Next Article in Journal
Carbon-Based Quantum Dots for Electrochemical Detection of Monoamine Neurotransmitters—Review
Previous Article in Journal
Printed Circuit Board (PCB) Technology for Electrochemical Sensors and Sensing Platforms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/bios10110161
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Rapid Immunochromatographic Method Based on a Secondary Antibody-Labelled Magnetic Nanoprobe for the Detection of Hepatitis B preS2 Surface Antigen

by
Yangyang Cai
1,2,3,
Jun Yan
1,2,3,
Li Zhu
4,
Hengliang Wang
4 and
Ying Lu
1,2,3,*
1
College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
2
Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Aquatic Products on Storage and Preservation (Shanghai), Ministry of Agriculture, Shanghai 201306, China
3
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Aquatic-Product Processing and Preservation, Shanghai 201306, China
4
Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing 100071, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2020, 10(11), 161; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10110161
Submission received: 24 September 2020 / Revised: 16 October 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2020 / Published: 31 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Nano- and Micro-Technologies in Biosensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hepatitis B is a globally prevalent viral infectious disease caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV). In this study, an immunochromatographic assay (ICA) for the rapid detection of hepatitis B preS2 antigen (preS2Ag) was established. The magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) indirectly labelled with goat anti-mouse (GAM) secondary antibody were applied as a nanoprobe for free preS2 antibody (preS2Ab) capturing and signal amplification. By employing sample pre-incubation processing as well, preS2Ag-preS2Ab was sufficiently caught by the GAM-MNPs probe in 5 min. A qualitative sensitivity of 625 ng/mL was obtained by naked-eye observation within 15–20 min. A standard curve (0–5000 ng/mL) was established, with a quantitative limit of detection (LOD) of 3.6 ng/mL, based on the stability and penetrability of the magnetic signal characteristics. The proposed method for preS2Ag was rapid (~25 min, cf. ELISA ~4 h) and had a good accuracy, which was verified using an ELISA kit (relative error < 15%). Large equipment and skilled technicians were not required. The sensitivity and specificity of the developed GAM-MNPs-ICA method were 93.3% and 90% in clinical serum samples (n = 25), respectively. A good detection consistency (84%) was observed between the developed ICA method and 2 types of commercial ELISA kits, indicating that the GAM-MNPs-ICA has a potential application in large-scale screening for and point-of-care diagnosis of hepatitis B or other infectious diseases.

1. Introduction

Hepatitis B remains a great threat to public health. It is estimated that more than 257 million people have suffered from chronic hepatitis B infection worldwide, and almost 9 million people have died from liver failure, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and other related diseases caused by HBV [1]. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is the envelope protein of HBV, which is the most conventional serological marker for the screening, diagnosis, and antiviral therapy evaluation of hepatitis B. The overexpression (10–100,000 folds excess) of HBV genome-free subviral particles (SVPs) was found in acute and chronic hepatitis B patients [2], making HBsAg an easily detected biomarker. Commercial HBsAg serological tests for HBV include radioimmunoassay (RIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay assay (ECLIA). However, these methods are complex, time consuming, and require large equipment and professional technicians. Additionally, given the complex and dynamic variations of HBV, a single HBsAg test has drawbacks in relation to occult HBV infection (OBI) identification and antiviral therapy evaluation, and further confirmation of other biomarkers is required [3].
The HBsAg consists of three components: preS1, preS2, and S proteins, among which the S protein is the main target of commercial detection kits. In recent years, in order to develop novel markers complementary to the traditional S protein, the clinical values and biological roles of preS1Ag, preS2Ag, and their complex proteins, including large surface protein (L protein, preS1+preS2+S) and middle surface protein (M protein, preS2+S), were studied and evaluated [4,5,6,7].
The preS2Ag is located on the surface of HBV mature virions and SVPs. It has a transcriptional transactivator function [8] and contains binding sites for fibronectin, transferrin, and polymerized human serum albumin (pHSA) [9], which are associated with virus entry, release, and active replication. Besides, some studies have shown that the amount and proportions of HBsAg components could be used to identify inactive HBV carriers [10], OBI [11], and predict the response to antiviral therapy [12]. Considering the fact that there have been few reports on clinical preS2Ag detection, it is essential to develop a rapid and quantitative method for preS2Ag.
ICA, also known as lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), is the most popular point-of-care diagnosis tool in many fields. ICA has been widely applied in HBV screenings, such as self-examinations, health checks, blood donations, emergencies, and epidemiological investigations, due to its great advantages, including a simple operation, low cost, and short analysis time [13]. Traditional ICA products employ colored or luminescent nanoparticles as detection probes. However, the quantitative detection may be influenced by the color of the sample matrix, light reflection and scattering of the membrane, and the optical signals for observation and further quantitative measurement exist only within a thickness of 10–20 μm on the surface of the nitrocellulose (NC) membrane, resulting in 90% signals being undetectable [14]. MNPs are another widely used detection probe and have shown great potential in ICA research due to their chemical stability, easy labelling operation, and low background interference. Additionally, magnetic signals can be totally collected from the surface to the inside (100 μm) of the NC membrane by a magnetic assay reader to achieve a more sensitive and accurate quantitative analysis [15]. Recently, MNPs-based ICA methods have been applied in the detection of drugs [16], toxins [17], biochemical markers [18,19], bacteria [20], and viruses [21].
In this work, a quantitative ICA method based on indirectly labelled GAM-MNPs were developed for rapid preS2Ag detection. A sample pre-incubation procedure and indirect labelling strategy were introduced to help reduce the usage of primary antibody, while maintaining the bioactivity of the antibody, and ensure a sufficient combination of antigen and antibody to capture a trace amount of preS2Ag [22]. MNPs were applied as a quantitative probe, instead of colloidal gold, to achieve a more accurate and rapid quantitative detection by utilizing their sensitive and stable magnetic signal.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The preS2Ag peptides, CMQWNSTAFHQALQDPRVRGLYFPAGGAA (120–145 amino acids with cysteine modified, UniProtKB-Q6VBP1), were synthesized by Genscript Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The anti-preS2 antibody was purchased from Abcam plc. (Cambridge, UK). The MNPs were purchased from Allrunnano Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The goat anti-mouse (GAM) secondary antibody, NC membrane (CN 140), sample pad, conjunction pad, absorbent pad, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) base pad were purchased from Jiening Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The mouse IgG was purchased from Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The bovine serum albumin (BSA) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The 4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylic acid succinimide ester (SMCC) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Co., Ltd. (Waltham, USA). The EDC (1-ethyl-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbonyl diimide hydrochloride), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), 2-morpholineethanesulfonic acid (MES), Tween-20, sodium azide, and BCA protein quantitative kit were purchased from Sangon Biotech Shanghai Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The disodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, boric acid, and sodium tetraborate were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The full-length hepatitis B preS2Ag and ELISA kit for preS2Ag were obtained from Cusabio Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). The hepatitis B preS1Ag, HBsAg, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), HIV surface antigen, and ELISA kit for HBsAg were obtained from Kehua Bio-Engineering Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Preparation of preS2Ag-BSA Conjugates

The conjugate of preS2Ag and BSA (preS2Ag-BSA) was prepared using the SMCC method. First, 200 μL of SMCC (1 mg/mL) was reacted with 1 mL of BSA (12 mg/mL) in a vertical mixer wrapped in tin foil for 30 min. The reaction solution was added to a desalted column, which was pre-washed with 10 mM PBS buffer 4 times. Next, 1.3 mL of PBS was added after the sample entered the packed bed completely. Subsequently, the column was eluted with 3.5 mL of PBS, and the eluate was collected. Finally, 200 μL of preS2Ag (1 mg/mL) was reacted with 200 μL of eluate at 25 °C overnight. The microplate reader was employed to measure the UV absorption spectra, and SDS-PAGE was utilized to examine the molecular weights of preS2Ag, BSA, and their conjugate.

2.3. Preparation of GAM-MNPs

The NHS/EDC chemical coupling method was used for the GAM-MNPs preparation, according to the method of Du et al. [23]. First, 1 mg of MNPs was reacted with 2.5 mg of NHS and EDC in 500 μL of the MEST buffer (pH 5.0, 10 mM MES, with 0.05% Tween-20 (v/v)) for 30 min at 25 °C. After being washed twice with 500 μL of BST buffer (pH 9.0, 5 mM borate buffer (BS), with 0.05% Tween-20 (v/v)), different amounts of GAM antibody were added and reacted for 3 h. After being washed with 500 μL of BST buffer three times, 500 μL of 10 mg/mL of BSA was added and reacted for 30 min at 25 °C. Finally, the obtained GAM-MNPs were stored in the BST buffer with 0.5 mg/mL of NaN3 and 1 mg/mL of BSA at 4 °C. The amount of GAM coupled with MNPs and the coupling ratio were determined by a BCA protein quantitative kit.

2.4. Preparation of GAM-MNPs-ICA Test Strips

The construction of the test strips was based on the method of Yan [24] et al., with some modifications. The preS2Ag-BSA conjugate was sprayed with a dispensing instrument (XYZ3020, Jiening Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) on the surface of the NC membrane as a test line (T-line), and 1.5 mg/mL of mouse IgG was sprayed as a control line (C-line). After drying at 37 °C for 2 h, the sample pad, conjugate pad, and absorbent pad were pasted onto the PVC base pad in sequence. Finally, the assembled composites were cut into strips with a width of 5 mm and preserved in aluminum foil bags.

2.5. Detection Procedure of GAM-MNPs-ICA

Firstly, 50 μL of the sample was incubated with 50 μL of preS2Ab and 8 μL of GAM-MNPs for 10 min to form the GAM-MNPs-preS2Ab-preS2Ag complexes. Subsequently, the sample mixed with 15 μL of chromatographic solution (BS buffer with 0.2 g/mL BSA and 5% Tween-20(v/v)) was added to the sample pad of the test strip. The qualitative test results could be obtained by the naked eye within 15–20 min, and the quantitative results for the T and C lines were measured by a magnetic reader. The B/B0 ratio between the sample (B) and negative control (B0) was calculated as an index for the quantification analysis [25] according to the following equation:
B / B 0 = M S T / M S C M S T 0 / M S C 0
where B is the ratio of the magnetic signals of the T and C lines of sample; B0 represents the ratio of the magnetic signals of the T and C lines of the negative control; M S T and M S C are the magnetic signals of the T and C lines of the sample, respectively; and M S T 0   and   M S C 0 are the magnetic signals of the T and C lines of the negative control, respectively. A high value for B/B0 indicated a strong positive result.

2.6. Detection Condition Optimization of GAM-MNPs-ICA

In order to improve the detection performance of the test strip, the preS2Ag-BSA concentration on T-line (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/mL), the amount of GAM secondary antibody coupled with MNPs (10, 20, 40, 80, 120, and 160 μg), and the incubation concentration of preS2Ab (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 ng/mL) were optimized. The optimization results were evaluated using samples with 0, 50, 500, and 5000 ng/mL of preS2Ag spiked in PBS to choose the appropriate line color and B/B0 ratios.

2.7. Detection Performance Evaluation

2.7.1. Sensitivity

A serial dilution of preS2Ag (9.8–5000 ng/mL) in PBS was used to establish a standard curve. The qualitative sensitivity was defined as the concentration when the T-line became invisible. The quantitative LOD was calculated as the main signals plus a three-fold standard deviation of the negative samples [26].

2.7.2. Specificity

Hepatitis B preS2Ag, preS1Ag, HBsAg, HBeAg, and HIV surface antigen were individually spiked in PBS (10 μg/mL) and used as test samples for specificity evaluation.

2.7.3. Accuracy Validation

Positive samples with different concentrations of preS2Ag (5, 50, 500, and 5000 ng/mL) were prepared by diluting them in 10% Hepatitis negative human serum (1:10, v/v). Moreover, the 10% Hepatitis negative human serum was used as a negative control. The prepared samples were tested by the developed GAM-MNPs-ICA and commercial ELISA kit. The concentrations of each sample were calculated and analyzed according to the established quantitative standard curves.

2.7.4. Stability

The storage stability of GAM-MNPs-ICA was evaluated by the accelerated experiment proposed by Liu et al. [27]. Four groups of samples with 0, 50, 500, and 5000 ng/mL of preS2Ag spiked in PBS were used as test samples. The tested strips were placed in an oven at 60 °C for 6 d, and the magnetic signals were repeatedly measured every day.

2.7.5. Reproducibility

Six groups of test strips from the same batch and different batches were tested with 0, 50, 500, and 5000 ng/mL of preS2Ag spiked samples. The intra- and inter-batch values were calculated and compared.

2.8. Clinical Sample Analysis

In total, 25 clinical samples were kindly provided by the Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital East (Shanghai, China) and stored at −80 °C for subsequent study. HBsAg assays with the commercial ELISA kit were adopted to identify HBsAg positive and negative samples. Each sample was individually numbered and tested by GAM-MNPs-ICA and another ELISA kit for preS2Ag.

3. Results

3.1. Detection Principle of GAM-MNPs-ICA

The developed GAM-MNPs-ICA was composed of a sample pre-incubation procedure and competitive ICA format (Figure 1). First, GAM-MNPs probes were prepared by coupling GAM secondary antibody onto the surface of MNPs using the EDC/NHS coupling method (Figure 1a). In order to ensure a sufficient combination of antigen and antibody and capture a trace amount of preS2Ag, a sample pre-incubation of preS2Ag, preS2Ab, and GAM-MNPs probes was then applied to form a complex of GAM-MNPs-preS2Ab-preS2Ag (Figure 1b). The residual preS2Ab on the GAM-MNPs that was not combined with preS2Ag in the sample could be captured by the preS2Ag-BSA at the T-line. Moreover, the preS2Ab on the complexes could react with mobilized mouse IgG to form a visible C-line. Based on the competitive principle, the more free preS2Ag in the sample, the less preS2Ab bound at the T-line. Therefore, when the color of the T-line was obviously lighter than the negative sample, or even disappeared, it could be considered as a positive result. When the color of the T-line was close to or deeper than the negative sample, it could be judged as a negative result. Finally, the magnetic signals of the T and C lines could be observed by the naked eye and quantified by a magnetic assay reader (Figure 1d).
It was reported that the indirect type of ICA using secondary antibody labelling was more sensitive than direct ICA based on primary antibody labelling [28], given that the indirectly labelled probes and primary antibody could be added to the sample pre-incubation step and intergraded in the sample dilution procedure to ensure a sufficient antigen–antibody reaction in the solution environment. Besides, the secondary antibodies on different MNPs may capture the same primary antibody and agglomerate to construct a network structure, thus effectively amplifying the specific signals. Additionally, the application of MNPs was conducive to achieving a more accurate quantification and improving the detection performance [29].

3.2. Characterization of Conjugated Antigen

In this study, the synthesized preS2Ag peptides were pre-modified with cysteine to provide active sulfhydryl groups, and preS2Ag-BSA conjugates were obtained using the SMCC coupling method. As shown in Figure 2a, the UV absorption wave patterns and absorption peaks of the preS2Ag-BSA conjugate in the range of 200–240 nm were different from those of the BSA and unconjugated preS2Ag, thus showing a successful coupling reaction. Correspondingly, it was observed that the band of the preS2Ag-BSA in SDS-PAGE moved more slowly compared with BSA (Figure 2b), indicating that the molecular weight increased after coupling and confirming the coupling of preS2Ag and BSA. Similar migration rate changes of the conjugate in SDS-PAGE analysis were reported by Shen et al. [30]. The unconjugated preS2Ag did not show any band, because the molecular weight was too small (3.3 kD) to remain in the gel.

3.3. Optimization of Detection Conditions

3.3.1. Optimization of the T-line Concentration

The optimization results of the preS2Ag-BSA concentration at the T-line are shown in Figure 3. For a competitive ICA, the stronger the positive reaction, the lighter the T-line (which can also be colorless). Obviously, the color of the T-lines in the same group became lighter with the increasing concentration of preS2Ag in the sample, while the test strips with the addition of 500 and 5000 ng/mL were almost invisible when the coated preS2Ag-BSA concentration was 0.5 mg/mL or lower (Figure 3a). It was found that the B/B0 ratios of the T-line changed most significantly at 0.5 mg/mL of preS2Ag-BSA (Figure 3b). A lower value of B/B0 indicated a stronger difference in the magnetic signals between the sample and negative control. Thus, a wider range of B/B0 demonstrated a better competition relationship, which was more conducive to the establishment of a sensitive detection method. Similar results were reported in the study on the ractopamine test strip by Hu [31]. Thus, 0.5 mg/mL was considered as the optimal concentration of preS2Ag-BSA coated at the T-line.

3.3.2. Optimization of the GAM Amount Coupled with MNPs

In this study, the GAM-MNPs probe was designed to capture the free preS2Ab and complex of preS2Ab-preS2Ag, and an appropriate amount of GAM coupled on MNPs helped to form a clear line color, while minimizing the nonspecific coloration. As presented in Figure 4, the magnetic signals of the T-line increased gradually with the increasing of the GAM amount. They reached their highest point at 40 μg and then subsequently decreased with the increasing of the GAM amount. The decrease was probably due to the agglomerated GAM-MNPs, because excessive secondary antibody forms a large network structure with primary antibody and jams in the NC membrane, thus reducing the valid combination of GAM, preS2Ab, and preS2Ag. A rebound at 160 μg may be due to the excess formation of large complexes of GAM-preS2Ab, erroneously magnifying the nonspecific signals. The coupling ratios gradually increased at first and reached their highest point at 80 μg. Then, they sightly decreased with the continued increase of the GAM amount. The ratios were all above 70%, thus proving the efficient coupling of GAM and MNPs using the EDC/NHS method. The optimal amount of GAM for the preparation of the GAM-MNPs probe was considered to be 40 μg because of the high magnetic signals and acceptable coupling ratio.

3.3.3. Optimization of the preS2Ab Concentration in the Pre-Incubation Solution

The concentration of primary antibody is closely related to the color intensity at the T-line of the test strip and greatly affects the detection performance. Typically, the higher the antibody concentration, the stronger the ability to bind antigen. Thus, the color of the T-line would be enhanced, while the color of the C-line would correspondingly be weakened. As a result, the T/C ratio rose, which was more conducive to observation and quantification for a competitive detection format. In order to compare the competitive efficiency, the preS2Ab of 12.5, 25, and 50 ng/mL were pre-incubated with preS2Ag of different concentrations (0, 50, 500, and 5000 ng/mL). The qualitative and quantitative results for preS2Ab optimization are demonstrated and plotted in Figure 5.
A lower concentration of primary antibody helped to form a competitive relationship with antigens in the sample and effectively improved the sensitivity. However, insufficient antibody lead to the weak color of the T-line and strengthened the nonspecific absorption [32]. The quantitative analysis curve showed that when the preS2Ab antibody concentration was 25 ng/mL, the B/B0 values for the maximum and minimum preS2Ag concentration varied most significantly (ΔB/B0 = 0.836). Moreover, the B/B0 ranges of the lower (12.5 ng/mL, ΔB/B0 = 0.717) and higher preS2Ab concentration (50 ng/mL, ΔB/B0 = 0.725) were inferior to that of the 25 ng/mL group. Thus, 25 ng/mL was selected as the optimal preS2Ab concentration for subsequent experiments.

3.4. Performance Evaluation of GAM-MNPs-ICA

3.4.1. Sensitivity

The qualitative results and quantitative curve of the GAM-MNPs-ICA tested with a series of diluted preS2Ag are shown in Figure 6. It was observed that the T-line gradually grew fainter as the preS2Ag concentration increased, showing a typical change pattern of competitive ICA. The color of the T-line was almost invisible at 625 ng/mL, which was determined to be a qualitative limit (Red rectangular box) (Figure 6a). The quantitative concentration range spanned 0–5000 ng/mL (Figure 6b), and the correlation was good (R2 = 0.994). The quantitative sensitivity was calculated to be 3.6 ng/mL, which was enough for HBV detection due to the high-level overexpression of SVPs [33].

3.4.2. Specificity

Three HBV markers and HIV surface antigen were used to evaluate the specificity of GAM-MNPs-ICA. As illustrated in Figure 7, the B/B0 ratio of Hepatitis B preS2Ag was less than 0.1, implying a strong positive result, while the ratios of Hepatitis B preS1Ag, HBsAg, HBeAg, and HIV surface antigen were all close to 1.0, indicating negative results. Consequently, the developed GAM-MNPs-ICA was specific to preS2Ag.

3.4.3. Accuracy Validation

A commercial ELISA kit against preS2Ag was employed to evaluate the accuracy of GAM-MNPs-ICA. As shown in Table 1, for serum spiked with different concentrations of preS2Ag (5, 50, 500, and 5000 ng/mL), the relative error of both methods was less than 15%, indicating a good consistency between the GAM-MNPs-ICA and ELISA kit. As the assay procedure of GAM-MNPs-ICA was greatly simplified (~25 min, cf. ELISA ~4 h), it might have a potential application prospect in the clinical analysis of Hepatitis B.

3.4.4. Stability

The stability of GAM-MNPs-ICA was evaluated using a 6d accelerated experiment (Figure 8). Slight changes (CV < 7%) were found in the B/B0 ratios of different preS2Ag concentrations over 6 days, showing that the magnetic signals on the test strips were stable. According to the Arrhenius equation, one day of storage at 60 °C is equivalent to one month at 25 °C in a dry environment [34]. Thus, it could be preliminarily estimated that the GAM-MNPs-ICA test strips could be stored for at least 6 months at 25 °C, ensuring that the recheck results would not be affected by magnetic signal changes during preservation.

3.4.5. Reproducibility

The evaluation of test strips of the same batch and different batches is shown in Table 2. It was denoted that the prepared test strips had a good reproducibility (CV < 15%) in the intra- and inter-assay, thus improving the test performance and reducing the detection error. Furthermore, the CV in the inter-assay was obviously higher than that in the intra-assay, suggesting that when performing a standard curve for quantitative calculations, the same batch of test strip products was required to ensure reliability. Interestingly, a higher concentration of preS2Ag brought about a larger CV, since fewer MNPs were captured by the T-line for measurement, and the background noises had a more obvious impact. Therefore, before testing high-concentration samples, an appropriate dilution should be performed to enhance the T-line signals, so that the B/B0 values would fall within a more accurate quantitative range to be analyzed.

3.5. Clinical Sample Analysis

HBsAg is the principal indicator in HBV infection. In this study, a commercial ELISA kit against HBsAg (Kit 2) was used to examine 25 serum samples, where 15 HBsAg positive samples and 10 negative samples were identified. Subsequently, the 25 samples were separately tested using the developed GAM-MNPs-ICA method and a commercial ELISA kit against preS2Ag (Kit 1). The number of true positives (TPs), false positives (FPs), false negatives (FNs), and true negatives (TNs) were recorded and are listed in Table 3. The sensitivity (TP/(TP+FN)) and specificity (TN/(FP+TN)) were calculated according to the description of Barnett et al. [35]. It was found that the detection results of 21 samples were the same for three methods, and the consistency was 84%. Among them, 12 serum samples were positive, while 9 samples were negative. According to the calculation results, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.3% and 90%, respectively, for the ICA method and 86.7% and 100%, respectively, for Kit 1. Thus, the developed ICA method was potentially applicable for the detection of preS2Ag in clinical serum samples. Among the 15 positive samples, only three samples were detected using GAM-MNPs-ICA or Kit 1, and one false positive result was found using the GAM-MNPs-ICA method in 10 negative samples. Since the genotypes of HBV, courses of HBV infection, mutants of HBsAg, and matrix effects of the serum sample may influence the detection results, further study was necessary to ensure the application possibility of GAM-MNPs-ICA.

4. Discussion

Hepatitis B infection accounts for more than 50% of hepatocellular carcinoma cases worldwide [36]. Since chronic HBV infection may not present obvious clinical symptoms, effective early diagnosis tools are of great significance for the control and management of hepatitis B. The HBsAg, HBsAb, HBeAb, HBeAg, and HBcAb are general serologic markers for HBV detection, and HBsAg is the most widely accepted hallmark in the evaluation of HBV infection and antiviral therapy response. Most researches on HBsAg focused on the function of the small surface protein of HBsAg. PreS antigen (preS1Ag+preS2Ag) is the N-terminal extension of small surface protein, and the preS antigen, as well as middle and large surface proteins, have gained widespread attention in recent studies on the role of oncogenic risk factors [6], identification of inactive HBV carriers [10], prognosis of therapeutic response [12], and prediction value of HBV infection phases and virological response [37].
Conventional immunoassays on hepatitis serological markers are cumbersome and time-consuming (~4 h) and require large equipment and skilled technicians. Thus, novel immunosensors were developed to simplify the operation and reduce costs. A comparison of several immunosensors for the quantitative detection of HBV serologic markers is summarized in Table 4. Obviously, ICA methods with various nanoparticle labels (colored, luminescent, and magnetic nanoparticles) have been widely applied in the quantitative detection of hepatitis B serological markers, with a short assay time (10~25 min), convenient operation, and good sensitivity [38,39,40,41,42]. However, clinical human serum samples have not been evaluated in the reported ICA methods [38,39,40,41], and other serologic markers, except HBsAg, were less reported. An electrochemical method based on an AuNPs-modified glassy carbon electrode was developed to detect preS1Ag; however, it took about 80 min [43].
In this study, a simple and rapid MNPs-ICA method for preS2Ag quantification was established. The indirect labelling of MNPs with secondary antibody was applied to capture free preS2Ab and amplify signals. Moreover, a 5-min sample pre-incubation procedure was introduced to maintain the maximum bioactivity of antibodies and fully ensure the reaction between antigen and antibodies. The assay time and complexity did not increase, as the pre-incubation could be completed during the sample dilution. The quantitative LOD of the proposed ICA method was 3.6 ng/mL, while the visual qualitative sensitivity was 625 ng/mL. The validation results using the commercial ELISA kits indicated that the assay procedure of GAM-MNPs-ICA was greatly simplified (~25 min, cf. ELISA ~4h). Additionally, the sensitivity and specificity of the developed GAM-MNPs-ICA method were 93.3% and 90% in clinical serum samples (n = 25), respectively. It was potentially applicable for detection of preS2Ag in clinical serum samples. Overall, the GAM-MNPs-ICA was rapid and sensitive, and the preS2Ag assay had a good correlation with the HBsAg assay, indicating that it was a good supplemental method for HBV screening, diagnosis, and antiviral therapy evaluation. In the future, a large number of clinical samples must be conducted to evaluate and analyze the application of the proposed method for different HBV genotypes, mutants, and courses of HBV infection.

5. Conclusions

In summary, a rapid competitive GAM-MNPs-ICA method for hepatitis B preS2Ag detection was developed by adopting GAM-MNPs as a detection probe. A quantitative LOD of 3.6 ng/mL and a qualitive sensitivity of 625 ng/mL were obtained by naked-eye observation within 25 min. The developed GAM-MNPs-ICA had a good stability and reproducibility and a high accuracy. The sensitivity and specificity of the developed GAM-MNPs-ICA method were 93.3% and 90% in clinical serum samples, respectively. It was applicable for the detection of preS2Ag in clinical serum samples and therefore has the potential to be used in large-scale screening for and point-of-care diagnosis of hepatitis B or other infectious diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.C., and Y.L.; Funding acquisition, H.W., and Y.L.; Methodology, Y.C.; Project administration, L.Z., H.W., and Y.L.; Resources, J.Y.; Supervision, L.Z., H.W., and Y.L.; Writing—original draft, Y.C.; Writing—review and editing, J.Y. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (No. 2018ZX10101003).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hutin, Y.; Desai, S.; Bulterys, M. Preventing hepatitis B virus infection: Milestones and targets. Bull. World Health Organ. 2018, 96, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Luckenbaugh, L.; Kitrinos, K.M.; Delaney, W.E.; Hu, J. Genome-free hepatitis B virion levels in patient sera as a potential marker to monitor response to antiviral therapy. J. Viral Hepat. 2015, 22, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Siederdissen, C.H.Z.; Maasoumy, B.; Cornberg, M. New viral biomarkers for Hepatitis B: Are we able to change practice? J. Viral Hepat. 2018, 25, 1226–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Su, I.J.; Wang, L.H.C.; Hsieh, W.C.; Wu, H.C.; Teng, C.F.; Tsai, H.W.; Huang, W. The emerging role of hepatitis B virus Pre-S2 deletion mutant proteins in HBV tumorigenesis. J. Biomed. Sci. 2014, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Yen, T.T.C.; Yang, A.; Chiu, W.T.; Li, T.N.; Wang, L.H.; Wu, Y.H.; Wang, H.C.; Chen, L.; Wang, W.C.; Huang, W.; et al. Hepatitis B virus PreS2-mutant large surface antigen activates store-operated calcium entry and promotes chromosome instability. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 23346–23360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Li, T.N.; Wu, Y.J.; Tsai, H.W.; Sun, C.P.; Wu, Y.H.; Wu, H.L.; Pei, Y.N.; Lu, K.Y.; Yen, T.T.C.; Chang, C.W.; et al. Intrahepatic hepatitis B virus large surface antigen induces hepatocyte hyperploidy via failure of cytokinesis. J. Pathol. 2018, 245, 502–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Musa, J.; Li, J.; Grünewald, T.G. Hepatitis B virus large surface protein is priming for hepatocellular carcinoma development via induction of cytokinesis failure. J. Pathol. 2019, 247, 6–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ji, D. Study of transactivating effect of pre-S2 protein of hepatitis B virus and cloning of genes transactivated by pre-S2 protein with suppression subtractive hybridization. WJG 2005, 11, 5438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xie, Y.; Zhai, J.; Deng, Q.; Tiollais, P.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, M. Entry of hepatitis B virus: Mechanism and new therapeutic target. Pathol. Biol. 2010, 58, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pfefferkorn, M.; Böhm, S.; Schott, T.; Deichsel, D.; Bremer, C.M.; Schröder, K.; Gerlich, W.H.; Glebe, D.; Berg, T.; van Bömmel, F. Quantification of large and middle proteins of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) as a novel tool for the identification of inactive HBV carriers. Gut 2018, 67, 2045–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, C.C.; Chen, Y.S.; Cao, L.; Chen, X.W.; Lu, M.J. Hepatitis B virus infection: Defective surface antigen expression and pathogenesis. WJG 2018, 24, 3488–3499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rinker, F.; Bremer, C.M.; Schröder, K.; Wiegand, S.B.; Bremer, B.; Manns, M.P.; Kraft, A.R.; Wedemeyer, H.; Yang, L.; Pavlovic, V.; et al. Quantitation of large, middle and small hepatitis B surface proteins in HBeAg-positive patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a. Liver Int. 2020, 40, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ryu, J.H.; Kwon, M.; Moon, J.D.; Hwang, M.W.; Lee, J.M.; Park, K.H.; Yun, S.J.; Bae, H.J.; Choi, A.; Lee, H.; et al. Development of a Rapid Automated Fluorescent Lateral Flow Immunoassay to Detect Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg), Antibody to HBsAg, and Antibody to Hepatitis C. Ann. Lab. Med. 2018, 38, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lu, W.; Wang, K.; Xiao, K.; Qin, W.; Hou, Y.; Xu, H.; Yan, X.; Chen, Y.; Cui, D.; He, J. Dual Immunomagnetic Nanobeads-Based Lateral Flow Test Strip for Simultaneous Quantitative Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Neuron Specific Enolase. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hong, L.X.; Wang, K.; Yan, W.Q.; Xu, H.; Chen, Q.H.; Zhang, Y.H.; Cui, D.X.; Jin, Q.H.; He, J.H. High performance immunochromatographic assay for simultaneous quantitative detection of multiplex cardiac markers based on magnetic nanobeads. Theranostics 2018, 8, 6121–6131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yan, L.Z.; Dou, L.N.; Bu, T.; Huang, Q.; Wang, R.; Yang, Q.F.; Huang, L.J.; Wang, J.L.; Zhang, D.H. Highly sensitive furazolidone monitoring in milk by a signal amplified lateral flow assay based on magnetite nanoparticles labeled dual-probe. Food Chem. 2018, 261, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, D.; Huang, Y.; Wang, S.; Liu, K.; Chen, M.; Xiong, Y.; Yang, W.; Lai, W. A modified lateral flow immunoassay for the detection of trace aflatoxin M1 based on immunomagnetic nanobeads with different antibody concentrations. Food Control 2015, 51, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khodadadi, M.; Chang, L.; Trabuco, J.R.C.; Vu, B.V.; Kourentzi, K.; Willson, R.C.; Litvinov, D. PCB-Based Magnetometer as a Platform for Quantification of Lateral-Flow Assays. Sensors 2019, 19, 5433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Xu, X.W.; Cui, Z.Q.; Lu, Y.; Jia, X.M.; Wang, Y.L. Establishment of HBV rapid magnetic immunochromatographic method based on magnetic nanoprobe for Pre-S1 antigen. J. Biol. 2016, 33, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Q.; Yang, Y.; Hu, F.; Cai, Y.; Liu, X.; He, X. Rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by a fluorescent microsphere-based immunochromatographic assay and immunomagnetic separation. Anal. Biochem. 2019, 564–565, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Razo, S.C.; Panferov, V.G.; Safenkova, I.V.; Varitsev, Y.A.; Zherdev, A.V.; Dzantiev, B.B. Double-enhanced lateral flow immunoassay for potato virus X based on a combination of magnetic and gold nanoparticles. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1007, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yao, X.; Wang, Z.; Dou, L.; Zhao, B.; He, Y.; Wang, J.; Sun, J.; Li, T.; Zhang, D. An innovative immunochromatography assay for highly sensitive detection of 17β-estradiol based on an indirect probe strategy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 289, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Du, J.; Xu, X.W.; Cui, Z.Q.; Wang, Y.L.; Jia, X.M.; Lu, Y. Influences of magnetic immunochromatographic assay for detection of PreS1 region of hepatitis B virus surface antigen. J. Biol. 2017, 34, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yan, J.; Liu, Y.Y.; Wang, Y.L.; Xu, X.W.; Lu, Y.; Pan, Y.J.; Guo, F.F.; Shi, D.L. Effect of physiochemical property of Fe3O4 particle on magnetic lateral flow immunochromatographic assay. Sens. Actuators B 2014, 197, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, H.; Chen, X.; Leng, Y.; Lai, W.; Huang, X.; Xiong, Y. Engineered gold nanoparticles as multicolor labels for simultaneous multi-mycotoxin detection on the immunochromatographic test strip nanosensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 316, 128107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Blažková, M.; Rauch, P.; Fukal, L. Strip-based immunoassay for rapid detection of thiabendazole. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25, 2122–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Y.Y.; Zhang, Z.H.; Wang, Y.L.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, Y.; Xu, X.W.; Yan, J.; Pan, Y.J. A highly sensitive and flexible magnetic nanoprobe labeled immunochromatographic assay platform for pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 211, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Urusov, A.E.; Zherdev, A.V.; Dzantiev, B.B. Use of gold nanoparticle-labeled secondary antibodies to improve the sensitivity of an immunochromatographic assay for aflatoxin B1. Microchim. Acta 2014, 181, 1939–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Petrakova, A.V.; Urusov, A.E.; Gubaydullina, M.K.; Bartosh, A.V.; Zherdev, A.V.; Dzantiev, B.B. “External” antibodies as the simplest tool for sensitive immunochromatographic tests. Talanta 2017, 175, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shen, X.Y.; Wu, X.L.; Liu, L.Q.; Kuang, H. Development of a colloidal gold immunoassay for the detection of four eugenol compounds in water. Food Agric. Immunol. 2019, 30, 1318–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, L.M.; Luo, K.; Xia, J.; Xu, G.M.; Wu, C.H.; Han, J.J.; Zhang, G.G.; Liu, M.; Lai, W.H. Advantages of time-resolved fluorescent nanobeads compared with fluorescent submicrospheres, quantum dots, and colloidal gold as label in lateral flow assays for detection of ractopamine. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 91, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dou, L.N.; Zhao, B.X.; Bu, T.; Zhang, W.T.; Huang, Q.; Yan, L.Z.; Huang, L.J.; Wang, Y.R.; Wang, J.L.; Zhang, D.H. Highly sensitive detection of a small molecule by a paired labels recognition system based lateral flow assay. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 3161–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cornberg, M.; Wong, V.W.-S.; Locarnini, S.; Brunetto, M.; Janssen, H.L.A.; Chan, H.L.-Y. The role of quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen revisited. J. Hepatol. 2017, 66, 398–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gong, Y.F.; Chen, Z.L.; Xi, X.; Li, M.; Wang, W.F.; Wang, M.Z.; Ying, Y.F.; Zhang, M.Z. Colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip for rapid detection of melamine. Chin. J. Biotech. 2012, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Barnett, J.M.; Wraith, P.; Kiely, J.; Persad, R.; Hurley, K.; Hawkins, P.; Luxton, R. An Inexpensive, Fast and Sensitive Quantitative Lateral Flow Magneto-Immunoassay for Total Prostate Specific Antigen. Biosensors 2014, 4, 204–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Inoue, T.; Tanaka, Y. Novel biomarkers for the management of chronic hepatitis B. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2020, 26, 261–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, C.; Wu, W.; Shang, H.; Lin, S.; Xun, Z.; Huang, E.; Lin, J.; Yang, B.; Ou, Q. Prediction value of serum HBV large surface protein in different phases of HBV infection and virological response of chronic hepatitis B patients. Clin. Chim. Acta 2018, 481, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, J.; Yu, Q.; Zhao, G.; Dou, W. A Au@Pt bimetallic nanoparticle and blue silica nanoparticle nanocomposite as a probe of immunochromatographic assay for HBsAg detection. Anal. Methods 2019, 11, 6103–6110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, J.; Yu, Q.; Zhao, G.; Dou, W. A novel immunochromatographic assay using ultramarine blue particles as visible label for quantitative detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1098, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yu, Q.; Dou, W.; Liu, J.; Zhao, G.; Yang, S.; Zhu, D.; Zhao, Y.; Li, L. A sensitive and quantitative immunochromatographic assay for HBsAg based on novel red silica nanoparticles. Anal. Methods 2019, 11, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oh, K.; Choi, Y.S.; Yoon, H.; Park, N.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.K. Immunochromatographic Assay of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Using Magnetic Nanoparticles as Signal Materials. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2014, 50, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shen, J.; Zhou, Y.; Fu, F.; Xu, H.; Lv, J.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, A. Immunochromatographic assay for quantitative and sensitive detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen using highly luminescent quantum dot-beads. Talanta 2015, 142, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Liang, W.; Zheng, J.; Li, S.; Hu, C.; Chen, A. A Highly Sensitive Detection System based on Proximity-dependent Hybridization with Computer-aided Affinity Maturation of a scFv Antibody. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Akkapinyo, C.; Khownarumit, P.; Waraho-Zhmayev, D.; Poo-arporn, R.P. Development of a multiplex immunochromatographic strip test and ultrasensitive electrochemical immunosensor for hepatitis B virus screening. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1095, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lim, S.L.; Ooi, C.W.; Tan, W.S.; Chan, E.S.; Ho, K.L.; Tey, B.T. Biosensing of hepatitis B antigen with poly(acrylic acid) hydrogel immobilized with antigens and antibodies. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 252, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biosensors 10 00161 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of GAM-MNPs-ICA for preS2Ag detection. (a) Preparation of the GAM-MNP probe using the EDC/NHS method. (b) Pre-incubation of preS2Ag, preS2Ab, and GAM-MNPs. (c) Structure of the test strip. (d) Judgment of the negative and positive results and qualitative and quantitative analysis methods.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of GAM-MNPs-ICA for preS2Ag detection. (a) Preparation of the GAM-MNP probe using the EDC/NHS method. (b) Pre-incubation of preS2Ag, preS2Ab, and GAM-MNPs. (c) Structure of the test strip. (d) Judgment of the negative and positive results and qualitative and quantitative analysis methods.
Biosensors 10 00161 g001
Biosensors 10 00161 g002 550
Figure 2. Characterization of conjugated antigen. (a) UV absorption spectrum. (b) SDS-PAGE. M: Marker; 1: preS2Ag; 2: BSA; 3: preS2Ag-BSA.
Figure 2. Characterization of conjugated antigen. (a) UV absorption spectrum. (b) SDS-PAGE. M: Marker; 1: preS2Ag; 2: BSA; 3: preS2Ag-BSA.
Biosensors 10 00161 g002
Biosensors 10 00161 g003 550
Figure 3. Optimization of different T-line concentrations with 0, 50, 500, and 5000 ng/mL of preS2Ag. (a) Qualitative results. (b) Quantitative results. The error bars represented the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Figure 3. Optimization of different T-line concentrations with 0, 50, 500, and 5000 ng/mL of preS2Ag. (a) Qualitative results. (b) Quantitative results. The error bars represented the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Biosensors 10 00161 g003
Biosensors 10 00161 g004 550
Figure 4. Optimization of the secondary antibody amount coupled onto the surface of MNPs. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Figure 4. Optimization of the secondary antibody amount coupled onto the surface of MNPs. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Biosensors 10 00161 g004
Biosensors 10 00161 g005 550
Figure 5. Qualitative results (a–c) and quantitative results (d) for different concentrations of preS2Ab antibody in sample pre-incubation. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Figure 5. Qualitative results (a–c) and quantitative results (d) for different concentrations of preS2Ab antibody in sample pre-incubation. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Biosensors 10 00161 g005
Biosensors 10 00161 g006 550
Figure 6. Detection sensitivity of the GAM-MNPs-ICA for preS2Ag detection. (a) Qualitative detection results. (b) Quantitative standard curve. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Figure 6. Detection sensitivity of the GAM-MNPs-ICA for preS2Ag detection. (a) Qualitative detection results. (b) Quantitative standard curve. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Biosensors 10 00161 g006
Biosensors 10 00161 g007 550
Figure 7. Quantitative results of the specificity analysis. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Figure 7. Quantitative results of the specificity analysis. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Biosensors 10 00161 g007
Biosensors 10 00161 g008 550
Figure 8. Stability evaluation of GAM-MNPs-ICA. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Figure 8. Stability evaluation of GAM-MNPs-ICA. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Biosensors 10 00161 g008
Table
Table 1. Accuracy validation of GAM-MNPs-ICA using the ELISA kit (n = 3).
Table 1. Accuracy validation of GAM-MNPs-ICA using the ELISA kit (n = 3).
Spiked PreS2Ag Concentrations
(ng/mL)		GAM-MNPs-ICAELISARelative Error
(%)
PreS2Ag Concentrations
(ng/mL)		PreS2Ag Concentrations
(ng/mL)
55.91 ± 1.685.16 ± 1.3414.4
5043.04 ± 6.3548.27 ± 4.6110.8
500456.93 ± 59.76505.64 ± 82.399.6
50004517.44 ± 787.504551.18 ± 753.047.4
Table
Table 2. Reproducibility evaluation of GAM-MNPs-ICA (n = 6).
Table 2. Reproducibility evaluation of GAM-MNPs-ICA (n = 6).
PreS2Ag Concentrations
(ng/mL)		Intra-AssayInter-Assay
B/B0CVB/B0CV
01.000 ± 0.0212.13%1.009 ± 0.0252.46%
500.928 ± 0.0313.39%0.953 ± 0.0454.74%
5000.247 ± 0.0114.45%0.270 ± 0.03011.29%
50000.079 ± 0.0079.07%0.092 ± 0.01212.72%
Table
Table 3. Detection results of the clinical serum sample using GAM-MNPs-ICA and 2 types of ELISA kits (n = 25).
Table 3. Detection results of the clinical serum sample using GAM-MNPs-ICA and 2 types of ELISA kits (n = 25).
Serological MarkerMethodPositive ResultsNegative Results
TPFPSame ResultsTNFNSame Results
PreS2AgGAM-MNPs-ICA14112919
ELISA Kit 1130102
HBsAgELISA Kit 2150100
Table
Table 4. Comparison of immunosensors for the quantitative detection of HBV serologic markers.
Table 4. Comparison of immunosensors for the quantitative detection of HBV serologic markers.
TargetMethodLabel MaterialLODDetection TimeQuantitative MethodSampleReference
HBsAgICAAu@Pt/blue SiNPs0.13 ng/mL15 minCamera/Image JSpiked FCS[38]
ICAUltramarine blue particles0.37 ng/mL15 minCamera/Image JSpiked FCS[39]
ICARed SiNPs0.97 ng/mL10 minCamera/Image JSpiked FCS[40]
ICAMNPs1 ng/mL20 minImmuno-chromato ReaderSpiked PBS buffer with 1% BSA[41]
ICAQuantum dots0.075 ng/mL15 minFluorescence strip readerHuman serum[42]
ECASPCE2.1 ng/mL25 minEISSpiked acetate buffer[44]
HBcAgHydrogel-based
QCM biosensor		Hydrogel based on PAAc0.6 mg/mL1 hQCMSpiked rabbit serum[45]
PreS1AgECAAuNPs modified glassy carbon electrode0.1 pM80 minElectrochemical analyserHuman serum[43]
PreS2AgICAMNPs3.6 ng/mL25 minMagnetic assay readerHuman serumThis work
Abbreviations: FCS: fetal calf serum; ECA: electrochemical assay; SPCE: screen-printed carbon electrode; EIS: electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; QCM: quartz crystal microbalance; PAAc: poly (acrylic acid).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cai, Y.; Yan, J.; Zhu, L.; Wang, H.; Lu, Y. A Rapid Immunochromatographic Method Based on a Secondary Antibody-Labelled Magnetic Nanoprobe for the Detection of Hepatitis B preS2 Surface Antigen. Biosensors 2020, 10, 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10110161

AMA Style

Cai Y, Yan J, Zhu L, Wang H, Lu Y. A Rapid Immunochromatographic Method Based on a Secondary Antibody-Labelled Magnetic Nanoprobe for the Detection of Hepatitis B preS2 Surface Antigen. Biosensors. 2020; 10(11):161. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10110161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cai, Yangyang, Jun Yan, Li Zhu, Hengliang Wang, and Ying Lu. 2020. "A Rapid Immunochromatographic Method Based on a Secondary Antibody-Labelled Magnetic Nanoprobe for the Detection of Hepatitis B preS2 Surface Antigen" Biosensors 10, no. 11: 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10110161

APA Style

Cai, Y., Yan, J., Zhu, L., Wang, H., & Lu, Y. (2020). A Rapid Immunochromatographic Method Based on a Secondary Antibody-Labelled Magnetic Nanoprobe for the Detection of Hepatitis B preS2 Surface Antigen. Biosensors, 10(11), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios10110161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop