Next Article in Journal
Accuracy of Customized Prefabricated Screw-Type Immediate Provisional Restorations after Single-Implant Placement
Next Article in Special Issue
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Hospitalized Renal Transplant Recipients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Nationwide Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Higher Serum Testosterone Levels Associated with Favorable Prognosis in Enzalutamide- and Abiraterone-Treated Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plasma Malondialdehyde and Risk of New-Onset Diabetes after Transplantation in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Cohort Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Higher Incidence of BK Virus Nephropathy in Pediatric Kidney Allograft Recipients with Alport Syndrome

1
Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea
2
Department of Pediatrics, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University College of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
3
Department of Pediatrics, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 07441, Korea
4
Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
5
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
6
Transplantation Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
7
Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors equally contributed to this article.
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(4), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040491
Submission received: 7 March 2019 / Revised: 28 March 2019 / Accepted: 8 April 2019 / Published: 11 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances and Clinical Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation)

Abstract

:
A retrospective review was performed to assess the risk factors and outcomes of BK virus infection and nephropathy (BKVN), an early complication in pediatric kidney allograft recipients. The study investigated the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of BK viremia and BKVN in a Korean population of pediatric patients who received renal transplantation from 2001–2015 at the Seoul National University Hospital. BKVN was defined as biopsy-proven BKVN or plasma BK viral loads >10,000 copies/mL for >3 weeks. BK viremia was defined as a BK viral load >100 copies/mL in blood. Among 168 patients assessed for BK virus status, 30 patients (17.9%) tested positive for BK viremia at a median of 12.6 months after transplantation. BKVN was diagnosed in six patients (3.6%) at a median of 13.4 months after transplantation. Three of the six BKVN patients had Alport syndrome (p = 0.003), despite this disease comprising only 6% of the study population. Every patient with BK viremia and Alport syndrome developed BKVN, while only 11.1% of patients with BK viremia progressed to BKVN in the absence of Alport syndrome. Multivariate analysis revealed that Alport syndrome was associated with BKVN development (hazard ratio 13.2, p = 0.002). BKVN treatment included the reduction of immunosuppression, leflunomide, and intravenous immunoglobulin. No allografts were lost in the two years following the diagnosis of BKVN. In summary, the incidence of BKVN in pediatric kidney allograft recipients was similar to findings in previous reports, but was higher in patients with underlying Alport syndrome.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

BK virus (BKV) is a polyomavirus that resides in the urogenital tract as a latent infection [1]. The seroprevalence of BKV in the first decade of life is 90% or higher [1,2], implying that most primary infections occur during childhood. In immunocompromised patients, reactivation of a latent infection is frequently observed [1,3] as BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) or hemorrhagic cystitis [1,4]. While hemorrhagic cystitis frequently develops in patients with hematologic stem cell transplantation, BKVN is essentially a complication of kidney transplantation [2,5]. BKVN has recently gained clinical significance with the introduction of potent immunosuppressive agents. The prevalence of BKVN in adult kidney allograft recipients is 1% to 10% [2,5,6] and has been reported to be 2% to 8% in pediatric renal transplant recipients [7,8]. BKVN is considered to be an early complication of kidney transplantation that often occurs in the first year of transplantation; 95% of BKVN develops within two years of transplantation according to the organization Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), but it may develop as late as in the fifth year [9,10,11]. Importantly, after BKVN is diagnosed, over 15% of patients are expected to lose their allograft kidney within one year [9].
Risk factors for BKVN in kidney allograft recipients include older age, male sex, ethnicity (non-African American), increased number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches, prolonged cold-ischemia time, ureteral stent placement, immunosuppression induction with anti-thymocyte globulin, tacrolimus- and/or mycophenolate mofetil-based maintenance immunosuppression, and prior rejection history [3,12]. The most important risk factor for BKVN is considered to be the degree of immunosuppression [12]. However, risk factors for BKVN in children have not yet been studied sufficiently. In a retrospective cohort study of children, a seronegative status for BKV in recipients was associated with BKVN [13].
To gain a better understanding of BKVN in pediatric kidney transplantation recipients, the clinical characteristics and risk factors for BK virus infection and BKVN in pediatric kidney allograft recipients was assessed in this study.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population and Ethics

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all pediatric kidney allograft recipients who underwent transplantation at the Seoul National University Hospital between January 2001 and July 2015. Clinical findings until July 2018 were assessed. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Seoul National University Hospital (IRB no. 1808-156-967) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Immunosuppression

The immunosuppression protocol of the Seoul National University Hospital consisted of steroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Methylprednisolone was administered as a 10 mg/kg intravenous bolus dose at the time of surgery and was tapered gradually to a maintenance dose of prednisolone 0.3 mg/kg by one month after transplantation. In patients with a low risk of rejection, prednisolone was discontinued by one year after transplantation. The tacrolimus target trough level was 8–12 ng/mL for up to three months, 6–8 ng/mL until six months, and 4–6 ng/mL thereafter. From 2001 to 2008, basiliximab was used as an induction therapy for high-risk patients with a transplanted kidney from a deceased donor or a high number of HLA mismatches. After 2008, all patients received basiliximab induction therapy.

2.3. BK Viremia and BKVN

BK virus DNA in the plasma of patients was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the large T antigen of BKV (BKV ELITe kit, ELITechGroup, Puteaux, France). BK viral load quantification became available as of June 2008 and thereafter BK viral load of >100 copies/mL was considered as BK viremia. In principle, since 2008, BK viremia was screened every month for three months after transplantation, then every three months for one year, and then every year up to five years. BK virus was additionally screened in patients with an unexplained acute rise in serum creatinine or in patients receiving acute rejection treatment. Upon detection, BK viremia was followed every month. Persisting BK virus PCR loads over 10,000 copies/mL for >3 weeks was categorized as presumptive BKVN, as described previously [6]. Presumptive BKVN and pathologically proven BKVN were collectively categorized as BKVN to assess the risk factors for BKVN in this study. Histologic grading of BKVN was classified according to the criteria of the University of Maryland, USA [14].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher exact test and continuous variables were compared using the t-test or Mann–Whitney U test. All values were reported as a median (range). To assess risk factors for BKVN, univariate analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier test with the log-rank test and multivariate analysis was done using the Cox proportional hazards model. Factors with a value of p < 0.25 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

A total of 195 patients younger than 20 years underwent allograft kidney transplantation between January 2001 and July 2015, and of these, 168 were tested for BK virus by PCR more than once (Table 1). BK viremia was positive in 30 patients (17.9%, 30/168) at 12.6 months (0.4–73.1 months) after transplantation (Figure 1). BKVN was diagnosed in six patients (3.6%, 6/168, BKVN group) at 13.4 months (3.9–60.0 months) after transplantation, with a BK viral titer at first detection of 46,508 copies/mL (16,924–289,699 copies/mL) at 10.9 months (1.5–60.0 months) and 306,277 copies/mL (41,914–10,165,852 copies/mL) at the peak at 14.2 months (4.3–60.3 months). The BK viral titer in the 24 patients with BK viremia but not BKVN (only-BK viremia group) was 437 copies/mL (119–6794 copies/mL) at first detection at 12.6 months (0.4–73.1 months) after kidney transplantation, and increased to 561 copies/mL (123–42,288 copies/mL) copies/mL at 15.3 months (0.4–73.7 months).

3.1. Risk Factors for BKVN and BK Viremia

To assess the risk factors for BKVN, the BKVN group (n = 6) and the remaining patients—including the BK viremia group and those who had not shown BK viremia (n = 162, non-BKVN group, Table 1)—were compared. There were no statistically significant differences in sex, age at transplant, primary kidney disease, donor source, HLA mismatch, induction with polyclonal or monoclonal antibody, prior acute rejection, and Epstein–Barr virus or cytomegalovirus infection. None of the BKVN patients had a ureteral stent placed after kidney transplantation. Interestingly, as a primary kidney disease of their native kidneys, Alport syndrome was significantly more common in the BKVN group compared to the non-BKVN group (50% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional analysis also showed that Alport syndrome was a significant risk factor for BKVN (Table 2).
Comparison of the BK viremia group and non-BK viremia group revealed that basiliximab induction therapy and transplant in the years after 2008 were significantly higher in the BK viremia group than in the non-BK viremia group (Table S1). Multivariable Cox hazards regression analysis showed that induction with basiliximab was a significant risk factor for the development of BK viremia (Table S2).
Comparison between the BKVN group and the non-BKVN BK viremia group (BK viremia-only group) revealed no significant differences between the two groups, except for BK viral load and Alport syndrome (Table S3).

3.2. Clinical Course of BKVN

Among the six patients in the BKVN group, four had pathologically-proven BKVN and the remaining two presented with presumptive BKVN. BKVN was managed with the reduction of immunosuppressive medications, intravenous immunoglobulin, leflunomide, ciprofloxacin, or cidofovir (Table 3). Three of the six patients had a pathological diagnosis of acute rejection along with BKVN on an allograft kidney biopsy, and were also treated with intravenous methylprednisolone.
After a 2.2–8.3-year follow-up, no patients experienced graft loss, but impairment of renal function was evident (median estimated glomerular filtration rate 39.9 (range, 20.7–56.9) mL/min/1.73 m2). BK viremia was only cleared in three patients over a median of 20.5 months (range, 16.6–89.9 months) after the first detection of viremia.

3.3. Alport Syndrome and BKVN

Although Alport syndrome comprised 6% of the study population (10 of 168 patients), as the primary disease of the native kidneys it accounted for 50% of BKVN patients. The prevalence of BK viremia was 30% (3 of 10 patients) for Alport syndrome, and all BK viremia in patients with Alport syndrome progressed to BKVN, whereas BK viremia was found in 17.1% of the remaining patients (other than Alport syndrome as their primary disease, 27 of 158 patients), and only 11.1% of those with BK viremia progressed to BKVN. In addition, BK viremia was detected relatively late in patients with Alport syndrome at 16, 24, and 60 months after transplantation (Table 3), and the initial viral load was higher, with a median 68,919 copies/mL (versus 4773 copies/mL in others with BK viremia, p = 0.001). BK viremia did not resolve in these patients, despite treatment for more than 2.2 years. BKVN-free survival curves of individuals with Alport syndrome and other patient groups also showed significant differences (Kaplan–Meier analysis, log-rank test p < 0.001, Figure 2).

4. Discussion

In our study, the prevalence of BK viremia was 17.8% in pediatric kidney allograft recipients, which was similar to that shown in previous studies in adults (11% to 25%) [4,11,15] and pediatric kidney recipients (21%) [16]. The prevalence of BKVN in our pediatric kidney transplantation recipients was 3.6%, which was similar to the 4.6% reported by the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies registry [8]. BK viremia was observed immediately following kidney transplantation (0.4 months) in a minority of patients, but most cases occurred sometime after the surgery. This suggested that most patients may have contracted BKV from their peers, as primary infections of BK virus usually occur in childhood [17]. However, the pre-donation BKV status of donors had not been assessed at Seoul National University Hospital until recently, and therefore data was unavailable to help assess the source of the BK virus infection. Interestingly, all patients with BKVN received their allograft kidney after 2009 and were older than seven years; however, neither of these parameters were statistically significant, likely due to the small size of the study population. Nevertheless, regarding why BKVN only occurred after 2009, it was speculated that: (1) BK monitoring was more aggressive after 2009, as was the availability of BK viremia quantitation protocols, and (2) immunosuppression became more potent with the awareness of antibody-mediated rejection associated with insufficient immunosuppression. BKVN in individuals older than seven years may reflect the timing of primary infection or a selection bias resulting from the small pool of younger recipients.
In this study, previously known risk factors in the adult population such as older age and type of immunosuppression were not identified as risk factors for BK viremia and BKVN. This was likely due to the relatively homogenous population in the study, as the Korean pediatric population evaluated mostly underwent induction treatment with monoclonal antibodies and maintenance treatment with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Male sex and an increased number of HLA mismatches were not significant factors in this population, although there were no BKVN patients with zero HLA mismatches. Data relative to ischemia time was not available in this study, but the distribution of donor types did not differ between the groups, implying that ischemia time was not associated with BKVN in this population. Ureteral stent placement was previously indicated as a significant risk factor for BKVN [12], but in this study, no BKVN patients were subjected to ureteral stent placement. Acute rejection was more common in the BK viremia group and in the BKVN group compared with the BK viremia-free group, but there was no statistically significant difference either. While previous studies showed that the primary cause of end-stage renal disease was not a risk factor for BKVN in children [8,13,18], in this study population, Alport syndrome was a risk factor for BKVN. Alport syndrome is caused by a genetic defect in type IV collagen which comprises basement membranes. It is a rare hereditary disorder with an incidence of 1 in 50,000 persons [19], but it is relatively common in the pediatric population as a cause of end-stage renal disease compared to the adult population. Although Alport syndrome has not been previously reported to be a risk factor for BKVN, a study of kidney transplantations in Australia and New Zealand from 1965 to 2010 reported that BKVN (n = 6) was found only in the group with Alport syndrome, and not in the group without Alport syndrome in a group of 243 patients [20].
Thus, the question arises: how can the finding that Alport syndrome is a risk factor of BKVN be explained? Interestingly, BKVN developed in every patient with BK viremia if the patient had Alport syndrome, while only one-tenth of patients with BK viremia progressed to BKVN (3 of 27) when Alport syndrome patients were excluded. Hence, it is speculated that tubular cells in Alport syndrome patients might be more prone to BK virus propagation, possibly because of the defective distal tubular basement membrane [21]. The gradual repopulation of recipient cells in the allograft kidney has been documented previously [22]; therefore, the vulnerability of individuals with Alport syndrome might appear gradually, which might explain the delayed occurrence of BKVN. Alternatively, BK viremia screening might not be performed sufficiently early in these patients, resulting in the propagation of BKV irrespective of immunosuppression, and later the development of BKVN. Nonetheless, further study with larger populations is necessary to validate the notion that Alport syndrome is a risk factor for BKVN.
Screening for BK viremia is recommended for the prevention and early detection of BKVN [11]. Guidelines recommend screening for BK viremia regularly (every month for three to six months after transplantation, then every three months for one or two years, and then every year up to five years) with creatinine elevation and after acute rejection treatment [10]. Considering that Alport syndrome was a significant risk factor for BKVN in this study, a more meticulous screening for Alport syndrome patients is recommended, and for a longer period after kidney transplantation [23]. When BK viremia is detected from screening, it is recommended that immunosuppression be reduced [24,25]. In this study, by reducing immunosuppression, most cases of BK viremia resolved and did not progress to BKVN. Once BKVN is diagnosed, there are a few treatment options available in addition to the reduction of immunosuppression [2,6,10], with intravenous immunoglobulin treatment, fluoroquinolone, cidofovir, and leflunomide being reported as partially effective [26]. Most of our BKVN patients were treated with these methods and no allografts were lost. Nevertheless, neither allograft renal function of BKVN patients nor eradication of BK viremia was satisfactory, as both persisted in three patients with Alport syndrome.
A shortcoming of this study is that it was a retrospective study of a small patient population. Immunosuppression protocols have changed over time, and this factor could not be controlled well. In addition, not all the cases of BKVN were confirmed by an allograft kidney biopsy. Nonetheless, considering the pediatric focus of the study, the population size was appreciable, and a relatively good outcome of BKVN was evident with the application of aggressive treatment.

5. Conclusions

The incidence of BKVN was 3.6% in pediatric kidney allograft recipients at Seoul National University Hospital, and BKVN was associated with the underlying disease, Alport syndrome. Following aggressive treatment, no BKVN cases resulted in the loss of an allograft kidney for over two years. Further study with a larger population is necessary to validate the notion that Alport syndrome is a risk factor for BKVN.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/4/491/s1. Table S1: Baseline characteristics of patients with and without BK viremia, Table S2: Risk factors for BK viremia, Table S3: Comparison between the BKVN group and only-BK viremia groups.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H.C., H.S.H., E.P., K.C.M., S.-I.M., J.H., I.-S.H., H.I.C., Y.H.A., and H.G.K.; Methodology, Y.H.C., I.-S.H., H.I.C., Y.H.A., and H.G.K.; Formal analysis, Y.H.C. and Y.H.A.; Investigation, Y.H.C., H.S.H., and E.P.; Data curation, H.S.H, E.P., K.C.M., S.-I.M.; Writing—original draft preparation, Y.H.C. and H.G.K.; Writing—review and editing, Y.H.A. and H.G.K.; Visualization, Y.H.C. and Y.H.A.; Supervision, J.H., I.-S.H., H.I.C., Y.H.A., and H.G.K.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reploeg, M.D.; Storch, G.A.; Clifford, D.B. BK virus: A clinical review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 33, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hirsch, H.H.; Randhawa, P. BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation. Am. J. Transplant. 2013, 13, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Randhawa, P.; Brennan, D.C. BK virus infection in transplant recipients: An overview and update. Am. J. Transplant. 2006, 6, 2000–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Herman, J.; Van Ranst, M.; Snoeck, R.; Beuselinck, K.; Lerut, E.; Van Damme-Lombaerts, R. Polyomavirus infection in pediatric renal transplant recipients: Evaluation using a quantitative real-time PCR technique. Pediatr. Transplant. 2004, 8, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hirsch, H.H.; Steiger, J. Polyomavirus BK. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2003, 3, 611–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hirsch, H.H.; Brennan, D.C.; Drachenberg, C.B.; Ginevri, F.; Gordon, J.; Limaye, A.P.; Mihatsch, M.J.; Nickeleit, V.; Ramos, E.; Randhawa, P.; et al. Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplantation: Interdisciplinary analyses and recommendations. Transplantation 2005, 79, 1277–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Acott, P.D.; Hirsch, H.H. BK virus infection, replication, and diseases in pediatric kidney transplantation. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2007, 22, 1243–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Smith, J.M.; Dharnidharka, V.R.; Talley, L.; Martz, K.; McDonald, R.A. BK virus nephropathy in pediatric renal transplant recipients: An analysis of the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS) registry. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007, 2, 1037–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ramos, E.; Drachenberg, C.B.; Papadimitriou, J.C.; Hamze, O.; Fink, J.C.; Klassen, D.K.; Drachenberg, R.C.; Wiland, A.; Wali, R.; Cangro, C.B.; et al. Clinical course of polyoma virus nephropathy in 67 renal transplant patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002, 13, 2145–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Disease, K. Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) transplant work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2009, 3, S1–S155. [Google Scholar]
  11. Almeras, C.; Vetromile, F.; Garrigue, V.; Szwarc, I.; Foulongne, V.; Mourad, G. Monthly screening for BK viremia is an effective strategy to prevent BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant recipients. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2011, 13, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sawinski, D.; Goral, S. BK virus infection: An update on diagnosis and treatment. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2015, 30, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Smith, J.M.; McDonald, R.A.; Finn, L.S.; Healey, P.J.; Davis, C.L.; Limaye, A.P. Polyomavirus nephropathy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2004, 4, 2109–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Drachenberg, R.C.; Drachenberg, C.B.; Papadimitriou, J.C.; Ramos, E.; Fink, J.C.; Wali, R.; Weir, M.R.; Cangro, C.B.; Klassen, D.K.; Khaled, A. Morphological spectrum of polyoma virus disease in renal allografts: Diagnostic accuracy of urine cytology. Am. J. Transplant. 2001, 1, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gabardi, S.; Waikar, S.S.; Martin, S.; Roberts, K.; Chen, J.; Borgi, L.; Sheashaa, H.; Dyer, C.; Malek, S.K.; Tullius, S.G. Evaluation of fluoroquinolones for the prevention of BK viremia after renal transplantation. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 5, 1298–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ginevri, F.; Azzi, A.; Hirsch, H.H.; Basso, S.; Fontana, I.; Cioni, M.; Bodaghi, S.; Salotti, V.; Rinieri, A.; Botti, G. Prospective monitoring of polyomavirus BK replication and impact of pre-emptive intervention in pediatric kidney recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 2007, 7, 2727–2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hirsch, H.H. BK virus: Opportunity makes a pathogen. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41, 354–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ginevri, F.; De Santis, R.; Comoli, P.; Pastorino, N.; Rossi, C.; Botti, G.; Fontana, I.; Nocera, A.; Cardillo, M.; Ciardi, M.R. Polyomavirus BK infection in pediatric kidney-allograft recipients: A single-center analysis of incidence, risk factors, and novel therapeutic approaches. Transplantation 2003, 75, 1266–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kruegel, J.; Rubel, D.; Gross, O. Alport syndrome—insights from basic and clinical research. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2013, 9, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mallett, A.; Tang, W.; Clayton, P.A.; Stevenson, S.; McDonald, S.P.; Hawley, C.M.; Badve, S.V.; Boudville, N.; Brown, F.G.; Campbell, S.B. End-stage kidney disease due to Alport syndrome: Outcomes in 296 consecutive Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry cases. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2014, 29, 2277–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Heidet, L.; Gubler, M.C. The renal lesions of Alport syndrome. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 20, 1210–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lagaaij, E.L.; Cramer-Knijnenburg, G.F.; van Kemenade, F.J.; van Es, L.A.; Bruijn, J.A.; van Krieken, J.H. Endothelial cell chimerism after renal transplantation and vascular rejection. Lancet 2001, 357, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Almeras, C.; Foulongne, V.; Garrigue, V.; Szwarc, I.; Vetromile, F.; Segondy, M.; Mourad, G. Does reduction in immunosuppression in viremic patients prevent BK virus nephropathy in de novo renal transplant recipients? A prospective study. Transplantation 2008, 85, 1099–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saad, E.R.; Bresnahan, B.A.; Cohen, E.P.; Lu, N.; Orentas, R.J.; Vasudev, B.; Hariharan, S. Successful treatment of BK viremia using reduction in immunosuppression without antiviral therapy. Transplantation 2008, 85, 850–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sood, P.; Senanayake, S.; Sujeet, K.; Medipalli, R.; Zhu, Y.R.; Johnson, C.P.; Hariharan, S. Management and outcome of BK viremia in renal transplant recipients: A prospective single-center study. Transplantation 2012, 94, 814–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wali, R.K.; Drachenberg, C.; Hirsch, H.H.; Papadimitriou, J.; Nahar, A.; Mohanlal, V.; Brisco, M.A.; Bartlett, S.T.; Weir, M.R.; Ramos, E. BK virus-associated nephropathy in renal allograft recipients: Rescue therapy by sirolimus-based immunosuppression. Transplantation 2004, 78, 1069–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Onset of BK viremia after kidney transplantation. Values are represented as number of patients (% of total subject population).
Figure 1. Onset of BK viremia after kidney transplantation. Values are represented as number of patients (% of total subject population).
Jcm 08 00491 g001
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves indicating progression to BK virus nephropathy after renal transplantation.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves indicating progression to BK virus nephropathy after renal transplantation.
Jcm 08 00491 g002
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with or without BK virus nephropathy.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients with or without BK virus nephropathy.
CharacteristicBKVN (n = 6)Non-BKVN (n = 162)Total (n = 168)p-Value
Sex, M:F3:398:64101:670.684
Recipient age at transplant, years13.9 (7.7–18.9)13.2 (1.5–19.9)13.3 (1.5–19.9)0.587
Primary kidney disease
  Glomerulopathy5 (83.3)85 (52.5)90 (53.6)0.282
  CAKUT036 (22.2)36 (21.4)
  Other141 (25.3)42 (25.0)
Alport syndrome3 (50.0)7 (4.3)10 (6.0)0.003
Donor type
  Deceased donor3 (50.0)63 (38.9)66 (39.3)0.681
  Living donor3 (50.0)99 (61.1)102 (60.7)
Recipient age at transplant, years
  0 to <7028 (17.3)28 (16.7)0.285
  7 to <132 (33.3)52 (32.1)54 (32.1)
  ≥134 (66.7)82 (50.6)86 (51.2)
HLA mismatch
  0–2035 (21.6)35 (20.8)0.578
  3–46 (100)112 (69.1)118 (70.2)
  5–6015 (9.3)15 (8.9)
Acute cellular rejection4/6 (66.7)95/151 (62.9)99/157 (63.1)1.000
Immunosuppression
  MMF61621681.000
  Tac6161 (99.4)167 (99.4)1.000
  BSX6131 (80.9)137 (81.5)0.594
  ATG09 (5.6)9 (5.4)1.000
Transplant year
  2001–2008047 (29.0)47 (28.0)0.187
  2009–20156115 (71.0)121 (72.0)
CMV infection3/5 (60)60/131 (45.8)63/136 (46.3)0.663
EBV infection1/4 (25)70/132 (53.0)71/136 (52.2)0.348
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia06 (3.7)6 (3.6)1.000
PTLD08 (4.9)8 (4.8)1.000
Comorbidity
  Hypertension2 (33.3)27 (16.7)29 (17.3)0.277
  Cardiovascular disease 108 (4.9)8 (4.8)1.000
  Diabetes mellitus09 (5.6)9 (5.4)1.000
  Dyslipidemia010 (6.2)10 (6.0)1.000
  Neurological disorder 2014 (8.6)14 (8.3)1.000
  Liver disease 31 (16.7)7 (4.3)8 (4.8)0.257
  Cancer except PTLD01 (0.6)1(0.6)1.000
Mortality02 (1.2)2 (1.2)1.000
1 Cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, congenital heart defect, and myocardial infarction. 2 Developmental delay, congenital malformations of the nervous system, and epilepsy. 3 Hepatitis, fatty liver, congenital hepatic fibrosis, and liver cirrhosis. Values are expressed as numbers (%) and median (range). Abbreviations: BKVN: BK virus nephropathy; CAKUT: congenital anomalies of the kidney and the urinary tract; HLA: human leukocyte antigen; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; Tac: tacrolimus; BSX: basiliximab; ATG: anti-thymocyte globulin; CMV: cytomegalovirus; EBV: Epstein–Barr virus; PTLD: post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease.
Table 2. Risk factors for BK virus nephropathy.
Table 2. Risk factors for BK virus nephropathy.
FactorsUnivariateMultivariate 1
p-ValueHazard Ratio (95% CI)p-Value
Alport syndrome<0.00113.204 (2.662–65.502)0.002
HLA mismatch ≥30.206NS0.984
Basiliximab0.224NS0.975
Transplant year, 2009–20150.108NS0.976
1 Factors with a value of p < 0.25 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; NS: not significant; HLA: human leukocyte antigen.
Table 3. The clinical course of patients with BKVN.
Table 3. The clinical course of patients with BKVN.
Patient No.Sex/Age at BKVN (yr)Primary
Disease
Transplant
Year/Donor Type
Onset of
Viremia
after KT
Initial Level 1
(Copies/mL)
Peak Level 2
(Copies/mL)
Biopsy
Grade
TreatmentFollow up
after BKVN
Time to Viremia Clearance
1F/8.0ATN2009/D1.5 mo16,92410,165,852B1Reduction of IS, IVIG, leflunomide8.3 yr89.9 mo
2F/20.6Alport2010/D60.3 mo289,699289,699B3Reduction of IS, IVIG, leflunomide3.0 yrNo
3M/13.1Alport2010/L24.0 mo41,91441,914B1Reduction of IS, IVIG, leflunomide6.4 yrNo
4M/15.0Alport2014/L15.9 mo68,9192,266,980B1Reduction of IS, IVIG, leflunomide, ciprofloxacin, cidofovir2.2 yrNo
5F/16.8FSGS2014/L4.6 mo51,102322,854NDReduction of IS, leflunomide, ciprofloxacin3.8 yr16.6 mo
6M/19.5FSGS2015/D6.0 mo25,55562,481NDReduction of IS, leflunomide2.4 yr20.5 mo
1 The value of BK virus load when BK viremia was first detected. 2 The highest value of BK virus load. Abbreviations: BKVN: BK virus nephropathy; S-Cr: serum creatinine; ATN: acute tubular necrosis; VUR: vesicoureteral regurgitation; FSGS: focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; D: deceased; L: living; ND: not done; IS: immunosuppressant; IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulin; mo: months; yr: year.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cho, Y.H.; Hyun, H.S.; Park, E.; Moon, K.C.; Min, S.-I.; Ha, J.; Ha, I.-S.; Cheong, H.I.; Ahn, Y.H.; Kang, H.G. Higher Incidence of BK Virus Nephropathy in Pediatric Kidney Allograft Recipients with Alport Syndrome. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040491

AMA Style

Cho YH, Hyun HS, Park E, Moon KC, Min S-I, Ha J, Ha I-S, Cheong HI, Ahn YH, Kang HG. Higher Incidence of BK Virus Nephropathy in Pediatric Kidney Allograft Recipients with Alport Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019; 8(4):491. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040491

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cho, Young Hoon, Hye Sun Hyun, Eujin Park, Kyung Chul Moon, Sang-Il Min, Jongwon Ha, Il-Soo Ha, Hae Il Cheong, Yo Han Ahn, and Hee Gyung Kang. 2019. "Higher Incidence of BK Virus Nephropathy in Pediatric Kidney Allograft Recipients with Alport Syndrome" Journal of Clinical Medicine 8, no. 4: 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040491

APA Style

Cho, Y. H., Hyun, H. S., Park, E., Moon, K. C., Min, S. -I., Ha, J., Ha, I. -S., Cheong, H. I., Ahn, Y. H., & Kang, H. G. (2019). Higher Incidence of BK Virus Nephropathy in Pediatric Kidney Allograft Recipients with Alport Syndrome. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(4), 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040491

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop