Next Article in Journal
Antibacterial Silicon Oxide Thin Films Doped with Zinc and Copper Grown by Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition
Next Article in Special Issue
Optical Nonlinearity of ZrS2 and Applications in Fiber Laser
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Cellulose Nanocrystal/Chitosan Hydrogel for Controlled Drug Release
Previous Article in Special Issue
Linear and Nonlinear Intersubband Optical Properties of Direct Band Gap GeSn Quantum Dots
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Selected Organometallic Compounds for Third Order Nonlinear Optical Application

by
Anna Popczyk
1,2,*,
Aouatif Aamoum
3,4,
Anna Migalska-Zalas
5,
Przemyslaw Płóciennik
4,
Anna Zawadzka
4,*,
Jaroslaw Mysliwiec
1,* and
Bouchta Sahraoui
2
1
Faculty of Chemistry, Department of Engineering and Advanced Materials Modelling, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wyb. Wyspianskiego 27, 50-320 Wroclaw, Poland
2
Laboratoire MOLTECH-Anjou, Université d’Angers, CNRS UMR 6200, 2 Boulevard Lavoisier, 49045 Angers, France
3
Laboratory of Physics of Condensed Matter (LPMC), Faculty of Science, Chouaib Doukkali University, El Jadida 24000, Morocco
4
Department of Automation and Measurement Systems, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Grudziadzka 5, 87-100 Torun, Poland
5
Institute of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, J. Dlugosz University of Czestochowa, Al. Armii Krajowej 13/15, 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(2), 254; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020254
Submission received: 14 December 2018 / Revised: 7 February 2019 / Accepted: 8 February 2019 / Published: 13 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non-Linear Optical Effects in Nanomaterials)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we present the third harmonic generation response of Znq2 (Bis-(8-hydroxyquinolinato)zinc), Cuq2 (8-Hydroxyquinoline copper(II)), and Alq3 (Tris-(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum) organometallic compounds. An experiment was conducted for s and p polarizations of incident beam, using the Maker fringes technique. The third order nonlinear susceptibility χ(3) was estimated using the Kubodera and Kobayashi comparative model, on the grounds that presented compounds exhibit high linear absorption of the generated third harmonic wavelength (355 nm). These complexes were deposited as thin films using the physical vapor deposition (PVD) method. Investigated complexes vary in terms of the coordination center and number of quinoline ligands, which visibly influence their nonlinear response. The global hybrid B3LYP functional with the basis set 6-31G(d) was used in computing the linear and non-linear optical properties. The computed γtot value (8765.36 × 10−36 esu for Cuq2) is superior to that of methylene blue (γ = 32.00 × 10−36 esu). The calculated theoretical values were found to be in good agreement with the experimental results.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, a great number of researchers pay attention to the metal complexes that represent promising candidates for nonlinear optics (NLO) [1]. These kind of compounds attracted enormous attention due to their applications in different fields, such as medicine [2], organic light-emitting diodes (OLED) [3,4], photovoltaic [5], and photonics and optoelectronics [6,7]. Organometallic compounds exhibit potential as a third order nonlinear material, due to the important charge transfer between the ligands and the metal, as well as the switchable nonlinearity that is related to multiple electronic states of the central metal atom [8,9]. It has been already proven that the abovementioned properties allow for significant values of first molecular hyperpolarizability β [10,11]. Bis(8-Hydroxyquinoline) zinc—Znq2, bis(8-Hydroxyquinoline) copper (II)—Cuq2, and tris(8-Hydroxyquinoline) aluminum—Alq3 have been widely investigated in recent years as organometallic compounds with potential applications in modern optoelectronics [12,13,14,15,16]. The organometallic complexes combine the advantages of organic and inorganic materials, such as an ease of fabrication, architectural flexibility, excellent temporal as well as physical ruggedness, and high resistance to laser light [17,18,19]. These kind of compounds are distinguished from others as, besides π→π* transitions present in the organic system, they can also exhibit intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) from ligand to metal (LMCT), from metal to ligand (MLCT), or d-d transitions [20]. In coordination complexes d-orbitals of transition metals have the ability to interact with the conjugated π-electron orbitals of the ligand. This phenomenon visibly enhances the possibility of a third order susceptibility (χ(3)) tailoring process and better design of molecules for NLO purposes [21]. The NLO-effects of the organometallic compounds originate from the interaction between an incident light and the electrons inside the individual molecular units, which allows a good nonlinear optical response to be achieved [22]. Presented compounds contain two or three organic ligands attached to the transition metal through chelation. The 8-hydroxyquinoline ligand shows electro-donating properties due to the presence of nitrogen atom at the quinoline ring and a phenolate oxygen atom [23]. Chosen metals are situated in the center of the coordination complex and exhibit differing electronegativity, which is the individual property of the metal atom, describing its tendency to attract pairs of shared electrons toward itself. The abovementioned properties suggest a significant charge transfer in these compounds, which can be induced by high-intensity light. The third harmonic generation (THG) is one of the experimental techniques from the nonlinear optics field, where the generated light has a tripled frequency of incident beam [24]. This technique, in contrast to the second harmonic generation, can be investigated for centrosymmetric molecules, as well as non-centrosymmetric. This phenomenon can be described by the third order susceptibility (χ(3)). It was shown in previous studies that systems with the highest charge transfer between donor and acceptor parts and long conjugation path achieve the highest values of nonlinear response [25,26]. In this paper, we present the third order nonlinear optical properties of three organometallic compounds (Znq2, Cuq2, and Alq3) induced by a Nd:YAG pump laser and measured for polarization s and p of the incident beam.
Due to the size and complexity of the structures of the analyzed molecules, semi-empirical methods such as the Lee model, Kurtz-Perry, Kobajaschi-Kubadera, and Rentjes [27,28,29,30] play an important role in the diagnostics, control, and investigations of molecular nonlinear optical properties. The model of François Kajzar is also commonly used [31]. It is worth mentioning that previously, third order nonlinear response in coordination complexes was mostly measured with the Z-Scan technique, whereas in this paper we present results from THG. Comparison and confrontation of theoretical and experimental results allow for a continuous evaluation of the quality of predictions and possible modification of the applied techniques and methods. Using quantum chemical methods, it has become possible to construct a clear description of the relationship between the electronic structure of the molecule and its nonlinear optical response. This allows for not only a deep understanding of phenomena related to the interaction of light with molecular matter, but also to organize the rich and ever-expanding experimental material in the presented area of research. In most cases, theoretical modeling is the starting point for the synthesis of functionalized molecular systems with desirable properties. Hence, many research groups were able to optimize the β and γ values by modifying the π-electron core, optimizing the donor (D) and acceptor (A) groups, and through conformational tuning of the studied systems [32,33,34,35]. To find a correlation between molecular structure and NLO phenomena, we extended our research to calculate second order hyperpolarizability. Figure 1 presents the chemical structures of investigated compounds.
The experimental studies used have allowed us to verify the correctness of the construction of the applied computational theoretical model, which together allowed for analysis of the mechanisms of the physical processes responsible for nonlinear effects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Thin Films

Presented compounds were obtained commercially from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Company (99% for Znq2, 98% for Cuq2, and 99.995% for Alq3, St. Louis, MO, USA). The Znq2, Cuq2, and Alq3 thin films were fabricated with the Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) technique using Thin Film Deposition System—NANO 36™ (Kurt J. Lesker Company, Jefferson Hills, PA, USA) in a high vacuum chamber under 2 × 10−6 Torr. Compounds were evaporated from the ceramic effusion cell with source material and deposited successfully on BK7 glass substrates kept at room temperature during the deposition process. Thickness of the thermally evaporated films depends on properties of the source, time of evaporation, and distance between source and substrate. The powdered source material was evaporated from a ceramic effusion cell with a nozzle 10 mm in diameter on the top. The distance between source and substrate was equal to 20 cm and substrates were rotated at a speed equal to 20 rot/min during the whole deposition process. The deposition rate was considered the most important parameter for thin films forming and for all samples it was equal to 0.1 Å/s. Initial power necessary to achieve the desired rate of the source material’s evaporation depends on properties of the source material, i.e., molecular mass, density, and temperature of the sublimation. The initial power required to fix the rate at 0.1 Å/s was different for all studied complexes and was equal to 280 W (Znq2), 220 W (Cuq2), and 150 W (Alq3), respectively. The deposition rate and the final film’s thickness were controlled by the piezoelectric controller.

2.2. UV-Vis Absorption Spectra

A Lambda 950 UV/Vis/NIR spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to measure the absorption spectra of Znq2, Cuq2, and Alq3 thin films in the range 300–1100 nm at room temperature.

2.3. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

An Agilent 5500 Atomic Force Microscope equipped with a MSNL-D Bruker cantilever was used to measure AFM images. AFM imaging was carried out in the tapping mode. Measurements were performed in an isolated sound and vibration proof chamber at a temperature equal to 16 °C.

2.4. NLO Measurements

The nonlinear optical measurements were carried out using the rotational Maker fringe technique [36,37,38,39]. The Nd:YAG laser generating at λ = 1064 nm was used as the fundamental beam, with 10 Hz repetition rate and 30 ps pulse duration. The energy of every pulse was 100 µJ and it was controlled by the laser powermeter (LabMax TOP, Coherent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The polarizer and the half wave plate were used for polarization adjustments of the laser beam. The incident beam was focused on the sample by the lens with the focal point equal to 25 cm. The motorized rotation stage changed angle of incidence from −60° to +60°. The interference filter was used to ensure only measurement of generated third harmonic wavelength (355 nm). The signal was recorded by the Hamamatsu R1828-01 photomultiplier which collected intensity of THG every 0.5°. The boxcar average system integrated the signal which was afterwards processed by the computer. As the reference material, we used a silica glass plate (SiO2) with a well-established value of χ(3) equal to 2.0 × 10−22 m2V−2. Due to the high linear absorption in the region of the generated third harmonic wavelength, the Kubodera and Kobayashi theoretical model was used to calculate the third order susceptibility of investigated compounds [40,41,42]. This model makes a comparison between the maximum light intensity of the generated signal of THG and the maximum light intensity of the reference signal (silica).
χ ( 3 ) = χ s i l i c a ( 3 ) ( 2 π ) ( L c o h d ) ( α d 2 1 e x p ( α d 2 ) ) I c o m p 3 ω I s i l i c a 3 ω
where, Lcoh represents the coherence length of the silica equal to 6.7 µm. The thickness of the studied thin films is represented as d, χ s i l i c a ( 3 ) is the third nonlinear susceptibility of fused silica, I c o m p 3 ω and I s i l i c a 3 ω represent the average peak intensity of the recorded Maker fringes signal. The thicknesses of the prepared thin films were measured using the profilometer Veeco Dektak 3.

2.5. Computational Details

The ground-state geometries were optimized in gas phase by a density functional theory DFT/B3LYP called the hybrid method based on three Becke parameters using the base 6-31G(d) level of theories implemented in the GAUSSIAN 09 program package [43,44]. With this method the dynamic second order hyperpolarizability γ (−2ω; ω, ω, 0) and the HOMO and LUMO energy levels of the investigated molecules were calculated. The addition of d polarization functions on the carbon and nitrogen atoms are critical in order to have a precise estimation of the hyperpolarizabilities.

3. Results

3.1. Topography and Structural Properties

The surface morphology of the investigated metalorganic thin films deposited by the PVD technique was analyzed by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Figure 2a–f shows AFM images of the Znq2, Cuq2, and Alq3 thin films for samples deposited on the substrate at room temperature, respectively. The scanning area of the films was equal to 1 × 1 µm2. Presented figures were drawn using Gwyddion software and they visualize 2D and 3D images for all of the investigated metalorganic complexes.
The Znq2 and Cuq2 thin films deposited at room temperature showed nanocrystalline characters. The structure of the films contained clearly visible hills of nanocrystallites and valleys between them. The average differences between them were equal to ca. 40 nm for Cuq2 and 30 nm for Znq2. The structure of the Alq3 thin film was completely different. The structure also showed a nanocrystalline character, but the size of the nanocrystallites were much smaller and the surface was more homogeneous. The average difference was equal to ca. 4nm. Thin film profile examples of tested compounds are presented in Figure 3.
AFM images showed that the different 8-Hydroxyquinoline derivatives form different nanocrystalline thin films despite the fact that the deposition process was carried out under identical vacuum conditions and deposition rate. However, replacement of the metal atom in the Mq2 (M = Zn, Cu) molecule hardly changes the structure of the films. Finally, both fabricated Mq2 thin films had a much larger active surface compared to the Alq3 film. Formation of the structures visible in Figure 4 and Figure 5 also indicates various mechanisms of thin film formation for Mq2 compared to Alq3 molecules. Film growth of Mq2 complexes showed an island formation nature. In the case of the Alq3 complex, film growth showed definitely more layer by layer growth. This phenomenon indicated a much stronger interaction between the molecules Mq2 compared to Mq3 on the substrate’s surface, not only during the formation process of the thin films, but also after the deposition inside thin films. Such intermolecular interactions usually affect nonlinear optical properties of the thin films. There are many interesting structural effects that can affect second and third order nonlinear effects. The enhancement of THG responses by surface plasmons [45,46], metal’s nanoparticles [47,48], or well-oriented nanostructures has been reported among many researchers [49,50]. There is still a need for systems (compounds) that can exhibit large NLO responses for potential photonics applications as nonlinear optical (NLO) systems play a major role in the field of nanophotonics, photonics including optical information processing, sensor protector applications, and optical data storage. As the occurrence of NLO response is not well studied in the case of investigated compounds, we studied these interesting NLO systems. In such systems, intermolecular interactions are not strong enough to create a well-oriented nanostructural film, which was proven by visualization of surface morphology. Moreover, the internal molecular bonds are not broken during the sublimation process. Therefore, the nanostructured nature of the films is entirely random, nanoparticles are not formed on the surface, and there are no plasmonic effects.

3.2. Optical Properties

Figure 4 illustrates the UV-Vis absorption spectra of Znq2, Cuq2, and Alq3 thin films. All of the investigated compounds exhibit absorption in range of the blue light, with maxima positioned at λabs = 380 nm for Znq2, λabs = 390 nm for Alq3, and λabs = 428 nm for Cuq2. These bands might be attributed to the combination of intraligand ππ* transition and the ligand to metal charge transfer (LMCT). The most important observation from this measurement is the fact that none of the compounds absorb wavelengths of 1064 nm, which was used to investigate the third nonlinear optical properties (THG response). These results suggest that in case of third order nonlinear susceptibility calculations, the use of the Kubodera-Kobayashi comparative model is justified, due to the strong absorption of generated third harmonic wavelength (355 nm).

3.3. THG Measurements

In Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7 we present curves with an oscillatory signal of measured sample and reference for two different polarizations of pump beam. There is a good symmetry of signals at incident angle 0° visible for all of investigated samples. In every case, there is no significant difference between applied polarizations of initial laser beam. The angle range of −60° to +60° allowed us to measure a wide spectrum with observable growth and decay of Maker fringes intensity and phase matching. All of the presented compounds exhibit a THG efficiency two magnitudes higher than reference material. Table 1 represents the thickness of studied samples, their absorption coefficients, and their third order susceptibilities, which were calculated using Equation (1).
A few important conclusions can be drawn from comparing the results of calculated third order susceptibilities. Due to the strong absorption coefficient in the region of generated third harmonic wavelength, the figure of merit was calculated (χ(3)/α) to allow easier comparison of NLO response for investigated compounds. This value provided a more accurate figure, which helped to conclude a clearer influence of the metal center on THG. Firstly, Alq3 has the lowest THG response, whereas Cuq2 have visibly the highest one. This order might be due to the metal’s electronegativity, orbitals’ shape, or extended delocalization path that are characteristic for coordination complexes. It should be noted that in the cases of both Cuq2 and Znq2 the clear intramolecular charge transfer is visible between ligand and metal (See Table 4), which increases THG response. Additionally, the unfilled d-shell in case of Cu enhances the NLO response, what can be associated with the additional electronic levels present in this system and increase of electron-accepting properties [51]. Moreover, in case of Alq3, the lowest THG response might originate from the lack of intramolecular charge transfer between ligand and metal center (See Table 4). Electron configuration of Al3+ indicates that all orbitals are filled with electrons, hence its acceptor properties visibly decrease. For this sample quinolone ligands seem to act as a donor and an acceptor simultaneously. In the investigated compounds of Znq2 and Cuq2, an organic ligand has more of an electron donating character, hence its orbitals have lower energy than metal orbitals that resolve in electron transfer from bonding π or antibonding π* orbital into σ* orbitals. Thus, the nature interactions between ligand and metal point to the ligand to metal charge transfer (LMCT) as an origin of high nonlinear optical response [52,53]. In the case of presented coordination complexes, the influence of the polarization of the incident beam is negligible. Results for p as well as s polarization vary in an insignificant way.

3.4. Theoretical Simulations

The optimized structures of investigated compounds using the DFT method are shown in Figure 8. The linear optical properties are very important for the characterization of materials used in nonlinear optics. Figure 9 displays the calculated UV–Vis absorption spectra of Alq3, Znq2, and Cuq2 complexes. The theoretical spectrum was made in the gas phase and the absorption peaks are shifted towards shorter wavelengths in respect to the experimental spectrum (see Table 2). The shift of the experimental absorption band towards the longer wavelengths is caused by the amorphous nature of the structure of films obtained by the PVD method. Comparing the experimental UV-visible absorption spectra and theoretical, it can be seen that intermolecular interactions cause a bathochromic effect on all molecules [54].
Calculated values of HOMO and LUMO energy and the HOMO-LUMO energy gap (see Table 2) allows you to explore the relationship of non-linear properties with the structure of the studied materials.
The HOMO-LUMO gap of Znq2 is relatively higher than the energy gap value for the remaining molecules. The high energy gap and the data here suggests that Znq2 is relatively less reactive than the molecules Alq3 and Cuq2. Decreasing the value of the energy gap increases the charge transfer within the particles. Persistent particles have large energy breaks, and the more reactive particles have small energy breaks HOMO-LUMO. Lower HOMO-LUMO gaps usually herald better nonlinear properties which are also visible in these complexes. It is known that the dependence of the energy gap on the third order nonlinear optical susceptibility is represented as the inverse of the optical break raised to 6th power [55].
χ ( 3 ) = 1 E g 6
The total third order hyperpolarizability γtot values have been calculated from the formula presented in Reference [56]. As you can see from Table 3, the hyperpolarizability of complex Cuq2tot = 8765 × 10−36 esu) is about one order higher than for Alq3 (γtot = 359 × 10−36 esu) and two orders higher than for Znq2 (γtot = 57 × 10−36 esu). We compared our hyperpolarizability values with those reported by Leupacher et al. [57] of methylene blue (γ = 32 × 10−36 esu) by means of THG measurements and the value of Cuq2 is two orders higher. A significant value of the corresponding component points to the delocalization of the electrons in a given direction. The second order frequency-dependent hyperpolarizability for Cuq2 is dominated by the oblong component of γzzzz. The calculated values suggest that the hyperpolarizability is controlled by donor–acceptor strengths and the metal cation variability.
As mentioned above, this complex exhibits an intramolecular charge transfer and produce polarization along the π-conjugated bonds. Table 4 shows the visualized structures of studied complexes and show the population of electrons on their orbitals. The left column shows molecular orbitals that are occupied in the ground state, with the lowest-energy orbital at the top. The orbital wave functions are positive in the red regions and negative in the green. The right column shows virtual molecular orbitals which may be occupied in excited states.
The HOMO for Tris-(8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum—Alq3 is mainly located on the three quinoxaline ligands. LUMO is mainly localized on the two nitrophenyl quinoxaline ligands. For the remaining two investigated molecules, the HOMO is also located on the ligands. LUMO is located all over the whole complex alike on the two linked ligands and as well as on Zn and Cu atoms. This electron delocalization can be attributed to the strong electron withdrawing nature of this group and is defined as ligand to metal charge transfer (LMCT) leading to high stability of complex. This effect is especially seen for the Znq2 and Cuq2 compounds. The presented calculation results reproduce the trend of the experimental results well and show clearly the increase of the nonlinear optical response upon Cu metal complexation [58].

4. Conclusions

The Alq3, Znq2, and Cuq2 complexes were studied both experimentally and theoretically, the HOMO and LUMO levels of compounds were analyzed by DFT/B3LYP/6-31G(d) method. In this paper, the main aim was to compare the third harmonic generation responses of three organometallic compounds investigated in the form of thin films. The films were obtained by using the PVD technique in a high vacuum on BK7 glass substrates. Structural properties showed that the number of quinoline ligands have a significant influence on the mechanism of thin film formation as well as the final microstructure of the film. The THG measurements were performed by means of the third harmonic generation (THG) technique at the fundamental wavelength of 1064 nm. The third order susceptibilities χ T H G ( 3 ) were calculated using the Kubodera and Kobayashi comparative model. We obtained the highest THG response for Cuq2. These results indicate that the character of the metal as well as the shape of its orbital strongly influence the NLO response. The thin films fabricated by the Physical Vapor Deposition technique have a high quality, give correct experimental results, and have good compliance with the obtained theoretical data. It is clearly shown that the substitution by Cu atom has affected the lowering of the HOMO-LUMO bandgap and at the same time leads to an increasing of the hyperpolarizability γtot. The HOMO-LUMO map indicates that electron delocalization in the studied complexes can be attributed to ligand to ligand charge transfer (LLCT) for Alq3 and to ligand to metal charge transfer (LMCT) in the case of Cuq2 as well as Znq2. The obtained values of second order hyperpolarizability γ, (which characterize the individual molecule) for Cuq2 is much larger than the values obtained for the remaining molecules from investigated series (more than 22 times). The advantage of coordination complexes is the additional effects which are present in organometallics that result from efficient delocalization of π–electrons and influence the nonlinear optical behavior. The crucial advantage of the studied materials is the unique combination of good nonlinear optical and electronic properties and good optical quality of the studied films which are extremely difficult to be achieved. We believe that NLO properties of the presented organometallic thin films can be used in optoelectronic devices due to their high value of third harmonic generation.

Author Contributions

Sample preparation A.A., THG and absorption measurements A.P., AFM measurements P.P., A.Z., DFT simulations A.M.-Z., manuscript preparation A.P., A.A., A.Z., A.M.-Z., B.S., J.M.

Funding

This research has been partly financed from the funds of the Polish National Science Centre (grant No. 2017/25/B/ST7/02124). The films used in this paper were obtained using Interdisciplinary Centre for Modern Technologies facilities, NCU, Torun, Poland.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the COST Action MP1403 (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) for financial support. Calculations have been carried out in Wroclaw Centre for Networking and Supercomputing (http://www.wcss.pl), grant No. 282.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Morrall, J.P.; Dalton, G.T.; Humphrey, M.G.; Samoc, M. Organotransition Metal Complexes for Nonlinear Optics. In Advances in Organometallic Chemistry; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 2007; Volume 55, pp. 61–136. ISBN 978-0-12-373978-0. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, P.; Sadler, P.J. Advances in the design of organometallic anticancer complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 839, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Humbs, W.; van Veldhoven, E.; Zhang, H.; Glasbeek, M. Sub-picosecond fluorescence dynamics of organic light-emitting diode tris(8-hydroxyquinoline) metal complexes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 304, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Muhammad, F.F.; Sulaiman, K. Optical and morphological modifications in post-thermally treated tris(8-hydroxyquinoline) gallium films deposited on quartz substrates. Mat. Chem. Phys. 2014, 148, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kido, J.; Okamoto, Y. Organo Lanthanide Metal Complexes for Electroluminescent Materials. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2357–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Arroudj, S.; Aamoum, A.; Messaadia, L.; Bouraiou, A.; Bouacida, S.; Bouchouit, K.; Sahraoui, B. Effect of the complexation on the NLO electronic contribution in film based conjugated quinoline ligand. Physica B 2017, 516, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boyd, R.W. Nonlinear Optics, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Boston, MA, USA, 2008; ISBN 978-0-12-369470-6. [Google Scholar]
  8. Qian, Y.; Cai, M.; Wang, S.; Yi, Y.; Shuai, Z.; Yang, G. Synthesis and third-order optical nonlinearities of nickel complexes of 8-hydroxyquinoline derivatives. Opt. Commun. 2010, 283, 2228–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thangaraj, M.; Vinitha, G.; Sabari Girisun, T.C.; Anandan, P.; Ravi, G. Third order nonlinear optical properties and optical limiting behavior of alkali metal complexes of p-nitrophenol. Opt. Laser Technol. 2015, 73, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Durand, R.J.; Gauthier, S.; Achelle, S.; Kahlal, S.; Saillard, J.-Y.; Barsella, A.; Wojcik, L.; Le Poul, N.; Robin-Le Guen, F. Incorporation of a platinum center in the pi-conjugated core of push–pull chromophores for nonlinear optics (NLO). D. Trans. 2017, 46, 3059–3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Nisic, F.; Colombo, A.; Dragonetti, C.; Garoni, E.; Marinotto, D.; Righetto, S.; De Angelis, F.; Lobello, M.G.; Salvatori, P.; Biagini, P.; et al. Functionalized Ruthenium Dialkynyl Complexes with High Second-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties and Good Potential as Dye Sensitizers for Solar Cells. Organometallics 2015, 34, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, R.; Cao, Y.; Jia, D.; Liu, L.; Li, F. New approach to synthesize 8-hydroxyquinoline-based complexes with Zn2+ and their luminescent properties. Opt. Mat. 2013, 36, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chavan, S.S.; Lolage, S.R.; Pawal, S.B. Synthesis, characterization and luminescence properties of azobenzene based heterobimetallic Ru(II)/M(II) (M = Ni and Zn) hybrid complexes composed of organometallic and coordination sites. J. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 815–816, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Núñez-Zarur, F.; Vivas-Reyes, R. Ab initio study of luminescent substituted 8-hydroxyquinoline metal complexes with application in organic light emitting diodes. J. Mol. Struct. 2008, 850, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Secu, M.; Polosan, S. Charge carrier traps in tris-(8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum. J. Lumin. 2018, 194, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zawadzka, A.; Płóciennik, P.; Strzelecki, J.; Łukasiak, Z.; Sahraoui, B. Photophysical properties of Alq3 thin films. Opt. Mat. 2013, 36, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Selvakumar, S.; Kumar, S.M.R.; Rajarajan, K.; Pragasam, A.J.A.; Rajasekar, S.A.; Thamizharasan, K.; Sagayaraj, P. Growth and Characterization of a Novel Organometallic Nonlinear Optical Crystal: Bis(Thiourea) Cadmium Formate. Cryst. Growth Des. 2006, 6, 2607–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balakrishnan, C.; Sivaraman, S.; Manonmani, M.; Markkandan, R.; Meenakshisundaram, S.P.; Sockalingam, R.M. Synthesis, crystal growth, structural characterization and theoretical investigations of bis(benzene-1,2-dicarboxylato)bis(thiourea)zinc. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2018, 664, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wan, X.Q.; Cheng, X.F.; Zhang, S.J.; Xu, D.; Zhang, G.H.; Sun, Z.H.; Yu, F.P.; Liu, X.J.; Liu, W.L.; Chen, C.L. Single crystal growth, structural characterization, thermal and optical properties of a novel organometallic nonlinear optical crystal: MnHg(SCN)4(C2H5NO)2. Physica B 2010, 405, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar]
  20. Long, N.J. Organometallic Compounds for Nonlinear Optics—The Search for En-light-enment! Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, X.Q.; Ren, Q.; Sun, J.; Fan, H.L.; Li, T.B.; Liu, X.T.; Zhang, G.H.; Zhu, L.Y.; Xu, D. Preparation, crystal growth, characterization, thermal and third-order nonlinear optical properties of ethyltriphenylphosphonium bis(2-thioxo-1,3-dithiole-4,5-dithiolato)aurate(III) for all-optical switching. J. Cryst. Growth 2011, 324, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, T.; Hao, Z.; Gong, H.; Liu, Z.; Xiao, S.; Li, S.; Zhai, Y.; You, S.; Wang, Q.; Qin, J. Third-order nonlinear optical properties of a new copper coordination compound: A promising candidate for all-optical switching. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 451, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Prachayasittikul, V.; Prachayasittikul, S.; Ruchirawat, S.; Prachayasittikul, V. 8-Hydroxyquinolines: a review of their metal chelating properties and medicinal applications. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2013, 7, 1157–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Abed, S.; Aida, M.S.; Bouchouit, K.; Arbaoui, A.; Iliopoulos, K.; Sahraoui, B. Non-linear optical and electrical properties of ZnO doped Ni Thin Films obtained using spray ultrasonic technique. Opt. Mat. 2011, 33, 968–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zawadzka, A.; Karakas, A.; Płóciennik, P.; Szatkowski, J.; Łukasiak, Z.; Kapceoglu, A.; Ceylan, Y.; Sahraoui, B. Optical and structural characterization of thin films containing metallophthalocyanine chlorides. Dyes Pigments 2015, 112, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Papagiannouli, I.; Szukalski, A.; Iliopoulos, K.; Mysliwiec, J.; Couris, S.; Sahraoui, B. Pyrazoline derivatives with a tailored third order nonlinear optical response. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 48363–48367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kurtz, S.K.; Perry, T.T. A Powder Technique for the Evaluation of Nonlinear Optical Materials. J. Appl. Phys. 1968, 39, 3798–3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, G.J.; Cha, S.W.; Jeon, S.J.; Jin, J.-I.; Yoon, J.S. Second-order nonlinear optical properties of unpoled bent molecules in powder and in vacuum-deposited film. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2001, 39, 912–915. [Google Scholar]
  29. Reintjes, J.F. Nonlinear Optical Parametric Processes in Liquids and Gases, Quantum Electronics--Principles and Applications; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1984; ISBN 978-0-12-585980-6. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kubodera, K.; Kobayashi, H. Determination of Third-Order Nonlinear Optical Susceptibilities for Organic Materials by Third-Harmonic Generation. Mol. Cryst. Liquid Cryst. Inc. Nonlinear Opt. 1990, 182, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rau, I.; Kajzar, F.; Luc, J.; Sahraoui, B.; Boudebs, G. Comparison of Z-scan and THG derived nonlinear index of refraction in selected organic solvents. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2008, 25, 1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. List, N.H.; Zaleśny, R.; Murugan, N.A.; Kongsted, J.; Bartkowiak, W.; Ågren, H. Relation between Nonlinear Optical Properties of Push–Pull Molecules and Metric of Charge Transfer Excitations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 4182–4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ulrich, G.; Barsella, A.; Boeglin, A.; Niu, S.; Ziessel, R. BODIPY-Bridged Push–Pull Chromophores for Nonlinear Optical Applications. ChemPhysChem 2014, 15, 2693–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Papagiannouli, I.; Iliopoulos, K.; Gindre, D.; Sahraoui, B.; Krupka, O.; Smokal, V.; Kolendo, A.; Couris, S. Third-order nonlinear optical response of push–pull azobenzene polymers. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2012, 554, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bouchouit, K.; Essaidi, Z.; Abed, S.; Migalska-Zalas, A.; Derkowska, B.; Benali-cherif, N.; Mihaly, M.; Meghea, A.; Sahraoui, B. Experimental and theoretical studies of NLO properties of organic–inorganic materials base on p-nitroaniline. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 455, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kulyk, B.; Taboukhat, S.; Akdas-Kilig, H.; Fillaut, J.-L.; Karpierz, M.; Sahraoui, B. Tuning the nonlinear optical properties of BODIPYs by functionalization with dimethylaminostyryl substituents. Dyes Pigments 2017, 137, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kouissa, B.; Bouchouit, K.; Abed, S.; Essaidi, Z.; Derkowska, B.; Sahraoui, B. Investigation study on the nonlinear optical properties of natural dyes: Chlorophyll a and b. Opt. Commun. 2013, 293, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bouchouit, K.; Bendeif, E.E.; EL Ouazzani, H.; Dahaoui, S.; Lecomte, C.; Benali-cherif, N.; Sahraoui, B. Correlation between structural studies and third order NLO properties of selected new quinolinium semi-organic compounds. Chem. Phys. 2010, 375, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zawadzka, A.; Płóciennik, P.; Strzelecki, J.; Sahraoui, B. Transparent amorphous zinc oxide thin films for NLO applications. Opt. Mat. 2014, 37, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Płóciennik, P.; Guichaoua, D.; Korcala, A.; Zawadzka, A. Studies of aluminum oxide thin films deposited by laser ablation technique. Opt. Mat. 2016, 56, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bosshard, C.; Gubler, U.; Kaatz, P.; Mazerant, W.; Meier, U. Non-phase-matched optical third-harmonic generation in noncentrosymmetric media: Cascaded second-order contributions for the calibration of third-order nonlinearities. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 10688–10701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gubler, U.; Bosshard, C. Optical third-harmonic generation of fused silica in gas atmosphere: Absolute value of the third-order nonlinear optical susceptibility χ(3). Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 10702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Becke, A.D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gaussian 09, Revision D.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009.
  45. Niu, J.; Luo, M.; Liu, Q.H. Enhancement of graphene’s third-harmonic generation with localized surface plasmon resonance under optical/electro-optic Kerr effects. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2016, 33, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jassim, N.; Wang, K.; Lu, P. A Review: Optical Second—Harmonic Generation Enhancement via Plasmonic Surface—Theory and Applications. Adv. Res. 2016, 7, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shcherbakov, M.R.; Neshev, D.N.; Hopkins, B.; Shorokhov, A.S.; Staude, I.; Melik-Gaykazyan, E.V.; Decker, M.; Ezhov, A.A.; Miroshnichenko, A.E.; Brener, I.; et al. Enhanced Third-Harmonic Generation in Silicon Nanoparticles Driven by Magnetic Response. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6488–6492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Scherbak, S.A.; Lipovskii, A.A. Understanding the Second-Harmonic Generation Enhancement and Behavior in Metal Core–Dielectric Shell Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 15635–15645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Grady, N.K.; Ayala-Orozco, C.; Halas, N.J. Three-Dimensional Nanostructures as Highly Efficient Generators of Second Harmonic Light. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 5519–5523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zawadzka, A.; Waszkowska, K.; Karakas, A.; Płóciennik, P.; Korcala, A.; Wisniewski, K.; Karakaya, M.; Sahraoui, B. Diagnostic and control of linear and nonlinear optical effects in selected self-assembled metallophthalocyanine chlorides nanostructures. Dyes Pigments 2018, 157, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Diaz-Garcia, M.A.; Ledoux, I.; Fernandez-Lazaro, F.; Sastre, A.; Torres, T.; Agullo-Lopez, F.; Zyss, J. Third-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties of Soluble Metallotriazolylhemiporphyrazines. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 4495–4497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Frazier, C.C.; Guha, S.; Chen, W.P.; Cockerham, M.P.; Porter, P.L.; Chauchard, E.A.; Lee, C.H. Third-order optical non-linearity in metal-containing organic polymers. Polymer 1987, 28, 553–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Le Bozec, H.; Guerchais, V.; Bian, Z. (Eds.) Molecular Organometallic Materials for Optics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2010; ISBN 978-3-642-01866-4. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mydlova, L.; Taboukhat, S.; Ayadi, A.; Migalska-Zalas, A.; El-Ghayoury, A.; Zawadzka, A.; Makowska-Janusik, M.; Sahraoui, B. Theoretical and experimental investigation of multifunctional highly conjugated organic push-pull ligands for NLO applications. Opt. Mat. 2018, 86, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cojan, C.; Agrawal, G.P.; Flytzanis, C. Optical properties of one-dimensional semiconductors and conjugated polymers. Phys. Rev. B 1977, 15, 909–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bogaard, M.P.; Orr, B.J. Molecular structure and properties. In MTP International Review of Science, Physical Chemistry Series Two; Butterworths: London, UK, 1975; Volume 2, p. 149. [Google Scholar]
  57. Leupacher, W.; Penzkofer, A. Third-order nonlinear susceptibilities of dye solutions determined by third-harmonic generation. Appl. Phys. B 1985, 36, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Abbas, H. First principle calculation of the photophysical properties of silylated coumarins 120 and 151. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2012, 992, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of investigated molecules: (a) 8-Hydroxyquinoline zinc [Znq2], (b) 8-Hydroxyquinoline copper II [Cuq2], (c) Tris(8-Hydroxyquinoline) aluminium [Alq3].
Figure 1. Chemical structures of investigated molecules: (a) 8-Hydroxyquinoline zinc [Znq2], (b) 8-Hydroxyquinoline copper II [Cuq2], (c) Tris(8-Hydroxyquinoline) aluminium [Alq3].
Nanomaterials 09 00254 g001
Figure 2. Topography Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) images of investigated metalorganic complexes thin films: Znq2 (a) 2D and (b) 3D, Cuq2 (c) 2D and (d) 3D, and Alq3 (e) 2D and (f) 3D.
Figure 2. Topography Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) images of investigated metalorganic complexes thin films: Znq2 (a) 2D and (b) 3D, Cuq2 (c) 2D and (d) 3D, and Alq3 (e) 2D and (f) 3D.
Nanomaterials 09 00254 g002
Figure 3. AFM profiles of investigated metalorganic complexes thin films.
Figure 3. AFM profiles of investigated metalorganic complexes thin films.
Nanomaterials 09 00254 g003
Figure 4. UV-Vis absorption spectra of studied molecules (Znq2, Cuq2, and Alq3).
Figure 4. UV-Vis absorption spectra of studied molecules (Znq2, Cuq2, and Alq3).
Nanomaterials 09 00254 g004
Figure 5. Third harmonic intensity of Znq2 film and silica as a function of the incident angle for polarization s and p.
Figure 5. Third harmonic intensity of Znq2 film and silica as a function of the incident angle for polarization s and p.
Nanomaterials 09 00254 g005
Figure 6. Third harmonic intensity of Cuq2 film and silica as a function of the incident angle for polarization s and p.
Figure 6. Third harmonic intensity of Cuq2 film and silica as a function of the incident angle for polarization s and p.
Nanomaterials 09 00254 g006
Figure 7. Third harmonic intensity of Alq3 film and silica as a function of the incident angle for polarization s and p.
Figure 7. Third harmonic intensity of Alq3 film and silica as a function of the incident angle for polarization s and p.
Nanomaterials 09 00254 g007
Figure 8. Optimized structures of investigated molecules: (a) Znq2, (b) Cuq2, (c) Alq3.
Figure 8. Optimized structures of investigated molecules: (a) Znq2, (b) Cuq2, (c) Alq3.
Nanomaterials 09 00254 g008
Figure 9. Theoretically simulated UV-Vis spectra of Alq3, Znq2, and Cuq2.
Figure 9. Theoretically simulated UV-Vis spectra of Alq3, Znq2, and Cuq2.
Nanomaterials 09 00254 g009
Table 1. The values of the third order nonlinear optical susceptibility χ T H G ( 3 ) of thin films obtained from the third harmonic generation (THG) technique for polarization s and p.
Table 1. The values of the third order nonlinear optical susceptibility χ T H G ( 3 ) of thin films obtained from the third harmonic generation (THG) technique for polarization s and p.
Polarisation SPolarisation P
d
[nm]
α
[106 m1]
χ(3)
[1020 m2/V2]
χ(3)
[1012 esu]
χ(3)
[1020 m2/V2]
χ(3)
[1012 esu]
χ(3)
[1019 esu·m]
Znq21734.191.621.161.761.273.03
Cuq21663.651.851.321.781.273.62
Alq32233.811.320.961.330.962.51
Silica--0.020.160.020.16
d—thickness, α—absorption coefficient, χ(3)—third order susceptibility.
Table 2. HOMO and LUMO energy levels and theoretical bandgap (Eg)HOMO–LUMO (B3LYP/6-31G(d)).
Table 2. HOMO and LUMO energy levels and theoretical bandgap (Eg)HOMO–LUMO (B3LYP/6-31G(d)).
SampleHOMO [eV]LUMO [eV](Eg)HOMO–LUMO [eV]
Alq3−5.25−2.193.06
Znq2−5.42−2.063.36
Cuq2−5.13−2.162.97
Table 3. Some selected components of the frequency-dependent γ (−2ω; ω, ω, 0) values at ω = 0.042827 a.u. = 1064 nm.
Table 3. Some selected components of the frequency-dependent γ (−2ω; ω, ω, 0) values at ω = 0.042827 a.u. = 1064 nm.
Sampleγxxxx × 1036 esuγyyyy × 1036 esuγzzzz × 1036 esuγxxyy × 1036 esuγxxzz × 1036 esuγyyzz × 1036 esuγtot × 1036 esu
Alq3626623142112828359
Znq2213136991057
Cuq2175140625653222636914178765
Table 4. The frontier molecular orbitals: HOMO and LUMO for Alq3, Znq2, and Cuq2.
Table 4. The frontier molecular orbitals: HOMO and LUMO for Alq3, Znq2, and Cuq2.
SampleHOMOLUMO
Alq3 Nanomaterials 09 00254 i001 Nanomaterials 09 00254 i002
Znq2 Nanomaterials 09 00254 i003 Nanomaterials 09 00254 i004
Cuq2 Nanomaterials 09 00254 i005 Nanomaterials 09 00254 i006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Popczyk, A.; Aamoum, A.; Migalska-Zalas, A.; Płóciennik, P.; Zawadzka, A.; Mysliwiec, J.; Sahraoui, B. Selected Organometallic Compounds for Third Order Nonlinear Optical Application. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020254

AMA Style

Popczyk A, Aamoum A, Migalska-Zalas A, Płóciennik P, Zawadzka A, Mysliwiec J, Sahraoui B. Selected Organometallic Compounds for Third Order Nonlinear Optical Application. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(2):254. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Popczyk, Anna, Aouatif Aamoum, Anna Migalska-Zalas, Przemyslaw Płóciennik, Anna Zawadzka, Jaroslaw Mysliwiec, and Bouchta Sahraoui. 2019. "Selected Organometallic Compounds for Third Order Nonlinear Optical Application" Nanomaterials 9, no. 2: 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020254

APA Style

Popczyk, A., Aamoum, A., Migalska-Zalas, A., Płóciennik, P., Zawadzka, A., Mysliwiec, J., & Sahraoui, B. (2019). Selected Organometallic Compounds for Third Order Nonlinear Optical Application. Nanomaterials, 9(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020254

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop