Next Article in Journal
Agricultural Landscapes as a Basis for Promoting Agritourism in Cross-Border Iberian Regions
Next Article in Special Issue
Potential of Nonthermal Atmospheric-Pressure Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma for Inhibition of Athelia rolfsii Causing Southern Blight Disease in Lettuce
Previous Article in Journal
Indirect Somatic Embryogenesis: An Efficient and Genetically Reliable Clonal Propagation System for Ananas comosus L. Merr. Hybrid “MD2”
Previous Article in Special Issue
Survey of Oomycetes Associated with Root and Crown Rot of Almond in Spain and Pathogenicity of Phytophthora niederhauserii and Phytopythium vexans to ‘Garnem’ Rootstock
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seed Coating with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 of Italian Durum Wheat Increases Protection against Fusarium culmorum-Induced Crown Rot

1
School of Agricultural, Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Basilicata, Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
2
Pharmacy Department, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II n.132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2022, 12(5), 714; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050714
Submission received: 19 April 2022 / Revised: 14 May 2022 / Accepted: 16 May 2022 / Published: 18 May 2022

Abstract

:
Changes in root organization and colonization could be relevant for wheat’s (Triticum durum Desf.) response to F. culmorum-induced crown rot disease (FCR). We investigated the biocontrol and biostimulant efficiency of seeds coated with T. harzianum T-22 (T-22) of four tetraploid wheat seedlings (ancient Saragolle Lucana and modern Creso, Simeto, and Ciclope). In an in vitro experiment, T-22 repressed F. culmorum mycelium growth by over 50% due to the probable combination of competition for nutrients, mycoparasitism, and antibiosis. The seed germination rate was not significantly affected by T-22 while the F. culmorum-induced decrease in emergence was attenuated in the presence of T-22. Ultimately, an improvement in growth was observed by comparing treated and control seedlings at 21 days after sowing. Inoculation with T-22 resulted in Saragolle Lucana seedlings being 4.69 cm higher while Ciclope and Simeto had main roots that were 9.96 and 8.13 cm longer than the control, respectively. Treated and infected Simeto seedlings were 3.75 cm higher and had roots that were 14.45 cm longer than the control, with little contemporary dense coiling colonization by T-22, like Saragolle Lucana. Seed coating induced the best performance regarding seedling growth and the ability to control the pathogen in Simeto (disease severity reduction rate (DDR) of 20%). The pathogenicity of F. culmorum was reduced in all four durum wheats, although it was highly susceptible to FCR. Ciclope, studied for the first time, showed a decrease in disease incidence from 100 ± 0.00% to 56.67 ± 9.13% and a 30% DDR. The seed coating influenced the seedlings’ response to FCR due to T-22’s different colonization actions. This study provides new explanations for the diverse responses of ancient and modern tetraploid wheat to F. culmorum mediated by T-22 inoculation via seed coating.

1. Introduction

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and, for a Mediterranean diet, durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) are food crops that provide daily nourishment for a large part of the global population [1]. Climatic change is resulting in a reduction in cultivable land due to the scarcity of water resources and regular invasion of fungal pathogens, with a significant reduction in wheat yield and the quality of seed production [2].
Among the major fungal pathogens that affect wheat, Fusarium culmorum (Wm.G.Sm.) Sacc. is one of the most pathogenic. It is the etiological agent of fusariosis of wheat seedlings (Fusarium crown rot, FCR) and ears (Fusarium head blight, FHB). It is a hemibiotrophic pathogen that is able to suppress the plant’s defense system during infection until the death of seedlings occurs [3]. During the early stage of the disease, F. culmorum causes lesions and browning of the coleoptile and seedling desiccation. When the infection of wheat plants occurs during later growing stages, brown spots on the basal internodes can be observed [4].
Water uptake and transport, soil mineral absorption, and the distribution of assimilates are essential physiological processes that are negatively affected during root infection of F. culmorum, with resulting effects on seedling growth and development, and grain quality and yield [5].
Efforts are currently focused on gene discovery and the development of new cultivars with improved resistance to FCR in wheat, but no wheat varieties are fully resistant [6,7]. Therefore, different defense and/or control strategies for this disease, involving the use of both agrochemicals and biocontrol microorganisms (biostimulants), have been assessed in durum wheat [8,9]. The use of synthetic pesticides leads to their accumulation in the environment and the presence of residues in food [10]. To overcome the issues concerning human health and environmental protection that are caused by the use of fungicides, biocontrol agents represent a pivotal tool for consideration in sustainable disease management.
Fungi of the genus Trichoderma spp. are able to induce plant defense responses against several pathogens, including soil- and seed-borne pathogens, such as Fusarium spp., through the colonization of plant roots while also promoting plant growth and development [11]. Their mechanisms of action include competition for nutrients, mycoparasitism, production of inhibitory volatiles and non-volatile compounds and hydrolytic enzymes and siderophores, and induction of defense mechanisms in plants [10,12]. In fact, Trichoderma-based products currently represent the main source of registered biofungicides for use in sustainable crop management to control plant diseases and to induce biostimulant effects [10,13,14,15].
In particular, seed coating with Trichoderma spp. has been considered a cost-effective, fast, efficient, and sustainable method that leads to several agronomic advantages against biotic and abiotic stresses. When applied to seeds, the spores of Trichoderma can germinate rapidly, and within few days, hyphae and branching filaments grow from the seed onto the emerging radicle [11]. Seed coating with a commercial product based on T. harzianum T-22 has been shown to enhance protection against F. culmorum, reducing the FCR disease incidence and improving seedling vigor in the susceptible durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cv. Karim [16]. More recently, the same authors demonstrated that seed coating with T. harzianum (KU710282) is effective in counteracting the deleterious effects of F. culmorum in the same variety of durum wheat by reducing the FHB severity by over 30% [9].
Some Mediterranean cultivars of durum wheat, such as Simeto and Creso, which were released after the Green Revolution, are valued for their specific traits, including yield potential, grain quality, and drought and heat tolerance; however, they are susceptible to Fusarium spp. [17,18]. Among the ancient tetraploid wheats, Saragolle Lucana was the first Italian landrace enrolled in the Italian Wheat Landrace Conservation Registry in 2014 (https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/gu/2014/01/28/22/sg/pdf, accessed date 1 March 2022).
In a previous study, we reported the different effects of seed coating with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 on the seedlings of four tetraploid durum wheats (Saragolle Lucana and the modern varieties Creso, Simeto, and Ciclope) in terms of the root morphology, root/shoot relations, and the amount of rhizosheath formation [19]. Apart from potential effects on the rhizosheath, the possible biocontrol efficiency in durum wheat infected with F. culmorum represents a prominent issue to be considered. Therefore, we explored the effect of seed coating with T. harzianum T-22 (T-22) on the growth parameters and F. culmorum disease incidence and severity in the same four Italian durum wheat landrace/varieties under controlled conditions. We hypothesized that changes in the root organization and colonization could be relevant for the wheat response and tested this hypothesis by using a combination of seed coatings with T-22 and substrate inoculation with F. culmorum in all four wheats.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Inoculum Preparation

Fusarium culmorum mycelium (kindly provided by Prof. Antonio Ippolito, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy), after 7 days of culture on PDA substrate, was kept for 2 weeks at 25 °C in the dark. A 5 mm mycelium was placed in 150 mL of LB broth. The suspension was stirred for 14 days at 120 rpm at 25 °C. After 2 weeks, the content of the suspension was filtered to separate the mycelium and macroconidia and stored at 4 °C. The number of macroconidia mL−1 was evaluated using a hemacytometer under an optical microscope. The conidial suspension was adjusted by dilution to a concentration of 1×105 conidia mL−1 for the experiment.

2.2. Trichoderma Strain

The commercial formulation TRIANUM-P (Koppert, Berkel en Rodenrijs, The Netherlands), containing the strain Trichoderma harzianum Rifai KRL-AG2 (T-22), was used. This commercial formulation was controlled and characterized before starting the trials. Serial dilutions of the TRIANUM-P powder in sterile water were carried out, and aliquots of each obtained suspension were distributed on solid substrate (PDA agar) and incubated at 25 °C for 7–14 days. The isolation and characterization of the mycelium and conidia showed the presence of only T-22 under optical microscope observation. A T-22 liquid culture was produced by scraping the spores from the solid culture in the sterile distilled water and transferring them to a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 mL of PDB medium. The liquid culture was then incubated on a rotary shaker at 110 rpm and 25 °C. After 7–14 days, the conidial suspension was filtered, and the concentration was adjusted to 1 × 106 conidia mL−1 for use in the experiment.

2.3. In vitro Antagonistic Activity of T. harzianum T-22 against F. culmorum

The in vitro antagonist activity against F. culmorum was evaluated using the dual culture technique with the methods of the radial growth of colonies, according to the three guidelines x, y, and z [20] and the hyphal interactions between colonies [21]. Briefly, 5 mm diameter 1-week-old mycelial discs of T-22 and F. culmorum were placed on the opposite sides of a Petri dish containing PDA at an equal distance. The experiment was conducted with 3 repetitions for each antagonist and for the control, represented by only T-22 or F. culmorum plates. After incubation at 25 °C for 7–14 days in the dark, the mycelial growth was measured at 2, 7, and 14 days to determine the inhibition (I) percentage as follows:
I% = [(RM − rm)/RM] × 100
where rm is the radius of the colonies in the direction of the antagonist and RM is the average of the three rays of the colony in the other directions.
In addition, the hyphal interactions between colonies were evaluated at 7 and 14 days under an optical microscope. Specifically, according to [21], the antagonistic ability of T. harzianum T-22 was determined using a rating scale for the 3 main types of reactions (A, B, C) and 4 subtypes (CA1, CB1, CA2, CB2). Type A and B represented ‘deadlock’ (mutual inhibition, with no ability shown by both fungi to overgrow on the other) at a mycelial contact point (A), or at a distance (B); type C, ‘replacement’, represented overgrowth without an initial deadlock. The intermediate subtypes scored included CA1 (partial) or CA2 (complete), replacement after an initial deadlock with a mycelial contact; and CB1 (partial) or CB2 (complete), replacement after an initial deadlock at a distance.

2.4. Plant Experiment

2.4.1. Plant Material

Italian tetraploid wheats (Triticum durum Desf.), specifically, three modern durum wheat varieties released in different years (Ciclope, Creso, and Simeto) and an ancient wheat landrace (Saragolle Lucana), were used [19], as summarized in Table 1. They are characterized by a sensitivity to Fusarium spp. disease, being highly susceptible to moderately susceptible for Simeto, Creso, and Saragolle lucana [18,22,23], respectively. No information on the susceptibility of Ciclope was available. All four tetraploid wheats are referred to as varieties in the text and the abbreviations reported in Table 1 are adopted.

2.4.2. T. harzianum T-22 Seed Coating Treatment and F. culmorum Inoculation

After surface sterilization with 0.6% Na-hypochlorite solution for 2 min and then with 70% ethanol for 2 min, seeds were rinsed 3 times with sterile dH2O.
A mixture of a T. harzianum T-22 suspension at a concentration of 1 × 106 spores mL−1, or water as a control, was used to coat seeds in 4 μL seed−1 Tween-20, and a homogeneous distribution was obtained by continuous rotation until complete adhesion and absorption, according to [19]. The presence of T-22 as the only microorganism on the coated seed of each variety was verified by fungus re-isolation on PDA medium. The isolation and characterization of the mycelium and conidia showed the presence of only T-22 under optical microscope observation.
Artificial inoculation of the sterilized substrate (70% universal soil and 30% sandy soil) was carried out by pouring an aqueous homogenate (0.6 mL plant−1) of a F. culmorum 7-day-old colony grown on a PDA medium in 90 mm diameter Petri dishes (150 mL of dH2O for each dish) on the sowing line.
Immediately after, 20 seeds for each variety, either coated with T-22 untreated, were sown in aluminum trays (210 × 280 × 60 mm, L × W × D) filled with soil that was either inoculated with F. culmorum or untreated. Five replicates for each experiment were considered.
Throughout the experiment, plants were kept in a growth chamber with a 16/8 h photoperiod, light/dark (average T of 22 °C; average relative humidity of 45%), and tap watered until the field water capacity was reached every 3 days. Seedlings were monitored for 21 days and the presence of T-22 on the wheat root was verified at the end of the survey under an optical microscope.

2.4.3. Effect of T. harzianum T-22 Seed Coating Treatment on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth

Seed germination was evaluated by counting the number of germinated seeds for each tray at 4, 8, and 12 days after sowing. On the last day, the seed vigor index (VI), which is the speed of emergence, was calculated according to [24] by applying the following formula:
VI = G1/N1 + …. Gn/Nn
where G is the number of germinated seeds on the day of the counting and N is the number of days (until 12 in our case).
At the end of the experiment (21 days post-sowing), the seedling height, from the ground level to the uppermost internode and to the tip of the last fully expanded leaf, was measured.
After, seedlings were carefully removed from the pots, the soil was gently pushed from the bottom, and the main root length was recorded.
At the same time, colonization by T. harzianum T-22 of the seedling root cortex was monitored under an optical microscope and verified by fungus re-isolation on PDA medium.

2.4.4. Effect of T. harzianum T-22 Seed Coating Treatment on F. culmorum Disease Control

Typical fusariosis symptoms of browning were monitored on each seedling 21 days after sowing. The disease incidence (DI%) was then obtained by dividing the number of infected seedlings by the total number of seedlings and then multiplying it by 100.
On the basis of a 5-level scale, according to [25] (0, healthy plant; 1, necrotic area lower than 25%; 2, necrotic area of 26–50%; 3, necrotic area between 51% and 75%; 4, necrotic area greater than 75%; 5, dead seedling), the disease severity index (DSI) was extended by the McKinney Index [26] calculation:
DSI% = [∑ (c × f)/N × V] × 100
where c indicates the class of the disease, f is the frequency, N is the number of examined seedlings, and V is the value of the most severe disease class.
For the calculation of the disease reduction rate (DRR%), the following formula was used:
DRR% = [(DS in control infected seedlings − DS in treated infected seedlings)/DS in control infected seedlings] × 100

2.5. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analysis was performed using SAS Studio (OnDemand for Academics, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA—https://www.sas.com/it_it/software/on-demand-for-academics.html) (accessed on 2 August 2021). For all the traits considered, the means and standard deviations for each genotype were computed.
One-way ANOVA was performed to test the significance of the in vitro antagonistic activity of Trichoderma harzianum T-22 against Fusarium culmorum, and the significance of differences between T-22 coating, F. culmorum inoculation, their combination, and a non-coated and non-inoculated control within the considered varieties in the tray trials. Mean discrimination was performed by applying Tukey’s post-hoc test (seed germination, vigor index, height, main root length, disease incidence, and disease severity index).

3. Results

3.1. Antagonistic Activity of Trichoderma harzianum T-22 in Fusarium culmorum Mycelium

The results regarding the in vitro antagonistic activity (Table 2 and Figure 1) showed that T. harzianum T-22 was increasingly effective in inhibiting the mycelial growth of F. culmorum from 2 to 14 days after incubation, with a value of 51.13% ± 1.38 (Table 2). Hyphal interactions of the CA2 subtype (Figure 1), according to Badalyan’s scale, were observed.
As shown in Figure 2, the presence of active hyperparasitism by T-22 on F. culmorum hyphae was observed at the fungal mycelia contact point. In particular, the formation of penetration structures, appressoria, lysis of the pathogen hyphae, sporulation, intracellular growth, and the presence of typical coiling were observed.

3.2. Effect of Seed Coating Treatment on Germination and Seedling Growth

As reported in Table 3, seed coating with T. harzianum T-22 did not affect seed germination during the early stage (4, 8, and 12 days after sowing and substrate inoculation with the pathogen) with respect to the control (T-22 vs. control) and the negative F. culmorum effect (T-22/F. culmorum vs. F. culmorum). Inoculation with F. culmorum significantly reduced the number of germinated seeds at 8 and 12 days in Ciclope and Creso, and the values of the T-22 treatment were significantly higher than those of infected seeds (T-22/F. culmorum) for Ciclope and Creso at day 8 and for all modern varieties at day 12.
The speed of emergence (vigor index, Table 3) was affected by T-22 and F. culmorum in a different manner depending on the variety. In general, F. culmorum infection significantly affected all varieties, with slower germination observed. This effect was attenuated in the presence of T. harzianum T-22 (T-22/F. culmorum vs. F. culmorum), in particular for SaL, the value (4.70 ± 0.26) of which was significantly higher than the control (3.58 ± 0.29) and seeds treated with only T-22 (3.98 ± 0.37). Finally, treatment with T-22 resulted in a significant increase in the germination speed with respect to the control in Creso.
In Table 4, the seedling height and the length of the main root are reported. The presence of F. culmorum in the growth substrate resulted in lower seedling height values and lower main root elongation than in the non-infected seedlings, as expected.
Seed coating with T-22 had a significant and positive effect on both the seedling height and main root length in all cases and in infected seedlings. The increase in the shoot height was 4.69, 4.34, 3.09, and 2.37 in SaL, Sim, Cic, and Cre (T-22 vs. control), respectively. Noteworthy, T-22-treated and -infected seedlings reached a height that was not significantly different (Cic, Cre, and SaL) or 3.75 cm higher (Sim) than the control. Furthermore, the main root length obtained from the T-22-treated seeds was significantly higher than the control, even in the case of infected seedlings. In particular, Ciclope and Simeto showed an increase of 9.96 and 8.13 cm (T-22 vs. control), respectively; and Sim, SaL, and Cic showed increases of 14.45, 12.89, and 11.86 cm (T-22/F. culmorum vs. F. culmorum), respectively.

3.3. Root Colonization by T. harzianum T-22

Figure 3 shows the colonization of T. harzianum T-22 on wheat roots 21 days after sowing. The T-22 hyphae clearly developed externally to the root and, precisely, on the root cortex in all varieties. This finding was also confirmed by re-isolation of T-22 from this tissue and the mycelial growth on the PDA substrate. It was observed that the arbuscular formations of T-22 were different and coiled differently around the wheat roots depending on the variety. In particular, they formed a denser coiling in Ciclope (Figure 3a) and Creso (Figure 3b) than Saragolle Lucana (Figure 3c) and Simeto (Figure 3d).

3.4. Effect of Seed Coating with T. harzianum T-22 on Disease Control

As shown in Table 5, a significant effect of the treatment on the FCR disease incidence (DI) and severity (DSI) at 21 days after sowing was recorded. In all varieties, DI and DSI were significatively reduced through the action of seed coating with T-22. In fact, the treatment induced a significant decrease in the DI values of 43, 42, 31, and 18% in Cic, Cre, SaL, and Sim, respectively. Meanwhile, the DSI values were significantly reduced to 54.17 ± 9.20, 34.43 ± 4.39, 34.43 ± 4.39, and 35.96 ± 2.99 in Cic, Cre, Sim, and SaL, respectively.
The efficacy of the DSI reduction rate (DRR) and symptoms (Figure 4), accordingly, was about 30, 24, 22, and 20% in Cic, Cre, Sim, and SaL, respectively.

4. Discussion

Trichoderma spp. are part of a non-pathogenic genus of fungi that provide protection in many crops against fungal diseases caused by Fusarium spp. [27]. The dual culture experiment indicated that T. harzianum T-22 was able to repress the mycelium growth of F. culmorum (Table 2) by over 50%, confirming the results obtained in another study [16]. The antagonistic activity of T-22 seemed to be linked contemporarily to competition for nutrients, mycoparasitism (Figure 2a,c), and antibiosis. The latter may have been mediated by the production of bioactive secondary metabolites that are able to trigger changes in the physiology of F. culmorum [28]. Because of this, T-22 may have acted as a weapon against this pathogen, as previously shown for Trichoderma asperellum against Fusarium graminearum [29]. The production of volatile organic compounds, known to play a major role in inhibiting the growth of F. culmorum by Trichoderma atroviride [30], could also have occurred.
It was demonstrated that Trichoderma spp. produce metabolites in the rhizosphere, belonging to an auxin and/or auxin-like compound, that are able to actively influence the growth of plants [31]. At the same time, Trichoderma spp. are able to affect seed germination and seedling development in some cereals through the production of phenolic compounds [32,33].
In our study, despite the general increasing trend shown by the seed germination rate, it was not significantly affected by the application of T. harzianum T-22 on seeds, as shown in Table 3. These results can be explained by the ability of T. harzianum T-22 to survive and develop in the rhizosphere but not on the surface of the seed [34].
On the contrary, we observed a reduced effect of F. culmorum on the seed germination speed (vigor index in Table 3) in all four durum wheat genotypes. This finding may depend on the low presence of hormones, especially gibberellins (GAs), which are known to play an important role in the Fusarium spp.–maize interaction [35]. The vigor index was always higher in the presence of T-22, thus attenuating the effect induced by F. culmorum on the seed germination speed (T-22/F. culmorum vs. F. culmorum in Table 3). This is because T. harzianum spp. produce indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and auxin-related substances [36], therefore ‘screening’, to some extent, the ‘missing’ hormonal effect of GAs induced by F. culmorum. The production of growth-stimulating hormones and secondary metabolites, and the modifications of the root architecture induced by T-22 through seed coating are also suggested by our results of the evident effects on the shoot height and main root length in all the varieties (Table 4). In particular, the effect on the shoot height in Saragolle Lucana and the main root length in Ciclope and Simeto confirmed the recent assessment reported by [19]. It was demonstrated that T. harzianum spp. synthesize plant hormones, which are responsible for improving root growth, such as the above-mentioned auxin; a secondary metabolite, named harzianolide, that is able to influence the early stages of seedling growth by enhancing the root length and root tips, and hence regulating the general root development; and the harzianolide-derived secondary metabolite harzianic acid, which regulates plant growth due to its Fe(III) chelating activity [37,38].
On this basis, our previous results regarding seedling growth, with the best performance shown by Simeto, suggest that this variety can modify its root architecture by increasing the amount of rhizosheath more than other varieties when T-22 is provided as a seed coating [19]. Hence, this specific T. harzianum T-22 inoculation method resulted in root colonization that was characterized by a less dense coiling (see Figure 3) and by the possible production of root exudates and/or specific secondary metabolites that are able to alleviate the oxidative stress induced by F. culmorum [28] and affect T-22–Simeto–pathogen interaction. Therefore, the final result was an improvement in the seedling growth, and the contemporary effect was the control of F. culmorum-induced disease (a DDR reduction of 20%).
Seed coating with T-22 reduced the pathogenicity of F. culmorum in all four considered durum wheats. Considering that the control seedlings in Ciclope had a DI and DSI of 100 and 75%, respectively (Table 5 and Figure 4), a strong reduction in both DI and DSI was obtained due to the T-22 treatment. In fact, the disease reduction rate in this variety was equal to 30%. On the other hand, the susceptibility identified in the current study was 45% in Creso and Saragolle Lucana, and 43% in Simeto, indicating that all studied varieties are highly susceptible during the early seedling phenological stage. Our results are in accordance with other studies on Fusarium spp., in which Simeto, Creso, and Saragolla were considered [18,22,23]. Noteworthy, these are the first available data on the sensitivity to F. culmorum-induced crown rot disease in Ciclope.
Altogether, the results of the current study suggest that seed coating by Trichoderma harzianum T-22 influenced the variable but always positive response of seedlings to F. culmorum-induced FCR in all considered varieties. We suggest that this depended, to some extent, on the ability of T-22 to colonize roots in a different manner and with a denser or less dense coiling, likely as a result of the selective response to the different exudates and biomolecules produced following the specific interaction between T-22 and the different genotypes. Recent studies have indicated that, in the presence of fusariosis, tomato plants release compounds, secreted at the root level, such as peroxidases and oxylipins, which act as chemical signals to attract and stimulate the beneficial fungus Trichoderma harzianum [39]. The authors concluded that T. harzianum colonizes the roots as a response to biotic stress induced by Fusarium spp. depending on the composition of the root exudates and that the germination of spores of both Trichoderma and Fusarium responds differently to compounds released by the roots of stressed plants. This is because the root exudates contain chemical compounds with low (i.e., phenols, small polysaccharides, amino acids, organic acids) and high (i.e., large carbohydrates, fatty acids, flavonoids, enzymes, tannins, steroids, terpenoids, alkaloids) molecular weights, which act as chemo-attractants of soil microbes during the interaction between plants and pathogenic and beneficial fungi [39]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the wheat root surface is capable of being colonized by beneficial microorganisms, including Trichoderma spp., and the amount of root exudates produced during plant–microorganism interaction is determined by the root architecture system and rhizodeposition [40].
It has been assumed that the domestication and subsequent crop selection of wild wheats, landraces, and modern cultivars led to different patterns of microbial colonization and interactions between the roots and rhizosphere [41]. In particular, landraces seem to be associated with a larger microbial diversity, which is probably the result of their increased genetic heterogeneity, and, as a consequence, their microbiome is characterized by certain microorganism families that are not found in modern varieties [40]. On the other hand, the ability to stimulate the rhizosheath and, therefore, to produce specific root exudates by Creso and Ciclope seedlings obtained from seeds treated with T-22 was associated to a greater increase in the rhizosheath/root mass ratio compared to a less evident increase in this ratio in Saragolle Lucana and Simeto [19].
In conclusion, we might speculate that lower colonization by T-22 results in the roots releasing less exudates that are rich in chemo-attractant biomolecules for the fungus. A reduced rhizosheath may result in a higher susceptibility to F. culmorum, as observed in Ciclope.
Further research will be needed to test this hypothesis and evaluate the composition of exudates in the rhizosphere/rhizosheath to better explain the different responses of ancient and modern wheat varieties to F. culmorum mediated by T. harzianum T-22-inoculated seed coating and, possibly, to improve them.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.N., A.V. and G.L.; methodology, V.B., A.V. and M.N.; formal analysis, M.N., G.L., A.V. and V.B.; investigation, V.B. and M.N.; resources, G.L., M.A. and M.N.; writing—original draft preparation, A.V., V.B. and M.N.; writing—review and editing, A.V., V.B., M.N., G.L., M.A. and R.B.; supervision, M.N.; project administration, M.A.; funding acquisition, M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partly funded by the following projects: open access publication was funded by the project “Gestione colturale sostenibile per la standardizzazione delle tecniche di produzione dei cereali lucani—LUCAN CEREALS PSR Basilicata 2014-2020. Misura 16.1 grant number CUP B44G18000020002; the work was funded by the project “Ottimizzazione degli input per la sostenibilità della cerealicoltura lucana-CERESO” PSR Basilicata 2014-2020-Misura 16 “Cooperazione”- Sottomisura 16.2 grant number CUP B41F19000030002.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the technician Michele Palumbo for his important help during the activities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Royo, C.; Soriano, J.M.; Alvaro, F. Wheat: A Crop in the Bottom of the Mediterranean Diet Pyramid. In Mediterranean Identities—Environment, Society, Culture; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Kashyap, P.L.; Kumar, S.; Aggarwal, S.K.; Kaul, N.; Jasrotia, P.; Gupta, A.; Singh, G.P. Resistance inducers and their role in reinforcing wheat defense system against fungal pathogens. J. Cereal Res. 2021, 13, 229–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Petti, C.; Reiber, K.; Ali, S.S.; Berney, M.; Doohan, F.M. Auxin as a player in the biocontrol of Fusarium head blight disease of barley and its potential as a disease control agent. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Mohapatra, S.; Mittra, B. Alleviation of Fusarium oxysporum induced oxisative stress in wheat by Trichoderma viridae. Arch. Phytopathol. Pflanzenschult 2017, 50, 84–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pastuszak, J.; Szczerba, A.; Dziurka, M.; Hornyák, M.; Kopeć, P.; Szklarczyk, M.; Płażek, A. Physiological and Biochemical Response to Fusarium culmorum Infection in Three Durum Wheat Genotypes at Seedling and Full Anthesis Stage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jin, J.; Duan, S.; Qi, Y.; Yan, S.; Li, W.; Li, B.; Xie, C.; Zhen, W.; Ma, J. Identification of a novel genomic region associated with resistance to Fusarium crown rot in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 2063–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bouanaka, H.; Bellil, I.; Khelifi, D. Multiple methods for varietal resistance assessment of durum wheat cultivars against Fusarium culmorum the causal agent of Fusarium head blight and crown in Algeria. Physiol. Mol. Plant. Pathol. 2021, 115, 101683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tini, F.; Beccari, G.; Onofri, A.; Ciavatta, E.; Gardiner, D.M.; Covarelli, L. Fungicides may have differential efficacies towards the main causal agents of Fusarium head blight of wheat. Pest Manag. Sci. 2020, 76, 3738–3748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kthiri, Z.; Jabeur, M.B.; Harbaoui, K.; Karmous, C.; Chamekh, Z.; Chairi, F.; Serret, M.D.; Araus, J.L.; Hamada, W. Comparative Performances of Beneficial Microorganisms on the Induction of Durum Wheat Tolerance to Fusarium Head Blight. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Modrzewska, M.; Bryła, M.; Kanabus, J.; Pierzgalski, A. Trichoderma as a biostimulator and biocontrol agent against Fusarium in the production of cereal crops: Opportunities and possibilities. Plant Pathol. 2022, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Harman, G.; Khadka, R.; Doni, F.; Uphoff, N. Benefits to plant health and productivity from enhancing plant microbial symbionts. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 610065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Harman, G.E.; Howell, C.R.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma species—opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Woo, S.; Ruocco, M.; Vinale, F.; Nigro, M.; Marra, R.; Lombardi, N.; Pascale, A.; Lanzuise, S.; Manganiello, G.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma-based products and their widespread use in agriculture. Open Mycol. J. 2014, 8, 71–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Vitti, A.; Sofo, A.; Scopa, A.; Nuzzaci, M. Sustainable agricultural practices in disease defence of traditional crops in Southern Italy: The case study of tomato cherry protected by Trichoderma harzianum T-22 Against Cucumber Mosaic Virus (CMV). In The Sustainability of Agro-Food and Natural Resource Systems in the Mediterranean Basin; Vastola, A., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 133–143. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sarrocco, S.; Vannacci, G. Preharvest application of beneficial fungi as a strategy to prevent postharvest mycotoxin contamination: A review. Crop. Prot. 2018, 110, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kthiri, Z.; Jabeur, M.B.; Machraoui, M.; Gargouri, S.; Hiba, K.; Hamada, W. Coating seeds with Trichoderma strains promotes plant growth and enhance the systemic resistance against Fusarium crown rot in durum wheat. Egypt J. Biol. Pest Control 2020, 30, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xynias, I.N.; Mylonas, I.; Korpetis, E.G.; Ninou, E.; Tsaballa, A.; Avdikos, I.D.; Mavromatis, A.G. Durum Wheat Breeding in the Mediterranean Region: Current Status and Future Prospects. Agronomy 2020, 10, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bentivenga, G.; Spina, A.; Ammar, K.; Allegra, M.; Cacciola, S.O. Screening of Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. durum (Desf.) Husn.) Italian Cultivars for Susceptibility to Fusarium Head Blight Incited by Fusarium graminearum. Plants 2021, 10, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bochicchio, R.; Labella, R.; Vitti, A.; Nuzzaci, M.; Logozzo, G.; Amato, M. Root Morphology, Allometric Relations and Rhizosheath of Ancient and Modern Tetraploid Wheats (Triticum durum Desf.) in Response to Inoculation with Trichoderma harzianum T-22. Plants 2022, 11, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Anselmi, N.; Nicolotti, G.; Sanguinetti, G. Antagonismo in vitro di Trichoderma spp. contro Basidiomycetes agenti di marciumi radicali di piante forestali. Monti e Boschi 1992, 2, 57–59. [Google Scholar]
  21. Badalyan, S.M.; Innocenti, G.; Garibyan, N.G. Antagonistic Activity of Xylotrophic Mushrooms against Pathogenic Fungi of Cereals in Dual Culture. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 2002, 41, 220–225. [Google Scholar]
  22. Orzali, L.; Forni, C.; Riccioni, L. Effect of chitosan seed treatment as elicitor of resistance to Fusarium graminearum in wheat. Seed Sci. Technol. 2014, 42, 132–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arici, S.E. Screening of wheat varieties for their susceptibility against Fusarium crown rot. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2012, 10, 404–408. [Google Scholar]
  24. Maguire, J.D. Speed of germination-Aid in selection and evaluation for seedling emergence and vigor. Crop. Sci. 1962, 2, 176–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Köycü, N.D. Effect on Fusarium culmorum of fungicides used in Wheat seed. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Engineering and Life Science, Kastamonu, Turkey, 26–29 April 2018; Kastamonu University: Kastamonu, Turkey, 2019; pp. 593–601. [Google Scholar]
  26. McKinney, H.H. Infuence of soil temperature and moisture on infection of wheat seedlings by Helminthosporium sativum. J. Agric. Res. 1923, 26, 195–217. [Google Scholar]
  27. Redda, E.T.; Ma, J.; Mei, J.; Li, M.; Wu, B.; Jiang, X. Antagonistic potential of different isolates of Trichoderma against Fusarium oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani and Botrytis cinereal. Eur. J. Exp. Biol. 2018, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mironenka, J.; Różalska, S.; Soboń, A.; Bernat, P. Trichoderma harzianum metabolites disturb Fusarium culmorum metabolism: Metabolomic and proteomic studies. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 249, 126770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Y.; Sun, R.; Yu, J.; Saravanakumar, K.; Chen, J. Antagonistic and biocontrol potential of Trichoderma asperellum zjsx5003 against the maize stalk rot pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Indian J. Microbiol. 2016, 56, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Stoppacher, N.; Kluger, B.; Zeilinger, S.; Krska, R.; Schuhmacher, R. Identification and profiling of volatile metabolites of the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma atroviride by HS-SPME-GC-MS. J. Microbiol. Methods 2010, 81, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vinale, F.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Ghisalberti, E.L.; Marra, R.; Barbetti, M.J.; Li, H.; Woo, S.L.; Lorito, M. A novel role for Trichoderma secondary metabolites in the interactions with plants. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2008, 72, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zheng, Z.; Shetty, K. Enhancement of pea (Pisum sativum) seedling vigour and associated phenolic content by extractsof apple pomace fermented with Trichoderma spp. Process. Biochem. 2000, 36, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Celar, F.; Valič, N. Effects of Trichoderma spp. and Gliocladium roseum culture filtrates on seed germination of vegetables and maize. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2005, 112, 343–350. [Google Scholar]
  34. Harman, G.E. Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 90–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Vrabka, J.; Niehaus, E.-M.; Münsterkötter, M.; Proctor, R.H.; Brown, D.W.; Novák, O.; Pěnčik, A.; Tarkowská, D.; Hromadová, K.; Hradilová, M. Production and role of hormones during interaction of Fusarium species with maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Contreras-Cornejo, H.; Macías-Rodríguez, L.I.; Alfaro, C.R.; López-Bucio, J. Trichoderma spp. Improve growth of Arabidopsis seedlings under salt stress through enhanced root development, osmolite production, and Na⁺ elimination through root exudates. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Cai, F.; Yu, G.; Wang, P.; Wei, Z.; Fu, L.; Shen, Q.; Chen, W. Harzianolide, a novel plant growth regulator and systemic resistance elicitor from Trichoderma harzianum. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 73, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vinale, F.; Nigro, N.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Flematti, G.; Ghisalberti, E.L.; Ruocco, M.; Varlese, R.; Marra, R.; Lanzuise, S.; Eid, A.; et al. Harzianic acid: A novel siderophore from Trichoderma harzianum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2013, 347, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lombardi, N.; Vitale, S.; Turrà, D.; Reverberi, M.; Fanelli, C.; Vinale, F.; Marra, R.; Ruocco, M.; Pascale, A.; d’Errico, G.; et al. Root Exudates of Stressed Plants Stimulate and Attract Trichoderma Soil Fungi. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2018, 31, 982–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gruet, C.; Muller, D.; Moënne-Loccoz, Y. Significance of the Diversification of Wheat Species for the Assembly and Functioning of the Root-Associated Microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 782135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iannucci, A.; Canfora, L.; Nigro, F.; De Vita, P.; Beleggia, R. Relationships between root morphology, root exudate compounds and rhizosphere microbial community in durum wheat. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 158, 103781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Front (a) and back (b) plate showing the interaction between T. harzianum T-22 (on the left) and F. culmorum (on the right) at 14 days post inoculum.
Figure 1. Front (a) and back (b) plate showing the interaction between T. harzianum T-22 (on the left) and F. culmorum (on the right) at 14 days post inoculum.
Agriculture 12 00714 g001
Figure 2. Micrograph of the hyphal interactions between T. harzianum T-22 and F. culmorum: (a) and (b), coiling hypha (CH), appressoria (A), and hyphal lisis (HL) (resolution: (a) 150×; (b) 100×); (c) penetration structures (PSs) (resolution 120×). Yellow and red arrows indicate the specific microstructures of T. harzianum T-22 and F. culmorum, respectively.
Figure 2. Micrograph of the hyphal interactions between T. harzianum T-22 and F. culmorum: (a) and (b), coiling hypha (CH), appressoria (A), and hyphal lisis (HL) (resolution: (a) 150×; (b) 100×); (c) penetration structures (PSs) (resolution 120×). Yellow and red arrows indicate the specific microstructures of T. harzianum T-22 and F. culmorum, respectively.
Agriculture 12 00714 g002
Figure 3. Roots of the four Italian tetraploid durum wheat seedlings deriving from seeds treated with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 (ad) or untreated (eh): Ciclope (a,e), Creso (b,f), Saragolle Lucana (c,g), and Simeto (d,h) (resolution 20×).
Figure 3. Roots of the four Italian tetraploid durum wheat seedlings deriving from seeds treated with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 (ad) or untreated (eh): Ciclope (a,e), Creso (b,f), Saragolle Lucana (c,g), and Simeto (d,h) (resolution 20×).
Agriculture 12 00714 g003
Figure 4. Effect of Trichoderma harzianum T-22 at 21 days after sowing, on the reduction in Fusarium crown rot symptoms in the seedling coleoptiles of four Italian tetraploid durum wheats derived from wheat seed treated with T-22 and sown in a substrate with F. culmorum (ad) or left untreated (eh): Ciclope (a,e), Creso (b,f), Simeto (c,g), and Saragolle Lucana (d,h).
Figure 4. Effect of Trichoderma harzianum T-22 at 21 days after sowing, on the reduction in Fusarium crown rot symptoms in the seedling coleoptiles of four Italian tetraploid durum wheats derived from wheat seed treated with T-22 and sown in a substrate with F. culmorum (ad) or left untreated (eh): Ciclope (a,e), Creso (b,f), Simeto (c,g), and Saragolle Lucana (d,h).
Agriculture 12 00714 g004
Table 1. Characteristics of the four Italian tetraploid durum wheats used in the experiment.
Table 1. Characteristics of the four Italian tetraploid durum wheats used in the experiment.
AbbreviationGenotypeTypeYear of ReleaseSusceptibility to
Fusariosis
CicCiclopeVariety (modern)2006unknown
CreCresoVariety (modern)1974high
SimSimetoVariety (modern)1988high
SaLSaragolle LucanaLandrace (ancient)2014 1moderate
1 year of enrollment as the first Italian landrace in the Italian Wheat Landrace Conservation Registry.
Table 2. In vitro antagonistic activity of Trichoderma harzianum T-22 against Fusarium culmorum.
Table 2. In vitro antagonistic activity of Trichoderma harzianum T-22 against Fusarium culmorum.
Inhibition (%)
2 Days7 Days14 Days
T-2215.43 ± 1.0332.91 ± 1.0851.13 ± 1.38
F. culmorum4.95 ± 0.733.78 ± 1.322.13 ± 1.00
ANOVA
Treatments1897.74 ***846.27 ***11345.10 ***
Asterisks indicate significant differences at *** p < 0.001.
Table 3. Germination and speed of emergence (vigor index) in the four Italian tetraploid durum wheat seeds treated with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 and sown in a substrate with F. culmorum.
Table 3. Germination and speed of emergence (vigor index) in the four Italian tetraploid durum wheat seeds treated with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 and sown in a substrate with F. culmorum.
VarietyTreatment *G4 *G8 *G12 *Vigor Index
CiclopeControl2.6 ± 1.67 a9.0 ± 1.87 ab15.2 ± 1.30 a2.95 ± 016 a
T-226.6 ± 3.78 a12.4 ± 4.28 a16.0 ± 2.45 a3.12 ± 0.34 a
F. culmorum2.0 ± 1.22 a3.4 ± 0.89 c4.8 ± 0.84 b0.82 ± 0.09 c
T-22/F. culmorum2.2 ± 2.39 a5.2 ± 1.64 bc6.4 ± 1.95 b1.46 ± 0.21 b
CresoControl4.2 ± 4.76 a14.4 ± 3.13 a17.6 ± 1.52 a3.67 ± 0.32 b
T-228.0 ± 3.08 a15.8 ± 5.31 a18.6 ± 1.95 a4.09 ± 0.23 a
F. culmorum2.6 ± 0.89 a5.6 ± 2.41 b7.0 ± 2.45 b0.90 ± 0.10 d
T-22/F. culmorum3.4 ± 1.14 a8.6 ± 4.93 b9.4 ± 5.13 b2.15 ± 0.11 c
SimetoControl6.0 ± 4.47 a11.0 ± 1.00 a15.4 ± 1.52 ab2.81 ± 0.19 a
T-227.0 ± 5.24 a13.0 ± 4.06 a18.4 ± 1.14 a3.04 ± 0.29 a
F. culmorum7.2 ± 1.92 a8.4 ± 1.14 a10.4 ± 4.72 b2.09 ± 0.12 b
T-22/F. culmorum9.2 ± 4.92 a11.6 ± 3.13 a11.8 ± 3.35 b2.87 ± 0.25 a
Saragolle LucanaControl14.4 ± 2.61 a17.2 ± 2.59 a18.6 ± 1.14 a3.58 ± 0.29 b
T-2214.4 ± 2.61 a17.8 ± 1.48 a18.6 ± 1.14 a3.98 ± 0.37 b
F. culmorum9.0 ± 5.96 a10.8 ± 5.36 b12.8 ± 6.83 a2.52 ± 0.33 c
T-22/F. culmorum13.2 ± 6.61 a14.8 ± 5.89 ab14.8 ± 5.89 a4.70 ± 0.26 a
* Control = seeds that were not treated with T-22 and sown in non-infected substrate; G4, G8, G12 = number of seeds that germinated for every 20 sown seeds on day 4, 8, and 12 from sowing; vigor index determined 12 days after sowing. Different letters in the same column for each variety indicate mean values that are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to ANOVA combined with the Tukey post hoc test. Data are expressed as the mean of 5 replicates (each of 20 seeds) ± SDs.
Table 4. Seedling height and main root length in the four Italian tetraploid durum wheat seeds treated with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 and sown in a substrate with F. culmorum, measured at 21 days after sowing.
Table 4. Seedling height and main root length in the four Italian tetraploid durum wheat seeds treated with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 and sown in a substrate with F. culmorum, measured at 21 days after sowing.
VarietyTreatment *Height
(cm)
Main Root Length
(cm)
CiclopeControl26.27 ± 2.64 b19.01 ± 4.86 c
T-2229.36 ± 2.62 a28.97 ± 3.86 a
F. culmorum19.48 ± 4.40 c13.07 ± 4.59 d
T-22/F. culmorum26.42 ± 5.09 b24.93 ± 3.08 b
CresoControl25.31 ± 2.37 b18.03 ± 3.94 c
T-2227.68 ± 3.27 a21.69 ± 3.87 b
F. culmorum21.61 ± 3.77 c16.01 ± 5.00 d
T-22/F. culmorum26.01 ± 2.47 b23.97 ± 2.42 a
SimetoControl23.77 ± 2.35 b18.19 ± 3.70 c
T-2228.11 ± 2.51 a26.32 ± 3.25 a
F. culmorum19.19 ± 4.05 c8.64 ± 2.43 d
T-22/F. culmorum27.52 ± 3.67 a23.09 ± 4.52 b
Saragolle LucanaControl28.50 ± 3.87 b19.11 ± 4.73 b
T-2233.19 ± 4.10 a24.76 ± 4.84 a
F. culmorum17.95 ± 5.14 c10.36 ± 4.15 c
T-22/F. culmorum27.91 ± 3.77 b23.25 ± 3.96 a
* Control = seeds that were not treated with T-22 and sown in a non-infected substrate. Different letters in the same column for each variety indicate mean values that are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to ANOVA combined with the Tukey post hoc test. Data are expressed as the mean of 5 replicates (each of 20 seeds) ± SDs.
Table 5. Disease incidence (DI) and disease severity index (DSI) in the four Italian tetraploid durum wheat seedlings obtained from seeds treated with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 and sown in a substrate with F. culmorum, measured at 21 days after sowing.
Table 5. Disease incidence (DI) and disease severity index (DSI) in the four Italian tetraploid durum wheat seedlings obtained from seeds treated with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 and sown in a substrate with F. culmorum, measured at 21 days after sowing.
VarietyTreatmentDI
(%)
DSI
(%)
CiclopeF. culmorum100.00 ± 0.00 a75.13 ± 10.81 a
T-22/F. culmorum56.67 ± 9.13 b54.17 ± 9.20 b
CresoF. culmorum85.33 ± 20.22 a45.28 ± 5.50 a
T-22/F. culmorum43.33 ± 25.28 b34.43 ± 4.39 b
SimetoF. culmorum75.00 ± 5.89 a42.48 ± 2.48 a
T-22/F. culmorum56.76 ± 7.08 b33.14 ± 2.34 b
Saragolle LucanaF. culmorum93.81 ± 8.52 a44.74 ± 3.98 a
T-22/F. culmorum62.62 ± 7.96 b35.96 ± 2.99 b
Different letters in the same column for each variety indicate mean values that are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to ANOVA combined with the Tukey post hoc test. Data are expressed as the mean of 5 replicates (each of 20 seeds) ± SDs.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vitti, A.; Bevilacqua, V.; Logozzo, G.; Bochicchio, R.; Amato, M.; Nuzzaci, M. Seed Coating with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 of Italian Durum Wheat Increases Protection against Fusarium culmorum-Induced Crown Rot. Agriculture 2022, 12, 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050714

AMA Style

Vitti A, Bevilacqua V, Logozzo G, Bochicchio R, Amato M, Nuzzaci M. Seed Coating with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 of Italian Durum Wheat Increases Protection against Fusarium culmorum-Induced Crown Rot. Agriculture. 2022; 12(5):714. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050714

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vitti, Antonella, Vincenzo Bevilacqua, Giuseppina Logozzo, Rocco Bochicchio, Mariana Amato, and Maria Nuzzaci. 2022. "Seed Coating with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 of Italian Durum Wheat Increases Protection against Fusarium culmorum-Induced Crown Rot" Agriculture 12, no. 5: 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050714

APA Style

Vitti, A., Bevilacqua, V., Logozzo, G., Bochicchio, R., Amato, M., & Nuzzaci, M. (2022). Seed Coating with Trichoderma harzianum T-22 of Italian Durum Wheat Increases Protection against Fusarium culmorum-Induced Crown Rot. Agriculture, 12(5), 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050714

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop