Next Article in Journal
Hydrous Hydrazine Decomposition for Hydrogen Production Using of Ir/CeO2: Effect of Reaction Parameters on the Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Lignin Nanoparticles and Their Nanocomposites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

SERRS Detection on Silver Nanoparticles Supported on Acid-Treated Melamine-Resin Microspheres

1
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Chemical Assessment and Sustainability, School of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2
Institute of Industrial Catalysis, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(5), 1337; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051337
Submission received: 30 March 2021 / Revised: 5 May 2021 / Accepted: 10 May 2021 / Published: 19 May 2021

Abstract

:
Melamine-resin microspheres were synthesized at a pH of 4.0 for 20 min and used as silver nanoparticle (AgNP) carriers for surface enhanced resonant Raman scattering (SERRS) detection. An acetic acid–treatment reaction was introduced into the fabrication of the final substrate. The SERRS performance of the substrate was effectively optimized by regulating excess formaldehyde and experimental parameters, such as acidity, number of treatments and reaction temperature in the acid-treatment reaction. Based on the SERRS detection, it was declared that a trace amount of oligomers with a certain degree of polymerization is necessary for the construction of SERRS hotspots. In addition, it is important to remove excess oligomers with reference to the synthetic reaction of the polymer materials, given the special role of oligomers and the wide application of polymer materials in SERRS detection.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, various polymer materials, such as polystyrene, polyamide, epoxy resin, phenolic resin, urea resin [1] and melamine resin [2,3], are frequently used in the fabrication of SERRS substrates. Therein, the inherent plasticity of these polymer materials was developed and utilized as much as possible. Their film or microsphere shape was used for adsorption of metal nanoparticles, their plane shape for metal colloidal lithography, their shell shape for encapsulation of nanoparticles [4,5,6,7,8], their molecularly imprinted membrane [9,10] for capturing specific analytes, their flexibility [11] for detecting contaminated fruits and their tensile state [12] or hollow spherical structure [13,14] for the effective construction of SERRS hotspots. In terms of molecular structures, the SERRS technology always takes advantages of some unique characteristics of polymer materials such as biocompatibility [15,16,17,18], multidentate coordination with metal nanoparticles [19,20], and three-dimensional construction of SERRS hotspots [19,21]. These characteristics depend on the abundance of selectable functional groups, such as –CN, –OH, –NH2 and –COOH, in their molecular structure. Although the self-assembly of metal nanoparticles is facilitated by multiple bonds between the metal and functional groups of the polymers [22,23,24,25], the polymer synthetic process may lead to contrasting functional group types. The confusion of these functional groups confers SERRS signals with serious reproducibility challenges that are intractable and generally concerning.
The urea and formaldehyde precipitation polymerization procedure [26] established that the output, crystallinity, morphology, density and water absorption capacity of the urea and formaldehyde resin (UF) microspheres were considerably dependent on the “excess monomer”, a general concept in copolymerization reactions. This concept emphasizes [26] the fact that a linear molecule A[BA]nBA, generated from the reaction with excess monomer A, for example, will be entirely different from the other molecule BA[BA]nB with the excess monomer B. Furthermore, the substrate incorporating either the UF resin [1] or melamine and formaldehyde resin (MFn, n = F/M molar ratio) microspheres [27] from excess formaldehyde are sensitive and stable in SERRS detection when compared to the SERRS-inert substrate that incorporates resin microspheres from excess urea or melamine. Wherein, MFn and UF microspheres are similar to each other in several aspects. Both reactions occur in acidic aqueous solutions, both products are resin microspheres, in both the NH2 groups at the terminals of polymer structures can be replaced with –NHCH2OH by the excess formaldehyde added in the reaction solution and, thus, both optimizations of the SERRS substrates have exactly the same characteristics [1,27]. In a recent study of DNA detection with the SERS substrate incorporating MFn microspheres [3], the parameter (n) was calculated and found to be 3.8, which is much larger than that of 1.5, a boundary between MFn microsphere characteristics based on its excess monomers [27]. This finding was in tandem with the effectiveness of SERRS substrate whose origin was the excess formaldehyde [1]. Herein, the biocompatibility and SERRS signal sensitivity of MFn microspheres was verified to be excellent.
In this study, MFn microspheres were pretreated with an acetic acid solution to support silver nanoparticles that was found to be much more effective in the R6G SERRS detection.

2. Experimental Methods

2.1. Synthetic and Acid-Treatment Reactions of Melamine-Resin Microspheres

MFn microspheres were synthesized through the precipitation polymerization of melamine and formaldehyde in acetic acid solution as previously described [28]. Briefly, a mixture of 90.0 mL acetic acid solution at a pH of 4.0, 2.50 g of melamine and 1.60 mL of 38 wt % formaldehyde was prepared in a conical flask and sealed with a piece of plastic membrane. The conical flask was placed in a water bath and dissolved at 65 °C, under electromagnetic stirring. It was then kept at 65 °C for 20 min until a cloudy state appeared. The mixture was then cooled and separated through a Buchner funnel, along with a washing step using water and ethanol, respectively. After drying at room temperatures in a desiccator for more than 24 h, the obtained MFn microspheres were subsequently used for SERRS-substrate fabrication. In the synthetic reaction, the F/M molar ratio was expressed as a parameter (n) and equaled 1.00. From this ratio, other values were determined.
Except for replacement of the reactants by MFn microspheres, as well as an ultrasonic dispersion step at the initial stage, the acid-treatment reaction of MFn microspheres was performed under the same conditions as in their synthetic reaction. In this study, any experimental parameters, including temperature, time, number of acid-treatments and acidity, as well as the volume of the acetic acid solution in the acid-treatment reaction, could be designed as a variable to examine the performance of the SERRS substrate incorporating the MFn microspheres.

2.2. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticle Colloid Solution

The silver nanoparticle (AgNP) colloid solution was synthesized through the reduction of silver nitrate by sodium citrate [1,29]. Then 95 mL of silver nitrate solution in a glass beaker was heated to boiling and 5.0 mL of sodium citrate added. The glass beaker was then sealed immediately using a piece of plastic membrane and left to boil for an additional 30 min. A stable gray-green AgNP colloid solution was formed and left to cool down to room temperature. The optimized molar ratio between silver nitrate and sodium citrate was 2:3, and their initial concentrations in the silver colloid solution were 2.0 × 10−3 and 3.0 × 10−3 M, respectively. The water used in AgNP colloid solution synthesis and SERRS-substrate fabrication had an electrical conductivity of 1.37 µS/cm. All chemicals were of analytical grade and were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.

2.3. Fabrication and Incubation of SERRS Substrate

Prior to R6G incubation, SERRS-substrate fabrication was performed in situ in a 2 mL centrifuge tube. AgNPs were separated from 2.0 mL of colloid solution through two sequential centrifugation steps at 2000 and 6000 rpms for 5 min. They were re-dispersed in water to the initial volume. The precipitate from the first step and the supernatant from the second step were discarded. Finally, 5.0 mg of MFn microspheres were impregnated in the AgNP solution for 60 min and separated at 2000 rpm to complete the SERRS-substrate fabrication. The AgNPs adsorbed on MFn (AgNP/MFn) were invariably separated and used as a whole for SERRS detection.
During R6G incubation, the SERRS substrate was dispersed and impregnated in a 1.00 × 10−7 M R6G solution for 2.0 h. After separation at 2000 rpm, the incubated substrate was transferred onto a glass slide that had been pretreated with ethanol (three times) and dried in a desiccator for 12 h. Moreover, other analytes, such as tetramethylthiuram disulfide, malachite green, p-hydroxythiophenol, basic violet 14, etc., in 1.00 × 10−5 M aqueous solutions, were examined as described above on an optimized substrate to verify the SERRS performance.

2.4. Characterization and SERRS Detection

SERRS signals were collected on a confocal microscope Raman spectrometer (Invia Reflex Renishaw, Renishaw Apply Innovation, Gloucestershire, UK) with a 514.5 nm and 0.2 mW laser, an acquisition time of 10 s and a wave-number region from 4000 to 200 cm−1. The sample was treated through various steps, such as being dispersed in ethanol, dropped onto a silicon wafer, dried at room temperature and being sprayed with powdered gold. The morphology of the sample was determined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, EFI Quanta 250 FEG USA), where the accelerating voltage was set at 20.0 kV.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthetic and Acid-Treatment Reactions of Melamine-Resin Microspheres

The AgNP colloid solution and MFn microspheres were synthesized separately while the SERRS substrate, i.e., AgNP/MFn, was fabricated through the adsorption of AgNPs on the MFn in a 2 mL centrifuge tube. Incubation with R6G was performed in the same tube. The SERRS performance of AgNP/MFn was shown to depend on parameter (n), i.e., the F/M molar ratio adopted in the MFn synthetic reaction. SERRS enhancement on AgNP/MFn>1.5 was attributed to the abundance of –NHCH2OH groups on the MFn surface that originated from excess formaldehyde [27] that had been added in the MFn synthetic reaction. It was also found that as the MFn synthetic-reaction time increased, the SERRS substrate was activated in a progressive way, even though the parameter (n) was higher than 1.5, a boundary value of the MFn characteristics. In a separate experiment, R6G-SERRS enhancement was observed on a set of pure AgNPs at a laser power of 0.01 mW only if they were treated with the MFn-impregnation liquor. The liquor was the supernatant that had been centrifuged from impregnation mixture of the MFn>1.5 in pure water. Therefore, a certain amount of polymers with low polymerization degrees (oligomers) must dissolve in water and adsorbed on the AgNPs to exhibit their role in SERRS detection.
Since it was able to catalyze the MFn synthetic reaction (a precipitation polymerization reaction) that involved the nucleation, growth and maturation of the MFn microspheres, the acetic acid solution was expected to do something more in the fabrication of the SERRS substrate. Therefore, a set of MFn acid-treatment reactions were designed with reference to the MFn synthetic reaction. A series of SEM micrographs of MFn microspheres with n = 2.0–9.0, having been synthesized at a pH of 4.0 and at a temperature of 65 °C for 20 min, were displayed at the top (a–d), while the series at the bottom (e–h) was of the samples that had been treated in the acetic acid solution at a pH of 4.0 and temperatures of 60 °C for 20 min, as shown in Figure 1. A short synthetic-reaction time was unfavorable for fabrication of the SERRS substrate and was herein adopted so as to highlight advantages of the acid treatment method. Except the temperatures, which decreased by 5 °C, the experimental parameters in the acid-treatment reaction were consistent with those adopted in the MFn synthetic reaction process. Besides some resin cores with ~1.0 μm sizes and some fragments in the non-treated microspheres, two single microsphere sizes (~3.80 and ~6.10 μm) corresponded to the parameters n ≤ 3.0 and ≥6.0, respectively (Figure 1a–d). Resin cores were generated in the primary stage of the MFn synthetic reaction and disappeared as the reaction time increased. Resin fragments (originating from partial dissolution of the MFn microspheres in the ethanol solvent) formed in ethanol volatilization during sample preparation for SEM tests or separation from their synthetic-reaction mixture.
As shown in Figure 1e–h, the acid-treatment reaction revealed some essential characteristics of the oligomers in MFn microspheres. The surface of the MFn microspheres exhibited a shrinkage texture that was attributed to the physical-shrinkage phenomenon of the microspheres during desiccation, after a certain amount of oligomers had been removed in the acid-treatment reaction. Furthermore, the resin cores and fragments were all cleaned up. There were obviously two other forms of the oligomers in MFn microspheres that were much more produced at the primary stage of the MFn synthetic reaction and dissolved or/and hydrolyzed into the acetic acid solution.
Table 1 shows MFn microsphere mass loss rates in the acid-treatment reaction. The mass loss rate for all samples was more than 4.29 wt %, and varied with parameter (n). In the case of M2F, the loss rate reached a maximum 17.5 wt %, wherein the MFn synthetic reaction was executed at n = 0.5 and the melamine in the synthetic reaction process was too much to produce a SERRS-active substrate.
Supplementary Materials Figure S1 provides the Raman spectra of MFn microspheres and the microspheres after the acid-treatment reaction. There existed a progressive addition of formaldehyde into the MFn microspheres if the parameter (n) increased and, meanwhile, the removed mass portion more than 4.29 wt %, as shown in Table 1, could be contributed to MFn oligomers with more terminal –NHCH2OH groups. The impact of the polymerization degree on the F/M molar ratio (n) in MFn structure is shown Supplementary Materials Figures S2 and S6, while the terminal overreaction of excess formaldehyde is presented in the supplementary information, as shown in Equations LO, PO and TO, as well as Supplementary Materials Figures S7–S12.

3.2. SERRS-Substrate Fabrication/Adsorbing Silver Nanoparticles on Melamine-Resin Microspheres

The SERRS-substrate fabrication and incubation with R6G were sequentially executed in a 2 mL centrifugation tube in situ. The silver colloid solution was prepared by boiling a solution mixed with silver nitrate and sodium citrate. The solution was then purified by centrifugation at a speed range of 1000 to 6000 rpm before use. The MFn microspheres were added into the silver colloid solution to bind AgNPs on their surfaces and finally form the hybrid microspheres.
SEM micrographs of a set of AgNP/MFn microspheres incorporating non-treated and the acid-treated MFn microspheres are respectively presented at the top (a,b,c,d) and bottom (e,f,g,h) of Figure 2. It was found that AgNPs were heavily adsorbed and aggregated on the non-treated MFn microspheres involving the resin cores as shown at the top row of Figure 2. However, they were delicately dispersed on the acid-treated microspheres as shown at the bottom of Figure 2.
The impact of MF3 acid-treatment reaction on morphologies of MF3 microsphere and AgNP/MF3 substrate could be summarized in Figure 3. The oligomer quantity in the MF3 microsphere (Figure 3a) was 6.21 wt% more than that in the acid-treated ones (Figure 3d). AgNPs on the microspheres (Figure 3b) were bound by the oligomers in a flocculation way when compared to those on the acid-treated microspheres (Figure 3e). The oligomers exhibited an excessive overflow and an intensive interaction with AgNPs through the simple SERRS-substrate fabrication under aqueous solution. The AgNPs were restricted in the colloid capsules that had been made from the oligomers as shown in Figure 3c. The sizes of AgNP capsules on the non-treated MF3 microsphere (Figure 3c) were as high as ~300 nm, which was ~5 times that of the AgNPs on the acid-treated one (Figure 3f). The effectiveness of acid-treatment reaction in MF3 oligomer desorption and solubility in the acetic acid solution was shown by the excellent dispersion of the AgNPs on the acid-treated microsphere as shown in Figure 3f. Herein the silver content in the substrate incorporating no-treated MF3 microspheres was 91 ppm and this value in the substrate incorporating acid-treated ones was only 58 ppm, which were detected on spectrophotometry at a 400 nm wavelength and summarized in Supplementary Materials Figure S13 and Table S1. It is obvious that a larger amount of AgNPs adsorbed on the no-treated MF3 microspheres was due to their more amount of oligomers.

3.3. Performance of the SERRS Substrate Incorporating the Acid-Treated Melamine-Resin Microspheres

R6G-SERRS spectra on the AgNP/MFn=1–9 incorporating the non-treated and the acid-treated MFn microspheres are shown in Figure 4A,B, respectively. The efficiency of R6G-SERRS was inhibited on the AgNP/MFn substrate incorporating the non-treated MFn, as shown in Figure 4A. The advantages of excess formaldehyde were only exhibited by some faint SERRS signals when the parameter (n) was equal to 6.00 or 9.00, much more than the boundary (1.50) of MFn characteristics. However, R6G-SERRS signals exhibited a heightened intensity on the substrate incorporating the acid-treated MFn microspheres when the parameter (n) increased from 1.00 to 9.00, as shown from Figure 4B(f–j), where the acid-treatment reaction was performed at a pH of 4.0 and at a temperature of 60 °C for 20 min.
The concept “excess formaldehyde” that is favorable to the R6G-SERRS performance was encountered again on the AgNP/MFn with the parameter n = 3.0–9.0, although the MFn synthetic reaction was only kept for 20 min this time, much shorter than 9.0 h adopted in our previous study in absence of the MFn acid-treatment reaction. The MFn characteristic boundary based on the parameter (n) is shown in the supplementary information. The 0.01 mW laser power was utilized for SERRS examination of the substrate incorporating the acid-treated MFn microspheres. It was 5% of the power adopted on the substrate incorporating the non-treated MFn microspheres as shown in Figure 4A. The oligomers at more than 4.29wt % prevented the AgNPs from constructing the SERRS hotspots on the non-treated MFn=3–9 microspheres. Herein, the blank AgNPs was examined at a laser power of 0.05 mW that was 5 times of the 0.01 mW used on the substrate incorporating acid-treated microspheres. Even though it was magnified 3 times, the R6G-SERRS signal was still faint and not comparable to that obtained on the acid-treated AgNP/MFn=3–9 microspheres. It is obvious that the R6G concentration of 10−7 M was just a detection limit based on the blank AgNPs and this SERRS method.
The impact of reaction time and the acetic acid volume in the MF6 acid-treatment reaction on AgNP/MF6 SERRS performance is shown in Figure 5A,B respectively, where the parameter (n) was chosen as a constant 6.0 in the MFn synthetic reaction. The R6G-SERRS signals from all samples exhibited a remarkable intensity and neither the reaction time nor the acetic acid volume could impact SERRS performance of the AgNP/MF6 in the MF6 acid-treatment reaction (Figure 5). The acid-treatment time was extended to 80 min while the acetic acid volume was increased to 450 mL, equaling 4 and 5 times those adopted in the MF6 synthetic reaction, respectively.
A possible explanation for these results was that there is a dependency between the polymerization degree of oligomers and the acidity of the acetic acid solution. The oligomers in the MF6 microspheres with a polymerization degree that was no more than a certain value would, therefore, be removed under a determinate acidity.
The impact of acetic acid and the number of treatments in the MFn acid-treatment reaction on AgNP/MF6 SERRS performance is shown in Figure 6A,B, respectively. As the acidity increased from a pH of 4.0 to 3.7, AgNP/MF6 SERRS signals were enhanced; however, they were rapidly weakened as the acidity increased from a pH of 3.7 to 2.3, as shown in Figure 6A(a–f). In addition, the AgNP/MF6 SERRS signal intensity was at a maximum when the number of acid treatments increased from one to two. However, the intensity declined rapidly as the treatment number increased from two to six, as shown from Figure 6B(g–l).
If there is a dependency between the oligomer polymerization-degree and acidity in the MF6 acid-treatment reaction, it is attributed to the fact that both acidity and the number of acid-treatments in the MFn acid-treatment reaction can be used to optimize SERRS performance. Therefore, a trace amount of oligomers with a determinate polymerization degree is necessary for R6G-SERRS detection.
The impact of the acid-treatment temperature on the morphology of the AgNP/MF6 is shown in Figure 7, where the MF6 acid-treatment temperature increased from 0 to 100 °C. With the acid-treatment temperature increasing from 0 to 100 °C, the characteristic shrinkage textures on MF6 microsphere surfaces became more prominent while the AgNPs were progressively dispersed. Resin fragments on the AgNP/MF6 appeared when the MF6 acid-treatment reaction was performed at 0 °C as shown in Figure 7a. This implies that the MFn acid-treatment reaction was activated at a high temperature. It was clear that the characteristic shrinkage textural morphology was initiated at the acid-treatment temperature of 60 °C as shown in Figure 7d. This characteristic temperature is significant for the effective removal of oligomers in the MF6 acid-treatment reaction. This temperature is close to the MFn synthetic-reaction temperature of 65 °C, and it, therefore, verifies that the generation and desorption of the MFn oligomers are reversible in the precipitation polymerization of MFn microspheres. The mass loss rates of MF6 in the acid-treatment reaction at the different acid-treatment temperatures were shown in Table 2. With the temperature increasing the mass loss rates of MF6 increased from 3.90% to 5.10%.
Figure 8 shows the impact of MF6 acid-treatment temperature on the SERRS performance of AgNP/MF6. The activity of AgNP/MF6 was inhibited in R6G-SERRS detection when the MF6 acid-treatment reaction was performed at 0 and 20 °C as shown in Figure 8A(a,b). In addition, SERRS performance rapidly declined as the MFn acid-treatment temperature increased from 60 to 100 °C, as shown in Figure 8A(d–f). These results emphasize an important fact that the more and insufficient oligomers on the surface of MFn microsphere were both unfavorable to the SERRS fabrication.
Supplementary Materials Figure S14 shows the R6G-SERRS performance of AgNPs treated with the liquor from the MF6 acid-treatment reaction. The R6G SERRS signal was enhanced with the acid-treatment temperature gradually increased from 0 to 100 °C. These results were on the contrary with those obtained on the AgNP/MF6 where the incorporating MF6 from the same acid-treatment reactions executed at the varied temperature from 40 to 100 °C. It was obvious that the oligomers in the MFn microspheres had transferred into the hydrolyzed liquor and played an important role in the construction of SERRS hotspots.
The MFn microspheres were synthesized with melamine and formaldehyde under catalysis of an acetic acid solution, in which the MFn oligomers were formed, grew, aggregated and precipitated into the MFn microspheres. Herein, the acetic acid-treatment reaction of MFn microspheres could be considered as a reversible procedure of this aggregation reaction in absence of the reactants melamine and formaldehyde. It is obvious that the degree of presence or absence of the oligomers on the surface of an MFn microsphere or in an acidic hydrolyzed liquor resulted in an opposite trend in the SERRS response of the AgNPs, as seen when comparing Figure 8A with Supplementary Materials Figure S14. These oligomers could be a linear, planar, or three-dimensional structure as illustrated in Supplementary Materials or in our previous works [1,26,27]. The chemical group –NHCH2OH at the ends of an oligomer structure was favorable to the formation of SERRS hotspots [1,27], which was as same as summarized on UF microspheres [1].
The MFn synthetic-reaction temperature was valuable to the MFn acid-treatment reaction. The remarkable SERRS enhancement on the AgNP/MF6 that incorporated the acid-treated MF6 microspheres was exhibited at 40–60 °C, as shown in Figure 8A(c,d), slightly less than the MF6 synthetic-reaction temperature of 65 °C. We hypothesize that oligomers should work within an appropriate amount and a certain polymerization degree. Herein, the AgNP nano-capsules and the shrinkage textural morphology represents two extreme conditions, where the oligomers were much more or poor on the surface of the microspheres that were unfavorable to the construction of SERRS hotspots, as shown in Figure 8B(a,e), respectively.
Although a rough surface of the MF6 microspheres could be produced at some harsh acid-treatment parameters, such as the treatment temperature 100 °C or pH 2.3, the SERRS substrate could not provide a higher SERRS activity. Therefore, the oligomers must play an important role in the formation of the SERRS hotspots. Based on the above results, a schematic on the formation of the SERRS hotspots is provided in Figure 9.
A large oligomer capsule contains a pair of AgNPs (a) was formed on a MF microsphere, which becomes small, as the amount of the oligomers decreases in the acid-treatment reaction (b), and an active SERRS hotspot has finally formed at the gap between the AgNPs, with a further decrease of oligomers within the acid-treatment reaction at 60 °C (c).
The gap between two AgNPs is swollen with a large amount of oligomers on a MF6 resin microsphere, as shown in Figure 9a, and becomes narrow with the amount of the oligomers decreased following the acetic acid–treatment reaction, as shown in Figure 9b. It is finally activated and acts as a SERRS hotspot [30,31] in the R6G detection when its oligomers contained in is further decreased within the acid-treatment reaction at 60 °C for 20 min, as shown in Figure 9c. Therein, oligomers are necessary for the formation of SERRS hotspots and work as a linker [30,31] to hold the AgNPs to close to each other.
The SERRS spectrum on AgNP/MF6, incorporating the acid-treated MF6 microspheres, varied with the R6G concentration from 1.0 × 10−15 to 1.0 × 10−7 M was provided in Figure 10. Its detection limit was lower than 1.0 × 10−13 M, where the R6G characteristic peaks were still clear as shown in Figure 10b. The SERRS detection on the blank AgNPs treated with 1.0 × 10−7 M R6G was conducted at a laser power of 0.05 mW that was five times the value 0.01 mW adopted on AgNP/MF6. Obviously, the blank used for 10−7 M R6G was incomparable to the optimized AgNP/MF6 for 10−13 M R6G, even though it was conducted at a much high laser power of 0.05 mW. The R6G detection limit on the optimized AgNP/MF6 was thus decreased to less than 10−6 times it on the blank according to these quantitative results.
SERRS spectra of a set of organic analytes on AgNPs/MF6 are shown in Figure 11 and Supplementary Materials Figure S15. The characteristic peaks in each SERRS spectrum were consistent with those in the standard spectrum. The relative standard deviations of the peak strengths from twelve tests on the SERRS substrate (see Supplementary Materials Figure S15) were not more than 12%, as shown in each set of spectrum in Figure 11. The AgNP/MFn substrate has, therefore, been incorporated into the SERRS analyses of some environmental pollutants, after the incorporated MFn microspheres were treated in the acetic acid solution.

4. Conclusions

Melamine-resin microspheres that were synthesized for 20 min were proved to be available in the fabrication of SERRS substrate, only if they were treated with an acetic acid solution before supporting silver nanoparticles. The performance of the SERRS substrate, incorporating in the melamine-resin microspheres with excess formaldehyde, can be optimized by regulating experimental parameters of the acetic acid–treatment reaction. Herein, the best n = F/M is 6, the best pH = 3.7, the best temperatures of acid treatment is 60 °C and the best condition for forming the hotspots for the loading temperature of silver nanoparticles is 40 °C. The R6G SERRS detection limit was equal to 10−13 M that was 106 times the value detected on the blank AgNPs. These advantages in SERRS substrate incorporating the acid-treated melamine-resin microspheres are attributed to the role of the trace amounts of oligomers with certain polymerization degrees. Although the 4.29–6.21 wt % of their content in the melamine-resin microspheres was found to be excessive, the oligomers in trace amounts are found to be indispensable for the SERRS detection. Oligomers are found in many polymers, and what a role they will play and how to deal with them may be the crucial issues for the SERRS fabrication. Therefore, effectiveness of the acid treatment of the oligomers in melamine-resin microspheres has just shown their significance in the SERRS detection.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano11051337/s1, Figure S1: Impact of the acid-treatment on Raman spectra of MFn microspheres, Figure S2: Two extreme structures in MFn polymers, Figure S3: Two extreme structures in linear MFn polymers, Figure S4: Two ideal units in linear MFn polymer structure with the F/M molar ratio n = 1.5, Figure S5: Influence of polymerization degree m on the F/M molar ratio n in an ideal linear polymer structure, Figure S6: Influence of polymerization degree m on the F/M molar ratio n in the planar or three-dimensional structures, Figure S7: Linear structure of an MFn polymer molecule (Structure L), Figure S8: Planar structure of an MFn nonamer (Structure P9), Figure S9: Three-dimensional structure of an MFn seventy-two polymer (Structure T72), Figure S10: Terminal overreaction at the end of a linear MFn molecule (Equation LO), Figure S11: Terminal overreaction at the end of a planar MFn nonamer (Equation P9), Figure S12: Terminal overreaction at the end of a three-dimensional MFn seventy-two polymers (Equation T72), Figure S13: Silver concentration as a function of absorbance from spectrophotometry, Figure S14: SERRS performance of AgNPs treated with the liquor from MF6 acid-treatment reaction, Figure S15: SERRS spectra of a set of analytes collected on AgNP/MF6 substrate, Figure S16: SERRS spectrum as a function of the tetramethylthiuram disulfide concentration on the optimized AgNP/MF6, Figure S17: SERRS spectrum as a function of the malachite green concentration on the optimized AgNP/MF6, Figure S18: SERRS spectrum as a function of the p-hydroxythiophenol concentration on the optimized AgNP/MF6, Figure S19: SERRS spectrum as a function of the basic violet 14 concentration on the optimized AgNP/MF6, Table S1: Calculation of silver content in the AgNP/MF3.

Author Contributions

C.D. and L.S. conceived of and performed the experiments. Z.H. and C.D. wrote and revised the manuscript. Y.G. was responsible for the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. X.W. (Xiaogang Wang) and X.W. (Xiaohua Wang) revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science and Technology Major Project from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China, grant number 2017YFB0803100.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article and in the Supplementary Material.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Science and Technology Major Project from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2017YFB0803100).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hao, Z.; Mansuer, M.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, X. Ag-nanoparticles on UF-microsphere as an ultrasensitive SERS substrate with unique features for rhodamine 6G detection. Talanta 2016, 146, 533–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dong, X.; Li, R.; Schäfer, C.G.; Wang, F. Composite MF@Ag-NPs microspheres for label-free quantitative detection of uric acid. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017, 523, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. You, L.; Li, R.; Dong, X.; Wang, F.; Guo, J.; Wang, C. Micron-sized surface enhanced Raman scattering reporter/fluorescence probe encoded colloidal microspheres for sensitive DNA detection. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 488, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Yang, M.; Chen, T.; Lau, W.S.; Wang, Y.; Tang, Q.; Yang, Y.; Chen, H. Development of polymer-encapsulated metal nano-particles as surface-enhanced Raman scattering probes. Small 2009, 5, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Song, L.; Mao, K.; Zhou, X.; Hu, J. A novel biosensor based on Au@Ag core-shell nanoparticles for SERS detection of arsenic (III). Talanta 2016, 146, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, J.; Wu, X.; Wang, C.; Rong, Z.; Ding, H.; Li, H.; Li, S.; Shao, N.; Dong, P.; Xiao, R.; et al. Facile Synthesis of Au-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles and Their Application in Bacteria Detection via a SERS Method. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 19958–19967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, J.-F.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Ding, S.-Y.; Panneerselvam, R.; Tian, Z.-Q. Core-Shell Nanoparticle-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 5002–5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Mei, R.; Yin, Y.; You, J.; Chen, L. Polystyrene Encapsulated SERS Tags as Promising Standard Tools: Simple and Universal in Synthesis; Highly Sensitive and Ultrastable for Bioimaging. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 5270–5277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wackerlig, J.; Schirhagl, R. Applications of Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Nanoparticles and Their Advances toward In-dustrial Use: A Review. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 250–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, Y.; Wu, L.; Yan, H.; Lu, Z.; Yin, W.; Han, H. Enzyme induced molecularly imprinted polymer on SERS substrate for ultrasensitive detection of patulin. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1101, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, Y.-R.; Shende, C.S.; Tu, S.-I.; Inscore, F.; Gift, A.; Maksymiuk, P.; Farquharson, S. Analysis of pesticides on or in fruit by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. In Nondestructive Sensing for Food Safety, Quality, and Natural Resources; International Society for Optics and Photonics: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, H.; Dai, H.; Zhang, Y.; Tong, W.; Gao, H.; An, Q. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectra Promoted by a Finger Press in an All-Solid-State Flexible Energy Conversion and Storage Film. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 2649–2654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, G.; Cai, W.; Kong, L.; Duan, G.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Cheng, Z. Trace detection of cyanide based on SERS effect of Ag nano-plate-built hollow microsphere arrays. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 248, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sanles-Sobrido, M.; Exner, W.; Rodrıguez-Lorenzo, L. Design of SERS-Encoded, Submicron, Hollow Particles Through Con-fifined Growth of Encapsulated Metal Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2699–2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Laing, S.; Gracie, K.; Faulds, K. Multiplex in vitro detection using SERS. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 45, 1901–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Jamieson, L.E.; Asiala, S.M.; Gracie, K.; Faulds, K.; Graham, D. Bioanalytical Measurements Enabled by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Probes. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2017, 10, 415–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Cialla-May, D.; Zheng, X.-S.; Weber, K.; Popp, J. Recent progress in surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for biological and biomedical applications: From cells to clinics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3945–3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Smolsky, J.; Kaur, S.; Hayashi, C.; Batra, S.K.; Krasnoslobodtsev, A.V. Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering-Based Immuno-assay Technologies for Detection of Disease Biomarkers. Biosensors 2017, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Han, Z.; Liu, H.; Wang, B.; Weng, S.; Yang, L.; Liu, J. Three-Dimensional Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Hotspots in Spherical Colloidal Superstructure for Identification and Detection of Drugs in Human Urine. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 4821–4828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Fisk, H.; Westley, C.; Turner, N.J.; Goodacre, R. Achieving optimal SERS through enhanced experimental design. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2016, 47, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zhang, C.; Li, C.; Yu, J.; Jiang, S.; Xu, S.; Yang, C.; Liu, Y.J.; Gao, X.; Liu, A.; Man, B. SERS activated platform with three-dimensional hot spots and tunable nanometer gap. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 258, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Freeman, R.G.; Grabar, K.C.; Allison, K.J.; Bright, R.M.; Davis, J.A.; Guthrie, A.P.; Hommer, M.B.; Jackson, M.A.; Smith, P.C.; Walter, D.G.; et al. Self-Assembled Metal Colloid Monolayers: An Approach to SERS Substrates. Science 1995, 267, 1629–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yap, F.L.; Thoniyot, P.; Krishnan, S.; Krishnamoorthy, S. Nanoparticle Cluster Arrays for High-Performance SERS through Directed Self-Assembly on Flat Substrates and on Optical Fibers. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 2056–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, J.; Sun, C.; Liu, X.; Xin, L.; Fang, Y. Self-assembled Au nanoparticle arrays on thiol-functionalized resin beads for sensitive detection of paraquat by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014, 455, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, H.; Hasi, W.; Li, N.; Sha, X.; Han, S. Preparation of a high-performance thermally shrinkable polystyrene SERS substrate via Au@Ag nanorods self-assembled to detect pesticide residues. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2019, 50, 1679–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hao, Z.; Guo, Y.; Mansuer, M.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, Z. Role of the excess monomer in the growth of urea and formaldehyde resin deposit particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 430, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shen, L.; Zhu, J.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, X.; Hao, Z. Optimizing Melamine Resin Microspheres with Excess Formaldehyde for the SERS Substrate. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. MA, F.W.; Zhao, A.H.; Sun, A.L.; Li, A.Q.; Huo, L.H. A Facile Route for Nitrogen-Doped Hollow Graphitic Carbon Spheres with Superior Performance in Supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 13464–13468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, P.C.; Meisel, D.J.J. Adsorption and surface-enhanced Raman of dyes on silver and gold sols. J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 3391–3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kuttner, C. Plasmonics in Sensing: From Colorimetry to SERS Analytics. In Plasmonics; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  31. Laura, F. Bottom-up optimization of SERS hot-spots. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 9346–9348. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Impact of the acid-treatment reaction on MFn microsphere SEM images: (a) MF2, (b) MF3, (c) MF6 and (d) MF9 at the top were collected on non-treated microspheres from a synthetic reaction at a pH of 4.0 and 65 °C for 20 min only; meanwhile (e) MF2, (f) MF3, (g) MF6 and (h) MF9 at the bottom were collected on the microspheres treated in an acetic acid solution at a pH of 4.0 and 60 °C for 20 min. The MFn microsphere surfaces had been transformed into shrinkage textures while the resin cores and fragments had all been cleaned up in the acid-treatment reaction.
Figure 1. Impact of the acid-treatment reaction on MFn microsphere SEM images: (a) MF2, (b) MF3, (c) MF6 and (d) MF9 at the top were collected on non-treated microspheres from a synthetic reaction at a pH of 4.0 and 65 °C for 20 min only; meanwhile (e) MF2, (f) MF3, (g) MF6 and (h) MF9 at the bottom were collected on the microspheres treated in an acetic acid solution at a pH of 4.0 and 60 °C for 20 min. The MFn microsphere surfaces had been transformed into shrinkage textures while the resin cores and fragments had all been cleaned up in the acid-treatment reaction.
Nanomaterials 11 01337 g001
Figure 2. Impact of the acetic acid treatment on SEM images of AgNP/MFn substrate: (a) AgNP/MF2, (b) AgNP/MF3, (c) AgNP/MF6 and (d) AgNP/MF9 at the top were collected on the substrate incorporating non-treated microspheres; (e) AgNP/MF2, (f) AgNP/MF3, (g) AgNP/MF6 and (h) AgNP/MF9 at the bottom collected on the substrate incorporating the acid-treated microspheres, wherein the AgNPs looked aggregated in a flocculation way on the non-treated MFn microspheres.
Figure 2. Impact of the acetic acid treatment on SEM images of AgNP/MFn substrate: (a) AgNP/MF2, (b) AgNP/MF3, (c) AgNP/MF6 and (d) AgNP/MF9 at the top were collected on the substrate incorporating non-treated microspheres; (e) AgNP/MF2, (f) AgNP/MF3, (g) AgNP/MF6 and (h) AgNP/MF9 at the bottom collected on the substrate incorporating the acid-treated microspheres, wherein the AgNPs looked aggregated in a flocculation way on the non-treated MFn microspheres.
Nanomaterials 11 01337 g002
Figure 3. Impact of the acid-treatment reaction on SEM images of the MF3 microspheres and AgNP/MF3 substrate: (a) and (d) were collected on non-treated and the acid-treated MF3 microspheres; (b) and (e) were collected on substrates incorporating the MF3 samples of (a) and (d); and (c) and (f) were amplified from (b) and (e), respectively. After the acid-treatment reaction, the AgNPs were well dispersed on the surface of the microsphere.
Figure 3. Impact of the acid-treatment reaction on SEM images of the MF3 microspheres and AgNP/MF3 substrate: (a) and (d) were collected on non-treated and the acid-treated MF3 microspheres; (b) and (e) were collected on substrates incorporating the MF3 samples of (a) and (d); and (c) and (f) were amplified from (b) and (e), respectively. After the acid-treatment reaction, the AgNPs were well dispersed on the surface of the microsphere.
Nanomaterials 11 01337 g003
Figure 4. Impact of the acid-treatment reaction on R6G-SERRS spectra on the AgNP/MFn substrate: (a) AgNP/MF1, (b) AgNP/MF2, (c) AgNP/MF3, (d) AgNP/MF6 and (e) AgNP/MF9 in (A) were collected on the substrate incorporating non-treated microspheres at a laser power of 0.2 mW; meanwhile (f) AgNP/MF1, (g) AgNP/MF2, (h) AgNP/MF3, (i) AgNP/MF6 and (j) AgNP/MF9 in (B) were collected on the substrate incorporating the acid-treated microspheres at a laser power of 0.01 mW. The blank AgNPs was examined at a laser power of 0.05 mW and the R6G-SERRS signal was magnified 3 times as shown at the bottom of (B). As shown in the inset, SERRS signals on the substrate had their intensities enhanced if the incorporated MFn microspheres were pretreated in acetic acid solution. Furthermore, superiority of excess formaldehyde in SERRS detection was noticeable as the parameter (n) increased.
Figure 4. Impact of the acid-treatment reaction on R6G-SERRS spectra on the AgNP/MFn substrate: (a) AgNP/MF1, (b) AgNP/MF2, (c) AgNP/MF3, (d) AgNP/MF6 and (e) AgNP/MF9 in (A) were collected on the substrate incorporating non-treated microspheres at a laser power of 0.2 mW; meanwhile (f) AgNP/MF1, (g) AgNP/MF2, (h) AgNP/MF3, (i) AgNP/MF6 and (j) AgNP/MF9 in (B) were collected on the substrate incorporating the acid-treated microspheres at a laser power of 0.01 mW. The blank AgNPs was examined at a laser power of 0.05 mW and the R6G-SERRS signal was magnified 3 times as shown at the bottom of (B). As shown in the inset, SERRS signals on the substrate had their intensities enhanced if the incorporated MFn microspheres were pretreated in acetic acid solution. Furthermore, superiority of excess formaldehyde in SERRS detection was noticeable as the parameter (n) increased.
Nanomaterials 11 01337 g004
Figure 5. SERRS spectra of AgNP/MF6 vs. treatment time and acid-volume in the MF6 acid-treatment reaction: (a) 10, (b) 20, (c) 40, (d) 60 and (e) 80 min in (A) were collected on the substrate incorporating the acid-treated MF6 microspheres at varied treatment times, from 10 to 80 min; meanwhile, (f) 1×, (g) 2×, (h) 3×, (i) 4× and (j) 5× times in (B) were collected on the substrate incorporating the acid-treated MF6 microspheres at varied acetic acid volumes, from 1× to 5× times 90 mL. The SERRS performance of the substrate was nearly stable.
Figure 5. SERRS spectra of AgNP/MF6 vs. treatment time and acid-volume in the MF6 acid-treatment reaction: (a) 10, (b) 20, (c) 40, (d) 60 and (e) 80 min in (A) were collected on the substrate incorporating the acid-treated MF6 microspheres at varied treatment times, from 10 to 80 min; meanwhile, (f) 1×, (g) 2×, (h) 3×, (i) 4× and (j) 5× times in (B) were collected on the substrate incorporating the acid-treated MF6 microspheres at varied acetic acid volumes, from 1× to 5× times 90 mL. The SERRS performance of the substrate was nearly stable.
Nanomaterials 11 01337 g005
Figure 6. SERRS spectra of AgNP/MF6 vs. the acidity and treatment number in the MF6 acid-treatment reaction: (a) pH 4.0, (b) 3.7, (c) 3.3, (d) 3.0, (e) 2.7 and (f) 2.3 in (A) were collected on the substrate incorporating MF6 microspheres that had been treated at varied acidic pH values, from 4.0 to 2.3; meanwhile (g) 1, (h) 2, (i) 3, (j) 4, (k) 5 and (l) 6 times in (B) were collected on the substrate incorporating the microspheres that had been treated with a variable treatment number from 1 to 5 times. The SERRS performance of the substrate could be optimized by variation of the acidity or treatment number in the MFn acid-treatment reaction.
Figure 6. SERRS spectra of AgNP/MF6 vs. the acidity and treatment number in the MF6 acid-treatment reaction: (a) pH 4.0, (b) 3.7, (c) 3.3, (d) 3.0, (e) 2.7 and (f) 2.3 in (A) were collected on the substrate incorporating MF6 microspheres that had been treated at varied acidic pH values, from 4.0 to 2.3; meanwhile (g) 1, (h) 2, (i) 3, (j) 4, (k) 5 and (l) 6 times in (B) were collected on the substrate incorporating the microspheres that had been treated with a variable treatment number from 1 to 5 times. The SERRS performance of the substrate could be optimized by variation of the acidity or treatment number in the MFn acid-treatment reaction.
Nanomaterials 11 01337 g006
Figure 7. Impact of the MF6 acid-treatment temperature on SEM images of the AgNP/MF6 substrate: (a) 0, (b) 20, (c) 40, (d) 60, (e) 80 and (f) 100 °C were collected on the substrate incorporating the MF6 microspheres that had been previously treated at varied acid-treatment temperatures, from 0 to 100 °C. The characteristic shrinkage textures on MF6 microsphere surfaces became gradually prominent as the acid-treatment temperature increased from 60 to 100 °C.
Figure 7. Impact of the MF6 acid-treatment temperature on SEM images of the AgNP/MF6 substrate: (a) 0, (b) 20, (c) 40, (d) 60, (e) 80 and (f) 100 °C were collected on the substrate incorporating the MF6 microspheres that had been previously treated at varied acid-treatment temperatures, from 0 to 100 °C. The characteristic shrinkage textures on MF6 microsphere surfaces became gradually prominent as the acid-treatment temperature increased from 60 to 100 °C.
Nanomaterials 11 01337 g007
Figure 8. Impact of the MF6 acid-treatment temperature on R6G-SERRS spectra on AgNP/MF6 substrate: (a) 0, (b) 20, (c) 40, (d) 60, (e) 80 and (f) 100 °C in (A) were collected on the substrate incorporating the MF6 microspheres previously treated at varied acid-treatment temperatures, from 0 to 100 °C. The SEM images of the samples in (a,c,e) are presented in (B). The AgNPs were encapsulated in the oligomer shells as the acid-treatment reaction was executed at low temperatures. (a,c,e) in Raman spectroscopy and (a,c,e) in SEM are two characterization methods of the same substance.
Figure 8. Impact of the MF6 acid-treatment temperature on R6G-SERRS spectra on AgNP/MF6 substrate: (a) 0, (b) 20, (c) 40, (d) 60, (e) 80 and (f) 100 °C in (A) were collected on the substrate incorporating the MF6 microspheres previously treated at varied acid-treatment temperatures, from 0 to 100 °C. The SEM images of the samples in (a,c,e) are presented in (B). The AgNPs were encapsulated in the oligomer shells as the acid-treatment reaction was executed at low temperatures. (a,c,e) in Raman spectroscopy and (a,c,e) in SEM are two characterization methods of the same substance.
Nanomaterials 11 01337 g008
Figure 9. A schematic on the formation of the SERRS hotspots with MF oligomers participation: (a) a gap between two AgNPs is swollen by oligomers, (b) becomes small with the amount of oligomers decreased, and (c) works as an activated SERRS hotspot with the oligomers further decreased after the acid-treatment reaction.
Figure 9. A schematic on the formation of the SERRS hotspots with MF oligomers participation: (a) a gap between two AgNPs is swollen by oligomers, (b) becomes small with the amount of oligomers decreased, and (c) works as an activated SERRS hotspot with the oligomers further decreased after the acid-treatment reaction.
Nanomaterials 11 01337 g009
Figure 10. SERRS spectrum as a function of the R6G concentration on the optimized AgNP/MF6: (a) 1.0 × 10−15, (b) 1.0 × 10−13, (c) 1.0 × 10−11, (d) 1.0 × 10−9 and (e) 1.0 × 10−7 M were R6G-SERRS spectra on the optimized AgNP/MF6 treated with a R6G solution from 1.0 × 10−15 to 1.0 × 10−7 M R6G at a laser power of 0.01 mW and the SERRS detection was conducted on the blank AgNPs treated with 1.0 × 10−7 M R6G solution at a laser power of 0.05 mW. The R6G SERRS spectrum was still clear if the AgNP/MF6 was treated with a 1.0 × 10−13 M R6G solution.
Figure 10. SERRS spectrum as a function of the R6G concentration on the optimized AgNP/MF6: (a) 1.0 × 10−15, (b) 1.0 × 10−13, (c) 1.0 × 10−11, (d) 1.0 × 10−9 and (e) 1.0 × 10−7 M were R6G-SERRS spectra on the optimized AgNP/MF6 treated with a R6G solution from 1.0 × 10−15 to 1.0 × 10−7 M R6G at a laser power of 0.01 mW and the SERRS detection was conducted on the blank AgNPs treated with 1.0 × 10−7 M R6G solution at a laser power of 0.05 mW. The R6G SERRS spectrum was still clear if the AgNP/MF6 was treated with a 1.0 × 10−13 M R6G solution.
Nanomaterials 11 01337 g010
Figure 11. SERRS spectra from a set of analytes on AgNPs/MF6. (a) Tetramethylthiuram disulfide (LDL: 1.0 × 10−8 M. CAS: 137-26-8; disinfectant, mildew preventive, pesticide, residue over seven days and vulcanization accelerator in rubbers); (b) malachite green (LDL: 1.0 × 10−7 M. CAS: 2437-29-8; dye and toxic antiseptic for aquaculture); (c) p-hydroxythiophenol (LDL: 1.0 × 10−7 M. CAS: 637-89-8; pharmaceutical and dye intermediate); (d) basic violet 14 (LDL: 1.0 × 10−9 M. CAS: 632-99-5; dye). Each concentration of the analytes was 1.00 × 10−5 M, the MF6 in SERRS substrate was synthesized at n = 6.00, pH = 4.0, and at a temperature of 65 °C for 20 min and acid-treated at a pH of 4.00 and at a temperature of 40 °C for 10 min. The position of the Raman peak of each material is marked with “*”. The detection limits for each analyte are shown in Supplementary Materials Figures S16–S19.
Figure 11. SERRS spectra from a set of analytes on AgNPs/MF6. (a) Tetramethylthiuram disulfide (LDL: 1.0 × 10−8 M. CAS: 137-26-8; disinfectant, mildew preventive, pesticide, residue over seven days and vulcanization accelerator in rubbers); (b) malachite green (LDL: 1.0 × 10−7 M. CAS: 2437-29-8; dye and toxic antiseptic for aquaculture); (c) p-hydroxythiophenol (LDL: 1.0 × 10−7 M. CAS: 637-89-8; pharmaceutical and dye intermediate); (d) basic violet 14 (LDL: 1.0 × 10−9 M. CAS: 632-99-5; dye). Each concentration of the analytes was 1.00 × 10−5 M, the MF6 in SERRS substrate was synthesized at n = 6.00, pH = 4.0, and at a temperature of 65 °C for 20 min and acid-treated at a pH of 4.00 and at a temperature of 40 °C for 10 min. The position of the Raman peak of each material is marked with “*”. The detection limits for each analyte are shown in Supplementary Materials Figures S16–S19.
Nanomaterials 11 01337 g011
Table 1. Mass loss rates of MFn microspheres in the acid-treatment reaction.
Table 1. Mass loss rates of MFn microspheres in the acid-treatment reaction.
SamplesM2FMF3MF6MF9
parameter n0.5003.006.009.00
* mass loss rate (wt %)17.56.214.294.75
* Mass loss rate: ( m s 0     m s m s 0 )   ×   100 % , where ms0 and ms are the amounts of non-treated and the treated microspheres, respectively.
Table 2. Mass loss rates of MF6 in the acid-treatment reaction at the different treatment temperatures.
Table 2. Mass loss rates of MF6 in the acid-treatment reaction at the different treatment temperatures.
Temperature (°C)20406080100
Parameter (n)6.06.06.06.06.0
* mass loss rate (wt %)3.904.084.294.975.10
* Mass loss rate: ( m s 0     m s m s 0 )   ×   100 % , where ms0 and ms are the amounts of non-treated and the treated microspheres, respectively.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duan, C.; Shen, L.; Guo, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Hao, Z. SERRS Detection on Silver Nanoparticles Supported on Acid-Treated Melamine-Resin Microspheres. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051337

AMA Style

Duan C, Shen L, Guo Y, Wang X, Wang X, Hao Z. SERRS Detection on Silver Nanoparticles Supported on Acid-Treated Melamine-Resin Microspheres. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(5):1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duan, Chaofeng, Lu Shen, Yuqing Guo, Xiaogang Wang, Xiaohua Wang, and Zhixian Hao. 2021. "SERRS Detection on Silver Nanoparticles Supported on Acid-Treated Melamine-Resin Microspheres" Nanomaterials 11, no. 5: 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051337

APA Style

Duan, C., Shen, L., Guo, Y., Wang, X., Wang, X., & Hao, Z. (2021). SERRS Detection on Silver Nanoparticles Supported on Acid-Treated Melamine-Resin Microspheres. Nanomaterials, 11(5), 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051337

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop