loewi in 1921 [21,22]. In this work, a chemical substance called Vagusstoff was found. This stimulated the vagus nerve causing a decrease in heart rate. This substance was revealed to be acetylcholine (ACh) [21]. The vagus nerve releases ACh activating M2 muscarinic receptors (M2R) in the SA node cells, which promotes the formation of the GPCR–Gα(GDP)βγ complex and subsequently, the exchange of GDP to GTP occurs at the Gα subunit. Then, dissociation of Gα(GTP) and Gβγ subunits takes place [14,23]. The Gβγ subunit specifically derived from Gi/o [24] binds to GIRK channels, activating them and generating an inward potassium current [15,25]. The opening of GIRK channels leads to the hyperpolarization of the cell membrane and consequently reduces the heart rate [13,23]. Even though β-adrenergic receptors of the sympathetic system liberate Gβγ when activated, this is not sufficient for activation of GIRK currents, except in heterologous systems or when atrial myocytes overexpress β1-adrenergic receptors [26]. Touhara and MacKinnon (2018) found that M2Rs catalyzes Gβγ subunit release at higher rates and generates higher GIRK protein concentrations [23].
Because ACh is the component that triggers the mentioned G-protein-dependent pathway, GIRK channels are also known as KACh channels, and they were first described in frog atrial myocytes [6]. The current flowing through them, called the muscarinic-receptor-activated current (IKACh), was reported as one of the main Kir channel currents in cardiac tissue [12]. These channels are composed of four subunits consisting of two α-transmembrane helices (M1 and M2), a pore-forming p helix that acts as a selective filter for potassium ions and an intracellular C- and N-termini [27]. Four subunits (GIRK 1 to 4) that assemble into homo- and heterotetrameric channels have been cloned in mammalian cells [25]. It has been shown that heteromultimerization among distinct subunits may lead to different functionally expressed GIRK channels with distinct G-protein-activated currents [28], although less is known about the physiological relevance of this matter.

2.1. GIRK1

GIRK1 (Kir3.1) is encoded by the KCNJ3 gene and is located in chromosome 2 in humans [29]. It was first cloned in 1993 by Kubo and colleagues and found to be expressed both in the heart (mostly atria and SA node) and brain [30]. Although GIRK1 functional homotetramers have not been reported [31], when coassembled with one of the other three subunits, GIRK1 clearly enhances the channel activity [32]. A Q404-specific residue in the carboxyl-terminal and three residues in the pore-forming loop are determinant characteristics of GIRK1, increasing the open probability and channel conductance of the formed heterotetramer [32]. Along with Kir3.4 (KCNJ5), it creates the heterotetrameric KACh channel in the atria, the major and most important cardiac configuration [33]. This multimeric form plays a fundamental role in regulating cardiac rhythm and it is known that, in the presence of cholesterol, its open probability increases [34]. In addition to the heart, Mett et al. [31] clarified the importance of GIRK1 heteromeric forms in hippocampal brain function, such as synaptic plasticity and memory, by using a knock-in mouse model [31]. Other studies have shown its role in the correct neuronal function in the cerebellum and thalamocortical regions [35,36,37]. Related to certain conditions, high gene expression has been directly linked to breast cancer [38,39], while its downregulation in the prefrontal cortex is associated with schizophrenia [40].

2.2. GIRK2

GIRK2 or Kir3.2 channels (KCNJ6 gene) are major players in the nervous system. Together with Kir3.1, these channels are known to be the most abundant subunits in the mammalian brain. Although they can assemble and form functional identical subunit homomers, GIRK2/2 seems to be less sensitive to activation than heterotetramers conformed with GIRK1 subunits [41]. As mentioned, the GIRK1/GIRK2 channel has been found to be the most abundant heteromultimer in the brain and cerebellum [42] and it controls neuronal excitability by lengthening the interval between action potentials, creating a slow inhibitory post-synaptic current in most of the brain regions [43]. It has also been reported than N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation might lead to increase in GIRK1/2 trafficking to the surface in response to different neuromodulators [44]. GIRK2 can also form functional homomers in dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra [45,46]. They display a “burst kinetic”, which means they rapidly switch between open and closed states when activated [47]. A special feature of these channels is that they present a specific aminoacidic domain on the surface that creates the binding site of the Gβγ subunit. It has been shown that atomic and electrostatic interactions might trigger a pre-open state, where phospatydilinositol-4,5-biphosphate (PIP2) and Na+ ions enhance the activation, creating a multi-ligand modulation of the channel gating [47].

2.3. GIRK3

GIRK3 (Kir3.3) is encoded by the KCNJ9 gene in humans and is widely distributed in the rodent brain [48,49,50]. It cannot form functional homotetramers [41], but it is capable of assembling with the other members of the GIRK subfamily. When coexpressed with GIRK1, enhanced evoked currents appear [28]. Along with GIRK2 channels, they are exclusive in dopaminergic neurons and the ventral tegmental area [41]. It has also been reported that there is a clear relationship between GIRK3 and cellular and behavioral effects of ethanol [51], as well as a link between these channels and dopaminergic sensitivity to abusive drugs such as cocaine [52].

2.4. GIRK4

KCNJ5 is the gene encoding Kir3.4, also known as GIRK4 [53]. Together with Kir3.1, it forms heterotetramers, creating the mentioned complex responsible for IKACh in the heart [33]. High protein expression of this form was found in the atria [54] and in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, a region in charge of cardiac vagal neuron regulation [55,56]. It does not seem to appear in many regions in the brain or be important in neuronal regulation, apart from spatial learning and memory in mice [56]. A study has shown that alterations in two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of this gene are related to a higher probability of suffering atrial fibrillation under 40 years old [19]. It has also been shown that aldosteronism, a condition that occurs when adrenal glands segregate high aldosterone levels, may occur because of mutations in the KCNJ5 gene in some patients [57]. In severe cases of aldosteronism, two mutations make these potassium channels permeable to Na+ [58].

3. GIRK Pharmacology

In addition to the G-protein signaling pathway, recent studies revealed that other substances can modulate GIRK channels (G-protein-dependent and -independent pathways are shown in Figure 1). It was observed that ethanol activates GIRK channels in a G-protein-independent manner both in vitro and in vivo [59,60]. Its activation is due to the existence of an alcohol-binding hydrophobic pocket first reported in GIRK2 [61,62]. It was also described as a GIRK1/2 channel activator called GiGA1 (G-protein-independent activator 1), that modulates the channel in native and heterologous systems [63], and ML297, a potent activator with a high efficacy and preference for GIRK1/2 combination [64]. Furthermore, GIRK channels are typically G-protein-dependent and activated by inhibitory neurotransmitters such as ACh [18] or B-type G-protein-coupled γ-aminobutyric acid receptors (GABABR), opioids, or serotonin [6,65]. Similarly to what happens in the brain, cholesterol is known to increase the open probability of GIRK cardiac heterodimers (GIRK1–GIRK4) [34]. By using the GIRK2 gene reconstituted into liposomes, it has been shown that both alcohol and cholesterol need the presence of PIP2 to directly activate the channels [66,67,68]. It also has been found that the antiparasitic drug ivermectin activates GIRK channels in a PIP2-dependent manner [69]. The mentioned studies show a possible relevant role of PIP2 in GIRK channel modulation, which is essential in maintaining channel activity [70]. These channels can present different configurations, and PIP2 might cause structural changes that help the Gβγ subunit to reach its binding side [71]. More research focusing on these changes in configuration might help to understand G-protein-independent activation of these channels. Furthermore, they are negative modulated by many different antidepressants, such as fluoxetine [72] or paroxetine [73] or by the norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitors atomoxetine and reboxetine [74]. For their part, regulators of G-protein-signaling (RSG) proteins play a fundamental role controlling GIRK channel activity. These proteins regulate GIRK channels in an allosteric manner by forming macromolecular complexes [75] and regulating channel-gating behavior [76]. For example, RGS4 attenuates sinus rhythm of the SA node by diminishing GIRK channel activity [77]. For its part, RSG6 also plays a fundamental role in weakening parasympathetic activation and preventing bradycardia [78,79], and RGS6-deficient myocytes cause a GIRK channel desensitization and higher activation deactivation rate [78]. Generally, it has been found that G-protein-independent modulation might play a more relevant role than first thought. Further information about GIRK pharmacological regulation can be found in the most recent review by Jeremic et al. (2021) [18].
The implication of these channels in GPCRs modulatory pathways in such a diverse manner makes GIRK channels an interesting partaker in heart-excitability control.

4. GIRK in the Heart

Broadly, the four subunits GIRK1 to 4 are widely expressed in mammals [5,8]. GIRK1-3 subunits have been found prominently in the brain, while GIRK4 is mainly located in cardiac tissue [5], forming the main GIRK heterotetramer in the heart along with GIRK1.
Regarding rodents, elevated mRNA levels of GIRK1, GIRK4, and M2R appear in mice atria and less strongly in the ventricle [80]. The GIRK1 channel is also strongly expressed in rat, ferret, and guinea-pig atria, but not ventricles [54,81]. Its mRNA expression was detected by PCR in both ferret atria and ventricles, as well as in dog ventricles. Although Kir3.1 and Kir3.4 protein expression was low in ferret ventricle-tissue sections and isolated cells, its expression was high in the atria [82]. Similarly, GIRK4 was found in the intercalated discs and in the external sarcolemma of the right atrium, whereas it was only shown in the left-ventricle intercalated discs by image experiments performed in rats [83]. Its expression was also determined by immunofluorescence in rat atria and scarce in ventricles [81]. In humans, GIRK4 presence in left-ventricular epicardial and human endocardial sections, specifically in the intercalated discs and slightly less in the t-tubules, was demonstrated; however, GIRK4 was not detected in mid-myocardial sections in the left ventricle [83]. All these data are summarized in Table 1. It seems that the GIRK1/4 complex predominantly appears in supraventricular SA node cells and myocytes, where it might have a most relevant role in cardiac physiology.
As mentioned before, the activation of IKACh leads to a membrane potential hyperpolarization, a slowdown of the spontaneous firing rate and, thus, a delay in atrioventricular conduction [18]. These currents mainly appear in the atrial area, and they are implicated in the cardiac action potential repolarization [84]. It is worth mentioning that, despite it has been suggested that cholinergic innervation (vagal efferents) may not have a significant role in ventricular function [85,86], it has also been found that the activation of GIRK channels in ventricular myocytes might cause higher density currents than previously reported [87], although its physiological relevance has not been clearly elucidated. More comparative research on their function in atria versus ventricles might help to clarify their significance in ventricular function.
Even so, there is no doubt that vagal stimulation has a crucial parasympathetic influence on cardiovascular physiology, that decreases heart rate through the main action of GIRK channels. Thus, it is not hard to imagine that aberrant variations in GIRK activity due to functional mutations might perpetuate atrial fibrillation and other cardiac pathogenesis. Several investigations suggest an important role of GIRK channels in cardiovascular pathophysiology (Table 2) and many studies in animal models has been developed in recent decades. In this regard, a direct impact of vagal stimulation on heart rate and the atrial activity of GIRK channels has been observed. Heart rate dynamics and control of parasympathetic regulation was affected after ablation of GIRK1 and 4 genes and subsequent vagal stimulation in mice [55]. Specifically, it was observed that IKACh mediated half of the negative chronotropic effects of vagal stimulation on heart rate, disrupting GIRK4 gene coding [15]. Similarly, the use of carbachol, a cholinergic agonist, failed to activate the IKACh and thus induced atrial fibrillation in mice lacking the GIRK4 gene, suggesting its importance in atrial heterotetramer physiology [88].
As described by Lee and colleagues (2018) [55], GIRK channels are the main contributors to heart rate via vagal nerve stimulation, specifically in the atria. Abnormalities in pacemaker conduction might lead to cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure. A study found that both GIRK4 and adenosine 1 receptor mRNA expression was augmented in isolated SA node myocytes of a heart-failure canine model. This generated a reduction in the hyperpolarization rate in the presence of adenosine, proving a possible protective role of adenosine-1 receptor trough the blockade of GIRK channels, which might prevent SA node dysfunction and subsequent arrhythmia [89]. Another study of canine atrial tachycardia showed a possible Kir3 channel role in cardioprotective effects against arrhythmia. As these channels contribute to action potential shortening in cardiomyocytes, its selective blockade by their antagonist tertiapin-Q suppressed atrial arrhythmias without affecting ventricle conductance [90]. By using tertiapin-Q, another work showed the implication of GIRK current cardiomyocytes from the pulmonary veins [91], with a well-known role in atrial fibrillation initiation and maintenance [92,93].
Regarding human studies, disruption of GIRK and especially GIRK4 has also been linked to cardiovascular alterations such as hypertension or atrial fibrillation in humans. Thus, a heterozygous mutation of the Kir3.4 (Kir3.4-Gly387Arg) was identified in all the affected members of a family with autosomal-dominant congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). This mutation revealed a loss of function resulting from a reduced plasma membrane expression and a subsequent decrement in the current amplitude and a prolongation of cell repolarization, which, among other symptoms, led to recurrent syncopal episodes [20]. Other research showed that variations in heart rate could stem from genetic variants of proteins involved in Gβγ sinoatrial signaling induced by the GIRK channels [94]. IKACh has also been found constitutively active in chronic atrial fibrillation patients, resulting from an abnormal phosphorylation by protein kinase C [95,96].
Furthermore, a left-to-right atrium gradient GIRK current was found to contribute to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation [97], thus leading to the possibility of a selective-localization approach to treat specific cardiac diseases. Regarding adenosine-induced atrial fibrillation, a study with 37 human hearts showed that GIRK4 channel blockade might prevent the shortening of action potential and subsequent atrial fibrillation, as these channels, along with adenosine 1 receptor, were overexpressed in those areas with greatest adenosine-induced action potential shortening [98]. By using shRNA adenovirus against GIRK4, Liu et al. achieved an efficient silencing of the channel in human atrial myocytes [99]. This could be a potential way to control arrhythmia mediated by GIRK overactivation. It is worth mentioning sinus-node dysfunction (SND), a disorder characterized by poor conduction between the SA node and the atria that generates an abnormal pacing rhythm [100]; however, the data published to date are contradictory. On the one hand, after sequencing the KCNJ3 and KCNJ5 genes, which encode the main subunits of KACh channels in the heart, from almost 50 patients, no mutation was found that could link these channels to SND [100]. Nevertheless, a few years later, a study found that a gain-of-function mutation in the human GIRK4 gene causes familial SND by enhancing the activity of these channels in pacemaker cells and resulting in a sustained reduction in heart rate [101]. Other research hypothesized that the G-protein-signaling regulator RGS4, highly expressed in SA node pacemaker cells, modulates GIRK channels in SA node myocytes; its loss of function might lead to atrial fibrillation and SND through to GIRK channel overfunction [102].
Table
Table 2. Effect of GIRK1/4 modifications in cardiac physiology.
Table 2. Effect of GIRK1/4 modifications in cardiac physiology.
ModificationSpeciesEffect in Cardiac PhysiologyReference
GIRK1 gene ablation
GIRK4 gene ablation		MouseLoss of parasympathetic regulation
Loss of heart rate dynamics		[55]
GIRK4 gene disruptionMouseIKACh effect in heart rate[15]
GIRK4 knockout miceMouseAtrial fibrillation[88]
↑ GIRK4 mRNA
in sinoatrial myocytes		DogHeart failure[89]
GIRK blockadeDogSuppression of atrial arrythmias[90]
GIRK genetic variationsHumanΒγ-signaling pathway variations
Heart-rate variations		[94]
GIRK4 mutation HumanFamiliar LQTS[20]
IKACh constitutive activationHumanChronic atrial fibrillation[95,96]
IKACh gradient currentHumanParoxysmal atrial fibrillation[97]
GIRK4 overexpressionHumanProtective against adenosine-induced atrial fibrillation[98]
GIRK4 silencingHumanArrhythmia-control mechanism[99]
GIRK4 gain-of-function HumanFamilial SND[101]
GIRK overfunctionHumanAtrial fibrillation and SND[102]
IKACh: muscarinic receptor-activated current; SND: sinus-node dysfunction; LQTS: long QT syndrome augmented.
Altogether, these studies show GIRK channels to be a promising tool in protecting the heart from atrial fibrillation and arrhythmias (Figure 2). In recent years, many studies have developed new selective blockers targeting the GIRK1/4 heart isoform in order to modulate the changes in action potential duration in the atria [103]. As GIRK channel modulation seems to be a good approach to treat atrial fibrillation and conduction abnormalities, some compounds were tested in recent years to achieve this objective [103]. NIP-142 and NIP-151, small selective inhibitors, provided a vagal nerve silencing without affecting the electrophysiology of the heart [104,105]. Another compound called XAF-1407 was shown to have antiarrhythmic properties through the inhibition of IKACh without side effects [106]. NTC-801 is also an effective antiarrhythmic GIRK channel blocker [107]. With the actual knowledge about the differential localization and modulation of cardiac GIRK1/4, it seems that this channel is a promising tool in abnormal arrhythmogenesis regulation and in electrical activity control.

5. Conclusions

The expression of GIRK channels in the heart provides a control point in cardiac physiology. Many of the findings to date have revealed that IKACh flowing through GIRK channels would strongly contribute to cardiac electrical excitability and thus to cardiac pathophysiology. The incidence and prevalence of these diseases are increasingly globally, and although more research is needed to elucidate its role in pathologies such as atrial fibrillation, we have observed that an extensive bibliography highlights the contribution of the GIRK1/4 heterotetrameric isoform in heart rate regulation and electrical activity control, and also that this isoform has been linked to cardiac alterations. This manifests the importance of focusing future research on the synthesis of new potential drugs to specifically target this channel and to find an approach to selectively direct these newly developed treatments to localized affected areas in specific cardiac diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C.-R., L.R.-R. and J.A.L.; validation, J.A.L.; investigation, A.C.-R., L.R.-R. and J.A.L.; resources, J.A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.-R. and L.R.-R.; writing—review and editing, A.C.-R. and L.R.-R.; supervision, J.A.L.; funding acquisition, J.A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish government, grant number PID2019-109425GBI00. All the funding was awarded to J. Antonio Lamas (J.A.L.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

  1. Burg, S.; Attali, B. Targeting of Potassium Channels in Cardiac Arrhythmias. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 42, 491–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tamargo, J.; Caballero, R.; Gómez, R.; Valenzuela, C.; Delpón, E. Pharmacology of Cardiac Potassium Channels. Cardiovasc. Res. 2004, 62, 9–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Snyders, D.J. Structure and Function of Cardiac Potassium Channels. Cardiovasc. Res. 1999, 42, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Nichols, C.G.; Makhina, E.N.; Pearson, W.L.; Sha, Q.; Lopatin, A.N. Inward Rectification and Implications for Cardiac Excitability. Circ. Res. 1996, 78, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lüscher, C.; Slesinger, P.A. Emerging Concepts for G Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying Potassium (GIRK) Channels in Health and Disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Glaaser, I.W.; Slesinger, P.A. Structural Insights into GIRK Channel Function. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2015, 123, 117–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pierce, K.L.; Premont, R.T.; Lefkowitz, R.J. Seven-Transmembrane Receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hibino, H.; Inanobe, A.; Furutani, K.; Murakami, S.; Findlay, I.; Kurachi, Y. Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels: Their Structure, Function, and Physiological Roles. Physiol. Rev. 2010, 90, 291–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kano, H.; Toyama, Y.; Imai, S.; Iwahashi, Y.; Mase, Y.; Yokogawa, M.; Osawa, M.; Shimada, I. Structural Mechanism Underlying G Protein Family-Specific Regulation of G Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channel. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Dascal, N.; Kahanovitch, U. The Roles of Gβγ and Gα in Gating and Regulation of GIRK Channels. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2015, 123, 27–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Logothetis, D.E.; Kurachi, Y.; Galper, J.; Neer, E.J.; Clapham, D.E. The Βγ Subunits of GTP-Binding Proteins Activate the Muscarinic K+ Channel in Heart. Nature 1987, 325, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wickman, K.D.; Iñiguez-Lluhi, J.A.; Davenport, P.A.; Taussig, R.; Krapivinsky, G.B.; Linder, M.E.; Gilman, A.G.; Clapham, D.E. Recombinant G-Protein Beta Gamma-Subunits Activate the Muscarinic-Gated Atrial Potassium Channel. Nature 1994, 368, 255–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. DiFrancesco, D. Pacemaker Mechanisms in Cardiac Tissue. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1993, 55, 455–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gordan, R.; Gwathmey, J.K.; Xie, L.-H. Autonomic and Endocrine Control of Cardiovascular Function. World J. Cardiol. 2015, 7, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wickman, K.; Nemec, J.; Gendler, S.J.; Clapham, D.E. Abnormal Heart Rate Regulation in GIRK4 Knockout Mice. Neuron 1998, 20, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Luján, R.; Marron Fernandez de Velasco, E.; Aguado, C.; Wickman, K. New Insights into the Therapeutic Potential of Girk Channels. Trends Neurosci. 2014, 37, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Rai, D.; Akagi, T.; Shimohata, A.; Ishii, T.; Gangi, M.; Maruyama, T.; Wada-Kiyama, Y.; Ogiwara, I.; Kaneda, M. Involvement of the C-Terminal Domain in Cell Surface Localization and G-Protein Coupling of MGluR6. J. Neurochem. 2021, 158, 837–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jeremic, D.; Sanchez-Rodriguez, I.; Jimenez-Diaz, L.; Navarro-Lopez, J.D. Therapeutic Potential of Targeting G Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying Potassium (GIRK) Channels in the Central Nervous System. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 223, 107808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jabbari, J.; Olesen, M.S.; Holst, A.G.; Nielsen, J.B.; Haunso, S.; Svendsen, J.H. Common Polymorphisms in KNCJ5 Are Associated with Early-Onset Lone Atrial Fibrillation in Caucasians. Cardiology 2011, 118, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liang, B.; Liu, J.; Li, J.; Grunnet, M.; Olesen, S.-P.; Rasmussen, H.B.; Ellinor, P.T.; Gao, L.; et al. Identification of a Kir3.4 Mutation in Congenital Long QT Syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 86, 872–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Loewi, O. Über Humorale Übertragbarkeit Der Herznervenwirkung. Pflüger’s Arch. Gesamte Physiol. Menschen Tiere 1921, 189, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Borges, R.; García, A.G. One Hundred Years from Otto Loewi Experiment, a Dream That Revolutionized Our View of Neurotransmission. Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2021, 473, 977–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Touhara, K.K.; Mackinnon, R. Molecular Basis of Signaling Specificity between GIRK Channels and GPCRs. eLife 2018, e42908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Digby, G.J.; Sethi, P.R.; Lambert, N.A. Differential Dissociation of G Protein Heterotrimers. J. Physiol. 2008, 586, 3325–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wickman, K.; Pu, W.T.; Clapham, D.E. Structural Characterization of the Mouse Girk Genes. Gene 2002, 284, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wellner-Kienitz, M.C.; Bender, K.; Pott, L. Overexpression of Beta 1 and Beta 2 Adrenergic Receptors in Rat Atrial Myocytes. Differential Coupling to G Protein-Gated Inward Rectifier K(+) Channels via G(s) and G(i)/O. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 37347–37354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kuang, Q.; Purhonen, P.; Hebert, H. Structure of Potassium Channels. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015, 72, 3677–3693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kofuji, P.; Davidson, N.; Lester, H.A. Evidence That Neuronal G-Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels Are Activated by G Beta Gamma Subunits and Function as Heteromultimers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 6542–6546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Stoffel, M.; Espinosa, R.; Powell, K.L.; Philipson, L.H.; Le Beau, M.M.; Bell, G.I. Human G-Protein-Coupled Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channel (GIRK1) Gene (KCNJ3): Localization to Chromosome 2 and Identification of a Simple Tandem Repeat Polymorphism. Genomics 1994, 21, 254–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kubo, Y.; Reuveny, E.; Slesinger, P.A.; Jan, Y.N.; Jan, L.Y. Primary Structure and Functional Expression of a Rat G-Protein-Coupled Muscarinic Potassium Channel. Nature 1993, 364, 802–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mett, A.; Karbat, I.; Tsoory, M.; Fine, S.; Iwanir, S.; Reuveny, E. Reduced Activity of GIRK1-Containing Heterotetramers Is Sufficient to Affect Neuronal Functions, Including Synaptic Plasticity and Spatial Learning and Memory. J. Physiol. 2021, 599, 521–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chan, K.W.; Sui, J.L.; Vivaudou, M.; Logothetis, D.E. Control of Channel Activity through a Unique Amino Acid Residue of a g Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channel Subunit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 14193–14198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Krapivinsky, G.; Gordon, E.A.; Wickman, K.; Velimirović, B.; Krapivinsky, L.; Clapham, D.E. The G-Protein-Gated Atrial K+ Channel IKACh Is a Heteromultimer of Two Inwardly Rectifying K(+)-Channel Proteins. Nature 1995, 374, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bukiya, A.N.; Osborn, C.V.; Kuntamallappanavar, G.; Toth, P.T.; Baki, L.; Kowalsky, G.; Oh, M.J.; Dopico, A.M.; Levitan, I.; Rosenhouse-Dantsker, A. Cholesterol Increases the Open Probability of Cardiac KACh Currents. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1848, 2406–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lippiello, P.; Hoxha, E.; Tempia, F.; Miniaci, M.C. GIRK1-Mediated Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Current Is a Candidate Mechanism Behind Purkinje Cell Excitability, Plasticity, and Neuromodulation. Cerebellum 2020, 19, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Kong, S.; Zang, K.; Jiang, S.; Wan, L.; Chen, L.; Wang, G.; Jiang, M.; Wang, X.; et al. GIRK1-Mediated Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Current Suppresses the Epileptiform Burst Activities and the Potential Antiepileptic Effect of ML297. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 101, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ponce, A.; Bueno, E.; Kentros, C.; Vega-Saenz de Miera, E.; Chow, A.; Hillman, D.; Chen, S.; Zhu, L.; Wu, M.; Wu, X.; et al. G-Protein-Gated Inward Rectifier K+ Channel Proteins (GIRK1) Are Present in the Soma and Dendrites as Well as in Nerve Terminals of Specific Neurons in the Brain. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 1990–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wagner, V.; Stadelmeyer, E.; Riederer, M.; Regitnig, P.; Gorischek, A.; DeVaney, T.; Schmidt, K.; Tritthart, H.A.; Hirschberg, K.; Bauernhofer, T.; et al. Cloning and Characterisation of GIRK1 Variants Resulting from Alternative RNA Editing of the KCNJ3 Gene Transcript in a Human Breast Cancer Cell Line. J. Cell. Biochem. 2010, 110, 598–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kammerer, S.; Sokolowski, A.; Hackl, H.; Platzer, D.; Jahn, S.W.; El-Heliebi, A.; Schwarzenbacher, D.; Stiegelbauer, V.; Pichler, M.; Rezania, S.; et al. KCNJ3 Is a New Independent Prognostic Marker for Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Patients. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 84705–84717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yamada, K.; Iwayama, Y.; Toyota, T.; Ohnishi, T.; Ohba, H.; Maekawa, M.; Yoshikawa, T. Association Study of the KCNJ3 Gene as a Susceptibility Candidate for Schizophrenia in the Chinese Population. Hum. Genet. 2012, 131, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jelacic, T.M.; Sims, S.M.; Clapham, D.E. Functional Expression and Characterization of G-Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels Containing GIRK3. J. Membr. Biol. 1999, 169, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liao, Y.J.; Jan, Y.N.; Jan, L.Y. Heteromultimerization of G-Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channel Proteins GIRK1 and GIRK2 and Their Altered Expression in Weaver Brain. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 7137–7150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Lüscher, C.; Jan, L.Y.; Stoffel, M.; Malenka, R.C.; Nicoll, R.A. G Protein-Coupled Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels (GIRKs) Mediate Postsynaptic but Not Presynaptic Transmitter Actions in Hippocampal Neurons. Neuron 1997, 19, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Hee, J.C.; Qian, X.; Ehlers, M.; Yuh, N.J.; Jan, L.Y. Neuronal Activity Regulates Phosphorylation-Dependent Surface Delivery of G Protein-Activated Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Inanobe, A.; Yoshimoto, Y.; Horio, Y.; Morishige, K.I.; Hibino, H.; Matsumoto, S.; Tokunaga, Y.; Maeda, T.; Hata, Y.; Takai, Y.; et al. Characterization of G-Protein-Gated K+ Channels Composed of Kir3.2 Subunits in Dopaminergic Neurons of the Substantia Nigra. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 1006–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Arora, D.; Haluk, D.M.; Kourrich, S.; Pravetoni, M.; Fernández-Alacid, L.; Nicolau, J.C.; Luján, R.; Wickman, K. Altered Neurotransmission in the Mesolimbic Reward System of Girk−/− Mice. J. Neurochem. 2010, 114, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Whorton, M.R.; MacKinnon, R. X-Ray Structure of the Mammalian GIRK2-Βγ G-Protein Complex. Nature 2013, 498, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kobayashi, T.; Ikeda, K.; Ichikawa, T.; Abe, S.; Togashi, S.; Kumanishi, T. Molecular Cloning of a Mouse G-Protein-Activated K+ Channel (MGIRK1) and Distinct Distributions of 3 GIRK (GIRK1, 2 and 3) MRNAs in Mouse Brain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 208, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Karschin, C.; Schreibmayer, W.; Dascal, N.; Lester, H.; Davidson, N.; Karschin, A. Distribution and Localization of a G Protein-Coupled Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channel in the Rat. FEBS Lett. 1994, 348, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Chen, S.C.; Ehrhard, P.; Goldowitz, D.; Smeyne, R.J. Developmental Expression of the GIRK Family of Inward Rectifying Potassium Channels: Implications for Abnormalities in the Weaver Mutant Mouse. Brain Res. 1997, 778, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Herman, M.A.; Sidhu, H.; Stouffer, D.G.; Kreifeldt, M.; Le, D.; Cates-Gatto, C.; Munoz, M.B.; Roberts, A.J.; Parsons, L.H.; Roberto, M.; et al. GIRK3 Gates Activation of the Mesolimbic Dopaminergic Pathway by Ethanol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015, 112, 7091–7096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Morgan, A.D.; Carroll, M.E.; Loth, A.K.; Stoffel, M.; Wickman, K. Decreased Cocaine Self-Administration in Kir3 Potassium Channel Subunit Knockout Mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 2003, 285, 932–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Yamada, M.; Inanobe, A.; Kurachi, Y. G Protein Regulation of Potassium Ion Channels. Pharmacol. Rev. 1998, 50, 723. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Dobrzynski, H.; Marples, D.D.R.; Musa, H.; Yamanushi, T.T.; Henderson, Z.; Takagishi, Y.; Honjo, H.; Kodama, I.; Boyett, M.R. Distribution of the Muscarinic K+ Channel Proteins Kir3.1 and Kir3.4 in the Ventricle, Atrium, and Sinoatrial Node of Heart. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2001, 49, 1221–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Lee, S.W.; Anderson, A.; Guzman, P.A.; Nakano, A.; Tolkacheva, E.G.; Wickman, K. Atrial GIRK Channels Mediate the Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Heart Rate Dynamics and Arrhythmogenesis. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wickman, K.; Karschin, C.; Karschin, A.; Picciotto, M.R.; Clapham, D.E. Brain Localization and Behavioral Impact of the G-Protein-Gated K+ Channel Subunit GIRK4. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20, 5608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Choi, M.; Scholl, U.I.; Yue, P.; Björklund, P.; Zhao, B.; Nelson-Williams, C.; Ji, W.; Cho, Y.; Patel, A.; Men, C.J.; et al. K+ Channel Mutations in Adrenal Aldosterone-Producing Adenomas and Hereditary Hypertension. Science 2011, 331, 768–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Scholl, U.I.; Nelson-Williams, C.; Yue, P.; Grekin, R.; Wyatt, R.J.; Dillon, M.J.; Couch, R.; Hammer, L.K.; Harley, F.L.; Farhi, A.; et al. Hypertension with or without Adrenal Hyperplasia Due to Different Inherited Mutations in the Potassium Channel KCNJ5. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 2533–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kobayashi, T.; Ikeda, K.; Kojima, H.; Niki, H.; Yano, R.; Yoshioka, T.; Kumanishi, T. Ethanol Opens G-Protein-Activated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 212, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lewohl, J.M.; Wilson, W.R.; Mayfield, R.D.; Brozowski, S.J.; Morrisett, R.A.; Harris, R.A. G-Protein-Coupled Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels Are Targets of Alcohol Action. Nat. Neurosci. 1999, 2, 1084–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Aryal, P.; Dvir, H.; Choe, S.; Slesinger, P.A. A Discrete Alcohol Pocket Involved in GIRK Channel Activation. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12, 988–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bodhinathan, K.; Slesinger, P.A. Molecular Mechanism Underlying Ethanol Activation of G-Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 18309–18314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Zhao, Y.; Ung, P.M.U.; Zahoránszky-Kőhalmi, G.; Zakharov, A.V.; Martinez, N.J.; Simeonov, A.; Glaaser, I.W.; Rai, G.; Schlessinger, A.; Marugan, J.J.; et al. Identification of a G-Protein-Independent Activator of GIRK Channels. Cell Rep. 2020, 31, 107770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kaufmann, K.; Romaine, I.; Days, E.; Pascual, C.; Malik, A.; Yang, L.; Zou, B.; Du, Y.; Sliwoski, G.; Morrison, R.D.; et al. ML297 (VU0456810), the First Potent and Selective Activator of the GIRK Potassium Channel, Displays Antiepileptic Properties in Mice. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2013, 4, 1278–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Tabata, T.; Haruki, S.; Nakayama, H.; Kano, M. GABAergic Activation of an Inwardly Rectifying K+ Current in Mouse Cerebellar Purkinje Cells. J. Physiol. 2005, 563, 443–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bodhinathan, K.; Slesinger, P.A. Alcohol Modulation of G-Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels: From Binding to Therapeutics. Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Mathiharan, Y.K.; Glaaser, I.W.; Zhao, Y.; Robertson, M.J.; Skiniotis, G.; Slesinger, P.A. Structural Insights into GIRK2 Channel Modulation by Cholesterol and PIP2. Cell Rep. 2021, 36, 109619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Glaaser, I.W.; Slesinger, P.A. Dual Activation of Neuronal G Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying Potassium (GIRK) Channels by Cholesterol and Alcohol. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Chen, I.S.; Tateyama, M.; Fukata, Y.; Uesugi, M.; Kubo, Y. Ivermectin Activates GIRK Channels in a PIP2-Dependent, Gβγ-Independent Manner and an Amino Acid Residue at the Slide Helix Governs the Activation. J. Physiol. 2017, 595, 5895–5912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Logothetis, D.E.; Mahajan, R.; Adney, S.K.; Ha, J.; Kawano, T.; Meng, X.Y.; Cui, M. Unifying Mechanism of Controlling Kir3 Channel Activity by G Proteins and Phosphoinositides. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2015, 123, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Niu, Y.; Tao, X.; Touhara, K.K.; Mackinnon, R. Cryo-Em Analysis of Pip2 Regulation in Mammalian Girk Channels. eLife 2020, 9, e60552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kobayashi, T.; Washiyama, K.; Ikeda, K. Inhibition of G Protein-Activated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels by Fluoxetine (Prozac). Br. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 138, 1119–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Kobayashi, T.; Washiyama, K.; Ikeda, K. Inhibition of G Protein-Activated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels by the Antidepressant Paroxetine. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 102, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Kobayashi, T.; Washiyama, K.; Ikeda, K. Inhibition of G-Protein-Activated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels by the Selective Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors Atomoxetine and Reboxetine. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010, 35, 1560–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Zhou, H.; Chisari, M.; Raehal, K.M.; Kaltenbronn, K.M.; Bohn, L.M.; Mennerick, S.J.; Blumer, K.J. GIRK Channel Modulation by Assembly with Allosterically Regulated RGS Proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 19977–19982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Doupnik, C.A. RGS Redundancy and Implications in GPCR-GIRK Signaling. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2015, 123, 87–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cifelli, C.; Rose, R.A.; Zhang, H.; Voigtlaender-Bolz, J.; Bolz, S.S.; Backx, P.H.; Heximer, S.P. RGS4 Regulates Parasympathetic Signaling and Heart Rate Control in the Sinoatrial Node. Circ. Res. 2008, 103, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Yang, J.; Huang, J.; Maity, B.; Gao, Z.; Lorca, R.A.; Gudmundsson, H.; Li, J.; Stewart, A.; Swaminathan, P.D.; Ibeawuchi, S.R.; et al. RGS6, a Modulator of Parasympathetic Activation in Heart. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 1345–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Posokhova, E.; Wydeven, N.; Allen, K.L.; Wickman, K.; Martemyanov, K.A. RGS6/Gβ5 Complex Accelerates IKACh Gating Kinetics in Atrial Myocytes and Modulates Parasympathetic Regulation of Heart Rate. Circ. Res. 2010, 107, 1350–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Anderson, A.; Kulkarni, K.; Marron Fernandez De Velasco, E.; Carlblom, N.; Xia, Z.; Nakano, A.; Martemyanov, K.A.; Tolkacheva, E.G.; Wickman, K. Expression and Relevance of the G Protein-Gated K+ Channel in the Mouse Ventricle. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. DePaoli, A.M.; Bell, G.I.; Stoffel, M. G Protein-Activated Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channel (GIRK1/KGA) MRNA in Adult Rat Heart and Brain by in Situ Hybridization Histochemistry. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 1994, 5, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Dobrzynski, H.; Janvier, N.C.; Leach, R.; Findlay, J.B.C.; Boyett, M.R. Effects of ACh and Adenosine Mediated by Kir3.1 and Kir3.4 on Ferret Ventricular Cells. Am. J. Physiol. Hear. Circ. Physiol. 2002, 283, H615–H630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Liang, B.; Nissen, J.D.; Laursen, M.; Wang, X.; Skibsbye, L.; Hearing, M.C.; Andersen, M.N.; Rasmussen, H.B.; Wickman, K.; Grunnet, M.; et al. G-Protein-Coupled Inward Rectifier Potassium Current Contributes to Ventricular Repolarization. Cardiovasc. Res. 2014, 101, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Schmitt, N.; Grunnet, M.; Olesen, S.P. Cardiac Potassium Channel Subtypes: New Roles in Repolarization and Arrhythmia. Physiol. Rev. 2014, 94, 609–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Takahashi, H.; Maehara, K.; Onuki, N.; Saito, T.; Maruyama, Y. Decreased Contractility of the Left Ventricle Is Induced by the Neurotransmitter Acetylcholine, but Not by Vagal Stimulation in Rats. Jpn. Heart J. 2003, 44, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Hoover, D.B.; Ganote, C.E.; Ferguson, S.M.; Blakely, R.D.; Parsons, R.L. Localization of Cholinergic Innervation in Guinea Pig Heart by Immunohistochemistry for High-Affinity Choline Transporters. Cardiovasc. Res. 2004, 62, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Beckmann, C.; Rinne, A.; Littwitz, C.; Mintert, E.; Bösche, L.I.; Kienitz, M.C.; Pott, L.; Bender, K. G Protein-Activated (GIRK) Current in Rat Ventricular Myocytes Is Masked by Constitutive Inward Rectifier Current (IK1). Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2008, 21, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kovoor, P.; Wickman, K.; Maguire, C.T.; Pu, W.; Gehrmann, J.; Berul, C.I.; Clapham, D.E. Evaluation of the Role of IKAChin Atrial Fibrillation Using a Mouse Knockout Model. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001, 37, 2136–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Long, V.P.; Bonilla, I.M.; Baine, S.; Glynn, P.; Kumar, S.; Schober, K.; Mowrey, K.; Weiss, R.; Lee, N.Y.; Mohler, P.J.; et al. Chronic Heart Failure Increases Negative Chronotropic Effects of Adenosine in Canine Sinoatrial Cells via A1R Stimulation and GIRK-Mediated IKado. Life Sci. 2020, 240, 117068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Cha, T.J.; Ehrlich, J.R.; Chartier, D.; Qi, X.Y.; Xiao, L.; Nattel, S. Kir3-Based Inward Rectifier Potassium Current. Circulation 2006, 113, 1730–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ehrlich, J.R.; Cha, T.-J.; Zhang, L.; Chartier, D.; Villeneuve, L.; Hébert, T.E.; Nattel, S. Characterization of a Hyperpolarization-Activated Time-Dependent Potassium Current in Canine Cardiomyocytes from Pulmonary Vein Myocardial Sleeves and Left Atrium. J. Physiol. 2004, 557, 583–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Chen, Y.J.; Chen, S.A.; Chen, Y.C.; Yeh, H.I.; Chan, P.; Chang, M.S.; Lin, C.I. Effects of Rapid Atrial Pacing on the Arrhythmogenic Activity of Single Cardiomyocytes from Pulmonary Veins: Implication in Initiation of Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation 2001, 104, 2849–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Pappone, C.; Rosanio, S.; Oreto, G.; Tocchi, M.; Gugliotta, F.; Vicedomini, G.; Salvati, A.; Dicandia, C.; Mazzone, P.; Santinelli, V.; et al. Circumferential Radiofrequency Ablation of Pulmonary Vein Ostia. Circulation 2000, 102, 2619–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Nolte, I.M.; Munoz, M.L.; Tragante, V.; Amare, A.T.; Jansen, R.; Vaez, A.; Von Der Heyde, B.; Avery, C.L.; Bis, J.C.; Dierckx, B.; et al. Genetic Loci Associated with Heart Rate Variability and Their Effects on Cardiac Disease Risk. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Voigt, N.; Friedrich, A.; Bock, M.; Wettwer, E.; Christ, T.; Knaut, M.; Strasser, R.H.; Ravens, U.; Dobrev, D. Differential Phosphorylation-Dependent Regulation of Constitutively Active and Muscarinic Receptor-Activated IK,ACh Channels in Patients with Chronic Atrial Fibrillation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2007, 74, 426–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Dobrev, D.; Friedrich, A.; Voigt, N.; Jost, N.; Wettwer, E.; Christ, T.; Knaut, M.; Ravens, U. The G Protein-Gated Potassium Current I(K,ACh) Is Constitutively Active in Patients with Chronic Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation 2005, 112, 3697–3706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Voigt, N.; Trausch, A.; Knaut, M.; Matschke, K.; Varró, A.; Van Wagoner, D.R.; Nattel, S.; Ravens, U.; Dobrev, D. Left-to-Right Atrial Inward Rectifier Potassium Current Gradients in Patients with Paroxysmal Versus Chronic Atrial Fibrillation. Circ. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2010, 3, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Li, N.; Csepe, T.A.; Hansen, B.J.; Sul, L.V.; Kalyanasundaram, A.; Zakharkin, S.O.; Zhao, J.; Guha, A.; Van Wagoner, D.R.; Kilic, A.; et al. Adenosine-Induced Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation 2016, 134, 486–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Liu, X.; Yang, J.; Shang, F.; Hong, C.; Guo, W.; Wang, B.; Zheng, Q. Silencing GIRK4 Expression in Human Atrial Myocytes by Adenovirus-Delivered Small Hairpin RNA. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2009, 36, 1345–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Holmegard, H.N.; Theilade, J.; Benn, M.; Duno, M.; Haunso, S.; Svendsen, J.H. Genetic Variation in the Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channel Subunits KCNJ3 (GIRK1) and KCNJ5 (GIRK4) in Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction. Cardiology 2010, 115, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kuß, J.; Stallmeyer, B.; Goldstein, M.; Rinné, S.; Pees, C.; Zumhagen, S.; Seebohm, G.; Decher, N.; Pott, L.; Kienitz, M.C.; et al. Familial Sinus Node Disease Caused by a Gain of GIRK (G-Protein Activated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channel) Channel Function. Circ. Genomic Precis. Med. 2019, 12, e002238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Mighiu, A.S.; Heximer, S.P. Controlling Parasympathetic Regulation of Heart Rate: A Gatekeeper Role for RGS Proteins in the Sinoatrial Node. Front. Physiol. 2012, 3, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Milnes, J.T.; Madge, D.J.; Ford, J.W. New Pharmacological Approaches to Atrial Fibrillation. Drug Discov. Today 2012, 17, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tanaka, H.; Hashimoto, N. A Multiple Ion Channel Blocker, NIP-142, for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. Cardiovasc. Drug Rev. 2007, 25, 342–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Hashimoto, N.; Yamashita, T.; Tsuruzoe, N. Characterization of In Vivo and In Vitro Electrophysiological and Antiarrhythmic Effects of a Novel IKACh Blocker, NIP-151: A Comparison with an IKr-Blocker Dofetilide. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2008, 51, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sobota, V.; Gatta, G.; van Hunnik, A.; van Tuijn, I.; Kuiper, M.; Milnes, J.; Jespersen, T.; Schotten, U.; Verheule, S. The Acetylcholine-Activated Potassium Current Inhibitor XAF-1407 Terminates Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Goats. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 11, 608410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Yamamoto, W.; Hashimoto, N.; Matsuura, J.; Machida, T.; Ogino, Y.; Kobayashi, T.; Yamanaka, Y.; Ishiwata, N.; Yamashita, T.; Tanimoto, K.; et al. Effects of the Selective KACh Channel Blocker NTC-801 on Atrial Fibrillation in a Canine Model of Atrial Tachypacing. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2014, 63, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Membranes 12 01119 g001 550
Figure 1. Activation of GIRK channels. (A) Scheme of the GIRK channel G-protein-coupled receptor-dependent activation pathway. When acetylcholine (ACh) binds to the receptor, it causes the dissociation of Gα(GTP) and Gβγ subunits. Gβγ intracellularly attaches to the channel, provoking its opening and muscarinic-receptor-activated current (IKACh) activation. In the upper scheme both atrial and ventricular cardiac potential are shown, together with the contribution of IKACh current driven through GIRK1/4 channel (purple trace). These channels contribute to the resting membrane-potential maintenance and to slowdown excitability. (B) G-protein-independent pathways, such as the ones caused by alcohol or by cholesterol have also been reported. These are both PIP2-dependent. Ach: acetylcholine; IKACh: muscarinic-receptor-activated current; PIP2: phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate.
Figure 1. Activation of GIRK channels. (A) Scheme of the GIRK channel G-protein-coupled receptor-dependent activation pathway. When acetylcholine (ACh) binds to the receptor, it causes the dissociation of Gα(GTP) and Gβγ subunits. Gβγ intracellularly attaches to the channel, provoking its opening and muscarinic-receptor-activated current (IKACh) activation. In the upper scheme both atrial and ventricular cardiac potential are shown, together with the contribution of IKACh current driven through GIRK1/4 channel (purple trace). These channels contribute to the resting membrane-potential maintenance and to slowdown excitability. (B) G-protein-independent pathways, such as the ones caused by alcohol or by cholesterol have also been reported. These are both PIP2-dependent. Ach: acetylcholine; IKACh: muscarinic-receptor-activated current; PIP2: phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate.
Membranes 12 01119 g001
Membranes 12 01119 g002 550
Figure 2. GIRK1/4 heterotetrameric channel controls heart rate via parasympathetic innervation. GIRK1/4 channel activation leads to a membrane potential hyperpolarization and a slowdown in firing rate (right), and subsequently a decrease in heart rate, being more relevant in the atria. As it is a promising target to treat arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation, and despite Kir channel blockers are already known to be capable of regulating channel activity, in the last few years several isoform specific blockers have been developed in order to achieve a more detailed control of the channel activity and to act as antiarrhythmic potential drugs. SA node: sinoatrial node; AV node: atrioventricular node; ACh: acetylcholine.
Figure 2. GIRK1/4 heterotetrameric channel controls heart rate via parasympathetic innervation. GIRK1/4 channel activation leads to a membrane potential hyperpolarization and a slowdown in firing rate (right), and subsequently a decrease in heart rate, being more relevant in the atria. As it is a promising target to treat arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation, and despite Kir channel blockers are already known to be capable of regulating channel activity, in the last few years several isoform specific blockers have been developed in order to achieve a more detailed control of the channel activity and to act as antiarrhythmic potential drugs. SA node: sinoatrial node; AV node: atrioventricular node; ACh: acetylcholine.
Membranes 12 01119 g002
Table
Table 1. Expression of GIRK channels in the heart of different species.
Table 1. Expression of GIRK channels in the heart of different species.
SubunitSpeciesLocation in the HeartExpression DeterminationReference
GIRK1
GIRK4		MouseAtria
Ventricles		mRNA expression[80]
GIRK1RatAtriaProtein expression[54,81]
GIRK1
GIRK4		Guinea pigAtria
Ventricles		Protein expression[54]
GIRK4RatRight atrium (intercalated discs and sarcolemma)
Left ventricle (intercalated discs)		 [83]
GIRK1
GIRK4		FerretAtria
Ventricles		mRNA expression
Protein expression		[81]
GIRK1DogAtria
Ventricles		mRNA expression[82]
GIRK4HumanLeft ventricle (intercalated discs and t-tubules)Protein expression[83]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Campos-Ríos, A.; Rueda-Ruzafa, L.; Lamas, J.A. The Relevance of GIRK Channels in Heart Function. Membranes 2022, 12, 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12111119

AMA Style

Campos-Ríos A, Rueda-Ruzafa L, Lamas JA. The Relevance of GIRK Channels in Heart Function. Membranes. 2022; 12(11):1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12111119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Campos-Ríos, Ana, Lola Rueda-Ruzafa, and José Antonio Lamas. 2022. "The Relevance of GIRK Channels in Heart Function" Membranes 12, no. 11: 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12111119

APA Style

Campos-Ríos, A., Rueda-Ruzafa, L., & Lamas, J. A. (2022). The Relevance of GIRK Channels in Heart Function. Membranes, 12(11), 1119. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12111119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop