Next Article in Journal
Isostatic Hot Pressed W–Cu Composites with Nanosized Grain Boundaries: Microstructure, Structure and Radiation Shielding Efficiency against Gamma Rays
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel Fluorescent Probe Based on Rare-Earth Doped Upconversion Nanomaterials and Its Applications in Early Cancer Detection
Previous Article in Journal
The Graphene Structure’s Effects on the Current-Voltage and Photovoltaic Characteristics of Directly Synthesized Graphene/n-Si(100) Diodes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Luminescence Reduced Graphene Oxide Based Photothermal Purification of Seawater for Drinkable Purpose
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spray-Assisted Interfacial Polymerization to Form CuII/I@CMC-PANI Film: An Efficient Dip Catalyst for A3 Reaction

1
Department of Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China
2
Photoelectric Information Center, School of Physics and Telecom, Yulin Normal University, Yulin 537000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(10), 1641; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101641
Submission received: 31 March 2022 / Revised: 1 May 2022 / Accepted: 2 May 2022 / Published: 11 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Luminescence Nanomaterials and Applications)

Abstract

:
A novel and interesting method for the preparation of carboxymethylcellulose–polyaniline film-supported copper catalyst (CuII/I@CMC-PANI) has been developed via spray-assisted interfacial polymerization. Using copper sulfate as an initiator, spraying technology was introduced to form a unique interface that is perfectly beneficial to the polymerization of aniline monomers onto carboxymethylcellulose macromolecule chains. To further confirm the composition and structure of the as-prepared hybrid film, it was systematically characterized by inductively coupled plasma (ICP), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) techniques. The Cu content in the fresh CuII/I@CMC-PANI film was determined to be 1.805 mmol/g, and spherical nanoparticles with an average size of ca. 10.04 nm could be observed in the hybrid film. The CuII/I@CMC-PANI hybrid film was exerted as a dip catalyst to catalyze the aldehyde–alkyne–amine (A3) coupling reactions. High yields of the products (up to 97%) were obtained in this catalytic system, and the catalyst could be easily picked up from the reaction mixture by tweezers and reused for at least six consecutive runs, without any discernible losses in its activity in the model reaction. The dip catalyst of CuII/I@CMC-PANI, with easy fabrication, convenient deployment, superior catalytic activity, and great reusability, is expected to be very useful in organic synthesis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In 2010, a pioneering researcher Radhakrishnan developed the concept of “dip catalyst”, and successively presented an Ag nanoparticle-embedded PVA thin film for the reduction of 4-nitrophenol by sodium borohydride [1]. Since then, the dip catalyst, which can switch the reaction on and off instantaneously, by merely dipping in and out of the reaction vessels, has drawn increasing attention for its ease of fabrication, excellent catalytic performance, convenient separation and reusability, and environmental friendliness [2]. To date, the dip catalyst has emerged as one of the most powerful tools in catalysis, synthetic methodology, materials science, and environmental science. A considerable number of dip catalysts have been well documented in the last dozen years, and the range of reported dip catalysts includes Pt@GS (dip coating) [3], CMC-Ni-BC (coating) [4], gold nanoparticle-loaded filter paper (impregnated into the filter paper) [5], palladium nanoparticle-loaded cellulose paper (dip coating) [6], Pd@filter paper (dip coating) [7], Pt-PVA thin film (spin coating) [8], Pd-PVA (spin coating) [9], AgNPs@NH2-CP (chemical modification) [10], Cu@CS-FP (layer coating) [11], Ag/CH-FP (layer coating) [12], and so on. Common strategies for the fabrication of a dip catalyst previously included dip-coating [3,4,5,6,7] and spin-coating technology [8,9], chemical modification of thin films with a variety of functional units [10], and layer coating over thin films with functional material [11,12]. However, these preparation procedures suffered from one or more drawbacks, such as tedious operation, being time consuming, involving multiple step reactions, and possessing low catalytic performance. Therefore, searching for novel and convenient protocols for the fabrication of a dip catalyst with excellent catalytic activity and reusability is still in great demand.
Copper is a low-toxicity, economical, sustainable, and readily available metal elemental, belonging to the [Ar]3d9 transition metal, with various oxidation states, such as Cu(0), Cu(I), Cu(II), and Cu(III). Depending on its unique properties and characteristics, copper can effectively catalyze various organic reactions, such as Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reactions [13,14], azide–alkyne cycloadditions [15], and Ullmann-type coupling reactions [16,17]. Performing the transition metal-catalyzed three-component reactions of aldehydes, alkynes, and amines (commonly called A3 reactions) in an atom-economic way is of importance, as it produces valuable N-containing heteroatom propargylamine products [18]. A great number of transition metal catalysts, including Cu, Ag, Au, and so on, have been exploited for the A3 coupling process. Several reviews have outlined the latest progress in A3 couplings well, and a large variety of copper catalysts have been criticized in these surveys [18,19,20]. However, there are no pertinent reports of a copper-based dip catalyst being applied to a one-pot A3 coupling reaction for the synthesis of versatile propargylamines.
We envisaged that polymer thin films generated in situ by interfacial polymerization, initiated by metal salts and embedded metal catalysts simultaneously, would be a class of easily fabricated, efficient, and reusable dip catalysts. Interfacial polymerization is a process that utilizes the interfacial layer (liquid–liquid layer or liquid–gas layer, etc.) to provide a unique space to constrain the polymerization for the preparation of polymer films or membranes [21]. Polymer materials generated in situ by interfacial polymerization have multiple advantages, including mild production conditions, high molecular weight, excellent uniformity [21], and high permeation rates [22]. The interfacial polymerization method also permits the creation of films that are highly resistant to destruction by exposure to harsh environments [22]. These merits of the films prepared by interfacial polymerization make them beneficial to be a dip catalyst.
Polyaniline exhibits good affinity to metal ions, through the unique coordination with its nitrogen atoms [23] and delocalized π-π conjugate system [24]; thus, it is a useful metal supportive material to form PANI-based metal catalysts (Metal@PANI), such as Pd@PANI [25,26], Fe@PANI [27], and Ag@PANI [28]. However, as most developed catalysts were reported in the preparation of powder-based PANI hybrids, using PANI to form a film is difficult, due to its strong rigidity, even when using an advanced method, such as the interfacial polymerization method mentioned above. The traditional method for the preparation of PANI films is the solution casting technique, using various solvents, such as m-cresol solution [29], to dissolve PANIs. To develop a new approach, a template method was developed by using synthetic polymer film as a soft template for the polymerization of aniline monomer on its surface, and, thus, assisted the formation of PANI film [30]. Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) is non-toxic, biodegrade, economic, and eco-friendly, and it bears a great number of carboxymethyl (–CH2COO) and free hydroxyl (–OH) groups on its glucose-unit chain, providing it with a splendid capacity to coordinate with various metal cations [31], and to form H-bonds with molecules containing active groups, such as hydroxy-, amino-, and carboxylic groups.
Based on the properties of PANI and CMC, in our previous work, we fabricated CMC-PANI hybrids via the one-pot and one-step oxidative polymerization of aniline, with CMC as the soft template and CuSO4 as the initiator [32]. However, the CuSO4NPs@CMC/PANI hybrids were obtained as dark green powders, which are not appropriate for application in dip catalysis. Interfacial polymerization may be an alternative approach to address the PANI shaping issue. Unfortunately, many attempts made on interfacial polymerization by various conventional methods, including pouring, dropping, immersing, and so on, failed to obtain the desired CMC-PANI hybrid film. It was reported that the occurrence of interfacial polymerization needs an interface between two phases to provide a unique reaction space [33,34]. However, the interfacial polymerization of aniline monomer onto the surface of the CMC-Na macromolecular chain is hard to perform using CuSO4 solution as an initiator, by conventional approaches, such as pouring, dropping, or immersing methods, as these two phases are both water soluble. Creatively, the spraying method was introduced into the process to solve this problem. By spraying copper sulfate solution onto the surface of the CMC and aniline mixture, aniline monomers polymerized immediately to rapidly form an extremely thin layer of CMC-PANI film. This thin layer served as an interface to provide a suitable space for further interfacial polymerization. Concerning the above facts, innovatively, we have attempted to fabricate carboxymethylcellulose–polyaniline film-supported copper catalyst (CuII/I@CMC-PANI) in situ via spray-assisted interfacial polymerization, and further explored it as a dip catalyst for A3 reactions.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Instrumentations

All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources and used as received, without further purification.
Gas chromatography (GC) was performed on a Shimadzu GCMS-QP2020 (Kyoto, Japan). The copper content of the catalyst was determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), using a Thermo Fisher Scientific X Series 2 instrument (Waltham, MA, USA). Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) were collected on a PerkinElmer FT-IR Spectrometer Spectrum Two (Waltham, MA, America) within the spectral range of 4000–400 cm−1. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were obtained on a Thermo Fisher Scientific K-Alpha instrument (Waltham, MA, America). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) data were collected on a Rigaku MiniFlex600 diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan), using Cu Kα radiation in a range of Bragg’s angles (5°–80°). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were conducted with a Zeiss Sigma 300 instrument (Oberkochen, Germany). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and derivative thermogravimetric analysis (DTG) were performed on a Mettler TGA/DSC3+ (Zurich, Switzerland), under a nitrogen atmosphere from 30 to 800 °C in a 50 mL·min−1 N2 flow and at a ramp rate of 10 °C·min−1. 1H NMR (300 MHz) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) spectra were obtained with a Bruker 300 Avance instrument (Karlsruhe, Germany), with CDCl3 as the solvent and TMS as the internal standard. HRMS was determined by using Agilent 6545 Q-TOF MS (Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.2. Preparation of CuII/I@CMC-PANI Film

CMC-Na (0.242 g, 1 mmol) was added to 30 mL aqueous methanol solution (MeOH/H2O, v/v = 1/2) at room temperature, with continuous stirring until it completely dissolved. Then, aniline monomer (0.0911 g, 1 mmol) was dropped in above the solution to form a homogeneous mixture. This mixture was poured into a Petri dish, and CuSO4 solution (5 wt.%) was finely and evenly misted onto the surface of the mixture using a handheld sprayer. Immediately, a light green interface (extremely thin film) was formed and isolated the CMC-Na/aniline mixture from the CuSO4 solution. The resultant system was stood for 48 h to form a dark green film. The as-formed film was washed thoroughly with methanol and water to remove unreacted aniline and CMC-Na, and dried to afford the CuII/I@CMC-PANI film. The schematic illustration of the preparation process of the CuII/I@CMC-PANI film is shown in Scheme 1.

2.3. General Procedure for A3 Coupling Reactions Catalysed by CuII/I@CMC-PANI Dip Catalyst

Aldehyde (1.0 mmol), amine (1.2 mmol), terminal alkyne (1.5 mmol) and a catalytic amount of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film (15 mg, 2.7 mol% of Cu) were added to 2 mL toluene in a sealed vessel, and the mixture was rigorously stirred at 110 °C for the specific time and monitored by TLC. As the reaction was completed, the dip catalyst was picked up with tweezers and washed several times with ethyl acetate and dried at 80 °C for the next run. The remaining mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 4 mL). Then, the combined organic phase was washed with brine and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. After removal of the organic solvent by a vacuum rotary evaporator, the crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the corresponding propargylamine. All the products, except product (i), are known, and their 1H NMR and 13C NMR data were found to be identical to those reported in previous literature. The new compound (i) was fully characterized by FT-IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and HRMS. All these data and spectra have been concluded in Supplementary Materials.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Catalyst

The synthetic route of the CuII/I@CMC-PANI film is outlined in Scheme 1. Before the addition of CuSO4 solution, the CMC-Na and aniline monomers were self-assembled together by H-bond interactions [35]. Then, the CuSO4 solution was finely and evenly misted onto the surface of the CMC-Na/aniline mixture, and a light green interface (an extremely thin film) was generated immediately, which separated the CMC-Na/aniline mixture and CuSO4 solution to provide an interfacial layer for aniline to polymerize (Scheme 2). In this process, the CuSO4 solution not only acted as the initiator, triggering the polymerization reaction, but also as the coupling reagent, combining the CMC molecular chain and PANI chain together. In the meantime, Cu(II)/Cu(I) species were deposited into the as-formed CMC-PANI film and stabilized by complexation with carboxylic groups (–COO), hydroxyl groups (–OH), and nitrogen atoms (–NH– and –N=) to form the target dip catalyst. The Cu content in fresh CuII/I@CMC-PANI film was determined by ICP-AES to be 1.805 mmol/g.
To verify the composition and structures of the CuII/I@CMC-PANI film, analytical techniques, including FT-IR, XPS, XRD, SEM, EDS, TGA, and DGT, were performed.
The FT-IR spectra of CMC-Na (curve a), PANI (curve b), and the obverse side (curve c) and back side (curve d) of the CuII/I@CMC-PANI film are presented in Figure 1. As shown in the spectrum of CMC-Na (Figure 1, curve a), the characteristic peaks appeared at 1606 cm−1 and 1424 cm−1, related to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibration of carboxylic (–COO) groups, respectively [36,37]. In the spectra of PANI (Figure 1, curve b), the peaks at 1558 cm−1, coupled with 1141 cm−1, and 1482 cm−1, along with 805 cm−1, are assigned to the stretching vibration of quinoid and benzenoid rings, correspondingly [32,38]. Due to the interfacial polymerization, the CuII/I@CMC-PANI film owns obverse and back sides, and they are composed of different components. The characteristic peaks of CMC (carboxylic groups: 1579 cm−1 and 1413 cm−1) and PANI (quinoid: 1107 cm−1 and benzenoid: 1501 cm−1) were both observed in the spectra of the catalyst obverse side (Figure 1, curve c), which confirmed that aniline monomers succeeded to the polymerization of PANI onto the CMC molecular chain. However, on the back side, only peaks of carboxylate groups (1582 cm−1 and 1414 cm−1) appeared (Figure 1, curve d), which means that PANI mostly exists on the obverse side of the catalyst.
XPS was carried out to further demonstrate the existence of all elements and the oxidation state of copper. Presented in the survey scan spectrum (Figure 2a), C, N, O, and Cu elements are found to be 39.33%, 4.57%, 48.20%, and 7.90%, respectively, in fresh CuII/I@CMC-PANI film. The peaks at 932.78 eV (Cu2p3/2) and 952.48 eV (Cu2p1/2) in Figure 2e, and the peak at 571.12 eV (CuLM2) in Figure 2f, were assigned to the presence of Cu(I) [39]. Meanwhile, the shoulder peaks (934.83 eV and 954.63 eV) and satellites peaks (940.18 eV, 944.07 eV, and 962.56 eV) illustrate that Cu (II) also existed in the catalyst [40]. Notably, nearly all the Cu (II) in the recovered catalyst was turned into Cu(I), evidenced by the disappearance of shoulder peaks and satellites, as well as the presence of peaks at 932.37 eV (Cu2p3/2) and 952.57 eV (Cu2p1/2) in Figure 2g, and the peak at 571.74 eV (CuLM2) [40] in Figure 2h, which means that Cu(I) species may be the true catalyst for A3 reactions.
To further confirm the composition of the CuII/I@CMC-PANI film, XRD was performed. The amorphous peak at 2θ = 20.6° in curve (a) and the broad peak at 2θ = 25.2° in curve (b) (Figure 3) were attributed to the pristine CMC-Na [41] and PANI powders [42], respectively, showing an extremely low degree of crystallinity. The peak at 2θ = 20.6° can also be observed in curve (c) of the catalyst, but the peak of PANI was shifted to 2θ = 21.8°, due to the interaction between PANI and CMC-Na [43]. The appearance of CMC and PANI peaks in curve (c) (Figure 3) proves that CMC and PANI were merged successfully into the film. Moreover, as can be found in curve (c) of the catalyst, the films consist of mixed phases of 6CuO·Cu2O (JCPDS 03-0879), CuO (JCPDS 44-0706), Cu2O (JCPDS 35-1091), and Cu4O3 (JCPDS 49-1830). Generally, the 6CuO·Cu2O phase is observed to be an intermediate phase between Cu2O and CuO [44], and Cu4O3 can be written as Cu(I)2Cu(II)2O3 [45]. These observations conclude that Cu (II) and Cu(I) species exist in the catalyst. The size of the particles can be calculated using the Scherrer equation, as follows: D = Kλ/(βcosθ) = 0.89 × 0.15405 0.534 180 × 3.14 × cos 28.5 2 = 15.19 (nm). These data are approximate, with the value of 10.04 nm obtained from the SEM images (Figure 4e,f), due to the Scherrer equation being applicable to nanocrystals with perfect crystallinity, and there may be a certain number of errors to the particles without high crystallinity.
SEM and EDS were carried out in order to study the morphology and components of the CuII/I@CMC-PANI film. The SEM images show a smooth surface for the obverse side (Figure 4a) and a rough surface for the back side (Figure 4c). It is worth noting that by increasing the magnification, spherical nanoparticles can be observed (Figure 4e,f), which may be attributed to the uniformly distributed copper oxides loaded in the film. The particle size histogram (Figure 4g) shows that the average particle size is approximately 10.04 nm in diameter. The EDS images of the obverse and back sides of CuII/I@CMC-PANI are shown in Figure 4b,d. EDS clearly showed the presence of the nonmetallic elements C, N, and O, and the metallic element Cu in the dip catalyst. Significantly, the N content of the obverse side of the film (Figure 4b) is much higher than that of the back side (Figure 4d). This observation matched very well with the finding obtained from FT-IR (Figure 1), which illustrated that PANI mostly exists on the obverse side of the dip catalyst. The elemental mapping images (Figure 5), coupled with SEM, evidenced that the C, N, O, and Cu elements distributed throughout the catalyst in a homogeneous manner. The uniform distribution of Cu makes the catalyst work steadily.
To investigate the thermal behavior of the CuII/I@CMC-PANI film, TGA and a corresponding DTG analysis of CMC-Na, PANI, and the CuII/I@CMC-PANI film were performed, and the results are displayed in Figure 6. Below 100 °C, all the samples (Figure 6a–c) showed a slight mass loss, which can be attributed to the release of adsorbed moisture and volatile impurities. After that, CMC-Na (Figure 6a) presented a sharp mass loss at around 290 °C, which corresponds to the decomposition of its glucose-unit chain and side carboxylic groups [46]. PANI (Figure 6b) exhibited two sharp decreases in mass at around 253 °C and 522 °C, which may be caused by the deprotonation of PANI and decomposition of the backbone units of PANI, respectively [30,47]. In the curve of the dip catalyst (Figure 6c), a mass loss in the temperature range of 198–400 °C appeared. This may account for the combined influence of the decomposition of CMC and PANI chains. This result indicated that the dip catalyst is stable up to nearly 200 °C, and that it is applicable for further A3 reactions.

3.2. Application of CuII/I@CMC-PANI Dip Catalyst in Three-Component A3 Coupling Reactions

First, the optimal reaction conditions for A3 reactions were explored in the presence of the CuII/I@CMC-PANI dip catalyst (Table 1). Morpholine (1.2 mmol), p-chlorobenzaldehyde (1.0 mmol), and phenylacetylene (1.5 mmol) were selected as the model substrates. Initially, different solvents, including H2O, DMSO, DMF, CH3CN, EtOH, n-BuOH, and toluene, were screened to assess efficiency. It was found that the product yields increased with the decrease in solvent polarity. The highest yield was obtained when toluene was used as the solvent (Table 1, entry 7). Subsequently, to establish the fact that copper in the dip catalyst plays a key role in the A3 reaction, the model reaction was performed in toluene at 110 °C in the absence of a catalyst, and in the presence of 1.8 mol% and 2.7 mol% of Cu in the catalyst, the product yields obtained were 0%, 93%, and 97% (Table 1, entries 7–9), respectively. When further increasing the dose of the catalyst to 3.6 mol%, no significant elevation in the product yield was observed (Table 1, entry 10). These results suggested that copper is essential for this A3 model reaction, and 2.7 mol% of Cu is the optimal amount for the model reaction. Finally, the reaction temperature was explored, and it was found that decreasing the temperature from 110 °C to 90 °C, and even to 70 °C, had a considerable negative impact on the product yields (Table 1, entries 11–12). Therefore, it was concluded that the optimal condition involved morpholine (1.2 mmol), p-chlorobenzaldehyde (1.0 mmol), phenylacetylene (1.5 mmol), and the CuII/I@CMC-PANI dip catalyst (2.7 mol% of Cu) in toluene at 110 °C.
Next, with the optimal reaction condition in hand, the substrate scope of the reaction was examined (Table 2). Aryl aldehydes, bearing both electron-withdrawing and electron-donating groups, proceeded well to afford excellent yields (Table 2, entries 1, 3, 4, and 6), while salicylaldehyde was difficult to conduct the reaction with (Table 2, entry 5), due to the intramolecular H-bond, which improves the stability of its aldehyde group. Phenylacetylene, with electron-withdrawing groups on its aromatic ring, afforded lower yields, due to the fact that this group reduces its nucleophilic activity (Table 2, entries 7–10). Because it is hard to form a Cu-alkyne intermediate with aliphatic alkyne, a trace product was observed when using aliphatic alkyne as a substrate (Table 2, entry 11). As the imine intermediate formed, aniline afforded no desired product (Table 2, entry 15). Unfortunately, aliphatic aldehydes afforded dissatisfactory yields (Table 2, entries 16–17), due to their low reactivity.
Furthermore, the recyclability and reusability of the CuII/I@CMC-PANI film for the A3 model reaction was assessed. As shown in Scheme 3, the film could be recycled and reused successfully for up to six consecutive cycles, without significant losses in its activity. The Cu content, as measured by ICP-AES, in the recovered catalyst after two cycles was 1.705 mmol/g, which is slightly lower than that of 1.805 mmol/g in the fresh catalyst. Thus, to further investigate the Cu leaching of the catalyst in the A3 reaction, a hot filtration test was performed. The model A3 reaction was carried out at 110 °C for 1 h (36% conversion), and then the dip catalyst was picked up. The remaining mixture was further stirred for 5 h without the catalyst and a slight increase in conversation (36% to 50%) was observed, indeed suggesting that there was a small amount of Cu species leached out from the catalyst into the reaction mixture, which is consistent with the result of the ICP-AES analysis.

4. Conclusions

A novel and practical method for the fabrication of a CuII/I@CMC-PANI film dip catalyst was developed via spray-assisted interfacial polymerization. In the preparation process, carboxymethylcellulose and copper sulfate served as the soft template and initiator, respectively, for the polymerization of aniline monomers, and the spraying method provided a unique interfacial layer to facilitate polymerization. This as-prepared film catalyst was well characterized by ICP, FT-IR, XPS, XRD, SEM, EDS, and TGA techniques. These characterized results proved that aniline had successfully polymerized to PANI onto the CMC molecular chain, and that Cu(II)/Cu(I) oxides, at the nano scale, were homogeneously loaded into the CMC-PANI film at the same time. The obverse and back side of the resultant film had different morphologies, due to their different PANI contents. In terms of application, the as-synthesized CuII/I@CMC-PANI film dip catalyst possessed good thermal stability up to 200 °C, and could be efficiently applied in the A3 coupling reaction, due to its excellent recyclability and tolerance of a broad scope of substrates.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12101641/s1, The spectra data, 1H and 13C NMR for all products (aq), FT-IR 19F NMR and HRMS for new product (i). References [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Investigation, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, visualization, writing—original draft, Z.X.; investigation, methodology, L.X., X.F., D.L. and L.M.; conceptualization, supervision, methodology, resources, funding acquisition, project administration, writing—review and editing, G.N. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by The Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2020A1515010399), Guangxi Innovation Driven Development Major Project (No. Guike AA20302013), Nanning Scientific Research and Technology Development Plan Project (No. RC20200001), “Yongjiang Plan” Project of Leading Talents of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Nanning City (No. 2020024), and Yulin City Science and Technology Transformation Project (No. 19040003).

Data Availability Statement

Data are within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hariprasad, E.; Radhakrishnan, T.P. A highly efficient and extensively reusable “dip catalyst” based on a silver-nanoparticle-embedded polymer thin film. Chem.-Eur. J. 2010, 16, 14378–14384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Madhuri, U.D.; Saha, J.; Radhakrishnan, T.P. ‘Dip Catalysts’ based on polymer-metal nanocomposite thin films: Combining soft-chemical fabrication with efficient application and monitoring. ChemNanoMat 2018, 4, 1191–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shaikh, M.N.; Aziz, M.A.; Yamani, Z.H. Facile hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde to cinnamyl ether by employing a highly re-usable “dip-catalyst” containing Pt nanoparticles on a green support. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020, 10, 6544–6551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kamal, T.; Ahmad, I.; Khan, S.B.; Asiri, A.M. Anionic polysaccharide stabilized nickel nanoparticles-coated bacterial cellulose as a highly efficient dip-catalyst for pollutants reduction. React. Funct. Polym. 2019, 145, 104395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zheng, G.; Polavarapu, L.; Liz-Marzan, L.M.; Pastoriza-Santos, I.; Perez-Juste, J. Gold nanoparticle-loaded filter paper: A recyclable dip-catalyst for real-time reaction monitoring by surface enhanced Raman scattering. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 4572–4575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zheng, G.; Kaefer, K.; Mourdikoudis, S.; Polavarapu, L.; Vaz, B.; Cartmell, S.E.; Bouleghlimat, A.; Buurma, N.J.; Yate, L.; de Lera, A.R.; et al. Palladium nanoparticle-loaded cellulose paper: A highly efficient, robust, and recyclable self-assembled composite catalytic system. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nishikata, T.; Tsutsumi, H.; Gao, L.; Kojima, K.; Chikama, K.; Nagashima, H. Adhesive catalyst immobilization of palladium nanoparticles on cotton and filter paper: Applications to reusable catalysts for sequential catalytic reactions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Madhuri, U.D.; Rao, V.K.; Hariprasad, E.; Radhakrishnan, T.P. In situ fabricated platinum—Poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposite thin film: A highly reusable ‘dip catalyst’ for hydrogenation. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 045018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hariprasad, E.; Radhakrishnan, T.P. Palladium nanoparticle-embedded polymer thin film “dip catalyst” for Suzuki–Miyaura reaction. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 1179–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liang, M.; Zhang, G.; Feng, Y.; Li, R.; Hou, P.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J. Facile synthesis of silver nanoparticles on amino-modified cellulose paper and their catalytic properties. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 53, 1568–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Feiz, E.; Mahyari, M.; Ghaieni, H.R.; Tavangar, S. Copper on chitosan-modified cellulose filter paper as an efficient dip catalyst for ATRP of MMA. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ahmad, I.; Kamal, T.; Khan, S.B.; Asiri, A.M. An efficient and easily retrievable dip catalyst based on silver nanoparticles/chitosan-coated cellulose filter paper. Cellulose 2016, 23, 3577–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hemming, D.; Fritzemeier, R.; Westcott, S.A.; Santos, W.L.; Steel, P.G. Copper-boryl mediated organic synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 7477–7494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Lakshmidevi, J.; Naidu, B.R.; Venkateswarlu, K. CuI in biorenewable basic medium: Three novel and low E-factor Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions. Mol. Catal. 2022, 522, 112237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Venkateswarlu, K. Ashes from organic waste as reagents in synthetic chemistry: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 3887–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gan, Z.; Yan, Q.; Li, G.; Li, Q.; Dou, X.; Li, G.Y.; Yang, D. Copper-catalyzed domino synthesis of sulfur-containing heterocycles using carbon disulfide as a building block. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2019, 361, 4558–4567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, X.; Ma, P.; Wang, J. Copper-catalyzed direct synthesis of arylated 8-aminoquinolines through chelation assistance. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2022, 36, e6578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Volkova, Y.; Baranin, S.; Zavarzin, I. A3 coupling reaction in the synthesis of heterocyclic compounds. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020, 363, 40–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nasrollahzadeh, M.; Sajjadi, M.; Ghorbannezhad, F.; Sajadi, S.M. A review on recent advances in the application of nanocatalysts in A3 coupling reactions. Chem. Rec. 2018, 18, 1409–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Peshkov, V.A.; Pereshivko, O.P.; Van der Eycken, E.V. A walk around the A3-coupling. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3790–3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, F.; Fan, J.B.; Wang, S. Interfacial polymerization: From chemistry to functional materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 21840–21856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chai, G.Y.; Krantz, W.B. Formation and characterization of polyamide membranes via interfacial polymerization. J. Membrane Sci. 1994, 93, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Eskandari, E.; Kosari, M.; Farahani, M.H.D.A.; Khiavi, N.D.; Saeedikhani, M.; Katal, R.; Zarinejad, M. A review on polyaniline-based materials applications in heavy metals removal and catalytic processes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 231, 115901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Song, E.; Choi, J.-W. Conducting polyaniline nanowire and its applications in chemiresistive sensing. Nanomaterials 2013, 3, 498–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, L.; Han, Z.; Ding, Y. Gram-scale preparation of Pd@PANI: A practical catalyst reagent for copper-free and ligand-free sonogashira couplings. Org. Process. Res. Dev. 2016, 20, 2124–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yu, L.; Han, Z. Palladium nanoparticles on polyaniline (Pd@PANI): A practical catalyst for Suzuki cross-couplings. Mater. Lett. 2016, 184, 312–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shi, B.; Zhao, C.; Ji, Y.; Shi, J.; Yang, H. Promotion effect of PANI on Fe-PANI/Zeolite as an active and recyclable Fenton-like catalyst under near-neutral condition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 508, 145298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, X.; Shen, Y.; Xie, A.; Chen, S. One-step synthesis of Ag@PANI nanocomposites and their application to detection of mercury. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013, 140, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahmed, F.; Kumar, S.; Arshi, N.; Anwar, M.S.; Su-Yeon, L.; Kil, G.-S.; Park, D.W.; Koo, B.H.; Lee, C.G. Preparation and characterizations of polyaniline (PANI)/ZnO nanocomposites film using solution casting method. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519, 8375–8378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lin, Z.; Cao, N.; Sun, Z.; Li, W.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, H.; Pang, J.; Jiang, Z. Based on confined polymerization: In situ synthesis of PANI/PEEK composite film in one-step. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, e2103706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Heinze, T. New ionic polymers by cellulose functionalization. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1998, 199, 2341–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, Z.; Xu, J.; Li, Y. CuSO4 nanoparticles loaded on carboxymethylcellulose/polyaniline composites: A highly efficient catalyst with enhanced catalytic activity in the synthesis of propargylamines, benzofurans, and 1,2,3-triazoles. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2021, 35, e6349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Raaijmakers, M.J.T.; Benes, N.E. Current trends in interfacial polymerization chemistry. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2016, 63, 86–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Song, Y.; Fan, J.-B.; Wang, S. Recent progress in interfacial polymerization. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 1028–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Megha, R.; Ravikiran, Y.T.; Kotresh, S.; Vijaya Kumari, S.C.; Raj Prakash, H.G.; Thomas, S. Carboxymethyl cellulose: An efficient material in enhancing alternating current conductivity of HCl doped polyaniline. Cellulose 2017, 25, 1147–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fathi Achachlouei, B.; Zahedi, Y. Fabrication and characterization of CMC-based nanocomposites reinforced with sodium montmorillonite and TiO2 nanomaterials. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 199, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xiao, J.; Lu, Z.; Li, Y. Carboxymethylcellulose-supported palladium nanoparticles generated in situ from palladium(II) carboxymethylcellulose: An efficient and reusable catalyst for Suzuki–Miyaura and Mizoroki–Heck reactions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, L.; Liu, P.; Su, Z. Preparation of PANI–TiO2 nanocomposites and their solid-phase photocatalytic degradation. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2006, 91, 2213–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Poulston, S.; Parlett, P.M.; Stone, P.; Bowker, M. Surface oxidation and reduction of CuO and Cu2O studied using XPS and XAES. Surf. Interface Anal. 1996, 24, 811–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, S.; Zhong, H.; Liu, G.; Xu, Z. Cu(I)/Cu(II) mixed-valence surface complexes of S-[(2-hydroxyamino)-2-oxoethyl]-N,N-dibutyldithiocarbamate: Hydrophobic mechanism to malachite flotation, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 512, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liang, T.; Sun, G.; Cao, L.; Li, J.; Wang, L. A pH and NH3 sensing intelligent film based on artemisia sphaerocephala krasch. gum and red cabbage anthocyanins anchored by carboxymethyl cellulose sodium added as a host complex. Food Hydrocolloid. 2019, 87, 858–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kai, W. Electrodeposition synthesis of PANI/MnO2/graphene composite materials and its electrochemical performance. Int. J. Electrochem. Sc. 2017, 12, 8306–8314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Buron, C.C.; Lakard, B.; Monnin, A.F.; Moutarlier, V.; Lakard, S. Elaboration and characterization of polyaniline films electrodeposited on tin oxides. Synth. Met. 2011, 161, 2162–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, S.H. The characteristics of Cu2O thin films deposited using RF-magnetron sputtering method with nitrogen-ambient. ETRI J. 2013, 35, 1156–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Morgan, P.; Partin, D.; Chamberland, B.; O’Keeffe, M. Synthesis of paramelaconite: Cu4O3. J. Solid State Chem. 1996, 121, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Calegari, F.; da Silva, B.C.; Tedim, J.; Ferreira, M.G.S.; Berton, M.A.C.; Marino, C.E.B. Benzotriazole encapsulation in spray-dried carboxymethylcellulose microspheres for active corrosion protection of carbon steel. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 138, 105329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kotal, M.; Thakur, A.K.; Bhowmick, A.K. Polyaniline-carbon nanofiber composite by a chemical grafting approach and its supercapacitor application. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 8374–8386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kidwai, M.; Jahan, A. Nafion® NR50 catalyzed A3-coupling for the synthesis of propargylamines via C-H activation. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2011, 8, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Samai, S.; Nandi, G.C.; Singh, M.S. An efficient and facile one-pot synthesis of propargylamines by three-component coupling of aldehydes, amines, and alkynes via C–H activation catalyzed by NiCl2. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 5555–5558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhu, W.; Qian, W.; Zhang, Y. Synthesis of 1, 3-diaryl-3-aminopropynes via the dethiolation of thioamides promoted by the samarium/samarium diiodide mixed reagent. J. Chem. Res. 2005, 2005, 410–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ren, G.; Zhang, J.; Duan, Z.; Cui, M.; Wu, Y. A simple and economic synthesis of propargylamines by CuI-catalyzed three-component coupling reaction with succinic acid as additive. Aust. J. Chem. 2009, 62, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Namitharan, K.; Pitchumani, K. Nickel-catalyzed solvent-free three-component coupling of aldehyde, alkyne and amine. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 2010, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fodor, A.; Kiss, A.; Debreczeni, N.; Hell, Z.; Gresits, I. A simple method for the preparation of propargylamines using molecular sieve modified with copper(II). Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 4575–4581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Samanta, S.; Hajra, A. Divergent synthesis of allenylsulfonamide and enaminonesulfonamide via In(III)-catalyzed couplings of propargylamine and N-fluorobenzenesulfonimide. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 13157–13165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, Q.; Chen, J.-X.; Gao, W.-X.; Ding, J.-C.; Wu, H.-Y. Copper-catalyzed one-pot synthesis of propargylamines via C-H activation in PEG. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2010, 24, 809–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sun, R.; Liu, J.; Yang, S.; Chen, M.; Sun, N.; Chen, H.; Xie, X.; You, X.; Li, S.; Liu, Y. Cp2TiCl2-catalyzed cis-hydroalumination of propargylic amines with Red-Al: Stereoselective synthesis of Z-configured allylic amines. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 6426–6429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Munshi, A.M.; Agarwal, V.; Ho, D.; Raston, C.L.; Saunders, M.; Smith, N.M.; Iyer, K.S. Magnetically directed assembly of nanocrystals for catalytic control of a three-component coupling reaction. Cryst. Growth Des. 2016, 16, 4773–4776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, L.; Cai, C. Reusable polymer-anchored amino acid copper complex for the synthesis of propargylamines. J. Chem. Res. 2008, 2008, 538–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhou, Y.; He, T.; Wang, Z. Nanoparticles of silver oxide immobilized on different templates: Highly efficient catalysts for three-component coupling of aldehyde-amine-alkyne. Arkivoc 2008, 8, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Han, L.; Li, S.J.; Zhang, X.T.; Tian, S.K. Aromatic aza-claisen rearrangement of arylpropargylammonium salts generated in situ from arynes and tertiary propargylamines. Chem.-Eur. J. 2021, 27, 3091–3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Idzik, K.; Cabaj, J.; Sooducho, J.; Abdel-Fattah, A.A. Classical benzotriazole-mediatedα-aminoalkylations of alkynes: Synthesis and characterization of alk-2-yn-1-amines as amphiphilic materials. Helv. Chim. Acta 2010, 90, 1672–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film.
Nanomaterials 12 01641 sch001
Scheme 2. Detailed illustration of spray-assisted interfacial polymerization process.
Scheme 2. Detailed illustration of spray-assisted interfacial polymerization process.
Nanomaterials 12 01641 sch002
Figure 1. The FT-IR spectra of CMC-Na (a), PANI (b), the obverse side of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film (c), and the back side of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film (d).
Figure 1. The FT-IR spectra of CMC-Na (a), PANI (b), the obverse side of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film (c), and the back side of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film (d).
Nanomaterials 12 01641 g001
Figure 2. The XPS survey scan (a) of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film and its high-resolution spectra of C1s (b), N1s (c), O1s (d), Cu2p (e) and CuLM2 (f); XPS high-resolution spectra of Cu2p (g) and CuLM2 (h) of catalyst recovered from A3 reaction.
Figure 2. The XPS survey scan (a) of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film and its high-resolution spectra of C1s (b), N1s (c), O1s (d), Cu2p (e) and CuLM2 (f); XPS high-resolution spectra of Cu2p (g) and CuLM2 (h) of catalyst recovered from A3 reaction.
Nanomaterials 12 01641 g002aNanomaterials 12 01641 g002b
Figure 3. The XRD patterns of the CMC-Na (a), PANI (b), and CuII/I@CMC-PANI film (c).
Figure 3. The XRD patterns of the CMC-Na (a), PANI (b), and CuII/I@CMC-PANI film (c).
Nanomaterials 12 01641 g003
Figure 4. SEM images (a,e,f) and EDS data (b) of the obverse side of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film; SEM images (c) and EDS data (d) of its back side; and histogram of particle size (g).
Figure 4. SEM images (a,e,f) and EDS data (b) of the obverse side of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film; SEM images (c) and EDS data (d) of its back side; and histogram of particle size (g).
Nanomaterials 12 01641 g004
Figure 5. SEM corresponding elemental mapping images of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film.
Figure 5. SEM corresponding elemental mapping images of CuII/I@CMC-PANI film.
Nanomaterials 12 01641 g005
Figure 6. The TGA and DTG curves of CMC (a), PANI (b) and CuII/I@CMC-PANI film (c).
Figure 6. The TGA and DTG curves of CMC (a), PANI (b) and CuII/I@CMC-PANI film (c).
Nanomaterials 12 01641 g006
Scheme 3. Reusability of CuII/I@CMC-PANI dip catalyst in model A3 reaction a. a Reaction conditions: p-chlorobenzaldehyde (1.0 mmol), morpholine (1.2 mmol), phenylacetylene (1.5 mmol), CuII/I@CMC-PANI dip catalyst (2.7 mol% of Cu), toluene (2 mL), at 110 °C. b Isolated yields. c Reacted for 6 h. d Reacted for 10 h.
Scheme 3. Reusability of CuII/I@CMC-PANI dip catalyst in model A3 reaction a. a Reaction conditions: p-chlorobenzaldehyde (1.0 mmol), morpholine (1.2 mmol), phenylacetylene (1.5 mmol), CuII/I@CMC-PANI dip catalyst (2.7 mol% of Cu), toluene (2 mL), at 110 °C. b Isolated yields. c Reacted for 6 h. d Reacted for 10 h.
Nanomaterials 12 01641 sch003
Table 1. Optimization of model A3 reactions catalyzed by CuII/I@CMC-PANI dip catalyst a.
Table 1. Optimization of model A3 reactions catalyzed by CuII/I@CMC-PANI dip catalyst a.
Nanomaterials 12 01641 i001
EntrySolventDose of Catalyst
(Mol% of Cu)
Temp. (°C)Time (h)Yield b (%)
1H2O2.710012N.R. c
2EtOH2.778126
3n-BuOH2.7110855
4DMSO2.7110838
5DMF2.7110851
6CH3CN2.78012trace d
7toluene2.7110697
8toluene01108trace d
9toluene1.8110893
10toluene3.6110897
11toluene2.790812
12toluene2.77024trace d
a Reaction conditions: p-chlorobenzaldehyde (1.0 mmol), morpholine (1.2 mmol), phenylacetylene (1.5 mmol) and solvent (2 mL). b Isolated yields. c No reaction. d Observed by TLC.
Table 2. A3 coupling reactions catalyzed by CuII/I@CMC-PANI film to synthesize a variety of propargylamines a.
Table 2. A3 coupling reactions catalyzed by CuII/I@CMC-PANI film to synthesize a variety of propargylamines a.
Nanomaterials 12 01641 i002
EntryRR’HNR’’2Time (h)Yield b (%)
14-Cl-PhPhmorpholine697 (a)
2PhPhmorpholine891 (b)
34-Me-PhPhmorpholine883 (c)
42-MeO-PhPhmorpholine897 (d)
52-OH-PhPhmorpholine4839 (e)
63-NO2-PhPhmorpholine4886 (f)
7Ph3-Me-Phmorpholine1687 (g)
8Ph4-MeO-Phmorpholine3297 (h)
9Ph4-CF3-Phmorpholine4883 (i)
10Ph4-Cl-Phmorpholine2488 (j)
11Phn-hexylmorpholine48trace (k) c
12PhPhpiperidine4884 (l)
134-Cl-PhPhpiperidine4886 (m)
144-Cl-PhPhdiethylamine4858 (n)
15PhPhaniline48N.P. (o) d
16EtPhmorpholine854 (p)
17i-PrPhmorpholine830 (q)
a Reaction conditions: aldehyde (1.0 mmol), amine (1.2 mmol), alkyne (1.5 mmol), CuII/I@CMC-PANI film (2.7 mol% of Cu), toluene (2 mL), at 110 °C. b All yields are isolated. c Observed by TLC. d No product, and generated imine was observed by GC-MS.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, Z.; Xiao, L.; Fan, X.; Lin, D.; Ma, L.; Nie, G.; Li, Y. Spray-Assisted Interfacial Polymerization to Form CuII/I@CMC-PANI Film: An Efficient Dip Catalyst for A3 Reaction. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101641

AMA Style

Xu Z, Xiao L, Fan X, Lin D, Ma L, Nie G, Li Y. Spray-Assisted Interfacial Polymerization to Form CuII/I@CMC-PANI Film: An Efficient Dip Catalyst for A3 Reaction. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(10):1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101641

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Zhian, Liang Xiao, Xuetao Fan, Dongtao Lin, Liting Ma, Guochao Nie, and Yiqun Li. 2022. "Spray-Assisted Interfacial Polymerization to Form CuII/I@CMC-PANI Film: An Efficient Dip Catalyst for A3 Reaction" Nanomaterials 12, no. 10: 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101641

APA Style

Xu, Z., Xiao, L., Fan, X., Lin, D., Ma, L., Nie, G., & Li, Y. (2022). Spray-Assisted Interfacial Polymerization to Form CuII/I@CMC-PANI Film: An Efficient Dip Catalyst for A3 Reaction. Nanomaterials, 12(10), 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12101641

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop