Next Article in Journal
Nanoparticles in Bone Regeneration: A Narrative Review of Current Advances and Future Directions in Tissue Engineering
Next Article in Special Issue
The Exponential Shapeshifting Response of N-Vinylcaprolactam Hydrogel Bilayers Due to Temperature Change for Potential Minimally Invasive Surgery
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture and Mechanical Properties Using Bone Surface Curvature Distributions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cuttlefish Bone-Derived Calcium Phosphate Bioceramics Have Enhanced Osteogenic Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JFB
Volume 15
Issue 9
10.3390/jfb15090240
jfb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Insights into the Dual Anticancer and Antibacterial Activities of Composites Based on Silver Camphorimine Complexes

by
Joana P. Costa
1,
Sílvia A. Sousa
2,
Jorge H. Leitão
2,
Fernanda Marques
3,
Marta M. Alves
1,* and
M. Fernanda N. N. Carvalho
1,*
1
Centro de Química Estrutural, Institute of Molecular Sciences and Departamento de Engenharia Química, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida António José de Almeida, n.º 12, 1000-043 Lisboa, Portugal
2
iBB-Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida António José de Almeida, n.º 12, 1000-043 Lisboa, Portugal
3
C2TN-Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares and Departamento de Engenharia e Ciências Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, EN 10, km 139.7, Bobadela, 2695-066 Loures, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15(9), 240; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15090240
Submission received: 21 July 2024 / Revised: 16 August 2024 / Accepted: 19 August 2024 / Published: 23 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design and Synthesis Composites for Biomedical Application)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hydroxyapatite (HAp) is a widely used biocompatible material in orthopedic composite preparations. However, HAp composites that exhibit both anticancer and antibacterial activities through bioactive coordination complexes are relatively rare. To explore orthopedic applications, we blended several silver camphorimine compounds with HAp to create [Ag(I)] composites. All compounds [Ag(NO3)(L)n] (n = 1,2) based on camphorimine (LA), camphor sulfonimine (LB) or imine bi-camphor (LC) ligands demonstrated significant cytotoxic activity (IC50 = 0.30–2.6 μgAg/mL) against osteosarcoma cancer cells (HOS). Based on their structural and electronic characteristics, four complexes (1–4) were selected for antibacterial evaluation against Escherichia coli, Burkholderia contaminans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. All complexes (1–4) revealed combined anticancer and antibacterial activities; therefore, they were used to prepare [Ag(I)]:HAp composites of 50:50% and 20:80% weight compositions and the activities of the composites were assessed. Results showed that they retain the dual anticancer and antibacterial characteristics of their precursor complexes. To replicate the clinical context of bone-filling applications, hand-pressed surfaces (pellets) were prepared. It is worth highlighting that no agglutination agent was necessary for the pellet’s consistency. The biological properties of the so-prepared pellets were assessed, and the HOS cells and bacteria spreading on the pellet’s surface were analyzed by SEM. Notably, composite 4B, derived from the bicamphor (LC) complex [Ag(NO3)(OC10H14N(C6H4)2NC10H14O)], exhibited significant anticancer activity against HOS cells and antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa, fostering potential clinical applications on post-surgical OS treatment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a primary malignant bone tumor that mainly affects children and young adults [1,2]. Surgery, followed by chemotherapy to control micro-metastasis after surgical resection, is the strategy typically used for the management of OS [3]. Advances in these treatments, such as targeted therapies that signalize and destroy cancer cells or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, that control tumor growth before surgery have transformed this fatal disease into a less life-threatening condition, resulting in an increased survival rate for some patients. Nevertheless, the high tendency of OS to metastasize, especially in the lungs, and the development of chemotherapy resistance with associated severe side effects are still major concerns [4]. Consequently, the control of cancer metastasis and infections in patients becomes a challenge to decrease morbidity and mortality in patients with OS. The increasing complexity of the disease requires a multidisciplinary approach, including exhaustive chemotherapeutic treatments and control of microbial infections due to immunity impairments. In severe OS, surgery and bone reconstruction are often associated with potential benefits for patients, like restoring function, tumor removal or pain, reduction the risk of metastasis and, overall, increasing the chances of survival [5,6].
Hydroxyapatite (HAp) is often used for bone reconstruction due to its biocompatibility and adhesion properties [7,8,9,10]. However, its brittleness and low fracture toughness limit load-bearing applications, especially in patients that require extensive bone resection. Additionally, HA’s inability to prevent cancer recurrence further limits its effectiveness in treating OS, where both mechanical durability and anticancer functionality are crucial for successful outcomes.
This is of special concern for oncologic patients, who are highly vulnerable to infections caused by opportunistic bacteria or fungi due to their immune-depressed systems. In fact, nosocomial bacterial infections are the major complication of orthopedic implant surgery, resulting in high morbidity and extended hospital stays [11]. Biofilm formation on the implants is the major cause of the resistance of these bacteria to the currently used antibiotics and compromises the host immune response. What constitutes bone implant-associated infections, those caused by Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa, or Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus are the most frequent and the most difficult to treat due to multidrug resistance [12,13,14,15]. Burkholderia contaminans and Escherichia coli are bacterial strains that represent a considerable threat due to lung and other organ infections associated with bone cancer metastasis [16].
To increase the success of OS treatments, a multidisciplinary approach able to face the above-mentioned risks is necessary. A potentially beneficial strategy is combining anticancer and antimicrobial agents [17] with the well-known biocompatibility of HAp, since the so-generated biologically active composites may reinforce the oncologic treatment and concomitantly reduce the occurrence of metastasis and infections. To bind composites, agglutinating agents (e.g., polymers) are commonly required [18,19]. Some attempts to functionalize biocompatible materials with commercial antibiotics aimed at preventing post-surgical infections associated with implants for bone reconstruction have been made [18,20,21,22,23]. However, the increasing resistance of the abovementioned microorganisms to commercially available antibiotics requires new agents (molecules or nanoparticles) acting by different mechanisms to defeat microorganism proliferation and/or biofilm formation [17,24,25,26]. Under such a purpose, coordination compounds are feasible options due to the presence of the metal that may enable specific types (e.g., redox) of interactions with microorganisms.
A strategy often reported has been the functionalization of hydroxyapatite (Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) with metals (Ag, Ni, Si, Se, Zn, others) having complementary bioactive properties [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. However, scarce examples exist [35] of bioactive coordination compounds being used to prepare composites of HAp, or other bone reconstruction agents while acting as anticancer/antimicrobial agents [20,21,28].
Within our previous research work, the combined anticancer and antimicrobial activities of several Ag(I) camphorimine complexes have been reported against ovarian cancer cells and a set of microbial strains [36,37,38]. Under the scope of orthopedic applications, HAp composites were now prepared based on the Ag(I) camphorimine complexes. The coordination polymer character of the complexes enables agglutination with HAp without the need for extra agglutinating agents. The biological properties of the new composites were evaluated against the human HOS osteosarcoma cell line and several bacterial strains (E. coli ATCC25922, B. contaminans IST408, P. aeruginosa 477, S. aureus Newman).
The herein results pertaining to the characteristics of HAp composites functionalized with Ag(I) camphorimine complexes showed that they combine anticancer (HOS cells) and antibacterial properties while enhancing the HAp agglomeration character.

2. Results and Discussion

The results obtained by us under the study of the anticancer and/or antimicrobial properties of coordination compounds based on camphorimine ligands (L) [39] showed that the activities of the complexes can be modulated through the selection of the metal center (e.g., Ag(I), Au(I), Cu(I), Cu(II)) and the camphorimine substituent (Y, R, or Z, Table 1).
In this study, the anticancer activity of a selection of silver camphorimine complexes ([Ag(I)]) was assessed against HOS osteosarcoma cells. In parallel, the antibacterial properties of complexes 1 and 2 against E. coli ATCC25922, B. contaminans IST408, P. aeruginosa 477 and S. aureus Newman strains were also assessed. This study also includes the results [40] previously obtained on the antibacterial activities of complexes 3–4 against the same bacterial strains.
Foreseeing orthopedic applications the preparation of bioactive [Ag(I)]:HAp composites were initiated aiming at combining cytotoxic activity towards HOS osteosarcoma cells, and antibacterial properties against Gram-negative (E. coli ATCC25922, B. contaminans IST408, P. aeruginosa 477) and Gram-positive (S. aureus Newman) strains.

2.1. Cytotoxic Activity of the Ag (I) Camphorimine Complexes towards HOS Osteosarcoma Cells

Three sets of Ag(I) camphorimine compounds—[Ag(I)]: [Ag(NO3)(OC10H14NY)] (Y = NH2, 1), [Ag(NO3)(OC10H14NY)2] (Y = 3-OHC6H4, 2; Y = OH; Y = C6H5), [Ag(NO3){(OC10H14N)2Z}] (Z = 4-(C6H4), 3; Z = 4-(C6H4)2, 4) and [Ag(NO3)(O2SNC10H14NR)2] (R = C6H5; R = C6H4NH2)) (Table 1) based on different types of camphor-derived ligands (LA, LB or LC) were synthesized using previously reported procedures [41]. The bulk purity of all complexes was confirmed by elemental analysis and 1H and 13C NMR, and their activity against HOS cancer cells was evaluated by the MTT assay based on the metabolic activity of viable cells (see Section 6).
The IC50 values (Figure 1) show that all complexes efficiently inhibit HOS cellular viability, no matter the type of camphorimine ligand (LA, OC10H14NY; LB, O2SNC10H14NR; LC, OC10H14N)2Z) or the metal-to-ligand ratio (Table 1). In contrast, the free camphorimine ligands display very low cytotoxic activity (e.g., OC10H14NNH2: IC50 > 100 µM) under the same experimental conditions.
The lowest IC50 values (highest activity) were obtained for the bi-camphor complexes [Ag(NO3)(LC)] (3, 4) (Figure 1) while the highest IC50 value (23.7 ± 10 µM, i.e., 2.6 ± 0.1 μgAg/mL) was obtained for the camphor sulfonimine complex [Ag(NO3)(LB)2] (LB, R = PhNH2).
The IC50 values for the complexes with different types of ligands [Ag(NO3)(L)2] (L = LA, Y = C6H5, 8.8 ± 2.5 µM or LB; R = C6H5, 8.3 ± 2.0 µM) and equal imine substituents (Y = R) do not differ appreciably. In contrast, the IC50 values for the complexes with the same type of ligand (LB) but different imine substituents (e.g., R = C6H5: 8.3 ± 2.0 µM or R = C6H4NH2: 23.7 ± 10.0 µM) differ considerably, showing that the imine substituent has a higher impact on the cytotoxicity of the complexes than the bicyclic (LA) or tricyclic (LB) character of the camphor-derived ligand, as previously observed for the A2780 and OVCAR3 ovarian cancer cells [36].
The IC50 values versus the silver content (µgAg/mL) are ca. one order of magnitude lower than those (µM) of the complexes (Figure 1).
The IC50 value of the metal precursor (AgNO3) does not differ much from those of the complexes, in agreement with the cytotoxic activity relying on the metal ion, as previously reported [37]. Nevertheless, complexes 1, 3, and 4 display lower IC50 values (Figure 1) than silver nitrate. The low IC50 values (Table 1) displayed by complexes 3 and 4 are attributed to the characteristics of the bi-camphor ligands (LC) that can better enable the cytotoxic activity of the complexes. These IC50 values measured (Table 1) for complexes 3 (3.1 ± 3.0 μM) and 4 (3.1 ± 0.9 μM) are lower than those of actinomycin D (9 μM) [42] or denosumab (34.8 μM) [43], which are drugs presently under use to treat OS.

2.2. Cytotoxic and Antibacterial Activities of [Ag(I)]:HAp Composites

The cytotoxic activity of the Ag(I) camphorimine complexes against HOS cells (Table 2) encouraged a deeper insight into their behavior, foreseeing possible orthopedic applications. Thus, a selection of complexes ([Ag(NO3)(LA)] (Y = NH2, 1), [Ag(NO3)(LA)2] (Y = m-OH(C6H4), 2), [Ag(NO3)(LC)] (Z = p-(C6H4), 3), [Ag(NO3)(LC)] (Z = p-(C6H4)2, 4)) was used for preparation of [Ag(I)]:HAP composites with compositions 50:50% and 20:80% weight ratios (see Section 6).
The high percentage of HAp in the 20:80% [Ag(I)]:HAp composites interfered with the MTT colorimetric method, preventing the accurate determination of their cytotoxic activity. Consequently, solely the activity of the [Ag(I)]:HAp composites with 50:50% weight ratios (Table 2) against the HOS cancer cells is reported. To facilitate perception, a graphical representation of IC50 and MIC values is displayed (Figure 2).
The herein results show that the cytotoxic activities of the composites, as expected, are typically one order of magnitude lower than those of the precursor complexes (Table 2) and follow the trend in their precursor complexes.
To obtain insights into the antibacterial activity of composites (1A–4A and 1B–4B) towards the bacterial strains E. coli ATCC25922, B. contaminans IST408, P. aeruginosa 477, and S. aureus Newman, their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were evaluated. The results (Table 2, Figure 2b) show that the composites have lower antibacterial activity (higher MIC values) than the precursor complexes, except for composite 2A, which displayed higher activity than complex 2 for the four bacterial strains under study (Figure 2b). Such a trend suggests that the substituent (m-OH(C6H4)) at the camphorimine ligand (L) prompts a structural organization into the [Ag(I)]:HAp composite (20:80%) that enhances the inhibition of bacterial activity. Such behavior is attributed to strong interactions being established between complex 2 and Hap, thus reducing the complex-to-complex interactions. This hypothesis is somehow corroborated by the fact that the effect is absent in the [Ag(I)]:HAp composite (2B, 50:50%) with a considerably lower quantity of HAp. From the composites under study, 2B displays the less encouraging results. Composites 1B, 3B, and 4B efficiently combine anticancer and antibacterial activities. Overall, the complexes and composites behave better against Gram-negative than Gram-positive (S. aureus Newman) bacteria.

3. Physiochemical Characterization of Ag(I) Complexes and [Ag(I)]:HAp Composites

The selected complexes (1, 2, 3, 4) and their derived composites [Ag(I)]:HAp, 50:50% weight composition) were physiochemically characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Powder X-Ray diffraction (PXRD), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) (Figure 3) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS).
As shown in Figure 3a, the particles that form the complexes are homogeneous. In 1 and 3, the bright spots observed are round-shaped in complex 1, while in complex 3, they are needle-like-shaped. Carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen, silver, and oxygen were identified in the samples by Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) analysis, as previously described for related camphorimine complexes [45]. A detailed analysis of the dark and bright spots observed in the powders of complexes 1 and 3 shows no difference in silver content.
EDS analysis of the composites (1B, 2B, 3B, 4B) confirmed the additional presence of calcium and phosphorus from HAp. Composites 1B and 3B are homogeneous, with Ag(I) complexes and HAp components evenly distributed. In contrast, composites 2B and 4B display a compact structure covered by blocks of the complex and HAp.
Visually, only complex 1 changed color in the composite; it went from gray to black; all the others kept the original color.
The crystallinity of the complexes and composites was analyzed by PXRD (Figure 3b). The comparison of the PXRD diffractograms of complexes and their derived composites shows that the crystallinity of complexes (1, 3) was preserved in composites (1B, 3B), and the amorphous nature of complex 2 was kept in composite (2B). A different pattern was observed for complex 4, which lost crystallinity and became amorphous within composite 4B. Such a loss of crystallinity is attributed to the characteristics of the imine bi-camphor ligand with a biphenyl spacer binding the two chiral camphor moieties. The versatility of the biphenyl spacer allows the molecule to rotate and rearrange as a disordered system during the preparation of the composite (ethanol: dissolution/evaporation along with mechanical stirring).
FTIR analysis was undertaken to ascertain whether the complexes’ integrity is maintained in the composites. The data obtained for composites (1B, 2B, 3B, Figure 3c) are consistent with the integrity of the complexes being retained in the composites since the functional bands (νC=O and νNO3) are observed at identical wavenumber values, although with less intensity. In contrast, in the FTIR spectrum of composite 4B, the νCO and νNO3- bands switched intensities. Such behavior is attributed to structural changes in the complex inside the composite, in agreement with the loss of crystallinity identified by PXRD. The FTIR bands characteristic of HAp (1086, 1061, 604, and 572 cm−1) were observed in all the composites.

4. Biological Activity of Pellets Obtained from [Ag(I)]:HAp Composite

To mimic the conditions used by surgeons during bone filling, pellets from composites were gently shaped to simulate clinical environments to obtain insights into the biological response of the [Ag(I)]:HAp composites to manual pressure. Such an approach is innovative since reports on the study of biofilm formation on pellets from HAp composites are scarce and have been typically reported to involve powders of doped HAp composites or coatings [46,47,48].
No pellets from 20:80% [Ag(I)]:HAp composites could be obtained due to the lack of aggregation and poor tenacity of the material. In contrast, the pellets obtained from [Ag(I)]:HAp (50:50%) composites revealed excellent aggregation. No agglutinating agent was necessary due to the physical interaction between the complexes and HAp that exempts the need for external aggregators. Such behavior is considered an added value concerning orthopedic applications.
The anticancer and antibacterial properties of the [Ag(I)]:HAp (50:50%) composites and HAp pellets were assessed. For a better comprehension of the process, the analysis of the pellet surface was made upon exposure to cancer cells or bacteria.

4.1. Pellets’ Superficial Behavior

Initial inspection of the white HAp pellet showed it was very frail, in contrast with pellets 2B, 3B, and 4B that were compact and firm. Pellet 1B was difficult to detach from the press; its texture was comparable to that of hard plastic, dark with a brilliant surface. Pellet 2B presented a dark brown color, 3B a dark yellow, and 4B a yellow color (Figure 4a). Consequently, the pellets maintained the same color as the composite powder.
To screen the behavior of the pellets in contact with body fluids, they were immersed in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), the medium used for supporting the growth of HOS cells. Upon 24 h of immersion, the visual inspection revealed the integrity of all pellets obtained from the composites (1B–4B). On the contrary, the pellets prepared solely from HAp were desegregated. Since cell fixation steps were necessary for the subsequent study, which involved cancer cells and bacteria spreading over the pellet surface, an investigation was conducted to assess the integrity of the pellets after the fixation process. SEM images were obtained and analyzed (Figure 4). Images revealed that the surface of the pellets remained homogeneous after the immersion and fixation steps (Figure 4). The HAp pellet showed loose pieces (Figure 4b), but the surface stayed uniform. Pellet 1B presented slits, 2B and 3B displayed a few more holes after immersion, while at pellet 4B, no visible alterations could be detected. The color of the pellets showed negligible differences between the two stages.
The pellets’ consistency supports the ability of the complexes (1–4) to act as agglomerating agents, given the lack of an external binder.

4.2. Cell Cytotoxic Response

To investigate the effects of the composite surface on the morphology of the HOS osteosarcoma cancer cells spreading, hand-made pellets of composites 1B–4B were incubated with the cells (HOS) for 24 h. SEM (Figure 5) analysis of the surface showed cells with typical spheroid shapes on either the pellet surface (Figure 5b) or the surface surrounding the pellet (Figure 5c) [49]. For comparison purposes, control images were collected from cells spread over glass (Figure 5a).
The analysis of the surface of the pellets and lamella (upon 24 h exposure) shows HOS cells adherent to the surface of the pellet as well as cells in the lamella surrounding the pellet. However, the morphologies are different from one another (Figure 5).
The morphology of the cells adhered to composites 2B, 3B, and HAp pellets is similar, suggesting that complexes allowed cells to actively phagocytize HAp (Figure 5b). A different behavior was evidenced by pellets 1B and 4B that show no explicit HAp uptake by cells, suggesting that somehow complexes 1 and 4 impaired it.
On the surrounds of HAp, 1B and 2B pellets (Figure 5c) dispersed HAp fragments along with spheroid cells, suggesting that the cells were up taking these loose particles [49]. The release of HAp particles into the pellet’s surroundings followed the order 1B > HAp > 2B. These three types of pellets were brittle 24 h after immersion, whereas those derived from complexes 3 and 4 remained unbroken (Figure 4 and Figure 5b). The disaggregation pattern observed for composites 1B and 2B can be attributed to the hydrogen bonding characteristics of the camphorimine substituents (Y, Z, Table 1) at the complexes (i.e., NNH2 in 1 and m-OHC6H4 in 2) that increase hydrophilicity, facilitate interactions with the medium or cells, and prompt disaggregation of the pellets. It is noteworthy that composite 1B developed a net around cells (Figure 5b), which we hypothesize to result from cells preferring interactions with the 1B composite to those with bare HAp (Figure 5b). Such behavior may be relevant to enhancing the efficacy of this composite as an anticancer agent. From the systems under study, only composites 2B and 3B favored mineralization by osteosarcoma cells.
A flat cell morphology similar to the control was seen in the surroundings of the 3B and 4B pellets, where no loose HAp fragments could be depicted (Figure 5c).
Pellets obtained from composites 3B and 4B were chosen for further antibacterial assay and morphological analysis because the HOS cancer cells showed distinct morphology when incubated with those pellets, while their precursor composites behave similarly in terms of anticancer and antibacterial activities (Figure 5).

4.3. Antibacterial Response

The antibacterial activity of the pellets obtained from [Ag(I)]:HAp composites (3B and 4B) were evaluated by incubating the pellets with Mueller Hinton Broth liquid medium (MHB) inoculated with P. aeruginosa 477 or S. aureus Newman. As representative examples, one Gram-negative (P. aeruginosa) and one Gram-positive (S. aureus) strain were chosen. Pellets composed uniquely of HAp were used as controls. After incubation with P. aeruginosa and S. aureus on the surface of the HAp pellets, colonies of S. aureus (ca. 109 CFUs/mL) and P. aeruginosa (ca. 107 CFUs/mL) were detected. This trend was expected since HAp by itself was reported to have some anti-biofilm properties against P. aeruginosa [50]. Under the experimental conditions used for HAp pellets, those containing composites 3B or 4B demonstrated strong growth inhibition. No CFUs of P. aeruginosa were detected on the pellets of composite 4B, in agreement with their excellent efficiency against colony formation. For the same bacterial strain, the pellets from composite 3B showed a reduction of 3 log CFUs/mL (Figure 6).
In terms of activity against S. aureus, growth inhibition by the 3B pellet was less pronounced than for P. aeruginosa. Yet, reductions of 4 and 6 logs in the S. aureus CFUs were detected in the pellets of composites 3B or 4B, respectively (Figure 6). Although pellets from both composites showed high activity against the bacterial strains under study, the 4B pellet performed better. Since the HAp pellet (used as a control) showed no activity, the antibacterial activity of pellets containing composites 3B and 4B can be attributed to the Ag(I) camphorimine complexes (3 and 4).
To gain insights into the bacterial morphology spreading over the pellets, SEM analysis was undertaken (Figure 7).
The SEM images of the surface of the HAp pellets showed cells of P. aeruginosa with their typical rod-like shape (bacilli) and S. aureus with a spherical-like shape (cocci), both forming biofilms [51,52,53,54]. In contrast, there was no sign of biofilm formation over pellets obtained from composites 3B and 4B, in agreement with the above-mentioned CFU results. The isolated cell morphology was similar to that observed over HAp pellet.
A schematic representation of the results obtained for complexes [Ag(NO3)(LC)] (3, 4; LC: bi-camphor ligands) and their derived composites (3B, 4B) and pellets is displayed in Figure 8. Data show that complexes and composites have significant potential either as anticancer or antibacterial agents. It is noteworthy that complexes 3 and 4 exhibit IC50 values (ca. 0.3 μgAg/mL, Table 1) against HOS in the range of the OS anticancer agents in use [41,42] (e.g., Dactinomycin, IC50 = 0.42 μM) [55] and activity against common bacterial infections.
In terms of antibacterial efficacy against P. aeruginosa, complex 3 displays a MIC value (3.6 ± 0.8 μgAg/mL, Table 2) ca. 4 times lower than that of complex 4, evidencing its higher antibacterial activity. Against S. aureus, the two complexes display higher MIC values in the same range (Table 2), still consistent with high activity.
The composites (3B, 4B), with half of the Ag(I) compared to the complexes, show a tenfold increase in the IC50 values against HOS (ca. 3–4 μgAg/mL, Figure 8). In what concerns MIC values against P. aeruginosa assessed for the composites 3B and 4B distinct trends are observed. Composite 3B and the precursor complex (3) display analogous MIC values (Table 2), while the MIC value for composite 4B is considerably lower than that of 4 (Table 2). Conversely, the composite MIC values for S. aureus are both higher than those of the related complexes (Table 2).
The results obtained are consistent with a beneficial synergic interaction between the complexes (3, 4) and HAp that enhances the activity of the composites against P. aeruginosa. Although composites inhibit cell proliferation, no such enhancement was detected for S. aureus (Figure 8).

5. Conclusions

The cytotoxic activities of a set of Ag(I) coordination compounds with three distinct types of camphor imine ligands were screened against osteosarcoma HOS cancer cells. Concomitantly, the antibacterial activity of the complexes against E. coli ATCC25922, B. contaminans IST408, P. aeruginosa 477, and S. aureus Newman bacterial strains was also assessed. The results showed that the complexes have excellent anticancer properties (HOS, IC50: 0.30–1.4 μgAg/mL) combined with good antibacterial activities. From the eight complexes under study, four were selected (1–4) for further investigation based on their structural differences and combined anticancer and antibacterial activities.
Focused on potential orthopedic applications, composites ([Ag(I)]:HAp) with 20:80% and 50:50% weight compositions were successfully prepared. The evaluation of the biological properties of the 50:50% composites (1B–4B) demonstrates that they maintain the synergic anticancer/antibacterial activities of the precursor complexes. The loss of integrity of the 20:80% composites in the biological medium precluded accurate data, and their study was abandoned.
The IC50 values (HOS cells) obtained for composites 1B–4B are higher (ca. one order of magnitude) than those assessed for their precursor complexes, but still significantly low from the point of view of orthopedic applications. In what concerns the MIC values, most of the composites display higher values than those of the complexes, although the differences depend on the complex and the bacterial strain. Significant exceptions to the tendency of loss of antibacterial activity by the composites, compared to the precursor complexes, are composites 3B (3.8 ± 0.6 μgAg/mL) and 4B (3.6 ± 0.8 μgAg/mL) that show MIC values against P. aeruginosa similar (3B) to the precursor complex (3, 3.6 ± 0.8 μgAg/mL) or even lower (4B) than complex 4 (14.3 ± 1.1 μgAg/mL). Such results are especially significant since Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a multi-resistant bacterium often responsible for infections in post-surgical orthopedic processes.
To support the potential use of the [Ag(I)]:HAp composites in bone filling processes, pellets were manually prepared, and their anticancer activity towards HOS cells, antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and morphological properties were assessed. The first outcome from the preparation and study of the pellets was their consistency, showing that the Ag(I) camphorimine complexes act as suitable agglomerating agents without the need for an external binder. In the biological medium, pellets maintained their integrity and homogeneity, as far as observed through morphological analysis. After 24 h incubation with HOS cancer cells, pellets showed different behaviors concerning morphology and cell interaction. When exposed to the two strains of bacteria, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, the pellets preserved the antiproliferative efficiency of the complexes, as shown by CFU and SEM images.
The herein results consistently evidence that the dual anticancer and antibacterial properties of silver camphorimine complexes are retained in composites [Ag(I)]:HAp (50:50% in weight). Still more relevant is that active pellets that potentially mimic bone filling conditions can be obtained from the composites without the need for an additional agglutinating agent. The intrinsic nature of these complexes, structurally arranged as coordination polymers, qualifies them as effective aggregating agents for potential clinical applications.
From the composites under study, 4B displays the highest HOS anticancer and antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa which is one of the bacteria that causes the highest concern due to antibiotic resistance.
The overall reported results on the combined anticancer and antibacterial properties of composites and pellets derived from silver camphorimine complexes foster complementary studies to evaluate their use in clinical settings.

6. Experimental Section

6.1. Synthesis of Complexes, Composites, and Pellets

All the camphor imine complexes, except [Ag(NO3){SO2NC10H13N(C6H4NH2-4)}2]·5/2H2O were previously synthesized and characterized according to published procedures [56]. The synthesis, analytical, and spectroscopic data concerning complex [Ag(NO3){(SO2NC10H13N(C6H4NH2-4)}2]·5/2H2O are described below.
The complex and the composites were prepared under nitrogen using Schlenk and vacuum techniques. The FT-IR spectra were obtained from KBr pellets using a JASCO FT/IR 4100 spectrometer (JASCO Corporation, 2967-5 Ishikawamachi, Hachioji, Tokyo Japan). The NMR spectra (1H, 13C, DEPT, HSQC, and HMBC) were obtained from CD3CN and DMSO solutions using Bruker Avance II+ (300 or 400 MHz) spectrometers (Bruker BioSpin AG, Industriestrasse 26, Fällanden, Switzerland. The NMR chemical shifts are referred in TMS (δ = 0 ppm). The elemental analyses were obtained from the accredited IST-Analysis Laboratory (LAIST).

6.2. Complex

[Ag(NO3){SO2NC10H13N(C6H4NH2-4)}2]·5/2H2O—AgNO3 (85 mg; 0.50 mmol) and SO2NC10H13NC6H4NH2-4 (256 mg; 1.0 mmol) were stirred under vacuum for 30 min. Then, CH3CN (5 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred for another 2 h. The suspension was filtered to remove reaction residues. Then, the solvent was partially evaporated, and the solution was placed in the fridge overnight. A dark red solid formed that was filtered off solution, affording the desired compound. Elem. Anal. for AgC32H38N7O7S2·5/2H2O Exp.: C, 45.5; N, 11.2; H, 4.9; S, 7.8. Calc.: C, 45.2; N, 11.5; H, 5.1; S, 7.5. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3485, 3384 (NH2); 1641 and 1623 (CN); 1384 (NO3); 1317 (SO2); 1161 (SO2). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3CN, δ ppm): 7.00 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); 6.71 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H); 3.45, 3.23 (2d, J = 14 Hz, 2H); 3.17 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H); 2.33–2.19 (m, 2H); 1.89–1.75 (m, 2H); 1.07 (s, 3H); 0.81 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CD3CN, δ ppm): 188.3, 162.7, 149.2, 139.0, 126.3, 122.8, 115.4, 63.9, 52.9, 50.5, 48.0, 29.6, 24.2, 19.8, 18.4.

6.3. Composites and Pellets

The composites were obtained by dissolving the suitable complex in ethanol and then adding the hydroxyapatite (1:1, w:w). The mixture was stirred for ca. 15 min and then the solvent evaporated under vacuum.
The pellets were obtained from the appropriate composite by shaping the optimized quantity (30 mg) of composite powder to form a thin pellet. All the pellets have the same diameter. A manual press was used to shape the pellets.

6.4. Cytotoxic Assays

Cell Lines, Cell Culture Conditions and Stock Solutions

The human osteosarcoma cell line MNNG/HOS (CRL-1547) was obtained from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection). For the experiments, cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM with GlutaMAX™) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and maintained at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. The stocks of compounds’ solutions (10 mM) were prepared in DMSO, and serial dilutions from each stock were made in a complete medium (DMEM + FBS).

6.5. Cellular Viability

Cells were seeded in 96-well plates (2 × 104 cells/200 µL medium) and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere for 24 h to adhere. Then, the medium was discarded, and cells were incubated with the compounds at serial concentrations in complete medium in the range 0.1–100 µM for 24 h. After incubation, the cellular viability was determined using the colorimetric MTT assay as previously described [56]. This assay is based on the reduction of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) by mitochondrial dehydrogenases in metabolically active cells to form purple formazan crystals. Briefly, after incubation with the complexes, the medium was discarded and 200 µL MTT solution in PBS (0.5 mg/mL) was added. After 3 h of incubation at 37 °C, the MTT solution was aspirated and 200 µL DMSO was added to solubilize the formazan crystals that formed inside the cells [57]. The IC50 was determined from dose–response curves using the GraphPad Prism 8.01 software.
The viability assays with the [Ag(I)]:HAP composites followed the same procedure as described above, incubating the cells with the composites at serial concentrations in complete medium in the range 0.1–50 µg Ag/mL for 24 h.

6.6. SEM Studies

Cells were seeded in 6-well plates (2 × 105 cells/2 mL medium) over the HAP pellets and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere for 24 h. After incubation, cells in the pellets were fixed by a four-step wash procedure as previously described [45]. Briefly, the medium was discarded, and cells were first washed with distilled water and fixed for three cycles with ethanol at different percentages to promote fixation. After drying, the pellets were analyzed by SEM using a Phenom ProX G6 apparatus (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

6.7. Physicochemical Characterization

Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD)—data were acquired from powder samples of the complexes and composites using a D8 Advance Bruker AXS θ–2θ diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a LYNX EYE-XE detector, and a copper radiation source (Cu Kα, λ = 1.5406 Å), operated at 40 kV and 30 mA. Data were collected in the 5–50° 2θ range, with a step size of 0.05° and 0.5 s per step.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)—The images were acquired from powder of both complexes and composites and from pellets of composites using a Phenom ProX G6 apparatus (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA USA), and the elemental chemical composition was evaluated by the corresponding X-ray energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS).

6.8. Antibacterial Activity of the Complex and Composites

The antibacterial activity of complex 1 and the composites (1A–4A and 1B–4B) towards S. aureus Newman, E. coli ATCC25922, B. contaminans IST408, and P. aeruginosa 477 was assessed by the determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) using microdilution assays according to EUCAST (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) recommendations and as previously described [58]. S. aureus Newman (ATCC 13420) and E. coli ATCC25922 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia contaminans are from our own culture collection. Both trains were isolated from human infections [44]. In particular, S. aureus Newman was isolated from a case of secondarily infected tubercular osteomyelitis [58].
All the strains were maintained in Lennox Broth (LB) solid medium, composed of 10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L NaCl, and 20 g/L agar. A minor modification of the protocol was performed for testing the composite antibacterial activity assay. Briefly, stock solutions of the composites were prepared in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB, Sigma-Aldrich) at a final concentration of 80 µg Ag/mL. Serial 1:2 dilutions of stock solutions were prepared in 96-well microplates for each composite in MHB, the final concentrations being between 40 and 0.156 μgAg/mL. Exponentially grown bacterial cultures were diluted with MHB fresh medium and added to the 96-well plates at a final inoculum of 5 × 105 CFU/mL. The microplates were then incubated for 22 h at 37 °C. After incubation, the wells were examined for turbidity (growth), resuspended by pipetting, and their optical density was measured in a SPECTROstar Nano microplate reader (BMG Labtech) at 640 nm.
At least 3 independent experiments were performed in duplicate for each complex and composite under study. The MIC value was defined as the lowest concentration of the antimicrobial that inhibited the visible growth of a microorganism after the incubation time. Positive (no composites or complex) and negative controls (no inoculum) were performed for each experiment.

6.9. Antibacterial Activity of Pellets

The bacterial strains Pseudomonas aeruginosa 477 and Staphylococcus aureus Newman were used in this work and maintained in Lennox Broth (LB) solid medium. Both trains were isolated from human infections [44]. In particular, S. aureus Newman was isolated from a case of secondarily infected tubercular osteomyelitis [59].
To prepare the initial bacterial suspension, each strain was inoculated at a final optical density measured at λ = 640 nm (OD640) of 0.05 in 4 mL Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB, Sigma-Aldrich). After 5 h of incubation at 37 °C, the bacterial cultures were diluted to an OD640 of 0.025 in MHB. The sample pellets were gently added to 24-well cell culture plates with a flat bottom (CELLSTAR, Greiner bio-one) and 750 µL of the bacterial suspension was added. Wells without pellets samples were also tested to estimate the amount of bacterial colony-forming units (CFUs) without pellet samples. Wells containing only MHB (controls) were added to test the medium culture sterility.
After culturing the bacteria on 24 well plates for 42 h at 37 °C, the bacteria non-adherent and adherent to the pellet samples were quantified by serial dilution and spot-inoculation methods. For the non-adherent bacteria, the medium culture was serially diluted and plated onto the surface of LB agar plates for overnight culturing. For the adherent bacteria, the medium culture was removed, and the pellet samples were washed with 1 mL NaCl 0.9% (w/v). Then, the pellet samples were resuspended in 1 mL NaCl 0.9% (w/v), mechanically disrupted with a sterile tip, and vortexed for 1 min. The bacterial suspensions were serially diluted and plated onto LB agar plates for overnight culturing. The number of colonies on the plates was counted, and the number of colony-forming units of bacteria that were non-adhered and adhered to pellets was calculated.
For SEM analysis, the above protocol was performed for the pellet-adherent bacteria. However, the mechanical disruption of the pellet was not performed and the bacterial cells on the pellet were fixed as previously described [45].

6.10. Statistical Methods

All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 software. Data are plotted as mean ± SD for all bar graphs. Figure legends indicate the test run, one-way ANOVA with indicated multiple comparison tests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.F.N.N.C.; Methodology, M.M.A.; Validation, M.M.A., J.H.L. and F.M.; Formal analysis, J.P.C.; Investigation, J.P.C., S.A.S. and F.M.; Data curation, J.H.L. and F.M.; Writing—review & editing, M.F.N.N.C.; Supervision, M.F.N.N.C. and M.M.A.; Funding acquisition, M.F.N.N.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia—FCT through funding to projects from Centro de Química Estrutural UIDB/00100/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00100/2020), UIDP/00100/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/00100/2020); the Associate Laboratory Institute of Molecular Sciences (LA/P/0056/2020); C2TN (UID/Multi/04349/2019); the Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (projects UIDB/04565/2020 and UIDP/04565/2020); the Associate Laboratory Institute for Health and Bioeconomy-i4HB (project LA/P/0140/2020) and a PhD Grant to J.P.C. (UI/BD/152244/2021).

Data Availability Statement

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time due to technical limitations.

Acknowledgments

The Portuguese NMR IST-UL Centers are acknowledge for facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, X.; Wu, Q.; Gong, X.; Liu, J.; Ma, Y. Osteosarcoma: A review of current and future therapeutic approaches. Biomed. Eng. Online 2021, 20, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Czyzewski, K.; Galazka, P.; Zalas-Wiecek, P.; Gryniewicz-Kwiatkowska, O.; Gietka, A.; Semczuk, K.; Chelmecka-Wiktorczyk, L.; Zak, I.; Salamonowicz, M.; Fraczkiewicz, J.; et al. Infectious complications in children with malignant bone tumors: A multicenter nationwide study. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 1471–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Harrison, D.J.; Geller, D.S.; Gill, J.D.; Lewis, V.O.; Gorlick, R. Current and future therapeutic approaches for osteosarcoma. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2018, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Michalakis, K.; Bakopoulou, A.; Papachristou, E.; Vasilaki, D.; Tsouknidas, A.; Michailidis, N.; Johnstone, E. Evaluation of the Response of HOS and Saos-2 Osteosarcoma Cell Lines When Exposed to Different Sizes and Concentrations of Silver Nanoparticles. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 5013065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yao, W.; Cai, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhang, P.; Wang, X.; Du, X.; Niu, X. Biological reconstruction in the treatment of extremity sarcoma in femur, tibia, and humerus. Medicine 2020, 99, e20715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Anagnostakos, K.; Schröder, K. Antibiotic-Impregnated Bone Grafts in Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Int. J. Biomater. 2012, 2012, 538061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shi, H.; Zhou, Z.; Li, W.; Fan, Y.; Li, Z.; Wei, J. Hydroxyapatite Based Materials for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Brief and Comprehensive Introduction. Crystals 2021, 11, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ambrogi, V.; Quaglia, G.; Pietrella, D.; Nocchetti, M.; Di Michele, A.; Bolli, E.; Kaciulis, S.; Mezzi, A.; Padeletti, G.; Latterini, L. Silver@Hydroxyapatite functionalized calcium carbonate composites: Characterization, antibacterial and antibiofilm activities and cytotoxicity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 586, 152760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. George, S.M.; Nayak, C.; Singh, I.; Balani, K. Multifunctional Hydroxyapatite Composites for Orthopedic Applications: A Review. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 8, 3162–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mo, X.; Zhang, D.; Liu, K.; Zhao, X.; Li, X.; Wang, W. Nano-Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds Loaded with Bioactive Factors and Drugs for Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Olajide, J.L.; Desai, D.A.; Ajibola, J.O.; Adekoya, G.J.; Daramola, O.O.; Alaneme, K.K.; Fasiku, V.O.; Sadiku, E.R. Nosocomial Bacterial Infection of Orthopedic Implants and Antibiotic Hydroxyapatite/Silver-Coated Halloysite Nanotube With Improved Structural Integrity as Potential Prophylaxis. In Antibiotic Materials in Health Care; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; Chapter 11; pp. 171–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Koopaie, M.; Bordbar-Khiabani, A.; Kolahdooz, S.; Darbandsari, A.K.; Mozafari, M. Advanced surface treatment techniques counteract biofilm associated infections on dental implant. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 015417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rodríguez-Merchán, E.C.; Davidson, D.J.; Liddle, A.D. Recent Strategies to Combat Infections from Biofilm-Forming Bacteria on Orthopaedic Implants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kadirvelu, L.; Sivaramalingam, S.S.; Jothivel, D.; Chithiraiselvan, D.D.; Govindarajan, D.K.; Kandaswamy, K. A review on antimicrobial strategies in mitigating biofilm-associated infections on medical implants. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2024, 6, 100231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Cui, J.; Chen, K.-Y.; Kuo, S.H.; Sharma, J.; Bhatta, R.; Liu, Z.; Ellis-Mohr, A.; An, F.; Li, J.; et al. A smart coating with integrated physical antimicrobial and strain-mapping functionalities for orthopedic implants. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadg7397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Odri, G.A.; Tchicaya-Bouanga, J.; Yoon, D.J.Y.; Modrowski, D. Metastatic Progression of Osteosarcomas: A Review of Current Knowledge of Environmental versus Oncogenic Drivers. Cancers 2022, 14, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rong, Z.-J.; Yang, L.-J.; Cai, B.-T.; Zhu, L.-X.; Cao, Y.-L.; Wu, G.-F.; Zhang, Z.-J. Porous nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen scaffold containing drug-loaded ADM–PLGA microspheres for bone cancer treatment. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2016, 27, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Korbut, A.; Włodarczyk, M.; Rudnicka, K.; Szwed, A.; Płociński, P.; Biernat, M.; Tymowicz-Grzyb, P.; Michalska, M.; Karska, N.; Rodziewicz-Motowidło, S.; et al. Three Component Composite Scaffolds Based on PCL, Hydroxyapatite, and L-Lysine Obtained in TIPS-SL: Bioactive Material for Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, A.; Kargozar, S.; Baino, F.; Han, S.S. Additive Manufacturing Methods for Producing Hydroxyapatite and Hydroxyapatite-Based Composite Scaffolds: A Review. Front. Mater. Sec. Biomater. 2019, 6, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Al-Shalawi, F.D.; Ariff, A.H.M.; Jung, D.-W.; Ariffin, M.K.A.M.; Kim, C.L.S.; Brabazon, D.; Al-Osaimi, M.O. Biomaterials as Implants in the Orthopedic Field for Regenerative Medicine: Metal versus Synthetic Polymers. Polymers 2023, 15, 2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aghaei, H.; Nourbakhsh, A.A.; Karbasi, S.; JavadKalbasi, R.; Rafienia, M.; Nourbakhsh, N.; Bonakdar, S.; Mackenzie, K.J. Investigation on bioactivity and cytotoxicity of mesoporous nano-composite MCM-48/hydroxyapatite for ibuprofen drug delivery. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 7355–7362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xiong, H.; Du, S.; Ni, J.; Zhou, J.; Yao, J. Mitochondria and nuclei dual-targeted heterogeneous hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for enhancing therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin. Biomaterials 2016, 94, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Martínez-Vázquez, F.; Cabañas, M.; Paris, J.; Lozano, D.; Vallet-Regí, M. Fabrication of novel Si-doped hydroxyapatite/gelatine scaffolds by rapid prototyping for drug delivery and bone regeneration. Acta Mater. 2015, 15, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ramesh, N.; Moratti, S.C.; Dias, G.J. Hydroxyapatite–polymer biocomposites for bone regeneration: A review of current trends. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2018, 106, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fraile-Martínez, O.; García-Montero, C.; Coca, A.; Álvarez-Mon, M.A.; Monserrat, J.; Gómez-Lahoz, A.M.; Coca, S.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Acero, J.; Bujan, J.; et al. Applications of Polymeric Composites in Bone Tissue Engineering and Jawbone Regeneration. Polymers 2021, 13, 3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Akiyama, T.; Miyamoto, H.; Yonekura, Y.; Tsukamoto, M.; Ando, Y.; Noda, I.; Sonohata, M.; Mawatari, M. Silver Oxide-Containing Hydroxyapatite Coating Has In vivo Antibacterial Activity in the Rat Tibia. J. Orthopahedic. Res. 2013, 31, 1195–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Verma, R.; Mishra, S.R.; Gadore, V. Ahmaruzzaman, Hydroxyapatite-based composites: Excellent materials for environmental remediation and biomedical applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 315, 102890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Boanini, E.; Cassani, M.C.; Rubini, K.; Boga, C.; Bigi, A. (9R)-9-Hydroxystearate-Funcionalized Anticancer Ceramics Promote Loading of Silver Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yuan, Q.; Xu, A.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Z.; Wan, L.; Shi, X.; Lin, S.; Yuan, Z.; Deng, L. Bioactive silver doped hydroxyapatite composite coatings on metal substrates: Synthesis and characterization. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 218, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bhat, S.; Uthappa, U.T.; Altalhi, T.; Jung, H.Y.; Kurkuri, M.D. Functionalized Porous Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications: A Focused Review. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 8, 4039–4076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oliveira, C.; Menezes de Oliveira, A.L.; Chantelle, L.; Cavalcanti, G.R.S.; Landers, R.; Medina-Carrasco, S.; Orta, M.D.M.; Filho, E.C.S.; Jaber, M.; Fonseca, M.G. Functionalization of the hydroxyapatite surface with ZnO for alizarin immobilization. Appl. Surf. Scie. 2022, 593, 53412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mashak, A.; Bazraee, S.; Mobedi, H. Advances in drug delivery and biomedical applications of hydroxyapatite-based systems: A review. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2022, 45, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Marcello, E.; Maqbool, M.; Nigmatullin, R.; Cresswell, M.; Jackson, P.R.; Basnett, P.; Knowles, J.C.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Roy, I. Antibacterial composite materials based on the combination of polyhydroxyalkanoates with selenium and strontium co-substituted hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 647007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Seyfoori, A.; Ebrahimi, S.S.; Omidian, S.; Naghib, S.M. Multifunctional magnetic ZnFe2O4-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite particles for local anti-cancer drug delivery and bacterial infection inhibition: An in vitro study. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2019, 96, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lotlikar, S.R.; Gallaway, E.; Grant, T.; Popis, S.; Whited, M.; Guragain, M.; Rogers, R.; Hamilton, S.; Gerasimchuk, N.G.; Patrauchan, M.A. Polymeric Composites with Silver (I) cyanoximates Inhibit Biofilm Formation of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria. Polymers 2019, 11, 1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Leitão, J.H.; Sousa, S.A.; Leite, S.A.; Carvalho, M.F.N. Silver camphorimine complexes: Novel antibacterial compounds from old medicines. Antibiotics 2018, 7, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cardoso, J.M.; Correia, I.; Galvão, A.M.; Marques, F.; Carvalho, M.F.N. Synthesis and assessment of the cytotoxic and DNA binding properties of Ag(I) camphor sulphonylimine complexes. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2017, 166, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Costa, J.P.; Pinheiro, T.; Martins, M.S.; Carvalho, M.F.N.N.; Feliciano, J.R.; Leitão, J.H.; Silva, R.A.L.; Guerreiro, J.F.; Alves, L.M.C.; Custódio, I.; et al. Tuning the Biological Activity of Camphorimine Complexes through Metal Selection. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carvalho, M.F.N.; Leite, S.; Costa, J.P.; Galvão, A.M.; Leitão, J.H. Ag(I) camphor complexes: Antimicrobial activity by design. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2019, 199, 110791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cardoso, J.M.S.; Guerreiro, S.I.; Lourenço, A.; Alves, M.M.; Montemor, M.F.; Mira, N.P.; Leitão, J.H.; Carvalho, M.F.N.N. Ag(I) camphorimine complexes with antimicrobial activity towards clinically important bacteria and species of the Candida genus. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Costa, J.P.; Sousa, S.A.; Galvão, A.M.; Mata, J.M.; Leitão, J.H.; Carvalho, M.F.N.N. Key Parameters on the Antibacterial Activity of Silver Camphor Complexes. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Siddiqui, K.; Kim, G.W.; Lee, D.H.; Shin, H.R.; Yang, E.G.; Lee, N.T.; Yang, B.-S. Actinomycin D Identified as an Inhibitor of Discoidin Domain Receptor 2 Interaction with Collagen through an Insect Cell Based Screening of a Drug Compound Library. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 32, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Misso, G.; Porru, M.; Stoppacciaro, A.; Castellano, M.; De Cicco, F.; Leonetti, C.; Santini, D.; Caraglia, M. Evaluation of the in vitro and in vivo antiangiogenic effects of denosumab and zoledronic acid. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2012, 13, 1491–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cardoso, J.M.S.; Galvão, A.M.; Guerreiro, S.I.; Leitão, J.H.; Suarez, A.C.; Carvalho, M.F.N.N. Antibacterial activity of silver camphorimine coordination polymers. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 7114–7123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pinheiro, M.J.F.; Costa, J.P.; Marques, F.; Mira, N.P.; Carvalho, M.F.N.N.; Alves, M.M. Bioactive Coatings with Ag-Camphorimine Complexes to Prevent Surface Colonization by the Pathogenic Yeast Candida albicans. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ghosh, R.; Das, S.; Mallick, S.P.; Beyene, Z. A review on the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of doped hydroxyapatite and its composites for biomedical applications. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 31, 103311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sun, T.; Huang, J.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, X.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Leng, H.; Yuan, W.; Song, C. Simvastatin-hydroxyapatite coatings prevent biofilm formation and improve bone formation in implant-associated infections. Bioact. Mater. 2023, 21, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Monte, J.P.; Fontes, A.; Santos, B.S.; Pereira, G.A.; Pereira, G. Recent advances in hydroxyapatite/polymer/silver nanoparticles scaffolds with antimicrobial activity for bone regeneration. Mater. Lett. 2023, 338, 134027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hatakeyama, W.; Taira, M.; Chosa, N.; Kihara, H.; Ishisaki, A.; Kondo, H. Effects of apatite particle size in two apatite/collagen composites on the osteogenic differentiation profile of osteoblastic cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2013, 2, 1255–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. MubarakAli, D.; Arunachalam, K.; Lakshmanan, M.; Badar, B.; Kim, J.-W.; Lee, S.-Y. Unveiling the Anti-Biofilm Properties of Hydroxyapatite on Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Synthesis and Strategy. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Diggle, S.P.; Whiteley, M. Microbe Profile: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Opportunistic pathogen and lab rat. Microbiology 2020, 166, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gnanamani, A.; Periasamy, H.; Paul Satyaseela, M. Staphylococcus aureus: Overview of Bacteriology, Clinical Diseases, Epidemiology, Antibiotic Resistance and Therapeutic Approach. In Frontiers in Staphylococcus aureus; IntechOpen Limited: London, UK, 2017; Chapter 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Peng, Q.; Tang, X.; Dong, W.; Sun, N.; Yuan, W. A review of Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Regulation Mechanism. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tuon, F.F.; Dantas, L.R.; Suss, P.H.; Ribeiro, V.S.T. Pathogenesis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm: A review. Pathogens 2022, 11, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wu, C.H.; Pan, J.S.; Chang, W.C.; Hung, J.S.; Mao, S.J.T. The molecular mechanism of actinomycin D in preventing neointimal formation in rat carotid arteries after balloon injury. J. Biomed. Sci. 2005, 12, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Carvalho, M.F.N.; Consiglieri, A.C.; Duarte, M.T.; Galvao, A.M.; Pombeiro, A.J.; Herrmann, R. Transition metal complexes of (1S,2S,3S)-3-hidroxy-camphorsultam. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 5160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Meth. 1983, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Alves, L.G.; Portel, J.F.; Sousa, S.A.; Ferreira, O.; Almada, S.; Silva, E.R.; Martins, A.M.; Leitão, J.H. Investigations into the Structure/Antibacterial Activity Relationships of Cyclam and Cyclen Derivatives. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Duthie, E.S.; Lorenz, L.L. Staphylococcal Coagulase: Mode of Action and Antigenicity. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1952, 6, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jfb 15 00240 g001
Figure 1. IC50 values for [Ag(NO3)Ln] complexes (L = LA, red; LB, green; LC, blue), ligand OC10H14NNH2 (purple) and silver nitrate (gray), shown versus molecular concentration (left, µM) and silver weight (right, µgAg/mL). Bars represent average errors, and a one-way ANOVA was used to detect differences, followed by multiple comparisons test, (*) denotes statistically significant differences in the left-hand plot, while letters indicate significant differences in the right-hand plot for p-value < 0.05.
Figure 1. IC50 values for [Ag(NO3)Ln] complexes (L = LA, red; LB, green; LC, blue), ligand OC10H14NNH2 (purple) and silver nitrate (gray), shown versus molecular concentration (left, µM) and silver weight (right, µgAg/mL). Bars represent average errors, and a one-way ANOVA was used to detect differences, followed by multiple comparisons test, (*) denotes statistically significant differences in the left-hand plot, while letters indicate significant differences in the right-hand plot for p-value < 0.05.
Jfb 15 00240 g001
Jfb 15 00240 g002
Figure 2. Graphic representation of data for complexes (1–4) and composites ([Ag(I)]:HAp, 50:50%, 1B–4B): (a) anticancer activities (IC50); (b) antibacterial activities (MIC). All values are referred to in μgAg/mL to facilitate comparison. Bars represent average errors, and a one-way ANOVA was used to detect differences, followed by multiple comparisons test, where letters indicate significant differences for p-value < 0.05.
Figure 2. Graphic representation of data for complexes (1–4) and composites ([Ag(I)]:HAp, 50:50%, 1B–4B): (a) anticancer activities (IC50); (b) antibacterial activities (MIC). All values are referred to in μgAg/mL to facilitate comparison. Bars represent average errors, and a one-way ANOVA was used to detect differences, followed by multiple comparisons test, where letters indicate significant differences for p-value < 0.05.
Jfb 15 00240 g002
Jfb 15 00240 g003
Figure 3. Physicochemical characterization of the complexes (1–4, left) and composites (1B–4B, right. 1, 1B—blue; 2, 2B—green, 3, 3B—yellow and 4, 4B—orange. (a) SEM images of complexes (left) and respective composites (right) with zoom on the up-right corner; (b) PXRD diffractograms from complexes (left) and respective composites (right) with HAp signals marked (*); (c) FTIR spectra from complexes (left) and respective composites (right) with HAp bands marked (**).
Figure 3. Physicochemical characterization of the complexes (1–4, left) and composites (1B–4B, right. 1, 1B—blue; 2, 2B—green, 3, 3B—yellow and 4, 4B—orange. (a) SEM images of complexes (left) and respective composites (right) with zoom on the up-right corner; (b) PXRD diffractograms from complexes (left) and respective composites (right) with HAp signals marked (*); (c) FTIR spectra from complexes (left) and respective composites (right) with HAp bands marked (**).
Jfb 15 00240 g003
Jfb 15 00240 g004
Figure 4. Pellets morphology. SEM images of the pellet surface of HAp and composites (1B–4B) (a) before and (b) after immersion in cell culture medium DMEM and fixation. Insets are optical images of pellets before (first row) and after (second row) 24 h incubation in culture medium.
Figure 4. Pellets morphology. SEM images of the pellet surface of HAp and composites (1B–4B) (a) before and (b) after immersion in cell culture medium DMEM and fixation. Insets are optical images of pellets before (first row) and after (second row) 24 h incubation in culture medium.
Jfb 15 00240 g004
Jfb 15 00240 g005
Figure 5. HOS cells morphology settled on th4e pellets surface and its surroundings. SEM images: (a) control HOS cells settled; (b) HAp and 1B–4B composites pellets surface; (c) lamella surrounding the pellets. Images were taken after incubation (24 h) of the cells in culture medium, in the presence of the pellets.
Figure 5. HOS cells morphology settled on th4e pellets surface and its surroundings. SEM images: (a) control HOS cells settled; (b) HAp and 1B–4B composites pellets surface; (c) lamella surrounding the pellets. Images were taken after incubation (24 h) of the cells in culture medium, in the presence of the pellets.
Jfb 15 00240 g005
Jfb 15 00240 g006
Figure 6. Antibacterial activity for the pellets of the composites 3B, 4B, and HAp towards P. aeruginosa 477 (black bars) and S. aureus Newman (gray bars). The number of colonies adherent to the pellets was estimated by serial dilution and spot inoculation (n.d.—non detected). The error bars represent the mean (±SD) of two independent experiments.
Figure 6. Antibacterial activity for the pellets of the composites 3B, 4B, and HAp towards P. aeruginosa 477 (black bars) and S. aureus Newman (gray bars). The number of colonies adherent to the pellets was estimated by serial dilution and spot inoculation (n.d.—non detected). The error bars represent the mean (±SD) of two independent experiments.
Jfb 15 00240 g006
Jfb 15 00240 g007
Figure 7. SEM images of the morphology of bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa 477 (first row) and Staphylococcus aureus Newman (second row) after incubation with HAp and [Ag(I)]:HAp composites 3B and 4B pellets (n.d.—non detected).
Figure 7. SEM images of the morphology of bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa 477 (first row) and Staphylococcus aureus Newman (second row) after incubation with HAp and [Ag(I)]:HAp composites 3B and 4B pellets (n.d.—non detected).
Jfb 15 00240 g007
Jfb 15 00240 g008
Figure 8. Schematic representation illustrating the various steps and results obtained for complexes 3, 4 and their derived composites and pellets.
Figure 8. Schematic representation illustrating the various steps and results obtained for complexes 3, 4 and their derived composites and pellets.
Jfb 15 00240 g008
Table 1. Cytotoxic activity a of Ag(I) camphorimine complexes based on ligands LA, LB and LC against HOS cells.
Table 1. Cytotoxic activity a of Ag(I) camphorimine complexes based on ligands LA, LB and LC against HOS cells.
CompoundLY/R/ZIC50 (µM)
[IC50(μgAg/mL)]
[Ag(NO3)(LA)2]Jfb 15 00240 i001OH8.2 ± 3.0
[0.88 ± 0.32]
[Ag(NO3)(LA)]
(1)		NH25.6 ± 2.0
[0.60 ± 0.27]
[Ag(NO3)(LA)2]C6H58.8 ± 2.5
[0.95 ± 0.22]
[Ag(NO3)(LA)2]
(2)		m-OH(C6H4)12.7 ± 4.5
[1.4 ± 0.48]
OC10H14NY
ligand		NH2>100
[Ag(NO3)(LB)2]Jfb 15 00240 i002C6H58.3 ± 2.0
[0.89 ± 0.32]
[Ag(NO3)(LB)2]C6H4NH223.7 ± 10
[2.6 ± 0.11]
[Ag(NO3)(LC)]
(3)		Jfb 15 00240 i003p-C6H43.1 ± 3.0
[0.30 ± 0.32]
[Ag(NO3)(LC)]
(4)		p-(C6H4)23.1 ± 0.9
[0.33 ± 0.10]
AgNO3——7.2 ± 2.5
[0.78 ± 0.27]
a Values upon 24 h exposure.
Table 2. Anticancer (IC50) and antibacterial (MIC) activity of Ag(I) camphorimine complexes (1–4) and [Ag(I)]:HAP composites a.
Table 2. Anticancer (IC50) and antibacterial (MIC) activity of Ag(I) camphorimine complexes (1–4) and [Ag(I)]:HAP composites a.
IC50MIC
μgAg/mL
HOSE. coli ATCC25922B. contaminans IST408P. aeruginosa 477S. aureus Newman
10.60 ± 0.272.3 ± 0.022.3 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.28.6 ± 0.02
1A—5.3 ± 0.66.6 ± 4.65.3 ± 0.240
1B6.7 ± 3.84.7 ± 0.44.9 ± 0.64.2 ± 0.321.0 ± 0.8
2 b,c1.37 ± 0.488.612.38.718.6
2A—5.8 ± 1.57.6 ± 0.75.5 ± 0.412.2 ± 1.5
2B31 ± 4.520.1 ± 0.220.6 ± 2.521.7 ± 0.5>40
3 b0.33 ± 0.323.8 ± 0.26.8 ± 0.53.6 ± 0.813.7 ± 0.4
3A—8.4 ± 1.18.3 ± 5.34.1 ± 0.337.4 ± 3.6
3B2.5 ± 0.75.2 ± 0.16.2 ± 0.43.8 ± 0.640
4 b,c0.33 ± 0.10>17>1714.3 ± 1.1>17
4A—8.9 ± 0.19.0 ± 0.65.9 ± 0.140
4B4.4 ± 1.24.7 ± 0.29.9 ± 1.33.5 ± 0.840
HAp—>630>630>630>630
AgNO3 b0.78 ± 0.272.4 ± 0.14.0 ± 0.92.1 ± 0.419.1 ± 2.1
a Composites [Ag(I)]:HAp (weight compositions): 20:80% (1A–4A) and 50:50% (1B–4B). b MIC values for complexes 2–4 and Ag(NO3) were taken from the literature [39,44]. c Values for 2 are shown as reported (no standard deviation).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Costa, J.P.; Sousa, S.A.; Leitão, J.H.; Marques, F.; Alves, M.M.; Carvalho, M.F.N.N. Insights into the Dual Anticancer and Antibacterial Activities of Composites Based on Silver Camphorimine Complexes. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15, 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15090240

AMA Style

Costa JP, Sousa SA, Leitão JH, Marques F, Alves MM, Carvalho MFNN. Insights into the Dual Anticancer and Antibacterial Activities of Composites Based on Silver Camphorimine Complexes. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2024; 15(9):240. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15090240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Costa, Joana P., Sílvia A. Sousa, Jorge H. Leitão, Fernanda Marques, Marta M. Alves, and M. Fernanda N. N. Carvalho. 2024. "Insights into the Dual Anticancer and Antibacterial Activities of Composites Based on Silver Camphorimine Complexes" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 15, no. 9: 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15090240

APA Style

Costa, J. P., Sousa, S. A., Leitão, J. H., Marques, F., Alves, M. M., & Carvalho, M. F. N. N. (2024). Insights into the Dual Anticancer and Antibacterial Activities of Composites Based on Silver Camphorimine Complexes. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 15(9), 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15090240

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop