Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Strength and Ductility of a Ni-26.6Co-18.4Cr-4.1Mo-2.3Al-0.3Ti-5.4Nb Alloy via Nanosized Precipitations, Stacking Faults, and Nanotwins
Previous Article in Journal
Chitosan Nanoparticle-Mediated Delivery of Curcumin Suppresses Tumor Growth in Breast Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Valley-Dependent Electronic Properties of Metal Monochalcogenides GaX and Janus Ga2XY (X, Y = S, Se, and Te)

Department of Physics, Graphene Research Institute, Quantum Information Science and Technology Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(15), 1295; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14151295
Submission received: 6 June 2024 / Revised: 10 July 2024 / Accepted: 12 July 2024 / Published: 31 July 2024

Abstract

:
Two-dimensional (2D) materials have shown outstanding potential for new devices based on their interesting electrical properties beyond conventional 3D materials. In recent years, new concepts such as the valley degree of freedom have been studied to develop valleytronics in hexagonal lattice 2D materials. We investigated the valley degree of freedom of GaX and Janus GaXY (X, Y = S, Se, Te). By considering the spin–orbit coupling (SOC) effect in the band structure calculations, we identified the Rashba-type spin splitting in band structures of Janus Ga2SSe and Ga2STe. Further, we confirmed that the Zeeman-type spin splitting at the K and K’ valleys of GaX and Janus Ga2XY show opposite spin contributions. We also calculated the Berry curvatures of GaX and Janus GaXY. In this study, we find that GaX and Janus Ga2XY have a similar magnitude of Berry curvatures, while having opposite signs at the K and K’ points. In particular, GaTe and Ga2SeTe have relatively larger Berry curvatures of about 3.98 Å2 and 3.41 Å2, respectively, than other GaX and Janus Ga2XY.

1. Introduction

Since electronic devices were first developed, one has tried to control the electrons in materials more precisely. By handling the charge and spin of an electron in three-dimensional (3D) materials, we have made various types of electronic devices such as transistors, diodes, magnetic memory devices, and so on. In 2004, it was discovered that graphene shows excellent atomic, mechanical and electronic properties [1,2,3,4,5]. Since the discovery of graphene, various 2D materials have received much attention from the scientific community because of their excellent atomic and electronic properties. Particularly, many researchers have mainly focused on making electronic devices by using 2D materials to replace or complement conventional 3D materials, and thus have shown their outstanding potential for electronic devices based on their interesting electrical properties beyond conventional 3D materials [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. In addition, as research on various 2D materials progressed, studies on Janus 2D materials, which comprise sandwich configurations with different atoms, were also conducted. The absence of inversion symmetry in a Janus 2D monolayer materials leads to high piezoelectric properties. Due to these characteristics, research is being conducted on the piezoelectric properties of these materials, as well as on their thermoelectric properties and phototactic behaviors [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].
Recently, a new concept of ‘valleytronics’ based on the valley degree of freedom has been suggested in relation to hexagonal lattice 2D materials. The valley degree of freedom, which is a new method to control electrons, means that there are maximum or minimum points of band structures having the same energy at different momentum values. Interestingly, the valley degree of freedom in 2D materials is free of intervalley scattering since the positions of valleys in momentum space are far separated from each other. At valleys, Zeeman-type spin splitting by spin–orbit coupling (SOC) gives the possibility of significant spin-valley coupling [26,27]. In addition to Zeeman-type spin splitting, Rashba-type spin splitting driven from the potential gradient or electric field induced by broken mirror inversion symmetry has been studied for valleytronics and spintronics [26,27]. Recently, because valleys naturally exist in band structures of various materials, there have been many experimental reports concerning the control of electrons through the valley degree of freedom [28,29,30,31,32]. Optical valley pumping is the first way to do so. In transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) with the formula MX2 (M = TM, X = chalcogens), two valleys at the K and K′ points have the same energy values with contributions by opposite spins due to the time reversal symmetry, and Zeeman-type spin splitting at the K and K′ points is large due to the orbital magnetic moment resulting from the orbital motion of electrons [33,34,35]. Thus, different spin contributes to each valley at the K and K′ points, and one can experimentally excite the electrons through a specific valley using polarized light [36,37]. The second is the valley Hall effect. Interestingly, as the Hall effect is controlled by a Lorentz force proportional to the magnetic field on a moving electron, the formula describing the valley Hall effect is related to the cross product of the electric field and Berry curvature that acts like a magnetic field on moving electrons. Note that since the Berry curvature is defined by the crystal structure of a given material, an external magnetic field does not have to be applied to the material to obtain the valley Hall effect [38,39,40,41]. Based on various methods of controlling electrons through valleys including the two methods mentioned above, 2D materials like TMDs and Janus TMDs (MXY, X, Y = chalcogen) have been proposed as candidates for valleytronics [42,43,44,45]. The relation between valleytronics and TMD materials has been thoroughly explored in various studies [46,47]. However, until now, most studies of valleytronics of 2D materials have been limited to TMDs, while there are few reports of other 2D materials like metal monochalcogenides (MMCs).
In this study, among various 2D materials, we focus on MMCs and Janus MMCs showing good physical and electrical properties for device applications. Specifically, we consider GaX (or Ga2X2) and Janus Ga2XY (X, Y = S, Se, Te), the electronic structures of which are investigated for future valleytronic device applications using density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The details of the electronic structure are studied using band structure and Berry curvature calculations.

2. Calculation Methods

For investigations of GaX and Janus Ga2XY, we perform DFT calculations within the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) for the exchange-correlation (xc) functionals [48,49], implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP). The kinetic energy cut-off is set to 400 eV, and the projector-augmented wave potentials (PAW) are used to treat the ion-electron interaction [50,51,52,53]. For the van der Waals (vdW) corrections, we use Grimme’s DFT-D3 method based on a semiempirical GGA-type theory [54]. To remove artificial interaction between the adjacent slabs, we use a vacuum region of about 20 Å. The SOC effect is considered in the electronic structure calculations. In the DFT calculations, we consider (1 × 1) hexagonal unit cells of monolayer GaX and Janus Ga2XY. Furthermore, we use the (12 × 12 × 1) grid in the gamma-centered scheme for the Brillouin zone integration. The Hellmann–Feynman forces and energy convergence criteria are set to 0.01 eV/Å and 10–5 eV for ionic relaxation, respectively. Moreover, to study the thermal stability of GaX and Janus Ga2XY, we perform an ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulation. The NVT ensemble is considered, and the simulation temperature is set to 300 K. The (6 × 6) hexagonal unit cell for AIMD simulation is used, and the total simulation time is set to 5000 fs, while each time step is 1 fs.
The Berry curvature is a fundamental physical quantity that plays a pivotal role in the study of topological materials. The Berry curvature Ω i j is defined as Ω i j = i A j j A i , where i and j are partial derivative operators with respect to parameters in the parameter space, and A i and A j are the components of the Berry connection. The Berry connection A i is defined as A i = i u k | i u k , where | u k represents the periodic part of the Bloch state, which encapsulates the geometric properties of the electronic state, and k is the wavevector in the Brillouin Zone. The Berry curvature can be expressed using Bloch states as follows [55,56,57]:
Ω i j = i i u k | j u k j u k | i u k
In our calculations, we use VASPBERRY software (ver. 1.0, Jülich, Germany) [58] to investigate the Berry curvature for the Janus GaX and Ga2XY materials.

3. Results and Discussion

The structures of monolayer GaX and Janus Ga2XY have two Ga atoms at the center and two chalcogen atoms located outside of the Ga atoms in their hexagonal unit cell. Figure 1 shows the optimized structure of Janus Ga2XY, which can be obtained by replacing the X atom of GaX (=Ga2X2) with a Y atom. The structural parameters of monolayer GaX and Janus Ga2XY, such as lattice constants, bond lengths and angles, are given in Table 1. The results show that the lattice parameters (a) of Janus Ga2XY are close to the average values of the lattice parameters of GaX and GaY. The bond length between Ga atoms (dGa-Ga) does not change depending on the type of chalcogen atom. The bond lengths (dGa-X, dGa-Y) and angles (θ1 and θ2) increase when the atomic number of chalcogen atoms is increased. Clearly, the structural mirror inversion symmetry of Janus Ga2XY is broken. Next, we calculate the plane-averaged local potentials of monolayer GaX and Janus Ga2XY. As shown in Figure 2, the difference in local potential (△ φ ) between the upper and lower sides of GaX is zero for every GaX. However, the △ φ values of Ga2XY are nonzero, which means that the charge transfer occurs between the X and Y atoms and an internal dipole moment in the out-of-plane direction is induced in Ga2XY. To examine the charge transfer analysis, the Bader charge analysis method was employed. In the Badger charge analysis of Ga2XY, a charge redistribution from Ga atoms to X and Y atoms was observed, indicating that the △ φ can be attributed to the charge transfer mechanism. Because the △ φ values are obviously proportional to the dipole moment [59] and represent the difference in work function and also the potential gradient of GaX and Ga2XY, we confirm that Ga2STe has the largest internal dipole moment among the Ga2XY, as shown in Table 1. In particular, internal dipole moment for the Janus Ga2XY materials occurs from the higher number of chalcogen atoms to the lower number of chalcogen atoms.
To study the thermal stability of monolayer GaX and Janus Ga2XY, we perform ab-initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) calculations. The temperature is set at room temperature (RT, 300 K), while the time step and the total simulation time are 1 fs and 5000 fs, respectively. After relaxation at RT, we plot the total energies as a function of time in Figure 3. Only a small range of fluctuation in total energy is shown, and there is no structural destruction in GaX and Ga2XY after 5000 fs, which implies that GaX and Ga2XY have good thermal stability at RT. The stability of Ga2XY and other Janus materials was demonstrated by previous results and supported by phonon calculations [60,61,62]. Recently, by using the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method, the successful synthesis of 2H Janus MoSSe was reported [63,64]. In this regard, we expect that Janus Ga2XY with a 2H structure like Janus MoSSe can be synthesized by the same experimental method used for making Janus MoSSe.
Next, we investigate the electronic structure of GaX and Janus Ga2XY by using band structure calculations. For the calculations below, the hexagonal Brillouin zone for GaX and Janus Ga2XY are used, as shown in Figure 4a, while schematic diagrams for Rashba-type spin splitting, Zeeman-type spin splitting, and the directional change in valley spins depending on the Berry curvature are given in Figure 4b–d, respectively. To study the valley-contrasting effect at the K and K′ points, we choose a symmetry path including K and K′. Figure 5 presents band structures of GaX and Janus Ga2XY along the symmetric path, obtained by considering SOC interaction. The up- and down-spin contributions determined by the size of circle are represented by red and blue colors, respectively. The valence band maximum (VBM) points of GaX and Ga2SSe are located between the K and Γ points, while Ga2STe and Ga2SeTe have VBM points at the Γ point. In the conduction band, all GaX and Ga2XY, except for GaTe, have the conduction band minimum (CBM) at the Γ point. These VBM and CBM points align closely with those depicted in both experimental and theoretical results [65,66]. Thus, GaX and Janus Ga2SSe have indirect band gaps with VBM between the K and Γ points and CBM at the Γ point, but the Janus GaSTe and GaSeTe have direct band gaps with both VBM and CBM located at the Γ point. In addition, the order of band gap size is found to be GaS (2.46 eV) > Ga2SSe (2.16 eV) > GaSe (1.89 eV) > GaTe (1.50 eV) > Ga2SeTe (0.98 eV) > Ga2STe (0.64 eV). Indeed, GaX and Janus Ga2XY show a wide range of band gaps.
To understand the SOC effect on band structure calculations, we study Zeeman-type and Rashba-type spin splitting in GaX and Janus Ga2XY induced by the presence of the intrinsic out-of-plane electric field or dipole moment due to inversion symmetry breaking. Basically, a strong potential gradient causes the SOC effect, and inversion symmetry breaking of the Janus structure increases the out-of-plane electric field. For example, it was reported that Zeeman-type spin splitting and Rashba-type spin splitting are identified at Janus MoSSe by out-of-plane intrinsic electric fields. Based on these results, MoSSe suggests a great possibility for applications in 2D spintronics and valleytronics [67]. In Janus Ga2SSe and Ga2STe, the Rashba-type spin splitting indicating band crossing or splitting at the Γ point is found, as shown in Figure 5d,e, but there seems to be no Rashba-type spin splitting in GaX and Ga2SeTe. In Janus Ga2SSe and Ga2STe, the band splitting by Rashba-type spin splitting does not occur at the VBM points. Instead, such band splitting occurs at the bands just below the VBM in both materials. For device applications utilizing the band structure changes induced by the Janus MMC materials, band splitting would be most effective if it occurred at the VBM. While neither material is ideal in this respect, Ga2SSe is relatively better for practical use because the energy difference ER is larger in Ga2SSe than in Ga2STe. In addition, to estimate the amount of Rashba-type spin splitting, we calculate the Rashba coefficient (αR = 2ER/KR), where ER is the Rashba energy defined by the VBM energy measured from the energy at Γ point, and KR is the momentum offset defined by the momentum distance from the Γ point to VBM point, as shown in Figure 4b. The Rashba coefficients of Janus Ga2SSe and Ga2STe are 0.678 meV Å and 1.72 meV Å, respectively. In terms of reciprocal space, Janus Ga2SSe shows the Rashba effect on Γ point, while the VBM point is not located at K or K′ point, which means that the electrons lying at the Γ point are hard to control, and thus, utilization of the Rashba effect at the Γ point is difficult. In contrast, the VBM points of Janus Ga2STe and Ga2SeTe are located at Γ points.
In addition to the Rashba-type spin splitting, we obtain the Zeeman-type spin splitting in GaX and Janus Ga2XY. It is confirmed that the K and K′ valleys have opposite spin contributions. The valley polarization is one of the useful ways to exploit the valley degree of freedom. Recently, various experimental methods such as optical pumping have been reported and enable one to control spin selectively under the valley optical selection rule [36,37]. As shown in Table 1, the order of magnitude for the Zeeman-type spin splitting is GaS (202 meV) > GaTe (180 meV) > Ga2SSe (97 meV) > GaSe (65 meV) = Ga2SeTe (65 meV) > Ga2STe (43 meV). However, the selectively excited states of K and K′ formed by optical valley pumping generate nonequilibrium distributions of carriers, which is related to carrier lifetime due to carrier recombination. Based on recent studies, GaX and Ga2XY monolayers exhibit valley properties comparable to those of TMDs. For instance, the valley-spin filtering mechanism in TMDs is attributed to metal-induced gap states (MIGS). This research contributes to a fundamental understanding and provides design guidelines for efficient valley-spin filter devices based on hexagonal monolayers with broken inversion symmetry [68]. Additionally, the potential of valley-dependent Lorentz forces in strained TMDs to induce valley separation is discussed [69]. This mechanism, coupled with the Zeeman-type spin splitting observed in our GaX and Ga2XY systems, suggests potential applications in valleytronic devices where valley-dependent filtering could be utilized.
The few-layer structure of InSe demonstrates a strong Dresselhaus-type SOC induced by its inversion-asymmetric gamma phase [70]. These features are pivotal for the practical application of SOC effects in Janus materials or alloys. The narrower band gap of few-layer crystals may facilitate doping through gating methods for device integration, while the interlayer hopping asymmetry could lead to significant SOC effects, even in sublayer mixed alloys. For these reasons, we investigate the Dresselhaus-type SOC effects on Janus Ga2XY materials. We calculate spin-texture to determine whether it exhibits Dresselhaus-type or Rashba-type spin splitting. As depicted in Figure 6, spin splitting occurs in Janus Ga2XY, confirming it to be of Rashba-type. To better illustrate spin splitting, spin textures are plotted from the Fermi level at various positions. The split bands display opposite helical spin textures in Rashba-type materials, whereas Dresselhaus spin splitting exhibits parallel spin polarization along kx and ky in the band dispersion curves. Therefore, there is no need to consider Dresselhaus-type spin splitting in our calculations.
For this reason, the Berry curvature Ω(k) has been actively investigated to expand carrier lifetime since a larger Berry curvature implies more difficult recombination and a longer lifetime. As shown in Figure 4d, the Berry curvature causes carriers to have transverse velocity, which is described by r ˙ = 1 E ( k ) k r ˙ × Ω ( k ) using the semiclassical picture. Interestingly, since the Berry curvature has an opposite sign to the out-of-plane direction at K and K′, the transverse velocity reduces the recombination of carriers. Figure 7 shows the Berry curvature Ω(k) of GaX and Janus Ga2XY, where the positive and negative signs of the Berry curvature are drawn in red and blue, respectively. The Berry curvature values indicate high symmetry, i.e., 3-fold symmetry, from the Γ point. It is confirmed that GaX and Janus Ga2XY have the same magnitude but opposite signs to the Berry curvature at K and K′, as shown in the line profile from A to B points in Figure 6. Therefore, excited carriers such as up and down spins have different transverse directions under the electric field. In detail, a comparison of line profiles of the Berry curvature shows that GaTe (3.98 Å2) and Ga2SeTe (3.41 Å2) have bigger Berry curvature values at K and K′ than other GaX and Janus Ga2XY.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we have investigated the atomic and electronic properties of GaX and Janus Ga2XY using first-principles calculations. We found that GaX and Janus Ga2XY show structural stability at room temperature using AIMD calculations. Inversion symmetry breaking in Janus Ga2XY leads to internal dipole moments, pointing in the out-of-plane direction in the Janus structure. Next, we studied the band structure of GaX and Janus Ga2XY where their band gaps range widely from 0.64 eV to 2.64 eV. In addition, Zeeman-type spin splitting and Rashba-type spin splitting were studied by considering the SOC effect on the band structure. In Janus Ga2SSe and Ga2STe, Rashba-type spin splitting was observed, indicating a band crossing or splitting, while in GaX and Ga2SeTe, there is no Rashba-type spin splitting. On the other hand, in GaX and Janus Ga2XY, we confirmed opposite spin contributions to the Zeeman-type spin splitting at K and K′. The largest value of the Zeeman-type spin splitting is 202 meV (GaS) and its smallest value is 43 meV (Ga2STe). We calculated the Berry curvature, finding that GaX and Janus Ga2XY have the same magnitude but opposite sign of Berry curvature at K and K′. Especially GaTe and Ga2SeTe show larger Berry curvatures (3.98 Å2 and 3.41 Å2, respectively) than other GaX and Janus Ga2XY. Considering the effect of strain, it is conjectured that the distortion of the Berry curvature occurs due to the distortion observed in the K-space [42]. Our study provides a deep understanding of GaX and Janus Ga2XY for use in valleytronics and spintronics applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H.; data curation, formal analysis, and investigation, J.K., Y.K., D.S. and S.H.; writing, J.K., Y.K., D.S. and S.H.; funding acquisition, S.H.; supervision, S.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the NRF (2021R1A4A1031900, 2022M3H4A1A04096396, and RS-2024-00355708) and the IITP (RS-2024-00437191) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), Korea.

Data Availability Statement

Our data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Manzeli, S.; Ovchinnikov, D.; Pasquier, D.; Yazyev, O.V.; Kis, A. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Das, S.; Robinson, J.A.; Dubey, M.; Terrones, H.; Terrones, M. Beyond Graphene: Progress in Novel Two-Dimensional Materials and van der Waals Solids. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2015, 45, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chaves, A.; Azadani, J.G.; Alsalman, H.; da Costa, D.R.; Frisenda, R.; Chaves, A.J.; Song, S.H.; Kim, Y.D.; He, D.; Zhou, J.; et al. Bandgap engineering of two-dimensional semiconductor materials. NPJ 2D Mater. Appl. 2020, 4, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Akinwande, D.; Brennan, C.J.; Bunch, J.S.; Egberts, P.; Felts, J.R.; Gao, H.; Huang, R.; Kim, J.S.; Li, T.; Li, Y.; et al. A review on mechanics and mechanical properties of 2D materials-Graphene and beyond. Extreme Mech. Lett. 2017, 13, 42–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, Z.; McCreary, A.; Briggs, N.; Subramanian, S.; Zhang, K.; Sun, Y.; Li, X.; Borys, N.J.; Yuan, H.; Fullerton-Shirey, S.K.; et al. 2D materials advances: From large scale synthesis and controlled heterostructures to improved characterization techniques, defects and applications. 2D Mater. 2016, 3, 042001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Choi, H.; Min, K.A.; Cha, J.; Hong, S. Mixed-dimensional 2D/3D heterojunctions between MoS2 and Si(100). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 25240–25245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kim, J.; Min, K.A.; Cha, J.; Hong, S. Contact properties of 2D/3D GaSe/Si(1 1 1) heterostructure. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 516, 145969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, J.; Choi, C.G.; Min, K.A.; Cho, K.; Hong, S. Effect of atomic passivation at Ni-MoS2 interfaces on contact behaviors. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2020, 20, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Min, K.A.; Hong, S. Doping effect in graphene on oxide substrates: MgO(111) andSiO2(0001). Curr. Appl. Phys. 2015, 15, S103–S107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sung, D.; Min, K.A.; Hong, S. Investigation of atomic and electronic properties of 2D-MoS2/3D-GaN mixed dimensional heterostructures. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 404002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jaffery, S.H.A.; Kim, J.; Dastgeer, G.; Hussain, M.; Ali, A.; Hussain, S.; Eom, J.; Hong, S.; Jung, J. Thickness-Dependent, Gate-Tunable Rectification and Highly Sensitive Photovoltaic Behavior of Heterostructured GeSe/WS2 p–n Diode. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 7, 2000893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lee, C.H.; Lee, G.H.; Zande, A.M.V.D.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Han, M.; Cui, X.; Arefe, G.; Nuckolls, C.; Heinz, T.F.; et al. Atomically thin p–n junctions with van der Waals heterointerfaces. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Frisenda, R.; Molina-Mendoza, A.J.; Mueller, T.; Castellanos-Gomez, A.; Zant, H.S.J.V.D. Atomically thin p–n junctions based on two-dimensional materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pesci, F.M.; Sokolikova, M.S.; Grotta, C.; Sherrell, P.C.; Reale, F.; Sharda, K.; Ni, N.; Palczynski, P.; Mattevi, C. MoS2/WS2 Heterojunction for Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 7, 4990–4998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nazir, G.; Kim, H.; Kim, J.; Kim, K.S.; Shin, D.H.; Khan, M.F.; Lee, D.S.; Hwang, J.Y.; Hwang, C.; Suh, J.; et al. Ultimate limit in size and performance of WSe2 vertical diodes. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, J.; Choi, J.; Kang, Y. First-principles study of SrTe and BaTe: Promising wide-band-gap semiconductors with ambipolar doping. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2023, 48, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, T.; Lee, K.-Y.; Lee, Y.-J.; Cho, C.-H.; Rho, H. Suppression of substrate-induced charge doping in hBN-encapsulated monolayer WS2. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2023, 49, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tao, W.-L.; Lan, J.-Q.; Hu, C.-E.; Cheng, Y.; Zhu, J. Hua-Yun Geng; Thermoelectric properties of Janus MXY (M = Pd, Pt; X, Y = S, Se, Te) transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers from first principles. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 127, 035101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rawat, A.; Mohanta, M.K.; Jena, N.; Ahammed, R.; De Sarkar, A. Nanoscale Interfaces of Janus Monolayers of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides for 2D Photovoltaic and Piezoelectric Applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 10385–10397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahammed, R.; Jena, N.; Rawat, A.; Mohanta, M.K.; De Sarkar, A. Ultrahigh Out-of-Plane Piezoelectricity Meets Giant Rashba Effect in 2D Janus Monolayers and Bilayers of Group IV Transition-Metal Trichalcogenides. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 21250–21260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ju, L.; Bie, M.; Tang, X.; Shang, J.; Kou, L. Janus WSSe Monolayer: An Excellent Photocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 29335–29343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, Y.; Liu, J.; Yu, J.; Guo, Y.; Sun, Q. Symmetry-breaking induced large piezoelectricity in Janus tellurene materials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 1207–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dimple; Jena, N.; Rawat, A.; Ahammed, R.; Mohanta, M.K.; De Sarkar, A. Emergence of high piezoelectricity along with robust electron mobility in Janus structures in semiconducting Group IVB dichalcogenide monolayers. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 24885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peng, R.; Ma, Y.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y. Two-dimensional Janus PtSSe for photocatalytic water splitting under the visible or infrared light. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nandi, P.; Rawat, A.; Ahammed, R.; Jena, N.; De Sarkar, A. Group-IV(A) Janus dichalcogenide monolayers and their interfaces straddle gigantic shear and in-plane piezoelectricity. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 5460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Manchon, A.; Koo, H.C.; Nitta, J.; Frolov, S.M.; Duine, R.A. New perspectives for Rasha-spin-orbit coupling. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 871–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Acosta, C.M.; Fazzio, A.; Dalpian, G.M. Zeeman-type spin splitting in nonmagnetic three-dimensional compounds. NPJ Quantum Mater. 2019, 4, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xiao, D.; Yao, W.; Niu, Q. Valley-Contrasting Physics in Graphene: Magnetic Moment and Topological Transport. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 236809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Isberg, J.; Gabrysch, M.; Hammersberg, J.; Majdi, S.; Kovi, K.K.; Twitchen, D.J. Generation, transport and detection of valley-polarized electrons in diamond. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Takashina, K.; Ono, Y.; Fujiwara, A.; Takahashi, Y.; Hirayama, Y. Valley Polarization in Si(100) at Zero Magnetic Field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 236801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shkolnikov, Y.P.; De Poortere, E.P.; Tutuc, E.; Shayegan, M. Valley Splitting of AlAs Two-Dimensional Electrons in a Perpendicular Magnetic Field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 226805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhu, Z.; Collaudin, A.; Fauqué, B.; Kang, W.; Behnia, K. Field-induced polarization of Dirac valleys in bismuth. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mak, K.F.; Xiao, D.; Shan, J. Light-valley interactions in 2D semiconductors. Nat. Photonics 2018, 12, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, B.T.; Taguchi, K.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Law, K.T. Spin-orbit coupling induced valley Hall effects in transition-metal dichalcogenides. Commun. Phys. 2019, 2, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, W.; Luo, C.; Tang, X.; Peng, X.; Zhong, J. Valleytronic properties of monolayer WSe2 in external magnetic field. AIP Adv. 2019, 9, 045222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xiao, D.; Liu, G.B.; Feng, W.; Xu, X.; Yao, W. Coupled Spin and Valley Physics in Monolayers of MoS2 and Other Group-VI Dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. 2012, 108, 196802. [Google Scholar]
  37. Xia, J.; Wang, X.; Tay, B.K.; Chen, S.; Liu, Z.; Yan, J.; Shen, Z. Valley polarization in stacked MoS2 induced by circularly polarized light. Nano Res. 2017, 10, 1618–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Berry, M.V. Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiabatic Changes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 1984, 392, 45–57. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sodemann, I.; Fu, L. Quantum Nonlinear Hall Effect Induced by Berry Curvature Dipole in Time-Reversal Invariant Materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 115, 216806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Shin, D.; Sato, S.A.; Hubener, H.; Giovannini, U.D.; Kim, J.; Park, N.; Rubio, A. Unraveling materials Berry curvature and Chern numbers from real-time evolution of Bloch states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 4135–4140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, Y.; Wei, W.; Wang, H.; Mao, N.; Li, F.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y. Janus TiXY Monolayers with Tunable Berry Curvature. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 7426–7432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Son, J.; Kim, K.H.; Ahn, Y.H.; Lee, H.W.; Lee, J. Strain Engineering of the Berry Curvature Dipole and Valley Magnetization in Monolayer MoS2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 036806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Schaibley, J.R.; Yu, H.; Clark, G.; Rivera, P.; Ross, J.S.; Seyler, K.L.; Yao, W.; Xu, X. Valleytronics in 2D materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, M.-Y.; Gong, L.; He, Y.; Cao, C. Tuning Rashba effect, band inversion, and spin-charge conversion of Janus XSn2Y monolayers via an external field. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 075421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhuang, H.L.; Cooper, V.R.; Xu, H.; Ganesh, P.; Hennig, R.G.; Kent, P.R.C. Rashba effect in single-layer antimony telluroiodide SbTeI. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 115302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, S.; He, J.; Yu, J.; Liu, Z. Valleytronics in transition metal dichalcogenides materials. Nano Res. 2019, 12, 2695–2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, S.; Li, X.; Dong, B.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Han, Z.; Zhang, H. Valley manipulation in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides and their hybrid systems: Status and challenges. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2021, 84, 026401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kohn, W.; Sham, L.J. Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133–A1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kresse, G. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169–11186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kresse, G.; Furthmiiller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6, 15–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Blochl, P.E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 50, 17953–17979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kresse, G.; Jouber, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Ehrlich, S.; Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 132, 154104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xiao, D.; Chang, M.-C.; Niu, Q. Berry phase effects on electronic properties. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Resta, R. Macroscopic polarization in crystalline dielectrics: The geometric phase approach. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1994, 66, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nagaosa, N.; Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 899–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kim, H.J.; Li, C.; Feng, J.; Cho, J.H.; Zhang, Z. Competing magnetic orderings and tunable topological states in two-dimensional hexagonal organometallic lattices. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 041404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yao, Q.; Cai, J.; Tong, W.; Gong, S.; Wang, J. Manipulation of the large Rashba spin splitting in polar two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 95, 165401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nguyen, H.T.T.; Vi, V.T.T.; Vu, T.V.; Phuc, H.V.; Nguyen, C.V.; Tong, H.D.; Hoa, L.T.; Hieu, N.N. Janus Ga2STe monolayer under strain and electric field: Theoretical prediction of electronic and optical properties. Phys. E 2020, 124, 114358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Demirtas, M.; Ozdemir, B.; Mogulkoc, Y.; Durgun, E. Oxygenation of monolayer gallium monochalcogenides: Design of two-dimensional ternary Ga2XO structures (X = S,Se,Te). Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 075423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhong, Q.; Dai, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Meng, S. Phonon thermal transport in Janus single layer M2XY (M = Ga; X, Y = S, Se, Te): A study based on first-principles. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostructures 2020, 115, 113683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, J.; Jia, S.; Kholmanov, I.; Dong, L.; Er, D.; Chen, W.; Guo, H.; Jin, Z.; Shenoy, V.B.; Shi, L.; et al. Janus Monolayer Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 8192–8198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lu, A.Y.; Zhu, H.; Xiao, J.; Chuu, C.P.; Han, Y.; Chiu, M.H.; Cheng, C.C.; Yang, C.W.; Wei, K.H.; Yang, Y.; et al. Janus monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 744–749. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Zólyomi, V.; Drummond, N.D.; Fal’ko, V.I. Band structure and optical transitions in atomic layers of hexagonal gallium chalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 195403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Aziza, Z.B.; Zólyomi, V.; Henck, H.; Pierucci, D.; Silly, M.G.; Avila, J.; Magorrian, S.J.; Chaste, J.; Chen, C.; Yoon, M.; et al. Valence band inversion and spin-orbit effects in the electronic structure of monolayer GaSe. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 115405. [Google Scholar]
  67. Li, F.; Wei, W.; Wang, H.; Huang, B.; Dai, Y.; Jacob, T. Intrinsic Electric Field-Induced Properties in Janus MoSSe van der Waals Structures. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Szczęśniak, D.; Kais, S. Gap states and valley-spin filtering in transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. Phys. Rev. B 2020, 101, 115423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ominato, Y.; Fujimoto, J.; Matsuo, M. Valley-Dependent Spin Transport in Monolayer Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 166803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ceferino, A.; Magorrian, S.J.; Zólyomi, V.; Bandurin, D.A.; Geim, A.K.; Patanè, A.; Kovalyuk, Z.D.; Kudrynskyi, Z.R.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Fal’ko, V.I. Tunable spin-orbit coupling in two-dimensional InSe. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 104, 125432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The top view and (b) side view of monolayer Janus Ga2XY. The green, yellow, and blue balls indicate the Ga atoms and chalcogen X and Y atoms, respectively.
Figure 1. (a) The top view and (b) side view of monolayer Janus Ga2XY. The green, yellow, and blue balls indicate the Ga atoms and chalcogen X and Y atoms, respectively.
Nanomaterials 14 01295 g001
Figure 2. The local potential plots of monolayer (a) GaX and (b) Janus Ga2XY. △ φ is the difference between local potentials corresponding to the upper and lower sides of MMCs and Janus MMCs. The red dotted lines represent the vacuum energy of the systems.
Figure 2. The local potential plots of monolayer (a) GaX and (b) Janus Ga2XY. △ φ is the difference between local potentials corresponding to the upper and lower sides of MMCs and Janus MMCs. The red dotted lines represent the vacuum energy of the systems.
Nanomaterials 14 01295 g002
Figure 3. Results of ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) calculations. The top and bottom panels represent the total energy and the atomic structure of each system, respectively. The graphs show total energy as a function of time step in units of 1 fs. The atomic structures are the final structures obtained from AIMD calculations.
Figure 3. Results of ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) calculations. The top and bottom panels represent the total energy and the atomic structure of each system, respectively. The graphs show total energy as a function of time step in units of 1 fs. The atomic structures are the final structures obtained from AIMD calculations.
Nanomaterials 14 01295 g003
Figure 4. (a) The hexagonal Brillouin zone of GaX and Janus Ga2XY. Schematic plots of (b) Rashba-type spin splitting and (c) spin−valley coupling at K or K′ point. (d) Schematic plot representing carrier transfer and valley Hall effect. The red and blue lines represent the energy bands of up and down spins, respectively.
Figure 4. (a) The hexagonal Brillouin zone of GaX and Janus Ga2XY. Schematic plots of (b) Rashba-type spin splitting and (c) spin−valley coupling at K or K′ point. (d) Schematic plot representing carrier transfer and valley Hall effect. The red and blue lines represent the energy bands of up and down spins, respectively.
Nanomaterials 14 01295 g004
Figure 5. Band structures of monolayer GaX and Janus Ga2XY with the SOC effect. The insets represent close-up images around K (or K’) and Γ points. The insets indicate the magnification of the specified regions. The red and blue lines represent the energy bands of up and down spins, respectively.
Figure 5. Band structures of monolayer GaX and Janus Ga2XY with the SOC effect. The insets represent close-up images around K (or K’) and Γ points. The insets indicate the magnification of the specified regions. The red and blue lines represent the energy bands of up and down spins, respectively.
Nanomaterials 14 01295 g005
Figure 6. Spin texture of (a) Ga2SSe, (b) Ga2STe, and (c) Ga2SeTe with SOC calculations. From fermi energy, (ac) are plotted at positions of −0.4 eV, −0.8 eV, and −1 eV, respectively. The colored arrows represent the spin polarization orientation.
Figure 6. Spin texture of (a) Ga2SSe, (b) Ga2STe, and (c) Ga2SeTe with SOC calculations. From fermi energy, (ac) are plotted at positions of −0.4 eV, −0.8 eV, and −1 eV, respectively. The colored arrows represent the spin polarization orientation.
Nanomaterials 14 01295 g006
Figure 7. (Left panel) Berry curvatures (Ω(k)) of monolayer GaX and Janus Ga2XY. (Right panel) Blue lines indicate the line profiles of Berry curvatures along the AB path.
Figure 7. (Left panel) Berry curvatures (Ω(k)) of monolayer GaX and Janus Ga2XY. (Right panel) Blue lines indicate the line profiles of Berry curvatures along the AB path.
Nanomaterials 14 01295 g007
Table 1. The structural parameters and electrical properties of GaX and Janus Ga2XY: distances between A and B atoms (dA-B) and difference in distances between dGa-X and dGa-YdGa-X,Y), distorted angle (Δθ = θ2θ1), local potential difference (Δ φ ), dipole moment ( μ ), band gap (type), and Zeeman-type spin splitting (ΔV) are given. Here, Δθ is the difference between θ1 and θ2, which are the angles denoted in Figure 1b.
Table 1. The structural parameters and electrical properties of GaX and Janus Ga2XY: distances between A and B atoms (dA-B) and difference in distances between dGa-X and dGa-YdGa-X,Y), distorted angle (Δθ = θ2θ1), local potential difference (Δ φ ), dipole moment ( μ ), band gap (type), and Zeeman-type spin splitting (ΔV) are given. Here, Δθ is the difference between θ1 and θ2, which are the angles denoted in Figure 1b.
a   ( Å ) d G a G a
( Å )
d G a X
( Å )
d G a Y
( Å )
d G a X , Y ( Å ) θ 1
( d e g )
θ 2
( d e g )
θ
( d e g )
φ
( e V )
μ
( Debye )
Band Gap (eV)Band Gap Type V
( meV )
GaS3.622.452.362.360117.55117.55002.46Indirect202
GaSe3.802.452.492.490118.21118.21001.89Indirect65
GaTe4.122.452.702.700118.18118.18001.50Indirect180
Ga2SSe3.712.452.392.470.08116.07119.633.560.250.0162.16Indirect97
Ga2STe3.882.452.442.630.19113.27121.738.460.610.0430.64Direct43
Ga2SeTe3.992.452.582.660.08115.32120.064.740.390.0280.98Direct65
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Sung, D.; Hong, S. Valley-Dependent Electronic Properties of Metal Monochalcogenides GaX and Janus Ga2XY (X, Y = S, Se, and Te). Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14151295

AMA Style

Kim J, Kim Y, Sung D, Hong S. Valley-Dependent Electronic Properties of Metal Monochalcogenides GaX and Janus Ga2XY (X, Y = S, Se, and Te). Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(15):1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14151295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Junghwan, Yunjae Kim, Dongchul Sung, and Suklyun Hong. 2024. "Valley-Dependent Electronic Properties of Metal Monochalcogenides GaX and Janus Ga2XY (X, Y = S, Se, and Te)" Nanomaterials 14, no. 15: 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14151295

APA Style

Kim, J., Kim, Y., Sung, D., & Hong, S. (2024). Valley-Dependent Electronic Properties of Metal Monochalcogenides GaX and Janus Ga2XY (X, Y = S, Se, and Te). Nanomaterials, 14(15), 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14151295

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop