Next Article in Journal
Experimental Convection Heat Transfer Analysis of a Nano-Enhanced Industrial Coolant
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation of N-Doped Carbon Nanosheets from Sewage Sludge for Adsorption Studies of Cr(VI) from Aqueous Solution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced N-doped Porous Carbon Derived from KOH-Activated Waste Wool: A Promising Material for Selective Adsorption of CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2

1
School of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
2
State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
3
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(2), 266; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020266
Submission received: 15 January 2019 / Revised: 9 February 2019 / Accepted: 12 February 2019 / Published: 15 February 2019

Abstract

:
Separation of impurities (CO2 and N2) from CH4 is an important issue for natural gas alternatives (such as coalbed gas, biogas, and landfill gas) upgrading. It is notably challenging to synthesize high N-doped porous carbon with an appropriate porous structure. In this work, high N content (14.48 wt %) porous carbon with micropore size of 0.52 and 1.2 nm and specific surface area of 862 m2 g−1 has been synthesized from potassium hydroxide (KOH) activated waste wool upon the urea modification. Pure component adsorption isotherms of CO2, CH4, and N2 are systematically measured on this enhanced N-doped porous carbon at 0 and 25 °C, up to 1 bar, to evaluate the gases adsorption capability, and correlated with the Langmuir model. These data are used to estimate the separation selectivities for binary mixtures of CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2 at different mixing ratios according to the ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) model. At an ambient condition of 25 °C and 1 bar, the predicted selectivities for equimolar CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2 are 3.19 and 7.62, respectively, and the adsorption capacities for CO2, CH4, and N2 are 2.91, 1.01, and 0.13 mmol g−1, respectively. This report introduces a simple pathway to obtain enhanced N-doped porous carbon with large adsorption capacities for gas separation of CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In latest decades, to satisfy the rapid growth in chemical and manufacturing industries, a large amount of fossil fuels burning has increased the level of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, which causes serious environmental issues, such as global climate change, the greenhouse effect, and ocean acidification [1,2,3]. A number of methods to reduce the CO2 gas have been suggested. One of the potential methods might be the use of natural gas (NG) as fuel for transportation and heating purpose [3]. Compared with the fossil fuels such as coal and petroleum, NG produces less CO2 per energy unit and has a high specific combustion enthalpy; therefore, it is considered a cleaner and potential substitute energy [4,5,6]. Additionally, NG has no threat to water or land, because of its non-toxic and no vapor pool forming on the ground as the liquefied petroleum gas does [3]. Nowadays, NG has provided a large amount of energy to satisfy business, industry, vehicle, and home needs throughout the world. The consumption of NG is expected to grow by 50% in the next 20 years, which makes the energy shortage situation much more serious [7]. As a result, coalbed gas, biogas, and landfill gas are deemed as attractive alternatives to NG, because they possess high methane (CH4) content and obvious socioeconomic advantages. However, the existence of some impurities such as CO2 and nitrogen (N2) will hamper the application of these alternative gases by reducing the heating value and corroding the transportation or storage system [7,8,9]. Consequently, urgent research is required to separate impurities (CO2 and N2) from CH4. At present, various technologies have been developed for gas separation and purification including cryogenic distillation, membrane separation, and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) [6,10]. Among these technologies, PSA has attracted intense interest due to its advantage of low cost, ease control, and energy effectiveness [6]. Accordingly, a lot of adsorbents have been evaluated for the adsorptive separation of CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2 such as metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [11,12,13,14], organic zeolites [14,15,16], organic frameworks [17], and carbon-based materials [6,7,8,9,18,19].
Porous carbons have been considered as the most promising candidates for gas storage and separation because they are easy to synthesize and have good economical properties and strong thermal stability [20,21,22]. The adsorption of CO2, CH4, and N2 could be described as physisorption through weak van der Waals interaction forces [22]. Current research has focused on increasing the specific surface area (SSA) and controlling the pore size distribution (PSD), since the adsorption capacity is closely related to the textural characteristics of the carbon materials [22,23,24]. For example, Leventis et al. [25,26] reported that microporous carbon aerogels demonstrated an exceptionally high adsorption capacity for CO2. Meanwhile, for the purpose of improving the adsorption efficiency and further enhancing the interactions between gas molecules and carbon material, it is important to incorporate heteroatoms (i.e., N, P, S) into the carbon framework [21,22,25,26,27,28]. Recently, many efforts have been devoted to the synthesis of robust porous carbon that possesses high adsorption capacity and good selectivity, especially the N-doped porous carbon adsorbent. For example, the N-doped porous carbon synthesized from benzimidazole-linked polymers demonstrated high adsorption selectivity for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 [21]. The N-rich porous carbon through polyamine-incorporated metal–organic framework materials, which exhibited excellent CO2-selective adsorption ability over CH4 and N2 [27]. The N-doped graphene sheets by reducing graphene oxide sheets in the presence of polyindole displayed outstanding adsorption selectivity ratios for CO2 over N2, CH4, and H2, respectively [28]. However, the synthesis processes of these N-doped porous carbons are very complex and time-consuming, and the precursor is not economical, which will enormously influence the practical application for the adsorbents. Thus, there still remains a challenge to develop porous carbon adsorbents with strong adsorption capacity, high selectivity, facile synthesis, and low cost.
Porous carbon adsorbents obtained from biomass materials are very competitive, which are not only cost-effective, easy to synthesis, abundant and sustainably renewable, but also happen to be excellent adsorbents for gas adsorption and separation [29,30,31,32]. So far, there already have been some biomass-derived porous carbons reported for CO2/CH4/N2 adsorption and separation. For example, Li et al. [31] investigated starch-derived porous carbon spheres for high uptakes of CO2, CH4, and H2. Niya et al. [32] synthesized N-doped carbon foams for CO2/N2, CO2/CH4, and CH4/N2 separation by using banana peel as a precursor and zinc complex as a template. Because of the N-rich nature, waste wool is a desirable precursor for the fabrication of N-doped porous carbon [33]. In a previous study, we have successfully synthesized N-doped hierarchical porous carbon from waste wool by potassium hydroxide (KOH) activation, exhibiting a good selective adsorption capability of CO2/N2 [34]. Although KOH activation is a well method for developing the porosity structure of the carbon, it unavoidably leads to a loss of N from the carbon framework [33,34,35].
Therefore, enhancing the N content of the porous carbon after KOH activation is an urgent task for further gas selective adsorption application. Keeping the above purpose in mind, in this work we propose a simple method to synthesize N-enhanced porous carbon from KOH activated waste wool for selective adsorption of CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2. As shown in Figure 1, first waste wool is chosen as carbon precursor to be activated by KOH, and then modified by urea. Here, waste wool is chosen because it is largely composed of keratin amino acids and is a unique renewable natural material with high N contents. However, the KOH activation can make a significant evolution of the structure for the original wool derived activated porous carbon (WAPC), which simultaneously reduces the N groups and introduces many O groups into the carbon frameworks [34,35,36]. Upon the urea modification, a significant amount of N groups can be again introduced into the activated carbon matrix, because the high N content (46 wt %) urea can react with O-containing functional groups [37]. The CO2, CH4, and N2 adsorption properties are evaluated at 0 °C and 25 °C, respectively, on the as-obtained enhanced N-doped wool derived activated porous carbon (N-WAPC) The isotherm data are used to predict the separation selectivities for binary mixtures of CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2 assuming different mixing ratios by the ideal adsorption solution theory (IAST).

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Waste wool was obtained from rural pastures of Henan, China. Potassium hydroxide (KOH), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and urea (NH2CONH2) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. China (Beijing, China) and used as received without any further purification.

2.2. Sample Preparation

First, the waste wool was thoroughly washed, and then pre-carbonized at 300 °C under N2 atmosphere. The as-obtained black and crisp carbide was ground to powder and mixed with a KOH agent (the ratio of KOH/pre-carbonized sample = 3), activated under N2 atmosphere as we have previously reported [34]. The resulting waste wool derived activated porous carbon was denoted as WAPC. In the following synthesis, 0.1 g of WAPC and 0.1 g of urea were thoroughly mixed by grinding for 20 min. After that, the mixture was transferred into a quartz boat placing in a horizontal tube furnace. Subsequently, the mixture was calcinated at 600 °C for 1 h with a heating rate of 3 °C min−1 under N2 atmosphere. After cooling down, the sample was thoroughly washed with hot distilled water to remove the residual urea, and then dried at 60 °C to obtain the final product. The as-obtained N-enhanced porous carbon sample was denoted as N-WAPC.

2.3. Material Characterizations

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and elemental mappings were obtained by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Hitachi S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) measurements were carried out on a JEOL-2100F transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 200 KV. Powdered X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were performed on a Bruker-D8 powder diffractometer (Bruker, Madison, WI, USA) using Cu Ka radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm). Raman spectra were collected on a Renishaw inVia (Renishaw, London, UK) with an excitation wavelength of 514 nm. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were collected on a Nicolet iS10 FT-IR spectrophotometer (Nicolet, Madison, WI, USA), using the KBr pellet technique. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on a Thermo Scientific ESCALAB250 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an Al Ka excitation source. Elemental analysis (C, H, and N) was performed on a dry basis using a VarioEL III Elemental Analyzer (Elementar, Hanau, Germany). The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were measured on a Quantachrome NOVA1000e volumetrically sorption analyzer (Quantachrome, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) at liquid nitrogen temperature. Prior to each adsorption experiment, the degassing procedure was carried out for 3 h at 300 °C to remove the guest molecules in the sample. The SSA was calculated by multiple points Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method and PSD was determined by a non-local density functional (NLDFT) theory using nitrogen adsorption data and assuming a slit pore model.

2.4. Adsorption Measurements

The CO2, CH4, and N2 adsorption isotherms were measured by the Micromeritics ASAP 2020 volumetrically at two temperatures of 0 °C and 25 °C, respectively. Ultrahigh-purity CO2, CH4, and N2 were used as received. As aforementioned, the degassing procedure was also carried out for 3 h at 300 °C prior to the adsorption measurement.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Characterizations of the As-Prepared Samples

The SEM images of the pre-carbonized sample show a bulky morphology with a smooth surface, and no pores can be observed (Figure S1). After the KOH activation process, the activated sample WAPC exhibits an obviously developed porous structure with spongy pores on the surface (Figure 2a). Further urea nitridation, the structure of the N-enhanced sample N-WAPC becomes more or less collapsed; however, the whole sponge-like porous structure still can be well kept (Figure 2b). TEM and HR-TEM measurements are also carried out to study the overall morphology and microstructure of the N-WAPC. As showed in Figure 2c, a continuous sponge-like architecture with a connected porous texture is clearly observed. Furthermore, the HR-TEM image of N-WAPC (Figure 2d) shows an amorphous curved surface with worm-like micropores, as well as the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern exhibiting typical diffuse rings (inset in Figure 2d).
XRD and Raman are employed to characterize the phase structures of the porous carbon samples. As shown in Figure 3a, the two broad low-intensity diffraction peaks around 25° and 43° correspond to the (002) and (100) diffraction patterns of amorphous graphitic carbon [38,39,40]. The weak peaks suggest a low graphitization of the WAPC. After urea nitridation treatment, these two peaks become much weaker, indicating a more disordered graphitic structure of N-WAPC. In Figure 3b, the two bands centered at about 1340 cm−1 (D band) and 1590 cm−1 (G band) are separated completely. The D band is closely related to the presence of disordered carbon structures, whereas the G band is associated with the sp2-hybridized carbon atoms in a graphitic layer [38,39,40]. The intensity ratio of the D and G band (ID/IG) is known to be an indicator of the degree of graphitization, the higher the ID/IG, the lower the degree of graphitization [39]. In our case, the ID/IG peak ratios for WAPC and N-WAPC are 1.12 and 2.71, respectively, indicating a low degree of graphitization. The ID/IG ratio of N-WAPC is higher than that of WAPC, suggesting more defect sites are introduced in N-WAPC during the urea nitridation, which corresponds with the XRD result.
The FT-IR spectroscopy is used to investigate the chemical bonding information of the porous carbon samples (Figure 3c). The broad absorption band around 3430 cm−1 is attributed to the N–H and/or O–H stretching vibrations [41,42,43]. The band at about 1580 cm−1 represents N–H in-plane deformation vibration or C=C stretching vibration in aromatic rings [42,43]. The characteristic absorption at 1418 cm−1 corresponded to C–N stretching vibration [44]. The broad band around 1200–1000 cm−1 can be assigned to the C–N or C–O stretching vibration [41,42]. The spectra of WAPC and N-WAPC present similar broad and overlapping absorption bands, which can be attributed to the strong absorption of carbon [45]. Furthermore, the N-WAPC exhibits some relatively strong amplitude, which associates with nitrogen-related bands of N–H and C–N.
The elemental analysis is used to provide chemical compositions of the carbon samples, and the corresponding results are demonstrated in Table 1. The N contents are found to be 4.14 and 14.48 wt % for the WAPC and N-WAPC, respectively, while the O contents are 24.79 and 12.44 wt %, and the C contents are 69.65 and 71.98 wt %. Clearly, the WAPC has a significant high O content, which should be ascribed to the KOH activation treatment [34]. The high level of oxygen-containing functional groups in the WAPC makes it very reactive for subsequent urea nitridation [37]. After the urea treatment, the N contents increase from 4.14 wt % for WAPC to 14.48 wt % for N-WAPC. On the contrary, the O contents decrease from 24.79 wt % for WAPC to 12.44 wt % for N-WAPC. While the C contents for the two samples do not change significantly. Above results demonstrate that the oxygen-containing groups on the WAPC can interact with the amino groups in the urea, contributing to the incorporation of N into the carbon framework.
In order to further investigate the feature of surface states, the XPS technique is applied for the carbon samples. As shown in Figure 4a, both samples exhibit C1s, N1s, and O1s peaks, respectively. It is noteworthy that the N-WAPC has a considerably strong N1s peak compared with WAPC (Figure 4a). The corresponding N species are presented in Figure 4b. The peaks at ~398.1 eV, ~400.0 eV, ~400.7 eV, and ~402.8 eV are attributed to pyridinic-N (N-6), pyrrolic-/pyridonic-N (N-5), quaternary-N (N-Q), and N-oxides of pyridine (N-x), respectively [43,44,46,47,48]. The structure of these different N species is shown in Figure 4c. To the best of our knowledge, the pyrrolic-N and pyridonic-N cannot be well distinguished from each other within the accuracy of XPS measurements. However, considering the oxygen presenting in the porous carbons and the fact that pyridonic-N is more stable than pyrrolic-N, the pyridonic-N is more likely to be present in the porous carbons [42]. As to pyridonic-N, the p orbital in its –OH would produce p–π conjugation effect with its p bond, which endows the N located in the ortho-position of –OH with stronger electron atmosphere and consequently enhances its Lewis basicity, resulting in the improvement of the CO2 adsorption ability of porous carbons [42]. Thus, the pyridonic-N, acting as an anchor for CO2 capture, is beneficial for CO2 capture [42,43]. Whereas, other N species have no active effect for CO2 capture [46]. Quantitative analysis calculations from the N1s peak area show that the N amounts of form N-5 is higher than those present of form N-6, N-Q and N-x, in the order of N-5 > N-6 > N-Q > N-x for both samples of WAPC and N-WAPC (Table 1). It should be noted that after urea nitridation treatment, the percentage of form N-5 in N-WAPC increases significantly. The relative percentage of N-5 in WAPC is only 33%, while in N-WAPC it is 44% (Table 1). This would be favorable for CO2 capture, because N-5 contributes more significantly to capturing CO2 than other forms of nitrogen species [46]. The high-resolution spectra of C1s and O1s for WAPC and N-WAPC are shown in Figure S2. The C1s peak can be deconvoluted to six sub-peaks at 284.5, 285.3, 285.9, 286.7, 287.3, and 288.8 eV, respectively (Figure S2a). The main peak centers at 284.5 eV corresponds to C-C [49], while the other weak peaks can be identified as C-OH at 285.3 eV [36,49], C=N at 285.9 eV [49], C-O-C at 286.4 eV [48], N-C=O at 287.4 eV [49], and -COOH at 288.8 eV [48]. Three characteristic peaks are observed at 531.8, 532.5, and 533.4 eV in the O 1s spectra (Figure S2b), which can be ascribed to C=O, C-OH, and O-C-O, respectively [48,49,50]. Furthermore, from the SEM energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) element mapping, it can be seen that N, C, and O elements are uniformly distributed on the N-WAPC surface (Figure S3).
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of WAPC and N-WAPC and the corresponding PSD curves are shown in Figure 5. The isotherms of WAPC and N-WAPC (Figure 5a) display a combination form of type I and type IV, with a rapid N2 uptake at very low relative pressure (P/P0) and a slight hysteresis loop at medium P/P0 range, indicating the presence of rich micropores and a small number of mesopores in the samples [51]. However, the N2 uptake amount at low P/P0 region for N-WAPC is obviously less than that of WAPC, which can be attributed to the structural collapse that resulted from urea nitridation. Correspondingly, the PSD curves of WAPC and N-WAPC calculated by the NLDFT theory both exhibit the presence of micropores and mesopores (Figure 5b). The PSD curve for WAPC displays three relatively strong micropore peaks at about 0.52, 0.85, and 1.2 nm, respectively, and one weak mesopore peak around 3.4 nm. As for N-WAPC, the two micropore peaks mainly center at around 0.52 and 1.2 nm, and one very weak mesopore peak at about 2.6 nm. As can be seen clearly, the peaks intensities of micropores and mesopores for N-WAPC are much inferior to that of N-WAPC, which is in accordance with their N2 adsorption isotherms and microstructure results. As shown in Table 2, which includes BET SSA (SBET) that calculated from N2 adsorption branch and total pore volume (Vtot) that obtained from N2 adsorption amount at P/P0 = 0.99, respectively. The SBET for WAPC and N-WAPC is 1352 and 862 m2 g−1, respectively; and the Vtot for WAPC and N-WAPC is 0.74 and 0.5 m3 g−1, respectively. We note that both the SBET and the Vtot significantly decrease after nitridation treatment with urea, because the structure collapse and addition N-groups may block partial pore volume.

3.2. Gas Adsorption and Separation Studies

The pure component adsorption isotherms of CO2, CH4, and N2 for WAPC and N-WAPC are measured at two temperatures (25 °C and 0 °C) and pressure up to 1 bar, as shown in Figure 6 and summarized in Table 2. All the isotherms show excellent reversibility without hysteresis, suggesting that the adsorbed molecules can be well removed during the desorption process. Thus, the samples of WAPC and N-WAPC can be easily regenerated by a vacuum without any heating treatment, which makes these samples superior to some MOFs and zeolites materials [6]. The adsorption isotherms for CO2 are fitted by the Double Site Langmuir (DSL) model and the adsorption isotherms for CH4 and N2 are fitted by the Langmuir (L) model. The calculation details and parameters are summarized in Figure S4–S9 and Table S1–S3 in the supporting information. It is clear that the amounts of gases adsorbed varied widely for samples N-WAPC and WAPC, in the sequence of CO2 > CH4 > N2. In both WAPC and N-WAPC, CO2 is the most strongly adsorbed gas owing to its significant quadrupolar moment and polarizability [6,9,52]. CH4 shows stronger adsorption than N2, which is attributed to its higher polarizability than that of N2 [6,9,52].
The adsorption capacity is an important factor to assess the gas separation capability for an adsorbent [6]. The higher CO2 capacity is obtained by N-WAPC, which is measured to be 4.50 and 2.91 mmol g−1 at 0 and 25 °C, respectively. These values are superior to some recently reported carbon-based adsorbents: sOMC (2.0 mmol g−1), MAC (2.13 mmol g−1), and N-HPCMs-5-0.6-973 (1.82 mmol g−1) at 25 °C and 100 kPa [6,7,53]. Although the SBET and Vtot for the WAPC are high, the CO2 capacity for WAPC (only 3.73 and 2.81 mmol g−1 at 0 and 25 °C, respectively) is much lower than that of N-WAPC. This can be clarified by the significantly enhanced N content in N-WAPC (14.48 wt %), especially the high percentage of form N-5 in N-WAPC (44%). Furthermore, the N-WAPC also exhibits high CH4 adsorption capacities of 1.70 and 1.01 mmol g−1 at 0 and 25 °C, respectively, at the pressure of 1 bar. As for the N2 uptake, the N-WAPC shows adsorption capacities of 0.67 and 0.13 mmol g−1 at 0 and 25 °C, respectively, under the pressure of 1 bar. Under the same conditions, all these values outperform the WAPC adsorption capacities on CH4 (1.18 mmol g−1 at 0 °C and 0.64 mmol g−1 at 25 °C) and N2 (0.37 mmol g−1 at 0 °C and 0.35 mmol g−1 at 25 °C).
In addition to the desirable gas uptake, selectivity is also very important for potential application in gas separation. Considering the good gas adsorption capacity of N-WAPC, the gas separation capability of N-WAPC for CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2 are further measured. The IAST is a widely used method to predict the binary mixture gas adsorption selectivity behavior based upon single component gas adsorption results [6,9,34]. Here, we use IAST to predict the selectivity of N-WAPC for the binary mixtures (CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2). In a mixture, the selectivity of the preferential adsorption gas 1 over gas 2 can be formally defined as the following equation:
Sads = [q1/q2]/[p1/p2]
where Sads is the selectivity factor, q1 and q2 are the absolute adsorbed loadings at a partial pressure of p1 and p2, respectively, in the binary mixture. The IAST selectivities of the binary mixtures at different gas proportions on N-WAPC in this paper are typical components of CH4-related gases, such as coalbed gas, biogas, and landfill gas. Accordingly, the mixing ratios of 50/50, 15/85, and 5/95 for CO2/CH4, and CH4/N2 are used to calculate the selectivity and the overall performance is summarized in Table 3.
The selectivities of binary mixtures for CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2 on N-WAPC, are plotted as a function of total bulk pressure in Figure 7. For equimolar binary mixture (50/50) of CO2/CH4, the selectivities decrease with the increased pressure, obtaining about 3.03 (0 °C) and 3.19 (25 °C) at 1 bar (Figure 7a). The CH4/CO2 selectivity displayed by N-WAPC is comparable to or higher than some other reported adsorbents [6,54,55,56]. When it comes to the CH4/N2 (50/50) separation, the selectivities are also decreased with the increased pressure and obtained 3.04 (0 °C) and 7.62 (25 °C) at 1 bar (Figure 7b), which is comparable to that of ultra-microporous carbon [57] and polycarbazole polymers under the same condition [58]. The selectivities for the binary mixture CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2 at other mixing ratios are further predicted by IAST. As shown in Figure 7c, with the mixture ratio of 15/85 for CO2/CH4, although the selectivities are decreased with the increased pressure, it can maintain a relatively high level of 6.91 (0 °C) and 5.98 (25 °C) at 1 bar. Whereas in the mixture ratio for CO2/CH4 is 5/95, the selectivity situation is different. As shown in Figure 7e, the CO2/CH4 selectivities gradually increase with the increased pressure, finally reaching 12.26 (0 °C) and 8.66 (25 °C) at 1 bar. As for the binary mixture of CH4/N2, when the gas component is 15/85, the CH4/N2 selectivity slightly decreases with the increased pressure, keeping 4.66 at 0 °C and 1 bar (Figure 7d). However, at 25 °C, the CH4/N2 selectivity obviously increases with the increased pressure, reaching about 11.76 under the pressure of 1 bar (Figure 7d). For the case of binary mixture CH4/N2 with mixing ratio of 5/95, the selectivities increase with the increased pressure, reaching 5.73 (25 °C) and 13.71 (0 °C) at 1 bar (Figure 7f). It is worth noting that, in the same conditions, the selectivities of CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2 keep increasing in the composition range (50/50 ~ 15/85 ~ 5/95), which is an attractive feature of an adsorbent. The listed selectivities indicate that the as-synthesized N-WAPC is a promising adsorbent in gas adsorptive separation.
The isosteric heat of adsorption (Qst) is the standard enthalpy of adsorption at a fixed surface coverage [59], which is an important value to evaluate the interactions between gas molecules and adsorbents and further elucidates the selectivity. The Qst for CO2 and CH4 on N-WAPC are calculated by obtaining the CO2 and CH4 isotherms at two different temperatures (25 and 0 °C). The single component Qst as a function of surface loading can be determined by a variant of the Clausius–Clapeyron equation as following [59,60,61]:
ln ( P 1 / P 2 )   =   Δ H ads   ( T 2   -   T 1 R   T 1   T 2 )
where ΔHads gives the isosteric heat of adsorption. P1 and P2 are the pressures, for the same amount of gas uptake, at two different temperatures T1 and T2 respectively. R is the ideal gas constant. As can be seen clearly in Figure 8, the Qst values of CO2 is in the range of 35.44–27.10 kJ mol−1 gently dropping from low coverage to saturation, which means that the interaction between CO2 molecules and the absorbent is stronger than that between CO2 molecules [58]. The Qst of CH4 is almost in the horizontal range from 22.59 to 22.88 kJ mol−1, which apparently exceeds standard enthalpy for interaction of CH4 with carbon (16 kJmol−1) and many activated carbon materials, such as M1273-150 (17–11 kJ mol−1) [31], C1000 (17.4–16.3 kJ mol−1) [62], K-PAF-1 (20.6–15.9 kJ mol−1) [63]. The enhanced N-doped porous carbon with appropriate pore structure can greatly enhance CH4 adsorption through weak interactions, and can therefore achieve a high CH4/N2 selectivity. Furthermore, the Qst of CO2 is obviously higher than that of CH4 within the experiment range, indicating a high CO2/CH4 selectivity. These high selectivities demonstrate that the enhanced N-doped porous carbon has potential in applications for CH4-related gas upgrading, such as coalbed gas, biogas, and landfill gas.

4. Conclusions

Enhanced N-doped porous carbon with an appropriate pore structure has been synthesized from KOH activated waste wool upon the urea modification. The as-obtained porous carbon N-WAPC has a high N content of 14.48 wt %, SSA of 862 m2 g−1, and an appropriate micropore size of 0.52 and 1.2 nm. The gas the adsorption capacities of N-WAPC follows the order CO2 > CH4 > N2. The adsorption selectivities of binary mixtures CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2 were predicted by the IAST method. At 25 and 1 bar, the selectivities of N-WAPC for equimolar CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2 are 3.19 and 7.62, respectively. The good selective adsorption performance of N-WAPC reveals its great potential for efficient methane mixture gases upgrading.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/2/266/s1, Figure S1: SEM image of the pre-carbonized waste wool; Figure S2: High-resolution XPS spectra of (a) C1s and (b) O1s for WAPC and N-WAPC; Figure S3: (a) SEM image for N-WAPC and the corresponding EDS element mappings of (b) N, (c) C and (d) O; Figure S4: CO2 gas adsorption for N-WAPC at 0 °C (a) and 25 °C (b). The continuous solid line corresponds to the DSL fittings of the experimental data; Figure S5: CH4 gas adsorption for N-WAPC at 0 °C (a) and 25 °C (b). The continuous solid line corresponds to the L fittings of the experimental data; Figure S6: N2 gas adsorption for N-WAPC at 0 °C (a) and 25 °C (b). The continuous solid line corresponds to the L fittings of the experimental data; Figure S7: CO2 gas adsorption for WAPC at 0 °C (a) and 25 °C (b). The continuous solid line corresponds to the DSL fittings of the experimental data; Figure S8: CH4 gas adsorption for WAPC at 0 °C (a) and 25 °C (b). The continuous solid line corresponds to the L fittings of the experimental data; Figure S9: N2 gas adsorption for WAPC at 0 °C (a) and 25 °C (b). The continuous solid line corresponds to the L fittings of the experimental data; Table S1: Langmuir parameters and coefficient of determination for adsorption of CO2 in N-WAPC and WAPC; Table S2: Langmuir parameters and coefficient of determination for adsorption of CH4 in N-WAPC and WAPC; Table S3: Langmuir parameters and coefficient of determination for adsorption of N2 in N-WAPC and WAPC.

Author Contributions

Y.L. proposed and planned the research, and supervised the experiments; R.X. performed the experiment and analyzed the data; B.W., J.W. and J.Y. improved the data analysis; L.W. polished and edited the English; M.S. prepared the porous carbon. All the authors discussed the results and participated in the writing of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Project funded by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M632775), NSFC (No. U1804156, 51574112, 51874124), Henan Province Colleges and Universities Key Research Project (18A620002, 18A150005), State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Gas Geology and Gas Control (Henan Polytechnic University) (WS2018A05), Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China (IRT_16R22), National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0804207), and Program for Innovative Research Team of Henan Polytechnic University (T2018-2).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ben-Mansour, R.; Habib, M.A.; Bamidele, O.E.; Basha, M.; Qasem, N.A.A.; Peedikakkal, A.; Laoui, T.; Ali, M. Carbon capture by physical adsorption: Materials, experimental investigations and numerical modeling and simulations-A review. Appl. Energ. 2016, 161, 225–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, X.F.; Guo, T.C.; Zhu, L.; Ling, C.C.; Xue, Q.Z.; Xing, W. Charge-modulated CO2 capture of C3N nanosheet: Insights from DFT calculations. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 338, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Byamba-Ochir, N.; Shim, W.G.; Balathanigaimani, M.S.; Moon, M. High density mongolian anthracite based porous carbon monoliths for methane storage by adsorption. Appl. Energy 2017, 190, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Song, W.H.; Yao, J.; Ma, J.S.; Li, A.F.; Li, Y.; Sun, H.; Zhang, L. Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations of pore structure influence on methane adsorption in micro-porous carbons with applications to coal andshale systems. Fuel 2018, 215, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Im, J.S.; Jung, M.J.; Lee, Y.S. Effects of fluorination modification on pore size controlled electrospun activated carbon fibers for high capacity methane storage. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2009, 339, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yuan, B.; Wu, X.F.; Chen, Y.X.; Huang, J.H.; Luo, H.M.; Deng, S.G. Adsorption of CO2, CH4, and N2 on ordered mesoporous carbon: Approach for greenhouse gases capture and biogas upgrading. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 5474–5480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yi, H.H.; Li, F.R.; Ning, P.; Tang, X.L.; Peng, J.H.; Li, Y.D.; Deng, H. Adsorption separation of CO2, CH4, and N2 on microwave activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 215, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shao, X.H.; Feng, Z.H.; Xue, R.S.; Ma, C.C.; Wang, W.C.; Peng, X.; Cao, D.P. Adsorption of CO2, CH4, CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 in novel activated carbon beads: Preparation, measurements and simulation. AIChE J. 2011, 57, 3042–3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, J.; Krishna, R.; Yang, J.F.; Deng, S.G. Hydroquinone and quinone-grafted porous carbons for highly selective CO2 capture from flue gases and natural gas upgrading. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 9364–9373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, C.M.; Zhou, Y.P.; Sun, Y.; Su, W.; Zhou, L. Enrichment of coal-bed methane by PSA complemented with CO2 displacement. AIChE J. 2011, 57, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bae, Y.S.; Mulfort, K.L.; Frost, H.; Ryan, P.; Punnathanam, S.; Broadbelt, L.J.; Hupp, J.T.; Snurr, R.Q. Separation of CO2 from CH4 using mixed-ligand metal-organic frameworks. Langmuir 2008, 24, 8592–8598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mishra, P.; Mekala, S.; Dreisbach, F.; Mandal, B.; Gumma, S. Adsorption of CO2, CO, CH4 and N2 on a zinc based metal organic framework. Sep. Purif. Techinol. 2012, 94, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, B.; Smit, B. Molecular simulation studies of separation of CO2/N2, CO2/CH4, and CH4/N2 by ZIFs. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 8515–8522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Saham, D.; Bao, Z.; Jia, F.; Deng, S.G. Adsorption of CO2, CH4, N2O, and N2 on MOF-5, MOF-177, and Zeolite 5A. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 1820–1826. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jensen, N.K.; Rufford, T.E.; Watson, G.; Zhang, D.K.; Ida Chan, K.; May, E.F. Screening zeolites for gas separation applications involving methane, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2012, 57, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Harlick, P.J.E.; Tezel, F.H. Adsorption of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrogen: Pure and binary mixture adsorption for ZSM-5 with SiO2/Al2O3 ratio of 280. Sep. Purif. Techinol. 2003, 33, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. İslamoğlu, T.; Rabbani, M.G.; El-Kaderi, H.M. Impact of post-synthesis modification of nanoporous organic frameworks on small gas uptake and selective CO2 capture. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 10259–10266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Djeridi, W.; Mansour, N.B.; Ouederni, A.; Llewellyn, P.L.; El Mir, L. Study of methane and carbon dioxide adsorption capacity by synthetic nanoporous carbon based on pyrogallol-formaldehyde. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 8905–8913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Djeridi, W.; Mansour, N.B.; Ouederni, A.; Llewellyn, P.L.; El Mir, L. Influence of the raw material and nickel oxide on the CH4 capture capacity behaviors of microporous carbon. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 13690–13701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.C.; Kaskel, S. KOH activation of carbon-based materials for energy storage. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 23710–23725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ashourirad, B.; Sekizkardes, A.K.; Altarawneh, S.; El-Kaderi, H.M. Exceptional gas adsorption properties by nitrogen-doped porous carbons derived from benzimidazole-linked polymers. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 1349–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, D.; Li, W.B.; Shi, J.S.; Xin, F.W. Influence of doping nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus on activated carbons for gas adsorption of H2, CH4 and CO2. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 50138–50143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alcañiz-Monge, J.; Lozano-Castelló, D.; Cazorla-Amorós, D.; Linares-Solano, A. Fundamentals of methane adsorption in microporous carbons. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 124, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Drage, T.C.; Arenillas, A.; Smith, K.M.; Pevida, C.; Piippo, S.; Snape, C.E. Preparation of carbon dioxide adsorbents from the chemical activation of urea-formaldehyde and melamine-formaldehyde resins. Fuel 2007, 86, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Far, H.M.; Rewatkar, P.M.; Donthula, S.; Taghvaee, T.; Saeed, A.M.; Sotiriou-Leventis, C.; Leventis, N. Exceptionally high CO2 adsorption at 273 K by microporous carbons from phenolic aerogels: The role of heteroatoms in comparison with carbons from polybenzoxazine and other organic aerogels. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2019, 220, 1800333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saeed, A.M.; Rewatkar, P.M.; Far, H.M.; Taghvaee, T.; Donthula, S.; Mandal, C.; Sotiriou-Leventis, C.; Leventis, N. Selective CO2 sequestration with monolithic bimodal micro/macroporous carbon aerogels derived from stepwise pyrolytic decomposition of polyamide-polyimide-polyurea random copolymers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 13520–13536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, J.W.; Lin, Y.C.; Yue, Q.F.; Tao, K.; Kong, C.L.; Chen, L. N-rich porous carbon with high CO2 capture capacity derived from polyamine-incorporated metal-organic framework materials. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 53017–53024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saleh, M.; Chandra, V.; Kemp, K.C.; Kim, K.S. Synthesis of N-doped microporous carbon via chemical activation of polyindole-modified graphene oxide sheets for selective carbon dioxide adsorption. Nanotechnology 2013, 24, 255702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, J.; Yang, J.; Hu, G.S.; Hu, X.; Li, Z.M.; Shen, S.W.; Radosz, M.; Fan, M.H. Enhanced CO2 capture capacity of nitrogen-doped biomass-derived porous carbons. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1439–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, P.; Guo, Y.F.; Zhao, C.W.; Yan, J.J.; Lu, P. Biomass derived wood ash with amine modification for post-combustion CO2 capture. Appl. Energ. 2017, 201, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Y.; Li, D.W.; Rao, Y.; Zhao, X.B.; Wu, M.B. Superior CO2, CH4, and H2 uptakes over ultrahigh-surface-area carbon spheres prepared from sustainable biomass-derived char by CO2 activation. Carbon 2016, 105, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Arami-Niya, A.; Rufford, T.E.; Zhu, Z.H. Nitrogen-doped carbon foams synthesized from banana peel and zinc complex template for adsorption of CO2, CH4, and N2. Energy Fuel. 2016, 30, 7298–7309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, L.; Cao, H.; Zhu, S.Q.; Hou, L.R.; Yuan, C.Z. Hierarchical micro-/mesoporous N- and O-enriched carbon derived from disposable cashmere: A competitive cost-effective material for high-performance electrochemical capacitors. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 2373–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, Y.; Xu, R.; Wang, X.; Wang, B.B.; Cao, J.L.; Yang, J.; Wei, J.P. Waste wool derived nitrogen-doped hierarchical porous carbon for selective CO2 capture. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 19818–19826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, M.L.; Guo, L.P.; Hu, G.S.; Hu, X.; Xu, L.Q.; Chen, J.; Dai, W.; Fan, M.H. Highly cost-effective nitrogen-doped porous coconut shell-based CO2 sorbent synthesized by combining ammoxidation with KOH activation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 7063–7070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Li, Y.; Zou, B.; Hu, C.W.; Cao, M.H. Nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanofiber webs for efficient CO2 capture and conversion. Carbon 2016, 99, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lin, Z.Y.; Waller, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, M.L.; Wong, C.P. Facile synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene via pyrolysis of graphene oxide and urea, and its electrocatalytic activity toward the oxygen-reduction reaction. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 884–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, J.R.; Wang, X.; Qi, G.C.; Li, B.H.; Song, Z.H.; Jiang, H.B.; Zhang, X.H.; Qiao, J.L. A novel N-doped porous carbon microsphere composed of hollow carbon nanospheres. Carbon 2016, 96, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wei, T.Y.; Wei, X.L.; Gao, Y.; Li, H.M. Large scale production of biomass-derived nitrogen-doped porous carbon materials for supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 169, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cheng, P.; Li, T.; Yu, H.; Zhi, L.; Liu, Z.H.; Lei, Z.B. Biomass-derived carbon fiber aerogel as a binder-free electrode for high-rate supercapacitors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 2079–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Alabadi, A.; Razzaque, S.; Yang, Y.W.; Chen, S.; Tan, B. Highly porous activated carbon materials from carbonized biomass with high CO2 capturing capacity. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 281, 606–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fan, X.Q.; Zhang, L.X.; Zhang, G.B.; Shu, Z.; Shi, J.L. Chitosan derived nitrogen-doped microporous carbons for high performance CO2 capture. Carbon 2013, 61, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sevilla, M.; Valle-Vigón, P.; Fuertes, A.B. N-doped polypyrrole-based porous carbons for CO2 capture. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 2781–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fu, N.; Wei, H.M.; Lin, H.L.; Li, L.; Ji, C.H.; Yu, N.B.; Chen, H.J.; Han, S.; Xiao, G.Y. Iron nanoclusters as template/activator for the synthesis of nitrogen doped porous carbon and its CO2 adsorption application. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 9955–9963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang, C.M.; Song, W.; Ma, Q.L.; Xie, L.J.; Zhang, X.C.; Guo, H. Enhancement of CO2 capture on biomass-based carbon from black locust by KOH activation and ammonia modification. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 4181–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, M.L.; Guo, L.P.; Hu, G.S.; Hu, X.; Chen, J.; Shen, S.W.; Dai, W.; Fan, M.H. Adsorption of CO2 by petroleum coke nitrogen-doped porous carbons synthesized by combining ammoxidation with KOH activation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ma, X.Y.; Zou, B.; Cao, M.H.; Chen, S.L.; Hu, C.W. Nitrogen-doped porous carbon monolith as a highly efficient catalyst for CO2 conversion. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 18360–18366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, C.; Xu, G.B.; Wei, X.L.; Yang, L.W. A macroscopic three-dimensional tetrapodseparated graphene-like oxygenated N-doped carbon nanosheet architecture for use in supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 9900–9909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Z.H.; Qie, L.; Yuan, L.X.; Zhang, W.X.; Hu, X.L.; Huang, Y.H. Functionalized N-doped interconnected carbon nanofibers as an anode material for sodium-ion storage with excellent performance. Carbon 2013, 55, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gao, Z.Y.; Liu, X.; Chang, J.L.; Wu, D.P.; Xu, F.; Zhang, L.C.; Du, W.M.; Jiang, K. Graphene incorporated, N doped activated carbon as catalytic electrode in redox active electrolyte mediated supercapacitor. J. Power Sources 2017, 337, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Y.; Cao, M.H. Synthesis of high-surface-area nitrogen-doped porous carbon microflowers and their efficient carbon dioxide capture performance. Chem. Asian J. 2015, 10, 1496–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bae, Y.S.; Farha, O.K.; Hupp, J.T.; Snurr, R.Q. Enhancement of CO2/N2 selectivity in a metal-organic framework by cavity modification. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 2131–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, R.L.; Ji, W.J.; He, T.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Zhang, J.; Dang, F.Q. Fabrication of nitrogen-doped hierarchically porous carbons through a hybrid dual-template route or CO2 capture and haemoperfusion. Carbon 2014, 76, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Peng, X.; Cao, D.P.; Wang, W.C. Adsorption and separation of CH4/CO2/N2/H2/CO mixtures in hexagonally ordered carbon nanopipes CMK-5. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66, 2266–2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Belmabkhout, Y.; Sayari, A. Adsorption of CO2 from dry gases on MCM-41 silica at ambient temperature and high pressure. 2: Adsorption of CO2/N2, CO2/CH4 and CO2/H2 binary mixtures. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64, 3729–3735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Saini, V.K.; Andrade, M.; Pinto, M.L.; Carvalho, A.P.; Pires, J. How the adsorption properties get changed when going from SBA-15 to its CMK-3 carbon replica. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 75, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yao, K.X.; Chen, Y.L.; Lu, Y.; Zhao, Y.F.; Ding, Y. Ultramicroporous carbon with extremely narrow pore distribution and very high nitrogen doping for efficient methane mixture gases upgrading. Carbon 2017, 122, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, G.Y.; Qin, L.; Yao, C.; Xu, Y.H. Controlled synthesis of conjugated polycarbazole polymers via structure tuning for gas storage and separation applications. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bandyopadhyay, S.; Anil, A.G.; James, A.; Patra, A. Multifunctional porous organic polymers: Tuning of porosity, CO2, and H2 storage and visible-light-driven photocatalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 27669–27678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mahurin, S.M.; Górka, J.; Nelson, K.M.; Mayes, R.T.; Dai, S. Enhanced CO2/N2 selectivity in amidoxime-modified porous carbon. Carbon 2014, 67, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dincă, M.; Long, J.R. Strong H2 binding and selective gas adsorption within the microporous coordination solid Mg3(O2C-C10H6-CO2)3. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9376–9377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wang, W.J.; Yuan, D.Q. Mesoporous carbon originated from non-permanent porous MOFs for gas storage and CO2/CH4 separation. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, Y.Q.; Ben, T.; Zhang, B.Y.; Fu, Y.; Qiu, S.L. Ultrahigh gas storage both at low and high pressures in KOH-activated carbonized porous aromatic frameworks. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis of enhanced N-doped porous carbon.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis of enhanced N-doped porous carbon.
Nanomaterials 09 00266 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) wool derived activated porous carbon (WAPC), (b) N-doped wool derived activated porous carbon (N-WAPC); TEM image (c,d) HRTEM image of N-WAPC (inset: SAED).
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) wool derived activated porous carbon (WAPC), (b) N-doped wool derived activated porous carbon (N-WAPC); TEM image (c,d) HRTEM image of N-WAPC (inset: SAED).
Nanomaterials 09 00266 g002
Figure 3. Powder XRD patterns (a), Raman spectra (b), and FT-IR spectra of WAPC and N-WAPC (c).
Figure 3. Powder XRD patterns (a), Raman spectra (b), and FT-IR spectra of WAPC and N-WAPC (c).
Nanomaterials 09 00266 g003
Figure 4. XPS for WAPC and N-WAPC (a) full-survey spectra and (b) high-resolution spectra of N1s; (c) the different N species possibly present in the porous carbons.
Figure 4. XPS for WAPC and N-WAPC (a) full-survey spectra and (b) high-resolution spectra of N1s; (c) the different N species possibly present in the porous carbons.
Nanomaterials 09 00266 g004
Figure 5. (a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and (b) pore size distribution (PSD) curves of WAPC and N-WAPC.
Figure 5. (a) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and (b) pore size distribution (PSD) curves of WAPC and N-WAPC.
Nanomaterials 09 00266 g005
Figure 6. Gas uptake isotherms of CO2, CH4, and N2 for (a) N-WAPC at 0 °C, (b) N-WAPC at 25°C, (c) WAPC at 0 °C (d) WAPC at 25 °C.
Figure 6. Gas uptake isotherms of CO2, CH4, and N2 for (a) N-WAPC at 0 °C, (b) N-WAPC at 25°C, (c) WAPC at 0 °C (d) WAPC at 25 °C.
Nanomaterials 09 00266 g006
Figure 7. IAST-predicted selectivities assuming different binary mixing ratios on N-WAPC (a) CO2/CH4 = 50/50, (b) CH4/N2 = 50/50, (c) CO2/CH4 = 15/85, (d) CH4/N2 = 15/85, (e) CO2/CH4 = 5/95, and (f) CH4/N2 = 5/95 at 0 and 25 °C.
Figure 7. IAST-predicted selectivities assuming different binary mixing ratios on N-WAPC (a) CO2/CH4 = 50/50, (b) CH4/N2 = 50/50, (c) CO2/CH4 = 15/85, (d) CH4/N2 = 15/85, (e) CO2/CH4 = 5/95, and (f) CH4/N2 = 5/95 at 0 and 25 °C.
Nanomaterials 09 00266 g007
Figure 8. Isosteric heats of adsorption for CO2 and CH4 on the N-WAPC.
Figure 8. Isosteric heats of adsorption for CO2 and CH4 on the N-WAPC.
Nanomaterials 09 00266 g008
Table 1. Elemental composition and relative percentages of nitrogen species of the carbon samples.
Table 1. Elemental composition and relative percentages of nitrogen species of the carbon samples.
SampleElemental Composition (wt %) Relative Percentages of Nitrogen Species [b] (%)
CNHO [a]N-6 N-5N-QN-x
WAPC69.654.141.4224.7925332517
N-WAPC71.9814.481.1012.444044124
[a] Calculated by difference. [b] Calculated from the corresponding peak areas of the deconvoluted N1s spectra.
Table 2. Textural characteristics and gas uptakes for WAPC and N-WAPC.
Table 2. Textural characteristics and gas uptakes for WAPC and N-WAPC.
SamplesTextural CharacteristicsGas Uptakes [c] (mmol g−1)
SBET [a] (m2g−1)Vtot [b] (cm3g−1)CO2CH4N2
0 °C25 °C0 °C25 °C0 °C25 °C
WAPC13520.743.732.811.180.640.370.35
N-WAPC8620.504.502.911.701.010.670.13
[a] SBET is the specific surface area calculated by BET equations based on the adsorption data in the P/P0 range from 0.005 to 0.05. [b] Vtot is the total pore volume obtained at P/P0 ~ 0.99. [c] Gas uptake in mmol g−1 is obtained under 1 bar.
Table 3. The selectivity of N-WAPC for binary mixtures [a].
Table 3. The selectivity of N-WAPC for binary mixtures [a].
Temp.CO2/CH4CH4/N2
50/5015/855/9550/5015/855/95
0 °C3.036.9112.263.044.665.73
25 °C3.195.988.667.6211.7613.71
[a] Calculated from IAST( 0 and 25 °C) for the binary mixtures assuming different mixing ratios at 1 bar.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Xu, R.; Wang, B.; Wei, J.; Wang, L.; Shen, M.; Yang, J. Enhanced N-doped Porous Carbon Derived from KOH-Activated Waste Wool: A Promising Material for Selective Adsorption of CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020266

AMA Style

Li Y, Xu R, Wang B, Wei J, Wang L, Shen M, Yang J. Enhanced N-doped Porous Carbon Derived from KOH-Activated Waste Wool: A Promising Material for Selective Adsorption of CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(2):266. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020266

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yao, Ran Xu, Binbin Wang, Jianping Wei, Lanyun Wang, Mengqi Shen, and Juan Yang. 2019. "Enhanced N-doped Porous Carbon Derived from KOH-Activated Waste Wool: A Promising Material for Selective Adsorption of CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2" Nanomaterials 9, no. 2: 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020266

APA Style

Li, Y., Xu, R., Wang, B., Wei, J., Wang, L., Shen, M., & Yang, J. (2019). Enhanced N-doped Porous Carbon Derived from KOH-Activated Waste Wool: A Promising Material for Selective Adsorption of CO2/CH4 and CH4/N2. Nanomaterials, 9(2), 266. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020266

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop