1. Introduction
A biosensor is an instrument that is sensitive to biological substances and converts their concentration into electrical signals for detection. It uses immobilized biologically sensitive materials as identification elements, including enzymes, antibodies, antigens, microorganisms, cells, tissues, nucleic acids, etc. A biosensor device or system combines appropriate physical/chemical transducers with signal amplification [
1,
2,
3]. In regard to a glucose biosensor, the detection sample is focused on the concentration of a glucose solution. Real-time and early detection of glucose concentration has become significant in clinical diagnoses and for assessing treatment progress. Diabetes is a global health issue affecting millions of people [
4]. Diabetes is closely related to insulin concentration and glucose levels must be monitored often to avoid complications caused by blood sugar fluctuations [
5]. Diabetic macroangiopathy and atherosclerosis due to diabetes can cause cerebrovascular, ischemic heart, peripheral arterial, and other vascular diseases, which are important causes of death in diabetic patients [
6].
Currently, more and more researchers have become interested in glucose biosensors due to the need for early detection of glucose levels. On the basis of the physical/chemical transducers of a biosensor, different types of biosensors have been achieved, such as electrochemical, optical, field effect transistor (FET), piezoelectric, microwave, and capacitor biosensors. Among them, an electrochemical biosensor realizes the selective detection of biomarkers by adding specific enzymes to electrodes [
7,
8]. The electrodes can be used to obtain the voltage–current curves and resistance of a tested solution at different concentrations [
9,
10]. An electrochemical biosensor is simple to use and cost effective [
11]; however, there are still some shortcomings, such as the introduction of external media that slows the sensor’s response and decreases its reliability, and the need to replace it in a cycle of about half a year depending on the use environment. In addition, another factor restricting the application of electrochemical sensors is that the electrolyte needs to be replenished regularly and testing tips are not reusable, which may lead to an extra cost. In regard to optical biosensors, non-contact and non-destructive measurement methods can be realized based on optical principles [
12,
13], and they have excellent color recognition performance for test solutions added with fluorescent markers [
14,
15]. However, the measurement system constituted by optical devices is relatively complicated, and normal detection usually requires a long calibration and stabilization time, and it is susceptible to the influence of ambient light that causes detection errors. In regard to FET biosensors, the use of specific nanomaterials makes an FET biosensor highly sensitive, selective, and it has commercial potential [
16,
17]. It can be used to detect various biological or chemical molecules and to detect protein molecules as well as other ions in the physiological environment [
18,
19]. Nevertheless, FET biosensors are commonly fabricated using an oxide as the sensing layer. This causes the sensor to have monotonic drift and, at the same time, the response will also cause fluctuations. The use of active devices such as logic gates and transistors will increase energy consumption and will have high performance requirements for the FET chips. In regard to piezoelectric biosensors, although the sensitivity of piezoelectric biosensors is relatively high. It can detect small physiological changes similar to sweat, and the piezoelectric signal containing the change information in the concentration of a small molecule can also be obtained [
20,
21]; however, the selectivity and linearity of this kind of sensor still need to be improved. It is still difficult to distinguish small changes in a substance, and whether they cause discomfort in the human body remains to be discussed. In regard to microwave biosensors, they can detect and characterize the dielectric properties in materials with high Q-factors, narrow resonance, low insertion loss, and high sensitivity [
22,
23]. Microwave biosensors can translate a variation in dielectric properties of adjacent materials into quantifiable electrical signals such as resonant frequency and resonant amplitude in a remote non-contact manner [
24]. However, a lack of accurate model characterization has restricted the simulation of microwave biosensors; the amount, position, and shape of a tested biomarker sample are important issues for accurate and quantitative detection of the biomarker solution, let alone the ambient temperature influence on detection. Recently, capacitor sensors have been especially applied for detecting humidity with high sensitivity, short response/recovery time, and good thermal stability [
25,
26,
27]. As compared with other types of humidity sensors, it is very competitive. In addition, a capacitor-based biosensor could be a promising candidate in the biosensor research field due to its quick response time, real-time detection, excellent design flexibility, compact chip dimension, cost effectiveness, easy measurement process, convenient integration with matching circuits, etc.
In this study, we propose a resistor-based temperature sensor and a capacitor-based biosensor which can measure the temperature and concentration of a biomarker solution in real time. The concentration range of the glucose solution is 25–1000 mg/dL, which is injected into the microfluidic cavity and placed on the top of the sensors. Then, the signal is provided through an LCR meter, while capacitance and resistance are recorded. The proposed biosensor applies a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) quantitative cavity structure with fixed volume and fixed test points, which is convenient for quantitative detection of glucose solution samples, and can eliminate the interference and influence caused by the fluidity, shape, and thickness of glucose solution samples during the test, and therefore achieves accurate measurements of the biomarker solution. Moreover, the amount of solution required for the measurements is quite small and only 1.806 μL of glucose solution is required to complete a measurement. Commonly used and low-cost medical syringes can be used to transfer and inject the biomarker solution for measurement, without using expensive and strict quantitative pipettes. The sensor response of the proposed work is real time, i.e., after the glucose solution is introduced, the resistance and capacitance can be directly affected in less than 1 s, and the value can be read out immediately through a low-cost LCR meter instead of an expensive and complex vector network analyzer. The concentration range of the glucose solution tested in this study includes the normal range of diabetic patients currently being tested in clinical practice.
2. Fabrication Process
The proposed biosensor is fabricated on a glass substrate by micro-/nano processing technology, as shown in
Figure 1. To begin, before the growth of the metal structure on the glass substrate, an atomic force microscope (AFM) image of bare glass substrate is analyzed, as shown in
Figure 1(c−i). A root mean square (RMS) value of 6.74 nm is obtained, which is not good enough for the following seed metal to stick on the surface of glass, because metal that locates on a glass surface usually suffers from a peel-off issue due to the self-tension of the seed metal. Therefore, in the case of such an issue, first, the glass substrate is polished with an SPM solution (sulfuric/peroxide mi) in order to remove impurities and organic pollutants and to enhance the roughness of the surface, targeting to improve the adhesion of the following metal growth. Then, the seed metal layer of Ti/Au with a thickness of 20/80 nm is prepared by the sputtering method. An RMS value of 0.47 nm is obtained for the surface morphology of the Ti/Au seed metal, as shown in
Figure 1(c−ii). In order to further ensure adhesion between the seed metal and the following photoresist as well as electroplated metal, the O
2 etching method is applied on the surface of the seed metal and an improvement of 0.12 nm RMS value is achieved, as shown in
Figure 1(c−iii). Following this, we spin a 6 μm thick photoresist on the seed metal, form the designed pattern through a photomask, and then develop the place where we are going to make the target metal through a lift-off machine. Subsequently, a 5 μm thick Cu/Au metal layer is electroplated at the notch. Finally, all photoresists are washed out with acetone solution, and the surplus seed metal layer is etched through the reactive ion etching method, the metal part of the sensor is finished without any peel-off issues between the glass surface and seed metal, between the seed metal and electroplated metal, and between the seed metal and photoresist. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the cross-section of metal is demonstrated in
Figure 1(d−i) with a thickness of 4.7 μm. A decrease in thickness occurs mainly due to the control tolerance of electroplating time and reactive ion etching during the isolation process of the seed metal. The details of the fabrication process of the metal structure for the resistor and capacitor are shown in
Figure 1a. The fabrication of the PDMS quantitative cavity is based on a reverse molding process using a SU-8 negative photoresist on silicon substrate. Firstly, the silicon substrate is cleaned by acetone. Then, a 200 nm thick silica (SiO
2) passivation layer is deposited over the silicon substrate using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Next, we spin a SU-8 photoresist on the passivation layer and form the required SU-8 structure through the photomask, and then wash away the excess SU-8 photoresist through developer. The SEM image shows the SU-8’s line pattern on the Si substrate, as shown in
Figure 1(d−ii). Its height and width are measured through a surface profiler; a height of approximately 105 μm can be obtained along with a width of approximately 106 μm, as shown in
Figure 1(d−iii). Finally, the PDMS microfluidic channel is obtained by a reverse molding process after the SU-8 and PDMS are separated, as shown in
Figure 1b. The biosensor and PDMS quantitative cavity are bonded together after the plasma bonding process and the thermal treatment to complete the whole fabrication. When the glucose solution is put into the PDMS quantitative cavity, the solution will directly contact the resistor and capacitor to change the resistance and capacitance.
3. Method and Analysis
A complete biosensor system should be comprised of four parts, which are the substance, as well as the detection, transduction, and signal conditioning components [
28]. We are mainly focused on the transduction components based on our research background on RF/microwave engineering and micro-/nano fabrication technology for research in the field of potential glucose biosensing applications. The operation mechanism for the proposed work is on the basis of the RF/microwave theory and realistic glucose biosensing application. We describe a new concept for transducers with microfluidic devices. Our design is mainly composed of three parts, which are a temperature sensor, glucose biosensor, and a PDMS microfluidic channel.
Ambient temperature is an important factor that influences the properties of a glucose solution, especially the dielectric property. The dielectric property, which is the complex relative permittivity (ε
s), is the key factor for the capacitor or microwave biosensor, and a variation in the dielectric property could result in a capacitance or frequency change in the biosensor. The mathematical equation is given below:
Note that, as the temperature of the glucose solution increased, the imaginary part of the complex relative permittivity of glucose
decreases more rapidly than that of real part
[
29]; the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric constant of glucose solution at 5 GHz can vary from 78.0 to 76.2 and from 15.7 to 12.4, respectively, when the ambient temperature is changed from 32 °C to 42 °C. Even for a microwave biosensor in [
30], temperature is considered to be a critical parameter to scrutinize for glucose sensing application. Temperature variations from 10 °C to 50 °C have been carried out to study the temperature effect on resonating frequency for different glucose concentrations. Therefore, temperature information is needed so that the concentration of the glucose solution is tested with calibration of the ambient temperature influence.
In this study, based on a resistor and capacitor structure, a temperature sensor and a glucose biosensor are proposed. In order to increase the contact area with the glucose solution, a symmetrical meandering type resistor and an intertwined capacitor are designed, as shown in
Figure 2.
Figure 2a shows the layout model established using an advanced design system; both sensors are integrated on a glass substrate with a dimension of 19.4 mm × 8.0 mm × 4.6 mm. The integrated microfluidic channel is demonstrated in
Figure 2(a−i) with detailed dimensions.
Figure 2(b−i) and (c−i) show the detailed schematics of the capacitor and resistor inserted with the glucose sample, separately. They all adopt the structure of a winding line, which can achieve a high number of turns in a compact area so that more inter-turn gaps can be formed, laying the foundation for a highly sensitive sensing response with the biomarker solution. The metal structure for the resistor and capacitor includes an input and an output port, respectively, two 1 mm × 1 mm align key modules. The input and output ports are used for the probe measurement of the LCR meter. An align key module is used for precise alignment when bonding with the quantitative channel structure of the PDMS, since R can change with a change in ambient temperature, resulting in total resistance variation in the equivalent circuit of the resistor-based temperature sensor, as shown in
Figure 2(b−ii). Similarly, C
c and C
g can change with different glucose concentrations, resulting in total capacitance variation in the equivalent circuit of the capacitor glucose biosensor, as shown in
Figure 2(c−ii).
The equivalent resistance of the resistor can be calculated using the equation below [
31]:
where R
sh is the sheet resistance of the metal layer used for the resistor design; h represents the width of the winding line resistor; N represents the order of the winding line resistor; d represents the gap of the winding line resistor; a and b represent the size of the winding line at the input and output ports, respectively. The resistance is affected by the temperature of the glucose solution. When the temperature rises, due to an increase in the outermost electron energy of the atom, it can move irregularly and freely, so that the metal can conduct electricity. However, in addition to the free electrons, the atoms in the metal also vibrate. The higher the temperature, the stronger the vibration, which increases the probability of collision between the free electrons and atoms, hinders the directional movement of electrons, and leads to an increase in metal resistance, that is, the value of R
sh increases, and metal commonly performs a positive temperature coefficient at a certain temperature range. The relationship between the resistance and temperature is given as follows [
32]:
where T is temperature (K); R(T) is the resistance (Ω); and A, B, and C are constants whose values are determined by conducting experiments at two temperatures and solving the equations simultaneously. As we calculated based on Equation (3), the resistance increases exponentially with increasing temperature for a metal with a positive temperature coefficient, therefore we use Cu/Au to fabricate the resistor structure and take advantage of a fraction of the exponential curve at a certain temperature range, in which the curve almost performs similar to a linear characteristic. The relationship between resistance and glucose solution temperature can be used to perform the temperature sensor response.
The capacitance of the biosensor is affected by the concentration of glucose solution, the equivalent capacitance of the capacitor can be calculated using the equation below [
33]:
where L
c is the coupled meandered-line length, t is the thickness of the metal, a is the distance between the winding line resistors, ε
0 (equals to 8.854 × 10
−12) denotes the free space permittivity, ε
s denotes the permittivity of the glucose solution, and ε
sub (equals to 4.1) denotes the permittivity of glass substrate; k (=a/b) and K(k) are the elliptic integrals of the first kind. Since the viscous effect increases as the concentration of the glucose solution increases, resulting in increased relaxation times and correspondingly decreased dielectric constants and increased loss factor [
34,
35], as a consequence, the capacitance of the proposed sensing capacitor in this study is expected to be maximized and minimized when the glucose level in the glucose sample is minimized and maximized at 25 mg/dL and 1000 mg/dL, respectively. Therefore, the relationship between capacitance and glucose concentration can be used to perform the biosensor response.
The equivalent circuits of the biosensor structures are depicted in
Figure 2b,c, respectively. They represent the series/parallel combination of the inductor and capacitor or resistor which are equivalent to electrodes’ conductive paths and the gap between them. In the presented equivalent structures, L represents inductance, R represents resistance, C
g represents gap capacitance, and C
c represents coupling capacitance. In the equivalent circuit of the resistor, because input and output ports are connected with each other, the inductor and resistor play the main role in the circuit, and the influence of coupling capacitance can be ignored. At the same time, because temperature has a significant influence on the resistance of metal, the resistor can be used to calibrate the temperature of the glucose solution in this design. In the equivalent circuit of the capacitor, because the input and output ports are disconnected, the inductor and capacitor play the main role in the circuit, and the influence of resistance can be ignored. When the glucose solution is introduced into the PDMS microfluidic channel, the solution fills all gaps, and the dielectric constant of the glucose solution with different concentrations are different, which will affect the coupling capacitance and gap capacitance. Therefore, in this design, the capacitor can be used to measure the concentration of the glucose solution. Moreover, the PDMS microfluidic cavity is designed to ensure that the glucose solution is in full contact with the metal structure at a fixed position and a fixed shape, so that the error caused by the different positions can be avoided and the error of solution quantity caused by the direct dropping can be eliminated. The inset image, as shown in
Figure 2(a−i), shows the structure and dimension of the PDMS microfluidic channel. The height of the cavity is 0.1 mm, and the depth of the whole PDMS is 3.8 mm. The quantitative cavity structure includes a capacitor cavity and a resistor cavity, which are connected by a microchannel with a height of 0.1 mm and a width of 0.1 mm. A through hole with a diameter of 2.6 mm can be obtained at each end of the channel through a hole punch, separately, which is prepared for the joint with the plastic hose in the later experiment, so as to ensure a complete fit with the plastic hose without liquid leakage. Furthermore, there are four calibration modules around the PDMS quantitative cavity structure, which correspond to the metal structure alignment modules, respectively.
4. Experimental Setup
The proposed biosensor is fabricated on a glass substrate with a dielectric constant and loss tangent of 4.1 and 0.08, respectively. The thicknesses of the glass substrate and metal layer are 0.8 mm and 5 μm, respectively. The glucose solution interacts with the biosensor through the PDMS microfluidic cavity. An LCR meter (HIOKI IM3536) is used to measure the capacitance and resistance as the sensor response.
Figure 3a shows the schematic diagram of the test setup. After the LCR meter is connected to the sensor, when the glucose solution is put into the PDMS microfluidic cavity, the changes in resistance and capacitance of the sensor can be observed. Such a measurement is completed only with a solution volume of 1.806 μL, which is cost effective for the tested biomarker solution.
In order to verify the experimental results, we used a glucose sample to measure the sensor response. The overall measurement process is shown in
Figure 3b, after connecting the two interfaces of the LCR meter to both ports of the capacitor or resistor. A syringe is used to inject the biomarker solution into the tube and the PDMS microfluidic channel. Then, the glucose solution is in contact with the resistor and capacitor in the microfluidic cavity. At the same time, the LCR meter can display the resistance and capacitance in real time. Finally, the used solution is stored in a beaker after passing through the biosensor. In this experiment, the glucose solution is used with concentrations of 25, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 800, and 1000 mg/dL, as shown in
Figure 3b. They are prepared using a quantized mixture of D-(+)-glucose powder (Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., LTD) and deionized (DI) water. The fabricated sensor is shown in
Figure 3e, which mainly includes three parts: the glass substrate, the metal structure of the sensor, and the PDMS quantitative cavity structure. The glass substrate has the advantages of smooth surface, easy PDMS bonding property, and transparency, which make it a strong candidate for a microfluidic-based application, as shown in
Figure 3c. The metal structure for the resistor and capacitor is designed with a single layer structure which is easy to process and low in cost. The metal structure for the resistor and capacitor at high frequency is more easily affected by the concentration of the biomarker solution, the structure is shown in
Figure 3c. The PDMS materials have uniform texture, few bubbles, strong bonding with glass, easy molding with the SU-8 photoresist mold, soft texture, and they are easy to combine with flexible electronic applications. The PDMS material after the plasma bonding process can be firmly and tightly combined with the glass substrate, and the area where the measurement port is located is reserved around the PDMS material, as shown in
Figure 3d. An LCR meter is used to input signals of different frequencies and measures the corresponding capacitance and resistance, as shown in
Figure 3e. During the experiment, the same concentration of glucose solution is measured three times for temperature sensor measurements and biosensor measurements, separately. After each measurement, another syringe is used to inject DI water to clean the glucose solution, and air is injected through different syringes to dry the DI water. Before each measurement, it should be ensured that there is no residual solution in the biosensor module, and the channel is dry and free from blockage.
5. Results and Discussion
We injected glucose solutions with different concentrations into the microfluidic cavity and recorded the response of the temperature sensor with an LCR meter. A remarkably quick response time of less than 1 s was realized when the tested glucose was injected into the shape-fixed, position-fixed, and volume-fixed PDMS microfluidic structures, which is shown in the
supplementary video in
Supplementary Materials. Next, we measured the resistance using a temperature sensor.
Figure 4a shows the resistance measurement histogram of the glucose solution in the temperature range of 25–100 °C.
Figure 4b shows the linear relationship between the temperature of the glucose solution and the change in resistance realized by the resistor-based temperature sensor. This relationship can be expressed as:
y1 [Ω] = 99.14418 + 0.27157 × x [°C], a good correlation with the linear fit of R2 = 0.99931, relative standard deviation (RSD) ≦0.49558, sensitivity is 0.272 Ω/°C, where y1 is the resistance of the resistor-based temperature sensor, and x is the temperature of the glucose solution. The regression analysis data show that the temperature of the glucose solution has a good linear correlation with the resistance of the resistor-based temperature sensor, that is, it can measure the temperature of the glucose solution before the capacitor-based biosensor measures the concentration, and therefore assists in calibrating the influence of solution temperature.
Under the condition of ambient relative humidity ranging from 47.4% to 48.6%, the capacitances of the capacitor-based biosensor for bare chip and DI water are measured three times under different input frequencies, as shown in
Table 1. It can be seen that with an increase in input frequency, the measured capacitances show a decreasing trend in the above two cases. Such a phenomenon is mainly caused by a decrease in the effective dielectric constant of the glucose solution when the input frequency increases [
35]. The measured capacitances of the bare-chip capacitor at DC, 1 kHz, and 1 MHz are far different from the capacitance measured after passing glucose solution. Therefore, in the actual measurements, the influence of bare chip and DI water on the concentration of glucose solution can be ignored.
The measured sensing responses of the capacitor-based biosensor to different concentrations of glucose solution are shown in
Figure 5.
Figure 5a–c, respectively, shows the measurement histograms of the glucose solution in the concentration range of 25–1000 mg/dL based on the capacitor-based biosensor at DC, 1 kHz, and 1 MHz signal frequencies.
Figure 5d–f shows the linear relationship between the glucose solution concentrations and capacitance change realized by the capacitor-based biosensor with input signals of DC, 1 kHz, and 1 MHz. The corresponding linear regression equations are as follows:
y2 [nF] = 768.10546 − 0.41329 × x [mg/dL], a correlation with the linear fit of R2 = 0.96039, RSD ≦ 2.63909%, sensitivity is 0.413 nF/mg·dL−1;
y3 [nF] = 53.55404 − 0.04785 × x [mg/dL], a correlation with the linear fit of R2 = 0.91547, RSD ≦ 1.97151%, sensitivity is 0.048 nF/mg·dL−1;
y4 [pF] = 19.88085 − 0.01081 × x [mg/dL], a correlation with the linear fit of R2 = 0.97835, RSD ≦ 0.96428% sensitivity is 0.011 pF/mg·dL−1; where y2, y3 and y4 are the capacitances of the capacitor-based biosensor at DC, 1 kHz, and 1 MHz; x is the concentration of glucose solution in the range of 25–1000 mg/dL. The regression analysis reveals a good linear correlation between glucose concentration and capacitance. In addition, it shows that the capacitance can be used as a parameter for glucose concentration detection, and the limit of detection (LOD) values of the capacitor-based biosensor are 67.236 mg/dL, 17.724 mg/dL, and 2.944 mg/dL at the input signal frequencies of DC, 1 kHz, and 1 MHz, respectively. The RSD of the mathematical parameters can be obtained based on the statistical data of multiple measurements of the capacitance, which are less than 3%, 2%, and 1% at the signal frequencies of DC, 1 kHz, and 1 MHz, respectively, indicating that the capacitance of the capacitor-based biosensor is quite stable in the process of multiple measurements.
Since environmental temperature is a key factor that influences the measurement accuracy of a glucose biosensor, we performed a temperature calibration test based on the 1 MHz capacitive biosensor and measured the sensing response at a temperature range between 30 °C and 80 °C. As shown in
Figure 6a, there was almost no change in the bare chip capacitance, which proved the stability of our fabricated capacitor. In addition, with an increase in temperature, the capacitor-based biosensor injected with a similar concentration of glucose sample shows a decreasing capacitance, such a phenomenon is mainly due to the higher temperature that gives more energy to the glucose molecules, leading to more active molecule movements, and thus a higher viscosity within a fixed volume of glucose sample. Therefore, a lower dielectric constant can be achieved and, finally, results in a decrease in capacitance as long as the temperature is increasing. Furthermore, the slope value (|tan θ|) and maximum variation (ΔC) of the capacitance fitting curve at different glucose concentrations are calculated, as shown in
Figure 6b. The |tan θ| and ΔC are both decreasing when the glucose concentration is increasing, while the temperature is also increasing. It can be concluded that a higher concentration of the glucose sample suffers less from temperature influence as comparing with a lower glucose concentration. Such a phenomenon is mainly due to the fact that the higher concentration glucose sample possesses more glucose molecules within a fixed sample volume, and therefore the glucose molecules have limited space to be active, resulting in a relatively lower viscous effect and a smaller variation in |tan θ| and ΔC. Therefore, consistent with our original design intention, it is necessary to design a temperature sensor before measuring capacitance to result in more accurate measurements of glucose concentration.
Figure 7 shows the current density of the proposed capacitor-based biosensor. As shown in
Figure 7a, a dark blue color can be observed for the proposed biosensor at both DC and 1 kHz, even though the maximum current density at this scale is only 8.952 × 10
−9 A/m, indicating that a few of the input signals couple between the conductor gaps. However, the simulation results of the current density for the proposed biosensor at 1 MHz shows a dark red color with a maximum value of 4.000 × 10
−3 A/m at the scale bar, as shown in
Figure 7b, indicating that the input signal not only concentrates on the conductor itself, but also has strong coupling between the conductor gaps. Under such a condition, the tested glucose solution that flows in the conductor gap could be in full contact with the electric field at stable ambient conditions in the microfluidic cavity, providing stable mathematical statistics of R
2, RSD, and LOD. Moreover, signal with higher frequency possesses smaller coverage area as compared with lower frequencies such as DC and 1 kHz, thus, smaller coverage area benefits from fewer ambient noise interferences, which also verifies the excellent properties of R
2, RSD, and LOD of a 1 MHz biosensor. Among these three frequencies, the measurement results of 1 MHz show relatively excellent linearity, sensitivity, LOD, and RSD. Therefore, we can consider this frequency in practical glucose biosensor applications. A performance comparison between this study and previously reported studies is summarized in
Table 2 in terms of sensor structure, sensitivity (in molar values), detection range (in molar values), detection limit (in molar values), temperature calibration, response time, and quantitative measurement. It can be inferred that the proposed work is excellent, especially for the functions of temperature calibration, quick response time, and quantitative measurement. Although the microwave biosensor mentioned in [
36] also achieved the abovementioned functions, it suffered from relatively low sensitivity and higher sample consumption. Moreover, the proposed biosensor in this study possessed a wide detection range which covered glucose measurements in the application of diabetes testing, as well as applications in some fruits and sweet foods. In regard to the detection limit, a moderate performance was obtained with a value of 0.1636 mmol/L at 1 MHz; such a value was not excellent enough as compared with electrochemical, SERS, optoelectronic, and LFA biosensors. Furthermore, since the proposed biosensor was in different sensitivity units as comparing with the reported electrochemical, SERS, optoelectronic, and LFA biosensors, proper comparisons could not be made. Few of the reported studies focused on a capacitor-based biosensor; among the studies, humidity sensors were quite popular. However, this study focused on a biosensor test based on the structure of the capacitor, providing a new method for glucose testing.