Next Article in Journal
Orthopedic Treatment for Class II Malocclusion with Functional Appliances and Its Effect on Upper Airways: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Whole Blood, Fixed Ratio, or Goal-Directed Blood Component Therapy for the Initial Resuscitation of Severely Hemorrhaging Trauma Patients: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Psychosocial Stress Hastens Disease Progression and Sudden Death in Mice with Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamics of Platelet Counts in Major Trauma: The Impact of Haemostatic Resuscitation and Effects of Platelet Transfusion—A Sub-Study of the Randomized Controlled RETIC Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/jcm9123805
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sufficient Thrombin Generation Despite 95% Hemodilution: An In Vitro Experimental Study

by
Johannes Gratz
1,
Christoph J. Schlimp
2,3,
Markus Honickel
4,
Nadine Hochhausen
4,
Herbert Schöchl
2,5 and
Oliver Grottke
4,*
1
Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AUVA Research Centre, Donaueschingenstraße 13, 1200 Vienna, Austria
3
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, AUVA Trauma Centre Linz, Garnisonstrasse 7, 4010 Linz, Austria
4
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
5
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, AUVA Trauma Centre Salzburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Doktor-Franz-Rehrl-Platz 5, 5010 Salzburg, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(12), 3805; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123805
Submission received: 27 October 2020 / Revised: 23 November 2020 / Accepted: 24 November 2020 / Published: 25 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management of Major Bleeding and Coagulopathy Following Trauma)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Guidelines for the treatment of severe bleeding comprise viscoelastic-test-guided use of coagulation factor concentrates as part of their recommendations. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of substituting fibrinogen, prothrombin complex concentrate, and a combination of both on conventional coagulation tests, viscoelastic test results, and thrombin generation. Blood was drawn from seven healthy volunteers to obtain platelet-free plasma, which later was diluted by replacing 40%, 60%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 99% with a crystalloid solution. The diluted samples were spiked with fibrinogen concentrate, prothrombin complex concentrate, a combination of both, or a corresponding amount of crystalloid solution. Up to a dilution level of 95%, viscoelastically determined clotting time was significantly shorter in the group substituted with fibrinogen only in comparison with the additional use of prothrombin complex concentrate. Clot firmness and endogenous thrombin potential remained at relatively stable values up to a dilution level of 95% with the substitution of fibrinogen but not prothrombin complex concentrate. Substitution of prothrombin complex concentrate led to an excessive overshoot of thrombin generation. The results of our study question currently propagated treatment algorithms for bleeding patients that include the use of prothrombin complex concentrate for patients without former intake of oral anticoagulants. Even in severely bleeding patients, thrombin generation might be sufficient to achieve adequate hemostasis.

1. Introduction

Hemorrhage in severely injured patients is associated with high mortality and is the leading cause of death in trauma patients [1]. One-third of bleeding trauma patients exhibit signs of trauma-induced coagulopathy, which is directly associated with an impaired outcome [2]. Historically, explanatory models for trauma-induced coagulopathy have focused on blood loss, dilution of coagulation factors due to volume replacement, hypothermia, and acidosis [3]. Although these factors might play a role in the development of trauma-induced coagulopathy, recent literature provides a more differentiated picture, characterizing it as a multifaceted process, including many more drivers such as shock-related hypoperfusion, endothelial injury with glycocalyx shedding, and platelet dysfunction [4,5].
Alongside rapid bleeding control, restrictive volume replacement, and the early use of tranexamic acid, current trauma guidelines comprise the administration of coagulation factor concentrates such as fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrate as part of their recommendations [6]. Fibrinogen is the first single coagulation factor that drops beyond critical levels in bleeding patients [7], and low fibrinogen levels upon hospital admission have been associated with increased mortality in trauma patients [8]. Thus, maintaining plasma fibrinogen levels ≥1.5 g/L is one of the cornerstones in hemostatic management of bleeding trauma patients [6].
While many centers worldwide use a fixed-ratio approach of packed red blood cells, platelet concentrates, and fresh frozen plasma for the management of severely injured trauma patients, a number of European trauma centers have implemented goal-directed treatment algorithms [9,10,11,12,13]. These primarily rely on prompt administration of tranexamic acid and the early use of fibrinogen concentrate as first-line therapy. Subsequently, prothrombin complex concentrate is administered according to point-of-care-available viscoelastic test results. Due to a number of advantages over conventional coagulation tests, viscoelastic testing is increasingly used to guide hemostatic therapy in bleeding trauma patients [14,15,16,17]. Several treatment algorithms have been suggested that, among other parameters, rely on the viscoelastic measurement of the initiation phase of the coagulation process, such as r-time (thrombelastography) or clotting time (rotational thromboelastometry), to trigger administration of prothrombin complex concentrate. However, to what extent these parameters are influenced by thrombin generation or substrates such as fibrinogen or platelets remains to be elucidated. Importantly, the use of prothrombin complex concentrate in bleeding patients does not come without significant side effects and has been associated with rates of up to 41% of thromboembolic events [18].
In an experimental model of extreme hemodilution, we thus investigated the effects of substituting (1) fibrinogen, (2) prothrombin complex concentrate, and (3) a combination of both on conventional coagulation tests, viscoelastic test results, and thrombin generation.

2. Experimental Section

The present study was approved by the relevant local ethics committee (RWTH Aachen, EK 380/15). Figure S1 gives an overview of the experimental procedures. After obtaining written informed consent, blood was drawn into citrated plasma tubes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) from a total of seven healthy volunteers by antecubital venipuncture. All participants did not have any history of coagulopathy, thromboembolism, or intake of antiplatelet or anticoagulant medication at the time of inclusion.
The blood samples were double-centrifuged to obtain platelet-free plasma. Thereafter, platelet-free plasma was diluted by replacing 40%, 60%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 99% with a balanced crystalloid solution (Sterofundin, B.Braun, Melsungen, Germany). The resulting diluted samples were spiked with (1) FC group: fibrinogen concentrate (FC; Haemocomplettan P, CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany); (2) PCC group: four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC; Beriplex P/N, CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany); (3) FC+PCC group: a combination of FC+PCC; (4) control group: a corresponding amount of balanced crystalloid solution. The diluted and spiked plasma samples of the four study groups were stored at −80 °C until the commencement of analysis.
For the preparation of the fibrinogen groups (FC, FC+PCC), the baseline individual plasma fibrinogen concentrations were measured and set as the target fibrinogen levels for substitution. Expected fibrinogen levels were calculated for the different dilutions, and fibrinogen concentrate was added accordingly. For the preparation of the PCC groups (PCC, FC+PCC), PCC was substituted in order to keep the prothrombin time index (PTI) at approximately 100%. PTI was expected to decrease in correlation to dilution levels. Thus, for example, at the 40% dilution level, PCC was added to raise PTI by 40% according to the prescribing information.
The resulting samples were then characterized by a number of measurements. Fibrinogen concentration was assessed on a coagulometer (ACL-TOP 550, Werfen, Munich, Germany). Prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, factor II levels, and antithrombin activity were determined with appropriate reagents on a hematology analyzer (ACL TOP 550; Werfen, Munich, Germany). Thromboelastometry (ROTEM; Tem International, Munich, Germany) was used for the measurement of viscoelastic coagulation properties of the different samples. The extrinsically activated assay using recombinant tissue factor (EXTEM) was performed, and clotting time (CT) and maximum clot firmness (MCF) were analyzed. Furthermore, for measurement of thrombin generation, we used the calibrated automated thrombogram method, as previously described [19], calculating thrombin generation curves with Thrombinoscope software (Thrombinoscope BV; Maastricht, The Netherlands).
Because of thrombin generation measurements beyond the upper detectable limit at higher dilution rates in the two PCC groups (PCC, FC+PCC), we decided to substitute antithrombin in those groups and repeat the measurements. Thus, in a second analysis step, samples in the PCC groups were spiked with antithrombin (Kybernin P, CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany) in order to keep antithrombin activity at approximately 100%, and thrombin generation measurements were repeated, as described above.
Since this study was designed as a pilot, no sample size calculation was performed. Data distribution was assessed by visual inspection and the use of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. According to normal data distribution results were expressed as mean (SD). One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s posthoc comparison were used to test for differences between the study groups. A two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed, and graphic representations were produced using GraphPad Prism 8.2 (GraphPad Software; San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

Table 1 shows the baseline values of all measured parameters in undiluted platelet-free plasma. Fibrinogen concentrations were significantly higher at any dilution level in the groups containing fibrinogen concentrate (FC, FC+PCC) versus those not containing fibrinogen concentrate (Figure 1). No significant intra- or intergroup differences at distinct dilution levels occurred in the two groups containing fibrinogen concentrate (e.g., 99% dilution level: FC 2.5 (0.6) g/L in the FC group vs. 2.4 (0.7) g/L in the FC+PCC group; p > 0.999). In both the PCC group and the control group, fibrinogen concentrations decreased to 1.5 (0.2) g/L at the 40% dilution level and were unmeasurable at any dilution level above 90%.
Figure 2 depicts the dilution-associated prolongation of the standard coagulation tests prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time. With regard to prothrombin time, significant intergroup differences occurred at dilution levels greater than 60%, and only the FC+PCC group allowed for measurements throughout all dilution levels (Figure 2A). In all other groups, PT values were prolonged beyond the upper detectable limit of 120 s at varying dilution levels. In contrast, dilution-associated prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time showed a similar pattern in the comparison between the different study groups (Figure 2B). Dilution greater than 80% resulted in prolongation beyond the upper detectable limit of 180 s in all groups except for the FC group, with a mean activated partial thromboplastin time of 178 (12) seconds at the 90% dilution level.
Hemodilution led to a substantial progressive decrease in antithrombin activity, with no significant differences between the study groups at any dilution level (Figure S2, supplemental digital content). Factor II activity increased significantly in the two PCC groups (PCC, FC+PCC) in comparison to the baseline value (40% dilution level PCC 151% (16%) and FC+PCC 149% (11%); p = 0.0023 and 0.034, respectively). It was significantly higher at any dilution level in the two PCC groups, with a progressive decline to activities beyond 5% in the FC and control groups at the 99% dilution level (Figure S3, supplemental digital content).
ROTEM measurements yielded significantly different results in a comparison between the study groups. In the PCC and the control group, ROTEM measurements showed a flat-line pattern at all dilution levels beyond 80%, i.e., EXTEM CT values yielded results beyond the upper detectable limit of 3600 s and EXTEM MCF values were below 2 mm (Figure 3). This stood in sharp contrast to the FC and FC+PCC groups, where EXTEM CT and EXTEM MCF were measurable at all dilution levels. Although EXTEM MCF values were lowest at the 99% dilution level in the FC group and the FC+PCC group (14.3 (4.8) and 16.0 (5.4) mm, respectively), these differences did not reach statistical significance in comparison with the baseline values (p = 0.176 and 0.555, respectively). Remarkably, there was a significant difference in EXTEM CT values between the FC group and the FC+PCC group, with more pronounced dilution-associated prolongations of the EXTEM CT in the FC+PCC group up to a dilution level of 95% (Figure 3A). Likewise, EXTEM MCF values were significantly reduced in the FC+PCC group up to a dilution level of 90% when compared with the FC group (Figure 3B).
With regard to thrombin generation measurements, Figure 4 illustrates differences in lag time, peak height, and endogenous thrombin potential between the study groups. At any dilution level higher than 80%, thrombin generation was not measurable in both PCC groups (PCC, FC+PCC). In the FC group and the control group, however, measurements of lagtime remained at roughly similar values up to a dilution level of 90% (Figure 4A). In contrast, peak height showed increasing values up to a dilution level of 60%, with a decreasing pattern at higher dilution levels only in these two groups (Figure 4B). Figure 4C illustrates measurements of endogenous thrombin potential that yielded results at or above the baseline values up to a dilution level of 95% for the FC group and the control group. In comparison with the baseline value, endogenous thrombin potential exhibited significantly higher results at the 60% dilution level in both groups (FC 667 (231) nM⋅L−1⋅min−1, p = 0.0272; control 643 (226) nM⋅L−1⋅min−1, p = 0.0312). At the 99% dilution level, endogenous thrombin potential was significantly lower (FC 509 (143) nM⋅L−1⋅min−1 and control 293 (139) nM⋅L−1⋅min−1) in comparison with the baseline value (p = 0.0001 and 0.0315, respectively).
When repeating thrombin generation measurements after substitution of antithrombin to a target of 100% activity in the two PCC groups (PCC, FC+PCC), lagtime showed a similar pattern between the groups with dilution-associated prolongations throughout all study groups (Figure 5A). However, measurements of peak height and endogenous thrombin potential suggest significantly increased thrombin generation up to a dilution level of 90% despite the correction of antithrombin activity in the PCC group and the FC+PCC group (Figure 5B,C).

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report the influence of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate plus fibrinogen concentrate on hemostasis in a model of severe hemodilution, up to 99%. The current study revealed that up to a dilution level of 95%, viscoelastically determined clotting time was shortest in the study group substituted with fibrinogen only. Moreover, both endogenous thrombin potential and viscoelastically determined clot firmness remained at relatively stable values up to a dilution level of 95% with the substitution of fibrinogen but not prothrombin complex concentrate. In contrast, the substitution of prothrombin complex concentrate with or without fibrinogen concentrate led to excessive thrombin generation. Despite the normalization of antithrombin activity, endogenous thrombin generation exceeded baseline values after prothrombin complex concentrate substitution up to dilution levels of 90%.
Fibrinogen has been shown to be the first coagulation factor to reach critically low levels (i.e., <1.5–2 g/L) in bleeding patients [7]. In the present study, diluting plasma by 40% already reduced fibrinogen concentrations to values of 1.5 (0.2) g/L in both the PCC group and the control group, whereas fibrinogen concentrations remained relatively stable in the FC group and the FC+PCC group. These findings were mirrored by viscoelastic measurements of maximum clot firmness (MCF). In both fibrinogen-substituted groups (FC and FC+PCC), EXTEM MCF did not show statistically significant reductions of fibrinogen up to dilution levels of 99%, whereas in the PCC group and the control group, MCF values showed a dilution-associated decreasing pattern comparable to that of fibrinogen concentrations.
Being one of the clinically pertinent findings of our study, EXTEM MCF values confirmed that stable fibrinogen levels in the FC group did indeed allow for clot formation up to dilutions of 99% without adding further factor concentrates. This is in line with earlier studies showing similar results, albeit up to lower dilution levels only [20,21,22], and underlines the clinical importance of early fibrinogen substitution in bleeding patients, as recommended by current guidelines [6,23]. Furthermore, with regard to factor concentrates, our findings suggest that even in severely bleeding patients, the substitution of fibrinogen might be entirely sufficient to maintain normal levels of hemostasis, given the patients are not anticoagulated. Our results are in line with a recently published trial, reporting the use of fibrinogen concentrate only in patients with extreme blood loss of up to 11.8 L during thoraco–abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery [24].
Thrombin generation measurements further corroborated these findings, with endogenous thrombin potential values remaining at relatively stable values throughout a broad range of dilution levels of up to 95% without substitution of prothrombin complex concentrate. We observed an increase of thrombin generation potential at the 60% dilution level that has been described before [25,26] and is most likely attributable to a dilution-associated imbalance of endogenous pro- and anticoagulatory proteins [27,28]. The fact that endogenous thrombin potential did not decrease significantly without substitution of any coagulation factors in the control group, up to dilution levels of 95%, suggests that even in severely bleeding trauma patients, thrombin generation might be sufficient to achieve adequate hemostasis. This hypothesis is consistent with a recently reported study that found preserved thrombin generation in an animal model of severe trauma bleeding [29].
Furthermore, trauma patients exhibit increased thrombin generation in comparison with healthy controls [26,30,31,32]. Importantly, patients hospitalized after trauma encounter a substantially elevated risk of venous thromboembolism, and elevated thrombin generation has been shown to be an independent predictor for venous thromboembolic events in this patient cohort [33,34]. The concern for an elevated thromboembolic risk associated with excessive thrombin generation following administration of prothrombin complex concentrate has been expressed before [28,35,36]. Based on the results of phase III trials, administration of prothrombin complex concentrate is well established and recommended as first-line therapy for the reversal of vitamin K antagonists [37]. Similarly, several studies imply that prothrombin complex concentrate might also be effective for the reversal of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in bleeding patients [38]. However, prothrombin complex concentrate is increasingly used in an attempt to correct trauma-induced coagulopathy in patients outside these indications [12,14,28,39]. Our findings of an excessive overshoot of thrombin generation in the two groups substituted with prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC, FC+PCC) further highlight concerns over an increased thromboembolic risk ensuing the use of prothrombin complex concentrate in bleeding patients, which might be aggravated by an imbalance of pro- and anticoagulatory proteins. Recent data from an experimental animal study have shown that high-dose prothrombin complex concentrate monotherapy for trauma-related bleeding can increase hypercoagulation and aggravate the risk of disseminated intravascular coagulation [36,40]. Additional treatment with antithrombin was effective in mitigating prothrombin complex concentrate-induced hypercoagulation, supporting future investigation of this treatment approach in human patients. To guide the effect of prothrombin complex concentrate, individual assessment of thrombin generation potential should be undertaken. However, due to technical constraints, turnaround time, and availability, thrombin generation measurement for the management of acutely bleeding patients is not feasible in the clinical setting to date.
Typically, viscoelastically guided protocolized treatment algorithms for bleeding patients first aim to restore fibrinogen levels, as measured by tests focusing on functional fibrinogen [14,39]. As shown by a recent study, the substitution of fibrinogen concentrate alone resulted in a reduction of prolonged EXTEM clotting time [41]. Therefore, administration of prothrombin complex concentrate should only be considered once adequate fibrinogen restoration has been confirmed by clot firmness in platelet-inhibited tests [14,39]. Remarkably, we observed prolonged EXTEM CT values, together with decreased EXTEM MCF values, in the FC+PCC group in comparison with the FC group throughout a broad range of dilution levels. This rather surprising finding has already been reported recently in a different study conducted by our group [35]. We hypothesized that the heparin content of the prothrombin complex concentrate might play a role, as suggested by an earlier study [42]. However, the manufacturer of the reagent used for this study claims that EXTEM measurements should be insensitive to heparin contents of up to 5 IU/mL, and the results of a study examining different preparations of prothrombin complex concentrate in diluted blood do not support this hypothesis [43]. Therefore, the clinical relevance of this finding and its impact on currently propagated protocolized treatment algorithms for bleeding patients remain to be evaluated by further research.
With regard to conventional coagulation parameters, our study further underlines the major drawbacks of these tests for guiding hemostatic therapy in bleeding patients. Not only do they have relevantly prolonged turnaround times in comparison with point-of-care-available viscoelastic tests [14], but they also fail to adequately reflect a clinically relevant picture of hemostasis [44]. It has been known for a long time that prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time measurements stop at a time point when only minimal amounts of thrombin have been generated [45]. This is consistent with the findings of our study. For example, values of activated partial thromboplastin time were significantly prolonged at the 80% dilution level in both PCC groups (PCC, FC+PCC), whereas endogenous thrombin potential measurements yielded results approximately 6-fold higher than baseline values.
Relevant limitations must be borne in mind when interpreting the results of our present study. First, due to the experimental in-vitro setup, excluding cell-based elements of the coagulation process and the small sample size of our pilot study, our results cannot readily be transferred into clinical practice. Future studies, including cell-based aspects of coagulation such as the endothelium, platelets, or erythrocytes, might help put our findings into context with in-vivo coagulation processes. Furthermore, our findings should prompt prospective randomized clinical trials to further investigate the relevance of thrombin generation measurements in different clinical settings as well as the safety and efficacy of using prothrombin complex concentrate in an attempt to correct thrombin generation. Second, we did not investigate different types of preparations of prothrombin complex concentrate (e.g., heparin-free preparations) that might have led to distinct results due to their different compositions [43]. Third, in particular, the higher levels of dilution described in the present study do not represent hemodilution levels encountered in clinical practice. Finally, a number of different viscoelastic devices are used for the management of bleeding patients and our findings might not be readily translated to measurements obtained by other viscoelastic devices. Especially with regard to the observed EXTEM CT prolongations in the FC+PCC group versus the FC group, this calls for further research to better define the role of prothrombin complex concentrate in protocolized hemostatic management algorithms for bleeding trauma patients.

5. Conclusions

In an in-vitro hemodilution model, throughout a broad range of dilution levels of up to 95%, the substitution of prothrombin complex concentrate was not necessary to provide for both viscoelastically determined clot formation as well as sufficient thrombin generation. In contrast, the substitution of prothrombin complex concentrate resulted in an overshoot of thrombin generation that might be particularly worrisome in trauma patients with an increased risk of thromboembolism once bleeding has stopped. Fibrinogen substitution, however, played a key role in the preservation of hemostatic capacity. The results of our present study scrutinize currently propagated hemostatic treatment algorithms and call for further research regarding the role of prothrombin complex concentrate in bleeding patients.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/12/3805/s1. Figure S1: Schematic description of the experimental procedures.; Figure S2: Antithrombin activity in a comparison between the four study groups and different dilution levels; Figure S3: Factor II activity in a comparison between the four study groups and different dilution levels.

Author Contributions

J.G. was involved in literature search, data analysis, data interpretation, and drafting the manuscript. C.J.S. was involved in study design, literature search, data analysis, data interpretation, and critical review of the manuscript. M.H. was involved in study design, data collection, data interpretation, and critical review of the manuscript. N.H. was involved in study design, data collection, data interpretation, and critical review of the manuscript. H.S. was involved in study design, literature search, data interpretation, and critical review of the manuscript. O.G. was involved in study design, literature search, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and critical review of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

J.G. has received support for congress travels and speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, and Johnson & Johnson Medical Products. He has also received advisory board honoraria from Instrumentation Laboratory Company and Portola. C.J.S. has received speaker fees and research support from CSL Behring, speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Portola, as well as research support from TEM International. H.S. has received speaker fees from CSL Behring, TEM International, Haemonetics, and Stago. O.G. has received research funding from Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biotest, CSL Behring, Octapharma, Novo Nordisk, Nycomed, and Portola. He has also received honoraria for lectures and consultancy support from Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Octapharma, Sanofi, Shire, Pfizer, and Portola. M.H. and N.H. declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Oyeniyi, B.T.; Fox, E.E.; Scerbo, M.; Tomasek, J.S.; Wade, C.E.; Holcomb, J.B. Trends in 1029 trauma deaths at a level 1 trauma center: Impact of a bleeding control bundle of care. Injury 2017, 48, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Maegele, M.; Lefering, R.; Yucel, N.; Tjardes, T.; Rixen, D.; Paffrath, T.; Simanski, C.; Neugebauer, E.; Bouillon, B. Early coagulopathy in multiple injury: An analysis from the German Trauma Registry on 8724 patients. Injury 2007, 38, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Frith, D.; Brohi, K. The pathophysiology of trauma-induced coagulopathy. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2012, 18, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chang, R.; Cardenas, J.C.; Wade, C.E.; Holcomb, J.B. Advances in the understanding of trauma-induced coagulopathy. Blood 2016, 128, 1043–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Cap, A.; Hunt, B.J. The pathogenesis of traumatic coagulopathy. Anaesthesia 2015, 70, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Spahn, D.R.; Bouillon, B.; Cerny, V.; Duranteau, J.; Filipescu, D.; Hunt, B.J.; Komadina, R.; Maegele, M.; Nardi, G.; Riddez, L.; et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: Fifth edition. Crit. Care 2019, 23, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chambers, L.A.; Chow, S.J.; Shaffer, L.E.T. Frequency and Characteristics of Coagulopathy in Trauma Patients Treated With a Low- or High-Plasma-Content Massive Transfusion Protocol. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2011, 136, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. McQuilten, Z.K.; Wood, E.M.; Bailey, M.; Cameron, P.A.; Cooper, D.J. Fibrinogen is an independent predictor of mortality in major trauma patients: A five-year statewide cohort study. Injury 2017, 48, 1074–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Winearls, J.; Mitra, B.; Reade, M.C. Haemotherapy algorithm for the management of trauma-induced coagulopathy. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2017, 30, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stein, P.; Kaserer, A.; Sprengel, K.; Wanner, G.A.; Seifert, B.; Theusinger, O.M.; Spahn, D.R. Change of transfusion and treatment paradigm in major trauma patients. Anaesthesia 2017, 72, 1317–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Schöchl, H.; Maegele, M.; Voelckel, W. Fixed ratio versus goal-directed therapy in trauma. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2016, 29, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schöchl, H.; Maegele, M.; Solomon, C.; Görlinger, K.; Voelckel, W. Early and individualized goal-directed therapy for trauma-induced coagulopathy. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2012, 20, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Schöchl, H.; Voelckel, W.; Schlimp, C.J. Management of traumatic haemorrhage—The European perspective. Anaesthesia 2015, 70, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gratz, J.; Güting, H.; Thorn, S.; Brazinova, A.; Görlinger, K.; Schäfer, N.; Schöchl, H.; Stanworth, S.; Maegele, M. Protocolised thromboelastometric-guided haemostatic management in patients with traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Anaesthesia 2019, 74, 883–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Innerhofer, P.; Fries, D.; Mittermayr, M.; Innerhofer, N.; von Langen, D.; Hell, T.; Gruber, G.; Schmid, S.; Friesenecker, B.; Lorenz, I.H.; et al. Reversal of trauma-induced coagulopathy using first-line coagulation factor concentrates or fresh frozen plasma (RETIC): A single-centre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017, 4, e258–e271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gonzalez, E.; Moore, E.E.; Moore, H.B.; Chapman, M.P.; Chin, T.L.; Ghasabyan, A.; Wohlauer, M.V.; Barnett, C.C.; Bensard, D.D.; Biffl, W.L.; et al. Goal-directed Hemostatic Resuscitation of Trauma-induced Coagulopathy. Ann. Surg. 2016, 263, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schöchl, H.; Nienaber, U.; Maegele, M.; Hochleitner, G.; Primavesi, F.; Steitz, B.; Arndt, C.; Hanke, A.; Voelckel, W.; Solomon, C. Transfusion in trauma: Thromboelastometry-guided coagulation factor concentrate-based therapy versus standard fresh frozen plasma-based therapy. Crit. Care 2011, 15, R83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. van den Brink, D.P.; Wirtz, M.R.; Neto, A.S.; Schöchl, H.; Viersen, V.; Binnekade, J.; Juffermans, N.P. Effectiveness of prothrombin complex concentrate for the treatment of bleeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 2457–2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Al Dieri, R.; Peyvandi, F.; Santagostino, E.; Giansily, M.; Mannucci, P.M.; Schved, J.; Béguin, S.; Hemker, H. The Thrombogram in Rare Inherited Coagulation Disorders: Its Relation to Clinical Bleeding. Thromb. Haemost. 2002, 88, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Schäfer, N.; Driessen, A.; Bauerfeind, U.; Fröhlich, M.; Ofir, J.; Stürmer, E.K.; Maegele, M. In vitro effects of different sources of fibrinogen supplementation on clot initiation and stability in a model of dilutional coagulopathy. Transfus. Med. 2016, 26, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. He, S.; Johnsson, H.; Zabczyk, M.; Hultenby, K.; Wallen, H.; Blombäck, M. Fibrinogen depletion after plasma-dilution: Impairment of proteolytic resistance and reversal via clotting factor concentrates. Thromb. Haemost. 2014, 111, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ninivaggi, M.; Feijge, M.; Baaten, C.; Kuiper, G.; Marcus, M.; ten Cate, H.; Lancé, M.; Heemskerk, J.; van der Meijden, P. Additive roles of platelets and fibrinogen in whole-blood fibrin clot formation upon dilution as assessed by thromboelastometry. Thromb. Haemost. 2014, 111, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kozek-Langenecker, S.A.; Ahmed, A.B.; Afshari, A.; Albaladejo, P.; Aldecoa, C.; Barauskas, G.; De Robertis, E.; Faraoni, D.; Filipescu, D.C.; Fries, D.; et al. Management of severe perioperative bleeding. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2017, 34, 332–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Morrison, G.A.; Koch, J.; Royds, M.; McGee, D.; Chalmers, R.T.A.; Anderson, J.; Nimmo, A.F. Fibrinogen concentrate vs. fresh frozen plasma for the management of coagulopathy during thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: A pilot randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia 2019, 74, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hasan, S.; Abuelkasem, E.; Williams, B.; Henderson, R.; Mazzeffi, M.A.; Tanaka, K.A. Factor IX from prothrombin complex concentrate augments low dose tissue factor-triggered thrombin generation in vitro. Br. J. Anaesth. 2018, 121, 936–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Dunbar, N.M.; Chandler, W.L. Thrombin generation in trauma patients. Transfusion 2009, 49, 2652–2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tanaka, K.A.; Mazzeffi, M.A.; Strauss, E.R.; Szlam, F.; Guzzetta, N.A. Computational simulation and comparison of prothrombin complex concentrate dosing schemes for warfarin reversal in cardiac surgery. J. Anesth. 2016, 30, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Schöchl, H.; Voelckel, W.; Maegele, M.; Kirchmair, L.; Schlimp, C.J. Endogenous thrombin potential following hemostatic therapy with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate: A 7-day observational study of trauma patients. Crit. Care 2014, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Gangloff, C.; Mingant, F.; Theron, M.; Galinat, H.; Grimault, O.; Ozier, Y.; Pichavant-Rafini, K. New considerations on pathways involved in acute traumatic coagulopathy: The thrombin generation paradox. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2019, 14, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Park, M.S.; Xue, A.; Spears, G.M.; Halling, T.M.; Ferrara, M.J.; Kuntz, M.M.; Dhillon, S.K.; Jenkins, D.H.; Harmsen, W.S.; Ballman, K.V.; et al. Thrombin generation and procoagulant microparticle profiles after acute trauma. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015, 79, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Voils, S.A.; Lemon, S.J.; Jordan, J.; Riley, P.; Frye, R. Early thrombin formation capacity in trauma patients and association with venous thromboembolism. Thromb. Res. 2016, 147, 13–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cardenas, J.C.; Rahbar, E.; Pommerening, M.J.; Baer, L.A.; Matijevic, N.; Cotton, B.A.; Holcomb, J.B.; Wade, C.E. Measuring thrombin generation as a tool for predicting hemostatic potential and transfusion requirements following trauma. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014, 77, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rattan, R.; Parreco, J.; Eidelson, S.A.; Gold, J.; Dharmaraja, A.; Zakrison, T.L.; Dante Yeh, D.; Ginzburg, E.; Namias, N. Hidden burden of venous thromboembolism after trauma. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018, 85, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Park, M.S.; Spears, G.M.; Bailey, K.R.; Xue, A.; Ferrara, M.J.; Headlee, A.; Dhillon, S.K.; Jenkins, D.H.; Zietlow, S.P.; Harmsen, W.S.; et al. Thrombin generation profiles as predictors of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after trauma. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017, 83, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gratz, J.; Ponschab, M.; Iapichino, G.E.; Schlimp, C.J.; Cadamuro, J.; Grottke, O.; Zipperle, J.; Oberladstätter, D.; Gabriel, C.; Ziegler, B.; et al. Comparison of fresh frozen plasma vs. coagulation factor concentrates for reconstitution of blood. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2020, 37, 879–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Grottke, O.; Braunschweig, T.; Spronk, H.M.H.; Esch, S.; Rieg, A.D.; van Oerle, R.; ten Cate, H.; Fitzner, C.; Tolba, R.; Rossaint, R. Increasing concentrations of prothrombin complex concentrate induce disseminated intravascular coagulation in a pig model of coagulopathy with blunt liver injury. Blood 2011, 118, 1943–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Goldstein, J.N.; Refaai, M.A.; Milling, T.J.J.; Lewis, B.; Goldberg-Alberts, R.; Hug, B.A.; Sarode, R. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus plasma for rapid vitamin K antagonist reversal in patients needing urgent surgical or invasive interventions: A phase 3b, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial. Lancet 2015, 385, 2077–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Levy, J.H.; Douketis, J.; Steiner, T.; Goldstein, J.N.; Milling, T.J. Prothrombin Complex Concentrates for Perioperative Vitamin K Antagonist and Non–vitamin K Anticoagulant Reversal. Anesthesiology 2018, 129, 1171–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Inaba, K.; Rizoli, S.; Veigas, P.V.; Callum, J.; Davenport, R.; Hess, J.; Maegele, M. 2014 Consensus conference on viscoelastic test–based transfusion guidelines for early trauma resuscitation. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015, 78, 1220–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Grottke, O.; Honickel, M.; Braunschweig, T.; Reichel, A.; Schöchl, H.; Rossaint, R. Prothrombin Complex Concentrate-induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Can Be Prevented by Coadministering Antithrombin in a Porcine Trauma Model. Anesthesiology 2019, 131, 543–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ponschab, M.; Voelckel, W.; Pavelka, M.; Schlimp, C.J.; Schöchl, H. Effect of coagulation factor concentrate administration on ROTEM® parameters in major trauma. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2015, 23, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Scharbert, G.; Thaler, U.; Weilnböck, C.; Wetzel, L.; Kozek-Langenecker, S. Heparin-induced effects of prothrombin complex concentrates in thromboelastometry. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2012, 124, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Grottke, O.; Rossaint, R.; Henskens, Y.; van Oerle, R.; ten Cate, H.; Spronk, H.M.H. Thrombin Generation Capacity of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in an In Vitro Dilutional Model. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Haas, T.; Fries, D.; Tanaka, K.A.; Asmis, L.; Curry, N.S.; Schöchl, H. Usefulness of standard plasma coagulation tests in the management of perioperative coagulopathic bleeding: Is there any evidence? Br. J. Anaesth. 2015, 114, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Mann, K.G. Thrombin Formation. Chest 2003, 124, 4S–10S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 09 03805 g001 550
Figure 1. Fibrinogen concentrations in a comparison between the four study groups and different dilution levels. Significant differences (p < 0.001) occurred at all dilution levels between the groups containing fibrinogen concentrate (FC, FC+PCC) and those that did not (PCC, Control). FC, fibrinogen concentrate group; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate group; FC+PCC, combined fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrate group; Control, control group.
Figure 1. Fibrinogen concentrations in a comparison between the four study groups and different dilution levels. Significant differences (p < 0.001) occurred at all dilution levels between the groups containing fibrinogen concentrate (FC, FC+PCC) and those that did not (PCC, Control). FC, fibrinogen concentrate group; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate group; FC+PCC, combined fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrate group; Control, control group.
Jcm 09 03805 g001
Jcm 09 03805 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Prothrombin time and (B) activated partial thromboplastin time in a comparison between the four study groups and different dilution levels. (A) Significant differences (p < 0.05) occurred at the 60% and 80% dilution levels between the groups containing PCC (PCC, FC+PCC) and those that did not (FC, Control), whereas, at the 95% and 99% dilution levels, only the FC+PCC group showed significantly different results in comparison to all other groups. (B) Significant intergroup differences (p < 0.05) occurred at the 80% dilution level only. PT, prothrombin time; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; FC, fibrinogen concentrate group; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate group; FC+PCC, combined fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrate group; Control, control group.
Figure 2. (A) Prothrombin time and (B) activated partial thromboplastin time in a comparison between the four study groups and different dilution levels. (A) Significant differences (p < 0.05) occurred at the 60% and 80% dilution levels between the groups containing PCC (PCC, FC+PCC) and those that did not (FC, Control), whereas, at the 95% and 99% dilution levels, only the FC+PCC group showed significantly different results in comparison to all other groups. (B) Significant intergroup differences (p < 0.05) occurred at the 80% dilution level only. PT, prothrombin time; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; FC, fibrinogen concentrate group; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate group; FC+PCC, combined fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrate group; Control, control group.
Jcm 09 03805 g002
Jcm 09 03805 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) EXTEM clotting time and (B) EXTEM maximum clot firmness in a comparison between the four study groups and different dilution levels. (A) Significant differences (p < 0.05) occurred at all dilution levels beyond 40%. Specifically, at the 60%, 80%, 90% and 95% dilution levels, the FC group showed significantly lower values (p < 0.05) in comparison with the FC+PCC group. (B) At any dilution level, groups containing fibrinogen concentrate (FC, FC+PCC) showed significantly higher (p < 0.001) values in comparison with those that did not (PCC, Control). The FC group showed significantly higher values (p < 0.05) in comparison with the FC+PCC group at the 60%, 80%, and 90% dilution levels. EXTEM CT, EXTEM clotting time; EXTEM MCF, EXTEM maximum clot firmness; FC, fibrinogen concentrate group; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate group; FC+PCC, combined fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrate group; Control, control group.
Figure 3. (A) EXTEM clotting time and (B) EXTEM maximum clot firmness in a comparison between the four study groups and different dilution levels. (A) Significant differences (p < 0.05) occurred at all dilution levels beyond 40%. Specifically, at the 60%, 80%, 90% and 95% dilution levels, the FC group showed significantly lower values (p < 0.05) in comparison with the FC+PCC group. (B) At any dilution level, groups containing fibrinogen concentrate (FC, FC+PCC) showed significantly higher (p < 0.001) values in comparison with those that did not (PCC, Control). The FC group showed significantly higher values (p < 0.05) in comparison with the FC+PCC group at the 60%, 80%, and 90% dilution levels. EXTEM CT, EXTEM clotting time; EXTEM MCF, EXTEM maximum clot firmness; FC, fibrinogen concentrate group; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate group; FC+PCC, combined fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrate group; Control, control group.
Jcm 09 03805 g003
Jcm 09 03805 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Lagtime, (B) peak height, and (C) endogenous thrombin potential in a comparison between the four study groups and different dilution levels. (A) Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the groups containing PCC (PCC, FC+PCC) and those that did not (FC, Control) occurred at the 80% dilution level. (B) Within the groups containing PCC, FC + PCC showed significantly higher values (p < 0.05 at the 80% dilution level. (C) Groups containing PCC (PCC, FC+PCC) showed significantly higher values (p < 0.001) at the 40%, 60%, and 80% dilution levels, whereas no significant differences occurred between the two groups containing PCC. ETP, endogenous thrombin potential; FC, fibrinogen concentrate group; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate group; FC+PCC, combined fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrate group; Control, control group.
Figure 4. (A) Lagtime, (B) peak height, and (C) endogenous thrombin potential in a comparison between the four study groups and different dilution levels. (A) Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the groups containing PCC (PCC, FC+PCC) and those that did not (FC, Control) occurred at the 80% dilution level. (B) Within the groups containing PCC, FC + PCC showed significantly higher values (p < 0.05 at the 80% dilution level. (C) Groups containing PCC (PCC, FC+PCC) showed significantly higher values (p < 0.001) at the 40%, 60%, and 80% dilution levels, whereas no significant differences occurred between the two groups containing PCC. ETP, endogenous thrombin potential; FC, fibrinogen concentrate group; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate group; FC+PCC, combined fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrate group; Control, control group.
Jcm 09 03805 g004
Jcm 09 03805 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Lagtime, (B) peak height, and (C) endogenous thrombin potential in a comparison between the four study groups and different dilution levels after correction of antithrombin activity to 100%. (A) The control group showed significantly shorter time values (p < 0.05) at the 90% and 95% dilution levels. (B) Within the groups containing PCC, FC+PCC showed significantly higher values (p < 0.05) at the 80% and 90% dilution levels. The groups without PCC (FC, Control) showed significantly lower values at all dilution levels, except for the 99% dilution level. (C) Groups containing PCC (PCC, FC+PCC) showed significantly higher values (p < 0.001) at the 40%, 60%, 80%, and 90% dilution levels, whereas no significant differences occurred between the two groups containing PCC. ETP, endogenous thrombin potential; FC, fibrinogen concentrate group; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate group; FC+PCC, combined fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrate group; Control, control group.
Figure 5. (A) Lagtime, (B) peak height, and (C) endogenous thrombin potential in a comparison between the four study groups and different dilution levels after correction of antithrombin activity to 100%. (A) The control group showed significantly shorter time values (p < 0.05) at the 90% and 95% dilution levels. (B) Within the groups containing PCC, FC+PCC showed significantly higher values (p < 0.05) at the 80% and 90% dilution levels. The groups without PCC (FC, Control) showed significantly lower values at all dilution levels, except for the 99% dilution level. (C) Groups containing PCC (PCC, FC+PCC) showed significantly higher values (p < 0.001) at the 40%, 60%, 80%, and 90% dilution levels, whereas no significant differences occurred between the two groups containing PCC. ETP, endogenous thrombin potential; FC, fibrinogen concentrate group; PCC, prothrombin complex concentrate group; FC+PCC, combined fibrinogen and prothrombin complex concentrate group; Control, control group.
Jcm 09 03805 g005
Table
Table 1. Baseline values of plasma coagulation tests, thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters, and thrombin generation measurements obtained from platelet-free plasma. Values are mean (SD).
Table 1. Baseline values of plasma coagulation tests, thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters, and thrombin generation measurements obtained from platelet-free plasma. Values are mean (SD).
Plasma coagulation testsFibrinogen; g/L2.9 (0.4)
Prothrombin time; seconds11.9 (2.1)
Activated partial thromboplastin time; seconds34.9 (3.5)
Factor II activity; %106 (4)
Antithrombin activity; %107 (5)
ROTEM parametersEXTEM CT; seconds55 (4)
EXTEM MCF; mm21 (3)
Thrombin generationLag time; min3.3 (1.0)
Peak height; nM·L−1 148 (75)
Endogenous thrombin potential; nM·L−1⋅min−1993 (210)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gratz, J.; Schlimp, C.J.; Honickel, M.; Hochhausen, N.; Schöchl, H.; Grottke, O. Sufficient Thrombin Generation Despite 95% Hemodilution: An In Vitro Experimental Study. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3805. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123805

AMA Style

Gratz J, Schlimp CJ, Honickel M, Hochhausen N, Schöchl H, Grottke O. Sufficient Thrombin Generation Despite 95% Hemodilution: An In Vitro Experimental Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(12):3805. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123805

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gratz, Johannes, Christoph J. Schlimp, Markus Honickel, Nadine Hochhausen, Herbert Schöchl, and Oliver Grottke. 2020. "Sufficient Thrombin Generation Despite 95% Hemodilution: An In Vitro Experimental Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 12: 3805. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123805

APA Style

Gratz, J., Schlimp, C. J., Honickel, M., Hochhausen, N., Schöchl, H., & Grottke, O. (2020). Sufficient Thrombin Generation Despite 95% Hemodilution: An In Vitro Experimental Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(12), 3805. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123805

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop