Effect of Cultural Distinctiveness and Perception of Digital Advertising Appeals on Online Purchase Intention of Clothing Brands: Moderation of Gender Egalitarianism
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Research Gap and Theoretical Underpinnings
2.2. Pakistan and Malaysia: Two Distinct Cultures
2.3. Effect of Digital Advertising on Online Purchase Intention
2.4. Moderated Mediation of the Attitude toward Digital Advertising and Cultural Distinctiveness
2.5. Moderating Factor of Gender Egalitarianism
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Instrumentation
3.1.1. Ad Stimuli
3.1.2. Measurements
4. Results
4.1. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.2. Manipulation Check
4.3. Testing the Mediation
4.4. Testing the Moderated Mediation
5. Discussion
5.1. Theoretical Implications
5.2. Implications for Practices
5.3. Limitations and Directions for Future Research
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Westjohn, S.A.; Singh, N.; Magnusson, P. Responsiveness to Global and Local Consumer Culture Positioning: A Personality and Collective Identity Perspective. J. Int. Mark. 2012, 20, 58–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hornik, J.; Ofir, C.; Rachamim, M. Advertising Appeals, Moderators, And Impact on Persuasion. J. Advert. Res. 2017, 57, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Mooij, M. On the misuse and misinterpretation of dimensions of national culture. Int. Mark. Rev. 2013, 30, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Cho, C.-H. Digital advertising: Present and future prospects. Int. J. Advert. 2020, 39, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, L. Advertising and Advertisements. Int. Encycl. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 2015, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samiee, S.; Jeong, I.; Pae, J.H.; Tai, S. Advertising standardization in multinational corporations. J. Bus. Res. 2003, 56, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gordon, B.R.; Jerath, K.; Katona, Z.; Narayanan, S.; Shin, J.; Wilbur, K.C. Inefficiencies in Digital Advertising Markets. J. Mark. 2021, 85, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saura, J.R. Using Data Sciences in Digital Marketing: Framework, methods, and performance metrics. J. Innov. Knowl. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaman, U.; Abbasi, M. Linking transformational leadership and individual learning behavior: Role of psychological safety and uncertainty avoidance. Pakistan J. Commer. Soc. Sci. 2020, 14, 167–201. [Google Scholar]
- Mensa, M.; Bittner, V. Portraits of Women: Mexican and Chilean Stereotypes in Digital Advertising. Commun. Soc. 2020, 33, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paek, H.-J.; Nelson, M.R.; Vilela, A.M. Examination of Gender-role Portrayals in Television Advertising across Seven Countries. Sex Roles 2010, 64, 192–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zawisza, M.; Luyt, R.; Zawadzka, A.M.; Buczny, J. Cross-Cultural Sexism and the Effectiveness of Gender (Non)Traditional Advertising: A Comparison of Purchase Intentions in Poland, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. Sex Roles 2018, 79, 738–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, S.; Wilson, B.; Russo, A. Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. IV). Adv. Advert. Res. 2013, 4, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mäntymäki, M.; Merikivi, J.; Verhagen, T.; Feldberg, J.; Rajala, R. Does a contextualized theory of planned behavior explain why teenagers stay in virtual worlds? Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2014, 34, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gramazio, S.; Cadinu, M.; Guizzo, F. Does Sex Really Sell? Paradoxical Effects of Sexualization in Advertising on Product Attractiveness and Purchase Intentions. Sex Roles 2020, 84, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zawisza, M.; Luyt, R.; Zawadzka, A.M.; Buczny, J. Does it pay to break male gender stereotypes in advertising? A comparison of advertisement effectiveness between the United Kingdom, Poland and South Africa. J. Gend. Stud. 2016, 27, 464–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grau, S.L.; Zotos, Y.C. Gender stereotypes in advertising: A review of current research. Int. J. Advert. 2016, 35, 761–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhter, W.; Abassi, A.S.; Umar, S. Ethical issues in advertising in pakistan: An islamic perspective. World Appl. Sci. J. 2011, 13, 444–452. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, A. Gender Role Portrayal in Television Advertisement: Evidence from Pakistan. Inf. Manag. Bus. Rev. 2012, 4, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hong, Y.H.; Soh, C.H.; Khan, N.; Bin Abdullah, M.M.; Teh, B.H. Effectiveness of Anti-Smoking Advertising: The Roles of Message and Media. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Czarnecka, B.; Brennan, D.; Keles, S. Cultural Meaning, Advertising, and National Culture: A Four-Country Study. J. Glob. Mark. 2017, 31, 4–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, S.H.; Iftikhar, M.; Mohamad, B.; Pembecioğlu, N.; Altaf, M. Precautionary Behavior Toward Dengue Virus Through Public Service Advertisement: Mediation of the Individual’s Attention, Information Surveillance, and Elaboration. SAGE Open 2020, 10, 2158244020929301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webb, D.; Kohlbacher, F.; Prieler, M. Life satisfaction in Japan: The role of hedonic values, advertising and watching TV. Soc. Bus. 2017, 7, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prieler, M.; Kohlbacher, F.; Hagiwara, S.; Arima, A. Gender Portrayals of Older People in Japanese Television Advertisements. J. Asian Women 2017, 33, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prieler, M.; Kohlbacher, F. Advertising in the Aging Society: Understanding Representations, Practitioners, and Consumers in Japan; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zawisza-Riley, M. Advertising, culture and society. Advert. Gend. Soc. 2019, 2019, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagani, M.; Goldsmith, R.; Perracchio, A. Standardization vs. adaptation: Consumer reaction to TV ads containing subtitled or English dubbed ads. Int. J. Advert. 2015, 34, 702–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bekk, M.; Spörrle, M.; Völckner, F.; Spieß, E.; Woschée, R. What is not beautiful should match: How attractiveness similarity affects consumer responses to advertising. Mark. Lett. 2017, 28, 509–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liaukonyte, J.; Teixeira, T.; Wilbur, K.C. Television Advertising and Online Shopping. Mark. Sci. 2015, 34, 311–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schivinski, B.; Dabrowski, D. The effect of social media communication on consumer perceptions of brands. J. Mark. Commun. 2013, 22, 189–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- O’Cass, A.; Lee, W.J.; Siahtiri, V. Can Islam and status consumption live together in the house of fashion clothing? J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2013, 17, 440–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- House, R.J.; Quigley, N.R.; De Luque, M.S. Insights from Project GLOBE. Int. J. Advert. 2010, 29, 111–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLellan, R. Culture and leadership. Quarr. Manag. 2002, 29, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychol. Health 2011, 26, 1113–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diehl, S.; Terlutter, R.; Mueller, B. Doing good matters to consumers: The effectiveness of humane-oriented CSR appeals in cross-cultural standardized advertising campaigns. Int. J. Advert. 2016, 35, 730–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gazley, A.; Krisjanous, J.; Grohs, R.; Fam, K.-S. Like it or not: Differences in advertising likeability and dislikeability within Asia. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2012, 24, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khairullah, D.Z.; Khairullah, Z.Y. Cultural Values in Indian Television Advertising. J. Promot. Manag. 2013, 19, 265–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hornikx, J.; De Groot, E. Cultural values adapted to individualism–collectivism in advertising in Western Europe: An experimental and meta-analytical approach. Int. Commun. Gaz. 2017, 79, 298–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu Bakar, H.; Bahtiar, M.; Halim, H.; Subramaniam, C.; Choo, L.S. Shared Cultural Characteristics Similarities in Malaysia’s Multi-ethnic Society. J. Intercult. Commun. Res. 2018, 47, 243–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Herk, H.; Torelli, C.J. Cross Cultural Issues in Consumer Science and Consumer Psychology: Current Perspectives and Future Directions; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raza, S.; Zaman, U.; Iftikhar, M.; Shafique, O. An Experimental Evidence on Eco-Friendly Advertisement Appeals and Intention to Use Bio-Nanomaterial Plastics: Institutional Collectivism and Performance Orientation as Moderators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maseland, R.; Van Hoorn, A. Culture at the Country Level. In Cross Cultural Issues in Consumer Science and Consumer Psychology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 7–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- De Mooij, M. Cross-cultural research in international marketing: Clearing up some of the confusion. Int. Mark. Rev. 2015, 32, 646–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- House, R.J.; Hanges, P.J.; Javidan, M.; Dorfman, P.W.; Gupta, V. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations; The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies-SAGE Publications, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Abu Bakar, H.; McCann, R.M. Workgroup diversity: Surface-level actual similarity and deep-level perceived similarity in leader-member relationship communication. Corp. Commun. Int. J. 2018, 23, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, S.H.; Abu Bakar, H.; Mohamad, B. The effects of advertising appeals on consumers’ behavioural intention towards global brands. J. Islam. Mark. 2019, 11, 440–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merkin, R. Pakistani Cultural Characteristics: Updated VSM Scores and Facework Geared towards Increasing Women’s Access to Education. Commun. Differ. 2016, 2016, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, R. The effect of religious, cultural and social identity on population genetic structure among Muslims in Pakistan. Ann. Hum. Biol. 2005, 32, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Majid, A. Cultural influence in Advertising Advertisements in Sweden and Pakistan. Univ. Gothenbg. 2013, 4, 1–52. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, S.; Jeong, S.-H.; Hwang, Y. Why are there cross-national differences in response to comparative advertising?: Some mediators. J. Mark. Commun. 2016, 24, 569–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romberg, A.R.; Bennett, M.; Tulsiani, S.; Simard, B.; Kreslake, J.M.; Favatas, D.; Vallone, D.M.; Hair, E.C. Validating Self-Reported Ad Recall as a Measure of Exposure to Digital Advertising: An Exploratory Analysis Using Ad Tracking Methodology. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Munsch, A. Millennial and generation Z digital marketing communication and advertising effectiveness: A qualitative exploration. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 2021, 31, 10–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H. Advertising Appeals and Cultural Values in Social Media Commercials in UK, Brasil and India: Case Study of Nokia and Samsung. Int. J. Soc. Behav. Educ. Econ. Bus Ind. Eng. 2014, 8, 2406–2414. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, K.T. Digital marketing strategies that Millennials find appealing, motivating, or just annoying. J. Strat. Mark. 2011, 19, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, S.H.; Adamu, A.A.; Ogadimma, E.C.; Hasnain, A. The Influences of Political Values Manifested in Advertisements on Political Participation: Moderating Roles of Self-transcendence and Conservation. J. Creative Commun. 2020, 15, 318–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, C.-H.; Tan, G.W.-H.; Tan, B.-I.; Ooi, K.-B. Mobile advertising: The changing landscape of the advertising industry. Telemat. Inform. 2015, 32, 720–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Su, S.; Zhou, L.; Liu, X. Attitude Toward the Viral Ad: Expanding Traditional Advertising Models to Interactive Advertising. J. Interact. Mark. 2013, 27, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okazaki, S.; Mueller, B.; Taylor, C.R. Measuring soft-sell versus hard-sell advertising appeals. J Advert. 2010, 39, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bergkvist, L.; Langner, T. Construct Measurement in Advertising Research. J. Advert. 2017, 46, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terlutter, R.; Diehl, S.; Mueller, B. The GLOBE study—Applicability of a new typology of cultural dimensions for cross-cultural marketing and advertising research. Int. Advert. Commun. 2006, 2006, 419–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.-C.; Chang, W.-P.; Chang, H.-H. Consumer attitudes toward blogger’s sponsored recommendations and purchase intention: The effect of sponsorship type, product type, and brand awareness. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 34, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, S.H.; Abu Bakar, H.; Mohamad, B. Relationships between the advertising appeal and behavioral intention: The mediating role of the attitude towards advertising appeal and moderating role of cultural norm. J. Bus. Retail. Manag. Res. 2018, 12, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, J.; Hong, I.B. Predicting positive user responses to social media advertising: The roles of emotional appeal, informativeness, and creativity. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2016, 36, 360–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, F.; Huang, L.; Dou, W. Social Factors in User Perceptions and Responses to Advertising in Online Social Networking Communities. J. Interact. Advert. 2009, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, S.-C.; Kamal, S.; Kim, Y. Understanding consumers’ responses toward social media advertising and purchase intention toward luxury products. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 2013, 4, 158–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jai, T.-M.; Burns, L.D.; King, N.J. The effect of behavioral tracking practices on consumers’ shopping evaluations and repurchase intention toward trusted online retailers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2013, 29, 901–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bright, L.F.; Daugherty, T. Does customization impact advertising effectiveness? An exploratory study of consumer perceptions of advertising in customized online environments. J. Mark. Commun. 2012, 18, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brewer, P.; Venaik, S. Individualism–Collectivism in Hofstede and GLOBE. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2011, 42, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, T.P. Personalized ads on Facebook: An effective marketing tool for online marketers. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 39, 230–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okazaki, S.; Taylor, C.R. Social media and international advertising: Theoretical challenges and future directions. Int. Mark. Rev. 2013, 30, 56–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taylor, C.R.; Okazaki, S. Do Global Brands Use Similar Executional Styles Across Cultures? A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Television Advertising. J. Advert. 2015, 44, 276–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- House, R.; Javidan, M.; Hanges, P.; Dorfman, P. Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. J. World Bus. 2002, 37, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raza, S.H.; Abu Bakar, H.; Bin Mohamad, B. Advertising appeals and Malaysian culture norms. J. Asian Pac. Commun. 2018, 28, 61–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ducoffe, R.H. How Consumers Assess the Value of Advertising. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 1995, 17, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, J.S.; Ri, S.Y.; Egan, B.D.; Biocca, F.A. The cross-platform synergies of digital video advertising: Implications for cross-media campaigns in television, Internet and mobile TV. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 48, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sari, D.; Kusuma, B. Does Luxury Brand Perception Matter In Purchase Intention? A Comparison Between A Japanese Brand And A German Brand. ASEAN Mark. J. 2014, 6, 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaman, U.; Nadeem, R.D.; Nawaz, S.; Ardito, L. Cross-country evidence on project portfolio success in the Asia-Pacific region: Role of CEO transformational leadership, portfolio governance and strategic innovation orientation. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2020, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaman, U.; Jabbar, Z.; Nawaz, S.; Abbas, M. Understanding the soft side of software projects: An empirical study on the interactive effects of social skills and political skills on complexity–performance relationship. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2019, 37, 444–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baron, R.M.; Kenny, D.A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hayes, A.F. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium. Commun. Monogr. 2009, 76, 408–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sniehotta, F.F.; Presseau, J.; Araújo-Soares, V. Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychol. Rev. 2014, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meuller, B.; Diehl, S.; Terlutter, R. GLOBE Cultural Dimensions: Providing Insight for advertising Execuation in the Global Marketplace. Adv. Advert. Res. 2015, 5, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
M | SD | PDA | ADA | OPI | GE | PDA | ADA | OPI | GE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | Pak | Mal | Pak | Mal | Pak | Pak | Pak | Mal | Mal | Mal | ||
PDA | 4.66 | 4.18 | 0.77 | 1.04 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
ADA | 4.32 | 4.22 | 0.68 | 0.93 | 0.49 * | 1 | 0.84 * | 1 | ||||
OPI | 4.40 | 4.21 | 0.77 | 0.91 | 0.44 * | 0.64 * | 1 | 0.71 * | 0.81 * | 1 | ||
GE | 4.89 | 4.73 | 1.02 | 0.79 | 0.12 * | 0.51 * | 0.53 * | 1 | 0.58 * | 0.29 * | 0.69 * | 1 |
Levene Test of Equality | F = 15.9 | F = 3.91 | t = 4.91 | t = 2.10 |
Model | x2/df | SRMR | GFI | TLI | IFI | CFI | RMSEA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
One-factor (Pakistan) | 2.24 | 0.061 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.033 |
Two-factor (Pakistan) | 1.78 | 0.060 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.035 |
Four-factor (Pakistan) | 2.67 | 0.059 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.036 |
One-factor (Malaysia) | 3.71 | 0.059 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.040 |
Two-factor (Malaysia) | 1.34 | 0.060 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.98 | 0.051 |
Four-factor (Malaysia) | 2.45 | 0.058 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.048 |
α | CR | AVE | PDA | ADA | OPI | GE | PDA | ADA | OPI | GE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | Pak | Mal | Pak | Mal | Pak | Mal | Pak | Pak | Pak | Mal | Mal | Mal | ||
PDA | 0.74 | 0.93 | 0.941 | 0.932 | 0.522 | 0.523 | 0.722 | 0.723 | ||||||
ADA | 0.86 | 0.95 | 0.968 | 0.967 | 0.512 | 0.504 | 0.40 * | 0.714 | 0.51 * | 0.709 | ||||
OPI | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.940 | 0.932 | 0.513 | 0.517 | 0.38 * | 0.54 * | 0.716 | 0.27 * | 0.67 ** | 0.719 | ||
GE | 0.73 | 0.84 | 0.862 | 0.906 | 0.511 | 0.603 | 0.23 * | 0.41 * | 0.29 ** | 0.715 | 0.21 * | 0.17 * | 0.62 * | 0.776 |
Pakistan | Malaysia | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X-Y | X-M | M-Y | X-Y | X-M | M-Y | |
Dependent Variables | Y: OPI | M: ADA | Y: OPI | Y: OPI | M: ADA | Y: OPI |
Step 1: Independent Variable PDA | 0.27 ** (c) | 0.49 * (a) | 0.17 * (c′) | 0.59 * (c) | 0.86 * (a) | 0.15 * (c′) |
Total Effect | 0.44 * | - | - | 0.75 *** | - | - |
R2 Step 2: Mediator ADA | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.75 | 0.67 |
0.56 * (b) | 0.69 * (b) | |||||
X: PDA | Estimated variance | X: PDA | Estimated variance | |||
(aj bj) = 0.01 | (aj bj) = 0.01 | |||||
E (aj bj) = 0.06 | E (aj bj) = 0.01 | |||||
95% CI = [0.05, 0.032] | 95% CI = [0.01, 0.039] | |||||
SE = 0.05 | SE = 0.03 | |||||
E (aj bj + C) = 0.27 | E (aj bj + C) = 0.38 | |||||
95% CI = [0.04, 0.031] | 95% CI = [0.02, 0.043] | |||||
SE = 0.04 | SE = 0.01 | |||||
R2 | 0.43 (c′) | 0.67 (c′) | ||||
Change R2 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 0.11 | −0.08 | 0.00 |
Log likelihood | 30 | 28 | 27 | 35 | 48 | 27 |
AIC | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
BIC | 18.01 | 18.06 | 18.41 | 15.53 | 18.04 | 20.6 |
Intercept | 2.35 * | 2.31 * | 1.27 * | 1.33 * | 4.19 * | 4.22 * |
Pakistan | Malaysia | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
DV Attitude | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 |
Step 1: Independent variables Digital advertising | 0.49 * | 0.40 * | 0.86 * | 0.82 * |
Gender egalitarianism | 0.29 * | 0.14 * | ||
R2 Step 2: Moderator Digital advertising X GE | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.75 | 0.73 |
0.18 * | 0.07 * | |||
R2 | 0.37 | 0.77 | ||
ΔR2 | 0.13 | 0.04 | ||
ΔR2 ADA in mediation effect on PDA-BI | 0.08 | 0.02 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Raza, S.H.; Zaman, U. Effect of Cultural Distinctiveness and Perception of Digital Advertising Appeals on Online Purchase Intention of Clothing Brands: Moderation of Gender Egalitarianism. Information 2021, 12, 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020072
Raza SH, Zaman U. Effect of Cultural Distinctiveness and Perception of Digital Advertising Appeals on Online Purchase Intention of Clothing Brands: Moderation of Gender Egalitarianism. Information. 2021; 12(2):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020072
Chicago/Turabian StyleRaza, Syed Hassan, and Umer Zaman. 2021. "Effect of Cultural Distinctiveness and Perception of Digital Advertising Appeals on Online Purchase Intention of Clothing Brands: Moderation of Gender Egalitarianism" Information 12, no. 2: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020072
APA StyleRaza, S. H., & Zaman, U. (2021). Effect of Cultural Distinctiveness and Perception of Digital Advertising Appeals on Online Purchase Intention of Clothing Brands: Moderation of Gender Egalitarianism. Information, 12(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020072