1. Introduction
IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most prevalent glomerulonephritis globally [
1]. The clinical course and prognosis of IgAN are variant, in which a third of these patients progress to end-stage renal disease [
2,
3]. The current diagnostic method for IgAN is renal biopsy. Since 2009, the Oxford classification became widely adopted as a popular pathological classification system of the IgAN, which could predict disease activity and prognosis [
2,
4]. In 2016, an updated Oxford classification, including the MEST-C score, was aimed to further enhance the histopathologic results’ predictive power [
5,
6,
7]. However, renal biopsy is not always performed in actual clinical practice due to the concerns of possible complications [
8,
9], and it is also rarely performed during clinical follow-ups.
The development of non-invasive biomarkers is needed to diagnose and evaluate the activity and outcomes of IgAN. In recent years, several studies have reported the role of plasma Gd-IgA1 in IgAN [
10,
11,
12,
13]. Some studies have demonstrated the role of complement activation in the pathogenesis of IgAN [
14,
15,
16]. The plasma C3 and factor H levels were reported to be the potential biomarkers associated with IgAN patients [
14,
16]. Until recently, few studies have examined the complement factor Ba and C5a levels in IgAN patients. Our prior study [
17] disclosed the close relationship between complement pathway activation (based on levels of Ba and C5a), Gd-IgA1 concentration and clinical severity of IgAN.
In this study, we further investigated if the blood levels of factor Ba/C5a and plasma Gd-IgA1 concentration were correlated with histopathological parameters in newly diagnosed IgAN patients.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patients and Blood Sample Collection
Patients aged between 20~80 years old with the pathologic diagnosis of IgAN were enrolled in this study at the time of renal biopsy between January 2015 and December 2019, as described previously [
17]. For the purpose of this study, we only selected patients with renal biopsy reports which were scored according to the updated Oxford classification of IgAN. Renal biopsies were performed in two medical centers: National Taiwan University Hospital and Far Eastern Memorial Hospital. At the time of biopsy, peripheral blood was collected from patients and processed immediately for storage at −80 °C until measurement for biomarkers. This study was approved by the ethics committee of both National Taiwan University Hospital and Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, which was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal representatives.
2.2. Clinical Parameters
Demographic characteristics, including age, sex, past medical history of diabetes or hypertension and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB), were recorded. The serum levels of creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equations formula for Taiwanese adults) were recorded. The amount of proteinuria was collected in spot urine (urine protein to creatinine ratio, UPCR).
2.3. Measurement of Plasma Gd-IgA1, C5a and Factor Ba
The plasma Gd-IgA1 levels were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Plasma levels of C5a were measured with the C5a ELISA kit (Aviva Systems Biology, San Diego, CA, USA). Plasma levels of Ba were measured with the MicroVue Ba fragment EIA kit (Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA). All assays were performed according to the protocols provided by the manufacturers at National Taiwan University Hospital and Far Eastern Memorial Hospital.
2.4. Pathology Results
All of the biopsies of IgAN were evaluated by pathologists in two medical centers and applied to the updated Oxford classification. The lesions comprised mesangial hypercellularity (M0 or M1), segmental glomerulosclerosis (S0 or S1), endocapillary hypercellularity (E0 or E1), tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T0, T1, or T2) and crescents (C0, C1 or C2).
2.5. Statistical Analysis
For baseline characteristics, continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and the data not normally distributed were expressed as median (interquartile range). The categorical data were reported as the frequency with percentage. Comparisons of continuous variables in two groups were performed by independent t-test or Mann–Whitney U test as appropriated in data with or without normal distribution. Relationships between two continuous variables with normal distribution were analyzed using Pearson correlation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for the predictive value of biomarkers on tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS Statistics Version 26 (IBM) and Prism software, version 9.3.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
4. Discussion
In this study, we found that the (1) plasma biomarkers of Gd-IgA1 and factor Ba level were both negatively correlated with eGFR and positively correlated with UPCR in IgAN patients. (2) The UPCR level was significantly elevated in IgAN patients with mesangial hypercellularity (M), endocapillary hypercellularity (E) and tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T) according to the updated Oxford classification. Nevertheless, the eGFR level had a significant association with T score only. (3) The plasma biomarkers of Gd-IgA1 and factor Ba level were significantly elevated in IgAN patients with tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T). Plasma C5a level was significantly elevated in IgAN patients with crescents (C).
Previous studies had demonstrated the correlation between plasma Gd-IgA1 and clinical parameters in IgAN patients. Kim et al. [
10] demonstrated that the plasma level of Gd-IgA1 was negatively correlated with eGFR and positively correlated with the frequency of CKD progression. One study reported the trend of lower eGFR and higher proteinuria with increasing Gd-IgA1 [
18]. In contrast, other studies reported that there was no correlation between the plasma Gd-IgA1 level and parameters of disease severity, including eGFR and UPCR [
11,
19]. Other studies reported that the levels of Gd-IgA1 were associated with disease progression, even though there was no significant correlation between plasma Gd-IgA1 levels and clinical findings at the time of IgAN diagnosis [
18,
20,
21]. The discrepancy in the relationship between the Gd-IgA1 level and disease activity may be related to the baseline disease severity of the enrolled IgAN patients. Gd-IgA1 levels may have a stronger clinical impact in moderate to severe IgAN patients than in patients with mild disease activity [
17]. In this current study, not only was the Gd-IgA1 level positively correlated with disease activity, but the alternative complement of the plasma factor Ba level was also correlated with clinical parameters.
The relationship between plasma Gd-IgA1 concentrations and pathological results has already been described in several studies [
10,
13,
18,
22]. The Gd-IgA1 level was positively correlated with advanced pathological findings and future renal function decline [
13]. Kim et al. [
10] demonstrated that the plasma Gd-IgA1 level was associated with tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis in IgAN patients. Two recent studies [
13,
18] both reported that the plasma Gd-IgA1 level was significantly higher in IgAN patients with segmental glomerulosclerosis and tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis. Consistent with the above studies, we observed that the plasma Gd-IgA1 level was significantly elevated in IgAN patients with tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis. In addition, the plasma Gd-IgA1 level was positively associated with tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis in IgAN patients after being adjusted for age and gender. Nguyen et al. [
18] were the first to show that higher plasma Gd-IgA1 titers were associated with stronger mesangial cell inflammatory response with production of a greater amount of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in vitro, which in turn was associated with severe histologic changes in S and T scores according to the updated Oxford classifications. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate that the plasma factor Ba and C5a levels were significantly elevated in IgAN patients with tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T) and crescents (C), respectively. In our study, we confirmed the significant association between plasma factor Ba levels and higher grade of tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis in IgAN patients, after being adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, UPCR and usage of ACEI/ARB. Such findings advocate for the causal role of the alternative pathway in the pathogenesis of IgAN. Since some early results from clinical trials targeting complement pathways have been showing promise in IgAN [
23], the levels of complement pathway activation products thus should be investigated for their role in predicting disease outcomes and guiding treatment decisions.
Renal biopsy is the current gold standard for diagnosis and assessment of IgAN. Pathology diagnosis and staging provide valuable information on disease severity and prognosis. Nevertheless, patients may refuse renal biopsy and it might not be available in some instances. Although proteinuria is widely known to be associated with the prognosis of patients with various types of glomerulonephritis, it is challenging to determine acute glomerular disease or chronic lesions simply by the degree of proteinuria. Thus, a reliable blood-based IgAN biomarker may be of clinical significance. In addition, by combining pathology, clinical parameters and blood-based biomarkers, IgAN patients may benefit from a new disease prediction algorithm to guide disease management in the future. Such an approach has been shown by Barbour et al. [
24], who had presented the accuracy and validation of a new international risk-prediction tool in IgAN.
Our study had several limitations. First, the plasma biomarker level of Gd-IgA1, factor Ba and C5a were only measured once in each patient. Levels of Gd-IgA1 and other biomarkers vary a lot between individual patients and thus the interpretation of this biomarkers for each patient should be carried out with caution. Second, the UPCR level was determined by spot urine, but not 24 h urine. Longitudinal analysis and more detailed clinical information may further solidify our findings. The findings should also be validated in additional studies with an adequate sample size.