Next Article in Journal
Vitiligo: From Pathogenesis to Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Unravelling Migraine Stigma: A Comprehensive Review of Its Impact and Strategies for Change
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 13
Issue 17
10.3390/jcm13175223
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Long-Term Hemorrhage and Reperfusion Rates of Coiled Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience

by
Lukas Andereggen
1,2,
Salome L. Bosshart
1,3,4,
Serge Marbacher
1,2,
Basil E. Grüter
4,5,
Jatta Berberat
5,
Gerrit A. Schubert
1,6,
Javier Anon
5,
Michael Diepers
5,
Hans-Jakob Steiger
1,
Luca Remonda
2,5 and
Philipp Gruber
4,5,*
1
Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland
2
Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
3
Department of Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
4
Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
5
Department of Neuroradiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, 5001 Aarau, Switzerland
6
Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5223; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175223
Submission received: 31 July 2024 / Revised: 24 August 2024 / Accepted: 2 September 2024 / Published: 3 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The endovascular approach has emerged as standard therapy for many intracranial aneurysms (IAs) to prevent hemorrhage, yet its long-term durability varies considerably. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an initially deliberate endovascular approach regarding IA hemorrhage rates over a long-term follow-up period. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included all consecutive patients with endovascularly treated IAs who presented between January 2008 and December 2020 with a follow-up of at least 12 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with long-term IA hemorrhage rates and reperfusion. The secondary endpoint was treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Independent risk factors for IA reperfusion over the long term were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Endovascular treatment was the therapy of choice for 333 patients with IAs, among whom 188 (57%) experienced rupture upon presentation. Complete coiling (Raymond I) was noted in 162 (49%) of the patients, with primary supportive devices being used in 51 (15%) patients. After a median (±SD) follow-up time of 34 ± 41 months (range 12–265 months), IA reperfusion was noted in 158 (47%), necessitating retreatment in 105 (32%) of the patients. Over the long term, hemorrhage was noted in four (1%) patients. Multivariate analysis revealed aneurysmal multilobarity (HR 1.8, 95%CI 1.2–2.7; p = 0.004) and a patient age of ≥50 years (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.5, p = 0.01) as independent predictors of reperfusion over time. Intervention-related morbidity was noted in 16 (4.8%) patients, namely, thrombosis formation and contrast extravasation in 8 (2.4%) patients each, while no intervention-induced mortality was observed. Conclusion: In the long term, the hemorrhage rate in patients with IA with an initially more conservative endovascular approach is low. Therefore, a deliberate endovascular treatment approach might be justified.

1. Introduction

The treatment strategy for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) varies considerably, with endovascular coil embolization being increasingly considered as the primary treatment option [1,2]. The main aim of IA treatment is the prevention of rebleeding in ruptured IAs and the prevention of hemorrhage in unruptured IAs [3]. However, IA recurrence after treatment with endovascular coiling is not infrequent and is reported to be as high as 33.6%, and long-term durability remains elusive [4,5,6]. Several risk factors for the recurrence of IAs have been described, such as age; sex, aneurysm location (i.e., posterior circulation or MCA location); aneurysmal wall enhancement (AWE) in large, coiled, unruptured IAs; and a low volume–embolization ratio [7,8]. Among these factors, some are clearly linked to IA recurrence, such as the aneurysmal neck configuration (i.e., wide neck) and the size of the aneurysms (i.e., large IA), whereas others, such as the rupture status, smoking, and other modifiable factors (e.g., blood pressure and diabetes), are less clearly associated [9]. The underlying pathological mechanisms of IA recurrence are aneurysmal growth, coil compaction, and coil migration through the aneurysm wall [10]. Of those, coil compaction might be the most important factor for IA recurrence due to the dissolution of the intra-aneurysmal thrombus and the water-hammer effect [11].
The significance of these factors regarding hemorrhage rates in the long term is ambiguous. For instance, the CARAT study showed that, for ruptured IAs, the larger the IA remnant, the higher the risk of rehemorrhage [12]. In addition, the treatment of recurrent IAs seems to be associated with greater periprocedural risks [13]. Thus, to reduce the risk of hemorrhage, prompt detection and retreatment are important.
Meanwhile, several techniques, such as balloon-assisted (BAC) or stent-assisted coiling (SAC), as well as novel devices, such as flow diverters and intrasaccular devices (e.g., Woven EndoBridge (WEB, Microvention, Terumo, CA, USA) and Contour (Stryker Neurovascular, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), have been introduced over the last several decades to lower the hemorrhage and reperfusion rates.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a deliberate endovascular approach regarding IA reperfusion and hemorrhage rates over a long-term follow-up period and the associated morbidity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Inclusion Criteria

Patients with ruptured and unruptured IAs referred to a single tertiary care hospital between January 2008 and December 2020 were included (n = 810; catchment area of around 800,000). Of these, 422 patients were treated with an endovascular approach. We included all patients who underwent primarily conventional coil embolization with or without supportive devices, and a follow-up of at least 12 months was required to document the risk of clinical and aneurysm-related adverse events. In brief, our specific treatment criteria (endovascular vs. microsurgery) were the following: small-necked (<4 mm, dome–neck ratio < 2) aneurysms with an anatomical midline distribution were favored for coiling, whereas wide-necked aneurysms and aneurysms located at the middle cerebral artery (MCA)–M1 bifurcation were favored for a microsurgical treatment.
Patients with fusiform or dissecting aneurysms and those with aneurysms needing another primarily endovascular intervention (e.g., a flow diverter or parent vessel occlusion (PAO)) strategy were excluded from this study. Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH)-related death within <6 months of study inclusion were censored for the long-term analysis [14]. Finally, 333 patients met these criteria. This study was approved by the local ethics committee (EKNZ Nr. 2020-02249), and the need for informed consent was waived.

2.2. Study Endpoints

The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with long-term IA hemorrhage and reperfusion rates. The secondary endpoint was treatment-related morbidity and mortality.

2.3. Assessment of Risk Factors for IA Recurrence

The following clinical and radiological risk factors were entered into the database for the assessment of the risk of IA reperfusion: patient age, sex, presence of aSAH at baseline, multiple IAs, IA multilobarity, baseline aneurysm neck diameter (“neck size”), IA location, the primary use of supportive devices, and completeness of initial coil embolization (modified Raymond–Roy occlusion classification, mRROC).

2.4. Neurointerventional Procedure

Cerebral digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed under general anesthesia using a biplane Angio system (Allura Xper FD20/20, Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Coil embolization was usually performed using a femoral approach. After placing a 6F or 7F guide catheter—for most of the cases—an Excelsior-SL 10 microcatheter (Stryker Neurovascular, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) was used. Detachable bare metal coils—for most of the cases, complex target coils (Stryker Neurovascular, MI, USA)—were used, and if needed, a stent or balloon was placed to allow for secured coil detachment (i.e., supportive devices). In cases of stent placement, 300 mg of aspirin was administered intravenously before stent deployment and coiling of the aneurysm, and 75 mg/day of clopidogrel was added after intervention depending on the clinical course after aSAH. In unruptured IAs, patients were preloaded with aspirin (100 mg/day) and clopidogrel (75 mg/day) three to five days prior to the intervention.

2.5. Procedural Complications

Peri-interventional complications such as aneurysm rupture, thromboembolic events, vessel dissections, and/or vasospasms with subsequent neurological deficits were recorded.

2.6. Clinical and Angiographic Follow-Up

Angiographic status and follow-up results, including IA reperfusion, retreatment rates, and the use of supportive devices (i.e., balloon- or stent-assisted coiling), were recorded from the time of study entry to the last follow-up. For the radiological follow-up, our patients usually received a first follow-up DSA and MRI with TOF (time-of-flight) angiography 6 months after the intervention. If not otherwise specified, the second follow-up was performed 2 years after the intervention using MRI with TOF, which is a reliable and less invasive alternative to DSA [15,16]. Thereafter, the follow-up periods were steadily increased depending on the follow-up results. The decision to recommend retreatment, as well as that of the approach to retreatment (endovascular vs. clipping), was made by a weekly multidisciplinary neurovascular board. If endovascular treatment was favored over the open surgical approach, the decision was based on favorable anatomical features of the aneurysm, as well as a low associated risk of endovascular retreatment in recurrent IAs as determined by factors such as the neck size, location of the aneurysm, age of the patient, and comorbidities [17,18].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistical software version 24.0 (IBM Corp., New York, NY, USA) and are presented with descriptive statistics as means ± SD for continuous variables and as counts and frequencies for categorical variables. Student’s t-test was used for normally distributed data, and the Mann–Whitney test was used for skewed or non-normal data. A statistical analysis of categorical variables was carried out with the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.
The association of the primary endpoint with potential independent risk factors was assessed by performing a time-dependent multivariable regression analysis to calculate hazard ratios (HRs). The following baseline risk factors were assessed: age ≥ 50 years, sex, presence of aSAH, multiple aneurysms, multilobarity, and the use of a supportive device at baseline. The multivariable Cox regression analysis included all dependent risk factors in the univariable regression with a p-value of <0.3 p-values that were ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patient and IA Characteristics

The patient demographics, IA characteristics, and treatment approaches are summarized in Table 1. A total of 227 (68%) women and 106 (32%) men met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at diagnosis was 56 ± 13 years. Vascular risk factors, including active smoking status in 33% of patients (110/333), hypertension in 48% of patients (160/333), diabetes in 8% of patients (27/333), and obesity (i.e., BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) in 18% of patients (58/333), were noted. Alcohol and/or cocaine abuse was recorded in 4% and 1% of patients (14/333 and 3/333), respectively. A total of 57% of patients (188/333) presented with aSAH due to IA rupture at baseline.
Fifty-one (15%) IAs were treated primarily with a supporting device (i.e., stent- or balloon-assisted coil embolization). Initial complete occlusion (mRROC I) was reported in 49% of patients (162/333), near-complete occlusion (mRROC II) was reported in 33% of patients (111/333), and incomplete occlusion (mRROC III) was reported in 18% of patients (60/333). In the mRROC III group, 56% of patients (34/60) had mRROC IIIa, whereas 44% of patients (26/60) had mRROC IIIb. The IA neck size (p = 0.01) was significantly larger and multilobarity (p = 0.01) was significantly more common in patients with IA recurrence in the long term, as was their retreatment rate (p < 0.001).

3.2. Risk Factors for IA Recurrence

After a median (±SD) follow-up time of 34 ± 41 months (range, 12–265 months), IA reperfusion was noted in 47% of patients (158/333), and retreatment was necessary in 32% of patients (105/333). Aneurysmal multilobarity (HR 1.8, 95%CI 1.2–2.7; p = 0.004) and a patient age of ≥50 years (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.5, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for IA reperfusion over the study period (Table 2), but IA size (large aneurysms > 7 mm, p = 0.33) and IA neck size (p = 0.32) were not.

3.3. IA Hemorrhage Rates

IA hemorrhage was noted in 1.2% of patients (4/333), and, in 0.9% of patients (3/333), IA reperfusion over time was noted. The relative risk (RR) for hemorrhage in patients with reperfused IAs was 1.01. (95% CI 1.0–1.1). The functional outcome at the last follow-up was not significantly different in patients with or without hemorrhage (mRS ≤ 2 in 75% vs. 82% of patients, p = 0.56), but it was in patients with initial aSAH (mRS ≤ 2 in 72% vs. 94% of patients, p < 0.001).

3.4. Treatment-Related Morbidity and Mortality

Intervention-related morbidity was noted in 4.8% of patients (16/333), namely, thrombosis formation and contrast extravasation in 2.4% of patients (8/333) each, and temporary cerebral vasospasm occurred in 1.2% of patients (4/333); no intervention-induced mortality was observed.

4. Discussion

The main findings of this study can be summarized as follows: (1) The rate of IA hemorrhage was low (1.2%) despite there being a reperfusion rate of 47% over time. (2) IA multilobarity was an independent risk factor for reperfusion, which may justify a more aggressive treatment approach in such cases. However, a deliberate treatment approach is both safe and functionally effective.
Endovascular coil embolization has become the treatment of choice for many IAs to prevent aSAH and its associated high mortality and long-term morbidity [19]. Although the risk of coil embolization is minimal for most aneurysms [20]. IA recurrences treated with endovascular coiling remain arduous [7]. Different IA characteristics, technical approaches, and clinical factors have been found to be associated with increased rates of IA reperfusion [21,22,23]. Incomplete initial coil embolization or low coil-packing density [24,25]; IA location (i.e., posterior or MCA aneurysms) [26,27,28]; a previous history of aSAH [21,22]; and large, wide-neck IAs [21,28], as well as AWE in large coiled unruptured IAs [8], have been linked to a higher probability of reperfusion. In particular, the configuration of the vascular structures may contribute to aneurysm growth and reperfusion [29,30,31,32].
Interestingly, in contrast to the wide-necked IAs, early major recurrence has been described for small-neck IAs instead [33]. In line with these findings, we noted significantly higher retreatment rates in recurrent and wide-neck aneurysms, with IA multilobarity being an independent risk factor for IA recurrence. While a multilobular shape is strongly associated with IA rupture states [34,35,36], an irregular IA shape is likewise associated with IA recanalization [37,38], corroborating our results. These IAs remain difficult to treat on an endovascular basis, with a recent study confirming that, even with novel techniques such as WEB devices for the treatment of wide-neck IAs, an irregular shape of the angiographic aneurysm remnant is an independent risk factor [38].
Nevertheless, considering our study’s results, a more aggressive approach might be justified, while a more deliberate treatment approach can be both safe and functionally effective regarding the low rebleeding rates in most IAs. Namely, we noted high recanalization and retreatment rates in 47% and 32% of patients, respectively.
However, novel endovascular devices, such as flow diverters and intrasaccular flow-disruptors (e.g., WEB, Contour), have been reported to have lower recurrence and retreatment rates than those of conventional coiling techniques. A recent meta-analysis of 11 studies on flow diverters showed a long-term retreatment rate of 5% [39]. Comparable findings were reported in a meta-analysis of 15 studies of WEB devices, showing a retreatment rate of around 6% with overall low morbidity and mortality rates [40]. However, more recent data from large WEB series indicated retreatment rates of 8.8% and 12.3%, respectively, but these values are still lower than those of conventional coil embolization [41,42]. A comparative study of another flow disruptor, Contour—specifically designed for wide-neck bifurcational aneurysms—vs. coil embolization revealed a lower retreatment rate (7% vs. 21%) [43]. Thus, these endovascular devices might be an alternative to conventional coil embolization.
The associated low morbidity and low risk of (re-)hemorrhage (1.2%) might justify a more conservative approach. These findings are in line with the previously reported risk of rehemorrhage as ranging between 0.6% and 2.6% [44]. As for aneurysm treatments, simple coil embolization is currently the most common, primary procedure [45]. Indeed, IA recanalization with a deliberate coil embolization approach that does not strictly use supporting devices was a risk factor in the univariable analysis (p = 0.04) but not in the multivariable analysis. This is in line with results showing a significantly lower recurrence rate of IA reperfusion when using stent-assisted coiling [46]. This is not an uncommon finding given that IA treatments using supporting devices present a minimal risk of recanalization once occlusion is achieved [47]. Higher rates of recanalization with coiling have been reported before [48], particularly in those with posterior circulation [49]. Interestingly, however, posterior circulation has not been shown to be an independent risk factor for aneurysm growth [32]. In our cohort, a posterior IA location was not associated with higher rates of reperfusion, nor was it a risk factor for aneurysm growth.
Our findings enrich the understanding of the recurrence of IAs using a more conservative and deliberate primary treatment approach with coil embolization, and, considering the low rebleeding rates, it might be justified. Nevertheless, for patients with IA shape irregularities, which are an independent risk factor, it will become crucial to apply novel endovascular devices in the treatment of these complex IAs and attenuate their recurrence.

5. Study Limitations

This study suffers from the limitations of every retrospective study, as well as its single-center design. The relatively low number of aneurysms treated at our center per year and, therefore, the relatively small sample size affects the power and significance of the findings and limit the ability to perform a detailed statistical analysis of rebleeding risk.
In addition, there have been tremendous advances in material and technical treatment options over the last several decades.

6. Conclusions

In the long term, the hemorrhage rate in patients with IA with an initially more conservative endovascular approach is low. Therefore, a deliberate endovascular treatment approach might be justified.

Author Contributions

L.A. contributed to this study’s conception and design, statistical analysis and interpretation, the drafting of the manuscript, critical revision, and the final approval of the article. P.G. contributed to the financial support, conception and design, ethical approval application, critical revision, final approval of the article, and study supervision. L.R. contributed to this study’s conception and design, critical revision, and final approval of this article. S.M., B.E.G., J.B., J.A., M.D., G.A.S. and H.-J.S. contributed to the critical revision and final approval of this article. S.L.B. contributed to the writing–review and editing, data curation and investigation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the local ethics commission [No. 2020-02249]. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of EKNZ; Ethikkommission Nordwest Schweiz (protocol code EKNZ 2020-02249 and approved on 24 September 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to authorization in accordance with Art. 34 of the Human Research Act (Swiss Law).

Data Availability Statement

The authors agree to share data upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Haffaf, I.; Clarencon, F.; Shotar, E.; Rolla-Bigliani, C.; Vande Perre, S.; Mathon, B.; Drir, M.; Sourour, N.A. Medina embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 18 months' angiographic results. J. NeuroInterv. Surg. 2019, 11, 516–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yamagami, K.; Hatano, T.; Nakahara, I.; Ishii, A.; Ando, M.; Chihara, H.; Ogura, T.; Suzuki, K.; Kondo, D.; Kamata, T.; et al. Long-term Outcomes After Intraprocedural Aneurysm Rupture During Coil Embolization of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2020, 134, e289–e297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hoh, B.L.; Ko, N.U.; Amin-Hanjani, S.; Chou, S.H.-Y.; Cruz-Flores, S.; Dangayach, N.S.; Derdeyn, C.P.; Du, R.; Hänggi, D.; Hetts, S.W.; et al. 2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2023, 54, e314–e370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tian, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Yang, M.; Yang, X.; Wang, K. Risk Factors of Angiographic Recurrence After Endovascular Coil Embolization of Intracranial Saccular Aneurysms: A Retrospective Study Using a Multicenter Database. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Suzuki, T.; Genkai, N.; Nomura, T.; Abe, H. Assessing the Hemodynamics in Residual Cavities of Intracranial Aneurysm after Coil Embolization with Combined Computational Flow Dynamics and Silent Magnetic Resonance Angiography. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2020, 29, 105290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Son, W.; Kang, D.-H. Risk Factor Analysis of Delayed Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Coil Embolization of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 584596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jin, J.; Guo, G.; Ren, Y.; Yang, B.; Wu, Y.; Wang, S.; Sun, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, J. Risk Factors for Recurrence of Intracranial Aneurysm After Coil Embolization: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 869880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ladenhauf, V.; Galijasevic, M.; Regodic, M.; Helbok, R.; Rass, V.; Freyschlag, C.; Petr, O.; Deeg, J.; Gruber, L.; Mangesius, S.; et al. Aneurysmal Wall Enhancement of Non-ruptured Intracranial aneurysms after endovascular treatment corrrelates with higher reperfusion rates, but only in large aneurysms. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nambu, I.; Misaki, K.; Uno, T.; Yoshikawa, A.; Uchiyama, N.; Mohri, M.; Nakada, M. Recurrence pattern predicts aneurysm rupture after coiling. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0261996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pierot, L.; Barbe, C.; Thierry, A.; Bala, F.; Eugene, F.; Cognard, C.; Herbreteau, D.; Velasco, S.; Chabert, E.; Desal, H.; et al. Patient and aneurys factors associated with aneurysm recanalization after coiling. J. NeuroInterv. Surg. 2022, 14, 1096–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sluzewski, M.; van Rooij, W.J.; Slob, M.J.; Bescós, J.O.; Slump, C.H.; Wijnalda, D. Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology 2004, 231, 635–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Johnston, S.C.; Dowd, C.F.; Higashida, R.T.; Lawton, M.T.; Duckwiler, G.R.; Gress, D.R. Predictors of rehemmorhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: The Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008, 39, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Muskens, I.S.; Hertgers, O.; Nijeholt, G.J.L.; Broekman, M.L.D.; A Moojen, W. Outcome of retreatment for intracranial aneurysms- a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2019, 85, 750–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schemper, M.; Smith, T.L. A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control. Clin. Trials 1996, 17, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pierot, L.; Portefaix, C.; Boulin, A.; Gauvrit, J.-Y. Follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: Comparison of 3D time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3T in a large, prospective series. Eur. Radiol. 2012, 22, 2255–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Simone, M.; Fontanella, M.M.; Choucha, A.; Schaller, K.; Machi, P.; Lanzino, G.; Bijlenga, P.; Kurz, F.T.; Lövblad, K.-O.; De Maria, L. Current and Future applications of arterial spin labeling MRI in cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Henkes, H.; Fischer, S.; Liebig, T.; Weber, W.; Reinartz, J.; Miloslavski, E.; Kühne, D. Repeated endovascular coil occlusion in 350 of 2759 intracranial aneurysms: Safety and effectiveness aspects. Neurosurgery 2006, 58, 224–232; discussion 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kang, H.-S.; Han, M.H.; Kwon, B.J.; Kwon, O.-K.; Kim, S.H. Repeat endovascular treatment in post-embolization recurrent intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2006, 58, 60–70; discussion 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Suarez, J.I.; Tarr, R.W.; Selman, W.R. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, S.S.; Park, H.; Lee, K.H.; Jung, S.; Yoon, C.H.; Kim, S.K.; Ryu, K.H.; Baek, H.J.; Hwang, S.H.; Kwon, O.-K. Utility of Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Junior Stent as a Rescue Therapy for Treating Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms During Complicated Coil Embolization. World Neurosurg. 2020, 135, e710–e715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Raymond, J.; Guilbert, F.; Weill, A.; Georganos, S.A.; Juravsky, L.; Lambert, A.; Lamoureux, J.; Chagnon, M.; Roy, D. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003, 34, 1398–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nguyen, T.N.; Hoh, B.L.; Amin-Hanjani, S.; Pryor, J.C.; Ogilvy, C.S. Comparison of ruptured vs unruptured aneurysms in recanalization after coil embolization. Surg. Neurol. 2007, 68, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. van Rooij, W.; Sluzewski, M. Opinion: Imaging follow-up after coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2009, 30, 1646–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chueh, J.-Y.; Vedantham, S.; Wakhloo, A.K.; Carniato, S.L.; Puri, A.S.; Bzura, C.; Coffin, S.; A Bogdanov, A.; Gounis, M.J. Aneurysm permeability following coil embolization: Packing density and coil distribution. J. NeuroInterv. Surg. 2015, 7, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Raymond, J.; Ghostine, J.; van Adel, B.; Shankar, J.; Iancu, D.; Mitha, A.; Kvamme, P.; Turner, R.; Turk, A.; Mendes-Pereira, V.; et al. Does Increasing Packing Density Using Larger Caliber Coils Improve Angiographic Results of Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms at 1 Year: A Randomized Trial. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2020, 41, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nguyen, T.N.; Raymond, J.; Roy, D.; Chagnon, M.; Weill, A.; Iancu-Gontard, D.; Guilbert, F. Endovascular treatment of pericallosal aneurysms. J. Neurosurg. 2007, 107, 973–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ferns, S.P.; Sprengers, M.E.; van Rooij, W.J.; Rinkel, G.J.; van Rijn, J.C.; Bipat, S.; Sluzewski, M.; Majoie, C.B. Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009, 40, e523–e529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hope, J.K.; Byrne, J.V.; Molyneux, A.J. Factors influencing successful angiographic occlusion of aneurysms treated by coil embolization. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1999, 20, 391–399. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ryu, C.-W.; Kwon, O.-K.; Koh, J.S.; Kim, E.J. Analysis of aneurysm rupture in relation to the geometric indices: Aspect ratio, volume, and volume-to-neck ratio. Neuroradiology 2011, 53, 883–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rooij, N.K.; Velthuis, B.K.; Algra, A.; Rinkel, G.J.E. Configuration of the circle of Willis, direction of flow, and shape of the aneurysm as risk factors for rupture of intracranial aneurysms. J. Neurol. 2009, 256, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bor, A.S.; Velthuis, B.K.; Majoie, C.B.; Rinkel, G.J. Configuration of intracranial arteries and development of aneurysms: A follow-up study. Neurology 2008, 70, 700–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bor, A.S.E.; Groenestege, A.T.T.; Terbrugge, K.G.; Agid, R.; Velthuis, B.K.; Rinkel, G.J.; Wermer, M.J. Clinical, Radiological, and Flow-Related Risk Factors for Growth of Untreated, Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. Stroke 2014, 46, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Abdalkader, M.; Raymond, J.; Mian, A.; Naragum, V.; Cronk, K.; Roy, D.; Weill, A.; Nguyen, T.N. Early major recurrence of cerebral aneurysms after satisfactory initial coiling. Interv. Neuroradiol. 2021, 27, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lindgren, A.E.; Koivisto, T.; Björkman, J.; Fraunberg, M.v.U.z.; Helin, K.; Jääskeläinen, J.E.; Frösen, J. Irregular Shape of Intracranial Aneurysm Indicates Rupture Risk Irrespective of Size in a Population-Based Cohort. Stroke 2016, 47, 1219–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Björkman, J.; Frösen, J.; Tähtinen, O.; Backes, D.; Huttunen, T.; Harju, J.; Huttunen, J.; Kurki, M.I.; von und du Fraunberg, M.; Koivisto, T.; et al. Irregular Shape Identifies Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients with Multiple Aneurysms. Stroke 2017, 48, 1986–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Greving, J.P.; Wermer, M.J.H.; Brown, R.D.; Morita, A.; Juvela, S.; Yonekura, M.; Ishibashi, T.; Torner, J.C.; Nakayama, T.; E Rinkel, G.J.; et al. Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: A pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol. 2014, 13, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sousa, E.B.; Brandão, L.F.; Tavares, C.B.; Brito, J.N.; Kessler, I.M. Importance of the First Coil in the Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Case Control Study. Clin. Neuroradiol. 2019, 29, 733–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cortese, J.; Caroff, J.; Chalumeau, V.; Gallas, S.; Ikka, L.; Moret, J.; Sabuzi, F.; Popescu, S.D.; Ozanne, A.; Grimaldi, L.; et al. Determinants of cerebral aneurysm occlusion after embolization with the WEB device: A single-institution series of 215 cases with angiographic follow-up. J. NeuroInterv. Surg. 2023, 15, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. A Shehata, M.; Ibrahim, M.K.; Ghozy, S.; Bilgin, C.; Jabal, M.S.; Kadirvel, R.; Kallmes, D.F. Long-term outcomes of flow diversion for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. NeuroInterv. Surg. 2023, 15, 898–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Asnafi, S.; Rouchaud, A.; Pierot, L.; Brinjikji, W.; Murad, M.; Kallmes, D. Efficacy and Safety of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2016, 37, 2287–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kabbasch, C.; Goertz, L.; Siebert, E.; Herzberg, M.; Borggrefe, J.; Krischek, B.; Dorn, F.; Liebig, T. Treatment of recurrent and residual aneurysms with the Woven EndoBridge device. Analysis of 11 patient and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2019, 129, e677–e685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Srinivasan, V.M.; Dmytriw, A.A.; Regenhardt, R.W.; Vicenty-Padilla, J.; Alotaibi, N.M.; Levy, E.; Waqas, M.; Cherian, J.; Johnson, J.N.; Jabbour, P.; et al. Retreatment of residual and recurrent aneurysms after embolization with the Woven EndoBridge Device: Multicenter Case Series. Neurosurgery 2022, 5, 569–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mostafa, K.; Neves, F.B.; Gärtner, F.; Peters, S.; Hensler, J.; Larsen, N.; Klintz, T.; Mahnke, J.; Jansen, O.; Wodarg, F. Contour device implantation versus coil embolization for treatment of narrow neck intracranial aneurysms. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 4904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sluzewski, M.; van Rooij, W.J.; Beute, G.N.; Nijssen, P.C. Late rebleeding of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005, 26, 2542–2549. [Google Scholar]
  45. Scerrati, A.; Trevisi, G.; Sturiale, C.L.; Salomi, F.; De Bonis, P.; Saletti, A.; Mangiola, A.; Tomatis, A.; Di Egidio, V.; Vigo, V.; et al. Radiological outcomes for endovascular treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysms: A retrospective multicenter study of the occlusion rate. J. Integr. Neurosci. 2021, 20, 919–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chalouhi, N.; Jabbour, P.; Gonzalez, L.F.; Dumont, A.S.; Rosenwasser, R.; Starke, R.M.; Gordon, D.; Hann, S.; Tjoumakaris, S. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms by coiling with and without stent assistance: A review of 235 cases. Neurosurgery 2012, 71, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. El-Chalouhi, N.; Jabbour, P.M.; Tjoumakaris, S.I.; Starke, R.M.; Dumont, A.S.; Liu, H.; Rosenwasser, R.; El Moursi, S.; Gonzalez, L.F. Treatment of large and giant intracranial aneurysms: Cost comparison of flow diversion and traditional embolization strategies. World Neurosurg. 2014, 82, 696–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Choi, H.H.; Cho, Y.D.; Yoo, D.H.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, S.-H.; Jang, D.; Lee, S.H.; Cho, W.-S.; Kang, H.-S.; Kim, J.E. Impact of fetal-type posterior cerebral artery on recanalization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms after coil embolization: Matched-pair case-control study. J. NeuroInterv. Surg. 2020, 12, 783–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Choi, H.H.; Cho, Y.D.; Yoo, D.H.; Lee, S.H.; Yeon, E.K.; Kang, H.-S.; Cho, W.-S.; Kim, J.E.; Han, M.H. Comparative analysis of coil embolization in posterior and anterior communicating artery aneurysms. J. NeuroInterv. Surg. 2019, 11, 790–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Patient demographics and aneurysm characteristics.
Table 1. Patient demographics and aneurysm characteristics.
CharacteristicsNo IA ReperfusionIA ReperfusionAll Patientsp-Value
Total cases, n (%)175 (53)158 (47)333 (100)
Age (mean ± SD), years56 ± 1455 ± 1356 ± 130.61
Female sex, n (%)117 (67)110 (70)227 (68)
Hypertension, n (%)82 (47)78 (49)160 (48)0.74
Diabetes, n (%)9 (5)18 (11)27 (8)0.05
Obesity, n (%)25 (14)33 (21)58 (18)0.15
Active smoking, n (%)62 (36)48 (31)110 (33)0.04
Alcohol abuse, n (%)7 (4)7 (4)14 (4)1
Cocaine abuse, n (%)0 (0)3 (2)3 (1)0.11
Posterior circulation of IAs, n (%)50 (29)54 (34)104 (31)0.29
Neck size (median, IQR)2.4 (1–3.7)3 (2.3–4)2.8 (2–3.7)0.01
Multiple IAs, n (%)66 (38)50 (32)116 (35)0.25
Multilobarity of IAs, n (%)84 (63)60 (47)144 (55)0.01
IA rupture (i.e., aSAH), n (%)108 (62)80 (51)188 (57)0.05
IA coiling complete, n (%)88 (50)74 (47)162 (49)0.58
Supportive devices used, n (%)28 (16)23 (15)51 (15)0.76
IA retreatment over time, n (%)14 (8)91 (58)105 (32)<0.001
IA hemorrhage over time, n (%)1 (0.6)3 (1.9)4 (1.2)0.35
Abbreviations: n, number; IQR, interquartile range; IA, intracranial aneurysm.
Table 2. Clinical and radiological predictors (hazard ratio with 95% CI) for IA reperfusion.
Table 2. Clinical and radiological predictors (hazard ratio with 95% CI) for IA reperfusion.
Risk Factors for ReperfusionUnivariable Analysis of HR (95% CI)p-ValueMultivariable Analysis of HR (95% CI)p-Value
Age > 50 years1.6 (1.1–2.2)0.011.7 (1.1–2.5)0.01
Sex (i.e., women)1.1 (0.8–1.5)0.64
aSAH at baseline1.2 (0.9–1.7)0.21.0 (0.6–1.4)0.80
Posterior circulation of IA1.0 (0.7–1.5)0.81
IA size (i.e., large IA)1.9 (0.5–6.7)0.33
Neck size of IA1.1 (0.9–1.2)0.32
Multiple aneurysms1.3 (0.9–1.9)0.111.3 (0.9–2.0)0.22
Multilobarity of IA1.7 (1.2–2.5)0.0041.8 (1.2–2.7)0.004
Initial complete IA coiling1.0 (0.7–1.4)0.91
Supportive devices used0.6 (0.4–1.0)0.040.7 (0.4–1.3)0.27
Abbreviations: n, number; IQR, interquartile range; IA, intracranial aneurysm; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andereggen, L.; Bosshart, S.L.; Marbacher, S.; Grüter, B.E.; Berberat, J.; Schubert, G.A.; Anon, J.; Diepers, M.; Steiger, H.-J.; Remonda, L.; et al. Long-Term Hemorrhage and Reperfusion Rates of Coiled Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5223. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175223

AMA Style

Andereggen L, Bosshart SL, Marbacher S, Grüter BE, Berberat J, Schubert GA, Anon J, Diepers M, Steiger H-J, Remonda L, et al. Long-Term Hemorrhage and Reperfusion Rates of Coiled Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(17):5223. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175223

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andereggen, Lukas, Salome L. Bosshart, Serge Marbacher, Basil E. Grüter, Jatta Berberat, Gerrit A. Schubert, Javier Anon, Michael Diepers, Hans-Jakob Steiger, Luca Remonda, and et al. 2024. "Long-Term Hemorrhage and Reperfusion Rates of Coiled Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 17: 5223. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175223

APA Style

Andereggen, L., Bosshart, S. L., Marbacher, S., Grüter, B. E., Berberat, J., Schubert, G. A., Anon, J., Diepers, M., Steiger, H. -J., Remonda, L., & Gruber, P. (2024). Long-Term Hemorrhage and Reperfusion Rates of Coiled Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(17), 5223. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175223

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop