Next Article in Journal
Plasma Modification of Biomass-Based Starfish Catalysts for Efficient Biodiesel Synthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as Promising Antibacterial Agents of New Generation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 14
Issue 15
10.3390/nano14151312
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Highly Efficient Peroxymonosulfate Electroactivation on Co(OH)2 Nanoarray Electrode for Pefloxacin Degradation

by
Tonghui Bao
,
Hui Ke
,
Wanjiang Li
,
Linke Cai
and
Yi Huang
*
Engineering Research Center of Photoenergy Utilization for Pollution Control and Carbon Reduction, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(15), 1312; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14151312
Submission received: 17 July 2024 / Revised: 28 July 2024 / Accepted: 1 August 2024 / Published: 4 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional Nanostructured Electro/Photocatalysts for Energy Conversion and Environmental Treatment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The activation of PMS to produce active species is an attractive technique for antibiotic degradation but is restricted to the low reaction kinetics and high costs. In this work, a cobalt-based catalyst was prepared by in situ electrodeposition to enhance the electrically activated PMS process for the degradation of antibiotics. Almost 100% of pefloxacin (PFX) was removed within 10 min by employing Co(OH)2 as the catalyst in the electrically activated peroxymonosulfate (PMS) process, and the reaction kinetic constant reached 0.52 min−1. The redox processes of Co2+ and Co3+ in Co(OH)2 catalysts were considered to be the main pathways for PMS activation, in which 1O2 was the main active species. Furthermore, this strategy could also achieve excellent degradation efficiency for other organic pollutants. This study provides an effective and low-cost strategy with no secondary pollution for pollutant degradation.

1. Introduction

Treatment of medical wastewater containing antibiotics has received worldwide attention [1,2]. Pefloxacin (PFX), a fluoroquinolone, is widely used in treating viral and bacterial infections [3,4,5]. However, antibiotics have been discharged into aquatic ecosystems through wastewater, animal excrement, and soil erosion, which has seriously threatened both human and ecological health [6,7]. Due to the antibacterial activity, water solubility, and stability of PFX, traditional methods such as biological processes, flocculation, adsorption, and membrane processes are inadequate or ineffective for their removal [8,9]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new processes for efficiently removing PFX and other fluoroquinolones antibiotics.
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) represented by activated peroxymonosulfate (PMS) have been widely studied due to its effective treatment, broad applicability, and low environmental impact [10,11]. PMS activation produces reactive species such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH), sulfate radicals (SO4•−), and singlet oxygen (1O2) that have exhibited high potential for the removal of persistent organic pollutants and pharmaceuticals [12,13]. The activation of PMS can be achieved by many methods, such as ultraviolet, electricity, ultrasound, heat, and external catalyst activation [14,15]. Compared to other methods, metal ion activation strategies have been widely used due to their low energy consumption, simple operation, and high efficiency [16]. Meanwhile, Co2+ ions are regarded as the most reactive and efficient homogeneous catalyst for the activation of PMS, and the mechanism of activation of PMS is as follows [17,18]:
Co2+ + HSO5- → Co3+ + SO4•- + OH-
Co3+ + HSO5− + OH− → Co2+ +SO5•− + H2O
However, the activation of PMS based on Co2+ ions has the disadvantages of a high ionic demand and strong pH dependence [19]. Recently, non-homogeneous catalysts represented by transition metal oxides have attracted extensive attention due to their high catalytic activity and stable crystalline structure [11,20,21]. Unfortunately, the catalyst particles dispersed in the solution are also prone to metal ion leaching, which cause secondary contamination and biotoxicity [22].
Electrochemistry is considered an effective way to enhance catalyst performance and has been widely used in the Fenton catalytic process [23]. The electric fields can accelerate electron transfer between electron donors and acceptors, which enhances PMS activation (Equation (3)) [24].
HSO5− + e− → SO4•− + OH−
On this basis, the combination of electrical activation and catalyst activation is a promising method for PMS activation, which not only avoids the release of toxic metal ions but also reduces the cost of catalyst [25,26]. Meanwhile, Jing et al. prepared NiCo2O4 nanoarray electrodes on a cathode for electroactivated PMS to remove rhodamine B (100 ppm), achieving 99.7% removal efficiency within 60 min [27]. Zhang et al. prepared a MnFe2O4 electrode for electroactivated PMS to promote the degradation of bisphenol A (10 ppm), achieving 100% removal efficiency within 90 min [28]. Therefore, the combination of heterogeneous and electrochemistry activation of PMS is expected to present economical and efficient degradation of antibiotics.
Considering the excellent PMS activation performance of cobalt-based catalysts, we prepared a Co(OH)2 catalyst applied to the electrocatalytic system to realize the efficient removal of antibiotics by the activation of PMS. In this study, electrodes from a Co(OH)2 nanosheet array grown on Ti mesh (Co(OH)2@Ti) were prepared for electrochemically activated PMS to remove PFX, and we investigated the effects of pH, PMS concentration, and voltage on the degradation of PFX in this system. Then, the types and contributions of the active species produced by PMS electroactivation were identified through electron spin resonance (ESR) and free radical quenching experiments. Finally, the mechanism of PFX degradation via the Co(OH)2@Ti/electroactivated PMS (Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS) process was proposed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Co(OH)2@Ti Nanoarray Electrode

The materials and chemicals utilized are shown in the Supporting Information of Table S1. The Co(OH)2@Ti nanoarray electrodes were prepared by electrochemical in situ deposition. Ti mesh (2 cm × 2 cm) was used as the working electrode, a Pt sheet was used as the counter electrode, and 0.025 mol/L cobalt nitrate (Co(NO3)2) was the electrode solution, which were reacted at −1.0 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) for 240 s. After the reaction, the Ti mesh was repeatedly cleaned and dried to obtain the Co(OH)2@Ti nanoarray electrodes.

2.2. Experimental Setups

The Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process was carried out using a standard three-electrode electrochemical cell, with the Co(OH)2@Ti as the working electrode, Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode, and Pt mesh as the counter electrode. In the experiment of removing PFX by activating PMS, 30 mL of the mixed solutions (0.1 mol/L K2SO4, 10 ppm PFX) was first added to the electrolytic cell. Then, a specific amount of PMS was introduced, and an electrochemical reaction was initiated by applying a constant voltage. Meanwhile, argon gas was continuously introduced into the solution during the reaction. Each electrochemical test was performed in triplicate.

2.3. Analytical Methods

The catalyst was characterized and analyzed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-7610E, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM 2100F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, Oxford, UK), X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku Ultima IV, Bruker, Saarbrucken, Germany), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-Alpha, Thermo Scientific Waltham, MA, USA). The linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) test was carried out with a CHI 760E (Shanghai Chenhua Instrument Company, Shanghai, China). The PFX, RhB, and TC concentrations were determined by using an ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer (UV-5500PC, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and the standard curves are shown in Figure S1. The electron spin resonance (ESR, A300, Bruker, Saarbrucken, Germany) was employed with DMPO and TEMP as spin-trapping agents for the detection of reactive species during the activation of PMS.
The PFX degradation efficiency and the pseudo-first-order rate constant were calculated using Equations (1) and (2).
Degradation   efficiency   ( % ) = C 0 − C t C 0 × 100 %
                    C t C 0 = e x p ( − k t )
where C0 and Ct are the concentrations of PFX at 0 min and t min, respectively; and k (min−1) is the pseudo-first-order rate constant.

3. Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Catalytic Electrodes

The morphology of the Co(OH)2@Ti electrode surface was first evaluated through SEM analysis. As shown in Figure 1a, b, the Ti mesh surface formed a uniformly distributed petal-like structure, which provided more active sites. Correspondingly, the elemental mapping images of Co(OH)2@Ti in Figure 1c confirm the uniform distribution of Co and O elements on the Ti mesh. Subsequently, the high-resolution TEM image of the Co(OH)2 catalysts was obtained (Figure 1d), revealing the nanoflake micromorphology of the catalysts, which was consistent with the SEM images.
XRD analysis was performed to examine the composition and structure of the Co(OH)2. Meanwhile, the Co(OH)2 catalysts were collected on carbon paper to avoid interference from the Ti substrate. As shown in Figure S2a, the corresponding diffraction peak corresponding to the plane of the C substrate can be found at 26.5° and 54.5°, and distinct diffraction peaks at 19.0°, 32.4°, 37.8°, 51.3°, and 57.7° are observed, which closely correspond to Co(OH)2 (PDF#03-0913) [29]. The Raman spectrum displays that the peaks related to Co(OH)2 appear at 665, 506, and 463 cm−1 (Figure S2b). Notably, no impurity peaks appear in the XRD and Raman spectra, providing evidence of the successful deposition of a pure Co(OH)2 catalytic layer.

3.2. Degradation of PFX in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS Process

Firstly, the PMS activation performance of the Co(OH)2@Ti electrode was tested in 0.1 M K2SO4 with and without 200 ppm PMS electrolyte. In comparison to the scenario without PMS, the LSV curves show that the Co(OH)2 catalysts demonstrate a remarkable increase in current density in the presence of PMS (Figure 2a). Furthermore, the time–current curve of PMS activated by Co(OH)2 at the potential of −0.8 V (V vs. Ag/AgCl) was obtained, and the electrode solution was initially 0.1 M K2SO4, and 200 ppm PMS was added at 200 s (Figure 2b). Clearly, the current density increased rapidly with the addition of PMS. The above results jointly suggest the efficient electron transfer between Co(OH)2 and PMS, indicating the exciting potential of Co(OH)2 catalysts for PMS electroactivation.
To assess the catalytic performance of the Co(OH)2@Ti electrode, PFX was selected as a target pollutant. The degradation rate of PFX over time is presented in Figure 2c, with an initial concentration of 10 mg L–1. The Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process achieved complete removal of PFX within 10 min. In contrast, only 27.6% and 35.0% of PFX was degraded via the Ti/EA-PMS process and the TiO2@Ti/EA-PMS process, respectively. Additionally, cobalt-based catalysts activate PMS poorly in the absence of electroactivation. Employing pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics (Figure 2d), the reaction rate constant on the Co(OH)2@Ti electrode was determined to be 0.52 min–1, which was significantly higher than that on the Ti electrode (0.04 min−1) and the TiO2@Ti electrode (0.02 min–1). Meanwhile, the Co(OH)2@Ti electrode exhibited excellent PMS activation potential, achieving 90% activation of the PMS within 10 min (Figure S3). These results verify that the Co(OH)2@Ti electrode has an inspiring potential for the removal of PFX by activating PMS. Compared to other catalytic systems, the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process not only efficiently removes organic pollutants but also significantly reduces catalyst costs (Table S2). Furthermore, the reusability of Co(OH)2 in the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system was evaluated by four-cycle experiments. The PFX degradation efficiency under four consecutive reactions was 100%, 100%, 100%, and 95% (Figure 2e). The slight decrease in the catalytic activity of Co(OH)2 may be attributed to the adsorption of intermediate products of PMS activation and PFX degradation on the surface of the catalysts to cover the active sites [30,31]. After four consecutive cycles, the Co(OH)2 catalysts maintained their nanoflake morphology, with almost no leaching of cobalt ions (determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)) from the electrode, indicating that the catalysts have inspiring cycling stability (Figure 2f).
In order to obtain the optimal experimental conditions (e.g., pH value, PMS concentration, and voltage) of Co(OH)2@Ti electroactivated PMS for the degradation of PFX, the impact of different PMS concentrations on the degradation of PFX in the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system was first investigated (Figure 3a). As the concentration of PMS increased, the degradation rate of PFX increased due to the fact that the higher concentration of PMS produced more activated radicals (Figure 3b). Figure 3c shows the effect of different potentials (−0.8 V, −1.0 V, and −1.2 V (V vs. Ag/AgCl)) on the degradation of PFX. The degradation rate of PFX increased with the increase in voltage from −0.8 V to 1.2 V due to the applied voltage increase accelerating the activation of PMS, thus accelerating the PFX degradation efficiency (Figure 3d). Furthermore, the effects of different initial pH values (4, 7, and 10) on the degradation efficiency of PFX in the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system were studied (Figure 3e and Figure 4f). When the initial pH value was 10, the degradation rate of PFX was the best, and the PFX degradation rate constant was 0.62 min−1, indicating that the weak alkaline environment was conducive to the degradation of PFX. It is noteworthy that PFX was also effectively degraded under weak acid and neutral conditions, confirming the wide pH range of the system.

3.3. The Mechanism of PFX Degradation in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS Process

Free radicals generated by PMS electroactivation play a crucial role in the degradation of PFX. Quenching experiments with scavengers were further conducted to clarify the contribution of different free radicals to the degradation of PFX. Meanwhile, furfuryl alcohol (FFA), tert-butanol (TBA), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were used as the quenching agents for 1O2, •OH, and •O2−, respectively [32,33], and MeOH was used as the quenching agent for •OH and SO4•− [34]. Employing pseudo-first-order reaction kinetics, the addition of TBA, MeOH, FFA, and SOD resulted in a reduction in the degradation rate constant of PFX by 13.5%, 6.9%, 75.2%, and 7.7%, respectively (Figure 4a,b). Therefore, we concluded that 1O2 was involved in PFX degradation as the main ROS produced by PMS activation. Additionally, we found that the degradation rate of PFX was higher in D2O compared to H2O due to the longer lifetime of 1O2 in D2O, which confirmed that that 1O2 is the main reactive oxygen species involved in PFX degradation (Figure S4) [35]. The DMPO and TEMP spin-trapping ESR was further used to determine the radical species involved in the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process [36]. As shown in Figure 4c,d, the signals of SO4•−, •OH, and 1O2 were detected; however, the signal of •O2− was not observed due to the extremely small reaction rate of DMPO with •O2− and the short lifetime of DMPO-•O2- (Figure 4e). In addition, the quantitative analysis of 1O2, SO4•−, •OH, and •O2− radicals produced in the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system was performed by the free radical molecular probe method using DPBF (1,3-Diphenylisobenzofuran), p-HBA (4-Hydroxybenzoic acid), TA-PL (terephthalic acid photoluminescence), and NBT (Nitro blue tetrazolium chloride), respectively [37,38,39,40]. As shown in Figure 4f, the contribution of the 1O2, SO4•−, •OH, and •O2− radicals to PFX degradation was 74.26%, 5.6%, 12.14%, and 8%, respectively, which was consistent with the free radical quenching experiments. The source of ROS was further determined by excluding PMS and O2 interference separately. As shown in Figure S5, the ROS were mainly derived from PMS activation, and different atmospheres had little effect.
Nanomaterials 14 01312 g004
Figure 4. Mechanism of PFX degradation in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system. (a) PFX degradation curves and (b) kinetics with addition of different quenching agents. EPR spectra of (c) DMPO-•OH and DMPO-SO4•−, (d) TEMP-1O2, and (e) DMPO-•O2− in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process. (f) Proportion of four oxygen species in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system.
Figure 4. Mechanism of PFX degradation in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system. (a) PFX degradation curves and (b) kinetics with addition of different quenching agents. EPR spectra of (c) DMPO-•OH and DMPO-SO4•−, (d) TEMP-1O2, and (e) DMPO-•O2− in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process. (f) Proportion of four oxygen species in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system.
Nanomaterials 14 01312 g004
To clarify the electroactivation mechanism of PMS by Co(OH)2@Ti, XPS was employed to analyze the catalyst chemical valence before and after the reaction. As shown in Figure 5a, the peaks at the binding energies of 781.6 eV and 797.8 eV are assigned to Co2+ 2p3/2 and Co2+ 2p1/2, respectively [41]. The peaks of Co 2p in Co(OH)2 exhibit a negative shift of 0.5 eV after the activation process of PMS compared to the initial Co(OH)2. The Co 2p spectra exhibit new peaks corresponding to Co3+, which indicates that the electron transfer resulting from the conversion from Co2+ to Co3+ was essential for the activation of PMS [42,43]. As shown in Figure 5b, the three characteristic peaks at 531.0 eV, 531.8 eV, and 532.8 eV in the O 1s spectrum are assigned to lattice oxygen, reactive oxygen, and H2O, respectively [44,45]. The ratio of reactive oxygen/lattice oxygen increases significantly from 1.33 to 2.2 after the PMS activation process, indicating the formation of substantial ROS during the activation of PMS [46,47].
Based on the above results and previous works, the PFX degradation mechanism in the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system was proposed as follows [11,18,48,49]: Firstly, the hydroxyl group on the surface of Co2+ is displaced by the SO5•− group, forming complexes. Subsequently, an internal nucleophilic attack leads to the formation of the intermediate Co2+-OO-Co2+ with Co2+ on adjacent surfaces, and O-O bond cleavage leads to Co3+, which is similarly stripped of the hydroxyl group on the surface to be replaced by the SO5•− group, forming the intermediate Co3+-OO-Co3+. Finally, O-O bond cleavage leads to the formation of 1O2 and the regeneration of the active sites. The relevant reactions are represented by Equations (5)–(10):
Co2+-OH + HSO5− → Co2+-SO5− + H2O
Co2+-SO5− + Co2+-OH → Co2+-OO-Co2+ + H+ + SO42−
Co2+-OO-Co2+ + 2H2O → 2Co3+-OH + 2HO−
Co3+-OH + HSO5− → Co3+-SO5− + H2O
Co3+-OH + Co3+-SO5− → Co3+-OO-Co3+ + H+ + SO42−
Co3+-OO-Co3+ + 2H2O → 2Co2+-OH + 2H+ + 1O2
Consequently, we propose that the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system could be extended to the treatment of other organic pollutants in wastewater. Using rhodamine B (RhB) and tetracycline (TC) as examples, we found that the degradation efficiency of RhB and TC was almost 100% in the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process within 10 min (Figure 6a), and the mineralization rates were 27% and 14% for RhB and TC, respectively (Figure 6b). This result displays the potential practical applications of the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process for treating various organic pollutants in wastewater.

4. Conclusions

In this study, Co(OH)2@Ti nanoarray electrodes were successfully fabricated by electrochemical in situ deposition. The catalysts were further characterized by XRD, Raman spectroscopy, SEM, TEM, and XPS to verify the petal-like structure of the Co(OH)2 uniformly loaded on the Ti mesh. In addition, the Co(OH)2@Ti electrode showed an inspiring potential for the removal of PFX by activating PMS, achieving 100% removal of PFX within 10 min at −0.8 V (V vs. Ag/AgCl). Combined with EPR and quenching experiments, we inferred that the PMS activation was mainly due to the electron transfer by redox processes of Co2+ and Co3+ in the Co(OH)2 catalysts, in which 1O2 was the main active species. On this basis, the PFX degradation mechanism in the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system was further proposed. In a word, this work provides an efficient strategy for PFX degradation, and the prepared Co(OH)2@Ti nanoarray electrodes show remarkable stability and performance in activating PMS for the degradation of PFX.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano14151312/s1, Table S1: Chemicals and materials; Table S2: Comparison of catalytic performance with other systems; Figure S1: The standard curves of PFX, RhB, and TC. Figure S2: Structural characterization and electrochemical performance of Co(OH)2 catalysts. (a) XPS spectrum and (b) Raman image of Co(OH)2 catalysts. Figure S3: Activating PMS on Co(OH)2 nanoarray electrode. (a) Standard curve of PMS. (b) Degradation curve of PMS. Figure S4: Degradation of PFX under H2O and D2O solutions: (a) degradation curves; (b) degradation kinetics. Figure S5: Degradation of PFX under different conditions: (a) degradation curves; (b) degradation kinetics. (References [50,51,52,53] are cited in Supplementary Materials).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H.; methodology, T.B. and H.K.; formal analysis, T.B. and H.K.; investigation, T.B. and H.K.; data curation, W.L.; writing—original draft preparation, T.B.; writing—review and editing, Y.H. and L.C.; supervision, Y.H.; project administration, Y.H.; funding acquisition, Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20286 and 22206054) and the Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation (2021CFB094).

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yao, B.; Zeng, W.; Núñez-Delgado, A.; Zhou, Y. Simultaneous adsorption of ciprofloxacin and Cu2+ using Fe and N co-doped biochar: Competition and selective separation. Waste Manag. 2023, 168, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Li, X.; Gao, L.; Wang, S.; Jia, S.; Shi, P.; Li, A. Prevalence of antibiotics, antibiotic resistance genes, and their associations in municipal wastewater treatment plants along the Yangtze River basin, China. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 348, 123800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, Y.; Wang, J. Electro-Fenton degradation of pefloxacin using MOFs derived Cu, N co-doped carbon as a nanocomposite catalyst. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 355, 124198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, D.; Xue, X.; Zhang, X.; Huang, Y.; Feng, P. Highly efficient peroxymonosulfate activation by MOFs-derived oxygen vacancy-rich Co3O4/ZnO p-n heterojunction nanocomposites to degrade pefloxacin. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 305, 122451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, M.; Jia, L.; Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Zhao, D.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, T.; Xu, J. Web system-assisted ratiometric fluorescent probe embedded with machine learning for intelligent detection of pefloxacin. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 407, 135491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, J.; Chu, L.; Wojnárovits, L.; Takács, E. Occurrence and fate of antibiotics, antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) and antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) in municipal wastewater treatment plant: An overview. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 744, 140997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yao, B.; Qin, T.; Zhao, C.; Zhou, Y. Degradation of sulfanilamide in aqueous solution by ionizing radiation: Performance and mechanism. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 338, 122681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, X.; Wen, D.; Wang, J. Radiation-induced degradation of sulfonamide and quinolone antibiotics: A brief review. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2024, 215, 111373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhuang, S.; Wang, J. Adsorptive removal of pharmaceutical pollutants by defective metal organic framework UiO-66: Insight into the contribution of defects. Chemosphere 2021, 281, 130997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ghanbari, F.; Moradi, M. Application of peroxymonosulfate and its activation methods for degradation of environmental organic pollutants: Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 310, 41–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oh, W.-D.; Dong, Z.; Lim, T.-T. Generation of sulfate radical through heterogeneous catalysis for organic contaminants removal: Current development, challenges and prospects. Appl. Catal. B 2016, 194, 169–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abdelrahman, A.; Ganiyu, S.O.; Gamal El-Din, M. Degradation of surrogate and real naphthenic acids from simulated and real oil sands process water using electrochemically activated peroxymonosulfate (EO-PMS) process. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 306, 122462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, S.; Zhou, M.; Wu, H.; Song, G.; Jing, J.; Meng, N.; Wang, W. High-efficiency degradation of carbamazepine by the synergistic electro-activation and bimetals (FeCo@NC) catalytic-activation of peroxymonosulfate. Appl. Catal. B 2023, 338, 123064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yu, S.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, X.; Chen, S.; Tang, J.; Zhu, J.-J.; Dang, Y. Doping Sb into CuFe2O4 improved the catalytic performance in the electrochemically enhanced homogeneous peroxymonosulfate-heterogeneous catalytic system for the degradation of ciprofloxacin. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, H.; Liu, H.; Chu, Z.; Sun, F.; Zou, X.; Wang, Q.; Chen, T.; Chen, D.; Wang, H. Fe3O4 derived from the decomposition of siderite as a heterogeneous photocatalyst to degrade 2,4-dichlorophenol via activating PMS. J. Water Process Eng. 2024, 57, 104538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, J.; Xu, M.; Yao, G.; Lai, B. Enhancement of the degradation of atrazine through CoFe2O4 activated peroxymonosulfate (PMS) process: Kinetic, degradation intermediates, and toxicity evaluation. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 348, 1012–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gerken, J.B.; McAlpin, J.G.; Chen, J.Y.C.; Rigsby, M.L.; Casey, W.H.; Britt, R.D.; Stahl, S.S. Electrochemical Water Oxidation with Cobalt-Based Electrocatalysts from pH 0–14: The Thermodynamic Basis for Catalyst Structure, Stability, and Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14431–14442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, B.; Wang, Y.-F.; Zhang, L.; Xu, H.-Y. Enhancement strategies for efficient activation of persulfate by heterogeneous cobalt-containing catalysts: A review. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, J.; Wang, S. Activation of persulfate (PS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and application for the degradation of emerging contaminants. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 1502–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Quan, X.; Zhang, J.; Yin, L.; Zuo, W.; Tian, Y. Fe3O4 decorated with α-cyclodextrin for enhanced peroxymonosulfate(PMS)-activated degradation of PPCPs. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 317, 123904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, Z.; Liu, T.; Wu, J.; Li, H.; Chu, S.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, L.; Lu, J.; Ivanets, A.; Davronbek, B.; et al. Preparation of copper-based catalysts from electroplating sludge by ultrasound treatment and their antibiotic degradation performance. Environ. Res. 2023, 216, 114567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, L.; Ding, D.; Liu, C.; Cai, H.; Qu, Y.; Yang, S.; Gao, Y.; Cai, T. Degradation of norfloxacin by CoFe2O4-GO composite coupled with peroxymonosulfate: A comparative study and mechanistic consideration. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dong, P.; Chen, X.; Guo, M.; Wu, Z.; Wang, H.; Lin, F.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; Zhao, C.; Sun, H. Heterogeneous electro-Fenton catalysis with self-supporting CFP@MnO2-Fe3O4/C cathode for shale gas fracturing flowback wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 412, 125208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, F.; Guo, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, J. Activated persulfate by the synergistic electro-activation and bimetals cathode (MBC@CF) leads to highly efficient degradation of tetracycline. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 335, 126204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ganiyu, S.O.; Hussain, N.A.S.; Stafford, J.L.; Gamal El-Din, M. Electrocatalytic activation of peroxomonosulfate (PMS) under aerobic condition for the remediation of oil sands process water: Insight into one-pot synergistic coupling of PMS electro-activation and heterogeneous electro-Fenton processes. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 480, 147737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yu, C.; Zhao, Z.; Zong, Y.; Xu, L.; Zhang, B.; Wu, D. Electric field-enhanced coupled with metal-free peroxymonosulfate activactor: The selective oxidation of nonradical species-dominated system. Water Res. 2022, 227, 119323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Di, J.; Zhu, M.; Jamakanga, R.; Gai, X.; Li, Y.; Yang, R. Electrochemical activation combined with advanced oxidation on NiCo2O4 nanoarray electrode for decomposition of Rhodamine B. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 37, 101386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, M.; Gong, Y.; Ma, N.; Zhao, X. Promoted photoelectrocatalytic degradation of BPA with peroxymonosulfate on a MnFe2O4 modified carbon paper cathode. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 399, 125088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lv, S.; Xia, G.; Jin, C.; Hao, C.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, J.J. Low-temperature CO oxidation by Co3O4 nanocubes on the surface of Co(OH)2 nanosheets. Catal. Commun. 2016, 86, 100–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xie, D.; Chu, S.; Zhang, S.; Ivanets, A.; Zhang, L.; Su, X. Facile synthesis of Cr-doped ferrite catalyst from Cr-containing electroplating sludge with activated persulfate for efficient degradation of tetracycline. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, Z.; Zhang, L.; Yan, B.; Wu, J.; Kong, D.; Romanovski, V.; Ivanets, A.; Li, H.; Chu, S.; Su, X. Removal of chromium from electroplating sludge by roasting-acid leaching and catalytic degradation of antibiotics by its residue. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 111754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cheng, X.; Guo, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Liu, Y. Non-photochemical production of singlet oxygen via activation of persulfate by carbon nanotubes. Water Res. 2017, 113, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Borgstahl, G.E.O.; Oberley-Deegan, R.E. Superoxide Dismutases (SODs) and SOD Mimetics. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tan, C.; Gao, N.; Deng, Y.; Deng, J.; Zhou, S.; Li, J.; Xin, X. Radical induced degradation of acetaminophen with Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles as heterogeneous activator of peroxymonosulfate. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 276, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lang, Y.; Wu, S.; Yang, Q.; Luo, Y.; Jiang, X.; Wu, P. Analysis of the Isotopic Purity of D2O with the Characteristic NIR-II Phosphorescence of Singlet Oxygen from a Photostable Polythiophene Photosensitizer. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 9737–9743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Guan, C.; Jiang, J.; Pang, S.; Chen, X.; Webster, R.D.; Lim, T.-T. Facile synthesis of pure g-C3N4 materials for peroxymonosulfate activation to degrade bisphenol A: Effects of precursors and annealing ambience on catalytic oxidation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 387, 123726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Żamojć, K.; Zdrowowicz, M.; Rudnicki-Velasquez, P.B.; Krzymiński, K.; Zaborowski, B.; Niedziałkowski, P.; Jacewicz, D.; Chmurzyński, L. The development of 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran as a highly selective probe for the detection and quantitative determination of hydrogen peroxide. Free Radic. Res. 2017, 51, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Joo, S.H.; Feitz, A.J.; Sedlak, D.L.; Waite, T.D. Quantification of the Oxidizing Capacity of Nanoparticulate Zero-Valent Iron. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 1263–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Žerjav, G.; Albreht, A.; Vovk, I.; Pintar, A. Revisiting terephthalic acid and coumarin as probes for photoluminescent determination of hydroxyl radical formation rate in heterogeneous photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. A 2020, 598, 117566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fu, Y.; Li, Z.; Liu, Q.; Yang, X.; Tang, H. Construction of carbon nitride and MoS2 quantum dot 2D/0D hybrid photocatalyst: Direct Z-scheme mechanism for improved photocatalytic activity. Chin. J. Catal. 2017, 38, 2160–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, K.; Zhao, B.; Bai, J.; Ma, H.; Fang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Sun, Y. A High-Energy-Density Hybrid Supercapacitor with P-Ni(OH)2@Co(OH)2 Core–Shell Heterostructure and Fe2O3 Nanoneedle Arrays as Advanced Integrated Electrodes. Small 2020, 16, 2001974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, J.; Gao, R.; Zhou, D.; Chen, Z.; Wu, Z.; Schumacher, G.; Hu, Z.; Liu, X. Boosting the Electrocatalytic Activity of Co3O4 Nanosheets for a Li-O2 Battery through Modulating Inner Oxygen Vacancy and Exterior Co3+/Co2+ Ratio. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 6533–6541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, P.; Fu, S.; Luo, Y.; Peng, C.; Cheng, L.; Jiao, Z. Deciphering the Space Charge Effect of the CoNiLDH/FeOOH n–n Heterojunction for Efficient Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution. Small 2023, 19, 2305241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lan, D.; Gao, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, G.; Kou, K.; Wu, H. Double-shell hollow glass microspheres@Co2SiO4 for lightweight and efficient electromagnetic wave absorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 408, 127313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Lin, T.; Zhu, X.; Luo, B.; Hu, H.; Xing, W.; Yan, Z.; Wang, L. Lithiation-Induced Vacancy Engineering of Co3O4 with Improved Faradic Reactivity for High-Performance Supercapacitor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2004172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yan, M.; Zhao, Z.; Cui, P.; Mao, K.; Chen, C.; Wang, X.; Wu, Q.; Yang, H.; Yang, L.; Hu, Z. Construction of hierarchical FeNi3@(Fe,Ni)S2 core-shell heterojunctions for advanced oxygen evolution. Nano Res. 2021, 14, 4220–4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yan, M.; Mao, K.; Cui, P.; Chen, C.; Zhao, J.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Yang, H.; Wu, Q.; Hu, Z. In situ construction of porous hierarchical (Ni3-xFex)FeN/Ni heterojunctions toward efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, Z.; Zhan, X.; Hong, B.; Wang, X.; Tang, P.; Ding, Y.; Xia, Y.; Zeng, Y. Edge interface microenvironment regulation of CoOOH/commercial activated carbon nano-hybrids enabling PMS activation for degrading ciprofloxacin. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 663, 909–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Dong, S.; Yang, S.; Chen, Y.; Kuss, C.; Cui, G.; Johnson, L.R.; Gao, X.; Bruce, P.G. Singlet oxygen and dioxygen bond cleavage in the aprotic lithium-oxygen battery. Joule 2022, 6, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, W.; Li, W.; He, K.; Tang, L.; Liu, Q.; Yang, K.; Chen, Y.-D.; Zhao, X.; Wang, K.; Lin, H.; et al. Peroxymonosulfate activation by oxygen vacancies-enriched MXene nano-Co3O4 co-catalyst for efficient degradation of refractory organic matter: Efficiency, mechanism, and stability. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 432, 128719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, P.; Wang, P.; Li, X.; Wei, R.; Wang, X.; Yang, C.; Shen, T.; Zheng, T.; Zhang, G. Efficient peroxymonosulfate activation by CuO-Fe2O3/MXene composite for atrazine degradation: Performance, coexisting matter influence and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 440, 135863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Song, H.; Du, R.; Wang, Y.; Zu, D.; Zhou, R.; Cai, Y.; Wang, F.; Li, Z.; Shen, Y.; Li, C. Anchoring single atom cobalt on two-dimensional MXene for activation of peroxymonosulfate. Appl. Catal. B 2021, 286, 119898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guo, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, L.; Tang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Shi, B. Persulfate activation by Cr2O3/BC derived from chrome shavings for antibiotics degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 127698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 14 01312 g001
Figure 1. Morphological characterization of Co(OH)2@Ti nanoarray electrodes: (a,b) SEM images at different magnifications. (c) EDS images and (d) TEM images.
Figure 1. Morphological characterization of Co(OH)2@Ti nanoarray electrodes: (a,b) SEM images at different magnifications. (c) EDS images and (d) TEM images.
Nanomaterials 14 01312 g001
Nanomaterials 14 01312 g002
Figure 2. PFX removal performance and catalyst stability in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process. (a) LSV curve in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process. (b) Time–current curve at −0.8 V (V vs. Ag/AgCl) in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process. (c) Removal efficiency and (d) first-order kinetic fitting constants of PFX for 10 min under different reaction conditions and systems. (e) Reusability of Co(OH)2 in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system. (f) SEM images of Co(OH)2@Ti electrode after four-cycle experiments.
Figure 2. PFX removal performance and catalyst stability in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process. (a) LSV curve in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process. (b) Time–current curve at −0.8 V (V vs. Ag/AgCl) in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process. (c) Removal efficiency and (d) first-order kinetic fitting constants of PFX for 10 min under different reaction conditions and systems. (e) Reusability of Co(OH)2 in Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS system. (f) SEM images of Co(OH)2@Ti electrode after four-cycle experiments.
Nanomaterials 14 01312 g002
Nanomaterials 14 01312 g003
Figure 3. The degradation efficiency and kinetics of PFX in the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process under different operating parameters. The effect of PMS concentrations on PFX degradation: (a) efficiency and (b) kinetics. The effect of voltage on PFX degradation: (c) efficiency and (d) kinetics. The effect of pH on PFX degradation: (e) efficiency and (f) kinetics.
Figure 3. The degradation efficiency and kinetics of PFX in the Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process under different operating parameters. The effect of PMS concentrations on PFX degradation: (a) efficiency and (b) kinetics. The effect of voltage on PFX degradation: (c) efficiency and (d) kinetics. The effect of pH on PFX degradation: (e) efficiency and (f) kinetics.
Nanomaterials 14 01312 g003
Nanomaterials 14 01312 g005
Figure 5. XPS spectrum of Co(OH)2@Ti nanoarray electrodes: (a) Co 2p and (b) O 1s before (up) and after (down) Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process.
Figure 5. XPS spectrum of Co(OH)2@Ti nanoarray electrodes: (a) Co 2p and (b) O 1s before (up) and after (down) Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process.
Nanomaterials 14 01312 g005
Nanomaterials 14 01312 g006
Figure 6. Other organic pollutants’ (a) degradation curves and (b) mineralization rates via Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process.
Figure 6. Other organic pollutants’ (a) degradation curves and (b) mineralization rates via Co(OH)2@Ti/EA-PMS process.
Nanomaterials 14 01312 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bao, T.; Ke, H.; Li, W.; Cai, L.; Huang, Y. Highly Efficient Peroxymonosulfate Electroactivation on Co(OH)2 Nanoarray Electrode for Pefloxacin Degradation. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14151312

AMA Style

Bao T, Ke H, Li W, Cai L, Huang Y. Highly Efficient Peroxymonosulfate Electroactivation on Co(OH)2 Nanoarray Electrode for Pefloxacin Degradation. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(15):1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14151312

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bao, Tonghui, Hui Ke, Wanjiang Li, Linke Cai, and Yi Huang. 2024. "Highly Efficient Peroxymonosulfate Electroactivation on Co(OH)2 Nanoarray Electrode for Pefloxacin Degradation" Nanomaterials 14, no. 15: 1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14151312

APA Style

Bao, T., Ke, H., Li, W., Cai, L., & Huang, Y. (2024). Highly Efficient Peroxymonosulfate Electroactivation on Co(OH)2 Nanoarray Electrode for Pefloxacin Degradation. Nanomaterials, 14(15), 1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14151312

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop