Next Article in Journal
A Waveguide Inline Binary Metasurface for Wavelength-Selective Transmission and Standing Wave Focusing
Next Article in Special Issue
Additive Manufacturing of Electrically Conductive Multi-Layered Nanocopper in an Air Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Unveiling Fundamentals of Multi-Beam Pulsed Laser Ablation in Liquids toward Scaling up Nanoparticle Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pillar Growth by Focused Electron Beam-Induced Deposition Using a Bimetallic Precursor as Model System: High-Energy Fragmentation vs. Low-Energy Decomposition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Reaction of TiO2 Nanotubes by Combining Surface Oxygen Vacancy Engineering and Zr Doping

by
Maged N. Shaddad
1,
Prabhakarn Arunachalam
2,*,
Mahmoud S. Hezam
3,*,
Saba A. Aladeemy
1,
Mamduh J. Aljaafreh
3,
Sharif Abu Alrub
3 and
Abdullah M. Al-Mayouf
2
1
Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Humanities in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 173, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
2
Electrochemical Sciences Research Chair (ESRC), Chemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
3
Physics Department, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 13318, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(4), 366; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14040366
Submission received: 14 December 2023 / Revised: 12 February 2024 / Accepted: 14 February 2024 / Published: 16 February 2024

Abstract

:
This work examines the cooperative effect between Zr doping and oxygen vacancy engineering in anodized TiO2 nanotubes (TNTs) for enhanced oxygen reduction reactions (ORRs). Zr dopant and annealing conditions significantly affected the electrocatalytic characteristics of grown TNTs. Zr doping results in Zr4+ substituted for Ti4+ species, which indirectly creates oxygen vacancy donors that enhance charge transfer kinetics and reduce carrier recombination in TNT bulk. Moreover, oxygen vacancies promote the creation of unsaturated Ti3+(Zr3+) sites at the surface, which also boosts the ORR interfacial process. Annealing at reductive atmospheres (e.g., H2, vacuum) resulted in a larger increase in oxygen vacancies, which greatly enhanced the ORR activity. In comparison to bare TNTs, Zr doping and vacuum treatment (Zr:TNT–Vac) significantly improved the conductivity and activity of ORRs in alkaline media. The finding also provides selective hydrogen peroxide production by the electrochemical reduction of oxygen.

1. Introduction

In fuel cells, oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is a prominent electrochemical reaction occurring in the cathodic compartment [1]. In acid solutions or alkaline media, there are two main pathways for oxygen reduction, namely direct four-electron reduction to H2O (in acidic media) or two-electron reduction to H2O2 [2]. An overpotential of 1.23 V (versus Reversible Hydrogen Electrode, RHE) [3] must be established to speed up the reaction. As far as fuel cell applications are concerned, platinum is the best material. However, platinum, in addition to suffering from low durability due to corrosion of the support (typically porous carbon), has a remarkably high cost, especially considering its extremely low utilization in the electrocatalysis process [4]. Many efforts have been made in recent years to resolve such Pt issues, for example, by supporting it onto conductive materials with high surface areas [5], or by alloying it with non-noble metals [6,7]. Other promising alternative methods [8] and nonprecious metals [9] are also being investigated. Alternatively, metal oxides based on non-noble metals can be used as a replacement for carbon support or to completely replace Pt, which greatly minimizes costs [10,11,12,13,14]. Metal oxides have, in fact, a few essential advantages. First, the metal in the metal oxide structure already exists in a high oxidation state (e.g., T4+ in TiO2), and is therefore more resistant to oxidation during fuel cell operation (which is the phenomenon causing carbon support degradation). Even when used as a support for Pt nanoparticles for example [15], there exists a strong Pt–metal oxide interaction that prevents the commonly observed problem of the aggregation and dissolution of Pt nanoparticles. Therefore, either as a support or as a standalone catalyst, metal oxides show exceptional stability when used as a cathode in fuel cells. In addition, metal oxides can be easily prepared by a variety of low-cost chemical methods, and a wide range of high-surface-area nanostructured thin films can be prepared by these methods with excellent producibility and scalability as well [16,17,18]. One of the most commonly used metal oxides is TiO2, and more interesting TiO2 nanotube (TNT) arrays, which have been extensively studied and used for a wide range of electrochemical applications [19,20,21]. Due to their particularly remarkable corrosion resistance in acidic and alkaline media [12], TNTs have been successfully examined for ORR catalysis [15,16,17,18]. TNTs are excellent electrode candidates as they offer both high surface areas, as well as direct electrical conduction pathways for charge carriers. In addition, TNTs make energetically favorable combinations with many material systems for different catalytic applications [22,23,24,25,26,27].
Oxygen reduction at the TiO2 surface is mainly a four-electron process [28]. It may, however, slightly depend on the fabrication procedure, TiO2 phase, and electrolyte properties. For example, on a single-crystal rutile surface, despite being largely a four-electron process as well, some oxygen species may go through a two-electron reduction to hydrogen peroxide [29]. In anodically prepared TiO2 electrodes, such as the ones in our study, it has been confirmed that a four-electron process is the dominant reduction process in alkaline media [17,30,31]. Two-electron reduction can, however, be enhanced by increasing the acidity of the electrolyte [30] by post-treatment of the surface [17], or by photo-induced reduction [31].
Researchers have recently discovered that self-assembled TNT arrays via anodization have unique nano-morphological and electronic properties [20,21,26]. The electrical conductivity of as-grown anodized TNT arrays is typically low, so their application in electro-catalysis and catalyst support is limited. In ORR catalysis, they typically serve as the support for noble metals or metallic alloys that acted as catalysts [15,16,32], mainly because TNTs alone are not very active in reduction reactions. Therefore, in order to use TNTs directly for the ORR process, metal or non-metal doping is often employed to produce oxygen vacancies in TNT structures and enhance their electrical features and reactivity [33,34,35]. However, fabricating highly efficient TNT electrodes with appropriate vacancy engineering processes is still a huge challenge.
Metal doping of TiO2 with Zr was reported to enhance different optoelectronic features. For example, the inclusion of Zr in TiO2 layers enhanced hybrid perovskite solar cell performance, which led to longer carrier lifetimes and greater charge carrier densities, perhaps due to fewer defects in bulk materials or at interfaces [36]. Previously, we investigated the cooperative effect of Zr ion doping and vacuum annealing of TNT arrays as an appropriate route to enhance the conductivity of TNTs [33]. It was shown that Ti4+ can be partially substituted by Zr4+, leading to a higher density of native defects, which reduces charge recombination and thus enhances the charge transfer process. Post-annealing under a reductive environment resulted in the creation of Ti3+ sites at the surface and oxygen vacancies in the bulk, respectively boosting the interfacial charge transfer and the conductivity of the TNTs [33]. It is thus interesting to explore if this dual Zr ion doping post-treatment combination would have a strong effect on ORR features.
In this work, highly conducting TNT arrays were obtained by anodization and subsequent heating at 450 °C in air (TNT–air), in nitrogen (TNT–N2), in hydrogen (TNT–H2), and in vacuum (TNT–Vac) atmospheres. The work also demonstrates the synergetic effects of Zr doping and annealing on TNT arrays under the same annealing environments. By using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and cyclic voltammetry, we investigated how annealing gases can influence the surface chemistry of TNT array electrodes with and without Zr doping. The influence of preparation conditions on Zr:TNT electrode electrocatalytic performance is also studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Section

Ti foils (>99.5% purity, Alfa Aesar, thickness: 0.25 mm) were used to fabricate TNTs. Ammonium fluoride (NH4F) and zirconium (IV) acetylacetonate (C20H28O8Zr) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Ethylene glycol (EG) was acquired from BDH. All aqueous solutions were prepared with Milli-Q water (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany).

2.2. Fabrication of TNT Arrays

TNT arrays were produced using the electrochemical anodizing of Ti foil in two steps. TNTs were first cleaned ultrasonically and potentiostatically anodized for 30 min in a 2-electrode electrochemical cell with Pt foil as the counter electrode. Anodization was carried out at a constant voltage of 60 Volts using an electrolyte solution containing NH4F, water, and EG. Afterwards, the Ti foil was ultrasonically cleaned in millipore water for a few seconds for the next round of potentiostatic anodization, which lasted 3 h. After the anodized Ti foil was rinsed with water several times, it was annealed at 450 °C for 120 min at a ramp rate of 2 °C/min to obtain crystalline TNTs.

2.3. Fabrication of Zr:TNT Electrodes

Zr:TNT electrodes were fabricated by electrodepositing C20H28O8Zr in ethylene glycol (EG). In a three-electrode cell, the TNT was used as the working electrode, Pt as a counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) as a reference electrode, and electrodeposition was carried out. A potentiostatic cathodic deposition of Ag/AgCl was performed at −2.0 V with varying deposition times (2–15 s) with different Zr loadings (2 to 20 mC) in 1.0 M NaOH electrolyte. After that, the film was heated for 120 min in air at 450 °C (ramp rate = 2 °C/minute). Afterwards, both bare and Zr-doped TNT arrays were annealed a second time under vacuum, N2, or in air.

2.4. Characterization of Electrodes

In this study, XRD was measured using an X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Miniflex 600, Tokyo, Japan) with a wavelength of 0.154 nm and a scanning rate of 3 per minute. The morphology of fabricated electrodes was investigated using Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM) (JEOL-7600F, Tokyo, Japan). Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was performed using an electrochemical workstation (Metrohm Autolab PGSTAT30, Herisau, Switzerland) with NOVA 1.8 software in a traditional three-electrode single-compartment Pyrex glass cell. In this experiment, saturated calomel (SCE) was used as the reference electrode and pure Pt foil was used as the auxiliary electrode.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystalline Properties of Zr:TNT Arrays

Ti foil is anodized to make the TNTs. In fact, the as-grown TNTs are amorphous [37,38]. The post-annealing treatment is important after that to improve their structural, morphological, and electrical properties [37,39,40]. Figure 1a shows the XRD patterns for the TNT samples post-annealed under air, N2, H2, and vacuum. Upon analyzing the XRD, the crystalline nature of all samples showed a pure anatase phase (JCPDS card no. 21-1272) without displaying any secondary phases (except the peaks of the Ti metal from the substrate), despite being heat-treated in four different atmospheres (air, N2, H2, and vacuum). In agreement with previous results, the (101) anatase peak at ~25.3° dominated the other peaks in the diffraction patterns [37,39], and this was the case for all annealing environments. A magnified image of the (101) region is shown in Figure 1b. By studying the (101) anatase peak, it can be noticed that different gas environments bring about slightly different peak positions. This can be attributed to the fact that different annealing environments result in different levels of lattice strain in the samples [41,42]. Compared to the TNT–air sample, all other environments resulted in reduced strain, which can be observed from their smaller peak positions. The shifts in peak positions were, however, not very significant, with the largest shift of about 0.4°under H2 annealing.

3.2. Morphological Features of Zr:TNT Arrays

SEM images of non-annealed TNTs and TNTs annealed in different annealing conditions are shown in Figure 2. In all samples, the adoption of the two-step anodization process resulted in highly ordered structures. In two-step anodization, TNTs are grown in the first anodization step of the Ti foil (which usually has a corrugated irregular surface) at a high voltage of 60 V, at which the tube dissolution is significant. This results in a TNT disordered array that is easy to be removed. Cleaning steps after the first anodization step remove the remnants and “delineate” a nanoconcave pattern on the Ti sheet. The first anodization also removes, to a large extent, the native oxide layer on the Ti foil. The delineated Ti substrate is then used in the second anodization step at a lower voltage to form a highly ordered uniform array of TiO2 nanotubes [43,44,45,46]. Our grown TNTs were smooth and well-aligned, and no apparent defects were noticed. The as-prepared sample has a top amorphous layer, and the nanotubes are grown underneath [43]. This layer does not appear on the surface of annealed samples. Considering the grown TNT pattern, each nanotube is generally surrounded by six other nanotubes resulting in a hexagonal closed packed pattern, in agreement with previous work [45,46]. However, it can be noticed that we have two levels of nanotube growth: upper hexagonal nanotube pores on the top (highlighted by a hexagon in Figure 2c) and two lower-level inside pores (highlighted by circles in Figure 2c) that have smaller diameters, making a double-layer lotus-root-shaped nanostructure. This structure has been reported to have low values of the second anodization voltage, and more than two inside pores can be observed [46]. In our growth conditions, we had 1–2 inside pores, the size of which were substantial compared to the size of the upper pore, which resulted in deviations from the hexagonal close-packed structure at many locations. In general, thermal treatment under air, N2, H2, and vacuum does not alter the morphological features of TNTs either on their surface or on the inside. The characteristic parameters of the different nanotubes were composed of NTs 147 ± 5 nm in diameter with a length of 900 ± 50 nm. Based on the image analysis, the surface density was estimated to be ~150 tubes/square meter. The TNTs maintained their structural integrity after annealing. The nanotubes appeared to be of high quality and can be used for electrocatalytic applications.

3.3. Electrochemical Performance of TNT Arrays

3.3.1. Electrochemical Performance of TNT Arrays without Zr Doping

Linear sweep voltammetry was first used to characterize pure TNTs (without the Zr deposition step) thermally treated under different atmospheric conditions. Using 1.0 M NaOH at 10 mV/s, TNT, TNT–N2, TNT–air, and TNT–Vac array electrodes were investigated for ORRs measured between 1.0 and 0 V versus RHE. The results are shown in Figure 3a, with Figure 3b showing the measurements. As a benchmark electrode material, a commercial Pt/C catalyst was also tested and is presented in Figure 3. In the TNT–air electrode, two distinct reduction peaks are seen at 0.38 V and 0.14 V vs. RHE, with cathodic peaks indicating mass transport-controlled reduction and peak currents of 0.11 mA cm−2. All electrodes studied under different annealing atmospheres showed distinct cathodic peaks, but TNT electrodes processed under vacuum performed the best electrochemically. Remarkably, the TNT–Vac electrode showed much greater ORR onset potential, as well as a superior current density of about 0.35 mA cm−2, which is considerably greater than the TNT–air sample (0.09 mA cm−2), and is also comparable to that of the commercial Pt/C electrode. On the other hand, the LSV voltammogram of TNT–Vac indicates that, at the measured potentials, cathodic currents are lower than those of the Pt/C materials. In comparison with those for TNT–N2, TNT–H2, and TNT–air electrodes, TNT–Vac’s oxygen reduction potentials shifted to a more positive position, indicating a higher catalytic activity. This indicates that TNT–Vac is more efficient in reducing oxygen than TNT–N2, TNT–H2, and TNT–air electrodes. Moreover, the shifted potentials of TNT–Vac suggest improved catalytic activity towards oxygen reduction.

3.3.2. Electrochemical Performances of Zr-Doped TNT Arrays

For Zr-doped samples, the Zr loading was first optimized for the best catalytic activity. Different Zr loadings were tested on TNTs during the cathodic electrodeposition process, and the optimal Zr content was determined after testing different applied charges. In Figure S1, LSV plots are shown for a TNT electrode with different Zr loadings (2 to 20 mC) in 1.0 M NaOH electrolyte. The results show that the optimal electrodeposited charge is 2 mC. Thus, unless otherwise specified, the optimized Zr-doped TNT electrodes are referred to as Zr:TNTs throughout the manuscript.
The optimized Zr-doped TNT electrodes were then used to investigate the combined effect of Zr incorporation (conditions) and post-annealing under different environments on ORR activity in alkaline media. The results are shown in Figure 4. As shown in Figure 4a, the LSV plots show the effect of annealing atmospheres in 1.0 M NaOH on Zr:TNT electrodes. A magnified view of the plots is shown in Figure 4b. It can be noticed that chemically irreversible reduction peaks occur at potentials of 0.61 V and 0.16 V vs. RHE in Zr:TNT–Vac. It can be clearly observed that Zr:TNT–Vac has also the highest current density (now even higher than the commercial Pt/C electrode) and ORR onset potential as well. The electrochemical results indicated that both Zr doping and vacuum annealing on TNT electrodes increased ORR activity more than N2-annealed, H2-annealed, and air-annealed Zr:TNT substrates. The electrochemical tests also confirm the importance of the vacuum annealing effect on Zr-doped TNTs. Overall, the Zr doping and vacuum annealing of TNTs proved to be a successful combination for increasing ORR activity, in agreement with the reported literature on other electrochemical systems [33,47,48].

3.3.3. Effect of Oxygen Concentration on the Reduction Peaks in Vacuum-Annealed Zr-Doped TNT Arrays

The origin of the two cathodic peaks, and if they are directly related to oxygen reduction at the surface of the champion Zr:TNT–Vac sample, can be investigated by changing the gas purging environment during LSV measurements. Using alkaline solutions pumped with pure O2, air (~20% O2), and pure argon under vacuum, the effect of oxygen concentration could therefore be investigated for the Zr:TNT–Vac electrode. LSV diagrams for the different oxygen concentrations in 1.0 M NaOH are shown in Figure 5. Under vacuum, LSV results for the electrode show only a small reduction peak at 0.13 V after completely deoxygenating the solution. Both reduction peaks started to be observed after purging the solution with air. By purging with pure oxygen gas, the current increases significantly with increasing oxygen concentrations. The results of this experiment prove that these two peaks are the result of oxygen reduction at the Zr:TNT–Vac array surface, and we speculate that the reduction process involves two sequential reactions. At the first peak at potential 0.63 V, oxygen is reduced by two electrons to give H2O2 (or more correctly HO2−), which is followed by the second peak at potential 0.18 V vs. RHE by a further two electron reductions to give water. We previously observed a similar two-step reduction mechanism for N2-annealed TNTs [17]. Based on the above results, the Zr:TNT–Vac electrode materials exhibit excellent ORR catalytic activity. Lastly, these results show that these electrode materials have potential applications in the field of ORR.
We further investigated the effect of scan rate on the Zr:TNT–Vac sample under a saturated O2 measurement environment. Figure 6a shows LSV diagrams of the Zr:TNT–Vac array samples at different scan rates in 1.0 M NaOH solution that was O2-saturated. Figure 6b shows the relationship between the two cathodic peak currents and the square root of the scan rate. For the Zr:TNT–Vac electrode, both oxygen reduction peak currents increased linearly with potential scan rate squared. This indicates that oxygen reduction is diffusion-controlled. Moreover, the diffusion rate of oxygen into the electrode increases with the potential scan rate. Based on this, it is likely that the diffusion of oxygen from the solution to oxygen vacancies in the electrode is controlling the overall ORR process. Therefore, it can be concluded that oxygen reduction is diffusion-controlled in Zr:TNT–Vac electrodes.

3.3.4. EIS Measurements

EIS measurements were performed on TNT films before and after Zr doping annealed under air and vacuum environments in order to determine the electrode reaction kinetics and charge-transfer resistance. Figure 7 shows typical Nyquist impedance plots (Z’ versus Z”) of the EIS data acquired for the TNT–air, TNT–Vac, Zr:TNT, and Zr:TNT–Vac electrodes obtained in the frequency varying between 10−2 and 200 kHz. Zr doping alone (blue arc) resulted in a reduced arc radius compared to that of the undoped sample (black arc), indicating that Zr doping resulted in a higher conductivity of the electrode. Zr doping also enhanced conductivity for the vacuum-annealed samples (magenta and red arcs). Similarly, vacuum annealing resulted in reducing the charge-transfer resistance as well for pure and Zr-doped electrodes. Therefore, the Nyquist plot for the Zr:TNT–Vac electrode has the smallest arc radius, indicating the remarkable synergetic effect of Zr doping and vacuum annealing. This combined effect clearly resulted in a smaller charge-transfer resistance, which again demonstrates superior electrochemical performance. The enhanced charge transfer kinetics of the Zr:TNT–Vac sample will manifest as an efficient ORR catalysis. Overall, the introduction of Zr doping and vacuum annealing to the TNT–air electrodes resulted in improved electrochemical performance, thus making them a promising candidate for oxygen reduction reactions.

3.3.5. Mechanisms of ORR Enhancement

The ORR process takes place at the TNT surface, and is therefore an atomistic process in nature. The effect of annealing under a reductive atmosphere (e.g., vacuum) on the TNT surface can be explained as follows. The reductive environment results in a higher density of oxygen vacancies, which are very diffusive to the surface [49]. At the oxygen vacancy sites on the surface, unsaturated Ti3+ (instead of saturated Ti4+) sites will be exposed to oxygen molecules and are thus ready to work as oxygen reduction sites. At the same time, oxygen vacancies are native defects that serve as electron donors, and increasing their density will therefore be reflected in a higher conductivity of the nanotubes, confirming the EIS results. The higher conductivity will improve electron transfer through the TNT bulk (by decreasing bulk carrier recombination events) until reaching the external circuit and the electric load of the fuel cell are reached, thus ultimately increasing the charge collection efficiency of the electrode. In a nutshell, oxygen vacancies created by the reductive environment improve photocatalytic activity in two ways: the creation of exposed Ti3+ ORR sites at the surface, and increasing free electron density and thus conductivity in the bulk of nanotubes.
The effect of Zr doping is more difficult to explain. It has to be mentioned first that Zr deposition was performed after TNT growth and not during the growth of the TNTs. Post-annealing after that will cause Zr atoms to diffuse into the bulk. However, a large concentration of Zr atoms is expected to be close to the surface. Although the formation of ZrO2 nanoparticles or nanoclusters is a possibility that cannot be ignored [50], we previously showed by X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) that Zr4+ ions replace Ti4+ ions in the lattice [33]. Therefore, both Zr4+ and Ti4+ have the same oxidation state and so doping with Zr is not expected to directly increase the free carrier density in TNTs. In addition, metal doping generally increases the formation energy and diffusion coefficient of oxygen vacancies in the lattice [51]. Both scenarios are against the observed higher conductivity observed in EIS measurements, and the higher photocatalytic activity as well. In fact, the enhanced conductivity can be explained as follows. In the TiO2 anatase lattice, Ti4+ lies at the center of TiO6 octrahedra, making a coordination number of 6 for the Ti4+ ion. For such a combination, the ionic radius of Ti4+ is 60.5 pm, while it is 72 pm for Zr4+ in the same lattice [52,53]. This slightly higher ionic radius of Zr4+ will induce a strain in the lattice. To alleviate this strain, nearby oxygen ions can escape to the surface, leaving oxygen vacancy donors that will thus increase the density of free electrons in the TNTs [54]. This process will be energy-supplied by heat in the annealing step. If annealing is further performed in a reductive environment, the formation of oxygen vacancies that will readily take place, as well as the creation of Ti3+(Zr3+) sites on the surface, will amplify the effect initiated by the presence of Zr4+ dopants, thus explaining the combined effect of both Zr doping and vacuum annealing. In summary, oxygen vacancies can be created directly by the reductive environment and indirectly by Zr doping, which result in a higher density of free carriers in the bulk and unsaturated Ti3+(Zr3+) sites at the surface. Figure 8 shows a schematic of the two paths available to generate oxygen vacancies in our samples.
This work and our previous studies [33,47,48] confirm the fact that the vacuum annealing process is more responsible for enhanced electrochemical activity than Zr doping. In Figure 9, different LSV diagrams from Figure 4 and Figure 5 are presented for different comparisons that can shed light on the weight of each of the two parameters. Figure 9a illustrates the vacancy effect on TNT substrate. In comparison to TNT–air, vacuum annealing significantly improved TNT conductivity and reactivity, with a 258 mV positive potential shift for oxygen reduction. As illustrated in Figure 9b, the effect of doping on TNT substrates is also shown. As a result of Zr doping over TNTs, an oxygen reduction shift of 258 mV was observed. Figure 9c shows the comparative effect of vacancies and doping. Figure 9d demonstrates the synergetic effect of Zr doping and vacuum annealing on TNTs. Compared with TNT–air, the synergetic effect of Zr doping and vacuum annealing showed a 232 mV positive potential shift. Therefore, vacuum annealing reduces TNT potential more effectively than Zr doping. This indicates that Zr doping improves oxygen reduction performance when vacuum annealing is present. This suggests that vacuum annealing is a key factor in TNT oxygen reduction.

3.3.6. ORR Catalytic Stability

ORR catalytic stability was investigated for the optimal Zr-doped vacuum-annealed electrode, and the chronoamperometric ( I t ) curves under a saturated oxygen electrolyte environment for both the optimal TNT and Pt/C electrode are shown in Figure 10. The Pt/C electrode deteriorates quickly by ~20% over 12 h. On the other hand, the current in the optimal TNT electrode increases by more than 50% before reaching a saturation current density of 0.62 mA/cm2 at 0.4 V vs. RHE, indicating the long-term stability of the electrode. Similar stability behavior has been reported in the literature for metal oxide electrodes in general and for the TNT morphology as well [12,15].

4. Conclusions

Overall, we demonstrate that Zr doping and vacuum annealing have synergistic effects on improving TNT surface activity, which results in improved ORR performance in alkaline media. Vacuum annealing results in donor-type oxygen vacancies, which increase the conductivity of the TNT bulk and also create unsaturated Ti3+(Zr3+) sites at the surface that work as active oxygen reduction sites. Zr doping can also result in the creation of oxygen vacancies that will relax the lattice when Ti4+ ions are replaced by Zr4+. The synergetic effect resulted in a remarkable improvement in ORR activity and stability for the optimized electrode. Compared to commercial Pt/carbon electrodes, higher current density was obtained, however at the cost of the appearance of two-electron reduction peaks, making the process slower compared to the complete four-electron process with Pt. On the other hand, these TNTs can be efficiently applied for the production of hydrogen peroxide by selective ORR.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano14040366/s1, Figure S1: LSV diagrams for TNT electrodes with different ZrO2 loading (2 to 20 mC) at a scan rate 10 mVs−1 immersed in 1.0 M NaOH and annealed under air.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.N.S. and P.A.; Methodology: M.N.S.; Data Curation: M.N.S. and P.A.; Formal Analysis: M.N.S., P.A. and S.A.A. (Saba A. Aladeemy); Investigation: M.N.S., P.A., M.S.H., S.A.A. (Saba A. Aladeemy), M.J.A. and S.A.A. (Sharif Abu Alrub); Validation: M.N.S., P.A. and M.S.H.; Writing—Original Draft: M.N.S., P.A. and M.S.H.; Writing—Review and Editing: P.A. and M.S.H.; Supervision and Project Administration: A.M.A.-M.; Funding Acquisition: M.S.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) grant number IMSIU-RG23125.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and supplementary materials.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported and funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) (grant number IMSIU-RG23125).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mehta, V.; Cooper, J.S. Review and Analysis of PEM Fuel Cell Design and Manufacturing. J. Power Sources 2003, 114, 32–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nie, Y.; Li, L.; Wei, Z. Recent Advancements in Pt and Pt-Free Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2168–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nørskov, J.K.; Rossmeisl, J.; Logadottir, A.; Lindqvist, L.; Kitchin, J.R.; Bligaard, T.; Jónsson, H. Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 17886–17892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tang, M.; Zhang, S.; Chen, S. Pt Utilization in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: Structure Impacting Factors and Mechanistic Insights. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 1529–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fang, B.; Chaudhari, N.K.; Kim, M.-S.; Kim, J.H.; Yu, J.-S. Homogeneous Deposition of Platinum Nanoparticles on Carbon Black for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15330–15338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, C.; Kang, Y.; Huo, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Huang, W.; Xin, H.L.; Snyder, J.D.; Li, D.; Herron, J.A.; Mavrikakis, M.; et al. Highly Crystalline Multimetallic Nanoframes with Three-Dimensional Electrocatalytic Surfaces. Science 2014, 343, 1339–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dai, Y.; Ou, L.; Liang, W.; Yang, F.; Liu, Y.; Chen, S. Efficient and Superiorly Durable Pt-Lean Electrocatalysts of Pt−W Alloys for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 2162–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Z.; Ge, R.; Su, J.; Chen, L. Recent Progress in Low Pt Content Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 7, 2000396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, X.; Xu, X.; Yao, S.; Hao, C.; Pan, C.; Xiang, X.; Tian, Z.Q.; Shen, P.K.; Shao, Z.; Jiang, S.P. Boosting Electrocatalytic Activity of Single Atom Catalysts Supported on Nitrogen-Doped Carbon through N Coordination Environment Engineering. Small 2022, 18, 2105329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Delmondo, L.; Salvador, G.P.; Muñoz-Tabares, J.A.; Sacco, A.; Garino, N.; Castellino, M.; Gerosa, M.; Massaglia, G.; Chiodoni, A.; Quaglio, M. Nanostructured MnxOy for Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) Catalysts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 388, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Garino, N.; Sacco, A.; Castellino, M.; Muñoz-Tabares, J.A.; Armandi, M.; Chiodoni, A.; Pirri, C.F. One-Pot Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Reduced Graphene Oxide/Iron Oxide Nanocomposite Catalyst for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 3640–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.; Gu, J.; Su, L.; Cheng, L. An Overview of Metal Oxide Materials as Electrocatalysts and Supports for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2535–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, X.; Su, C.; Shao, Z. Fundamental Understanding and Application of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ Perovskite in Energy Storage and Conversion: Past, Present, and Future. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 13585–13609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, X.; Wang, W.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Recent Advances in Novel Nanostructuring Methods of Perovskite Electrocatalysts for Energy-Related Applications. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1800071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, C.; Yu, H.; Li, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Song, W.; Shao, Z.; Yi, B. Supported Noble Metals on Hydrogen-Treated TiO2 Nanotube Arrays as Highly Ordered Electrodes for Fuel Cells. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shaddad, M.N.; Al-Mayouf, A.M.; Ghanem, M.A.; AlHoshan, M.S.; Singh, J.P.; Al-Suhybani, A.A. Chemical Deposition and Electrocatalytic Activity of Platinum Nanoparticles Supported on TiO2 Nanotubes. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2013, 8, 2468–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ghanem, M.A.; Al-Mayouf, A.M.; Shaddad, M.N.; Marken, F. Selective Formation of Hydrogen Peroxide by Oxygen Reduction on TiO2 Nanotubes in Alkaline Media. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 174, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, W.; Lv, F.; Lei, B.; Wan, S.; Luo, M.; Guo, S. Tuning Nanowires and Nanotubes for Efficient Fuel-Cell Electrocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 10117–10141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fujishima, A.; Zhang, X.; Tryk, D. TiO2 Photocatalysis and Related Surface Phenomena. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2008, 63, 515–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mor, G.K.; Varghese, O.K.; Paulose, M.; Shankar, K.; Grimes, C.A. A Review on Highly Ordered, Vertically Oriented TiO2 Nanotube Arrays: Fabrication, Material Properties, and Solar Energy Applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2006, 90, 2011–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grimes, C.; Mor, G. TiO2 Nanotube Arrays: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  22. Arunachalam, P.; AlOraij, H.A.; Amer, M.S.; Hezam, M.; Shaddad, M.N.; Madhavan, J. Activation Effect of Nickel Phosphate Co-Catalysts on the Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation Performance of TiO2 Nanotubes. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2022, 26, 101484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhu, K.; Neale, N.R.; Miedaner, A.; Frank, A.J. Enhanced Charge-Collection Efficiencies and Light Scattering in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Using Oriented TiO2 Nanotubes Arrays. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Xu, W.; Kulkarni, S.A.; Batabyal, S.K.; Zhang, S.; Cao, A.; Wong, L.H. TiO2 Nanotube Arrays Based Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells with Transparent Carbon Nanotube Electrode. Nano Energy 2015, 11, 728–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Arunachalam, P.; Amer, M.S.; AlOraij, H.A.; Al-Mayouf, A.M.; Hezam, M.; Al-Shalwi, M. Boosting the Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation Performance of TiO2 Nanotubes by Surface Modification Using Silver Phosphate. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Macak, J.M.; Tsuchiya, H.; Ghicov, A.; Yasuda, K.; Hahn, R.; Bauer, S.; Schmuki, P. TiO2 Nanotubes: Self-Organized Electrochemical Formation, Properties and Applications. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2007, 11, 3–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xing, L.; Jia, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Dong, S. Pt Modified TiO2 Nanotubes Electrode: Preparation and Electrocatalytic Application for Methanol Oxidation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 12169–12173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Baez, V.B.; Graves, J.E.; Pletcher, D. The Reduction of Oxygen on Titanium Oxide Electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1992, 340, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parkinson, B.; Decker, F.; Julião, J.F.; Abramovich, M.; Chagas, H.C. The Reduction of Molecular Oxygen at Single Crystal Rutile Electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 1980, 25, 521–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mentus, S.V. Oxygen Reduction on Anodically Formed Titanium Dioxide. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 50, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Clechet, P.; Martelet, C.; Martin, J.R.; Olier, R. Photoelectrochemical Behaviour of TiO2 and Formation of Hydrogen Peroxide. Electrochim. Acta 1979, 24, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Macak, J.; Schmidt-Stein, F.; Communications, P.S.-E. Efficient Oxygen Reduction on Layers of Ordered TiO2 Nanotubes Loaded with Au Nanoparticles. Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9, 1783–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shaddad, M.N.; Cardenas-Morcoso, D.; García-Tecedor, M.; Fabregat-Santiago, F.; Bisquert, J.; Al-Mayouf, A.M.; Gimenez, S. TiO2 Nanotubes for Solar Water Splitting: Vacuum Annealing and Zr Doping Enhance Water Oxidation Kinetics. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 16095–16102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Noh, K.J.; Nam, I.; Han, J.W. Nb-TiO2 Nanotubes as Catalyst Supports with High Activity and Durability for Oxygen Reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 521, 146330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nah, Y.C.; Paramasivam, I.; Schmuki, P. Doped TiO2 and TiO2 Nanotubes: Synthesis and Applications. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 2698–2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nagaoka, H.; Ma, F.; Dequilettes, D.W.; Vorpahl, S.M.; Glaz, M.S.; Colbert, A.E.; Ziffer, M.E.; Ginger, D.S. Zr Incorporation into TiO2 Electrodes Reduces Hysteresis and Improves Performance in Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells While Increasing Carrier Lifetimes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Albu, S.P.; Tsuchiya, H.; Fujimoto, S.; Schmuki, P. TiO2 Nanotubes–Annealing Effects on Detailed Morphology and Structure. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 2010, 4351–4356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Macak, J.M.; Aldabergerova, S.; Ghicov, A.; Schmuki, P. Smooth Anodic TiO2 Nanotubes: Annealing and Structure. Phys. Status Solidi (a) 2006, 203, R67–R69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Albu, S.P.; Ghicov, A.; Aldabergenova, S.; Drechsel, P.; LeClere, D.; Thompson, G.E.; Macak, J.M.; Schmuki, P. Formation of Double-Walled TiO2 Nanotubes and Robust Anatase Membranes. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 4135–4139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xiao, P.; Liu, D.; Garcia, B.B.; Sepehri, S.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, G. Electrochemical and Photoelectrical Properties of Titania Nanotube Arrays Annealed in Different Gases. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2008, 134, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hyam, R.S.; Lee, J.; Cho, E.; Khim, J.; Lee, H. Effect of Annealing Environments on Self-Organized TiO2 Nanotubes for Efficient Photocatalytic Applications. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 12, 8908–8912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Talla, A.; Suliali, N.J.; Goosen, W.E.; Urgessa, Z.N.; Motloung, S.V.; Botha, J.R. Effect of Annealing Temperature and Atmosphere on the Structural, Morphological and Luminescent Properties of TiO2 Nanotubes. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2022, 640, 414026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Regonini, D.; Satka, A.; Jaroenworaluck, A.; Allsopp, D.W.E.; Bowen, C.R.; Stevens, R. Factors Influencing Surface Morphology of Anodized TiO2 Nanotubes. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 74, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Khudhair, D.; Bhatti, A.; Li, Y.; Hamedani, H.A.; Garmestani, H.; Hodgson, P.; Nahavandi, S. Anodization Parameters Influencing the Morphology and Electrical Properties of TiO2 Nanotubes for Living Cell Interfacing and Investigations. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 59, 1125–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Pishkar, N.; Ghoranneviss, M.; Ghorannevis, Z.; Akbari, H. Study of the Highly Ordered TiO2 Nanotubes Physical Properties Prepared with Two-Step Anodization. Results Phys. 2018, 9, 1246–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, S.; Zhang, G.; Guo, D.; Yu, L.; Zhang, W. Anodization Fabrication of Highly Ordered TiO2 Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 12759–12765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shaddad, M.N.; Arunachalam, P.; Amer, M.S.; Al-Mayouf, A.M.; Hezam, M.; AlOraij, H.A.; Gimenez, S. Exploiting the Synergistic Catalytic Effects of CoPi Nanostructures on Zr-Doped Highly Ordered TiO2 Nanotubes for Efficient Solar Water Oxidation. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 12608–12622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shaddad, M.; Alharthi, A.; Alotaibi, M.; Alanazi, A.A.; Arunachalam, P.; Al-Mayouf, A.M. Combining Heterointerface/Surface Oxygen Vacancies Engineering of Bismuth Oxide to Synergistically Improve Its Solar Water Splitting Performance. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 469, 143217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Schaub, R.; Wahlstrom, E.; Rønnau, A.; Lægsgaard, E.; Stensgaard, I.; Besenbacher, F. Oxygen-Mediated Diffusion of Oxygen Vacancies on the TiO2(110) Surface. Science 2003, 299, 377–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Simka, W.; Majewski, D.; Nawrat, G.; Krząkała, A.; Nieużyła, Ł.; Michalska, J. Electrodeposition of Zirconium from DMSO Solution. Arch. Metall. Mater. 2014, 59, 565–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bakulin, A.; Elfimov, B.; Matiskina, E.V.; Kulkova, S.E. Impurity Influence on Oxygen Diffusion in TiO2. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2310, 020026. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shannon, R.D. Revised Effective Ionic Radii and Systematic Studies of Interatomic Distances in Halides and Chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Cryst. Phys. 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Baloch, A.A.B.; Alqahtani, S.M.; Mumtaz, F.; Muqaibel, A.H.; Rashkeev, S.N.; Alharbi, F.H. Extending Shannon’s Ionic Radii Database Using Machine Learning. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2021, 5, 043804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, M.; Ioccozia, J.; Sun, L.; Lin, C. Inorganic-Modified Semiconductor TiO2 Nanotube Arrays for Photocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2182–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns of bare TNTs (black), TNT–N2 electrodes (blue), TNT–H2 electrodes (magenta) and TNT–Vac (red) electrodes obtained through annealing under atmosphere (b) and enlarged view of fabricated electrodes.
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction patterns of bare TNTs (black), TNT–N2 electrodes (blue), TNT–H2 electrodes (magenta) and TNT–Vac (red) electrodes obtained through annealing under atmosphere (b) and enlarged view of fabricated electrodes.
Nanomaterials 14 00366 g001
Figure 2. FE-SEM top-view images of as-prepared TNTs (a), TNTs annealed in air (b), TNTs annealed in N2 (c), TNTs annealed in H2 (d), TNTs annealed under vacuum (e,f).
Figure 2. FE-SEM top-view images of as-prepared TNTs (a), TNTs annealed in air (b), TNTs annealed in N2 (c), TNTs annealed in H2 (d), TNTs annealed under vacuum (e,f).
Nanomaterials 14 00366 g002
Figure 3. (a) LSV for a TNT electrode at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1 immersed in 1.0 M NaOH and annealed under air, N2, H2, and vacuum conditions; (b) enlarged view of the figures.
Figure 3. (a) LSV for a TNT electrode at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1 immersed in 1.0 M NaOH and annealed under air, N2, H2, and vacuum conditions; (b) enlarged view of the figures.
Nanomaterials 14 00366 g003
Figure 4. (a) LSV for a Zr:TNT electrodes at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1 immersed in 1.0 M NaOH and annealed under air, N2, H2, and vacuum conditions; (b) enlarged view of the figures.
Figure 4. (a) LSV for a Zr:TNT electrodes at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1 immersed in 1.0 M NaOH and annealed under air, N2, H2, and vacuum conditions; (b) enlarged view of the figures.
Nanomaterials 14 00366 g004
Figure 5. CV for a Zr:TNT–Vac electrode at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1 immersed in 1.0 M NaOH purged for 20 min with pure argon, air, and pure oxygen.
Figure 5. CV for a Zr:TNT–Vac electrode at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1 immersed in 1.0 M NaOH purged for 20 min with pure argon, air, and pure oxygen.
Nanomaterials 14 00366 g005
Figure 6. (a) LSV at different scan rates for a Zr:TNT–Vac electrode in 1.0 M oxygen-saturated NaOH; (b) plot for peak currents versus square root of scan rate.
Figure 6. (a) LSV at different scan rates for a Zr:TNT–Vac electrode in 1.0 M oxygen-saturated NaOH; (b) plot for peak currents versus square root of scan rate.
Nanomaterials 14 00366 g006
Figure 7. Nyquist plots of fabricated TNT array films, TNT–Vac, Zr:TNT–air, and Zr:TNT–Vac substrates.
Figure 7. Nyquist plots of fabricated TNT array films, TNT–Vac, Zr:TNT–air, and Zr:TNT–Vac substrates.
Nanomaterials 14 00366 g007
Figure 8. A schematic showing the different possible paths to generate oxygen vacancies in TNTs.
Figure 8. A schematic showing the different possible paths to generate oxygen vacancies in TNTs.
Nanomaterials 14 00366 g008
Figure 9. LSV diagrams for (a) TNTs–air vs. TNT–vacuum electrodes to show the effect of oxygen vacancies on bare TNT electrodes (b) TNTs–air vs. Zr:TNT–air electrodes to show the effect of Zr doping, (c) TNTs–Vac vs. Zr:TNT–air electrodes, and (d) TNTs–air vs. Zr:TNT–Vac electrodes to show the synergistic effect for both kinds of defects (vacancy and doping). All results were measured at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1 immersed in 1.0 M NaOH.
Figure 9. LSV diagrams for (a) TNTs–air vs. TNT–vacuum electrodes to show the effect of oxygen vacancies on bare TNT electrodes (b) TNTs–air vs. Zr:TNT–air electrodes to show the effect of Zr doping, (c) TNTs–Vac vs. Zr:TNT–air electrodes, and (d) TNTs–air vs. Zr:TNT–Vac electrodes to show the synergistic effect for both kinds of defects (vacancy and doping). All results were measured at a scan rate of 10 mVs−1 immersed in 1.0 M NaOH.
Nanomaterials 14 00366 g009
Figure 10. ORR stability chronoamperometric curves for Zr–doped vacuum-annealed TNTs, as well as Pt/C electrodes in 1.0 M oxygen-saturated NaOH electrolyte.
Figure 10. ORR stability chronoamperometric curves for Zr–doped vacuum-annealed TNTs, as well as Pt/C electrodes in 1.0 M oxygen-saturated NaOH electrolyte.
Nanomaterials 14 00366 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shaddad, M.N.; Arunachalam, P.; Hezam, M.S.; Aladeemy, S.A.; Aljaafreh, M.J.; Abu Alrub, S.; Al-Mayouf, A.M. Enhanced Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Reaction of TiO2 Nanotubes by Combining Surface Oxygen Vacancy Engineering and Zr Doping. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14040366

AMA Style

Shaddad MN, Arunachalam P, Hezam MS, Aladeemy SA, Aljaafreh MJ, Abu Alrub S, Al-Mayouf AM. Enhanced Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Reaction of TiO2 Nanotubes by Combining Surface Oxygen Vacancy Engineering and Zr Doping. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(4):366. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14040366

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shaddad, Maged N., Prabhakarn Arunachalam, Mahmoud S. Hezam, Saba A. Aladeemy, Mamduh J. Aljaafreh, Sharif Abu Alrub, and Abdullah M. Al-Mayouf. 2024. "Enhanced Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Reaction of TiO2 Nanotubes by Combining Surface Oxygen Vacancy Engineering and Zr Doping" Nanomaterials 14, no. 4: 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14040366

APA Style

Shaddad, M. N., Arunachalam, P., Hezam, M. S., Aladeemy, S. A., Aljaafreh, M. J., Abu Alrub, S., & Al-Mayouf, A. M. (2024). Enhanced Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Reaction of TiO2 Nanotubes by Combining Surface Oxygen Vacancy Engineering and Zr Doping. Nanomaterials, 14(4), 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14040366

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop