Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) in Portugal: Novel GCK, HNFA1 and HNFA4 Mutations
by
, , , and add
Show full author list
Maria I. Alvelos
1,†, 
Catarina I. Gonçalves
1,†,
Eduarda Coutinho
1,
Joana T. Almeida
1,2,
Margarida Bastos
3,
Maria L. Sampaio
4,
Miguel Melo
3,5,
Sofia Martins
6,
Isabel Dinis
7,
Alice Mirante
7,
Leonor Gomes
3,5,
Joana Saraiva
3,5,
Bernardo D. Pereira
8,
Susana Gama-de-Sousa
9,
Carolina Moreno
3,5,
Daniela Guelho
3,
Diana Martins
3,5,
Carla Baptista
3,
Luísa Barros
3,
Mara Ventura
1,3,
Maria M. Gomes
6,10 and
Manuel C. Lemos
1,*add
Show full author list
1
CICS-UBI, Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal
2
C4-UBI, Cloud Computing Competence Centre, University of Beira Interior, 6200-501 Covilhã, Portugal
3
Serviço de Endocrinologia, Diabetes e Metabolismo, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal
4
Unidade de Endocrinologia Pediátrica, Serviço de Pediatria Médica, Departamento de Pediatria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal
5
Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
6
Unidade de Endocrinologia Pediátrica, Serviço de Pediatria, Hospital de Braga, 4710-243 Braga, Portugal
7
Unidade de Endocrinologia Pediátrica, Serviço de Pediatria Ambulatória, Hospital Pediátrico de Coimbra, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, 3000-602 Coimbra, Portugal
8
Serviço de Endocrinologia e Diabetes, Hospital Garcia de Orta, 2805-267 Almada, Portugal
9
Consulta de Pediatria/Patologia endócrina, Centro Hospitalar do Médio Ave, Unidade de V. N. Famalicão, 4761-917 Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal
10
School of Medicine, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
M.I. Alvelos and C.I. Gonçalves contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(1), 288; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010288
Submission received: 14 December 2019
/
Revised: 2 January 2020
/
Accepted: 15 January 2020
/
Published: 20 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Endocrinology & Metabolism)
Abstract
:Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a frequently misdiagnosed type of diabetes, which is characterized by early onset, autosomal dominant inheritance, and absence of insulin dependence. The most frequent subtypes are due to mutations of the GCK (MODY 2), HNF1A (MODY 3), and HNF4A (MODY 1) genes. We undertook the first multicenter genetic study of MODY in the Portuguese population. The GCK, HNF1A, and HNF4A genes were sequenced in 46 unrelated patients that had at least two of the three classical clinical criteria for MODY (age at diagnosis, family history, and clinical presentation). The functional consequences of the mutations were predicted by bioinformatics analysis. Mutations were identified in 23 (50%) families. Twelve families had mutations in the GCK gene, eight in the HNF1A gene, and three in the HNF4A gene. These included seven novel mutations (GCK c.494T>C, GCK c.563C>G, HNF1A c.1623G>A, HNF1A c.1729C>G, HNF4A c.68delG, HNF4A c.422G>C, HNF4A c.602A>C). Mutation-positive patients were younger at the time of diagnosis when compared to mutation-negative patients (14.3 vs. 23.0 years, p = 0.011). This study further expands the spectrum of known mutations associated with MODY, and may contribute to a better understanding of this type of diabetes and a more personalized clinical management of affected individuals.
1. Introduction
Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a monogenic form of diabetes characterized by early onset (usually under the age of 25 years), autosomal dominant inheritance and absence of insulin dependence during a variable period of time [1].
MODY is estimated to account for about 1–2% of all cases of diabetes [2]. However, the high costs of genetic testing and the frequent overlap of clinical features between MODY and the more frequent types of diabetes (i.e., types 1 and 2) have resulted in a significant underdiagnosis of MODY [3]. A correct molecular diagnosis is an important aspect in patient management because it can help select the most appropriate treatment, provide a prognosis for the course of the disease, alert to the existence of associated malformations, and allow for genetic counselling [4].
There are several subtypes of MODY caused by mutations in at least 14 known genes (HNF4A, GCK, HNF1A, PDX1, HNF1B, NEUROD1, KLF11, CEL, PAX4, INS, BLK, ABCC8, KCNJ11, APPL1), which have in common a primary defect in insulin secretion associated with pancreatic beta cell dysfunction [5]. However, heterozygous mutations in the GCK (glucokinase) (MODY 2), HNF1A (hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha) (MODY 3), and HNF4A (hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha) (MODY 1) genes are the most frequent, and together they explain over 95% of the known genetic causes of MODY [6].
The relative frequencies of MODY subtypes show variations according to the countries where the studies took place. For example, MODY 3 is the most common subtype in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Denmark, and Norway, but MODY 2 is the most common in Germany, Austria, Poland, the Czech Republic, Italy, Greece, and Spain [6]. These differences may be explained by the use of different selection criteria for patients for genetic testing [6].
The aim of this study was to identify the underlying genetic mutations in a group of Portuguese patients with clinically suspected MODY.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Subjects
Forty-six families with suspected MODY cases were referred by physicians based at six pediatric and adult diabetes clinics serving the northern, central, and southern regions of mainland Portugal, from 2012 to 2019. Patients were referred for genetic testing due to clinical suspicion of MODY based on at least two of the following three criteria: (a) diagnosis of diabetes under the age of 25 years in at least one family member; (b) autosomal dominant inheritance pattern through at least three generations, or the existence of at least two first-degree relatives with diabetes; (c) ability to control diabetes without insulin treatment for at least two years, or significant levels of serum C-peptide, or absence of pancreatic autoantibodies. Whenever possible, other affected and non-affected family members were studied. The control population consisted of 500 healthy volunteers recruited among blood donors. All patients and controls were Caucasian Portuguese. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects and the study was approved by the local research ethics committee (Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Ref: CE-FCS-2012-010).
2.2. Genetic Studies
Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from peripheral blood leucocytes [7] and used with custom-designed primers for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the coding regions and exon–intron boundaries of the GCK, HNF1A, and HNF4A genes. Bidirectional sequencing of the PCR products was performed using a CEQ DTCS sequencing kit (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA) and an automated capillary DNA sequencer (GenomeLab TM GeXP, Genetic Analysis System; Beckman Coulter). Genomic sequence variants identified in patients were searched for in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) [8] in order to assess their frequency in the general population. Novel missense variants were screened for in a panel of 200 healthy Portuguese volunteers (400 alleles) using sequence-specific restriction enzymes or allele-specific PCR, to exclude the possibility that these were common population-specific polymorphisms. For one variant found in a healthy control, the screening was extended to 500 controls (1000 alleles). Variants that were found to be present at an allele frequency higher than 0.1% in either gnomAD or in the Portuguese control population were excluded from further analysis. Computational functional prediction analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of the sequence variants on protein function, using SIFT [9], PolyPhen-2 [10], Mutation Taster [11], and Human Splicing Finder [12] programs. Sequence variants were analyzed by VarSome [13] and classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines [14]. Mutation nomenclature was based on the cDNA reference sequences for the GCK (NM_000162.5), HNF1A (NM_000545.5), and HNF4A (NM_175914.3) genes.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
The clinical characteristics of patients with and without identified mutations (i.e., mutation-positive and mutation-negative patients) were compared. Mean age at time of diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (A1c), and serum C-peptide were compared by two-tailed Student’s t-tests. The proportions of patients in each group with positive family history (defined as autosomal dominant inheritance pattern through at least three generations, or the existence of at least two first-degree relatives with diabetes), typical clinical presentation and course (defined as ability to control diabetes without insulin treatment for at least two years, or significant levels of serum C-peptide, or absence of pancreatic autoantibodies), and presence of all three classical MODY clinical criteria, were compared by a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
3. Results
Rare heterozygous sequence variants were identified in 23 (50%) of 46 families (Figure 1a–d). Twelve occurred in the GCK gene, eight in the HNF1A gene, and three in the HNF4A gene (Figure 2). Three variants were found to be recurrent, thus the total number of unique variants was 20. These consisted of 16 missense, two nonsense, one frameshift, and one synonymous variant.
Thirteen variants have already been reported in MODY patients, namely GCK c.130G>A [15], GCK c.386G>A [16], GCK c.544G>A [17], GCK c.556C>T [18], GCK c.698G>A [19], GCK c.757G>C [20], GCK c.1099G>A [21], GCK c.1268T>A [22], HNF1A c.425C>T [23], HNF1A c.475C>T [24], HNF1A c.511C>T [23], HNF1A c.521C>T [25], and HNF1A c.607C>A [26].
Seven variants (GCK c.494T>C, GCK c.563C>G, HNF1A c.1623G>A, HNF1A c.1729C>G, HNF4A c.68delG, HNF4A c.422G>C, HNF4A c.602A>C) have not previously been reported in patients with MODY and were found to be absent or very rare (≤0.0001) in the gnomAD population database [8] (Table 1). These variants were not found in healthy Portuguese controls, except for HNF1A c.1729C>G, which was identified in 1/1000 alleles. These novel variants were shown to cosegregate with diabetes in additional family members, except for HNF4A c.68delG, because DNA from relatives was not available for testing. All variants were predicted to be deleterious by at least one of four bioinformatics programs (SIFT [9], PolyPhen-2 [10], Mutation Taster [11], or Human Splicing Finder [12]) (Table 1). The synonymous variant in HNF1A (c.1623G>A, p.Gln541Gln) was predicted to affect RNA splicing, by the Mutation Taster [11] and Human Splicing Finder [12] bioinformatics programs.
According to strict ACMG classification criteria [14], HNF1A c.521C>T, HNF1A c.1623G>A, and HNF1A c.1729C>G were classified as variants of uncertain significance and all others were classified as either pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (Table 1).
An additional synonymous variant (HNF4A c.711G>A, p.Ala237Ala) was identified in one patient. Although this variant was found to be very rare in the gnomAD population database (allele frequency 3/282800 = 0.00001), it was found in several Portuguese normal controls (allele frequency 5/980 = 0.005) and was therefore considered as a population-specific polymorphism with no relation to the disorder.
The clinical characteristics of MODY patients with identified mutations are summarized in Table 2. The comparison between mutation-positive and mutation-negative patients (Table 3) showed that mutation-positive patients were significantly younger at the time of diagnosis (14.3 vs. 23.0 years, p = 0.011). No differences were observed regarding family history, clinical presentation, or course of the diabetes (Table 3). No differences were observed for BMI, A1c, or serum C-peptide (data not shown). The majority (n = 12) of mutation-positive patients presented only two of the three classical clinical criteria for MODY (Table 3).
4. Discussion
This study of 46 families with clinically suspected MODY revealed the presence of a genetic cause in 23 (50%) families. GCK, HNF1A, and HNF4A heterozygous mutations were found in 12 (26%), eight (17%), and three (7%) families, respectively.
The frequency of mutations in clinically suspected MODY cases varies across different European countries, such as Germany/Austria (97%), Spain (89%), Italy (70%), Greece (66%), Denmark (49%), the Czech Republic (48%), the Netherlands (39%), Norway (31%), the United Kingdom (27%), and Poland (7%) [6]. The differences observed between different countries are most likely explained by the different selection criteria used for genetic testing [6]. Ours is the first study in the Portuguese population and shows that the mutation frequency (50%) lies within the range for European populations [6].
The most frequent genetic defects in our population were GCK mutations (MODY 2), followed by HNF1A mutations (MODY 3). This is consistent with the distribution in other southern European populations [6]. HNF4A mutations (MODY 1) were rarer, as expected according to their known contribution to MODY [6]. Other MODY subtypes are even rarer and therefore were not searched for in our group of patients.
The 23 identified mutations consisted of 20 unique mutations and three recurrent mutations (i.e., occurring in more than one family). Of these 20 different mutations, 13 have already been reported in MODY [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The remaining seven mutations (GCK c.494T>C, GCK c.563C>G, HNF1A c.1623G>A, HNF1A c.1729C>G, HNF4A c.68delG, HNF4A c.422G>C, HNF4A c.602A>C) have not previously been reported, and are therefore novel mutations.
Bioinformatics analysis, using sequence conservation and structure-based algorithms, predicted that the identified mutations are highly likely to affect protein function. Most mutations in this study were missense mutations. These results are consistent with studies in other European populations where missense mutations were also predominant [22,26]. Missense mutations may result in alterations of secondary structures, affecting protein stability or resulting in the loss of important catalytic domains. Two nonsense and one frameshift mutations were identified—these may result in premature termination of the encoded protein or in nonsense-mediated RNA decay [27]. A synonymous mutation in HNF1A (c.1623G>A, p.Gln541Gln), involving the last nucleotide of exon 8, was predicted to affect RNA splicing, although no RNA was available from the patient to demonstrate this experimentally. In addition to the computational prediction results, the absence or rarity of all these mutations in large population databases [8] is highly suggestive that these are indeed pathogenic mutations associated with the disorder, rather than common benign polymorphisms.
In 23 (50%) of the families, no genetic defect was identified in the GCK, HNF1A, or HNF4A genes. This rate of mutation-negative cases is similar to that observed in other European populations [6] and could have several explanations. First, it may be due to the occurrence of mutations in genes that were not analyzed in the study. Although the GCK (MODY 2), HNF1A (MODY 3), and HNF4A (MODY 1) genes are responsible for the vast majority of genetic causes of MODY [6], there are other rarer MODY subtypes caused by mutations in genes not analyzed in this study, which could have been analyzed by next-generation sequencing methods [28]. However, these other subtypes have been shown to represent together only a small proportion (<5%) of cases or to be associated with specific extra-pancreatic features that were not present in our patients [29]. Second, mutations may rarely be located in the promoter or deep intronic regions, or result from large deletions of the genes that would not be detected by conventional sequencing [30]. Finally, mutation-negative genetic tests may be explained by the occurrence of phenocopies. This occurs when suspected MODY cases represent other types of diabetes (e.g., type 1 or 2) that can also occur in young individuals and/or coexist with other affected family members, thus mimicking the phenotype of MODY, but with no monogenic cause. As diabetes is a relatively common disease, the existence of several affected family members does not necessarily imply an inherited cause of diabetes [31]. Furthermore, the fact that mutation-negative patients in our study were diagnosed at a later age suggests that these are less likely to be associated with a genetic cause.
The inclusion criteria for patients in this study were less stringent than the classical clinical triad for MODY (i.e., diagnosis under the age of 25 years, autosomal dominant inheritance, and clinical presentation and course of the diabetes) [1], because patients do not always exhibit all the typical clinical characteristics of MODY. This occurs because family history is sometimes incomplete or unknown and vertical transmission through three generations is not always possible to confirm, patients may have de novo mutations (i.e., not present in the parents), asymptomatic hyperglycemias can remain undiagnosed beyond the age of 25 years, and the presence of pancreatic autoantibodies (which are typical for type 1 diabetes) has also been reported in MODY [32]. As our study included cases that fulfilled only two of the three above-mentioned criteria, this allowed the genetic diagnosis of 12 patients that would have otherwise remained undiagnosed, although at the expense of a higher proportion of mutation-negative cases. Several studies have proposed the selection of cases for genetic testing based on biomarkers and clinical features associated with a higher probability of having a genetic defect [33,34,35]. These prediction models show high sensitivity, although with relatively low positive predictive values that result in even higher proportions of mutation-negative cases. It is likely that the decision about which patients should undergo genetic testing, based on their prior likelihood of having a MODY mutation, will ultimately depend on the cost-effectiveness of the genetic testing [36].
In conclusion, this is the first Portuguese multicenter genetic study of MODY patients. In 46 families with clinically suspected MODY, mutations were found in 23 (50%) families, including seven GCK, HNF1A, and HNF4A mutations that have not previously been reported. Several mutations were identified in cases that only partially fulfilled the classical clinical criteria for MODY. The study results may contribute to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of the most common subtypes of MODY and to a more personalized approach to patients’ treatment, follow-up, and genetic counselling.
Author Contributions
All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript. Conceptualization, M.I.A. and M.C.L.; clinical evaluation and investigation, M.B., M.L.S., M.M., S.M., I.D., A.M., L.G., J.S., B.D.P., S.G.-d.-S., C.M., D.G., D.M., C.B., L.B., M.V., M.M.G., and M.C.L.; genetic investigation, M.I.A., C.I.G., E.C., J.T.A., and M.C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.L.; writing—review and editing, M.I.A., C.I.G., E.C., J.T.A., M.B., M.L.S., M.M., S.M., I.D., A.M., L.G., J.S., B.D.P., S.G.-d.-S., C.M., D.G., D.M., C.B., L.B., M.V., and M.M.G.; supervision, M.C.L.; project administration, M.C.L.; funding acquisition, M.I.A., M.C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Portuguese Society of Diabetology (“Bolsa Nuno Castel-Branco /SPD/2012”), the European Regional Development Fund through the POCI—COMPETE 2020—Operational Programme Competitiveness and Internationalisation in Axis I—Strengthening research, technological development and innovation (Project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007491), the “Programa Operacional Regional do Centro (Centro 2020)—Sistema de Apoio à Investigação Científica e Tecnológica—Programas Integrados de IC&DT” (Project Centro-01-0145-FEDER-000019—C4—Centro de Competências em Cloud Computing), and National Funds by FCT—Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Project UID/Multi/00709/2013).
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the following clinicians who participated in the collection of patient samples and data: Carla Pereira (Lisboa), Diana Silva (Coimbra), Glória Silva (Guarda), Joana Guiomar (Coimbra), Nelson Cunha (Coimbra), Sandra Paiva (Coimbra), Sofia Gouveia (Coimbra), and Tiago Silva (Almada).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Tattersall, R.B. Mild familial diabetes with dominant inheritance. QJM Int. J. Med. 1974, 43, 339–357. [Google Scholar]
- Ledermann, H.M. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) at least ten times more common in Europe than previously assumed? Diabetologia 1995, 38, 1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shields, B.M.; Hicks, S.; Shepherd, M.H.; Colclough, K.; Hattersley, A.T.; Ellard, S. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): How many cases are we missing? Diabetologia 2010, 53, 2504–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hattersley, A.T.; Patel, K.A. Precision diabetes: Learning from monogenic diabetes. Diabetologia 2017, 60, 769–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Firdous, P.; Nissar, K.; Ali, S.; Ganai, B.A.; Shabir, U.; Hassan, T.; Masoodi, S.R. Genetic Testing of Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young Current Status and Future Perspectives. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kleinberger, J.W.; Pollin, T.I. Undiagnosed MODY: Time for Action. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2015, 15, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemos, M.C.; Regateiro, F.J. N-acetyltransferase genotypes in the Portuguese population. Pharmacogenetics 1998, 8, 561–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karczewski, K.J.; Francioli, L.C.; Tiao, G.; Cummings, B.B.; Alföldi, J.; Wang, Q.; Collins, R.L.; Laricchia, K.M.; Ganna, A.; Birnbaum, D.P.; et al. Variation across 141,456 human exomes and genomes reveals the spectrum of loss-of-function intolerance across human protein-coding genes. BioRxiv 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ng, P.C.; Henikoff, S. SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3812–3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Adzhubei, I.A.; Schmidt, S.; Peshkin, L.; Ramensky, V.E.; Gerasimova, A.; Bork, P.; Kondrashov, A.S.; Sunyaev, S.R. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 248–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schwarz, J.M.; Rodelsperger, C.; Schuelke, M.; Seelow, D. MutationTaster evaluates disease-causing potential of sequence alterations. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 575–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Desmet, F.O.; Hamroun, D.; Lalande, M.; Collod-Beroud, G.; Claustres, M.; Beroud, C. Human Splicing Finder: An online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, e67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kopanos, C.; Tsiolkas, V.; Kouris, A.; Chapple, C.E.; Albarca Aguilera, M.; Meyer, R.; Massouras, A. VarSome: The human genomic variant search engine. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 1978–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Richards, S.; Aziz, N.; Bale, S.; Bick, D.; Das, S.; Gastier-Foster, J.; Grody, W.W.; Hegde, M.; Lyon, E.; Spector, E.; et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 2015, 17, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gragnoli, C.; Cockburn, B.N.; Chiaramonte, F.; Gorini, A.; Marietti, G.; Marozzi, G.; Signorini, A.M. Early-onset Type II diabetes mellitus in Italian families due to mutations in the genes encoding hepatic nuclear factor 1 alpha and glucokinase. Diabetologia 2001, 44, 1326–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Massa, O.; Meschi, F.; Cuesta-Munoz, A.; Caumo, A.; Cerutti, F.; Toni, S.; Cherubini, V.; Guazzarotti, L.; Sulli, N.; Matschinsky, F.M.; et al. High prevalence of glucokinase mutations in Italian children with MODY. Influence on glucose tolerance, first-phase insulin response, insulin sensitivity and BMI. Diabetologia 2001, 44, 898–905. [Google Scholar]
- Froguel, P.; Zouali, H.; Vionnet, N.; Velho, G.; Vaxillaire, M.; Sun, F.; Lesage, S.; Stoffel, M.; Takeda, J.; Passa, P.; et al. Familial hyperglycemia due to mutations in glucokinase. Definition of a subtype of diabetes mellitus. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993, 328, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katagiri, H.; Asano, T.; Ishihara, H.; Inukai, K.; Anai, M.; Miyazaki, J.; Tsukuda, K.; Kikuchi, M.; Yazaki, Y.; Oka, Y. Nonsense mutation of glucokinase gene in late-onset non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1992, 340, 1316–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wheeler, B.J.; Patterson, N.; Love, D.R.; Prosser, D.; Tomlinson, P.; Taylor, B.J.; Manning, P. Frequency and genetic spectrum of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) in southern New Zealand. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2013, 12, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Weinert, L.S.; Silveiro, S.P.; Giuffrida, F.M.; Cunha, V.T.; Bulcao, C.; Calliari, L.E.; Della Manna, T.; Kunii, I.S.; Dotto, R.P.; Dias-da-Silva, M.R.; et al. Three unreported glucokinase (GCK) missense mutations detected in the screening of thirty-two Brazilian kindreds for GCK and HNF1A-MODY. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2014, 106, e44–e48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velho, G.; Blanche, H.; Vaxillaire, M.; Bellanne-Chantelot, C.; Pardini, V.C.; Timsit, J.; Passa, P.; Deschamps, I.; Robert, J.J.; Weber, I.T.; et al. Identification of 14 new glucokinase mutations and description of the clinical profile of 42 MODY-2 families. Diabetologia 1997, 40, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Osbak, K.K.; Colclough, K.; Saint-Martin, C.; Beer, N.L.; Bellanne-Chantelot, C.; Ellard, S.; Gloyn, A.L. Update on mutations in glucokinase (GCK), which cause maturity-onset diabetes of the young, permanent neonatal diabetes, and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Hum. Mutat. 2009, 30, 1512–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vaxillaire, M.; Rouard, M.; Yamagata, K.; Oda, N.; Kaisaki, P.J.; Boriraj, V.V.; Chevre, J.C.; Boccio, V.; Cox, R.D.; Lathrop, G.M.; et al. Identification of nine novel mutations in the hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha gene associated with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY3). Hum. Mol. Genet. 1997, 6, 583–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chevre, J.C.; Hani, E.H.; Boutin, P.; Vaxillaire, M.; Blanche, H.; Vionnet, N.; Pardini, V.C.; Timsit, J.; Larger, E.; Charpentier, G.; et al. Mutation screening in 18 Caucasian families suggest the existence of other MODY genes. Diabetologia 1998, 41, 1017–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bellanne-Chantelot, C.; Carette, C.; Riveline, J.P.; Valero, R.; Gautier, J.F.; Larger, E.; Reznik, Y.; Ducluzeau, P.H.; Sola, A.; Hartemann-Heurtier, A.; et al. The type and the position of HNF1A mutation modulate age at diagnosis of diabetes in patients with maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY)-3. Diabetes 2008, 57, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Colclough, K.; Bellanne-Chantelot, C.; Saint-Martin, C.; Flanagan, S.E.; Ellard, S. Mutations in the genes encoding the transcription factors hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha and 4 alpha in maturity-onset diabetes of the young and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Hum. Mutat. 2013, 34, 669–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyle, M.C.; Kolakada, D.; Cortazar, M.A.; Jagannathan, S. How to get away with nonsense: Mechanisms and consequences of escape from nonsense-mediated RNA decay. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2019, e1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellard, S.; Lango Allen, H.; de Franco, E.; Flanagan, S.E.; Hysenaj, G.; Colclough, K.; Houghton, J.A.; Shepherd, M.; Hattersley, A.T.; Weedon, M.N.; et al. Improved genetic testing for monogenic diabetes using targeted next-generation sequencing. Diabetologia 2013, 56, 1958–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, S.H. Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young: What Do Clinicians Need to Know? Diabetes Metab. J. 2015, 39, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ellard, S.; Bellanne-Chantelot, C.; Hattersley, A.T. Best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young. Diabetologia 2008, 51, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pezzilli, S.; Ludovico, O.; Biagini, T.; Mercuri, L.; Alberico, F.; Lauricella, E.; Dallali, H.; Capocefalo, D.; Carella, M.; Miccinilli, E.; et al. Insights From Molecular Characterization of Adult Patients of Families With Multigenerational Diabetes. Diabetes 2018, 67, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- D’Annunzio, G.; Marchi, M.; Aloi, C.; Salina, A.; Lugani, F.; Lorini, R. Hyperglycaemia and beta-cell antibodies: Is it always pre-type 1 diabetes? Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2013, 100, e20–e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shields, B.M.; Shepherd, M.; Hudson, M.; McDonald, T.J.; Colclough, K.; Peters, J.; Knight, B.; Hyde, C.; Ellard, S.; Pearson, E.R.; et al. Population-Based Assessment of a Biomarker-Based Screening Pathway to Aid Diagnosis of Monogenic Diabetes in Young-Onset Patients. Diabetes Care 2017, 40, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Shields, B.M.; McDonald, T.J.; Ellard, S.; Campbell, M.J.; Hyde, C.; Hattersley, A.T. The development and validation of a clinical prediction model to determine the probability of MODY in patients with young-onset diabetes. Diabetologia 2012, 55, 1265–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Misra, S.; Owen, K.R. Genetics of Monogenic Diabetes: Present Clinical Challenges. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2018, 18, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Naylor, R. Economics of Genetic Testing for Diabetes. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2019, 19, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
(a–d) Families with identified maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) mutations. Filled symbols represent patients with diabetes, open symbols represent unaffected individuals. Squares, circles, and diamond symbols denote males, females, and unspecified, respectively. Numbers within symbols indicate additional siblings with the same phenotype. Oblique lines through symbols represent deceased individuals. Arrows indicate the index cases. The age of diagnosis of diabetes (y, years), when known, is presented. The presence (+) or absence (–) of the mutation, when known, is presented. The chromatograms of the DNA sequence for normal individuals and for patients with mutations (asterisks) are presented below each pedigree.
Figure 1.
(a–d) Families with identified maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) mutations. Filled symbols represent patients with diabetes, open symbols represent unaffected individuals. Squares, circles, and diamond symbols denote males, females, and unspecified, respectively. Numbers within symbols indicate additional siblings with the same phenotype. Oblique lines through symbols represent deceased individuals. Arrows indicate the index cases. The age of diagnosis of diabetes (y, years), when known, is presented. The presence (+) or absence (–) of the mutation, when known, is presented. The chromatograms of the DNA sequence for normal individuals and for patients with mutations (asterisks) are presented below each pedigree.
Figure 2.
Schematic representation of the GCK, HNF1A, and HNF4A genes and positions of the identified mutations. Numbered boxes represent exons and lines represent introns (not to scale). UTR, untranslated regions. A 250 base-pair (bp) scale is shown.
Figure 2.
Schematic representation of the GCK, HNF1A, and HNF4A genes and positions of the identified mutations. Numbered boxes represent exons and lines represent introns (not to scale). UTR, untranslated regions. A 250 base-pair (bp) scale is shown.
Table 1.
Rare sequence variants identified in MODY patients.
| Gene (a) | Nucleotide Change | Amino Acid Change | Mutation Type | Population Allele Frequency (gnomAD/Portuguese Controls) | Computational Programs That Support a Pathogenic Effect (b) | Classification (ACMG Criteria) (c) | Previously Reported (Reference) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCK | c.130G>A | p.Gly44Ser | missense | 0 | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3) | Yes [15] |
| c.386G>A | p.Cys129Tyr | missense | 0 | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3) | Yes [16] | |
| c.494T>C | p.Leu165Pro | missense | 0/0 (d) | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3, PP5) | No | |
| c.544G>A | p.Val182Met | missense | 0 | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3, PP5) | Yes [17] | |
| c.556C>T | p.Arg186* | nonsense | 0 | MT | Pathogenic (PVS1, PM1, PM2, PP3, PP5) | Yes [18] | |
| c.563C>G | p.Ala188Gly | missense | 0/0 (h) | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3) | No | |
| c.698G>A | p.Cys233Tyr | missense | 0 | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3) | Yes [19] | |
| c.757G>C | p.Val253Leu | missense | 0 | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PM5, PM6, PP2, PP3) | Yes [20] | |
| c.1099G>A | p.Val367Met | missense | 0 | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3, PP5) | Yes [21] | |
| c.1268T>A | p.Phe423Tyr | missense | 0 | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3, PP5) | Yes [22] | |
| HNF1A | c.425C>T | p.Ser142Phe | missense | 0 | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM2, PP1, PP2, PP3, PP5) | Yes [23] |
| c.475C>T | p.Arg159Trp | missense | 0.0000039 | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3, PP5) | Yes [24] | |
| c.511C>T | p.Arg171* | nonsense | 0 | MT | Pathogenic (PVS1, PM2, PP3, PP5) | Yes [23] | |
| c.521C>T | p.Ala174Val | missense | 0.0001951 | MT | VUS (PP2, PP3, BS2) | Yes [25] | |
| c.607C>A | p.Arg203Ser | missense | 0 | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3) | Yes [26] | |
| c.1623G>A | p.Gln541Gln | synonymous | 0/0 (e) | MT, HSF | VUS (PM2, PP1, PP3) | No | |
| c.1729C>G | p.His577Asp | missense | 0.0001429/0.001 (i) | SIFT, MT | VUS (PP1, PP2, PP3, BS2) | No | |
| HNF4A | c.68delG | p.Gly23Alafs*81 | frameshift | 0 | MT | Pathogenic (PVS1, PM2, PP3) | No |
| c.422G>C | p.Arg141Pro | missense | 0/0 (f) | SIFT, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PP1, PP2, PP3) | No | |
| c.602A>C | p.His201Pro | missense | 0/0 (g) | SIFT, PPh-2, MT | L. Pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3) | No |
(a) Reference sequences are GCK (NM_000162.5), HNF1A (NM_000545.5), and HNF4A (NM_175914.3). (b) SIFT, sorting tolerant from intolerant; PPh-2, PolyPhen-2; MT, Mutation Taster; HSF, Human Splicing Finder. (c) American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria [14] were used to classify each variant as Pathogenic, Likely (L) Pathogenic, or Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS), based on the evidence of pathogenicity (very strong (PVS1), strong (PS1–4), moderate (PM1–6), or supporting (PP1–5)). (d–g) Determined in 200 Portuguese controls (400 alleles) using allele-specific PCR. (h) Determined in 200 Portuguese controls (400 alleles) using HpyCH4III restriction enzyme. (i) Determined in 500 Portuguese controls (1000 alleles) using allele-specific PCR.
Table 2.
Clinical characteristics of MODY patients with identified mutations.
| Patient ID | Sex/Age (yrs) | Age at Diagnosis (yrs) | Family History (a) | Presenting Signs and Symptoms | BMI (kg/m2) | A1c (%) | C-Peptide (ng/mL) (b) | Abs | Treatment | Complications | Last A1c (%) | Mutation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2476 | M/28 | 9 | Yes | Asymptomatic | 21.8 (*) | 7.2 | 0.10 | Yes | Insulin | Retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy (kidney transplant) | 5.2 | HNF1A c.1729C>G (p.His577Asp) |
| 5035 | F/48 | 15 | No | Asymptomatic | 19.4 (*) | n/a | n/a | n/a | No | No | 6.5 | GCK c.563C>G (p.Ala188Gly) |
| 5227 | M/9 | 8 | No | Asymptomatic | 17.5 | 6.4 | 0.84 | No | No | No | 6.7 | GCK c.130G>A (p.Gly44Ser) |
| 6243 | F/22 | 10 | Yes | Asymptomatic | 22.3 (*) | n/a | 7.20 | No | OHA | No | 6.6 | GCK c.544G>A (p.Val182Met) |
| 6291 | F/12 | 11 | No | Weight loss | 17.9 | 6.0 | 4.80 | No | No | No | 6.0 | GCK c.757G>C (p.Val253Leu) |
| 6518 | F/15 | 14 | Yes | Polyuria/polydipsia | 25.5 | 6.5 | 4.50 | No | OHA | No | 6.4 | GCK c.1099G>A (p.Val367Met) |
| 6856 | F/16 | 6 | No | Asymptomatic | 15.5 | 6.6 | 0.82 | No | OHA | No | 6.3 | GCK c.494T>C (p.Leu165Pro) |
| 6866 | M/33 | 3 | Yes | Asymptomatic | 25.2 (*) | 6.6 | 2.52 | n/a | No | No | 6.2 | GCK c.1268T>A (p.Phe423Tyr) |
| 6955 | F/34 | 34 | Yes | Asymptomatic | 26.2 | 6.4 | 3.40 | No | OHA | No | 5.9 | HNF1A c.521C>T (p.Ala174Val) |
| 7004 | F/32 | 31 | Yes | Gestational diabetes | 20.7 (*) | 6.1 | 0.80 | No | No | No | 6.1 | GCK c.1268T>A (p.Phe423Tyr) |
| 7018 | F/31 | 16 | Yes | Polyuria/polydipsia | 28.9 | 9.0 | 1.00 | No | Insulin | Retinopathy | 6.7 | HNF4A c.422G>C (p.Arg141Pro) |
| 7034 | M/20 | 14 | Yes | Asymptomatic | 23.4 (*) | 6.5 | 2.39 | n/a | No | No | 6.1 | GCK c.386G>A (p.Cys129Tyr) |
| 7071 | F/39 | 21 | Yes | Gestational diabetes | 19.1 (*) | n/a | 0.70 | No | No | No | 6.4 | HNF4A c.68delG (p.Gly23Alafs *81) |
| 7113 | M/7 | 4 | No | Asymptomatic | 17.4 (*) | 6.4 | 1.17 | No | No | No | 6.7 | GCK c.757G>C (p.Val253Leu) |
| 7396 | F/13 | 11 | Yes | Weight loss | 16.2 | 8.7 | 1.80 | No | Insulin | No | 5.9 | HNF1A c.425C>T (p.Ser142Phe) |
| 7422 | M/27 | 25 | No | Asymptomatic | 22.7 | n/a | 1.70 | No | OHA + Insulin | No | 5.1 | HNF1A c.607C>A (p.Arg203Ser) |
| 7451 | F/39 | 18 | Yes | Asymptomatic | 25.8 | 6.4 | 2.30 | No | OHA | No | 7.3 | GCK c.698G>A (p.Cys233Tyr) |
| 7467 | F/14 | 14 | No | Asymptomatic | 22.2 | 8.0 | 1.37 | No | OHA | No | 8.0 | HNF1A c.511C>T (p.Arg171 *) |
| 7613 | M/7 | 6 | No | Asymptomatic | 15.6 | 6.9 | 0.90 | No | No | No | 6.7 | GCK c.556C>T (p.Arg186 *) |
| 7629 | F/32 | 18 | Yes | Polyuria/polydipsia | 22.9 (*) | n/a | 1.50 | No | Insulin | No | 5.6 | HNF1A c.425C>T (p.Ser142Phe) |
| 7646 | M/35 | 17 | Yes | Polyuria/polydipsia | 19.3 (*) | n/a | 0.10 | No | Insulin | No | 5.5 | HNF1A c.475C>T (p.Arg159Trp) |
| 7690 | F/18 | 14 | No | Asymptomatic | 30.7 | 6.8 | 3.60 | No | OHA | No | 7.7 | HNF1A c.1623G>A (p.Gln541Gln) |
| 7797 | F/12 | 11 | Yes | Polyuria/polydipsia | 24.1 | 12.0 | 2.22 | No | OHA + Insulin | No | 8.1 | HNF4A c.602A>C (p.His201Pro) |
(a) Autosomal dominant inheritance pattern through at least three generations, or the existence of at least two first-degree relatives with diabetes. Yrs, years. (b) Normal values > 0.8 ng/mL. M, male; F, female; BMI, body mass index (*) At last evaluation. A1c, glycated hemoglobin; Abs, positivity for at least one pancreatic autoantibody; OHA, oral hypoglycemic agents; n/a, not available.
Table 3.
Comparison of clinical characteristics of mutation-positive and mutation-negative patients.
Table 3.
Comparison of clinical characteristics of mutation-positive and mutation-negative patients.
| Mutation-Positive (n = 23) | Mutation-Negative (n = 23) | p-Value (c) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis (mean ± SD) (y) | 14.3 ± 7.7 | 23.0 ± 13.2 | 0.011* |
| Family history (a) (n, %) | 14 (60.9) | 15 (65.2) | 1.000 |
| Clinical presentation and course (b) (n, %) | 22 (95.7) | 22 (95.7) | 1.000 |
| Presence of 2 inclusion criteria (n, %) | 12 (52.2) | 16 (69.6) | 0.365 |
| Presence of 3 inclusion criteria (n, %) | 11 (47.8) | 7 (30.4) | 0.365 |
(a) Autosomal dominant inheritance pattern through at least three generations, or the existence of at least two first-degree relatives with diabetes. (b) Ability to control diabetes without insulin treatment for at least two years, or significant levels of serum C-peptide, or absence of pancreatic autoantibodies. (c) Mean age compared by two-tailed Student´s t-test (*statistically significant), all other parameters compared by two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. SD, standard deviation; y, years; n, number.
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Alvelos, M.I.; Gonçalves, C.I.; Coutinho, E.; Almeida, J.T.; Bastos, M.; Sampaio, M.L.; Melo, M.; Martins, S.; Dinis, I.; Mirante, A.; et al. Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) in Portugal: Novel GCK, HNFA1 and HNFA4 Mutations. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010288
AMA Style
Alvelos MI, Gonçalves CI, Coutinho E, Almeida JT, Bastos M, Sampaio ML, Melo M, Martins S, Dinis I, Mirante A, et al. Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) in Portugal: Novel GCK, HNFA1 and HNFA4 Mutations. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(1):288. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010288
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlvelos, Maria I., Catarina I. Gonçalves, Eduarda Coutinho, Joana T. Almeida, Margarida Bastos, Maria L. Sampaio, Miguel Melo, Sofia Martins, Isabel Dinis, Alice Mirante, and et al. 2020. "Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) in Portugal: Novel GCK, HNFA1 and HNFA4 Mutations" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 1: 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010288
APA StyleAlvelos, M. I., Gonçalves, C. I., Coutinho, E., Almeida, J. T., Bastos, M., Sampaio, M. L., Melo, M., Martins, S., Dinis, I., Mirante, A., Gomes, L., Saraiva, J., Pereira, B. D., Gama-de-Sousa, S., Moreno, C., Guelho, D., Martins, D., Baptista, C., Barros, L., ... Lemos, M. C. (2020). Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) in Portugal: Novel GCK, HNFA1 and HNFA4 Mutations. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(1), 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010288
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
