1. Introduction
Starting from the mid-19th century, Catholic and Protestant missionaries operating within the confines of the Ottoman Empire demonstrated a dual commitment to advancing both educational and healthcare initiatives. This commitment was manifested through the deliberate allocation of a substantial portion of their personnel and resources towards the establishment of a diverse array of institutions. These included educational establishments, such as schools, seminaries, and universities, as well as medical facilities, like dispensaries and hospitals.
During the same historical epoch, French Roman Catholic missions underwent a noteworthy transformation. Initially oriented towards addressing the needs of local Catholics, these missions underwent significant evolution, emerging as pivotal components in the Holy See’s endeavors to consolidate the Eastern Christian Churches under the authority of Rome. The missionary endeavors in education contributed to the forging of channels of communication and cooperation between Eastern Christian populations and the Western sphere. Furthermore, they functioned as conduits for the dissemination and assimilation of European culture, particularly through the influence wielded by the French.
This study examines the educational activities of the Augustinians of the Assumption (the Assumptionists), a French Roman Catholic order, aimed at the inculturation of Ottoman Christian communities, to establish an environment conducive to achieving the union of Eastern Christians with Rome. Specifically focusing on the Assumptionist presence in the Ottoman Empire, from the start of the Assumptionists’ Mission d’Orient in 1863 to the expulsion of the French missionaries from the Ottoman Empire in 1914, this article seeks to address the following question: What was the Assumptionists’ strategy in achieving the inculturation of Ottoman communities to the service of the Holy See’s unification project? Through this exploration, I argue that the Assumptionist educational institutions achieved success on two fronts. Firstly, they accomplished the inculturation of various Ottoman communities, operating within an environment where the Mission d’Orient was perceived by indigenous communities as Rome’s proselytism. Secondly, these institutions acted as bridges for cultural exchange between Europe and the Ottoman Orient.
This article employs a transnational approach to comprehensively analyze the relationships between Assumptionist activities and France, the Holy See, and the Ottoman Empire. Many historians of international relations argue that transnational history primarily focuses on the actions of non-state actors (
Saunier 2013, p. 32). In this paper, the specific focus is on the Assumptionists’ religious and educational interactions with various Ottoman millets. Therefore, a transnational historical approach is deemed the most appropriate method through which to analyze these interrelations.
To conduct this research, the author utilizes content analysis for both primary and secondary sources. The primary sources were obtained from the online archives of the Vatican, as well as the Assumptionists’ Library in Kadıköy. Additionally, this paper benefited from the Annales de la Préparation de la Foi and the Assumptionists’ magazines, including Echos d’Orient, Mission des Augustins de l’Assomption, L’Œuvre de Vocation in Echos du Noviciat de Notre Dame de l’Assomption, and La Croix.
The Assumptionists, a French Roman Catholic congregation, were deeply influenced in their activities in the Orient by the evolving developments in France, which encompassed religious, cultural, political, and economic relations with both the Ottoman Empire and the Holy See. The Capitulations of 1740, which laid the foundation for French legislation within the Ottoman Empire, were granted by the Sublime Porte, allowing France to exert its influence under the pretext of safeguarding the Holy Places, as well as the Catholics residing within the Ottoman Empire (
Ghaleb 1913). Similar to its predecessors, the Capitulation of 1740 acknowledged the authority of French consuls in protecting individuals without French nationality, extending this protection to Ottoman subjects under specific conditions. Under the French protectorate, French citizens not designated as Ottoman subjects retained their nationality, while being subject to French jurisdiction, reflecting their legal status in France. Ottoman subjects, on the other hand, enjoyed advantages similar to those granted to foreigners under this protectorate. A diverse group of non-Muslim subjects of the Porte willingly opted to escape Ottoman jurisdiction and fall, instead, under consular authority (
Cirilli 1898, pp. 237–39).
Following the Treaty of Paris in 1858, the Ottoman Empire controlled territories marked by complex politics, arising from diverse ethnicities, languages, and religions, while the Great Powers competed over the “Eastern Question”. The religious–cultural aspect of this competition aimed to gain the support of local populations. Christian missions acted as representatives of the Western powers in this endeavor, as they had direct interaction with the communities.
The culmination of the Papal States in 1870, following significant territorial reductions in 1860, marked a considerable decline in the political sway of the Church across Europe. The Vatican strategically employed the Capitulations, the protégé system, and the French protectorate of Catholics to advance its interests, increase its influence over Eastern Christians, and seek the unification of the Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches. The rivalry between the Great Powers over the Holy Places, combined with Russian influence over the Orthodox community, British–American attempts to spread Protestantism among Ottoman Christians, and French efforts to maintain their protectorate, resulted in a clash of denominations in the Ottoman lands. Despite conflicts with the Third Republic, the Holy See leveraged French political and religious support to increase its influence over Ottoman Christians until the first quarter of the twentieth century. Ultimately, the success of Roman Catholic missions in the Orient depended on the collaboration between France and the Holy See, as well as their interactions with the Sublime Porte (
Hajjar 1979).
The Assumptionists emerged as one of the leading Roman Catholic orders, advancing the Holy See’s interests during a period when European powers were primarily focused on protecting holy places and utilizing education to gain cultural and religious advantages over each other. Their mission in the Orient, spanning the territories of the former Russian and Ottoman Empires, exemplified their profound engagement with indigenous communities, impactful educational endeavors, and dynamic interactions with various states.
Previous research on the Assumptionists’ and Oblates’ Mission d’Orient provides valuable insights into the strategies employed by both the French and the Vatican to further their interests. The research, primarily conducted by the Assumptionists themselves, is complemented by contributions from multiple scholars to the historiography of the Mission d’Orient. Firstly, the Assumptionist mission can be extracted from broader research that offers an understanding of the political environment where the mission was born (e.g.,
Hajjar 1979, pp. 134–549;
Prudhomme 1994, pp. 295–325; and
Fouilloux 2000, pp. 167–75). Secondly, scholars who focused on the Assumptionists provided a thorough analysis of Roman Catholic missions, as well as the reasons behind their transformation in the nineteenth century (e.g.,
Babot 2000, pp. 13–117;
Vrignon 2007, pp. 83–138; and
Babot 2011, pp. 9–46). Thirdly, the research primarily focuses on the overall activities of the Assumptionists and explores Assumptionist Education as part of the overview (e.g.,
Jacob 2000, pp. 241–321;
Babot 2000, pp. 327–83; and
Thobie 2009, pp. 593–674).
While benefiting from the previous research on the subject, my objective is to utilize the Assumptionists as a case study through which to comprehend the role of French Roman Catholic missionary education as a vehicle for the spread of Western culture and ideas through the French language, while creating bridges of communication and cooperation between the Christian churches of the East and the West. Moreover, I intend to investigate the impact of Assumptionist education on various religious and cultural groups, including Catholics, Armenians, Greeks, and Muslims.
2. Impact of Political Diplomacy, Missionary Endeavors, and Indigenous Engagement
The Ottoman Empire employed a complex system, called the millet system, which consisted of various religious and administrative structures. The purpose of the millet system was to ensure religious and cultural autonomy for non-Muslim communities within the Ottoman Empire, thereby promoting stability and harmonious coexistence. It effectively enabled the empire to manage its diverse population by granting a level of self-governance to various religious and ethnic groups. The Greeks obtained the status of millet in 1453, while the Armenians were recognized in 1461. These two Christian communities were main targets of the Assumptionist mission, as the conversion of Muslims was not an option, and the conversion of Jews was unlikely.
The Tanzimat reforms (1839–1876) were a turning point for the Ottoman millets, as they promised equality to all Ottoman subjects, while the Ottoman Reform Edict of 1856 assured that “all the privileges and spiritual immunities of the churches would be respected and that individual Christians would enjoy all civil rights on the same level as Muslims” (
Frazee 1983, p. 225). The Ottoman Westernization reforms resulted in a flow of European Christians arriving to benefit from the freedom that the Tanzimat offered.
The pro-Western transformation of the Ottoman Empire in the nineteenth century had a positive outcome for the Christian missions. Christian missionaries in the Middle East prioritized education and health initiatives, allocating a significant portion of their personnel and resources to establish schools, colleges, universities, dispensaries, and hospitals. Despite the charitable focus of these institutions, aimed at addressing the needs of the economically disadvantaged, their services extended beyond the most marginalized segments of the local population. In addition to educational and health-related efforts, missions actively participated in explicit charitable activities, including operating orphanages, providing shelter for prostitutes, visiting prisoners, and supporting unskilled workers. The missionaries’ commitment to both educational and charitable endeavors reflects their comprehensive approach to improving the well-being of the communities they served (
Verdeil 2020, p. 23).
The Roman Catholic missions had been active within the Ottoman Empire since the seventeenth century, primarily focused on serving the needs of European Catholics. However, following the Crimean War (1853–56), a collaborative effort between the Holy See and France sought to intensify their religious and cultural engagement in the Ottoman Orient. The French Roman Catholic missions emerged as pivotal players in advancing the expansion of French religious and cultural influence, while serving as representatives for both France and the Vatican.
The Augustinians of the Assumption, a French Roman Catholic Congregation, was founded in Nîmes by Emmanuel d’Alzon in 1845. The name of the congregation came from St. Augustine of Hippo, who was considered a “friend of the Orient”, due to his knowledge of the Greek language and esteem of the great Greek philosophers (
Salaville 1931) (
Salaville 1922, pp. 382–93). The “
Mission d’Orient” began for the Assumptionists on 4 June 1862, with Pope Pius IX’s famous sentence, “I bless your deeds in the Orient and Occident”, addressed to Fr. D’Alzon. Pius IX knew of Fr. D’Alzon’s aspiration to serve the Christians in the Middle East, which had grown stronger after 1860, when France militarily intervened to safeguard persecuted Maronite Christians from the Druzes. Therefore, he assigned the Assumptionists to this mission, which was initiated in the Balkans. The Mission d’Orient had both a religious goal and a political goal. The religious goal was “The elimination of the “Photian Schism (
Vailhe 1934, p. 349)””. The political goal was to assist France in diminishing the Russian influence over the Ottoman Orthodox (
Hazir 2023a).
The Assumptionist mission in the Ottoman lands started with Fr. Victorin Galabert’s arrival in Istanbul on 10 December 1862. However, following the Holy See’s instructions, he relocated to Plovdiv in 1863 (
Monsch 2000, p. 125), and then to Edirne to establish the first Assumptionist school in 1867 (
Fleury 2000, p. 115). The Oblates of the Assumption arrived in Edirne on 7 May 1868, to support the Assumptionists (
Jacob 2000, p. 243). Initially, the target community for the mission was the Balkan Slavs, as Bulgarian Christians already had the intention to form closer relations with the Holy See to detach themselves from the patriarch in Phanar and Russian pan-Slavism (
Voillery 1980, pp. 31–47). The detachment of Bulgarians from the Orthodox Patriarchate in 1870, and the success of the unionist movement, encouraged the Assumptionists to expand their activities. After the Russo-Ottoman War of 1877–78, which resulted in Ottoman defeat and Bulgarian independence, the Assumptionist focus turned to Istanbul and Anatolia, even though they continued their activities in the Balkans.
The Assumptionists, along with their female counterparts, the Oblates (founded in 1865), advocated for the inculturation of Eastern Christians and the inclusion of the Muslims and Jews to ensure the success of their mission. The term “Eastern Christians” encompassed a wide range of different churches. Eastern Orthodox Churches, Maronites, Melkites, Armenians, Western Syrians, Eastern Syrians, and Copts were represented in the Ottoman Empire (
Amsler 2020, p. 190). The Assumptionnists and Oblates emphasized the importance of quality education and free healthcare in this endeavor. Furthermore, through their educational institutions, they aimed to build an understanding of the Eastern Christian populations, especially the Greeks and the Slavs, while exploring their cultures, traditions, languages, and history. The mission served as a vital conduit for cultural exchange between Europe and the Ottoman Orient, facilitating the exchange of ideas, knowledge, and experiences. This cultural bridge significantly contributed to fostering mutual understanding and establishing a platform for dialogue between the East and the West.
For instance, in his report, Monsignor Zschokké, an Austrian prelate who served as the director of the Austrian hospice in Jerusalem in 1897, praises the French Catholic activities in the Holy Land. “I was not at all surprised to see everything that France has been able to accomplish in Jerusalem. The board of the Austrian hospice struggles to maintain 70 beds, while the French Catholics continuously establish one charitable work after another in the holy city of Jerusalem. Not to mention the sacrifices they make at home in support of Catholic schools and universities in their own country. It is these very same French Catholics who send missionaries and nuns around the world, using French funds to build churches, religious houses, and schools everywhere. Catholic France has remained, until our days, the eldest and most devoted daughter of the Church. A nation that makes such sacrifices for the Catholic Church can surely rely on divine Providence, which will undoubtedly grant it a better fate one day (
Bailly 1897)”.
Thus, in terms of supporting the Catholic missions, the Republic did not act in the name of a divine mission, but in that of a national civilizing mission (
Prudhomme 2008). The Assumptionists’ connection to the French state was as strong as their connection to the Holy See. Thus, their mission did not only export Catholicism, but also the ideas of enlightenment, secularism, human rights, and republican rights, through the power of French as a language. “France’s educational mission was not exercised triumphantly or monolithically. It was the fruit of learning lessons from previous experiences, competition with other denominations, and dealing with conflicting ideologies. For example, Catholics relied on secular education to maintain their influence when the conversion of the locals was not an option (
Dana and Cabanel 2007)”.
The Assumptionist activities in Ottoman Anatolia noticeably increased after the Treaty of Berlin in1878, as the Ottoman Empire lost the majority of its territories in the Balkans. After the death of Fr. d’Alzon (1880), François Picard became the head of the order. Under Fr. Picard’s supervision (1880–1903), Assumptionist establishments multiplied in Istanbul and Anatolia. His good relations with Leo XIII, and the change in the Holy See’s Eastern politics, started a new chapter for the Assumptionists. In the Orientalium Dignitas on the Eastern Churches published in 1894, Leo XIII described the importance of the Eastern rites for Rome (
Leo 1894). He repeated his hope for the union, while instructing Catholic missionaries on their approach toward the Christians of the Orient. Leo XIII slightly changed the Vatican’s oriental politics, in terms of ending Latin proselytism to reach acculturation and the idea of the global union as mentioned in the Councils of Lyon and Florence (
Fouilloux 2000, p. 73). The Jerusalem eucharistic congress in 1893 described the Holy See’s position regarding a unified Church. The greatest obstacle preventing the union was the Vatican’s proselytism. The Roman Catholic clergy ensured that the Eastern Catholics, united under Rome, freely practiced their rites and traditions. During the congress, All Catholic Churches celebrated the Holy Sacrifice according to their rites. Chaldeans, Syrians, Maronites, Copts, Greek-Melchites, Greco-Slavs, and Armenians, in turn, offered the Eucharist, and the Orthodox Greeks, who were welcome to participate, could see with what respect and with what sympathy the Latins attended these services in various languages and following various rites (
Bailly 1897, pp. 33–38). “Pius X unlike Leo XIII did not go back on the policy of support for the Uniats of the East. He also wanted to revive their life, encourage their Eastern liturgies, foster their national traditions, and abandon the Latinizing endeavor (
Chadwick 1998, p. 546)”.
Diplomatic reconciliation among the Holy See, France, and the Ottoman Empire created a favorable environment for Roman Catholic missions operating in Ottoman territories until the First World War. This understanding fostered tolerance and cooperation, allowing missions to access Christian communities within the empire. Improved relations contributed to a more conducive environment for the propagation of the Catholic faith and missionary endeavors. However, the ultimate success of these missions relied on the efficacy of missionary activities and the ability to cultivate positive relationships with indigenous populations, with the Greek and Armenian Patriarchs having decisive positions under the Sublime Porte, due to their authority within their respective millets.
The impact of Assumptionist education on Catholics, Armenians, Greeks, and Muslims was generally positive, which is attributed to the quality of education and the equal opportunities provided to these communities. The conflicts that arose between the Assumptionists and the communities they served were mainly political. Greeks, Armenians, and Muslims responded to Assumptionists’ activities in light of this tension.
The primary conflict with the Orthodox communities was the assertion of Papal infallibility. Papal infallibility presented a challenge to achieving unity with the Orthodox, as Eastern Christians rejected Rome’s claim of superiority. This matter was deliberated during the First Vatican Council (1869–1870). Moreover, since the recognition of the Armenian Catholic millet by the Sublime Porte, the Ottoman government saw Western attempts to influence its non-Muslim subjects as interference in its internal affairs.
The Assumptionists’ engagement with non-Catholic communities varied, depending on factors such as the millet (Greek, Armenian, or Muslim), their position within the hierarchy (Church or believers), and the geographical context. Generally, Assumptionists interacted with Muslims through state authorities, with construction, renovation, and foundation projects being permitted by the local governor upon obtaining the necessary permissions.
Interaction with Armenians proved to be relatively easy, compared to that with the Greek Orthodox, largely due to the presence of an Armenian Catholic millet. However, engaging with the Greek Orthodox posed challenges. For example, when the Assumptionists sought to build a bell tower for their Church in Eskisehir, local Greeks attempted to obstruct the construction by filing complaints with the local authorities. Father Bertin described the Greek attitude as follows: “The jealousy of the Orthodox and their deadly hatred had caused us many troubles until now, and this time too, it was expected that the difficulties would arise not from Muslims, but from the Greeks.”
1 In the end, the bell tower was built with the aid of the Armenian and Greek students of the congregation.
Missionaries’ efforts to communicate Catholic Church teachings and provide education, healthcare, and humanitarian assistance were the leading factors in gaining acceptance and support from local communities. The missionaries’ ability to understand and respect the cultural, social, and religious contexts of Ottoman Christians was essential in fostering meaningful connections and building trust (See
Hazir 2023b, pp. 8–14).
Between 1867 and 1914, Assumptionists established various institutions, from Edirne to Trabzon. However, the onset of the Balkan Wars (1912–13) led to their decline, influenced by significant demographic changes in Anatolia, which was driven by Turkish nationalism promoted by the Committee of Union and Progress, the influx of Muslim refugees from the Balkans, and the 1913 population exchange involving the Ottoman Empire, Greece, Serbia, and Bulgaria. The Committee of Union and Progress unilaterally abolished capitulations in 1914, signaling the end of the French protectorate of Roman Catholics. All French institutions, except for churches, hospitals, and orphanages, were closed, and French missionaries who did not enlist with France for the war were expelled.
4. Conclusions
The Augustinians of the Assumption played a significant role in providing high-quality French Roman Catholic missionary education, with various objectives, within the Ottoman Empire. France utilized missionary education as a means to advance its religious and cultural influence over the Ottoman Christians. The Holy See also recognized the value of this education in uniting non-Catholic Ottoman Christians, including Armenians and Greeks, under Rome. One of the key factors contributing to the success of the Assumptionists was their approach to education, which respected indigenous cultures and traditions. By integrating European modernity into a multiethnic and multireligious society, they aimed to enhance communication among diverse groups and emancipation within their institutions. The education received in Assumptionist schools, irrespective of religious affiliation, laid a valuable groundwork for nurturing individuals inclined towards Western values and offered promising prospects within the multicultural and multinational society of the Ottoman Empire. Unintentionally, this educational system played a role in fostering the development of national identity, as republican ideas eagerly contributed to this undertaking.
The findings of this study demonstrate significant achievements by the Assumptionist educational institutions in two key areas. Firstly, they successfully facilitated the integration of diverse Ottoman communities, particularly in an environment where the Mission d’Orient was perceived by indigenous communities with national inclinations as Rome’s proselytism. The Assumptionists effectively navigated these complexities and managed to create an inclusive atmosphere conducive to the desired union. Moreover, they contributed to the inclusion of girls into communities by educating them.
Secondly, the Assumptionist educational institutions served as vital conduits for cultural exchange between Europe and the Ottoman Orient. Through their presence and educational initiatives, they facilitated the exchange of ideas, knowledge, and experiences, thereby contributing to a deeper understanding and appreciation of different cultures. They were especially well known for their excessive and detailed research on Byzantine culture and history. The bridge of culture they attempted to build played a significant role in fostering mutual understanding and establishing a platform for dialogue between the East and the West. The publication of Echos d’Orient was the ultimate proof of this dialogue.
Overall, the Assumptionist and Oblate missions, through their educational activities to achieve the objectives of the Holy See’s unification project, demonstrated their ability to navigate complex sociopolitical dynamics and successfully fostered an environment where indigenous communities could embrace their own cultural heritage while forging closer ties with Rome. A Roman Catholic mission was completed when a cemetery was added to the mission’s church, hospital, and schools. Despite the Mission d’Orient not reaching its ultimate goal, the ongoing Assumptionist presence in Turkey shows that the Assumptionist and Oblate efforts in facilitating cultural exchange between Europe and the Ottoman Orient enriched the broader dialogue between civilizations, while their research and publications contributed to the region’s historiography. Moreover, their efforts resulted in a rapprochement between the Eastern and the Western Christians.