Next Article in Journal
Suicidal Ideation and Suicide-Attempt-Related Hospitalizations among People with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and AD-Related Dementias in the United States during 2016–2018
Previous Article in Journal
Urinary Mass Spectrometry Profiles in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of Variability in the DDAH1, DDAH2, AGXT2 and PRMT1 Genes with Circulating ADMA Concentration in Human Whole Blood

Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(4), 941; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040941
Submission received: 10 January 2022 / Revised: 5 February 2022 / Accepted: 10 February 2022 / Published: 11 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)

Abstract

:
Asymmetric dimethylarginine is an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthesis and a cardiovascular risk factor. Its regulation has been studied extensively in experimental models, but less in humans. We studied common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes encoding for enzymes involved in ADMA biosynthesis and metabolism, i.e., PRMT1, DDAH1, DDAH2, and AGXT2, and assessed their associations with blood ADMA concentration in 377 unselected humans. The minor allele of DDAH1 SNP rs233112 was significantly more frequent in individuals with ADMA in the highest tertile or in the highest quartile, as was the major allele of DDAH2 rs805304. A combined genotype comprising both SNPs showed a significant genotype–phenotype association, with increasing ADMA concentration by an increasing number of inactive alleles. SNPs in the AGXT2 and PRMT1 genes showed no significant associations with blood ADMA concentration. Our study provides comprehensive evidence that DDAH1 and DDAH2 are the major enzymes regulating blood ADMA concentration, whilst PRMT1 indirectly affects ADMA, and AGXT2 may act as a back-up enzyme in ADMA metabolism under pathophysiological conditions only.

1. Introduction

Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis. Both in vitro and in vivo, ADMA concentration-dependently inhibits the conversion of 15N-L-arginine into 15NO3 [1,2]; administration of L-arginine in vivo overcomes the inhibitory effects of ADMA and restores endothelium-dependent vasodilation [3]. Therefore, ADMA has been recognized as an important regulator of NO availability; its circulating concentration is associated with total mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events [4].
ADMA is formed during posttranslational protein modification by protein arginine N-methyltransferases (PRMTs) that introduce up to two methyl groups into L-arginine residues of specific proteins (for review, cf. [5]). Among nine PRMT isoforms that have been identified thus far, PRMT1 appears to be the isoform responsible for the majority of asymmetric protein demethylation, and, thus, ADMA production [6]. Free ADMA is released during cellular turnover of methylated proteins. Its concentration in plasma and tissues is controlled by either of two isoforms of dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase (DDAH) [7], of which DDAH1 appears to be the major enzyme that is highly expressed in kidneys and liver and regulates plasma ADMA concentration in animal models [8], whilst DDAH2 can be found in vascular tissues and lungs [7], where it is involved in the regulation of NO-mediated vasodilation [8]. Alanine glyoxylate aminotransferase-2 (AGXT2) is a mitochondrial enzyme that is able to utilize ADMA and its congener, symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) as alternative substrates [9]; however, the physiological role of AGXT2 in controlling ADMA concentration has not yet been fully understood, as the majority of experiments that showed its involvement in ADMA metabolism were performed using overexpression models [10]. In a human genome-wide association study, we did not find an association of the AGXT2 gene with ADMA [11]. Figure 1 depicts the major pathways of ADMA biosynthesis and metabolic degradation, highlighting the genes that were analyzed in this study.
To further clarify the physiological roles of the different enzymes involved in ADMA biosynthesis and degradation in humans, we analyzed genetic polymorphisms in each of the corresponding genes that might be linked to altered dimethylarginine levels, nitric oxide generation, or vascular disease. We identified nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the PRMT1, DDAH1, DDAH2, and AGXT2 genes that fulfilled this criterion and for which the expected minor allele frequencies were sufficiently high to allow for genotype–phenotype analyses in a medium-sized cohort. Thus, the aim of the present study was to analyze common single nucleotide polymorphisms in four genes relating to ADMA and to assess the associations of the major and minor alleles of these genes with circulating ADMA concentration in a randomly chosen human cohort.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Participants and Protocol

We included 377 adult human subjects who had consented to have their ADMA and L-arginine levels measured in dried blood spots for a variety of motivations, ranging from an individual history of cardiovascular disease to the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, as well as to a primary prevention approach to biomarker analysis. No specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to define this unselected study cohort. Each individual had filled a short, structured questionnaire asking for medical history; presence of cardiovascular risk factors (i.e., hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and diabetes); and additional variables such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglyceride, and creatinine serum levels if known to the individual. Each individual had six blood spots drawn from one fingertip; three blood spots were used for ADMA analysis and three blood spots were used for isolation of genomic DNA.
The samples and questionnaires were anonymized after the participants had received their individual reports on biomarker levels, and all genomic analyses were performed with strictly anonymized data in agreement with current data protection regulations after the anonymization code had been discarded.

2.2. Assessment of ADMA Concentration from Dried Blood Spots

We have previously published the method of analysis of ADMA from dried blood spots in detail [12]. Briefly, three dried blood spots from each subject were collected in reaction tubes and incubated with 300 µL of elution buffer on an orbital shaker for 20 min. Samples were centrifuged at 3000× g, and two aliquots of 75 µL each were used for analysis after acylation (60 min, room temperature). Analysis of ADMA was performed using commercially available ELISA assays (DLD Diagnostika, Hamburg, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The ADMA ELISA had previously been validated by our group [13].

2.3. DNA Isolation from Dried Blood Spots

DNA was isolated from dried blood spots using a salting-out procedure modified from Shaik et al. [14]. Briefly, three punches of dried blood (6 mm each) were collected in a 2 mL reaction tube and incubated in 750 µL methanol by gently shaking for 15 min at room temperature. The punches were allowed to air dry for 15 to 30 min and were then transferred to a clean 2 mL reaction tube. A total of 500 µL of lysis buffer (20 mM EDTA, pH 8.0; 30 mM Tris-HCl; 5 mM MgCl2; 1% Triton X-100 (v/v); 3% SDS (w/v)) were added and allowed to incubate for 30 min at 80 °C and 400 rpm on an Eppendorf Thermomixer. Subsequently, 100 µg of proteinase K was added, followed by a 60 min incubation at 60 °C and 400 rpm. A total of 200 µL of 6 M NaOH was added, and the sample was centrifuged for 15 min at room temperature at 3000× g. The clear upper phase was transferred into a clean 1.5 mL reaction tube, and DNA was precipitated by 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.0) and absolute ethanol overnight at −20 °C. Pellets were washed once with 70% ethanol, resuspended in 20 µL H2O, and dissolved over night at 4 °C and 400 rpm on a thermomixer. DNA concentration was determined using a nanophotometer NP60 (Implen, Munich, Germany).

2.4. Genotyping

We genotyped three SNPs in the DDAH1 gene (rs1241321, rs480414, and rs233112), two SNPs in the DDAH2 gene (rs805304 and rs2272592), two SNPs in the AGXT2 gene (rs16899974 and rs37369), and two SNPs in the PRMT1 gene (rs1041588 and rs975484). These SNPs were selected on the basis of a literature search for SNPs that have been reported to be associated with differences in ADMA concentration, differences in nitric oxide-related vascular function, or cardiovascular diseases (Appendix A). Details of published information on the selected SNPs is given in Appendix A Table A1. SNP genotyping was performed using single-tube human TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Each reaction mix contained 10 ng template DNA, 0.5 µL specific TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assay, and 5 µL of 2xTaqPath ProAmp™ Mastermix in a total reaction volume of 10 µL. The PCR was performed in a QuantStudio™ 5 Real-Time PCR System (Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA) using the following PCR program: pre-read of 30 s at 60 °C, enzyme activation at 95 °C for 5 min, 40 cycles of denaturation (5 s, 95 °C) and annealing (30 s, 60 °C), followed by a last post-read of 30 s at 60 °C. Allelic calls were identified by Quant Studio Design and Analysis Software (Thermofisher, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.5. Statistical Analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 21; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism (version 6.01, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). All variables were tested for normal distribution using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Differences between groups were tested for significance by using either the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test for two groups or the Kruskal–Wallis analysis of variance for more than two groups. Allele frequencies of the genes of interest were compared to the European reference population or between groups using contingency tables and Fisher’s exact test. Differences in ADMA concentrations between genotypes were tested for statistical significances by ANOVA followed by the Scheffé f-test, and allele frequencies between ADMA tertiles and quartiles were tested for significance by using the χ2 test. Data are presented as median with interquartile range, or as mean with standard deviation. For all tests, p < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics of the Study Participants

We analyzed 377 human subjects with a mean age of 59.4 ± 13.1 years. Both sexes were evenly distributed (50.9% males); the prevalence of CVD and risk factors is given in Table 1.

3.2. Distribution of ADMA Concentration in the Study Cohort

Mean circulating ADMA concentration in the study cohort was 0.98 ± 0.35 µmol/L. The distribution of ADMA concentration in the study cohort is shown in as a histogram in Figure 2a. Individuals with high ADMA had a significantly higher mean age than individuals with low ADMA; the proportion of males significantly increased with increasing tertiles of ADMA (Table 1).
We further analyzed the association of circulating ADMA with CVD and CVD risk factors. We found no significant trends for higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of myocardial infarction, or smoking status with increasing tertiles of ADMA (Table 1). There was a trend towards fewer patients with diabetes mellitus with higher ADMA tertiles; however, due to the relatively small number of patients with diabetes, this did not reach statistical significance. We neither observed significant trends for systolic nor for diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels across ADMA tertiles. However, individuals in the highest ADMA tertile had significantly higher serum creatinine concentrations than those in the lowest ADMA tertile (p = 0.038). Mean ADMA concentrations in tertiles and in quartiles of ADMA are depicted in Figure 2b,c.

3.3. Allele Frequencies of the SNPs in the Study Cohort Compared to the European Reference Population

The prevalence of the major allele of PRMT1 rs10415880 was significantly higher, and that of DDAH1 rs2331112 was slightly but significantly lower than those expected on the basis of allele frequencies reported for the European reference population of the 1000 Genomes project [15]. For all other SNPs investigated in this study, the frequencies of the major and minor alleles did not deviate significantly from those reported for the 1000 Genomes project (Table 2).

3.4. Association of SNPs with ADMA Concentration

We observed a significant association of DDAH1 rs233112 genotypes with mean ADMA concentration (p = 0.027 for trend across genotypes); individuals homozygous for the minor allele had a significantly higher mean ADMA concentration than in carriers homozygous for the major allele. For all other SNPs, there were no significant associations of ADMA concentration with genotypes. Table 3 summarizes the associations of all SNPs with ADMA concentration.
We next subdivided individuals by tertiles and quartiles of ADMA concentration and assessed differences in allele frequencies for all SNPs across ADMA tertiles and quartiles. With increasing tertiles of ADMA, the frequency of the major allele of DDAH1 rs233112 decreased significantly (p = 0.047; Figure 3a); by contrast, the frequency of the major allele of DDAH2 rs805304 increased significantly (p = 0.024; Figure 3b). When we analyzed allele frequencies for quartiles of ADMA, the differences in allele frequencies of DDAH1 rs2331112 and DDAH2 rs805304 retained statistical significance (p = 0.018 and p = 0.046, respectively; Figure 3c,d).
We then constructed a combined genotype of the DDAH1 rs233112 and DDAH2 rs805304 polymorphisms (inactive alleles: minor allele for rs233112, major allele for rs805304) and analyzed its association with ADMA concentration. In this analysis, “zero inactive alleles” refers to individuals homozygous for the major allele of rs2331112 and the minor allele of rs805304; “4 inactive alleles” refers to individuals homozygous for the minor allele of rs233112 and the major allele of rs805304. Individuals with 1–3 inactive alleles were heterozygous for one or both SNPs. Figure 4 demonstrates that ADMA concentration significantly increased with an increasing number of inactive alleles for the combined genotype (p = 0.021 for trend).

4. Discussion

This study has two major results. Firstly, in an unselected and diverse cohort of human subjects, DDAH1 and DDAH2 were the two genes that were significantly related with circulating ADMA concentration in whole blood. Secondly, neither AGXT2 nor PRMT1 showed significant associations with ADMA concentration in whole blood.
This study is the first to comprehensively investigate SNPs in all four known genes encoding for enzymes involved in dimethylarginine biosynthesis or metabolism, and that have previously been reported to be associated with high ADMA and/or NO-dependent vascular function, with blood ADMA levels in a relatively large human cohort. Whilst our first finding confirms previous reports from genome-wide association studies [11] and observational and experimental studies [16,17,18] that DDAH isoenzymes are the major enzymes controlling circulating ADMA concentration in humans, the second finding is novel, as there have been no prior studies of similar size that analyzed the associations of AGXT2 and PRMT with circulating ADMA concentration in humans. Nonetheless, there has been debate about the differential roles of the enzymes involved in the biosynthesis and degradation of ADMA in regulating ADMA concentration. This was mainly fostered by experimental results that showed the influence of overexpressing or deleting the genes encoding for one of the respective enzymes.
Achan and co-workers [19] estimated that about 80% of the total ADMA synthesized in humans is metabolically cleaved by DDAH(s). Genetic knockdown studies of either DDAH1 or DDAH2 suggested that DDAH1 is the major DDAH isoform involved in regulating circulating ADMA concentration [8]. Plasma ADMA concentration increased by 30% (heterozygous DDAH knockout; [18]) and 120% (homozygous DDAH1 knockout; [20]) in two independent DDAH1 knockout mouse models. These knockout mouse models therefore confirmed the primary role of DDAH1 in ADMA metabolism. By contrast, there was no change in plasma ADMA in homozygous DDAH2 knockout mice [17], whereas tissue concentrations of ADMA in kidneys and myocardium were 93% and 33% higher than in wild-type littermates, respectively. Taken together, these data suggest that ADMA concentration circulating in blood is regulated primarily by DDAH1 and independently from ADMA tissue concentrations, at least in heart and kidneys. For AGXT2, one study demonstrated that homozygous knockout of this gene in mice increased plasma ADMA concentration by some 25% [21]. The same authors estimated that about 20% of variability in (log)ADMA and (log)SDMA concentrations in humans is caused by AGXT2.
Overexpression of human DDAH1 in mice resulted in significantly lower circulating and tissue ADMA concentrations [16], whilst DDAH1 knockout mice showed significantly elevated ADMA plasma concentration [18]. By contrast, DDAH2 knockout mice did not show elevated ADMA plasma concentration despite altered ADMA tissue concentration in myocardium and kidneys and impaired endothelium-dependent vascular reactivity [17].
In our study we found that the minor allele of DDAH1 rs233112 was significantly associated with high ADMA blood levels. Previous investigators had reported that the minor allele of this SNP was associated with arterial stiffness and increased pulse wave reflection [22]. High ADMA, by inhibiting NO generation, may cause arterial stiffness and increase arterial pulse wave reflections [23], thus offering a mechanistic explanation for this genotype–clinical phenotype association. However, genetic variation in DDAH1 was found to be related to circulating ADMA concentration but not to endothelium-dependent vasodilation in a large, population-based study [24], nor were any DDAH2 SNPs associated with vascular reactivity in this study. Therefore, we must be careful in translating experimental findings from genetically engineered rodent models into human biology, and DDAH genotype–phenotype relationships in humans clearly deserve further careful investigation.
The second SNP that was significantly associated with blood ADMA levels was DDAH2 rs805304, of which the major allele was associated with higher ADMA. The DDAH2 gene and, more specifically, this SNP, appear to have a complex relationship with ADMA metabolism. In previous studies, this promoter polymorphism was associated with the prevalence of arterial hypertension [25] and with ADMA levels in type 2 diabetes subjects with renal function impairment [26], whilst none of these associations was found in another study [27]. In a study comprising 473 patients with acute myocardial infarction and 447 controls, the minor allele of DDAH2 rs805304 was significantly associated with a decreased risk of myocardial infarction [28]. Another DDAH2 SNP (rs805305) turned out to be protective in septic shock by regulating ADMA concentration through DDAH activity [29]. Since both SNPs, rs805304 and rs805305, are in strong linkage disequilibrium (R2 = 1.0), our findings for rs805304 in the present study are assumed to be equally valid for rs805305. In line with these prior observations, we recently gathered evidence that carriers of the major allele of DDAH2 rs805304 had a greater increase in ADMA during hypoxia [30]. Taken together, these previous findings and our present data may suggest that DDAH2 underlies transcriptional regulation in pathophysiological conditions (myocardial infarction, diabetes, hypoxia, sepsis), and genetic variability in this gene may impair this regulatory role. Future studies should aim to further clarify the pathophysiological role of DDAH2 versus DDAH1 in humans.
Data showing that AGXT2 metabolizes ADMA came mostly from models in which the AGXT2 gene was overexpressed under the control of promoters that ensured high expression levels of the gene product [10,31]. Another mouse study showed that infusion of beta-aminoisobutyrate (BAIB), a major substrate of AGXT2, may displace ADMA from this enzyme in mice and cause a moderate increase in ADMA concentration [32]. Nonetheless, it has remained unclear as to whether AGXT2 contributes to the physiological control of ADMA concentration in humans. Kittel and co-workers reported that the two coding AGXT2 SNPs rs27269 and rs16899974 were associated with BAIB and SDMA, but not with ADMA plasma concentration in healthy humans [33]. This was strongly supported by our finding from a genome-wide association study that AGXT2 only showed genome-wide significant association with SDMA but not with ADMA concentration [11]. Our present findings further support the notion that, although AGXT2 is catalytically able to utilize ADMA as a substrate, its physiological role in humans as an ADMA-degrading enzyme may be limited. The main catalytic activity of AGXT2 is directed towards the conversion of alanine and glyoxylate to pyruvate and glycine [9]; both ADMA and SDMA may act as alternative substrates for this enzyme. In conditions of impaired DDAH expression or activity, AGXT2 may step in and help to maintain low dimethylarginine concentrations. In line with this hypothesis, we have recently observed that exposure of healthy human subjects to six months of chronic intermittent hypoxia leads to a gradual elevation of plasma ADMA, whilst simultaneously, plasma SDMA gradually decreased [34]. As AGXT2 degrades both ADMA and SDMA, whilst DDAH is inactive towards SDMA, this pattern of metabolite changes in plasma would be consistent with downregulation of DDAH in hypoxia, as has been shown experimentally, and compensatory upregulation of AGXT2. In a recent study in 750 elderly Japanese individuals, a loss-of-function haplotype comprising four SNPs in AGXT2 was positively associated with blood pressure and serum glucose levels; individuals homozygous for this haplotype had significantly elevated ADMA levels [35]. Thus, the physiological and pathophysiological roles of AGXT2 in dimethylarginine metabolism in humans require further study.
PRMT1 has been described to be the major protein arginine methyltransferase that is responsible for asymmetric demethylation of proteins, accounting for 70–80% of ADMA generation [36]. However, there are at least five additional PRMTs that asymmetrically dimethylate proteins—i.e., PRMT2, PRMT3, PRMT4 (CARM1), PRMT6, and PRMT8; they are categorized as type 1 methyltransferases [37]. Dimethylation of arginine residues within specific proteins results in generation of free ADMA only after hydrolytic degradation of the respective proteins and outbound transport of ADMA from the cytoplasm via the y+ amino acid transporter system [38]. Thus, PRMTs rather indirectly affect blood ADMA concentration, a fact that may explain why in our study there was no significant association of PRMT1 SNPs with blood ADMA concentration.
As we did not actually measure standard laboratory parameters but used those reported by the study participants, our correlation analyses of ADMA with standard laboratory parameters do not support major conclusions. It is interesting to note, however, that the previously described correlation of ADMA with renal function was reproduced in this study by showing a significant association of ADMA tertiles with serum creatinine concentration [39,40]. DDAH1 is highly expressed in renal tissue, as is AGXT2; the correlation of ADMA with creatinine may therefore point to dysregulation of the expression and/or activity of these ADMA-metabolizing enzymes in the kidneys rather than to reduced excretion of unchanged ADMA into the urine [41,42]. Elevated ADMA concentration in kidney disease may thus explain the high incidence of cardiovascular co-morbidity in this patient population.
Our study has a number of strengths and limitations. We analyzed whole blood concentration of ADMA on the basis of a previously described and validated dried blood spot assay [12]. Whole blood concentration of ADMA was shown to be higher than its plasma concentration when intra-individual comparisons were made (0.98 ± 0.28 µmol/L vs. 0.78 ± 0.05 µmol/L; [12]). Nonetheless, we demonstrated a close correlation between ADMA concentration in dried whole blood spots and in plasma [12]. Whilst limitation of sample size is always a drawback, one strength of our study results from the fact that we included an unselected, diverse cohort, and that we did not influence the association of genotypes and phenotype by any active intervention nor by selection of a specific patient population. This is the first study to analyze genetic variability in the four major genes linked to biosynthesis and metabolism of ADMA. Nonetheless, we were unable to quantitatively estimate the relative contributions of DDAH1, DDAH2, and AGXT2 to ADMA metabolism, as we did not measure DDAH and AGXT2 activities in this study.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study provides comprehensive evidence that amongst all enzymes involved in dimethylarginine synthesis and degradation, DDAH1 and DDAH2 are the ones that most directly influence blood ADMA concentration in humans.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H. (Juliane Hannemann) and R.B.; methodology, J.H. (Juliane Hannemann); formal analysis, J.H. (Juliane Hannemann) and R.B.; data curation, J.Z., J.H. (Jonas Hillig) and L.R.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, J.H. (Juliane Hannemann) and R.B.; writing—review and editing, J.Z., J.H. (Jonas Hillig) and L.R.-G.; supervision, J.H. (Juliane Hannemann) and R.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical review and approval were waived for this study according to §12 HmbKHG, as the aggregated statistical analyses for this study were performed in a strictly anonymized manner.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mariola Kastner, Fiona Franke, and Melanie Reckordt for excellent technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Selection and Clinical Significance of the Selected Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms

In this study, we aimed to investigate whether genetic variance in the genes encoding for enzymes relating to the biosynthesis and metabolism of ADMA are associated with ADMA concentration in human whole blood. The major enzymes involved in these activities are depicted in Figure 1 in the main manuscript. Genetic variability studies on the corresponding genes have been performed previously by several groups of investigators. Table A1 provides an overview of the SNPs that were selected for this study, including references to previous studies linking variability to outcome parameters related to nitric oxide-mediated functions. We made a selection of references relating the SNPs in DDAH1, DDAH2, and AGXT2 to clinical parameters linked to the topic of our present study, whilst there is very little published information available for the PRMT1 gene. Amongst the many known SNPs in each of the genes of interest for our study, many are in linkage disequilibrium (LD) based on information available in the LDLink database of the National Cancer Institute, USA (https://ldlink.nci.nih.gov/; last accessed 8 January 2022). We therefore decided for one tag SNP out of a specific group in order to identify SNPs spread over the whole gene, even if no clinical associations have been published yet.
Table A1. Summary of SNPs selected for this study and their previously published associations with clinical parameters.
Table A1. Summary of SNPs selected for this study and their previously published associations with clinical parameters.
Gene/SNPPositionGenetic ConsequenceClinical RationaleRelated References
DDAH1
rs1241321Intron 1Intron variantMinor allele associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality and the combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke.[43]
rs233112Exon 63’ UTR variantMinor allele associated with arterial stiffness and pulse wave reflection.[22]
rs480414Intron 1Intron variantMinor allele associated with a lower incidence of pulmonary hypertension in patients with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.[44]
DDAH2
rs805304 2 kb upstream variantMinor allele associated with higher prevalence of hypertension, higher ADMA concentration in diabetic renal impairment, and decreased risk of myocardial infarction.[25,26,28]
rs2272592 2 kb upstream variantMinor allele associated with type 2 diabetes.[27]
AGXT2
rs37369Exon 4Missense variantMinor allele associated with higher methylarginine levels, higher diastolic blood pressure, and higher risk of coronary artery disease.[21,33,45]
rs16899974Exon 14Missense variantMinor allele associated with higher levels of SDMA, with atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke, and higher risk of coronary artery disease.[33,45,46]
PRMT1
rs10415880Intron 8Intron variantMinor allele associated with arteriovenous fistula malfunction in male hemodialysis patients.[47]
rs975484 Promoter variantMinor allele associated with reduced immune checkpoint gene expression; no significant assocation with ADMA in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage nor in healthy male Chilean individuals.[30,48,49]

References

  1. Böger, R.H.; Sydow, K.; Borlak, J.; Thum, T.; Lenzen, H.; Schubert, B.; Tsikas, D.; Bode-Böger, S.M. LDL cholesterol upregulates synthesis of asymmetrical dimethylarginine in human endothelial cells: Involvement of S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferases. Circ. Res. 2000, 87, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Böger, R.H.; Tsikas, D.; Bode-Böger, S.M.; Phivthong-Ngam, L.; Schwedhelm, E.; Frölich, J.C. Hypercholesterolemia impairs basal nitric oxide synthase turnover rate: A study investigating the conversion of L-[guanidino-(15)N(2)]-arginine to (15)N-labeled nitrate by gas chromatography—Mass spectrometry. Nitric Oxide 2004, 11, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Böger, R.H.; Bode-Böger, S.M.; Szuba, A.; Tsao, P.S.; Chan, J.R.; Tangphao, O.; Blaschke, T.F.; Cooke, J.P. Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA): A novel risk factor for endothelial dysfunction: Its role in hypercholesterolemia. Circulation 1998, 98, 1842–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Böger, R.H.; Sullivan, L.M.; Schwedhelm, E.; Wang, T.J.; Maas, R.; Benjamin, E.J.; Schulze, F.; Xanthakis, V.; Benndorf, R.A.; Vasan, R.S. Plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine and incidence of cardiovascular disease and death in the community. Circulation 2009, 119, 1592–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nicholson, T.B.; Chen, T.; Richard, S. The physiological and pathophysiological role of PRMT1-mediated protein arginine methylation. Pharmacol. Res. 2009, 60, 466–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fulton, M.D.; Brown, T.; Zheng, Y.G. The Biological Axis of Protein Arginine Methylation and Asymmetric Dimethylarginine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Leiper, J.M.; Santa Maria, J.; Chubb, A.; MacAllister, R.J.; Charles, I.G.; Whitley, G.S.; Vallance, P. Identification of two human dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolases with distinct tissue distributions and homology with microbial arginine deiminases. Biochem. J. 1999, 343 Pt 1, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, D.; Gill, P.S.; Chabrashvili, T.; Onozato, M.L.; Raggio, J.; Mendonca, M.; Dennehy, K.; Li, M.; Modlinger, P.; Leiper, J.; et al. Isoform-specific regulation by N(G),N(G)-dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase of rat serum asymmetric dimethylarginine and vascular endothelium-derived relaxing factor/NO. Circ. Res. 2007, 101, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Rodionov, R.N.; Jarzebska, N.; Weiss, N.; Lentz, S.R. AGXT2: A promiscuous aminotransferase. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2014, 35, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rodionov, R.N.; Murry, D.J.; Vaulman, S.F.; Stevens, J.W.; Lentz, S.R. Human alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase 2 lowers asymmetric dimethylarginine and protects from inhibition of nitric oxide production. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 5385–5391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lüneburg, N.; Lieb, W.; Zeller, T.; Chen, M.H.; Maas, R.; Carter, A.M.; Xanthakis, V.; Glazer, N.L.; Schwedhelm, E.; Seshadri, S.; et al. Genome-wide association study of L-arginine and dimethylarginines reveals novel metabolic pathway for symmetric dimethylarginine. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2014, 7, 864–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hannemann, J.; Roskam, T.I.; Eilermann, I.; Siques, P.; Brito, J.; Böger, R. Pre-Analytical and Clinical Validation of a Dried Blood Spot Assay for Asymmetric Dimethylarginine and L-Arginine. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Schulze, F.; Wesemann, R.; Schwedhelm, E.; Sydow, K.; Albsmeier, J.; Cooke, J.P.; Böger, R.H. Determination of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) using a novel ELISA assay. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2004, 42, 1377–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shaik, M.; Shivanna, D.K.; Kamate, M.; Ab, V.; Tp, K.V. Single Lysis-Salting Out Method of Genomic DNA Extraction From Dried Blood Spots. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2016, 30, 1009–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Auton, A.; Brooks, L.D.; Durbin, R.M.; Garrison, E.P.; Kang, H.M.; Korbel, J.O.; Marchini, J.L.; McCarthy, S.; McVean, G.A.; Abecasis, G.R. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 2015, 526, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Dayoub, H.; Achan, V.; Adimoolam, S.; Jacobi, J.; Stuehlinger, M.C.; Wang, B.Y.; Tsao, P.S.; Kimoto, M.; Vallance, P.; Patterson, A.J.; et al. Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase regulates nitric oxide synthesis: Genetic and physiological evidence. Circulation 2003, 108, 3042–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lambden, S.; Kelly, P.; Ahmetaj-Shala, B.; Wang, Z.; Lee, B.; Nandi, M.; Torondel, B.; Delahaye, M.; Dowsett, L.; Piper, S.; et al. Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2 regulates nitric oxide synthesis and hemodynamics and determines outcome in polymicrobial sepsis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 1382–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Leiper, J.; Nandi, M.; Torondel, B.; Murray-Rust, J.; Malaki, M.; O’Hara, B.; Rossiter, S.; Anthony, S.; Madhani, M.; Selwood, D.; et al. Disruption of methylarginine metabolism impairs vascular homeostasis. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Achan, V.; Broadhead, M.; Malaki, M.; Whitley, G.; Leiper, J.; MacAllister, R.; Vallance, P. Asymmetric dimethylarginine causes hypertension and cardiac dysfunction in humans and is actively metabolized by dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2003, 23, 1455–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hu, X.; Atzler, D.; Xu, X.; Zhang, P.; Guo, H.; Lu, Z.; Fassett, J.; Schwedhelm, E.; Böger, R.H.; Bache, R.J.; et al. Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase-1 is the critical enzyme for degrading the cardiovascular risk factor asymmetrical dimethylarginine. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 1540–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Caplin, B.; Wang, Z.; Slaviero, A.; Tomlinson, J.; Dowsett, L.; Delahaye, M.; Salama, A.; Wheeler, D.C.; Leiper, J. Alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase-2 metabolizes endogenous methylarginines, regulates NO, and controls blood pressure. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2012, 32, 2892–2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Schnabel, R.; Larson, M.G.; Dupuis, J.; Lunetta, K.L.; Lipinska, I.; Meigs, J.B.; Yin, X.; Rong, J.; Vita, J.A.; Newton-Cheh, C.; et al. Relations of inflammatory biomarkers and common genetic variants with arterial stiffness and wave reflection. Hypertension 2008, 51, 1651–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Weber, T.; Maas, R.; Auer, J.; Lamm, G.; Lassnig, E.; Rammer, M.; O’Rourke, M.F.; Böger, R.H.; Eber, B. Arterial wave reflections and determinants of endothelial function a hypothesis based on peripheral mode of action. Am. J. Hypertens. 2007, 20, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Lind, L.; Ingelsson, E.; Kumar, J.; Syvänen, A.C.; Axelsson, T.; Teerlink, T. Genetic variation in the dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1 gene (DDAH1) is related to asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) levels, but not to endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Vasc. Med. 2013, 18, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Maas, R.; Erdmann, J.; Lüneburg, N.; Stritzke, J.; Schwedhelm, E.; Meisinger, C.; Peters, A.; Weil, J.; Schunkert, H.; Böger, R.H.; et al. Polymorphisms in the promoter region of the dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2 gene are associated with prevalence of hypertension. Pharmacol. Res. 2009, 60, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Marra, M.; Marchegiani, F.; Ceriello, A.; Sirolla, C.; Boemi, M.; Franceschi, C.; Spazzafumo, L.; Testa, I.; Bonfigli, A.R.; Cucchi, M.; et al. Chronic renal impairment and DDAH2-1151 A/C polymorphism determine ADMA levels in type 2 diabetic subjects. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2013, 28, 964–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Seo, H.A.; Kim, S.W.; Jeon, E.J.; Jeong, J.Y.; Moon, S.S.; Lee, W.K.; Kim, J.G.; Lee, I.K.; Park, K.G. Association of the DDAH2 gene polymorphism with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2012, 98, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pérez-Hernández, N.; Vargas-Alarcón, G.; Arellano-Zapoteco, R.; Martínez-Rodríguez, N.; Fragoso, J.M.; Aptilon-Duque, G.; Posadas-Sánchez, R.; Posadas-Romero, C.; Juárez-Cedillo, T.; Domínguez-López, M.L.; et al. Protective role of DDAH2 (rs805304) gene polymorphism in patients with myocardial infarction. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2014, 97, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lambden, S.; Tomlinson, J.; Piper, S.; Gordon, A.C.; Leiper, J. Evidence for a protective role for the rs805305 single nucleotide polymorphism of dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2 (DDAH2) in septic shock through the regulation of DDAH activity. Crit. Care 2018, 22, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hannemann, J.; Siques, P.; Schmidt-Hutten, L.; Zummack, J.; Brito, J.; Böger, R. Association of Genes of the NO Pathway with Altitude Disease and Hypoxic Pulmonary Hypertension. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rodionov, R.N.; Martens-Lobenhoffer, J.; Brilloff, S.; Hohenstein, B.; Jarzebska, N.; Jabs, N.; Kittel, A.; Maas, R.; Weiss, N.; Bode-Böger, S.M. Role of alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase 2 in metabolism of asymmetric dimethylarginine in the settings of asymmetric dimethylarginine overload and bilateral nephrectomy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2014, 29, 2035–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Kittel, A.; Maas, R.; König, J.; Mieth, M.; Weiss, N.; Jarzebska, N.; Hohenstein, B.; Martens-Lobenhoffer, J.; Bode-Böger, S.M.; Rodionov, R.N. In vivo evidence that Agxt2 can regulate plasma levels of dimethylarginines in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 430, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kittel, A.; Müller, F.; König, J.; Mieth, M.; Sticht, H.; Zolk, O.; Kralj, A.; Heinrich, M.R.; Fromm, M.F.; Maas, R. Alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase 2 (AGXT2) polymorphisms have considerable impact on methylarginine and β-aminoisobutyrate metabolism in healthy volunteers. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Siques, P.; Brito, J.; Schwedhelm, E.; Pena, E.; León-Velarde, F.; De La Cruz, J.J.; Böger, R.H.; Hannemann, J. Asymmetric Dimethylarginine at Sea Level Is a Predictive Marker of Hypoxic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension at High Altitude. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yoshino, Y.; Kumon, H.; Mori, T.; Yoshida, T.; Tachibana, A.; Shimizu, H.; Iga, J.I.; Ueno, S.I. Effects of AGXT2 variants on blood pressure and blood sugar among 750 older Japanese subjects recruited by the complete enumeration survey method. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bedford, M.T.; Clarke, S.G. Protein arginine methylation in mammals: Who, what, and why. Mol. Cell 2009, 33, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jarrold, J.; Davies, C.C. PRMTs and Arginine Methylation: Cancer’s Best-Kept Secret? Trends Mol. Med. 2019, 25, 993–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Strobel, J.; Mieth, M.; Endress, B.; Auge, D.; König, J.; Fromm, M.F.; Maas, R. Interaction of the cardiovascular risk marker asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) with the human cationic amino acid transporter 1 (CAT1). J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2012, 53, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vallance, P.; Leone, A.; Calver, A.; Collier, J.; Moncada, S. Accumulation of an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthesis in chronic renal failure. Lancet 1992, 339, 572–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zoccali, C.; Bode-Böger, S.; Mallamaci, F.; Benedetto, F.; Tripepi, G.; Malatino, L.; Cataliotti, A.; Bellanuova, I.; Fermo, I.; Frölich, J.; et al. Plasma concentration of asymmetrical dimethylarginine and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease: A prospective study. Lancet 2001, 358, 2113–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jarzebska, N.; Georgi, S.; Jabs, N.; Brilloff, S.; Maas, R.; Rodionov, R.N.; Zietz, C.; Montresor, S.; Hohenstein, B.; Weiss, N. Kidney and liver are the main organs of expression of a key metabolic enzyme alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase 2 in humans. Atheroscler. Suppl. 2019, 40, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tomlinson, J.A.; Caplin, B.; Boruc, O.; Bruce-Cobbold, C.; Cutillas, P.; Dormann, D.; Faull, P.; Grossman, R.C.; Khadayate, S.; Mas, V.R.; et al. Reduced Renal Methylarginine Metabolism Protects against Progressive Kidney Damage. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015, 26, 3045–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lu, T.M.; Lin, S.J.; Lin, M.W.; Hsu, C.P.; Chung, M.Y. The association of dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 1 gene polymorphism with type 2 diabetes: A cohort study. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2011, 10, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Trittmann, J.K.; Gastier-Foster, J.M.; Zmuda, E.J.; Frick, J.; Rogers, L.K.; Vieland, V.J.; Chicoine, L.G.; Nelin, L.D. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase gene is associated with lower risk of pulmonary hypertension in bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Acta Paediatr. 2016, 105, e170–e175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Amir, M.; Hassanein, S.I.; Abdel Rahman, M.F.; Gad, M.Z. AGXT2 and DDAH-1 genetic variants are highly correlated with serum ADMA and SDMA levels and with incidence of coronary artery disease in Egyptians. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2018, 45, 2411–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Seppälä, I.; Kleber, M.E.; Bevan, S.; Lyytikäinen, L.P.; Oksala, N.; Hernesniemi, J.A.; Mäkelä, K.M.; Rothwell, P.M.; Sudlow, C.; Dichgans, M.; et al. Associations of functional alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase 2 gene variants with atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, K.H.; Tsai, W.J.; Chen, Y.W.; Yang, W.C.; Lee, C.Y.; Ou, S.M.; Chen, Y.T.; Chien, C.C.; Lee, P.C.; Chung, M.Y.; et al. Genotype polymorphisms of genes regulating nitric oxide synthesis determine long-term arteriovenous fistula patency in male hemodialysis patients. Ren. Fail. 2016, 38, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Hannemann, J.; Appel, D.; Seeberger-Steinmeister, M.; Brüning, T.; Zummack, J.; Böger, R. Sequence Variation in the DDAH1 Gene Predisposes for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Subarachnoidal Hemorrhage. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schonfeld, M.; Zhao, J.; Komatz, A.; Weinman, S.A.; Tikhanovich, I. The polymorphism rs975484 in the protein arginine methyltransferase 1 gene modulates expression of immune checkpoint genes in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 7126–7137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Scheme of enzymatic pathways for biosynthesis and metabolism of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA). L-arginine residues within specific proteins are subject to methylation by protein arginine N-methyltransferases (PRMTs), amongst which PRMT1 has been identified to be the major isoform generating ADMA. Free ADMA is released during physiological protein turnover. ADMA is a competitive inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthase. ADMA is mainly degraded by dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolases (DDAH1 and DDAH2) into L-citrulline and dimethylamine (DMA). It may be cleaved by an alternative pathway through alanine glyoxylate aminotransferase 2 (AGXT2), resulting in the formation of asymmetric dimethylguanidinovaleric acid (DMGV). Enzymes of which we have analyzed genetic variance in this study are marked in bold red type within the yellow arrows.
Figure 1. Scheme of enzymatic pathways for biosynthesis and metabolism of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA). L-arginine residues within specific proteins are subject to methylation by protein arginine N-methyltransferases (PRMTs), amongst which PRMT1 has been identified to be the major isoform generating ADMA. Free ADMA is released during physiological protein turnover. ADMA is a competitive inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthase. ADMA is mainly degraded by dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolases (DDAH1 and DDAH2) into L-citrulline and dimethylamine (DMA). It may be cleaved by an alternative pathway through alanine glyoxylate aminotransferase 2 (AGXT2), resulting in the formation of asymmetric dimethylguanidinovaleric acid (DMGV). Enzymes of which we have analyzed genetic variance in this study are marked in bold red type within the yellow arrows.
Jcm 11 00941 g001
Figure 2. (a) Histogram depicting the distribution of circulating ADMA concentrations in the study cohort. Data are shown as absolute frequencies of ADMA concentrations in 377 adult humans split up in 0.1 µmol/L intervals. (b) ADMA concentration in tertiles of ADMA (first tertile, N = 121; second tertile, N = 128; third tertile, N = 128). (c) ADMA concentration in quartiles of ADMA (first quartile, N = 88; second quartile, N = 99; third quartile, N = 96; fourth quartile, N = 94). Data are depicted as mean ± SD. p-values denote statistical significance for two-sided one-way ANOVA.
Figure 2. (a) Histogram depicting the distribution of circulating ADMA concentrations in the study cohort. Data are shown as absolute frequencies of ADMA concentrations in 377 adult humans split up in 0.1 µmol/L intervals. (b) ADMA concentration in tertiles of ADMA (first tertile, N = 121; second tertile, N = 128; third tertile, N = 128). (c) ADMA concentration in quartiles of ADMA (first quartile, N = 88; second quartile, N = 99; third quartile, N = 96; fourth quartile, N = 94). Data are depicted as mean ± SD. p-values denote statistical significance for two-sided one-way ANOVA.
Jcm 11 00941 g002
Figure 3. Allele frequencies for the major and minor allele of DDAH1 SNP rs233112 (a,c) and DDAH2 SNP rs805304 (b,d) separated by tertiles (a,b) and quartiles of ADMA (b,d), respectively. p-values denote statistical significance in χ2 test for trend.
Figure 3. Allele frequencies for the major and minor allele of DDAH1 SNP rs233112 (a,c) and DDAH2 SNP rs805304 (b,d) separated by tertiles (a,b) and quartiles of ADMA (b,d), respectively. p-values denote statistical significance in χ2 test for trend.
Jcm 11 00941 g003
Figure 4. ADMA concentration according to the number of inactive alleles in the combined genotype of DDAH1 rs2331112 and DDAH2 rs805304. Data are mean ± S.E.M. p denotes statistical significance in linear regression analysis.
Figure 4. ADMA concentration according to the number of inactive alleles in the combined genotype of DDAH1 rs2331112 and DDAH2 rs805304. Data are mean ± S.E.M. p denotes statistical significance in linear regression analysis.
Jcm 11 00941 g004
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study participants.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study participants.
AllLow ADMA
(First Tertile)
Medium ADMA
(Second Tertile)
High ADMA
(Third Tertile)
DemographicsN = 377N = 121N = 128N = 128
 Age, years59.4 ± 13.158.5 ± 13.457.0 ± 12.962.6 ± 12.6 *
 Age range, years18–9222–9121–9218–90
 Male sex192 (50.9)47 (38.8)65 (50.8) #80 (62.5) #
 Female sex185 (49.1)74 (61.2)63 (49.2) #48 (38.5) #
ADMA concentration in whole blood
 ADMA, µmol/L0.98 ± 0.350.62 ± 0.150.93 ± 0.07 *1.35 ± 0.27 *
Laboratory parameters
 Systolic BP, mm Hg128.9 ± 16.5129.9 ± 15.9130.3 ± 17.7126.8 ± 15.7
 Diastolic BP, mm Hg77.9 ± 9.577.2 ± 10.279.2 ± 9.077.2 ± 9.3
 Total cholesterol, mmol/L5.08 ± 1.335.30 ± 1.004.82 ± 1.505.09 ± 1.45
 Triglycerides, mmol/L1.45 ± 1.301.62 ± 1.381.51 ± 1.091.23 ± 1.45
 Creatinine, mmol/L0.91 ± 0.240.80 ± 0.220.93 ± 0.191.00 ± 0.29 *
CV risk factors
 History of MI39 (10.3)14 (11.6)7 (5.5)18 (14.1)
 Family history of heart disease88 (23.3)32 (26.4)27 (21.1)29 (22.7)
 Diabetes mellitus35 (9.3)18 (14.9)8 (6.3)9 (7.0)
 Hypertension53 (14.1)18 (14.9)14 (10.9)21 (16.4)
 Congestive heart failure3 (0.8)1 (0.8)1 (0.8)1 (0.8)
 Active smoker43 (11.4)14 (11.6)13 (10.2)16 (12.5)
Abbreviations: MI, myocardial infarction; ADMA, asymmetric dimethylarginine; CV, cardiovascular. * p < 0.05 for significant difference of continuous variables from first tertile of ADMA (univariate ANOVA with Scheffé f-test). # p < 0.05 for significant difference of categorical variables from first tertile of ADMA (Pearson’s χ2 test).
Table 2. Allele frequencies for single nucleotide polymorphisms in the DDAH1 and DDAH2 genes.
Table 2. Allele frequencies for single nucleotide polymorphisms in the DDAH1 and DDAH2 genes.
Gene/SNPPositionGenetic ConsequenceMajor/Minor AlleleMeasured Allele FrequencyExpected Allele Frequency *p
PRMT1
rs10415880Intron 8Intron variantG/A0.718/0.2820.658/0.3420.008
rs975484-Intron variantC/G0.730/0.2700.738/0.2620.696
DDAH1
rs1241321Intron 1Intron variantA/G0.670/0.3300.712/0.2880.057
rs233112Exon 63’ UTR variantT/C0.568/0.4320.617/0.3830.038
rs480414Intron 1Intron variantG/A0.735/0.2650.698/0.3020.092
DDAH2
rs805304-2 kb upstream variantT/G0.601/0.3990.639/0.3610.102
rs2272592-2 kb upstream variantC/T0.810/0.1900.844/0.1560.064
AGXT2
rs16899974Exon 1Missense variantC/A0.753/0.2470.773/0.2270.325
rs37369Exon 13Missense variantC/T0.907/0.0930.913/0.0870.640
* Expected allele frequencies were calculated using the allele distributions in the European population of the 1000 Genomes Project (N = 1006) [15]. The p-values denote the level of statistical significance for the comparison of absolute frequencies of the minor and major allele in Fisher’s exact test (two-sided). A p < 0.05 was considered significant. Abbreviations: AGXT2, alanine glyoxylate aminotransferase-2; DDAH1, dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase-1; DDAH2, dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase-2; PRMT1, protein arginine N-methyltransferase-1.
Table 3. Mean ADMA concentration separated by genotypes for each of the SNPs.
Table 3. Mean ADMA concentration separated by genotypes for each of the SNPs.
Homozygous MajorHeterozygousHomozygous Minorp for Trend
PRMT1
rs104158800.96 ± 0.321.00 ± 0.350.97 ± 0.300.642
rs9754840.98 ± 0.351.00 ± 0.350.88 ± 0.290.275
DDAH1
rs12413211.00 ± 0.380.97 ± 0.320.90 ± 0.320.286
rs2331120.92 ± 0.390.99 ± 0.321.03 ± 0.350.027
rs4804140.96 ± 0.381.00 ± 0.310.94 ± 0.310.333
DDAH2
rs8053041.01 ± 0.320.95 ± 0.340.98 ± 0.410.157
rs22725920.97 ± 0.370.98 ± 0.321.02 ± 0.250.476
AGXT2
rs168999740.97 ± 0.350.99 ± 0.331.14 ± 0.400.232
rs373690.99 ± 0.350.94 ± 0.310.95 ± 0.180.156
Data are mean ± SD. p-values were calculated by Kruskal–Wallis test for independent samples.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hannemann, J.; Zummack, J.; Hillig, J.; Rendant-Gantzberg, L.; Böger, R. Association of Variability in the DDAH1, DDAH2, AGXT2 and PRMT1 Genes with Circulating ADMA Concentration in Human Whole Blood. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040941

AMA Style

Hannemann J, Zummack J, Hillig J, Rendant-Gantzberg L, Böger R. Association of Variability in the DDAH1, DDAH2, AGXT2 and PRMT1 Genes with Circulating ADMA Concentration in Human Whole Blood. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(4):941. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040941

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hannemann, Juliane, Julia Zummack, Jonas Hillig, Leonard Rendant-Gantzberg, and Rainer Böger. 2022. "Association of Variability in the DDAH1, DDAH2, AGXT2 and PRMT1 Genes with Circulating ADMA Concentration in Human Whole Blood" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 4: 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040941

APA Style

Hannemann, J., Zummack, J., Hillig, J., Rendant-Gantzberg, L., & Böger, R. (2022). Association of Variability in the DDAH1, DDAH2, AGXT2 and PRMT1 Genes with Circulating ADMA Concentration in Human Whole Blood. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(4), 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040941

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop