Next Article in Journal
Ultrasensitive and Rapid Visual Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Based on RAA-CRISPR/Cas12a System
Next Article in Special Issue
A Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe for Hypochlorite and Lipid Droplets to Monitor Oxidative Stress
Previous Article in Journal
The Optimization of a Label-Free Electrochemical DNA Biosensor for Detection of Sus scrofa mtDNA as Food Adulterations
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Aggregation-Induced Emission Fluorescent Probe for Detection of β-Amyloid Based on Pyridinyltriphenylamine and Quinoline–Malononitrile
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

A Novel Fluorescent Probe for the Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide

1
State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, Key Lab of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China
2
Nanjing Luhe People’s Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biosensors 2023, 13(6), 658; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13060658
Submission received: 17 May 2023 / Revised: 12 June 2023 / Accepted: 14 June 2023 / Published: 16 June 2023

Abstract

:
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is one of the important reactive oxygen species (ROS), which is closely related to many pathological and physiological processes in living organisms. Excessive H2O2 can lead to cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and other diseases, so it is necessary to detect H2O2 in living cells. Since this work designed a novel fluorescent probe to detect the concentration of H2O2, the H2O2 reaction group arylboric acid was attached to the fluorescein 3-Acetyl-7-hydroxycoumarin as a specific recognition group for the selective detection of hydrogen peroxide. The experimental results show that the probe can effectively detect H2O2 with high selectivity and measure cellular ROS levels. Therefore, this novel fluorescent probe provides a potential monitoring tool for a variety of diseases caused by H2O2 excess.

1. Introduction

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are chemically reactive substances that contain oxygen. It contains superoxide anion (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (OH), ozone (O3), and singlet oxygen (1O2). Because they contain unpaired electrons and have high chemical reactivity, they play an important role in a variety of physiological and pathological processes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Among them, H2O2, which is continuously produced by basic cellular processes such as protein folding, is a kind of enzyme-catalyzed active oxygen metabolism by-product [5,8] and can serve as a key modulator in many oxidative stress-related statuses [9]. The excessive production and accumulation of hydrogen peroxide in the body can lead to various diseases such as cancer, aging, asthma, and cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases [10,11]. Up until now, the important role of H2O2 in human health and various diseases has not been fully revealed, so it is of great significance to develop a sensitive and effective method to detect the level of H2O2.
Currently, the main detection methods for H2O2 include the fluorescence probe method, spectrophotometry, electrochemical method, colorimetric method, etc. [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Sample preparation for research methods such as spectrophotometry, electrochemistry, and colorimetry is complex and cannot dynamically reflect changes in H2O2 levels or effectively detect the concentration of H2O2 in living cells. In contrast, fluorescence probe methods provide a powerful method for monitoring H2O2 levels in the living system [25,26]. Fluorescent probes are usually composed of fluorescent groups, detection groups, and connecting groups. By connecting different fluorescent groups and different detection groups, it is possible to design fluorescent probes with diverse performances to meet various detection requirements. Therefore, using fluorescence probes to detect hydrogen peroxide related to many diseases in the human body is still an essential technology. In 2003, the first boric acid-based H2O2 fluorescence probe was reported [27]. Studies have revealed that the probe is effective at detecting H2O2. Boric acid or borate esters are frequently utilized as hydrogen peroxide reaction components because a significant number of studies have demonstrated that probes based on the oxidation reaction of borate esters have superior selectivity for H2O2 than other ROS. The design of probe recognition groups has been verified for most classical fluorophores, such as coumarin [28], naphthalimide [29], and AIE mechanism fluorophores [30].
In order to meet the needs of identifying and characterizing the different sources and functions of hydrogen peroxide as a transient redox messenger, we designed and synthesized a novel fluorescent probe, YXSH, that combines the H2O2 reaction group arylboronic acid with fluorescein 3-Acetyl-7-hydroxycoumarin as a specific recognition group for the selective detection of hydrogen peroxide. The experimental results demonstrate that the probe can effectively detect H2O2 with high selectivity. Therefore, this novel fluorescent probe provides a potential monitoring tool for a variety of diseases caused by H2O2 excess.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Instruments and Reagents

All chemical reagents required for this study were purchased from Bidepharm Technology Co., Ltd (Bidepharm, Shanghai, China). No further purification was required. For the NMR spectra, 1H (300 MHz) and 13C (75 MHz) of the probe YXSH were collected using an AVANCE 300 MHz spectrometer. Fluorescence and UV-visible absorption spectra are measured by the Perkin Elmer Fluorescence Spectrometer FL6500 fluorescence spectrophotometer. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data for the synthesis of the new compounds were determined using an Agilent 6500. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) data were determined using the Agilent 1220 Infinity II. Fluorescent emission spectra were collected on a Perkin Elmer LS 55.

2.2. Synthesis of Compound 2

2,4-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde (279 mg, 2 mmol) and Ethyl acetoacetate (253 μL, 2 mmol) were dissolved in ethanol (6 mL), followed by a few drops of piperidine as a catalyst, and the reaction mixture was returned to 78 °C for 2 h to cool. Pour cold, dilute hydrochloric acid, filter the precipitate, rinse the precipitate with water, and recrystallize the purified residue from methanol to obtain the product; the product is a light yellow crystal (286 mg, 70%). The 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ(ppm): 11.15 (s, 1H), 8.60 (s, 1H), 7.78–7.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.84–6.87 (dd, J1 = 8.7 Hz, J2 = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.75–6.76 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), and 2.55 (s, 3H). HRMS C11H8O4, m/z: [M+H]+ calcd 205.05, found 205.05.

2.3. Synthesis of Probe YXSH

3-Acetyl-7-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (202 mg, 1 mmol), 4-(Bromomethyl)phenylboronic acid (219 mg, 1 mmol), Anhydrous K2CO3(963 mg, 7 mmol), and acetone (15 mL) were added to the flask, the reaction mixture was reflow at 55 °C for 14 h, the reaction mixture was cooled and filtered, the solvent was removed by spin evaporation, DCM extraction was carried out, the organic phase was cleaned in saturated salt water, dried on anhydrous sodium sulfate, and then filtered, and the volatiles were removed under vacuum. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography to obtain a crude product, which was then recrystallized with DCM n-hexane to produce a bright yellow powder (179 mg, 53%). The 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ(ppm): 8.64 (s, 1H), 8.11 (s, 2H), 7.80–7.96 (m, 3H), 7.43–7.45 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.11 (t, J = 10.8 Hz, 2H), 5.28 (s, 2H), and 2.56 (s, 3H). The 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ(ppm): 195.28, 164.30, 159.39, 157.50, 148.12, 138.15, 134.82, 132.76, 127.40, 120.95, 114.57, 112.47, 101.62, 70.68, 49.11, and 30.63. HRMS C18H15BO6, m/z: [M]+ calcd 338.10, found 338.34.

2.4. Stability Experiment with YXSH

Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) containing 100 μM H2O2 (from a 100 mM stock solution in H2O) and 10 μM YXSH (1 mM stock solution in DMSO) was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C on a shaker in the dark. H2O2 was first added to PBS, and then YXSH was added. The reaction solution was added to a 96-well plate (each well containing 200 μL), and six replicate wells were set up. Assayed it every 20 min for 10 h.

2.5. Sensitivity Experiment with YXSH

PBS separately containing 0, 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 80, and 100 μM H2O2 (from a 100 mM stock solution in H2O) and 1 μM YXSH (1 mM stock solution in DMSO) was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C on a shaker in the dark. H2O2 was first added to PBS, and then YXSH was added. The reaction solution was added to a 96-well plate (each well containing 200 μL), and three replicate wells were set up. Assayed it immediately.

2.6. Selectivity Experiment of YXSH

PBS separately containing 100 μM cations (Na+, K+, Fe2+, Mg2+, and Cu2+), anions (HCO3, Cl, OH, and SO42−), amino acids (Arg, Cys, Ala, and Gly), L-GSH, C10H6O4, TBAF (from a 100 mM stock solution in H2O/DMSO), and H2O2 with 10 μM YXSH (1 mM stock solution in DMSO) was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C on a shaker in the dark. YXSH was added to PBS at the end. The reaction solution was added to a 96-well plate (each well containing 200 μL), and three replicate wells were set up. Assayed it immediately.

2.7. Cell Culture

Human NSLCS A549 cell lines were obtained from the Shanghai Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The A549 cell line was cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Prime, FSP500, ExCell Bio, Shanghai, China) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). A549 cell lines were grown at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 and 95% air-humidified atmosphere and sub-cultured every 2−3 days.

2.8. Measurement of Intracellular ROS Levels

A549 cells (5 × 104 cells/glass) were seeded in a 4-Chamber Glass Bottom Dish. After 24 h, cells were incubated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, coli. 0111:B4, Sigma, Shanghai, China) (2 μg/mL) for 2 h [31,32,33], followed by treatment with YXSH for 2 h. Finally, fluorescent images of cells were acquired on an LSM-700 Microscope (Zeiss, Jena, TH, Germany) with an objective lens (×40) using a green filter (excitation wavelength: 405 nm).

3. Results and Discussions

Design and synthesis of compound YXSH. As shown in Scheme 1, our developed probe only involves two steps. Firstly, we synthesized 3-Acetyl-7-hydroxy-2H-chromen-2-one (compound 2) using 2,4-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde and Ethyl acetate as raw materials. Then, we reacted arylboronic acid with compound 2 to obtain a probe, 3-Acetyl-7-[(4-boronyl)method]-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one (compound YXSH), that binds to H2O2, which is used for selective detection of hydrogen peroxide in living cells. The synthesis of compound YXSH has not been reported before, and the characteristic data of the obtained product can be found in the supplementary information.
Stability and sensitivity measurements of YXSH. Firstly, the fluorescent spectra of the probe were recorded, and they showed a maximum fluorescent emission at 455 nm under excitation at 415 nm. Subsequently, the reaction time of the probe and the stability of the fluorescence were tested after the reaction. As shown in Figure 1, the fluorescence increased to 25% of the maximum intensity within 30 min and continued to increase, stabilizing after 5 h. This proved that YXSH has good stability, and the fluorescence was not easily quenched after the reaction with H2O2.
Subsequently, we investigated the response mechanism of this probe and found that YXSH contains a boric acid group as both a reaction site and an electron-withdrawing group. The 3-Acetyl group is also an electron-withdrawing group, and the two electron-withdrawing groups weaken the fluorescence of the compound. However, when it reacts with hydrogen peroxide, the electron-deficient boric acid group becomes the electron-donating hydroxyl group, and the 3-Acetyl group acts as the electron-sucking group, forming a push–pull system. The intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) process was enhanced, and the reaction product compound 2 had stronger fluorescence emission than the probe (Figure 2). In order to verify the response mechanism of YXSH, liquid chromatography was used. High-performance liquid chromatography (Figure S4) showed that YXSH showed a signal peak at 28.768 min and compound 2 showed a signal peak at 7.982 min. After the reaction of YXSH with H2O2 for 30 min and 12 h, although the chromatographic baseline was not smooth, the YXSH signal peak decreased significantly, and new signal peaks appeared at 8.596 min (reaction time: 30 min) and 7.079 min (reaction time: 12 h). The retention time was almost consistent with compound 2. Therefore, the experiment supports the fact that the structural transformation caused by the reaction of YXSH with H2O2 triggers the enhancement of the fluorescence signal, which proves our inference of the response mechanism of YXSH to H2O2 proposed in Figure 2.
As shown in Figure 3A, the probe concentration was 1 μM, and the tested H2O2 concentrations ranged from 1 μM to 100 μM. As the concentration of H2O2 increases, the fluorescence intensity increases. As shown in Figure 3B, the titration curve of fluorescence intensity was plotted, which showed a good linear relationship, and the LOD was as low as 0.9 μM. This LOD was not that good compared with the previously reported probes, but it was low enough to detect H2O2 in cells.
Selectivity measurement of YXSH. As shown in Figure 4, cations (Na+, K+, Fe2+, Mg2+, and Cu2+), anions (HCO3, Cl, OH, and SO42−), amino acids (Arg, Cys, Ala, and Gly), L-GSH, C10H6O4, TBAF, and H2O2 were incubated with YSXH, respectively, and a blank control group was set up. The results showed that only the reaction of H2O2 with YSXH produced significant fluorescence under the PBS buffer, which proved the good specificity of YSXH. The above experimental data indicate that probe YXSH can react with H2O2 to generate strong fluorescent compounds with good selectivity, which can effectively characterize H2O2 and provide a potential monitoring tool for various diseases caused by excessive H2O2.
Measurement of cellular ROS levels in A549 cells. YXSH (10 μM) was used to detect endogenous ROS in living A549 cells by stimulating cells with LPS at 2 μg/mL for 2 h. It shows that the fluorescence intensity in cells pretreated with LPS increased (Figure 5A–F). Meanwhile, LPS incubation can cause endogenous ROS in A549 cells to be elevated, as confirmed by the commercially available probe H2DCFDA (Figure 5G–L). After being treated with H2DCFDA (10 μM), the fluorescence intensity in cells pretreated with LPS is stronger than in the control group. The results showed that the YXSH succeeded in labeling endogenous ROS in A549 cells.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have prepared a novel fluorescent probe, YXSH, that characterizes hydrogen peroxide. The probe combines the H2O2 reaction group arylboronic acid with fluorescein 3-Acetyl-7-hydroxycoumarin to form a specific recognition group for selective detection of hydrogen peroxide. Our relevant research data indicates that this probe can effectively characterize H2O2 with high selectivity and measure cellular ROS levels. As a result, this novel probe provides a potential monitoring tool for various diseases caused by excessive H2O2.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bios13060658/s1, Figure S1: 1H NMR spectrum of compound 2. Figure S2: 1H NMR spectrum of YXSH. Figure S3: 13C NMR spectrum of YXSH. Figure S4: Liquid chromatography of YXSH, YXSH treated with H2O2, and compound 2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Writing—review and editing. X.X.; Methodology, Writing—original draft, Investigation, and Data curation. K.W., T.Y. and J.X.; Investigation. Y.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2632023TD10 to X.X.) and the Open Research Fund Program of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Virology (X.X.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nosaka, Y.; Nosaka, A.Y. Generation and Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species in Photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 11302–11336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. D’Autréaux, B.; Toledano, M.B. ROS as signalling molecules: Mechanisms that generate specificity in ROS homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 813–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Winterbourn, C.C. Reconciling the chemistry and biology of reactive oxygen species. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008, 4, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cochemé, H.M.; Quin, C.; McQuaker, S.J.; Cabreiro, F.; Logan, A.; Prime, T.A.; Abakumova, I.; Patel, J.V.; Fearnley, I.M.; James, A.M.; et al. Measurement of H2O2 within living Drosophila during aging using a ratiometric mass spectrometry probe targeted to the mitochondrial matrix. Cell Metab. 2011, 13, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Schieber, M.; Chandel, N.S. ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, R453–R462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Reichmann, D.; Voth, W.; Jakob, U. Maintaining a Healthy Proteome during Oxidative Stress. Mol. Cell. 2018, 69, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sies, H.; Jones, D.P. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 363–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Snezhkina, A.V.; Kudryavtseva, A.V.; Kardymon, O.L.; Savvateeva, M.V.; Melnikova, N.V.; Krasnov, G.S.; Dmitriev, A.A. ROS Generation and Antioxidant Defense Systems in Normal and Malignant Cells. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 6175804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pei, Z.M.; Murata, Y.; Benning, G.; Thomine, S.; Klüsener, B.; Allen, G.J.; Grill, E.; Schroeder, J.I. Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in guard cells. Nature 2000, 406, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Trachootham, D.; Alexandre, J.; Huang, P. Targeting cancer cells by ROS-mediated mechanisms: A radical therapeutic approach? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Andersen, J.K. Oxidative stress in neurodegeneration: Cause or consequence? Nat. Med. 2004, 10, S18–S25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhao, S.; Zang, G.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, N.; Cai, S.; Durkan, C.; Xie, G.; Wang, G. Recent advances of electrochemical sensors for detecting and monitoring ROS/RNS. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 179, 113052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, X.; Gao, J.; Zhao, G.; Wu, C. In situ growth of FeOOH nanoparticles on physically-exfoliated graphene nanosheets as high performance H2O2 electrochemical sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 313, 128038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, S.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y.; Hu, F. Electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide using metal nanoparticles: A review. Microchim. Acta 2013, 180, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bagheri, N.; Khataee, A.; Hassanzadeh, J.; Habibi, B. Visual detection of peroxide-based explosives using novel mimetic Ag nanoparticle/ZnMOF nanocomposite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 360, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gökdere, B.; Üzer, A.; Durmazel, S.; Erçağ, E.; Apak, R. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles-based colorimetric sensors for determination of hydrogen peroxide and triacetone triperoxide (TATP). Talanta 2019, 202, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xu, M.; Bunes, B.R.; Zang, L. Paper-based vapor detection of hydrogen peroxide: Colorimetric sensing with tunable interface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 642–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Climent, E.; Biyikal, M.; Gröninger, D.; Weller, M.G.; Martínez-Máñez, R.; Rurack, K. Multiplexed Detection of Analytes on Single Test Strips with Antibody-Gated Indicator-Releasing Mesoporous Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 23862–23869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tawfik, S.M.; Abd-Elaal, A.A.; Lee, Y.I. Selective dual detection of Hg2+ and TATP based on amphiphilic conjugated polythiophene-quantum dot hybrid materials. Analyst 2021, 146, 2894–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zheng, P.; Abdurahman, A.; Zhang, Z.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ai, X.; Li, F.; Zhang, M. A simple organic multi-analyte fluorescent prober: One molecule realizes the detection to DNT, TATP and Sarin substitute gas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 409, 124500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, M.; Han, J.M.; Wang, C.; Yang, X.; Pei, J.; Zang, L. Fluorescence ratiometric sensor for trace vapor detection of hydrogen peroxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 8708–8714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, J.; Wu, W.; McNeil, A.J. Detecting a peroxide-based explosive via molecular gelation. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7310–7312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Amani, M.; Chu, Y.; Waterman, K.L.; Hurley, C.; Platek, M.J.; Gregory, O.J. Detection of triacetone triperoxide (TATP) using a thermodynamic based gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 162, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Steinberg, S.M. High-performance liquid chromatography method for determination of hydrogen peroxide in aqueous solution and application to simulated Martian soil and related materials. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2013, 185, 3749–3757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brewer, T.F.; Garcia, F.J.; Onak, C.S.; Carroll, K.S.; Chang, C.J. Chemical approaches to discovery and study of sources and targets of hydrogen peroxide redox signaling through NADPH oxidase proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2015, 84, 765–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bruemmer, K.J.; Crossley, S.W.M.; Chang, C.J. Activity-Based Sensing: A Synthetic Methods Approach for Selective Molecular Imaging and Beyond. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 13734–13762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chang, M.C.; Pralle, A.; Isacoff, E.Y.; Chang, C.J. A selective, cell-permeable optical probe for hydrogen peroxide in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15392–15393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, Y.-B.; Luo, H.-Z.; Wang, C.-Y.; Guo, Z.-Q.; Zhu, W.-H. A turn-on fluorescent probe based on π-extended coumarin for imaging endogenous hydrogen peroxide in RAW 264.7 cells. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2021, 414, 113270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dai, F.; Jin, F.; Long, Y.; Jin, X.L.; Zhou, B. A 1,8-naphthalimide-based turn-on fluorescent probe for imaging mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide in living cells. Free Radic. Res. 2018, 52, 1288–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, Q.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, D.; Tang, B.Z. Hydrogen peroxide-responsive AIE probe for imaging-guided organelle targeting and photodynamic cancer cell ablation. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 3489–3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Han, J.; Chu, C.; Cao, G.; Mao, W.; Wang, S.; Zhao, Z.; Gao, M.; Ye, H.; Xu, X. A simple boronic acid-based fluorescent probe for selective detection of hydrogen peroxide in solutions and living cells. Bioorg. Chem. 2018, 81, 362–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhou, S.; Wang, Y.; Cudjoe, O.; Cha, Y.; Wang, C.; Cao, X.; Liu, W.; Jin, K. Poldip2 knockdown protects against lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury via Nox4/Nrf2/NF-κB signaling pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 958916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kim, H.J.; Kim, S.R.; Park, J.K.; Kim, D.I.; Jeong, J.S.; Lee, Y.C. PI3Kγ activation is required for LPS-induced reactive oxygen species generation in respiratory epithelial cells. Inflamm. Res. 2012, 61, 1265–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of the hydrogen peroxide probe.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of the hydrogen peroxide probe.
Biosensors 13 00658 sch001
Figure 1. The fluorescence intensity changes versus the time of probe YSXH (10 μM) toward H2O2 (100 μM). λex = 415 nm and λem = 455 nm.
Figure 1. The fluorescence intensity changes versus the time of probe YSXH (10 μM) toward H2O2 (100 μM). λex = 415 nm and λem = 455 nm.
Biosensors 13 00658 g001
Figure 2. Proposed reaction mechanism of YXSH with H2O2.
Figure 2. Proposed reaction mechanism of YXSH with H2O2.
Biosensors 13 00658 g002
Figure 3. Quantitative measurements of YXSH fluorescent enhancement induced by different concentrations of H2O2. (A) Fluorescence spectra of probe YSXH in the presence of H2O2 (0, 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 80, and 100 μM). (B) Linear regression plot of the fluorescent intensity of probe YSXH following incubation with increasing concentrations of H2O2 (1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 80, and 100 μM). The concentration of probe YSXH is 1 μM. λex = 415 nm and λem = 455 nm.
Figure 3. Quantitative measurements of YXSH fluorescent enhancement induced by different concentrations of H2O2. (A) Fluorescence spectra of probe YSXH in the presence of H2O2 (0, 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 80, and 100 μM). (B) Linear regression plot of the fluorescent intensity of probe YSXH following incubation with increasing concentrations of H2O2 (1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 80, and 100 μM). The concentration of probe YSXH is 1 μM. λex = 415 nm and λem = 455 nm.
Biosensors 13 00658 g003
Figure 4. The fluorescence intensity changes of the probe YSXH (10 μM) in PBS buffer with the addition of different anions, cations, and amino acids. The concentration of each compound is 100 μM in PBS buffer (pH = 7.4).
Figure 4. The fluorescence intensity changes of the probe YSXH (10 μM) in PBS buffer with the addition of different anions, cations, and amino acids. The concentration of each compound is 100 μM in PBS buffer (pH = 7.4).
Biosensors 13 00658 g004
Figure 5. Fluorescence images of cellular ROS stimulated by LPS in A549 cells. A549 cells were incubated with 10 μM YXSH (AF) or H2DCFDA (GL) in the absence (AC,GI) or presence (DF,JL) of LPS (2 μg/mL). Bright-field images of cells were shown in (B,E,H,K). Merged fluorescent images of cells were shown in (C,F,I,L). Scale bar: 20 μm. λex = 405 nm (YXSH) or 488 nm (H2DCFDA).
Figure 5. Fluorescence images of cellular ROS stimulated by LPS in A549 cells. A549 cells were incubated with 10 μM YXSH (AF) or H2DCFDA (GL) in the absence (AC,GI) or presence (DF,JL) of LPS (2 μg/mL). Bright-field images of cells were shown in (B,E,H,K). Merged fluorescent images of cells were shown in (C,F,I,L). Scale bar: 20 μm. λex = 405 nm (YXSH) or 488 nm (H2DCFDA).
Biosensors 13 00658 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, K.; Yao, T.; Xue, J.; Guo, Y.; Xu, X. A Novel Fluorescent Probe for the Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide. Biosensors 2023, 13, 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13060658

AMA Style

Wang K, Yao T, Xue J, Guo Y, Xu X. A Novel Fluorescent Probe for the Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide. Biosensors. 2023; 13(6):658. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13060658

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Kangkang, Tingting Yao, Jiayu Xue, Yanqiu Guo, and Xiaowei Xu. 2023. "A Novel Fluorescent Probe for the Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide" Biosensors 13, no. 6: 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13060658

APA Style

Wang, K., Yao, T., Xue, J., Guo, Y., & Xu, X. (2023). A Novel Fluorescent Probe for the Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide. Biosensors, 13(6), 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13060658

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop