Next Article in Journal
Efficacy of 0.05% Chlorhexidine and 0.05% Cetylpyridinium Chloride Mouthwash to Eliminate Living Bacteria on In Situ Collected Biofilms: An In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Journal
In Vitro Evaluation of the Potential Pharmacological Activity and Molecular Targets of New Benzimidazole-Based Schiff Base Metal Complexes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Erratum

Erratum: Golding et al. Examining the Effect of Context, Beliefs, and Values on UK Farm Veterinarians’ Antimicrobial Prescribing: A Randomized Experimental Vignette and Cross-Sectional Survey. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 445

1
School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Stag Hill Campus, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
2
Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Neston, Cheshire CH64 7TE, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(6), 729; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060729
Submission received: 13 May 2021 / Accepted: 13 May 2021 / Published: 17 June 2021
The authors wish to make the following corrections to their published paper [1]. The hyperlink to the open dataset that accompanies this paper was incorrect in the original published Data Availability Statement. In the original publication the link was: ‘http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-854821kdj’. The correct hyperlink is: ‘http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-854821’.
The corrected Data Availability Statement should be:
Data Availability Statement: Data available in a publicly accessible repository. The data presented in this study are openly available in UK Data Service at http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-854821 (Data Collection title: Experimental vignette and cross-sectional survey with farm veterinarians, 2018). Demographic data have been removed from the publicly accessible file to ensure participant anonymity.
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes. The change does not affect the results or conclusions of the study.

Reference

  1. Golding, S.E.; Ogden, J.; Higgins, H.M. Examining the Effect of Context, Beliefs, and Values on UK Farm Veterinarians’ Antimicrobial Prescribing: A Randomized Experimental Vignette and Cross-Sectional Survey. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Golding, S.E.; Ogden, J.; Higgins, H.M. Erratum: Golding et al. Examining the Effect of Context, Beliefs, and Values on UK Farm Veterinarians’ Antimicrobial Prescribing: A Randomized Experimental Vignette and Cross-Sectional Survey. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 445. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060729

AMA Style

Golding SE, Ogden J, Higgins HM. Erratum: Golding et al. Examining the Effect of Context, Beliefs, and Values on UK Farm Veterinarians’ Antimicrobial Prescribing: A Randomized Experimental Vignette and Cross-Sectional Survey. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 445. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(6):729. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060729

Chicago/Turabian Style

Golding, Sarah E., Jane Ogden, and Helen M. Higgins. 2021. "Erratum: Golding et al. Examining the Effect of Context, Beliefs, and Values on UK Farm Veterinarians’ Antimicrobial Prescribing: A Randomized Experimental Vignette and Cross-Sectional Survey. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 445" Antibiotics 10, no. 6: 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060729

APA Style

Golding, S. E., Ogden, J., & Higgins, H. M. (2021). Erratum: Golding et al. Examining the Effect of Context, Beliefs, and Values on UK Farm Veterinarians’ Antimicrobial Prescribing: A Randomized Experimental Vignette and Cross-Sectional Survey. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 445. Antibiotics, 10(6), 729. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060729

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop