Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Antifungal Activity of Graphene Oxide and Fungicides against Fusarium Head Blight In Vitro and In Vivo
Next Article in Special Issue
Biofilm-Resistant Nanocoatings Based on ZnO Nanoparticles and Linalool
Previous Article in Journal
Fluorinated Boron-Based Anions for Higher Voltage Li Metal Battery Electrolytes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Solid State Photoreduction of Silver on Mesoporous Silica to Enhance Antifungal Activity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Giant Second Harmonic Generation Enhancement by Ag Nanoparticles Compactly Distributed on Hexagonal Arrangements

by
Alejandro Gómez-Tornero
,
Luisa E. Bausá
and
Mariola O. Ramírez
*
Departamento Física de Materiales, Instituto de Materiales Nicolás Cabrera and Condensed Matter Physics Center (IFIMAC), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(9), 2394; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092394
Submission received: 28 July 2021 / Revised: 3 September 2021 / Accepted: 10 September 2021 / Published: 14 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metallic and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Applications)

Abstract

:
The association of plasmonic nanostructures with nonlinear dielectric systems has been shown to provide useful platforms for boosting frequency conversion processes at metal-dielectric interfaces. Here, we report on an efficient route for engineering light–matter interaction processes in hybrid plasmonic-χ(2) dielectric systems to enhance second harmonic generation (SHG) processes confined in small spatial regions. By means of ferroelectric lithography, we have fabricated scalable micrometric arrangements of interacting silver nanoparticles compactly distributed on hexagonal regions. The fabricated polygonal microstructures support both localized and extended plasmonic modes, providing large spatial regions of field enhancement at the optical frequencies involved in the SHG process. We experimentally demonstrate that the resonant excitation of the plasmonic modes supported by the Ag nanoparticle-filled hexagons in the near infrared region produces an extraordinary 104-fold enhancement of the blue second harmonic intensity generated in the surface of a LiNbO3 crystal. The results open new perspectives for the design of efficient hybrid plasmonic frequency converters in miniaturized devices.

1. Introduction

The generation and manipulation of nonlinear optical processes at the nanoscale is a highly interesting field due to its broad range of applications in a variety of disciplines such as biology, physics, chemistry, materials science, and information technologies [1,2,3]. However, limitations associated with the low conversion efficiency at small scales require the use of novel designs to develop efficient nonlinear optical sources operating in extremely confined volumes. In the last decade, different approaches based on plasmon-driven light confinement have been used to enhance the nonlinear response of a variety of systems of reduced dimensions. In fact, the large near field enhancement provided by localized surface plasmon resonances (LSPRs) compensates for the lack of phase matching mechanisms at the nanoscale, leading to high nonlinear responses at subwavelength scales [4,5,6]. Depending on the size and geometry of the plasmonic nanostructures, the enhancement of the electromagnetic field can be achieved either at the harmonic or the fundamental frequency, the latter being much more efficient due to the nonlinear dependence of the generated harmonic signal with the fundamental radiation [7,8,9,10].
In recent years, the use of plasmonic nanostructures for light confinement in nonlinear dielectrics has emerged as an efficient and straightforward approach for boosting the frequency doubling response in miniaturized components. This approach exploits both the high nonlinear coefficients offered by certain nonlinear dielectric crystals and the strong light confinement provided by plasmonic structures, which has led to efficient hybrid plasmonic-χ(2) dielectric systems operating at different spectral ranges. The proposed designs include core-shell nanoparticles (ferroelectric nanoparticles surrounded by Au shells [11,12]), semiconductors or nonlinear dielectrics in the gap between plasmonic nanoantennas [13,14,15], colloidal BTO-Au hybrid nano-dimmers [16], Au nanoring resonators filled with LiNbO3 [17], hybrid plasmonic waveguides [18,19], or ordered and disordered plasmonic arrangements of interacting silver nanoparticles (NPs) assembled on the polar surface of ferroelectric crystals [20,21,22,23,24].
In this work, we use an alternative approach to demonstrate SHG enhancement by around four orders of magnitude in LiNbO3 by means of interacting Ag NPs compactly distributed within polygonal surfaces onto a ferroelectric domain patterned nonlinear LiNbO3 crystal. LiNbO3 is one of the most widely employed dielectrics for advanced photonics and optoelectronics due to its remarkable acousto-optic, electro-optic, and nonlinear coefficients [25,26,27]. The association of LiNbO3 with noble metal plasmonic nanostructures has shown to be a useful route to provide solid-state platforms for boosting nonlinear processes at the nanoscale [17,19,21,28]. SHG enhancement factors as high as 400 have been reported by using hexagonal plasmonic necklaces of silver nanoparticles formed on the LiNbO3 crystal surface [21]. Additionally, theoretical works have pointed out the possibility of achieving giant SHG enhancements by using either Ag-coated LiNbO3 core-shell nanocuboids with designed double plasmonic resonances [29] or hybrid nanoplasmonic waveguides [30].
Here, we go a step further to experimentally demonstrate that SHG in LiNbO3 can be enhanced by around four orders of magnitude by completely filling the inside of the hexagonal necklaces with interacting silver NPs. The fabricated plasmonic structure provides two spectrally overlapping plasmonic resonances; namely, a collective localized plasmonic mode sustained by the surrounding hexagonal polygonal necklace (centered at around 535 nm) and a spatially extended plasmonic mode centered at 705 nm, which is associated with the LSPR of the Ag NPs covering the hexagonal regions. These Ag Np filled hexagons are responsible for an efficient enhancement of the fundamental NIR radiation, thus leading to giant SHG enhancement values of about 104 in the blue spectral region due to the two-photon character of the nonlinear process. The results provide an alternative strategy to design cost-efficient and scalable plasmonic architectures to enhance SHG processes in hybrid plasmonic-dielectric systems, opening new opportunities for increasing the nonlinear conversion efficiency in small volumes.
The manuscript is structured as follows. First, we briefly describe the fabrication procedure and the main sample features. Then, the optical response of large-filled hexagons (5–10 µm side length) as well as their capability to boost the SHG in the nonlinear material are studied and compared to those obtained for empty hexagonal necklaces with similar dimensions. Finally, the influence of the hexagon size on the SHG enhancement is analyzed. The results show that by reducing the size of the filled hexagons to dimensions close to the fundamental radiation wavelength (size length of hexagons around 700 nm), the nonlinear emission process is highly improved and an extraordinary 104-fold enhancement of the blue second harmonic intensity generated in the surface of a LiNbO3 crystal is obtained. The results, related to the interconnection of the NPs structure and to the collective modes in the wavelength-scale hexagonal arrangements, validate the optical performance of the hybrid system in a spectral region of high technological interest.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

Domain Fabrication: Two dimensional patterns of hexagonal ferroelectric domains were fabricated in a 0.5 mm thick z-cut LiNbO3 single domain crystal by direct electron beam irradiation using a Philips XL30 SFEG electron microscope driven by an Elphy Raith nanolithography software. The beam current and acceleration voltage were fixed at 0.3 nA and 15 kV, respectively. Additionally, during the irradiation process, the z+ face was coated with an Al film of 100 nm acting as ground electrode. After irradiation, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) microscopy was employed to confirm that the inverted hexagonal domains crossed the whole sample thickness, their size and shape being similar at both crystal faces [31,32].
Ag Decoration: The photo-deposition of metallic NPs was carried out by ferroelectric lithography by immersing the domain patterned crystal into a 0.01 M AgNO3 solution at 60 °C while their polar surface was illuminated with above band gap UV radiation with a mercury pen lamp (UVP model 11SC-1) with its main line at 253.6 nm. The Hg lamp emission power was 5400 μW/cm2 at a distance of 2 cm. The illumination time was varied to achieved different types of hybrid structures. More specifically, the formation of empty hexagonal necklaces was achieved for an illumination time of 4 min and the fabrication of Ag-filled hexagonal regions was achieved after illuminating the AgNO3 solution for 15 min. In both cases, the photoinduced silver deposition process was carried out on optical grade polished crystals. Finally, it is worth mentioning that while the formation of hexagonal necklaces can be achieved illuminating the crystal at any polar face, the Ag-filled hexagonal regions correspond to ferroelectric domains with a z+ positive polarity. That is, the photoinduced silver deposition must be carried out by illuminating the z− face of the crystal containing z+ hexagonal domains.

2.2. Optical Characterization

Dark field images were obtained in transmission configuration by using an Olympus BX51 microscope equipped with a dark-field condenser. For the extinction spectra, a double beam Lambda 1050 PerkinElmer spectrometer was employed.
Spatially resolved SHG experiments were carried out by means of a laser scanning confocal microscope (Olympus BX41) provided with a two-axis XY motorized platform driven by commercial Labspec software. The spatial resolution of the stage was 0.3 μm. The fundamental beam, delivered by a femtosecond pulsed Ti:sapphire laser (Spectra Physics Model 177-Series), was tuned at 850 nm and focused onto the sample surface by a 100× microscope objective. The SHG signal was collected in backscattering geometry with the same objective and detected by a Peltier cooled photomultiplier tube.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fabrication Process. Sample Characteristics

Ag NPs assembled on hexagonal arrangements were obtained on the polar surface of LiNbO3 crystals by using hexagonal inverted ferroelectric domains as artificial templates for selective photo-deposition process [21,22]. The side length of the hexagons varied from 0.7 µm up to 10 μm, in such a way that the contour of a single hexagon consisted of a necklace containing hundreds of Ag NPs. The domain selective formation of Ag NPs on a positive domain is based on the photo-chemical reactions that take place on the surface of domain patterned ferroelectric crystals [33,34]. More specifically, when the patterned ferroelectric is placed into an AgNO3 solution and illuminated with above-band-gap UV light, the screening charge produces electronic photocarriers at the crystal surface, which participate in the chemical reaction reducing the silver cations on the specific polarity domains [34]. In the case of LiNbO3, Ag NP formation involves both a weak downward band bending at positive domain surfaces and a strong electric field at domain boundaries [35]. This allows a certain degree of control over the process so that the Ag deposition on the domain surface and the deposition on the domain boundary surface can be achieve independently. Accordingly, by modifying the illumination time, either Ag NPs hexagonal necklaces formed on the domain wall boundaries or a dense distribution of closely spaced interacting Ag nanoparticle covering the positive domain surface can be obtained. Specific details on the preparation method can be found elsewhere [22].
Figure 1 shows SEM images of the resultant metallic nanostructures after different photo-deposition processes. By varying the illumination time while keeping constant the rest of the parameters (0.01 M AgNO3 solution, 5400 μW/cm2 UV emission power, 60 °C substrate temperature) different type of plasmonic arrangements are obtained on the polar surface of LiNbO3. Figure 1a shows a hexagonal plasmonic necklace of Ag NPs on the domain boundary surface of LiNbO3 obtained for an illumination time of 4 min. As observed, the chain of Ag NPs is perfectly located on the domain boundary surface of a hexagonal ferroelectric domain, bending at vertices to form a polygonal necklace (Figure 1b). According to the distribution displayed in Figure 1c, the average size of the Ag NPs forming the hexagonal necklace is around 50 nm and the interparticle distance about 2 nm.
Increasing the illumination time leads to the formation of Ag NPs that completely cover the surface of positive ferroelectric domains after 15 min of illumination. This assembling of nearby NPs within the hexagon provides a straightforward fabrication of large spatial regions of high density of interacting plasmonic NPs confined inside a specific polygonal zone (Figure 1d). A detailed image of the Ag NPs located inside the plasmonic hexagon is shown in Figure 1e. As can be seen, a high density of mostly spherical Ag NPs fills the polygonal region. Although in this case, a slightly larger size dispersion is obtained (Figure 1f), the average NP size is similar to that of the Ag NPs necklaces. Additionally, comparable values of the interparticle distance are obtained in both type of Ag NPs arrangements (around 2 nm). Finally, it is worth mentioning that the fabricated polygonal microstructures can be organized in two-dimensional superlattices leading to scalable functional nonlinear metasurfaces [36].

3.2. Optical Response of Filled Polygonal Assemblies

The dark-field scattering image of both types of arrangements is displayed in Figure 2. In both cases, the radiative nature of the plasmonic modes is observed. For the filled hexagons, a predominantly reddish color spreads throughout the decorated domain surface (Figure 2a). Differently, the dark field image associated with the hexagonal necklaces (short photo-deposition times) shows a dominant orange color, the scattered light being produced along the contour of the necklace where the Ag NPs are located. The corresponding extinction spectra obtained in transmission mode after subtracting the contribution from the bare LiNbO3 substrate are depicted in Figure 2b. As seen, in both cases a broad resonance with the maximum around λI = 535 nm is observed. In the case of the Ag NPs hexagonal necklaces, the spectrum corresponds to the collective mode sustained by the necklaces as previously reported by the authors [21,37]. In the case of the filled hexagons, the additional spectral band appearing at the low energy side (centered at around λII = 705 nm) can be related to the highly dense Ag NPs distribution decorating the interior of the hexagon. Both the λI and λII values correspond to the central wavelength of two Gaussian profiles that fit the extinction spectrum of the plasmonic structures shown in Figure 2b.
The appearance of the low energy band can be explained in the frame of previous studies, which show that complex NP structures can be efficiently analyzed by an embedded chain plasmon model [38,39,40]. In this context, the spectral response of the complex plasmonic structure filling the hexagons can be interpreted as the contribution of a variety of linear or quasi-linear kinked NP chains within the hexagons. As a result, numerous plasmonic chains, with different numbers of interacting NPs, contribute to the total spectral response in the far field. Moreover, significant chain coupling has been reported for chain separation distances of a few nanometers, which shifts the resonance to the near infrared region [41]. This chain plasmon mode has been shown to be useful to enhance a variety of optical phenomena including SHG, SERS or nanolasing, because of its robustness, strong radiative nature, and broad spectral response [21,42,43]. On the other hand, the assembly of NPs inside the hexagons also shows certain similarity to percolated systems or disordered plasmonic networks where a spectral shift of the plasmonic resonance towards the near infrared spectral region has been reported due to the presence of NP clusters extended in relatively large spatial regions [44,45,46].
The effect of the plasmonic arrangements on the SHG response generated by the nonlinear substrate was analyzed by means of confocal scanning microscopy. The experiments were performed at a fundamental wavelength of 850 nm, which efficiently overlaps the low energy side of the spectra shown Figure 2. The LiNbO3 substrate also exhibits a good transparency range for this wavelength, enabling the generation of SHG in the blue spectral region, which is of technological interest in the context of potential nonlinear photonic nanodevices. Figure 3 shows the spatial distribution of the blue SHG signal generated in the LiNbO3 substrate, which is enhanced by the plasmonic nanostructures. The spatial maps displayed in Figure 3a show that the SHG signal is greatly boosted in the presence of the metallic nanostructures with respect to that of the bare substrate, reproducing the spatial distribution of the Ag nanoparticles. That is, the SHG enhancement remains localized at the domain boundary surfaces in the case of hexagonal necklaces and extends over the whole domain surface in the case of the Ag NP filled domains. For illustrative purposes, the SHG spatial maps were normalized to their maximum values. The cross-section intensity profiles depicted in Figure 3b show the quantitative comparison of the SHG enhancement in both systems. As can be seen, the enhanced SHG intensity shows remarkable differences when comparing the response of both types of structures, the improved nonlinear response in the filled hexagons being two orders of magnitude greater than that obtained from the necklaces.
To estimate the enhancement factor, we compared the nonlinear performance of the hybrid architectures with respect to that generated in the substrate in the absence of metallic NPs. To that end, we experimentally determined the fundamental pump power required to achieve a comparable SHG intensity. The results obtained for the three analyzed systems were: 26 mW for the bare LiNbO3 substrate, 3 mW for the hybrid LiNbO3-plasmonic necklaces, and 1 mW for the filled hexagons. Hence, according to the quadratic dependence of the SHG response on the fundamental power, an SHG enhancement value of 675 is obtained for the filled hexagons, while an enhancement factor of 9 is achieved for the hexagonal necklaces. Figure 3c compares in log scale the enhancement factors obtained from both types of plasmonic structures. The dramatic difference between them can be accounted for by the presence of the low energy plasmonic resonance associated with the filled hexagons (see Figure 2), which provides a much more efficient spectral overlap of the fundamental radiation with respect to the case of the hexagonal necklaces. Accordingly, a significantly larger SHG enhancement due to the two-photon character of the frequency conversion process is obtained.
Finally, we should emphasize that the SHG signal is generated in the LiNbO3 nonlinear substrate. This fact was confirmed by analyzing the SHG intensity as a function of the polarization of the fundamental radiation. The resulting polar plots of SHG intensity for the bare substrate and for the Ag NPs filled hexagon obtained in reflection geometry are shown in Figure 3d. For the sake of comparison, the nonlinear signal in the absence of Ag NPs was registered with an incident pump power 20 times greater than the one employed for the filled hexagon (~1 mW). As observed, they show similar trends and both polar plots are consistent with the 3 m point group symmetry of LiNbO3. Therefore, we can conclude that the SH signal is generated in the nonlinear LiNbO3 crystal, the contribution of the Ag nanostructures to the SHG being negligible.

3.3. Scaling Effects on SHG Enhancement

Once the capability of large-filled hexagons to enhance the SHG process has been demonstrated, we aim to study the effect of reducing the hexagon size to dimensions comparable to that of the fundamental radiation wavelength. Figure 4a illustrates the SHG obtained for a distribution of hexagonal domains with side lengths around 700 nm. A striking difference is observed when comparing the enhancement factors obtained for large and small hexagons (Figure 4b). In contrast to the 670-fold value featured by the large-filled hybrid hexagons, the enhancement factor obtained for small hexagons is close to 104. Indeed, the SHG spatial maps in these structures were recorded with an incident pump power of about 0.15 mW, that is one order of magnitude lower than that used for the large hexagons.
The much larger enhancement in the small hexagons could be related to the existence of extended collective plasmonic modes propagating through the entire hexagon. In fact, the possibility of using the inner NP structure as plasmonic interconnection between the different sides of the hexagon could also favor the propagation of the plasmon mode inside the hexagon [47,48,49,50,51]. Additionally, due to the hexagon dimensions, the presence of modes in the wavelength-scale hexagonal nanocavity could also contribute to the light confinement and enhanced light–matter interaction process [52].

4. Summary and Conclusions

To summarize, we have presented an alternative hybrid plasmonic-nonlinear dielectric system for enhancing SHG processes at reduced dimensions. Using hexagonal plasmonic necklaces filled with a dense distribution of interacting Ag NPs, we show that the second harmonic response generated from the surface of a LiNbO3 crystal can be enhanced in about four orders of magnitude. Such a large enhancement is achieved by taking advantage of the strong near field generated at the metal-dielectric interface associated with the resonant excitation of localized and spatially extended plasmonic modes in small filled hexagons. The ability to combine both plasmonic fields in a single microstructure and the possibility to resonantly excite them by means of the optical fields involved in the nonlinear process, provides an efficient route for engineering light–matter interaction processes at subwavelength scales to enhance parametric nonlinear processes. Because of the ease of the fabrication process and the extraordinary improvement of the SHG response in small-confined region, our findings offer an alternative approach for the design of efficient hybrid plasmonic frequency converter nanodevices and opens interesting perspectives for a range of applications including sensing, imaging, information technologies, or future integrated circuits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O.R.; methodology and investigation A.G.-T.; validation, A.G.-T., L.E.B. and M.O.R.; formal analysis, A.G.-T., L.E.B. and M.O.R.; supervision, M.O.R.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been supported by the Spanish Government (contracts MAT2016-76106-R and PID2019-108257GB-I00 and María de Maeztu “Programme for Units of Excellence in R&D” CEX2018-000805-M).

Data Availability Statement

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ray, P.C. Size and shape dependent second order nonlinear optical properties of nanomaterials and their application in biological and chemical sensing. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 5332–5365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wang, K.; Titchener, J.G.; Kruk, S.S.; Xu, L.; Chung, H.-P.; Parry, M.; Kravchenko, I.I.; Che, Y.-H.; Solntsev, S.S.; Kivshar, Y.S.; et al. Quantum metasurface for multiphoton interference and state reconstruction. Science 2018, 361, 1104–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Butet, J.; Russier-Antoine, I.; Jonin, C.; Lascoux, N.; Benichou, E.; Brevet, P.F. Sensing with multipolar second harmonic generation from spherical metallic nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 1697–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bonacina, L.; Brevet, P.F.; Finazzi, M.; Celebrano, M. Harmonic generation at the nanoscale. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 127, 230901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kauranen, M.; Zayats, A. Nonlinear plasmonics. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 737–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Butet, J.; Brevet, P.F.; Martin, O.J.F. Optical second harmonic generation in plasmonic nanostructures: From fundamental principles to advanced application. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 10545–10562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Celebrano, M.; Wu, X.F.; Baselli, M.; Großmann, S.; Biagioni, P.; Locatelli, A.; De Angelis, C.; Cerullo, G.; Osellame, R.; Hecht, B.; et al. Mode matching in multiresonant plasmonic nanoantennas for enhanced second harmonic generation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Weber, N.; Protte, M.; Walter, F.; Georgi, P.; Zentgraf, T.; Meier, C. Double resonant plasmonic nanoantennas for efficient second harmonic generation in zinc oxide. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 205307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thyagarajan, K.; Rivier, S.; Lovera, A.; Martin, O.J.F. Enhanced second-harmonic generation from double resonant plasmonic antennae. Opt. Express 2012, 12, 12860–12865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Yang, K.Y.; Butet, J.; Yan, C.; Bernasconi, G.D.; Martin, O.J.F. Enhancement mechanisms of the second harmonic generation from double resonant aluminum nanostructures. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 1522–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pu, Y.; Grange, R.; Hsieh, C.L.; Psaltis, D. Nonlinear Optical Properties of Core-Shell Nanocavities for Enhanced Second-Harmonic Generation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 207402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Richter, J.; Steinbrück, A.; Zilk, M.; Sergeyev, A.; Pertsch, T.; Tünnermann, A.; Grange, R. Core-shell potassium niobate nanowires for enhanced nonlinear optical effects. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 5200–5207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chauvet, N.; Maeliss, E.; Jeannin, M.; Laurent, G.; Huant, S.; Gacoin, T.; Dantelle, G.; Nogues, G.; Bachelier, G. Hybrid KTP–Plasmonic Nanostructures for Enhanced Nonlinear Optics at the Nanoscale. ACS Photonics 2020, 7, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Metzger, B.; Hentschel, M.; Schumacher, T.; Lippitz, M.; Ye, X.; Murray, C.B.; Knabe, B.; Buse, K.; Giessen, H. Doubling the efficiency of third harmonic generation by positioning ITO nanocrystals into the hot-spot of plasmonic gap-antennas. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 2867–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Linnenbank, H.; Grynko, Y.; Forstner, J.; Linden, S. Second harmonic generation spectroscopy on hybrid plasmonic/dielectric nanoantennas. Light Sci. Appl. 2016, 5, e16013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Timpu, F.; Hendricks, N.R.; Petrov, M.; Ni, S.; Renaut, C.; Wolf, H.; Isa, L.; Kivshar, Y.; Grange, R. Enhanced Second-Harmonic Generation from Sequential Capillarity-Assisted Particle Assembly of Hybrid Nanodimers. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 5381–5388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lehr, D.; Reinhold, J.; Thiele, I.; Hartung, H.; Dietrich, K.; Menzel, C.; Pertsch, T.; Kley, E.-B.; Tünnermann, A. Enhancing Second Harmonic Generation in Gold Nanoring Resonators Filled with Lithium Niobate. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 1025–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shi, J.J.; Li, Y.; Kang, M.; He, X.; Halas, N.J.; Nordlander, P.; Zhang, S.; Xu, H. Efficient second harmonic generation in a hybrid plasmonic waveguide by mode interactions. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 3838–3845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Z.; Corbett, B.; Gocalinska, A.; Pelucchi, E.; Chen, W.; Ryan, K.M.; Khan, P.; Silien, C.; Xu, H.; Liu, N. Direct Visualization of Phase-Matched Efficient Second Harmonic and Broadband Sum Frequency Generation in Hybrid Plasmonic Nanostructures. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yraola, E.; Molina, P.; Plaza, J.L.; Ramírez, M.O.; Bausá, L.E. Spontaneous emission and nonlinear response enhancement by silver nanoparticles in a Nd3+doped periodically poled LiNbO3 laser crystal. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 910–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gomez-Tornero, A.; Tserkezis, C.; Mateos, L.; Bausá, L.E.; Ramírez, M.O. 2D Arrays of Hexagonal Plasmonic Necklaces for Enhanced Second Harmonic Generation. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 160527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ramírez, M.O.; Molina, P.; Gómez-Tornero, A.; Hernández-Pinilla, D.; Sánchez-García, L.; Carretero, S.; Bausá, L.E. Hybrid Plasmonic–Ferroelectric Architectures for Lasing and SHG Processes at the Nanoscale. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1901428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sánchez-García, L.; Ramírez, M.O.; Molina, P.; Gallego-Gómez, F.; Mateos, L.; Yraola, E.; de las Heras, C.; Bausá, L.E. Blue SHG Enhancement by Silver Nanocubes Photochemically Prepared on RbTiOPO4 Ferroelectric Crystal. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sánchez-García, L.; Tserkezis, C.; Ramírez, M.O.; Molina, P.; Carvajal, J.J.; Aguiló, M.; Díaz, F.; Aizpurua, L.; Bausá, L.E. Plasmonic enhancement of second harmonic generation from nonlinear RbTiOPO4 crystals by silver nanoaggregates. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 8491–8500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Lin, J.; Bo, F.; Cheng, Y.; Xu, J. Advances in On-Chip Photonic Devices Based on Lithium Niobate on Insulator. Photonics Res. 2020, 8, 1910–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Boes, A.; Corcoran, B.; Chang, L.; Bowers, J.; Mitchell, A. Status and Potential of Lithium Niobate on Insulator (LNOI) for Photonic Integrated Circuits. Laser Photonics Rev. 2018, 12, 1700256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Song, W.; Liu, X.; Pang, J.; Geng, D.; Sang, Y.; Liu, H. Microstructure and Domain Engineering of Lithium Niobate Crystal Films for Integrated Photonic Applications. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gürdal, E.; Horneber, A.; Meixner, A.J.; Kern, D.P.; Zhang, D.; Fleischer, M. Enhancement of the second harmonic signal of nonlinear crystals by a single metal nanoantenna. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 23105–23115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ren, M.; Liu, S.; Wang, B.; Chen, B.; Jiafan, L.; Yuan, Z. Gian enhancement of second harmonic by engineering double plasmonic resonances at nanoscale. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 28653–28661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carnio, B.N.; Elezzabi, A.Y. Second harmonic generation in metal-LiNbO3-metal and LiNbO3 hybrid-plasmonic waveguides. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 26283–26291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mateos, L.; Bausá, L.E.; Ramírez, M.O. Two Dimensional Ferroelectric Domain Patterns in Yb3+ Optically Active LiNbO3 Fabricated By Direct Electron Beam Writing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 042910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Mateos, L.; Bausá, L.E.; Ramírez, M.O. Micro-spectroscopic characterization of ferroelectric domain structures in Yb3+:LiNbO3 prepared by electron beam writing. Opt. Mater. Express 2014, 4, 1077–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kalinin, S.V.; Bonnell, D.A.; Alvarez, T.; Lei, X.J.; Hu, Z.H.; Shao, R.; Ferris, J.H. Ferroelectric Lithography of Multicomponent Nanostructures. Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kalinin, S.V.; Bonnell, D.A.; Alvarez, T.; Lei, X.; Hu, Z.; Ferris, J.H.; Zhang, Q.; Dunn, S. Atomic Polarization and Local Reactivity on Ferroelectric Surfaces:  A New Route toward Complex Nanostructures. Nano Lett. 2002, 2, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, Y.; Nemanich, R.J. Photoinduced Ag deposition on periodically poled lithium niobate: Wavelength and polarization screening dependence. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 104302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gómez-Tornero, A.; Palacios, P.; Molina, P.; Carretero-Palacios, S.; Bausá, L.E.; Ramírez, M.O. Enhancing Nonlinear Interactions by the Superposition of Plasmonic Lattices on χ(2)-Nonlinear Photonic Crystals. ACS Photonics 2021, 8, 2529–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gómez-Tornero, A.; Tserkezis, C.; Robledo-Moreno, J.; Bausá, L.E.; Ramírez, M.O. Field Enhancement and Spectral Features of Hexagonal Necklaces of Silver Nanoparticles for Enhanced Nonlinear Optical Processes. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 22394–22404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Taylor, R.W.; Esteban, R.; Mahajan, S.; Aizpurua, J.; Baumberg, J.J. Optimizing SERS from Gold Nanoparticle Clusters: Addressing the Near Field by an Embedded Chain Plasmon Model. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 10512–10522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Esteban, R.; Taylor, R.W.; Baumberg, J.J.; Aizpurua, J. How chain plasmons govern the optical response in strongly interacting self-assembled metallic clusters of nanoparticles. Langmuir 2012, 28, 8881–8890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tserkezis, C.; Taylor, R.W.; Beitner, J.; Esteban, R.; Baumberg, J.J.; Aizpurua, J. Optical response of metallic nanoparticle heteroaggregates with subnanometric gaps. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hanske, C.; Tebbe, M.; Kuttner, C.; Bieber, V.; Tsukruk, V.V.; Chanana, M.; Konig, T.A.F.; Fery, A. Strongly Coupled Plasmonic Modes on Macroscopic Areas via Template-Assisted Colloidal Self-Assembly. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6863–6871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Taylor, R.W.; Lee, T.; Scherman, O.A.; Esteban, R.; Aizpurua, J.; Huang, F.; Baumberg, J.J.; Mahaja, S. Precise Subnanometer Plasmonic Junctions for SERS within Gold Nanoparticle Assemblies using Cucurbit[n]uril “Glue”. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 3878–3887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Molina, P.; Yraola, E.; Ramírez, M.O.; Tserkezis, C.; Plaza, J.L.; Aizpurua, J.; Bravo-Abad, J.; Bausá, L.E. Plasmon-Assisted Nd3+-based Solid-State Nanolaser. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 895–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Earp, A.A.; Smith, G.B. Evolution of plasmonic response in growing silver thin films with pre-percolation non-local conduction and emittance drop. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 255102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Sánchez-García, L.; Ramírez, M.O.; Tserkezis, C.; Sole, R.; Carvajal, J.J.; Aguiló, M.; Díaz, F.; Bausá, L.E. Anisotropic enhancement of Yb3+ luminescence by disordered plasmonic networks self-assembled on RbTiOPO4 ferroelectric crystal. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 16166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Shalaev, M.; Ying, C.X.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, H. Coexistence of Localized and Delocalized Surface Plasmon Modes in Percolating Metal Films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 206103. [Google Scholar]
  47. Greybush, N.J.; Liberal, I.; Malassis, L.; Kikkawa, J.M.; Engheta, N.; Murray, C.B.; Kagan, C.R. Plasmon Resonances in Self-Assembled Two-Dimensional Au Nanocrystal Metamolecules. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 2917–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, S.; Sim, K.; Moon, S.; Choi, J.; Jeon, Y.; Nam, J.; Park, S.-J. Controlled Assembly of Plasmonic Nanoparticles: From Static to Dynamic Nanostructures. Adv. Mater. 2021, 2007668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Borah, R.; Verbruggen, W. Coupled Plasmon Modes in 2D Gold Nanoparticle Clusters and Their Effect on Local Temperature Control. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 30594–30603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Luk’yanchuk, B.; Zheludev, N.I.; Maier, S.A.; Halas, N.J.; Nordlander, P.; Giessen, H.; Chong, C. The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Phan, H.T.; Heiderscheit, T.S.; Haes, A.J. Understanding Time-Dependent Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering from Gold Nanosphere Aggregates Using Collision Theory. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 14287–14296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yan, Y.; Tang, M.; Wang, F.L.; Xiao, Z.Z.; Xiao, J.L.; Huang, Y.Z. Whispering–gallery mode hexagonal micro-/nanocavity lasers. Photonics Res. 2019, 7, 594–607. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Plasmonic hexagonal arrangements on LiNbO3 substrate. SEM images of (a) Hexagonal plasmonic necklace formed on the domain boundary surface of LiNbO3 at a photo-deposition time of 4 min. (b) Detailed view of the Ag NPs forming the vertex of a hexagonal necklace. (c) Histogram of the Ag NPs diameter forming the necklace. (d) Filled hexagonal domain. It is formed by a dense distribution of Ag NPs covering the positive domain surface after a photo-deposition time of 15 min. (e) Detail of the Ag NPs that cover a positive ferroelectric domain of hexagonal shape. (f) Histogram of the Ag NPs diameter covering the filled hexagonal region.
Figure 1. Plasmonic hexagonal arrangements on LiNbO3 substrate. SEM images of (a) Hexagonal plasmonic necklace formed on the domain boundary surface of LiNbO3 at a photo-deposition time of 4 min. (b) Detailed view of the Ag NPs forming the vertex of a hexagonal necklace. (c) Histogram of the Ag NPs diameter forming the necklace. (d) Filled hexagonal domain. It is formed by a dense distribution of Ag NPs covering the positive domain surface after a photo-deposition time of 15 min. (e) Detail of the Ag NPs that cover a positive ferroelectric domain of hexagonal shape. (f) Histogram of the Ag NPs diameter covering the filled hexagonal region.
Nanomaterials 11 02394 g001
Figure 2. Far field optical response of the polygonal assemblies. (a) Dark-field scattering images recorded for the two types of Ag NPs hexagonal arrangement. Left: filled hexagons, Right: hexagonal necklaces. The scale bar is 5 μm. (b) Extinction spectra obtained in transmission mode after subtracting the contribution from the bare LiNbO3 substrate. Blue: hexagonal necklaces. Red: filled hexagons. The dashed red lines correspond to Gaussian fitting functions.
Figure 2. Far field optical response of the polygonal assemblies. (a) Dark-field scattering images recorded for the two types of Ag NPs hexagonal arrangement. Left: filled hexagons, Right: hexagonal necklaces. The scale bar is 5 μm. (b) Extinction spectra obtained in transmission mode after subtracting the contribution from the bare LiNbO3 substrate. Blue: hexagonal necklaces. Red: filled hexagons. The dashed red lines correspond to Gaussian fitting functions.
Nanomaterials 11 02394 g002
Figure 3. SHG enhancement: Filled hexagons vs hexagonal necklaces. (a) Spatial distribution of the SHG intensity generated in the LNbO3 substrate in the proximities of an Ag NPs hexagonal necklace (left) and Ag NPs filled hexagon (right) for a fundamental radiation wavelength of 850 nm. The SHG intensity map associated with the necklaces is multiplied by a factor of 100. The scale bar corresponds to 5 µm. (b) SHG intensity profile obtained from the SHG maps shown in (a). The fundamental pump power was about 1 mW. (c) Comparison between the SHG enhancement factor for the filled hexagon (red) and for the hexagonal necklace (blue). (d) Variation of the polarized SHG intensity as a function of the polarization angle of the incident radiation for filled hexagons (red) and bare LiNbO3 (dark blue).
Figure 3. SHG enhancement: Filled hexagons vs hexagonal necklaces. (a) Spatial distribution of the SHG intensity generated in the LNbO3 substrate in the proximities of an Ag NPs hexagonal necklace (left) and Ag NPs filled hexagon (right) for a fundamental radiation wavelength of 850 nm. The SHG intensity map associated with the necklaces is multiplied by a factor of 100. The scale bar corresponds to 5 µm. (b) SHG intensity profile obtained from the SHG maps shown in (a). The fundamental pump power was about 1 mW. (c) Comparison between the SHG enhancement factor for the filled hexagon (red) and for the hexagonal necklace (blue). (d) Variation of the polarized SHG intensity as a function of the polarization angle of the incident radiation for filled hexagons (red) and bare LiNbO3 (dark blue).
Nanomaterials 11 02394 g003
Figure 4. SHG enhancement by small-filled hexagons. (a) Top panel: SEM image and SHG spatial map from a region comprising four hexagons (hexagon sides around 700 nm). The blue regions in the map correspond to the SHG intensity. Bottom panel: SHG intensity area across the hexagons. (b) SHG enhancement factor for Ag NPs filled hexagons with hexagon sides of about 10 μm (red) and 700 nm (dark red).
Figure 4. SHG enhancement by small-filled hexagons. (a) Top panel: SEM image and SHG spatial map from a region comprising four hexagons (hexagon sides around 700 nm). The blue regions in the map correspond to the SHG intensity. Bottom panel: SHG intensity area across the hexagons. (b) SHG enhancement factor for Ag NPs filled hexagons with hexagon sides of about 10 μm (red) and 700 nm (dark red).
Nanomaterials 11 02394 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gómez-Tornero, A.; Bausá, L.E.; Ramírez, M.O. Giant Second Harmonic Generation Enhancement by Ag Nanoparticles Compactly Distributed on Hexagonal Arrangements. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2394. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092394

AMA Style

Gómez-Tornero A, Bausá LE, Ramírez MO. Giant Second Harmonic Generation Enhancement by Ag Nanoparticles Compactly Distributed on Hexagonal Arrangements. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(9):2394. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092394

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gómez-Tornero, Alejandro, Luisa E. Bausá, and Mariola O. Ramírez. 2021. "Giant Second Harmonic Generation Enhancement by Ag Nanoparticles Compactly Distributed on Hexagonal Arrangements" Nanomaterials 11, no. 9: 2394. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092394

APA Style

Gómez-Tornero, A., Bausá, L. E., & Ramírez, M. O. (2021). Giant Second Harmonic Generation Enhancement by Ag Nanoparticles Compactly Distributed on Hexagonal Arrangements. Nanomaterials, 11(9), 2394. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11092394

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop