Next Article in Journal
Optimization of the Production Process and Product Quality of Titanate Nanotube–Drug Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
Antibacterial and Antioxidant Potential of Silver Nanoparticles Biosynthesized Using the Spruce Bark Extract
Previous Article in Journal
Single-Crystalline Metal Oxide Nanostructures Synthesized by Plasma-Enhanced Thermal Oxidation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Colorimetric Determination of the Activity of Starch-Debranching Enzyme via Modified Tollens’ Reaction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Functional Layered Double Hydroxide Nanohybrids for Biomedical Imaging

1
Department of Nano Materials Science and Engineering, Kyungnam University, Changwon, Gyeongsangnamdo 51767, Korea
2
College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332005, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(10), 1404; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101404
Submission received: 29 August 2019 / Revised: 17 September 2019 / Accepted: 26 September 2019 / Published: 2 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanostructured Materials and Natural Extract)

Abstract

:
Biomedical investigations using layered double hydroxide (LDH) nanoparticles have attracted tremendous attentions due to their advantages such as biocompatibility, variable-chemical compositions, anion-exchange capacity, host–guest interactions, and crystallization-dissolution characters. Bio-imaging becomes more and more important since it allows theranostics to combine therapy and diagnosis, which is a concept of next-generation medicine. Based on the unique features mentioned above, LDHs create novel opportunities for bio-imaging and simultaneous therapy with LDHs-based nanohybrids. This review aims to explore the recent advances in multifunctional LDH nanohybrids ranging from synthesis to practical applications for various bio-imaging with therapeutic functions. Furthermore, their potential both as diagnostic agents and drug delivery carriers will be discussed with the improvement in noninvasive bio-imaging techniques.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) have been extensively explored in the nano-bio fields based on their inherent two-dimensional (2D) layered structure, excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Since intercalative nanohybrids of DNA in LDH was proposed as “bio-inorganic nanohybrids” for the first time in 1999 [8], LDHs have received continuous attentions in biomedical applications with multifunctional nanohybrid systems. A representative research is related to nano contrast agent systems that are essential for the development of bio-imaging technology [9,10,11,12]. Successful manipulation on the nanometer scale of LDH can provide novel perspectives in the design of multifunctional nanohybrids, which open up a promising field for applications in bio-imaging with simultaneously effectual therapeutic functions.
Bio-imaging techniques with high resolution and sensitivity aid in both the detection of diseases and the understanding of biological phenomena. It is rapidly evolving through the convergence of advanced imaging technology, medicine, molecular biology, genetics, cytology, nuclear medicine, chemistry, pharmacology, physics, etc. It is also the latest multidisciplinary field that contributes to the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of disease as well as continuous monitoring of post-treatment condition [13,14,15,16,17,18]. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, a combination of 3D printing techniques and medical technology, is one core technology of the 4th industrial revolution era [19]. 3D bioprinting has expanded widely in patient-customized applications ranging from production of artificial skin, organs, and even to blood vessels, but in order to pursue clinical efficacy, it is essential that 3D bioprinting is based on fast, reliable, and high-quality data through bio-imaging. The representative bio-imaging modalities in either clinical settings or preclinical research are optical fluorescence imaging [6,9,20,21,22,23,24,25], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [26,27,28,29] and multimodal imaging [30,31,32,33,34], which has been utilized via the combination of different imaging methods with various image performances, such as sensitivity, resolution and accuracy (Figure 1. right).
In order to achieve highly accurate images for early diagnosis and effective treatment, continuous trials in performance enhancements of noninvasive bio-imaging techniques are in progress. One strategy is the use of advanced contrast agents to overcome instrumental limitations including resolution or sensitivity of a particular imaging technique to enhance the accuracy of bio-imaging [35,36,37,38,39]. Another method under study is multimodality imaging, which is a synergistic integration of various modalities to complement the weaknesses with the strengths of the other imaging modalities [40,41,42,43,44,45].
In particular, LDHs have been serving as a suitable material in the development of nano contrast agents due to their tunable properties based on unique 2D crystal structure as well as internal and external surface properties [46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. (a) The negatively charged contrast agent can be readily immobilized in the interlayer space of LDHs and stabilized mainly by an electrostatic attraction, whereby a stable nano contrast agent with 2D layered structure can be produced. (b) LDH nanoparticle-based contrast agents can be produced by doping various metal ions (Gd3+, Mn2+, etc.) through a suitable lattice manipulation within the positively charged metal hydroxide layer. (c) The surface functionalization of the LDH nanoparticles, usually done by introducing photofunctional components, such as fluorescent probes or gold nanoparticles, can be achieved as a nano contrast agent material (Figure 1. left). In addition, because of high loading capacity, protection of drugs and genes within interlayer galleys, and sustained release with pH-controlled solubility properties, LDHs have been thus widely researched as bio-imaging agents and drug delivery carriers simultaneously with both diagnostic and therapeutic functions [57,58,59,60,61].
We focus here on recent developments in the field of nanoscale contrast agent materials for enhanced bio-imaging application based on the multifunctional LDHs. This review presents an overview of LDH nanohybrids along with their various synthetic strategies and potential applications for some representative bio-imaging modalities with therapeutic functions. The emerging challenges in related research will be highlighted with in vitro and in vivo studies.

2. Design of Functional LDH Nanohybrids for Biomedical Imaging

As one of the 2D layered materials, LDHs consist of positively charged metal hydroxide layers and the anions in the interlayer space in order to satisfy the charge neutrality condition. The general formula of synthetic LDHs is [M2+1−xM3+x(OH)2]x+(Am−)x/m∙nH2O, where M2+/M3+ represents a divalent/trivalent metal cation respectively, and Am− is a negatively charged molecule. To understand soft chemistry of LDHs, it is required to describe the structure of brucite mineral Mg(OH)2, where the Mg2+ ion is coordinated with six OH ligands to form an octahedron crystal structure, and formed octahedrons are bound to another by sharing edges to build up infinite sheets, which are then stacked layer by layer to achieve lamellar structure by strong hydrogen bonding. In the LDH structure, metal divalent cations, such as Mg2+, Fe2+, Zn2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Co2+, and Ca2+ are partially substituted by trivalent cations, such as Al3+, Gd3+, Fe3+, Co3+, and Ga3+, so that the positively charged host layer can be obtained. To compensate the positive charge in LDH lattice, anionic species should be stabilized in the interlayer space, which can be further exchanged with other ones—atomic ions, molecular clusters, and even supramolecular anions [2].
Various kinds of organic or inorganic anions have been introduced between the metal hydroxide layers to prepare functional nanohybrids based on LDHs [62,63]. There are several lattice engineering routes for hybridization such as co-precipitation, ion-exchange, calcination–reconstruction, and exfoliation–reassembling strategies. Such intercalative nanohybrids could be formed by many different chemical driving forces—mainly electrostatic interaction, partly coordinative bonding, and molecular interactions including hydrogen bonding and van der Waals interaction at interfaces between LDH host planes and guest species.
As described in Section 1, the structure of functional LDH nanohybrids for bio-imaging application is largely composed of three types: an intercalation type, in which fluorescent substance or a typical example of Gd(III) complexes, diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) is intercalated into the guest layer between inorganic materials; a substitution type doping various metal ions such as Gd3+ and Mn2+ in the metal hydroxide host layer; or a surface functionalization type through surface chemistry using fluorescent substance or gold nanoparticles. The nano contrast agent materials with described structures are primarily produced through the following four synthesis strategies reported so far [5,7,46]. (1) The co-precipitation is a facile and economic method of preparing bio-hybrids (Figure 2A). In this reaction, an aqueous solution of mixed two or more metal ions including Gd3+ or Mn2+, which can improve MRI performance, is immediately precipitated by base titration to form nanoscale imaging agent. Negative charged imaging functionalized molecules can simultaneously be intercalated into layered LDHs. (2) The most widely used alternative post-synthetic intercalative method to prepare LDHs-supported imaging contrast agent has been developed by ion-exchange reaction (Figure 2B). In this process, the pristine LDHs are prepared with exchangeable anions first, and then the contrast-enhancing agents, e.g., Gd-DTPA, can replace the pre-occupied ones within interlayer space of LDHs matrix. (3) The substitution of metal ions (like Mn2+, Dy3+, Cu2+, etc.) into LDH lattices is another suitable way to develop LDHs-based functional nanomaterials (Figure 2C). For instance, the synthesis of Mn2+ doped LDH nanoparticles can be conducted by two steps: first co-precipitation to get the pristine LDHs and then subsequent isomorphic substitution can occur to form Mn-LDH with evenly dispersed Mn2+ ions on the host layers. (4) The surface functionalization of the LDH nanoparticles is possible by using the OH groups around metal ions and can be utilized as a nano contrast agent material by introducing photofunctional components such as fluorescent substances or gold nanoparticles (Figure 2D).
Similarly, the anticancer drugs, biomolecules (like DNA, siRNA) and other therapeutic agents can be introduced into LDHs through lattice engineering strategies like intercalation, surface functionalization, etc. LDHs can provide efficient protection for biological functional molecules to enhance their stability, as well as bioavailability due to anion exchange capacity and high host layer charge density. They have been thus widely researched as controlled-release and target-oriented drug delivery system [3,4].

3. LDH Nanohybrids for Bio-Imaging Applications with Therapeutic Functions

During the last decade, continuous attempts have been made in developing LDHs for novel bio-imaging applications with therapeutic functions. In this section, we will highlight some recent experimental findings in both in vitro and in vivo studies on fuorescence imaging, MRI, and multimodal imaging. Their possible applications as nanocontainers for therapeutic agents including genes, anti-cancer drugs, and photothermal reagents will also be discussed along with the bio-imaging functions.
In addition to the synergistic combination of different imaging modalities, the drug or gene molecules can be intercalated into the interlayer or onto the surface of the nanoparticle probes through bioconjugation chemistry, producing theranostic agents. There are some studies on LDH-based nanohybrids for multimodal imaging as well as desirable combination therapies, which use more than one medication or modality to realize synergistic treatment. LDHs have been extensively studied as a theranostic delivery carrier for a variety of therapies, including chemo-, gene-, photo-, boron neutron capture-, and even immunotherapy [64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78].

3.1. Fluorescence Imaging

Fluorescence imaging techniques play an important role in the bio-imaging owing to their advantage of obtaining high spatial and temporal resolution with good sensitivity as well as the practical utility in real-time monitoring caused by their relatively short acquisition time. It has developed rapidly with the development of nanotechnology which has led to the bio-imaging at subcellular or molecular level [41,42].

3.1.1. LDH Nanohybrids for Fluorescence Imaging

In 2000, Choy’s group reported that the stable bio-LDH hybrids could be introduced into cells by intercalating negatively charged biomolecules DNA into the interlayer of layered LDHs used as nonviral vectors [22]. The bio-LDH hybrids had been achieved by simple ion-exchange reaction and the DNA was efficiently protected by LDHs. The charge neutralization weakened the electrostatic interactions between the anionic biomolecule and the negatively charged cell membrane, enhancing the transfer of the DNA-LDH hybrids into the cell through endocytosic means. In this study, the cellular uptake behaviors were demonstrated through the fluorescence imaging by intercalating a green fluorescent dye, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) between the LDH layers. Once within the cells, the encapsulated LDH slowly dissolved in the lysosome exhibiting slight acidity (pH = 4–5), and thereby the intercalated biomaterial was released.
In 2006, in vitro studies with FITC-LDH were performed to demonstrate the possibility of internalization of LDH nanoparticles into cells principally through the clathrin-mediated endocytosis [9]. However, it has been noticed that the mechanism of selectively permeating into cell is effective only at LDH nanoparticle size of 300 nm or less. And it was also showed that the internalization of LDHs loaded with an anticancer drug methotrexate (MTX) via clathrin-mediated endocytosis allowed the delivery of MTX-LDH into cells and, thus, delivery efficiency was effectively improved.
Related researches have been continuously conducted, and in 2012 Choy et al. presented the intracellular trafficking pathway and mechanism of FITC-labeled LDH nanoparticles of different sizes (50 nm, 100 nm) [21]. It has been proved that the nanoparticle size plays an important role in cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of drug or gene encapsulated in LDH nanoparticles and it can maximize therapeutic effect by controlling the particle size. Especially, 100 nm LDH nanoparticles are more effective in gene delivery because they could effectively escape and avoid endolysosomal degradation.

3.1.2. LDH Nanohybrids for Fluorescence Imaging with Therapeutic Functions

More recently, Choy et al. reported the inhibition of tumor growth utilizing LDH nanovectors conjugated with specific targeting ligand folic acid (FA) and loaded with Survivin siRNA (siSurvivin). [6] They described in vitro and in vivo delivery system with two groups of LDH-siSurvivin nanohybrids, one being the LDH-siSurvivin hybrids for passive delivery based upon the permeability and retention (EPR) effect and enhanced clathrin-mediated endocytosis and the other being LDHFA-siSurvivin hybrids for folate receptor (FR)-mediated active targeting (Figure 3A). The negatively charged siSurvivin was self-assembled with LDH or LDHFA by electrostatic interaction. Both LDH-siSurvivin and LDHFA-siSurvivin nanohybrids were formed as uniform hexagonal shaped platelets with a size of 100 nm (Figure 3B), which is proper to avoid endolysosomal degradation. With fluorophore labelling, LDH-FITC-siSurvivin and LDHFA-FITC-siSurvivin were prepared and used for ex vivo biodistribution and in vivo anti-tumor effect. At 30 min after intraperitoneal injection, both groups showed greater tumor selectivity when compared to other organs, including lung, liver, and spleen. The fluorescence intensity of the group injected with the LDHFA-FITC-siSurvivin hybrids was found to be 1.2-fold higher (Figure 3C), and it was confirmed that the FA ligands improved the transmission efficiency. It was also indicated that LDHFA-siSurvivin gene delivery system using LDHFA active nanovector improved the inhibition rate of tumor growth 3.0-fold after 30 days of intraperitoneal injection in KB tumors compared to the LDH-siSurvivin comparison group (Figure 3D).
Yang et al. developed doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded MgAl-LDH nanohybrids for efficient cancer therapy (Figure 4) [23]. DOX is a kind of widely used DNA-targeting anticancer drug with positive charge. However, its clinical use is limited because it causes damage to the heart. MgAl-LDH-DOX was obtained through a facile strategy in a base-catalyzed co-precipitation reaction (Figure 4A(a)). During this reaction, Mg2+ and Al3+ ions in the LDH host layer might be bound to the NH2 of DOX through coordination interaction under alkaline condition. Both MgAl-LDH and MgAl-LDH-DOX showed well-defined plate morphology with the particle size of 180 and 220 nm, respectively (Figure 4A(b)). They also demonstrated that MgAl-LDH-DOX nanohybrids showed effective pH-responsive drug release in tumor acidic microenvironment (Figure 4B(a)). The in vivo biodistribution of nanoparticles, which plays an important role for biological activity, was investigated through fluorescence imaging. The Cy5 fluorescence intensity increased over time in tumors both of Cy5-conjugated MgAl-LDH- and free Cy5-treated groups. However, Cy5-conjugated MgAl-LDH-treated groups showed much stronger fluorescence intensity (Figure 4B(b)). Furthermore, more DOX was detected in tumors of H22 tumor-bearing mice compared with free DOX. These results revealed that MgAl-LDH-DOX exhibits good tumor targeting capacity and enhanced cellular uptake. As in the result of in vitro study in human hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells, the intracellular DOX fluorescence intensity was stronger in MgAl-LDH-DOX-treated group than free DOX-treated group, namely MgAl-LDH-DOX exhibited 7-fold more internalization into HepG2 cells after 6 h treatment (Figure 4B(c)). Correspondingly, enhanced treatment effect was shown in MgAl-LDH-DOX-treated group by detecting stronger inhibition in cell viability against HepG2 cells. In vivo study in H22 tumor-bearing mice confirmed the excellent anticancer activity of MgAl-LDH-DOX with decreased heart toxicity. It exhibited an inhibition rate in tumor growth of 64%, while free DOX with 36% inhibition rate.

3.2. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

MRI holds the advantages of being a noninvasive technique for high-resolution anatomical imaging and 3D tomography, for which it is now one of the most powerful biomedical imaging modalities. MRI is able to measure the proton relaxation processes of water in tissues and can record such relaxation processes to reconstruct as 3D gray scale images [38,44]. To enhance the contrast, contrast agents are used to shorten the T1 (longitudinal relaxation time) and T2 (transverse relaxation time) of water. According to such two different relaxation pathways, obtained images can be classified as T1-weighted or T2-weighted images. T1 contrast agents are used to enhance longitudinal relaxation processes, producing brighter signals by using a paramagnetic material such as Gd3+ or Mn2+ metal ion [10,11,12,79] to shorten the T1. On the other hand, T2 contrast agents are made of a superparamagnetic material such as iron oxide nanoparticles [12,38,80,81], which can enhance the transverse relaxation processes by shortening T2 and thus result in darker signals. Studies are underway on advanced contrast agents that can boost up imaging sensitivity through the contrast enhancement in regions of interest in T1 or T2 images.

3.2.1. LDH Nanohybrids for MRI

A representative example of pioneering studies of the MRI contrast agent based on LDHs is to intercalate a contrast agent such as Gd-DTPA into the interlayer of LDHs to form the T1-weighted contrast agent system [27,29]. The synthesis of nanohybrids is possible by the co-precipitation or ion-exchange after the production of the LDH. Since then, many researchers have continued to develop T1-weighted contrast agent by doping divalent or trivalent metal ions (Gd3+, Dy3+, Mn2+, Cu2+, etc.), available as contrast agents, onto the LDH host layers [10,11,26,28,56]. The therapeutic functions including drug delivery and gene therapy along with imaging functions were also widely investigated. Most recently, the concurrently enhanced T1/T2-weighted contrast agent was reported and has attracted special attention for clinical applications in MRI with improved accuracy [12].
Xu et al. have developed a novel Mn-LDH T1-MRI contrast agent by isomorphic substitution, replacing partial Mg2+ with Mn2+ metal ions in Mg3Al-LDH (Figure 5A) [26]. The devised nano contrast agent showed satisfactory pH-ultrasensitive T1 relaxivity even at very weakly acidic environment with pH 6.5–7.0, i.e., the range of tumor microenvironment. It showed superb T1 relaxivity in pH 5.0–7.0 (9.48 mM−1s−1, 6.82 mM−1s−1 at pH 5.0, 7.0, respectively, vs. 1.16 mM−1s−1 at pH 7.4) The Mn-LDH can be efficiently internalized into tumor cells and can effectively acquire MRI images over a period of as long as 2 days or more in vivo (vs. conventional Gd-based contrast agents with less than 2 h). It is a remarkable T1 contrast with high relaxivity, ultrasensitive pH response, and prolonged imaging time, widening its potential application with both diagnostic and therapeutic functions.
The Mn-LDH exhibits extremely sensitive properties to pH, which may be due to the microstructure change of Mn2+ in the LDH host layer and is demonstrated by extended X-ray absorption fine structure (Figure 5C). The in vivo T1-MRI performance was demonstrated with bovine serum albumin (BSA)/Mn-LDH pre-coated with BSA to prevent aggregation of nanoparticles in vivo. BSA/Mn-LDH are produced with a size of ≈68 nm, and it was demonstrated that there was no distinct change in the crystal structure and pH ultrasensitivity for MR imaging before and after coating. As shown in Figure 5D, a remarkable T1-enhanced signal was clearly observed in the tumor area 1 h after intravenous injection of BSA/Mn-LDH nanoparticles, and the intensity continuously increased for 24 h probably due to the ERP effect. The prolonged MR imaging time compared to these of conventional Gd-based contrast agents is expected to provide an alternative to in vivo disease therapy monitoring, such as anticancer and regenerative medicine. Additionally, the cytotoxicity test for Mn-LDH nanoparticles was found to exhibit low cytotoxicity compared to the conventional Gd-based contrast agent.
Most recently in 2019, a novel MnMgAl-LDH/iron oxide nanoparticle (MnMgAl-LDH/IO NP) has been successfully achieved as a concurrently enhanced T1 and T2-weighted MRI contrast agent for accurate tumor diagnosis with sensitive pH response (Figure 6) [12]. In this study, which purposed at eliminating the interference effect and enhancing the selectivity, the well-crystallized MnMgAl-LDH/IO NPs were synthesized via a facile hybridization strategy through conjugating positively charged MgMnAl-LDH NPs with negatively charged IO NPs (Figure 6A,B). Both T1 and T2 MRI enhancements were investigated in comparison with the MRI of MnMgAl-LDH NPs and IO NPs (Figure 6C). The r1 values of MnMgAl-LDH/IO NPs were 2-fold higher than those of MnMgAl-LDH NPs in terms of Mn (i.e., 4.46 mM−1 s−1 for MnMgAl-LDH/IO NPs vs. 2.14 mM−1 s−1 for MnMgAl-LDH NPs.). And the r2 values of MnMgAl-LDH/IO NPs were also higher than those of IO NPs in terms of Fe (i.e., 301.88 mM−1 s−1 for MnMgAl-LDH/IO NPs vs. 274.33 mM−1 s−1 for IO NPs.). This evidently enhanced T1 and T2 MRI contrast effect of MnMgAl-LDH/IO NPs could be resulted from the increased local magnetic field intensity which was due to the adsorption of IO NPs on the surface of MnMgAl-LDH NPs. Further in vivo MR imaging of tumor tissues in a tumor xenograft model revealed the significantly increased signals after the injection of as prepared NPs (Figure 6D).

3.2.2. LDH Nanohybrids for MRI with Therapeutic Functions

In 2017, Yang et al. reported the MnFe-LDH for the first time, where Mn and Fe are essential trace elements for mammals and suitable for constructing LDH host layer for biomedical applications [11]. And they demonstrated pH-responsive T1 MRI contrast enhancement and the capability drug delivery with negatively charged chemotherapeutic drug MTX intercalated into the gallery of MnFe-LDH (Figure 7). The MnFe-LDH-MTX was synthesized by an in situ co-precipitation method and exhibited no significant changes on a platelet-like morphology (Figure 7A). The great enhancement in T1 relaxivity in acidic microenvironment of tumor was realized by releasing paramagnetic Mn2+ and Fe3+ ions from MnFe-LDH. The in vitro study with HeLa cells showed a great enhancement in T1 signals in the cells with the elapse of time, demonstrating that in acidic environment of endosomes/lysosomes, MnFe-LDH could be triggered to release Mn2+/Fe3+ ions, therefore leading to achieve brighter T1-weighted images (Figure 7B(a)). As shown in Figure 7B(b), change in the release amount of MTX under different pH conditions was measured to investigate the drug release behavior. The release at pH 7.4 was slow and only 21% MTX was released from MnFe-LDH within 20 h, while approximately 80%, 85%, and 90% were released at pH 6.0, 5.0, and 4.0, respectively. The comparison result showed that it could significantly promote the release of drug in the acidic environment. Moreover, they also demonstrated the excellent T1 contrast, effective drug delivery and related therapeutic abilities in a pH-controlled manner (e.g., in tumor area) through in vivo study.

3.3. Multimodal Imaging

As described above, researches in the bio-imaging fields based on nanomaterials has exploded and has shown the potential exists for next-generation biomedical technologies during the past few years. However, a single imaging modality alone cannot possess all the necessary capabilities for comprehensive imaging. Therefore, multimodal imaging strategy, in which the advantages of each imaging modality can be synergistically combined altogether and the disadvantages can be complemented by each other, is quickly becoming a quite useful tool to ultimately provide more accurate information [10,30,31,32,33,34,40,41,42,43,44,45]. Various combinations of different modalities are possible and in the following section, we will discuss some recent progress in synergistically integrated nanoparticle probes for CT/MR and fluorescence/MR dual modal imaging.
For example, CT/MR dual-modal probes were developed by Shi et al. in 2013 [10] and it has been demonstrated that the Gd-doped MgAl-LDH/Au nanocomposite was a practically applicable platform as a diagnostic agent for bimodal imaging and a drug carrier monitored by non-invasive visualization both in vitro and in vivo (Figure 8B). In this study, a disk-shaped Gd-LDH/Au nanocomposite with a nanoparticle size of ≈138 nm was produced by functionalizing Au nanoparticles as CT contrast agent with a size of ≈3.4 nm on the surface of Gd-LDH (Figure 8A). The Gd-LDH/Au nanohybrids have been observed to be better contrast agents not only in vitro than the commercial agent Iobitridol and Magnevist, but also effective contrast agents in vivo for CT and T1-weighted MRI dual imaging. After surface modification prepared nanohybrids with heparin, they also showed effective in vivo CT and MR imagings of tumors after intravenous administration in 4T1 murine breast tumor-bearing mice. As shown in Figure 8D, the CT signal intensity value increased from 28.9 to 80.2 and T1-weighted MR value increased from 4688.7 to 5166.7 in 4 h after the intravenous administration, which demonstrated excellent in vivo targeting function through ERP effect and uptaking by cancer cells of Gd-LDH/Au nanohybrids. In addition, the loaded DOX was transported by Gd-LDH/Au via endocytosis into the cancer cell followed by pH-responsive release in the acidic cytoplasm and showed stronger cytotoxicity against cancer cells (Figure 8D).
One of the recent studies of progress in the field is utilizing a layered supramolecular nanovehicle, denoted as Gd-LDH/indocyanine green (ICG)-DOX, for fluorescence/MR dual modal imaging and synergistic cancer therapy [30]. They synthesized multifunctional nano-system, i.e., Gd-LDH/ICG-DOX by doping Gd3+ into the MgAl-LDH host layers, followed by intercalating both of DOX, the anti-tumor chemotherapeutic drug and ICG, the photothermal reagent into the Gd-LDH galley. As revealed in Figure 9A, the morphology of as-prepared material was a plate-like particle with a size of ≈120 nm with homogeneous dispersed and well stabilized DOX and ICG guest molecules into the interlayer of the LDH carrier. The doped Gd3+ and intercalated ICG could provide fluorescence/T1-weighted MR dual-modal imaging with great accuracy and sensitivity, which led to great contribution on the trace of drug distribution and tumor treatment (Figure 9B,C). The unique structure of LDH can stabilize the ICG-DOX and Gd-LDH/ICG-DOX could generate hyperthermia and reactive oxygen species (ROS) to enhance the photothermal therapeutic efficiency as well as the loading capacity of DOX under an irradiation in near infrared (NIR) range. The excellent chemo- and photothermal-combination therapy effects on tumor growth inhibition were also demonstrated through both in vitro studies with Hela cells and in vivo studies using Hela tumor bearing nude mice model (Figure 9D). Compared with both the Gd-LDH/DOX for chemo-therapy and Gd-LDH/ICG for photothermal therapy (PTT) groups, Gd-LDH/ICG-DOX for both chemo- and PTT have shown the greatest therapeutic ability. These phenomena imply the reciprocal promoting properties of DOX and ICG, for instance, the acceleration of the DOX release from LDH along with increase of temperature caused by ICG and the enhancement of the 1O2 generation possibly by forming non-covalent interactions between the DOX and ICG molecules. Despite the mechanism for such combinations needs further identification, the Gd-LDH/ICG-DOX was indicated to be a promising multifunctional platform for biomedical applications.
More recently, Duan et al. reported ultrathin monolayered-double-hydroxide (MLDH) nanosheets as a versatile platform that can be utilized for dual modal imaging including near infrared fluorescence (NIRF) and MR imaging and a highly desirable for multimodal image-guided combination therapy, which showed the synergistic chemo/PTT/PDT effect of cancer treatment [57]. Gd3+-doped MLDH/DOX-ICG nanosheets were prepared via a new “bottom-up” strategy, while the previously reported ultrathin 2D structured nanosheets were mainly synthesized based on a “top-down” method [82,83,84,85]. This LDH-based multifunctional system could be endowed with a precisely controlled chemical composition, uniform morphology/size, and especially high specific surface area (Figure 10A), which resulted in an optimal drug loading content of 797.36% and an encapsulation efficiency of 99.67% for DOX and ICG. The ultrahigh drug loading has been explained by virtue of two unique properties of reported MLDH: (1) ultrathin nanosheets with an ultrahigh surface area which indicate that a lateral size of ≈70 nm with a thickness of ≈1.2 nm for pristine MLDH nanosheets and a lateral size of ≈80 nm with an increased thickness of ≈2.0 nm after co-loading of DOX and ICG; (2) the combined electrostatic interaction between DOX, ICG and MLDH nanosheets may owe to primary amine group in DOX molecule and sulfonate group in ICG molecule.
It was confirmed that diagnosis for tumor can be performed noninvasively using in vivo dual imaging technique including NIRF and MR imaging. The T1-weighted relaxivity r1 value, which is a key parameter for evaluating the contrast agent, was determined to be 7.93 × 10−3 M−1s−1 in Gd-MLDH/DOX-ICG and this was found to be about 2.27-fold larger than the r1 value of the conventional Gd-DTPA of 3.5 × 10−3M−1s−1. In order to observe the in vivo biodistribution and tumor accumulation of Gd-MLDH/DOX-ICG, nude mice bearing HepG2 tumors were investigated through both NIRF and MR imaging. After intravenous (i.v.) injection of MLDH/DOX-ICG in mice, T1-enhanced MR signal at the tumor site gradually increased, showed the strongest intensity after 8 h and the effect continued for 24 h (Figure 10C). In accordance with the MRI results, the fluorescence signal was observed after 2 h, the strongest signal was presented at 8 h and a significant intensity was maintained till 24 h. The ex vivo fluorescence imaging for the tumor and other normal organs at 24 h post administration showed the strongest fluorescence signal at the tumor site (Figure 10B). As is studied, NIRF/MRI dual imaging was able to provide clear information on enhanced uptake and effective accumulation in the tumor area of Gd-MLDH/DOX-ICG nanocomposite material with excellent penetration, high spatial resolution and real-time visualization.
In addition, from both in vitro and in vivo studies, the as-prepared Gd-MLDH/DOX-ICG revealed a chemo-/PT/PD trimode combination therapy which originates from accurate delivery and release of DOX anticancer drugs by pH controlled and NIR-irradiation, as well as significantly large ROS production. As showed in Figure 10D, notably, the treatment with Gd-MLDH/DOX-ICG upon irradiation exhibited the strongest ability toward tumor elimination, indicating a remarkably enhanced synergistic anticancer therapeutic effect. Furthermore, the superior biocompatibility of Gd-MLDH/DOX-ICG was proved as well.

4. Conclusions

A number of strategic properties of LDHs, such as biocompatibility, unique host–guest interactions, surface functionality, tunable particle size, high loading capacity of biomolecules, protection of drugs or genes within interlayer galleys, pH-responsive solubility and sustained release, can contribute to the cellular uptake, circulation, distribution and clearance behaviors in vivo. The recently emerged LDH nanomaterials for bio-imaging applications with therapeutic functions are briefly summarized in Table 1. In this review, the features and synthesis strategies of nanoparticle probes for bio-imaging based on LDH are summarized and functional LDH materials for bio-imaging, which are being developed focusing on fluorescence imaging, MRI and multimodal imaging, i.e., CT/MRI and fluorescence imaging/MRI, have been specifically described. Furthermore, we highlighted recent in vitro and in vivo results, which have confirmed their potential as enhanced bio-imaging agents as well as drug delivery vehicles.
As the medical paradigm is changing from the treatment of disease to the early diagnosis and prevention, the need for promptness and reliability improvement in the field of diagnosis is rising. The development of a novel high sensitivity nano contrast agent system for molecular bio-imaging, being combined with drug delivery, gene therapy, and photothermal therapy and so on, is expected to monitor the treatment process of diseases by real-time imaging, realize early diagnosis of diseases accurately, and provide a platform to develop customized therapies or to accelerate the development of new drugs. With further improvement in noninvasive bio-imaging techniques, the LDH-supported imaging agent systems are expected to contribute more to clinical applications in the future.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2019R1G1A1006582). W. J. Jin acknowledges the support of Jiujiang University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Evans, D.G.; Slade, R.C.T. Structural Aspects of Layered Double Hydroxides. In Layered Double Hydroxides; Structure and Bonding; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; Volume 119, pp. 1–87. [Google Scholar]
  2. Park, D.H.; Hwang, S.J.; Oh, J.M.; Yang, J.H.; Choy, J.H. Polymer–inorganic supramolecular nanohybrids for red, white, green, and blue applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38, 1442–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Oh, J.M.; Park, D.H.; Choi, S.J.; Choy, J.H. LDH nanocontainers as bio-reservoirs and drug delivery carriers. Recent Pat. Nanotech. 2012, 6, 200–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mishra, G.; Dash, B.; Pandey, S. Layered double hydroxides: A brief review from fundamentals to application as evolving biomaterials. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 153, 172–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Oh, J.M.; Park, D.W.; Choy, J.H. Integrated bio-inorganic hybrid systems for nano-forensics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 583–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Park, D.H.; Cho, J.; Kwon, O.J.; Yun, C.O.; Choy, J.H. Biodegradable Inorganic Nanovector: Passive versus Active Tumor Targeting in siRNA Transportation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4582–4586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Park, D.H.; Kim, J.E.; Oh, J.M.; Shul, Y.G.; Choy, J.H. DNA Core@Inorganic Shell. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16735–16736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Choy, J.H.; Kwak, S.Y.; Park, J.S.; Jeong, Y.J.; Portier, J. Intercalative nanohybrids of nucleoside monophosphates and DNA in layered metal hydroxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1399–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oh, J.M.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, S.T.; Choy, J.H. Cellular Uptake Mechanism of an Inorganic Nanovehicle and Its Drug Conjugates: Enhanced Efficacy Due To Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis. Bioconjugate Chem. 2006, 17, 1411–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, L.; Xing, H.; Zhang, S.; Ren, Q.; Pan, L.; Zhang, K.; Bu, W.; Zheng, X.; Zhou, L.; Peng, W.; et al. A Gd-doped Mg-Al-LDH/Au nanocomposite for CT/MR bimodal imagings and simultaneous drug delivery. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 3390–3401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, G.; Zhang, K.L.; Chen, S.; Li, S.H.; Wang, L.L.; Wang, L.P.; Liu, R.; Gao, J.; Yang, H.H. Manganese-iron layered double hydroxide: A theranostic nanoplatform with pH-responsive MRI contrast enhancement and drug release. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 3629–3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xie, W.S.; Guo, Z.H.; Cao, Z.B.; Gao, Q.; Wang, D.; Boyer, C.; Kallavaris, M.; Sun, X.D.; Wang, X.M.; Zhao, L.Y.; et al. Manganese-based magnetic layered double hydroxide nanoparticle: A pH-sensitive and concurrently enhanced T1/T2-weighted dual-mode magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent for accurate cancer diagnosis. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 2555–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ahrens, E.T.; Bulte, J.W. Tracking immune cells in vivo using magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yang, J.; Lee, C.H.; Ko, H.J.; Suh, J.S.; Yoon, H.G.; Lee, K.; Huh, Y.M.; Haam, S. Multifunctional magneto-polymeric nanohybrids for targeted detection and synergistic therapeutic effects on breast cancer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8836–8839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Weissleder, R. Molecular Imaging in Cancer. Science 2006, 312, 1168–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Qian, X.; Peng, X.H.; Ansari, D.O.; Yin-Goen, Q.; Chen, G.Z.; Shin, D.M.; Yang, L.; Young, A.N.; Wang, M.D.; Nie, S. In Vivo Tumor Targeting and Spectroscopic Detection with Surface-Enhanced Raman Nanoparticle Tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 26, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Michalet, X.; Pinaud, F.F.; Bentoilla, L.A.; Tsay, J.M.; Doose, S.; Li, J.J.; Sundaresan, G.; Wu, A.M.; Gambhir, S.S.; Weiss, S. Quantum Dots for Live Cells, in Vivo Imaging, and Diagnostics. Science 2005, 307, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Cao, Y.W.; Jin, R.; Mirkin, C.A. Nanoparticles with Raman Spectroscopic Fingerprints for DNA and RNA Detection. Science 2002, 297, 1536–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Schwab, K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution; World Economic Forum: Cologny, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wei, P.R.; Cheng, S.H.; Liao, W.N.; Kao, K.C.; Weng, C.F.; Lee, C.H. Synthesis of chitosan-coated near-infrared layered double hydroxide nanoparticles for in vivo optical imaging. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 5503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chung, H.E.; Park, D.H.; Choy, J.H.; Choi, S.J. Intracellular trafficking pathway of layered double hydroxide nanoparticles in human cells: Size-dependent cellular delivery. Appl. Clay. Sci. 2012, 65, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Choy, J.H.; Kwak, S.Y.; Jeong, Y.J.; Park, J.S. Inorganic Layered Double Hydroxides as Nonviral Vectors. Angew. Chem. 2000, 39, 4041–4045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hakeem, A.; Zhan, G.T.; Xu, Q.B.; Yong, T.Y.; Gan, L.; Yang, X.L. Facile synthesis of pH-responsive doxorubicin-loaded layered double hydroxide for efficient cancer therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 5768–5774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hu, T.Y.; He, J.; Zhang, S.M.; Mei, X.; Zhang, W.K.; Liang, R.Z.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. An ultrathin photosensitizer for simultaneous fluorescence imaging and photodynamic therapy. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 5760–5763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, W.Y.; Zuo, H.L.; Zhang, E.Q.; Li, L.; Henrich-Noack, P.; Cooper, H.M.; Qian, Y.J.; Xu, Z.P. Brain targeting delivery facilitated by ligand-functionalized layered double hydroxide nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 24, 20326–20333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, B.; Gu, Z.; Kurniawan, N.; Chen, W.; Xu, Z.P. Manganese-Based Layered Double Hydroxide Nanoparticles as a T1-MRI Contrast Agent with Ultrasensitive pH Response and High Relaxivity. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kim, S.Y.; Oh, J.M.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, T.J.; Choy, J.H. Gadolinium (III) Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid/Layered Double Hydroxide Nanohybrid as Novel T1-Magnetic Resonant Nanoparticles. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2008, 8, 5181–5184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, B.; Tang, J.; Chen, W.; Hao, G.; Kurniawan, N.; Gu, Z.; Xu, Z.P. Novel theranostic nanoplatform for complete mice tumor elimination via MR imaging-guided acid-enhanced photothermo-/chemo-therapy. Biomaterials 2018, 177, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, Z.P.; Kurniawan, N.D.; Bartlett, P.F.; Lu, G.Q. Enhancement of Relaxivity Rates of Gd–DTPA Complexes by Intercalation into Layered Double Hydroxide Nanoparticles. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 2824–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guan, S.; Weng, Y.; Li, M.; Liang, R.; Sun, C.; Qu, X.; Zhou, S. An NIR-sensitive layered supramolecular nanovehicle for combined dual-modal imaging and synergistic therapy. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 10367–10374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mei, X.; Wang, W.; Yan, L.; Hu, T.; Liang, R.; Yan, D.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.; Duan, X. Hydrotalcite monolayer toward high performance synergistic dual-modal imaging and cancer therapy. Biomaterials 2018, 165, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Choi, J.; Jun, Y.; Yeon, S.I.; Kim, H.C.; Shin, J.S.; Cheon, J. Biocompatible Heterostructured Nanoparticles for Multimodal Biological Detection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15982–15983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guan, S.; Liang, R.; Li, C.; Wei, M. A supramolecular material for dual-modal imaging and targeted cancer therapy. Talanta 2017, 165, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Weng, Y.; Guan, S.; Lu, H.; Meng, X.; Kaassis, A.Y.; Ren, X.; Qu, X.; Sun, C.; Xie, Z.; Zhou, S. Confinement of carbon dots localizing to the ultrathin layered double hydroxides toward simultaneous triple-mode bioimaging and photothermal therapy. Talanta 2018, 184, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Oh, J.M.; Choi, S.J.; Lee, G.E.; Kim, J.E.; Choy, J.H. Inorganic Metal Hydroxide Nanoparticles for Targeted Cellular Uptake Through Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis. Chem. Asian. J. 2009, 4, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cha, B.G.; Kim, J. Functional mesoporous silica nanoparticles for bio-imaging applications. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 11, e1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Medintz, I.L.; Uyeda, H.T.; Goldman, E.R.; Mattoussi, H. Quantum Dot Bioconjugates for Imaging, Labelling and Sensing. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Na, H.B.; Song, I.C.; Hyeon, T. Inorganic Nanoparticles for MRI Contrast Agents. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2133–2148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Usman, M.S.; Hussein, M.Z.; Kura, A.U.; Fakurazi, S.; Masarudin, M.J.; Saad, F.F.A. Synthesis and characterization of protocatechuic acid-loaded gadolinium-layered double hydroxide and gold nanocomposite for theranostic application. Appl. Nanosci. 2018, 8, 973–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lee, D.H.; Koo, H.; Sun, I.C.; Ryu, J.H.; Kim, K.; Kwon, I.C. Multifunctional nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and theragnosis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2656–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cheon, J.; Lee, J.H. Synergistically integrated nanoparticles as multimodal probes for nanobiotechnology. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1630–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Choi, J.; Park, J.C.; Nah, H.; Woo, S.; Oh, J.; Kim, K.M.; Cheon, G.J.; Chang, Y.; Yoo, J.; Cheon, J. A hybrid nanoparticle probe for dual-modality positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6259–6262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, J.; Lim, E.M.; Lee, H.J.; Park, J.; Lee, S.C.; Lee, K.; Yoon, H.G.; Suh, J.S.; Huh, Y.M.; Haam, S. Fluorescent magnetic nanohybrids as multimodal imaging agents for human epithelial cancer detection. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 2548–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Shin, T.H.; Choi, Y.; Kim, S.; Cheon, J. Recent advances in magnetic nanoparticle-based multi-modal imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 4501–4516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yoon, Y.S.; Lee, B.I.; Lee, K.S.; Im, G.H.; Byeon, S.H.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, I.S. Surface Modification of Exfoliated Layered Gadolinium Hydroxide for the Development of Multimodal Contrast Agents for MRI and Fluorescence Imaging. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 3375–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Park, D.H.; Choi, G.; Choy, J.H. Bio-Layered Double Hydroxides Nanohybrids for Theranostics Applications. In Photofunctional Layered Materials; Structure and Bonding; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 166, pp. 137–175. [Google Scholar]
  47. Oh, J.M.; Hwang, S.H.; Choy, J.H. The effect of synthetic conditions on tailoring the size of hydrotalcite particles. Solid State Ion. 2002, 151, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Choy, J.H.; Kwak, S.Y.; Park, J.S.; Jeong, Y.J. Cellular uptake behavior of [γ-32P] labeled ATP–LDH nanohybrids. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11, 1671–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kim, T.H.; Lee, W.J.; Lee, J.Y.; Paek, S.M.; Oh, J.M. Isomorphous substitution of divalent metal ions in layered double hydroxides through a soft chemical hydrothermal reaction. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 10430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jung, Y.; Ji, E.; Capasso, A.; Lee, G.H. Recent Progresses in the Growth of Two-dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2019, 56, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Choy, J.H.; Choi, S.J.; Oh, J.M.; Park, T. Clay minerals and layered double hydroxides for novel biological applications. Appl. Clay Sci. 2007, 36, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Oh, J.M.; Choi, S.J.; Lee, G.E.; Han, S.H.; Choy, J.H. Inorganic drug-delivery nanovehicle conjugated with Cancer-Cell-Specific ligand. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 1617–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wei, P.R.; Kuthati, Y.; Kankala, R.K.; Lee, C.H. Synthesis and Characterization of Chitosan-Coated Near-Infrared (NIR) Layered Double Hydroxide-Indocyanine Green Nanocomposites for Potential Applications in Photodynamic Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 20943–20968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Arratia-Quijada, J.; Jiménez, C.S.; Gurinov, A.; Pérez Centeno, A.; Ceja Andrade, I.; Carbajal Arízaga, G.G. Dysprosium-containing layered double hydroxides nanoparticles intercalated with biologically active species as an approach for theranostic systems. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2016, 203, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Bandgar, S.S.; Yadav, H.M.; Shirguppikar, S.S.; Shinde, M.A.; Shejawal, R.V.; Kolekar, T.V.; Bamane, S.R. Enhanced Hemolytic Biocompatibility of Hydroxyapatite by Chromium (Cr3+) Doping in Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles Synthesized by Solution Combustion Method. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2017, 54, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Viruete, A.; Carbajal-Arízaga, G.G.; Hernández Gutiérrez, R.; Oaxaca Camacho, A.R.; Arratia-Quijada, J. Passive targeting effect of Dy-doped LDH nanoparticles hybridized with folic acid and gallic acid on HEK293 human kidney cells and HT29 human cells. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2018, 20, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Peng, L.; Mei, X.; He, J.; Xu, J.; Zhang, W.; Liang, R.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. Monolayer Nanosheets with an Extremely High Drug Loading toward Controlled Delivery and Cancer Theranostics. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1707389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Eslami, H.; Tahriri, M.; Moztarzadeh, F.; Bader, R.; Tayebi, L. Nanostructured Hydroxyapatite for Biomedical Applications: From Powder to Bioceramic. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2018, 55, 597–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Huang, H.C.; Barua, S.; Sharma, G.; Dey, S.K.; Rege, K. Inorganic nanoparticles for cancer imaging and therapy. J. Control. Release 2011, 155, 344–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zuo, H.; Chen, W.; Li, B.; Xu, K.; Cooper, H.; Gu, Z.; Xu, Z.P. MnAl Layered Double Hydroxide Nanoparticles as a Dual-Functional Platform for Magnetic Resonance Imaging and siRNA Delivery. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 14299–14306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Son, Y.J.; Lee, I.C.; Jo, H.H.; Chung, T.J.; Oh, K.S. Setting Behavior and Drug Release from Brushite Bone Cement prepared with Granulated Hydroxyapatite and β-Tricalcium Phosphate. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2019, 56, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dutta, K.; Pramanik, A. Synthesis of a novel cone-shaped CaAl-layered double hydroxide (LDH): Its potential use as a reversible oil sorbent. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 6427–6429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Darder, M.; López-Blanco, M.; Aranda, P.; Leroux, F.; Ruiz-Hitzky, E. Bio-Nanocomposites Based on Layered Double Hydroxides. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 1969–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Song, X.R.; Wang, X.; Yu, S.X.; Cao, J.; Li, S.H.; Li, J.; Liu, G.; Yang, H.H.; Chen, X. Co₉ Se₈ nanoplates as a new theranostic platform for photoacoustic/magnetic resonance dual-modal-imaging-guided chemo-photothermal combination therapy. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3285–3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Liu, T.; Wang, C.; Gu, X.; Gong, H.; Cheng, L.; Shi, X.; Feng, L.; Sun, B.; Liu, Z. Drug delivery with PEGylated MoS2 nano-sheets for combined photothermal and chemotherapy of cancer. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3433–3440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cheng, L.; Liu, J.; Gu, X.; Gong, H.; Shi, X.; Liu, T.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Liu, G.; Xing, H.; et al. PEGylated WS(2) nanosheets as a multifunctional theranostic agent for in vivo dual-modal CT/photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1886–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chen, W.; Ouyang, J.; Liu, H.; Chen, M.; Zeng, K.; Sheng, J.; Liu, Z.; Han, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; et al. Black Phosphorus Nanosheet-Based Drug Delivery System for Synergistic Photodynamic/Photothermal/Chemotherapy of Cancer. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1603864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, M.; Tang, S.; Guo, Z.; Wang, X.; Mo, S.; Huang, X.; Liu, G.; Zheng, N. Core–Shell Pd@Au Nanoplates as Theranostic Agents for In-Vivo Photoacoustic Imaging, CT Imaging, and Photothermal Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 8210–8216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhao, X.; Yang, C.X.; Chen, L.G.; Yan, X.P. Dual-stimuli responsive and reversibly activatable theranostic nanoprobe for precision tumor-targeting and fluorescence-guided photothermal therapy. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Zhang, L.; Xia, J.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Z. Functional graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for controlled loading and targeted delivery of mixed anticancer drugs. Small 2010, 6, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zeng, D.; Wang, L.; Tian, L.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, X.; Li, H. Synergistic photothermal/photodynamic suppression of prostatic carcinoma by targeted biodegradable MnO2 nanosheets. Drug Deliv. 2019, 26, 661–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Choi, G.; Jeon, I.R.; Piao, H.; Choy, J.H. Highly Condensed Boron Cage Cluster Anions in 2D Carrier and Its Enhanced Antitumor Efficiency for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 28, 1704470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, D.; Ge, N.; Yang, T.; Peng, F.; Qiao, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, X. NIR-Triggered Crystal Phase Transformation of NiTi-Layered Double Hydroxides Films for Localized Chemothermal Tumor Therapy. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mei, X.; Liang, R.; Peng, L.; Hu, T.; Wei, M. Layered double hydroxide bio-composites toward excellent systematic anticancer therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 3212–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gao, R.; Mei, X.; Yan, D.; Liang, R.; Wei, M. Nano-photosensitizer based on layered double hydroxide and isophthalic acid for singlet oxygenation and photodynamic therapy. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wang, N.; Wang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhu, G. A Cisplatin-Loaded Immunochemotherapeutic Nanohybrid Bearing Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Enhanced Cervical Cancer Therapy. Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 3484–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Taviot-Guého, C.; Prévot, V.; Forano, C.; Renaudin, G.; Mousty, C.; Leroux, F. Tailoring Hybrid Layered Double Hydroxides for the Development of Innovative Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 28, 1703868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Choi, G.; Eom, S.; Vinu, A.; Choy, J.H. 2D Nanostructured Metal Hydroxides with Gene Delivery and Theranostic Functions; A Comprehensive Review. Chem. Rec. 2018, 18, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Caravan, P.; Ellison, J.J.; McMurry, T.J.; Lauffer, R.B. Gadolinium(III) Chelates as MRI Contrast Agents: Structure, Dynamics, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2293–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Laurent, S.; Forge, D.; Port, M.; Roch, A.; Robic, C.; Vander Elst, L.; Muller, R.N. Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stabilization, Vectorization, Physicochemical Characterizations, and Biological Applications. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2064–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Han, J.S.; An, G.S.; Park, B.G.; Choi, S.C. The Influence of Functionalization of the Fe3O4 Nanoparticle on its Dispersion Property. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2018, 55, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Falin, A.; Cai, Q.; Santos, E.J.G.; Scullion, D.; Qian, D.; Zhang, R.; Yang, Z.; Huang, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; et al. Mechanical properties of atomically thin boron nitride and the role of interlayer interactions. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Han, Q.; Wang, X.; Jia, X.; Cai, S.; Liang, W.; Qin, Y.; Yang, R.; Wang, C. CpG loaded MoS2 nanosheets as multifunctional agents for photothermal enhanced cancer immunotherapy. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 5927–5934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhu, C.; Zeng, Z.; Li, H.; Li, F.; Fan, C.; Zhang, H. Single-Layer MoS2-Based Nanoprobes for Homogeneous Detection of Biomolecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5998–6001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Yin, W.; Yan, L.; Yu, J.; Tian, G.; Zhou, L.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, X.; Yong, Y.; Li, J.; Gu, Z.; et al. High-throughput synthesis of single-layer MoS2 nanosheets as a near-infrared photothermal-triggered drug delivery for effective cancer therapy. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 6922–6933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Overview of functional layered double hydroxide nanohybrids (left) and their related application systems (right): fluorescence imaging, reproduced from [20,35], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, 2012 [20] and Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2009 [35], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), reproduced from [11,12], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017 [11] and American Chemical Society, 2019 [12], and multimodal imaging, reproduced from [10], with permission from Elsevier Ltd., 2013.
Figure 1. Overview of functional layered double hydroxide nanohybrids (left) and their related application systems (right): fluorescence imaging, reproduced from [20,35], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, 2012 [20] and Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2009 [35], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), reproduced from [11,12], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017 [11] and American Chemical Society, 2019 [12], and multimodal imaging, reproduced from [10], with permission from Elsevier Ltd., 2013.
Nanomaterials 09 01404 g001
Figure 2. Synthesis strategies of functional LDH nanohybrids for bio-imaging, (A) coprecipitation, (B) ion exchange, (C) substitution, and (D) surface functionalization.
Figure 2. Synthesis strategies of functional LDH nanohybrids for bio-imaging, (A) coprecipitation, (B) ion exchange, (C) substitution, and (D) surface functionalization.
Nanomaterials 09 01404 g002
Figure 3. (A) Schematic illustration of intracellular trafficking pathway and synthetic procedure of active bio-LDHFA nanoparticles, (B) SEM images and size distributions of passive LDH and active LDHFA, (C) ex vivo biodistribution of the LDHFA-FITC-siSurvivin in the xenograft model: optic (top) and fluorescence (bottom) images, (D) in vivo anti-tumor efficacy of KB tumor-bearing mice treated for 30 days with each sample via intraperitoneal injection once every seven days (inset photo image shows the mice on 18 days post-treatment), reproduced from [6], with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2016.
Figure 3. (A) Schematic illustration of intracellular trafficking pathway and synthetic procedure of active bio-LDHFA nanoparticles, (B) SEM images and size distributions of passive LDH and active LDHFA, (C) ex vivo biodistribution of the LDHFA-FITC-siSurvivin in the xenograft model: optic (top) and fluorescence (bottom) images, (D) in vivo anti-tumor efficacy of KB tumor-bearing mice treated for 30 days with each sample via intraperitoneal injection once every seven days (inset photo image shows the mice on 18 days post-treatment), reproduced from [6], with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2016.
Nanomaterials 09 01404 g003
Figure 4. (A) (a) Schematic illustration of synthetic procedure and pH-responsive DOX release, (b) TEM image of MgAl-LDH-DOX, (B) (a) pH-responsive DOX release profiles from MgAl-LDH-DOX in PBS at 37 °C, (b) in vivo fluorescence images of H22 tumor-bearing mice at different time courses after intravenous injection of free Cy5 or Cy5-MgAl-LDH at the Cy5 dose of 0.3 mg/kg, respectively, (c) intracellular DOX content in HepG2 cells treated with free DOX or MgAl-LDH-DOX at DOX concentration of 3 μg/mL for different time intervals by flow cytometry, reproduced from [23], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, 2018.
Figure 4. (A) (a) Schematic illustration of synthetic procedure and pH-responsive DOX release, (b) TEM image of MgAl-LDH-DOX, (B) (a) pH-responsive DOX release profiles from MgAl-LDH-DOX in PBS at 37 °C, (b) in vivo fluorescence images of H22 tumor-bearing mice at different time courses after intravenous injection of free Cy5 or Cy5-MgAl-LDH at the Cy5 dose of 0.3 mg/kg, respectively, (c) intracellular DOX content in HepG2 cells treated with free DOX or MgAl-LDH-DOX at DOX concentration of 3 μg/mL for different time intervals by flow cytometry, reproduced from [23], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, 2018.
Nanomaterials 09 01404 g004
Figure 5. (A) Schematic illustration of synthetic procedure, (B) TEM image, STEM image and the corresponding element mapping of Mn-LDH nanoparticles, (C) Plot of T-1 versus Mn concentration of Mn-LDH nanoparticles after co-incubation with different pH buffer solution at 37 °C for 4 h and 2D atomic structure models of Mn-LDH dispersed in pH 5.0 (a) and pH 7.4 (b) buffer, (D) in vivo MR imaging in the melanoma tumor-bearing mouse after intravenous injection of BSA/Mn-LDH nanomaterial within 72 h, from [26], with permission from WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2017.
Figure 5. (A) Schematic illustration of synthetic procedure, (B) TEM image, STEM image and the corresponding element mapping of Mn-LDH nanoparticles, (C) Plot of T-1 versus Mn concentration of Mn-LDH nanoparticles after co-incubation with different pH buffer solution at 37 °C for 4 h and 2D atomic structure models of Mn-LDH dispersed in pH 5.0 (a) and pH 7.4 (b) buffer, (D) in vivo MR imaging in the melanoma tumor-bearing mouse after intravenous injection of BSA/Mn-LDH nanomaterial within 72 h, from [26], with permission from WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2017.
Nanomaterials 09 01404 g005
Figure 6. (A) Schematic illustration of MnMgAl-LDH/IO NPs, (B) TEM images of MnMgAl-LDH (left) and MnMgAl-LDH/IO NPs (right), (C) analysis of relaxation rate 1/T1 vs. Mn (a) and 1/T2 vs. Fe (b) concentration for contrast agents at pH 6.5, (D) T1-and T2-weighted MR images of breast tumor bearing mice before and after intratumoral injection of BSA/MnMgAl-LDH/IO NPs, reproduced from [12], with permission from American Chemical Society, 2019.
Figure 6. (A) Schematic illustration of MnMgAl-LDH/IO NPs, (B) TEM images of MnMgAl-LDH (left) and MnMgAl-LDH/IO NPs (right), (C) analysis of relaxation rate 1/T1 vs. Mn (a) and 1/T2 vs. Fe (b) concentration for contrast agents at pH 6.5, (D) T1-and T2-weighted MR images of breast tumor bearing mice before and after intratumoral injection of BSA/MnMgAl-LDH/IO NPs, reproduced from [12], with permission from American Chemical Society, 2019.
Nanomaterials 09 01404 g006
Figure 7. (A) Schematic illustration of MnFe-LDH-MTX, TEM images of MnFe-LDH (a) and MnFe-LDH-MTX (b), (B) release profiles of Mn ions from MnFe-LDH (a) and MTX from MnFe-LDH-MTX (b) in different pH buffers (n = 3), (C) in vivo T1-weighted MR images of S180 tumor bearing BALB/c nude mice after the administration of MnFe-LDH-MTX within 24 h, (D) tumor volume change of S180 tumor bearing mice during treatment and photo images of excised tumors collected at 20 days after treatment, reproduced from [11], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017.
Figure 7. (A) Schematic illustration of MnFe-LDH-MTX, TEM images of MnFe-LDH (a) and MnFe-LDH-MTX (b), (B) release profiles of Mn ions from MnFe-LDH (a) and MTX from MnFe-LDH-MTX (b) in different pH buffers (n = 3), (C) in vivo T1-weighted MR images of S180 tumor bearing BALB/c nude mice after the administration of MnFe-LDH-MTX within 24 h, (D) tumor volume change of S180 tumor bearing mice during treatment and photo images of excised tumors collected at 20 days after treatment, reproduced from [11], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017.
Nanomaterials 09 01404 g007
Figure 8. (A) TEM images of Gd-LDH and Gd-LDH/Au, (B) Schematic illustration of the Gd-LDH/Au as a theranostics platform for dual modal CT-MR imaging and anti-cancer drug delivery, (C) CT (top) and T1-weighted MR images (bottom) of tumor after intravenous injection of Gd-LDH/Au-heparin in 4 T1 murine breast tumor-bearing mice for 0 h, 1 h and 4 h; (D) HeLa cell viabilities when exposed to free DOX and Gd-LDH/Au-DOX at different concentrations (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001), reproduced from [10], with permission from Elsevier Ltd., 2013.
Figure 8. (A) TEM images of Gd-LDH and Gd-LDH/Au, (B) Schematic illustration of the Gd-LDH/Au as a theranostics platform for dual modal CT-MR imaging and anti-cancer drug delivery, (C) CT (top) and T1-weighted MR images (bottom) of tumor after intravenous injection of Gd-LDH/Au-heparin in 4 T1 murine breast tumor-bearing mice for 0 h, 1 h and 4 h; (D) HeLa cell viabilities when exposed to free DOX and Gd-LDH/Au-DOX at different concentrations (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001), reproduced from [10], with permission from Elsevier Ltd., 2013.
Nanomaterials 09 01404 g008
Figure 9. (A) SEM image of Gd-LDH/ICG-DOX, (B) analysis of relaxation rate 1/T1 vs. Gd concentration and corresponding T1-weighted MR images (inset), (C) in vivo fluorescence imaging Hela tumor bearing nude mice at 24, 48, 72 h, and seven days after intratumor injection of Gd-LDH/ICG-DOX, (D) the tumor growth curves under different treatments and photo images of excised Hela tumors collected at 20 days after corresponding treatment, reproduced from [30], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017.
Figure 9. (A) SEM image of Gd-LDH/ICG-DOX, (B) analysis of relaxation rate 1/T1 vs. Gd concentration and corresponding T1-weighted MR images (inset), (C) in vivo fluorescence imaging Hela tumor bearing nude mice at 24, 48, 72 h, and seven days after intratumor injection of Gd-LDH/ICG-DOX, (D) the tumor growth curves under different treatments and photo images of excised Hela tumors collected at 20 days after corresponding treatment, reproduced from [30], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017.
Nanomaterials 09 01404 g009
Figure 10. (A) AFM images of Gd-MLDH and Gd-MLDH-DOX&ICG nanosheets (left), schematic illustration for MLDH-based versatile platform that can be utilized for dual modal imaging including NIRF and MR imaging with the synergistic chemo-/PT/PD combination therapy (right). (B) In vivo fluorescence imaging of nude mice bearing HepG2 tumors at different time points after i.v. injection of i: saline, ii: MLDH-DOX&ICG, and iii: DOX&ICG (tumors are pointed out by the black arrows) and NIRF images of tumor and different organs after i.v. injection of DOX&ICG (top) and MLDH-DOX&ICG (bottom) at 24 h (respectively heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, tumor, from left to right). (C) In vivo T1-weighted MR images at different time points after i.v. injection of MLDH-DOX&ICG (tumor locations are indicated by the orange arrows). (D) Digital photographs of the mice on day 14 after various treatments and corresponding excised tumors (respectively from (1) to (8): saline, MLDH nanosheets, DOX&ICG, MLDH-DOX&ICG, MLDH-DOX with irradiation, DOX&ICG with irradiation, MLDH-ICG with irradiation, and MLDH-DOX&ICG with irradiation), reproduced from [57], with permission from WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2018.
Figure 10. (A) AFM images of Gd-MLDH and Gd-MLDH-DOX&ICG nanosheets (left), schematic illustration for MLDH-based versatile platform that can be utilized for dual modal imaging including NIRF and MR imaging with the synergistic chemo-/PT/PD combination therapy (right). (B) In vivo fluorescence imaging of nude mice bearing HepG2 tumors at different time points after i.v. injection of i: saline, ii: MLDH-DOX&ICG, and iii: DOX&ICG (tumors are pointed out by the black arrows) and NIRF images of tumor and different organs after i.v. injection of DOX&ICG (top) and MLDH-DOX&ICG (bottom) at 24 h (respectively heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, tumor, from left to right). (C) In vivo T1-weighted MR images at different time points after i.v. injection of MLDH-DOX&ICG (tumor locations are indicated by the orange arrows). (D) Digital photographs of the mice on day 14 after various treatments and corresponding excised tumors (respectively from (1) to (8): saline, MLDH nanosheets, DOX&ICG, MLDH-DOX&ICG, MLDH-DOX with irradiation, DOX&ICG with irradiation, MLDH-ICG with irradiation, and MLDH-DOX&ICG with irradiation), reproduced from [57], with permission from WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2018.
Nanomaterials 09 01404 g010
Table 1. A brief summary of LDH nanomaterials for biomedical imaging applications.
Table 1. A brief summary of LDH nanomaterials for biomedical imaging applications.
LDH HostContrast AgentsTherapeutic AgentsMolecular EngineeringApplicationsKey FeatureReferences
MgAlFITCsiRNASilane coupling,
self-assembly,
size control
Fluorescence imaging,
gene-therapy
Selective tumor targeting conjugated with FA,
siRNA-based gene-therapy in vitro and in vivo
[6]
MgAlFITCMTXIntercalation (coprecipitation and ion exchange), size controlFluorescence imaging,
chemo-therapy
Intercellular uptake mechanism:
clathrin-mediated endocytosis
[9]
MgAlICG Intercalation,
covalent coating
NIRF imagingOrgan-specific drug delivery system[20]
MgAlFITC Silane coupling, size controlFluorescence imagingIntracellular fate and trafficking mechanism: endolysosomal escape for 100 nm nanoparticles[21]
MgAlFITCDNA, adenosine triphosphateIntercalation (ion exchange)Fluorescence imaging,
gene-therapy
Gene delivery system with high transfection efficiency[22]
MgAlCy5DOXA base-catalyzed coprecipitationFluorescence imaging,
chemo-therapy
Internalization into cancer cells mechanism: macropinocytosis, clathrin- and lipid raft/caveolae-mediated endocytosis[23]
MgAlCDs, ICGICGSelf-assembly,
ultrathin LDHs
Fluorescence imaging,
photoacoustic imaging,
two-photon imaging, PTT
Multifunctional theranostic nanocarrier system for the cancer treatment[34]
MgAlFITC Silane coupling,
size control
Fluorescence imagingTargeted cellular uptake mechanism: particle size dependant clathrin-mediated endocytosis [35]
MgAlFITC, ICGICGIntercalation (ion exchange),
covalent coating
Fluorescence imaging,
PDT
High photo-toxicity of PDT due to the enhanced protection against photo and thermal degradations[53]
MgAlCy7, FITC Self-assemblyFluorescence imaging,
brain targeting
Enhanced brain cell targeting and cellular transportation for efficient brain disease treatment (ligand-modified LDH)[25]
GdMgAlGd3+, Au NPsDOXSubstitution,
self-assembly
MRI, CT,
chemo-therapy
Selective cancer targeting in vivo through EPR effect[10]
GdMgAlGd3+, ICGDOX, ICGCo-intercalationMRI, fluorescence imaging,
chemo-therapy, PTT
Multifunctional theranostic nano-systems for the cancer treatment[30]
GdMgAlGd3+, ICGDOX, ICGMLDH,
a novel bottom-up method
MRI, NIRF imaging,
chemo-therapy, PTT, PDT
An ultrahigh drug loading content (LC): 797.36%,
an encapsulation efficiency (EE): 99.67%
[57]
MnMgAlMn2+ Coprecipitation,
isomorphic substitution
MRIpH-ultrasensitive T1-MRI performance (even with pH 6.5–7.0, i.e., the pH range in a tumor microenvironment)[26]
MnMgAlMn2+, IO NPs Coprecipitation, isomorphic substitution, self-assemblyMRI (T1/T2)Enhanced T1/T2 MRI signals both in vitro and in vivo[12]
MnAlMn2+siRNACoprecipitation,
self-assembly
MRI,
gene-therapy
An effective anticancer drug/gene delivery system,
T1-weighted MRI in brain cancer theranostics
[60]
MnFeMn2+MTXCoprecipitation,MRI,
chemo-therapy
The first work on MnFe-LDH[11]
ZnAlGd-DTPA Coprecipitation,
size control
MRISimilar T1-weighted MR contrast effect,
a suitable particle size for in vivo
[27]
DyZnAlDy3+Folate, ibuprofen and gallate ionsCoprecipitation,
intercalation
MRI,
drug delivery system
Theranostic materials with luminescent and magnetic properties[54]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, W.; Park, D.-H. Functional Layered Double Hydroxide Nanohybrids for Biomedical Imaging. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1404. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101404

AMA Style

Jin W, Park D-H. Functional Layered Double Hydroxide Nanohybrids for Biomedical Imaging. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(10):1404. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101404

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Wenji, and Dae-Hwan Park. 2019. "Functional Layered Double Hydroxide Nanohybrids for Biomedical Imaging" Nanomaterials 9, no. 10: 1404. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101404

APA Style

Jin, W., & Park, D. -H. (2019). Functional Layered Double Hydroxide Nanohybrids for Biomedical Imaging. Nanomaterials, 9(10), 1404. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9101404

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop