Next Article in Journal
Antiviral Properties of Silver Nanoparticles against SARS-CoV-2: Effects of Surface Coating and Particle Size
Previous Article in Journal
Systematic Research on the Transport of Ball-Milled Biochar in Saturated Porous Media: Effect of Humic Acid, Ionic Strength, and Cation Types
Previous Article in Special Issue
Photocatalytic Degradation of Dissolved Phenol by Immobilized Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: Batch Studies, Continuous Flow Experiments, and Numerical Modeling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of TiO2/NiO p-n Nanocomposite for Enhancement Dye Photodegradation under Solar Radiation

1
Nanophotonics and Applications (NPA) Lab, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62514, Egypt
2
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Islamic University in Madinah, Al-Madinah, Al-Munawarah 42351, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Physics, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(6), 989; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12060989
Submission received: 9 February 2022 / Revised: 3 March 2022 / Accepted: 7 March 2022 / Published: 17 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Developments in Photocatalytic Materials and Processes)

Abstract

:
A p-n nanocomposite based on TiO2 nanotubes (NTs) and NiO nanoparticles (NPs) was designed and optimized in this study to improve the photocatalytic performance of methylene blue (MB). The hydrothermal technique has been used to produce TiO2/NiO nanocomposites with different NiO NPs weight ratios; 1TiO2:1NiO, 1TiO2:2NiO, and 1TiO2:3NiO. The crystal phase, chemical composition, optical properties, and morphology of TiO2/NiO were explored by various techniques. TiO2 NTs have a monoclinic structure, while NiO NPs have a cubic structure, according to the structural study. The bandgap of TiO2 NTs was reduced from 3.54 eV to 2.69 eV after controlling the NiO NPs weight ratio. The TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite showed the best photodegradation efficiency. Within 45 min of solar light irradiation, the efficiency of MB dye degradation using TiO2/2NiO hits 99.5% versus 73% using pure TiO2 NTs. Furthermore, the catalytic photodegradation efficiency did not deteriorate significantly even after five reusability cycles, intimating the high stability of the TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite. This suggests that the loading of NiO NPs into TiO2 NTs lowers the recombination of photo-produced electron/hole pairs and enlarged solar spectral response range, which results in improved photocatalytic activity. The mechanism of charge transfer in the TiO2/NiO and kinetic models were discussed for the photodegradation of MB.

1. Introduction

Wastewater from the various industrial processes of printing and textiles contains significant amounts of organic compounds, which contribute to increased pollution of the environment. Indeed, about 10% of the world’s total dye supply is lost and released into the water during the dying process [1,2]. This is considered one of the most significant causes of water contamination. The existence of dye toxins in water supplies reduces the consistency of water, which can have harmful effects on humans and the surrounding wildlife [3]. The decolorization of toxic dye wastes has, therefore, gained more and more attention. Several methods have been applied as potential methods to remove dyes from water to prevent their side effects. These methods include adsorption, advanced oxidation, filtration, coagulation, flocculation, photocatalytic, and microbial degradation [4,5]. Among these techniques, photocatalytic degradation is recommended as a low-cost, environmental, and high-efficient method of oxidizing organic pollutants [6,7].
Several semiconductor photocatalysts, such as CuO, ZnO, TiO2, NiO, and Fe2O3, were used in developing photocatalysts for dye degradation [8,9,10,11,12]. Many studies have been focused on TiO2 as an n-type semiconductor for the treatment of many toxic pollutants [13,14,15]. This is due to TiO2 having highly desirable properties, such as low cost, heavy oxidization, non-toxic nature, and high photocorrosion stability [16]. Unfortunately, two main practical issues are accompanied with the usage of a TiO2 photocatalyst. First, the rapid recombination of photoelectron-hole pairs in TiO2 reduces photocatalytic performance [17]. Second, it has large bandgap energy [18]. This means it requires a photon with a wavelength in the ultraviolet (UV) region for electron-hole pair production. Less than 5% of solar energy is UV irradiation. Therefore, many more research investigations are needed to boost TiO2′s catalytic activity to meet the demands of practical applications.
Doping, deposition of noble metal, and coupled semiconductor are widely used to improve the photocatalytic properties of TiO2. More focus was given to the paired semiconductors, such as SnO2, CuO, ZnO, Fe2O3, and NiO nanoparticles, with TiO2 to build a heterostructure nanocomposite. This is because heterostructures can enhance the charge separation, suppress the electron-hole recombination rate, and tune the bandgap to the visible region [19,20,21]. The combination of coupled semiconductors with nanoparticles of a vast surface area can also lead to a greater adsorption capacity. There have been several TiO2-based heterostructure systems introduced and explored. Liu et al. [22] prepared TiO2/CuO heterojunction by spray drying process for photodegradation of methyl orange solution. The degradation percentage reaches only 65% after a time of 60 min under irradiation. Lv et al. [23] prepared TiO2/BiVO4 heterojunction for the degradation of Rhodamine B by a hydrothermal method. Full photodegradation is achieved for a long time after 4 h of exposure to visible light. Cao et al. [24] synthesized TiO2/Fe2O3 by using atomic layer deposition. The highest photodegradation activity of TiO2/Fe2O3 was 97.4% after 90 min. Nasr et al. [25] synthesized TiO2/BiOF heterostructures via a solid-state sintering method. There was a slight improvement in the visible light absorption. Furthermore, the fabrication method is done in the existence of hazardous hydrofluoric acid solution and argon atmosphere.
On the other side, nickel oxide (NiO) is an excellent cocatalyst for improving the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 for several reasons [26,27,28,29,30]. NiO is an important p-type semiconductor of wide bandgap energy (3.50 eV) [31]. It has excellent properties included as great carrier concentration, superior stability, and absorption light in the visible region. Furthermore, the unique electronic structure of NiO leads to the fast mobility of charge carriers. For a TiO2/NiO nanocomposite, the n-type TiO2 areas collect positive charges, while the p-type NiO areas collect negative charges [31]. Hence, charge equilibrium is established, resulting in improved interfacial charge separation and longer charge carrier lifetimes [32,33]. Consequently, TiO2/NiO heterostructures have gained more interest. The hydrothermal approach is widely utilized for the creation of novel materials and nanostructures because it has numerous advantages, including low-cost, simplicity, controllability, and high yield. It is also environmentally benign because the reactions are carried out in a closed system at low temperatures [34].
Although there are many previous works on the photodegradation activity for TiO2/NiO nanocomposite, the photocatalytic efficiency is still low and the time of irradiation is long. Furthermore, optimizing the ratio between TiO2 and NiO was not addressed. J. Liu et al. [35] prepared the TiO2/NiO by hydrothermal technique, but they achieved only 75% removal efficiency for MB after a 90 min reaction time under a 300 W Xenon lamp. M. Sabzehparvar et al. [36] reached a removal efficiency of 85.5% for MB after a 90 min irradiation time using TiO2/NiO/Ag nanocomposite. Y. Yang et al. [37] prepared a TiO2/NiO/Ni nanocomposite thin film via sol-gel method followed by calcination. The efficiency reached about 23.5%, 74.4%, and 98.0% for MO (methyl orange), RhB (rhodamine B), and MB, respectively, at a concentration of 2 mg/L under a solar simulator with a light intensity of 510 W/m2. N. J. Baygi et al. [38] fabricated TiO2/NiO by a modified combustion-based process. The degradation percentage of MB is less than 90% after 210 min under daylight emission. Furthermore, the stability was not investigated. M. Faisal et al. [39] prepared TiO2/NiO in the presence of triblock copolymer as a directing agent. Approximately 90% of the MB dye was gone after 180 min of visible light exposure. H. Rojas et al. [40] designed a TiO2-F/NiO nanocomposite by in situ fluorination of the semiconductor using a sol-gel method. The photocatalytic efficiency achieved 88% for caffeine degradation after 180 min under UV irradiation. Hence, enhancement of the photocatalytic performance of the TiO2/NiO for dye photodegradation within a short time is highly required.
In this study, TiO2/xNiO nanocomposites were synthesized using a simple and inexpensive hydrothermal technique and physical mixing solid-solid interaction. Furthermore, optimization of the weight ratio of NiO NPs content for p-n nanocomposite photocatalysts was presented. The structural properties, optical properties, and chemical composition of the fabricated nanopowders are identified by SEM, XRD, EDX, FT-IR, and UV/Vis spectrophotometry. The photocatalytic performances of the nanopowders were studied by using MB dye under sunlight and a 400 W Xenon lamp. The photodegradation process’s stability, mechanism, and kinetics are studied.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

Nickel chloride dihydrate (NiCl2·6H2O, Alfa Aesar, Kandel, Germany, 99%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, Fluka, Munich, Germany, 96%), urea (CO(NH2)2 LOBA Chemie, Mumbai, India, 98%), titanium dioxide (TiO2, Alfa Aesar, Kandel, Germany, 99%), and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, Fluka, Munich, Germany, 98%) were used as received from the supplier.

2.2. Synthesis of TiO2 NTs

Pure TiO2 nanostructures were fabricated by the hydrothermal technique with the calcination process. About 200 mM of TiO2 was added to a 10 M NaOH aqueous solution and magnetically stirred for 60 min. Then, the mixture was placed in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave for hydrothermal treatment at 140 °C for 24 h in a muffle furnace. The autoclave was cooled to room temperature when the reaction was completed and the white product precipitate was separated. The precipitate was washed with 100 mM HCl acid solution and deionized (DI) water several times until almost all of the Na+ ions were removed [41]. Lastly, the precipitate was filtered, dried at 60 °C in an oven, and then annealed for 3 h at 400 °C. The nanopowder was recorded as TiO2 NTs.

2.3. Synthesis of NiO NPs

Equi-molar (0.2 M) nickel chloride and urea were dissolved in DI water at room temperature for 30 min under magnetic stirring. Then, the obtained solution was placed in the autoclave and hydrothermally treated for 16 h at 140 °C. After cooling to room temperature, the product was centrifuged and rinsed multiple times with distilled H2O. Finally, the nanopowder was calcined for 3 h at 400 °C for the complete conversion into NiO NPs crystalline phase.

2.4. Nanocomposite TiO2/NiO Loading

TiO2/NiO nanocomposite was prepared from a nanopowders mixture of the corresponding component solid oxides. Different weight ratio TiO2 NTs and NiO NPs mixture and ground thoroughly in an agate mortar. To obtain an aqueous dispersion, the mixed oxides were ultrasonically disseminated in 45 mL distilled H2O for 2 h. Then, the suspension solution was stirred for 4 h. After filtering, the resulting precipitation was collected and dried in an oven for 15 h at 70 °C. The nanopowders were recorded as TiO2/xNiO, and the x (=1, 2, and 3) was denoted to the adding weight of NiO NPs.

2.5. Characterization

The surface morphologies of TiO2 NTs, NiO NPs, and TiO2/xNiO nanopowders were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JEOL, JSM-5410LV, Tokyo, Japan). The degree of crystallization and phase composition were determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD; Philips X’Pert Pro MRD, Almelo, The Netherlands) with Cu-K radiation at 40 kV in the 2θ-range 20°–80° with scan rate 0.05°/s. The morphology and structure of samples were characterized utilizing transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM-2100) at 200 kV. The chemical compositions were examined by using the energy dispersive X-ray (EDX; JEOL JED-2300, Tokyo, Japan) spectrometer at 30 kV. The optical properties of the nanopowders were studied by using UV/Vis/IR double beam spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Lambda 950, Waltham, MA, USA). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) charts of the designed nanopowders have been examined using Vertex 70, Mumbai, India, FTIR-FT Raman spectrometer.

2.6. Photocatalytic Activity Test

The photocatalytic properties of TiO2 NTs, NiO NPs, and TiO2/xNiO were evaluated by adopting MB as a model pollutant under direct solar light irradiation for time intervals up to 50 min. The experiments are carried out at pH 6. The photodegradation of MB was performed in a 200 mL beaker with a working volume of 100 mL MB solution. For residual MB concentration, the dye solution was collected and examined at a regular time interval by using a UV/Vis/IR spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer Lamba 950, Waltham, MA, USA) at a single wavelength of 664 nm (characteristic absorption wavelength of MB dye). All measurements were carried out in triplicate and the average values were reported. The photocatalytic experiments were carried out in February 2021 at Beni-Suef city (Egypt) on bright sunny days under clear sky conditions from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. with a temperature of 25 °C. To reduce the effect of solar radiation variance, the trials were conducted on consecutive days and at a set hour. For comparison, the dye degradation was examined under a 400 W Xenon lamp (Jiangsu, China). The photodegradation performances have been tested after the adsorption/desorption equilibrium. The measurements were measured as a function of illumination time, MB initial concentration, and photocatalyst dose. Furthermore, the photocatalyst stability was studied for several photodegradation runs at different exposure times.

2.6.1. Influence of Illumination Times and MB Initial Concentrations

The influence of illumination times and MB initial concentrations on the catalytic performance of the catalyst was tested. Under sun light, 0.05 g of TiO2/xNiO nanopowders were mixed with 100 mL MB dye solutions of various concentrations: 5, 10, 30, 50, 70, and 90 mg/L.

2.6.2. Influence of the TiO2/NiO Catalyst Dose

The influences of the photocatalyst dose on the photocatalytic activity were studied using various TiO2/2NiO doses; 0.015, 0.020, 0.025, 0.050, and 0.100 g. The measurements were carried out using 100 mL of MB solutions of concentration 5 mg/L.

2.6.3. Stability and Reusability of TiO2/NiO Catalyst

The TiO2/2NiO reusability was tested for five runs under sunlight using 0.05 g of the photocatalyst and 100 mL MB solution of concentration 5 mg/L. The photocatalyst nanopowder was rinsed with distilled H2O and ethanol and dried for 1 h at 60 °C after each cycle before being re-dispersed into a fresh MB solution for the following cycle.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterizations of the Fabricated Nanocomposite

3.1.1. Structure Analysis

XRD charts for the pure TiO2 NTs, NiO NPs, and TiO2/2NiO are displayed in Figure 1. Pure TiO2 NTs is a monoclinic structure based on JCPDS No. 04-009-8327 [42]. It has seven diffraction peaks at 2θ = 24.4°, 28.69°, 33.51°, 39.28°, 48.24°, 61.76°, and 69.81° as seen in Figure 1. These diffraction peaks were attributed to (201), (002), (−311), (311), (020), (512), and (620) planes, respectively. Multiple orientations were detected in the TiO2 NTs signifying that the TiO2 NTs are polycrystalline. These peaks also have high widths that suggest a tiny crystallite size. For the pure NiO NPs, there are four diffraction peaks located at 37.29°, 43.32°, 62.9°, and 75.4°, based on JCPDS No. 00-047-1049 [43]. These diffraction angles were corresponding to (111), (200), (220), and (311) planes, respectively, with cubic structure. The peaks of NiO NPs are narrow with high intensities peaks, proposing that the nanopowder is well crystallized. The TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite has well-indexed peaks related to the combination of cubic NiO NPs (JCPDS 00-047-1049) and monoclinic TiO2 NTs (JCPDS 04-009-8327). No characteristic peaks are detected for any impurities. Compared with TiO2 NTs, the TiO2/2NiO presented more sharp diffraction peaks and higher crystallinity. The intensity of diffraction peaks associated with TiO2 NTs is lower than that obtained for the TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite. After NiO NPs are loaded, the phase of TiO2 NTs does not change.
The crystallite size of nanopowders is obtained from the broadening of diffraction peaks by using the Scherer formula (1) [44].
D = 0.94   λ   β   cos θ
Here λ is the Cu-Kα X-ray wavelength (0.154 nm), β is the peak full width at half maximum (FWHM), and θ is the XRD angle at the center of the peak. The average crystallite size for TiO2 is 12.6 nm, with the largest crystallite size of 25.3 nm reported for the (020) orientation. The average crystallite size for NiO is 35.5 nm, while the (200) crystallite size is 35.9 nm. The average crystallite size for TiO2/2NiO is 35.6 nm, with a (200) crystallite size of 31.3 nm.
The interplanar distance between crystal planes measured using Bragg’s equation [45]:
d = λ 2   sin θ  
There’s a little change in the interplanar distance (d) of TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite compared with pure TiO2 NTs for the planes (002) and (020) as a result of a very small shift of peak position.
The preferred growth orientations are recognized if the texture coefficient (TC) is greater than one. The TC of the nanopowders can be determined from the following Equation (3) [46]:
TC   hkl = I hkl   /   I 0 hkl N 1   n I hkl   /   I 0 hkl
Here I(hkl) is the observed peak intensity, Io(hkl) is the JCDPS standard peak intensity, and N is the total number of diffraction peaks. The preferred crystallite growth orientations have TC > 1. According to the TCs calculations, the preferred orientation for the formation of TiO2 nanocrystallites is (020) with TC = 2.22, but the preferred orientation for NiO crystallites is (200) with TC = 1.89. The TiO2/2NiO TC values for the highest four intense peaks, which correspond to NiO crystallites, were determined and given in Table 1. The highest TC value (1.86) was observed for the (200) orientation.

3.1.2. Surface Morphological Analysis

The TEM images of the TiO2 NTs, TiO2/2NiO, and NiO NPs samples are presented in Figure 2a–c. The TiO2 nanopowder, in Figure 2a, displays nanotubes with an average inner diameter of 4.4 ± 0.8 nm and an average outer diameter of 10.5 ± 0.9 nm. The wall thickness of TiO2 NTs is ~3.1 nm. Figure 2b shows the TEM image of the TiO2/2NiO sample. Mixed TiO2 nanotubes and NiO hexagonal nanoparticles are observed in this figure. The average diameter of NiO is 47.2 ± 1.5 nm, whereas the average inner and outer diameters of TiO2 are 5 and 10.9 nm, respectively. The TEM image of the NiO sample is composed of mixed morphologies from hexagonal nanorods and nanoparticles as seen in Figure 2c. The diameters of the NiO nanoparticles are ranged from ~33 to ~39 nm. These values are very close to the crystallite size obtained by the XRD analysis. The length of the nanorods is ranged from ~97 to 132 nm, whereas the width is ranged from ~44 to ~75 nm. It is important to mention that the TiO2 nanotubes can offer higher photo activities compared to other forms of TiO2, such as nanorods (NRs), nanowires (NWs), and nanoparticles (NPs). This is due to their hollow structure, which increases the surface area and light absorption [34,47]. Furthermore, the nanotubes work as channels for facilitating the electron and ion transport at the interfaces of the photocatalyst/dye. Because of the significant charge transfer, the development of a p-n heterojunction at the interface of TiO2 NTs and NiO NPs can greatly boost photocatalytic activity and delay electron-hole recombination [48,49,50].
Furthermore, the morphologies of the photocatalysts were examined using the SEM images in Figure 2d–f. Figure 2d indicates that the fabricated TiO2 are nano/micro agglomerates of nanotubes with rough surfaces. This rough surface was favorable to the loading of NiO NPs. The magnified SEM images in Figure 2d show that the surface of the agglomerates is made of densely packed agglomerated nanotubes, as shown in the inset SEM image. Figure 2e shows the surface morphology of the TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite. The TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite is composed of TiO2 micro/nanoparticles partially covered with fine and homogeneous NiO NPs, as seen in the high-magnification image. Therefore, when the TiO2 NTs surface was loaded with NiO NPs that could be linked to the protrusions, the grains were not visible. This suggests to the formation of the TiO2/2NiO p-n heterojunction. The NiO NPs possess an aggregated nano/microsphere-like morphology, as shown in Figure 2f. The microsphere contains small nanoparticles with a regular arrangement. Figure S1(a,b) (supplementary data) shows histograms for the particle size distribution of the NiO and TiO2/2NiO nanoparticles obtained from the inset SEM images of Figure 2e,f. The average particle size is ~40 nm for NiO and ~70 nm for TiO2/2NiO.

3.1.3. EDX Study

The prepared nanopowders were examined by EDX to identify quantitative and qualitative chemical composition. Figure 3 shows the EDX patterns of (a) TiO2 NTs, (b) NiO, and (c) TiO2/2NiO NPs at the microscopic level with inset tables providing quantitative analysis. For TiO2 NTs, there are only signals for Ti and O with mass ratios of 64.38% and 35.62%, respectively. No impurities of elements, such as Na and C, were found within the detection limit of the EDX. This indicates that the high purity and well-crystallization of the fabricated TiO2 NTs agree well with the XRD results. The peaks Ti is positioned around are 4.9, 5.1, 4.5, and 4.8 keV. Furthermore, the obtained ratios are very close to the ideal stoichiometric ratio between Ti and O atoms. A typical EDX pattern of the fabricated NiO NPs is presented in Figure 3b. This EDX spectrum reveals the presence of Ni and O signals. According to EDX analysis, the mass ratios are 77.29% Ni and 22.71% O, which is quite close to the stoichiometric mass ratios of NiO (78.6% Ni, 21.4% O). The quantitative EDX analysis, in Figure 3c, shows that the TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite is composed of Ti, Ni, and O. The mole ratios for the compound TiO2 NTs and NiO NPs are 46.84 and 53.16%, respectively, which further confirm the successful formation of a TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite.

3.1.4. Optical Characterization

The optical properties of a photocatalyst influence its photocatalytic activity. For enhancing the photocatalytic performance of titania, the absorption band and optical bandgap must be shifted towards the visible region for efficient solar light photons harvesting [31]. The TiO2/NiO heterostructure can display a good visible light response [51]. Consequently, optimizing the optical property of loading NiO NPs is highly desirable. UV/Vis/IR spectrophotometry is used to identify the optical properties and bandgap of the photocatalysts. The absorbance (A) spectra of the prepared photocatalysts are studied from 250 to 1000 nm and are represented in Figure 4a–e.
From Figure 4a, TiO2 NTs exhibit a strong absorption band with an edge in the UV region at around 305 nm corresponding to electron jump from O 2p valence band to Ti 3d conduction band [52]. This is in line with TiO2 NTs’ intrinsic band-gap absorption. The absorption spectrum decreases rapidly as the wavelengths increase from 300 to 1000 nm, so that the TiO2 NTs showed no significant spectral response to the visible light region. The sharp absorption edge confirms the good crystalline quality nature of the TiO2 NTs and the narrow size distribution of the nanoparticles [53,54]. This confirms the XRD and SEM measurements.
The prepared NiO NPs have a black color as a consequence of the lattice defects and their nanoscale size [55]. The absorption spectrum of the black NiO NPs exhibits a high response to the light, owing to a wavelength of nearly 700 nm. This suggests that NiO NPs exhibits visible light absorption response, decreased band gaps, and probably improved carrier collection, which significantly benefits the photocatalytic activity [32]. After loading NiO NPs on the TiO2 NTs, the color of TiO2 NTs, TiO2/NiO, TiO2/2NiO, and TiO2/3NiO powders change from white, to yellow to light grey, and, further, to dark grey due to the different loadings of NiO NPs. The right absorption edge of these nanopowders exhibits a redshift towards a higher wavelength at the visible region compared with that of pure TiO2 NTs. This shift is caused by the presence of more opportunities both for band overlapping and strong interaction between the TiO2 NTs and NiO NPs, which modifies the electronic structure of TiO2/NiO nanocomposite [56]. Furthermore, as a result of the formation of the p-n junction, good inter-dispersion of TiO2 NTs and NiO NPs semiconductors and contacts between them leads to an extended absorption edge in the visible region [30]. The interaction between Ti and Ni species leads to a reduction in the bandgap between Ti 3d and O 2p of TiO2 states and redshift in the absorption spectrum, which makes it easier to absorb the visible light [35,57,58]. As the NiO NPs content gradually increased, the absorption edge red-shifts gradually and the TiO2/2NiO had the maximum redshift. The absorption edge is blue-shifted with a further increase in the NiO NPs content. This behavior agrees with the previous works [59,60]. The blueshift at a high ratio of NiO in the TiO2/3NiO nanocomposite might be related to particle size owing to the quantum confinement effect. Furthermore, this trend can be explained by the synergetic effects that related to the electronic contact between both oxide particles. Consequently, the blueshift of the absorption edge would preclude visible light absorption for TiO2 NTs and limit the effect of the p-n heterostructure because of the excessive NiO NPs loading in the TiO2/3NiO nanopowder [61].
Hence, the TiO2/2NiO nanopowder has a great absorption band in the UV/Vis compared with the other nanopowders. This implies that the TiO2/2NiO nanopowder can respond to photons with visible light wavelengths (the maximum portion of solar light), which is better for charge transfer. Using the obtained data for absorbance (A), the absorption coefficient (α) was calculated by using the following equation [62]:
α   = 2.303   A   ρ L   C
where ρ is the photocatalyst density, L is the quartz cell width (1.0 cm), and C is the photocatalyst concentration in the suspension. The direct band gap of nanopowders was calculated by using the Tauc equation [54]:
( α   h ν ) 2 =   B   h ν     Eg
Here B is a constant, ν is the frequency of the photon, h is Planck’s constant, Eg is the direct bandgap, and α is the absorption coefficient. From the plots of α   h ν 2 versus hν and intersection of the linear portion with the h ν axis, Eg =   h ν when α = 0 , as shown in the insets of Figure 4a–e. The obtained values of Eg are plotted in Figure 4f for all of the nanopowders. The value of Eg for the nanostructured TiO2 NTs is decreased by the incorporation of the NiO NPs for the nanopowders TiO2/NiO and TiO2/2NiO, which matches the observed redshift in the absorption edge. The bandgap of TiO2/3NiO nanopowder is then increased as the weight ratio of NiO NPs is raised.
The estimated values of the energy gaps of the TiO2 NTs, TiO2/NiO, TiO2/2NiO, TiO2/3NiO, and NiO NPs are 3.28, 3.09, 2.88, 3.16, and 3.23 eV, respectively, as clarified in the insets of Figure 4. The Eg values for TiO2 and NiO are matched well with the values reported in the previous works [32,37,63,64,65,66]. The energy gap between the Ti d and O p orbitals of TiO2 NTs may be reduced by the overlap of the Ti d orbital of TiO2 NTs and the Ni d orbital of NiO NPs at the interface area [65]. For nanomaterials with a narrower bandgap, electrons can more easily move from the V.B to the C.B. Based on the band gap values, the TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite’s optical absorption is clearly improved. Hence, TiO2/2NiO nanopowder is the most suitable for application in the photodegradation of dye.

3.1.5. FT-IR Analysis

The presence of a functional group on the photocatalyst surface can be determined via infrared spectroscopy. The FTIR spectra of the samples were analyzed in the wavenumber range from 4000 to 400 cm−1, as displayed in Figure 5. Several broad absorption bands appeared indicating the nanocrystalline nature of the samples. The broadband that appeared between 3500 to 3000 cm−1 was ascribed to stretching hydroxyl group (O-H) vibration [67].
Two bands located between 2366 and 2338 cm−1 for pure TiO2 NTs are assigned to C-H stretching vibrations. These bands are shifted to 2365 and 2342 cm−1 for TiO2/3NiO, respectively. The peak at ~1635 cm−1 refers to the bending modes of Ti-OH [68]. This is evidence of a large number of water adsorbed molecules on the TiO2 NTs surface that play an important role in photodegradation performance [69]. The adsorbed OH ions trapped the charge carriers to produce reactive OH radicals, which act as active sites for degrading the dye molecules.
The prominent band located around 1360 cm−1 is related to Ti-O modes [70]. The band at 1060 cm−1 could be due to the Ti-O vibration [71]. Furthermore, the Ti-O vibration is observed at 895 cm−1. Moreover, the weak band around 455 cm−1 is related to the vibrational mode of the Ti-O-Ti bond in the anatase phase [72]. The band around 767 cm−1 is correlated to the band C=O stretching vibrations, which indicated that the NiO NPs powers tend to strong physical absorption of CO2 [73]. As seen in the inset of Figure 5, the Ni-O stretching vibration occurs at 470–400 cm−1 [74]. These peaks appear in the TiO2 and NiO nanocomposite, which suggests the interaction between NiO NPs and the TiO2 NTs blend matrix.

3.2. Dye Removal Study

3.2.1. Influence of Illumination Time

The photocatalytic activities of the fabricated TiO2 NTs, NiO NPs, and TiO2/xNiO composites were tested for the photodegradation of MB dye under natural sunlight and a 400 W Xenon lamp. Figure 6 demonstrates the photocatalytic removal% versus the illumination time at an initial dye concentration of 5 mg/L and catalyst mass of 0.05 g.
The photodegradation percentage η   % of MB dye is determined based on the following Equation (6) [2].
η   % = C o C t C o × 100
where C o the starting absorption of the MB solution and C t the absorption of MB dye after exposure time t. The overall behaviors for catalytic photodegradation of the examined MB dye by all nanopowders demonstrate a continual increase in dye removal% as illumination time increases. It could be seen in Figure 6a that the NiO NPs Wt% ratio exhibits a significant influence on the photocatalytic activity process compared with the pure TiO2 NTs.
The photocatalytic dye removal curves for MB suggest that pure TiO2 NTs have low photocatalytic activity because of their high bandgap [75,76]. Furthermore, NiO NPs have rapid recombination of photogenerated electrons-holes [77,78,79,80]. Therefore, only a fraction of the electrons and holes were involved in the photocatalytic response, leading to low photocatalytic activity. The coupled heterostructures between TiO2 NTs and NiO NPs exhibited superior photocatalytic behavior. The decomposition of MB in the absence of the catalyst under sunlight and 400 W Xenon lamp illumination is presented in Figure 6a,c (black color). The dye degradation is about 20% after 45 min under sunlight illumination and after 60 min under 400 W xenon lamp illumination. This suggests that the MB self-decomposition is limited in the absence of the catalyst. From Figure 6a,c, the removal efficiency is higher under sunlight irradiation than under Xenon lamp irradiation at the same exposure time. From Figure 6b,d, the values of the photodegradation% of MB dye using the photocatalysts TiO2 NTs, TiO2/1NiO, TiO2/2NiO, TiO2/3NiO, and NiO NPs after 45 min under sunlight illumination are 73.4, 83.3, 99.2, 61.5, and 77%, respectively. Furthermore, the percentage photodegradation values of MB dye using the photocatalysts TiO2 NTs, TiO2/1NiO, TiO2/2NiO, TiO2/3NiO, and NiO NPs after 60 min under 400 W Xenon lamp illumination are 69.28, 89.07, 98.97, 59.39, and 79.18%, respectively.
This behavior matches with optical properties (Figure 4). For MB dye concentration of 5 mg/L, the TiO2/2NiO nanopowder exhibits the best photocatalytic activity, which reached complete photocatalytic degradation (~100%) after 30 min and then reaches a plateau value, as seen from Figure 6a. The improved photocatalytic performance of TiO2/2NiO nanopowder is ascribed to a collective effect of many factors: First, the TiO2/2NiO nanopowder shows the highest surface-volume ratio, which increases the light absorption rate, provides more reactive sites for adsorption of MB, and gives a positive influence towards the high photocatalytic activity. Second, TiO2/2NiO nanopowder has higher separation efficacy for the electron/hole pairs and prolongs the separation lifetime, which reacts with H2O and O2 further to degrade MB. Besides, the TiO2/2NiO nanopowder has narrow Eg, which provides more electron-hole pairs under visible light region. The efficient creation of essential oxidizing species, such as OH . and O 2 . radicals, which are the major factor for the destruction of the targeted pollutants, derive from the rapid flow of electrons and holes to the surfaces of composites [39]. By increasing NiO NPs content in the nanocomposite, the photocatalytic activity rapidly decreases, as noticed in the TiO2/3NiO nanopowder. The same behavior was observed in many previous works [81]. This was possibly due to the accumulation of excessive NiO clusters, which shield the active sites on the TiO2 NTs surface from touching the dye molecules and decreased the light absorption of TiO2 NTs. At the same time, the rapid recombination rate of the electron/hole pairs in NiO NPs reduces the quantum efficiency of the TiO2/3NiO. Besides, because of the high electron affinity of TiO2 NTs relative to NiO NPs, the lifetime of the electron-hole pair decreases. Furthermore, the recombination of the accumulated holes with the photogenerated electrons reduces the photocatalytic activity [16]. From the above results, the TiO2/2NiO nanopowder indicates a very high efficiency in the MB photodegradation under sunlight in a short period compared to other nanopowders. Within a short time using TiO2/2NiO, the degradation efficiency of MB under sunlight was sharply increased relative to the efficiency of the pure TiO2 NTs. Accordingly, the TiO2/2NiO nanopowder can be considered as the optimized nanopowder and will be used for subsequent works.

3.2.2. Kinetic Modeling

To obtain a better comparison of the photocatalytic efficiencies for prepared nanopowders, kinetic models’ analysis of the TiO2/xNiO for catalytic photodegradation of MB was performed under sunlight illumination. The kinetic models explored are the zero-order, first-order, and second-order models, which can be stated by Equations (7)–(9), respectively [82]:
C t =   C 0   k 0   t
C t =   C 0   e k 1   t
1 / C t = 1 / C 0 +   k 2   t
here, kn indicates the photodegradation rate constant (n = 0, 1, 2). C0 is the starting MB concentration and Ct is the reminder MB concentration after exposure time t.
Fittings of the catalytic photodegradation of MB dye using TiO2/xNiO nanocomposite with the zero-order, first-order, and second-order models were evaluated through linear regression plotting of Ct, ln(C0/Ct), and 1/Ct vs. time, respectively, as illustrated in Figure 7a–c. The slopes of the straight lines represent the catalytic photoreaction rate constants (k). The obtained values of the photodegradation rate constants and correlation coefficients (R2) for all TiO2/xNiO nanopowders at starting MB concentration of 5 mg/L are listed in Table 2. The TiO2/2NiO nanopowder has a high kinetic degradation rate constant for all models.
Fitting of the zero-order kinetic model indicated that the TiO2/2NiO nanopowder has a high value of the kinetic rate constant (k0 = 0.01848 min−1) and very poor fitting (R2 = 0.67713) compared with other nanopowders (Table 2). The degradation rate constant of the first-order model gradually increases with increasing the weight ratio of NiO NPs in the TiO2/NiO nanocomposite from 1:1 to 1:2, and then it is decreasing for TiO2/3NiO and pure NiO NPs. The fitting value of the degradation rate constant for TiO2/2NiO nanopowder is 1.19736 with a good correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.90219). The data of the second-order kinetic model indicate the medium fitting of the obtained data for TiO2/NiO and TiO2/3NiO, while the high fitting for the degradation of TiO2/2NiO. Furthermore, the degradation rate constant for TiO2/3NiO exhibits a high value (k2 = 0.09682) compared to other nanopowders. From the above analysis, the photodegradation of MB dye at starting concentration of 5 mg/L is better represented by the second-order model than by the others.

3.2.3. Influence of the MB Concentrations

The influence of MB dye concentration (5, 10, 30, 50, 70, and 90 mg/L) on photocatalytic removal% was studied for TiO2/2NiO nanopowder and presented in Figure 8a. In general, the catalytic photodegradation curves refer to a decrease in the removal% with increasing the dye concentrations at the selected irradiation time (45 min). The best photocatalytic results for TiO2/2NiO at 5 mg/L dye concentration were nearly 100% and then decreased to 42.5% for 90 mg/L MB dye concentration, as in Figure 8a.
The rise in the quantity of adsorbed dyes on the photocatalyst surfaces causes this behavior. Furthermore, the excessive dye concentration blocks incident light, preventing the necessary light intensity from reaching the photocatalyst. This reduces the number of hydroxyl radicals and positive holes produced, lowering the percentage of degradation [83]. As a consequence of loading NiO NPs onto TiO2 NTs at a weight ratio of 1:2, the resulting material is a fantastic photocatalytic nanomaterial for the elimination of high MB concentrations in a short time using sunlight illumination.

3.2.4. Influence of the Catalyst Mass

The influence of the TiO2/2NiO catalyst mass (0.015, 0.02, 0.025, 0.05, and 0.1 g) on the photocatalytic removal of MB dye (5 mg/L) at 45 irradiation time was presented in Figure 8b. At a starting MB concentration of 5 mg/L, the proportion of dye removed increases as the catalyst mass increases. About 83.39%, 90.06%, and 94.56% for the 5 mg/L MB dye are removed after only 20 min sunlight exposure time, utilizing 0.025, 0.05, and 0.10 g of TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite, respectively. By increasing the exposure time to 30 min, the photodegration% increased to 96.7% and 99%, utilizing 0.05 and 0.10 g, respectively. This could be due to an increase in photogenerated hydroxyl radicals and positive holes when the photocatalyst dose is increased, as well as an increase in adsorption capacity when the total surface area is increased [84].

3.2.5. Reusability of the Catalyst

The most significant elements for the practical utility of a photocatalyst during reactions are its reusability and stability. For five dye degradation cycles, the stability of TiO2/2NiO photocatalyst was investigated. This research involved treating 100 mL of MB solution of concentration 5 mg/L with 0.05 g of the photocatalyst for up to 45 min under sunlight illumination. After each run, the loss in photocatalyst dose due to the washing process was determined, and the error was included in the removal% estimate. From Figure 8c, the photocatalytic removal of MB dye decreased from 100 to 72.63% after five runs, suggesting good stability of TiO2/2NiO. The degradation curves of the investigated runs exhibit no equilibrium stage, indicating that the catalyst has the potential to remove more MB dye by extending the solar irradiation period. As a result, TiO2/2NiO might be a promising photocatalyst for large-scale environmental cleaning, because it may be easily isolated from the slurry system after the photocatalytic process using filtering. As a result, they can be reused more easily than traditional photocatalytic nanomaterials. For comparison, Table 3 shows the obtained results with various types of photocatalysts of previous works.

3.2.6. Photocatalytic Mechanism of TiO2/NiO

The mechanism of photocatalysis is dependent on the generation of electrons and holes under light excitation, as presented in Figure 9. The catalytic photodegradation% is controlled by the amount of absorbed light, which validates the number of e-h pairs, and the separation of the charge carriers. Electrons may transfer to the conduction band in pure TiO2 NTs, leading to the creation of holes on the valence band (O 2p → Ti 3d) when TiO2 NTs is illuminated by UV light [90]. Photo-generated electrons and holes recombine to achieve a lower energy level.
The majority charge carrier production and recombination are two competing processes that influence catalytic photodegradation efficiency. Recombination of electrons/holes reduces carrier mobility and stops the majority of charge carriers from participating in the reactions. Before recombination, electrons and holes can react with harmful molecules and break them down into non-toxic compounds if they migrate to the surface of the semiconductor photocatalyst. For a TiO2/NiO nanocomposite, the formation of a p-n nanocomposite is an effective approach to increase the yield of photocatalytic reactions. To explore the effect of p-n type junctions on the performance of the nanocomposite, Figure S2 (supplementary data) shows the photocatalytic performance of TiO2/2NiO composite versus the performance of TiO2/2NiO mixture. After 60 min, the degradation efficiency using a TiO2/2NiO composite reached 99.8%, and using a TiO2/2NiO mixture reached 58.9%.
A schematic energy band diagram of the n-TiO2/p-NiO heterojunction structure is plotted in Figure 9. For n-type TiO2 NTs, the Fermi energy level is closer to the conduction band, while for p-type NiO NTs, the Fermi energy level is closer to the valence band [91]. Furthermore, the conduction band edge of TiO2 is 0.5 eV less than that of NiO [92]. When TiO2 NTs and NiO NPs couple a nanoscale p-n heterostructure of TiO2/NiO is formed. Some electrons in the TiO2 NTs fill the holes in the NiO NPs semiconductor because these holes can be found in lower-energy states. This generates positively charged cores in the TiO2 NTs and negatively charged electrons in the NiO. The space charge layer induces an internal electrical field by polarization. The built-in electron field leads to changes in the energy band bending of the TiO2 NTs and NiO NPs at the interface [93].
The energy band in TiO2 NTs shifts downward whereas the energy band in NiO NPs shifts upward until the Fermi level reaches its new equilibrium state. The electron-hole lifespan will be extended as a result of the new Fermi level equilibrium condition. Under light illumination of sufficient energy, photons incident on TiO2 NTs (or NiO NPs) and generate electron/hole pairs in the electric field. Photogenerated holes flow into the negative field, whereas photogenerated electrons flow into the positive field, because of the inner electric field, i.e., the inner electric field accelerates the holes in the valence band of TiO2 NTs toward the p-type NiO NPs, and the electrons from NiO NPs toward n-type TiO2 NTs. Therefore, the built-in electric field acts as a potential barrier that prevents the photoexcited electrons-holes upon light illumination of sufficient energy. This enabled the creation of extra free carriers on the active sites of the TiO2/NiO nanocomposites. Furthermore, this field can be a benefit in increasing the charge mobility to the catalyst, which results in an improvement of photochemical reactivity [94].
The holes at the valence band react with H2O or hydroxide ions (OH) to generate short-lived hydroxyl radicals ( OH . ), which is the primary reactive oxidizing species. Simultaneously, the electrons at the conduction band are trapped by adsorbed oxygen molecules (O2) that produce highly active superoxide anion radicals ( O 2 . ) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Electrons are trapped at molecular oxygens, preventing the recombination of charge carriers and consuming electrons efficiently. These radicals ( O 2 . and OH . ) are powerful reactive species that aggressively attack organic compounds adsorbed on the surface of the photocatalyst [31]. At the same time, photogenerated electron/hole pairs can be formed by the light absorption of the dye. The electrons in the MB dye can be transferred to the conduction band (C.B) of TiO2/NiO and trapped by oxygen to generate free radicals [95]. The free radicals can initiate the oxidative degradation of MB pollutants down to water and carbon dioxide (H2O and CO2) [47]. However, it has been reported that the valence band hole potential is positive enough to oxidize the adsorbed organic pollutants [96]. Thus, it was suggested that two types of reaction pathways may be considered for the oxidation of organic pollutants on the TiO2 NTs.
The mechanism of degradation of MB dye over TiO2/NiO photocatalyst can be summarized in the below equations:
TiO 2 / NiO   + h ν     TiO 2 / NiO   e   CB +   h +   VB
dye +   h ν     dye   e   CB +   h +   VB
dye e   CB + h +   VB + TiO 2 / NiO TiO 2 / NiO e   CB +   dye h +   VB
h + +   H 2 O     OH +   H +
h + + OH   OH
e +   O 2     O 2  
e +   O 2   + 2   H +     H 2 O 2
e +   H 2 O 2 +   H +     OH +   H 2 O
e +   H 2 O 2     OH +   OH
e +   O 2 +   H +   HO 2  
OH ,   O 2   , H 2 O 2 + dye h +   VB     products   CO 2 +   H 2 O
h + + dye     product   CO 2 +   H 2 O

4. Conclusions

In summary, solar-light-driven TiO2/xNiO nanocomposites were successfully prepared by hydrothermal method with different NiO NPs weight ratios. The prepared samples have been described by XRD, EDX, SEM, UV-visible, and FTIR for morphological and structural characterization. The photocatalytic degradation of MB was studied and the effects of the initial dye concentration, TiO2/NiO dosage, and exposure time on removal efficiency were examined. After loading NiO nanoparticles with a reduced bandgap, the optical response of TiO2 NTs in the visible region was improved. The TiO2/2NiO showed better photocatalytic efficiency than the pure TiO2 NTs and NiO nanopowders against the MB dye. The MB photodegradation efficiency was enhanced due to the induced formation of the p-n nanocomposite in the TiO2/NiO that prevents electron-hole recombination. The mechanism of charge transfer under solar light irradiation inside the TiO2/NiO nanocomposite structure has been investigated. Our findings show that, due to its high photocatalytic capability and stability, the TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite shows potential for a wide range of applications as efficient photocatalysts in wastewater purification.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12060989/s1, Figure S1(a,b). Histograms of the particle size distribution for (a) NiO and (b) TiO2/2NiO; Figure S2. The photocatalytic performance of TiO2/2NiO composite versus the performance of TiO2/2NiO mixture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z., A.M.A., A.S.A. and M.S.; methodology, M.Z., A.M.A., S.S. and M.S.; validation, M.Z., A.M.A., A.S.A. and M.S.; formal analysis, M.Z., A.M.A., A.S.A. and M.S.; investigation, M.Z., A.M.A. and M.S.; resources, F M.Z., A.M.A., A.S.A. and M.S.; data curation, M.Z., S.S., A.M.A. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z., A.M.A. and M.S.; writing—review and editing, M.Z., A.M.A., A.S.A. and M.S.; visualization, M.Z., A.M.A., H.H., A.S.A. and M.S.; project administration, M.Z., A.M.A., A.S.A. and H.H.; funding acquisition, M.Z., A.M.A., A.S.A. and M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R16), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This research received external funding from the Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) under grant number 44992 (STDF/2021, Egypt).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This paper is based upon work supported by the Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) under grant number 44992 (STDF/2021, Egypt). The authors express their gratitude to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R16), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Konstantinou, I.K.; Albanis, T.A. TiO2-assisted photocatalytic degradation of azo dyes in aqueous solution: Kinetic and mechanistic investigations: A review. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2004, 49, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohamed, F.; Abukhadra, M.R.; Shaban, M. Removal of safranin dye from water using polypyrrole nanofiber/Zn-Fe layered double hydroxide nanocomposite (Ppy NF/Zn-Fe LDH) of enhanced adsorption and photocatalytic properties. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 640, 352–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tio, I. Photodegradation of Commercial Dye, Methylene Blue Using. IPCBEE 2012, 43, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shaban, M.; Abukhadra, M.R. Geochemical evaluation and environmental application of Yemeni natural zeolite as sorbent for Cd2+ from solution: Kinetic modeling, equilibrium studies, and statistical optimization. Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, J.; Wang, G.; Li, Z.; Yu, E.; Xie, J.; Zheng, Z. Extraction of flocculants from a strain of Bacillus thuringiensis and analysis of their properties. Aquac. Fish. 2017, 2, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sivakumar, M.; Towata, A.; Yasui, K.; Tuziuti, T.; Kozuka, T.; Iida, Y. Dependence of sonochemical parameters on the platinization of rutile titania—An observation of a pronounced increase in photocatalytic efficiencies. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2010, 17, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mohamed, F.; Hassaballa, S.; Shaban, M.; Ahmed, A.M. Highly Efficient Photocatalyst Fabricated from the Chemical Recycling of Iron Waste and Natural Zeolite for Super Dye Degradation. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Q.; Sun, J.; Han, D.; Liu, X.; Gao, X.; Jiang, Y.; Xie, K. Highly efficient photocatalytic removal of methylene blue by lamellar structured nanocrystalline and amorphous CuO. Mater. Lett. 2020, 276, 128217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chandekar, K.V.; Shkir, M.; Al-Shehri, B.M.; AlFaify, S.; Halor, R.G.; Khan, A.; Al-Namshah, K.S.; Hamdy, M.S. Visible light sensitive Cu doped ZnO: Facile synthesis, characterization and high photocatalytic response. Mater. Charact. 2020, 165, 110387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ali, I.; Park, S.; Kim, J.O. Modeling the photocatalytic reactions of g-C3N4-TiO2 nanocomposites in a recirculating semi-batch reactor. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 821, 153498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sabouri, Z.; Akbari, A.; Hosseini, H.A.; Khatami, M.; Darroudi, M. Egg white-mediated green synthesis of NiO nanoparticles and study of their cytotoxicity and photocatalytic activity. Polyhedron 2020, 178, 114351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Frindy, S.; Sillanpää, M. Synthesis and application of novel α-Fe2O3/graphene for visible-light enhanced photocatalytic degradation of RhB. Mater. Des. 2020, 188, 108461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Muneer, M.; Bahnemann, D.; Qamar, M.; Tariq, M.A.; Faisal, M. Photocatalysed reaction of few selected organic systems in presence of titanium dioxide. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2005, 289, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tariq, M.A.; Faisal, M.; Muneer, M.; Bahnemann, D. Photochemical reactions of a few selected pesticide derivatives and other priority organic pollutants in aqueous suspensions of titanium dioxide. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2007, 265, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abu Tariq, M.; Faisal, M.; Muneer, M. Semiconductor-mediated photocatalysed degradation of two selected azo dye derivatives, amaranth and bismarck brown in aqueous suspension. J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 127, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Atrees, M.S.; Ebraheim, E.E.; Ali, M.E.M.; Yasser, M.; Mahmoud, M.S.; Almutairi, M.M. Environmental Effects Synergetic effect of metal-doped GO and TiO2 on enhancing visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production from water splitting. Energy Sources Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 2021, 43, 484–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rabia, M.; Mohamed, S.H.; Zhao, H.; Shaban, M.; Lei, Y.; Ahmed, A.M. TiO2/TiOxNY hollow mushrooms-like nanocomposite photoanode for hydrogen electrogeneration. J. Porous Mater. 2020, 27, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, Z.; Pichugin, V.F.; Evdokimov, K.E.; Konishchev, M.E.; Syrtanov, M.S.; Kudiiarov, V.N.; Li, K.; Tverdokhlebov, S.I. Effect of nitrogen-doping and post annealing on wettability and band gap energy of TiO2 thin film. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, G.; Ji, S.; Sang, Y.; Chang, S.; Wang, Y.; Hao, P.; Claverie, J.; Liu, H.; Yu, G. Synthesis of scaly Sn3O4/TiO2 nanobelt heterostructures for enhanced UV-visible light photocatalytic activity. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 3117–3125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.; Liu, H.; Luo, D.; Li, J.; Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Fang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, L. Adsorption of CO2 on heterostructure CdS(Bi2S3)/TiO2 nanotube photocatalysts and their photocatalytic activities in the reduction of CO2 to methanol under visible light irradiation. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 180, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cao, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Wei, L.; Shao, C.; Liu, Y. Fabrication, structure, and enhanced photocatalytic properties of hierarchical CeO2 nanostructures/TiO2 nanofibers heterostructures. Mater. Res. Bull. 2010, 45, 1406–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Z.; Zhou, C. Improved photocatalytic activity of nano CuO-incorporated TiO2 granules prepared by spray drying. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2015, 25, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lv, Y.R.; Liu, C.J.; He, R.K.; Li, X.; Xu, Y.H. BiVO4/TiO2 heterojunction with enhanced photocatalytic activities and photoelectochemistry performances under visible light illumination. Mater. Res. Bull. 2019, 117, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cao, Y.Q.; Zi, T.Q.; Zhao, X.R.; Liu, C.; Ren, Q.; Fang, J.B.; Li, W.M.; Li, A.D. Enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity of Fe2O3 modified TiO2 prepared by atomic layer deposition. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nasr, M.; Huang, W.; Bittencourt, C.; Cui, D.; Sun, Y.; Wang, L.; Caperaa, N.G.; Ning, Y.; Song, P.; Bonnet, P.; et al. Synthesis of BiOF/TiO2 Heterostructures and Their Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 2020, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. Carbon-Incorporated NiO/TiO2 Mesoporous Shells with p–n Heterojunctions for Efficient Visible Light Photocatalysis. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acsami.6b10480 (accessed on 14 March 2020).
  27. Shifu, C.; Sujuan, Z.; Wei, L.; Wei, Z. Preparation and activity evaluation of p-n junction photocatalyst NiO/TiO2. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 155, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fujita, S.-i.; Kawamori, H.; Honda, D.; Yoshida, H.; Arai, M. Photocatalytic hydrogen production from aqueous glycerol solution using NiO/TiO2 catalysts: Effects of preparation and reaction conditions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 181, 818–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Buama, S.; Junsukhon, A.; Ngaotrakanwiwat, P.; Rangsunvigit, P. Validation of energy storage of TiO2[sbnd]NiO/TiO2 film by electrochemical process and photocatalytic activity. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 309, 866–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liang, Z.; Ouyang, B.; Wang, T.; Liu, X.; Huo, H.; Liu, D.; Feng, H.; Ma, J.; Deng, K.; Li, A.; et al. Pt modified TiO2/NiO p-n junction with enhanced surface reaction and charge separation for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2022, 47, 10868–10876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, M.; Hu, Y.; Han, J.; Guo, R.; Xiong, H.; Yin, Y. TiO2/NiO hybrid shells: P-n junction photocatalysts with enhanced activity under visible light. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 20727–20735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Ke, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Xiao, H. Black NiO-TiO2 nanorods for solar photocatalysis: Recognition of electronic structure and reaction mechanism. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 224, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, C.J.; Liao, C.H.; Hsu, K.C.; Wu, Y.T.; Wu, J.C.S. P-N junction mechanism on improved NiO/TiO2 photocatalyst. Catal. Commun. 2011, 12, 1307–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ahmed, A.M.; Mohamed, F.; Ashraf, A.M.; Shaban, M.; Aslam Parwaz Khan, A.; Asiri, A.M. Enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting activity of carbon nanotubes@TiO2 nanoribbons in different electrolytes. Chemosphere 2020, 238, 124554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, J.; Tao, Z.; Xie, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; Xiao, H.; Wang, L. Facial construction of defected NiO/TiO2 with Z-scheme charge transfer for enhanced photocatalytic performance. Catal. Today 2019, 335, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sabzehparvar, M.; Kiani, F.; Tabrizi, N.S. Mesoporous-assembled TiO2-NiO-Ag nanocomposites with p-n/Schottky heterojunctions for enhanced photocatalytic performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 876, 160133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhu, Q.; Liu, N.; Zhang, N.; Song, Y.; Stanislaus, M.S.; Zhao, C.; Yang, Y. Efficient photocatalytic removal of RhB, MO and MB dyes by optimized Ni/NiO/TiO2 composite thin films under solar light irradiation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 2724–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baygi, N.J.; Saghir, A.V.; Beidokhti, S.M.; Khaki, J.V. Modified auto-combustion synthesis of mixed-oxides TiO2/NiO nanoparticles: Physical properties and photocatalytic performance. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 15417–15437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Faisal, M.; Harraz, F.A.; Ismail, A.A.; El-Toni, A.M.; Al-Sayari, S.A.; Al-Hajry, A.; Al-Assiri, M.S. Novel mesoporous NiO/TiO2 nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light illumination. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 7047–7056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Castañeda, C.; Martínez, J.J.; Santos, L.; Rojas, H.; Osman, S.M.; Gómez, R.; Luque, R. Caffeine photocatalytic degradation using composites of NiO/TiO2–F and CuO/TiO2–F under UV irradiation. Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Q.; Zhang, J.; Liu, B.; Li, M.; Liu, R.; Li, X.; Ma, H.; Yu, S.; Wang, L.; Zou, Y.; et al. Synthesis of high-density nanocavities inside TiO2-B nanoribbons and their enhanced electrochemical lithium storage properties. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 9870–9873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hao, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ping, X.; Liu, T.; Zhao, Q. Flexible TiO2 nanograss array film decorated with BiOI nanoflakes and its greatly boosted photocatalytic activity. Ceram. Int. 2020, 47, 7845–7852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liang, Z.Y.; Huang, R.K.; Liang, R.W.; Chen, F.; Yu, Y.; Yan, G.Y. Preparation of a shell nanostructure for highly selective photocatalytic oxidation of organic compounds by wrapping on NiO nanorods exposed {110} facets with ultrathin g-C3N4 nanosheets. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 484, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shaban, M.; Zayed, M.; Hamdy, H. Nanostructured ZnO thin films for self-cleaning applications. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zayed, M.; Ahmed, A.M.; Shaban, M. Synthesis and characterization of nanoporous ZnO and Pt/ZnO thin films for dye degradation and water splitting applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 17630–17648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sivaraman, T.; Balu, A.R.; Nagarethinam, V.S. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing Effect of magnesium incorporation on the structural, morphological, optical and electrical properties of CdS thin films. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2014, 27, 915–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shaban, M.; Ahmed, A.M.; Shehata, N.; Betiha, M.A.; Rabie, A.M. Ni-doped and Ni/Cr co-doped TiO2 nanotubes for enhancement of photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 555, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhao, H.; Li, C.-F.; Liu, L.-Y.; Palma, B.; Hu, Z.-Y.; Renneckar, S.; Larter, S.; Li, Y.; Kibria, M.G.; Hu, J.; et al. n-p Heterojunction of TiO2-NiO core-shell structure for efficient hydrogen generation and lignin photoreforming. J. Colloid Interface Sci 2021, 585, 694–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhi, J.; Chen, A.; Cui, H.; Xie, Y.; Huang, F. NiO-decorated mesoporous TiO2 flowers for an improved photovoltaic dye sensitized solar cell. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 5103–5108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jasim, M.M.; Dakhil, O.A.A.; Hussein, E.H.; Abdullah, H.I. Enhanced photoelectrochemical properties of NiO nanoparticles-decorated TiO2 nanotube arrays for water splitting. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020, 31, 10707–10714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vinoth, R.; Karthik, P.; Devan, K.; Neppolian, B.; Ashokkumar, M. TiO2–NiO p–n nanocomposite with enhanced sonophotocatalytic activity under diffused sunlight. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2017, 35, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Fuerte, A.; Hernández-Alonso, M.D.; Maira, A.J.; Martínez-Arias, A.; Fernández-García, M.; Conesa, J.C.; Soria, J.; Munuera, G. Nanosize Ti-W mixed oxides: Effect of doping level in the photocatalytic degradation of toluene using sunlight-type excitation. J. Catal. 2002, 212, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sharma, R.; Acharya, A.D.; Shrivastava, S.B.; Patidar, M.M.; Gangrade, M.; Shripathi, T.; Ganesan, V. Studies on the structure optical and electrical properties of Zn-doped NiO thin films grown by spray pyrolysis. Optik 2016, 127, 4661–4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ahmed, A.M.; Rabia, M.; Shaban, M. The structure and photoelectrochemical activity of Cr-doped PbS thin films grown by chemical bath deposition. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 14458–14470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nail, B.A.; Fields, J.M.; Zhao, J.; Wang, J.; Greaney, M.J.; Brutchey, R.L.; Osterloh, F.E. Nickel Oxide Particles Catalyze Photochemical Hydrogen Evolution from Water; Nanoscaling Promotes P-Type Character and Minority Carrier Extraction. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 5135–5142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sreethawong, T.; Ngamsinlapasathian, S.; Yoshikawa, S. Surfactant-aided sol-gel synthesis of mesoporous-assembled TiO2-NiO mixed oxide nanocrystals and their photocatalytic azo dye degradation activity. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 192, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mary, J.A.; Vijaya, J.J.; Dai, J.H.; Bououdina, M.; John Kennedy, L.; Song, Y. Experimental and first-principles DFT studies of electronic, optical and magnetic properties of cerium-manganese codoped zinc oxide nanostructures. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2015, 34, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shaban, M.; El Sayed, A.M. Influences of lead and magnesium co-doping on the nanostructural, optical properties and wettability of spin coated zinc oxide films. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2015, 39, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mannaa, M.A.; Qasim, K.F.; Alshorifi, F.T.; El-Bahy, S.M.; Salama, R.S. Role of NiO Nanoparticles in Enhancing Structure Properties of TiO2 and Its Applications in Photodegradation and Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 30386–30400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zheng, D.; Zhao, H.; Wang, S.; Hu, J.; Chen, Z. NiO-TiO2 p-n Heterojunction for Solar Hydrogen Generation. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liang, Z.; Li, J.; He, X.; Niu, L.; Xu, X. Fabrication of p-NiO nanoparticles/n-TiO2 nanospheres photocatalysts and their photocatalytic performance for degradation of Rh B. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2019, 21, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dom, R.; Baby, L.R.; Kim, H.G.; Borse, P.H. Fe controlled charge-dynamics in ZnO for solar hydrogen generation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 5758–5767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chai, W.; Zhu, W.; Chen, D.; Chen, D.; Xi, H.; Chang, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Hao, Y. Combustion-processed NiO/ALD TiO2 bilayer as a novel low-temperature electron transporting material for efficient all-inorganic CsPbIBr2 solar cell. Sol. Energy 2020, 203, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. He, X.; Gui, Y.; Liu, K.; Xu, L. Comparison of sensing and electronic properties of C2H2 on different transition metal oxide nanoparticles (Fe2O3, NiO, TiO2) modified BNNT (10, 0). Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 521, 146463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ravi, P.; Navakoteswara Rao, V.; Shankar, M.V.; Sathish, M. CuO@NiO core-shell nanoparticles decorated anatase TiO2 nanospheres for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 7517–7529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, T.-T.; Chiang, C.L.; Lin, Y.C.; Srinivasadesikan, V.; Lin, M.C.; Lin, Y.G. KSCN-activation of hydrogenated NiO/TiO2 for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 511, 145548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, S.; Zhao, W.; Liu, W.; Zhang, S. Preparation, characterization and activity evaluation of p-n junction photocatalyst p-ZnO/n-TiO2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 255, 2478–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. León, A.; Reuquen, P.; Garín, C.; Segura, R.; Vargas, P.; Zapata, P.; Orihuela, P.A. FTIR and raman characterization of TiO2 nanoparticles coated with polyethylene glycol as carrier for 2-methoxyestradiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bezrodna, T.; Puchkovska, G.; Shymanovska, V.; Baran, J.; Ratajczak, H. IR-analysis of H-bonded H2O on the pure TiO2 surface. J. Mol. Struct. 2004, 700, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mugundan, S.; Rajamannan, B.; Viruthagiri, G.; Shanmugam, N.; Gobi, R.; Praveen, P. Synthesis and characterization of undoped and cobalt-doped TiO2 nanoparticles via sol–gel technique. Appl. Nanosci. 2015, 5, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Roy, A.K.; Prasad, K.; Prasad, A. Piezoelectric, impedance, electric modulus and AC conductivity studies on (Bi0.5Na0.5)0.95Ba0.05TiO3 ceramic. Processing Appl. Ceram. 2013, 7, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mahalingam, T.; Selvakumar, C.; Ranjith Kumar, E.; Venkatachalam, T. Structural, optical, morphological and thermal properties of TiO2–Al and TiO2–Al2O3 composite powders by ball milling. Phys. Lett. Sect. A Gen. At. Solid State Phys. 2017, 381, 1815–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wei, Z.; Qiao, H.; Yang, H.; Zhu, L.; Yan, X. Preparation and characterization of NiO nanoparticles by anodic arc plasma method. J. Nanomater. 2009, 2009, 795928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Kalam, A.; Al-Shihri, A.S.; Shakir, M.; El-Bindary, A.A.; Sayed, E.; Yousef, S.; Du, G.; Al-Shihri, S. Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic, Metal-Organic, and Nano-Metal Chemistry Spherical NiO Nanoparticles (SNPs): Synthesis, Characterization, and Optical Properties Spherical NiO Nanoparticles (SNPs): Synthesis, Characterization, and Optical Properties. Synth. React. Inorganic, Met. Nano-Metal Chem. 2011, 41, 1324–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yu, J.; Ran, J. Facile preparation and enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity of Cu(OH)2 cluster modified TiO2. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 1364–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Xiang, Q.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M. Enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity of graphene-modified titania nanosheets. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 3670–3678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Yu, J.; Hai, Y.; Cheng, B. Enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity of TiO2 by Ni(OH)2 cluster modification. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 4953–4958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ran, J.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M. Ni(OH)2 modified CdS nanorods for highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic H2 generation. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2708–2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, W.; Liu, S.; Nie, L.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J. Enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity of TiO2 using Ni(NO3)2 as an additive. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 12033–12039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Tran, P.D.; Xi, L.; Batabyal, S.K.; Wong, L.H.; Barber, J.; Chye Loo, J.S. Enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2 nanopowders for H2 production by using non-noble transition metal co-catalysts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 11596–11599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, J.; Chen, T.; Lai, L.; Li, P.; Liu, H.; Hong, Y.; Liu, D. Preparation and Characterization of Surface Photocatalytic Activity with NiO/TiO2 Nanocomposite Structure. Materials 2015, 8, 4273–4286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Sun, S.P.; Li, C.J.; Sun, J.H.; Shi, S.H.; Fan, M.H.; Zhou, Q. Decolorization of an azo dye Orange G in aqueous solution by Fenton oxidation process: Effect of system parameters and kinetic study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 1052–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Behnajady, M.A.; Modirshahla, N.; Hamzavi, R. Kinetic study on photocatalytic degradation of C.I. Acid Yellow 23 by ZnO photocatalyst. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 133, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Huang, Y.H.; Huang, Y.F.; Chang, P.S.; Chen, C.Y. Comparative study of oxidation of dye-Reactive Black B by different advanced oxidation processes: Fenton, electro-Fenton and photo-Fenton. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Cheng, X.; Shang, Y.; Cui, Y.; Shi, R.; Zhu, Y.; Yang, P. Enhanced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic properties of anatase-TiO2(B) nanobelts decorated with CdS nanoparticles. Solid State Sci. 2020, 99, 106075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Vedichi, M.; Mani, S. Materials Today: Proceedings Enhanced microwave and photocatalytic decomposition of synthetic lignin wastewater by TiO2 nanoparticles coated on activated carbon. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 47, 800–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hasan, J.; Li, H.; Tian, G.; Qin, C. Fabrication of Cr2S3-GO-TiO2 composite with high visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity on degradation of organic dyes. Chem. Phys. 2020, 539, 110950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ali, A.; Shoeb, M.; Li, Y.; Li, B.; Asim, M. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of antibiotic drug and dye pollutants by graphene-ordered mesoporous silica (SBA 15)/TiO2 nanocomposite under visible-light irradiation. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 20, 118–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Badvi, K.; Javanbakht, V. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of dye contaminants with TiO2 immobilized on ZSM-5 zeolite modi fi ed with nickel nanoparticles. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 280, 124518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ahmed, M.A.; El-katori, E.E.; Gharni, Z.H. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye using Fe2O3/TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by sol–gel method. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 553, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yu, J.; Wang, W.; Cheng, B. Synthesis and enhanced photocatalytic activity of a hierarchical porous flowerlike p-n junction NiO/TiO2 photocatalyst. Chem. Asian J. 2010, 5, 2499–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Environ, E.; Zhou, H.; Qu, Y.; Duan, X. Environmental Science Towards highly efficient photocatalysts using semiconductor nanoarchitectures. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6732–6743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Liang, Y.C.; Xu, N.C.; Chiang, K.J. Surface morphology-dependent functionality of titanium dioxide–nickel oxide nanocomposite semiconductors. Nanomaterials 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Yu, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Guo, W.; Qiu, J.; Mou, X.; Li, A.; Claverie, J.P.; Liu, H. NiO-TiO2 p-n heterostructured nanocables bridged by zero-bandgap rGO for highly efficient photocatalytic water splitting. Nano Energy 2015, 16, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wen, Z.B.; Yu, F.; You, T.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y.P. A core-shell structured nanocomposite of NiO with carbon nanotubes as positive electrode material of high capacitance for supercapacitors. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 74, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Dvoranová, D.; Barbieriková, Z.; Brezová, V. Radical intermediates in photoinduced reactions on TiO2 (An EPR spin trapping study). Molecules 2014, 19, 17279–17304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. XRD charts of the fabricated TiO2 NTs, NiO NPs, and TiO2/2NiO.
Figure 1. XRD charts of the fabricated TiO2 NTs, NiO NPs, and TiO2/2NiO.
Nanomaterials 12 00989 g001
Figure 2. TEM images of the fabricated (a) TiO2 NTs, (b) TiO2/2NiO, and (c) NiO NPs, and SEM images of the fabricated (d) TiO2 NTs, (e) TiO2/2NiO, and (f) NiO NPs.
Figure 2. TEM images of the fabricated (a) TiO2 NTs, (b) TiO2/2NiO, and (c) NiO NPs, and SEM images of the fabricated (d) TiO2 NTs, (e) TiO2/2NiO, and (f) NiO NPs.
Nanomaterials 12 00989 g002
Figure 3. EDX spectra for (a) TiO2 NTs, (b) TiO2/2NiO, and (c) NiO NPs. The inset Tables show the quantitative EDX analysis.
Figure 3. EDX spectra for (a) TiO2 NTs, (b) TiO2/2NiO, and (c) NiO NPs. The inset Tables show the quantitative EDX analysis.
Nanomaterials 12 00989 g003
Figure 4. Absorbance spectra with inset figure of Tauc’s plot of (α hν)2 versus hν of (a) TiO2 NTs, (b) TiO2/NiO, (c) TiO2/2NiO, (d) TiO2/3NiO, and (e) NiO NPs; and (f) energy gap of all nanopowders.
Figure 4. Absorbance spectra with inset figure of Tauc’s plot of (α hν)2 versus hν of (a) TiO2 NTs, (b) TiO2/NiO, (c) TiO2/2NiO, (d) TiO2/3NiO, and (e) NiO NPs; and (f) energy gap of all nanopowders.
Nanomaterials 12 00989 g004
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of TiO2 NTs, NiO NPs, and TiO2/xNiO nanocomposite.
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of TiO2 NTs, NiO NPs, and TiO2/xNiO nanocomposite.
Nanomaterials 12 00989 g005
Figure 6. (a) The influence of sunlight illumination on the photodegradation of MB dye (5 mg/L) for all prepared nanopowder (0.05 g); (b) the degradation percentage of MB under sunlight irradiation for 45 min; (c) the effect of Xenon Lamp (400 W) irradiation on the photodegradation of MB dye (5 mg/L) for all fabricated nanopowder (0.05 g); and (d) the degradation percentage of MB under 400 W Xenon Lamp irradiation for 60 min.
Figure 6. (a) The influence of sunlight illumination on the photodegradation of MB dye (5 mg/L) for all prepared nanopowder (0.05 g); (b) the degradation percentage of MB under sunlight irradiation for 45 min; (c) the effect of Xenon Lamp (400 W) irradiation on the photodegradation of MB dye (5 mg/L) for all fabricated nanopowder (0.05 g); and (d) the degradation percentage of MB under 400 W Xenon Lamp irradiation for 60 min.
Nanomaterials 12 00989 g006
Figure 7. Kinetic study of the catalytic photodegradation of MB solutions using the prepared nanopowders under sunlight (a) zero-order, (b) first-order, and (c) second-order kinetic models, and (d) kinetic constants vs. Eg and Efficiency.
Figure 7. Kinetic study of the catalytic photodegradation of MB solutions using the prepared nanopowders under sunlight (a) zero-order, (b) first-order, and (c) second-order kinetic models, and (d) kinetic constants vs. Eg and Efficiency.
Nanomaterials 12 00989 g007
Figure 8. Under sunlight (a) the effect of the initial dye concentration on the photodegradation for TiO2/2NiO nanopowder, (b) the influence of the photocatalyst dose on photodegradation for TiO2/2NiO nanopowder, and (c) the reusability of TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite for the photodegradation of MB for five cycles.
Figure 8. Under sunlight (a) the effect of the initial dye concentration on the photodegradation for TiO2/2NiO nanopowder, (b) the influence of the photocatalyst dose on photodegradation for TiO2/2NiO nanopowder, and (c) the reusability of TiO2/2NiO nanocomposite for the photodegradation of MB for five cycles.
Nanomaterials 12 00989 g008
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of the charge transfer in TiO2/NiO-based photocatalyst.
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of the charge transfer in TiO2/NiO-based photocatalyst.
Nanomaterials 12 00989 g009
Table 1. The structural parameters of the photocatalysts from XRD data; crystallites sizes (D), interplanar distances (d), and texture coefficients (TC).
Table 1. The structural parameters of the photocatalysts from XRD data; crystallites sizes (D), interplanar distances (d), and texture coefficients (TC).
Samplehkld (A°)D (A°)TC
TiO2 NTs(201)24.413.6572.830.76
(002)28.693.1158.761.87
(−311)33.512.6799.220.84
(311)39.292.2950.350.50
(020)48.251.89252.62.22
(512)61.771.555.260.56
(520)69.821.3557.830.25
NiO NPs(111)37.302.41352.51.15
(200)43.322.09359.41.89
(220)62.911.48301.60.72
(311)75.411.26501.70.24
TiO2/2NiO
(NiO crystallites)
(111)37.372.41352.61.14
(200)43.392.09312.51.86
(220)63.011.48341.20.75
(311)75.521.268030.25
Table 2. The kinetic parameters of the studied models for MB photodegradation using different photocatalysts.
Table 2. The kinetic parameters of the studied models for MB photodegradation using different photocatalysts.
SamplesZero First Second
K0R2K1R2K2R2
TiO2 NTs−0.016030.862420.028380.964710.055290.99367
TiO2/1NiO−0.015400.761180.032450.927560.080200.93822
TiO2/2NiO−0.018480.677130.096820.966001.197360.90219
TiO2/3NiO−0.012700.852150.018650.932240.028680.97726
NiO NPs−0.016460.844770.030870.961700.064870.99384
Table 3. Comparison of the efficiency between the present study and previously reported works of photodegradation of MB dye.
Table 3. Comparison of the efficiency between the present study and previously reported works of photodegradation of MB dye.
CatalystLight SourceIrradiation Time (min)Dye Removal (%)Ref.
1TiO2/2NiOSolar Light2599.5Present work
CdS/TiO2Solar Light3091.9[85]
activated carbon/ TiO2Micro-Wave6099[86]
Cr2S3/GO/TiO2visible light12098.3[87]
Graphene/silica/TiO2visible light6098[88]
TiO2/zeolite/NiUV irradiation12099.08[89]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zayed, M.; Samy, S.; Shaban, M.; Altowyan, A.S.; Hamdy, H.; Ahmed, A.M. Fabrication of TiO2/NiO p-n Nanocomposite for Enhancement Dye Photodegradation under Solar Radiation. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12060989

AMA Style

Zayed M, Samy S, Shaban M, Altowyan AS, Hamdy H, Ahmed AM. Fabrication of TiO2/NiO p-n Nanocomposite for Enhancement Dye Photodegradation under Solar Radiation. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(6):989. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12060989

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zayed, Mohamed, Salsbeel Samy, Mohamed Shaban, Abeer S. Altowyan, Hany Hamdy, and Ashour M. Ahmed. 2022. "Fabrication of TiO2/NiO p-n Nanocomposite for Enhancement Dye Photodegradation under Solar Radiation" Nanomaterials 12, no. 6: 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12060989

APA Style

Zayed, M., Samy, S., Shaban, M., Altowyan, A. S., Hamdy, H., & Ahmed, A. M. (2022). Fabrication of TiO2/NiO p-n Nanocomposite for Enhancement Dye Photodegradation under Solar Radiation. Nanomaterials, 12(6), 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12060989

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop