Next Article in Journal
Temperature-Dependent Optical Properties of Oxidized Graphenes
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Composites for the Removal of F- Anions
Previous Article in Journal
One-Pot Mechanochemical Synthesis of Carbons with High Microporosity and Ordered Mesopores for CO2 Uptake at Ambient Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Facile Preparation of SrZr1-xTixO3 and SrTi1-xZrxO3 Fine Particles Assisted by Dehydration of Zr4+ and Ti4+ Gels under Hydrothermal Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 15
10.3390/nano13152264
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Oxygen Evolution Reaction of Ir Nanodendrites Supported on Antimony Tin Oxide

by
Yu-Chun Chiang
1,2,*,
Zhi-Hui Pu
1 and
Ziyi Wang
1
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan
2
Fuel Cell Center, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(15), 2264; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13152264
Submission received: 14 July 2023 / Revised: 1 August 2023 / Accepted: 5 August 2023 / Published: 7 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials for Chemical Engineering (Volume II))
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, the iridium nanodendrites (Ir NDs) and antimony tin oxide (ATO)-supported Ir NDs (Ir ND/ATO) were prepared by a surfactant-mediated method to investigate the effect of ATO support and evaluate the electrocatalytic activity for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). The nano-branched Ir ND structures were successfully prepared alone or supported on ATO. The Ir NDs exhibited major diffraction peaks of the fcc Ir metal, though the Ir NDs consisted of metallic Ir as well as Ir oxides. Among the Ir ND samples, Ir ND2 showed the highest mass-based OER catalytic activity (116 mA/mg at 1.8 V), while it suffered from high degradation in activity after a long-term test. On the other hand, Ir ND2/ATO had OER activity of 798 mA/mg, and this activity remained >99% after 100 cycles of LSV and the charge transfer resistance increased by less than 3 ohm. The enhanced durability of the OER mass activities of Ir ND2/ATO catalysts over Ir NDs and Ir black could be attributed to the small crystallite size of Ir and the increase in the ratio of Ir (III) to Ir (IV), improving the interactions between the Ir NDs and the ATO support.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen is a clean and efficient energy carrier. When hydrogen is used in the replacement of fossil fuels, the immediate benefits include a reduction in emissions. Water electrolysis is well known as a practical way to produce hydrogen with high purity, which is green when the power is from renewable energy sources [1,2]. Compared to the conventional alkaline electrolysis, the proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) is an alternative and promising technique because of several advantages including high efficiency at high current densities, ease of maintenance, system compactness, and rapid response to startups and shutdowns [2,3,4]. However, the application of PEMWE is limited by the high cost and high loading of the anodic electrocatalysts. The high cost is associated with the use of high loadings of noble metals, where the high loadings are due to the sluggish kinetics of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) [5]. Noble metals, such as iridium (Ir) and ruthenium (Ru) as well as their oxides (IrO2 and RuO2), are currently available electrocatalysts for the OER to provide high corrosion resistance and good catalytic activity [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Since noble metals are expensive and scarce, lowering the loading of the OER noble metal catalyst is necessary for the mass production of hydrogen based on this technology.
The most proposed reaction pathway for OER in acidic media is that of two H2O molecules being oxidized into one oxygen molecule by releasing four H+ ions and four electrons [11]. Since four electrons are transferred, the mechanisms comprise multistep adsorption–desorption reaction processes. The dissolution processes during the cycles with and without hydrous oxide buildup on an iridium metal electrode were suggested [12], and the mechanism of iridium dissolution triggered by OER was also proposed by Cherevko et al. [13]. Ru-based materials have high OER activity; however, they suffer from rapid dissolution due to the formation of volatile tetroxide (RuO4) in OER potential regions; thus, their durability issues must be addressed to ensure practical use [14,15]. In contrast, Ir-based materials possess compatible electrochemical activity and durability and are now the most widely used electrocatalysts for the OER in acid media [16,17].
An increase in the utilization of catalysts facilitates a decrease in the use of catalysts. One attractive strategy for addressing this challenge is to use a support material, which must possess a high surface area, a porous and interconnected structure, corrosion resistance, and high electrical conductivity [18]. The use of a high-surface-area support enables an increase in accessible surface area by decreasing the Ir particle size and increasing the surface-to-mass ratio of the catalyst [19,20]. Supported nanocatalysts were observed to be extremely active toward the OER because they possessed mixed Ir oxidation states and a high density of active sites [21]. Carbon materials are used as the support of the electrocatalysts in the applications of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell. However, carbon materials could not resist the high working potential and harshly acidic environment of water electrolysis. The resultant outcome is carbon corrosion, which results in the migration and agglomeration of the nanocatalysts and even detachment from the surface of the support. Therefore, several metal oxides have been studied as alternatives for carbon materials, such as TiO2, SnO2, doped metal oxides [10,22,23,24], etc.
Most of the metal oxides are semiconductors; thus, doping with hypovalent or hypervalent ions is a prerequisite to high electrical conductivity, but the change in the doping concentration causes severe ohmic losses [18]. Among them, antimony tin oxide (ATO) has attracted much attention because of its nanometer-size scales and relatively high electrical conductivity, compared with most metal oxides. The dispersion of Ir nanoparticles on ATO has been reported to improve the OER activity [10], where the uniform dispersion of Ir nanoparticles and large strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) led to high OER activity of Ir/ATO. It was observed that the introduction of vanadium into ATO support did not provide any more active sites but could change the porosity of the aerogel support and decrease the impurity content of the chlorine [22].
One IrO2/ATO catalyst possessing a current density of 63 A/g Ir at an overpotential of 300 mV versus a reversible hydrogen electrode was reported [23], significantly exceeding a commercial TiO2-supported IrO2 catalyst under the same measurement conditions. Abbou et al. [18] found that the durability of electrochemical activity of IrOx/doped SnO2 aerogels was controlled by the resistance to corrosion of the doping element, and by its concentration in the host SnO2 matrix. Specifically, Sb-doped SnO2 supports continuously dissolve while Ta-doped or Nb-doped SnO2 supports with appropriate doping concentrations are stable under acidic OER conditions. This implied that a complex equilibrium relationship existed between SnO2 and the doping element oxide.
Another approach is to tailor the structure and morphology of the catalysts. For instance, a nanoneedle network of iridium-containing oxides assembled into macroporous micro-scaled particles [9], nanoporous Ir nanosheets [25], a porous nano net cage of RuIrOx hollow particles [26,27], and amorphous Ir-atomic-cluster-deposited ultrathin IrO2 nanoneedles [28] all had high catalytic activity for OER in comparison to a commercial IrO2 nanoparticle catalyst. Claudel et al. [29] investigated the degradation mechanisms of OER electrocatalysts and showed that Ir (III) and Ir (V) were the best-performing Ir valences for the OER.
The highly branched structure of the Ir nanodendrites (Ir NDs) with a particle size of ~10 nm provides an increased active facet area that is available for OER in comparison to a commercial Ir catalyst, resulting in enhanced activity toward OER, though the formation of an anodic IrO2 film on the surface of the Ir NDs was observed [30]. Oh et al. [5] found that Ir NDs supported on ATO were efficient and stable catalysts for water-splitting reactions. The Ir ND catalysts exhibited a kinetic water-splitting activity twofold larger than supported Ir nanoparticles and eightfold larger than commercial Ir blacks. The size of the nanodendrites was highly related to the reaction temperature; specifically, at a higher temperature, smaller particle sizes were produced by the burst-nucleation process [31]. The formation mechanism of Ir NDs was observed to be a time-dependent process, which suggested that Ir ions were first reduced to Ir0 by the reducing agent. Subsequently, the size of the initially formed NPs started to increase as the reaction proceeded. Finally, the NPs self-aggregated, reducing the surface energy, and began to form highly branched dendritic nanostructures through an oriented-attachment formation mechanism [32,33]. Several Ir-based alloy NDs were also studied, including IrPt [34], IrCo [35], and IrW [36], and they usually behaved as bifunctional electrocatalysts.
In this study, the Ir NDs and Ir ND supported on antimony tin oxide (Ir ND/ATO) were prepared. Several material properties were characterized, and the electrocatalytic activity toward OER was evaluated. In addition, the long-term tests and resistance analysis were also investigated. According to the results of this study, ATO can be a good candidate as a support material, and Ir ND/ATO has been demonstrated to be an efficient and stable OER catalyst under a suitable concentration of Ir precursor.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of Ir NDs and Ir ND/ATO

The Ir ND nanostructures were prepared by a surfactant-mediated method [5], where three Ir concentrations in the precursor solution were investigated. Firstly, 0.1 mmol dihydrogen hexachloroiridate (IV) hydrate (H2IrCl6·xH2O, 99%, Alfa Aesar) and 10 mmol tetradecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (TTAB, 99%, Sigma) were dissolved in 75 mL deionized water, where iridium salt: TTAB = 1: 100 mol%, heating to 70 °C with vigorous stirring for 30 min to dissolve the Ir precursor. Then, 50 mg of sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 97%, Riedel-deHaën) was added to the mixture under vigorous stirring, and the color of the solution changed to clear blue. Next, 25 mL ice-cold sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 98%, Aldrich) aqueous solution (150 mM) was added dropwise to the mixture under stirring. After that, mixing continued for 6 h at 70 °C, and the solution was cooled down to room temperature naturally. The products were collected by centrifugation and washed several times with ethanol–water mixtures (1:1 v/v). Then, the sample was dried at 80 °C in a vacuum oven and denoted as Ir ND1.
In order to determine the effect of the concentration of Ir precursor, in this study, the concentration of Ir precursor was 2- and 5-fold that of the Ir ND1, and all chemicals were also proportionally increased except for the amount of deionized water. The products of the Ir ND prepared with 2- and 5-fold concentrations were named Ir ND2 and Ir ND3. For the preparation of Ir ND/ATO, one commercial ATO (nanopowder, <50 nm, 47 m2/g, Aldrich) was dispersed in deionized water (25 mL). This solution was added to the above-mentioned Ir-containing mixture with NaOH, and mixing continued for another 1 h. The following processes were the same as in the previous description.

2.2. Characterization of the Samples

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was employed to observe the morphology of the Ir NDs nanoparticles and Ir NDs deposited on the ATO support using a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi H-7100, Tokyo, Japan). The electrical conductivity (σ, S/cm) of the ATO was calculated using the equation: σ = 1/(Rsh t) [37]. The results were obtained based on the average of ten conductivity measurements on a tablet of 13 mm in diameter. The sheet resistance (Rsh, Ω) of the tablet was measured using a four-point probe (source meter, Keithley 2401, Radiotek, New Taipei City, Taiwan). The thickness of the tablets (t, cm) was determined using a precise vernier caliper, where the resolution of the scale is 0.01 mm. The elemental compositions of Ir NDs and ATO-supported Ir NDs were acquired by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), conducted with a QUANTAX Annular XFlash® QUAD FQ5060 (Bruker, Kanagawa, Japan). X-ray diffraction (XRD) was carried out using a powder diffractometer (Rigaku TTRAX III, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm) to determine the crystal structure. The XRD patterns were collected at a rate of 4°/min over 10–90° in 2θ mode. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was carried out using a spectrophotometer (PHI 5000 VersaProbe II, ULVAC-PHI, Kanagawa, Japan). The spectrophotometer was equipped with an Al- Kα monochromatic source. The XPSPEAK software (version 4.1) was utilized for the deconvolution of the XPS spectra, which is a nonlinear least-squares curve-fitting program.

2.3. Electrochemical Activity Tests

Electrochemical characterization of the electrocatalysts was carried out using a CHI 6116E electrochemical analyzer (CH Instruments, Austin, Texas, USA). A common three-electrode setup and an electrolytic bath filled with 0.1 M HClO4 aqueous solution were used to conduct the electrochemical experiments. A glassy carbon rotating disk electrode (RDE, Pine Research Instrument) of 0.5 cm in diameter with a thin layer of the catalyst ink was used as the working electrode. A saturated calomel electrode (SCE) and a platinum wire were used as the reference and counter electrodes, respectively. The catalyst inks, which consisted of 5 mg catalyst, 0.02 mL Nafion® ionomer (5 wt%, DuPont), 2.49 mL deionized water, and 2.49 mL isopropanol [5], were prepared by magnetic stirring for 48 h. Prior to the measurement, the working electrode was activated using a potential sweep between 0.5 and 1.5 V for 100 cycles at a scan rate of 0.1 V/s (a conditioning step). Then, the polarization curves of OER were measured using the linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) for 100 cycles at a scan rate of 0.005 V/s and 1600 rpm at 30 °C in N2-saturated 0.1 M HClO4 aqueous solution. Moreover, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed to determine the ohmic resistance. The EIS spectra of the samples were recorded at 1.8 V with an ac potential amplitude of 5 mA and a frequency range from 1 Hz to 105 Hz.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physical and Chemical Properties of the Electrocatalysts

TEM images of the samples are shown in Figure 1. It can be seen that Ir NDs could be prepared by the self-assembly of tiny metal seeds using TTAB as an organic capping agent [5,30]. The strong reductant, NaBH4, led to the rapid formation of tiny Ir seeds, and the Ir seeds were self-assembled into a dendritic structure through the guidance of TTAB [38]. Figure 1a shows a single Ir-ND1 composed of three-to-five branches in various directions. When the concentration of Ir precursor increased, the number or width of branches increased (Figure 1b,c). The size of each Ir ND was in the order of 5–15 nm. Figure 1d–e confirm that the Ir NDs could be dispersed uniformly on the surface of ATO supports through the in situ synthesis. In addition, the TEM image of one commercial Ir black (Figure 1f) was provided for comparison.
The elemental compositions of the samples were investigated by EDX analysis, as shown in Table 1. For Ir NDs, the Ir content ranged from 88.1 to 95.5 wt.%, similar to that of Ir black (Premetek). For the ATO-supported Ir NDs, the Ir contents in Ir ND1/ATO and Ir ND2/ATO were 20.9 and 26.1 wt.%, respectively, close to the designed percent (20 wt.%). The Sb/(Sn + Sb) was 15% in ATO, while the ratios reduced when Ir NDs were incorporated onto the surface of ATO. It was expected that some Sb ions would be dissolved during the Ir ND deposition processes. The EDX spectrum of Ir ND2/ATO was used as an example, as shown in Figure 2a. The corresponding atomic percentages are also shown in Table 1.
Figure 2b displays the XRD patterns of all samples. Four major peaks on the patterns of Ir NDs at 40.6, 47.3, 69.1, and 83.4° were assigned to diffractions from the (111), (200), (220) and (311) plans of the Ir metallic face-centered cubic (fcc) structure (JCPDS no. 87-0715), respectively. The XRD patterns of the branched Ir NDs suggested that the obtained nanostructures were primarily composed of pure Ir. For Ir ND2/ATO, the major diffraction peaks of metallic Ir were insignificant, indicating the formation of IrOx species on ATO. The crystallite size (d) of Ir nanoparticles was calculated from the Ir (111) peak according to Scherrer’s equation [39], as shown below:
d = K   λ β cos ⁡ θ
where K is the Scherrer’s constant of 0.9 [40], λ is the X-ray wavelength of Cu-Kα, β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) in radians, and θ is the Bragg angle in radians. The crystallite sizes of Ir ND1, Ir ND2, Ir ND3, and Ir black (Premetek) were 2.28, 1.68, 2.86, and 3.42 nm, respectively.
The chemical states of the samples were investigated by XPS. Figure 3 displays the results of the curve fitting of high-resolution XPS Ir 4f peaks, which confirms the presence of metallic Ir (Ir0), Ir (IV), and Ir (III) phases. The latter two may correspond to the molecular formulas Ir(OH)4 and Ir(OH)3 or IrOx [10]. The existence of Ir oxides may be due to the oxidation of the surface when exposed to air. Table 2 shows the fitting results of the XPS Ir 4f regions for the samples, in which the atomic ratios of Ir 4f were also displayed in the table. Three chemical states of Ir for all samples are illustrated in Figure 4, indicating that the atomic ratio of Ir0 increased as the concentration of Ir precursor increased for unsupported Ir NDs, and Ir ND2 comprised the highest percent of Ir (IV). The phase distribution of Ir ND1 was similar to that of Ir (Premetek).
For Ir ND/ATO samples, the percent of Ir0 increased in comparison to unsupported Ir NDs, indicating that the deposition of Ir NDs on the surface of ATO contributed to the reduction in Ir precursor. In addition, Ir (III)/Ir (IV) was higher in Ir ND2/ATO than in Ir ND1/ATO, for which it was expected that Ir ND2/ATO might have better electrocatalytic activity [24,29].
Figure 5 shows the curve fitting of high-resolution XPS Sn 3d spectra and the atomic ratios are outlined in Table 3. The as-received ATO contained a small portion of Sn (II), though the majority was still Sn (IV). As seen from Figure 6, the XPS Sn 3d regions were only Sn (IV) for Ir ND/ATO, indicating that the oxidation of Sn (II) to form Sn(IV) promoted the reduction in Ir precursor.
The overlapping of Sb 3d5/2 and O 1s regions renders the peak decomposition more complicated. Taking the area ratio of the Sb 3d3/2 peak to Sb 3d5/2 peak as 2 to 3, the peak decomposition could be accomplished [41], as shown in Figure 6 and Table 4. The oxidation state of Sb on ATO was Sb (V), corresponding to the molecular formula of Sb2O5/SnO2. The deposition of Ir NDs was expected to lead to the dissolution of Sb ions in which the degree of loss was dependent on the Ir content. This implies that Sb was not stable in the alkaline environment during the synthesis process of Ir ND/ATO. However, the Sb amount on Ir ND1/ATO and Ir ND2/ATO remained 3 and 2.03 at.%, respectively. Consequently, the oxidation of Sn and Sb in ATO support suppressed the oxidation of Ir0 and Ir (III).

3.2. Electrochemical Properties of the Electrocatalysts

The electrocatalytic activity for the OER of the catalysts was evaluated in acidic electrolytes using the LSV process. Figure 7a shows OER polarization curves of three unsupported Ir NDs, two Ir ND/ATO samples, and one commercial Ir nanoparticle. The mass-based activities at 1.8 V were 113 mA/mg for Ir ND1, 116 mA/mg for Ir ND2, and 106 mA/mg for Ir ND3. All performed slightly lower activity compared to the commercial Ir black (154 mA/mg). Since the catalytic activity of Ir NDs followed the order Ir ND2 > Ir ND1 > IrND3, the ATO-supported Ir NDs were only prepared for Ir ND1 and Ir ND2. The mass activities of ATO-supported Ir NDs at 1.8 V were 414 mA/mg for Ir ND1/ATO and 798 mA/mg for Ir ND2/ATO, significantly higher than unsupported Ir NDs. These excellent activities were attributed to the uniformly distributed intrinsically Ir nano-dendritic structure on the surface of ATO nanoparticles. The electrical conductivity of the ATO support was 0.026 ± 0.001 S/cm by the four-point probe method. The high electrical conductivity of the ATO support was expected to be another reason that the ATO-supported Ir NDs had good activity. The corresponding OER polarization curves (normalized to the geometric disk area) of the samples are shown in Figure 7b, and the optimal activities at 1.8 V for unsupported and ATO-supported Ir NDs occurred at Ir ND2 (0.0060 A/cm2) and Ir ND2/ATO (0.0106 A/cm2), respectively. The Ir-mass-based activity at 1.5, 1.65, and 1.8 V is also displayed in Figure 7c,d for comparison.
A comparison of the mass-based OER activities at 1.8 V on the polarization curves for the 1st and the 100th cycles of LSV is shown in Figure 8. The activity decay of the electrocatalysts increased in the order Ir ND2/ATO < Ir ND1/ATO < Ir ND3 < Ir ND1 < Ir black (Premetek) < Ir ND2. It is evident that the ATO-supported Ir NDs exhibited higher durability than Ir black and unsupported Ir NDs. Specifically, the activity decay of Ir ND2/ATO was only 0.8% after 100 cycles of LSV. The excellent durability of the electrocatalytic activity for Ir ND/ATO was primarily attributed to the in situ synthesis of Ir NDs on the surface of ATO nanoparticles, the uniform dispersion of Ir NDs on the surface of ATO, and good corrosion resistance of ATO in an acidic environment. It is anticipated that the metallic Ir would convert to hydrous Ir oxides upon potential cycling. In addition, strong metal–support interactions would change the electrochemical behavior of the hydrous Ir oxides [10].
The EIS was used to investigate the internal resistances of the electrocatalysts, where the resistance was determined from the width of the semicircles in the X-axis. The Nyquist plots obtained from EIS data are shown in Figure 9. Before the LSV measurements, the Nyquist diagrams of Ir NDs only showed diffusion resistance in the electrolyte, about 20 ohm (Figure 9a–c). The charge transfer resistance occurring at the catalyst–electrolyte interface was observed after 100 cycles of LSV, and the resistances of Ir ND1, Ir ND2, and Ir ND3 were approximately 193, 152, and 151 ohm, respectively. This was highly associated with the OER activity decay.
The ATO-supported Ir NDs displayed a different pattern. Except for the diffusion resistance, another semicircle occurred, indicating the resistance of ATO support, which was about 130 ohm for Ir ND1/ATO and 40 ohm Ir ND2/ATO. It is expected that the effect of ATO on the resistance depends on the interactions between Ir NDs and ATO. The interactions were stronger in Ir ND2/ATO; hence, the resistance from the ATO support was less significant. After 100 cycles of LSV, the resistances of the samples increased to about 170 and 43 ohm for Ir ND1/ATO and Ir ND2/ATO, respectively, which was also related to the activity decay.

4. Conclusions

The results showed that Ir NDs nanostructures were successfully prepared alone or supported on ATO nanoparticles, where the structures of nanodendrites were dependent on the Ir concentrations in the precursor solution. The XRD patterns of Ir NDs exhibited major diffraction peaks, which were indexed to the reflections of the fcc Ir metal. However, for Ir ND/ATO, the major diffraction peaks of metal Ir were insignificant, indicating the formation of IrOx species on ATO. The unsupported and ATO-supported Ir NDs consisted of metallic Ir as well as Ir oxides, which was supported by the results of XPS. Moreover, the oxidation of ATO stimulated the reduction in Ir during the synthesis processes. The mass-based OER catalytic activity at a potential of 1.8 V had the order Ir ND2/ATO (798 mA/mg) > Ir ND1/ATO (414 mA/mg) > Ir black (155 mA/mg) > Ir ND2 (116 mA/mg) > Ir ND1 (113 mA/mg) > Ir ND3 (106 mA/mg). After performing LSV of 100 cycles, the OER catalytic activity of Ir ND2/ATO remained at > 99% of activity, while Ir ND2 had only about 61.4% of the activity left, indicating that Ir NDs supported on ATO significantly improve the durability of the OER catalytic activity. This observation was also supported by the results of EIS, according to which the charge transfer resistance was the lowest on Ir ND2/ATO.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-C.C.; methodology, Y.-C.C.; software, Z.W.; validation, Y.-C.C.; investigation, Z.-H.P.; resources, Y.-C.C.; data curation, Z.-H.P. and Z.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-C.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.-C.C.; visualization, Y.-C.C.; supervision, Y.-C.C.; project administration, Y.-C.C.; funding acquisition, Y.-C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, grant numbers MOST 111-2221-E-155-010- and NSTC 111-2622-E-155-009-.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Instrumentation Center at NTU for performing the TEM and EDX analyses; the Instrumentation Center at NTHU for performing the XRD and XPS analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barbir, F. PEM electrolysis for production of hydrogen from renewable energy sources. Sol. Energy 2005, 78, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Carmo, M.; Fritz, D.L.; Mergel, J.; Stolten, D. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 4901–4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nieminen, J.; Dincer, I.; Naterer, G. Comparative performance analysis of PEM and solid oxide steam electrolysers. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 10842–10850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Buttler, A.; Spliethoff, H. Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 2440–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Oh, H.S.; Nong, H.N.; Reier, T.; Gliech, M.; Strasser, P. Oxide-supported Ir nanodendrites with high activity and durability for the oxygen evolution reaction in acid PEM water electrolyzers. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 3321–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Siracusano, S.; Baglio, V.; Di Blasi, A.; Briguglio, N.; Stassi, A.; Ornelas, R.; Trifoni, E.; Antonucci, V.; Aricò, A.S. Electrochemical characterization of single cell and short stack PEM electrolyzers based on a nanosized IrO2 anode electrocatalyst. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 5558–5568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oh, J.G.; Lee, W.H.; Kim, H. The inhibition of electrochemical carbon corrosion in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells using iridium nanodendrites. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 2455–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Siracusano, S.; Van Dijk, N.; Payne-Johnson, E.; Baglio, V.; Aricò, A.S. Nanosized IrOx and IrRuOx electrocatalysts for the O2 evolution reaction in PEM water electrolysers. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2015, 164, 488–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Faustini, M.; Giraud, M.; Jones, D.; Rozière, J.; Dupont, M.; Porter, T.R.; Nowak, S.; Bahri, M.; Ersen, O.; Sanchez, C.; et al. Hierarchically structured ultraporous iridium-based materials: A novel catalyst architecture for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1802136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hartig-Weiss, A.; Miller, M.; Beyer, H.; Schmitt, A.; Siebel, A.; Freiberg, A.T.S.; Gasteiger, H.A.; El-Sayed, H.A. Iridium oxide catalyst supported on antimony-doped tin oxide for high oxygen evolution reaction activity in acidic media. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 2185–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, H.J.; Yoon, H.; Ju, B.; Kim, D.W. Highly efficient perovskite-based electrocatalysts for water oxidation in acidic environments: A Mini Review. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2002428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cherevko, S.; Geiger, S.; Kasian, O.; Mingers, A.; Mayrhofer, K.J.J. Oxygen evolution activity and stability of iridium in acidic media. Part 1.—Metallic iridium. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 773, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cherevko, S.; Geiger, S.; Kasian, O.; Mingers, A.; Mayrhofer, K.J.J. Oxygen evolution activity and stability of iridium in acidic media. Part 2.—Electrochemically grown hydrous iridium oxide. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 774, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roy, C.; Rao, R.R.; Stoerzinger, K.A.; Hwang, J.; Rossmeisl, J.; Chorkendorff, I.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Stephens, I.E.L. Trends in activity and dissolution on RuO2 under oxygen evolution conditions: Particles versus well-defined extended surfaces. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 2045–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, Z.; Duan, X.; Wei, W.; Wang, S.; Ni, B.J. Electrocatalysts for acidic oxygen evolution reaction: Achievements and perspectives. Nano Energy 2020, 78, 105392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, Z.; Duan, X.; Wei, W.; Wang, S.; Ni, B.J. Iridium-based nanomaterials for electrochemical water splitting. Nano Energy 2020, 78, 105270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. She, L.; Zhao, G.; Ma, T.; Chen, J.; Sun, W.; Pan, H. On the durability of iridium-based electrocatalysts toward the oxygen evolution reaction under acid environment. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2108465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abbou, S.; Chattot, R.; Martin, V.; Claudel, F.; Solà-Hernandez, L.; Beauger, C.; Dubau, L.; Maillard, F. Manipulating the corrosion resistance of SnO2 aerogels through doping for efficient and durable oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis in acidic media. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 7283–7294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hayden, B.E. Particle size and support effects in electrocatalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1858–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Puthiyapura, V.K.; Mamlouk, M.; Pasupathi, S.; Pollet, B.G.; Scott, K. Physical and electrochemical evaluation of ATO supported IrO2 catalyst for proton exchange membrane water electrolyser. J. Power Sources 2014, 269, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Da Silva, C.D.F.; Claudel, F.; Martin, V.; Chattot, R.; Abbou, S.; Kumar, K.; Jiménez-Morales, I.; Cavaliere, S.; Jones, D.; Rozière, J.; et al. Oxygen evolution reaction activity and stability benchmarks for supported and unsupported IrOx electrocatalysts. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 4107–4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, L.; Song, F.; Ozouf, G.; Geiger, D.; Morawietz, T.; Handl, M.; Gazdzicki, P.; Beauger, C.; Kaiser, U.; Hiesgen, R.; et al. Improving the activity and stability of Ir catalysts for PEM electrolyzer anodes by SnO2: Sb aerogel supports: Does V addition play an active role in electrocatalysis? J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 3172–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Böhm, D.; Beetz, M.; Schuster, M.; Peters, K.; Hufnagel, A.G.; Döblinger, M.; Böller, B.; Bein, T.; Fattakhova-Rohlfing, D. Efficient OER catalyst with low Ir volume density obtained by homogeneous deposition of iridium oxide nanoparticles on macroporous antimony-doped tin oxide support. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1906670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kim, E.J.; Shin, J.; Bak, J.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, K.H.; Song, D.H.; Roh, J.H.; Lee, Y.; Kim, H.W.; Lee, K.S.; et al. Stabilizing role of Mo in TiO2-MoOx supported Ir catalyst toward oxygen evolution reaction. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2021, 280, 119433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chatterjee, S.; Peng, X.; Intikhab, S.; Zeng, G.; Kariuki, N.N.; Myers, D.J.; Danilovic, N.; Snyder, J. Nanoporous iridium nanosheets for polymer electrolyte membrane electrolysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhuang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xu, C.Q.; Liu, S.; Chen, C.; Peng, Q.; Zhuang, Z.; Xiao, H.; Pan, Y.; Lu, S.; et al. Three-dimensional open nano-netcage electrocatalysts for efficient pH-universal overall water splitting. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, Y.Z.; Yang, M.; Ding, Y.M.; Li, N.W.; Yu, L. Recent advances in complex hollow electrocatalysts for water splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2108681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lim, J.; Kang, G.; Lee, J.W.; Jeon, S.; Jeon, H.; Kang, P.W.; Lee, H. Amorphous Ir atomic clusters anchored on crystalline IrO2 nanoneedles for proton exchange membrane water oxidation. J. Power Sources 2022, 524, 231069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Claudel, F.; Dubau, L.; Berthome, G.; Sola-Hernandez, L.; Beauger, C.; Piccolo, L.; Maillard, F. Degradation mechanisms of oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts: A combined identical-location transmission electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 4688–4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lee, W.H.; Kim, H. Oxidized iridium nanodendrites as catalysts for oxygen evolution reactions. Catal. Commun. 2011, 12, 408–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, C.; Oh, J.-G.; Kim, Y.-T.; Kim, H.; Lee, H. Platinum dendrites with controlled sizes for oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochem. Commun. 2010, 12, 1596–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, C.; Xiao, G.J.; Sui, Y.M.; Yang, X.Y.; Liu, G.; Jia, M.J.; Han, W.; Liu, B.B.; Zou, B. Synthesis of dendritic iridium nanostructures based on the oriented attachment mechanism and their enhanced CO and ammonia catalytic activities. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 15059–15065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chaudhari, N.K.; Joo, J.; Kwon, H.; Kim, B.; Kim, H.Y.; Joo, S.H.; Lee, K. Nanodendrites of platinum-group metals for electrocatalytic applications. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 6111–6140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, G.; Shao, Z.G.; Lu, W.; Li, G.; Liu, F.; Yi, B. One-pot synthesis of Ir@Pt nanodendrites as highly active bifunctional electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution in acidic medium. Electrochem. Commun. 2012, 22, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fu, L.; Zeng, X.; Cheng, G.; Luo, W. IrCo nanodendrite as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting under acidic conditions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 24993–24998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lv, F.; Feng, J.; Wang, K.; Dou, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, J.; Yang, C.; Luo, M.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; et al. Iridium−tungsten alloy nanodendrites as pH-universal water-splitting electrocatalysts. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 1244–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Fadil, Y.; Dinh, L.N.M.; Yap, M.O.Y.; Kuchel, R.P.; Yao, Y.; Omura, T.; Aregueta-Robles, U.A.; Song, N.; Huang, S.; Jasinski, F.; et al. Ambient-temperature waterborne polymer/rGO nanocomposite films: Effect of rGO distribution on electrical conductivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 48450–48458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gu, J.; Zhang, Y.W.; Tao, F. Shape control of bimetallic nanocatalysts through well-designed colloidal chemistry approaches. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 8050–8065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Li, W.; Liang, C.; Zhou, W.; Qui, J.; Zhou, Z.; Sun, G.; Xin, Q. Preparation and characterization of multiwalled carbon nanotube-supported platinum for cathode catalysts of direct methanol fuel cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 6292–6299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kojima, Y.; Suzuki, K.I.; Fukumoto, K.; Sasaki, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Kawai, Y.; Hayashi, H. Hydrogen generation using sodium borohydride solution and metal catalyst coated on metal oxide. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2002, 27, 1029–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jiménez-Morales, I.; Cavaliere, S.; Dupont, M.; Jones, D.; Roziere, J. On the stability of antimony doped tin oxide supports in proton exchange membrane fuel cell and water electrolysers. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2019, 3, 1526–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g001
Figure 1. TEM images of the samples: (a) Ir ND1; (b) Ir ND2; (c) Ir ND3; (d) Ir ND1/ATO; (e) Ir ND2/ATO; (f) ATO; (g) Ir black (Premetek). The yellow circles show the number or width of branches increased as the concentration of Ir precursor increased.
Figure 1. TEM images of the samples: (a) Ir ND1; (b) Ir ND2; (c) Ir ND3; (d) Ir ND1/ATO; (e) Ir ND2/ATO; (f) ATO; (g) Ir black (Premetek). The yellow circles show the number or width of branches increased as the concentration of Ir precursor increased.
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g001
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g002
Figure 2. (a) EDX pattern of Ir ND2/ATO. (b) XRD patterns of all samples.
Figure 2. (a) EDX pattern of Ir ND2/ATO. (b) XRD patterns of all samples.
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g002
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g003
Figure 3. Curve fitting of high-resolution XPS Ir 4f spectra for the samples: (a) Ir ND1; (b) Ir ND2; (c) Ir ND3; (d) Ir ND1/ATO; (e) Ir ND2/ATO; (f) Ir black (Premetek).
Figure 3. Curve fitting of high-resolution XPS Ir 4f spectra for the samples: (a) Ir ND1; (b) Ir ND2; (c) Ir ND3; (d) Ir ND1/ATO; (e) Ir ND2/ATO; (f) Ir black (Premetek).
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g003
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g004
Figure 4. The different chemical states of surface Ir contents from XPS analysis for all samples.
Figure 4. The different chemical states of surface Ir contents from XPS analysis for all samples.
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g004
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g005
Figure 5. Curve fitting of high-resolution XPS Sn 3d spectra for the samples: (a) ATO; (b) Ir ND1/ATO; (c) Ir ND2/ATO.
Figure 5. Curve fitting of high-resolution XPS Sn 3d spectra for the samples: (a) ATO; (b) Ir ND1/ATO; (c) Ir ND2/ATO.
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g005
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g006
Figure 6. Curve fitting of high-resolution XPS Sb 3d and O 1s spectra for the samples: (a) ATO; (b) Ir ND1/ATO; (c) Ir ND2/ATO.
Figure 6. Curve fitting of high-resolution XPS Sb 3d and O 1s spectra for the samples: (a) ATO; (b) Ir ND1/ATO; (c) Ir ND2/ATO.
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g006
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g007
Figure 7. Electrocatalytic OER activity of the catalysts: (a) mass activity; (b) current density; the Ir-mass-based activity at 1.5, 1.65, and 1.8 V: (c) unsupported Ir; (d) Ir ND/ATO.
Figure 7. Electrocatalytic OER activity of the catalysts: (a) mass activity; (b) current density; the Ir-mass-based activity at 1.5, 1.65, and 1.8 V: (c) unsupported Ir; (d) Ir ND/ATO.
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g007
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g008
Figure 8. Degradation of electrocatalytic OER activity of the catalysts at 1.8 V: (a) Ir ND1; (b) Ir ND2; (c) Ir ND3; (d) Ir ND1/ATO; (e) Ir ND2/ATO; (f) Ir black (Premetek).
Figure 8. Degradation of electrocatalytic OER activity of the catalysts at 1.8 V: (a) Ir ND1; (b) Ir ND2; (c) Ir ND3; (d) Ir ND1/ATO; (e) Ir ND2/ATO; (f) Ir black (Premetek).
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g008
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g009
Figure 9. Nyquist plots of the catalysts: (a) Ir ND1; (b) Ir ND2; (c) Ir ND3; (d) Ir ND1/ATO; (e) Ir ND2/ATO; (f) Ir black (Premetek).
Figure 9. Nyquist plots of the catalysts: (a) Ir ND1; (b) Ir ND2; (c) Ir ND3; (d) Ir ND1/ATO; (e) Ir ND2/ATO; (f) Ir black (Premetek).
Nanomaterials 13 02264 g009
Table 1. The elemental compositions of the samples from EDX analysis.
Table 1. The elemental compositions of the samples from EDX analysis.
SampleElemental Composition
Weight Percentage (wt.%)Atomic Percentage (at.%)
IrOSnSbIrOSnSb
Ir ND188.811.2——39.860.2——
Ir ND288.111.9——38.261.8——
Ir ND395.54.5——63.6336.37——
Ir ND1/ATO20.913.759.55.97.256.533.13.2
Ir ND2/ATO26.114.656.42.98.759.030.71.6
Ir black (Premetek)92.87.2——51.748.3——
ATO—31.358.310.4—77.219.43.4
Table 2. Results of fitting of the XPS Ir 4f region for the samples; values given in at.% of total intensity.
Table 2. Results of fitting of the XPS Ir 4f region for the samples; values given in at.% of total intensity.
SampleIr 4fBinding Energy (eV)
IroIr (IV)Ir (III)
60.863.861.964.962.765.7
Ir ND116.63.30 2.48 2.07 1.55 4.11 3.09
Ir ND226.15.90 4.43 4.47 3.35 4.54 3.41
Ir ND332.38.43 6.32 0.66 0.50 9.37 7.03
Ir ND1/ATO5.512.07 1.55 0.40 0.30 0.68 0.51
Ir ND2/ATO6.681.96 1.47 0.28 0.21 1.59 1.19
Ir black (Premetek)37.47.90 5.92 4.26 3.20 9.21 6.91
Table 3. Results of fitting of the XPS Sn 3d region for the samples; values given in at.% of total intensity.
Table 3. Results of fitting of the XPS Sn 3d region for the samples; values given in at.% of total intensity.
SampleSn 3dBinding Energy (eV)
Sn (II)Sn (IV)
486.5494.91486.7495.11
ATO23.31.71 1.14 12.27 8.18
Ir ND1/ATO21.1— — 12.66 8.44
Ir ND2/ATO23.32— — 13.99 9.33
Table 4. Results of fitting of the XPS Sb 3d and O 1s regions for the samples; values given in at.% of total intensity.
Table 4. Results of fitting of the XPS Sb 3d and O 1s regions for the samples; values given in at.% of total intensity.
SampleSb3dO1sBinding Energy (eV)
Sb (V)C=OC-OH-COOH
531.5540.88531.5532.7533.7
ATO10.965.86.54 4.36 56.80 6.38 2.62
Ir ND1/ATO370.391.80 1.20 46.71 14.46 9.23
Ir ND2/ATO2.0367.971.22 0.81 51.69 6.02 10.25
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiang, Y.-C.; Pu, Z.-H.; Wang, Z. Study on Oxygen Evolution Reaction of Ir Nanodendrites Supported on Antimony Tin Oxide. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13152264

AMA Style

Chiang Y-C, Pu Z-H, Wang Z. Study on Oxygen Evolution Reaction of Ir Nanodendrites Supported on Antimony Tin Oxide. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(15):2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13152264

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiang, Yu-Chun, Zhi-Hui Pu, and Ziyi Wang. 2023. "Study on Oxygen Evolution Reaction of Ir Nanodendrites Supported on Antimony Tin Oxide" Nanomaterials 13, no. 15: 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13152264

APA Style

Chiang, Y. -C., Pu, Z. -H., & Wang, Z. (2023). Study on Oxygen Evolution Reaction of Ir Nanodendrites Supported on Antimony Tin Oxide. Nanomaterials, 13(15), 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13152264

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop