The analyses that follow are based on collective results of our study based on a group-administered questionnaire. This sociological study was conducted in late September/early October 2019, on a purposive sample of 620 Polish Catholics living in London, Oxford, or Swindon. The study was carried out in major Polish community centres in these locations, i.e., Polish Saturday schools (parents, employees), Polish community Catholic parishes, and Polish centres within parishes. This method seems optimal for migration conditions, where it is difficult to reach each respondent on an individual basis. While this sample might not be representative, purposive sampling has been successfully used in many social science studies designed to, e.g., forecast developments in social structures across their many dimensions (
Kozak 2015). From the methodological perspective, this approach is correct, provided that extreme care is exercised when generalising the findings to the population as a whole (
Jabkowski 2015), but with this study, we decided not to make such generalisations. It is important to remember that, in 2019, the number of Poles in the UK was about 827,000, while other sources report this number to be more than a million (
Clark 2020).
2.1. How Polish Catholics Abroad Describe Their Faith
The British approach to religious freedom and tolerance, developed over centuries, is consistent with a more general model of cultural pluralism. This is supported by the influx of migrants. As a result, British society becomes more culturally and religiously diverse, which, in turn, requires research perspectives to be constantly updated (
Kurcewicz 2015). Some sociologists who have explored religiosity among Polish migrants to the UK have claimed that their faith has become individualised. Many Polish migrants have started to approach faith as a personal experience, not as closely related to customs, national historical and patriotic events, and national culture, as it is in Poland. Religious experience has become personalised and individualised. Such Catholicism among migrants can be characterised by less frequent religious practices, separation from national traditions, and weakening of inherited religious identity, but the quality of such faith, which becomes a more conscious act, can improve (
Gallagher and Trzebiatowska 2017).
Migration can free many people from the social pressure associated with practising one’s faith. However, this does not mean that religion is unimportant for Polish Catholic migrants. For many of them, migration raises questions about the meaning and direction of their goals in life, and encourages them to reconsider their attitudes towards religion. For the majority of the respondents, their relationship with the transcendent plays a very important role in building their identity. God is important as someone who controls the world and guides the life of each individual. A relationship with God provides protection against the chaos of chance and gives meaning to life’s experiences. The institutional aspect of religion does not play such an important role in the development of such a relationship between the individual and God, as it does in the case of ritual religiosity. However, religious individualism is manifested through the search for, and discovery of, transcendence (
Adamczyk 2018).
In our sociological study, we asked respondents to describe their faith. Six in ten respondents (59.0%) described themselves as religious, and one in four (26.3%) as deeply religious. One in eleven (8.9%) described their attitude towards faith as undecided but attached to religious traditions. Similar percentages were recorded for no answer (2.1%), religiously indifferent (1.9%), and non-religious (1.8%).
Table 1 shows how respondents from the different locations where the study was conducted described their attitudes towards religion:
The percentages of religious and deeply religious people by age group were as follows: ≥50: 45.5% and 53.0%; 40–49: 62.8% and 27.2%; 30–39: 61.0% and 24.2%; and <30: 61.8% and 14.7%, respectively. The number of undecided but attached to religious traditions decreased with age (11.8% for >30-year-olds; 11.0% for 30–39-year-olds; 7.3% for 40–49-year-olds; 1.5% for those aged 50 or more). Religious indifference was declared by 5.9% of respondents aged 30 or less, nearly half as many (2.7%) 30-to-39-year-olds, and only one 40-to-49-year-old (0.5%). There were nearly twice as many non-religious respondents among the youngest study participants as there were among those in their forties (4.4% for those aged less than 30, and 2.1% for 40–49-year-olds); and there were only three such answers among people in their thirties (1.1%). One person aged under 30 (1.5%) did not provide any answer (no data) (χ2 = 43.789; df = 12; p = 0.000; C = 0.263).
Job type produced the following differences between respondents—two in three blue-collar workers (64.2%), and more than half white-collar workers (56.9%), described themselves as religious. One in four blue- and white-collar workers (25.9% and 25.3%, respectively) described themselves as deeply religious, and the answer Undecided, but attached to religious traditions was given by one in nine (10.9%) white-collar workers and one in thirteen (7.6%) blue-collar workers. Religious indifference was recorded for similar numbers of respondents across the two job types (1.8% for white-collar, and 1.7% for blue-collar), but the number of the non-religious was twelve times as high among white-collar workers (3.6%) as it was among blue-collar workers (0.3%) (χ2 = 10.774; df = 4; p = 0.030; C = 0.137).
Respondents representing different levels of English-language proficiency also described their faith differently. Nearly two thirds of the respondents who described themselves as being intermediate English speakers or having a working knowledge of the language, considered themselves religious (65.9% and 61.9%, respectively). The same was true for more than a half (54.5%) of those describing their English skills as fluent, and for 48.7% of respondents having poor or no knowledge of English. Declarations of being deeply religious were recorded most often among people with poor or no knowledge of the language (43.6%), much less frequently among those with a working knowledge of English (26.9%), and for every fourth person who was intermediate or fluent in English (25.1% and 24.8%, respectively). The number of respondents who were undecided but attached to religious traditions was twice as high for those considering themselves fluent English speakers as it was for those with a working or intermediate knowledge of English, and nearly five times as high compared to people with poor or no English language skills (12.8%, 7.5%, 7.1%, and 2.6%, respectively). We found more respondents who considered themselves religiously indifferent but attached to religious traditions among those with a poor or no knowledge of English than in the group of fluent English speakers or those with a working knowledge of the language (5.1%, 3.5%, and 0.7%, respectively) (χ2 = 28.071; df = 12; p = 0.005; C = 0.211).
Some interesting results were obtained for Involvement with Polish community organisations abroad. Two in three respondents (68.5%) moderately involved with such organisations considered themselves religious. This number was much lower (59.1%) among those with low or no involvement, and for those with active or very deep involvement, it was one in two (50.3%). As respondents became more actively involved, they were also more likely to be deeply religious (low or no involvement 21.5%, moderate involvement 23.3%, active or deep involvement 40.0%). The percentage of the undecided but attached to religious traditions was twice as high for people with low or no involvement, compared to those actively or deeply involved, and three times as high in relation to those describing their involvement as moderate (13.2%, 5.5%, and 3.4%, respectively). Religious indifference was declared by eleven respondents with low or no involvement, and one person from the actively or deeply involved group (3.6% and 0.7%, respectively), and the smallest number of the non-religious was found among those with low or no involvement (1.7%), with similar percentages across the other groups (2.1% each) (χ2 = 38.839; df = 8; p = 0.000; C = 0.250).
It is important to note that, in our study, we identified a correlation between how respondents described their faith, and their involvement with Polish community organisations abroad. As many as two in three (68.5%) respondents who reported moderate involvement with such organisations, and every other (50.3%) among those actively or deeply involved, considered themselves as religious. Even more distinctive was that, as respondents became more actively involved, they were also more likely to be deeply religious (low or no involvement 21.5%, moderate involvement 23.3%, active or deep involvement 40.0%).
2.2. Membership of Polish Parishes in the UK
As part of this study, we analysed the sense of membership of a Polish parish as a religious community. Respondents were asked about their membership of Polish Catholic parishes, which in the studied locations operate as part of the Polish Catholic Mission in England and Wales (
Table 2). In addition, they were also asked about the nature of this membership, as shown in the table. For positive answers, the percentages were almost identical (
I am a member and I am actively involved—34.3%;
I am a member but I am not that involved—34.2%). A slightly lower number of respondents (28.9%) answered that they were not members of Polish Catholic missions, and missing answers represented 2.6%.
In the study, we asked respondents not only about their membership of Polish parishes, but also about the nature of such membership. The answer I am a member, but I am not that involved was considered to correspond to passive membership. The answer I am a member and I am actively involved was considered to mean active membership. The highest number of people from the group characterised by active membership was recorded among migrants with higher education (bachelor’s degree 38.1%; master’s degree 35.0%), and slightly less for those having general or technical secondary or post-secondary education (32.5%), and those with primary or vocational education (31.3%). Reverse proportions were found for passive membership (general or technical secondary or post-secondary education, 42.6%; primary or vocational education, 39.6%; bachelor’s degree, 33.9%; and master’s degree, 26.9%). More educated people were less likely to be members of parishes (master’s degree, 36.8%; bachelor’s degree, 27.1%; general or technical secondary or post-secondary education, 22.5%; primary or vocational education, 27.1%) (χ2 = 17.073; df = 6; p = 0.009; C = 0.166).
Similar to education, job type also produced statistically significant differences between respondents. Active membership of Polish parishes was declared by 35.1% of blue-collar workers and by 31.0% of white-collar workers, passive membership by four in ten blue-collar workers (39.9%) and by three in ten white-collar workers (30.7%), and no membership was much more likely to be declared by white-collar than blue-collar workers (37.2% vs. 22.9%) (χ2 = 13.706; df = 2; p = 0.001; C = 0.156).
People with poor or no knowledge of English were the most likely to describe themselves as active members (43.6%). This was true for a slightly lower number of those having good or working knowledge of English (38.4% and 35.1%, respectively), while fluent speakers of English were the least likely to be actively involved (29.2%). Passive membership was reported by one in four respondents with working knowledge of English (39.6%), slightly less intermediate speakers (36.0%), one in three of those having poor or no English language skills (33.3%), and rarely by those fluent in English (31.0%) (χ2 = 19.198; df = 6; p = 0.004; C = 0.176).
Involvement with Polish parishes proved to be strongly correlated with involvement with other Polish communities and organisations abroad. As respondents became more actively involved in what happened in their parish, they were also more likely to support other Polish community organisations in the UK—low or no involvement, 23.1%; moderate involvement, 37.0%; active or deep involvement, 57.2%. Involvement with other Polish community organisations abroad decreased in passive membership of Polish parishes—low or no involvement, 43.6%; moderate involvement, 34.2%; active or deep involvement, 19.3%. Similar observations were made for the declared non-membership of any Polish parish (32.3%, 27.4%, and 22.1%, respectively). No data was recorded for about 1% in each group (χ2 = 53.186; df = 4; p = 0.000; C = 0.288).
Active membership of Polish parishes increased along with the length of stay abroad—up to 10 years 29.5%, between 10 and 20 years 36.3%, more than 20 years 57.1%. The percentage of passive members proved to be nearly three times higher for the migrants staying in the UK the shortest, compared to those who had stayed there the longest (35.5% for 10–20 years, 35.0% for less than 10 years, and 9.5% for more than 20 years).
2.3. Religious Practices among Polish Migrants in the UK
Poles who practise their religion represent a major part of the Polish community in the UK, and are the ones who make up the Polish diaspora and influence its cultural, moral, and—obviously—religious qualities. Religion and religious practices become a foundation on which migrants from specific countries or regions can form minority groups (
Kurcewicz 2015).
Leaving one’s homeland can be perceived by migrants as a new theological experience, and religious practices can provide a “shelter” for new arrivals. Migrants often treat religious communities as a form of therapy to remedy the painful separation from their families and everything that was native to their homeland. Marta Trzebiatowska describes religious practices in one’s native language as
a balm to the spirit of an immigrant, which provides a sense of security in the new environment and ensures emotional wellbeing (
Gallagher and Trzebiatowska 2017, p. 433).
But not all scholars share these views. Nigel Biggar argues that in the UK churchgoing has become
the sport of a minority (
Biggar 2011, p. 21). Following their arrival to the UK, Polish migrants enter a relatively lay and multicultural world. The reality of economic migration, the need to adapt to the new society, the lack of family interactions, and the economic pressure make some Poles abandon their religious practices. This could explain their limited church attendance (
Gallagher and Trzebiatowska 2017).
In our sociological study, we asked respondents:
how often did you attend a Holy Mass at the church over the last year? (
Table 3). A third of all respondents (36.9%) answered that they went to church every Sunday, and a quarter (26.3%) almost every Sunday. Irregular practices (once or twice a month) were declared by 15.8% of respondents, and every eighth respondent (12.4%) only celebrated major holidays. About four in a hundred respondents (3.9%) said they never practised throughout the year, and 2.6% only went to church for weddings or funerals. Missing answers represented 2.1%.
The core variable we adopted produced significant differences in answers. Those who went to church every Sunday were usually from Oxford (43.7%). Such attendance was reported by one in three Londoners (34.4%) and a similar number of Swindon residents (33.0%). The number of people who went to church almost every Sunday was similar across all the locations we studied and was slightly higher than the first quartile (26.9% for Oxford, 26.5% for London, and 25.8% for Swindon). Irregular attendance (once or twice a month) was usually reported by Oxford residents (21.8%), slightly less often by Londoners (16.4%), and half as often (compared to the university city) by residents of Swindon (10.3%). Attendance only during major holidays was usually reported by Swindon residents (17.6%), and much less frequently by Londoners (13.2%) or people living in Oxford (5.6%). Slightly more people from Swindon than those from London went to church occasionally, i.e., for weddings or funerals (4.3% vs. 3.2%). The number of people who said they never went to church was four times higher for Londoners than for Oxford residents (6.3% vs. 1.5%). This answer was provided by four percent of Swindon residents. Missing answers for this question were recorded for people from Swindon (5.2%) and Oxford (0.5%) (χ2 = 38.682; df = 10; p = 0.000; C = 0.245).
Age proved to produce significant differences between respondents’ answers. Weekly attendance was reported by more than half Catholics over fifty years of age (29.4% of people below 30, 32.6% of 30–39-year-olds, 42.4% of 40–49-year-olds, and 59.1% of those aged 50 or more). Attendance on almost every Sunday was reported by twice as many people in their forties as by the oldest respondents (30.9% for 40–49-year olds vs. 16.7% for people aged 50 or more). This answer was also given by one in four youngest respondents and people in their thirties (26.5% of people under 30, and 36.1% of those aged 30–39). Sunday church attendance only during major holidays decreased with age (14.7% of people under 30, 14.0% of 30–39-year-olds, 10.5% of 40–49-year-olds, and 7.6% of those aged 50 or more). Compared to other age groups, the youngest participants in our study proved to be three times (10.3%) more likely to not attend the Sunday Mass at all (3.1% for 40–49-year-olds, 3.0% for those aged 50 or less, 2.7% for 30–39-year-olds). Occasional churchgoing was declared by 3.8% of people in their thirties, 2.9% of those under 30, and 1.6% of people in their forties (χ2 = 37.828; df = 15; p = 0.001; C = 0.246).
The length of stay abroad also produced considerable statistical differences between respondents’ answers. The longer they stayed in the UK, the stronger was their need to attend the Sunday services every week (below 10 years 35.5%, 10–20 years 37.7%, more than 20 years 61.9%). Fairly regular churchgoing (almost every Sunday) was reported by every third respondent (30.0%) who had been living abroad for 10–20 years, by every fifth respondent who had been there the shortest (22.0%), and a similar number of those who had been there the longest (19.0%). Irregular Sunday Mass attendance (once or twice a month) was observed to grow as the length of stay abroad decreased (more than 20 years 4.8%, 10–20 years 15.6%, less than 10 years 18.0%). Occasional attendance decreased as the length of stay in the UK increased (less than 10 years 18.5%, 10–20 years 14.1%, more than 20 years 9.5%). Compared to people who had stayed abroad for different lengths of time, those who had been living in the UK for 10–20 years were the least likely (2.7%) to never go to church (more than 20 years 4.8%, less than 10 years 5.5%) (χ
2 = 38.682; df = 10;
p = 0.000; C = 0.245). Of course, those remarks do not prove that religiosity is a function of the length of the stay abroad and not, for example, a function of age. It should be mentioned here that positive correlation between age and frequency of religious practice is well documented in sociology of religion (
Mariański 2014). It is clearly possible that migrants with longer time of stay in the UK happen to be simply older than those who migrated more recently. It is also possible that different waves of migration involved groups with different religious, cultural or patriotic attitudes, like more political or even ideological migration during communism, and more economic migration recently. Some form of further analysis, e.g., regression analysis, could be valuable at this point.