Next Article in Journal
Light-to-Heat Converting ECM-Mimetic Nanofiber Scaffolds for Neuronal Differentiation and Neurite Outgrowth Guidance
Next Article in Special Issue
Highly Compressible and Sensitive Flexible Piezoresistive Pressure Sensor Based on MWCNTs/Ti3C2Tx MXene @ Melamine Foam for Human Gesture Monitoring and Recognition
Previous Article in Journal
Controlled Delivery of an Anti-Inflammatory Toxin to Macrophages by Mutagenesis and Nanoparticle Modification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Realizing Broadband NIR Photodetection and Ultrahigh Responsivity with Ternary Blend Organic Photodetector
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trench FinFET Nanostructure with Advanced Ferroelectric Nanomaterial HfZrO2 for Sub-60-mV/Decade Subthreshold Slope for Low Power Application

Department of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(13), 2165; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132165
Submission received: 19 May 2022 / Revised: 15 June 2022 / Accepted: 21 June 2022 / Published: 23 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Nanomaterials for Soft and Wearable Electronics)

Abstract

:
Ferroelectric fin field-effect transistors with a trench structure (trench Fe-FinFETs) were fabricated and characterized. The inclusion of the trench structures improved the electrical characteristics of the Fe-FinFETs. Moreover, short channel effects were suppressed by completely surrounding the trench channel with the gate electrodes. Compared with a conventional Fe-FinFET, the fabricated trench Fe-FinFET had a higher on–off current ratio of 4.1 × 107 and a steep minimum subthreshold swing of 35.4 mV/dec in the forward sweep. In addition, the fabricated trench Fe-FinFET had a very low drain-induced barrier lowering value of 4.47 mV/V and immunity to gate-induced drain leakage. Finally, a technology computer-aided design simulation was conducted to verify the experimental results.

1. Introduction

Since no additional power supply is available, power consumption is the major concern for conventional complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) based integrated circuits for wearable applications. The wearable devices are supposed to operate in an intermittent mode; thus, the power consumption of the wearable devices will be dominated by standby leakage power [1,2]. To suppress current leakage and maintain the drive current and dynamic performance, the subthreshold swing (SS) must be reduced to maintain the high on–off current ratio. However, the Boltzmann limitation of SS [3,4] is inevitable for traditional metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) and strongly limits the reduction of power consumption. For Internet of Things (IoTs), wearable electronics, and next-generation technology node applications, electronic components with ultralow power consumption and high performance must be developed. Therefore, ferroelectric field-effect transistors (FeFETs) with doped HfO2 thin films [5,6,7] as the gate insulator have become a promising solution for overcoming the fundamental thermionic limit of SS (≈60 mV/dec) of MOSFETs. The HfO2 thin films represent the state-of-the-art gate insulator for essentially all high-k metal-gate process nodes. By modifying the gate insulator to ferroelectric doped HfO2, numerous experimental FeFETs have achieved an SS of <60 mV/dec due to the negative capacitance (NC) effect [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Accordingly, nanomaterials doped with HfO2 are suitable for devices for low power applications such as wearable electronics and IoTs.
The ferroelectric fin field-effect transistor (Fe-FinFET) is the most promising candidate for near-future applications, which combines the state-of-the-art technology node and the ferroelectric gate insulator. To further improve its performance, an Fe-FinFET with a trench structure (trench Fe-FinFET) is proposed in this work. Most FETs with a trench structure produced to date [15,16,17,18] have been designed as junctionless, ultra-thin channel transistors to ensure that the channel is fully depleted and to suppress short channel effects (SCEs). However, this design may result in degraded carrier mobility [19] and lower on current (ION). In this work, we integrated a trench structure into a Fe-FinFET to suppress SCEs and gain the advantages of the trench structure. Furthermore, a trench channel with higher thickness and an inversion-mode-type FET were designed to prevent the aforementioned drawbacks. Technology computer-aided design (TCAD) simulations were also conducted to verify the experimental results and understand the device physics.

2. Device Fabrication

Figure 1a,b present the schematics and the process flows of the trench Fe-FinFET and conventional Fe-FinFET, respectively. The trench Fe-FinFET devices have a trench structure channel, which was realized with an additional etching after fin shape definition. Both the trench Fe-FinFET and Fe-FinFET devices were fabricated on p-type 65-nm-thick monocrystalline silicon/145-nm-thick buried SiO2/Si substrate on 8-inch silicon-on-insulator wafers. First, the active region with a fin width (FW) of 40 nm was defined by electron-beam lithography (EBL), and the fin shape was transferred by transformer-coupled plasma (TCP) etching. The etch process condition for Si was optimized with HBr flow of 450 sccm, O2 flow of 2 sccm, chamber pressure of 10 mTorr, TCP RF power of 700 W, and bias RF power of 80 W.
For the trench Fe-FinFET devices, the trench structure with a length of 100 nm was patterned with an additional mask, and the Si was subsequently thinned to 14 nm by anisotropic etching (Figure 3). After RCA cleaning, a chemical oxide interfacial layer (IL) was formed with H2O2, and a 5-nm-thick HfZrO2 (HZO) ferroelectric layer was deposited by atomic layer deposition at 250 °C with supercycles of layer-by-layer HfO2 and ZrO2. Hf(N(CH3)2)4 (TDMAH), Zr(N(CH3)2)4 (TDMAZ), and O2 plasma were used as the Hf precursor, Zr precursor, and oxygen source, respectively. Subsequently, an 80-nm-thick TaN layer was deposited as the gate electrode using ULVAC ENTRON W200 sputter (ULVAC, Chigasaki, Japan) with a DC power of 300 W, Ar flow of 20 sccm, and N2 flow of 2 sccm. The gate region with a series of gate lengths (LG) from 250 to 400 nm was patterned with EBL and TCP etching. The etch process condition for TaN was with Cl2 flow of 70 sccm, SF6 flow of 30 sccm, chamber pressure of 10 mTorr, TCP RF power of 600 W, and bias RF power of 100 W. After gate patterning, self-aligned implantation with P at a dosage of 1 × 1015 cm−2 and 10 keV was performed to form the N+ source (S) and drain (D). Finally, the ferroelectric layer crystallization and dopant activation were simultaneously performed by rapid thermal annealing (RTA) at 500 °C for 30 s.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 presents a three-dimensional atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) image of the active region with the trench structure of a fabricated device. The AFM image reveals that the Si surface maintained its smoothness after trench etching. Figure 3a presents an A–A’ cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) image of the fabricated trench Fe-FinFET device. Figure 3b presents the two-dimensional energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapping of the element distribution for the fabricated device. Figure 3c presents the zoomed in TEM image of the HZO/SiO2/Si interface. As shown in the TEM image, the ferroelectric HZO layer was well crystallized after RTA. The minimum thickness of Si in the trench was 14 nm, and the thickness of the HZO layer was 5 nm; these layers were separated by a chemical oxide IL with thickness approximately 1 nm. To ensure that the trench channel could be completely wrapped by the gate electrode to achieve better gate control ability [17], the trench length (LT) was set to 100 nm, and LG was varied to be between 250 and 400 nm. Figure 3d,e present the enlarged view of the TaN gate and the diffraction pattern of TaN, respectively. The TEM image and diffraction pattern indicate that the TaN gate was polycrystalline, and the resistivity of TaN was approximately 300 µΩ∙cm, characterized by the four-probe method.
To prove the ferroelectric behavior of the 5-nm-thick ferroelectric layer, grazing incident X-ray diffraction (GIXRD) (PANalytical, Malvern, United Kingdom) and positive-up-negative-down (PUND) measurement were performed. Figure 4a presents the GIXRD analysis of the 5-nm-thick HZO film annealed at 500 °C for 30 s. The GIXRD pattern of ALD HZO showed strong peaks at approximately 30° and 35° that corresponded to the ferroelectric orthorhombic phase with space group Pbc21 [20]. Figure 4b presents the polarization–voltage (PV) curve measured by the PUND method for the metal/ferroelectric/insulator/semiconductor (MFIS) capacitor with 5 nm HZO after RTA at 500 °C for 30 s, which was the same condition as used for the fabricated devices. It is worth mentioning that under PUND measurement, applying positive pulses to the TaN top electrode for positive polarization measurement would create a depletion region generated from the p-type semiconductor and cause a voltage drop in the Si substrate [21]. Therefore, the actual voltage and polarization response for the positive polarization cannot be truly reflected. To prevent the depletion effect, only the negative polarization measurement was considered, as shown in Figure 4b. The negative remanent polarization (Pr) for the MFIS capacitor was 9.34 µC/cm2, and the detected Pr in the MFIS capacitor was attributed to the non-centrosymmetric o-phase.
Figure 5a,b present the transfer IDVG curves of the fabricated trench Fe-FinFET and Fe-FinFET, respectively. The IDVG curves, including the forward and reverse sweeps, were determined for the Fe-FinFETs with FW = 40 nm and LG = 250 nm at VD = 0.1V, and ID was normalized by the fin width (FW). The average SS (SSavg) was 67.7 mV/dec over the whole subthreshold region, and a minimum SS in the forward sweep (SSfor min) of 35.4 mV/dec was achieved with the trench Fe-FinFET. Because the trench structure produces a strong NC effect, the trench Fe-FinFET has a much smaller minimum SS value than the conventional Fe-FinFET does. Furthermore, the experimental results indicated that the trench Fe-FinFET also has a higher ION and lower off current (IOFF) than the conventional Fe-FinFET. A high on–off current ratio of 4.1 × 107 in the forward sweep was measured for the trench Fe-FinFET, and the IOFF of the trench Fe-FinFET was almost one order of magnitude smaller than that of the conventional Fe-FinFET. Despite the SSavg extracted from the whole range of subthreshold region being approximately 70 mV/dec for the trench Fe-FinFET, the steep slope region still results in a lower off current and a larger on–off current ratio. Notably, when applying the gate voltage from negative to positive on the gate of an n-type transistor with a ferroelectric layer, the dipoles in the ferroelectric layer would flip down and attract the electrons to the channel, therefore reducing the VT value [22]. The reverse sweep might be the left shift. However, the charge trapping effect may dominate and compensate for the VT shift of ferroelectric polarization switching and result in a clockwise hysteresis, as shown in the conventional Fe-FinFET in Figure 5b. The electric field enhancement of the trench Fe-FinFET attributed to the trench structure benefits dipole flipping and the ferroelectric behavior would dominate, hence causing a counterclockwise hysteresis, as shown in Figure 5a.
For a more complete comparison of the electrical characteristics between the trench Fe-FinFET and conventional Fe-FinFET, the statistics of the SSavg values and on–off current ratio of the fabricated devices with LG = 250, 320, and 400 nm are shown in Figure 6. The SSavg of the trench Fe-FinFET was slightly lower than that of the conventional Fe-FinFET because of the better gate control ability. Furthermore, the SSavg decreased as the LG varied from 250 to 400 nm for both the trench Fe-FinFET and conventional Fe-FinFET. This is because of the larger LG dimensions, and the lower influence of the SCEs on the devices, therefore leading to a smaller SSavg value. However, the trench Fe-FinFET devices had a steep slope region below 60 mV/dec because of the stronger NC effect. On the other hand, the conventional Fe-FinFET devices exhibited SSmin values of around 60 mV/dec. The steep slope region of the trench Fe-FinFET caused a lower off current and was reflected in the on–off current ratio. Most of the trench Fe-FinFET devices exhibited a larger on–off current ratio at VD = 0.1 V than the conventional Fe-FinFET devices under the same LG dimension. Furthermore, despite the large LG dimension that would decrease the on current, the on–off current ratio still slightly increased with LG varying from 250 to 400 nm, both in the trench Fe-FinFET and conventional Fe-FinFET. The larger on–off current ratio in large LG devices can be attributed to the lower off current.
Figure 7a,b present the IDVG curves at VD = 0.1, 0.5, and 1 V for the fabricated trench Fe-FinFET and Fe-FinFET, respectively; both Fe-FinFETs had LG = 400 nm. VT was determined at a constant current of 10−7 A/µm. Both devices had high immunity to drain-induced barrier lowing (DIBL) values of 4.47 and 36.5 mV/V for the trench and conventional Fe-FinFETs, respectively. The FinFET is a structure well known for suppressing SCEs [23]. In this work, a thin Si trench was wrapped around the gate electrode of the trench Fe-FinFET, further preventing the electric field from penetrating from the drain to the source and therefore reducing the DIBL. Moreover, the trench Fe-FinFET device has lower IOFF at various VD values and also has high immunity to gate-induced drain leakage. Figure 8 presents the output IDVD characteristics of the trench and conventional Fe-FinFET devices both with LG = 400 nm at VOV (VGSVT) from 0.1 to 0.5 V with a step of 0.1 V for comparison. The trench Fe-FinFET had a saturation current approximately 2.3 greater than the conventional Fe-FinFET at VOV = 0.5 V. This higher ION can be attributed to the higher electron velocity and electron density in the trench, especially around the valleys of the trench [16].
TCAD simulations (Synopsys, Mountain View, CA, USA) were performed to further understand how the trench structure improves the electrical characteristics. The simulation was designed in accordance with the experimental data illustrated in Figure 3 and the corresponding FinFET structure (LG = 250 nm and FW = 40 nm). Figure 9a,b present the TCAD simulation results for the electric field of the Si trench FinFET and Si FinFET at VG = 1 V and VD = 0.1 V in the x and z directions, respectively. As depicted in the simulation results, the electric field in the gate insulator of the trench FinFET was much stronger than that in the conventional FinFET. This electric field enhancement occurs in the direction perpendicular to the gate electrode and gate insulator and induces fast dipole flipping [24]. This result is consistent with the low SS values of the trench Fe-FinFET due to the stronger NC effect. Figure 10 presents a comparison of the simulation results for the electron current density of the Si trench FinFET and Si FinFET in the strong inversion region (VG = 1 V, VD = 0.1 V) and surface depletion region (VG = 0 V, VD = 0.1 V).
The Si trench FinFET had an electron current density approximately 1.7 times greater than the conventional FinFET in the strong inversion region, and the much lower electron current density of the Si trench FinFET in the surface depletion region could be clearly observed. Because the current density includes the effects of carrier density, carrier velocity, and the electric field, simulations of current density are an intuitive method of understanding how a trench structure improves the electrical characteristics. In conclusion, the simulation results reveal the source of larger ION and lower IOFF values, which correspond to the high on–off ratio achieved in the experimental results.

4. Conclusions

Fe-FinFETs with trench structures were fabricated and characterized. The fabricated trench Fe-FinFET had a steep minimum SS of 35.4 mV/dec due to a strong NC effect that was attributed to fast dipole flipping; this was in turn due to its high electric field strength across the ferroelectric layer of the trench structure. Moreover, compared with a conventional Fe-FinFET, the fabricated trench Fe-FinFET had better gate control ability, increased immunity to SCEs, and a higher on–off current ratio of 4.1 × 107 due to its thin trench channel. Finally, these phenomena were verified by TCAD simulations, and the device physics was also discussed. The fabrication processes used to produce the trench Fe-FinFET are compatible with those used for Si-CMOS devices. With one simple process, the inclusion of the trench structures improved the electrical characteristics of the Fe-FinFETs. Thus, the as-fabricated trench Fe-FinFET is a promising candidate for ultralow-power applications and three-dimensional stacked integrated circuit applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, and writing—original draft, S.-C.Y.; methodology, investigation, and data curation, C.-H.W.; validation and writing—review and editing, C.-J.S., Y.-W.L., and Y.-J.Y.; supervision and project administration, Y.-C.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, grant number MOST 111-2119-M-007-010-MBK, MOST 111-2218-E-A49-015-MBK, MOST 109-2221-E-007-031-MY3, and in part by the Taiwan Semiconductor Research Institute, Taiwan.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support of the Taiwan Semiconductor Research Institute (TSRI) and National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Nano Facility Center (NFC).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kobayashi, M. A perspective on steep-subthreshold-slope negative-capacitance field-effect transistor. Appl. Phys. Express 2018, 11, 110101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cheng, K.-L.; Wu, C.C.; Wang, Y.P.; Lin, D.W.; Chu, C.M.; Tamg, Y.Y.; Lu, S.Y.; Yang, S.J.; Hsieh, M.H.; Liu, C.M.; et al. A highly scaled, high performance 45 nm bulk logic CMOS technology with 0.242 μm2 SRAM cell. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Washington, DC, USA, 10–12 December 2007; pp. 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Taur, Y.; Ning, T.H. Fundamentals of Modern VLSI Devices, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chandrakasan, A.P.; Brodersen, R.W. Minimizing power consumption in digital CMOS circuits. Proc. IEEE 1995, 83, 498–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Böscke, T.; Müller, J.; Bräuhaus, D.; Schröder, U.; Böttger, U. Ferroelectricity in hafnium oxide thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 102903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mueller, S.; Mueller, J.; Singh, A.; Riedel, S.; Sundqvist, J.; Schroeder, U.; Mikolajick, T. Incipient ferroelectricity in Al-doped HfO2 thin films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 2412–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, L.; Nishimura, T.; Shibayama, S.; Yajima, T.; Migita, S.; Toriumi, A. Kinetic pathway of the ferroelectric phase formation in doped HfO2 films. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 122, 124104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Si, M.; Jiang, C.; Su, C.-J.; Tang, Y.-T.; Yang, L.; Chung, W.; Alam, M.; Ye, P. Sub-60 mV/dec ferroelectric HZO MoS2 negative capacitance field-effect transistor with internal metal gate: The role of parasitic capacitance. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 2–6 December 2017; pp. 23.5.1–23.5.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kwon, D.; Chatterjee, K.; Tan, A.J.; Yadav, A.K.; Zhou, H.; Sachid, A.B.; Reis, R.D.; Hu, C.; Salahuddin, S. Improved subthreshold swing and short channel effect in FDSOI n-channel negative capacitance field effect transistors. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2017, 39, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, M.; Chen, K.-T.; Liao, C.-Y.; Gu, S.-S.; Siang, G.-Y.; Chou, Y.-C.; Chen, H.-Y.; Le, J.; Hong, R.-C.; Wang, Z.-Y. Extremely steep switch of negative-capacitance nanosheet GAA-FETs and FinFETs. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), San Francisco, CA, USA, 1–5 December 2018; pp. 31.8.1–31.8.4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tsai, M.-J.; Chen, P.-J.; Hsu, C.-C.; Ruan, D.-B.; Hou, F.-J.; Peng, P.-Y.; Wu, Y.-C. Atomic-level analysis of Sub-5-nm-Thick Hf 0.5Zr0.5 O2 and characterization of nearly hysteresis-free ferroelectric FinFET. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2019, 40, 1233–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tsai, M.-J.; Chen, P.-J.; Ruan, D.-B.; Hou, F.-J.; Peng, P.-Y.; Chen, L.-G.; Wu, Y.-C. Investigation of 5-nm-Thick Hf 0.5 Zr0.5O2 ferroelectric FinFET dimensions for sub-60-mV/decade subthreshold slope. IEEE J. Electron. Devices Soc. 2019, 7, 1033–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, C.; Chen, H.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.; Fan, C.-C.; Hsu, H.-H.; Cheng, C.-H. Negative capacitance CMOS field-effect transistors with non-hysteretic steep Sub-60mV/dec swing and defect-passivated multidomain switching. In Proceedings of the 2019 Symposium on VLSI Technology (VLSIT), Kyoto, Japan, 9–14 June 2019; pp. T224–T225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, C.-J.; Yan, S.-C.; Lin, Y.-W.; Tsai, M.-J.; Tsai, Y.-C.; Chou, C.-P.; Hou, F.-J.; Luo, G.-L.; Wu, Y.-C. Comprehensive Study of Inversion and Junctionless Ge Nanowire Ferroelectric HfZrO Gate-All-Around FETs Featuring Steep Subthreshold Slope with Transient Negative Capacitance. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 065002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Migita, S.; Morita, Y.; Matsukawa, T.; Masahara, M.; Ota, H. Experimental demonstration of ultrashort-channel (3 nm) junctionless FETs utilizing atomically sharp V-grooves on SOI. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2014, 13, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yeh, M.-S.; Wu, Y.-C.; Wu, M.-H.; Chung, M.-H.; Jhan, Y.-R.; Hung, M.-F. Characterizing the electrical properties of a novel junctionless poly-Si ultrathin-body field-effect transistor using a trench structure. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2014, 36, 150–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, L.-C.; Yeh, M.-S.; Lin, K.-W.; Wu, M.-H.; Wu, Y.-C. Junctionless poly-Si nanowire FET with gated raised S/D. IEEE J. Electron. Devices Soc. 2016, 4, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, Y.-R.; Cheng, C.-H.; Jhan, Y.-R.; Kurniawan, E.D.; Du, Y.-T.; Lin, Y.-H.; Wu, Y.-C. Hybrid p-channel/n-substrate poly-si nanosheet junctionless field-effect transistors with trench and gate-all-around structure. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2018, 17, 1014–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schmidt, M.; Lemme, M.C.; Gottlob, H.; Driussi, F.; Selmi, L.; Kurz, H. Mobility extraction in SOI MOSFETs with sub 1 nm body thickness. Solid-State Electron. 2009, 53, 1246–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Toprasertponga, K.; Tahara, K.; Takenaka, M.; Takagi, S. Evaluation of polarization characteristics in metal/ferroelectric/semiconductor capacitors and ferroelectric field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 242903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Böscke, T.S.; Müller, J.; Bräuhaus, D.; Schröder, U.; Böttger, U. Ferroelectricity in hafnium oxide: CMOS compatible ferroelectric field effect transistors. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 5–7 December 2011; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ni, K.; Sharma, P.; Zhang, J.; Jerry, M.; Smith, J.A.; Tapily, K.; Clark, R.; Mahapatra, S.; Datta, S. Critical role of interlayer in Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 ferroelectric FET nonvolatile memory performance. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2018, 65, 2461–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, F.-L.; Lee, D.-H.; Chen, H.-Y.; Chang, C.-Y.; Liu, S.-D.; Huang, C.-C.; Chung, T.-X.; Chen, H.-W.; Huang, C.-C.; Liu, Y.-H. 5nm-gate nanowire FinFET. In Proceedings of the 2004 Symposium on VLSI Technology, Honolulu, HI, USA, 15–17 June 2004; pp. 196–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yan, S.-C.; Lan, G.-M.; Sun, C.-J.; Chen, Y.-H.; Wu, C.-H.; Peng, H.-K.; Lin, Y.-H.; Wu, Y.-H.; Wu, Y.-C. High speed and large memory window ferroelectric HfZrO2 FinFET for high-density nonvolatile memory. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2021, 42, 1307–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematics and process flows of (a) the trench Fe-FinFET and (b) conventional Fe-FinFET.
Figure 1. Schematics and process flows of (a) the trench Fe-FinFET and (b) conventional Fe-FinFET.
Nanomaterials 12 02165 g001
Figure 2. Three-dimensional AFM image of the active region and trench of a fabricated trench Fe-FinFET.
Figure 2. Three-dimensional AFM image of the active region and trench of a fabricated trench Fe-FinFET.
Nanomaterials 12 02165 g002
Figure 3. (a) TEM image of a fabricated Fe-FinFET device with 14-nm-thick trench, LT of 100 nm, LG of 250 nm, and HZO thickness of 5 nm. (b) Two-dimensional energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapping of the element distribution. (c) Enlarged view of the HZO/SiO2/Si interface. (d) Enlarged view of the TaN gate. (e) Diffraction pattern of the TaN layer.
Figure 3. (a) TEM image of a fabricated Fe-FinFET device with 14-nm-thick trench, LT of 100 nm, LG of 250 nm, and HZO thickness of 5 nm. (b) Two-dimensional energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapping of the element distribution. (c) Enlarged view of the HZO/SiO2/Si interface. (d) Enlarged view of the TaN gate. (e) Diffraction pattern of the TaN layer.
Nanomaterials 12 02165 g003
Figure 4. (a) The GIXRD pattern of 5-nm-thick HZO shows the orthorhombic phase in HZO film. (b) PV characteristic for the MFIS capacitor with 5 nm HZO.
Figure 4. (a) The GIXRD pattern of 5-nm-thick HZO shows the orthorhombic phase in HZO film. (b) PV characteristic for the MFIS capacitor with 5 nm HZO.
Nanomaterials 12 02165 g004
Figure 5. Transfer IDVG curves (LG = 250 nm, FW = 40 nm, and VD = 0.1 V) of fabricated (a) trench and (b) conventional Fe-FinFETs, including forward and reverse sweeps. The sweep directions are indicated by the arrows on the plot.
Figure 5. Transfer IDVG curves (LG = 250 nm, FW = 40 nm, and VD = 0.1 V) of fabricated (a) trench and (b) conventional Fe-FinFETs, including forward and reverse sweeps. The sweep directions are indicated by the arrows on the plot.
Nanomaterials 12 02165 g005
Figure 6. Statistical analysis of SSavg and on–off current ratio with LG = 250, 320, and 400 nm for the trench Fe-FinFET and the conventional Fe-FinFET.
Figure 6. Statistical analysis of SSavg and on–off current ratio with LG = 250, 320, and 400 nm for the trench Fe-FinFET and the conventional Fe-FinFET.
Nanomaterials 12 02165 g006
Figure 7. IDVG curves (LG = 400 nm, FW = 40 nm) for VD = 0.1, 0.5, and 1 V for fabricated (a) trench and (b) conventional Fe-FinFETs. VT was determined at a constant current of 10−7 A/µm.
Figure 7. IDVG curves (LG = 400 nm, FW = 40 nm) for VD = 0.1, 0.5, and 1 V for fabricated (a) trench and (b) conventional Fe-FinFETs. VT was determined at a constant current of 10−7 A/µm.
Nanomaterials 12 02165 g007
Figure 8. IDVD curves of a fabricated trench Fe-FinFET and a fabricated Fe-FinFET with LG = 400 nm and FW = 40 nm at VOV = 0.1–0.5 V.
Figure 8. IDVD curves of a fabricated trench Fe-FinFET and a fabricated Fe-FinFET with LG = 400 nm and FW = 40 nm at VOV = 0.1–0.5 V.
Nanomaterials 12 02165 g008
Figure 9. TCAD simulation results for the electric field in the (a) x and (b) z directions for the Si-trench FinFET and Si FinFET. The trench FinFET has a much stronger electric field in the gate insulator than the conventional FinFET does.
Figure 9. TCAD simulation results for the electric field in the (a) x and (b) z directions for the Si-trench FinFET and Si FinFET. The trench FinFET has a much stronger electric field in the gate insulator than the conventional FinFET does.
Nanomaterials 12 02165 g009
Figure 10. TCAD simulation results for the electron current density in (a) the strong inversion region and (b) surface depletion region of an Si trench FinFET and an Si FinFET. The trench FinFET has greater electric current density in the strong inversion region and lower electric current density in the surface depletion region.
Figure 10. TCAD simulation results for the electron current density in (a) the strong inversion region and (b) surface depletion region of an Si trench FinFET and an Si FinFET. The trench FinFET has greater electric current density in the strong inversion region and lower electric current density in the surface depletion region.
Nanomaterials 12 02165 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, S.-C.; Wu, C.-H.; Sun, C.-J.; Lin, Y.-W.; Yao, Y.-J.; Wu, Y.-C. Trench FinFET Nanostructure with Advanced Ferroelectric Nanomaterial HfZrO2 for Sub-60-mV/Decade Subthreshold Slope for Low Power Application. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132165

AMA Style

Yan S-C, Wu C-H, Sun C-J, Lin Y-W, Yao Y-J, Wu Y-C. Trench FinFET Nanostructure with Advanced Ferroelectric Nanomaterial HfZrO2 for Sub-60-mV/Decade Subthreshold Slope for Low Power Application. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(13):2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132165

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Siao-Cheng, Chen-Han Wu, Chong-Jhe Sun, Yi-Wen Lin, Yi-Ju Yao, and Yung-Chun Wu. 2022. "Trench FinFET Nanostructure with Advanced Ferroelectric Nanomaterial HfZrO2 for Sub-60-mV/Decade Subthreshold Slope for Low Power Application" Nanomaterials 12, no. 13: 2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132165

APA Style

Yan, S. -C., Wu, C. -H., Sun, C. -J., Lin, Y. -W., Yao, Y. -J., & Wu, Y. -C. (2022). Trench FinFET Nanostructure with Advanced Ferroelectric Nanomaterial HfZrO2 for Sub-60-mV/Decade Subthreshold Slope for Low Power Application. Nanomaterials, 12(13), 2165. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12132165

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop